1: % MANUAL.TEX -- User input guide for AAS\TeX\ markup package.
2: % Revised 4/23/94 - mostly reordering with some editing - J. Barnes
3: % Final editing started 8/8/94 - J. Barnes
4:
5: \documentstyle[aasms4,12pt]{article}
6:
7: \textwidth 7.3in
8: \hoffset=-0.4in % This centers the extra wide page
9: \voffset=-0.4in % This is because the printer I use prints too low...
10: \def\baselinestretch{0.96}
11:
12: \hyphenation{com-pu-scripts}
13:
14: %%\doublespace
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18: \title{Star Forming Objects in the Tidal Tails of Compact Groups}
19: %\vspace{.2in}
20: \author{J. Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo}
21: %\vspace{.2in}
22: \author{jiglesia@ll.iac.es}
23: %\vspace{.2in}
24: \affil{Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Canarias\\
25: 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, SPAIN}
26: \and
27: \author{J.M. V\'{\i}lchez}
28: %\vspace{.2in}
29: \author{jvm@iaa.es}
30: %\vspace{.2in}
31: \affil{Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Andaluc\'{\i}a (CSIC)\\
32: Apdo. 3004, 18080 Granada, SPAIN}
33: \vspace{.2in}
34:
35: \begin{abstract}
36:
37: A search for star forming objects belonging to tidal tails has
38: been carried out in a sample of deep H$\alpha$ images of 16 compact groups
39: of galaxies. A total of 36 objects with H$\alpha$ luminosity larger than
40: 10$^{38}~erg~s^{-1}$ have been detected in five groups.
41: The fraction of the total H$\alpha$ luminosity of their respective
42: parent galaxies shown by the tidal objects is always below 5\% except
43: for the tidal features of HCG~95, whose
44: H$\alpha$ luminosity amounts to 65\% of the total luminosity.
45: Out of this 36 objects, 9 star forming tidal dwarf galaxy
46: candidates have been finally identified on the basis of their projected distances
47: to the nuclei of the parent galaxies and their total H$\alpha$ luminosities.
48: Overall, the observed properties of the candidates resemble those
49: previously reported
50: for the so-called tidal dwarf galaxies.
51:
52: \end{abstract}
53:
54: \keywords{Galaxies: evolution --- starburst --- interactions; ISM: H{\sc
55: ii} regions}
56:
57: \section{Introduction}
58:
59: Interactions between disk galaxies are known to produce strong
60: morphological disturbances and, if the geometry of the encounter is
61: favorable, to enhance the star formation rates of the disk
62: galaxies. The pioneering work by Tomre \& Tomre (1972) and a later study by Barnes
63: (1988) supported the
64: original idea by Zwicky (1956) that dwarf galaxies could originate
65: within the tidal tails resulting from a strong interaction between two
66: disk galaxies. Since then, several examples of dwarf galaxies with
67: tidal origin have already been detected in interacting systems in an
68: advanced stage of merging and also around galaxies
69: experiencing less dramatic interactions (Schweizer 1978, Mirabel et
70: al. 1991,1992, Hibbard \& van Gorkom 1996, Duc \& Mirabel 1997,1998).
71:
72: The compact group environment has been suggested to be an ideal place for
73: interactions between galaxies given their large spatial densities and
74: their low velocity dispersions. Mendes de Oliveira \& Hickson (1994)
75: reported morphological signs of interaction in many galaxies of compact
76: groups from Hickson's Catalogue (1982). Other recent studies on the
77: photometric properties of the galaxies in Hickson Compact Groups at
78: different wavelengths resulted contradictory when compared to samples of
79: field galaxies: while CO, FIR, H$\alpha$ and optical fluxes seem to be
80: similar to those measured for field galaxies (Moles et al. 1994, Verdes-Montenegro et
81: al. 1998, Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo \& V\'{\i}lchez 1999),
82: radio continuum and 21cm emission are on
83: average lower than for samples of isolated galaxies (Williams \& Rood 1987,
84: Menon 1995, Huchtmeier 1997).
85:
86: Hunsberger et al. (1998) carried
87: out a search for dwarf galaxy candidates in the close environment of a
88: sample of Hickson Compact Groups, by automated detection of faint
89: objects on deep $R$ band frames. After decontamination for the presence
90: of background galaxies, they found that the luminosity
91: function in compact groups showed an enhancement at the faint luminosity
92: end compared to a normal Schechter function. They concluded that the
93: initial dwarf galaxy population in compact groups is replenished by
94: ``subsequent generations'' formed in the tidal debris of giant galaxy
95: interactions.
96:
97: In this work we present the results of a search for tidal star forming
98: dwarfs in our H$\alpha$ images
99: of a sample of nearby compact groups (see V\'{\i}lchez \&
100: Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo 1998, Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo \& V\'{\i}lchez 1999). Five
101: of the groups were found to show optically prominent tidal tails with star forming objects
102: within them. We emphasize the fact that all the detected objects are
103: H$\alpha$ emitters, therefore implying that they are physically
104: associated with the galaxies of the group.
105: The main properties of the star forming objects will be presented in
106: \S\ref{sample}, as well as a description of their close
107: environment. \S\ref{discussion} contains a discussion on their
108: likely evolutionary scenario.
109:
110: \section{The Sample\label{sample}}
111:
112: Deep H$\alpha$ images for a total of 67 galaxies belonging to 16 Hickson
113: compact groups were inspected.
114: Four telescopes were used in order to obtain all the data presented in
115: this paper: The INT 2.5m and JKT 1.0m in the Observatorio del Roque de los
116: Muchachos, the IAC80 in the Observatorio del Teide and the 2.2m
117: Telescope in the Observatorio Hispano-Alem\'{a}n de Calar Alto. Also,
118: some $R$ band continuum frames taken at
119: the 3.6m~CFHT were kindly made available to us by Dr. Paul Hickson.
120: More details concerning the data acquisition
121: and reduction for the sample can be found in Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo \&
122: V\'{\i}lchez (1999)\footnote{Although not mentioned in that paper, HCG~80
123: belongs to the current sample}.
124: H$\alpha$ emitting objects in tidal features were found in 5
125: groups of the sample: HCG~31, HCG~44, HCG~92, HCG~93 and HCG~95. We
126: note that although tidal features were reported for some other groups of
127: our sample
128: (Mendes de Oliveira \& Hickson 1994), no H$\alpha$ objects have been
129: found associated with these features.
130:
131: Figures~\ref{g31cont} to~\ref{g95cont} show detailed contour maps of
132: continuum subtracted H$\alpha$
133: images of the sections of the groups where star forming tidal objects were detected. The contour
134: scales are different for each group.
135: A preselection of star forming objects was done
136: by careful optical inspection of the H$\alpha$ images, with
137: the following criteria: (1) all the objects appear spatially resolved at the
138: 3$\sigma$ isophote over the
139: sky level, (2) they are more luminous than $10^{38}~erg~s^{-1}$ --
140: this somewhat arbitrary luminosity limit was chosen in
141: order to exclude normal low luminosity H{\sc ii} regions (see \S~3) --
142: (3) they are
143: located along tidal features, well away from the main body of the parent
144: galaxies.
145:
146: Table~\ref{prop} shows some physical properties of the tidal
147: objects. Column 1 shows the identifier of each object as quoted in
148: Figures 1 to 5 (with the
149: prefix TD added to the identifier); Column 2 shows
150: the name of the parent galaxy according to Hickson et al. (1989);
151: Column 3 shows the optical radius at the $25~mag~arcsec^{-2}$ isophote of the
152: parent galaxy, $R_{25}$; Column 4 shows
153: the measured H$\alpha$ luminosity in $erg~s^{-1}$; Column 5 shows
154: the fraction of the total H$\alpha$ luminosity emitted by the tidal
155: objects; Column 6 shows the H$\alpha$ equivalent width in \AA; Column 7
156: shows the projected distance of the tidal object to the center of the
157: parent galaxies normalized to $R_{25}$.
158: All the
159: distance-dependent quantities have been estimated adopting
160: $H_{0} = 75~km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}$ and assuming a pure Hubble
161: flow\footnote{Note that the H$\alpha$ luminosities
162: published in our previous papers adopted a different value for
163: $H_{0}$}. Here follows a brief morphological description of the close
164: environment of the detected tidal objects.
165:
166: \subsection{HCG~31}
167:
168: This group, that hosts up to nine tidal objects, has been previously
169: discussed in the literature (i.e. Rubin et al. 1990, Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo
170: \& V\'{\i}lchez 1997a, Johnson et al. 1999). The parent galaxies seem to be in an
171: advanced stage of merging, and show strong star formation activity
172: everywhere. A third galaxy located to the West could be joining the interacting
173: pair. The whole group is immersed in an H{\sc i} cloud (Williams et
174: al. 1991) and is one of the few Hickson Compact Groups richer than
175: expected in H{\sc i}. The tidal tail containing objects TD~31c
176: to TD~31i, appears also delineated in the H{\sc i} map. The large equivalent
177: widths measured for some of the tidal objects, together with their
178: extremely blue broad band colors (Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo \& V\'{\i}lchez
179: 1997a), suggest that we are probably observing two recently originated
180: dwarf galaxies. This is remarkable since this kind of objects were thought
181: to be born mostly in systems containing early-type galaxies (Duc \&
182: Mirabel 1998) without apparent optical spiral arms.
183:
184: \subsection{HCG~44}
185:
186: HCG~44 is quite a dispersed group. Overall, it was found to be deficient
187: in H{\sc i} (Williams \& Rood 1987). The individual galaxies HCG~44a and
188: c were also found to be H{\sc i} deficient. An H{\sc i} dwarf
189: galaxy was detected within the field of the group at approximately the
190: same radial velocity (Williams et al. 1991). The parent galaxy hosting the
191: tidal objects, HCG~44d, is a SB(s)c peculiar galaxy showing two distorted
192: tidal arms perpendicular to the direction of the central bar (Mendes de
193: Oliveira \& Hickson 1994). Almost no
194: underlying emission from the tidal objects was detected in broad band
195: images. The H{\sc i} map of this galaxy also
196: shows asymmetries and clear signatures of interactions (Williams et
197: al. 1991). The nearby galaxy HCG~44a, an early-type spiral with the plane
198: of the disk perpendicular to the tidal tails of HCG~44d, could be
199: responsible for the interaction suffered by HCG~44d; the
200: distortion detected in the outer disk of HCG~44a towards HCG~44d is
201: a relic of the interaction between both galaxies.
202: Eight star forming objects were detected in the tidal tails of HCG~44d.
203:
204: \subsection{HCG~92}
205:
206: Several tidal objects were detected in this group, widely known as Stephan's
207: Quintet. Interesting reviews of the history and evolution of this
208: group can be found in Moles et al. (1997,1998) and Xu et al. (1999).
209: The H{\sc i} distribution is decoupled from the optical galaxies
210: (Verdes-Montenegro et al., 2000), which could explain the low star formation
211: activity of this group in spite of the high rate of interaction among its
212: members. One of the tidal objects, TD~92a, is located at the tip of a long tidal
213: tail extending out from HCG~92c. This galaxy shows a Seyfert 2 type active nucleus,
214: a strong bar across the disk and several shells apparent in the
215: continuum image. However, excepting the nucleus,
216: no strong H$\alpha$ emission was detected throughout this galaxy. Xu
217: et al. (1999) performed a detailed study of the star forming regions in
218: HCG~92 based on IR imaging, and reported this tidal dwarf galaxy as
219: probably due to the interaction of HCG~92c with the nearby galaxy NGC~7320c,
220: not included as a member of the group in the original catalog. The rest
221: of the tidal objects were detected around the interacting pair of
222: galaxies HCG~92b and d. Each of these galaxies has developed one tidal
223: tail pointing towards the North. Our H$\alpha$ map of the tail
224: associated with HCG~92b shows a
225: vertical bar-like structure, probably containing shocked gas (Ohyama et
226: al. 1998) due to the intrusion of this galaxy into the group. At the tip
227: of this tail, a starburst region was reported by Xu et al. (1999) -- our
228: object TD~92b -- and attributed to the
229: collision of the galaxy with the intergalactic medium of the
230: group. We have detected several other objects in the outskirts of HCG~92d.
231:
232: \subsection{HCG~93}
233:
234: Only one galaxy, HCG~93b, hosts the seven tidal objects detected in this
235: group. HCG~93 is a very H{\sc i} poor compact group. The mean separation between its galaxies is
236: about 70~$kpc$, which makes it the largest of the five groups reported in this
237: work. The parent galaxy, HCG~93b, is an SB(s)cd peculiar galaxy with two
238: long tails, well visible in the optical continuum images. This galaxy,
239: together with the massive elliptical HCG~93a was cataloged as a binary
240: system by Peterson (1979). The low surface brightness asymmetric halo
241: surrounding HCG~93a (see the red continuum image in V\'{\i}lchez \&
242: Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo 1998) suggests that an interaction between the two
243: galaxies may be responsible for the tidal tails exhibited by HCG~93b as
244: well as for the faint halo of HCG~93a. Four of the tidal objects --
245: including the most luminous one -- were
246: detected along the Northern tail, and the remaining three along the
247: Southern one.
248:
249: \subsection{HCG~95}
250:
251: In this group of galaxies, a three-galaxy interaction
252: seems to be taking place (Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo \& V\'{\i}lchez 1998).
253: As a result, four tidal tails emerge from the
254: doubly nucleated galaxy HCG~95c. The gas distribution of the system
255: appears peculiar because it seems weighted towards the Eastern nucleus
256: of HCG~95c and the Northern tidal tail emerging from it, with almost no
257: gas in the rest of the system. Four tidal objects were detected along
258: the Northern gas-rich tail. A close inspection of the broad band and
259: H$\alpha$ images of the system suggested the possibility that transfer
260: of material was taking place from the most luminous object in this tidal
261: tail -- namely TD~95b -- towards the nucleus of the bright nearby
262: elliptical galaxy HCG~95a (Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo \& V\'{\i}lchez
263: 1997b). The analysis of the broad band colors of the tidal objects
264: showed that the amount of underlying population present along
265: the Northern tidal tail probably decreases outwards, being almost negligible for
266: TD~95a and TD~95b.
267:
268: \section{Discussion and Conclusions\label{discussion}}
269:
270: As can be seen from Table~1, the H$\alpha$ equivalent widths and
271: luminosities of the
272: tidal objects suggest that most of them host very young star
273: formation bursts and are above the luminosity limit for giant H{\sc ii}
274: regions.
275: The underlying continuum
276: luminosity varies greatly from object to object as shown in Figures~1 to
277: 5. This
278: is the reason for the large range covered by their H$\alpha$ equivalent
279: width values, rather than the result of different evolutionary stages of the
280: corresponding star formation bursts of the tidal objects.
281: The fraction of the total H$\alpha$ flux corresponding to tidal objects is
282: typically under 5\% (see Table~1), except in the remarkable case of the tidal
283: features in HCG~95c, which amount to 65\% of the total
284: luminosity of the galaxy. We attribute this extraordinarily high
285: fraction of luminosity within the tidal tail to the fact that HCG~95c
286: belongs to a triple system showing a rather complicated interaction
287: sequence (Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo \& V\'{\i}lchez 1998).
288:
289: The existence of these tidal objects is linked to
290: the possibility that they could subsequently evolve as independent dwarf galaxies, like
291: those observed at the tips of the tidal tails of the Antennae and the
292: Superantennae (Mirabel et al. 1991,1992).
293: Looking to the optical images,
294: only rough morphological similarities between the tails of the
295: Antennae and Superantennae and the tails shown by our galaxies can be
296: found.
297: The Antennae and Superantennae fall in the most dramatic case
298: of interaction of a pair of galaxies, whereas our five groups span a
299: wide range of interaction strengths.
300: At this point, two critical questions arise concerning the
301: possibility that tidal objects can evolve independently as dwarf galaxies: (1)
302: are they distant enough from the parent galaxy so as to be able to escape from the
303: potential well?, and (2) are they massive enough to be
304: self gravitating systems and to be considered dwarf galaxies?
305:
306: Concerning the first question, some authors have claimed (Schweizer
307: 1978; Hibbard \& van Gorkom 1996) that most
308: of the material ejected during an interaction is
309: accumulated in the tidal tails.
310: N-body simulations suggest that a substantial fraction of
311: this material will slowly fall into the main body of the remnant of
312: the interaction, and only the outermost 20\% will probably gain
313: enough kinetic energy to be able to evolve
314: independently for a long time (see Hibbard \& Mihos 1995).
315: Given that no information is available on the velocity
316: fields of the interacting pairs of our sample, and that
317: they show a great variety of interaction patterns, we will adopt a
318: quantitative criterion based on the projected distances of the tidal
319: objects from the nuclei of their
320: parent galaxies in order to select the most likely candidates to escape
321: from the potential well. Ferguson et al. (1998) carried
322: out a deep search for H{\sc ii} regions well outside the optical limits
323: of a sample of disk galaxies, and found no H{\sc ii} regions located at a
324: projected galactocentric distance larger than $2 \times R_{25}$. This
325: result was explained as due to the fact that the gas surface density is
326: below the critical density for star formation at such large radii from the
327: centers of the galaxies. Therefore, we can consider that those star
328: forming regions located that far from the nuclei of their parent galaxies
329: must have been originated by an external mechanism which has removed
330: gas from the inner regions of the parent galaxies. Star forming
331: regions far away from their parent galaxies may become kinematically
332: decoupled from the stellar disks; thus they are very likely escaping the potential
333: well of the parent galaxy and could become good tidal dwarf galaxy candidates.
334: According to
335: Table~\ref{prop}, {\em only 9 tidal objects fulfill this criterion} ($R > 2
336: \times R_{25}$).
337: Obviously, this is a conservative
338: criterion adopted given the lack of information on the velocity field of the
339: tidal tails. Therefore, we should bear in mind that because of
340: possible projection effects, the number of tidal dwarfs candidates
341: selected is a lower limit since other objects not satisfying this
342: criterion cannot be ruled out to be tidal dwarf galaxies.
343:
344: Concerning the second question posed above,
345: Elmegreen et al. (1993) proposed that
346: clouds as massive as $10^{8}~M_{\odot}$ can form during interactions of disk
347: galaxies. Under some conditions, these clouds could become
348: dwarf galaxies. In particular, when the mass of the perturber is
349: larger than approximately 1.4 times the mass of the parent galaxy,
350: -- as appears to be the case for the five groups of our
351: sample presenting H$\alpha$ emitting tidal tails\footnote{estimated from a
352: comparison of the magnitudes of the parent galaxies with those of the
353: remaining galaxies in the groups} --
354: these models predict that the outermost clouds are very likely to escape the
355: potential well.
356: Such $10^{8}~M_{\odot}$ clouds would produce $10^{6}~M_{\odot}$ starbursts,
357: assuming a value for the efficiency of star formation of 1\% (see
358: Kennicutt 1998 and references therein).
359: From the observational side, the H$\alpha$ luminosities reported for the
360: tidal dwarf galaxies of the Antennae (Mirabel et al. 1991) and NGC~5291 (Duc \& Mirabel
361: 1998), are comparable to the ones derived in the present paper; the H{\sc i}
362: masses measured for those dwarfs appear to be typically above $10^{8}~M_{\odot}$.
363: In the same direction, from a large compilation of dwarf galaxies Hunter \& Gallagher (1986)
364: reported H{\sc i} masses larger than $10^{8}~M_{\odot}$ for
365: objects with $L_{\mbox{\scriptsize{H}}\alpha} \gtrsim
366: 10^{39}~erg~s^{-1}$. Such bright objects are known to be
367: gravitationally bound, according to the well established
368: $L($H$\alpha$) {\em versus} $\sigma$ relationship for H{\sc ii}
369: galaxies (Terlevich \& Melnick 1981). The 9 objects selected above show
370: H$\alpha$ luminosities larger than $10^{39}~erg~s^{-1}$, which on
371: observational grounds seems to be a reasonable lower limit to ensure
372: self gravitation for H{\sc ii} complexes.
373:
374: The two restrictions imposed above, though conservative, appear
375: reasonable since H{\sc ii} regions brighter than
376: $10^{39}~erg~s^{-1}$ are found to be located at galactocentric
377: distances lower than about $1.2 \times R_{25}$ (as derived from the
378: H{\sc ii} region surveys by
379: Rozas et al. 1996,2000).
380: A naive estimation of the dynamical time needed by our dwarf galaxy
381: candidates to travel a distance equivalent to $R_{25}$
382: as a consequence of
383: the interaction would be of the order of the fading time for H{\sc
384: ii} regions. Thus, we are confident that the 9 selected candidates must have
385: been generated during the interaction and do not belong to a
386: previous generation of disk H{\sc ii} regions.
387:
388: From the arguments presented above, it appears clear that the 9 star forming
389: objects finally selected represent good candidates to satisfy the {\em escape} and
390: {\em self gravitation} conditions, and thus they can be included in the group of
391: the so-called tidal dwarf galaxies. Further information on total masses and relative
392: velocity with respect to their parent galaxies is required to confirm
393: that they satisfy both conditions.
394:
395: It seems striking that the ratio between the number of candidate dwarf galaxies to the total
396: number of tidal objects detected, 25\%, appears consistent with the fraction of
397: the ejected material which is expected to escape according to
398: theoretical models (Hibbard \& van Gorkom 1995). Since
399: all these candidate tidal galaxies were selected
400: at projected distances larger than $2\times R_{25}$, we suggest that this last
401: criterion might be a useful indicator of an {\em effective} escape
402: radius for these systems.
403:
404: Summarizing, as a result of a search performed on a sample of net H$\alpha$ images of
405: 16 compact groups of galaxies, we have identified 9 star forming
406: tidal objects proposed to be considered dwarf galaxy candidates given
407: their large projected distances from their parent galaxies and their large
408: H$\alpha$ luminosities.
409: These interesting objects deserve further detailed study, including dynamical and
410: evolutionary aspects which are beyond the scope of the present study.
411:
412: \acknowledgements
413:
414: We acknowledge John Beckman for carefully reading of the last
415: version of this document and for interesting comments and suggestions.
416: Thanks must also be given to A. Zurita for providing H{\sc ii} region catalogues.
417: The INT and the JKT are operated on the island of La Palma by the Isaac
418: Newton Group in
419: the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de Los Muchachos of the Instituto de
420: Astrof\'{\i}sica de Canarias.
421: The 2.2m Telescope is operated by the MPIA in
422: the Spanish Observatorio de Calar Alto.
423: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)
424: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute
425: of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space
426: Administration. This study was partly financed by the Spanish DGES
427: (Direcci\'{o}n General de Ense\~{n}anza Superior), grant PB97-0158.
428:
429: \begin{thebibliography}{}
430:
431: \bibitem{} Barnes J.E., 1988, \apj, 331, 699
432:
433: \bibitem{} Duc P.A., Mirabel I.F., 1997, Messenger, 89, 14
434:
435: \bibitem{} Duc P.A., Mirabel I.F., 1998, \aap, 333, 813
436:
437: \bibitem{} Elmegreen B.G., Kaufman M., Thomasson M., 1993, \apj, 412, 90
438:
439: \bibitem{} Ferguson A.M.N., Wyse R.F.G., Gallagher J.S., Hunter D.H.,
440: 1998, \apjl, 506, L19
441:
442: \bibitem{} Hibbard J.E., Mihos J.C., 1995, \aj, 110, 140
443:
444: \bibitem{} Hibbard J.E., van Gorkom J.H., 1996, \aj, 111, 655
445:
446: \bibitem{} Hickson P., 1982, \apj, 255, 382
447:
448: \bibitem{} Hickson P., Kindl E., Auman J.R., 1989, \apjs, 70, 687
449:
450: \bibitem{} Huchtmeier W.K., 1997, \aap, 325, 473
451:
452: \bibitem{} Hunsberger S.D., Charlton J.C., Zaritsky D., 1998, \apj, 505, 536
453:
454: \bibitem{} Hunter D.A., Gallagher J.S., 1986, \pasp, 98, 5
455:
456: \bibitem{} Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo J., V\'{\i}lchez J.M., 1997a, \apj, 479, 190
457:
458: \bibitem{} Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo J., V\'{\i}lchez J.M., 1997b, \apj, 489, L13
459:
460: \bibitem{} Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo J., V\'{\i}lchez J.M., 1998, \aj, 115, 1791
461:
462: \bibitem{} Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo J., V\'{\i}lchez J.M., 1999, \apj, 518, 94
463:
464: \bibitem{} Johnson K.E., Vacca W.D., Leitherer C., Conti P.S., Lipscy
465: S.J., 1999, \aj, 117, 1708
466:
467: \bibitem{} Kennicutt R.C., 1998, \araa, 36, 189
468:
469: \bibitem{} Mendes de Oliveira C., Hickson P., 1994, \apj, 427, 684
470:
471: \bibitem{} Menon T.K., 1995, \mnras, 274, 845
472:
473: \bibitem{} Mirabel I.F., Lutz D., Maza J., 1991, \aap, 243, 367
474:
475: \bibitem{} Mirabel I.F., Dottori H., Lutz D., 1992, \aap, 256, L19
476:
477: \bibitem{} Moles M., del Olmo A., Perea J., Masegosa J., M\'{a}rquez I.,
478: Costa V., 1994, \aap, 285, 404
479:
480: \bibitem{} Moles M., Sulentic J.W., M\'{a}rquez I., 1997, \apj, 485, L69
481:
482: \bibitem{} Moles M., M\'{a}rquez I., Sulentic J.W., 1998, \aap, 334, 473
483:
484: \bibitem{} Ohyama Y., Nishiura S., Murayama T., Taniguchi Y., 1998,
485: \apj, 492, L250
486:
487: \bibitem{} Peterson S.D., 1979, \apjs, 40, 527
488:
489: \bibitem{} Rozas M., Beckman J.E., Knapen J.H., 1996, \aap, 307, 735
490:
491: \bibitem{} Rozas M., Zurita A., Beckman J.E., 2000, \aap, 354, 823
492:
493: \bibitem{} Rubin V.C., Hunter D.A., Ford W.K., 1990, \apj, 365, 86
494:
495: \bibitem{} Schweizer F., 1978, in The Structure and Properties of Nearby
496: Galaxies, IAU Symposium No. 77, edited by E. M. Berkhuijsen and
497: R. Wielebinski (Reidel, Dordrecht), p. 279
498:
499: \bibitem{} Terlevich R., Melnick J., 1981, \mnras, 195, 839
500:
501: \bibitem{} Tomre A., Tomre J., 1972, \apj, 178, 623
502:
503: \bibitem{} Verdes-Montenegro L., Yun M.S., Perea J., del Olmo A., Ho
504: P.T.P., 1998, \apj, 497, 89
505:
506: \bibitem{}Verdes-Montenegro L., Yun M.S., Williams B.A., Huchtmeier
507: W.K., del Olmo A., Perea J., 2000, in Small Galaxy Groups, IAU
508: Coll. 174, in press
509:
510: \bibitem{} V\'{\i}lchez J.M., Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo J., 1998, \apjs, 508, 248
511:
512: \bibitem{} Williams B.A., Rood H.J., 1987, \apjs, 63, 265
513:
514: \bibitem{} Williams B.A., McMahon P.M., van Gorkom J.H., 1991, \aj, 101,
515: 1957
516:
517: \bibitem{} Xu C., Sulentic J.W., Tuffs R., 1999, \apj, 512, 178
518:
519: \bibitem{} Zwicky F., 1956, Ergebnisse der Exakten Naturwissenschaften, 29, 344
520:
521: \end{thebibliography}
522:
523: \newpage
524:
525: %\begin{figure}
526: %\begin{center}
527: %\epsscale{0.8}
528: %\plotone{./gf1.eps}
529: %\caption{Greyscale map of HCG~31 in the red continuum band. Overimpossed
530: %contours correspond to the net H$\alpha$ emission. Tidal objects are
531: %marked with arrows. Axis units correspond to arcseconds. North is
532: %Up and East is Left.\label{g31cont}}
533: %\end{center}
534: %\end{figure}
535:
536: %\begin{figure}
537: %\begin{center}
538: %\epsscale{0.8}
539: %\plotone{./gf2.eps}
540: %\caption{Same as Figure~\ref{g31cont} for HCG~44.\label{g44cont}}
541: %\end{center}
542: %\end{figure}
543:
544: %\begin{figure}
545: %\begin{center}
546: %\epsscale{0.8}
547: %\plotone{./gf3.eps}
548: %\caption{Same as Figure~\ref{g31cont} for HCG~92.\label{g92cont}}
549: %\end{center}
550: %\end{figure}
551:
552: %\begin{figure}
553: %\begin{center}
554: %\epsscale{0.8}
555: %\plotone{./gf4.eps}
556: %\caption{Same as Figure~\ref{g31cont} for HCG~93.\label{g93cont}}
557: %\end{center}
558: %\end{figure}
559:
560: %\begin{figure}
561: %\begin{center}
562: %\epsscale{0.8}
563: %\plotone{./gf5.eps}
564: %\caption{Same as Figure~\ref{g31cont} for HCG~95.\label{g95cont}}
565: %\end{center}
566: %\end{figure}
567:
568: \figcaption[f1.eps]{Greyscale map of HCG~31 in the red continuum band. Overimpossed
569: contours correspond to the net H$\alpha$ emission. Tidal objects are
570: marked with arrows. Axis units correspond to arcseconds. North is
571: Up and East is Left.\label{g31cont}}
572:
573: \figcaption[f2.eps]{Same as Figure~\ref{g31cont} for HCG~44.\label{g44cont}}
574:
575: \figcaption[f3.eps]{Same as Figure~\ref{g31cont} for HCG~92.\label{g92cont}}
576:
577: \figcaption[f4.eps]{Same as Figure~\ref{g31cont} for HCG~93.\label{g93cont}}
578:
579: \figcaption[f5.eps]{Same as Figure~\ref{g31cont} for HCG~95.\label{g95cont}}
580:
581:
582: \newpage
583:
584: \begin{table}
585: \begin{center}
586: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc}
587: \tableline
588: Name & Parent Gal. & $R_{25}$ & $L(\mbox{H}\alpha)$ & $x(\%)$ & $E.W.(\mbox{H}\alpha)$ &
589: $D_{proj}/R_{25}$ \\
590: & & $kpc$ & $erg~s^{-1}$ & & \AA\ & \\
591: \tableline
592: TD~31a & HCG~31a, HCG~31c & 6.74 & 39.82 & 0.8 & 103 & 1.43 \\
593: TD~31b & & & 39.96 & 1.1 & 50 & 1.03 \\
594: TD~31c & & & 40.47 & 3.6 & 219 & 0.98 \\
595: TD~31d & & & 39.21 & 0.2 & -- & 1.37 \\
596: TD~31e & & & 38.91 & 0.1 & -- & 1.53 \\
597: TD~31f & & & 38.91 & 0.1 & -- & 1.69 \\
598: TD~31g & & & 40.44 & 3.4 & 623 & 2.21 \\
599: TD~31h & & & 40.06 & 1.4 & 592 & 2.52 \\
600: TD~31i & & & 39.21 & 0.2 & -- & 3.07 \\
601: \tableline
602: TD~44a & HCG~44d & 3.84 & 39.31 & 3.5 & 188 & 2.33 \\
603: TD~44b & & & 39.35 & 3.8 & 163 & 1.59 \\
604: TD~44c & & & 38.82 & 1.1 & 76 & 1.40 \\
605: TD~44d & & & 38.68 & 0.8 & 105 & 1.14 \\
606: TD~44e & & & 38.73 & 0.9 & 81 & 0.99 \\
607: TD~44f & & & 38.25 & 0.3 & 118 & 0.97 \\
608: TD~44g & & & 38.38 & 0.4 & 150 & 1.33 \\
609: TD~44h & & & 38.08 & 0.2 & -- & 1.22 \\
610: \tableline
611: TD~92a & HCG~92c & 19.51 & 40.36 & 2.8 & 90 & 2.41 \\
612: \tableline
613: TD~92b & HCG~92b, HCG~92d & 19.52 & 41.32 & 1.3 & 110 & 1.14 \\
614: TD~92c & & & 41.08 & 0.7 & 95 & 1.64 \\
615: TD~92d & & & 40.71 & 0.3 & -- & 0.53 \\
616: TD~92e & & & 41.11 & 0.8 & 30 & 0.36 \\
617: TD~92f & & & 40.96 & 0.6 & 33 & 0.45 \\
618: TD~92g & & & 40.74 & 0.3 & -- & 1.07 \\
619: \tableline
620: TD~93a & HCG~93b & 10.90 & 39.06 & 0.3 & 23 & 3.02 \\
621: TD~93b & & & 40.16 & 3.2 & 58 & 2.01 \\
622: TD~93c & & & 39.39 & 0.6 & 12 & 1.78 \\
623: TD~93d & & & 39.31 & 0.5 & 16 & 1.30 \\
624: TD~93e & & & 40.75 & 5.0 & 22 & 0.94 \\
625: TD~93f & & & 39.65 & 1.0 & 14 & 0.79 \\
626: TD~93g & & & 39.48 & 0.7 & 12 & 1.07 \\
627: TD~93h & & & 39.38 & 0.5 & 13 & 1.08 \\
628: \tableline
629: TD~95a & HCG~95c & 7.54 & 40.25 & 7.9 & 23 & 2.66 \\
630: TD~95b & & & 40.91 & 36 & 179 & 2.02 \\
631: TD~95c & & & 40.56 & 16 & 20 & 1.34 \\
632: TD~95d & & & 40.20 & 7.2 & 14 & 0.51 \\
633: \tableline
634: \end{tabular}
635: \caption{Physical properties of the tidal dwarf objects: (1) Name of
636: the dwarfs; (2) Name of the parent galaxy according to Hickson et
637: al. (1989); (3) Radius in $kpc$ of the
638: $\mu_{B} = 25~mag~arcsec^{-2}$ isophote corresponding to the parent
639: galaxy; (4) H$\alpha$
640: luminosity in $erg~s^{-1}$; (5) Fraction of the total H$\alpha$
641: luminosity emitted by the dwarf galaxy; (6) H$\alpha$ equivalent width
642: of the dwarf galaxies, expressed in \AA; (7) Projected distance to the
643: center of the parent galaxy, in units of $R_{25}$.\label{prop}}
644: \end{center}
645: \end{table}
646:
647: \end{document}
648:
649: