1: % Ver 6: 2000 October 31.

2: \documentstyle[12pt]{article}

3: \input{epsf}

4: \input psfig.sty

5: \textwidth=14cm

6: \textheight=20cm

7: \topmargin=-1cm

8: \leftmargin=-1in

9: \rightmargin=-1in

10: 

11: \title{Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies}

12: \author{Yoshiaki SOFUE \\

13: {\it Institute of Astronomy, University of Tokyo, Mitaka} \\

14: {\it Tokyo 181-0015, Japan }\\

15: and \\

16: Vera RUBIN \\

17: {\it Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Wash.}\\

18: {\it 5241 Broad Branch Road, N.W., Washington, DC 20015, USA}\\

19: \\

20: \\

21: \\

22: \\

23: {\it Submitted for publ. in Ann. Rev. Astron. \& Astrophys. Vol. 39, 2001}\\

24: %(http://astro.annualreviews.org)\\

25: \\

26: \\

27: \\ }

28: \date{2000 October 15}

29: 

30: \pagestyle{plain}

31: 

32: \begin{document}

33: %\begin{figure}

34: %\psfig{figure=tophi.eps,height=2cm}

35: %\vskip -1.6cm \hskip 2.2cm {\Large Institute of Astronomy, University of  Tokyo}

36: %\vskip 0cm \hskip 2.2cm {\Large Univ. Tokyo Astro. Preprint No. 2000-09}

37: %\end{figure}

38: \maketitle

39: \pagenumbering{roman}

40: \cleardoublepage

41: \pagenumbering{arabic}

42: 

43: \def\v{\vskip 2mm}

44: \def\noi{\noindent}

45: \def\r{\hangindent 1pc  \noindent}

46: \def\cen{\centerline}

47: \def\endpage{\vfil\break}

48: \def\page{\vfil\break}

49: \def\kms{km s$^{-1}$}

50: \def\kmsmpc{km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$}

51: \def\vrot{$V_{\rm rot}$}

52: \def\Vrot{V_{\rm rot}}

53: \def\Msun{M_{\odot \hskip-5.2pt \bullet}}

54: \def\msun{$M_{\odot \hskip-5.2pt \bullet}$}

55: \def\halpha{H$\alpha$}

56: \def\Halpha{H$\alpha$}

57: \def\ha{H$\alpha$}

58: \def\Ha{H$\alpha$}

59: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

60: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

61: \def\deg{$^\circ$}

62: 

63: \begin{abstract}

64: Rotation curves of spiral galaxies are the major tool  for determining the

65: distribution of mass in spiral galaxies. They provide fundamental

66: information for understanding the dynamics, evolution

67: and formation of spiral galaxies.

68: We describe various methods to derive rotation curves, and

69: review the results obtained.

70: We discuss the basic characteristics of observed rotation curves

71: in relation to various galaxy properties, such as

72: Hubble type, structure, activity, and environment.

73: \end{abstract}

74: 

75: 

76: %%% 1

77: \section{HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION}

78: 

79: The rotation of galaxies was discovered in 1914, when Slipher (1914) detected

80: inclined absorption lines in the nuclear spectra of M31 and the

81: Sombrero galaxy, and Wolf (1914) detected inclined  lines in the

82: nuclear spectrum of M81.

83: This evidence led Pease (1918) to use the Mt. Wilson 60-inch

84: to $``$investigate the rotation of the great nebula in

85: Andromeda" by obtaining a minor axis long slit spectrum of

86: M31 with an exposure of 84 hours taken during clear

87: hours in August, September, and October, 1916, and a major axis spectrum taken

88: over 79 hours in August, September, and October, 1917.

89: The absorption lines extended only 1.5 arcminutes in radius along the

90: major axis, less than 2\% of the optical radius,

91: but were sufficient to show the steep nuclear velocity rise.

92: Later studies of M31's rotation by Babcock (1939) and Mayall (1951)

93: extended major axis rotation velocities to almost 2\deg\ from the nucleus,

94: but exposure times were tens of hours, and spectrographs had stability problems.

95: Interestingly, both Babcock's velocities for M31 and Humason's

96: unpublished velocities for NGC 3115  showed the last measured

97: point to have a rotation velocity of over 400 \kms\  (almost 2 times actual),

98: but consequently raised questions of mass distribution.

99: 

100: At the dedication of the McDonald Observatory in 1939, Oort's (1940)

101: comment that $``$...the distribution of mass [in NGC 3115] appears to bear

102: almost no relation to that of the light" seems from the view in 2000 to

103: have attracted little attention.

104: His conclusion concerning the mass distribution in NGC 3115 is

105: worth quoting, even 60 years later.  $``$In the outer parts of the

106: nebula the ratio {\it f}

107: of mass density to light density is found to be very high; and this

108: conclusion holds for whatever dynamical model we consider.

109: The spectrum of the nebula shows the characteristics of G-type dwarfs.

110: Since {\it f} cannot be much larger than 1 for such stars,

111: they can account for roughly only 1/2 percent of the mass; the remainder

112: must consist either of extremely faint dwarfs having an average ratio of

113: mass to light of about 200 to 1 or else of interstellar gas and dust".

114: From  a reanalysis of the (scattered) velocities for M31,

115: Schwarzschild (1954) concluded that the approximately flat rotation

116: curve was $``$not discordant with the assumption of equal mass and

117: light distribution."

118: 

119: The modern era of optical observations

120: of rotation velocities within spiral galaxies dates from Page's (1952)

121: and especially Margaret and Geoffrey Burbidge's (1960)

122: observations which exploited the new red sensitivity of

123: photographic plates to observe the H$\alpha$ and [NII] emission

124: lines arising from HII regions within spiral disks. Within a decade,

125: rotation curves existed for a few dozen galaxies,

126: most of them extending only over the initial velocity rise and the turnover of the velocities.

127: 

128: Early radio observations of neutral hydrogen in external galaxies showed a

129: slowly falling rotation curve for M31 (van de Hulst et al. 1957) and a

130: flat rotation curve for

131: M33 (Volders 1959). The first published velocity field ($``$spider diagram') was of

132: M31 (Argyle 1965). For M33, the flatness could be

133: attributed to the side lobes of the beam, and was consequently ignored.

134: Louise Volders must also have realized that a flat rotation curve

135: conflicted with the value of the Oort constants for our Galaxy,

136: which implied a falling rotation curve at the position of the sun.

137: Jan Oort was one of her thesis professors.

138: By the 1970s, flat rotation curves were routinely detected

139: (Rogstad and Shostak 1972), but worries about side bands still persisted,

140: and a variation in M/L across the disk was a possible explanation

141: (Roberts and  Rots 1973).

142: 

143: Surveys of galaxy observations from these early years by de

144: Vaucouleurs (1959) and of galactic dynamics by Lindblad (1959)

145: reveal the development of the observations and the interpretation

146: of the spiral kinematics.  They are historically notable because

147: they contains early references, many of which have faded into oblivion.

148: More recent (but still early) reviews include

149: de Vaucouleurs \& Freeman (1973),

150:  Burbidge \& Burbidge (1975), van der Kruit and Allen (1978).

151: 

152: Rotation curves are tools for several purposes:

153: for studying the kinematics of galaxies;

154: for inferring the evolutionary  histories and the role that interactions

155: have played;

156: for relating departures from the expected rotation curve Keplerian form

157: to the amount and distribution of dark matter;

158: for observing evolution by comparing rotation curves in distant

159: galaxies with galaxies nearby.

160: Rotation curves derived from emission lines

161: such as H$\alpha$, HI and CO lines are particularly useful to

162: derive the mass distribution in disk galaxies,

163: because they manifest the motion of interstellar gases of population I,

164: which have much smaller velocity dispersion, of the order of

165: $5 - 10 $ \kms, compared to the rotation velocities.

166: This allows us to neglect the pressure term in the equation of motion

167: for calculating the mass distribution in a sufficiently accurate

168: approximation.

169: 

170: Here, we review the general characteristics of rotation curves for spiral

171: galaxies as kinematic tracers, in relation to galaxy properties, such as

172: Hubble types, activity, structure, and environment.

173: These parameters are fundamental input for understanding the dynamics and

174: mass distribution, evolution, and formation of spiral galaxies.

175: Methods for analysis are described.

176: In general, the discussion is restricted to studies since 1980.

177: Higher-order, non-axisymmetric velocity components due to

178: spiral arms and bars are not emphasized here.

179: Although rotation curves of spiral galaxies are a major

180: tool for determining the distribution of mass in spiral galaxies,

181: we stress the observations rather than the mass determinations

182: or the deconvolutions into luminous and dark matter.

183: 

184: Numerous discussions of rotation properties are included in the

185: conference proceedings,  {\it Galaxy Dynamics} (Merritt et al. 1999),

186: {\it Dynamics of Galaxies} (Combes et al. 2000),

187: {\it Galaxy Disks and Disk Galaxies} (Funes \& Corsini 2001).

188: Reviews of dark matter as deduced from galaxy rotation curves can be

189: found in Trimble (1987), Ashman (1992), and

190: Persic \& Salucci (1997, and papers therein).

191: 

192: Spheroidal galaxies have been reviewed earlier

193: (Faber \& Gallagher 1979; Binney 1982; de Zeeuw \& Franx 1991).

194: Generally, measures of velocity and velocity dispersions are necessary  for

195: mass determinations in early type galaxies, although methods which we

196: describe below are applicable to the cold disks often found in the cores  of ellipticals, in extended disks of low-luminosity ellipticals (Rix et al. 1999),

197: and  in S0 galaxies.

198: 

199: Data for several million galaxies are available from huge databases

200: accessible on the World Wide Web.  Hypercat (Lyon/Meudon Extragalactic

201: Database http://www-obs.univ-lyon1.fr/hypercat/) classifies references to

202: spatially resolved kinematics (radio/optical/1-dimension/2-dim/velocity

203: dispersion, and more) for 2724 of its over 1 million galaxies.

204: NED (NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/index.html)

205: contains velocities for 144,000 galaxies. The number of measured velocity

206: points is tabulated for each galaxy reference. Both of these sites contain

207: extensive literature references for galaxy data.

208: High spatial (HST) STIS spectroscopy preprints are found

209: in http://STScI.edu/science/preprints.

210: 

211: 

212: 

213: 

214: %%% 2

215: \section{THE DATA}

216: 

217: When Margaret and Geoffrey Burbidge (1960) initiated their observational

218: program to determine the kinematics and hence masses of spiral galaxies,

219: they were reproducing the technique employed by Pease (1918),

220: but with improvements.

221: Telescopes were larger, spectrographs were faster, photographic plates

222: were sensitive in the red. The strong emission lines of H$\alpha$ and [NII]

223: could be more easily detected and measured than the weak broad H and K

224: absorption lines.

225: Since the 1980s, larger telescopes  and improved detectors have existed

226: for optical, radio, and mm observations. The combination of

227: high spatial and high spectral resolution digital detectors and speedy

228: computers has permitted a sophistication in the velocity analyses (Section 3)

229: that will surely continue.

230: 

231: \subsection{\ha\ and Optical Measurements}

232: 

233: Optical astronomers have available several observing techniques for

234: determining rotation curves and velocity fields for both the ionized

235: gas and stars.  Traditional long slit spectra are still valuable for

236: deducing the rotation curve of a galaxy from emission lines

237: (Rubin et al. 1980, 1982, 1985; Mathewson et al. 1992, 1996;

238: Amram et al.  1992, 1994; Corradi et al. 1991; Courteau 1997;

239: Vega Baltran 1999), but methods which return

240: the entire velocity field, such as Fabry-Perot spectrographs (Vaughan 1989)

241: or integral (fiber-optic) field instruments (Krabbe et al. 1997) offer more

242: velocity information at the price of more complex and time-consuming reductions.

243: Although H$\alpha$, [NII], and [SII] emission lines have traditionally

244: been employed, the Seyfert galaxy NGC 1068 has become the first galaxy whose

245: velocity field has been studied from the IR [Si VI] line (Tecza et al. 2000).

246: Distant planetary nebula (Section 2.5) and satellite galaxies  are

247: valuable test particles for determining the mass distribution at large

248: distances from galaxy nuclei. For a limited number of nearby galaxies,

249: rotation curves can be produced from velocities of individual HII regions

250: in galactic disks (Rubin \& Ford, 1970, 1983;

251: Zaritsky et al. 1989, 1990, 1994).

252: 

253: \subsection{HI line}

254: 

255: The HI line is a powerful tool to obtain kinematics of spiral galaxies,

256: in part because its radial extent is often greater, sometimes 3 or 4

257: times greater, than that of the visible disk. Bosma's thesis (1981a, b;

258: van der Kruit \& Allen 1978)  played a fundamental role in establishing

259: the flatness of spiral rotation curves. Instrumental improvements in the last

260: 20 years have increased the spatial resolution of the beam, so that problems

261:  arising from low resolution are important only near the nucleus or in special

262:   cases (Section 4). While comparison of the inner velocity rise for

263: NGC 3198 showed good agreement between the 21-cm and the optical velocities

264: (van Albada et al. 1985; Hunter et al. 1986), the agreement was poor for Virgo

265:  spirals observed at low HI resolution (Guhathakurta et al. 1988;

266:  Rubin et al. 1989).

267: For low surface brightness galaxies, there is still discussion over whether

268: the slow velocity rise is an attribute of the galaxy or due the

269: instrumentation and reduction procedures (Swatters 1999, 2001; de Blok et al

270: 2001; Section 7.5).

271: 

272: \subsection{CO Line}

273: 

274: The rotational transition lines of carbon monoxide (CO) in the millimeter wave

275: range [e.g., 115.27 GHz for $^{12}{\rm CO} (J=1-0)$ line, 230.5 GHz

276: for $J=2-1$] are valuable in studying rotation

277: kinematics of the inner disk and central regions of spiral galaxies,

278: for  extinction in the central dusty

279: disks is negligible at CO wavelengths (Sofue 1996, 1997).

280: Edge-on and high-inclination galaxies are particularly useful for

281: rotation curve analysis in order to minimize the uncertainty arising

282: from inclination corrections, for which extinction-free measurements are

283: crucial, especially for central rotation curves.

284: 

285: Because the central few kpc of the disk are dominated by molecular gas

286: (Young \& Scoville 1992; Young et al. 1995; Kenny \& Young 1988;

287: Garcia-Burillo et al. 1993; Nakai et al. 1995; Nishiyama \& Nakai 1998;

288: Sakamoto 1999),

289: the molecular fraction,  the ratio of the

290: molecular-gas mass density to that of total of molecular and HI masses,

291: usually exceeds 90\% (Sofue et al. 1995; Honma et al. 1995).

292: CO lines are emitted from molecular clouds associated with

293: star formation regions emitting the \ha\ line.

294: Hence, CO is a good alternative to \ha\,  and also to HI in the

295: inner disk, while HI is often weak or absent in the central regions.

296: The \ha, CO, and HI rotation curves agree well with each other

297: in the intermediate region disks of spiral galaxies

298: (Sofue 1996; Sofue et al. 1999a, b).

299: Small displacements between \ha\ and CO rotation curves can arise in the

300: inner regions from the extinction of the optical lines and the contamination

301: of the continuum star light from central bulges.

302: 

303: Decades ago, single dish observations in the mm wave range had angular

304: resolutions limited from  several to tens of arc seconds

305: due to the aperture diffraction limit.

306: Recently, however, interferometric observations have achieved sub- or

307: one-arcsec resolution  (Sargent and Welch 1993; Scoville et al. 1993;

308: Schinnerer et al. 2000; Sofue et al. 2000), comparable to, or sometimes

309: higher than, the current optical measurements (Fig. 1).

310: Another advantage of CO spectroscopy is its high velocity

311: resolution of one to several \kms.

312: 

313: \v

314: ---- Fig. 1 ---

315: \v

316: 

317: \subsection{Maser Lines}

318: 

319: Radial velocity observations of maser lines, such as SiO, OH and H$_2$O

320: lines, from circum-stellar shells and gas clouds allow us to measure

321: the kinematics of stellar components in the disk and bulge of our Galaxy

322: (Lindqvist et al. 1992a, b; Izumiura 1995, 1999; Deguchi et al. 2000).

323: VLBI astrometry of SiO maser stars' proper motion and parallax

324: as well as radial velocities will reveal more unambiguous rotation of

325: the Galaxy in the future.

326: VLBI measurements of water masers from nuclei of galaxies reveal circumnuclear

327: rotation on scales of 0.1 pc around massive central black holes, as was

328: successfully observed for NGC 4258 (Miyoshi et al. 1995; see Section 4.4).

329: 

330: \subsection{Planetary Nebulae, Fabry-Perot, and Integral Field Spectrometers}

331: 

332: Planetary nebulae (PN) are valuable tracers of the velocity fields of early

333: type and complex galaxies, at large nuclear distances where the optical

334: light is faint or absent (Jacoby et al. 1990;

335: Arnaboldi  1998; Gerssen 2000),

336: and for galaxies in clusters (Cen A, Hui et al. 1995;

337: Fornax A, Arnaboldi et al. 1998). The simultaneous analysis of absorption

338:  line velocities for inner regions and hundreds of PN in the outer regions

339:  can constrain the viewing geometry as no single tracer can, and thus

340: reveal valuable details of the kinematics and the mass distribution

341: (Rix et al. 1997; Arnaboldi et al. 1998).

342: 

343: Fabry-Perot spectrometers are routinely used to derive the H$\alpha$ velocity

344: fields of spirals of special interest  (Vaughan 1989; Vogel et al. 1993;  Regan

345: and Vogel 1994; Weiner \& Williams 1996). Like Integral Field Spectrometry

346: (Krabbe et al. 1997), these techniques will

347: acquire more adherents as the instrument use and the reduction techniques

348: become routine.

349: 

350: 

351: %%% 3

352: \section{MEASURING ROTATION VELOCITIES}

353: 

354: Although the mathematics of rotating disks is well established

355: (e.g., Plummer 1911, Mestel, 1963, Toomre 1982, Binney \& Tremaine 1987,

356: Binney \& Merrifield, 1998) the analysis of the observational data has

357: continued to evolve as the quality of the data has improved.

358: Both emission lines

359: and absorption lines at a point on a spectrum are an integral along the line

360: of sight through the galaxy. Only  recently has the quality of the

361: observational material permitted the deconvolution of various components.

362: We describe a few procedures below.

363: 

364: \subsection{Intensity-Weighted-Velocity Method}

365: 

366: A rotation curve of a galaxy is defined as the trace of velocities on a

367: position-velocity (PV) diagram along the major axis, corrected for the

368: angle between the line-of-sight and the galaxy disk.

369: A widely used method is to trace intensity-weighted velocities

370: (Warner et al. 1973),

371: which are  defined by

372: \be

373:  V_{\rm int}=\int I(v) v dv / \int I(v) dv,

374: \ee

375: where $I(v)$ is the intensity profile at a given radius

376: as a function of the radial velocity.

377: Rotation velocity is then given by

378: \be

379: \Vrot=(V_{\rm int}- V_{\rm sys})/{\rm sin}~i,

380: \ee

381: where $i$ is the inclination angle and

382: $V_{\rm sys}$ is the systemic velocity of the galaxy.

383: 

384: \subsection{Centroid-Velocity and Peak-Intensity-Velocity Methods}

385: 

386: In outer galactic disks, where line profiles can be assumed to be

387: symmetric about the peak-intensity value, the intensity-weighted velocity can

388: be approximated by a centroid velocity of half-maximum values of a line

389: profile (Rubin et al. 1980, 1982, 1985),

390: or alternatively by a velocity at which the intensity attains

391: its maximum, the peak-intensity velocity (Mathewson et al. 1992, 1996).

392: Both methods have been adopted in deriving emission line rotation curves.

393: Tests indicate that centroid measures of weak emission lines show less scatter

394: (Rubin, unpublished).

395: 

396: However, for inner regions, where the line profiles are not

397: simple, but are superposition of outer and inner disk components,

398: these two methods often under-estimate the true rotation velocity.

399: The same situation occurs for edge-on galaxies, where line profiles are the

400: superposition of profiles arising from all radial distances sampled along

401: the line-of-sight. In these circumstances,

402: the envelope-tracing method described below

403: gives more reliable rotation curves.

404: 

405: \subsection{Envelope-Tracing Method}

406: 

407: This method makes use of the terminal velocity in a PV diagram along the

408: major axis.

409: The rotation velocity is derived by using the terminal velocity

410: $V_{\rm t}$:

411: \be

412: \Vrot=(V_{\rm t}-V_{\rm sys}) / {\rm sin}~i~

413: -(\sigma_{\rm obs}^2 + \sigma_{\rm ISM}^2)^{1/2},

414: \ee

415: where $\sigma_{\rm ISM}$ and $\sigma_{\rm obs}$ are

416: the velocity dispersion of the interstellar gas and the velocity resolution

417: of observations, respectively.

418: The interstellar velocity dispersion is of the order of

419: $\sigma_{\rm ISM} \sim 7$ to 10 \kms, while $\sigma_{\rm obs}$ depends on

420: instruments.

421: 

422: Here, the terminal velocity is defined by a velocity at which

423: the intensity becomes equal to

424: \be

425: I_{\rm t}=[(\eta I_{\rm max})^2+I_{\rm lc}^2]^{1/2}

426: \ee

427: on observed PV diagrams, where $I_{\rm max}$ and $I_{\rm lc}$ are

428: the maximum intensity and intensity corresponding to the lowest contour level,

429: respectively, and $\eta$ is usually taken to be 0.2 to 0.5.

430: For $\eta=0.2$,

431: this equation defines a 20\% level of the intensity profile at a fixed

432: position, $I_{\rm t}\simeq 0.2 \times I_{\rm max}$,

433: if the signal-to-noise ratio is sufficiently high. If the intensity is weak,

434: the equation gives

435: $I_{\rm t}\simeq I_{\rm lc}$ which approximately defines the loci along

436: the lowest contour level (usually $\sim 3 \times$ rms noise).

437: 

438: For nearly face-on galaxies observed at

439: sufficiently high angular resolution,

440: these three methods give an almost identical rotation curve.

441: However, both finite beam width and disk thickness

442: along the line of sight cause confusion of gas with

443: smaller velocities than the terminal velocity,

444: which often results in a lower rotation velocity in the former two methods.

445: 

446: The  envelope-tracing method is ill-defined when applied to

447: the innermost part of a PV diagram, for the two sides of the nucleus

448: have a discontinuity at the nucleus due

449: principally to the instrumental resolution, which is large with respect to

450: the velocity gradients. In practice, this discontinuity is avoided by

451: stopping the tracing

452: at a radius corresponding to the telescope resolution, and then

453: approximating the rotation curve by a straight

454: line crossing the nucleus at zero velocity. The $``$solid body" rotation

455: implied by this procedure is probably a poor approximation to the true

456: motions near the nucleus (Section 4.3).

457: 

458: \subsection{Iteration Method}

459: 

460: Takamiya and Sofue (private communication)

461: have developed an iterative method to derive a

462: rotation curve. This extremely reliable method comprises the following

463: procedure. An initial rotation curve, RC0, is adopted from a PV diagram (PV0),

464: obtained by any method as above (e.g. a peak-intensity method).

465: Using this rotation curve and an observed radial distribution of

466: intensity (emissivity) of the line used in the analysis, a PV diagram, PV1, is

467: constructed. The difference between this calculated PV diagram and the

468: original PV0, e.g. the difference between peak-intensity velocities, is used to

469: correct the initial rotation curve to obtain a corrected rotation curve, RC1.

470: This RC is used to calculated another PV diagram PV2 using the observed

471: intensity distribution, and to obtain the next iterated rotation curve, RC2

472: by correcting for the difference between PV2 and PV0.

473: This iteration is repeated until PV$i$ and PV0 becomes identical, such that

474: the summation of root mean square of the differences between PV$i$ and

475: PV0 becomes minimum and stable.

476: RC$i$ is adopted as the most reliable rotation curve.

477: 

478: 

479: \subsection{Absorption Line Velocities}

480: 

481: For several decades, the Fourier quotient technique (Simkin 1974,

482: Sargent et al.  1977) or the correlation technique (Bender 1990,

483: Franx \& Illingworth 1988) were methods of choice for determining

484: rotation velocities within early-type galaxies.

485: Both procedures assume that the   stellar absorption lines formed by

486: the integration along the line of sight through the galaxy can be

487: fit by a Gaussian profile. However, recent instrumental improvements

488: confirm that even disk galaxies consist of multi-component kinematic

489: structures, so more sophisticated methods of analysis

490: are required to reveal velocity  details of the separate stellar components.

491: 

492: Various methods have been devised to account for the non-Gaussian

493: form of the line-of-sight velocity distribution. Line profiles

494: can be expanded into a truncated Gauss-Hermite series

495: (van der Marel \& Franx 1993) which measure the asymmetric deviations

496: (h{$_3$}) and the symmetric deviations (h{$_4$}) from Gaussian.

497: Alternatively, one can use the unresolved

498: Gaussian decomposition method (Kuijken and Merrifield 1993).

499: Other procedures to determine line profiles and their higher

500: order moments (e.g. Bender 1990, Rix \& White 1992, Gerhard 1993)

501: are in general agreement (Fisher 1997); differences arise

502: from signal-to-noise, resolution,

503: and template mismatch. Such procedures will define the future

504: state-of-the-art.

505: 

506: \subsection{Dependence on Observational Methods}

507: 

508: Disk galaxies are a complex combination of various structural components.

509: Observations from emission lines and absorption lines in the optical, mm, and

510: radio regions may not sample identical regions along the same line-of-sight.

511: Instruments sample at  different sensitivities with different wavelength and

512: spatial resolutions.

513: Results are a function of the techniques of observations and reductions.

514: A simple $``$rotation curve" is an approximation as a function of radius

515: to the full velocity field of a disk galaxy.

516: As such, it  can be obtained only by neglecting small scale

517: velocity variations, and by

518: averaging and smoothing  rotation velocities from both sides of the

519: galactic center. Because it is a simple, albeit

520: approximate, description of a spiral velocity field, it is likely to be

521: valuable even as more complex descriptions become available for many galaxies.

522: 

523: 

524: %%% 4

525: \section{CENTRAL ROTATION CURVES}

526: 

527: 

528: Centers of galaxies are still mysterious places.  For galaxies as close as the

529: Virgo cluster, 0.1$''$ subtends about 8pc.  Only in a few special cases can

530: the stellar or gas kinematics be inferred on such scales: for very few

531: galaxies can we   sample velocity fields on scales of tens of parsecs.

532: Generally, when astronomers

533: discuss circumnuclear rotation curves, they refer to velocities  measured

534: from spectra where a single resolution element encompasses a large fraction of

535: the radius on which the velocities vary. $``$High accuracy" and $``$high

536: resolution" mean high with respect the present state-of-the-art.

537: 

538: \subsection{High Resolution and Dynamic Range}

539: 

540: A simulation reveals the effects of the finite resolution on the observed PV

541: diagram, for a galaxy with assumed gas and mass distributions (Sofue 1999a).

542: Fig. 2 shows an assumed rotation curve for a galaxy containing

543: a central compact core, bulge, disk

544: and massive halo, each expressed by a Plummer potential.

545: In the observed PV diagram, however, the central steep rise and

546: the peaks due to the core and bulge are

547: hardly recognized.

548: Central rotation curves derived from observed

549: PV diagrams generally give {\it lower limits} to the rotation velocities.

550: In fact, this conclusion holds for virtually all procedures

551: which do not adequately account for the finite observed resolution.

552: 

553: \v

554: --- Fig. 2 ---

555: \v

556: 

557: CCD spectroscopy has made it possible to derive optical rotation curves of

558: centers of galaxies, due to high dynamic range and

559: precise subtraction of bulge continuum light

560: (Rubin \& Graham 1987; Woods et al. 1990; Rubin et al. 1997;

561: Sofue et al. 1998, 1999a;

562: Bertola et al. 1998). However, optical spectroscopy often encounters additional

563: difficulty arising from

564: extinction due to dusty nuclear disks as well as confusion with absorption

565: features from Balmar wings of  A-type stars.

566: These problems are lessened at the wavelength of CO lines because of

567: the  negligible extinction, the high molecular gas content, and the high

568: spatial and velocity resolution. At present,

569: the combination of optical and CO-line spectroscopy produces rotation

570: curves of high accuracy, reliable for the entire regions of galaxies

571: including the central regions

572: (Sofue 1996, 1997, Sofue et al. 1997, 1998, 1999).

573: 

574: In a few special cases, nuclear disks have been studied with other techniques.

575: For several bright radio cores, HI absorption features

576: have revealed high-velocity central disks

577: (Ables et al. 1987; Irwin \& Seaquist 1991).

578: Rapidly rotating nuclear disks studied from their water maser emission

579: and very high resolution observations are discussed in Section 4.4.

580: 

581: \subsection{The Milky Way Center}

582: 

583: By its proximity, our Galaxy provides a unique opportunity

584: to derive a high resolution central rotation curve (Gilmore et al. 1990).

585: Proper-motion studies in the near infrared show

586: that the velocity dispersion of stars within the central 1 pc

587: increases toward the center, indicating the existence of a massive

588: black hole of mass $3\times 10^6\Msun$ (Genzel et al. 1997, 2000;

589: Ghez et al. 1998).

590: 

591: The rotation curve varies slightly depending upon the tracer.

592: A rotation curve formed from high resolution

593: CO and HI-line spectroscopy

594: (Burton \& Gordon 1978; Clemens 1985; Combes 1992),

595: shows a very steep rise in the central hundred

596: pc region, attaining a peak velocity of 250 \kms\ at $R\sim 300$ pc.

597: It then decreases to a minimum at $R\sim 3$ kpc of about 200 \kms,

598: followed by a gentle maximum at 6 kpc and a flat part beyond the solar

599: circle. Rotation velocities due to the black hole are combined

600: with the outer velocities in Fig. 3: the curve is presented

601: both in linear and logarithmic plots.

602: Of course, the rotation velocity does not decline to zero at the nucleus,

603: but increases inward, following a Keplerian law.

604: 

605: \v

606: --- Fig. 3 ---

607: \v

608: 

609: Radial velocities of OH and SiO maser lines from IR stars in the Galactic

610: Center region are used to derive the velocity dispersion and the mass

611: within the observed radius, as well as the mean rotation, which

612: seems to take part in the Galactic rotation

613: (Lindqvist et al.1992a, b; Sjouwerman et al. 1998).

614: SiO masers from IRAS sources in the central bulge

615: have been used to study the kinematics, and the mean rotation of the bulge

616: was found to be in solid body rotation of the order of 100 \kms

617: (Izumiura et al. 1995; Deguchi et al. 2000).

618: SiO masers in the disk region have been also used to study the structure

619: and kinematics of a possible bar structure and non-circular streaming motion

620: superposed on the disk and bulge components (Izumiura et al. 1999).

621: 

622: \subsection{Rapidly Rotating Central Components and Massive Cores}

623: 

624: Central rotation curves have been produced for a number of galaxies

625: by a systematic compilation of PV diagrams in the CO and \ha\ lines

626: (Sofue 1996; Sofue et al. 1997, 1998, 1999).

627: Fig. 4 shows  rotation curves obtained for nearby galaxies

628: at high  spatial and velocity resolution.

629: For massive spiral galaxies, high nuclear velocities may be a universal

630: property, but detected only with highest resolution observations.

631: Even a decade ago, it was observed (Rubin \& Graham 1987) that innermost

632: velocities  for some galaxies start from an already

633: high velocity at the nucleus. But high central density may not be a

634: characteristic only of massive galaxies. The nearby M33 (1$''$=3pc), a galaxy

635: with a minimal $``$bulge", exhibits velocities over the inner $\pm$200pc which

636: are flat at about V=100 \kms\

637: (Rubin 1987), and do not decrease to zero at the

638: origin.

639: Here too, the contribution from the falling density of a peaked central mass

640: exceeds the density contribution from the disk.

641: 

642: \v

643: --- Fig. 4 ---

644: \v

645: 

646: Bertola et al. (1998) have emphasized that the

647: high-velocity nuclear peaks observed in some spiral

648: galaxies   match the simulated PV diagrams  for

649: Keplerian rotation due to a massive ($\sim 10^9\Msun$) black hole, at

650: equivalent resolution.  Even more dramatic, the analysis of

651: Maciejewski  \& Binney (2000) show that when a galaxy with an arbitrarily

652: large central velocity gradient is observed with a slit wider than the

653: instrumental point spread function, artifacts are generated in the spectra.

654: Such artifacts  can erroneously be interpreted as discrete kinematic

655: components, and may account for some of the features observed in the

656: spectra of Virgo galaxies (Rubin et al. 1999).

657: 

658: Evidence confirms that the steep nuclear rise observed in massive

659: galaxies is real, and not  due to a particular view of non-circular motions.

660: The probability of looking at a bar side-on

661: is larger than that of viewing one end-on. Hence there is

662: a larger probability for apparently slower rotation

663: than circular velocity.

664: For these massive galaxies, the mass density increases toward the

665: nucleus more rapidly than expected from an exponential or de Vaucouleurs law.

666: The widely adopted custom of drawing a rotation curve by linking

667: positive and negative velocities from the opposite sides across the

668: nucleus along the major axis is incorrect, at least for these massive galaxies.

669: 

670: 

671: \subsection{Massive Black Holes and Circum-nuclear Rotation}

672: 

673: For many spirals, the innermost region exhibits rapid rotation velocities

674: (Carter \& Jenkins 1993; van der Marel et al. 1994;

675: Miyoshi et al. 1995; Kormendy \& Richstone 1995; Richstone, et al. 1998,

676: Bertola et al. 1998; Ferrarese 1999; Kormendy \& Westpfahl 1989;

677: Kormendy 2001).

678: These high velocities offer evidence for massive nuclear black holes.

679: Consequently, orbital velocities in the center decrease rapidly from a

680: velocity close to the speed of light.

681: Detecting these high central velocities will require both

682: enormously high spatial and velocity resolution and is a program for

683: the future.

684: 

685: At present, spectroscopic sub arcsecond seeing is limited to the Space

686: Telescope Imaging Spectrographs(STIS) and

687: a few ground based telescopes, except in special cases.

688: STIS is now engaged in a major study of a sample of 54 Sb-Sc spirals,

689: V$\le$2000\kms\  to obtain spectra at H$\alpha$,

690: within a few arcsec of the nucleus (Axon, unpublished).

691: The aim is to measure black hole masses, or significant upper limits.

692: 

693: In one very special nearby galaxy, NGC 4258, water masers at 22 GHz

694: are observed  from a disk of radius 0.1 pc in

695: Keplerian rotation about a mass of $3.9 \times 10^{7}\Msun$ (Nakai et al. 1993;

696: Watson \& Wallim 1994; Miyoshi et al. 1995; Herrnstein et al. 1999).

697: The maximum rotation velocity is 900 \kms; the rotation period is 800 years.

698: VLBI observations of the water maser line

699: have revealed a rapidly rotating nuclear torus of sub parsec scales

700: in several nearby active galactic nuclei

701: (NGC 3079: Haschick et al. 1990; Trotter et al. 1998; Sawada-Satoh et al. 2000;

702: NGC 1068: Greenhill et al. 1996; NGC 4945: Greenhill et al. 1997).

703: 

704: 

705: 

706: \subsection{Activity and Rotation Curves}

707: 

708: One might ask whether the existence of massive objects in the nuclei,

709: as suggested from the high central velocities, is correlated with nuclear

710: activity.

711: High-accuracy central rotation curves for starburst galaxies

712: (NGC 253, NGC 1808, NGC 3034),

713: Seyferts (NGC 1068, NGC 1097), LINERs (NGC 3521, NGC 4569, NGC 7331),

714: and galaxies with nuclear jets (NGC 3079) (Sofue et al. 1999a;

715: Brinks et al. 1997) show, however, no particular peculiarity.

716: Even such a very active galaxy like NGC 5128 (Cen  A) shows a rotation

717: curve much like a normal galaxy (van Gorkom et al. 1990).

718: The radio lobe galaxy NGC 3079 has both strong nuclear activity

719: and usual rotation properties, but with very high central velocities

720: (Sofue \& Irwin 1992; Irwin \& Sofue 1992; Sofue et al. 1999a).

721: While these galaxies all show a very steep central velocity rise, such steep

722: rise is generally observed

723: for massive galaxies without pronounced central activity. Because

724: the global rotation and mass distribution in active spirals

725: are generally normal, it is likely that nuclear activity is triggered by local

726: and temporal causes around central massive cores and/or black holes.

727: 

728: 

729: \subsection{Resonance Rings}

730: 

731: The ring resonance in rotating disks will affect the kinematics

732: and rotation of gas and stars in a galaxy disk.

733: Rotation curves for several ring galaxies  (Buta et al. 1995, 1999) exhibit

734: normal rotation properties, showing a steep nuclear rise,  high-velocity

735: peak near the resonance ring, and flat velocities in the disk and halo.

736: Simulations of rotation properties for a bar resonance mimic well the

737: observed variations of rotation velocities, which is of the

738: order of $\pm 20 - 30$ \kms\ (Salo et al. 1999).

739: 

740: \subsection{ Nuclear Warp}

741: 

742: A major interest in current interferometer observations of the

743: CO line emissions from nuclear regions is the

744: detailed orientation of the nuclear molecular disk (NMD)

745: and circum-nuclear torus.

746: A NMD is produced by accretion of disk gas due to an

747: angular momentum transfer to the massive disk by galactic

748: shock waves, either in spiral arms or bars, whereas off-axis angular

749: momentum such as associated with warping is invariant.

750: If the accreting disk has a warp, as is often the case and is particularly

751: prominent in mergers and interacting galaxies,

752: the displacement of angular momentum of accreting disk from the original

753: rotation axis is amplified.

754: Hence, NMDs often exhibit significant warp from the main disk.

755: Interferomeric CO observations exhibit that

756: NGC 3079's NMD is warped from the main disk by 20 degrees

757: which contains a higher-density molecular core inclined from both the

758: NMD and main disk (Sofue et al. 2000);

759: NGC 1068 shows an warped nuclear disk surrounding a nuclear torus whose

760: axis is quite different from that of the main disk and nuclear disk

761: (Kaneko et al. 1997; Schinnerer et al. 2000).

762: A nuclear warp produces uncertain inclination corrections in the

763: rotation velocities. These can  be minimized by observing edge-on galaxies.

764: 

765: \subsection{Nuclear Counterrotation}

766: 

767: An extreme case of a nuclear warp is  counterrotation.

768: Rotating nuclear disks of cold gas have been discovered in  more than 100

769: galaxies, types E through Sc

770: (Bertola \& Galletta 1978; Galletta 1987, 1996; Bertola et al. 1990;

771: Bertola et al. 1992; Rubin 1994b; Garcia-Burillo et al. 1998);

772: counterrotation is not especially rare.

773: Simulations of disk interactions and mergers which  include gas and stellar

774: particles (Hernquist \& Barnes 1991; Barnes \& Hernquist 1992)

775: reveal that a kinematically distinct nuclear gas disk can form;

776: it may be counterrotating.

777: Simulation of galactic-shock accretion of nuclear gas disk

778: in an oval potential, such as a nuclear bar,

779: produces highly eccentric streaming motion toward the nucleus,

780: some portion being counterrotating (Wada et al. 1999).

781: Kinematically decoupled {\it stellar} nuclear disks are also observed in

782: early type galaxies (Jedrzejewski \& Schechter 1989;

783: Franx et al.  1991). Counter rotating nuclear disks can result from

784: merger, mass exchange and/or

785: inflow of intergalactic clouds.

786: In addition to forming the central disk,  an inflow of

787: counterrotating gas would also be likely to promote nuclear activity.

788: 

789: \subsection{Non-circular Motion in Nuclear Molecular Bar}

790: 

791: Oval potential such as due to a bar produces galactic shocks of

792: interstellar gas, and the shocked gas streams along the bar in

793: non-circular orbits (Sorensen et al. 1976;

794: Noguchi 1988; Wada \& Habe 1992, 1995; Shlosman 1990).

795: The velocity of streaming motion during its out-of-shock passage

796: is higher than the circular velocity, while the velocity

797: during its shock passage is much slower than circular velocity, close to

798: the pattern speed of the bar in rigid-body rotation.

799: The molecular gas is strongly condensed in the galactic shock, and stays

800: there for a large fraction of its orbiting period.

801: Hence, CO line velocities manifest the velocity of shocked gas,

802: and therefore, observed CO velocities are close to those of gas in

803: rigid-body motion with a bar, slower than the circular velocity.

804: This results in underestimated rotation velocities.

805: Geometrical effect that the probability of side-on view of a bar

806: is greater than that of end-on view also causes underestimated rotation

807: velocities.

808: 

809: Bar-driven non-circular motion of the order of 20 to 50 \kms\

810: are observed in central molecular disks

811: (Ishizuki et al. 1990; Handa et al. 1990;

812: Sakamoto et al. 1999; Kenney et al. 1992; Kohno 1998; Kohno et al. 1999).

813: The CO-line PV diagram in the Milky Way Center (Bally et al. 1985;

814: Oka et al. 1998; Sofue 1995) shows that the majority ($\sim 95$\%) of

815: gas is rotating in steep rigid-body features.

816: A few percent exhibits non-circular 'forbidden' velocities,

817: which could be due to non-circular motion in an

818: oval potential (Binney et al. 1991), whereas a question remains why

819: the majority of the gas is regularly rotating.

820: Because the gas is shocked and intensity-weighted velocities are smaller

821: than the circular velocity as discussed above, determination of mass

822: distribution in barred galaxies from observed CO velocities

823: is not straightforward, and will be a challenge for numerical

824: simulations in the future.

825: 

826: %%% 5

827: 

828: \section{DISK ROTATION CURVES}

829: 

830: 

831: A disk rotation curve manifests the  distribution of

832: surface mass density in the disk, attaining a broad maximum at a

833: radius of about twice the scale radius of the exponential disk.

834: For massive Sb galaxies, the rotation maximum appears at a radius

835: of 5 or 6 kpc, which is about twice the scale length of the disk.

836: Beyond the maximum, the rotation curve is usually flat,

837: merging with the flat portion due to the massive dark halo.

838: Superposed on the smooth rotation curve are fluctuations of

839: a few tens of \kms\ due to spiral arms or velocity ripples.

840: For barred spirals, the fluctuations are larger, of order 50 \kms,

841: arising from non circular motions in the oval potential.

842: 

843: 

844: \subsection{Statistical Properties of Rotation Curves}

845: 

846: The overall similarity of shapes of rotation curves for spiral galaxies

847: has led to a variety of attempts to categorize their forms, and to establish

848: their statistical properties.

849: Kyazumov (1984) cataloged rotation curve parameters for 116 normal

850: S and Ir galaxies, and categorized the

851: shapes.  Rubin et al. (1985) formed families of Sa, Sb, and Sc synthetic

852: rotation curves as a function of luminosity, from the galaxies they had

853: observed. Casertano \& van Gorkom (1991), using HI velocities, studied

854: rotation curves as a function of luminosity.

855: 

856: Mathewson et al. (1992, 1996) used their massive set of \ha\

857: rotation curves together with optical luminosity profiles for

858: 2447 southern galaxies,  to examine the Tully-Fisher (1977) relation.

859: For a subset of 1100 optical and radio rotation curves,

860: Persic et al. (1995, 1996) fit the curves by a formula, which is a

861: function of total luminosity and radius, comprising both disk and

862: halo components. Both the forms and amplitudes are functions of

863: the luminosity, and  the outer gradient of the RC is a decreasing

864: function of luminosity.  Their formula does not contain any free

865: parameters, and they call it universal rotation curve.

866: Courteau (1997) obtained optical long-slit rotation curves for 304

867: Sb-Sc northern UGC galaxies for Tully-Fisher applications, and

868: fitted them empirically by a simple function for the purpose to calculate

869: line widths.

870: Roscoe (1999) has also empirically parameterized outer rotation

871: curves by an extremely simple power law of radius.

872: 

873: Universal rotation curves reveal the following characteristics.

874: Most luminous galaxies show  a slightly declining rotation curves in

875: the outer part, following a broad maximum in the disk.

876: Intermediate galaxies have nearly flat rotation from across the disk.

877: Less luminous galaxies have monotonically increasing

878: rotation velocities across the optical disk.

879: While Persic et al. conclude that the dark-to-luminous mass ratio

880: increases with decreasing luminosity, mass deconvolutions are far from unique.

881: 

882: A study of 30 spirals in the Ursa Major Cluster  (Verheijen 1997) showed

883: that 1/3 of the galaxies (chosen to have kinematically unperturbed gas disks)

884: have velocity curves which do not conform to the universal curve shape.

885: Like humans, rotation curves have their individualities, but they share many

886: common characteristics.  These common properties are meaningful in some

887: situations: in other circumstances their use may be misleading. It is

888: important to apply the common properties only in

889: appropriate situations, e.g., for outer disk and halo beyond $\sim 0.5$

890: optical radii, corresponding to several kpc for Sb and Sc galaxies.

891: Inner rotation curves have greater individuality (Sofue et al. 1999a).

892: 

893: \subsection{Environmental Effects in Clusters}

894: 

895: A variety of physical mechanisms can alter the internal kinematics of spirals

896: in clusters, just as these mechanism have altered the morphology of galaxies

897: in clusters (Dressler 1984; Cayatte et al. 1990).

898: Gas stripping (REF), star stripping, galaxy-galaxy encounters, and interaction

899: with the general tidal field are all likely to occur. Early studies of optical

900: rotation curves for galaxies in clusters (Burstein et al. 1986;

901: Rubin et al. 1988; Whitmore et al. 1988, 1989)

902: detected a correlation between outer rotation-velocity gradients

903: and distances of galaxies from the cluster center. Inner cluster galaxies show

904: shallower rotation curves than outer cluster galaxies,  for distances

905: 0.25 to 5 Mpc from cluster centers.

906: These authors suggest that the outer galaxy mass is truncated in the

907: cluster environment. Later studies have failed to confirm this result

908: (Amram et al. 1992, 1993, 1996; Sperandio et al. 1995).

909: 

910: A study of rotation curves for 81 galaxies in Virgo (Rubin et al. 1999,

911: Rubin \& Haltiwanger 2001) shows that about half (43) have rotation curves

912: identified as disturbed. Abnormalities include asymmetrical rotation

913: velocities on the two sides of the major axis, falling outer rotation curves,

914: inner velocity peculiarities, including velocities hovering near zero at

915: small radii, and dips in mid-disk rotation velocities.  Kinematic disturbance

916: is not correlated with morphology, luminosity, Hubble type, inclination,

917: maximum velocity, magnitude, or local galaxy density.

918: 

919: Virgo spirals with disturbed kinematics have a Gaussian distribution of

920: systemic velocities which matches that of the cluster ellipticals; spirals

921: with regular rotation show a flat distribution.  Both ellipticals and

922: kinematically disturbed spirals are apparently in the process of establishing

923: an equilibrium population. H$\alpha$ emission extends farther in the

924: disturbed spirals; the  gravitational interactions have also enhanced

925: star formation. The distribution on the sky and in systemic

926: velocity suggests that kinematically disturbed galaxies are on elongated

927: orbits which carry them into the cluster core, where galaxy-cluster and

928: galaxy-galaxy interactions are more common and stronger. Self-consistent

929: N-body models

930: that explore the first pass of two gravitationally interacting disk galaxies

931: (Barton et al. 1999) produce rotation curves with  mid-region velocity

932: dips matching those observed. Models of disk galaxies falling for the first

933: time into the cluster mean field (Valluri 1993) show m=1 (warp)

934: and m=2 (bar and spiral arms)

935: perturbations.

936: 

937: \subsection{Lopsided Position-Velocity Diagrams}

938: 

939: There is increased interest in galaxies with kinematically

940: lopsided HI profiles (Baldwin 1980; Sancisi 2001), which can arise from

941: a large-scale asymmetry of HI gas distribution in the spiral disk.

942: Of 1700 HI profiles, at least 50\% show asymmetries  (Richter \& Sancisi 1994);

943: recent work (Haynes et al. 1998) confirms this fraction. Because HI profiles

944: result from an integration of the velocity and the

945: HI distribution, {\it resolved} HI velocity fields offer more direct

946: information on kinematic lopsidedness.

947: From resolved HI velocity fields, Swaters et al. (1999) also estimate the

948: disturbed fraction to be at least 50\%.

949: 

950: As noted above, about 50\% of Virgo spirals show optical major

951: axis velocity disturbances; how this figure translates into lopsided

952: HI profiles is presently unclear.

953: The  field spirals studied earlier by Rubin et al. (1985),

954: chosen to be isolated and without obvious morphological peculiarities,

955: have rotation curves which are {\it very} normal (74\%; Rubin et al. 1999).

956: Yet the sample of optical rotation curves for galaxies in the

957: Hickson groups (Rubin et al. 1991) shows noticeably lopsided rotation curves

958: for $\ge$ 50\%. Further studies are needed to establish the frequency of

959: lopsidedness as a function of luminosity, morphology, HI content, resolution,

960: sensitivity, extent of the observations, and environment.

961: 

962: \subsection{Counterrotating Disks and Other Kinematic  Curiosities}

963: 

964: Only a handful of galaxies are presently known to have counterrotating

965: components over a large fraction of their disks (Rubin 1994b).

966: The disk of E7/S0 NGC 4550, (Rubin et al. 1992; Keneey \& Faundez 2000)

967: contains two hospital stellar populations, one

968: orbiting programmed, one retrograde.

969: This discovery prompted modification of  computer programs

970: which fit only a single

971: Gaussian to integrated absorption lines in galaxy spectra (Rix et al. 1992).

972: In NGC 7217 (Sab), 30\% of the disk stars orbit retrograde

973: (Merrifield \& Kuijen 1994).

974: The bulge in NGC 7331 (Sbc) may (Prada et al. 1996) or may not

975: (Mediavilla et al. 1998) counterrotate with respect to the disk.

976: Stars in NGC 4826 (Sab; the Black Eye or Sleeping Beauty) orbit

977: with a single sense.

978: Gas extending from the nucleus through the broad dusty lane rotates prograde,

979: but reverses its sense of rotation immediately beyond; radial infall

980: motions are present where the galaxy velocities reverse

981: (Rubin et al. 1965; Braun et al. 1994;  Rubin 1994a;

982: Walterbos et al. 1994; Rix et al. 1995; Sil'chenko 1996).

983: 

984: However, galaxies with extended counterrotating disks are not common.

985: A peculiar case is the early type spiral NGC 3593,

986: which exhibits two cold counterrotating disks (Bertola et al. 1996).

987: Of 28 S0 galaxies examined by Kuijken (1996), none have

988: counterrotating components accounting for more than 5\% of the disk light

989: (see also Kannappan \& Fabricant 2000).

990: Formation mechanisms for counterrotating disks can be devised

991: (Thaker \& Ryden 1998),  although cases of failure are reported

992: only anecdotally (Spergel, private communication).

993: While such galaxies are generally assumed to be remnants of mergers,

994: models show that generally the disk

995: will heat up and/or be destroyed in a merger.

996: 

997: In an effort to circumvent the problem of disk destruction in a merger,

998: Evans \& Collett (1994) devised a mechanism for producing

999: equal numbers of prograde and retrograde stellar disk orbits,

1000: by scattering stars off a bar in a galaxy whose potential slowly changes

1001: from triaxial to more axisymmetric.

1002: In an even more dramatic solution by Tremaine \& Yu (2000;

1003: see also Heisler et al. 1982; van Albada et al. 1982)

1004: polar rings and/or counterrotating stellar disks can

1005: arise in a disk galaxy with a triaxial halo. As the pattern speed of the

1006: initially retrograde halo  changes to prograde due to infalling dark matter,

1007: orbits of disk stars caught at the Binney resonance can evolve from

1008: prograde to retrograde disk orbits. If, instead, the halo rotation

1009: decays only to zero, stars with small inclinations are

1010: levitated (Sridhar \& Touma 1996) into polar orbits.

1011: This model predicts that stellar orbits in a polar ring will be divided

1012: equally into two! counterrotating streams, making this a perfect

1013: observing program for a very large telescope.

1014: 

1015: As spectral observations obtain higher resolution and sensitivity, emission

1016: from weaker components is measured. VLA observations of  NGC 2403

1017: (Fraternali et al. 2000) reveal a normal rotation, plus more slowly

1018: rotating HI extensions, the $``$beard".

1019: HI detected in the forbidden velocity quadrants can be due to an

1020: infall of gas from an extended HI halo with slower rotation,

1021: perhaps from a galactic fountain flow (Schaap et al. 2000).

1022: Improved instrumentation permits detection of weaker features,

1023: so we glimpse the kinematic complexities which exist in minor populations

1024: of a single galaxy.

1025: 

1026: Edge-on  and face-on spirals are fine laboratories for studying

1027: vertical kinematics.

1028: In the edge on NGC 891, HI extends about 5 kpc above the plane,

1029: where it rotates at about 25 \kms, more slowly than the disk

1030: (Swaters et al. 1997).

1031: Slower rotation is also observed in the CO halo in the edge on dwarf

1032: M82 (Sofue et al. 1992).

1033: Face on galaxies like M101 and NGC 628 show often extended

1034: HI disk showing different kinematical properties from the

1035: disk (Kamphuis et al. 1991; Kamphuis \& Brigg 1992).

1036: 

1037: \subsection{Rotation of High Redshift Galaxies}

1038: 

1039: Only recently have rotation curves been obtained for distant galaxies,

1040: using HST and large-aperture ground-based telescopes with sub-arc second

1041: seeing.

1042: We directly observe galaxy evolution by studying galaxies closer to

1043: their era of formation. Rotation velocities for moderately distant

1044: spirals, z$\approx$ 0.2 to 0.4, (Bershady 1997, et al. 1999,

1045: Simard \& Prichet 1998, Kelson et al. 2000a)  have already been surpassed with

1046: Keck velocities reaching z$\approx$1 (Vogt et al. 1993, 1996, 1997; Koo 1999),

1047: for galaxies whose diameters subtend only a few seconds of arc.

1048: The rotation properties are similar to those of nearby galaxies,

1049: with peak velocities between 100 to 200 \kms, and flat outer disk velocities.

1050: 

1051: Regularly rotating spiral disks existed at z$\approx$1, when the universe was

1052: less than half of its present age. The Keck rotation velocities define a

1053: TF relation (i.e., the correlation of rotation velocity

1054: with blue magnitude) which matches to within $\le$0.5 magnitudes that for

1055: nearby spirals.

1056: Spiral galaxy evolution,  over the last half of the age of the universe,

1057: has not dramatically altered the TF correlation.

1058: 

1059: \subsection{Rotation Velocity as a Fundamental Parameter of Galaxy Dynamics

1060: and Evolution}

1061: 

1062: The maximum rotation velocity, reached

1063: at a few galactic-disk scale radii for average and larger sized

1064: spiral galaxies, is equivalent to one-half the velocity width of an integrated

1065: 21 cm  velocity profile.

1066: The Tully-Fisher relation (1977; Aaronson et al. 1980; Aaronson \& Mould 1986),

1067: the correlation between total velocity width and spiral absolute magnitude,

1068: represents an oblique projection of the fundamental plane of spiral galaxies,

1069: which defines a three-dimensional relation among the radius, rotation velocity,

1070: and luminosity (absolute magnitude) (Steinmetz \& Navarro 1999;

1071: Koda et al. 2000a,b).

1072: The shape of a disk rotation curve manifests the mass distribution

1073: in the exponential-disk, which is the result of dissipative process of

1074: viscous accreting gas through the proto-galactic disk evolution

1075: (Lin \& Pringle 1987).

1076: 

1077: As such, it emphasizes

1078: the essential role that rotation curves play in determining the principal

1079: galactic structures, and in our understanding of the formation

1080: of disk galaxies (e.g. Mo et al. 1998).

1081: For elliptical galaxies, the three parameter (half-light radius,

1082: surface brightness, and central velocity dispersion) fundamental plane

1083: relation (Bender et al. 1992; Burstein et al. 1997) is a

1084: tool for studying elliptical galaxy evolution, analogous to the

1085: spiral TF relation.

1086: Keck spectra and HST images  of 53 galaxies in cluster CL1358+62  (z=0.33)

1087: define a fundamental plane similar to that of nearby ellipticals

1088: (Kelson et al. 2000b).

1089: Ellipticals at z=0.33 are structurally mature; data for more distant

1090: ellipticals should be available within several years.

1091: 

1092: 

1093: %%% 6

1094: \section{HALO ROTATION CURVES AND DARK MATTER: A Brief Mention}

1095: 

1096: The difference between the matter distribution implied by the

1097: luminosity, and the distribution of mass implied by the rotation velocities,

1098: offers strong evidence that spiral galaxies are embedded in extended

1099: halos of dark matter. The physics of dark matter has been and will be

1100: one of the major issues to be studied by elementary particle

1101: physicists and astronomers.

1102: 

1103: \subsection{Flat Rotation Curve in the Halo}

1104: 

1105: When Rubin \& Ford (1970) published the rotation curve of M31,

1106: formed from velocities of 67 HII regions, they noted that the mass

1107: continued to rise

1108: out to the last measured region, 24 kpc. They concluded  $``$extrapolation

1109: beyond that distance is clearly a matter of taste".

1110: By 1978, Rubin et al.  (1978) had learned  that $``$rotation curves of

1111: high luminosity spiral galaxies are flat, at nuclear distances as

1112: great as 50 kpc" ($H_0=50$ \kmsmpc).

1113: Flat HI rotation curves were first noticed (Roberts \& Rots 1973) using a

1114: single dish telescope.

1115: However, it would be a few years before the observers and the theorists

1116: (Ostriker \& Peebles 1973; Ostriker et al. 1974,  Einasto et al. 1974)

1117: recognized each others' work, and collectively  asserted that disk

1118: galaxies are immersed in extended dark matter halos.

1119: 

1120: Deeper and higher-resolution HI observations with synthesis telescopes

1121: reveal that for the majority of spiral galaxies, rotation curves remain flat

1122: beyond the optical disks (Bosma 1981a, b; Guhathakurta et al. 1988;

1123: van Albada et al. 1985; Begeman 1989).

1124: The Sc galaxy UGC 2885 has the largest known HI disk, with HI radius of

1125: 120 kpc for $H_0=50$ \kmsmpc\ (85 kpc

1126: for $H_0=70$ \kmsmpc); the HI rotation curve is

1127: still flat (Roelfsema \& Allen 1985).

1128: 

1129: The conclusion that a flat rotation curve is due to a massive dark halo

1130: surrounding a spiral disk requires that Newtonian gravitational theory

1131: holds over cosmological distances. Although proof of this assumption

1132: is lacking, most astronomers and physicists prefer this explanation to

1133: the alternative, that   Newtonian

1134: dynamics need modification for use over great distances.

1135: For readers interested in such alternatives,

1136: see Milgrom (1983), Sanders (1996), McGaugh \& de Blok (1998),

1137: de Blok \& McGaugh (1998), Begeman et al. (1991), Sanders (1996),

1138: Sanders \& Verheijen (1998).

1139: Non gravitational acceleration of halo gas rotation

1140: would be also an alternative, such

1141: as due to magneto-hydrodynamical force (Nelson 1998).

1142: 

1143: 

1144: 

1145: \subsection{Massive Dark Halo}

1146: 

1147: One of the best indicators of dark matter is the difference between the

1148: galaxy mass predicted by the luminosity and the mass predicted by the

1149: velocities.

1150: This difference, which also produces a  radial variation of

1151: the mass-to-luminosity ratio ($M/L$), is  a clue to the distribution of

1152: visible and dark (invisible) mass (e.g., Bosma 1981a, b; Lequeux 1983;

1153: Kent 1986, 1987;  Persic \& Salucci 1988, 1990;

1154: Salucci \& Frenk 1989; Forbes 1992;  Persic et al. 1996;

1155: H\'{e}raudeau \& Simien 1997; Takamiya \& Sofue 2000).

1156: Unfortunately, there is not yet a model independent procedure for

1157: determining the fraction of mass contained in the bulge, disk,

1158: and dark halo, and mass deconvolutions are rarely unique.

1159: Most current investigations

1160: assume that the visible galaxy consists of a bulge and a disk,

1161: each of constant $M/L$. Kent (1986, 1991, 1992) has used

1162: the ``maximum-disk method'' to derive averaged $M/L$s in the

1163: individual components.

1164: Athanasoula et al. (1987) attempted to minimize the uncertainty

1165: between maximum and minimal disks by introducing constraints to

1166: allow for the existence of spiral structure.

1167: Even for our Galaxy, discussions of maximum or

1168: non-maximum disk persist (van der Kruit 2000).

1169: 

1170: Radial profiles of the surface-mass density (SMD) and surface

1171: luminosity can be used to calculate $M/L$ directly.

1172: Forbes (1992) derived the radial variation in the ratio of the

1173: total mass to total luminosity involved within a radius,

1174: $r$, an 'integrated $M/L$'.

1175: Takamiya and Sofue (2000) determine

1176: the SMD directly from the rotation curves, which can be sandwiched

1177: by mass distributions calculated from rotation curves on both

1178: spherical and flat-disk assumptions by solving  directly the formula

1179: presented by Binney and Tremaine (1987).

1180: A comparison of the SMD distributions  with optical surface

1181: photometry shows that the radial distributions of the $M/L$ ratio

1182: is highly variable within the optical disk and bulge, and

1183: increases rapidly  beyond the disk,

1184: where the dark mass dominates.

1185: 

1186: Separation of halo mass from disk mass, whether dark or luminous,

1187: is an issue for more sophisticated observations and theoretical modeling.

1188: Weiner et al. (2000a, b) have used non-circular streaming motion to

1189: separate the two components using their theory that the streaming

1190: motion in a bar potential is sensitive to the halo mass.

1191: 

1192: \subsection{The Extent of the Milky Way Halo}

1193: 

1194: Interior to the Sun's orbit, the mass of the Galaxy is

1195: $\approx 10^{11}\Msun$.

1196: Although there is evidence that the halo rotation curve is

1197: declining beyond 17 kpc in a Keplerian fashion

1198: (Honma \& Sofue 1997a), the mass distribution beyond the HI disk, e.g.

1199: at $> 22$ kpc, is still controversial.

1200: Interior to the distance of the Large Magellanic Cloud, the

1201: Galaxy mass may grow to $6 \times 10^{11}\Msun$ (Wilkinson \& Evans 1999),

1202: which depends upon the assumed orbit of the Cloud.

1203: Interior to 200 kpc, the mass is at least $2 \times 10^{12}\Msun$

1204: (Peebles 1995), matching masses for  a set of Milky Way-like galaxies

1205: with masses inferred statistically from the velocities of their satellite

1206: galaxies (Zaritsky  1992).

1207: 

1208: A Milky Way halo which extends at least 200 kpc is getting close to the

1209: half-way distance between the Galaxy and M31, 350 kpc.

1210: And if halos are as large as those suggested by the gravitational distortion

1211: of background galaxies seen in the vicinity of foreground galaxies

1212: (Fischer et al. 2000; Hoekstra 2000), then the halo of our Galaxy may brush

1213: the equivalently large halo of M31.

1214: 

1215: \subsection{Declining Rotation Curves}

1216: 

1217: Few spirals exhibit a true Keplerian decline in their rotation velocities.

1218: Among peculiar rotation curves,  declining rotation curves are occasionally

1219: observed, confirming the conventional belief that the mass

1220: distribution is truncated at about 1 to 3 optical radii (3-5 scale lengths)

1221: (Casertano 1983; Casertano \& van Gorkom 1991; Barteldrees \& Dettman 1994).

1222: Yet some galaxies exhibit Keplerian rotation curves well beyond the critical

1223: truncation radius (Honma \& Sofue 1997a, b).

1224: While truncation is an important issue for those who wish to weaken

1225: the notion of a conspiracy of luminous and dark matter (Casertano

1226: \& van Gorkom 1991), the issue is far from resolved.

1227: 

1228: 

1229: %%% 7

1230: \section{GALAXY TYPES AND ROTATION CHARACTERISTICS}

1231: 

1232: There is a marked similarity of form, but not of amplitude, of

1233: disk and halo rotation curves

1234: for galaxies with different morphologies from Sa to Sc (Rubin et al. 1985).

1235: Thus the form of the gravitational potential in the disk and halo

1236: is not strongly dependent on the form of the optical luminosity distribution.

1237: Some moderate correlation is found between total luminosity

1238: and rotation velocity amplitude.

1239: Also, less luminous galaxies tend to show increasing outer rotation curve,

1240: while most massive galaxies have slightly declining rotation in the

1241: outmost part (Persic et al. 1996).

1242: On the other hand, form of central rotation curves depend on the total

1243: mass and galaxy types (Sofue et al. 1999):

1244: Massive galaxies of Sa and Sb types show a steeper rise and

1245: higher central velocities within a few hundred pc of the nucleus

1246: compared to less massive Sc galaxies and dwarfs.

1247: Dwarf galaxies generally show a gentle central rise.

1248: 

1249: \subsection{Sa, Sb, Sc Galaxies}

1250: 

1251: The maximum rotation velocities for Sa galaxies are higher than those of Sb

1252: and Sc galaxies with equivalent optical luminosities.

1253: Median values of $V_{\rm max}$ decreases from 300 to 220 to 175 \kms\ for

1254: the Sa, Sb, and Sc types, respectively (Rubin et al. 1985).

1255: 

1256: 

1257: Sb galaxies have  rotation curves with  slightly lower

1258: values of the maximum velocity than  Sa (Rubin et al. 1982).

1259: The steep central rise at 100-200 pc  is often associated

1260: with a velocity peak at radii $r \sim 100-300$ pc

1261: (Sofue et al. 1999a).

1262: The rotation velocity then declines to a minimum at $r\sim 1 $ kpc,

1263: and is followed by a gradual rise to a broad maximum at

1264: $r \sim 2-7$ kpc, arising from the disk potential. The disk rotation curve has

1265: superposed  amplitude

1266: fluctuations of tens of \kms\ due to spiral arms or velocity ripples.

1267: The outermost parts are usually flat, due to the massive dark halo.

1268: Some Sb galaxies show a slight outer decline, often no larger than the inner

1269: undulations  (Honma \& Sofue 1997a, b).

1270: 

1271: The rotation curve of the Milky Way Galaxy, a typical Sb galaxy,

1272: is shown in Fig. 2 (Clemens 1985; Blitz 1979; Brand and Blitz 1993;

1273: Fich et al. 1989; Merrifield 1992; Honma and Sofue 1995).

1274: The rotation curve of Sb galaxies, including the Milky Way,

1275: can be described as having:

1276: (a) a high-density core, including the massive black hole, which causes a

1277: non-zero velocity very close to the center;

1278: (b) a steep rise within the central 100 pc;

1279: (c) a maximum at radius of a few hundred pc, followed by a decline to a

1280: minimum at 1 to 2 kpc; then,

1281: (d) a gradual rise from to the disk maximum at 6 kpc; and

1282: (e) a nearly flat outer rotation curve.

1283: 

1284: Sc galaxies have lower maximum velocities than Sa and Sb

1285: (Rubin et al. 1980; 1985), ranging from $\le 100$ to $\sim 200$ \kms.

1286: Massive Sc galaxies show a steep nuclear rise similar to Sb's.

1287: However, less-massive Sc galaxies have a more gentle rise.

1288: They also have a flat rotation to their outer edges.

1289: Low-surface brightness Sc galaxies have a gentle central

1290: rise with monotonically increasing rotation velocity toward the edge,

1291: similar to dwarf galaxies (Bosma et al. 1988).

1292: 

1293: \subsection{Barred Galaxies}

1294: 

1295: Large-scale rotation properties of SBb and SBc galaxies are generally

1296: similar to those of

1297: non-barred galaxies of Sb and Sc types.

1298: However, the study of their kinematics is more

1299: complicated than for non-barred spirals, because their gas tracers

1300: are less uniformly distributed (Bosma 1981a,1996),

1301: and their iso-velocity contours are

1302: skewed in the direction toward the bar (H$\alpha$, Peterson et al. 1978; HI,

1303: Sancisi et al. 1979; stellar absorption lines, Kormendy 1983).

1304: CO-line mapping and spectroscopy reveal high concentration of

1305: molecular gas in shocked lanes along a bar superposed by significant

1306: non-circular motions (Handa et al. 1990; Sakamoto et al. 1999).

1307: 

1308: Thus, barred galaxies show  velocity jumps

1309: from $\pm \sim 30 - 40$ \kms\ to $\ge 100$ \kms\

1310: on the leading edges of the bar,

1311: $R\sim 2 - 5$ kpc. Non-barred spirals can show velocity variation

1312: of about $\pm 10 - 20$ \kms, caused mainly by spiral arms.

1313: Compared with non-barred spirals, barred  galaxies require a more

1314: complete velocity field to understand their kinematics.

1315: As discussed earlier, intensity-weighted velocities are underestimated

1316: compared to the circular velocities, which is particularly crucial for shock

1317: compressed molecular gas in the central regions (see Section 4.9).

1318: 

1319: This large velocity variation arises from the barred

1320: potential of several kpc length.

1321: Simulations of PV diagrams for edge-on barred galaxies

1322: show many tens of \kms\ fluctuations,

1323: superposed on the usual flat rotation curve

1324: (Athanassoula and Bureau 1999; Bureau and Athanassoula 1999;

1325: Weiner \& Sellwood 1999).

1326: However, distinguishing the existence of a bar and quantifying it

1327: are not uniquely done from such limited edge-on information.

1328: For more quantitative results, two-dimensional velocity analyses are

1329: necessary (Wozniak \& Pfenniger 1997).

1330: In these models, barred spirals contain up to 30\% counterrotating stars;

1331: the orbits are almost circular and perpendicular to the bar.

1332: Pattern speeds for the bar have been determined from absorption line spectra

1333: (Buta et al. 1996; Gerssen 2000 and references therein).

1334: 

1335: Due to their kinematic complexity, barred galaxies have been observed

1336: considerably less than non-barred,

1337: even though they constitute a considerable fraction of all disk galaxies

1338: (Mulchaey \& Regan 1997).

1339: However, high resolution optical observations, combined with HI and

1340: CO,  have helped to stimulate the study of

1341: two-dimensional non-circular velocity fields (e.g. Wozniak \& Pfenniger 1997,

1342: Hunter \& Gottesman 1996; Buta et al. 1996). Gas streaming motions

1343: along the bar are an efficient way to transport gas to the nuclear

1344: regions (Sorensen et al. 1976;

1345: Schwartz 1981; Noguchi 1988; Wada \& Habe 1992, 1995;

1346: Wada et al. 1998; Shlosman et al. 1990), and lead to enhanced star formation.

1347: 

1348: \subsection{Low Surface Brightness Galaxies; Dwarf Galaxies}

1349: 

1350: Until the last decade, observations of rotational kinematics were

1351: restricted to  spirals with average or high surface brightness.

1352: Only within the past decade have low surface brightness (LSB)

1353: galaxies been found in great numbers (Schombert \& Bothun 1988;

1354: Schombert et al. 1992); many are spirals.

1355: Their kinematics were first studied by de Blok et al. (1996) with HI,

1356: who found slowly rising  curves which often

1357: continued rising to their last measured point.

1358: However, many of the galaxies are small in angular extent,

1359: so observations are subject to beam smearing.

1360: Recent optical rotation curves (Swaters 1999, 2001; Swaters et al. 2000;

1361: de Blok et al. 2001) reveal a steeper rise for some,

1362: but not all, of the galaxies studied previously at 21-cm.

1363: It is not now clear if LSB galaxies are as dominated by dark matter

1364: as they were previously thought to be; the mass models

1365: have considerable uncertainties.

1366: 

1367: Dwarf galaxies, galaxies of low mass, are often grouped with low

1368: surface brightness galaxies, either by design or by error.

1369: The two classes overlap in the low surface brightness/low mass region.

1370: However, some low surface brightness galaxies are large and massive;

1371: some dwarf galaxies have high surface brightness.

1372: Early observations showed dwarf galaxies to be slowly rotating,

1373: with rotation curves which  rise monotonically to the last measured point

1374: (Tully et al. 1978; Carignan \& Freeman 1985;

1375: Carignan \& Puche 1990a,b; Carignan \& Beaulieu 1989;

1376: Puche et al. 1990, 1991a, b; Lake et al. 1990; Broeils 1992).

1377: The dark matter domination of the mass of the

1378: dwarf galaxy NGC 3109 (Carignan 1985; Jobin \& Carignan 1990)

1379: is confirmed by a reanalysis including H$\alpha$ Fabry-Perot

1380: data (Blais-Ouellette et al. 2000a, b).

1381: An exceptional case of a declining outer rotation curve has

1382: been found in the dwarf galaxy NGC 7793 (Carignan \& Puche 1990a).

1383: \ha\ velocity field observations of blue compact galaxies,

1384: with velocities less than 100 \kms, show that

1385: rotation curves rise monotonically to the edges of the galaxies

1386: (\"Ostlin et al. 1999).

1387: 

1388: Swaters (1999) derived rotation curves from velocity fields obtained with the

1389: Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope for 60 late-type dwarf galaxies of low

1390: luminosity. By  an interactive analysis,  he obtained rotation curves which

1391: are corrected for a large part of the beam smearing. Most of the rotation

1392: curve shapes are similar to those of more luminous spirals; at the lowest

1393: luminosities, there is more variation in shape.

1394: Dwarfs with higher central light concentrations have more steeply

1395: rising rotation curves, and a similar dependence is found

1396: for disk rotation curves of spirals (Fig. 5).

1397: For dwarf galaxies dominated

1398: by dark matter, as for LSB (and also HSB) spirals, the contributions of the

1399: stellar and dark matter components to the total mass cannot be unambiguously

1400: derived. More high quality observations and less ambiguous mass

1401: deconvolutions, perhaps more physics, will be required to settle questions

1402: concerning the dark matter fraction as a function of mass and/or luminosity.

1403: 

1404: \v

1405: --- Fig. 5 ---

1406: \v

1407: 

1408: \subsection{Large Magellanic Cloud}

1409: 

1410: The LMC is a dwarf galaxy showing irregular optical morphology,

1411: with the enormous starforming region, 30 Dor, located significantly

1412: displaced from the optical bar and HI disk center.

1413: High-resolution HI kinematics of the

1414: Large Magellanic Cloud, Kim et al. (1998;

1415: see Westerlund 1999 review)  indicate, however, a regular

1416: rotation around the kinematical center, which is displaced

1417: 1.2 kpc from the center of the optical bar as well as from the center of

1418: starforming activity (Fig. 6).

1419: The rotation curve has a steep central rise, followed by a flat rotation

1420: with a gradual rise toward the edge.

1421: This implies that the LMC has a compact bulge

1422: (but not visible on photographs),

1423: an exponential disk, and a massive halo.

1424: This dynamical bulge is 1.2 kpc away from the center of the stellar bar,

1425: and is not associated with an optical counterpart.

1426: The $``$dark bulge" has a large fraction of dark matter,

1427: with an anomalously high mass-to-luminosity ($M/L$) ratio (Sofue 1999).

1428: In contrast, the stellar bar has a smaller $M/L$ ratio compared to that

1429: of the surrounding regions.

1430: 

1431: \v

1432: --- Fig. 6 ---

1433: \v

1434: 

1435: \subsection{Irregular Galaxies: Interacting and Merging}

1436: 

1437: Rotation curves for irregular galaxies are not straightforward.

1438: Some irregular galaxies exhibit quite normal rotation curves, such as

1439: observed for a ring galaxy NGC 660, amorphous galaxy NGC 4631

1440: and NGC 4945 (Sofue et al. 1999a).

1441: 

1442: 

1443: The interacting galaxy NGC 5194 (M51) shows a very peculiar rotation

1444: curve, which declines more rapidly than  Keplerian at

1445: $R\sim 8 - 12$ kpc.

1446: This may be due to inclination varying with the radius, e.g. warping.

1447: Because the galaxy is viewed nearly face-on ($i = 20^\circ$), a slight warp

1448: causes a large error in deriving the rotation velocity.

1449: If the galaxy's outer disk at 12 kpc has an inclination as small as

1450: $i \sim 10^\circ$, such an apparently steep velocity decrease would be observed

1451: even for a flat rotation.

1452: 

1453: When galaxies gravitationally interact, they tidally distort each other, and

1454: produce the pathological specimens that had until recently defied

1455: classification.  In an innovative paper, Toomre (1977; see also

1456: Toomre \& Toomre 1972; Holmberg 1941)

1457: arranged eleven known distorted galaxies $``$in rough order of completeness of

1458: the imagined mergers" starting with the Antennae (NGC 4038/39) and ending with

1459: NGC 7252.  Observers rapidly took up this challenge, and Schweizer (1982)

1460: showed that NGC 7252 is a late-stage merger, in which the central gas disks of

1461: the two original spirals still have separate identities.

1462: 

1463: There is now an extensive literature both observational and computational

1464: (Schweizer 1998 and references therein; Barnes \& Hernquist 1992, 1996;

1465: Hibbard et al.  2000) that make it possible to put limits on the initial

1466: masses, the gas quantities, the time since the initial encounter, and the

1467: evolutionary history of the merger remnant. Equally remarkable, tidal tails

1468: can be used as probes of dark matter halos (Dubinski et al.  1999).

1469: 

1470: Many nearby galaxies are also products of mergers, and hence have been

1471: extensively studied.  NGC 5128 (Cen A) has a long history of velocity

1472: observations, with few signs of being completely untangled yet (H$\alpha$ long

1473: slit, Graham 1979; H$\alpha$ Fabry-Perot, Bland-Hawthorn et al. 1997; CO,

1474: Phillips et al. 1987; HI, van Gorkom et al. 1990;  PN, Hui  et al. 1995).

1475: 

1476: The starburst dwarf galaxy NGC 3034 (M82)

1477: shows an exceptionally peculiar rotation property (Burbidge et al. 1964;

1478: Sofue et al. 1992).

1479: It has a normal steep nuclear rise and rotation velocities  which have a

1480: Keplerian decline beyond the nuclear peak. This may arise from a tidal

1481: truncation of the disk and/or halo by an encounter with M81 (Sofue 1998).

1482: 

1483: The past and present history of the Milky Way and the Local Group is written

1484: in the warp of the Milky Way (Garcia-Ruiz et al. 2000), in the tidal disruption

1485: of the Sagittarius dwarf (Ibata et al. 1995), in the mean retrograde motion of

1486: the younger globular clusters (Zinn 1993), in the tidal streams in the halo

1487: (Lynden-Bell and Lynden-Bell, 1995), and in the orbits of the Magellanic

1488: Clouds and the Magellanic stream (Murai \& Fujimoto 1980;

1489: Gardiner \& Naguchi 1996).

1490: For an excellent discussion $``$Interactions and Mergers in the Local

1491: Group" with extensive references, see Schweizer (1998).

1492: 

1493: \subsection{Polar Ring Galaxies}

1494: 

1495: Polar ring galaxies provide an unique opportunity to probe the

1496: rotation and mass distribution perpendicular to galaxy disks, and hence the

1497: three dimensional distribution of the dark matter

1498: (Schweizer et al. 1983; Combes \& Arnaboldi 1996; Sackett \& Sparke 1990, et al

1499: 1994; van Driel et al. 1995).

1500: The conclusion of Schweizer et al. (1983) from emission line velocities,

1501: that the halo mass is more nearly circular than flattened, has been

1502: contested by Sackett \& Sparke (1990), based on both emission and absorption

1503: line data. However, the data are limited and velocity uncertainties are large,

1504: so the conclusions are not robust.

1505: 

1506: A major surprise  comes from the study of the polar ring galaxy NGC 4650A.

1507: Arnaboldi et al. (1997; see also van Gorkom et al. 1987) discovered an

1508: extended HI disk {\it coplanar with the ring}, which twists from almost

1509: edge-on to more face-on at large radii. The K-band optical features and the

1510: HI velocities can be fit simultaneously with a model in which spiral arms are

1511: present in this polar disk. Hence the polar ring is a very massive disk.

1512: This result strengthens previous suggestions that polar ring galaxies are

1513: related to spirals (Arnaboldi et al. 1995; Combes \& Arnaboldi 1996).

1514: 

1515: 

1516: %%% 8

1517: \section{THE FUTURE}

1518: 

1519: Most of what we know about rotation curves we have learned in the last

1520: fifty years, due principally to instrumental and computational advances.

1521: It is likely that these advances will accelerate in the future. We can look

1522: forward to an exciting future. Specifically,

1523: 

1524:  1.  Extinction-free rotation kinematics in the central regions will come

1525: from high-$J$ CO line spectroscopy and imaging using ALMA, the Andes

1526: large mm- and sub- mm wave interferometer at 5000 m altitude.

1527: This array  will produce high spatial (0.01 arcsec) and

1528:  high velocity ($\delta V<1$ \kms) resolution.

1529: 

1530:  2. Extinction-free measurements will also come from eight- and

1531: ten-meter class telescopes using Br $\gamma$, H$_{2}$ molecular, and

1532: other infrared lines in K-band and longer-wavelength spectroscopy.

1533: 

1534: 3. VLBI spectroscopic imaging of maser sources will teach us more about

1535: super massive black holes and rotation and mass distribution in nuclear disks.

1536: 

1537:  4. Rotation of the Galaxy, separately for the disk and bulge,

1538: will be directly measured from proper motions, parallaxes, and hence,

1539: distances, and radial velocities of maser sources using micro-arcsecond

1540: radio interferometry. VERA (VLBI Experiment for Radio Astrometry) will

1541: become a prototype.

1542: This facility will also derive an accurate measurement of

1543: the Galactic Center distance, $R_0$.

1544: 

1545:  5. Optical interferometry may permit us to $``$watch" a nearby

1546: spiral (M31, M33, LMC, etc.)  rotate on the plane of the sky,

1547: at least through a few microarcsecond.

1548: Radio interferometry of maser stars will be used to

1549: directly measure rotation on the sky of the nearest galaxies, from measures

1550: of proper motion (hence, distances) and radial velocities.

1551: 

1552:  6. Rotation curves will be determined for galaxies at extremely high

1553: redshift; with luck we will observe protogalactic rotation and dynamical

1554: evolution  of primeval galaxies.

1555: This may be a task for successive generations of space telescopes.

1556: 

1557:  7. We may be lucky and ultimately understand details of barred spiral

1558: velocity fields from spectroscopic imaging.

1559: We may be able to separate the disk, bulge and bar

1560: potentials by fitting the number of parameters necessary for describing

1561: bar's mass and dynamical properties.

1562: 

1563:  8. Polar ring kinematics will be understood, especially halo kinematics

1564: perpendicular to the disk, and therefore, 3-D halo structure.

1565: We are certain to

1566: learn details of galaxies which are unexpected and hence surprising.

1567: We may even be luckier and learn something new about the Universe.

1568: 

1569:  9. Sophisticated methods of analysis, perhaps involving line shapes and

1570: velocity dispersions, will produce more accurate rotation curves for

1571: large samples of spirals. These will lead to more tightly constrained

1572: mass deconvolutions.

1573: Distribution of dark and luminous matters within the halo,

1574: disk, bulge, and core will be mapped in detail from more sophisticated

1575: mass-to-luminosity ratio analyses.

1576: 

1577:  10. Dark halos will finally be understood.   We will know their extent, and

1578: their relation to the intracluster dark mass. We may even know the

1579: rotation velocity of the halo. Will the concept of a $``$rotation curve"

1580: apply at such large distances from the disk? Will we learn if our

1581: halo brushes the halo of M31?

1582: 

1583:  11. We will ultimately know what dark matter is,

1584: the major constituent of the Universe when measured in mass.

1585: Elementary particle physics will teach us its origin and physical properties.

1586: 

1587:  12. Perhaps we will be able to put to rest the last doubt about the

1588: applicability of Newtonian gravitational theory on a cosmic scale, or

1589: enthusiastically embrace its successor.

1590: 

1591: \vskip 10mm

1592: 

1593: Acknowledgements:

1594: The authors thank Dr. Yoichi Takeda for assisting in gathering and

1595: selecting the references from a huge number of related papers in the decades.

1596: They thank Drs. Linda Dressel, Jeffrey Kenney, Stacy McGaugh,

1597: and Rob Swaters for references and helpful comments.

1598: They also thank Mareki Honma for references, Jin Koda and Kotaro Kohno

1599: for NMA data analyses.

1600: 

1601: \vskip 10mm

1602: This is an unedited draft of a chapter submitted for publication in the

1603: Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 39, 2001

1604: \parindent=0pt

1605: \parskip=0pt

1606: 

1607: (http://astro.annualreviews.org/).

1608: 

1609: \newpage

1610: 

1611: \def\r{\hangindent=1pc \noindent}

1612: 

1613: \noindent{\bf References}

1614: \parindent=0pt

1615: \parskip=0pt

1616: 

1617: \r Aaronson M, Huchra J, Mould J 1980. {\it Ap. J.} 237:655

1618: 

1619: \r Aaronson M, Mould J. 1986. {\it Ap. J.} 303:1

1620: 

1621: \r Ables JG, Forster JR, Manchester RN, Rayner PT, Whiteoak JB, Mathewson DS, Kalnajs AJ, Peters WL, Wehner H. 1987. {\it MNRAS}. 226:157

1622: 

1623: \r Amram P, Balkowski C, Boulesteix J, Cayatte V, Marcelin M, Sullivan III WT. 1996. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 310:737

1624: 

1625: \r Amram P, Boulesteix J, Marcelin M, Balkowski C, Cayatte V, Sullivan III WT. 1995. {\it Astron. Astrophys. Supp.} 113:35

1626: 

1627: \r Amram P, Le Coarer E, Marcelin M, Balkowski C, Sullivan III WT, Cayatte V. 1992. {\it Astron. Astrophys. Supp.} 94:175

1628: 

1629: \r Amram P, Marcelin M, Balkowski C, Cayatte V, Sullivan III WT, Le Coarer E. 1994. {\it Astron. Astrophys. Supp.} 103:5 year?

1630: 

1631: \r Amram P, Sullivan III WT, Balkowski C, Marcelin M, Cayatte V. 1993. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 403:59

1632: 

1633: \r Argyle E. 1965. {\it Ap. J.} 141:750

1634: 

1635: \r Arnabaldi M, Oosterloo T, Combes F, Freeman KC, Koribalski B. 1997. {\it Astron. J.} 113:585

1636: 

1637: \r Arnaboldi M, Freeman KC, Gerhard O, Matthias M, Kudritzki RP, Mendez RH, Capaccioli M, Ford H. 1998. {\it Ap. J.} 507:759

1638: 

1639: \r Arnaboldi M, Freeman KC, Sackett PD, Sparke LS, Capaccioli M. 1995. {\it Planetary \& Sp. Sci.} 43:1377

1640: 

1641: \r Ashman KM. 1992. {\it PASP.} {\it Ap. J.} 104:1109

1642: 

1643: \r Athanassoula E Bureau 1999. {\it Ap. J.} 522:699

1644: 

1645: \r Athanassoula E, Bosma A, Papaioannou S. 1987. {\it Astron. Astrophys. Supp.} 179:23

1646: 

1647: \r Babcock HW. 1939. {\it Lick Obs. Bull.} 19:41

1648: 

1649: \r Baldwin JE, Lynden-Bell D,    Sancisi R. 1980. {\it MNRAS}. 193:313

1650: 

1651: \r Bally J, Stark AA, Wilson RW,  Henkel C. 1987. {\it Ap. J. Suppl.} 65:13

1652: 

1653: \r Barnes JE, Hernquist L. 1992. {\it Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys}. 30:705

1654: 

1655: \r Barnes JE, Hernquist L. 1996. {\it Ap. J.} 471:115

1656: 

1657: \r Barteldrees A, \& Dettmar R-J. 1994.  {\it Astron. Astrophys. Suppl.} 103: 475

1658: 

1659: \r Barton EJ, Bromley BC, Geller MJ. 1999. {\it Ap. J. Lett.}   511:25

1660: 

1661: \r Begeman KG, Broeils AH, Sanders RH. 1991. {\it MNRAS}. 249:523

1662: 

1663: \r Begeman KG. 1989. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 223:47

1664: 

1665: \r Bender R, Burstein D, Faber SM. 1992. {\it Ap. J.} 411:153.

1666: 

1667: \r Bender R. 1990. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 229:441

1668: 

1669: \r Bershady MA, Haynes MP, Giovanelli R, Andersen DR. 1999.  in {\it Galaxy Dynamics}. eds. DR Merritt, JA Sellwood, M Valluri. 182:263. San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pacific

1670: 

1671: \r Bershady MA. 1997. in {\it Dark Matter in the Universe}. eds. M Persic, P Salucci. 117:537. San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pacific

1672: 

1673: \r Bertola F, Bettoni D, Buson LM, Zeillinger WW. 1990. In {\it Dynamics and Interactions of Galaxies}. eds. ER Weilen. 249. Springer: Heideberg

1674: 

1675: \r Bertola F, Bettoni D, Zeillinger WW. 1992. {\it Ap. J. Lett.}  401:79

1676: 

1677: \r Bertola F, Cappellari M, Funes JG, Corsini EM, Pizzella A, Vega Bertran JC. 1998. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 509:93

1678: 

1679: \r Bertola F, Cinzano P. Corsini EM, Pizzella A, Persic M, Salucci P. 1996. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 458:L67

1680: 

1681: \r Bertola F, Galletta G.1978. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 226:115

1682: 

1683: \r Binney J, Gerhard OE, Stark AA, Bally J, Uchida KI 1991. {\it MNRAS.} 252:210

1684: 

1685: \r Binney J, Merrifield M. 1998. {\it Galactic Astronomy}. Princeton Univ. Press

1686: 

1687: \r Binney J, Tremaine S. 1987. {\it Galactic Dynamics}. Princeton Univ. Press

1688: 

1689: \r Binney J. 1982. {\it Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 20:399

1690: 

1691: \r Blais-Ouellette S, Amram P, Carignan C. 2000b. {\it Astron. J.} submitted.

1692: 

1693: \r Blais-Ouellette S, Carignan C, Amram P, Cote S. 2000a. {\it Astron. J.} in press

1694: 

1695: \r Bland-Hawthorn J, Freeman KC, Quinn PJ. 1997. {\it Ap. J.} 490:143

1696: 

1697: \r Blitz L. 1979. {\it Ap. J.} 227:152

1698: 

1699: \r Bosma A, van der Hulst JM, Athanassoula E, 1988. {\it Astron. Astrophys} 198:100

1700: 

1701: \r Bosma A. 1981a. {\it Astron. J.} 86:1825  %II.HI many galaxies

1702: 

1703: \r Bosma A. 1981b. {\it Astron. J.} 86:1791

1704: 

1705: \r Bosma A. 1996. in {\it Barred Galaxies}. eds. R Buta, DA Crocker, BG Elmegreen. {\it PASP Conf. Series.} 91:132.

1706: 

1707: \r Brand J, Blitz L. 1993. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 275:67.

1708: 

1709: \r Braun R, Walterbos RAM, Kennicutt JR, Tacconi LJ. 1994. {\it Ap. J.} 420:558

1710: 

1711: \r Brinks E, Skillman ED, Terlevich RJ, Terlevich E. 1997. {\it ApSS}. 248:23

1712: 

1713: \r Broeils AH. 1992. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 256:19

1714: 

1715: \r Burbidge EM,  Burbidge G. R. 1960. {\it Ap. J.} 132:30

1716: 

1717: \r Burbidge EM, Burbidge GR, Crampin DJ, Rubin VC, Prendergast KH. 1964. {\it Ap. J.} 139:1058

1718: 

1719: \r Burbidge EM, Burbidge GR. 1975. in {\it Stars and Stellar Systems IX: Galaxies and the Universe}. eds. A Sandage, M Sandage, J Kristian. University of Chicago Press, p. 81

1720: 

1721: \r Bureau M, Athanassoula E. 1999. {\it Ap. J.} 522:686

1722: 

1723: \r Burstein D, Bender R, Faber SM, Nolthenius R. 1997. {\it Astron. J.}  114:4

1724: 

1725: \r Burstein D, Rubin VC, Ford Jr WK, Whitmore BC. 1986. {\it Ap. J. Lett.}   305:11

1726: 

1727: \r Burton WB, Gordon MA. 1978. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 63:7

1728: 

1729: \r Buta R, Crocker  DA, Elmegreen BG. 1996. eds. {\it Barred Galaxies}.  PASJ Conf. Series. 91

1730: 

1731: \r Buta R, Purcell GB, Cobb ML, Crocker DA, Rautiainen P, Salo H. 1999. {\it Astron. J.} 117:778

1732: 

1733: \r Buta R, van Driel W, Braine J, Combes F, Wakamatsu K, Sofue Y, Tomita A. 1995 {\it Ap. J.} 450:593

1734: 

1735: \r Cayatte V, van Gorkom JM, Balkowski C, Kotanyi C. 1990. {\it Astron. J.} 100:604

1736: 

1737: \r Carignan C, Beaulieu S. 1989. {\it Ap. J.} 347:760

1738: 

1739: \r Carignan C, Freeman KC. 1985. {\it Ap. J.} 294:494

1740: 

1741: \r Carignan C, Puche D. 1990. {\it Astron. J.}  100:394

1742: 

1743: \r Carignan C, Puche D. 1990. {\it Astron. J.}  100:641

1744: 

1745: \r Carignan C. 1985. {\it Ap. J.} 299:59

1746: 

1747: \r Carter D, Jenkins CR. 1993. {\it MNRAS}. 263:1049

1748: 

1749: \r Casertano S, van Gorkom JH. 1991. {\it Astron. J.}  101:1231

1750: 

1751: \r Casertano S. 1983. {\it MNRAS}. 203:735

1752: 

1753: \r Clemens, DP. 1985. {\it Ap. J.} 295:422

1754: 

1755: \r Combes F, 1992. {Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 29:195

1756: 

1757: \r Combes F, Arnaboldi M. 1996. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 305:763

1758: 

1759: \r Combes F, Mamon GA, Charmandaris V. 2000. eds. {\it Dynamics of Galaxies: from the Early Universe to the Present (XVth IAP Meeting: PASP. Conf. Series)}. Vol. 197

1760: 

1761: \r Corradi RLM,  Boulesteix J, Bosma A, Amram P, Capaccioli M. 1991. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 244:27

1762: 

1763: \r Courteau, S. 1997. {\it Astron. J.} 114:2402

1764: 

1765: %\r Courteau, S, Rix, HW. 1999 {\it Ap. J.}  513:561

1766: 

1767: \r de Blok E, McGaugh, SS, Rubin VC. 2001. in {\it Galaxy Disks and Disk Galaxies}.  eds. J Funes, E Corsini.  {\it PASP. Conf. Series}, in press %lsb comparison

1768: 

1769: \r de Blok WJG, McGaugh SS, van der Hulst JM. 1996. {\it MNRAS} 283:18

1770: 

1771: \r de Blok WJG, McGaugh SS. 1998. {\it Ap. J.} 508:132

1772: 

1773: \r de Vaucouleurs G,   Freeman KC. 1973. {\it Vistas in Astronnomy.} 14:163

1774: 

1775: \r de Vaucouleurs G. 1959. in {\it Handbuch der Physics, Astrophysik IV} 53:310

1776: 

1777: \r de Zeeuw T, Franx M. 1991. {\it Annu, Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 29:239

1778: 

1779: 

1780: \r Deguchi S, Fujii T, Izumiura H, Kameya O, Nakada Y, Nakashima J, Ootsubo T. Ukita N. 2000. {\it Ap. J. Suppl.} 128:571 %center kine

1781: 

1782: \r Dressler A. 1984. {\it Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 22:185

1783: 

1784: \r Dubinski J, Mihos JC,  Hernquist L. 1999. { Ap. J.} 526:607

1785: 

1786: \r Einasto J, Saar E, Kaasik A, Chernin AD. 1974. {\it Nature}. 252:111

1787: 

1788: \r Evans NW, Collett JL. 1994. {\it Ap. J. Lett.}   420:67

1789: 

1790: \r Faber SM, Gallagher JS. 1979. {\it Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 17:135

1791: 

1792: \r Ferrarese L, Ford HC. 1999. {\it Ap. J.} 515:583

1793: 

1794: \r Fich M, Blitz L, Stark A. 1989. {\it Ap. J.} 342:272

1795: 

1796: \r Fischer P. et al. 2000. {\it Astron. J.} submitted

1797: 

1798: 

1799: \r Fisher D. 1997. {\it Astron. J.} 113:950

1800: 

1801: \r Forbes, DA. 1992. {\it Astron. Astrophys. Supp.} 92:583

1802: 

1803: \r Franx M, Illingworth GD, de Zeeuw T. 1991. {\it Ap. J.} 383:112

1804: 

1805: \r Franx M, Illingworth GD. 1988. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 327:55

1806: 

1807: \r Fraternali F,  Oosterloo T, Sancisi R, van Moorsel G. 2000. in {\it Gas and Galaxy Evolution}, VLA 20th Anniversary Conference, J.E. Hibbard, M.P. Rupen \& J.H. van Gorkom (eds.), in press

1808: 

1809: \r Funes SJ, Corsini EM. 2001.  eds.  {\it Galaxy Disks and Disk Galaxies (ASP. Conf. Series)} in press

1810: 

1811: \r Galletta G. 1987. {\it Ap. J.} 318:531

1812: 

1813: \r Galletta G. 1996.  in {\it Barred Galaxies}. eds. R Buta, DA Crocker, Elmegreen BG. {\it PASP. Conf. Series.} 91:429

1814: 

1815: \r Garcia-Burillo S, Guelin M,  Cernicharo J. 1993. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 274:123

1816: 

1817: \r Garcia-Burillo S, Sempere MJ, Bettoni D. 1998. {\it Ap. J.}  502:235

1818: 

1819: \r Garcia-Ruiz I, Kuijken K,  Dubinski J. 2000. {\it MNRAS}. submitted

1820: 

1821: \r Gardiner LT, Noguchi M. 1996. {\it MNRAS.} 278:191

1822: 

1823: \r Genzel R, Eckart A, Ott T, Eisenhauer F. 1997. {\it MNRAS}. 291:219

1824: 

1825: \r Genzel R, Pichon C, Eckart A, Gerhard OE, Ott T. 2000. {\it MNRAS.} 317:348

1826: 

1827: \r Gerhard OE. 1993. {\it MNRAS}. 265:213

1828: 

1829: \r Gerssen J. 2000. thesis Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

1830: 

1831: \r Ghez A, Morris M, Klein BL, Becklin EE. 1998. {\it Ap. J.} 509:678.

1832: 

1833: \r Gilmore G, King IR, van der Kruit PC. 1990. in {\it The MIlky Way as a Galaxy}.   University Science Books: Mill Valley, CA

1834: 

1835: \r Graham JA. 1979. {\it Ap. J.} 232:60

1836: 

1837: \r Greenhill LJ, Gwinn CR, Antonucci R, Barvainis R. 1996. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 472:L21 %water maser ngc1068

1838: 

1839: \r Greenhill LJ, Moran JM, Herrnstein JR. 1997. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 481:L23 % water maser NGC 4945

1840: 

1841: \r Guhathakrta P, van Gorkom JH, Kotanyi CG, Balkowski C. 1988. {\it Astron. J.}  96:851

1842: 

1843: \r H\'{e}raudeau Ph, Simien F. 1997. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 326:897

1844: 

1845: \r Handa T, Nakai N, Sofue Y, Hayashi M, Fujimoto M, 1990. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Jaapn}. 42:1

1846: 

1847: \r Haschick AD, Baan WA, Schneps MH, Reid MJ, Moran JM,  Guesten R. 1990. {\it Ap. J.}, 356:149. %3079

1848: 

1849: \r Haynes MP, Hogg DE, Maddalena RJ, Roberts MS, van Zee L. 1998. {\it Astron. J.}  115:62

1850: 

1851: \r Heisler J, Merritt D, Schwarzschild M. 1982. {\it Ap. J.} 258:490

1852: 

1853: \r Heraudeau P, Simien F. 1997. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 326:897

1854: 

1855: \r Hernquist L, Barnes JE. 1991. {\it Nature}. 354:10

1856: 

1857: \r Herrnstein JR, Moran JM, Greenhill LJ, Diamond PJ, Inoue M, Nakai N, Miyoshi M, Henkel C, Riess A.  1999. {\it Nature}. 400:539

1858: 

1859: \r Hibbard JE, Vacca WD, Yun MS. 2000. {\it Astron. J.} 119:1130

1860: 

1861: \r Hoekstra H. 2000. thesis Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

1862: 

1863: \r Holmberg E. 1941. {\it Ap. J.} 94:385

1864: 

1865: \r Honma M, Sofue Y, Arimoto N. 1995. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 304:1

1866: 

1867: \r Honma M, Sofue Y. 1996. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan Lett.} 48:103. %Mass

1868: 

1869: \r Honma M, Sofue Y. 1996. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan Lett.} 48:103 %MW Mass

1870: 

1871: \r Honma M, Sofue Y. 1997a. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan.} 49:453 %MW RC

1872: 

1873: \r Honma M, Sofue Y. 1997b. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan.} 49:539 %Declining RC

1874: 

1875: \r Hui X, Ford HC,  Freeman KC, Dopita MA. 1995. {\it Ap. J.} 449:592

1876: 

1877: \r Hunter DA, Rubin VC, Gallagher III, JS. 1986. {\it Astron. J.} 91:1086

1878: 

1879: \r Hunter JH, Gottesman ST. 1996. in {\it Barred Galaxies}. eds. R Buta, DA Crocker, Elmegreen BG. {\it PASP. Conf. Series}. 91:398

1880: 

1881: \r Ibata, RA, Gilmore G, Irwin MJ. 1995. {\it MNRAS.} 277:781

1882: 

1883: \r Irwin JudithA,  Sofue Y.  1992. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 396:L75.

1884: 

1885: \r Irwin JudithA, Seaquist ER. 1991. {\it Ap. J.} 371:111

1886: 

1887: \r Ishizuki S, Kawabe R, Ishiguro M, Okumura SK, Morita KI, Chikada Y, Kasuga T, Doi M. 1990. {\it Ap.J.} 355:436

1888: 

1889: \r Izumiura H, Deguchi S, Hashimoto O, Nakada Y, Onaka T, Ono T, Ukita N, Yamamura I. 1995. {\it Ap. J.} 453:837 %bulge

1890: 

1891: \r Izumiura H. Deguchi S, Fujii T, Kameya O, Matsumoto S, Nakada Y, Ootsubo T, Ukita N. 1999. {\it Ap. J. Suppl.} 125:257 %bar end

1892: 

1893: \r Jacoby GH, Ciardullo R, Ford HC. 1990. {\it Ap. J.} 356:332

1894: 

1895: \r Jedrrejewski R, Schechter P. 1989. {\it Astron. J.} 98:147

1896: 

1897: \r Jobin M, Carignan C. 1990. {\it Astron. J.}  100:648

1898: 

1899: \r Kamphuis J, Briggs F.  1992. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 253:335

1900: 

1901: \r Kaneko N, Aoki K, Kosugi G, Ohtani H, Yoshida M, Toyama K, Satoh T, Sasaki M. 1997. {\it Astron. J.}  114:94

1902: 

1903: \r Kannappan SJ, Fabricant DG. 2000. {\it Astron. J.}. in press

1904: 

1905: \r Kelson DD, Illingworth GD, van Dokkum PG, Franx M. 2000a. {\it Ap. J.}

1906: 31:159

1907: 

1908: \r Kelson DD, Illingworth GD, van Dokkum PG, Franx M. 2000b. {\it Ap. J.}

1909: 531:184

1910: 

1911: \r Kenney  J,  Young  SJ 1988. {\it Astrophys. J. Suppl} 66:261  % CO PV

1912: 

1913: \r Kenney JDP,  Wilson CD, Scoville NZ, Devereux NA, Young JS. 1992. {\it Ap. J. L.} 395:L79

1914: 

1915: \r Kenney JPD, Faundez. 2000.  in {\it Stars, Gas and Dust in Galaxies: Exploring the Links}.  {\it PASP. Conf. Series}. in press

1916: 

1917: \r Kent SM. 1986. {\it Astron. J.}  91:1301

1918: 

1919: \r Kent SM. 1987. {\it Astron. J.} 93:816.

1920: 

1921: \r Kent SM. 1991. {\it Ap. J.} 378:131

1922: 

1923: \r Kent SM. 1992. {\it Ap. J.} 387:181

1924: 

1925: \r Kim S, Stavely-Smith L, Dopita MA, Freeman KC. Sault RJ, Kesteven MJ, McConnell D. 1998. {\it Ap. J.} 503:674.

1926: 

1927: \r Koda  J, Sofue Y, Wada K. 2000a. {\it Ap. J.} 532:214

1928: 

1929: \r Koda J,  Sofue Y, Wada K. 2000b. {\it Ap. J. L.} 531:L17

1930: 

1931: \r Kohno K, Kawabe R, Villa-Vilaro B. 1999.. {\it Ap. J.} 511:157

1932: 

1933: \r Kohno K. 1998. PhD. Thesis, University of Tokyo

1934: 

1935: \r Koo D. C. 1999. in {\it Proceedings of XIX Moriond Meeting on Building Galaxies: from the Primordial Universe to the Present}. eds. F Hammer, TX Thuan, V Cayatte, B Guiderdoni J, Tran Thanh Van (Gif-sur-Yvette: Editions Frontieres), in press

1936: 

1937: \r Kormendy J,  Richstone D. 1995. {\it Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 33:581

1938: 

1939: \r Kormendy J, Westpfahl DJ, 1989. {\it Ap. J.} 338:752

1940: 

1941: \r Kormendy J.  1983. {\it  Ap. J.} 275:529

1942: 

1943: \r Kormendy J. 2001. in {\it Galaxy Disks and Disk Galaxies}.  eds. J Funes, E Corsini. {\it PASP. Conf. Series}, in press

1944: 

1945: \r Krabbe A, Colina L, Thatte N, Kroker H. 1997. {\it Ap. J.} 476:98

1946: 

1947: \r Kuijken K, Merrifield MR. 1993. {\it MNRAS}. 264:712

1948: 

1949: \r Kuijken K. 1996. {\it MNRAS}. 283:543

1950: 

1951: \r Kyazumov GA, 1984. {\it AZh}. 61:846

1952: 

1953: \r Lake G, Schommer RA, van Gorkom JH. 1990. {\it Astron. J.}  99:547

1954: 

1955: \r Larkin JE, Armus L, Knop RA, Matthews K, Soifer BT. 1995. {\it Ap. J.}   452:599

1956: 

1957: \r Lequeux J. 1983. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 125:394

1958: 

1959: \r Lin DNC, Pringle JE 1987. {\it Ap. J. L.} 320:L87

1960: 

1961: \r Lindblad B. 1959. in {\it Handbuch der Physics, Astrophysik IV} 53:21

1962: 

1963: \r Lindqvist M, Habing HJ, Winnberg A. 1992a. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 259:118

1964: 

1965: \r Lindqvist M, Winnberg A, Habing HJ, Matthews HE.  1992b. {\it Astron. Astropjhys. Suppl.} 92:43

1966: 

1967: \r Lynden-Bell D, Lynden-Bell RM.  1995. {\it MNRAS.} 275:429

1968: 

1969: \r Maciejewski W, \& Binney J. 2000. IAU Symposium No. 205. {\it Galaxies and their Constituents at the Highest Angular Resolution} in press

1970: 

1971: \r Mathewson DS, Ford VL, Buchhorn M. 1992. {\it Ap. J. Suppl.} 81:413

1972: 

1973: \r Mathewson DS, Ford VL. 1996. {\it Ap. J. Supp.} 107:97

1974: 

1975: \r Mayall NU. 1951. in {\it The Structure of the Galaxy}.  Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press p. 19

1976: 

1977: \r McGaugh SS, \& de Blok WJG. 1998. {\it Ap. J.} 499:66

1978: 

1979: \r Mediavilla E, Arribas S, Garcia-Lorenzo B, Del Burgo C. 1998. {\it Ap. J.}   488:682

1980: 

1981: \r Merrifield MR, Kuijken K. 1994. {\it Ap. J.} 432:75

1982: 

1983: \r Merrifield MR. 1992. {\it Astron. J.} 103:1552.

1984: 

1985: \r Merritt DR, Sellwood JA, Valluri M. 1999. eds. {\it Galaxy Dynamics}. San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pacific

1986: 

1987: \r Mestel L. 1963.  {\it MNRAS}. 126:553

1988: 

1989: \r Milgrom M, Braun E. 1988. {\it Ap. J.} 334:130

1990: 

1991: \r Milgrom M. 1983. {\it Ap. J.} 270:371

1992: 

1993: \r Miyoshi M, Moran J, Herrnstein J, Greenhill L, Nakai N, Diamond P, Inoue M. 1995. {\it Nature}. 373:127.

1994: 

1995: \r Mo HJ, Mao S, White SDM. 1998. {\it MNRAS}. 295:319

1996: 

1997: \r Moellenhoff C, Matthias M, Gerhard OE. 1995. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 301:359

1998: 

1999: \r Mulchaey JS, Regan MW. 1997. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 482:L135

2000: 

2001: \r Murai T, Fujimoto M 1980. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan}. 32:581

2002: 

2003: \r Nakai N, Inoue M, Miyoshi M  1993. {\it Nature}. 361:45

2004: 

2005: \r Nakai N, Kuno N, Handa T, Sofue Y. 1994. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn.} 46:527

2006: %\r Navarro JF, Eke VR, Frenk CS. 1996. {\it MNRAS Lett.}. 283:72 %core of dwarf galaxyhalo

2007: 

2008: \r Nelson AH. 1988. {\it MNRAS}. 233:115

2009: 

2010: \r Nishiyama K, Nakai N. 1998. IAU Symposium No. 184 {\it The central regions of the Galaxy and galaxies} p.245

2011: 

2012: \r Noguchi N. 1988. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 203:259

2013: 

2014: \r Oestlin G, Amram P, Masegosa J, Bergvall N, Boulesteix J.  1999. {\it Astron. Astrophys. Supp.} 137:419

2015: 

2016: \r Oka T, Hasegawa T, Sato F, Tsuboi M, Miyazaki A, 1998. {\it Ap.J.S.} 118:455

2017: 

2018: \r Oort JH. 1940. {\it Ap. J.} 91:273

2019: 

2020: \r Ostriker JP,  Peebles PJE. 1973. {\it Ap. J.} 186:467

2021: 

2022: \r Ostriker, JP, Peebles, PJE, Yahil A. 1974. {\it Ap. J.} 193:L1O

2023: 

2024: \r Page T. 1952. {\it Ap. J.} 116:63 erratum 136:107

2025: 

2026: \r Pease FG. 1918. {\it Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. US} 4:21

2027: 

2028: \r Peebles PJE. 1995. {\it Ap. J.} 449:52

2029: 

2030: \r Persic M, Salucci P, Stel F. 1996. {\it MNRAS}. 281:27

2031: 

2032: \r Persic M, Salucci P. 1988. {\it MNRAS}. 234:31

2033: 

2034: \r Persic M, Salucci P. 1990a. {\it MNRAS}. 247:349

2035: 

2036: \r Persic M, Salucci P. 1990b. {\it MNRAS}. 245:577

2037: 

2038: \r Persic M, Salucci P. 1995. {\it Ap. J. Supp.} 99:501

2039: 

2040: \r Persic M, Salucci P. 1997. eds. {\it Dark Matter in the Universe}. San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pacific

2041: 

2042: \r Peterson CJ, Rubin VC, Ford Jr WK, Thonnard N. 1978.  {\it Ap. J.} 219:31

2043: 

2044: \r Phillips TG, Ellison BN, Keene JB, Leighton RB, Howard RJ, Masson CR, Sanders DB, Veidt B, Young K. 1987. { Ap. J. Lett.} 322:L73

2045: 

2046: \r Plummer HC. 1911. {\it MNRAS}. 71:460

2047: 

2048: \r Prada, F, Gutierrez CM, Peletier RF, McKeith CD. 1996. {\it Ap. J.} 463:9

2049: 

2050: \r Puche D, Carignan C, Bosma A. 1990. {\it Astron. J.}  100:1468

2051: 

2052: \r Puche D, Carignan C, Wainscoat RJ. 1991a. {\it Astron. J.}  101:447

2053: 

2054: \r Puche D, Carignan C, van Gorkom JH. 1991b. {\it Astron. J.}  101:456

2055: 

2056: \r Regan MW, Vogel SN. 1994. {\it Ap. J.} 43:536

2057: 

2058: \r Richstone D, Bender R, Bower G, Dressler A, Faber S, et al. 1998. {\it Nature} 395A:14 .

2059: 

2060: \r Richter O-G,  Sancisi R. 1994. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 290:19

2061: 

2062: \r Rix H-W, Carollo CM, Freeman K. 1999. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 513:L25

2063: 

2064: \r Rix H-W, Franx M, Fisher D, Illingworth G. 1992. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 400:5

2065: 

2066: \r Rix H-W, Kennicutt RC, Braun R,  Walterbos RAM. 1995. {\it Ap. J.} 438:155

2067: 

2068: \r Rix H-W, White S. 1992. {\it MNRAS}. 254:389

2069: 

2070: \r Rix H-W, de Zeeuw PT, Cretton N, van der Marel RP, Carollo CM. 1997. {\it Ap. J.} 488:702

2071: 

2072: \r Roberts MA,  Rots AH. 1973. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 26:483.

2073: 

2074: \r Roelfsema PR, Allen RJ. 1985. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 146:213

2075: 

2076: \r Rogstad DH, Shostak GS. 1972. {\it Ap. J.} 176:315

2077: 

2078: %\r Roscoe DF. 1999. {\it Astron. Asrophys.} 343:697

2079: 

2080: \r Roscoe DF. 1999. {\it Astron. Asrophys.} 343:788

2081: 

2082: \r Rubin VC, Burbidge EM, Burbidge GR, Prendergast KH. 1965. {\it Ap. J.} 141:885.

2083: 

2084: \r Rubin VC, Burstein D, Ford Jr WK,  Thonnard N. 1985. {\it Ap. J.} 289:81

2085: 

2086: \r Rubin VC, Ford Jr WK, Thonnard N. 1980. {\it Ap. J.} 238:471

2087: 

2088: \r Rubin VC, Ford Jr WK, Thonnard N. 1982. {\it Ap. J.} 261:439

2089: 

2090: \r Rubin VC, Ford Jr WK. 1970. {\it Ap. J.} 159:379

2091: 

2092: \r Rubin VC, Ford Jr WK. 1983. {\it Ap. J.} 271, 556R

2093: 

2094: \r Rubin VC, Graham JA, Kenney JD. 1992. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 394:9

2095: 

2096: \r Rubin VC, Graham JA. 1987. {\it Ap. J. Lett}. 316:67

2097: 

2098: \r Rubin VC, Haltiwanger, J. 2001. in {\it Galaxy Disks and Disk Galaxies}.  eds. J Funes, E Corsini.  {\it PASP. Conf. Series}, in press

2099: 

2100: \r Rubin VC, Hunter DA, Ford Jr WK. 1991. {\it Ap. J. Supp.} 76:153

2101: 

2102: \r Rubin VC, Hunter DA. 1991. {\it Ap. J. Supp.} 76:153

2103: 

2104: \r Rubin VC, Kenney JD, Boss AP, Ford Jr WK. 1989. {\it Astron. J.}  98:1246

2105: 

2106: \r Rubin VC, Kenny JDP, Young, JS. 1997. {\it Astron. J.}  113:1250

2107: 

2108: \r Rubin VC, Thonnard N, Ford Jr WK. 1982. {\it Astron. J.}  87:477

2109: 

2110: \r Rubin VC, Thonnard N, Ford WKJr.  1978. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 225:L107

2111: 

2112: \r Rubin VC, Waterman AH,  Kenney JD, 1999. {\it Astron. J.}  118:236

2113: 

2114: \r Rubin VC, Whitmore B C, Ford Jr W K, 1988. {\it Ap. J.} 333:522

2115: 

2116: \r Rubin VC. 1994a. {\it Astron. J.} 107:173

2117: 

2118: \r Rubin VC. 1994b. {\it Astron. J.} 108:456

2119: 

2120: \r Rubin VC. 1987. in {\it Observational Evidence of Activity in Galaxies}. eds. EYe Khachikian, KJ Fricke, \& J Melnick. I.A.U. Symposium 121:461. Reidel:Dordrecht

2121: 

2122: \r Sackett PD, Rix H-W, Jarvis BJ, Freeman KC. 1994. {\it Ap. J.} 436:629

2123: 

2124: \r Sackett PD, Sparke LS, 1990. {\it Ap. J.} 361:408

2125: 

2126: \r Sackett PD, Sparke LS. 1994.  or et al

2127: 

2128: \r Sakamoto K, Okumura SK, Ishizuki S, Scoville NZ 1999. {\it Ap.J. S.} 124:403

2129: 

2130: \r Salo H, Rautiainen P, Buta R, Purcell GB, Cobb ML, Crocker DA, Laurikainen E. 1999. {\it Astron. J.}  117:792.

2131: 

2132: \r Salucci P, Ashman KM, Persic M. 1991. {\it Ap. J.} 379:89

2133: 

2134: \r Salucci P, Frenk CS. 1989. {\it MNRAS}. 237:247

2135: 

2136: \r Sancisi R, Allen RJ, Sullivan III WT. 1979. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 78:217

2137: 

2138: \r Sancisi R. 2001. in {\it Galaxy Disks and Disk Galaxies}.  eds. J Funes, E Corsini.  {\it PASP. Conf. Series}, in press

2139: 

2140: \r Sanders RH, Verheijen MAW. 1998. {\it Ap. J.} 503:97

2141: 

2142: \r Sanders, RH. 1996. {\it Ap. J.} 473:117

2143: 

2144: \r Sargent AI,  Welch WJ. 1993. {\it Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 31:297.

2145: 

2146: \r Sargent WLW, Schechter PL, Boksenberg A, Shortridge K. 1977. {\it Ap. J.} 212:326

2147: 

2148: \r Sawada-Satoh S, Inoue M, Shibata KM, Kameno S, Migenes V, Nakai N, Diamond PJ. 2000. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn.} 52:421

2149: 

2150: \r Schaap WE, Sancisi R, Swaters RA 2000. {\it Astron. Astropys. L.} 356:49

2151: 

2152: \r Schinnerer E, Eckart A, Tacconi LJ, Genzel R, Downes D. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 533:850. %N1068 highresoCO

2153: 

2154: \r Schombert JM, Bothun GD, Schneider SE, McGaugh SS. 1992.  {\it Astron. J.} 103:1107

2155: 

2156: \r Schombert JM. Bothun GD. 1988. {\it Astron. J.} 95:1389

2157: 

2158: \r Schwarzschild M. 1954. {\it Astron. J.} 59:273

2159: 

2160: \r Schweizer F, Whitmore BC, Rubin VC.  1983. {\it Astron. J.} 88:909

2161: 

2162: \r Schweizer F. 1982. {\it Ap. J.} 252:455

2163: 

2164: \r Schweizer F. 1998. in {\it Galaxies: Interactions and Induced Star Formation},  Swiss Society for Astrop. Astron. XIV, eds. R. C. Kennicutt, Jr. F. Schweizer, J. E. Barnes, D. Friedli, L. Martinet, \& D. Pfenniger. Springer-Verlag Berlin

2165: 

2166: \r Scoville NZ, Thakker D, Carlstrom JE, Sargent AE 1993. {\it Ap. J. L} 404:L63

2167: 

2168: \r Shlosman I, Begelman MC, Frank, J  1990. {\it Nature}. 345:679

2169: 

2170: 

2171: \r Sjouwerman LO, van Langevelde HJ, Winnberg A, Habing HJ.  1998. {\it Astron. Astrophys. Suppl.} 128:35

2172: 

2173: \r Sil'chenko KO. 1996. {\it Ast. L.} 22:108

2174: 

2175: \r Simard L, Prichet CJ. 1998. {\it Ap. J.} 505:96

2176: 

2177: \r Simkin SM. 1974. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 31:129

2178: 

2179: \r Slipher VM. 1914. {\it Lowell Obs. Bull.} 62

2180: 

2181: \r Sofue Y, Honma M, Arimoto N. 1995. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} 296:33

2182: 

2183: \r Sofue Y, Irwin JudithA. 1992. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn.} 44:353

2184: 

2185: \r Sofue Y, Koda J, Kohno K, Okumura SK, Honma M,  Kawamura A, Irwin JudithA. 2000.  {\it Ap. J. Lett.} in press.

2186: 

2187: \r Sofue Y, Reuter H-P, Krause M, Wielebinski R, Nakai N. 1992. {\it Ap. J.}   395:126

2188: 

2189: \r Sofue Y, Tomita A, Honma M, Tutui Y, Takeda Y. 1998. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan.} 50:427

2190: 

2191: \r Sofue Y, Tomita A, Honma M, Tutui Y. 1999b. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn.} 51:737

2192: 

2193: \r Sofue Y, Tutui Y, Honma M, Tomita A, Takamiya T, Koda J, Takeda Y. 1999a.  {\it Ap. J.} 523:136

2194: 

2195: \r Sofue Y, Tutui Y, Honma M, Tomita A. 1997. {\it Astron. J.} 114:2428

2196: 

2197: \r Sofue Y. 1995. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn.} 47:527

2198: 

2199: \r Sofue Y. 1996. {\it Ap. J.}. 458:120

2200: 

2201: \r Sofue Y. 1997. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan.} 49:17

2202: 

2203: \r Sofue Y. 1998. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan.} 50:227

2204: 

2205: \r Sofue Y. 1999. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan.} 51:445

2206: 

2207: \r Sorensen S-A, Matsuda T, Fujimoto M. 1976. {\it Astrophys. Sp. Sci.} 43:491

2208: 

2209: \r Sperandio M, Chincarini G, Rampazzo R, de Souza R. 1995. {\it Astron. Astrophys. Supp.} 110:279

2210: 

2211: \r Sridhar S,  Touma J. 1996. {\it MNRAS}. 279:1263

2212: 

2213: \r Steinmetz M, Navarro JF. 1999. {\it Ap. J.} 513:555

2214: 

2215: \r Swaters RA, Madore BF, Trewhella M. 2000. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 356:L49.

2216: 

2217: \r Swaters RA, Sancisi R, van der Hulst JM. 1997. {\it Ap. J.} 491:140

2218: 

2219: \r Swaters RA, Schoenmakers RHM, Sancisi R, van Albada TS. 1999. {\it MNRAS}.    304:330

2220: 

2221: \r Swaters RA. 1999. thesis Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

2222: 

2223: \r Swaters RA. 2001. in {\it Galaxy Disks and Disk Galaxies}. eds. J Funes, E Corsini.  {\it PASP. Conf. Series}, in press

2224: 

2225: \r Takamiya T, Sofue Y. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} 534:670

2226: 

2227: \r Tecza M, Thatte N, Maiolino R. 2000. IAU Symposium No. 205. {\it Galaxies and their Constituents at the Highest Angular Resolution} in press

2228: 

2229: \r Thaker AR. Ryden BS. 1998. {\it Ap. J.} 506:93

2230: 

2231: \r Toomre A, Toomre J. 1972. {\it Ap. J.} 178:623

2232: 

2233: \r Toomre A. 1977. in {\it The Evolution of Galaxies and Stellar Populations}. eds. BM Tinsley, RB Larson. Yale University Observatory

2234: 

2235: \r Toomre A. 1982. {\it Ap. J.} 259:535

2236: 

2237: \r Tremaine S, Yu Q. 2000. {\it MNRAS}. submitted

2238: 

2239: \r Trimble V. 1987. {\it Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 25:425

2240: 

2241: \r Trotter AS, Greenhill LJ, Moran JM, Reid MJ, Irwin JudithA, Lo K-Y. 1998. {\it Ap. J.} 495:740  %3079

2242: 

2243: \r Tully RB,  Fisher JR. 1977. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 54:661

2244: 

2245: \r Tully RB, Bottinelli L, Fisher JR, Goughenheim L, Sancisi R, van Woerden H.   1978. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 63:37

2246: 

2247: \r Valluri M. 1993. {\it Ap. J.} 408:57

2248: 

2249: \r Valluri M. 1994. {\it Ap. J.}. 430:101

2250: 

2251: \r van Albada TS, Bahcall JN, Begeman K, Sancisi R. 1985. {\it Ap. J.} 295:305

2252: 

2253: \r van Albada TS, Kotanyi CG, Schwarzschild M. 1982 {\it MNRAS}. 198:303

2254: 

2255: \r van Driel W, Combes F, Casoli F, Gerin M, Nakai  N, Miyaji T, Hamabe M, Sofue Y, Ichikawa T, Yoshida S, Kobayashi Y, Geng F, Minezaki T, Arimoto N, Kodama T, Goudfrooij P, Mulder PS, Wakamatsu K, Yanagisawa K. 1995. {\it Astron. J.} 109:942

2256: 

2257: \r van Gorkom JH, Schechter PL, Kristian J.  1987. {\it Ap. J.} 314:457

2258: 

2259: \r van Gorkom JH, van der Hulst JM, Haschick AD, Tubbs AD. 1990. {\it Astron. J.}. 99:1781

2260: 

2261: \r van Moorsel GA. 1983. {\it Astron. Astrophys. Supp.} 54:1

2262: 

2263: \r van de Hulst HC, Raimond E, van Woerden H. 1957.  {\it Bull. Ast. Inst. Neth.} 14:1

2264: 

2265: \r van der Kruit PC, Allen RJ. 1978. {\it Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 16:103

2266: 

2267: \r van der Kruit PC. 2001. in {\it Galaxy Disks and Disk Galaxies}.  eds. J Funes, E Corsini.  {\it PASP. Conf. Series}, in press

2268: 

2269: \r van der Marel M,  Franx M. 1993.  {\it Ap. J.} 407:525

2270: 

2271: \r van der Marel RP, Rix HW, Carter D, Franx M, White SDM, de  Zeeuw T. 1994.  {\it MNRAS}. 268:521

2272: 

2273: \r Vaughan JM. 1989. {\it The Fabry-Perot interferometer. History, theory, practice and applications.} The Adam Hilger Series on Optics and Optoelectronics, Bristol: Hilger.

2274: 

2275: \r Vega Baltran JC. 1999. Thesis Universidad de La Laguna

2276: 

2277: \r Verheijen MAW. 1997. thesis Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

2278: 

2279: \r Vogel SN, Rand RJ, Gruend RA, Teuben PJ. 1993. {\it PASP.} 105:666

2280: 

2281: \r Vogt NP, Forbes DA, Phillips AC, Gronwall C, Faber SM, Illingworth GD, Koo DC. 1996. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 465:15

2282: 

2283: \r Vogt NP, Herter T, Haynes MP, Courteau S. 1993. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 415:95V

2284: 

2285: \r Vogt NP. Phillips AC, Faber SM,  Gallego J, Gronwall C,  Guzman R, Illingworth GD, Koo DC, Lowenthal J D. et al. 1997. {\it Ap. J. Lett.} 479:121

2286: 

2287: \r Volders L. 1959. {\it BAN.} 1:323

2288: 

2289: \r Wada K, Habe A 1992. {\it MNRAS.} 258:82

2290: 

2291: \r Wada K, Habe A 1995. {\it MNRAS.} 277:433

2292: 

2293: \r Wada K, Sakamoto K, Minezaki T. 1998. {\it Ap.J.} 494:236

2294: 

2295: \r Walterbos RAM, Braun R, Kennicutt Jr RC. 1994. {\it Astron. J.} 107:184

2296: 

2297: \r Warner PJ. Wright MCH, Baldwin JE. 1973, {\it MNRAS}. 163:163

2298: 

2299: \r Watson WD, Wallim BK. 1994. {\it Ap. J.} 432:35

2300: 

2301: \r Weiner  B, Sellwood JA. 1999. {\it Ap. J.} 524:112

2302: 

2303: \r Weiner  BJ, Williams TB. 1996. {\it Astron. J.} 111:1156

2304: 

2305: \r Weiner BJ,  Williams TB,  van Gorkom JH,  Sellwood SA. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} accepted.

2306: 

2307: \r Weiner BJ, Sellwood SA, Williams  TB. 2000. {\it Ap. J.} accepted.

2308: 

2309: \r Westerlund BE. 1999. in {\it New Views of the Magellanic Clouds}, IAU Symposium No. 190, eds Y.-H. Chu, N. Suntzeff, J. Hesser, \& D. Bohlender. in press

2310: 

2311: \r Whitmore BC, Forbes DA, Rubin VC. 1988. {\it Ap. J.} 333:542

2312: 

2313: \r Whitmore BC, Forbes DA. 1989. {\it ApSS}. 156:175

2314: 

2315: \r Wilkinson MI, \& Evans NW. 1999. {\it MNRAS.} 310:645

2316: 

2317: \r Wolf M. 1914. {\it Vierteljahresschr Astron. Ges.} 49:162

2318: 

2319: \r Woods D, Madore BF, Fahlman GG. 1990. {\it Ap. J.} 353:90

2320: 

2321: \r Wozniak H, Pfenniger D. 1997. {\it Astron. Astrophys}. 317:14

2322: 

2323: \r Young  JS,  Xie  S,  Tacconi  L,  Knezek  P,  Vicuso  P, Tacconi-Garman  L,  Scoville  N,  Schneider  S,  et al.  1995. {\it Ap. J. Suppl} 98:219

2324: 

2325: \r Young JS, Scoville NZ. 1992. {\it Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.} 29:581

2326: 

2327: \r Zaritsky D, Elston R, Hill JM. 1989. {\it Astron. J.} 97:97

2328: 

2329: \r Zaritsky D, Elston R, Hill JM. 1990. {\it Astron. J.} 99:1108

2330: 

2331: \r Zaritsky D, White SDM. 1994. {\it Ap. J.} 435:599

2332: 

2333: \r Zaritsky D. 1992. {\it Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.} 104:831

2334: 

2335: \r Zinn R. 1993. in {\it  The globular clusters-galaxy connection.} ASP Conf. Series. eds. Graeme H. Smith, and Jean P. Brodie. 48:38

2336: 

2337: \newpage

2338: 

2339: \noindent{Figure Captions}

2340: \v

2341: 

2342: 

2343: \r Fig. 1. Position-velocity diagram along the major axis of the

2344: edge-on galaxy NGC 3079 in the CO ($J=1-0$) line emission

2345: at a resolution of $1''.5$ observed with the 7-element interferometer

2346: consisted of the 6-element mm-wave Array and the 45-m telescope at Nobeyama

2347: (Sofue et al. 2000).

2348: The lower panel shows a composite rotation curve produced by combining the

2349: CO result and HI data (Irwin and Seaquist 1991) for the outer regions.

2350: 

2351: \v

2352: \r Fig. 2. Simulation of the effect of beam-smearing on a position-velocity

2353: diagram. The top panel shows an assumed 'true' rotation

2354: curve comprising a central core,  bulge,  disk and a halo.

2355: Assumed molecular and HI gas distributions are indicated by the thin lines.

2356: The middle panel is an 'observed' PV diagram in CO, and the bottom in HI.

2357: Both the resolution and sensitivity are crucial to detect central

2358: high velocities and steep rise.

2359: 

2360: \v

2361: \r Fig. 3. Logarithmic rotation curves of the Milky Way (thick line),

2362: NGC 4258 (thin line) and M31 (dashed line).

2363: Innermost rotation velocities are Keplerian velocities

2364: calculated for massive black holes.

2365: Observational methods for the Milky Way are shown by horizontal lines.

2366: 

2367: \v

2368: \r Fig. 4. Rotation curves of spiral galaxies obtained by

2369: combining CO data for the central regions, optical for disks,

2370: and HI for outer disk and halo (Sofue et al. 1999).

2371: 

2372: \v

2373: \r Fig. 5. The rotation curve slope between one and two

2374: scale lengths, plotted against the central concentration of light,

2375: $\Delta\mu_{R}$, which represents the

2376: difference between the observed central surface brightness and

2377: the extrapolated surface brightness of the exponential disk.

2378: For pure disk systems, $\Delta\mu_{R} = 0$.

2379: Filled and open circles are dwarfs (high and low accuracy), and

2380: triangles are spirals. [Courtesy of R. Swaters (1999)].

2381: 

2382: \v

2383: \r Fig. 6. The HI velocity field of the LMC superposed on an \ha\ image,

2384: and a position-velocity diagram across the kinematical major axis

2385: (Kim et al. 1998: Courtesy of S. Kim).

2386: The ellipse indicates the position of the optical bar.

2387: The thick line in the PV diagram traces the rotation curve, corrected

2388: for the inclination angle of 33\deg.

2389: 

2390: \end{document}

2391: