1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file latex
3: %%
4: %% Modified 03 Nov 99
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.0 LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.0 document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the default manuscript style,
14: %% which will produce a double-spaced document on one column.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17:
18: %%\documentclass{aastex}
19:
20: %% preprint produces a one-column, single-spaced document:
21:
22: \documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28:
29:
30:
31: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
32: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
33: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
34: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
35: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
36: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
37:
38: \shorttitle{Stern et al.}
39: \shortauthors{Argon in Comet Hale-Bopp}
40:
41:
42: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
43: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
44:
45: \begin{document}
46:
47: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
48: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
49: %% you desire.
50:
51: \title{The Discovery\\ of Argon in Comet C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp)}
52:
53:
54: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
55: %% author and affiliation information.
56: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
57: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
58: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
59: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
60:
61: \author{S.A. Stern}
62: \affil{Space Studies Dept., Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302}
63: \email{astern@swri.edu}
64:
65: \author{D.C. Slater}
66: \affil{Space Science Dept., Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio TX 78256}
67:
68: \author{M.C.~Festou\altaffilmark{1}}
69: \affil{Space Studies Dept., Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302}
70:
71: \author{J.Wm.~Parker}
72: \affil{Space Studies Dept., Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302}
73:
74: \author{G.R.~Gladstone}
75: \affil{Space Science Dept., Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio TX 78256}
76:
77: \author{M.F.~A'Hearn}
78: \affil{Dept. of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742}
79:
80: \and
81:
82: \author{E.~Wilkinson}
83: \affil{CASA, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80302}
84:
85:
86:
87: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
88: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
89: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
90: %% affiliation.
91:
92: \altaffiltext{1}{present address: Observatoire Midi-Pyren\'ees, Toulouse, France.}
93:
94:
95: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
96: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
97: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
98: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
99: %% editorial office after submission.
100:
101: \begin{abstract}
102:
103: On 30.14 March 1997 we observed the EUV spectrum of the bright comet C/1995 O1
104: (Hale-Bopp) at the time of its perihelion, using our EUVS sounding rocket
105: telescope/spectrometer. The spectra reveal the presence H Ly $\beta$, O$^+$, and, most
106: notably, Argon. Modelling of the retrieved Ar production rates indicates that comet
107: Hale-Bopp is enriched in Ar relative to cosmogonic expectations. This in turn indicates
108: that Hale-Bopp's deep interior has never been exposed to the 35--40 K temperatures
109: necessary to deplete the comet's primordial argon supply.
110:
111: \end{abstract}
112:
113: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
114: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
115: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
116: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
117:
118: \keywords{comets-- general, comet-- Hale-Bopp, solar system-- formation}
119:
120:
121: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
122: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
123: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
124: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
125: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
126: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
127: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
128: %% each reference.
129:
130: \section{Introduction}
131:
132: As well preserved, ancient relics of the chemistry present at the formation stage of the
133: outer solar system, comets provide one of the most valuable tools available for
134: understanding the formation processes and conditions extant when the planets formed,
135: $\approx$4.5 Gyr ago \citep{Mea93}.
136:
137: Among the most long-standing observational goals for understanding cometary origins has
138: been the search for cometary noble gases. Owing to their combination of high volatility and
139: disaffinity to chemical reactions, noble gases provide a key diagnostic to the thermal
140: history of cometary ices. More specifically, the members of the He, Ne, Ar, Kr sequence
141: display successively higher sublimation temperatures; as such, they provide a series of
142: thermometers that can be exploited to constrain the thermal history, and therefore the
143: sites of cometary origins. Although the interpretation of noble gas abundances in
144: cometary comae is complicated by the details of their trapping and release efficiencies
145: in cometary ice \citep{Oea91}, their detection has nonetheless been highly desired.
146: Unfortunately, however, although significant upper limits revealing He
147: depletions of $\sim$10$^4$ in comet Austin \citep{Sea92} and Ne depletions of
148: $\sim$25 in comet Hale-Bopp \citep{Kea97} have been obtained, no detection of
149: any cometary noble gas emmanating from within a comet has previously been obtained.
150:
151: He, Ne, Ar, and Kr each have resonance transitions in the far and extreme ultraviolet.
152: Among the noble gases, argon offers a particularly good combination of comparatively
153: high cosmogonic abundance, moderate sublimation temperature, and good UV resonance
154: fluorescence efficiency; together these properties suggested some time ago \citep{Sea92,
155: Mea93} that argon may be the easiest noble gas to detect in comets. We took
156: advantage of the apparition of the unusually active and bright comet C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp)
157: in order to conduct a new and more sensitive search for argon in comets.
158:
159:
160:
161: \section{The 950--1100 \AA\ Spectrum of Comet Hale-Bopp}
162:
163: With the objectives of (i) obtaining a general survey spectrum of Hale-Bopp in the EUV
164: near its perihelion, and (ii) making a more sensitive search for argon than had
165: previously been attempted for any comet, we launched the EUVS sounding rocket
166: telescope/spectrometer payload on a suborbital mission timed to coincide with the
167: comet's perihelion. This timing also corresponded closely to the epoch of
168: Hale-Bopp's peak in activity.
169:
170: The 184 kg EUVS payload \citep{Sea95} consists of a 40-cm diameter grazing incidence
171: telescope, a long slit Rowland circle spectrograph, and its accompanying Ranicon 2-D
172: microchannel plate detector, power system, and telemetry electronics. The telescope is
173: a diamond-turned f/15 Wolter type II grazing incidence design, with a 30-cm aperture
174: \citep{Cea89}. The primary mirror is Ni coated; the secondary is SiC coated. For the
175: Hale-Bopp flight, EUVS was configured to study the bandpass from 820--1100 \AA; the
176: characteristic effective area of the instrument in this bandpass is 0.5 cm$^2$.
177:
178: EUVS was launched to observe Hale-Bopp on a NASA Black Brant IX sounding rocket from
179: White Sands, New Mexico, at 03:25 UT on 30 Mar 1997. At this time Hale-Bopp was less
180: than 48 hours from perihelion, with a geocentric distance of $\Delta$=1.34 AU, a
181: heliocentric distance of $R$=0.915 AU, and a heliocentric radial velocity of
182: $\dot{R}$=--1.20 km s$^{-1}$. The launch occurred in darkness, with the Sun and the
183: comet 116 deg and 76.1 deg from the zenith, respectively. The launch vehicle performed
184: nominally, lifting the instrument to a peak altitude of 314 km. During the flight
185: EUVS remained in the Earth's shadow at all times; the line of sight to the comet
186: remained above local horizontal. These two factors effectively eliminated telluric
187: dayglow emissions from the spectra that EUVS obtained. The data we describe below were
188: obtained during the 195 sec period when the payload was above 200 km, where telluric
189: absorption of the EUV is also negligible \citep{PA92}.
190:
191: EUVS successfully obtained spectra to survey Hale-Bopp in the EUV bandpass using both its
192: 130$\times$38.6 arcsec (12.5 \AA) medium resolution EUVS (MRES) and 130x6.4 arcsec high
193: resolution (2 \AA) EUVS (HRES) slits; the centers of these two slits are located 130
194: arcsec apart. Based on count rate measurements received in real time as telemetry, we
195: elected to maximize SNR at the expense of spectral resolution and place the center of
196: brightness of Hale-Bopp's coma in the MRES; the adjacent HRES slit was therefore located
197: some 1.27$\times$10$^5$ km away, along the tail axis of the comet. The EUVS Hale-Bopp
198: dataset contains both strong H Ly $\beta$, and the first ever spectroscopic detections of
199: other neutral H and O features in the EUV, cometary O$^+$, and cometary argon
200: \citep{Sea98}. In this Letter, we concentrate on the 950--1100 \AA\ portion of the EUVS
201: data (see Figure 1) in order to focus on the evidence for, and implications of, Ar in
202: Hale-Bopp; a future publication will discuss the other emissions in the EUVS Hale-Bopp dataset.
203:
204: The EUVS wavelength scale was established by a least-squares fit to a series of Pt-lamp
205: lines imaged onto the detector before and after the flight; these pre- and post-flight
206: wavelength calibrations concurred to within 3 \AA. During data reduction, accurate
207: co-registration of the wavelength scales for the MRES and HRES data was achieved using
208: the centroid of the prominent 1025.7 \AA\ Lyman $\beta$ emission line in Hale-Bopp. The
209: effective area of EUVS was calibrated in flight as a function of wavelength using the
210: UV-bright B0.5 IV star, $\epsilon$ Per. A post-flight laboratory effective area
211: calibration was also obtained, using an O$^+$/Ar resonance source at five wavelengths
212: across the EUVS bandpass. The two calibrations are in good ($\pm$35\%) agreement.
213:
214: Using the effective area of the instrument and the solid angle of the slit(s), we converted
215: the Hale-Bopp raw counts spectra to the brightness spectra shown in Figure 1. The brightness error bars
216: shown in Figure 1 were computed at each plotted wavelength from the standard deviation of
217: the mean of the uncertainties due to counting statistics (including the term due to the
218: nominal background subtraction), but neglect the systematic uncertainty in effective area;
219: errors due to ephemeris and pointing geometry uncertainties ($<<$1 deg) are completely
220: negligible.
221:
222: The MRES data in Figure 1 reveals what we believe are the 1048 and 1066 \AA\ ArI features
223: blended together just redward of the far stronger, 1026 \AA\ HI/OI blend. Additional
224: emissions are seen between 975--990 \AA\ and 1080--1097 \AA. Although these emissions are
225: clearly statistically significant, their identification is not presently secure; therefore,
226: the analysis of these emissions and the marginally optically thick H Ly $\beta$ signal EUVS
227: detected will be discussed in a second publication. Regarding the latter, here we
228: simply note that the Lyman $\beta$ feature is blended with a contribution from an OI
229: [3d$^3$D$_{1,2,0}$--$>$2s$^2$2p$^4$ $^3$P$_{2,1,0}$] triplet at 1025.7, 1027.4, and 1028.7
230: \AA, which, owing to radiative pumping by Ly $\beta$, is difficult to precisely model, but
231: which to first order contributes $\sim$15 R; the telluric background Ly$\beta$ brightness
232: is estimated to contribute some 20 R above the background. Sky background spectra obtained
233: while EUVS was maneuvering toward Hale-Bopp contain only a weak instrumental background and
234: H I Ly $\beta$ emission generated by a combination of geocoronal and interplanetary medium
235: hydrogen. The fact that no other features are present in EUVS sky background
236: spectra, combined with the observing altitude and geometry discussed above,
237: virtually eliminates the possibility of the features seen at Hale-Bopp as being due to
238: telluric contamination.
239:
240: Returning now to the main subject of this paper, additional evidence for the Ar
241: identification comes in three forms. First, the width of the MRES feature extending from
242: 1045--1070 \AA\ is consistent with a pair of blended lines 19 \AA\ apart (such as the two
243: Ar lines). Second, the sense of the asymmetry seen in the 1045--1070 \AA\ emission is
244: consistent with the fact that the 1048 \AA\ line's resonance fluorescence efficiency in
245: sunlight (i.e., its g-factor) is 2.4 times higher than the 1066 \AA\ line's. Third, as
246: shown in the righthand panel of Figure 1, there is also both clear evidence for a 1048
247: \AA\ Ar feature (present some 3.2 $\sigma$ above the local background) and an hint of the
248: 1066 \AA\ feature in the higher-resolution HRES data, thereby all but eliminating
249: pathological detection cases (e.g., due to flat field effects or count statistics
250: variations) of the Ar features in the main slit.
251:
252: Since the MRES data has considerably better count levels than the HRES data, we used our
253: line detection software to retrieve individual, background-subtracted gaussians (with
254: widths established from calibration line sources) for the two suspected MRES dataset
255: argon features. This software, which obtains best fit wavelengths and integrated
256: brightnesses gaussians for features detected above a specified background, retrieved
257: brightnesses and statistical error bars of 24$\pm$8 R centered at 1049 \AA, and 12$\pm5$
258: R at 1066 \AA\ (1 R=10$^6$ ph cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ emitted into 4$\pi$ sr). It is worth
259: pointing out that the 2.0$\pm$0.6 ratio of these two retrieved brightnesses corresponds
260: well (within our statistics) to the 2.4:1 value predicted by their g-factors, and line
261: formation theory for optically thin emission.\footnote {The adopted background level we
262: are using is based on the entire 825--1100 \AA\ MRES spectrum. If we instead adopt an
263: upward sloping background that better corresponds to a slope set by the three lowest
264: pixel brightnesses in the 950--1100 \AA\ MRES spectrum, then one retrieves 22 R at 1049
265: \AA, and 10 R at 1067 \AA. Although we do not advocate such a choice of background, we
266: do note that it does more closely reflect the 2.4:1 brightness ratio expected on the
267: basis of the g-factors of the two Ar I features.}
268:
269:
270:
271: \section{Argon and Its Implications}
272:
273: In order to interpret the Ar emissions, we first converted the signal brightness $B$
274: in Rayleighs into a slit-average column density $\bar{N}$ along the line of sight
275: for each Ar line.\footnote {On the date of our observations, the projected MRES slit
276: size at the distance of the comet was $\approx$37,600$\times$126,600 km. The Ar
277: photoionization scale length at 0.915 AU ($\approx$2.7$\times$10$^{6}$ km) is large
278: compared to the EUVS slit.} The conversion to column densities in the slit was
279: performed according to the optically thin approximation: $\bar{N_i} = (10^6
280: B_i)/g_i$, where $B_i$ is the brightness of line $i$, and $g_i$ is the photon
281: fluorescence rate (i.e., ph s$^{-1}$) of that emission at the comet. We adopted
282: resonance fluorescence efficiencies at 1 AU of 5.3$\times$10$^{-8}$ s$^{-1}$ and
283: 2.2$\times$10$^{-8}$ s$^{-1}$ for the 1048 and 1066 \AA\ lines (after adjustment for
284: the variation in solar FUV using the daily F10.7 solar flux index at the time of our
285: flight)\footnote {Owing to the fact that we observed Hale-Bopp essentially at
286: perihelion, when its heliocentric radial velocity was consequently small, no Swings
287: effect correction was made.}; these g-values (derived from \citep{M91, Pea98} were
288: then adjusted to reflect Hale-Bopp's 0.915 AU heliocentric distance.
289:
290: To derive an Ar production rate ($Q_{Ar}$), we constructed a simple model of the coma's Ar
291: distribution, assuming a spherically symmetric, steady-state radial outflow diverging from a
292: point source. To calculate Q$_{Ar}$, we assumed an argon outflow velocity in equilibrium
293: with the H$_2$O outflow, i.e., $v_i$=1.25 km s$^{-1}$ at 0.915 AU. Based on the MRES slit
294: brightnesses (and counting+background brightness errors) of the two argon
295: lines, an error-weighted average Ar production rate of
296: 1.1$\pm$0.3$\times$10$^{29}$ s$^{-1}$, was derived.
297:
298: To interpret the physical meaning of the EUVS Ar production rate obtained above, we ratio
299: the derived Ar production rates to the O production rate of the comet. H$_2$O is the
300: dominant O-bearing molecule in cometary ices, so we derived the O production rate $Q_O$ on
301: the established 1.1$\times$10$^{31}$ s$^{-1}$ perihelion H$_2$O production rate
302: \citep{Bea97, Cea97}. To account for the oxygen in other O-bearing species (CO, CO$_2$,
303: CHONs, SiO$_x$) when deriving the Ar production ratio [Ar/O], we adopt $Q_{\rm
304: oxygen}=1.5Q_{\rm H_2O}$ (based on Giotto NMS data adjusted for the higher CO abundance of
305: Hale-Bopp; W.~Huebner, pers.~comm.). Based on this and the $Q_{Ar}$ estimate
306: given above, we thus derive an estimate of [Ar/O]=0.0058$\pm$0.0017
307: in Hale-Bopp's coma. In what follows we assume that this ratio of production rates is
308: indicative of the coma's Ar/O abundance ratio. The most recent cosmogonic (i.e., solar)
309: [Ar/O] abundance ratio gives [Ar/O]$_{\odot}$=0.00372 \citep{GS98}. Figure 2 presents the
310: derived correspondence between the error-weighted average brightness $B$ of the two Ar
311: lines, and the quantity $Q_{Ar}$/$Q_O$, ratioed to its cosmogonic value.
312:
313: Although we recognize the difficulty of connecting coma to nuclear abundances with
314: precision because one does not at present know exactly how gases are stored in the
315: nucleus\footnote {As a result, inferring absolute abundance ratios with high confidence
316: will likely remain problematic until cryogenic comet nucleus samples can be returned to
317: Earth.}, we interpret our results at their face value: Hale-Bopp's coma appears to be
318: enriched in Ar relative to cosmogonic proportions by 1.8$\pm$0.5:1.\footnote {CO is almost
319: as volatile as argon. It is intriguing that Hale-Bopp's coma is enriched in Ar (this
320: paper) and also has a notably high CO abundance \citep{Bea97}.} However, we must note that
321: the error estimate given here derives purely from the EUVS MRES counting statistics. Our
322: effective area calibration uncertainty (35\%) could reduce this ratio to $\approx$1.2, but
323: it is equally likely to increase the ratio to 2.4; so too, there is a dispersion in the
324: various Hale-Bopp $Q_{\rm H_2O}$ measurements at perihelion of 20\%, which could reduce
325: this ratio to $\approx$1.4, but it is equally likely to increase the ratio to 2.2, and a
326: quoted 16\% uncertainty in the solar Ar/O ratio \citep {GS98}. Adding {\it all} of these
327: errors in quadrature, we find Hale-Bopp's coma appears to have an Ar/O ratio relative to
328: cosmogonic proportions that is 1.8$\pm$0.96:1.
329:
330: Because noble gases by their nature do not participate in either the cometary ice chemistry
331: or coma chemistry, noble gases are parent species in the coma, and their abundance in the
332: neutral coma should reflect their bulk abundance within the cometary nucleus. We assume this
333: is the case in what follows.\footnote {Though near-surface thermal segregation effects, which
334: are difficult to accurately predict at present, could in principle affect the accuracy of
335: this correspondence.}
336:
337: The lack of depletion of Hale-Bopp's Ar relative to cosmogonic proportions is
338: interesting in several respects. The first of these concerns the thermal history of
339: Hale-Bopp itself. The fact that Ar is not depleted in Hale-Bopp indicates that the deep
340: interior of Hale-Bopp's nucleus cannot have ever reached equilibrium temperatures of
341: perhaps 35--40 K, else the Ar would have been lost to sublimation \citep{BO98}. Neon,
342: which is even more volatile than argon, sublimates vigorously at temperatures of 16--20 K.
343: The EUVE satellite returned spectra of Hale-Bopp in 1996 showing Ne is $>$25 times depleted
344: relative to cosmogonic proportions \citep{Kea97}; this is strong evidence that Hale-Bopp's
345: deep interior {\it has} been warmed above 20 K.
346:
347: Together, the EUVE satellite and EUVS rocket experiment results trap Hale-Bopp's bulk
348: internal temperature as having exceeded the Ne sublimation loss range of 16--20 K, but not
349: the Ar sublimation range of approximately 35--40 K. These temperature constraints are
350: consistent with others Hale-Bopp retrieved from H$_2$O ortho-para \citep{Crea97} and D/H
351: ratios \citep{Bea99}. We interpret our result as indicating that either the solar nebula
352: was far colder and far richer in Ar than models typically predict \citep{Lea00}, or that
353: Hale-Bopp was formed in the cold, Kuiper Belt region (i.e., well beyond the 20--30 AU
354: Uranus-Neptune zone) and was then subsequently ejected to the Oort Cloud (its more recent
355: dynamical home) without ever spending much time in the (warmer) Jupiter-Saturn zone, or
356: both. Although either implication is contrary to ``conventional wisdom,'' we
357: note that the transport of comets from the Kuiper Belt region (usually after
358: Neptune-induced inward evolution) to the Oort Cloud has been detected in recent
359: dynamical simulations of Oort Cloud formation.\citep{Dea00}.
360:
361: This first detection of a native cometary noble gas, argon, whets our appetite
362: for more measurements, in order to assess how typical Hale-Bopp is in its Ar
363: abundance. We also look forward to detection of other noble gases in comets,
364: particularly Ne and Kr, and to the eventual determination of whether the ices
365: within individual comets contain varying proportions of Ar and other chemically
366: inert tracers as a guide to understanding the heterogeneity vs.~homogeneity of
367: material within cometary nuclei, and therefore better still understanding their
368: origins.
369:
370:
371:
372: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
373: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
374: %% command.
375:
376: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
377: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
378: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
379: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
380: %% text to be printed in the second.
381:
382: \acknowledgments
383:
384: We thank NASA mission manager Anel Flores, NASA Sounding Rocket branch, NASA Headquarters
385: discipline scientist Henry Brinton, and the entire NASA/contractor team that made these
386: time-critical observations a success. At SwRI, we thank our support staff, including Tom
387: Booker, John McDonald, Clarence McGinnis, David Orth, Bill Tomlinson, and Roy Welch. At
388: the University of Colorado, we thank Gary Kushner and Scott McDonald for assistance with
389: our instrument calibration. Leslie Young provided a careful and insightful reading of this
390: manuscript; David Grinspoon and Walter Huebner provided illuminating discussions. An
391: anonymous referee made a series of helpful comments as well. This work was supported by
392: NAG5-5006.
393:
394:
395: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
396: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
397: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
398: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
399: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
400: %%
401: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
402: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
403: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
404: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
405: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
406: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
407: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
408: %% place of the \cite commands.
409:
410: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
411: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
412: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
413:
414: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
415: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
416: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
417: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
418: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
419:
420: \begin{thebibliography}{}
421:
422:
423: \bibitem[Bar-Nun and Owen(1998)]{BO98} Bar-Nun, A., and T.C. Owen, 1998. Solar
424: System Ices, B. Schmitt, C. de Bergh, and M. Festou, Kluwer: Dordrecht, 353
425:
426: \bibitem[Biver et al.(1997)]{Bea97} Biver, N., et al., 1997. Science, 275,
427: 1915
428:
429: \bibitem[Blake et al.(1999)]{Bea99} Blake, G.A., Hogerheijde, M.R., Gurwell,
430: M.A., and Muhleman, D.O. 1999, Nature, 398, 213
431:
432: \bibitem[Cash et al.(1989)]{Cea89} Cash, W.C., Cook, T.A., Chambelan, C.,
433: Heyse, D., Hofmockel, D., Snow, T.P., and Windt, D. 1989, Exper.~Space Sci., 1,
434: 123
435:
436: \bibitem[Colom et al.(1997)]{Cea97} Colom, P., G\'erard, E., Crovisier, J.,
437: Bockel\'ee-Morvan, D., Biver, N., and Rauer, H. 1997, Earth, Moon, and Planets, 78,
438: 37
439:
440: \bibitem[Crovisier et al.(1997)]{Crea97} Crovisier, J., Leech, K., Bockl\`ee-Morvan,
441: D., Brooke, T.Y., Hanner, M.S., Altieri, B., Keller, U., and Lellouch, E., 1997,
442: Science, 275, 1904
443:
444: \bibitem[Dones et al.(2000)]{Dea00} Dones, H., Levison, H.F., Duncan, M.J., and Weissman,
445: P.R. 2000, AJ, in prep.
446:
447: \bibitem[Grevesse and Sauval (1998)]{GS98} Grevesse, N., and Sauval, A.J. 1998,
448: Sp.~Sci.~Rev., 85, 161
449:
450: \bibitem[Krasnopolsky et al.(1997)] {Kea97} Krasnopolsky, V.A., et al., 1997.
451: Science, 277, 1488
452:
453: \bibitem[Lunine et al.(2000)]{Lea00} Lunine, J.I., Owen, T.C., and Brown, R.H.,
454: 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, V. Mannings, A.P. Boss, and S.S. Russell,
455: Univ. Az. Press: Tucson, 1055
456:
457: \bibitem[Meier (1991)]{M91} Meier, R., 1991. {\it Space Sci.~Revs.}, {\bf 58}, 1
458:
459: \bibitem[Mumma et al.(1993)]{Mea93} Mumma, M.I., Weissman, P.R., and Stern,
460: S.A., 1993. Protostars and Planets III, E. Levy \& J.I. Lunine, Univ. Az.
461: Press: Tucson, 1177
462:
463: \bibitem[Owen et al.(1991)]{Oea91} Owen, T.C., Bar-Nun, A., and Kleinfeld, I.,
464: 1991, Comets in the Post-Halley Era, R. Newburn and J. Rahe, Kluwer Press:
465: Dordrecht, 429
466:
467: \bibitem[Parker et al.(1998)]{Pea98} Parker, J.W., S.A.~Stern, G.R.~Gladstone,
468: \& J.M.~Shull, 1998. {\it ApJL}, {\bf 509}, L61
469:
470: \bibitem[Paxton and Anderson(1992)]{PA92} Paxton, L.J., and Anderson, D.E.,
471: 1992, AGU Geophysical Monograph, 66, 113
472:
473: \bibitem[Slater et al.(1995)]{Sea95} Slater, D.C., Stern, S.A. Scherrer, J.,
474: Cash, W.C. Green, J.C., and Wilkinson, E., 1995, EUV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray
475: Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, O.H.W. Siegmund and J. Vallerga, SPIE, 2518,
476: 211
477:
478: \bibitem[Stern et al.(1992)]{Sea92} Stern, S.A., Green, J.C., Cash, W., and
479: Cook, T.A., 1992, Icarus, 95, 157
480:
481: \bibitem[Stern et al.(1998)]{Sea98} Stern, S.A., Festou, M.C., A'Hearn, M.F.,
482: Slater, D.C., and Parker, J.Wm., 1998, BAAS, 30, 1423
483:
484: \end{thebibliography}
485:
486:
487:
488: %% Generally speaking, only the figure captions, and not the figures
489: %% themselves, are included in electronic manuscript submissions.
490: %% Use \figcaption to format your figure captions. They should begin on a
491: %% new page.
492:
493: \clearpage
494:
495: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
496: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
497: %% after every seventh one.
498:
499: %% There must be a \figcaption command for each legend. Key the text of the
500: %% legend and the optional \label in curly braces. If you wish, you may
501: %% include the name of the corresponding figure file in square brackets.
502: %% The label is for identification purposes only. It will not insert the
503: %% figures themselves into the document.
504: %% If you want to include your art in the paper, use \plotone.
505: %% Refer to the on-line documentation for details.
506:
507:
508: \figcaption[hb_ar_fig1.eps]{{\it Left-Hand Panel:} The spatially-collapsed 950--1100 \AA\
509: brightness spectrum of Hale-Bopp derived from the EUVS medium resolution slit (MRES) dataset
510: centered very close to the center of brightness in Hale-Bopp's coma; the data shown were
511: taken exclusively above 200 km altitude. Both the H I Ly $\beta$ and the Ar I features
512: cited in the text are identified; the nominal instrumental pseudo-continuum background level
513: we adopted is also shown, as a dashed line. {\it Right-Hand Panel:} Comparison of the
514: Hale-Bopp spectra obtained in the EUVS medium resolution (MRES, bold line) and high
515: resolution (HRES, thin line) slits datasets, with the HRES dataset having been rebinned to
516: $\approx$6 \AA/bin; the presented offset and scaling of the two spectra in the righthand
517: panel was set purely for plotting clarity.\label{fig1}}
518:
519: \figcaption[hb_ar_fig2.eps]{Derived Ar perihelion production rate estimate, compared to the
520: cosmogonically-predicted Ar production rate one would expect based on Hale-Bopp's total
521: oxygen production rate; the error bar shown here is due to counting statistics alone. See
522: text for calculation, additional error bar details, as well as the interpretation of this
523: result.\label{fig2}}
524:
525:
526: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
527: %% that appears after it.
528:
529: \end{document}
530:
531: