1: \documentstyle[emulateapj,psfig,pstricks,apjfonts]{article}
2: \hoffset=-0.4truein
3: \voffset=-.9truein
4: \textwidth=7.3truein
5: \textheight=9.4truein
6:
7: \hbadness=10001
8: \hfuzz=200pt
9: \newcommand{\eg}{{\it e.g. }}
10: \newcommand{\ie}{{\it i.e.~}}
11: \newcommand{\Hi}{\ion{H}{1}}
12: \newcommand{\Hii}{\ion{H}{2}}
13: \newcommand{\jtwoone}{{\sl J} = $2 {\rightarrow} 1$}
14: \newcommand{\jonezero}{{\sl J} = $1 {\rightarrow} 0$}
15: \newcommand{\snr}{{G266.2$-$1.2}}
16: \newcommand{\rxj}{{RXJ~0852.0$-$0462}}
17:
18: \begin{document}
19:
20: \title{\rxj: Another Nonthermal Shell-Type SNR (\snr)}
21:
22: \author{Patrick Slane\altaffilmark{1},
23: John P. Hughes\altaffilmark{2},
24: Richard J. Edgar\altaffilmark{1},
25: Paul P. Plucinsky\altaffilmark{1},\\
26: Emi Miyata\altaffilmark{3,4},
27: Hiroshi Tsunemi\altaffilmark{3,4},
28: and Bernd Aschenbach\altaffilmark{5}}
29:
30: \altaffiltext{1}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street,
31: Cambridge, MA 02138}
32: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers, The State
33: University of New Jersey, 136 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8019}
34: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Earth and Space Science, Osaka University,
35: 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043 JAPAN}
36: \altaffiltext{4}{CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, 2-1-6
37: Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0047 JAPAN}
38: \altaffiltext{5}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r extraterrestrische Physik,
39: D-85740, Garching, Germany}
40:
41: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal}
42:
43: \begin{abstract}
44: \noindent
45: The newly discovered supernova remnant \snr\ (RX~J0852.0--0462), along the
46: line of sight to the Vela SNR, was observed with ASCA for 120 ks.
47: We find that the X-ray spectrum is featureless, and well described by
48: a power law, extending to three the class of
49: shell-type SNRs dominated by nonthermal X-ray emission. Like G347.3$-$0.5,
50: this low-latitude remnant displays discrete regions of enhanced emission
51: along the rim as well as faint nonthermal emission from the interior.
52: We derive limits on the thermal content of the remnant emission, although the
53: presence of the Vela SNR compromises our ability to seriously constrain
54: a low temperature component. Limits placed on the amount of Sc-K emission
55: are compared with the expected flux based upon the reported $^{44}$Ti emission
56: from \snr. We also report on an unresolved X-ray source surrounded by diffuse
57: emission near the center of the remnant. The properties of the source
58: are not well determined, but appear consistent with the interpretation
59: that the source is a neutron star surrounded by a synchrotron nebula.
60: Alternatively, the source may be associated with one of two stars located
61: within the positional error circle, but this appears somewhat unlikely.
62:
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65: \keywords{ISM: individual (\snr) --- supernova remnants --- X-rays:
66: ISM --- radiation mechanisms: non-thermal}
67:
68:
69: \section{INTRODUCTION}
70:
71: Young supernova remnants (SNRs) are believed to be the prime accelerators
72: of cosmic rays, at least up to the ``knee'' of the cosmic ray spectrum
73: at energies of $\sim 10^3$~TeV, beyond which
74: the spectrum steepens. However, the direct evidence for particle
75: acceleration to such energies is scarce. Radio emission from shell-type
76: SNRs is the result of synchrotron radiation from shock accelerated electrons,
77: but these electrons have typical energies of order 10~GeV. It is only
78: the recent discoveries of nonthermal X-ray emission from shell-type SNRs
79: that have finally provided evidence of particles at energies of
80: 10--100~TeV. The X-ray emission from SN~1006 (Koyama et al. 1995)
81: and G347.3$-$0.5 (Koyama et al. 1997, Slane et al. 1999) is {\it
82: predominantly} nonthermal, while that from Cas~A, Kepler, Tycho,
83: and RCW 86 (Allen, Gotthelf, \& Petre 1999) is predominantly thermal,
84: but contains a nonthermal component as well.
85: However, it may also be the X-ray emission that poses the most
86: significant constraint on accepting SNRs as the source of cosmic rays
87: at energies near the knee. The X-ray fluxes from all remnants fall
88: below the extrapolation of their radio spectra, implying a steepening
89: or cut-off of the electron spectrum at higher energies. The implied spectral
90: cut-off energies appear to be well below the knee of the cosmic ray
91: spectrum (Reynolds \& Keohane 1999). It is thus of considerable
92: importance to identify new examples of shell-type SNRs for which the
93: X-ray emission is largely nonthermal.
94:
95: RX~J0852.0-0462 was discovered by Aschenbach (1998) using
96: data from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey. Situated along the line of sight
97: to the Vela SNR, the emission stands out above the soft
98: thermal emission from Vela only at energies above $\sim 1$~keV. Data
99: from the ROSAT PSPC indicates a hard spectrum with either a hot
100: thermal component with $kT \sim 2.5$~keV or a power law component
101: with photon index $\Gamma \sim 2.6$ (Aschenbach 1998). The remnant
102: is circular with a diameter of $\sim 2^\circ$; the emission is
103: particularly enhanced along the northern, western, and southeastern
104: limbs. Hereafter, we use the designation \snr\ for this newly
105: identified SNR.
106:
107: As first noted by Aschenbach (1998) the radio emission
108: from \snr\ is quite weak ($S_\nu = 30 - 50$ Jy at 1 GHz) with faint,
109: limb-brightened emission similar to the X-ray morphology
110: (Combi, Romero, \& Benaglia 1999; Duncan \& Green 2000). SN1006
111: and G347 are also
112: faint radio emitters, perhaps suggesting a general characteristic
113: of remnants for which the X-ray flux is dominated by nonthermal
114: processes.
115:
116: Iyudin et al. (1998) reported the COMPTEL detection of $^{44}$Ti from
117: the source GRO~J0852-4642, which was tentatively associated with \snr.
118: If correct, this association would be profound; the very short $^{44}$Ti
119: lifetime ($\tau \approx 90$~y) would imply a very young SNR, and the
120: large observed size would require that the remnant be very nearby as
121: well. Estimates based on the X-ray diameter and $\gamma$-ray flux
122: of $^{44}$Ti indicate an age of $\sim 680$~y and a distance of
123: $\sim 200$~pc (Aschenbach, Iyudin, \& Sch\"{o}nfelder 1999).
124: The hard X-ray spectrum would seem to support this scenario
125: as well. The inferred temperature would imply a rapid shock that is
126: consistent with a young SNR. However, as we show here, the hard
127: X-ray emission is not from hot, shock-heated gas; it is nonthermal.
128: Further, separate reanalysis of the COMPTEL data finds that the detection of
129: \snr\ as a $^{44}$Ti source is only significant at the
130: $2 - 4 \sigma$ confidence level (Sch\"onfelder et al.~2000).
131: In the absence of such emission, and given that the X-ray emission
132: is nonthermal, the nearby distance and young age may need to be reexamined.
133:
134: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Figure 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
135: \centerline{\psfig{file=f1.eps,width=8.8cm}}
136: \small\parindent=3.5mm
137: {\sc Fig.}~1.---
138: ASCA GIS image of G266.2--1.2 ($E = 0.7 - 10$~keV). The image consists of
139: a mosaic of 7 individual fields. Contours represent the outline of the
140: Vela SNR as seen in ROSAT survey data with the PSPC.
141: \normalsize
142: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
143:
144: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND ANALYSIS}
145: We have carried out X-ray observations of \snr\ with the {\it Advanced
146: Satellite for Cosmology and Astrophysics} (ASCA). The remnant was
147: mapped in 7 distinct pointings, each of $\sim 17$~ks duration. The
148: resulting image from the ASCA GIS detectors is illustrated in
149: Figure 1 (see also Tsunemi et al.~2000).
150: Bright emission along the northern and western shell is accompanied by a
151: compact central source surrounded by diffuse emission. Additional enhanced
152: emission along the southeast shell is seen in the ROSAT image (Aschenbach
153: 1998) but was inadvertently missed in the mapping carried out here.
154: Contours in Figure 1 correspond to soft emission ($E = 0.1 - 2.4$~keV)
155: from the Vela SNR, as observed in the ROSAT All-Sky Survey.
156: Standard screening processes were applied to data from both the GIS and
157: SIS detectors, and spectra were extracted from distinct regions of the
158: remnant. Regions outside the SNR shell in the northwestern pointing were
159: used for background subtraction for the GIS and for SIS chips S0C1,2 and
160: S1C0,3. For the other SIS chips, for which no local background was
161: available, we extracted background spectra from the blank sky fields
162: available from the ASCA Guest Observer Facility. Although these fields
163: are at high Galactic latitude, and are thus not representative of our
164: viewing direction (particularly given the contribution from Vela
165: itself), we find that results from spectral fitting
166: are quite similar with either background source.
167:
168: In Figure 2 we present plots of the X-ray spectra from three regions
169: along the rim of the remnant using the GIS detectors: 1) the bright
170: northwest rim; 2) the northeast rim; and 3) the western rim.
171: Spectra were extracted from circular regions with radius $\sim 10$~arcmin
172: centered on the location of maximum brightness.
173: Unlike the line-dominated thermal emission
174: that one expects from a young remnant, the spectra are featureless
175: and well described by a power law of index $\sim 2.6$. This is remarkably
176: similar to that observed for G347.3$-$0.5 (Koyama et al.~1997,
177: Slane et al.~1999), another
178: shell-type SNR dominated by nonthermal emission. The index is flatter
179: than that observed for SN~1006 ($\Gamma = 2.95 \pm 0.2$), the prototype of this
180: class of nonthermal shell-type SNRs (Koyama et al.~1995), although this
181: value was derived for only a portion of the remnant shell.
182:
183: Due to the smaller field of view and the difficulty of merging
184: spectra from different CCDs, the spectra from the SIS are somewhat sparse.
185: However, there is still a clear lack of emission line features.
186: The spectra are still
187: adequately described by an absorbed power law, although the best-fit
188: parameters differ somewhat from those derived from the GIS observations.
189: Due to the better overall statistics, and the higher sensitivity to
190: the high energy end of the spectrum, we use the results from the GIS
191: spectral fits in the discussion below.
192:
193: Although we have applied a background subtraction to the GIS spectra, the
194: soft thermal emission from the Vela SNR is spatially variable, and
195: there is significant residual soft flux in some of the regions, as
196: seen in Figure 2. We have modeled the emission with two components.
197: A thermal model (Raymond \& Smith 1977) was used to account for the
198: soft emission, with the column density fixed at $\sim 10^{20}
199: {\rm\ cm}^{-2}$, a typical value for the Vela SNR (Bocchino,
200: Maggio, \& Sciortino 1999; Aschenbach, Egger, \& Tr\"umper 1985).
201: An absorbed power law was used for the
202: hard emission. To emphasize the contribution from Vela, we have not
203: included the thermal component in the spectral plots shown here.
204:
205: The best-fit spectral parameters for \snr\ are summarized
206: in Table 1. The temperature of the thermal component is similar to
207: that observed for the hotter component of Vela (Bocchino, Maggio,
208: \& Sciortino 1999), as expected since the GIS response is not well-suited
209: to detected the softer component at $\sim 0.1$~keV. The spectral
210: indices for the emission regions along the shell of \snr\ are
211: all consistent with a value of $\sim 2.6.$
212:
213: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%55%%%%%%%% Figure 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
214: \vspace{-0.05in}
215: \centerline{\psfig{file=f2.ps,width=8.8cm}}
216: \small\parindent=3.5mm
217: {\sc Fig.}~2.---
218: ASCA spectra from both GIS detectors for regions of G266.2--1.2.
219: The featureless spectrum
220: is well described by a power law. Excess flux at low energies is
221: presumably associated with soft thermal emission from the Vela SNR.
222: \normalsize
223: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
224:
225: The column density for the power law component summarized in Table 1 is
226: significantly higher than that for Vela. While simple scaling of
227: the column density to estimate the distance to \snr\ is clearly
228: rather uncertain, it would appear that the remnant is at least
229: several times more distant than Vela.
230: To provide some measure of the scaling of quantities, in discussions
231: below, we express the distance as $d_1 = (d/1{\rm\ kpc})$.
232: We note that the column density derived from PSPC data alone (Aschenbach
233: 1998), though not well determined, is apparently lower than that
234: measured here. Given
235: the importance of the distance measurement, as we discuss below, it
236: is of considerable interest to obtain improved measurements of the
237: column density.
238:
239: \begin{center}
240: \small
241: {\bf Table 1: G266.2--1.2: Spectral Parameters}\\
242: \begin{tabular}{l|llll}\hline\hline
243: Region & $kT$(keV) & $N_H^a$ & $\Gamma$ (photon) & $F_x^{b}$\\ \hline
244: NW Rim & $0.5^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$ & $4.0 \pm 1.8$ & $2.6 \pm 0.2$ & $4.2 \times
245: 10^{-
246: 11}$ \\ %updated 4/19
247: NE Rim & $0.6 \pm 0.1$ & $5.3^{+2.0}_{-0.9}$ & $2.6 \pm 0.2$ & $2.9 \times
248: 10^{-
249: 11}$\\ %updated 4/19
250: W Rim & $0.5^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$ & $1.4^{+2.8}_{-1.4}$ & $2.5 \pm 0.2$ & $2.1
251: \times 10^{-11}$ \\ %updated 4/19
252: Center$^c$ & $0.7 \pm 0.1$ & $11.5^{+14.3}_{-10.2}$ & $2.0^{+0.6}_{-0.3}$ &
253: $6.7 \times 10^{-12}$ \\ \hline %updated 4/19
254: \multicolumn{5}{c}{AX J0851.9-4617.4} \\ \hline
255: BB & $0.47 \pm 0.04$ & $0.0 - 0.8$ & & $2.1 \times
256: 10^{-12}$ \\
257: PL & & $3.7^{+3.8}_{-2.6}$ & $3.2 \pm 0.5$ & $6.6 \times
258: 10^{-12}$ \\ \hline
259: \end{tabular}
260:
261: $a)$ Power Law component only for SNR, in units of $10^{21}{\rm\ cm}^{-2}$\\
262: $b) {\rm\ erg\ cm}^{-2} {\rm\ s}^{-1}$ (0.5 - 10 keV) \\
263: $c)$ diffuse emission only
264: \end{center}
265: \normalsize
266:
267:
268: As shown in Figure 1, the central region of the remnant contains a
269: compact source which we designate as AX~J0851.9-4617.4.
270: The image centroid is at RA$_{2000}$: 08$^h$51$^m$57$^s$,
271: Dec$_{2000}$: $-46^\circ$17$^\prime$24$^{\prime\prime}$;
272: the position uncertainty is
273: roughly 2~arcmin in each direction due to the low-resolution mode
274: in which the GIS data were obtained.
275: This source is surrounded by diffuse emission that
276: extends toward the northwest. It is of considerable interest to speculate
277: as to whether this represents a central neutron star surrounded by
278: a synchrotron nebula. Such an association would be spectacular indeed,
279: providing further evidence of a massive progenitor for the remnant,
280: and possibly constraining the age through modeling of the plerionic
281: component. In Figure 3 we present the GIS spectrum for both AX~J0851.9-4617.4
282: and the diffuse central region of the remnant. The diffuse emission is
283: well described by a power law of spectral index $\sim 2.0$, again accompanied
284: by a soft thermal component that we associate with Vela. Given the
285: nonthermal nature of the shell emission, however, it is quite possible
286: that the diffuse central emission is just associated with emission from the
287: shell projected along the central line of sight. We note that the spectrum
288: of this central emission appears somewhat harder than that from the rest of
289: the remnant, perhaps suggesting a plerionic nature, but more sensitive
290: observations are required to clarify this.
291:
292: The GIS count rate for AX~J0851.9-4617.4 is $\sim 0.04 {\rm\ s}^{-1}$.
293: The $14.6$~ks GIS exposure (after screening) thus yields roughly
294: 500 counts in each detector. The spectrum is thus rather sparse and can
295: be adequately described by a variety of models. Two of particular interest are
296: blackbody emission, as might be expected from the surface of a cooling
297: neutron star or from the polar caps of a neutron star heated through particle
298: acceleration in the magnetosphere, and a power law spectrum that might result
299: from emission directly from a neutron star magnetosphere. Best-fit spectral
300: results from these models are summarized in Table 1.
301:
302: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Figure 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
303: \centerline{\psfig{file=f3.ps,width=8.8cm}}
304: \small\parindent=3.5mm
305: {\sc Fig.}~3.---
306: ASCA spectra from both GIS detectors for the central point source and
307: surrounding diffuse region
308: of G266.2--1.2. The diffuse emission is indistinguishable from that
309: of the SNR shell. The point source spectrum is adequately described by
310: a power law, but other models are possible as well.
311: \normalsize
312: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
313:
314:
315: \section{DISCUSSION}
316: The prevalence of nonthermal X-ray emission in \snr\ suggests that the
317: remnant is an efficient accelerator of particles. While thermal emission
318: from swept-up material and shocked ejecta typically dominates the
319: emission of shell-type SNRs, there are conditions which can lead to
320: enhanced nonthermal X-ray emission. Recent models for nonlinear shock
321: acceleration in SNRs (e.g. Ellison, Berezhko, \& Baring 2000) show that
322: the ambient density and magnetic field are critical parameters in
323: determining the relative contributions of thermal and nonthermal electrons
324: in the X-ray emission. Low values of both quantities can yield
325: a synchrotron-dominated remnant in X-rays, while a low magnetic field,
326: in particular, also leads to an increased ratio of the TeV $\gamma$-ray to
327: radio flux ratio. This scenario appears
328: consistent with both SN1006 and G347.3$-$0.5. The former is the remnant
329: of a Type Ia explosion, for which the ejecta mass and ambient density
330: are expected to be relatively low, and is located at a relatively high
331: Galactic latitude which is consistent with a low magnetic field. The
332: latter, on the other hand, is in the Galactic plane and appears consistent
333: with a massive star progenitor if the association with surrounding
334: molecular clouds and a nearby \ion{H}{2} region suggested by Slane
335: et al. (1999) is correct. This, too, would then imply a low ambient
336: density if the remnant has evolved in a stellar wind cavity, which
337: is likely in such a scenario. Both remnants are observed in TeV
338: $\gamma$-rays (Tanimori et al. 1998, Muraishi et al. 2000), and both are
339: weak radio remnants (Stephenson et al. 1977, Aschenbach 1998,
340: Combi et al. 1999).
341: We note, however, that the circumstances which lead to a dominant
342: nonthermal contribution in the soft X-ray band are complicated. Reynolds
343: (1998) has shown that the maximum nonthermal X-ray emission relative
344: to the radio emission occurs when the remnant age is comparable to
345: the electron loss time in the postshock magnetic field. However, this
346: alone is not sufficient to guarantee that the thermal X-ray emission
347: from shock-heated ejecta and interstellar material will not dominate
348: the X-ray flux.
349:
350: For \snr, the ASCA observations clearly show that nonthermal processes
351: dominate the X-ray emission. Our limit on the density of any thermally
352: emitting material in the northwest region, where the emission is brightest,
353: is $n_0 < 2.9 \times 10^{-2} d_1^{-1/2} f^{-1/2} {\rm\ cm}^{-3}$, where $f$
354: is the filling factor of a sphere taken as the emitting volume in
355: the region extracted. Here we have assumed an equilibrium thermal model
356: (Raymond \& Smith 1977). Nonequilibrium ionization models can yield higher
357: emissivities, which would lower the derived limit on the density.
358: We note that this limit is restricted to
359: gas with temperatures above 1~keV because of the severe contributions of
360: soft thermal emission from the Vela SNR; higher densities of cooler material
361: in \snr\ cannot be ruled out. Observations of the brightest shell regions
362: with high angular resolution, so as to minimize these contributions, are
363: of considerable interest to further constrain the ratio of thermal to
364: nonthermal emission.
365:
366: If \snr\ is actually a source of $^{44}$Ti at levels indicated by the
367: COMPTEL measurements, so that the age and distance
368: estimates suggested by Aschenbach et al. (1999) and
369: others are correct, then the ambient density is extremely low. The
370: reported $\gamma$-ray line flux would indicate a massive star progenitor,
371: and the low density would then imply the presence of a stellar-wind
372: cavity such as that inferred for G347.3$-$0.5.
373:
374: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Figure 4 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
375: \centerline{\psfig{file=f4.eps,width=9.2cm}}
376: \small\parindent=3.5mm
377: {\sc Fig.}~4.---
378: CO emission ($V_{LSR} = -5 - +20 {\rm\ km\ s}^{-1}$)
379: along the line of sight to \snr. Countours correspond to the X-ray
380: emission from the remnant as seen in Figure 1. Note the use of
381: Galactic coordinates to emphasize orientation relative to the
382: Galactic Plane.
383: \normalsize
384: \vspace{0.1in}
385: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
386:
387: CO data (May, Murphy, \& Thaddeus 1988) reveal a concentration of
388: giant molecular clouds -- the Vela Molecular Ridge -- at a distance
389: of $\sim 1 - 2$~kpc in the direction of Vela. The presence of
390: OB and R associations, as well as \Hii\ regions, demonstrate that
391: these clouds are sites of recent star formation. The bulk of the
392: CO emission along the line of sight to \snr\ is concentrated in a
393: velocity range $v_{\rm LSR} = 0.7 - 9.8 {\rm\ km\ s}^{-1}$ (Murphy
394: \& May 1991), and extends down to a Galactic latitude of
395: $b \approx -1.2^\circ$. The total column density through the ridge
396: is in excess of $10^{22}{\rm\ cm}^{-2}$, with the northeast rim
397: of \snr\ (nearest the Galactic Plane) falling along the steeply
398: increasing column density region
399: of the ridge while the western rim lies along a line of much lower
400: column density (Figure 4); the CO column density varies by more
401: than a factor of 6 between these regions. The lack of a strong variation
402: in $N_H$ across
403: \snr\ indicates that the remnant cannot be more distant than the
404: Vela Molecular Ridge. On the other hand, if $N_H$ is
405: much larger than for the Vela SNR, as the GIS data reported here
406: indicate, then \snr\ must be as distant as possible consistent with
407: being in front of most of the Molecular Ridge gas.
408: This is consistent with an interpretation in
409: which \snr\ is the product of a massive progenitor from this star-forming
410: region, and that the remnant evolution has proceeded in the presence
411: of a wind cavity, leading to a low ambient density much like that
412: indicated for G347.3$-$0.5.
413:
414: The angular size of \snr\ gives a free-expansion age of
415: $t \sim 3.4 \times 10^3 v_{\rm 5k}^{-1} d_1$~yr, where $v_{\rm 5k}$ is
416: the expansion velocity in units of $5000 {\rm\ km\ s}^{-1}$.
417: Alternatively, using the limit on the preshock density derived above,
418: the Sedov age of the remnant is $t < 3.9 \times 10^3 d_1^{9/4}
419: f^{-1/4} E_{51}^{-1/2}$~yr, where $E_{51}$ is the kinetic energy from the
420: explosion in units of $10^{51}$~erg. In either case, the remnant
421: is relatively young, although ages as young as those based on the
422: $^{44}$Ti lifetime would require either an extremely large expansion
423: velocity or an extremely low ambient density unless the remnant
424: distance is actually much less than 1 kpc.
425:
426: We note that the $E = 1.156$~MeV $\gamma$-rays that announce the
427: presence of $^{44}$Ti are actually secondary products. The decay of
428: $^{44}$Ti proceeds via electron capture to form $^{44}$Sc which then
429: decays rapidly to $^{44}$Ca, producing the observed $\gamma$-rays.
430: As electrons fill the vacancy created by the electron capture, we
431: expect Sc-K emission of X-rays at $E = 4.1$~keV. Using the fluorescence
432: efficiency of $19\%$ (Krause 1979), we expect a flux $F({\rm Sc-K}) \sim
433: (6.6 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-6}{\rm\ cm}^{-2}{\rm\ s}^{-1}$
434: based on the $^{44}$Ti flux
435: of Iyudin et al. 1998). We have searched the ASCA SIS data for evidence
436: of such a line feature, but have found no compelling evidence to support
437: its presence. The SIS0 spectrum of one region along the NW rim contains
438: a feature at $\sim 4$~keV (Figure 5),
439: but is not seen in the SIS1 spectrum of the same region,
440: nor in adjacent regions with either detector.
441: Using our power law fits, the inclusion of the additional feature
442: is not significant according to the F-test;
443: the thermal fits of Tsunemi et al. (2000) suggest that the feature
444: is significant at the $\sim 99\%$ confidence level.
445: We derive a $1 \sigma$
446: upper limit of $4.4 \times 10^{-6}{\rm\ cm}^{-2}{\rm\ s}^{-1}$ for
447: Sc-K emission from this region, which is not inconsistent with the
448: expected result, particularly since additional contributions could
449: come from elsewhere in the remnant.
450: Higher sensitivity searches for such emission are clearly of interest
451: to provide an independent method for obtaining evidence of the presence
452: of $^{44}$Ti.
453:
454: The nature of the central compact X-ray source in \snr\ is poorly constrained
455: by the ASCA and ROSAT data. There are two bright stars ($m_V < 14$)
456: located within the large
457: positional uncertainty (Aschenbach 1998), but neither is a compelling
458: counterpart.
459: The first star, WRAY~16-30 (IRAS 08502-4606), is a Be star whose position
460: is within 2~arcmin of AX~J0851.9-4617.4. Using a thermal model appropriate
461: for a Be star, the X-ray luminosity of the source is $L_x \sim 4
462: \times 10^{32} d_1^2 {\rm\ erg\ s}^{-1}$. The typical range for
463: Be stars is roughly $10^{29} - 10^{32} {\rm\ erg\ s}^{-1}$
464: (Zinnecker \& Preibisch 1994). This would suggest a distance
465: of less than $\sim 500$~pc, which is difficult to reconcile with the
466: observed visual magnitude of $V = 13.8.$ The second potential counterpart
467: is HD76060 ($m_V = 7.88$, $m_B = 7.79$), a B8 IV/V star whose measured
468: parallax puts the distance at $\sim 270$~pc. The upper end of the
469: X-ray luminosity for stars of this class is $L_X \approx 10^{30.5}
470: {\rm\ erg\ cm}^{-2}{\rm\ s}^{-1}$ (Bergh\"ofer, Schmitt, Danner,
471: \& Cassinelli 1997) which, for the measured value, requires a distance
472: of roughly 90~pc. While this discrepancy is perhaps not sufficient to
473: absolutely rule out an association, further observations to improve the
474: position of the X-ray source, and better constrain its spectrum, are
475: clearly in order.
476:
477: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Figure 5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
478: \centerline{\psfig{file=f5.ps,width=9cm}}
479: \vspace{-0.3in}
480: \small\parindent=3.5mm
481: {\sc Fig.}~5.---
482: ASCA SIS spectrum (chip S1C0) for a region along the NW limb. There
483: is some evidence of a feature at $E \sim 4$~keV, perhaps suggestive
484: of $^{44}$Sc emission. However, this feature is not seen in other
485: SIS data.
486: \normalsize
487: \vspace{0.1in}
488: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
489:
490: Alternatively, we have considered the possibility that AX~J0851.9-4617.4 is
491: a neutron star associated with \snr. In this case, the power-law fit
492: yields a spectral index that is rather steep compared with known pulsars.
493: The luminosity, on the other hand, is quite reasonable for a young neutron
494: star if the distance is indeed several kpc, and the observed column density is
495: compatible with that for the SNR shell. A blackbody model leads to an
496: inferred surface temperature of $\sim 0.5$~keV with an emitting region
497: only $\sim 200 d_1 {\rm\ m}$ in radius which could be indicative of
498: emission from compact polar cap regions of a neutron star, although this
499: region is somewhat large for such a scenario. We have searched
500: for pulsations but detect no obvious modulation of the flux. We set an
501: upper limit to the pulsed fraction of $45 - 70\%$ for frequencies from
502: $10^{-3} - 10^3$~Hz.
503:
504: Finally, we note that the spectrum of the diffuse emission in the central
505: region of the remnant is consistent with a power law whose index is
506: similar to the Crab nebula and other synchrotron nebulae associated
507: with supernova remnants. The ratio of the point source flux to that
508: of the diffuse surrounding emission is $\sim 40\%$ which is similar
509: to that for the Vela pulsar and its associated synchrotron nebula.
510: It is of interest that the Vela pulsar also has a soft spectrum
511: best characterized as blackbody emission from heated polar caps
512: (\"{O}gelman, Finley, \& Zimmermann 1993).
513: High resolution radio observations of the central region of \snr\
514: using the ATCA reveal a faint, slightly extended ($\sim 45''$ across)
515: source within the error circle of AX~J0851.9-4617.4 (B. Gaensler --
516: private communication). The 1.4~GHz flux density of this source
517: is $\sim2$~mJy, however, substantially lower than seen for known
518: synchrotron nebulae, and the X-ray luminosity is quite low as well. Further
519: observations are required to better understand the nature of this
520: source.
521:
522: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
523:
524: The ASCA observations of \snr\ reveal that the soft X-ray emission from
525: this SNR is dominated by nonthermal processes. This brings to three the
526: number of SNRs in this class, and provides additional evidence for
527: shock acceleration of cosmic rays in SNRs. Because of the bright and
528: spatially varying background caused by the Vela SNR, limits on the
529: thermal emission from \snr\ are difficult to establish. As a result,
530: its evolutionary state is poorly constrained. However, the ASCA data
531: reveal a larger column density for this remnant than for Vela,
532: indicating that \snr\ is at a larger distance,
533: and perhaps associated with the star formation region located at a
534: distance of $1 - 2$~kpc.
535: The very strong ratio of nonthermal to thermal X-ray emission argues for
536: a low density environment, possibly suggesting evolution in a stellar
537: wind cavity. Such a scenario would indicate a massive progenitor, from
538: which one could expect a relic neutron star. The point source
539: AX~J0851.9-4617.4 could represent this source, with the diffuse emission
540: around the source being an associated synchrotron nebula, albeit
541: a very faint one. Higher resolution
542: X-ray observations of this source are of considerable importance in
543: order to assess its relationship to the SNR.
544:
545: We note that TeV $\gamma$-ray emission has been detected from both
546: SN~1006 and G347.3$-$0.5, confirming the presence of very energetic
547: electrons in these remnants. Similar observations of \snr\ are clearly
548: of considerable interest as well.
549:
550:
551: \acknowledgments
552: The authors would like to thank Roland Diehl and Donald Ellison for
553: particularly helpful discussions in the preparation of this paper, and
554: also Bryan Gaensler, Douglas Bock, and Anne Green for kindly providing
555: information on radio measurements of AX~J0851.9-4617.4, and Tom Dame
556: for providing the CO data.
557: This work was supported in part by the National Aeronautics and
558: Space Administration through contract NAS8-39073 and grant NAG5-9106,
559: and has made use of data obtained from the High Energy Astrophysics
560: Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC), provided by NASA's Goddard
561: Space Flight Center.
562:
563:
564: \begin{references}
565:
566: \reference{} Allen, G. E., Gotthelf, E. V., Petre, R. 1999,
567: ``Evidence of 10-100 TeV Electrons in Supernova Remnants,'' in
568: Proceedings of the 26th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Salt Lake City,
569: 17-25 August 1999, Edited by D. Kieda, M. Salamon, and B. Dingus,
570: Vol. 3, 480-3
571:
572:
573: \reference{} Aschenbach, B. 1998, Nature 396, 141
574:
575: \reference{} Aschenbach, B., Egger, R., \& Tr\"umper, J. 1995, Nature 373,
576: 587
577:
578: \reference{}Aschenbach, B., Iyudin, A. F., \& Sch\"{o}nfelder, V. 1999,
579: A\&A 350, 997
580:
581: \reference{} Bergh\"ofer, T. W., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Danner, R., \&
582: Cassinelli, J. P. 1997, A\&A 322, 167
583:
584: \reference{} Bocchino, F., Maggio, A., \& Sciortino, S. 1999, A\&A 342, 839
585:
586: \reference{} Combi, J. A., Romero, G. E., \& Benaglia, P. 1999,
587: ApJL 519, L177
588:
589: \reference{} Duncan, A. R., \& Green, D. A. 2000, A\&A - in press.
590:
591: \reference{} Ellison, D. C., Berezhko, E. G., \& Baring, M. G. 2000, ApJ -
592: submitted
593:
594: \reference{} Iyudin, A. F. et al. 1998, Nature 326, 142
595:
596: \reference{} Koyama, K., Petre, R., Gotthelf, E. V., Hwang, U., Matsura, M.,
597: Ozaki, M., \& Holt, S. S. 1995 Nature 378, 255
598:
599: \reference{} Koyama, K. et al.~1997, PASJ 49, L7
600:
601: \reference{} Krause, M. O. 1979, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 8, 307
602:
603: \reference{} May, J., Murphy, D. C., \& Thaddeus, P. 1988, A\&ASS 73, 51
604:
605: \reference{} Muraishi, H. et al. 2000, A\&A 354, L57
606:
607: \reference{} Murphy, D. C., \& May, J. 1991, A\&A 247, 202
608:
609: \reference{} \"{O}gelman, H., Finley, J. P., \& Zimmermann, H. U. 1993,
610: Nature 361, 136
611:
612: \reference{} Raymond, J. C., \& Smith, B. W. 1977, ApJS, 35, 419
613:
614: \reference{} Reynolds, S. P. 1998, ApJ, 493, 375
615:
616: \reference{} Reynolds, S. P. \& Keohane, J. W. 1999, ApJ 525, 368
617:
618: \reference{} Sedov, L. 1959, Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics
619: (New York:Academic)
620:
621: \reference{} Sch\"onfelder, V. et al. 2000, 5th Compton Symposium, Portsmouth,
622: AIP Conf. Proc. 510, p. 54, eds. M.L. McConnell and J.M. Ryan
623:
624: \reference{} Slane, P., Gaensler, B. M., Dame, T. M., Hughes, J. P., Plucinsky,
625: P. P., \& Green, A., 1999, ApJ, 525, 357
626:
627: \reference{} Stephenson, F. R., Clark, D. H., Crawford, D. F. 1977, MNRAS
628: 180, 567
629:
630: \reference{} Tanimori, T. et al. 1998, ApJ 497, L25
631:
632: \reference{} Tsunemi, H., Miyata, E., Aschenbach, B., Hiraga, J., \&
633: Akutsu, D. 2000, PASJ, in press
634:
635: \reference{} Zinnecker, H. \& Preibisch, Th. 1994, A\&A 292, 152
636:
637: \end{references}
638:
639: \end{document}
640: