1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: % This is a sample input file for your contribution to a multi-

3: % author book to be published by Springer Verlag.

4: %

5: % Please use it as a template for your own input, and please

6: % follow the instructions for the formal editing of your

7: % manuscript as described in the file "1readme".

8: %

9: % Please send the Tex and figure files of your manuscript

10: % together with any additional style files as well as the

11: % PS file to the editor of your book.

12: %

13: % He or she will collect all contributions for the planned

14: % book, possibly compile them all in one go and pass the

15: % complete set of manuscripts on to Springer.

16: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

17: 

18: 

19: 

20: %RECOMMENDED%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

21: 

22: \documentclass[runningheads]{cl2emult}

23: 

24: \usepackage{makeidx}  % allows index generation

25: \usepackage{graphicx} % standard LaTeX graphics tool

26:                       % for including eps-figure files

27: \usepackage{subeqnar} % subnumbers individual equations

28:                       % within an array

29: \usepackage{multicol} % used for the two-column index

30: \usepackage{cropmark} % cropmarks for pages without

31:                       % pagenumbers

32: \usepackage{eso}      % placeholder for figures

33: \makeindex            % used for the subject index

34:                       % please use the style sprmidx.sty with

35:                       % your makeindex program

36: 

37: %upright Greek letters (example below: upright "mu")

38: \newcommand{\euler}[1]{{\usefont{U}{eur}{m}{n}#1}}

39: \newcommand{\eulerbold}[1]{{\usefont{U}{eur}{b}{n}#1}}

40: \newcommand{\umu}{\mbox{\euler{\char22}}}

41: \newcommand{\umub}{\mbox{\eulerbold{\char22}}}

42: 

43: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

44: 

45: 

46: %OPTIONAL%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

47: %

48: %\usepackage{amstex}   % useful for coding complex math

49: %\mathindent\parindent % needed in case "Amstex" is used

50: %

51: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

52: 

53: %AUTHOR_STYLES_AND_DEFINITIONS%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

54: %

55: %Please reduce your own definitions and macros to an absolute

56: %minimum since otherwise it will become rather strenuous to

57: %compile all individual contributions to a single book file

58: %

59: %

60: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

61: 

62: \providecommand*{\dfrac}[2]{\displaystyle\frac{#1}{#2}}

63: \begin{document}

64: %

65: \title*{The 2dF QSO redshift survey}

66: %

67: %

68: %\toctitle{Focusing of a Parallel Beam to Form a Point

69: %\protect\newline in the Particle Deflection Plane}

70: % allows explicit linebreak for the table of content

71: %

72: %

73: \titlerunning{The 2dF QSO redshift survey}

74: % allows abbreviation of title, if the full title is too long

75: % to fit in the running head

76: %

77: \author{B.J.Boyle\inst{1}

78: \and S.M.Croom\inst{1}

79: \and R.J.Smith\inst{2}

80: \and T.Shanks\inst{3}

81: \and P.J.Outram\inst{3}

82: \and F.Hoyle\inst{3}

83: \and L.Miller\inst{4}

84: \and N.S.Loaring\inst{4}

85: }

86: %

87: \authorrunning{B.J.Boyle et al.}

88: % if there are more than two authors,

89: % please abbreviate author list for running head

90: %

91: %

92: \institute{Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping, 

93: NSW 1710, Australia

94: \and 

95: Liverpool John Moores University, Twelve Quays House, Egerton Wharf,

96: Birkenhead, CH41 1LD, UK

97: \and

98: Department of Physics, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, 

99: DH1 3LE, UK

100: \and

101: Department of Physics, University of Oxford, 1 Keble Road,

102: Oxford, OX1 3RH, UK

103: }

104: 

105: \maketitle              % typesets the title of the contribution

106: 

107: \begin{abstract}

108: We present some initial results from the 2dF QSO redshift survey.

109: The aim of the survey is to produce an optically-selected catalogue of 

110: 25000 QSOs over the redshift range $0<z<3$ using the 2-degree field

111: at the Anglo-Australian Telescope. 

112: \end{abstract}

113: 

114: \section{Introduction}

115: In the past, statistical studies of QSO clustering have been limited by

116: the small numbers of QSOs available in homogeneously-selected

117: catalogues\cite{cs96}.  The aim of the 2dF QSO redshift survey (2QZ)

118: is to provide a optically-selected catalogue of 25000 QSOs,

119: approximately 50 times larger than the previous largest QSO survey to

120: a similar depth ($B<21\,$mag).  This survey will be used to provide

121: measures of:

122: \begin{itemize}

123: \item the evolution of QSO clustering over the redshift range $0<z<3$

124: \item large-scale structure over scales 1--1000h$^{-1}$Mpc 

125: \item the cosmological parameters ($\Omega_\Lambda$, $\Omega_{\rm m}$) using

126: geometrical tests

127: \item the QSO luminosity function and its evolution with redshift

128: \item the spectral properties of a  large sample of QSOs

129: \end{itemize}

130: 

131: \section{Catalogue selection and observations}

132: 

133: The 2QZ is based on $U-B_J$/$B_J-R$ colour selection of blue candidate

134: objects from the Automated Plate Measuring (APM) machine scans of UK

135: Schmidt $U$, $J$ and $R$ plates.  Full details of the catalogue

136: selection process are given by Smith et al.\ (2001a)\cite{s01a}. 

137: The survey covers 740 deg$^2$, comprising

138: two $75^{\circ}\times5^{\circ}$ strips (excluding the regions around bright

139: stars, etc) in the South Galactic Pole region at declination $-30^{\circ}$

140: and in the North Galactic Cap region at declination $0^{\circ}$ (see 

141: Fig.~\ref{fig:cat})

142:   

143: \begin{figure}

144: \centering

145: \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth,angle=90]{ubrcat.ps}

146: \caption{Final QSO candidate catalogue based on $U-B_J$/$B_J-R$ selection.

147: Reproduced from Smith et al. (2001a).}

148: \label{fig:cat}

149: \end{figure}

150: 

151: \begin{figure}

152: \centering

153: \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{obsframe.ps}

154: \caption{Observed frame spectra of the first 10000 QSOs in the 2QZ.  

155: Spectra are stacked in order of increasing redshift. 

156: Reproduced from Smith et al.\ (2001b).}

157: \label{fig:spec}

158: \end{figure}

159: 

160: In total 47845 candidates were selected for observations with the 2dF

161: instrument at the Anglo-Australian Telescope.  The survey observations

162: are combined with those of the 2dF galaxy redshift survey 

163: (2dFGRS\cite{c99}).  QSO candidates are observed at 7\AA\

164: resolution over the wavelength range 3800--7250\AA.  We obtain

165: reliable identification for $\sim 85\%$ of the candidates to our survey

166: magnitude limit $B_J<20.85\,$mag.  Spectra for the first 10000 QSOs

167: observed are shown in Fig.~ref{fig:spec}.

168: At the time of writing (November 2000), we have observed over 32000

169: QSO candidates, resulting in the identification of more than 15000 QSOs.

170: 

171: Galactic stars represent the largest single contaminant in the

172: survey (25\%), including almost 1500 white dwarfs. 

173: Narrow emission line galaxies ($0<z<0.6$) comprise a

174: further 10\% of the sample.  The spectroscopic catalogue will be

175: released to the community in two stages.  First, an initial release of

176: 20000 objects (including 10000 QSOs) will be made by June 30, 2001.

177: The release will include positions, redshift, spectra and a detailed

178: coverage map of the survey.  The final catalogue release will be made

179: one year after the survey is completed in February 2002.  The data

180: will be available from the 2QZ catalogue home page {\tt

181: http://www.2dfquasar.org}.  The input catalogue is already available

182: from this site.

183: 

184: \section{Preliminary Results}

185: \subsection{QSO Spectra}

186: 

187: The composite spectrum based on the co-addition of the first 10000 QSO

188: spectra is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:comp}.  Full details of this work will be presented

189: in Smith et al. (2001, in preparation).  

190: \begin{figure}

191: \centering

192: \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth,angle=270]{2qz_lbqs_offset.ps}

193: \caption{Composite spectra for the 2QZ (lower) and LBQS (upper) samples.}

194: \label{fig:comp}

195: \end{figure}

196: 

197: The composite based on the 1000 QSOs

198: identified the Large Bright QSO survey (LBQS)\cite{f91} is

199: shown for comparison.  The LBQS composite is based on QSOs that are,

200: on average, 10 times more luminous than those identified in the 2QZ.

201: However, the two composites are almost identical.  In particular, 

202: the equivalent widths of the broad

203: emission lines (including CIV) are the same between the two surveys,

204: providing further evidence that the `Baldwin' effect is weak or

205: non-existent in optically-selected QSO catalogues\cite{z92}.  

206: The only difference in the emission line properties occurs

207: for the narrow lines; the LBQS composite exhibiting much stronger

208: narrow [OII] and [OIII] emission compared to the 2QZ composite.  

209: Given the correlation between host mass and QSO luminosity\cite{m99}, 

210: this suggests that the size/luminosity 

211: of the narrow line region is simply proportional to the mass of the host 

212: galaxy.

213: 

214: \subsection{QSO Luminosity Function}

215: 

216: The QSO luminosity function (LF) based on the first 5000 QSOs

217: identified in the 2QZ and the 1000 QSOs in the LBQS is shown in 

218: Fig.~\ref{fig:olf}  Full details of the analysis are given by Boyle et

219: al. (2000)\cite{b00}.  

220: 

221: \begin{figure}

222: \centering

223: \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{olf.ps}

224: \caption{Binned estimate of the $0.35<z<2.3$ QSO optical luminosity 

225: function derived from the 2QZ and LBQS samples. Reproduced from Boyle

226: et al.\ (2000).}

227: \label{fig:olf}

228: \end{figure}

229: 

230: For an $\Omega_{\rm m}=1$ Universe, the QSO LF

231: is given by a two power law model:

232: \[

233: \Phi(L,z)=\dfrac{\Phi^*}{\left[\left(\dfrac{L}{L^*(z)}\right)^{\alpha}+

234: \left(\dfrac{L}{L^*(z)}\right)^{\beta}\right]},

235: \]

236: \noindent

237: where there parameter values lie in the range 

238: $3.45<\alpha<3.75$, $1.55<\beta<1.96$, $-23<M_B^*<-22$ and 

239: $\Phi^*=10^{-6}$Mpc$^{-3}$mag$^{-1}$.  The evolution of the 

240: LF over the range $0.35<z<2.3$ can be fitted by a pure luminosity 

241: evolution model of the form:

242: \[

243: L^*(z)\propto L^*(0)10^{1.40z-0.27z^2}.

244: \]

245: This form of evolution is consistent with the $L(z)\propto (1+z)^3$

246: form previously derived for the redshift range $0.3<z<2$.  However the

247: exponential form of the relation provides for a slow down in the 

248: rate of PLE at $z>2$; peaking at $z=2.5$, beyond the 80\% completeness

249: limit for the survey.

250: 

251: \subsection{QSO correlation function}

252: 

253: The QSO correlation function based on the first 8000 QSOs

254: in the 2QZ is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:xi}.  

255: Full details of the analysis are presented 

256: in Croom et al. (2001)\cite{c01}.  

257: 

258: \begin{figure}

259: \centering

260: \includegraphics[width=0.60\textwidth]{xi2qz.ps}

261: \caption{Estimate of the mean QSO correlation function

262: function over the redshift range $0.35<z<2.9$ ($\Omega_{\rm m}=1)$.  

263: Reproduced from Croom et al.\ (2001).}

264: \label{fig:xi}

265: \end{figure}

266: 

267: 

268: At $r<20$h$^{-1}$ Mpc the correlation 

269: function, $\xi(r)$, determined over the full 2QZ redshift

270: range $0.35<z<2.9$ is a good fit to a power law of the form;

271: \[

272: \xi(r)=\left(\dfrac{r}{r_0}\right)^{-\gamma},

273: \]

274: \noindent

275: where the $\gamma=1.5$ and $r_0=4.5\pm1.0$h$^{-1}$Mpc ($\Omega_{\rm

276: m}=1$) at a mean redshift $z=1.4$.  This is comparable to the

277: present-day clustering of optically-selected galaxies.  The

278: clustering scale length $r_O$ shows little or no dependence on 

279: redshift when the sample is split into smaller redshift intervals.

280: 

281: For a flat Universe with $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$, the mean

282: scale length over the redshift range $0.35<z<2.9$ increases to

283: $r_0=5.9\pm1.0$h$^{-1}$Mpc, and exhibits a strong evolution with

284: redshift, with $r_0$ increasing towards high redshifts.

285: 

286: Biasing models for QSO formation based on the

287: Press-Schechter formalism\cite{m97} are consistent with

288: the observed evolution in $r_0$ for halo masses of

289: $10^{12}$M$_{\odot}$ ($\Omega_{\rm m}=1$) and $10^{13}$M$_{\odot}$

290: ($\Omega_{\rm m}=0.3$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$).  Comparison with CDM

291: models yields values for the shape parameter $\Gamma\sim0.2$

292: ($\Omega_{\rm m}=1$), $\Gamma\sim0.1$ ($\Omega_{\rm m}=0.3$,

293: $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$).

294: 

295: \subsection{QSO power spectrum}

296: 

297: We have also determined the QSO power spectrum from the first $\sim

298: 6000$ QSOs in the survey (Hoyle et al. 2001, in preparation).  

299: 

300: \begin{figure}

301: \centering

302: \includegraphics[width=0.70\textwidth]{pk.ps}

303: \caption{The QSO power spectrum obtained from the first

304: 6000 QSOs in the 2QZ, shown for both a $\Omega_{\rm m}=1$ and

305: $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.3$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$ Universe.

306: The APM P(k) from Baugh \& Efstathiou (1993) is

307: also shown. Reproduced from Hoyle et al., in preparation.}

308: \label{fig:pk}

309: \end{figure}

310: 

311: Over scales $20-150$h$^{-1}$Mpc, the QSO redshift-space power spectrum

312: (see Fig.\ref{fig:pk}) shows a similar shape, $P(k)\propto k^{-1.6}$,

313: to that measured for galaxies and clusters at low redshift.  The

314: amplitude of the QSO power spectrum is similar to the present epoch

315: galaxy power spectrum for $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.3$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$

316: and a factor of 2 lower for $\Omega_{\rm m}=1$.  At larger scales, the

317: QSO power spectrum displays excess power over that derived from the

318: APM galaxy survey\cite{be93} Fitting CDM models to the observed QSO

319: spectrum yields low values of $\Gamma$ consistent with those obtained from

320: the analysis of the correlation function.

321: 

322: \section{Conclusions}

323: 

324: The 2QZ is now over 60\% complete.  It has already begun to provide

325: important new information on the spectral properties, luminosity

326: function, evolution and clustering of QSOs.  The initial catalogue of

327: 10000 QSOs will be publically released by June 30, 2001.  Combined

328: with other major QSO surveys (SDSS, FIRST), the 2QZ should result in a

329: much greater understanding of both the QSO phenomenon and the

330: evolution of large-scale structure in the early Universe.

331: 

332: \begin{thebibliography}{7}

333: \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{References}

334: 

335: \bibitem{be93} Baugh, C., \& Efstathiou, G.P., 1993, MNRAS, 265, 143

336: 

337: \bibitem{b00} Boyle, B.J., Shanks, T., Croom, S M. Smith, R.J., Miller, L.,

338: Loaring, N. \& Heymans, C. 2000, MNRAS, 317, 1014

339: 

340: \bibitem{c99} Colless, M. 1999 in Large Scale Structure in the Universe,  eds 

341: G.P. Efstathiou, R.S. Ellis, J.E. Gunn, D. York, 

342: (London: Royal Society), 105

343: 

344: \bibitem{cs96} Croom, S.M., \& Shanks, T. 1996, MNRAS, 281, 893

345: 

346: \bibitem{c01} Croom, S.M., Shanks, T., Boyle, B.J., Smith R.J., Miller, L., Loaring N.S.,  \& Hoyle, F. 2001, MNRAS, in press 

347: 

348: \bibitem{f91} Francis, P.J., Hewett, P.C., Foltz, C.B., Chaffee, F.H., Weymann, R.J., \& Morris, S.L. 1991, ApJ, 373, 465 

349: 

350: \bibitem{m97} Mataresse, S., Coles, P., Lucchin, F., \& Moscardini, L. 1997, MNRAS, 286, 115

351: 

352: \bibitem{m99} McLure, R.J., Dunlop, J.S., Kukula, M.J., Baum, S.A., O'Dea, C.P., \& Hughes, D.H. 1999, MNRAS, 308, 377

353: 

354: \bibitem{s01a} Smith R.J., Croom, S.M., Boyle, B.J., Shanks, T., Miller, L., \& Loaring, N.S. 2001a, MNRAS, submitted

355: 

356: \bibitem{s01b} Smith R.J., Croom, S.M., Boyle, B.J., Shanks, T., Miller, L., \& Loaring, N.S. 2001b, PASA, in press

357: 

358: \bibitem{z92} Zamorani, G., Marano, B., Mignoli, M., Zitelli, V., \& Boyle, B.J. 1992, MNRAS, 256, 238

359: 

360: \end{thebibliography}

361: \end{document}

362: 

363: 

364: 

365: 

366: 

367: 

368: 

369: 

370: 

371: