1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: % New mechanism for the generation of primordial seeds
4: % for the cosmic magnetic fields
5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
6: %\documentstyle[eqsecnum,prd,aps,floats,twocolumn,epsfig]{revtex}
7: \documentstyle[prd,aps,floats,epsfig]{revtex}
8: %\documentstyle[prl,aps,floats,twocolumn,epsfig]{revtex}
9: %\documentstyle[prl,aps,floats,twocolumn,epsf]{revtex}
10: %\documentstyle[preprint,aps,floats,tighten]{revtex}
11: % \documentstyle[preprint,aps]{revtex}
12: %\documentstyle[aps,prl,floats]{revtex}
13:
14: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
15: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
16: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
17: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
18:
19: %minore o circa uguale
20: \def\laq{~\raise 0.4ex\hbox{$<$}\kern -0.8em\lower 0.62
21: ex\hbox{$\sim$}~}
22: %maggiore o circa uguale
23: \def\gaq{~\raise 0.4ex\hbox{$>$}\kern -0.7em\lower 0.62
24: ex\hbox{$\sim$}~}
25:
26: \def \pa {\partial}
27: \def \ra {\rightarrow}
28: \def \la {\lambda}
29: \def \La {\Lambda}
30: \def \Da {\Delta}
31: \def \b {\beta}
32: \def \a {\alpha}
33: \def \ap {\alpha^{\prime}}
34: \def \Ga {\Gamma}
35: \def \ga {\gamma}
36: \def \sg {\sigma}
37: \def \da {\delta}
38: \def \ep {\epsilon}
39: \def \r {\rho}
40: \def \om {\omega}
41: \def \Om {\Omega}
42: \def \noi {\noindent}
43: \def \ti {\tilde}
44:
45: \def \fp {\dot{\phi}}
46: \def \fpp {\ddot{\phi}}
47: \def \tH {\tilde H}
48: \def \tr {\tilde \rho}
49: \def \tp {\tilde p}
50: \def \tf {\tilde \phi}
51: \def \tV {\tilde V}
52:
53: \begin{document}
54:
55: %%%%%%%start PREPRINT page %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
56: \def\baselinestretch{1.4}
57:
58: {\large
59: \begin{flushright}
60: BA-TH/00-389\\
61: July 2000\\
62: astro-ph/0009476
63: \end{flushright}
64: }
65:
66: \vspace*{0.3truein}
67:
68: \vskip 1.3 cm
69: {\Large\bf\centering\ignorespaces
70: New mechanism for the generation of primordial seeds\\
71: for the cosmic magnetic fields
72: \vskip2.5pt}
73: {\dimen0=-\prevdepth \advance\dimen0 by23pt
74: \nointerlineskip \rm\centering
75: \vrule height\dimen0 width0pt\relax\ignorespaces
76:
77: \vskip 1 cm
78: {\large M. Gasperini}
79: \par}
80: {\large\it\centering\ignorespaces
81: Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a di Bari, \\
82: Via G. Amendola 173, 70126 Bari, Italy\\
83: and \\
84: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari,
85: Bari, Italy \\
86: \par}
87: %{\small\rm\centering(\ignorespaces May 1998\unskip)\par}
88:
89: \par
90: \bgroup
91: \leftskip=0.10753\textwidth \rightskip\leftskip
92: \dimen0=-\prevdepth \advance\dimen0 by17.5pt \nointerlineskip
93: \small\vrule width 0pt height\dimen0 \relax
94:
95: \vskip 1.5 cm
96: \centerline{\Large Abstract}
97: \vskip 0.5 cm
98: \noi
99: {\large
100: We discuss the inflationary production of magnetic seeds for the
101: galactic dynamo through the photon-graviphoton mixing, typical of
102: extended models of local supersymmetry. An analysis of the allowed
103: region in parameter space shows that such a mechanism is compatible
104: with existing phenomenological bounds on the vector mass and mixing
105: parameter, but requires a large enough mixing that seems difficult
106: to implement naturally in the context of a minimal supersymmetric
107: scenario.
108: }
109:
110: \par\egroup
111:
112: {\large
113: \vspace{0.8cm}
114: \begin{center}
115: ------------------------------
116:
117: \vspace{0.5cm}
118: To appear in {\bf Phys. Rev. D}
119: \end{center}
120: }
121:
122: \vfill
123:
124: %%%%%%%%%%end PREPRINT page%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
125:
126: \def\baselinestretch{1}
127: \newpage
128: \setcounter{page}{1}
129:
130:
131: \par
132: \begingroup
133: \twocolumn[%
134:
135: \begin{flushright}
136: BA-TH/00-389\\
137: astro-ph/0009476\\
138: To appear in {\bf Phys. Rev. D}
139: \end{flushright}
140: \bigskip
141:
142: {\large\bf\centering\ignorespaces
143: New mechanism for the generation of primordial seeds\\
144: for the cosmic magnetic fields
145: \vskip2.5pt}
146: {\dimen0=-\prevdepth \advance\dimen0 by23pt
147: \nointerlineskip \rm\centering
148: \vrule height\dimen0 width0pt\relax\ignorespaces
149: M. Gasperini
150: \par}
151: {\small\it\centering\ignorespaces
152: Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a di Bari,
153: Via G. Amendola 173, 70126 Bari, Italy\\
154: and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, Bari,
155: Italy
156: \par}
157: %{\small\rm\centering(\ignorespaces July 2000\unskip)\par}
158:
159: \par
160: \bgroup
161: \leftskip=0.10753\textwidth \rightskip\leftskip
162: \dimen0=-\prevdepth \advance\dimen0 by17.5pt
163: \nointerlineskip
164: \small\vrule width 0pt height\dimen0 \relax
165:
166: We discuss the inflationary production of magnetic seeds for the
167: galactic dynamo through the photon-graviphoton mixing, typical of
168: extended models of local supersymmetry. An analysis of the allowed
169: region in parameter space shows that such a mechanism is compatible
170: with existing phenomenological bounds on the vector mass and mixing
171: parameter, but requires a large enough mixing that seems difficult
172: to implement naturally in the context of a minimal supersymmetric
173: scenario.
174:
175: \par\egroup
176: \vskip2pc]
177: \thispagestyle{plain}
178: \endgroup
179:
180: The parametric amplification of the vacuum fluctuations \cite{1},
181: induced by inflation, is one of the most appealing mechanisms \cite{2}
182: for the spontaneous generation of the large-scale magnetic fields
183: required to seed the galactic dynamo, or the galactic magnetic field
184: itself \cite{3}. Unfortunately, the minimal coupling of photons to a
185: four-dimensional geometry is conformally invariant: in that case, the
186: electromagnetic fluctuations are unaffected by the time evolution of a
187: conformally flat metric (typical of the inflationary scenario) and then,
188: in particular, cannot be amplified.
189:
190: Up to now, known attempts to generate large enough magnetic seeds
191: from the vacuum try to break conformal invariance either at the
192: classical level, through some {\sl ad-hoc} nonminimal coupling of
193: photons to the background curvature \cite{2}, or at the quantum leel,
194: though the so-called ``trace-anomaly" \cite{4} (or even through a
195: spontaneous breaking of Lorentz invariance \cite{4a}).
196: Alternatively, it is possible to exploit the nonminimal coupling of
197: photons to a scalar field, the inflaton \cite{5} or the dilaton \cite{6},
198: which cannot be eliminated by a conformal rescaling of the metric, and
199: which plays the role of the external ``pump field" amplifying the
200: electromagnetic fluctuations. The coupling to a dynamical dilaton, in
201: particular, is naturally provided by superstring theory, and may act
202: efficiently in the context of the pre-big bang scenario \cite{6}.
203:
204: The physical origin of the conformal invariance, which prevents the
205: inflationary amplification of minimally coupled electromagnetic
206: fluctuations, is the unbroken gauge symmetry of the Maxwell action,
207: leading to massless photons. Even if massless, however, the photon
208: field $A_\mu$ could be non-trivially mixed with the massive vector
209: component $V_\mu$ of the gravitational supermultiplet -- the
210: so-called ``graviphoton" -- according to the effective action:
211: \bea
212: &&
213: S = \int {d^4x\over 8\pi}\sqrt{-g}~(-{1\over 2}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}
214: -{1\over 2}G_{\mu\nu}G^{\mu\nu} \nonumber\\
215: &&
216: ~~~~~~~+\a F_{\mu\nu}G^{\mu\nu}+m^2
217: V_\mu V^\mu),
218: \label{1}
219: \eea
220: where $F_{\mu\nu}= 2\pa_{[\mu }A_{\nu]}$, $G_{\mu\nu}= 2\pa_{[\mu
221: }V_{\nu]}$. Such a gauge-invariant mixing, parametrized by the
222: dimensionless coefficient $\a$ ($|\a|<1$ to avoid unphysical states in
223: the mass spectrum), is indeed required by local supersymmetry in $N=2$
224: extended models for the graviphoton \cite{7}, and may also arise
225: naturally in the context of higher-dimensional gauge interactions
226: \cite{8}. The above action also describes, formally, the effective mixing
227: of photons and paraphotons \cite{9}, and is phenomenologically
228: equivalent to a particular case of the two-photon electrodynamics
229: earlier studied by Okun \cite{10}.
230:
231: The mass of the $V_\mu$ field breaks the conformal invariance of the
232: action and makes possible, in principle, the inflationary amplification of
233: vector fluctuations. We note, for future reference, that in the
234: context of supersymmetric models the vector mass $m$ is typically of
235: the order of the gravitino mass \cite{7}, and thus expected to be fixed
236: by SUSY breaking mechanisms at the natural scale \cite{7a} $m \sim 1$
237: TeV (see however \cite{7b} for the compatibility of smaller masses with
238: realistic models of supersymmetry breaking). In the context of
239: higher-dimensional models, on the contrary, the vector mass can be
240: much lighter \cite{8a}, so as to match the (phenomenologically
241: interesting) macroscopic range $1$ m -- $1$ Km, provided new
242: supersmall mass scales are introduced \cite{8}. Also, in supersymmetric
243: models the mixing with the photon is expected to be strongly
244: suppressed by the fundamental (quark or lepton) mass scale $M$
245: expressed in Planck units \cite{7}, so that one obtains, typically, a very
246: small mixing parameter, $\alpha \sim M/M_p \sim 10^{-20}$. The mixing
247: can be much larger, however, in a higher -dimensional context \cite{8},
248: if the vector mass is fixed (for instance) around the weak interaction
249: scale.
250:
251: Quite irrespective of the physical (supersymmetric and/or
252: higher-dimensional) origin of the mixing, and of the particular
253: mechanism of mass generation for the graviphoton, the aim of this
254: paper is to discuss whether, for phenomenologically allowed values of
255: $\a$ and $m$, the fluctuations of the massive vector can be efficiently
256: amplified (because of the mass) by inflation, and efficiently converted
257: (through the mixing) into electromagnetic fluctuations, strong enough
258: to seed the cosmic magnetic fields observed on (inter)galactic scale. It
259: should be recalled, to this purpose, that if we identify $V_\mu$ with
260: the so-called ``fifth-force" vector boson \cite{11}, coupled to baryon
261: number, then the strength of the mixing is significantly constrained by
262: geomagnetic data and by Cavendish's tests of Coulomb's law in
263: the geophysical mass range \cite{12}, and by pion and kaon decays in
264: the nuclear mass range \cite{13}. Independently from the
265: possible sources of $V_\mu$, the mixing is also
266: constrained by the induced photon-graviphoton oscillations in a
267: dielectric \cite{14}, and by changes of electromagnetic polarization due
268: to a possible anomalous magnetic moment of the massive vector
269: \cite{15}.
270:
271: In order to discuss the cosmological amplification of the vacuum
272: fluctuations, in a conformally flat metric $g_{\mu\nu}$, it is convenient
273: to use the conformal time $\eta$ by setting $g_{\mu\nu}= a^2(\eta)
274: \eta_{\mu\nu}$, and to impose the gauge conditions $\pa_\mu
275: A^\mu=0=\pa_\mu V^\mu$. The action (\ref{1}) then becomes, after
276: integration by part,
277: \bea
278: &&\qquad
279: S= \int {d^3x d\eta\over 8\pi}\Bigg[A_\mu \Box A^\mu+ V_\mu \Box
280: V^\mu
281: \nonumber\\
282: &&\qquad
283: - 2\a A_\mu \Box V^\mu + m^2 a^2(\eta) V_\mu V^\mu\Bigg],
284: \label{2}
285: \eea
286: where the vector indices are now raised and lowered with the
287: Minkowski metric $\eta_{\mu\nu}$, and $\Box \equiv \pa^2_\eta -
288: \nabla^2$ is the flat-space Dalembertian in the conformal time gauge.
289: In this gauge, the coupling to the background geometry only survives
290: in the mass term, through the scale factor $a(\eta)$.
291:
292: The above action describes the vector mixing of a non-orthogonal
293: combination of the two mass eigenstates, $\psi_\mu, \phi_\mu$,
294: coupled to a time-dependent external field, $a(\eta)$. By setting
295: \beq
296: \pmatrix{A^\mu \cr V^\mu \cr}= \pmatrix{1 & \a \cr 0 & 1 \cr}
297: \pmatrix{\psi^\mu \cr \phi^\mu \cr}
298: \label{3}
299: \eeq
300: the action takes indeed the diagonal form
301: \beq
302: S= \int {d^3x d\eta\over 8\pi}\Bigg[\psi_\mu \Box \psi^\mu
303: +(1-\a^2) \phi_\mu \left(\Box +{m^2 a^2\over 1- \a^2}\right) \phi^\mu
304: \Bigg],
305: \label{4}
306: \eeq
307: and leads to the evolution equations
308: \bea
309: &&
310: \left(\psi^\mu_k\right)'' + k^2 \psi^\mu_k=0, \\
311: &&
312: \left(\phi^\mu_k\right)'' + \left(k^2 +{m^2 a^2 \over 1-\a^2} \right)
313: \phi^\mu_k=0.
314: \label{6}
315: \eea
316: Here the prime denotes differentiation with respect to $\eta$, and we
317: have expanded the fields into Fourier modes, $\nabla^2 \psi_k = -k^2
318: \psi_k$. Given an initial vacuum fluctuation spectrum, $\da
319: \psi_k^\mu$, $\da \phi_k^\mu$, the massless fluctuations evolve freely,
320: unaffected by the background geometry, and only the massive
321: components, with effective mass $ \overline m = m/\sqrt{1-\a^2}$, are
322: amplified. After the amplification we can thus set $\da \psi^\mu_k=0$,
323: and the spectrum of the electromagnetic fluctuations, induced by the
324: mixing of eq. (\ref{3}), turns out to be proportional to the massive
325: vector spectrum, $\da A^\mu_k= \a \da \phi^\mu_k$. The spectral
326: energy densities, $ \rho(k)= d \rho /d \ln k$, are quadratic in the fields,
327: and are thus related by:
328: \beq
329: \r_A(k) = \a^2 \r_\phi(k)= \a^2 \r_V(k).
330: \label{7}
331: \eeq
332:
333: For a first, indicative estimate of the possibility of seed production we
334: shall now compute the massive vector spectrum $\r_\phi(k)$, following
335: the standard methods of cosmological perturbation theory \cite{16},
336: and assuming a ``minimal" model of cosmological evolution in which
337: the standard radiation era, starting at $\eta=\eta_1$, is preceeded in
338: time by a phase of exponentially expanding, de Sitter-like inflation
339: (there is no need of considering also the transition to the
340: matter-dominated epoch since, for our purpose, it will be enough to
341: evaluate the spectrum at the intergalactic scale $k/a\sim (1 {\rm
342: Mpc})^{-1}\sim 10^{-14}$Hz, which re-enters the horizon before the
343: matter-radiation equilibrium). Thus we set $ a(\eta) = -
344: (H_1\eta)^{-1}$ for $\eta \ll \eta_1$, and $ a \sim \eta$ for $\eta \gg
345: \eta_1$. Our final electromagnetic spectrum will be characterized by
346: three free parameters: the graviphoton mass $m$, the mixing
347: coefficient $\a$, and the inflation scale $H_1$.
348:
349: In the initial inflationary phase eq. (\ref{6}), for each physical
350: polarization modes $\phi_k$, in our case reduces to
351: \beq
352: \phi_k'' +\left(k^2 +{\overline m^2\over H_1^2 \eta^2}\right)\phi_k =0,
353: ~~~~~~~ \overline m = {m\over \sqrt{1-\a^2}},
354: \label{8a}
355: \eeq
356: and the solution, normalized at $\eta \ra -\infty$ to a vacuum
357: fluctuation spectrum \cite{16}, can be written in terms of the
358: second kind Hankel functions \cite{17} as
359: \beq
360: \phi_k(\eta)= |\eta|^{1/2}H_\nu^{(2)} (|k\eta|),
361: ~~ \nu = {1\over 2}\left(1-4{\overline m^2\over
362: H_1^2}\right)^{1\over 2}, ~\eta <\eta_1.
363: \label{8}
364: \eeq
365: We are interested in modes which are non-relativistic ($k<\overline m
366: a$) already at the transition epoch $\eta_1$, since for higher modes
367: the mass term can be neglected in eq. (\ref{6}), and there is no
368: significant amplification throughout the whole inflationary epoch. Such
369: modes are defined by the condition $k<k_M$, where $k_M=\overline m
370: a_1 =(\overline m /H_1)k_1$, and $k_1 = |\eta|^{-1}$ is the limiting
371: mode crossing the horizon just at $\eta=\eta_1$. We shall assume that
372: the graviphoton mass is much smaller than the inflation scale
373: (we have in mind, typically, $\overline m \simeq m \sim 1$ TeV), so that
374: $k_M/k_1 = (\overline m/H_1) \ll1$.
375:
376: In the subsequent radiation era the mass term $ma(\eta)$ grows linearly
377: in conformal time, and then dominates always better the evolution
378: equation for all non-relativistic modes $k<k_M$. For such modes we can
379: thus approximate eq. (\ref{6}), in the radiation era, by
380: \beq
381: \phi_k''+\b^2 \eta^2 \phi_k=0, ~~~~ \b=\overline m H_1 a_1^2, ~~~~
382: k<k_M,
383: \label{9}
384: \eeq
385: and the general solution can be written in terms of the Hankel
386: functions as
387: \bea
388: &&
389: \phi_k(\eta)= \eta^{1/2}\left[c_+(k)H_{1/4}^{(2)}
390: \left(\b\eta^2\over 2\right)+c_-(k)H_{1/4}^{(1)} \left(\b\eta^2\over
391: 2\right)\right], \nonumber \\
392: &&
393: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~k<k_M, ~~~~~~~~\eta >\eta_1.
394: \label{10}
395: \eea
396: Here $c_\pm(k)$ are the so-called Bogoliubov coefficients \cite{16},
397: determining the spectral number distribution of the pair of vector
398: particles produced from the vacuum. They can be computed by matching
399: the two solutions (\ref{8}) and (\ref{10}) and their first derivative at
400: $\eta=\eta_1$. Such a matching can be easily performed by exploiting
401: the small argument limit of the Hankel functions (since
402: $|k\eta_1|<k_M/k_1=\overline m/H_1=\b \eta_1^2 \ll1$), and leads to
403: \beq
404: |c_-(k)|\simeq |c_+(k)| \simeq \left(k\over
405: k_1\right)^{-\nu}\left(H_1\over \overline m\right)^{1/4}, ~~~k <k_M
406: \label{11}
407: \eeq
408: (here and throughout we will neglect numerical factors of order unit,
409: as we are primarly interested in an order of magnitude estimate of
410: seed production). We may note that $|c_\pm (k)|\gg1$, signalling the
411: effective entry of non-relativistic modes into the parametric
412: amplification regime.
413:
414: The spectral energy distribution of the non-relativistic vector
415: fluctuations, amplified by inflation, can now be conveniently expressed
416: in terms of the proper wave-number $p=k/a$, and referred to the total
417: critical energy density $\r_c=3M_P^2H^2/8\pi$ ($M_P$ is the Planck
418: mass) as
419: \bea
420: &&
421: \Om_\phi(p,t) \equiv {p\over \r_c}{d\r_\phi\over dp}\simeq
422: {\overline m p^3 |c_-(p)|^2\over M_P^2H^2}\simeq \nonumber\\
423: &&
424: \left(H_1\over M_P\right)^2 \left(\overline m \over
425: H_1\right)^{1\over 2} \left(H_1\over H\right)^2
426: \left(a_1\over a\right)^3 \left(p\over p_1\right)^2,
427: ~p<p_M,
428: \label{12}
429: \eea
430: where we have set $\nu=1/2$ from eq. (\ref{8}),
431: working in the assumption $\overline m/H_1 \ll1$. Here $p_M=
432: (\overline m/H_1 )p_1$, and $p_1=k_1/a_1=H_1a_1/a$ is the proper
433: momentum scale crossing the horizon at the end of inflation (today
434: $p_1(t_0)\simeq (H_1/M_P)^{1/2} 10^{11}$ Hz). During the
435: matter-dominated era, the above spectrum keeps frozen at the
436: value reached at the time of equilibrium,
437: $\Om_\phi(t_0)=\Om_\phi(t_{\rm eq})$. On the other hand, using
438: the kinematics of the radiation era, $(H_1/H_{\rm eq})^2(a_1/a_{\rm
439: eq})^3$=$(H_1/H_{\rm eq})^{1/2}$. The final energy spectrum of the
440: electromagnetic fluctuations, obtained from the vacuum through the
441: photon-graviphoton mixing, can be finally estimated from eqs. (\ref{7})
442: and (\ref{12}) as follows:
443: \beq
444: \Om_A(p,t_0) \simeq \a^2 \left(H_1\over M_P\right)^2
445: \left(\overline m \over H_{\rm eq}\right)^{1\over 2} \left(p\over
446: p_1\right)^2, ~p<p_M.
447: \label{13}
448: \eeq
449: As anticipated, it only depends on the three parameters $\a,m$ and
450: $H_1$ ($H_{\rm eq}\sim 10^{-55}M_P$ is the known value of the
451: curvature scale at the equilibrium epoch).
452:
453: In order to seed the galactic dynamo \cite{2} we must now require that
454: the above electromagnetic spectrum extends in frequency to include at
455: least the intergalactic scale $P_G(t_0)= (1 {\rm Mpc})^{-1}\simeq
456: 10^{-14}$ Hz, namely
457: \beq
458: p_M=p_1(\overline m/H_1) \gaq p_G.
459: \label{14}
460: \eeq
461: In addition, the fraction $r$ of seed energy density stored in the mode
462: $p_G$, relative to the CMBR energy density, $\Om_{\rm CMB}$, at the
463: epoch of galaxy formation, when $a_{\rm gal} \sim 10^{-2}a_0$, must
464: satisfy the (conservative) condition \cite{2}
465: \beq
466: r=\Om_A(p_G,t_{\rm gal})/\Om_{\rm CMB}(t_{\rm gal}) \gaq 10^{-34},
467: \label{15}
468: \eeq
469: in order that the produced magnetic fields may be large enough to seed
470: the galactic dynamo. Finally, the graviphoton mass cannot be
471: arbitrarily large, as the perturbation spectrum, integrated over all
472: modes, has to be at least smaller than one to avoid overcritical density,
473: and to avoid a Universe overdominated by the fluctuations of a massive
474: non-relativistic vector. This requires
475: \beq
476: \int_0^{p_M} d \ln \Om_\phi(p,t_0) \laq 1,
477: \label{16}
478: \eeq
479: where $\Om_\phi = \Om_A/\a^2$.
480:
481: An explicit computation shows that the lower bound on $m$
482: from eq. (\ref{14}) is always weaker than from eq. (\ref{15}), provided
483: we limit to ``realistic" values of the inflation scale, $H_1 \laq
484: 10^{-1}M_P$. Assuming that this is indeed the case, we are left with
485: the conditions (\ref{15}) and (\ref{16}) which, by referring the mass
486: to the physically interesting TeV scale, can be written explicitly as
487: \beq
488: 10^{-11}{(1-\a^2)^{1\over 2}\over \a^4} \left(M_P\over H_1\right)^2
489: \laq
490: \left(m\over 1 {\rm TeV}\right)\laq 10^5 (1-\a^2)^{1\over 2}.
491: \label{17}
492: \eeq
493: The above bounds are illustrated in Fig. 1 for three different values of
494: the inflation scale. The allowed region lies below the curve of critical
495: density, and above the lines of seed magnetic energy. The allowed
496: windows close completely for $\log \a \laq -3.5$ and, in the limit $\a \ra
497: 1$, for $H_1 \laq 10^{-8}M_P$. The standard inflation scale $H_1 \sim
498: 10^{-5}M_P$ is not excluded, but the allowed region is larger for higher
499: scales.
500:
501: We may note, to this purpose, that de Sitter inflation at a nearly
502: Planckian scale is not necessarily ruled out by graviton production,
503: provided it is preceeded by a phase of superinflationary expansion
504: \cite{18}. In addition, the presence of such a superinflationary phase
505: leaves unchanged the constraints obtained with our previous analysis,
506: if the de Sitter epoch is long enough to amplify the galactic scale $p_G$,
507: which is the relevant scale in the context of seed production. This may
508: occur even for $H_1 \sim 0.1 M_P$ without clashing with obervational
509: data\cite{19,20}, provided -- as can be easily checked using the results
510: of \cite{18} -- $p_G (0.1 M_P/\overline m) \gaq 10^{-7}$Hz, i.e.
511: provided $(m/1 {\rm TeV})\laq 10^8 (1-\a^2)^{1/2}$, which is always
512: automatically satisfied because of (\ref{17}).
513:
514: The vector masses allowed by the cosmological bounds (\ref{17}) thus
515: range from $10^5$ TeV for $\a \ll1$, to the KeV scale for $\a \sim1$ and
516: $H_1\ra 0.1M_P$ (smaller masses are not forbidden by eq. (\ref{17}),
517: but would require a fine-tuning of $\a$ to $1$). It becomes crucial, at
518: this point, to include in the discussion all existing experimental bounds
519: on the mixing parameter $\a$, for such a range of masses.
520:
521: \begin{figure}[t]
522: \begin{center}
523: \mbox{\epsfig{file=f1gravi.ps,width=82mm}}
524: \vskip 5mm
525: \caption{\sl Allowed region for the inflationary production of magnetic
526: seeds, in the parameter space of the photon-graviphoton mixing. The
527: allowed region is below the bold curve (critical density), above
528: and to the right of the thin lines (seed magnetic energy, plotted for
529: different $H_1$), and above the $200$ Mev dashed line (determined by
530: the anomalous contribution to the $(g-2)/2$ ratio of the muon, by the
531: Lamb shift, and by other particle physics effects not shown in the
532: picture).} \end{center}
533: \end{figure}
534:
535: Known bounds, at present, are mainly referred to a graviphoton
536: interpretation of $V_\mu$ as the ``fifth-force" vector, coupled to
537: baryon number with gravitational strength. In that case, the mixing is
538: constrained on a macroscopic scale by geo-electric and geo-magnetic
539: data \cite{12}, leading to the condition $(m/1 {\rm TeV})\gaq 10^{-18}
540: \a (1-\a^2)^{-1/2}$, which is weaker, however, than the lower bound of
541: eq. (\ref{17}) (except in the limit $\a \ra 1$, where it forbids arbitrarily
542: small values of the vector mass). A much stronger bound on $\a$ would
543: follow \cite{12} from Cavendish's tests of Coulomb's law \cite{21}, but
544: it only applies when the graviphoton interaction is active on a
545: macroscopic range ($\la \gaq 1$ cm, i.e. $m \laq 10^{-4}$eV), and
546: then outside the mass range of Fig. 1.
547:
548: From $10^{-4}$ eV to $280$ MeV there are, however, important bounds
549: on the mixing obtained from nuclear physics \cite{13}. In particular: $\a
550: \laq 10^{-6}$ for $m=1.8$ MeV (from beam-dump experiments); $\a
551: \laq 10^{-4}$ for $m\leq 1$ MeV (from the Lamb shift in hydrogen
552: atoms); $\a
553: \laq 10^{-3}$ up to $m=100$ MeV, and $\a
554: \laq 10^{-2.5}$ for $m=200$ MeV (from the anomalous magnetic
555: moment of the muon). According to these bounds, all masses smaller
556: than $200$ Mev are associated to a mixing parameter $\a$ too small to
557: be compatible with the constraints (\ref{17}), and are thus to be
558: excluded from the allowed region of parameter space (see Fig.1, where
559: we have only reported the most significant bounds).
560:
561: Summing up the above results, we may conclude that the mixing of the
562: photon with a massive vector, gravitationally coupled to matter, can
563: provide, in principle, an efficient mechanism for the inflationary
564: generation of magnetic seeds for the galactic dynamo. A first estimate
565: of the allowed region in parameter space shows that such a mechanism
566: may be effective for a quite large mass window, $200$ MeV -- $10^5$
567: Tev. Higher inflation scales (typical, for instance, of string cosmology
568: \cite{6}) seem to be favoured, but also the standard inflation scale
569: $H_1 \sim 10^{-5}M_P$ is not excluded. The allowed mass window, in
570: particular, is well compatible with all conservative theoretical
571: estimates. The required mixing parameter, on the contrary, is
572: constrained by the severe bound $\log \a \gaq -3.5$, which is hardly
573: compatible with the most natural expectations based on extended
574: supersymmetric models, but not excluded in the context of
575: higher-dimensional unification schemes.
576:
577:
578: \acknowledgments
579: It is a pleasure to thank Massimo Giovannini and Gabriele Veneziano for
580: helpful discussions.
581:
582:
583: \begin{references}
584: \newcommand{\bb}{\bibitem}
585:
586: \bibitem{1}
587: L. P. Grishchuk, Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 40}, 409 (1975);
588: A. A. Starobinski, JETP Lett. {\bf 30}, 682 (1979).
589:
590: \bibitem{2}M. S. Turner and L. M. Widrow, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 37},
591: 2743 (1988).
592:
593: \bibitem{3}E. N. Parker, {\em Cosmical magnetiuc fields} (Clarendon,
594: Oxford, 1979); Y. B. Zeldovich, A. A. Ruzmaikin and D. D. Sokoloff, {\em
595: Magnetic fields in astrophysics} (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1983).
596:
597: \bibitem{4}A. D. Dolgov, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 48}, 2499 (1993).
598:
599: \bb{4a}O. Bertolami and D. F. Mota, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 455}, 96 (1999).
600:
601: \bibitem{5}B. Ratra, Astrophys. J. Lett. {\bf 391}, L1 (1992).
602:
603: \bibitem{6}M. Gasperini, M. Giovanini and G. Veneziano, Phys. Rev. Lett.
604: {\bf 75}, 3796 (1995).
605:
606: \bibitem{7}R. Barbieri and S. Cecotti, Z. Phys. C {\bf 33}, 255 (1986).
607:
608: \bb{7a}T. Banks, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, Phys.
609: Rev. D {\bf 49}, 779 (1994).
610:
611: \bibitem{7b}S. Ferrara, C. Kounnas and F. Zwirner, Nucl. Phys. B
612: {\bf 429}, 589 (1994).
613:
614: \bibitem{8}S. M. Barr and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. Lett.
615: {\bf 57}, 3129 (1986).
616:
617: \bb{8a}I. Bars and M. Visser, Phys. Rev. Lett.
618: {\bf 57}, 25 (1986).
619:
620: \bibitem{9}B. Holdom, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 166}, 196 (1986).
621:
622: \bibitem{10}L. B. Okun, Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 56}, 502 (1982).
623:
624: \bb{11}E. Fischbach et al., Ann. Phys. {\bf 182}, 1 (1988).
625:
626: \bb{12}M. Gasperini, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 40}, 3525 (1989); Phys. Lett. A
627: {\bf 140}, 271 (1989).
628:
629: \bb{13}A. E. Nelson and N. Tedradis, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 221}, 80 (1989).
630:
631: \bb{14}M. Gasperini, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 237}, 431 (1990).
632:
633: \bb{15}M. Gasperini, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 263}, 267 (1991).
634:
635: \bb{16}V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman and R. H.
636: Brandenberger, Phys. Rep. {\bf 215}, 203 (1992).
637:
638: \bb{17}M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, {\em Handbook of
639: mathematical functions} (Dover, New York, 1972).
640:
641: \bb{18}M. Gasperini and M. Giovannini, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 282}, 36
642: (1992).
643:
644: \bb{19}L. M. Krauss and M. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 69}, 869
645: (1992).
646:
647: \bb{20}V. Kaspi, J. Taylor and M. Ryba, Ap. J. {\bf 428}, 713 (1994).
648:
649: \bb{21}E. R. Williams et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 26}, 721 (1971);
650: D. F. Bartlett and S. Logl, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 61}, 2285
651: (1988).
652:
653: \end{references}
654: \end{document}
655:
656: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
657:
658: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
659: table
660: !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?
661: @ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_
662: