1: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
2: %\documentstyle[aasms4]{article}
3: \documentstyle[emulateapj]{article}
4: %\documentstyle[aaspp4]{article}
5: %\documentstyle[]{article}
6:
7: %\submitted{submitted to The Astrophysical Journal}
8:
9:
10: \lefthead{}
11: \righthead{OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPY OF XTE J1118+480}
12:
13:
14: \def\gsim{\;\rlap{\lower 2.5pt
15: \hbox{$\sim$}}\raise 1.5pt\hbox{$>$}\;}
16: \def\lsim{\;\rlap{\lower 2.5pt
17: \hbox{$\sim$}}\raise 1.5pt\hbox{$<$}\;}
18:
19: \begin{document}
20:
21: \title{Optical Spectroscopy Of The X-Ray Transient XTE
22: J1118+480 In Outburst\altaffilmark{1}}
23:
24:
25: \author{Guillaume Dubus\altaffilmark{2}, Rita
26: S.J. Kim\altaffilmark{3}, Kristen Menou\altaffilmark{3,4}, Paula
27: Szkody\altaffilmark{5}\\ and David V. Bowen\altaffilmark{3}}
28:
29: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations obtained with the
30: Apache Point Observatory 3.5-meter telescope, which is owned and
31: operated by the Astrophysical Research Consortium.}
32:
33: \altaffiltext{2}{Astronomical Institute ``Anton Pannekoek'',
34: University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ, Amsterdam, the
35: Netherlands; gd@astro.uva.nl}
36:
37: \altaffiltext{3}{Princeton University, Department of Astrophysical
38: Sciences, Princeton NJ 08544, USA; rita, kristen,
39: dvb@astro.princeton.edu}
40:
41: \altaffiltext{4}{Chandra Fellow}
42:
43: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astronomy, University of Washington,
44: Seattle, WA 98195; szkody@astro.washington.edu}
45:
46: \begin{abstract}
47: We report on optical spectroscopic observations of the X-ray Transient
48: XTE~J1118+480 covering the period from April 7, 2000 to July 4,
49: 2000. The spectrum is characterized by weak, broad, double-peaked
50: Balmer and He lines on top of a blue continuum of slope $p \approx
51: 1/3$, as expected for an optically-thick accretion disk. The weak
52: Bowen blend seen in our spectra may indicate a low metallicity for
53: the source. The presence of a partial S-wave pattern
54: in the He{\sc {\sc ii}}~$\lambda 4686$ line appears consistent with
55: the reported photometric period $P_{\rm orb} = 4.1$~hr for
56: XTE~J1118+480. By using a combination of Doppler mapping and various
57: theoretical arguments, we constrain plausible orbital parameters for
58: the system: a mass ratio $0.02 \lsim q \lsim 0.1$, an inclination $i
59: \gsim 70^o$ for a neutron star primary, or $30^o \lsim i \lsim 50^o$
60: for a black hole primary with a mass between $4$ and $10~M_\odot$.
61: Ca{\sc ii} absorption features observed at very high resolution
62: constrain the interstellar hydrogen absorption column $\log [N_{\rm
63: H{\sc i}}~({\rm ~cm^{-2}})] \approx 20.45 \pm 0.2$ and the
64: identification of three absorbing clouds indicate a distance to the
65: source $\lsim 1$~kpc, assuming the line-of-sight to XTE~J1118+480 has
66: average high-latitude properties. These results are discussed in the
67: context of previous multiwavelength observations of this unusual
68: system.
69: \end{abstract}
70:
71: \keywords{X-ray: stars -- binaries: close -- accretion, accretion
72: disks }
73:
74: \section{Introduction}
75:
76: Soft X-ray Transients (SXTs) are compact binary systems in which a
77: low-mass secondary (either a main-sequence star or a subgiant)
78: transfers mass via Roche-lobe overflow onto a black hole (BH) or a
79: neutron star (NS) primary (see reviews by Tanaka \& Lewin 1995; van
80: Paradijs \& McClintock 1995; White, Nagase \& Parmar 1995). SXTs have
81: highly variable luminosities. They spend most of their lifetime in a
82: low luminosity quiescent state, but occasionally undergo dramatic
83: outbursts during which both their optical and X-ray emission increase by
84: several orders of magnitude (see, e.g., Tanaka \& Shibazaki 1996;
85: Chen, Shrader \& Livio 1997).
86:
87: The X-ray emission during outburst of an SXT is typically dominated by
88: relatively soft, thermal emission from the accretion disk surrounding
89: the compact object, while the optical emission is usually interpreted
90: as reprocessed X-rays from the disk and/or the companion star. The new
91: source XTE~J1118+480 belongs to the class of SXTs, but it also
92: possesses some rather unusual characteristics.
93:
94: XTE~J1118+480 was discovered on March 29 2000 with the RXTE All-Sky
95: Monitor as a brightening X-ray source. Pointed RXTE observations
96: confirmed the presence of this high Galactic latitude source
97: ($l=157.7^o$, $b=+62.3^o$), with a rather hard power law emission
98: spectrum of photon index $\Gamma \simeq 1.8$ up to 30~keV. It was
99: subject to rapid X-ray flares, but no pulsation was
100: detected. Retrospective ASM analysis revealed that the source
101: experienced another modest outburst in January 2000 (Remillard et
102: al. 2000; see Fig.~\ref{fig:lightcurve}). BATSE observations showed
103: that the source is visible up to 120~keV (Wilson \& McCollough 2000),
104: and a 6.2 mJy { (at 15 GHz)} variable radio counterpart was later
105: discovered (Pooley \& Waldram 2000).
106:
107:
108: The $V \sim 13$ optical counterpart of XTE~J1118+480 was found to
109: correspond to an $18.8$ mag star in the USNO catalog by Uemura, Kato
110: \& Yamaoka (2000; see also Uemura et al. 2000). A photometric
111: modulation on a 4.1~hr period was observed by Cook et al. (2000) and
112: was later confirmed as a plausible orbital period by Patterson (2000)
113: and Uemura et al. (2000; see Stull, Ioannou \& Webb in Haswell et
114: al. 2000b for a discrepant claim at twice this value). The photometric
115: modulation was later reported changing shape and period, possibly
116: showing the development of superhumps in this source (Uemura 2000).
117: { If these are normal superhumps, then the orbital period would be
118: smaller than the photometric superhump modulation by a few percent.}
119:
120:
121: Garcia et al. (2000) reported the first optical spectroscopic results
122: on XTE~J1118+480. They found an optical spectrum typical of SXTs in
123: outburst, with very broad H$\alpha$, H$\beta$ and He{\sc ii} lines (
124: FWHM $\gsim 2000$~km~s$^{-1}$). These observations also indicated the
125: presence of absorption features and a very low interstellar absorption
126: ($E(B-V) \lsim 0.024$) to the source. These authors suggested that the
127: surprisingly low X-ray ($\sim 40$~mCrab, 2-12~keV) to optical ($V \sim
128: 13$) flux ratio of XTE~J1118+480 could be due to a nearly edge-on
129: viewing angle.
130:
131:
132: Additional X-ray observations revealed the presence of a strong
133: Quasi-Periodic Oscillation (QPO) at 0.085~Hz in the X-ray lightcurve
134: of XTE~J1118+480. The shape of the power density spectrum and the hard
135: emission spectrum of XTE~J1118+480 prompted Revnivtsev, Sunyaev \&
136: Borozdin (2000) to propose that the source is a BH transient, by
137: analogy with other such systems. The QPO was confirmed by ASCA
138: observations, which also suggest the presence of a soft component in
139: the spectrum (below 2~keV), possibly due to emission from the
140: accretion disk in the system (Yamaoka et al. 2000). { Soft
141: X-ray observations by {\it Chandra} did not confirm this
142: (McClintock et al. 2000)}. The QPO frequency
143: was reported to have shifted from 0.085~Hz to $\gsim 0.1$~Hz in
144: subsequent observations (Yamaoka et al. 2000; Wood et al. 2000).
145: Pointed XTE observations at the end of May do not reveal significant
146: changes in the emission spectrum (P. Jonker, private communication).
147:
148:
149: XTE~J1118+480 has also been the subject of an extensive
150: multiwavelength observation campaign with HST, EUVE, UKIRT and
151: RXTE. Thanks to the very low interstellar absorption to the source,
152: the first EUVE spectrum of a BH-candidate X-ray Transient was obtained
153: (Mauche et al. 2000). No periodic modulation was found in the EUVE
154: data (Hynes et al. 2000b). An HST spectrum revealed a very broad ($>
155: 10,000$~km~s$^{-1}$) Ly$\alpha$ absorption feature, suggestive of a
156: massive accretor (Haswell et al. 2000b). Haswell et al. (2000c)
157: obtained a near-UV power density spectrum of XTE~J1118+480 with a QPO
158: and an overall shape in agreement with previous RXTE timing data. In
159: addition, the near-UV variability was found to lag by 1-2~seconds
160: behind the X-ray variations, as would be expected from light echoes in
161: a system with $P_{\rm orb} =4.1$~hr. Hynes et al. (2000b), combining
162: data from HST, EUVE, UKIRT and RXTE, find that the IR to UV data
163: suggests emission from both an optically-thick disk and another, flat
164: spectrum component (possibly synchrotron), while the EUVE and X-ray
165: data suggest a power law emission typical of a Galactic X-ray binary
166: in a low-hard state. They conclude that XTE~J1118+480, rather than
167: experiencing a full outburst { approaching the Eddington
168: luminosity}, seems to be in a mini-outburst state { (but see
169: Kuulkers 2000)}.
170:
171: In this paper, we describe the results of our optical spectroscopic
172: campaign to monitor the evolution of XTE~J1118+480 during its recent
173: outburst (and early decline). In \S2, we describe our
174: observations and the data reduction techniques used. Our results
175: concerning the continuum and line emission, a partial S-wave pattern
176: and the interstellar absorption to the source are presented in \S3 and
177: discussed in the context of the current knowledge on XTE~J1118+480 in
178: \S4. Our main conclusions are summarized in \S5.
179:
180:
181: \section{Observations and Reduction}
182:
183: We obtained optical spectra of XTE~J1118+480 from April 7, 2000 to
184: July 4, 2000 with the ARC 3.5~m telescope at Apache Point Observatory.
185: { We mostly used the Double Imaging Spectrograph (DIS),} but
186: spectra with the Echelle spectrograph were also obtained on April 7,
187: 2000. Table~\ref{tab:obs} summarizes the dates and other
188: characteristics of our observational campaign.
189:
190: Most of our observations with DIS were carried out with the high
191: resolution gratings { (hereafter {\em hires})} with a 1.5'' slit
192: (dispersion 1.6\AA~pixel$^{-1}$ in the blue, 1.1\AA~pixel$^{-1}$ in
193: the red, and a resolution of 2~pixels), but we also obtained spectra
194: with the low-resolution gratings (same slit size, dispersion
195: 6.2\AA~pixel$^{-1}$ in the blue, 7\AA~pixel$^{-1}$ in the red, and a
196: resolution of 2~pixels;{ hereafter {\em lowres})} on April 7,
197: 2000. For the DIS high resolution observations, the blue and red
198: gratings were centered on slightly different wavelengths during our
199: various nights of observations, but we generally centered the blue
200: side to cover the H$\beta$ and He{\sc ii}~$\lambda 4686$ lines, and
201: the red side to cover the H$\alpha$ line. The complete list of
202: spectral coverage for our observations can be found in
203: Table~\ref{tab:obs}. The Echelle spectrograph covers the (fixed)
204: wavelength range 3500-10000\AA\ with $R\sim 30000$ (10~km~s$^{-1}$ at
205: 5000\AA) and a resolution element of $\sim$~2.5 pixels. All the
206: exposure times can be found in Table~\ref{tab:obs}.
207:
208: The DIS observations were reduced in the standard way using {\em IRAF}
209: and the spectra were optimally-extracted and dispersion corrected
210: without any particular difficulty.
211:
212: The Echelle spectra were reduced using the IRAF {\em ecspec} package.
213: Direct extraction of the object spectra proved difficult for the
214: highest (bluest) orders where the trace was hard to follow. We decided
215: to use the flat field as a guide and validated the method with a
216: standard star observed on the same night. This resulted in
217: significantly higher S/N in the blue part of the spectrum. A total of
218: 115 orders were extracted covering the spectral range
219: 3500\AA-10000\AA, in which the source is detected, albeit with
220: varying sensitivity. The dispersion varied between
221: $\sim$~0.05\AA/pixel to 0.1\AA/pixel and the usable spectral range in
222: each order between $\sim$ 70\AA\ to 150\AA\ from the blue to the red
223: end.
224:
225: The emission lines in the spectrum of XTE~J1118+480 are both broad and
226: weak (see below, Fig.~\ref{fig:lowres}) and their identification in
227: the Echelle spectra turned out to be challenging. The broad lines can
228: cover almost half of the spectral range in one order making a
229: continuum fit unreliable. We therefore proceeded by normalizing to an
230: interpolated continuum determined from the two closest orders where no
231: lines are expected. The normalised summed spectra clearly show
232: H$\alpha$ (in one order, left panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:echha}) and
233: He{\sc ii} $\lambda$4686 (spread over two orders, right panel of
234: Fig.~\ref{fig:echha}). These lines are also detectable in the
235: individual continuum-subtracted { Echelle} spectra. { The
236: different profile of the He{\sc ii} line in the {\em lowres} and
237: Echelle spectra is most probably due to the S-wave modulation
238: discussed below. This S-wave is much less prominent in H$\alpha$}.
239:
240: \section{Results}
241:
242: The RXTE ASM lightcurve of XTE~J1118+480 is shown in
243: Fig.~\ref{fig:lightcurve} with the dates of our spectroscopic
244: observations indicated by dashed lines. The source was in outburst
245: during the entire period covered by our optical observations, with a
246: flux about 40~mCrab in the 2-12~keV band
247: (Fig.~\ref{fig:lightcurve}). Optical photometry
248: \footnote{VSNET observations at
249: http://www.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet} also shows the source in
250: outburst with a mean magnitude that decreased at most by $0.5$~mag
251: (from its peak value $\lsim 13$) at the end of our observational
252: program. Since then, the optical and X-ray flux have decreased
253: significantly, indicating that the source may soon enter quiescence.
254:
255: \subsection{Continuum}
256:
257: Figure~\ref{fig:lowres} shows the sum of the two DIS {\em lowres} spectra
258: obtained on April 7, 2000, which is also representative of other
259: spectra of the source obtained later on during our campaign. The
260: strong, blue power-law continuum and the weak emission lines are
261: typical of an SXT in outburst (see also Garcia et al. 2000). A
262: power-law fit to the blue part of the spectrum yields a slope $p
263: \simeq +0.4 \pm 0.2$ (where the flux F$_\nu \propto \nu^p$), while a
264: similar fit to the red part of the spectrum yields $p \simeq +0.33 \pm
265: 0.15$. These values are consistent with the expectation $p=1/3$ for an
266: optically-thick accretion disk (see, e.g., Frank, King \& Raine
267: 1992). Hynes et al. (2000b) find that the spectrum is flat using a
268: wider wavelength range.
269:
270: The broad, double-peaked H$\alpha$ emission line is the only one
271: easily identified on the spectrum of Fig.~\ref{fig:lowres}, but a
272: closer examination reveals the presence of He{\sc ii}~$\lambda4686$,
273: and of additional Balmer and He lines in the other spectra that we
274: collected (see \S3.2 below). We find only marginal evidence for
275: continuum variability in XTE~J1118+480, both during the same night and
276: from night to night. The lack of obvious variability is consistent
277: with the long-term variations in the optical VSNET lightcurve ($<$
278: 0.5~mag), the short timescale ($<$10~s) of the large amplitude
279: ($>$0.3~mag) flickering and the low amplitude (0.052 mag) of the 4~hr
280: modulation (Patterson 2000).
281:
282: \subsection{Line Profiles and their Evolution during Outburst}
283:
284: We identify three Balmer lines, three He lines and the Bowen blend in
285: our set of spectra. These are: H$\gamma~\lambda 4340.5$, He{\sc
286: i}~$\lambda 4471.5$, the Bowen blend at $\sim~\lambda4638$, He{\sc
287: ii}~$\lambda 4686.7$, H$\beta~\lambda 4861.3$, He{\sc i}~$\lambda
288: 4921.9$, H$\alpha~\lambda 6562.8$ and He{\sc i}~$\lambda 6678.1$ The
289: lines are weak, broad and double-peaked. H$\beta$, H$\gamma$ and also
290: the weaker He{\sc i} $\lambda$4471.5 have double-peaked emission
291: clearly embedded in a large absorption trough. There is no clear
292: evidence of such absorption around H$\alpha$.
293:
294: Fig.~\ref{fig:echha} shows the H$\alpha$ and He{\sc ii} line profiles
295: in the summed Echelle spectrum with the low resolution spectrum taken
296: on the same night overplotted. We find no evidence for structures at
297: high spectral resolution in the lines, except for an excess at rest
298: wavelength which would not be expected in a pure double-peaked disk
299: profile. This component also seems to be present in the high
300: resolution DIS spectra (see Fig.~\ref{fig:sumlines}). The Bowen blend,
301: which is very weak in the DIS {\em hires} spectra, was not detected on April
302: 7 in either the DIS {\em lowres} or the Echelle spectra.
303:
304: Measuring the lines proved difficult, not because of a lack of counts
305: in the spectra but because of their intrinsic broadness and
306: weakness. As a rule, we performed two-component Gaussian fits to the
307: emission lines. For H$\gamma$ and H$\beta$ the two emission components
308: were subtracted to measure the equivalent width (EW) and FWHM of the
309: absorption trough. The EW of the lines varies (with large associated
310: errors) within a night but we could find no periodic behaviour linked
311: to the { photometric} period. We also tried to estimate the semi-amplitude
312: velocity of the primary $K_1$ by fitting the wings of the He{\sc ii}
313: line (expected to trace the motion of the compact star) and folding
314: around the suspected $P_{\rm orb}$ of 0.17~day. This did not lead to
315: any result as could be expected from the usually low $K_1$ of SXTs
316: ($K_1\lsim 50$~km~s$^{-1}$).
317:
318: The evolution of these lines during the 3 months of observations is
319: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:sumlines}, after the underlying continuum was
320: normalized to unity. When available, multiple spectra were summed up
321: to increase the S/N of the spectra. A comparison between the most
322: comprehensive datasets (Apr. 17 and Jul. 4), where measurement errors
323: can be minimized, shows that the two strongest lines, H$\alpha$ and
324: He{\sc ii}, did not change significantly. We conclude that there do
325: not seem to be any long term variations. The average properties of
326: the lines are summed up in Table.~\ref{tab:lines} (the quoted errors are
327: the rms of the measurements).
328:
329: In all our spectra the blue side of the absorption troughs in
330: H$\gamma$ and H$\beta$ is less { strong} than the red side. The
331: measured central wavelengths of the absorptions are redshifted
332: compared to the rest wavelength (which could be an artefact of the
333: method we used to remove the double peaked emission). Fitting a
334: gaussian to the red part of the absorption while ignoring (but not
335: subtracting) the emission lines gave higher equivalent widths (2.4\AA\
336: for H$\gamma$ and 2.0\AA\ for H$\beta$) and better agreement with the
337: rest wavelength (7\AA\ redshift for both instead of 15\AA). Similar
338: absorption redshifts were reported by Callanan et al. (1995) for
339: GRO~J0422+32. A plausible explanation would be that the shifts are due
340: to distorted line profiles. Such asymetric lines are observed in dwarf
341: novae when the disk becomes eccentric and the system shows superhumps
342: (Warner 1995). There is evidence for such superhumps in XTE~J1118+480
343: (see discussion in \S4.3).
344:
345: \subsection{Constraint on the EUV flux}
346:
347: The He{\sc ii} emission may be used to obtain a crude estimate of the
348: extreme ultraviolet (EUV) flux from the source (e.g. Patterson \&
349: Raymond 1985) { if one assumes} the $\lambda$4686 line stems from
350: the recombination of He{\sc i} photoionized in the disk by photons
351: with energies between 55-280 eV. { On the other hand, the doppler
352: map discussed below in \S3.5 shows most of the He{\sc ii} emission is
353: localized and in all likelihood associated with stream-disk
354: interaction. In this case the $\lambda$4686 line would be pumped by
355: collisional excitation rather than photoionization. The following
356: estimate therefore only yields an upper limit on the EUV flux. This is
357: still of interest since the upper limit is independent of the column
358: density to the source.}
359:
360: We derive from our observations $F_{\lambda4686}\approx
361: 7\cdot10^{-14}$ erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$ and, from the values given by
362: Haswell et al. (2000b), $F_{\lambda1640}\approx 7\cdot10^{-13}$
363: erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$. This favours Case B recombination for which
364: one would expect $F_{\lambda1640}/F_{\lambda4686}\sim7$ (Seaton 1978).
365: Therefore, the region is optically-thick to the ionizing flux but thin
366: to the line and a fraction $\epsilon\approx0.2$ of the photoionized
367: He{\sc i} recombinations lead to $\lambda$4686 emission (Hummer \&
368: Storey 1987).
369:
370: Following previous applications to soft X-ray transients (Marsh,
371: Robinson \& Wood 1994; Hynes et al. 1998), the EUV flux $F_{\rm EUV}$
372: and the He{\sc ii} line flux $F_{\lambda4686}$ are related through
373: \begin{equation}
374: \epsilon\alpha\frac{F_{\rm EUV}}{E_{\rm EUV}}=\frac{F_{\lambda4686}}
375: {E_{\lambda4686}}
376: \end{equation}
377: where $\alpha$ is the fraction of EUV photons intercepted by the disc
378: while $E_{\rm EUV}\approx100$~eV and $E_{\lambda4686}\approx2.6$~eV
379: refer to the mean energy of the photons. We have assumed $L_{\rm
380: EUV}/L_{\lambda4686}=F_{\rm EUV}/F_{\lambda4686}$, which may be
381: incorrect if the EUV emission is not isotropic or if we see only a
382: fraction of the He{\sc ii} emission. In both cases this assumption
383: leads to an underestimate of the true EUV luminosity. Observations
384: suggest that a fraction $\sim 10^{-3}$ of the soft X-ray flux is
385: intercepted and reprocessed in the optical by the accretion disk in
386: SXTs (e.g. Dubus et al. 1999). By analogy, we take $\alpha=10^{-3}$
387: from which we finally derive { an upper limit to the} 55-280~eV
388: flux of $10^{-8}$ erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$. This is obviously a very
389: crude estimate.
390:
391: { An EUVE spectrum was obtained for this source, the first time
392: ever for a SXT. The source flux at these wavelengths is heavily
393: dependent on the extinction, but the upper limit on $F_{\rm EUV}$
394: derived above appears consistent with both a simple extrapolation of
395: the optical--UV flux observed and the EUVE flux inferred if a value of
396: $N_{\rm H} \approx 10^{20}$~cm$^{-2}$ is assumed when dereddening the
397: EUVE spectrum (Mauche et al. 2000; Hynes et al. 2000). }
398:
399:
400: \subsection{Peak-to-peak velocities}
401:
402: The mean peak-to-peak separation for all the observations is 18\AA\
403: (1240 km~s$^{-1}$) for H$\gamma$, 23\AA\ (1470 km~s$^{-1}$) for He{\sc
404: ii}, 21\AA\ (1300 km~s$^{-1}$) for H$\beta$ and 28\AA\ (1280
405: km~s$^{-1}$) for H$\alpha$. The S-wave is much less prominent in the
406: Balmer lines { and} we assume this represents the projected
407: Keplerian velocity of the outer disk. { The peak-to-peak
408: separations have been found in well-known systems to overestimate the
409: outer disk radius by about 20\% because of sub-Keplerian motion or
410: local broadening (Marsh 1998). This uncertainty is acceptable
411: considering other assumptions made below.} For a Keplerian disk with
412: an emissivity $\propto R^{-n}$, $\Delta v$ can be related to the outer
413: (emitting) disk radius $R_{\rm d}$ (Smak 1981):
414: \begin{equation}
415: \Delta v = 2 R_{\rm d}\Omega_{\rm K} \sin i = 2 \sin i (GM_1/R_{\rm
416: d})^{1/2},
417: \label{eq:vrout}
418: \end{equation}
419: where $M_1$ is the mass of the primary and $i$ the system inclination.
420: We can also express $R_{\rm d}/a$ as a function of the
421: velocity semi-amplitude of the secondary $K_2$ and the mass ratio
422: $q=M_2/M_1$ by combining the above equation with the mass function
423: (see below, Eq.~\ref{eq:fm}) and Kepler's third law\footnote{From
424: $P_{\rm orb}=$0.17~day, Kepler's third law gives a binary separation
425: $a \approx 10^{11}$~cm with a weak dependence on $M_1$ and $q$.},
426: resulting in:
427: \begin{equation}
428: \frac{R_{\rm d}}{a}=(1+q)\left(\frac{2 K_2}{\Delta v}\right)^2
429: \label{eq:rova}
430: \end{equation}
431: The disk outer radius is expected to reach the tidal truncation radius
432: for $q\gsim0.2$ and to be limited to $R_{\rm d}/a\approx0.48$ by the
433: 3:1 resonance for $q\lsim 0.2$ (e.g. Warner 1995). Papaloizou \&
434: Pringle (1977; their Tab.~1) give a theoretical estimate of the outer
435: disk radius that we recklessly use for $R_{\rm d}/a$.
436: Eq.~\ref{eq:rova} can therefore be used to give the semi-amplitudes
437: $K_2(q)$ for which the disk radius is consistent with the theoretical
438: expectations. For $0.01<q<1$ the disk radius varies between 0.5 and
439: 0.3 in units of the binary separation $a$. The expected $K_2$ as a
440: function of $q$ is shown as a solid line in the left panel of
441: Fig.~\ref{fig:cons1}. We find $440>K_2$~(km~s$^{-1}$)~$>260$ for
442: $0.01<q<1$.
443:
444: The observed velocity FWHM ($v_{\rm fwhm}$) of the lines provides an
445: upper limit to the minimum emitting Keplerian disk radius:
446: \begin{equation}
447: R_{\rm in}\lsim 1.3\cdot 10^{10}\ (M_1/M_\odot)\left(\sin i/v_{\rm
448: fwhm}\right)^2\ {\rm cm},
449: \end{equation}
450: where $v_{\rm fwhm}$ is expressed in units of 1000~km~s$^{-1}$. The
451: absorption features from the optically-thick disk (see \S4.1 and
452: Table.~\ref{tab:lines}) have FWHM $\gsim 3000$~km~s$^{-1}$ implying
453: $R_{\rm in}\lsim 10^9$~cm. Haswell et al. (2000b) detect broad
454: Ly$\alpha$ absorption with $v_{\rm fwhm} \sim 10^4$~km~s$^{-1}$ which
455: gives a stricter $R_{\rm in}\lsim 10^8$~cm or $R_{\rm in} \lsim 500$
456: in Schwarzschild units. Spectral models of the X-ray low/hard state
457: of BH candidates tend to predict larger values of $R_{\rm in} (\gsim
458: 1000$ in Schwarzschild units) at which the transition from a thin disk
459: to a hot advection-dominated flow occurs (see, e.g., Esin et
460: al. 1998). The EUV flux of XTE~J1118+480 could also imply a smaller
461: transition radius (see \S4.2).
462:
463: \subsection{Doppler mapping}
464:
465: Figure~\ref{fig:swave} shows the evolution of the He{\sc ii}~$\lambda
466: 4686$ line profile over an approximately continuous 2.9 hr period on
467: April 20, 2000. A partial S-wave pattern moves from the red to the
468: blue side of the He{\sc ii}~$\lambda 4686$ line rest wavelength and
469: appears consistent with the claimed photometric period of $4.1$~hr
470: (Cook et al. 2000; Patterson 2000). The modulated component is
471: particularly strong towards the middle of the observation at HJD
472: 51654.876 where it is blueshifted by about 900 km~s$^{-1}$.
473:
474: The trailed spectrum clearly shows that the Bowen blend, He{\sc i}
475: $\lambda4921.9$, H$\gamma$ and H$\beta$ follow the same S-wave pattern
476: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:swave} ). We note that identical behaviour is seen
477: in the smaller continuous set (1.8 hr) of July 4 although with poorer
478: S/N (not shown here). However, the presence of the S-wave in the
479: H$\alpha$ emission profile is not clear on either dates.
480:
481: Despite the incomplete phase coverage and the absence of a reference
482: for superior conjunction of the secondary, we attempted to locate the
483: emission site of the S-wave in the binary velocity plane using the
484: Doppler tomography technique (Marsh \& Horne 1988). Maps were
485: reconstructed for He{\sc ii} and H$\alpha$ for the April 20
486: observations using the software developed by Spruit (1998), assuming
487: an orbital period of 0.1708~day and a null systemic velocity. It was
488: not possible to combine this dataset with our other observations as
489: this would have required $P_{\rm orb}$ to be known much more
490: accurately ($\Delta P_{\rm orb}/P_{\rm orb}= \Delta \phi P_{\rm orb}/
491: T \sim 10^{-5}$ day with $T\approx90$ days and an error on the phase
492: set by the exposure time of $\Delta \phi=0.01$). { Furthermore, the
493: 0.1708~day modulation is probably related to superhumps so that the
494: orbital period can be expected to be close to this value with
495: an uncertainty of a few percent. We tried several different orbital
496: periods around 0.17~day but this had no significant impact on the
497: maps. } The reconstructed trailed profiles and corresponding velocity
498: maps are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:prof} and Fig.~\ref{fig:map}
499: respectively.
500:
501: Each pixel on the projected Doppler map corresponds to an S-wave in
502: the trailed spectra. The binary components are located on the y-axis
503: of the map at positions corresponding to their semi-amplitude
504: velocities $(v_x,v_y)=(0,-K_1)$ for the primary and $(0,K_2)$ for the
505: companion (indicated by crosses). However, since the orbital reference
506: phase is arbitrary (here we chose $t_0=$51654.420 in MJD), the map can
507: be rotated in any fashion around the velocity origin. The secondary
508: position, the ballistic gas stream trajectory and the corresponding
509: Keplerian velocity at the location of the stream shown on
510: Fig.~\ref{fig:map} result from particular choices of $K_2$ and
511: $q=M_2/M_1=K_1/K_2$ discussed further below.
512:
513:
514: The trailed emission of He{\sc ii} shows a nice S-wave pattern which is
515: consistent with the reported 0.1708~day photometric period (Cook et al.
516: 2000; Patterson 2000). Most of the He{\sc ii} emission originates from a
517: localized region but there is also an underlying (double-peaked) disk
518: component which is visible in the original data. On the other hand, the
519: disk dominates the H$\alpha$ profile producing a ring of emission in the
520: velocity map. We also note the regions of enhanced H$\alpha$ emission at
521: about (-910,0)~km~s$^{-1}$ (consistent with the He{\sc ii} S-wave) and
522: $(-210,-730)$~km~s$^{-1}$. The peak at the velocity origin (the center of
523: mass) is due to the H$\alpha$ emission component at rest wavelength
524: discussed in \S3.2.
525:
526: The bright emission region is typically associated with emission
527: arising from the stream-disk interaction region or from the X-ray
528: heated surface of the secondary (e.g. Smak 1985; Marsh, Robinson \&
529: Wood 1994; Casares et al. 1995ab; Harlaftis et al. 1996, 1997ab; Hynes
530: et al. 2000a). Some SXTs also have low-velocity emission regions in
531: their doppler maps, possibly associated with a magnetic propeller
532: (Hynes et al. 2000a). Here, the velocity of $\sim 900$~km~s$^{-1}$
533: makes it doubtful that we observe such a phenomenon.
534:
535: Assuming the He{\sc ii} emission arises from the heated hemisphere of
536: the secondary, the semi-amplitude $900$~km~s$^{-1}$ {
537: (underestimating the real $K_2$)} gives a rough constraint on the mass
538: function through :
539: \begin{equation}
540: f(M)=\frac{M_1^3\sin^3 i}{(M_1+M_2)^2}=\frac{K_2^3 P_{\rm orb}}{2 \pi G}
541: \label{eq:fm}
542: \end{equation}
543: This gives a {\em minimum} mass for the primary of 12 M$_\odot$, which
544: { would make XTE~J1118+480 at least as massive as the black hole in
545: V404 Cyg. Lower inclinations would imply an even greater mass making
546: this system rather unusual compared to the dynamical masses inferred
547: in other SXTs (see, e.g., van Paradijs \& McClintock 1995). Although
548: we cannot formally reject this possibility, the He{\sc ii} emission is
549: unlikely to originate from the heated surface of the secondary.}
550:
551: The He{\sc ii} emission is more likely to originate from the
552: stream-disk interaction. { Typically, the hotspot is located (see
553: above references) somewhere between the ballistic gas stream
554: trajectory and its corresponding Keplerian velocity (which defines a
555: circularization radius)}. We derive a { lower limit on $K_2(q)$
556: (hence a lower limit on the primary mass)} by assuming that the
557: emission is located at the intersection of the two trajectories. The
558: values of $K_2$ and $q$ for which the intersection matches the He{\sc
559: ii} emission are plotted as a dashed line in the left panel of
560: Fig.~\ref{fig:cons1}.
561:
562: A comparison between the two estimates of $K_2(q)$ shows that values
563: of $0.02\lsim q\lsim 0.1$ best fit the data in the sense that they
564: minimize the discrepancies. Formal agreement requires $q\approx0.045$
565: ($K_2\approx430$~km~s$^{-1}$) but this is, of course,
566: model-dependent. Knowing $q$ and $K_2$, the mass function
567: (Eq.~\ref{eq:fm}) gives the inclination $i$ as a function of $M_1$.
568: This relation is plotted in Fig.~\ref{fig:cons1} (right panel) for the
569: two extreme cases ($q=0.02$,$K_2=500$~km~s$^{-1}$) and
570: ($q=0.1$,$K_2=350$~km~s$^{-1}$). Clearly, a NS would require large
571: inclinations while a BH gives intermediate inclinations. { Given
572: the assumptions made for the interpretation of the peak-to-peak
573: velocity and the He{\sc ii} emission, we are likely to underestimate
574: $K_2$ in both cases. This would only strengthen the case for a black
575: hole primary.}
576:
577: The stream-disk interaction apparently extends some way along the
578: Keplerian velocity trace as previously seen in other SXTs
579: (e.g. Harlaftis et al. 1996). This could also be a numerical artifact
580: { possibly due to an inaccurate orbital period}. The second weaker
581: emission region in the H$\alpha$ velocity map could be due to
582: continued disturbance of the accretion disk further along in azimuth.
583: In this picture the stream-disk interaction takes place inside the
584: disk as emphasized by the larger velocity amplitude of the S-wave with
585: respect to the peak-to-peak amplitude of the Balmer emission
586: lines. This interpretation suggests significant stream overflow above
587: the outer disk and an interaction region close to the circularization
588: radius. { Alternatively, systematic effects leading to lower
589: observed peak-to-peak velocities (e.g. local line broadening, Marsh
590: 1998) would place the hot spot closer to the disk outer edge}.
591:
592: \subsection{Interstellar Absorption}
593: The Echelle spectra of XTE~J1118+480 obtained on April 7, 2000 reveal
594: the presence of weak Ca{\sc ii}~$\lambda 3933$ absorption features,
595: which can be used to estimate the neutral hydrogen absorption column
596: to the source. The spectra also show Ca{\sc ii}~$\lambda 3968$ in
597: absorption, with an equivalent width of order half that of Ca{\sc
598: ii}~$\lambda 3933$ features, as expected for this doublet (see, e.g.,
599: Cohen 1975). Both features are seen on two overlapping orders with
600: similar structure. The Ca{\sc ii} lines are detected in some of the
601: individual Echelle exposures with identical profiles.
602: Figure~\ref{fig:ca2} shows the Ca{\sc ii}~$\lambda\lambda 3933,3968$
603: absorption features in the summed Echelle spectra. The two orders have
604: also been summed for this plot with weighting corresponding to the
605: different sensitivities at the locations of the Ca{\sc ii} lines.
606:
607:
608: A Gaussian fit to each of the three absorption components yields
609: heliocentric velocities $v_0 \simeq -44$, $-26$ and $-5$~km~s$^{-1}$.
610: These velocities are consistent with an absorption component clearly
611: seen at $\sim -44$~km~s$^{-1}$ and the hint of another component at
612: $-26$~km~s$^{-1}$ in NaI~$\lambda\lambda 5889, 5895$. The presence
613: of strong Na emission at the rest wavelength (sky emission) precludes
614: the detection of the presumed third absorption component at
615: $-5$~km~s$^{-1}$ and the use of Na absorption for the determination of
616: the H{\sc i} absorption column, N$_{\rm H{\sc i}}$, to XTE~J1118+480.
617:
618:
619: We proceed as follows to determine N$_{\rm H{\sc i}}$.\footnote{Note
620: that we do not have to worry about a stellar Ca{\sc ii} absorption
621: component from the companion star because the emission of
622: XTE~J1118+480 in outburst is presumably dominated by accretion} We
623: assume that the gas in each absorbing cloud has a Maxwellian velocity
624: distribution centered on its heliocentric velocity $v_0$, so that the
625: Ca{\sc ii} optical depth of the cloud can be described by (Spitzer
626: 1978):
627: \begin{equation}
628: \tau [v-v_0] = {\rm N_{Ca{\sc ii}}} \frac{\sqrt{\pi} e^2 f \lambda_0}{m_e c b}
629: e^{-[(v-v_0)/b]^2},
630: \end{equation}
631: where ${\rm N_{Ca{\sc ii}}}$ is the total cloud absorption column,
632: $\lambda_0 = 3933.6~\AA$ is the rest wavelength of the Ca{\sc ii}~K
633: line, $f=0.688$ is the oscillator strength of this transition
634: (Cardelli \& Wallerstein 1986), $b$ is the velocity dispersion
635: of the cloud, $e$ is the charge of the electron, $m_e$ is the mass of
636: the electron and $c$ is the speed of light. Relative to a unity
637: continuum, the line profile of a given absorbing cloud component has a
638: depth given by:
639: \begin{equation}
640: e^{- \tau[v-v_0]}
641: \end{equation}
642: at any speed $v$ (or equivalently wavelength) around the central value
643: $v_0$.
644:
645:
646:
647: To deduce precise values of $b$ and ${\rm N_{Ca{\sc ii}}}$, we have
648: compared the observed Ca${\sc ii}$ line profiles with theoretical,
649: multi-component absorption line profiles. Initial profiles were
650: calculated using the values of $b$ and ${\rm N_{Ca{\sc ii}}}$ derived
651: from Eqs.~(6) \&~(7), which were then convolved with a Gaussian
652: instrumental Line Spread Function whose FHWM was measured from the arc
653: lines used to wavelength calibrate the data. The best values of $b$
654: and ${\rm N_{Ca{\sc ii}}}$ were found by minimizing $\chi^2$ between
655: the data and the theoretical fits. The resulting values for the
656: Ca${\sc ii}$ lines are: $b\:=\:9.1, 2.4 $ and 6.2~km~s$^{-1}$, $\log
657: {\rm N_{Ca{\sc ii}}} = 11.85, 11.34$ and 11.67 for the components at
658: $v_0\:=\:-5, -26$ and $-44$~km~s$^{-1}$ respectively.
659:
660:
661: The translation of the Ca{\sc ii} absorption column to an hydrogen
662: absorption column is somewhat delicate, especially in view of the
663: possibly efficient deposition of gaseous Ca{\sc ii} onto dust grains
664: (see, e.g., Vallerga et al. 1993). However, there is a substantial
665: body of observational data on Ca{\sc ii} absorption which allows us to
666: use an average value for the ratio ${\rm N_{Ca{\sc ii}}/N_{H{\sc
667: i}}}$. In their independent studies, both Cohen (1975) and Sembach \&
668: Danks (1994) find an average average value of $\log[{\rm N_{Ca{\sc
669: ii}}/N_{H{\sc i}}}] \simeq -8.3$ for high latitude line-of-sights,
670: with approximate errorbars of $\pm 0.2$ in log in the two
671: cases. Assuming this average is representative of the line of sight to
672: XTE~J1118+480, this translates in a value $\log[{\rm N_{H{\sc
673: i}}~(cm^{-2})}] = 20.45 \pm 0.2$, where the errorbars come from the
674: conversion of ${\rm Ca{\sc ii}}$ to ${\rm H{\sc i}}$ absorption.
675:
676:
677:
678: {
679: We note that this estimate is somewhat larger than the values
680: $\log[{\rm N_{H{\sc i}}~(cm^{-2})}] \approx 20$ considered as
681: reasonable by Hynes et al. (2000; see also McClintock et al. 2000;
682: Esin et al. 2000) when dereddening the low-energy spectrum of
683: XTE~J1118+480. This discrepancy raises the possibility that the value
684: obtained from the Ca${\sc ii}$ measurement overestimates the true
685: value of N$_{H{\sc i}}$ on the line of sight to the source. Most
686: likely, this would come from the conversion from Ca${\sc ii}$ to
687: H${\sc i}$ which may not be ``average'' as assumed above for
688: XTE~J1118+480. It is also possible to measure the total $N$(H~I) along
689: the sightline towards XTE~J1118+480 from 21~cm emission
690: observations. Using data from the Leiden/Dwingeloo Survey (Hartmann \&
691: Burton 1997), the H~I column at ($l,b$)=(157.5,62.0) is
692: $1.32\times10^{20}$~cm$^{-2}$, a factor of two lower than we
693: derive. This value represents an {\it upper} limit of course, since
694: the 21~cm emission is integrated along the line of sight through the
695: entire Milky Way. This therefore also suggests our value of $N$(H~I)
696: is over-estimated, although the Dwingeloo beam size of 36$'$ is too
697: large to measure higher $N$(H~I) over smaller angular scales, and it
698: remains possible that a small, dense knot of H~I with $N$(H~I)$>>
699: 1.3\times10^{20}$~cm$^{-2}$ could be lying directly along the line of
700: sight. }
701:
702: It is encouraging to see that the properties derived above for the
703: clouds are consistent with the average properties of high latitude
704: line-of-sights described in Sembach \& Danks (1994): $\langle{\rm
705: N_{Ca{\sc ii}}}\rangle =4.3 \pm 1.3 \times
706: 10^{11}$~cm$^{-2}$. Furthermore, these authors find that, along
707: extended sight lines at high latitude, the average number of absorbing
708: Ca{\sc ii} clouds is 3.6~kpc$^{-1}$. This indicates that XTE~J1118+480
709: is located at a distance $\approx 0.83$~kpc if the line of sight to
710: the source has average properties, an estimate which is consistent
711: with those for other SXTs. The actual distance to XTE~J1118+480 could
712: be somewhat different if this line-of-sight has properties deviating
713: significantly from the mean. Note that our estimate of the distance
714: is in rough agreement with that of Uemura et al. (2000) who use the
715: 18.8 quiescent magnitude to derive $d\sim0.5$~kpc (M-type secondary)
716: or $d\sim1.5$~kpc (K secondary), and is consistent with the 0.8~kpc
717: distance estimate of McClintock et al. (2000), assuming that the
718: primary is a massive BH and that a third of the light in quiescence is
719: provided by the M-dwarf secondary. { It is also of interest to note
720: that the 21~cm emission from the Leiden/Dwingeloo Survey mentioned
721: above shows two peaks in brightness temperature which correspond
722: closely to the Ca~II components at $-5$ and
723: $-44$~km~s$^{-1}$. Although the distance of the H~I is not known, the
724: scale height of H~I in the Milky Way is $\sim 1$~kpc, and since the
725: 21~cm emission arises from {\it all} the H~I in the Galaxy along the
726: sightline, XTE~J1118+480 must be sufficiently far away so as to show
727: the Ca~II absorption from both H~I components. This again suggests a
728: significant distance between us and XTE~J1118+480.}
729:
730:
731: \section{Discussion}
732:
733: \subsection{The absorption troughs}
734:
735: An interesting feature of the spectra are the absorption troughs in
736: $H\gamma$ and $H\beta$. Although rarely discussed (see, however, Soria
737: et al. 2000), these have been observed in several other transients
738: with similar FWHM, { including} GRO J1655-40, A0620-00, GS1124-68,
739: Nova Mus 91, XTE J2123-058, XTE J1859+226, and especially GRO J0422+32
740: which bears many similarities to XTE J1118+480 (see conclusion).
741:
742: This type of line profile is also seen in dwarf novae (DN) and {
743: nova-like} (NL), systems which are analogous to low-mass X-ray
744: binaries (LMXBs), except for a primary which is a white dwarf.
745: Typically, the spectrum of quiescent DN display strong emission lines
746: which are gradually replaced by absorption features during the rise to
747: outburst and vice-versa during the decay (e.g. Szkody et al. 1990).
748:
749: Schematically, the absorption is thought to arise from the
750: optically-thick accretion disk whilst the emission is thought to
751: result from photoionization in a chromosphere-like optically thin
752: region above the disk. A key feature is that the expected spectrum is
753: inclination dependent since the absorption should disappear as the
754: system gets closer to being edge-on due to strong line limb-darkening
755: in the 2D disk (see e.g. Marsh \& Horne 1990; la Dous 1989; Wade \&
756: Hubeny 1998). There is indeed such an observed dependence in both DN
757: and NL with the highest inclination systems showing only emission
758: lines (la Dous 1991).
759:
760: Although the detected absorption makes it unlikely that the
761: inclination of XTE~J1118+4800 is very high, this constraint is
762: weak. For instance, GRO J1655-40 also showed Balmer absorption (Soria
763: et al. 2000) but has a well-determined inclination of 70\arcdeg. In
764: contrast with DN and NL, irradiation heating is much stronger in SXT
765: where it usually dominates the heat balance in the outer disk regions
766: (hence the optical emission, van Paradijs \& McClintock 1994). Energy
767: deposited by soft X-rays easily causes a thermal inversion in the top
768: layers where the emission lines originate (e.g. Ko \& Kallman
769: 1994). If the optically thin atmospheres of SXTs are indeed more
770: extended than in DN, one would expect Balmer absorption not to be as
771: common an occurence as in the non-magnetic cataclysmic variables.
772:
773: The spectral models of X-ray irradiated disks computed by Sakhibullin
774: et al. (1998) show that softer irradiation leads to the disappearance
775: of the absorption troughs. As the irradiation spectrum hardens, the
776: X-ray photons deposit their energy in deeper disk layers, which do not
777: contribute to the line emission. Inversely, any parameter change
778: resulting in additional heating of the disk atmosphere leads to more
779: emission. Any combination of a low inclination, low X-ray luminosity,
780: hard X-ray spectrum or low fraction of reprocessed X-ray photons in
781: the disk could explain the absorption troughs.
782:
783: Those SXTs in which Balmer absorption has been observed have probably
784: been guilty of one or several of the above. Interestingly, in GRO
785: J0422+32, the H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ lines evolved from absorption to
786: emission within 3 days during the rise to one of the mini-outbursts
787: (Callanan et al. 1995). Although the authors could not find any
788: evidence for increased X-ray flux between 0.5-10 keV, the simultaneous
789: rise in He{\sc ii} emission does suggest a larger flux of soft
790: 0.05-0.3~keV photons which would have a strong effect on the
791: chromosphere. However, a hard X-ray upturn in GRO J1655-40 was
792: accompanied by a dramatic increase of H$\alpha$ emission but also by a
793: {\em decrease} of the He{\sc ii} $\lambda 4686$ flux (Shrader et
794: al. 1996). It seems difficult to identify the dominant culprit but we
795: propose the low X-ray flux (see next section) and the hard X-ray
796: spectrum of XTE~J1118+480 as prime suspects responsible for the
797: absorption troughs observed.
798:
799: \subsection{The optical magnitude}
800:
801: A unique characteristic of this system is the large optical to X-ray
802: ratio, as compared to other SXTs. The ratio for XTE~J1118+480 is not
803: dissimilar (Garcia et al. 2000) to that found in Accretion Disk Corona
804: (ADC) sources where the X-ray flux is partly hidden by the disk seen
805: edge-on. Yet, XTE~J1118+4800 has not shown any of the typical
806: behaviour associated with ADC sources, namely X-ray dips or
807: eclipses. In addition, our crude `fitting' of the peak-to-peak
808: velocity of the Balmer lines and of the velocity map rather hints at
809: intermediate inclinations.
810:
811: This high ratio might simply be due to the low absorption and
812: proximity of the source. At the $\sim$ 0.8~kpc distance implied by the
813: Ca{\sc ii} absorption, the 2-10~keV X-ray flux ($\approx
814: 8\cdot10^{-10}$erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$, Yamaoka et al. 2000) is such
815: that $L_{\sc x}\approx 6\cdot 10^{34}$~erg~s$^{-1}$. By analogy with
816: the low/hard state of Cyg X-1, Fender et al. (2000) find the broad
817: band X-ray luminosity is $\sim 10^{36}$erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$
818: at 1~kpc, i.e. this outburst was weak for a SXT.
819:
820: We compare the X-ray flux and optical magnitude $M_V$ by computing the
821: quantity $\Sigma=(L_{\sc x}/L_{\rm Edd})^{1/2}(P_{\rm orb}/1{\rm
822: ~hr})^{(2/3)}$, where $L_{\rm Edd}= 1.3 \times 10^{38}
823: (M_1/M_\odot)$~erg~s$^{-1}$ is the Eddington luminosity. With $P_{\rm
824: orb}=0.1708$~day, we find $\log\Sigma\lsim -1.2$ with
825: $M_1=1$~M$_\odot$ while $M_V\approx 3.5$ for $V=13$ and
826: $E(B-V)=0$. Within the error bars, this is consistent with the
827: correlation found for other SXTs between $\log\Sigma$ and $M_V$ by van
828: Paradijs \& McClintock (1994). In other words, the optical flux of
829: XTE~J1118+480 is roughly in agreement with what would be expected if
830: the disk is irradiation-dominated.
831:
832: The agreement is less good for higher $M_1$, the optical flux being
833: larger than expected from the correlation. The X-ray heated companion
834: could contribute to the optical as in, e.g., the persistent LMXB Cyg
835: X-2. { In this case we might expect the He{\sc ii} emission to
836: originate from the X-ray heated surface of the secondary. We have
837: argued this is unlikely. A better candidate for this extra optical
838: emission is} synchrotron emission (Hynes et al. 2000b) originating in
839: a magnetic corona (Merloni et al. 2000),\footnote{Note that the corona
840: model of Merloni et al. 2000 may be challenged by the observations of
841: Haswell et al. (2000c) which show that the near-UV variability lags
842: behind the X-ray variability by 1 to 2 seconds.} an
843: advection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF; Esin et al. 2000) and/or a
844: jet ($\sim$ equivalent to the first model with the base of the jet
845: acting as the magnetic corona; { Markoff et
846: al. 2000}). XTE~J1118+480 { probably has} a powerful compact jet,
847: with emission extending at least to the near-infrared (Fender et
848: al. 2000). Both ADAF and magnetic corona models can explain the high
849: optical/X-ray ratio but the EUV predictions may differ. The model
850: presented by Merloni et al. (2000) has a large blackbody component
851: peaking at $\nu\approx10^{16.5}$~Hz due to hard X-ray reprocessing in
852: the disk. { The soft X-ray observations of {\it Chandra} do not
853: seem to support this model (McClintock et al. 2000; Esin et
854: al. 2000).}
855:
856:
857: \subsection{Superhumps ?}
858:
859: The detection of superhumps (Uemura 2000) could add several
860: constraints to the system parameters. According to current models,
861: superhumps appear when the disk can reach the 3:1 resonance radius,
862: requiring small mass ratio $q\lsim0.3$ (Warner 1995). In principle,
863: the relative difference between the superhump period and the orbital
864: period can give an even better constraint on $q$ (e.g. O'Donoghue \&
865: Charles 1996). Such a small mass ratio is compatible with the
866: constraint $0.02\lsim q\lsim 0.1$ that we derived in \S3.5.
867:
868: In DN and NL, the origin of the optical variation could lie in the
869: enhanced viscous dissipation modulated on the superhump period.
870: However, these variations should be swamped in SXTs where irradiation
871: heating rather than viscous heating dominates the optical
872: output. Haswell et al. (2000a) recently argued that the small change
873: in the accretion disk area on the superhump cycle, rather than the
874: enhanced viscous dissipation, would give the desired effect for
875: SXTs. The amplitude of the superhump would however decrease with
876: larger inclinations.
877:
878: The detection of superhumps in XTE~J1118+4800, if confirmed, would
879: therefore either mean the disk was not irradiation-dominated (which is
880: unlikely considering, e.g., the correlated X-ray/near-UV behaviour
881: reported by Haswell et al. 2000c) or that the inclination is low
882: enough for the variations of the area of the disk to be observable.
883:
884: \subsection{Is XTE~J1118+480 a halo object ?}
885:
886: The high Galactic latitude of XTE~J1118+480 ($b=+62^o$) is in sharp
887: contrast with the latitudes of other LMXBs which cluster next to the
888: Galactic plane. Whether or not XTE~J1118+480 is a halo object
889: obviously depends on its actual distance. At our inferred $d\sim
890: 0.8$~kpc, XTE~J1118+480 lies $\sim 0.7$~kpc above the Galactic plane.
891:
892:
893: The distribution of BH LMXBs around the Galactic plane has a
894: dispersion of $\sim 0.5$~kpc. The larger dispersion of NS LMXBs ($\sim
895: 1$~kpc) is probably due to larger kick velocities at birth (White \&
896: van Paradijs 1996). Whether XTE~J1118+480 has a BH or a NS primary,
897: its height above the Galactic plane is not much larger than for other
898: LMXBs. For instance, White \& van Paradijs (1996) find $z\approx
899: 0.9$~kpc for the BH Nova Oph 1977.
900:
901: A low metallicity environment would be supported by the low Bowen to
902: He{\sc ii} flux ratio $\approx 0.3$ (Table.~\ref{tab:lines}) that we
903: find (Motch \& Pakull 1989). But the detection of N and the
904: non-detection of C and O lines in the UV spectra has been used to
905: argue that the matter has been CNO processed in the companion (Haswell
906: et al. 2000b) and that, from an evolutionary point of view,
907: $M_1<3$~M$_\odot$ is preferred to allow for an evolved
908: secondary. Considering that XTE~J1118+480 is not extremely far from
909: the distribution of other LMXBs above the Galactic plane and that CNO
910: processing might explain the low Bowen/He{\sc ii} flux ratio, we
911: conclude that there is no compelling evidence for a halo origin of
912: XTE~J1118+480.
913:
914:
915: \section{Conclusion}
916:
917: Let us first summarize the main conclusions of this work.
918:
919: $\bullet$ The optical spectrum of XTE~J1118+480 in outburst shows
920: several variable broad and weak emission lines superposed on a
921: $F_\nu\propto \nu^{1/3}$ continuum typical of an optically-thick
922: accretion disk. The He{\sc ii} line shows a strong S-wave pattern
923: which is consistent with the claimed 0.1708~day photometric period.
924: We see no { other} obvious periodic or long-term behaviour in the lines.
925:
926: $\bullet$ We find from the Ca{\sc ii} lines that the interstellar
927: absorption to the source is low ($\log[{\rm N_{H{\sc i}}~(cm^{-2})}] =
928: 20.45 \pm 0.2$) and that the presence of three intervening clouds
929: suggests a distance of $\sim 0.8$~kpc to the source. Since the low
930: Bowen to He{\sc ii} ratio could indicate CNO-processed material
931: (Haswell et al. 2000b) rather than an intrinsically low metallicity,
932: we conclude there is no strong evidence to support a halo origin for
933: XTE~J1118+480.
934:
935: $\bullet$ { We estimate an upper limit for the 0.05-0.3~keV source
936: flux of $\approx 10^{-8}$~erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$. The dereddened EUVE
937: spectrum (using a column absorption $\log[{\rm N_{H{\sc
938: i}}~(cm^{-2})}] \approx 20$; Hynes et al. 2000; Mcclintock et
939: al. 2000) appears compatible with this value. This suggests that a
940: significant fraction of the source flux is emitted in the EUV/Soft
941: X-ray band. Given the very strong dependence of the slope of the
942: dereddened EUVE spectrum on ${\rm N_{H_{\sc i}}}$ , it may be
943: difficult to accomodate a higher value for ${\rm N_{H_{\sc i}}}$ as
944: derived from Ca{\sc ii} absorption in \S3.6.
945:
946: }
947: $\bullet$ The absorption in H$\gamma$, H$\beta$ and the Balmer jump
948: (Hynes et al. 2000b), originating from the optically-thick disk,
949: suggests that X-ray heating of the atmosphere is not as strong as in
950: other SXTs, which may be consistent with the (very) low X-ray flux and
951: hard X-ray spectrum. This also disfavors very high inclinations for
952: which limb-darkening would remove the absorption features.
953:
954:
955: $\bullet$ The Balmer lines have peak-to-peak velocities of $\approx
956: 1250$~km~s$^{-1}$. Assuming this corresponds to the Keplerian velocity
957: of the outer disk, we use theoretical arguments on the disk size to
958: estimate $K_2(q)$. We find $250 \lsim K_2$~(km~s$^{-1}$)$\lsim 450$
959: for $0.01<q<1$.
960:
961: $\bullet$ Using the reconstructed Doppler tomogram, we tentatively
962: identify the He{\sc ii} S-wave with the stream-disk interaction. This
963: gives us a second estimate of $K_2(q)$ which, combined with the first
964: one, restricts possible values for $q$ to $0.02\lsim q\lsim0.1$. This
965: further implies that if the primary is a NS, the system should have a
966: high inclination ($i\gsim70$\arcdeg), while for a BH primary, an
967: intermediate inclination is preferred (30\arcdeg$\lsim i
968: \lsim$50\arcdeg\ for $10\gsim M_1/M_\odot\gsim4$).
969:
970: Superhumps (Uemura 2000), if they require $q<0.3$ and low to
971: intermediate inclinations (Haswell et al. 2000a), the absence of dips
972: or eclipses in the X-ray lightcurve, the lack of high frequency QPOs
973: (Revnivtsev et al. 2000) and the broad Ly$\alpha$ line (Haswell et
974: al. 2000b) all favor an intermediate inclination system containing a
975: BH. All of the arguments above are, however, rather uncertain and
976: model-dependent. { The assumptions made to interpret the
977: peak-to-peak velocity and He{\sc ii} emission probably underestimate
978: $K_2$. A larger $K_2$ would strengthen the case for a black hole
979: primary}.
980:
981: We conclude by emphasizing the similarities between XTE~J1118+480 and
982: the black hole LMXB GRO~J0422+32 in mini-outburst: both have orbital
983: periods of $\sim 4$ hours, stayed in the low/hard X-ray state during
984: outburst, had low X-ray luminosities, showed superhumps and had
985: identical optical spectra (including the absorption troughs). Scaling
986: the $V=19.5$ secondary of GRO~J0422+32 from $d\approx2.5$~kpc to the
987: distance of XTE~J1118+480 ($\approx 0.8$~kpc) gives $V=18.5$,
988: consistent with the reported 18.8 quiescent magnitude. The system
989: parameters for GRO~J0422+32 (taken from Chen et al. 1997) are also
990: within our allowed range for a coherent explanation of both the Balmer
991: line peak-to-peak velocity and the location of the He{\sc ii} emission
992: in XTE~J1118+480. Quiescent studies, which can constrain the spectral
993: type of the secondary and $K_2$, will shed more light on this
994: interesting object.
995:
996: \section*{Acknowledgments}
997:
998: The authors are grateful to Mike Garcia and Jeff McClintock for very
999: useful discussions, to Todd Tripp for sharing his knowledge of the
1000: APO Echelle spectrograph and to { Rob Hynes for a very useful
1001: referee report}. We are indebted to Ed Turner for granting us
1002: some of his Director's discretionary time at APO. Support for this work
1003: was provided by NASA through Chandra Postdoctoral Fellowship grant
1004: number PF9-10006 awarded by the Chandra X-ray Center, which is
1005: operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory for NASA under
1006: contract NAS8-39073. GD acknowledges support from the European
1007: Commission through the TMR network `Accretion on to Black Holes,
1008: Compact Stars and Protostars' (contract number ERBFMRX-CT98-0195) and
1009: from the Leids Kerkhoven-Bosscha Fonds. RSJK acknowledges support from
1010: NSF grant AST96-16901 and the Princeton University Research Board. PS
1011: acknowledges support from NASA grant NAG 5-7278.
1012:
1013: %\clearpage
1014:
1015: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1016: \bibitem[]{}Callanan, P. J., Garcia, M. R., McClintock, J. E., Zhao, P., Remillard, R. A., Bailyn, C. D., Orosz, J. A.; Harmon, B. A., Paciesas, W. S., 1995, ApJ, 441, 786
1017: \bibitem[]{}Casares, J., Charles, P. A., Marsh, T. R., 1995a, MNRAS, 277, L45
1018: \bibitem[]{}Casares, J., Marsh, T. R., Charles, P. A., et al., 1995b, MNRAS, 274, 565
1019: \bibitem[]{}Cardelli, J. A. \& Wallerstein, G., 1986, ApJ, 302, 492.
1020: \bibitem[]{}Chaty, S., Haswell, C. A., Smith, G. P., Smail, I., \& Hynes, R. I., 2000, IAU Circ.\ 7394
1021: \bibitem[]{}Chen, W., Shrader, C.R. \& Livio, M., 1997, ApJ, 491, 312.
1022: \bibitem[]{}Cohen, J.G., 1975, ApJ, 197, 117.
1023: \bibitem[]{}Cook, L., Patterson, J., Buczynski, D., \& Fried, R., 2000, IAU Circ.\ 7397
1024: \bibitem[]{}Dhawan, V., Pooley, G. G., Ogley, R. N., \& Mirabel, I. F., 2000, IAU Circ. 7395
1025: \bibitem[]{}la Dous, C., 1991, A\&A, 252, 100
1026: \bibitem[]{}la Dous, C., 1989, A\&A, 211, 131
1027: \bibitem[]{}Dubus, G., Lasota, J.-P., Hameury, J.-M., Charles, P. A., 1999, MNRAS, 303, 139
1028: \bibitem[]{}Esin, A.A. et al., 2000, preprint
1029: \bibitem[]{}Esin, A.A., McClintock, J. E., Narayan, R., 1997, ApJ, 489, 865
1030: \bibitem[]{}Esin, A.A., Narayan, R., Cui, W., Grove, J.E. \& Zhang, S.-N., 1998, ApJ, 505, 854
1031: \bibitem[]{}Frank, J., King, A. R., \& Raine, D. J. 1992, Accretion Power in Astrophysics, 2nd ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
1032: \bibitem[]{}Garcia, M., Brown, W., Pahre, M., McClintock, J., Callanan, P., \& Garnavich, P., 2000, IAU Circ.\ 7392
1033: \bibitem[]{}Fender, R. P., Hjellming, R. M., Tilanus, R. J., Pooley, G. G., Deane, J. R., Ogley, R. N., Spencer, R. E., 2000, MNRAS, submitted
1034: %\bibitem[]{}Harlaftis, E. T., Collier, S., Horne, K., Filippenko, A. V., 1999, A\&A, 341, 491
1035: \bibitem[]{}Harlaftis, E. T., Charles, P. A., Horne, K., 1997a, MNRAS, 285, 673
1036: \bibitem[]{}Harlaftis, E. T., Steeghs, D., Horne, K., Filippenko, A. V., 1997b, AJ, 114, 1170
1037: \bibitem[]{}Harlaftis, E. T., Horne, K., Filippenko, A. V., 1996, PASP, 108, 762
1038: \bibitem[]{}Haswell, C. A., King, A. R., Murray, J. R., Charles, P. A., 2000a, MNRAS, submitted (astro-ph/0008367)
1039: \bibitem[]{}Haswell, C. A., Hynes, R. I., \& King, A. R., 2000b, IAU Circ.\ 7407
1040: \bibitem[]{}Haswell, C. A., Skillman, D., Patterson, J., Hynes, R. I., \& Cui, W., 2000c, IAU Circ.\ 7427
1041: %\bibitem[]{}Horne, K., Saar, S.H, 1991, ApJ, 374, L55
1042: \bibitem[]{}Hummer, D. G., Storey, P. G., 1987, MNRAS, 224, 801
1043: \bibitem[]{}Hartmann, D. \& Burton, W.B., 1997, {\it Atlas of galactic neutral hydrogen} (Cambridge: CUP)
1044: \bibitem[]{}Hynes, R. I., Charles, P. A., Haswell, C. A., Casares, J., Zurita, C., 2000a, in {\em Proceedings of Astro-Tomography Workshop}, Brussels, July 2000, Eds. H. Boffin, D. Steeghs, Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Physics (astro-ph/0008145)
1045: \bibitem[]{}Hynes, R. I., Mauche, C. W., Haswell, C. A., Shrader, C. R., Cui, W. \& Chaty, S., 2000b, ApJL, 539, L37
1046: \bibitem[]{}Hynes, R. I., Haswell, C. A., Shrader, C. R., Chen, W., Horne, K., Harlaftis, E. T., O'Brien, K., Hellier, C., Fender, R. P., 1998, MNRAS, 300, 64
1047: \bibitem[]{}Ko, Y.-K., Kallman, T. R., 1994, ApJ, 431, 273
1048: \bibitem[]{}Kuulkers, E., 2000, A\&A, submitted
1049: \bibitem[]{}Lubow, S. H., Shu, F. H., 1975, ApJ, 198, 383
1050: \bibitem[]{}Mauche, C., Hynes, R., Charles, P. \& Haswell, C., 2000, IAUC 7401
1051: \bibitem[]{}Markoff, S., Falcke, H., Fender, R. P., ApJL, submitted (astro-ph/0010560)
1052: \bibitem[]{}Marsh T. R., 1998, in {\em Wild Stars In The Old West: Proceedings of the 13th North American Workshop on CVs and Related Objects}, ed. S. Howell, E. Kuulkers, C. Woodward, ASP Conf. Series, Vol. 137, p.236
1053: \bibitem[]{}Marsh, T. R., Horne, K., 1990, ApJ, 349, 593
1054: \bibitem[]{}Marsh, T. R., Horne, K., 1988, MNRAS, 235, 269
1055: \bibitem[]{}Marsh, T. R., Robinson, E. L., Wood, J. H., 1994, MNRAS, 266, 137
1056: \bibitem[]{}McClintock, J.E. et al., 2000, preprint
1057: \bibitem[]{}Merloni, A., Di Matteo, T. \& Fabian, A.C., 2000, MNRAS, submitted (astro-ph/0006139)
1058: \bibitem[]{}Motch, C., Pakull, M. W., 1989, A\&A, 214, L1
1059: \bibitem[]{}O'Donoghue, D., Charles, P. A., 1996, MNRAS, 282, 191
1060: \bibitem[]{}Papaloizou, J. C. B., Pringle, J. E., 1977, MNRAS, 181, 441
1061: \bibitem[]{}van Paradijs, J., McClintock, J. E., 1995, in X-ray Binaries, eds. W.H.G. Lewin, J. van Paradijs \& E.P.J. van den Heuvel, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 58.
1062: \bibitem[]{}van Paradijs, J., McClintock, J. E., 1994, A\&A, 290, 133
1063: \bibitem[]{}Patterson, J. 2000, IAU Circ., 7412
1064: \bibitem[]{}Patterson, J., Raymond, J.C., 1985, ApJ, 292, 550
1065: \bibitem[]{}Pooley, G. G., \& Waldram, E. M., 2000, IAU Circ., 7390
1066: \bibitem[]{}Remillard, R., Morgan, E., Smith, D., \& Smith, E., 2000, IAU Circ.\ 7389
1067: \bibitem[]{}Revnivtsev, M., Sunyaev, R., \& Borozdin, K., 2000, A\&A, submitted (astro-ph/0005212)
1068: \bibitem[]{}Sakhibullin, N. A., Suleimanov, V. F., Shimanskii, V. V., Suleimanova, S. L., 1998, AstL, 24, 22
1069: \bibitem[]{}Seaton, M. J., 1978, MNRAS, 185, 5P
1070: %\bibitem[]{SS1973}Shakura N. I. \& Sunyaev R. A., 1973, A\&A, 24, 337
1071: \bibitem[]{}Shrader, C.R., Wagner, R.M., Hjellming, R.M., Starrfield, S.G., 1996, A\&AS, 120, 261
1072: %\bibitem[]{S1997}Shrader, C. R., Wagner, R. M., Charles, P. A., Harlaftis, E. T., \& Naylor, T., 1997, ApJ, 487, 858
1073: %\bibitem[]{ST1980}Sunyaev, R. A. \& Titarchuk, L. G., 1980, A\&A, 86, 121
1074: \bibitem[]{}Sembachs, K.R. \& Danks, A.C., 1994, A\&A, 289, 539.
1075: \bibitem[]{}Smak, J., 1985, AcA, 35, 351
1076: \bibitem[]{}Smak, J., 1981, AcA, 31, 395
1077: \bibitem[]{}Soria, R., Wu, K., Hunstead, R. W., 2000, ApJ, in press
1078: \bibitem[]{}Spitzer, L., 1978, Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium (New York: John Wiley \& Sons)
1079: \bibitem[]{}Spruit, H.C., 1998, astro-ph/9806141
1080: \bibitem[]{}Szkody, P., Pich\'e, F., Feinswog, L., 1990, ApJSS, 73, 441
1081: \bibitem[]{}Tanaka, Y. \& Lewin W.H.G., 1995, in X-ray Binaries, eds. W.H.G. Lewin, J. van Paradijs \& E.P.J. van den Heuvel, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 126.
1082: \bibitem[]{}Tanaka, Y., Shibazaki, N., 1996, ARA\&A, 34, 607
1083: \bibitem[]{}Uemura, M., 2000, IAU Circ. 7418
1084: \bibitem[]{}Uemura, M., Kato, T., \& Yamaoka, H., 2000, IAU Circ.\ 7390
1085: \bibitem[]{}Uemura, M. et al., 2000, PASJ, in press (astro-ph/0004245)
1086: %\bibitem[]{}della Valle, M., Masetti, N., Bianchini, A., 1998, A\&A, 329, 606
1087: \bibitem[]{}Vallerga, J.V., Vedder, P.W., Craig, N.; \& Welsh, B.Y., 1993, ApJ, 411, 729
1088: \bibitem[]{}Wade, R. A., Hubeny, I., 1998, ApJ, 509, 350
1089: \bibitem[]{}Warner, B., 1995, Cataclysmic Variables, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
1090: \bibitem[]{}White, N. E., van Paradijs, J., 1996, ApJ, 473, L25
1091: \bibitem[]{}White, N. E., Nagase, F. \& Parmar, A. N., 1995, in X-ray Binaries, eds. W.H.G. Lewin, J. van Paradijs \& E.P.J. van den Heuvel, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 1.
1092: \bibitem[]{}Wilson, C. A. \& McCollough, M. L., 2000, IAU Circ.\ 7390
1093: \bibitem[]{}Wood, K. S. et al., 2000, ApJL, submitted (astro-ph/0006234)
1094: \bibitem[]{}Yamaoka, K., Ueda, Y., Dotani, T., Durouchoux, P. \& Rodriguez, J., 2000, IAU Circ. 7427
1095: \end{thebibliography}
1096: \clearpage
1097:
1098: \begin{table*}
1099: \caption{ SPECTROSCOPIC OBSERVATIONS OF XTE~J1118+480}
1100: \begin{center}
1101: \begin{tabular}{ccccc} \hline \hline
1102: \\
1103: Date (UT) & Epoch & Instrument & Wavelength coverage & Exposures \\
1104: & (HJD-2400000) & & (\AA) &\\
1105: \\
1106: \hline
1107: \\
1108: April 7, 2000 & 51641.7 & DIS lowres & 4000-9000& $2 \times 60$s\\
1109: & & Echelle & 3500-9800 & $2 \times 600$s + $12 \times 1200$s\\
1110: April 20, 2000 & 51654.9 & DIS hires & 4200-5000 / 5800-6800 & $26 \times 300$s \\
1111: April 23, 2000 & 51657.8 & DIS hires & 4200-5000 / 6200-7200 & $1 \times 300$s \\
1112: May 6, 2000 & 51670.8 & DIS hires & 4200-5000 / 6300-7300 & $1 \times 480$s \\
1113: May 12, 2000 & 51676.8 & DIS hires & 4200-5000 / 6300-7300 & $1 \times 300$s \\
1114: May 15, 2000 & 51679.7 & DIS hires & 4200-5000 / 6300-7300 & $1 \times 300$s \\
1115: May 28, 2000 & 51692.8 & DIS hires & 4200-5000 / 6300-7300 & $1 \times 300$s \\
1116: July 3, 2000 & 51728.7 & DIS hires & 4200-5000 / 6300-7300 & $1 \times 300$s \\
1117: July 4, 2000 & 51729.7 & DIS hires & 4350-5150 / 6050-7050 & $9 \times 300$s + $ 2 \times 600$s \\
1118: \\
1119: \hline
1120: \end{tabular}
1121: \label{tab:obs}
1122: \end{center}
1123: \end{table*}
1124:
1125: \begin{figure}
1126: \plotone{lightcurve.eps}
1127: \caption{RXTE ASM lightcurve of XTE~J1118+480, with dashed lines
1128: indicating the dates of our spectroscopic observations (see
1129: Tab.~\ref{tab:obs}). Data provided by the ASM/RXTE teams at MIT and at
1130: the RXTE SOF and GOF at NASA's GSFC.
1131: \label{fig:lightcurve}}
1132: \end{figure}
1133:
1134: \begin{figure}
1135: \plotone{lowres.eps}
1136: \caption{A representative spectrum of XTE~J1118+480 obtained by
1137: summing the two DIS {\em lowres} spectra of April 7, 2000. The spectrum,
1138: typical of an X-ray transient in outburst, is characterized by a blue
1139: power-law continuum and the presence of relatively weak double-peaked
1140: emission lines, such as H$\alpha$ and He{\sc ii}~$\lambda 4686$. The blank
1141: spectral region corresponds to wavelengths which are not efficiently
1142: covered by either the blue or the red side of the spectrograph. The
1143: unit for F$_\lambda$ is erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$~$\AA ^{-1}$.
1144: \label{fig:lowres}}
1145: \end{figure}
1146:
1147: \begin{figure}
1148: \plottwo{ha_ech.eps}{he_ech.eps}
1149: \caption{H$\alpha$ (left) and He{\sc ii} (right) profiles for the summed Echelle spectra of April 7. Overplotted are the low resolution spectra taken earlier on the same night. The Echelle spectrum were also binned to
1150: 0.50\AA/pix for H$\alpha$ and 0.35\AA/pix for He{\sc ii}.
1151: \label{fig:echha}}
1152: \end{figure}
1153:
1154: \begin{figure}
1155: \plottwo{longblue.eps}{longred.eps}
1156: \caption{Evolution of the line profiles over the 3-month period of
1157: observation. The location of H$\gamma~\lambda 4340.5$, He{\sc
1158: i}~$\lambda 4471.5$, the Bowen blend at $\sim~\lambda4638$, He{\sc
1159: ii}~$\lambda 4686.7$, H$\beta~\lambda 4861.3$, He{\sc i}~$\lambda
1160: 4921.9$, H$\alpha~\lambda 6562.8$ and He{\sc i}~$\lambda 6678.1$ are
1161: indicated by vertical dashed lines. The spectra are the { daily}
1162: sums of the DIS {\em hires} spectra except for the top one which is
1163: the sum of the two DIS {\em lowres} spectra obtained on April 7,
1164: 2000. The DIS {\em hires} spectra were further binned to reach a
1165: resolution comparable to that of the DIS {\em lowres} spectra. The
1166: vertical scale is identical for all spectra which were simply offset
1167: from each other. Note the two unidentified absorption features
1168: blueward of H$\alpha$.
1169: \label{fig:sumlines}}
1170: \end{figure}
1171:
1172: \begin{figure}
1173: \plottwo{bluea20.eps}{reda20.eps}
1174: \caption{Time-resolved spectroscopy of XTE~J1118+480 on April 20, 2000
1175: reveals the presence of an S-wave pattern in the He{\sc ii}~$\lambda
1176: 4686$ emission as well as in the Bowen blend, H$\beta$ and H$\gamma$\
1177: (dashed lines). The S-wave is less prominent in H$\alpha$. The 26
1178: spectra (which have been smoothed to enhance the features) have
1179: 5~minute exposures and the set covers a total of 2.9~hours. The S-wave
1180: pattern, which is moving from the red to the blue side of the
1181: double-peaked line, is consistent with the claimed photometric
1182: orbital period of 4.1~hr.\label{fig:swave}}
1183: \end{figure}
1184:
1185: \begin{table*}
1186: \caption{EMISSION LINES AND ABSORPTION TROUGHS IN XTE~J1118+480}
1187: \begin{center}
1188: \begin{tabular}{lcccc} \hline \hline
1189: \\
1190: Line & $\lambda_0$ (\AA) & $\lambda_{\rm obs}-\lambda_0$ (\AA) & EW (\AA) & FWHM (1000 km~s$^{-1}$)\\
1191: \\
1192: \hline
1193: \\
1194: H$\gamma$ & 4340.5 & -2$\pm$4 & -1.1$\pm$0.4 & 2.1$\pm$0.5\\
1195: & 4340.5 & 15$\pm$5 & 1.8$\pm$0.5 & 3.5$\pm$0.5\\
1196: He{\sc i} & 4471.5 & 1$\pm$5 & -0.3$\pm$0.2 & 1.9$\pm$0.6\\
1197: & 4471.5 & 4$\pm$5 & 0.7$\pm$0.4 & 4.0$\pm$0.8\\
1198: Bowen blend & 4638 & 8$\pm$10 & -0.5$\pm$0.3 & 2.0$\pm$1.1\\
1199: He{\sc ii} & 4686.7 & 0$\pm$3 & -1.5$\pm$0.4 & 2.3$\pm$0.4\\
1200: H$\beta$ & 4861.3 & -1$\pm$5 & -1.0$\pm$0.3 & 1.8$\pm$0.3\\
1201: & 4861.3 & 13$\pm$6 & 1.5$\pm$0.5 & 3.1$\pm$0.4\\
1202: He{\sc i} & 4921.9 & 2$\pm$5 & -0.2$\pm$0.2 & 1.4$\pm$0.6\\
1203: H$\alpha$ & 6562.8 & 0$\pm$2 & -1.9$\pm$0.4 & 1.8$\pm$0.4\\
1204: He{\sc i} & 6678.1 & -1$\pm$5 & -0.6$\pm$0.4 & 1.8$\pm$0.8\\
1205: \hline
1206: \end{tabular}
1207: \label{tab:lines}
1208: \end{center}
1209: NOTE. -- Negative equivalent widths indicate emission lines, while
1210: positive values correspond to absorption troughs. $\lambda_0$ is the
1211: rest wavelength and $\lambda_{\rm obs}$ is the central wavelength at
1212: which each feature is observed.
1213: \end{table*}
1214:
1215: \begin{figure}
1216: \plottwo{heplot4.eps}{haplot4.eps}
1217: \caption{Observed (unsmoothed data) and reconstructed trailed emission
1218: line profiles on April 20, 2000 of He{\sc ii} $\lambda4686$ (left) and
1219: H$\alpha$ (right). The corresponding Doppler maps are shown in
1220: Fig.~\ref{fig:map}. The assumed orbital period is 0.1708~day, the
1221: system has a null systemic velocity and the orbital phase is
1222: arbitrary. The velocity reference is the rest wavelength of the
1223: emission line. Note the clear S-wave in the He{\sc ii} emission
1224: profile. { The data are shown twice for clarity.}\label{fig:prof}}
1225: \end{figure}
1226: \begin{figure}
1227: \plottwo{heplot3.eps}{haplot3.eps}
1228: \caption{Reconstructed projected velocity maps (in km~s$^{-1}$) for
1229: the He{\sc ii} (left) and H$\alpha$ (right) emission during the April
1230: 20 observation (see Fig.~\ref{fig:prof}). Also shown are the location
1231: of the binary components (crosses), the trajectory of the accretion
1232: stream from the secondary and corresponding Keplerian velocity for
1233: $q=0.05$ and $K_2=420$~km~s$^{-1}$. For this particular choice of
1234: parameters, and for an appropriate orbital reference phase, the
1235: emission region in the lower-left quadrant is associated with
1236: stream-disk interaction (the hotspot).\label{fig:map}}
1237: \end{figure}
1238:
1239: \begin{figure}
1240: \plottwo{constraints1.eps}{constraints2.eps}
1241: \caption{Left: Estimates of $K_2(q)$. The solid line was obtained by
1242: assuming that the peak-to-peak velocity of the H$\alpha$ line
1243: represents the velocity of the outer radius $R_{\rm d}$ of a Keplerian
1244: disk, with $R_{\rm d}(q)$ given by theoretical arguments on disk
1245: truncation. The dashed line was obtained by forcing the ballistic gas
1246: stream trajectory and its corresponding Keplerian velocity to
1247: intersect at the location of the He{\sc ii} emission region in the
1248: Doppler map (Fig.~\ref{fig:map}). Given the (large) uncertainties
1249: involved, we consider the agreement acceptable for $0.02\lsim q \lsim
1250: 0.1$. Right: Estimate of the inclination $i$ as a function of the
1251: primary mass $M_1$. Given $K_2$ and $q$, $i(M_1)$ is obtained from the
1252: mass function (Eq.~\ref{eq:fm}). The two curves correspond to the
1253: extreme values of $q$ and $K_2$ derived from the left panel ($a$ for
1254: $q=0.02$ and $K_2=500$~km~s$^{-1}$; $b$ for $q=0.1$ and
1255: $K_2=350$~km~s$^{-1}$). Values in between the two curves are
1256: acceptable within our assumptions. The high inclinations required for
1257: small values of $M_1$ (in solar masses) are necessary to explain the
1258: high peak-to-peak velocity (hence outer disk velocity) in the data.
1259: \label{fig:cons1}}
1260: \end{figure}
1261:
1262: \begin{figure}
1263: \plottwo{newca2.eps}{blank.eps}
1264: \caption{Echelle spectroscopy of XTE~J1118+480 reveals three narrow
1265: interstellar Ca{\sc ii}~$\lambda 3933.6$ absorption lines (seen also
1266: in Ca{\sc ii}~$\lambda 3968$ and Na{\sc i}~$\lambda\lambda
1267: 5889,5895$). The total equivalent widths are $0.108 \pm 0.009 \AA$ for
1268: the Ca{\sc ii}~$\lambda 3933$ lines and $0.061 \pm 0.008 \AA$ for the
1269: Ca{\sc ii}~$\lambda 3968$ lines. All the absorption features shown in
1270: the four panels above (summed Echelle spectra) are fully consistent
1271: with each other, in width and velocity (note the Na{\sc i} sky
1272: emission at rest wavelength). In each panel, the data are shown as an
1273: histogram, the solid line shows a fit to the absorption lines and the
1274: dotted line a fit to the continuum. The three Ca{\sc ii} lines can be
1275: used to constrain the low hydrogen absorption column and distance to
1276: the source (see text for details).
1277: \label{fig:ca2}}
1278: \end{figure}
1279:
1280: \end{document}
1281:
1282:
1283:
1284:
1285:
1286:
1287: