1: %%
2: %% This is file `esapub.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% esapub.dtx (with options: `manual')
8: %% ============================================
9: %% This is the manual describing the usage of
10: %% esapub.cls
11: %% ============================================
12: %% Copyright 1999 Patrick W Daly
13: %% Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Aeronomie
14: %% Max-Planck-Str. 2
15: %% D-37191 Katlenburg-Lindau
16: %% Germany
17: %% E-mail: daly@linmpi.mpg.de
18: %%
19: %% ----------------------------------------------------
20: %% gc.tex - V. 15 22/02/2001 - Final/modif. for astroph
21: %% ----------------------------------------------------
22: \ProvidesFile{gc.tex}
23: [1999/12/02 1.01 (PWD)]
24: \documentclass[a4paper,twocolumn]{esapub} % European paper
25: %\documentclass[letterpaper,twocolumn]{esapub} % American paper
26: %\usepackage{times}
27: \usepackage{natbib}
28: \usepackage{epsfig}
29: \title{The Center of Our Galaxy:
30: Activity and High-Energy Emission of the Closest Massive Black Hole}
31: \author{A. Goldwurm}
32: \affil{Service d'Astrophysique /DAPNIA/DSM/CEA - Saclay,
33: 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France}
34: \newcommand{\btx}{\textsc{Bib}\TeX}
35: \newcommand{\filename}{esapub}
36: %
37: \begin{document}
38: %
39: \keywords{Galactic Center; Black Holes; Sgr A*}
40: %
41: \maketitle
42: %
43: \begin{abstract}
44: The Center of our Galaxy is a peculiar region where a number
45: of crucial astrophysical phenomena take place, from star formation
46: to SN explosions and accretion onto a massive black hole.
47: The quest for a massive black hole in the Galactic Nucleus
48: is of course of particular relevance because,
49: it would be the closest of such extreme objects, which are now
50: believed to reside in most of the galactic nuclei of the universe.
51: I will review here the main observational characteristics of the
52: Galactic Center with particular attention to the the problem of
53: existence, physical condition and activity of the
54: 3 10$^6$~M$_{\odot}$ black hole coincident with the compact radio
55: source Sgr A$^*$.
56: I will report historical and recent results of high energy
57: observations of the central degree of our Galaxy, along with
58: the specific accretion models proposed to account for the
59: apparent lack of high energy activity from Sgr A$^*$.
60: The scientific perspectives of the next X and $\gamma$-ray missions
61: in the domain of the Galactic Center physics are also mentioned.
62: \end{abstract}
63: %
64: \section{Introduction: the Nuclear Bulge}
65: %
66: Already in the decade 1920-1930
67: it was observed that the globular clusters are
68: distributed with spherical symmetry around a point located in the
69: Sagittarius constellation and also that stars were rotating
70: around the same point of the sky.
71: We now know that the dynamical center of the Galaxy is indeed located in
72: Sagittarius, at about 8 kpc from the Sun,
73: right in the middle of the Milky Way.
74: The Sun also lies on the galactic plane and the Galactic Center (GC)
75: is highly absorbed by all the galactic disk dust which intercepts
76: the line of sight.
77: Optical, UV and soft X-rays are therefore totally masked by an absorption
78: of A$_V$~$\approx$~31~mag corresponding to a column density
79: N$_H$~$\approx$~6~10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$, and the study of the
80: central regions can be carried out only from radio to near infrared
81: (NIR) frequencies or at energies $>$~1~keV.
82: \\
83: The recently published VLA pictures at 90~cm \citep{LAR00}
84: (Fig.~\ref{fig:VLA90})
85: show the richness and complexity of the Galactic
86: Center region.
87: In the central 600 pc $\approx$~4$^{\circ}$
88: (at 8 kpc 1$''$~$\approx$~0.04 pc),
89: a sky area often referred as the Nuclear Bulge,
90: the interstellar matter (ISM) is concentrated in a narrow layer (50~pc)
91: of molecular gas for a total mass of $\approx$~10$^8$~M$_{\odot}$.
92: Half of this gas forms dense, cold Giant Molecular Clouds (GMC),
93: the denser of which are Sgr~B, Sgr~C, Sgr~D and those in the Sgr~A complex.
94: They have typical densities of
95: $\approx$~10$^4$ -10$^5$~cm$^{-3}$ and temperatures of 30$-$200~K.
96: Several Supernova Remnants (SNR) are visible in the picture along with
97: other filaments and structures of non-thermal emission, like the prominent
98: Radio Arc, a filamentary source crossing the galactic plane.
99: \\
100: A number of thermal radio structures are also present, like the Bridge,
101: which is connecting the Arc to the Sgr~A complex.
102: Some are identified with HII regions, like the features named
103: Pistol and Seiklo, whose gas is ionized by young hot stellar clusters,
104: like Quintuplet and Arches.
105: Magnetic fields are strong ($\approx$~2~mG) compared to typical values of
106: the galactic disk ($\approx$~10~$\mu$G)
107: and lines are perpendicular to the galactic plane in the intercloud gas
108: and parallel to the plane in the GMCs.
109: Cloud kinematics indicates large velocity fields and a general inflow towards
110: the center with rate of $\approx$~$10^{-2}$~M$_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$.
111: %% Stellar content
112: Stellar content of the Nuclear Bulge is basically an extension of the
113: Galactic Bulge population.
114: It is dominated by a central nearly-isothermal
115: cluster of low-intermediate mass stars,
116: of metallicity $\approx$ 2, with density increasing towards the GC
117: with decreasing radius
118: as ~R$^{-1.8}$, from R~$\approx$~100~pc down to a core radius
119: R$_c$~$\approx$~0.1 pc where the star density reaches a constant
120: value of $\approx$~10$^{7}$~M$_{\odot}$~pc$^{-3}$ and the mass
121: a core value of M$_c \approx$~10$^{5}$~M$_{\odot}$.
122: However, unlike the Galactic Bulge, this old-middle age (1-10~Gyr)
123: population coexists with a young (10$^7$-10$^8$ yr) population
124: of massive stars whose total fraction increases towards the center
125: and whose presence indicates recent star formation.
126: \\
127: In the following I will describe results obtained for the
128: inner 50 pc and from high energy observations of the central degree.
129: For extensive reviews see Mezger et al. (1996) and
130: Morris $\&$ Serabyn (1996), while for recent results see
131: Vol. 186 of ASP Conf. Series (eds. Falke et al. 1999)
132: and Yusef-Zadeh et al. (2000).
133: %%
134: \begin{figure}
135: \centering
136: {\epsfig{figure=figure1.ps, width=77mm}}
137: \caption{
138: Very Large Array (VLA) image at 90~cm of the Nuclear Bulge.
139: \label{fig:VLA90}}
140: \end{figure}
141: %
142: %% Sgr~A COMPLEX
143: \section{The ~Sgr~A~ Radio and Molecular Complex}
144: The central 50~pc (20$'$) are dominated by the Sgr~A radio complex
145: (Fig.~\ref{fig:SgrAE}, from Yusef-Zadeh et al. 2000).
146: Relevant components of the Sgr A complex are, listing from the outside to
147: the inner regions:
148: several dense molecular clouds, the non-thermal Sgr~A East source,
149: the CircumNuclear Disk (CND), the thermal source Sgr~A West
150: and the compact source Sgr~A$^*$.
151: A recent study of molecular gas velocities of the region \citep{COI00}
152: describes the morphology and distribution of matter of the complex.
153: Two dense molecular clouds account for most of the ISM of the region,
154: interact with, and probably supply matter to the inner central region.
155: M-0.02-0.07, also known as the 50 km s$^{-1}$ cloud,
156: lies on the north-east side
157: of the GC and includes the Sgr~A East Core very dense MC
158: (15~pc size and 2~10$^{5}$~M$_{\odot}$ mass)
159: observed to surround Sgr~A East from behind the GC. It is connected by
160: a molecular ridge to the North side of the other cloud, M-0.13-0.08
161: (the 20 km s$^{-1}$ cloud), which is located South-East of the GC,
162: about 10 pc in front of it and which
163: seems to supply the CND of molecular gas through the so called ``southern
164: streamer''.
165: M-0.02-0.07 and its molecular ridge are compressed by the expanding shell
166: of Sgr~A East. Sgr~A East is a non-thermal source composed by a diffuse
167: halo of triangular shape (7$'$ $\times$ 10$'$)
168: and an oval shell (7 pc $\times$ 9 pc i.e.
169: 3$'~\times$~4$'$) with major axis parallel to the galactic plane and
170: centered about 50$''$ ($\approx$ 2~pc) west of Sgr~A$^*$.
171: The shell appears in expansion, compressing the cloud and probably
172: creating the string of 4 HII regions at the border with M-0.02-0.07
173: and the OH masers also observed around the shell.
174: %%
175: \begin{figure}
176: \centering
177: {\epsfig{figure=figure2.ps ,width=80mm}}
178: \caption{
179: VLA (6~cm) images of Sgr~A East halo (blue) and shell (light blue),
180: the inner thermal minispiral (red) and the 4 HII regions on the East side.
181: \label{fig:SgrAE}}
182: \end{figure}
183: %%
184: A life time of 5 10$^{4}$ - 10$^{5}$ yr and a total explosion energy of
185: 4~10$^{52}$~ergs were derived from the source radio brightness and
186: expansion velocity.
187: 40 nearly simultaneous SN are needed to account for this energy
188: and other scenarios
189: have been proposed to explain Sgr A East energetics, including the
190: explosive tidal disruption of a 1~M$_{\odot}$ star by the central massive
191: black hole.
192: %%
193: Between 1.7$-$7 pc (40$''$-175$''$) from the center lies the CND
194: a clumsy, asymmetrical torus of neutral molecular gas and dust
195: rotating (V$_R \approx$~100~km~s$^{-1}$) around Sgr~A West.
196: The CND mass is 10$^4$~M$_{\odot}$, the gas temperature $\geq$100 K
197: and it is observed in molecular transition lines (e.g. HCN)
198: and also in infrared
199: wavelengths, emitted by the dust heated by radiation coming
200: from the central cavity.
201: Its inner part has the shape of a ring whose edges bound
202: the central cavity and the thermal source Sgr~A West.
203: The HII region Sgr~A West was unambiguously separated by the non-thermal
204: emission of Sgr~A East in 1975, while the inner minispiral pattern
205: was discovered in 1983 with the VLA.
206: The bulk of the ionized gas (250~M$_{\odot}$) appears as
207: extended emission of size 2.1~pc $\times$ 2.9~pc with average density
208: n$_e$~$\approx$~10$^3$~cm$^{-3}$, in which is embedded the denser
209: {\it minispiral}, a 3 armed spiral structure (Fig.~\ref{fig:SgrAW})
210: orbiting around the GC, composed by northern and eastern arms,
211: a central bar and a western arc.
212: The radio spectrum resembles that of a typical optically thin HII region
213: with T$_e$~$\approx$~6000~K,
214: emission measure $\approx$~2~10$^3$~pc~cm$^{-6}$
215: and ionization temperature T~$\approx$~3~10$^4$~K.
216: These parameters imply the presence of a ionizing source of UV luminosity
217: L$_{UV}$~$\approx$~7.5~10$^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$
218: and total flux of Lyman continum photons
219: N$_{Lyc}$~$\approx$~1.2~10$^{50}$~ph~s$^{-1}$.
220: Recombination emission lines allowed detailed kinematic studies of the gas,
221: which show that Sgr~A West is rotating from north-east to south-west and then
222: towards north-west.
223: This seems to imply that the western arc is the ionized edge
224: of the CND, the N and E arms are tidally stretched streams of infalling gas
225: and the bar is an extension of the N arm.
226: Sgr~A West is seen in front of Sgr~A East and Sgr~A East Core cloud
227: but is behind the 20~km s$^{-1}$ molecular cloud.
228: Little north of the minispiral central bar and visible as a white point in
229: Fig.~\ref{fig:SgrAW} lies the compact source Sgr~A$^*$ which must be seen
230: in front of the minispiral bar even if embedded in the diffuse ionized cloud.
231: %%
232: \begin{figure}
233: \centering
234: {\epsfig{figure=figure3.ps,width=70mm}}
235: \caption{
236: Sgr~A West minispiral observed with the VLA at 1.2 cm.
237: The central white spot is Sgr~A$^*$.
238: \label{fig:SgrAW}}
239: \end{figure}
240: %%
241: \section{The Compact Radio Source Sgr~A$^*$}
242: Sgr~A$^*$ was discovered by Balick $\&$ Brown (1974),
243: 3 years after Lynden-Bell $\&$ Rees (1971)
244: had predicted that a compact synchrotron radio source should
245: reveal the presence of a massive black hole (MBH) in the Galactic Nucleus.
246: Sgr~A$^*$ is indeed a compact, bright, non-thermal radio source,
247: which coincides (within 50~mas) \cite{GHE00}
248: with the dynamical center of the Galaxy.
249: The radio spectrum (Fig.~\ref{fig:SgrA*}) is an inverted power-law
250: ($S_{\nu} \div \nu^{\alpha}$)
251: with spectral index $\alpha~\approx~0.33$ between 1~GHz
252: and 800~GHz, and with low and high frequency cut-offs.
253: Flux variability of 30-100$\%$,
254: around a value of $\approx$~1~Jy,
255: on timescales of few months is observed,
256: and the average radio luminosity is estimated to $\approx$~300~L$_{\odot}$.
257: The source is also very static, an upper limit of 20~km~s$^{-1}$
258: has been set to its proper motion.
259: Considering the high velocities of the stars of the region
260: (500-1000 km s$^{-1}$) this unusual low value indicates that Sgr~A$^*$
261: must be massive. A lower limit of
262: 1000~M$_{\odot}$ to its mass was indeed derived,
263: excluding the possibility of a stellar object.
264: The apparent radio size of Sgr~A$^*$ increases with wavelength
265: as $\lambda^2$,
266: which is the sign of source broadening due to ISM electron scattering.
267: However at low enough $\lambda$ ($<$ 7 mm) the relation seems to flatten
268: and the source is probably resolved by the VLBI.
269: The most recent VLBI data at 1.4~mm provide a size of
270: $\approx$~0.1~mas \citep{KRI98}
271: which at 8 kpc corresponds to only 1.2~10$^{13}$~cm = 0.8~AU or,
272: in terms of a 3~M$_{\odot}$ BH Schwarzschild radius (see $\S$~6),
273: of only $\approx$~14~R$_S$.
274: Moreover the source appears elongated with the intrinsic
275: major axis $\approx$~3 times greater
276: than the minor axis and oriented in the North-South direction \citep{LO98}.
277: This result, if confirmed, could indicate the presence of a weak radio-jet.
278: Circular polarization is observed at several radio frequencies but
279: until recently only upper limits ($<$ few $\%$) were set for linear
280: polarization.
281: Aitken et al. (2000) have now discovered linear polarization at
282: level of 10-20~$\%$ at sub-mm frequencies ($\geq$~100~GHz).
283: The sub-mm part of the Sgr~A$^*$ spectrum seems peculiar
284: also because it shows a bump of emission with respect to the
285: extrapolation of the radio power-law. Indeed,
286: using simultaneous observations at different frequencies
287: from 10~cm to 1~mm, Falke et al. (1998) found at $>$~100GHz an
288: excess which implies a change in the spectral slope.
289: \begin{figure}
290: \centering
291: {\epsfig{figure=figure4.ps ,width=80mm}}
292: \caption{
293: Radio spectrum of Sgr~A$^*$. Minimum and maximum fluxes
294: show the variability level.
295: \label{fig:SgrA*}}
296: \end{figure}
297: %%
298: \section{Evidences for a Massive Black Hole at the GC}
299: %
300: High gas velocities in the vicinity of the putative MBH of the
301: galaxy were also predicted by Lynden-Bell $\&$ Rees in 1971
302: as a consequence of the gravitational pull exerted by the BH.
303: These authors suggested to search for radio recombination lines
304: of the thermal gas close to the BH to measure gas velocities
305: and then to estimate the BH mass.
306: High velocities of the Sgr~A West ionized gas have been indeed observed,
307: since 1974, using the H recombination lines (H109$\alpha$,
308: H91$\alpha$, H92$\alpha$) the forbidden line $\lambda$12.8~$\mu$m
309: of [NeII] and the $\lambda$2.17~$\mu$m Br$\gamma$ line
310: \citep{MEZ96, YUS00}. These measures could show that the
311: dynamics at radii R~$>$~1.5-2 pc (i.e. outside the CND inner ring)
312: is dominated by the nearly-isothermal central star cluster, while within
313: 1.5~pc from the center the dynamics is due to a central mass of
314: $\approx$~3~10$^6$~M$_{\odot}$ enclosed within $\approx$~0.17 pc.
315: However gas motion measures cannot constrain further the volume of
316: the central mass and also non-gravitational forces
317: (magnetic fields, turbulence, etc.) may play a role
318: making the interpretation of the recorded velocities not obvious.
319: \\
320: Star kinematic studies, based on both stellar dispersion and
321: rotation velocities, started in 1978, with the aim of evaluating
322: the central mass M(R) enclosed within the radius R down to distances
323: $<$~0.1 pc.
324: The most convincing results have been obtained
325: in the last 8 years thank to high resolution NIR observations
326: performed with speckle/adaptive optics in the K band (2.2$\mu$m),
327: which allowed to provide independent determination of
328: star velocities using measures of star proper motions.
329: The recent paper by Genzel (2000) summarizes the results obtained both
330: with the SHARP CCD camera mounted on the 3.5m ESO NTT telescope
331: (Genzel et al. 1997) and with the NIRC camera at the 10~m Keck telescope
332: (Ghez et al. 1998).
333: About 1000 star with m(K) $<$ 16 (= 0.25 mJy) were imaged between
334: 1992-1999 within the central 1~pc (25$''$)
335: with angular resolutions in the range 0.15-0.05$''$.
336: Proper motions for 100 stars
337: could be determined along with 200 high quality spectra.
338: The important improvement provided by proper motion measures
339: is that they allow
340: measurements of stellar velocities of the very faint stars which are
341: very close (R~$<$~0.6$''$) to Sgr~A$^*$ and which show motions at
342: $>$ 1000 km s$^{-1}$ (1470 km s$^{-1}$ for the closest star
343: in projection, at 0.1$''$ = 800~AU from the radio source).
344: The simultaneous measure of proper motion and radial velocity for 32 stars
345: between 1$''$-5$''$ from Sgr~A$^*$ also allowed to test the fundamental
346: hypothesis of velocity isotropy assumed by most of the mass estimators.
347: Combining radial and proper motions data and using various projected mass
348: estimators Genzel et al. (2000) derived the mass distribution reported
349: in Fig.~\ref{fig:EncMass}.
350: The enclosed mass for R~$>$~1-2~pc can be accounted for by the isothermal
351: star cluster (broken line in Fig. 5)
352: but at lower radii, in particular to fit data
353: at 0.015~pc ($\approx$ 3000 AU),
354: it is necessary either to assume a point mass of
355: 2.9~10$^6$~M$_{\odot}$ (full line)
356: or to invoke the presence of a dark cluster of
357: objects with central density of 4~10$^{12}$~M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-3}$
358: (dotted line).
359: Even composed of stellar BHs, such a cluster would not be stable
360: for more than 10$^{7}$ yr and the hypothesis of a massive black hole
361: at the Galactic Nucleus is now extremely strong.
362: The very recent discovery with the Keck of curvature in the trajectories
363: of 3 of the closest stars to Sgr~A$^*$ \citep{GHE00},
364: confirms that stars are orbiting around the GC, increases by a factor 10
365: the density required for an alternative dark cluster
366: and proves that the radio source is at less than 0.05$''$
367: from the dynamical center of the stars.
368: \\
369: NIR observations have also led to the discovery of a cluster of about
370: 25 bright, young, hot stars most of them belonging to
371: the complex IRS 16 centered $\approx$~2$''$ east of the GC.
372: These very luminous stars show broadened and
373: P-Cyg type HeI/HI emission lines which indicate that their helium rich
374: surfaces are expanding as powerful stellar winds with velocities of
375: V$_{_W}$$\approx$ 500-1000 km s$^{-1}$ and mass loss rates
376: $\dot M_{_W} \approx$ 1-80 10$^{-5}$~M$_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$ \citep{NAJ97}.
377: These outflows produce a hypersonic wind of density
378: n$_{_W}$$\approx$ 10$^{3}-$10$^{4}$ cm$^{-3}$
379: which pervades the central pc.
380: These stars also emit $\approx$ 10$^{38}$~erg~s$^{-1}$
381: in UV and can therefore totally account for the entire UV luminosity
382: required to excite Sgr~A West and to heat the dust of the central cavity
383: and of the CND ($\S$~2).
384: To conclude with IR observations we have to mention the important upper limits
385: set by Menten et al. (1997) on the NIR flux from Sgr~A$^*$ which imply
386: an L$_{NIR}$~$<$~10$^{35}$ erg~s$^{-1}$ for the compact radio source.
387: %%
388: \begin{figure}
389: \centering
390: {\epsfig{figure=figure5.ps ,width=80mm}}
391: \caption{
392: Enclosed mass vs. distance from GC.
393: \label{fig:EncMass}}
394: \end{figure}
395: %%
396: %%
397: \section{High Energy Observations of Sgr~A$^*$}
398: %
399: After the first detections of high energy emission from the general direction
400: of the GC made with non-imaging instruments in the decade 1970-1980,
401: the first real X-ray images with arcmin resolution were obtained
402: with the Einstein Observatory \citep{WAT81}.
403: In addition to diffuse emission, 12 point sources were detected within
404: the central 20$'$, one of which, 1E~1742.5$-$2859, observed at $<$~1$'$ from
405: Sgr~A$^*$ with L$_{1-4~keV}$~=~1.5~10$^{35}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.
406: Between 1980-1990 several observations were carried out
407: in the standard and hard X-ray bands and a number of transient sources
408: were detected.
409: The most remarkable observations were certainly those performed
410: with the coded mask XRT instrument on SpaceLab2, which provided the first
411: ever images (3$'$ resolution) of the GC in hard X-rays (3-30~keV)
412: \citep{SKI87}.
413: Sgr~A$^*$ appeared again rather faint
414: (L$_{3-30~keV}$~=~5~10$^{35}$~erg~s$^{-1}$),
415: in spite of the high expectations for an hard spectrum of the
416: type of Cyg~X-1.
417: %
418: However in 1991 the Rosat telescope with 25$''$ resolution in the
419: band 0.1-2.5~keV, could separate
420: 1E~1742.5$-$285 in 3 sources one of which, RXJ~1745.6$-$2900,
421: was found within 10$''$ from Sgr~A$^*$ \citep{PRE94}.
422: Rosat luminosity (L$_{0.8-2.5~keV}$~=~3~10$^{34}$~erg~s$^{-1}$)
423: however falls below 2 orders of magnitude
424: from extrapolation of the N$_H$-corrected XRT luminosity.
425: The possibility of strong variability or additional N$_H$ were
426: considered but ASCA 1993-1994 observations in the range 0.1-10 keV,
427: revealed presence of 2 point sources,
428: a soft and stable one close to the Nucleus and another harder and transient
429: about 1$'$ away \citep{KOY96}. The authors concluded then that
430: the flux observed by the hard X-ray instrument on SL2
431: (also confirmed by ART-P/GRANAT, Pavlinsky et al. 1994)
432: was due to the transient source and not to Sgr~A$^*$.
433: \\
434: ASCA also confirmed and improved the results of EXOSAT,
435: Tenma and Ginga on the presence of hard X-ray diffuse emission.
436: A large part of the Nuclear Bulge seems permeated by hot plasma
437: emitting X-ray diffuse emission with thermal spectrum of T~$\approx$~10~keV
438: and numerous K emission lines of He-like and H-like ions.
439: The diffuse source has an elliptical shape 1$^{\circ}$~$\times$~1.8$^{\circ}$
440: elongated on the galactic plane. The emission peaks around the center
441: where a hot spot with an oval 2$'~\times$~3$'$ shape
442: (= 4.8 pc $\times$ 7.2pc)
443: and luminosity of $\approx$~10$^{36}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ was also imaged with ASCA.
444: This emission is puzzling because at this temperatures the gas would not
445: be bound by the GC gravitational potential.
446: The estimated expansion of the large shell
447: at sound speed provides an age of $\approx$~50000~yr and input energy of
448: $\approx$~10$^{54}$~erg for the gas, and continuous heating is required
449: with power of $\approx$~10$^{41-42}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.
450: Tanaka et al. (2000) have recently argued against thermal origin of this
451: emission and proposed that charge-exchange interaction of
452: low-energy cosmic-rays with ISM contribute to it.
453: %%
454: ASCA also detected 6.4~keV neutral iron line diffuse emission in
455: the Nuclear Bulge, and more precisely from Sgr~B2 the most
456: massive of the GMC. This fluoroscence line can be produced by
457: high energy emission which is scattered in the neutral environment of
458: a GMC.
459: Murakami et al. (2000) estimated, comparing data to simulations,
460: that an external source at a distance d, should have emitted about
461: L$_{2-10~keV}$~=~3~10$^{39}$~(d/100 pc)$^2$~erg~s$^{-1}$ over 100 yr.
462: This excludes binary transient sources but leaves open the
463: possibility for a flare of Sgr~A$^*$.
464: If emitted from Sgr~A$^*$, radiation should have been travelling through
465: $\approx$ 300 l.y. to reach SGR B2. These data could then probe
466: 300 yr ago flaring activity from Sgr~A$^*$.
467: Similar conclusions were reached by Sunyaev $\&$ Churazov (1998)
468: who investigated also dependence of the line characteristics
469: and variability with position and time behavior of primary source,
470: while Fromerth et al. (2001) found that data are also
471: compatible with location of primary source inside the GCM.
472: \\
473: To a be a faint source in X-rays does not prevent to be
474: strong emitters in gamma rays, in particular for
475: such extreme objects like BH, which are known to emit very hard radiation
476: and suspected to generate e$^+$-e$^-$ annihilation line.
477: The GC has been a priority target of the first satellite imager
478: of soft $\gamma$-rays (30 keV - 1300 keV) SIGMA. SIGMA with its 13$'$-15$'$
479: resolution and large field of view performed deep surveys of the galactic
480: bulge between 1990-1997 cumulating nearly 10$^{7}$~s of data.
481: SIGMA found that in this band the 1$^{\circ}$ region around
482: the GC is dominated by the otherwise anodyne
483: X-ray source 1E 1740.7-2942,
484: which follow up observations revealed to be associated to radio-jets
485: and which is now one of the 4 persistent galactic BH candidates X-ray sources.
486: Sgr~A$^*$ appeared instead silent.
487: The only weak flare observed by SIGMA from the vicinity of the GC in 1991
488: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:SigmaGN}),
489: was attributed to a point source $>$~9$'$ away from Sgr~A* \citep{GOLD94, VAR96}.
490: A recent re-analysis of the whole SIGMA data by Goldoni et al. (1999)
491: have provided
492: the best low-energy $\gamma$-ray upper limits for this source
493: (see also Fig.~\ref{fig:IBISsen} and Goldwurm et al. 2000).
494: The results imply L$_{30-300~keV}$~$<$~1.2~10$^{36}$~erg~s$^{-1}$,
495: and an upper limit (3~$\sigma$) of 3.3~10$^{-4}$~ph~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$
496: for narrow 511 keV line point source at the GC
497: was also obtained with SIGMA \citep{MAL95}.
498: OSSE/GRO mapped the galactic diffuse 511 keV emission
499: and could identify a bulge component of
500: about the same value in flux than the above quoted SIGMA upper
501: limit, with a positronium fraction of 0.89 \citep{PUR97}.
502: Due to the limited angular resolution ($>$~4$^{\circ}$),
503: however it was not possible to estimate if any of this emission
504: is from a central point source.
505: \\
506: A source (2EG~J1746-2852) in the Galactic Center
507: was also detected by EGRET/GRO \citep{MAY98} at $>$ 30 MeV.
508: The poor angular resolution of the instrument ($\sim$1$^{\circ}$)
509: does not exclude it is actually diffuse.
510: The spectrum is a broken power-law with photon indexes of 1.3 and 3.1
511: below and above 1900 MeV, which seems against
512: pure $\pi_0$ decay origin, with total luminosity of
513: L$_{>100 MeV}$ = 2.2~10$^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.
514: SAX (NFC/MEC) monitoring of GC
515: has not provided new results on the Nucleus itself,
516: however it was found that the soft component (T~$\approx$~0.6 keV)
517: of the local diffuse emission seems related to Sgr A East and it is well
518: interpreted as thermal emission from a SNR \citep{SID99}.
519: The hard component (T~$\approx$~8 keV) instead
520: lies along the plane as shown previously by ART-P and ASCA.
521: \\
522: Chandra observations with the unprecedent angular resolution
523: of ~0.5$''$, carried out in fall 1999, have instead
524: resolved the Rosat source in few components, one of which
525: could be point-like and lies within 0.35$''$ from Sgr~A$^*$ \citep{BAG01}.
526: The source, which may well be the real X-ray counterpart of the
527: radio source, has a power-law spectrum rather steep ($\approx 2.7$)
528: and luminosity L$_{2-10~keV}$~$\approx$~2~10$^{33}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.
529: Althought the 0.5-2 keV flux is very uncertain due to the low
530: accuracy of N$_H$ estimation it seems clear that Sgr~A$^*$ soft X-ray
531: luminosity is well below the Rosat value.
532: %
533: \begin{figure}
534: \centering
535: {\epsfig{figure=figure6.ps ,width=80mm}}
536: \caption{
537: Image around Galactic Nucleus obtained by SIGMA in 1991.
538: Black diamond is position of Sgr~A$^*$, and crosses of
539: SIGMA sources of the region.\label{fig:SigmaGN}}
540: \end{figure}
541: %%
542: \section{The Problem of Sgr~A$^*$ Low-Luminosity}
543: In spite of the very compelling evidences for a MBH at the Galactic Nucleus,
544: Sgr~A$^*$ does not behave like a simple mass scaled-down AGN.
545: Summing measured luminosities and considering the quoted upper
546: limits, Sgr~A$^*$ bolometric luminosity is
547: $$ L_{Sgr~A^*}~<~5~10^{36}~erg~s^{-1}$$
548: The UV luminosity is uncertain due to the high extinction but the fact that
549: Sgr~A West ionization can be provided by the IRS~16 cluster
550: of hot stars implies
551: that there is not an additional strong source of UV, whose emission
552: would also be re-emitted by the heated dust and observed in IR.
553: The EGRET source can rise this value by a factor
554: 5 but in any case the Nucleus remains sub-luminous.
555: \\
556: For a BH at the GC with mass M = 3.0~10$^{6}$~M$_{\odot}$,
557: the Schwarzshild radius R$_S$ and Eddington luminosity L$_E$ are
558: %%
559: $$ R_S = {2 G M \over c^2} = 9.0~10^{11} cm = 0.060~AU \sim 7.5~\mu as$$
560: $$ L_E = {4~G M m_p \over \sigma_T } = 3.9~10~^{44}~erg~s^{-1} $$
561: %%
562: In spherical accretion, matter with density n$_{_W}$
563: flowing with relative velocity V$_{_W}$
564: within a distance R$_A$ (accretion radius) from the BH is captured,
565: undergoes a shock which dissipates the kinetic energy in thermal energy
566: and then is accreted radially
567: with free-fall velocity and mass accretion rate
568: $\dot M_A$ providing a power L$_A$ (accretion luminosity) given by
569: %%
570: $$ R_{A} = {2 G M \over V_{_W}^2} = 1.6~10^{17}~cm = 0.05~pc \sim 1.3''$$
571: $$ \dot M_{A} = R_{A}^2 \rho_{_W} V_{_W} = 5.5~10^{22}~g~s^{-1} =
572: 8.7~10^{-4}~M_{\odot}~yr^{-1}$$
573: $$ L_{A} = {G M \dot M_{A} \over R_S} =
574: 2.4~10^{43}~erg~s^{-1} = 0.061~L_E$$
575: %%
576: where wind parameters quoted in $\S$~4 where used,
577: i.e. V$_{_W}$ = 700 km s$^{-1}$, n$_{_W}$ = 5.5~10$^3$ cm$^{-3}$.
578: 3D simulations of the stellar winds from the IRS 16 cluster
579: flowing into the GC black hole have
580: been performed by Cocker and Melia (1997) using results of Najarro et al.
581: (1997) and they obtained a mass accretion $\approx$ 1-2 times
582: the value of $\dot M_A$.
583: So the accretion luminosity is 10$^{6}$-10$^{7}$
584: times higher than the measured bolometric luminosity
585: and efficiency of conversion of available energy
586: in radiation must be lower than 10$^{-6}$.
587: The final efficiency depends actually on how the matter, once captured
588: at R$_A$ is accreted, how reaches the BH event horizon, which are
589: the characteristics of the flow and whether a disk forms.
590: Cocker and Melia (1997) in their simulations
591: also found that the accreted specific angular momentum l
592: in units of cR$_S$ ($\lambda$ = l/cR$_S$) varies around an average
593: of $\lambda$ = 40~$\pm$~10 with the sign swapping on
594: time-scales of $\sim$~100 years.
595: This implies that the circularization radius R$_c~\approx~2\lambda^2R_S$
596: (distance at which angular momentum equals the Keplerian value)
597: is $<$~3000~R$_S$ and a large accretion disk probably does not form.
598: %%
599: %%
600: \section{Accretion Models for the GC Black Hole}
601: An optically thick and geometrically thin accretion disk
602: has efficiency of the order of 0.1 and, if present around Sgr~A$^*$,
603: would originate a bright spectral peak in the UV band
604: similar to the blue bump of AGNs,
605: followed by a steep Wien tail which may contribute little to X-rays.
606: The low energy tail would extend to NIR and such component would
607: violate the Menten et al. (1997) upper limits.
608: \\
609: The first attempt to fit the entire spectrum of Sgr~A$^*$ modeling
610: the accretion into the massive BH was done by
611: Melia (1992, 1994), who computed emission produced
612: in pure spherical Bondi-Hoyle geometry.
613: Without the viscous dissipation which occurs in disks, matter would
614: fall into the hole heated up by simple adiabatic compression,
615: and efficiency of conversion of gravitational energy in radiation
616: would be very small.
617: However it is usually assumed that matter carries, in the fall, the
618: magnetic field, maintained in equipartition with the gas,
619: and magnetic dissipation by turbulence or field lines reconnection
620: can heat efficiently the particles which then
621: emit synchrotron, free-free and inverse Compton radiation.
622: With this model Melia (1992) could fit the available data for a
623: black hole mass of 10$^6$~M$_{\odot}$,
624: a value smaller than recent estimates.
625: In its 1994 model, Melia also included an optically thick
626: disk at small radii, to account for the effects of the accreted angular
627: momentum, but the Menten et al. (1997) IR upper limits are
628: not compatible even with such small disk.
629: Recently, Cocker and Melia (2000) revisited the model
630: improving computation of the emitted spectrum and
631: assuming magnetic field B in sub-equipartition by letting
632: its value to be free parameter. Considering variability the
633: model luminosities seem marginally compatible with the data
634: and imply that B, which is of few mG at R$_A$ ($\sim$ 10$^5$~R$_S$),
635: does not reach the equipartition value at intermediate radii.
636: Only in the inner region of $\approx$~5-25~R$_S$, where
637: gas circularizes and a small Keplerian disk is formed,
638: the magnetic dynamo can rise the field to values of the order of 200 G.
639: The emission from this inner region could then account for the
640: sub-mm excess and for its polarization. However this variant of the
641: model fits the data only for an effective accretion rate
642: $<$~10$^{-4}$~$\dot M_A$.
643: %%
644: \\
645: In 1995, Narayan et al. proposed that accretion flows
646: for sub-Eddington rates ($\dot M < \dot M_E$)
647: in systems with BHs be dominated by advection.
648: These models (ADAF) assume a very weak coupling between protons and electrons
649: in the flow and the energy carried by protons is not transmitted
650: efficiently to the radiating electrons but rather advected into the hole.
651: \\
652: The plasma gets very hot (optically thin), flows with 2 temperatures
653: (kT$_p~\approx$~10$^9$~K, kT$_e~\approx$~10$^7$~K),
654: with nearly spherical geometry (geometrically thick disks),
655: but with viscous dissipation and momentum transport.
656: The radio spectrum is generated by optically thick self-absorbed
657: synchrotron emission
658: from hot nearly-relativistic thermal electrons at different temperatures.
659: Each disk ring at radius R gives rise to a spectrum peaked at the
660: critical frequency above which radiation becomes optically thin.
661: A total flat spectrum is then produced by the superposition
662: of these ring spectra.
663: Highest radio frequencies are generated by the hottest electrons of the
664: inner regions close to the BH while inverse Compton produces a weak
665: tail in IR, optical and UV, and X-rays are produced by thin thermal
666: bremsstrahlung from electrons at all radii till R$_A$.
667: The best ADAF model for Sgr~A$^*$ \citep{NAR98} fits the
668: radio data, the Rosat X-ray flux and the IR and hard X-rays upper limits
669: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:IBISsen})
670: for the correct BH mass but for an accretion rate
671: $\dot M \approx$ 10$^{-5}$~M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$.
672: This is more than a factor 10
673: lower than estimated from the IRS~16 stellar winds.
674: Since in ADAF L~$\div$~$\dot M^2$ the luminosity for 10 times the rate
675: would be 100 times greater and the discrepancy is not easily explained
676: \citep{QUA99b}.
677: To account for the EGRET $\gamma$-ray source Narayan et al. (1998) computed
678: the contribution of decay of
679: pions produced by proton-proton collisions in the very hot inner region of
680: the ADAF. The spectrum could reproduce the EGRET spectral shape but not the
681: flux normalization.
682: On the other hands electrons produced by the muons seem able to naturally
683: account for the {\it cm} part of the spectrum
684: not well explained by the thermal electrons \citep{MAH98}.
685: \\
686: The spectrum of Narayan et al. 1998 fitted the Rosat flux
687: and the new value of X-ray luminosity obtained with Chandra certainly
688: makes more acute the problem of accretion rate (see Fig.~\ref{fig:IBISsen}).
689: Blandford $\&$ Begelman (1999) argued that ADAFs must have
690: outflows in form of winds and, more recently, it was also found
691: that convection in the disk may reduce outward transport of
692: angular momentum reducing the net flow of matter into the hole
693: \citep{QUA00}.
694: Both these new variants of ADAF (known as ADIOS and CDAF) could
695: reduce effective mass accretion.
696: However Quataert $\&$ Narayan (1999) discussed the spectral shape
697: of ADAF with winds and found that since soft X-rays
698: are produce far from the hole (between 10$^4$-10$^5$~R$_S$),
699: outflows, expected in the inner regions, will not reduce the
700: expected X-ray emission and discrepancy with the accretion rates
701: is not resolved.
702: Moreover the Chandra steep spectrum does not seem
703: compatible with thermal bremsstrahlung.
704: Another important difficulty for ADAF models is the recent discovery of linear
705: polarization in the sub-mm band. In both ADAF and Bondi-Hoyle models
706: this excess is produced in the inner regions of the flow and therefore
707: even if radiation can be initially polarized, the accreting plasma
708: encountered on the way out would depolarize the emission
709: by Faraday effect \citep{AGO00}, unless very peculiar geometries are invoked.
710: Observed values of polarization seem to imply accretion rates as low
711: as 10$^{-8}$~M$_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$ making of course need for low-efficiency
712: models much less important.
713: \\
714: All these factors certainly revive the non-thermal models of Sgr~A$^*$.
715: The flat (index $\approx$ 0.3) radio spectrum could
716: indeed be interpreted as due to thin synchrotron radiation
717: from a quasi mono-energetic distribution of electrons,
718: e.g. accelerated by shocks inside the accretion flow.
719: The low frequency cut-off is due to self absorption while the high frequency
720: one to the cut off in the truncated power-law electron distribution.
721: Such model was investigate by Beckert et al. (1996) and refined by
722: Beckert $\&$ Duschl (1997).
723: X-rays can then be produced by self synchrotron Compton (SSC)
724: emission.
725: The main difficulty was to correctly account for the X-ray flux
726: and to explain the ``ad-hoc'' cut off in the electron distribution.
727: Another non-thermal model for Sgr~A$^*$ is the jet/nozzle model,
728: recently re-discussed by Falcke $\&$ Markoff (2000) (see references therein).
729: The authors propose that radio emission is generated
730: in a compact radio jet, similar to those seen in AGNs, but less powerful.
731: This model could explain the possible
732: asymmetry in the radio and sub-mm shape of the source \citep{LO98}
733: which, if confirmed, would indeed favor the presence of a jet.
734: The base of the jet where the acceleration
735: of the magnetized plasma takes place, the nozzle,
736: is a compact region where the sub-mm radiation is originated.
737: The nozzle is close to the BH and to the inner part of the accretion flow.
738: The jet mechanism is not known but the authors invoke a
739: coupling between jet and accretion disk.
740: As for the mono-energetic electron model the X-rays are produced
741: by SSC and the expected spectrum seems to fit well the recent Chandra
742: results.
743: However the accretion flow must not provide relevant X-ray
744: emission and the problems of low-efficiency accretion or
745: of a much lower effective accretion rate than the one estimated from
746: data on stellar winds remain.
747: \\
748: Finally, the Sgr~B2 6.4 keV line could indicate that Sgr~A$^*$ is flaring,
749: may be cyclically like the X-ray Novae.
750: However if the accreted material is stored between the flares,
751: in a large low-viscosity disk, the latter should be visible in IR.
752: %%
753: \begin{figure}
754: \centering
755: {\epsfig{figure=figure7.ps, width=80mm}}
756: \caption{
757: IBIS (full lines) and JEM-X (dotted) INTEGRAL sensitivities and
758: the ADAF spectrum (broken-dotted) of Sgr A$^*$ with
759: SIGMA and ASCA upper limits, and Rosat and Chandra luminosities.
760: \label{fig:IBISsen}}
761: \end{figure}
762: %%
763: \section{Perspectives and Conclusions}
764: ADAFs have become popular in recent yeas because they seemed
765: able to explain, in the frame of BH accretion disk thermal models,
766: the low efficiencies observed in the nucleus of our Galaxy
767: and of other close normal galaxies.
768: However these models are now encountering serious difficulties,
769: and non-thermal models become again competitive.
770: All models however fail to explain why the closest known
771: massive black hole to us radiates so little, unless we admit
772: that it does not accrete the available matter as expected.
773: Major advances in understanding of the physics of the Galactic Center
774: will be provided in the next years by new and more accurate observations,
775: in particular at high energies.
776: The Chandra and XMM-Newton observatories will probably address
777: the question of the X-ray (0.1-15 keV) luminosity, variability
778: and spectrum of Sgr~A$^*$ and
779: of the characteristics and origin of the local X-ray diffuse emission.
780: The next ESA $\gamma$-ray (3 keV - 10 MeV)
781: mission INTEGRAL will allow to study, if present,
782: the ADAF hard X-ray component predicted by Narayan et al. (1998).
783: Fig.~\ref{fig:IBISsen} reports the expected sensitivity
784: of the medium energy (20 keV - 10 MeV) instrument (IBIS) onboard INTEGRAL
785: compared with the ADAF model.
786: Detailed simulations \citep{GOLD00} show that
787: IBIS will be able to detect the expected thermal bremsstrahlung
788: hard component of Sgr~A$^*$ in 4~10$^6$~s.
789: With INTEGRAL it will be possible to search for a
790: compact source of 511 keV line at the GC. In spite most models
791: do not predict a strong e$^-$-e$^+$ annihilation line contribution
792: from the MBH itself, Fatuzzo et al. (2000) argued
793: that part of the 511 keV bulge component may be due to cumulative
794: effect of pair production in the expanding shells of repeated
795: Sgr~A~East type events.
796: High energy observations with GLAST at $>$ 100 MeV will
797: resolve the standing problem of the EGRET source,
798: possibly linked to the Sgr~A$^*$ or to the non-thermal Sgr~A East shell.
799: The latter is also expected to provide detectable flux in the TeV range,
800: making the GC an interesting target also for next generation of ground
801: VHE/UHE $\gamma$-ray and neutrino experiments.
802: Moreover the Galactic Center has been recognized as possible
803: site of large cold dark matter concentration and
804: annihilation \citep{G&S99}.
805: \\
806: Sgr~A$^*$ is probably the closest massive black hole, and
807: in spite presently in low state of activity,
808: remains a highly privileged target for astronomical multi-$\lambda$
809: observations and for future astroparticle experiments.
810: %%
811: \section*{Acknowledgments}
812: I thank Fulvio Melia for very useful discussions and Frederick
813: K. Baganoff for providing information about Chandra
814: observations before publication.
815: %%
816: \begin{thebibliography}{}
817: \bibitem[Aitken et al. 2000]{AIT00}Aitken D.K., et al., 2000, {\it ApJ}, 534, L173.
818: \bibitem[Agol 2000]{AGO00}Agol E., 2000, {\it ApJ}, 538, L121.
819: \bibitem[Balick \& Brown 1974]{B&B74}Balick B. \& Brown R.L., 1974, {\it ApJ}, 194, 265.
820: \bibitem[Baganoff et al. 2001]{BAG01}Baganoff F., et al., 2001, {\it ApJ}, {\it subm.}, aph/0102151.
821: \bibitem[Beckert et al. 1996]{BEC96}Beckert T., et al., 1996, {\it A}\&{\it A}, 307, 450.
822: \bibitem[Beckert \& Duschl 1997]{BEC97}Beckert T. \& Duschl W.J., 1997, {\it A}\&{\it A}, 328, 95.
823: \bibitem[Blandford \& Begelman 1999]{BLA99}Blandford R., Begelman M., 1999,{\it MNRAS},303,L1.
824: \bibitem[Coil \& Ho 2000]{COI00}Coil A.L. \& Ho P.T., 2000, {\it ApJ}, 533, 245.
825: \bibitem[Coker \& Melia 1997]{COK97}Coker R.F. \& Melia F., 1997, {\it ApJ}, 488, L149.
826: \bibitem[Coker \& Melia 2000]{COK00}Coker R.F. \& Melia F., 1999, {\it ApJ}, 534, 723.
827: \bibitem[Fatuzzo et al. 2000]{FAT00}Fatuzzo M., et al., 2000, {\it ApJ}, {\it subm.}, aph/0007371.
828: \bibitem[Falcke et al. 1998]{FAL98}Falcke H., et al., 1998, {\it ApJ}, 499, 731.
829: \bibitem[Falcke \& Markoff 2000]{FAL00}Falcke H. \& Markoff S., 2000, {\it A}\&{\it A}, 362, 113.
830: \bibitem[Fromerth et al. 2001]{FRO00}Fromerth M.J., et al., 2001, {\it ApJL}, 547, L129.
831: \bibitem[Genzel et al. 1997]{GEN97}Genzel R., et al., 1997, {\it MNRAS} 291, 219.
832: \bibitem[Genzel 2000]{GEN00}Genzel R., 2000, {\it Star2000 Conf.}, aph/0008119.
833: \bibitem[Ghez et al. 1998]{GHE98}Ghez A.M.., et al., 1998, {\it ApJ}, 509, 678.
834: \bibitem[Ghez et al. 2000]{GHE00}Ghez A.M.., et al., 2000, {\it Nature} 407, 349.
835: \bibitem[Goldoni et al. 1999]{GOL99}Goldoni P., et al., 1999, {\it Astr. Lett.}\&{\it C.}, 38, 305.
836: \bibitem[Goldwurm et al. 1994]{GOLD94}Goldwurm A., et al., 1994, {\it Nature} 371, 589.
837: \bibitem[Goldwurm et al. 2000]{GOLD00}Goldwurm A., et al., 2000, Proc. {\it 19$^{\rm th}$ Texas Symp.},
838: ed. Paul J. et al., M-Symp. 15, atroph/9904104.
839: \bibitem[Gondolo \& Silk 1999]{G&S99}Gondolo P. \& Silk J., 1999, {\it Phys. Rev. L.} 83, 1719.
840: \bibitem[Koyama et al. 1996]{KOY96}Koyama K., et al., 1996, {\it PASJ} 48, 249.
841: \bibitem[Krichbaum et al. 1998]{KRI98}Krichbaum T.P., et al., 1998, {\it A}\&{\it A}, 335, L106.
842: \bibitem[La Rosa et al. 2000]{LAR00}La Rosa T.N., et al., 2000, {\it AJ}, 119, 207 .
843: \bibitem[Lo et al. 1998]{LO98}Lo K.Y., et al., 1998, {\it ApJ}, 508, L61.
844: \bibitem[Lynden-Bell \& Rees 1971]{LB&R71}Lynden-Bell D., Rees M.J.,1971,{\it MNRAS},152,461.
845: \bibitem[Mahadevan 1998]{MAH98}Mahadevan R., 1998, {\it Nature}, 394, 651.
846: \bibitem[Malet et al. 1995]{MAL95}Malet I., et al., 1995, {\it ApJ}, 444, 222.
847: \bibitem[Mayer-Hasselwander et al. 1998]{MAY98}Mayer-Hasselwander, et al., 1998, {\it A}\&{\it A}, 335, 161.
848: \bibitem[Mezger et al. 1996]{MEZ96}Mezger P.G., et al., 1996, {\it A}\&{\it A Rev.}, 7, 289.
849: \bibitem[Melia 1992]{MEL92}Melia F., 1992, {\it ApJ}, 387, L25.
850: \bibitem[Melia 1994]{MEL94}Melia F., 1994, {\it ApJ}, 426, 577.
851: \bibitem[Menten et al. 1997]{MEN97}Menten et al., 1997, {\it ApJ}, 475, L111.
852: \bibitem[Morris \& Serabyn 1996]{M&S96}Morris M. \& Serabyn E., 1996, {\it ARA}\&{\it A }, 34, 645.
853: \bibitem[Murakami et al. 2000]{MUR00}Murakami H., et al., 2000, {\it ApJ}, 534, 283.
854: \bibitem[Najarro et al. 1997]{NAJ97}Najarro F., et al., 1997, {\it A}\&{\it A}, 325, 700.
855: \bibitem[Narayan et al. 1995]{NAR95}Narayan R., et al., 1995, {\it Nature}, 374, 623.
856: \bibitem[Narayan et al. 1998]{NAR98}Narayan R., et al., 1998, {\it ApJ}, 492, 554.
857: \bibitem[Pavlinsky et al. 1994]{PAV94} Pavlinsky M.N., et al., 1994, {\it ApJ}, 425, 110.
858: \bibitem[Predehl \& Truemper 1994]{PRE94}Predehl P., \& Truemper J., 1994, {\it A}\&{\it A}, 290, L29.
859: \bibitem[Purcell et al. 1997]{PUR97}Purcell W.R., et al., 1997, {\it ApJ}, 491, 725.
860: \bibitem[Quataert \& Narayan 1999]{QUA99}Quataert E. \& Narayan R., 1999, {\it ApJ}, 520, 298.
861: \bibitem[Quataert et al. 1999]{QUA99b}Quataert E., et al., 1999, {\it ApJ}, 517, L101.
862: \bibitem[Quataert \& Gruzinov 2000]{QUA00}Quataert E. \& Gruzinov A., 2000, {\it ApJ}, 539, 809.
863: \bibitem[Skinner et al. 1987]{SKI87}Skinner G.K., et al., 1987, {\it Nature}, 330, 544.
864: \bibitem[Sidoli et al. 1999]{SID99}Sidoli L., et al., 1999, {\it A}\&{\it A}, 349, L49.
865: \bibitem[Sunyaev \& Churazov 1998]{SUN98}Sunyaev R. \& Churazov E. 1998, {\it MNRAS} 297,1279.
866: \bibitem[Tanaka et al. 2000]{TAN00}Tanaka Y., et al., 2000, {\it PASJ}, 50, L52.
867: \bibitem[Vargas et al. 1996]{VAR96}Vargas M., et al., 1996, {\it ASP Conf. Ser.}, 102, 431.
868: \bibitem[Watson et al. 1981]{WAT81} Watson M.G., et al., 1981, {\it ApJ}, 250, 142.
869: \bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh et al. 2000]{YUS00}Yusef-Zadeh F., et al., 2000, {\it Science}, 287(5450), 85.
870: %%
871: \end{thebibliography}
872: %%
873: \end{document}
874: %%
875: %% <<<<< End of generated file <<<<<<
876: %%
877: %% End of file `esapub.tex'.
878: