1: %\documentstyle[aaspp4,aabib]{article}

2: \documentstyle[aas2pp4,twoside,aabib]{article}

3: %\documentstyle[emulateapj]{article}

4: %\documentstyle[aasms4,twoside,aabib]{article}

5: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.2cm}

6: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{-1.0cm}

7: \input epsf

8: %

9: \def\s2n{S^{\prime}/N}

10: \def\vecr{{\bf r}}

11: \def\vecdr{{\bf \Delta r}}

12: \def\dr{{\Delta r}}

13: \def\aq{{\langle Q \rangle}}

14: %

15: \newcommand{\Tco}{$^{12}$CO}

16: \newcommand{\JTco}{J=1$\rightarrow$0~$^{12}$CO}

17: \newcommand{\tco}{$^{13}$CO}

18: \newcommand{\Jtco}{J=1$\rightarrow$0~$^{13}$CO}

19: \def\vecr{{\bf r}}

20: \def\vecdr{{\bf \Delta r}}

21: \def\dr{{\Delta r}}

22: \def\aq{{\langle Q \rangle}}

23: %

24: \def\inlinefig{1}

25: %

26: 

27: \begin{document}

28: \title{A New Method to Measure and Map the Gas Scale--Height of Disk Galaxies}

29: 

30: \author{Paolo Padoan\footnote{ppadoan@cfa.harvard.edu},

31: Sungeun Kim\footnote{skim@cfa.harvard.edu},

32: Alyssa Goodman\footnote{agoodman@cfa.harvard.edu}}

33: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138}

34: \author{and Lister Staveley--Smith}

35: \affil{Australia Telescope National Facility, CSIRO, PO Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia}

36: 

37: \begin{abstract}

38: 

39: We propose a new method to measure and map the gas scale height of nearby disk

40: galaxies. This method is applied successfully

41: to the Australia Telescope Compact Array interferometric HI survey of the Large 

42: Magellanic Cloud (LMC); it could also be applied to a significant number of nearby 

43: disk galaxies, thanks to the next generation of interferometric facilities, such as 

44: the extended VLA and CARMA.  

45: 

46: The method consists of computing the Spectral Correlation Function (SCF) for a  

47: spectral--line map of a face--on galaxy. The SCF quantifies the correlation

48: between spectra at different map positions as a function of their separation,

49: and is sensitive to the properties of both the gas mass distribution and the

50: gas velocity field. It is likely that spatial correlation properties of the gas

51: density and velocity fields in a galactic disk are sensitive to the value of the 

52: scale height of the gas disk. A scale--free turbulent cascade is unlikely to 

53: extend to scales much larger than the disk scale height, as the disk dynamics 

54: on those larger scales should be dominated by two dimensional motions. 

55: 

56: We find a clear feature in the SCF of the LMC HI disk, on the scale of 

57: $\approx 180$~pc, which we identify as the disk scale height. We are 

58: also tentatively able to map variations of the scale height over the disk. 

59: 

60:  

61: \end{abstract}

62: 

63: \keywords{

64: turbulence -- ISM: kinematics and dynamics -- radio astronomy: interstellar: lines

65: }

66: %

67: %\begin{slocitlum}{2}

68: %

69: 

70: \section{Introduction}

71: 

72: The gas scale height of galactic disks is an important quantity related to 

73: the process of star formation. It can be used to constrain the surface 

74: density of matter, the balance between star formation processes and gravity, 

75: and the ISM pressure, which must be important for regulating star formation.

76: 

77: Optical images of edge--on 

78: galaxies show that the scale height of stellar disks are independent of 

79: position along their major axis (Van der Kruit \& Searle 1981, 1982; Kylafis 

80: \& Bahcall 1987; Shaw and Gilmore 1990; Barnaby \& Thronson 1992), or 

81: slowly increasing with radius (de Grijs \& Peletier 1997). 

82: The constancy of the stellar scale height must be related to the radial and 

83: vertical distribution of the gas, since molecular clouds (MCs) are responsible

84: for both the formation of stars and the dynamical heating of the stellar disk

85: (Spitzer \& Schwarzschild 1951).

86: 

87: \nocite{vanderKruit+Searle81} \nocite{vanderKruit+Searle82} 

88: \nocite{Kylafis+Bahcall87} \nocite{Shaw+Gilmore90} \nocite{Barnaby+Thronson92} 

89: \nocite{deGrijs+Peletier97} \nocite{Spitzer+Schwarzschild51}

90: 

91: The vertical distribution of neutral hydrogen in our Galaxy has been studied

92: by many authors. It is found that the HI scale height $h$ is approximately 

93: constant over a large range of galactocentric radii (Dickey \& Lockman 1990; 

94: Heiles 1991). It is commonly assumed that the HI gas is supported in the 

95: Galactic gravitational potential primarily by turbulence (Lockman \& Gehman 1991), 

96: with contributions from magnetic and cosmic ray pressure (Parker 1966; Spitzer 1990) 

97: and radiation (Ferrara 1993). 

98: 

99: \nocite{Dickey+Lockman90} \nocite{Heiles91} \nocite{Lockman+Gehman91}

100: \nocite {Parker66} \nocite{Spitzer90} \nocite{Ferrara93}

101: 

102: The constancy of the gas scale height in galactic disks is a common assumption

103: in several models. However, it should not be taken for granted, since direct 

104: measurements of the HI scale height in external galaxies are difficult and 

105: sparse, and the HI scale height has never been mapped in a face--on galaxy. 

106: A nearby edge-on galaxy where the HI distribution has been studied with 

107: very high linear resolution is NGC 891. Sancisi \& Allen (1979) found the 

108: HI disk of NGC 891 to be less than 1~kpc thick near the center, increasing 

109: outwards up to 1--2 kpc. The HI disk flare is not confirmed in the later 

110: study by Swaters, Sancisi \& van der Hulst (1997), where a significant HI 

111: halo component is instead identified, and it is pointed out that the inferred 

112: HI vertical density profile is dependent on the adopted kinematic model.    

113: The CO scale height for the same galaxy ($\approx 220$~pc) has also been 

114: estimated (Scoville et al. 1993).

115: 

116: \nocite{Sancisi+Allen79} \nocite{Swaters+97} \nocite{Scoville+93}

117: 

118: In this Letter we propose a new method to measure and map the HI scale height 

119: of face--on galaxies. The method is based on the application of the Spectral 

120: Correlation Function (SCF) to HI interferometric surveys. The SCF 

121: (Rosolowsky et al. 1999; Padoan, Rosolowsky \& Goodman 2001) quantifies 

122: the correlation between spectra at different map positions as a function of 

123: their separation, and is sensitive to the properties of both 

124: the gas mass distribution and the gas velocity field. The scale 

125: corresponding to the scale height of the HI disk should mark the 

126: transition from small--scale three--dimensional turbulence to two--dimensional 

127: large--scale motions on the disk, since the ratio between radius and scale 

128: height of the cold gas in typical disk galaxies is very large ($\sim 100$). 

129: This transition should appear as a feature in the SCF at a spatial lag 

130: approximately equal to the HI scale height. On smaller scales the SCF 

131: should instead be a power law reflecting the self--similar nature of 

132: turbulence, as in MCs (Padoan, Rosolowsky \& Goodman 2001).

133: 

134: \nocite{Rosolowsky+99} \nocite{Padoan+2001SCF}

135: 

136: We have applied this method to the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) 

137: interferometric HI survey of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) by Kim et 

138: al. (1998a,b, 1999), combined with the single dish survey done with the 

139: Parkes Multibeam by Staveley--Smith et al. (in preparation). Results of 

140: the combined survey are presented in Kim et al. (in preparation --see 

141: also astro--ph/0009299). We find that the SCF is indeed a power law 

142: on small scale, and has a characteristic feature at approximately 

143: 180~pc, where the power law is interrupted. We identify the scale 

144: of the clear ``break'' in the SCF as the HI scale height. We are also 

145: able to map significant variations of the scale height over the disk, 

146: between $\approx 140$ and 240~pc.

147: 

148: \nocite{Kim+98a} \nocite{Kim+98b} \nocite{Kim+99}

149: 

150: In a recent work, Elmegreen, Kim \& Staveley--Smith (2001) have computed 

151: the power spectrum of HI intensity maps of the LMC from the same survey 

152: used in this work. They find that the power spectrum of intensity is 

153: steeper on small scales than on large ones. The transition occurs at 

154: approximately 80--100~pc, and is interpreted as the line of sight 

155: thickness of the cold HI layer. 

156: %

157: \nocite{Elmegreen+2001LMC} \nocite{Lazarian+Pogosian2000}

158: %

159: The present Letter is qualitatively a confirmation of this earlier result, 

160: in the sense that both works show the possibility of using the statistical 

161: information from HI interferometric surveys to estimate the HI scale 

162: height of a face--on galaxy. 

163: 

164: 

165: 

166: \section{The SCF Method}

167: 

168: 

169: The Spectral Correlation Function (SCF) measures the correlation between 

170: spectra at different map positions as a function of their spatial separation, 

171: and is sensitive to the properties of the gas mass distribution and the gas 

172: velocity field (Rosolowsky et al. 1999; Padoan, Rosolowsky \& Goodman 2001).

173: 

174: Let $T(\vecr,v)$ be the antenna temperature as a function of velocity 

175: channel $v$ at map position $\vecr$. The SCF for spectra with spatial 

176: separation $\dr$ is: 

177: 

178: \begin{equation}

179: S_0(\dr)=\left\langle \frac{S_0(\vecr,\dr)}{S_{0,{\rm N}}(\vecr)} \right\rangle _{\vecr},

180: \label{1}

181: \end{equation}

182: %

183: where the average is done over all map positions $\vecr$. $S_0(\vecr,\dr)$ 

184: is the SCF uncorrected for the effects of noise,

185: \begin{equation}

186: S_0(\vecr,\dr)=\left\langle 1- \sqrt{\frac{\Sigma_v[T(\vecr,v)-T(\vecr+\vecdr,v)]^2}

187: {\Sigma_vT(\vecr,v)^2+\Sigma_vT(\vecr+\vecdr,v)^2}} \right\rangle _{\vecdr},

188: \label{2}

189: \end{equation}

190: %

191: where the average is limited to separation vectors $\vecdr$ with $|\vecdr|=\dr$,

192: and $S_{0,{\rm N}}(\vecr)$ is the SCF due entirely to noise,

193: \begin{equation}

194: S_{0,{\rm N}}(\vecr)=1-\frac{1}{Q(\vecr)},

195: \label{3}

196: \end{equation}

197: %

198: and $Q(\vecr)$ is the ``spectrum quality'' (see discussion in Padoan, Rosolowsky \& 

199: Goodman 2001). $Q(\vecr)$ is computed as the ratio of the rms signal within a 

200: velocity window $W$ to the rms noise, $N$,

201: % 

202: \begin{equation}

203: Q(\vecr)=\frac{1}{N}\sqrt{\frac{\sum_v T(\vecr,v)^2dv}{W}},

204: \label{4}

205: \end{equation}

206: %

207: where $dv$ is the width of the velocity channels.

208: 

209: The SCF has been computed for both molecular cloud data and synthetic data obtained

210: by solving the radiative transfer through the three--dimensional density and velocity 

211: fields of numerical simulations of super--sonic MHD turbulence. 

212: The result is typically a power law that extends up to a separation $\dr$ comparable

213: to the map size, reflecting the self--similarity of super--sonic turbulence (see Padoan, 

214: Rosolowsky \& Goodman 2001, and references therein).

215: 

216: \ifnum\inlinefig=1

217: \begin{figure}[!th]

218: \centerline{\epsfxsize=8.2cm \epsfbox{fig1.eps}}

219: \caption[]{%

220: Velocity integrated HI intensity in the LMC from the ATCA 

221: interferometric survey by Kim et al. (1998a,b, 1999), combined 

222: with the single dish survey done with the Parkes Multibeam by 

223: Staveley--Smith et al. (in preparation). The perimeter of 

224: each of the 25 regions used to compute the SCF is over--plotted.}

225: \label{fig1}

226: \end{figure}

227: \fi

228: 

229: \ifnum\inlinefig=1

230: \begin{figure}[!th]

231: \centerline{\epsfxsize=8.7cm \epsfbox{fig2.eps}}

232: \caption[]{%

233: The SCF for the third and fourth column of regions from

234: Figure~1. The regions are given coordinates (x,y) starting from (0,0) at the 

235: bottom left corner of the $5\times 5$ square in Figure~1.}

236: \label{fig2}

237: \end{figure}

238: \fi

239: 

240: \ifnum\inlinefig=1

241: \begin{figure}[!th]

242: \centerline{\epsfxsize=8.2cm \epsfbox{fig3.eps}}

243: \caption[]{%

244: Contour map of the SCF scale height of the LMC disk. Values of contour 

245: lines are in pc. The intensity map shows the HI integrated intensity 

246: as in Figure~1.}

247: \label{fig3}

248: \end{figure}

249: \fi

250: 

251: 

252: 

253: \section{The SCF and the Scale--Height of the LMC HI Disk}

254: 

255: We have computed the SCF for several regions of the Australia Telescope 

256: Compact Array (ATCA) interferometric HI survey of the Large Magellanic Cloud 

257: (LMC) by Kim et al. (1998a,b, 1999), combined with the single dish survey 

258: done with the Parkes Multibeam by Staveley--Smith et al. (in preparation).

259: The original data has been rebinned to a resolution of 80'', that is a linear

260: resolution of 20~pc assuming a distance to the LMC of 50~kpc (Feast 1991). 

261: We therefore obtain a map made of $350\times350$ spectra ($7\times 7$~kpc), 

262: with 120 velocity channels. The velocity resolution is 1.65~km/s. Details 

263: about the ATCA survey can be found in Kim et al. (1998a,b, 1999).

264: 

265: \nocite{Feast91}

266: 

267: The finite size of a map with non--periodic boundaries generates edge effects

268: in correlation functions. In order to avoid this problem, we have

269: computed the SCF for subsets of $50\times 50$ spectra ($1\times 1$~kpc),

270: excluding the data from the ``edges'' of the map. The spectra 

271: in each subset have been compared with all spectra within a larger area around that 

272: subset, including $150\times 150$ spectra ($3\times 3$~kpc). In this way the SCF for 

273: all the spectra in each subset can be computed up to a separation equal to the size 

274: of the subset (1~kpc), without any effects related to the finite size of the map. 

275: 

276: Figure~1 shows the integrated HI intensity map of the LMC, divided into $7\times 7$

277: subsets with $50\times 50$ spectra each. The SCF has been computed only for the 

278: $5\times 5$ central ones (delimited by the darker square) for which complete sets

279: of $150\times 150$ reference spectra are available. For lack of space, we have 

280: plotted in Figure~2 only the SCF computed inside the area marked with the

281: rectangle in Figure~1.  

282: 

283: Figure~2 shows that the SCF is a power law on small scales over almost an order 

284: of magnitude range in spectral separation $\dr$. The power law slope of the SCF 

285: varies from -0.40 to -0.15 over the whole map. The power law is very clearly 

286: interrupted at $\approx 180$~pc, where the slope of the SCF generally decreases. 

287: In 22 of the 25 regions, the SCF breaks to a ``shallower'' slope on larger

288: scales. It sometimes becomes steeper again on the scale of a few hundred pc,

289: due probably to the effect of differential rotation, which grows with 

290: increasing spectral separation. In only 3 of the 25 cases, the SCF breaks from 

291: a power law to a ``steeper'' slope. This happens in the 3 regions around 

292: the location of 30 Doradus, and south of it (the 3 regions covering

293: the largest intensity feature on the bottom left of the map in Figure~1). 

294: 

295: We interpret the interruption of the power law shape of the SCF as the outer scale

296: of three dimensional super--sonic turbulence in the LMC disk. A scale--free 

297: cascade of three dimensional turbulence is unlikely to extend to scales much

298: larger than the disk scale height, as virtually two dimensional flows should 

299: dominate the dynamics on those larger scales. 

300: The power law shape of the SCF for the HI data reflects the presence

301: of self--similar turbulence, probably extending to much smaller scale than probed by 

302: the present survey (20~pc in our rebinned data). Below 20~pc the turbulent cascade

303: is well--probed by the SCF of molecular emission line maps (see Padoan, Rosolowsky 

304: \& Goodman 2001). 

305: 

306: Assuming that the the SCF is indeed sensitive to the HI scale height, $h$, we 

307: find that $h$ varies in the range $130<h<280$~pc over the surveyed area. 

308: The largest value is found in the region around 30 Doradus.

309: Statistical error bars are smaller than the size of the symbols used in the 

310: plots in Figure~2, and variations of $h$ are therefore significant. 

311: Figure~3 shows a contour map of $h$ over the $5\times 5$ regions where the 

312: SCF has been computed. The average value is $\langle h\rangle\approx 176$~pc. 

313: Kim et al. (1999) estimated the HI scale height using the average 

314: vertical velocity dispersion and the average surface density of both the HI 

315: and the stellar components of the LMC disk, and adopting the disk model by 

316: Dopita \& Ryder (1994). They found $h\approx 180$~pc. This is almost

317: identical to the value of $\langle h\rangle$ estimated with the SCF method,

318: which is the main reason why we interpret the outer correlation scale 

319: of the SCF as the local value of the disk scale height. 

320: Nevertheless, we cannot rule out possible alternative 

321: interpretations of the SCF results, and the subject deserves further study.

322: 

323: \nocite{Dopita+Ryder94}

324:  

325: Elmegreen, Kim \& Staveley--Smith (2001) have recently computed the power

326: spectrum of HI intensity maps of the LMC obtained with data from the same survey

327: used in this work. They find a steeper power spectrum on small scales than on 

328: large ones. The transition occurs at approximately 80--100~pc, and is interpreted 

329: as the line of sight thickness of the HI layer, based the theoretical results by

330: Lazarian \& Pogosian (2000).  

331: 

332: In this work we confirm the possibility of using the statistical information 

333: from HI interferometric surveys to estimate the HI scale height of a face--on 

334: galaxy. However, there is a fundamental difference between the present Letter 

335: and the work by Elmegreen, Kim \& Staveley--Smith (2001), apart from the 

336: different method of data analysis adopted. Elmegreen, Kim \& Staveley--Smith 

337: (2001) implicitly assume that the three dimensional power spectrum of the 

338: turbulent density field is described by a unique power law over all scales, 

339: and the change in slope of the two dimensional power spectrum of integrated 

340: intensity is merely a projection effect. Here instead we argue that there 

341: must be a physical transition in the statistical properties of the flow on 

342: a scale close to the disk scale height, which the SCF is sensitive to. 

343: 

344: 

345: 

346: 

347: \section{Conclusions}

348: 

349: 

350: We have proposed a new way to measure and map the scale height of the gas

351: in face--on disk galaxies, based on the application of the SCF to HI interferometric

352: surveys. We have shown that this method applies successfully to the LMC.

353: It can be applied to a number of nearby galaxies, depending on the spatial and

354: velocity resolution of HI or molecular transition interferometric surveys.

355: The BIMA survey of nearby galaxies, BIMA SONG (Regan et al. 2001), 

356: for example, has an angular resolution

357: of approximately 6'' (using the D and C array configurations), and can achieve

358: approximately 3'', with the B array configuration. At the distance of 4 Mpc, 

359: a 3'' resolution corresponds to a linear resolution of $\approx 60$~pc. 

360: There are six galaxies within the approximate distance range between 2 and 4.5 Mpc, 

361: in the BIMA SONG list: IC0342, NGC2403, NGC2976, NGC3031, NGC4736 and NGC4826. 

362: They could in principle be studied with this method. Problems with the CO surveys 

363: may arise due to the low surface filling factor of CO relative to HI, and, in the 

364: particular case of the BIMA SONG survey, due to the relatively low velocity 

365: resolution (4.06~km/s). However, a velocity resolution of approximately

366: 1.0~km/s could be easily achieved with BIMA in these galaxies (Tamara T. Helfer,

367: private communication). 

368: 

369: \nocite{Regan+2001}

370: 

371: For 21-cm HI observations, a 50-km baseline in a radio interferometer gives

372: a resolution of 16 pc at 4 Mpc. At 3-mm, CO gives the same kind of resolution 

373: on a 0.7-km baseline. Therefore, the synthesized beams of the immediate descendants 

374: of existing cm and mm interferometers (e.g. the EVLA and CARMA) should be able to map 

375: many galaxies with more--than--adequate resolution for the SCF to be used to measure, 

376: and map out, galactic scale height. 

377: 

378: The application of this method to a number of galaxies could provide new important

379: measurements of the gas scale height and its variations inside individual disks and 

380: between different galaxies. Once the scale height is measured, it can also be used, 

381: together with the observed vertical velocity dispersion, to put new constraints on 

382: the distribution of dynamical mass in galactic disks.

383: 

384: 

385: 

386: 

387: \acknowledgements

388: 

389: We are grateful to Jos\'{e} Franco for helpful comments.

390: This work was supported by NSF grant AST-9721455.

391: 

392: 

393: %\clearpage

394: 

395: %\bibliographystyle{aabib}

396: %\bibliography{padoan,MC,GALAXIES}

397: 

398: \begin{thebibliography}{}

399: 

400: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Barnaby} \&

401:   {Thronson}}{1992}]{Barnaby+Thronson92}

402: {Barnaby}, D., {Thronson}, H.~A. 1992, \aj, 103, 41

403: 

404: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{de Grijs} \&

405:   {Peletier}}{1997}]{deGrijs+Peletier97}

406: {de Grijs}, R., {Peletier}, R.~F. 1997, \aap, 320, L21

407: 

408: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Dickey} \& {Lockman}}{1990}]{Dickey+Lockman90}

409: {Dickey}, J.~M., {Lockman}, F.~J. 1990, \araa, 28, 215

410: 

411: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Dopita} \& {Ryder}}{1994}]{Dopita+Ryder94}

412: {Dopita}, M.~A., {Ryder}, S.~D. 1994, \apj, 430, 163

413: 

414: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{Elmegreen et~al.}{2001}]{Elmegreen+2001LMC}

415: Elmegreen, B.~B., Kim, S., Staveley-Smith, L. 2001, \apj, (astro-ph/0010578)

416: 

417: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Feast}}{1991}]{Feast91}

418: {Feast}, M.~W. 1991,

419: \newblock in T.~S. et~al. (ed.), Observational Tests of Cosmological Inflation,

420:   Dordrecht: Kluwer,  147

421: 

422: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Ferrara}}{1993}]{Ferrara93}

423: {Ferrara}, A. 1993, \apj, 407, 157

424: 

425: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{Heiles}{1991}]{Heiles91}

426: Heiles, C. 1991,

427: \newblock in H. Bloemen (ed.), The Interstellar Disk--Halo Connection in

428:   Galaxies, Dordrecht: Kluwer,  433

429: 

430: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Kim} et~al.}{1999}]{Kim+99}

431: {Kim}, S., {Dopita}, M.~A., {Staveley-Smith}, L., {Bessell}, M.~S. 1999, \aj,

432:   118, 2797

433: 

434: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Kim} et~al.}{1998a}]{Kim+98b}

435: {Kim}, S., {Staveley-Smith}, L., {Dopita}, M.~A., {Freeman}, K.~C., {Sault},

436:   R.~J., {Kesteven}, M.~J., {McConnell}, D. 1998a, \apj, 503, 674

437: 

438: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Kim} et~al.}{1998b}]{Kim+98a}

439: {Kim}, S., {Staveley-Smith}, L., {Sault}, R.~J., {Kesteven}, M.~J.,

440:   {McConnell}, D., {Dopita}, M.~A., {Bessell}, M. 1998b, Publications of the

441:   Astronomical Society of Australia, 15, 132

442: 

443: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Kylafis} \& {Bahcall}}{1987}]{Kylafis+Bahcall87}

444: {Kylafis}, N.~D., {Bahcall}, J.~N. 1987, \apj, 317, 637

445: 

446: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Lazarian} \&

447:   {Pogosyan}}{2000}]{Lazarian+Pogosian2000}

448: {Lazarian}, A., {Pogosyan}, D. 2000, \apj, 537, 720

449: 

450: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Lockman} \& {Gehman}}{1991}]{Lockman+Gehman91}

451: {Lockman}, F.~J., {Gehman}, C.~S. 1991, \apj, 382, 182

452: 

453: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{Padoan et~al.}{2001}]{Padoan+2001SCF}

454: Padoan, P., Rosolowsky, E.~W., Goodman, A.~A. 2001, ApJ,  (in press --also

455:   astro--ph/0010344)

456: 

457: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Parker}}{1966}]{Parker66}

458: {Parker}, E.~N. 1966, \apj, 145, 811

459: 

460: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Regan} et~al.}{2001}]{Regan+2001}

461: {Regan}, M.~W., {Thornley}, M.~D., {Helfer}, T.~T., {Sheth}, K., {Wong}, T.,

462:   {Vogel}, S.~N., {Blitz}, L., {Bock}, D. C.-J. 2001, \apj,  (submitted)

463: 

464: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{Rosolowsky et~al.}{1999}]{Rosolowsky+99}

465: Rosolowsky, E, W., Goodman, A.~A., Wilner, D.~J., Williams, J.~P. 1999, ApJ,

466:   524, 887

467: 

468: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Sancisi} \& {Allen}}{1979}]{Sancisi+Allen79}

469: {Sancisi}, R., {Allen}, R.~J. 1979, \aap, 74, 73

470: 

471: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Scoville} et~al.}{1993}]{Scoville+93}

472: {Scoville}, N.~Z., {Thakkar}, D., {Carlstrom}, J.~E., {Sargent}, A.~I. 1993,

473:   \apjl, 404, L59

474: 

475: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Shaw} \& {Gilmore}}{1990}]{Shaw+Gilmore90}

476: {Shaw}, M.~A., {Gilmore}, G. 1990, \mnras, 242, 59

477: 

478: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Spitzer}}{1990}]{Spitzer90}

479: {Spitzer}, L.~J. 1990, \araa, 28, 71

480: 

481: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Spitzer} \&

482:   {Schwarzschild}}{1951}]{Spitzer+Schwarzschild51}

483: {Spitzer}, L.~J., {Schwarzschild}, M. 1951, \apj, 114, 385

484: 

485: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Swaters} et~al.}{1997}]{Swaters+97}

486: {Swaters}, R.~A., {Sancisi}, R., {van der Hulst}, J.~M. 1997, \apj, 491, 140

487: 

488: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{van der Kruit} \&

489:   {Searle}}{1981}]{vanderKruit+Searle81}

490: {van der Kruit}, P.~C., {Searle}, L. 1981, \aap, 95, 116

491: 

492: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{van der Kruit} \&

493:   {Searle}}{1982}]{vanderKruit+Searle82}

494: {van der Kruit}, P.~C., {Searle}, L. 1982, \aap, 110, 79

495: 

496: \end{thebibliography}

497: 

498: 

499: 

500: 

501: \ifnum\inlinefig=0

502: \clearpage

503: 

504: 

505: \onecolumn

506: 

507: {\bf Figure captions:} \\

508: 

509: {\bf Figure \ref{fig1}:} Velocity integrated HI intensity in the LMC from the ATCA 

510: interferometric survey by Kim et al. (1998a,b, 1999), combined 

511: with the single dish survey done with the Parkes Multibeam by 

512: Staveley--Smith et al. (in preparation). The perimeter of each of the 

513: 25 regions used to compute the SCF is over over--plotted. \\

514: 

515: {\bf Figure \ref{fig2}:} The SCF for the third and fourth column of regions from

516: Figure~1. The regions are given coordinates (x,y) starting from (0,0) at the bottom

517: left corner of the $5\times 5$ square in Figure~1. \\

518: 

519: 

520: {\bf Figure \ref{fig3}:} Contour map of the SCF scale height of the LMC disk. Values of 

521: contour lines are in pc. The intensity map shows the HI integrated intensity as in Figure~1.\\

522: 

523: \clearpage

524: \begin{figure}

525: \centerline{\epsfxsize=15cm \epsfbox{fig1.ps}}

526: \caption[]{}

527: \label{fig1}

528: \end{figure}

529: 

530: \clearpage

531: \begin{figure}

532: \centerline{\epsfxsize=15cm \epsfbox{fig2.eps}}

533: \caption[]{}

534: \label{fig2}

535: \end{figure}

536: 

537: \clearpage

538: \begin{figure}

539: \centerline{\epsfxsize=15cm \epsfbox{fig3.eps}}

540: \caption[]{}

541: \label{fig3}

542: \end{figure}

543: 

544: 

545: \fi

546: 

547: \end{document}

548: 

549: