1: %\documentstyle[emulateapj]{article}
2: \documentstyle[12pt,aaspp4]{article}
3: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
4:
5: \newcommand{\co}{{\rm $^{12}$CO}}
6: \newcommand{\cothree}{{\rm $^{13}$CO}}
7: \newcommand{\cn}{{\rm C$^0$}}
8: \newcommand{\cp}{{\rm C$^+$}}
9: \newcommand{\ci}{\mbox{\rm [\ion{C}{1}]}}
10: \newcommand{\oi}{\mbox{\rm [\ion{O}{1}]}}
11: \newcommand{\cii}{\mbox{\rm [\ion{C}{2}]}}
12: \newcommand{\oiii}{\mbox{\rm [\ion{O}{3}]}}
13: \newcommand{\hi}{\mbox{\rm \ion{H}{1}}}
14: \newcommand{\hii}{\mbox{\rm \ion{H}{2}}}
15: \newcommand{\jone}{($J=1\rightarrow0$)}
16: \newcommand{\jtwo}{($J=2\rightarrow1$)}
17: \newcommand{\jthree}{($J=3\rightarrow2$)}
18: \newcommand{\jfour}{($J=4\rightarrow3$)}
19: \newcommand{\fsone}{($^3$P$_1\rightarrow^3$P$_0$)}
20: \newcommand{\fstwo}{($^3$P$_2\rightarrow^3$P$_1$)}
21: \newcommand{\fseno}{($^3$P$_0\rightarrow^3$P$_1$)}
22: \newcommand{\fsowt}{($^3$P$_1\rightarrow^3$P$_2$)}
23: \newcommand{\fscii}{($^2$P$_{3/2}\rightarrow^2$P$_{1/2}$)}
24: \newcommand{\percmcu}{cm$^{-3}$}
25: \newcommand{\percmsq}{cm$^{-2}$}
26: \newcommand{\persr}{sr$^{-1}$}
27: \newcommand{\kmpers}{km~s$^{-1}$}
28: \newcommand{\Kkmpers}{K~km~s$^{-1}$}
29: \newcommand{\intunits}{erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$~sr$^{-1}$}
30: \newcommand{\intensity}{erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$}
31: \newcommand{\fluxdens}{erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$~$\mu$m$^{-1}$}
32: \newcommand{\Ico}{\mbox{\rm I$_{\rm CO}$}}
33: \newcommand{\Ici}{\mbox{\rm I$_{\rm [CI]}$}}
34: \newcommand{\Icii}{\mbox{\rm I$_{\rm [CII]}$}}
35: \newcommand{\Ifir}{\mbox{\rm I$_{\rm FIR}$}}
36: \newcommand{\citoco}{\Ici/\Ico}
37: \newcommand{\ciitoco}{\Icii/\Ico}
38: \newcommand{\ciitoci}{\Icii/\Ici}
39: \newcommand{\xco}{\mbox{\rm X$_{\rm CO}$}}
40: \newcommand{\av}{\mbox{\rm A$_{\rm V}$}}
41: \newcommand{\xuv}{\mbox{$\chi_{\rm uv}$}}
42: \newcommand{\vlsr}{\mbox{V$_{\rm LSR}$}}
43:
44: \begin{document}
45:
46: \title{First Detection of Submillimeter \ci\ Emission in the Small Magellanic Cloud}
47:
48: \author{Alberto D. Bolatto\altaffilmark{1}, James M. Jackson\altaffilmark{1},
49: Kathleen E. Kraemer\altaffilmark{1},}
50: \affil{Institute for Astrophysical Research, Department of Astronomy,}
51: \affil{Boston University, 725 Commonwealth Ave., Boston MA 02215}
52: \and
53: \author{Xiaolei Zhang\altaffilmark{2}}
54: \affil{Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 60 Garden St. MS 78,
55: Cambridge, MA 02138}
56:
57: \altaffiltext{1}{bolatto, jackson, kraemer@bu-ast.bu.edu}
58: \altaffiltext{2}{Currently at Raytheon ITSS and NASA GSFC, code 685,
59: Greenbelt, MD 20771 (xzhang@specs1.gsfc.nasa.gov)}
60:
61: \begin{abstract}
62: We report the first detection of \ci\ \fsone\ emission at 609 $\mu$m
63: in a region of the Small Magellanic Cloud (N27). Environments poor in
64: heavy elements and dust such as the SMC are thought to be dominated by
65: photodissociation regions. This is the lowest metallicity source where
66: submillimeter neutral carbon emission has been detected. Studying the
67: \citoco\ ratio in several sources spanning more than an order of
68: magnitude in metallicity, $Z$, we find that the \citoco\
69: ratio increases for decreasing $Z$. The existence of such a trend points to a
70: photodissociation origin for most of neutral carbon in molecular clouds,
71: in agreement with standard PDR models. We also report ISO FIR
72: spectroscopic observations of N27, and use them to derive its physical
73: properties. Comparison between the density and radiation field
74: revealed by FIR diagnostics ($n\sim300$---1000~\percmcu,
75: $\xuv\sim30$---$100\chi_0$) and those derived from millimeter and
76: submillimeter data ($n\sim10^5$~\percmcu, $\xuv\lesssim30\chi_0$)
77: suggests that the FIR lines originate in more diffuse gas,
78: and are perhaps dominated by the interclump medium. Regardless of the
79: cause, analysis of the FIR and mm-submm data produces a discrepancy of
80: two orders of magnitude for the density of this source.
81: \end{abstract}
82:
83: \keywords{Magellanic Clouds --- galaxies: ISM --- galaxies: irregular
84: --- infrared: ISM: lines and bands --- submillimeter --- ISM: clouds}
85:
86: \section{Introduction}
87: \label{intron27}
88:
89: Studies of the interstellar medium (ISM) in the Small Magellanic Cloud
90: (SMC) allow us to investigate star forming clouds that are poor in
91: heavy elements. The SMC is indeed an excellent choice to study this
92: phenomenon, because it is nearby ($D\sim61$~kpc; Laney \& Stobie
93: 1994), has an unobscured line of sight and very small internal
94: obscuration, and possesses the lowest metallicity among the nearby
95: members of the Local Group ($Z\sim Z_\odot/10$; Dufour 1984). Because
96: of their low metallicity, morphological irregularity, and active star
97: formation, the Magellanic Clouds resemble primeval galaxies.
98: Therefore, studies such as this will eventually allow us to draw
99: conclusions about those much more elusive targets: the high-z
100: primitive galaxies.
101:
102: The depletion of heavy elements, and the consequent low dust-to-gas
103: ratio ($D/G_{\rm SMC}\sim1/8\,D/G_{\rm MW}$; Bouchet et al. 1985),
104: affects the ISM by enhancing photodissociation. Because of its high
105: abundance (i.e., strong self-shielding) and cross-shielding with
106: atomic hydrogen lines, molecular hydrogen is mostly unaffected by $Z$.
107: The usual tracer molecules such as CO, however, are efficiently
108: destroyed in dust-poor systems. A much larger fraction of the
109: ISM in these systems is thus expected to be occupied by
110: photodissociation regions (PDRs; e.g., Tielens \& Hollenbach 1985;
111: Sternberg \& Dalgarno 1995). Consequently, we expect the intensities
112: of the spectral lines associated with the PDR (e.g., \cii, \ci) to be
113: enhanced when compared to molecular lines (e.g., \co\ \jone),
114: resulting in increasing \ciitoco\ and \citoco\ ratios (Bolatto,
115: Jackson, \& Ingalls 1999).
116:
117: The immediate purpose of this work is twofold: 1) to test for the
118: existence of an increasing \citoco\ ratio with decreasing metallicity
119: $Z$ (\S\ref{disccin27}), and 2) to investigate the power of
120: far-infrared (FIR) spectroscopic diagnostics and compare their results
121: to those obtained using millimeter and submillimeter lines
122: (\S\ref{discpcn27}). An \citoco\ dependence on $Z$ could be useful for
123: determining metallicities in high-z sources using only radio
124: observations. The trend in \citoco\ with $Z$ is also a test for the
125: origin of neutral carbon inside molecular clouds. An increasing
126: \citoco\ ratio for decreasing $Z$ points to a PDR origin, while a flat
127: $\citoco$ ratio suggests that \cn\ is produced inside the CO cores by
128: means other than UV photons.
129:
130: Our SMC source, the N27 nebula, was first
131: cataloged by Henize (1956). A later survey by Davies, Elliott and
132: Meaburn (1976) calls it DEM40. Its associated IR peak
133: is also known as LIRS49 (Schwering \& Israel 1989). This region was
134: mapped by the Swedish-ESO Submillimeter Telescope (SEST) in the \jone\
135: and \jtwo\ transitions of CO (Rubio et al. 1993), and studied in
136: detail in several molecular transitions by Heikkil\"a et
137: al. (1999). Albeit a weak emitter when compared to Galactic sources,
138: the molecular cloud associated with N27 features some of the strongest
139: CO \jone\ emission in the SMC (Israel et al. 1993).
140:
141: \section{Observations}
142: \subsection{Far Infrared Data}
143: \label{obsfirn27}
144: We observed N27 using the Long Wavelength Spectrometer (LWS) onboard
145: the Infrared Space Observatory satellite (ISO), at
146: $R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim200$. These LWS data are a 4160 second-long
147: full-grating scan obtained on 20 December 1997 as part of the
148: LOMETPDR project. The instrumental characteristics are described by
149: Clegg et al. (1996), and the calibration of the ISO LWS instrument is
150: described by Swinyard et al. (1996). The data pipeline was version 8.7
151: and the observations were processed using ISAP version 2.0. We
152: averaged the spectra across scans and scan direction, but not across
153: detectors, with the default wavelength spacing of 0.135 $\mu$m. The
154: averaging was done after 2.5$\sigma$ clipping of outlying points.
155: For the purposes of obtaining an \Ifir\ estimate only, we joined the
156: detectors together by offsetting them with the dark correction method in
157: ISAP, using detector LW1 as the reference. Table \ref{tabiso}
158: summarizes the spectroscopic results.
159:
160: We can assess the calibration of the LWS data by comparing it with
161: previous \cii\ measurements of N27 featuring
162: a similar beam size (Israel \& Maloney 1993). The
163: intensity measured by FIFI at the LWS pointing is
164: \Icii$\approx9\times10^{-4}$ \intunits. The LWS measured intensity
165: after applying the recommended correction factors for beam size and
166: extended source is \Icii$\approx9.5\times10^{-4}$ \intunits, in
167: remarkable agreement with the FIFI observations. The measurements
168: listed in Table \ref{tabiso} include both corrections.
169:
170: \subsection{Submillimeter Data}
171: \label{obssubmmn27}
172: We observed the \ci\ \fsone\ transition of neutral atomic carbon at
173: $\nu\simeq492.1607$ GHz (609 $\mu$m) using AST/RO, the Antarctic
174: Submillimeter Telescope and Remote Observatory located at the
175: Amundsen-Scott South Pole base (Stark et al. 1997). The observations
176: were obtained on 3 to 7 July of 1998, using the AST/RO SIS
177: quasi-optical receiver, with a system temperature
178: $T_{sys}\sim1800$---2400~K. The backend was the 2048 channel low
179: resolution AOS. The spectra were observed in position switching mode,
180: chopping 15\arcmin\ in Azimuth (same as R.A. at the
181: pole). At 492 GHz the telescope beam had
182: HPBW$\sim3.8\arcmin\pm0.3$. The forward efficiency determined from
183: skydips was 70\%, and it is assumed to be identical to $\eta_{mb}$.
184: The pointing was better than $30\arcsec$. A $6\arcmin\times6\arcmin$
185: region centered on this source was mapped on a 30\arcsec\ grid,
186: considerably oversampling the beam. The data were calibrated using
187: the standard procedure for AST/RO, which includes sky, hot and cold load
188: measurements every 30 minutes, and processed using the COMB
189: package. The total accumulated integration time, after rejecting bad
190: spectra, was 63 hours. The spectrum obtained after averaging all the
191: observations together is shown in Fig. \ref{cispectrum}. A gaussian
192: fit to the data gives $v_{cen}=115.2\pm1.4$~\kmpers, $\Delta
193: v=9.3\pm3.3$~\kmpers, and $T_{max}=14\pm4$~mK (main beam
194: brightness). The location of the \ci\ line agrees very well with the
195: strongest CO component, for which $v_{cen}=114.5$ \kmpers\ (Rubio et
196: al. 1993).
197:
198: The relatively weak \ci\ emission from N27, combined with its small
199: size and consequent beam dilution, produced a low signal-to-noise
200: map. Thus the analysis in \S\ref{disccin27} will be focused on the
201: averaged spectrum for the region.
202:
203: \section{Results and Discussion}
204:
205: \subsection{Metallicity and the \citoco\ Ratio}
206: \label{disccin27}
207:
208: The prime motivation for this study is to determine the \citoco\
209: intensity ratio in the SMC, an environment that because of its low
210: metallicity and low dust-to-gas ratio should be dominated by PDRs
211: (cf., \S\ref{intron27}). To do this we compare our \ci\ data with the
212: \co\ \jone\ map by Rubio et al. (1993). This map covers only a
213: relatively small fraction of the area mapped in \ci, but it probably
214: contains most of the CO emission: to obtain a \citoco\ ratio we assume
215: that there is no CO emission outside this region. The CO emission
216: associated with N27 has two components, at 114.5 and 126.9
217: \kmpers. For this analysis we have integrated the CO and \ci\ data
218: over the velocity range corresponding to the strongest component, at
219: $\sim114$ \kmpers. In order to compute a ratio we have convolved the
220: CO \jone\ integrated intensity data to the angular resolution of the
221: \ci\ map. Subsequently we sampled the convolved CO map at the
222: positions observed in \ci, excluding those positions where \ci\
223: spectra were discarded. These samples were averaged with the same
224: weighting scheme used for \ci. This procedure allows us to obtain a
225: reliable average ratio for the N27 region, relatively insensitive to
226: uncertainties in the \ci\ beam size and pointing. The resulting
227: intensities, integrated over the velocity interval 107---119 \kmpers,
228: are $\Ici\simeq0.132\pm0.027$ and $\Ico\simeq0.517\pm0.052$ \Kkmpers,
229: yielding a ratio $\citoco\approx0.26\pm0.06$. The corresponding
230: cooling ratio (the ratio of intensities in \intunits) is
231: $\citoco\approx19.9\pm4.5$. The uncertainties are
232: $1\sigma$ and include the statistical errors as well as a 10\%
233: $1\sigma$ calibration uncertainty in the intensities, added in
234: quadrature.
235:
236: Figure \ref{pdrci} compares the \citoco\ ratio in N27 to a
237: sample of molecular clouds associated with star-forming regions in
238: systems of different metallicities. This plot suggests that there is
239: an increasing trend in the \citoco\ ratio with decreasing metallicity
240: $Z$, such that $\citoco\propto Z^{-0.5}$. The scatter around this line
241: is relatively large, as shown by the data for the Large
242: Magellanic Cloud. Theoretical expectations notwithstanding, this
243: scatter has made it difficult to identify a trend in past studies over
244: a narrower range of metallicities (e.g., Bolatto et al. 2000a).
245:
246: Shown also in Fig. \ref{pdrci} is a model for carbon in unresolved PDRs
247: (Bolatto et al. 1999). This model consists of intensity
248: ratios computed over a distribution of clumps with uniform excitation,
249: where each spherical clump is divided in three concentric regions of
250: \cp, \cn, and CO. The sizes of these regions depend on the metallicity
251: (or the dust-to-gas ratio) of the ISM. While necessarily crude this
252: model incorporates the effects of clumping, and the increase in the
253: physical size of the PDR for decreasing metallicity. The growth of
254: the PDR is mostly caused by the diminishing attenuation of the UV
255: radiation, as the dust-to-gas ratio of the ISM decreases for smaller
256: metallicities. In this scenario, the primary reason why the \citoco\
257: ratio increases for decreasing metallicity is the reduction and
258: eventual disappearance of the CO cores in the clumps.
259:
260: Are the models for the \citoco\ ratio as a function of $Z$
261: quantitatively consistent with the measurements? Bolatto et al. explore two
262: possibilities: \cn\ produced in the growing PDR (model A), and \cn\
263: restricted to a region whose size does not change with metallicity
264: (model B). This latter model predicts an essentially flat \citoco\
265: ratio ($\citoco\propto Z^{+0.1}$). A similar result (constant
266: $\citoco$) would be obtained if \cn\ was produced inside the CO cores
267: via unidentified chemical reactions. The slope predicted by model A
268: in this metallicity range is slightly steeper than that suggested by
269: the data, $\citoco\propto Z^{-0.8}$. Whether this difference is
270: actually significant is difficult to assert given the paucity of
271: observations and the intrinsic scatter in the data. Nevertheless,
272: several possibilities could explain this discrepancy: 1) an increase
273: in CO excitation for decreasing metallicity (i.e., hotter molecular
274: gas for diminishing $Z$), 2) clump-to-clump
275: shielding preventing the efficient photodissociation of CO, 3) a
276: dust-to-gas ratio not proportional to the oxygen abundance (but this
277: would require the dust abundance to be a slower function of $Z$,
278: e.g. D/G$\sim Z^{0.5}$, when observations suggest D/G$\sim Z^2$;
279: Lisenfeld \& Ferrara 1998), and 4) some fraction ($\sim30$\%) of the
280: \cn\ produced inside the CO cores instead of the PDR. We conclude
281: that, within the bounds imposed by the limitations of the models and
282: the paucity of the measurements, the observed trend for the \citoco\
283: ratio with metallicity shown in Fig. \ref{pdrci} agrees with
284: theoretical expectations for mostly photodissociation-produced \cn.
285:
286: \subsection{Physical Conditions}
287: \label{discpcn27}
288:
289: The FIR spectroscopic data can be used to determine the
290: conditions prevalent in N27. Using Table \ref{tabiso} and the PDR models
291: by Kaufman et al. (1999) we will find the UV field, \xuv, and the gas
292: density, $n$. The important FIR ISM diagnostics
293: computed by Kaufman et al. are: 1) the \oi\ \fseno/\fsowt\ line ratio
294: (${\rm I_{145}/I_{63}}\sim0.051\pm0.006$, according to our
295: measurements), 2) the \oi\ \fsowt\ to \cii\ \fscii\ line ratio (${\rm
296: I_{63}/I_{158}}\sim0.42\pm0.01$), 3) the ratio of \oi\ \fsowt+\cii\
297: \fscii\ to the FIR continuum (using the LWS spectrum we estimate
298: $\Ifir\sim1.1\times10^{-2}$ \intunits, yielding ${\rm
299: (I_{63}+I_{158})/\Ifir}\sim0.012\pm0.002$), and 4) the \cii\ \fscii\
300: intensity itself. These joint four diagnostics agree very well,
301: placing N27 in the low density, $n\sim300$---$1000$~\percmcu, moderate
302: UV field, $\xuv\sim30$---$100\chi_0$, region of the $n-\xuv$ diagrams
303: ($\chi_0$ is the interstellar UV field in the vicinity of the Sun,
304: $\chi_0\simeq1.6\times10^{-3}$ erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$; Habing 1968).
305: The corresponding PDR temperature in these conditions is $T_{pdr}\sim200$~K.
306: The FIR continuum dust temperature, derived from the LWS spectrum, is
307: $T_d\sim40$~K.
308:
309: The density and radiation field derived using millimeter and
310: submillimeter lines, however, strongly disagree with the
311: FIR results. This lack of agreement is not surprising,
312: perhaps, since these lines probably originate in different regions of the
313: ISM. A millimeter wavelength multiline excitation analysis using several
314: molecular species was performed by Heikkil\"a et al. (1999), yielding
315: $n\sim10^{5}$~\percmcu, $T\gtrsim15$~K, and visual extinction
316: $\av\sim1$ for N27. The \citoco\ ratio determined in \S\ref{disccin27}
317: strongly constrains the density according to the calculations
318: by Kaufman et al. (1999), also resulting in $n\sim10^4$---$10^5$~\percmcu\
319: (albeit over a much larger area). Finally, using the \co\ \jone\
320: observations by Rubio et al. (1993) convolved to the FIFI beam we
321: compute an accurate \ciitoco\ ratio at the LWS pointing, yielding
322: $\ciitoco\approx7000$. This ratio alone does not constrain either
323: parameter very well, but implies $\xuv>100\chi_0$ and when used in
324: combination with the measured \citoco\ ratio results in
325: $\xuv\sim10^4$---$3\times10^5\chi_0$. This is not a fair comparison,
326: however, since both the \ciitoco\ and \citoco\ ratios will be affected
327: by the low metallicity and extinction of this source. Fortunately,
328: Kaufman et al. (1999) provide some calculations for small $Z$ and
329: \av. Using their model tracks for $Z=0.1$ and $\av=1$ we find
330: $n\sim10^5$~\percmcu\ and $\xuv\sim30\chi_0$ for N27, based on
331: $\Icii/\Ifir\sim10^{-2}$ and $\Ico/\Ifir\sim10^{-6}$. These
332: measurements are also consistent with $n_{\rm CO}>n_{\rm C^+}$ at a
333: lower radiation field, if we allow the model tracks to be shifted in
334: the abscissa as described by the model authors.
335:
336: At any rate, the diagnostics including \ci\ or molecular line
337: observations are inconsistent with the density $n\sim10^3$ \percmcu\
338: implied by the FIR transitions. Because in general the FIR lines are
339: generated closer to the surface of the cloud, this discrepancy may
340: indicate a real density gradient in the gas. Another possibility is
341: that the mm-submm and FIR lines originate in different regions of the
342: cloud, with the latter dominated by material in a more diffuse
343: interclump medium, or perhaps associated with the \hii\ region rather
344: than the molecular cloud. A third possibility is that the FIR line
345: ratios are significantly affected by $Z$ or \av, and using model results
346: computed for Galactic metallicity and large \av\ is inappropriate. If
347: this is the cause of the density discrepancy, however, it is
348: remarkable that {\em all four} FIR diagnostics agree on essentially
349: the same value for the density and radiation field. Independent of
350: which explanation is correct, we conclude that: 1) the
351: FIR and mm-submm measurements roughly agree on the radiation field
352: intensity, although it is extremely important to use models with the
353: appropriate $Z$ and \av, and 2) the mm-submm data systematically
354: indicate a density about two orders of magnitude higher than that
355: derived from FIR fine structure data.
356:
357: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
358: We report new FIR and submillimeter observations of the star forming
359: region N27 in the Small Magellanic Cloud. Using our measured
360: intensities for the FIR continuum and \oi\ and \cii\ fine structure
361: transitions, and comparing with existing model calculations (Kaufman
362: et al. 1999), we derive the density and radiation field in N27 to be
363: $n\sim300$---1000~\percmcu\ and $\xuv\sim30$---$100\chi_0$. In
364: contrast, the density derived using millimeter and submillimeter data
365: is two orders of magnitude higher, $n\sim10^5$~\percmcu, while the
366: radiation field is similar or lower, $\xuv\lesssim30\chi_0$. The cause
367: for this discrepancy is not clear, but we suggest that the FIR and the
368: mm-submm lines arise in different parcels of gas, with the former
369: perhaps dominated by the interclump medium or the \hii\ region.
370:
371: We have detected \ci\ \fsone\ emission from the Small
372: Magellanic Cloud for the first time. This is the lowest metallicity
373: source in which submillimeter neutral carbon emission has been detected.
374: Low metallicity, dust-poor environments are thought to be dominated by
375: PDRs. Despite the factor of $\sim5$ in metallicity spanned by N27 and
376: Orion, however, the \citoco\ ratio in N27 is only modestly larger than
377: the \citoco\ ratio in Orion. Nevertheless, when we study the ratio in
378: several sources spanning more than an order of magnitude in
379: metallicity, we find a noisy but convincing increasing trend in the
380: \citoco\ ratio for decreasing metallicity (Fig. \ref{pdrci}). This
381: trend is somewhat flatter than, but in rough agreement with, the
382: modelling results by Bolatto et al. (1999). The existence of an
383: increasing trend points to a photodissociation origin for most of neutral
384: carbon inside molecular clouds, in agreement with standard PDR models.
385:
386: \acknowledgements This research was supported in part by grants NSF
387: OPP 89-20223, NSF AST 98-03065, NASA JPL 96-1513, and made use of NASA
388: ADS and the CDS databases. We wish to thank M\'onica Rubio for
389: providing the calibrated and baseline-removed CO \jone\ spectra, Frank
390: Israel for the FIFI \cii\ data, and Tom Bania for his useful comments.
391:
392: \begin{references}
393: \reference{ACW97} Afflerbach, A., Churchwell, E., \& Werner, M. W. 1997,
394: \apj, 478, 190
395:
396: \reference{BJI99} Bolatto, A. D., Jackson, J. M., \& Ingalls, J. G. 1999,
397: \apj, 513, 275
398:
399: \reference{BO00a} Bolatto, A. D., Jackson, J. M., Wilson, C. D., \&
400: Moriarty-Schieven, G. 2000a, \apj, 532, 909
401:
402: \reference{BO00b} Bolatto, A. D., Jackson, J. M., Israel, F. P., Zhang, X.,
403: \& Kim, S. 2000b, \apj, in print (astro-ph/0007149)
404:
405: \reference{BO85} Bouchet, P., Lequeux, J., Maurice, E., Pr\'evot, L., \&
406: Pr\'evot-Burnichon, M. L. 1985, \aap, 149, 330
407:
408: \reference{CL96} Clegg, P. E. et al. 1996, \aap, 315, L38
409:
410: \reference{DEM76} Davies, R. D., Elliot, K. H., \& Meaburn, J. 1976,
411: \memras, 81, 89
412:
413: \reference{DU84} Dufour, R. J. 1984, in Structure and Evolution of the
414: Magellanic Clouds, ed. S. van der Bergh \&
415: K. S. de Boer (Dordrecht:Kluwer), 353
416:
417: \reference{HA68} Habing, H. J. 1968, \bain, 19, 421
418:
419: \reference{HE99} Heikkil\"a, A., Johansson, L. E. B., \& Olofsson, H. 1999,
420: \aap, 344, 817
421:
422: \reference{HE56} Henize, K. G. 1956, \apjs, 2, 315
423:
424: \reference{IS93} Israel, F. P. et al. 1993, \aap, 276, 25
425:
426: \reference{IM93} Israel, F. P., \& Maloney, P. R. 1993, in New Aspects
427: of Magellanic Cloud Research, eds. B. Baschek, G. Klare and J. Lequeux
428: (Berlin:Springer-Verlag), 44
429:
430: \reference{KA99} Kaufman, M. J., Wolfire, M. G., Hollenbach, D. J., \& Luhman,
431: M. L. 1999, \apj, 527, 795
432:
433: \reference{LS94} Laney, C. D., \& Stobie, R. S. 1994, \mnras, 266, 441
434:
435: \reference{LE79} Lequeux, J., Peimbert, M., Rayo, J. F., Serrano, A.,
436: \& Torres-Peimbert, S. 1979, \aap, 80, 155
437:
438: \reference{LF98} Lisenfeld, U., \& Ferrara, A. 1998, \apj, 496, 145
439:
440: \reference{OJ00} Ojha, R. et al. 2000, \apjlett, submitted
441:
442: \reference{RU93} Rubio, M. et al. 1993, \aap, 271, 1
443:
444: \reference{ST97} Stark, A. A., Chamberlin, R. A., Cheng, J., Ingalls, J. G.,
445: \& Wright, G. 1997, Rev. Sci. Inst., 68 (5), 2200
446:
447: \reference{SD95} Sternberg, A., \& Dalgarno, A. 1995, \apjs, 99, 565
448:
449: \reference{SW96} Swinyard, B. M. et al. 1996, \aap, 315, L43
450:
451: \reference{TH85a} Tielens, A. G. G. M., \& Hollenbach, D. 1985, \apj, 291, 722
452:
453: \end{references}
454:
455: \newpage
456: \begin{deluxetable}{llcrcr@{$\pm$}lcr@{$\pm$}l}
457: \tablewidth{0pc}
458: \scriptsize
459: \tablecaption{ISO LWS Line Intensities in N27}
460: \tablehead{\multicolumn{1}{c}{Specie} &
461: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Transition}&\multicolumn{1}{c}{Wavelength}&
462: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Beam Size} &\multicolumn{1}{c}{ESCF\tablenotemark{a}}&
463: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Line Flux} &\multicolumn{1}{c}{Continuum}&
464: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Line/Cont.\tablenotemark{b}}\\
465: & &\multicolumn{1}{c}{($\mu$m)} &
466: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(sr)}& &
467: \multicolumn{2}{c}{(\intunits)}&\multicolumn{1}{c}{(MJy sr$^{-1}$)}&
468: \multicolumn{2}{c}{}
469: }
470: \startdata
471: \mbox{[O~III]} & \fstwo & \phn51.815 &
472: $11.8\times10^{-8}$ & 0.85 &
473: 1.34 & $0.22\times10^{-5}$ & 191 &
474: 0.20 & 0.03 \\
475: \mbox{[O~I]} & \fsowt & \phn63.184 &
476: $13.0\times10^{-8}$ & 0.83 &
477: 3.93 & $0.09\times10^{-5}$ & 237 &
478: 0.72 & 0.02 \\
479: \mbox{[O~III]} & \fsone & \phn88.356 &
480: $11.8\times10^{-8}$ & 0.67 &
481: 9.64 & $0.85\times10^{-6}$ & 293 &
482: 0.13 & 0.01 \\
483: \mbox{[O~I]} & \fseno & 145.525 &
484: $6.7 \times10^{-8}$ & 0.58 &
485: 2.01 & $0.23\times10^{-6}$ & 415 &
486: 0.06 & 0.01 \\
487: \mbox{[C~II]} & \fscii & 157.741 &
488: $6.7 \times10^{-8}$ & 0.58 &
489: 9.46 & $0.08\times10^{-5}$ & 394 &
490: 3.14 & 0.04 \\
491: \enddata
492: \tablenotetext{a}{Recommended extended source correction factor
493: (ISO LWS Handbook online v1.0).}
494: \tablenotetext{b}{Line to continuum ratio at line center (unresolved lines,
495: $\Delta\lambda=0.29$ $\mu$m for $\lambda<80$ $\mu$m. Otherwise
496: $\Delta\lambda=0.60$ $\mu$m).}
497: \label{tabiso}
498: \end{deluxetable}
499:
500: \newpage
501: \begin{figure}[p]
502: \plotone{fig1.eps}
503: \figcaption[fig1.eps]{Averaged \ci\ spectrum of N27 obtained by AST/RO
504: (Hanning-smoothed to $\Delta v\sim2.1$ \kmpers). Superimposed are
505: the rescaled Gaussian \co\ components measured by Israel et al. (1993).
506: There is a hint of the 127 \kmpers\ component in the \ci.\label{cispectrum}}
507: \end{figure}
508:
509: \begin{figure}[p]
510: \plotone{fig2.eps}
511: \figcaption[fig2.eps]{The \ci/CO line intensity ratio as a function of
512: metallicity, for molecular clouds in the Galactic Center (GC), the
513: Orion region, the LMC, IC~10, and the SMC. The continuous line is a
514: linear fit to the data: $\log[\citoco]=-0.47*(12+\log[{\rm
515: O/H}])+5.0$. The dashed line is Bolatto et al. (1999) model A
516: (PDR-produced neutral carbon): $\log[\citoco]=-0.82*(12+\log[{\rm
517: O/H}])+8.2$. The references for metallicity and \citoco\ ratio for
518: each source indicated in the figure are: (1) Afflerbach et al. 1997,
519: (2) Ojha et al. 2000, (3) Tauber et al. 1995, (4) Dufour 1984, (5)
520: Bolatto et al. 2000b, (6) Lequeux et al. 1979, (7) Bolatto et
521: al. 2000a, and (8) this work.
522: \label{pdrci}}
523: \end{figure}
524:
525: \end{document}
526: