1: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc1.tex %%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % $Id: espcrc1.tex 1.1 1999/07/26 10:27:59 Simon Exp spepping $
4: %
5: \documentclass[12pt,twoside]{article}
6: \usepackage{fleqn,espcrc1}
7: \usepackage{xspace,amssymb}
8:
9: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
10: % \documentstyle[12pt,twoside,fleqn,espcrc1]{article}
11:
12: % if you want to include PostScript figures
13: \usepackage{graphicx}
14: % if you have landscape tables
15: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
16:
17: % put your own definitions here:
18: \newcommand{\Msun}{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{M}_{\odot}}}\xspace}
19: \newcommand{\erg}{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{erg}}}\xspace}
20: \newcommand{\K}{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{K}}}\xspace}
21: \newcommand{\Sec}{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{s}}}\xspace}
22: \newcommand{\yr}{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{yr}}}\xspace}
23: \newcommand{\Msuns}{{\ensuremath{\Msun\,\Sec^{-1}}}\xspace}
24: \newcommand{\g}{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{g}}}\xspace}
25: \newcommand{\cm}{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{cm}}}\xspace}
26: \newcommand{\gcc}{{\ensuremath{\g\,\cm^{-3}}}\xspace}
27:
28: % formatting macros
29: \newcommand{\powersep}{{\ensuremath{\times}}}
30: \newcommand{\isofont}[1]{{\mathrm{#1}}}
31: \newcommand{\isomass}[1]{{\ensuremath{\isofont{^{#1}}}}}
32: \newcommand{\isocharge}[1]{{\ensuremath{\isofont{_{#1}}}}}
33: \newcommand{\isotope}[3]{{\ensuremath{\isocharge{#1}\isomass{#2}\isofont{#3}}}}
34: \newcommand{\I}[2]{{\isotope{}{#1}{#2}}}
35: \newcommand{\Ep}[1]{{\ensuremath{10^{#1}}}}
36: \newcommand{\E}[1]{{\ensuremath{\powersep\Ep{#1}}}}
37:
38: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
39: \hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
40:
41: % declarations for front matter
42: \title{Evolution and Nucleosynthesis of Very Massive Primordial Stars}
43:
44: \author{A.~Heger\address{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Uiversity of California, Santa Cruz, CA~95064, U.S.A.},
45: I.~Baraffe\address{C.R.A.L (UMR 5574 CNRS), Ecole Normale Sup\'erieure, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France},
46: C.~L.~Fryer$^\mathrm{a}$\address{T-6 Group, LANL, Los Alamos, NM 87454, U.S.A.}, and
47: S.~E.~Woosley$^\mathrm{a}$}
48:
49: \begin{document}
50:
51: % typeset front matter
52: \maketitle
53:
54: \begin{abstract}
55: We investigate the evolution, final fate, and nucleosynthetic yields
56: of rotating and non-rotating very massive stars (VMS) of zero
57: metallicity. First we address the issue of mass loss during hydrogen
58: burning due to vibrational instabilities. We find that these objects
59: are much more stable than what was found in previous studies of VMS of
60: solar composition, and expect only negligible mass loss driven by the
61: pulsations. As these stars thus reach the end of their evolution with
62: massive helium cores, they encounter the pair-creation instability.
63: We find that for helium core masses of $\sim64\ldots133\,\Msun$ these
64: stars are completely disrupted with explosion energies of up to
65: $\sim\Ep{53}\,\erg$ and eject up to $\sim60\,\Msun$ of \I{56}{Ni}.
66: Stars with more massive helium cores collapse into black holes. We
67: present the first calculations that follow the collapse of such a
68: massive rotating star and predict that X-ray burst and significant
69: gravitational wave emission could result.
70: \end{abstract}
71:
72: \section{INTRODUCTION}
73:
74: Recently, three-dimensional cosmological simulations have reached
75: sufficient resolution on small scales to begin to address the star
76: formation problem of the first generation of so-called Population III
77: (Pop III) stars \cite{OG96,abe98}. Though the formation and nature of
78: the first generation of metal-free stars have been investigated since
79: over thirty years \cite[and many others]{SS53,Yon72,HC77,PSS83,Sil83},
80: the extent to which they differed from present day stars in ways other
81: than composition is still debated. While considerable uncertainty
82: remains, these simulations suggest that the first generation of stars
83: may have been quite massive, $\sim 100-1000\,\Msun$
84: \cite{Lar99,ABN00,BCL99}, giving us motivation to
85: examine the properties, evolution, and fate of such stars.
86:
87: \section{VIBRATIONAL (IN-)STABILITY AND MASS LOSS}
88:
89: Above a critical mass, main sequence stars are vibrationally unstable
90: due to the destabilizing effect of nuclear reactions in their central
91: regions ($\epsilon$-mechanism) \cite{Led41,SH59}. According to
92: non-linear calculations, such an instability leads to mass loss rather
93: than catastrophic disruption \cite{App70,Tal71,Pap73}. Previous
94: investigations of stars of solar-like compositions or slightly
95: metal-poor stars \cite{SH59,SS68,AHR75,Sto92,GK93,KFG93} indicated
96: that stars above a few 100\,\Msun would lose a substantial amount of
97: mass during hydrogen burning. However, the structure of metal-free
98: stars is significantly different from those that even contain a trace
99: of initial metals. We have thus performed, to our knowledge, the
100: first stability analysis of zero metallicity stars with $100\,\Msun
101: \le M \le 500\,\Msun$.
102:
103: We find that the different structure and the higher central
104: temperatures of these stars make them less vibrationally unstable,
105: \textsl{i.e.}, the timescale for the growth of the amplitude is much
106: longer, and thus, based on the non-linear calculations of
107: \cite{App70}, we derive considerably lower mass loss rates than for
108: more metal rich counterparts, and find that even our 500\,\Msun star
109: loses only a negligible amount of mass during central hydrogen
110: burning. During central helium burning only stars with initial masses
111: above $\sim300\,\Msun$ become pulsationally unstable during the last
112: few 10,000\,\yr of their evolution. Therefore we estimate that stars
113: of $\lesssim500\,\Msun$ can even retain their hydrogen envelope until
114: they encounter the pair creation instability. A more detailed
115: description of our analysis can be found in \cite{BHW00}.
116:
117: \section{NUCLEOSYNTHETIC YIELDS OF PAIR CREATION SUPERNOVAE}
118:
119: \begin{figure}[tb]
120: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{fig1}
121: \caption{%
122: %
123: Post-explosive nucleosynthetic yields of helium cores as a function of
124: mass (\textsl{black lines; left axis}). \I{20}{Ne} and \I{36}{Ar}
125: have yields similar to those of respectively \I{24}{Mg} and
126: \I{40}{Ca}. The \textsl{thick gray line} gives the explosion energy
127: in ``foe'' ($1\,\mathrm{foe}=\Ep{51}\,\erg$, about the explosion
128: energy of a ``typical'' core collapse supernova; \textsl{right axis}) .
129: %
130: \label{fig:yield}}
131: \end{figure}
132:
133: The evolution of very massive stars has already been followed by many
134: authors before \cite[e.g.]{BAC84}. We followed the evolution and
135: nucleosynthesis of rotating and non-rotating VMS Pop III stars from
136: onset of hydrogen burning through the electron-positron pair creation
137: instability until one year after the explosion \cite{HW00}, using
138: recent stellar ``input physics'' and extended nuclear reaction
139: networks.
140:
141: In Fig.~\ref{fig:yield} we give the results of calculations of
142: non-rotating plain helium cores evolved without mass loss. It
143: displays the yields of the ejecta as a function of helium core mass
144: and the resulting explosion energy. For a
145: \I{12}C($\alpha$,$\gamma$)\I{16}O rate of $1.7\times$ that of
146: \cite{CF88}, in the extreme case of a $133.3\,\Msun$ helium core we
147: find an explosion energy of about 9.4\E{52}\,\erg and ejection of
148: 57\,\Msun of \I{56}{Ni}, almost half of all ejecta. The ejecta from
149: these objects are dominated by ``$\alpha$-nuclei'', but some nickel
150: isotopes are made in the $\alpha$-rich freeze-out in the center of the
151: most massive cores. Essentially no elements above the iron group are
152: produced. Below the iron group, the elements of even charge number
153: are produced in about solar abundance ratios, while elements of odd
154: mass number are strongly underproduced.
155:
156: Below $\sim64\,\Msun$ we do not find prompt explosions of the helium
157: cores, but after a strong pair-instability induced pulse the outer
158: layers are ejected while the central parts of the star fall back and
159: contract again and are either disrupted in subsequent pulses or evolve
160: through to iron core collapse \cite{Woo86} and could become a
161: collapsar, similar to the models of \cite{MWH00}. Above
162: $\sim133\,\Msun$ the photo-disintegration of heavy elements into
163: $\alpha$-particles, and $\alpha$-particles into nucleons, consumes so
164: much energy that the center of the star continues to collapse into a
165: black hole (see below). Only in the mass range shown in
166: Fig.~\ref{fig:yield}, which corresponds to initial stellar mass of
167: $\sim150\ldots250\,\Msun$, the star is completely disrupted in one
168: pulse.
169:
170: \section{SIMULATIONS OF THE COLLAPSE TO A BLACK HOLE}
171:
172: We have followed the collapse of a rotating 300\,\Msun stars that had
173: a rotation of 10\,\% Keplerian on the zero-age main sequence and which
174: formed a $\sim180\,\Msun$ helium core. The 1D model was mapped into a
175: 2D Lagrangian SPH code when the central density exceeded 5\E{10}\,\gcc
176: and the further evolution was followed including, for the first time,
177: neutrino trapping during the collapse. Sufficient angular momentum
178: was present for triaxial deformations to grow significantly in the
179: ``proto-black hole'', with the possible consequence of a strong
180: gravity wave signal. After the formation of the initial black hole,
181: it accreted mass to $\sim140\,\Msun$ at a rate of
182: $10\ldots100\,\Msuns$. At this point, a centrifugally supported disk
183: forms that may produce jets along the poles through
184: magneto-hydrodynamical effects \cite{BZ77}. Though the efficiencies of
185: the mechanisms under consideration are still very speculative, such a
186: jet could lead either to an energetic, jet-driven explosion or an
187: x-ray transient, depending on whether the hydrogen-rich envelope of
188: the star is still present or has been lost to a possible binary
189: companion star. A more detailed description is given in \cite{FWH00}.
190:
191: \section{SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS}
192:
193: Recent results on the formation of Pop~III stars indicate that very
194: massive stars of zero metallicity could have formed. Our analysis of
195: the pulsation properties indicates that stars of $\lesssim500\,\Msun$
196: are far less vibrationally unstable than previously though and thus
197: may reach the end of their evolution as objects with massive helium
198: cores that encounter the pair-creation instability. This has
199: interesting consequences for the nucleosynthetic yield from these
200: objects, and may even allow for the observation of their explosions
201: despite the high red shift. Above an initial mass of $\sim300\,\Msun$
202: the core collapses into a black hole and may cause an X-ray burst or a
203: strong gravity wave signal that may be accessible to experiments in
204: the near future.
205:
206: The survival of these objects as very massive stars until the end of
207: their evolution also has interesting consequences for the
208: re-ionization of the early universe, as these VMS have an effective
209: surface temperature of $\sim\Ep5\,\K$ \cite{EC71,BHW00}, which means
210: that they very efficiently turn nuclear energy into ionizing photons.
211:
212: \textbf{Acknowledgements.\/}
213: This research was supported, in part, by Prime Contract
214: No. W-7405-ENG-48 between The Regents of the University of California
215: and the United States Department of Energy, the National Science
216: Foundation (AST 97-31569, INT-9726315), and the Alexander von
217: Humboldt-Stiftung (FLF-1065004).
218:
219: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
220:
221: \bibitem{OG96} J.P.~Ostriker and N.Y.~Gnedin, ApJ (1996) 472, L63.
222: \bibitem{abe98} T.~Abel, P.~Anninos, M.L.~Norman, and Y.~Zhang, ApJ (1998) 508, 518.
223: \bibitem{SS53} M.~Schwarzschild and L.~Spitzer, Observatory (1953) 73, 77.
224: \bibitem{Yon72} T.~Yoneyama, PASJ (1972) 24, 87.
225: \bibitem{HC77} T.W.~Hartquist and A.G.W.~Cameron, Ap\&SS (1977) 48, 145.
226: \bibitem{PSS83} F.~Palla, E.E.~Salpeter, and S.W.~Stahler ApJ (1983) 271, 632.
227: \bibitem{Sil83} J.~Silk MNRAS (1983) 205, 705.
228: \bibitem{Lar99} R.B.~Larson, ESA Special Publications Series (SP-445), eds. F.~Favata, A.A.~Kaas, and A.~Wilson (1999) in press, astro-ph/9912539.
229: \bibitem{ABN00} T.~Abel, G.L.~Bryan, and M.L.~Norman, ApJ (2000) in press, astro-ph/0002135.
230: \bibitem{BCL99} V.~Bromm, P.S.~Coppi, and R.B.~Larson, ApJ (1999) 527, L5.
231: \bibitem{Led41} P.~Ledoux, ApJ (1941) 94, 537.
232: \bibitem{SH59} M.~Schwarzschild and R.~H\"arm, ApJ (1959) 129, 637.
233:
234: \bibitem{App70} I.~Appenzeller, A\&A (1970) 5, 355.
235: \bibitem{Tal71} R.J.~Talbot, ApJ (1971) 165, 121.
236: \bibitem{Pap73} J.C.B.~Papaloizou, MNRAS (1973) 162, 169.
237:
238: \bibitem{SS68} R.~Stothers and N.R.~Simon, ApJ (1968) 152, 233.
239: \bibitem{AHR75} M.L.~Aizenman, C.J.~Hansen, and R.R.~Ross, ApJ (1975) 201, 387.
240: \bibitem{Sto92} R.~Stothers, ApJ (1992) 392, 706.
241: \bibitem{GK93} W.~Glatzel and M.~Kiriakidis, MNRAS (1993) 262, 85.
242: \bibitem{KFG93} M.~Kiriakidis, K.J.~Fricke, and W.~Glatzel, MNRAS (1993) 264, 50.
243:
244: \bibitem{BHW00} I.~Baraffe, A.~Heger, and S.E.~Woosley, ApJ (2000) submitted, astro-ph/0009410.
245:
246: \bibitem{BAC84} J.R.~Bond, W.D.~Arnett, and B.J.~Carr, ApJ (1984) 280, 825.
247:
248: \bibitem{HW00} A.~Heger and S.E.~Woosley, ApJ (2000) in preparation.
249:
250: \bibitem{CF88} G.R.~Caughlan, W.A.~Fowler, Atom. Data and Nucl. Data Tables (1988) 40, 283.
251:
252: \bibitem{Woo86} S.E.~Woosley, in \textsl{Nucleosynthesis and Chemical Evolution}, Saas-Fee Advanced Course (1986) 15, 1.
253:
254: \bibitem{MWH00} A.I.~MacFadyen, S.E.~Woosley, and A.~Heger, ApJ (2000) accepted.
255: \bibitem{BZ77} R.D.~Blanford and R.L.~Znajek, MNRAS (1977) 179, 433.
256:
257: \bibitem{FWH00} C.L.~Fryer, S.E.~Woosley, and A.~Heger, ApJ (2000) accepted.
258:
259: \bibitem{EC71} D.~Ezer and A.G.W.~Cameron, Ap\&SS (1971) 14, 399.
260:
261:
262:
263:
264:
265: \end{thebibliography}
266:
267: \end{document}
268: