1: \documentclass{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[aaspp4]{aastex}
3: %\documentstyle{emulateapj}[article]
4: %\documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
5: \usepackage{emulateapj5}
6: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
7:
8: % Version 1 12/29/00
9: % Version 2 1/18/01 comments from ASW
10: % Version 3 1/19/01 comments from ASW
11: % Version 4 1/22/01 comments from ASW; submitted
12: % Version 5 2/16/01 referee comments
13: % Version 6 2/19/01 comments from ASW; accepted
14:
15: \renewcommand{\tabcolsep}{3pt}
16:
17: \newcommand{\NH}{{$N_{\rm H}$}}
18: \newcommand{\LX}{{$L_{\rm X}$}}
19: \newcommand{\eps}{ergs s$^{-1}$}
20: \newcommand{\pcm}{cm$^{-2}$}
21: \newcommand{\ps}{s$^{-1}$}
22: \newcommand{\chandra}{{\it Chandra}}
23: \newcommand{\asca}{{\it ASCA}}
24: \newcommand{\rosat}{{\it ROSAT}}
25: \newcommand{\Einstein}{{\it Einstein}}
26: \newcommand{\Ginga}{{\it Ginga}}
27:
28: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in {\it The Astrophysical Journal}.}
29:
30: \lefthead{Terashima et al.}
31: \righthead{Chandra Observation of M51}
32:
33: \begin{document}
34:
35: \title{A Chandra Observation of M51: Active Nucleus and
36: Nuclear Outflows}
37:
38: \author{Yuichi Terashima\altaffilmark{1, 2} and
39: Andrew S. Wilson\altaffilmark{2, 3}
40: }
41:
42: \altaffiltext{1}{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 662,Greenbelt, MD 20771}
43:
44: \altaffiltext{2}{Astronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park,
45: MD 20742}
46:
47: \altaffiltext{3}{Adjunct Astronomer, Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700
48: San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218}
49:
50:
51: \begin{abstract}
52:
53: We present a {\chandra} ACIS-S observation of the nuclear region of
54: the nearby spiral galaxy M51 (NGC 5194), which has a low-luminosity
55: Seyfert 2 nucleus. The X-ray image shows the nucleus, southern
56: extranuclear cloud, and northern loop, the morphology of the extended
57: emission being very similar to those seen in radio continuum and
58: optical emission line images. The X-ray spectrum of the nucleus is
59: well represented by a model consisting of soft thermal plasma with $kT
60: \approx 0.5$ keV, a very hard continuum, and an Fe K$\alpha$ emission
61: line at 6.45 keV with an equivalent width of $>$ 2 keV. The very
62: strong Fe line and the flat continuum indicate that the nucleus is
63: obscured by a column density in excess of $10^{24}$ {\pcm} and the
64: spectrum is dominated by reflected emission from cold matter
65: near the nucleus. The X-ray spectra of the extranuclear clouds
66: are well fitted by a thermal plasma model with $kT\approx 0.5$
67: keV. This spectral shape and morphology strongly suggest that the
68: clouds are shock heated by the bi-polar outflow from the nucleus. The
69: shock velocities of the extranuclear cloud and northern loop inferred
70: from the temperatures of the X-ray gas are 690 km {\ps} and 660 km
71: {\ps}, respectively.
72: By assuming a steady-state situation in which the emission of the
73: extranuclear clouds is powered by the jets, the mechanical energy in
74: the jets is found to be comparable to the bolometric luminosity of the
75: nucleus.
76:
77:
78: \end{abstract}
79:
80: \keywords{galaxies: active --- galaxies: individual (M51) --- galaxies:
81: nuclei --- galaxies: Seyfert --- X-rays: galaxies --- shock waves}
82:
83:
84: \section{Introduction}
85:
86: M51 (NGC 5194) is a nearby (distance 8.4 Mpc; Feldmeier et al. 1997)
87: spiral galaxy hosting a low-luminosity active galactic nucleus (AGN).
88: The nucleus shows optical emission lines and is classified as a Seyfert 2
89: (e.g., Ford et al. 1985; Ho, Filippenko, \& Sargent 1997). Radio
90: continuum and optical emission-line observations reveal a bi-polar
91: structure comprising a southern extranuclear cloud (hereafter XNC) and
92: a northern loop; this morphology and the high gas velocities observed
93: are indicative of nuclear outflow
94: (Ford et al. 1985, Cecil 1988, Crane \& van der Hulst
95: 1992). A radio jet connecting the nucleus and the XNC is also seen in
96: a 6 cm image (Crane \& van der Hulst 1992). The optical emission-line
97: clouds are inferred to be heated by the jet emanating from the nucleus.
98:
99: X-ray observations are a powerful tool to investigate the physical
100: nature of these phenomena. However, the spatial resolution of previous
101: observations is not good enough to resolve the structures in the
102: nuclear region. In the soft X-ray regime, extended nuclear emission
103: was detected with the {\Einstein} HRI (Palumbo et al. 1985), the
104: {\rosat} PSPC (Marston et al. 1995), and the {\rosat} HRI (Ehle,
105: Pietsch, \& Beck 1995; Roberts \& Warwick 2000), but only a hint of
106: enhanced emission in the direction towards the XNC is seen in the
107: {\rosat} HRI data. The spectrum of the nuclear region obtained with
108: the {\rosat} PSPC is very soft. Hard X-ray emission,with an X-ray
109: luminosity of 9$\times10^{40}$ {\eps} (2--20 keV) was detected by
110: {\Ginga} and interpreted as a combination of low-mass X-ray binaries
111: in the host galaxy and a highly absorbed AGN (Makishima et al. 1990).
112: Subsequently, {\asca} detected a strong Fe K$\alpha$ emission line
113: with an equivalent width (EW) of $\approx$ 1 keV, which probably comes
114: from the heavily obscured AGN, as well as emission from thermal plasma
115: with a temperature of $\approx$0.5 keV. The 2--10 keV luminosity of
116: the entire galaxy measured by {\asca} was $8.4\times10^{39}$ {\eps}
117: which is about six times smaller than that obtained with {\Ginga}
118: in the same band (Terashima et al. 1998). The reason for this
119: large difference in luminosities has recently been clarified by {\it
120: BeppoSAX} observations. Fukazawa et al. (2001) find that the nucleus
121: is photoelectrically absorbed below 10 keV, but seen directly through
122: the absorption at 20 keV, implying an absorbing column of {\NH} =
123: $5.6\times10^{24}$ {\pcm}. The 2--10 keV luminosity measured by {\it
124: BeppoSAX} was similar to that of {\asca}. Fukazawa et al. (2001)
125: attributed the higher {\Ginga} luminosity to variability of the
126: absorbing column, as long as the {\Ginga} measurement is not contaminated
127: by nearby bright sources. None of these X-ray studies has sufficient
128: spatial resolution to resolve the nucleus and outflows seen in radio
129: continuum and optical [\ion{N}{2}]$\lambda\lambda$6548,6583 images.
130:
131: % Marston et al. phton index = 3.8, 0.38 keV Brems, etc.
132:
133: High spatial resolution X-ray observations with the {\chandra} X-ray
134: observatory can easily resolve the multiple components in the nuclear
135: region and enable us to study the physical nature of the nucleus and
136: outflows, as well as the various X-ray sources in the host galaxy. In
137: this {\it Letter}, we present {\chandra} results on the nuclear region
138: of NGC 5194. Results on the diffuse X-ray emission and discrete X-ray
139: sources seen in the host galaxy will be presented in a future paper. At the
140: distance of 8.4 Mpc, 1 arcsec corresponds to 40.7 pc.
141:
142: \newpage
143:
144: \section{Observation and Data Analysis}
145:
146: M51 was observed on 2000 June 20 with the {\chandra} Advanced CCD
147: Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS; Garmire et al. 2001, in preparation). M51
148: was located on the back illuminated CCD chip S3. The data were reduced
149: using the CIAO software version 1.1.5. Gain correction was made using
150: the latest calibration files. We used only {\it ASCA} event grades 0,
151: 2, 3, 4, and 6 (see {\chandra} Proposer's Observatory Guide,
152: 2000). The background was stable during the observation and a net
153: exposure time of 14865 sec was obtained. The count rates of all the
154: detected sources in the field were relatively low and effects of
155: pileup were negligible. Spectral fits were performed using XSPEC
156: version 11.0 and all the quoted errors are 90\% confidence range for
157: one parameter of interest.
158:
159:
160: \section{Results and Discussion}
161:
162: \subsection{X-ray Images}
163:
164: Our {\chandra} image of NGC 5194 shows X-rays from a bright nuclear
165: region, diffuse emission distributed over the host galaxy, and many
166: discrete sources. The companion galaxy NGC 5195 is also detected in the
167: same field. In this {\it Letter}, we concentrate on the nuclear region
168: of NGC 5194.
169:
170: % \placefigure{fig-1}
171:
172: % \placefigure{fig-2}
173:
174: An expanded image of the central region of NGC 5194 in the 0.5--8 keV
175: band is shown in Figs 1 and 2. In Fig. 1, red, green, and blue colors
176: correspond to the energy bands 0.5--1.3, 1.3--3, and 3--8 keV,
177: respectively. The nucleus, extended features, and a few discrete
178: sources are seen. The extended structures north and south of the
179: nucleus are remarkably similar to the features seen in radio (6 cm ,
180: 20 cm) and [\ion{N}{2}] images, and we refer to them as the northern
181: loop and the XNC, respectively. Fig. 2 shows a 20 cm image (contours,
182: from Ford et al. 1985) overlaid on a {\chandra} image in the 0.5--8
183: keV band. Both images have $\approx 1^{\prime\prime}$ resolution and
184: a close correspondence is seen between the two maps. The nuclei
185: were aligned by shifting the X-ray image by 0.4$^{\prime\prime}$.
186:
187:
188: The color (=hardness) map (Fig. 1) shows that the nucleus has a hard
189: spectrum while the XNC and the northern loop are soft. A spectral
190: analysis (next subsection) shows that the nucleus emits both hard and
191: soft spectral components, the latter being very similar to the spectra
192: of the XNC and northern loop. The north-east part of the XNC is
193: somewhat harder than the rest of the XNC and the northern loop. It is
194: intriguing to note that this region coincides with a bright knot in
195: the [\ion{N}{2}] image from which the broadest optical emission lines
196: (extending over $\sim1500$ km {\ps}) are found (the point P in Cecil
197: 1988). It is also worth noting that the elongation of the nucleus seen
198: in [\ion{N}{2}] is towards the point P, and that the radio jet
199: connects the nucleus and point P (Crane \& van der Hulst 1992). Thus
200: this medium-hardness region might be the site where the jet emanating
201: from the nucleus is currently interacting with the interstellar medium
202: and shock heating it.
203:
204:
205: \subsection{X-ray spectra}
206:
207: % \placefigure{fig-3}
208:
209: \subsubsection{Nucleus}
210:
211: The spectrum of the nucleus was extracted from a circular region with
212: a radius of 1.5 arcsec. The spectrum was binned so that each bin
213: contains at least three counts in order to enhance the visibility of
214: the narrow Fe-K$\alpha$ emission line. In this case, a chi-squared fit
215: is not adequate and a maximum-likelihood method using the C-statistic
216: (Cash 1979) was employed. In the fit with the C-statistic, background
217: cannot be subtracted, so we first constructed a model of the
218: background spectrum. This background model was obtained from an area
219: away from the nucleus, which includes diffuse emission in the host
220: galaxy. The spectrum from this area was fitted by a two temperature
221: ($kT$=0.23 keV, 0.60 keV; abundance 0.16 solar) plasma model plus a
222: flat power law. This fixed background model was then added to the
223: model for the nucleus after normalizing by the geometrical area.
224:
225: The spectrum of the nucleus (Fig. 3a) consists of at least three
226: components, namely a soft component showing emission lines from
227: ionized species, a hard component which dominates the 3--8 keV band,
228: and a strong emission line at 6.4 keV. We modeled the soft component
229: with the optically-thin thermal plasma model MEKAL. Two models were
230: examined for the hard component: an absorbed power law or pure
231: reflection from almost face-on cold matter (Magdziarz \& Zdziarski
232: 1995). The latter corresponds to a situation in which the X-ray emission
233: from the nucleus is almost completely obscured by a column density
234: in excess of $10^{24}$ {\pcm} and only emission scattered by matter
235: near the nucleus is observed. We added a Gaussian component to
236: represent the emission line at 6.4 keV. The absorbed power law and
237: pure reflection model provide a similar quality of fit (C-statistic =
238: 39.1 and 39.6, respectively). The spectral parameters obtained are
239: summarized in Table 1.
240:
241: In the case of the best-fit absorbed power law model, we fixed the
242: photon index of the power law component at 2.0 (typical of unobscured
243: AGN) and obtained an absorption column density of
244: {\NH}=$3.1^{+1.8}_{-1.5}\times10^{23}$ {\pcm}. The emission line
245: centroid energy and equivalent width (EW) are
246: $6.458^{+0.033}_{-0.039}$ keV (source rest frame) and
247: $3.5^{+2.7}_{-1.6}$ keV, respectively. Although this model can
248: describe the data, the very large EW of the Fe line is not compatible
249: with the relatively small absorption column ($3\times10^{23}$ {\pcm}),
250: from which an Fe line with much lower EW ($\sim 200$ eV) is expected
251: (e.g, Awaki et al. 1991; Leahy \& Creighton 1993; Ghisellini, Haardt,
252: \& Matt 1994 ).
253:
254: The center energy, line width, and EW of the strong emission line in
255: the pure reflection model are $6.458^{+0.035}_{-0.048}$ keV at the
256: source rest frame, $\sigma$ = 0.020 ($<$0.099) keV, and
257: $4.8^{+4.3}_{-2.5}$ keV, respectively. This line centroid energy is
258: consistent with fluorescent iron emission from neutral or
259: low-ionization state ($<$ FeXIX) iron when possible small calibration
260: uncertainties are taken into account. The line intensity of
261: $(5.4^{+3.5}_{-2.5})\times10^{-6}$ photons {\pcm} {\ps} is consistent
262: with that obtained with an {\asca} observation (Terashima et
263: al. 1998), although the error ranges are large. The huge EW ($>$2.4
264: keV) is difficult to explain even in the pure reflection picture and
265: probably an overabundance of iron is required (Matt, Fabian, \&
266: Reynolds 1995). Such a large equivalent width is also seen in other
267: Compton thick Seyfert 2s such as the Circinus galaxy (Matt et
268: al. 1996). The X-ray luminosity of the reflection component in M51 is
269: $9.8\times10^{38}$ {\eps} in the 2--10 keV band. Although this
270: luminosity is nine times smaller than the total 2--10 keV luminosity
271: of M51 observed by {\asca}, X-ray binaries contribute significantly to
272: the {\asca} luminosity (Terashima et al. 1998). Therefore, the smaller
273: luminosity obtained with {\chandra} does not imply time variability of
274: the AGN. Recently {\it BeppoSAX} observations have shown that
275: the nucleus is heavily absorbed by a column density of {\NH} =
276: $5.6\times10^{24}$ {\pcm} and the intrinsic luminosity corrected for
277: the absorption is $1.1\times10^{41}$ {\eps} in the
278: 2--10 keV band (Fukazawa et al. 2001). Thus, the luminosity obtained
279: with {\chandra} is about 1\% of the intrinsic X-ray
280: luminosity, implying that $\approx$1\% of the nuclear luminosity is
281: scattered in our direction.
282:
283: The soft component (Fig. 3a) is well represented by a MEKAL plasma
284: model (Table 2). The obtained absorption column density is only
285: slightly larger than the Galactic value ($1.3\times10^{20}$ {\pcm},
286: Stark et al. 1992) given the large errors. The emission measure is
287: $1.2\times10^{62}$ cm$^{-3}$ and the luminosity corrected for the
288: absorption is $4.5\times10^{38}$ {\eps} in the 0.5--4 keV band. The
289: temperature and abundance are quite similar to the extended emission
290: (the XNC and north loop). The gas may be shock heated as discussed
291: below.
292:
293:
294: \subsubsection{Southern Extranuclear Cloud and Northern Loop}
295:
296: We extracted X-ray spectra of the southern extranuclear cloud (XNC)
297: and the northern loop. A background spectrum was obtained from a
298: region free of the nuclear emission. Bright point sources in this
299: region were excluded. This background spectrum was then subtracted
300: from the spectra of the XNC and northern loop. The spectra were binned
301: so that at least 15 counts were contained in each bin, so chi-squared
302: statistics can be used.
303:
304: The two spectra (Fig. 3b and c) show emission lines which are
305: indicative of optically thin thermal plasma emission with a
306: temperature below 1 keV. Therefore, we fitted the spectra with the
307: MEKAL model modified by photoelectric absorption along the line of
308: sight. This model provides successful descriptions of both the XNC and
309: the northern loop. The results of the spectral modeling are shown in
310: Table 2.
311:
312: The spectral parameters obtained for the XNC are $kT =
313: 0.58^{+0.04}_{-0.08}$ keV, abundance $0.14^{+0.07}_{-0.05}$ solar, and
314: {\NH} = $9.5^{+5.5}_{-3.9}\times10^{20}$ {\pcm}. We note that the
315: abundance values in all the fits in this paper are unusually low for
316: the central regions of spiral galaxies and are similar to other X-ray
317: measurements of abundance of spiral galaxies and starburst galaxies.
318: The reason for these unphysically low abundances is unknown, but may
319: involve systematic errors in modeling thermal plasmas, nonthermal
320: continuum contributions, or depletion of gas phase elements onto
321: grains (Netzer \& Turner 1997, Arimoto et al. 1997, Dahlem et
322: al. 2000, Matsushita et al. 2000) and does not necessarily mean real
323: low abundance. The luminosity (corrected for absorption) and emission
324: measure are $1.5\times10^{39}$ {\eps} in the 0.5--4 keV band and
325: $2.7\times10^{62}$ cm$^{-3}$, respectively. If we assume a simple
326: spherical shape with a radius of 80 pc and a filling factor $\eta
327: (<1)$ of the X-ray emitting gas, we can derive some physical
328: quantities. The density $n$, gas mass $M$, and the thermal energy $U$
329: are determined as $n=2.1\eta^{-1/2}$ cm$^{-3}$,
330: $M=1.5\times10^5\eta^{1/2}M_{\odot}$, and
331: $U=1.2\times10^{53}\eta^{1/2}$ ergs, respectively.
332:
333: %shock velocity vs temperature
334:
335: This thermal plasma is expected from shock heating due to
336: outflows. The expected postshock temperature is $T_{\rm s} = 1.4
337: \times 10^5 ~V_{\rm s7}^2$ K, where $V_{\rm s7}$ is the shock velocity
338: in units of 100 km s$^{-1}$, if the preshock medium is fully ionized
339: and the helium abundance is 10\% of hydrogen by number (Hollenbach and
340: McKee 1979). Using this relation, the shock velocity is determined as
341: 690 km s$^{-1}$ from the observed temperature of the XNC. This shock
342: velocity is roughly consistent with that determined from [\ion{N}{2}]
343: observations (500 km s$^{-1}$; Cecil 1988). The XNC shows LINER-like
344: optical emission lines (Ford et al. 1985). The emission line ratios
345: [\ion{O}{1}]/H$\alpha$, [\ion{O}{3}]/H$\beta$, and
346: [\ion{S}{2}]/H$\alpha$ are in the range expected from fast shocks
347: without precursors for a shock velocity of 300--500 km {\ps}, as
348: calculated by Dopita \& Sutherland (1995, 1996). The observed
349: [\ion{N}{2}]/H$\alpha$ ratio is larger than predicted by the shock
350: model and could be due to an overabundance of nitrogen, as often
351: suggested previously. Thus the optical emission line ratios are
352: consistent with fast shocks and reinforce a shock interpretation of
353: the origin of the extranuclear clouds.
354:
355: The spectral parameters for the northern loop are $kT =
356: 0.53^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$ keV, abundance $0.14^{+0.07}_{-0.04}$ solar, and {\NH}
357: = $6.2^{+2.7}_{-3.3}\times10^{20}$ {\pcm}. The luminosity (corrected
358: for absorption) and emission measure are $2.0\times10^{39}$ {\eps} in
359: the 0.5--4 keV band and $3.8\times10^{62}$ cm$^{-3}$, respectively. As
360: in the case of the XNC, we determine physical parameters of the X-ray
361: gas by assuming a simple geometry. Here we assume a spherical shell
362: with an outer radius of 200 pc and a thickness of 40 pc, and a volume
363: filling factor of $\eta$. The parameters obtained for the hot gas are
364: $n=0.88\eta^{-1/2}$ cm$^{-3}$, $M=5.0\times10^5\eta^{1/2}M_{\odot}$,
365: and $U=3.7\times10^{53}\eta^{1/2}$ ergs.
366:
367: The X-ray spectral shape (i.e. the model's $kT$ and abundance), X-ray
368: morphology, and optical emission line properties of the northern loop
369: are quite similar to the XNC and suggest a similar origin to the XNC,
370: i.e., shock heating by nuclear outflows. The shock velocity required
371: to heat the gas to $kT$ =0.53 keV is 660 km s$^{-1}$, almost the same
372: shock velocity as obtained for the XNC. The fact that the northern
373: loop is much larger than the XNC suggests that it is an older
374: structure.
375:
376: The total radiative luminosity of the shock heated gas ($L_{\rm T}$)
377: can be estimated from the H$\beta$ luminosities (Ford et al. 1985) by
378: assuming the shock model (Dopita \& Sutherland 1995, 1996). A value
379: $L_{\rm T} \sim 2\times10^{42}$ {\eps} is obtained. This luminosity is
380: comparable to the photon luminosity of the nucleus if an intrinsic
381: X-ray luminosity of $10^{41}$ {\eps} (Fukazawa et al. 2001) and a
382: bolometric correction of a factor of ten (Ho 1999) are assumed. If
383: the shock-heated gas is, indeed, powered by the jets, which are
384: assumed to be steady, the mechanical and radiative outputs of the
385: nucleus are then similar to within the considerable uncertainties.
386:
387:
388: \section{Concluding Remarks}
389:
390: Our {\chandra} observations have shown that the X-ray morphology of
391: the extranuclear regions of NGC 5194 is very similar to that seen in
392: radio continuum and optical emission-line imaging. The X-ray spectra
393: of the extranuclear cloud and the northern loop are well described by
394: thermal plasma models with $kT\approx$ 0.5--0.6 keV. This temperature is
395: close to that expected from shock heating given the range of
396: velocities seen ($\sim$500 km {\ps}) in optical emission-line
397: spectra. The optical emission-line ratios also agree with models
398: involving shocks with velocities in the range 300--500 km {\ps}.
399: Further, the location with the hardest X-ray spectrum in the
400: extranuclear cloud coincides with the region exhibiting the broadest
401: optical lines ($\sim1500$ km {\ps}). This location is also apparently
402: the terminus of the radio jet. All of these findings indicate that the
403: extranuclear gas is shock heated by nuclear jets and/or other
404: collimated outflows.
405:
406: The nucleus itself exhibits a soft X-ray spectrum which is very
407: similar to that of the extranuclear gas. We presume that this gas is
408: also shock heated by mass outflows. In addition, the nucleus shows a
409: very hard continuum and an iron line with equivalent width in excess
410: of 2 keV. This spectrum arises through reflection of the radiation
411: from a compact nuclear source with a power law spectrum by cold matter
412: in its vicinity. The nuclear source itself is obscured by a large
413: column density of gas ({\NH}=$5.6\times10^{24}$ {\pcm}) and is only
414: seen directly above 10 keV (Fukazawa et al. 2001).
415:
416: \acknowledgments
417:
418: We are grateful to Gerald Cecil for providing the radio and
419: [\ion{N}{2}] images in computer readable format. YT was supported in
420: part by a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Postdoctoral
421: Fellowship for Research Abroad. This research was supported by NASA
422: grant NAG 81027.
423:
424:
425: \begin{thebibliography}{}
426: \bibitem[Arimoto et al. (1997)]{a97} Arimoto, N., Matsushita, K., Ishimaru, Y., Ohashi, T., \& Renzini, A. 1997, \apj, 477, 128
427: \bibitem[Awaki et al.(1991)]{a91} Awaki, H., Koyama, K., Inoue, H., \& Halpern, J.~P. 1991, \pasj, 43, 195
428: \bibitem[Cash(1979)]{c79} Cash, W. 1979, \apj, 228, 939
429: \bibitem[Cecil(1988)]{c88} Cecil, G. 1988, \apj, 329, 38
430:
431: \bibitem[POG(2000)]{pog} Chandra Proposer's Observatory Guide 2000, (Chandra X-ray Center: Cambridge, MA)
432: \bibitem[Crane(1992)]{c92} Crane, P.~C., \& van der Hulst, J.~M. 1992, \aj, 103, 1146
433: \bibitem[Dahlem et al. (2000)]{d00} Dahlem, M., Parmar, A., Oosterbroek, T., Orr, A., Weaver, K.~A., \& Heckman, T.~M. 2000, \apj, 538, 555
434: \bibitem[Dopita(1995)]{ds95} Dopita, M.~A., \& Sutherland, R.~S. 1995, \apj, 455, 468
435:
436: \bibitem[Dopita(1996)]{ds96} Dopita, M.~A., \& Sutherland, R.~S. 1996, \apjs, 102, 161
437:
438: \bibitem[Ehle(1995)]{e95} Ehle, M., Pietsch, W., \& Beck, R. 1995, \aap, 295, 289
439:
440: \bibitem[Feldmeier et al.(1997)]{f97} Feldmeier, J.~J., Ciardullo, R., \& Jacoby, G 1997, \apj, 479, 231
441:
442: \bibitem[Ford et al.(1985)]{f85} Ford, H.~C., Crane, P.~C., Jacoby, G.~H., Lawrie, D.~G., van Der Hulst, J.~M. 1985, \apj, 293, 132
443:
444: \bibitem[Fukazawa et al. (2001)]{f01} Fukazawa, Y., Iyomoto, N., Kubota, A., Matsumoto, Y., \& Makishima, K. 2001, \aap, submitted
445:
446: \bibitem[Ghisellini et al. (1994)]{g94} Ghisellini, G., Haardt, F., \& Matt, G. 1994, \mnras, 267, L17
447:
448: \bibitem[Ho (1999)]{h99} Ho, L.~C. 1999, \apj, 516, 672
449:
450: \bibitem[Ho et al. (1997)]{hfs97} Ho, L.~C., Filippenko, A.~C., \& Sargent, W.~L.~W. 1997, \apjs, 112, 315
451:
452: \bibitem[Hollenbac \& McKee (1979)]{h79} Hollenbach, D., \& McKee, C.~F. 1979, \apjs, 41, 555
453:
454: \bibitem[Leahy \& Creighton (1993)]{LC93} Leahy, D.~A., \& Creighton, J. 1993, \mnras, 263, 314
455:
456: \bibitem[Magdziarz \& Zdziarski (1995)]{MZ95} Magdziarz, P. \& Zdziarski, A.~A. 1995 MNRAS, 273, 837
457:
458: \bibitem[Makishima et al. (1990)]{m90} Makishima, K., Ohashi, T., Kondo, H., Palumbo, G.~G.~C., \& Trinchieri, G. 1990, \apj, 365, 159
459:
460: \bibitem[Marston et al. (1995)]{marston95} Marston, A.~P., Elmegreen, D., Elmegreen, B., Forman, W., Jones, C., \& Flanagan, K. 1995, \apj, 438, 663
461:
462: \bibitem[Matsushita et al. (2000)]{matsushita00} Matsushita, K., Ohashi, T., \& Makishima, K. 2000, \pasj, 52, 685
463:
464: \bibitem[Matt et al. (1995)]{matt95} Matt, G., Fabian, A.~C., \& Reynolds, C.~S. 1995, \mnras, 289, 175 % reflection
465:
466: \bibitem[Matt et al. (1996)]{matt96} Matt, G. et al., 1996, \mnras, 281, L69 % Circinus
467:
468: \bibitem[Netzer \& Turner (1997)]{nt97} Netzer, H., \& Turner, T.J. 1997, \apj, 488, 694
469:
470: \bibitem[Palumbo et al. (1985)]{p85} Palumbo, G.~C.~C., Fabbiano, G., Fransson, C., \& Trinchieri, G. 1985, \apj, 298, 259
471:
472: \bibitem[Roberts \& Warwick (2000)]{rw00} Roberts, T.~P. \& Warwick, R. 2000, \mnras, 315, 98
473:
474: \bibitem[Stark et al. (1992)]{s92} Stark, A.~A., Gammie, C.~F., Wilson, R.~W., Bally, J., Linke, R.~A., Heiles, C., \& Hurwitz, M. 1992, \apjs, 79, 77
475:
476: \bibitem[Terashima et al. (1998)]{t98} Terashima, Y., Ptak, A.~F., Fujimoto, R., Itoh, M., Kunieda,
477: H., Makishima, K., \& Serlemitsos, P.~J. 1998, \apj, 496, 210 % M51
478:
479: \end{thebibliography}
480:
481: \newpage
482:
483: % Tables
484:
485: \begin{table*}
486: \begin{center}
487: \caption{Spectral modeling of the hard component of the nucleus.}
488: \begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
489: \tableline \tableline
490: Model & $N_{\rm H}$ & photon index & $E_{\rm line}^{a}$ & Width & EW & Luminosity$^b$ & C-statistic\\
491: & [$10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$] & & [keV] & [keV] & [keV] & [$10^{39}$ ergs s$^{-1}$] & \\
492: \hline
493: 1 & $31^{+18}_{-15}$ & 2.0$^c$ & $6.458^{+0.033}_{-0.039}$ & $0(<0.085)$ & $3.5^{+2.7}_{-1.6}$ & 1.1 & 39.1\\
494: 2 & $0.25(<34)$ & 2.0$^c$ & $6.458^{+0.035}_{-0.048}$ & $0.020(<0.099)$ & $4.8^{+4.3}_{-2.5}$ & 0.98 & 39.5\\
495: \tableline
496: \end{tabular}
497: \end{center}
498: \tablecomments{Model 1: MEKAL + absorbed power law + Gaussian line,
499: Model 2: MEKAL + pure reflection + Gaussian line.
500: {\it a}: Source rest frame. {\it b}: Observed luminosity (not corrected for absorption) in the 2--10 keV band. {\it c}: Fixed parameter.
501: }
502: \end{table*}
503:
504:
505: \begin{table*}
506: \begin{center}
507: \caption{Spectral modeling of the soft thermal component.}
508: \begin{tabular}{cccccc}
509: \hline \hline
510: & $N_{\rm H}$ & $kT$ & abundance & Luminosity$^a$ & $\chi^2$/dof\\
511: & [$10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$] & [keV] & [solar] & [$10^{39}$ ergs s$^{-1}]$ & \\
512: \hline
513: Nucleus$^b$ & $0.14^{+0.17}_{-0.11}$ & $0.49^{+0.13}_{-0.08}$ & $0.084\pm0.05$ & 0.45 & ...\\
514: XNC & $0.095^{+0.055}_{-0.039}$ & $0.58^{+0.04}_{-0.08}$ & $0.14^{+0.07}_{-0.05}$ & 1.5 & 53.9/47\\
515: Northern Loop & $0.062^{+0.027}_{-0.033}$ &$0.53^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$ & $0.14^{+0.07}_{-0.04}$ & 2.0 & 44.9/50\\
516: \hline
517: \end{tabular}
518: \end{center}
519: \tablecomments{ {\it a}: Luminosity corrected for absorption in the 0.5--4 keV band. {\it b}: The hard component is modeled by a pure reflection continuum + Gaussian line.
520: }
521: \end{table*}
522:
523:
524: \newpage
525:
526: \clearpage
527:
528: % Figures
529:
530: \begin{figure}[h]
531: %\plotone{fig/fig1.ps}
532: \includegraphics[scale=0.87]{fig1.ps}
533: \caption{{\chandra} ACIS-S image of the central region of NGC
534: 5194. Red, green, and blue colors correspond to the 0.5--1.3, 1.3--3,
535: and 3--8 keV band, respectively. The color intensity is scaled
536: logarithmically to the number of photons in each pixel. The position
537: of the optical nucleus is (13$^{\rm h}$29$^{\rm m}$52$^{\rm s}$.7, 47$^{\circ}$11$^\prime$43$^{\prime\prime}$) (J2000).
538: The size of
539: the image is 40 arcsec $\times$ 45 arcsec. North is up and east is to
540: the left.
541: \label{fig-1}}
542: \end{figure}
543:
544: % 102 px x 102 px = 50.18 arcsec
545:
546: \begin{figure}[h]
547: \hspace{2.1cm}
548: \includegraphics[scale=0.49,angle=-90]{fig2.ps}
549: \figcaption[]{ A VLA 20 cm map (contours, from Ford et al. 1985)
550: overlaid on a {\chandra} image in the 0.5--8 keV band.
551: Contours are plotted at 7.5, 15, 21, 30, 43, 60, 85\% of peak
552: and the peak corresponds to 2.12 mJy beam$^{-1}$.
553: \label{fig-2}}
554: \end{figure}
555:
556: \begin{figure}[ht]
557: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=-90]{fig3a.ps}
558: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=-90]{fig3b.ps}
559: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=-90]{fig3c.ps}
560: \figcaption[]{X-ray spectra of the nucleus ({\it a}), southern
561: extranuclear cloud (XNC) ({\it b}), and northern loop ({\it
562: c}). Crosses are data and histograms are models. The hard component of
563: the nucleus is assumed to be reflected emission from cold matter
564: (dotted line), while the soft component of all the three spectra is
565: assumed to be thermal emission from a gas in collisional-ionization
566: equilibrium, modeled by the MEKAL code.
567: \label{fig-3}}
568: \end{figure}
569:
570: \end{document}
571: