1: \documentstyle[epsfig]{aipproc}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \newcommand{\snr}{{G266.2$-$1.2}}
6:
7: \title{Nonthermal X-Ray Emission from G266.2$-$1.2 (RX~J0852.0$-$4622)}
8:
9: \author{P. Slane$^1$, J. P. Hughes$^2$, R. J. Edgar$^1$,
10: P. P. Plucinsky$^1$,\\
11: E. Miyata$^3$, and B. Aschenbach$^4$}
12: \address{$^1$Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA
13: 02138\\
14: $^2$Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8019\\
15: $^3$Osaka University, Osaka 560-0043 JAPAN\\
16: $^4$Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, Germany
17: }
18:
19: %\lefthead{LEFT head}
20: %\righthead{RIGHT head}
21: \maketitle
22:
23:
24: \begin{abstract}
25: The newly discovered supernova remnant G266.2$-$1.2 (RX~J0852.0--4622),
26: along the line of sight to the Vela SNR, was observed with ASCA for 120 ks.
27: We find that the X-ray spectrum is featureless, and well described by
28: a power law, extending to three the class of shell-type SNRs dominated by
29: nonthermal X-ray emission. Although the presence of the Vela SNR
30: compromises our ability to accurately determine the column density,
31: the GIS data appear to indicate absorption considerably in excess of
32: that for Vela itself, indicating that G266.2-1.2 may be several times
33: more distant. An unresolved central source may be an associated neutron
34: star, though difficulties with this interpretation persist.
35: \end{abstract}
36:
37: \section*{Introduction}
38:
39: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Figure 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
40: \begin{figure}[t!] % fig 1
41: \centerline{
42: \epsfig{file=md_fig1a.eps,width=2.6in}\hspace{0.4in}
43: \epsfig{file=md_fig1b.ps,width=2.6in}}
44: \caption{Left: ASCA GIS image of G266.2--1.2 ($E = 0.7 - 10$~keV). The image
45: consists of a mosaic of 7 individual fields. Contours represent the outline
46: of the Vela SNR as seen in ROSAT survey data with the PSPC. Right:
47: ASCA spectra from both GIS detectors for regions of G266.2--1.2.
48: The featureless spectrum
49: is well described by a power law. Excess flux at low energies is
50: presumably associated with soft thermal emission from the Vela SNR.}
51: \label{fig1}
52: \vspace{-0.13in}
53: \end{figure}
54: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
55:
56: \snr\ was discovered by Aschenbach \cite{asch1} using
57: data from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey. Situated along the line of sight
58: to the Vela SNR, the emission stands out above the soft
59: thermal emission from Vela only at energies above $\sim 1$~keV.
60: Iyudin et al. \cite{iyud} reported the detection of $^{44}$Ti from
61: the source GRO~J0852-4642, which was tentatively associated with the SNR.
62: If correct,
63: the very short $^{44}$Ti
64: lifetime ($\tau \approx 90$~y) would imply a very young SNR, and the
65: large angular size would require that the remnant be very nearby as
66: well. Estimates based on the X-ray diameter and $\gamma$-ray flux
67: of $^{44}$Ti indicate an age of $\sim 680$~y and a distance of
68: $\sim 200$~pc \cite{aschetal}.
69: The hard X-ray spectrum, if interpreted as high temperature emission
70: from a fast shock, would seem to support this scenario.
71: However, as we summarize here (see \cite{slane01}
72: for a detailed discussion), the X-ray emission is not from hot,
73: shock-heated gas; it is nonthermal.
74: Further, reanalysis of the COMPTEL data finds that the $^{44}$Ti detection
75: is only significant at the
76: $2 - 4 \sigma$ confidence level \cite{schon}.
77: In the absence of such emission, and given that the X-ray emission
78: is nonthermal, the nearby distance and young age may need to be reexamined.
79:
80: \section*{Observations and Analysis}
81: We have carried out ASCA observations of \snr\ using
82: 7 pointings, each of $\sim 17$~ks duration. The
83: resulting image from the ASCA GIS is illustrated in
84: Fig. 1 \cite{tsun}, where we also
85: present GIS spectra from three regions
86: along the rim of the remnant: 1) the bright
87: NW rim; 2) the NE rim; and 3) the W rim.
88: Unlike the line-dominated thermal emission typical of
89: a young SNR, the spectra are featureless
90: and well described by a power law of index $\sim 2.6$. \snr\ thus joins
91: SN~1006 \cite{koy95} and G347.3$-$0.5 \cite{koy97,slane97} as a shell-type
92: SNR dominated by nonthermal emission in X-rays. Weaker nonthermal
93: components are observed for other SNRs as well, indicating the
94: shock-acceleration of particles to energies of order
95: $10-100$~TeV.
96:
97: The best-fit spectral parameters for \snr\ yield
98: $N_H \sim (1 - 4) \times 10^{21}{\rm\ cm}^{-2}$.
99: We include a soft thermal component with the column density fixed
100: at a low value appropriate for Vela \cite{bocc}.
101: The column density for the power law component
102: is significantly higher than that for Vela. While simple scaling of
103: the column density to estimate the distance to \snr\ is clearly
104: rather uncertain, it would appear that the remnant is at least
105: several times more distant than Vela;
106: improved column density measurements are of considerable importance.
107:
108:
109: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Figure 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
110: \begin{figure}[t!] % fig 2
111: \centerline{
112: \epsfig{file=md_fig2a.eps,width=2.6in} \hspace{0.4in}
113: \epsfig{file=md_fig2b.ps,width=2.6in}}
114: \caption{Left: CO emission ($V_{LSR} = -5 - +20 {\rm\ km\ s}^{-1}$)
115: in the direction of \snr. Contours are GIS data. Note the
116: Galactic coordinates.
117: Right: ASCA SIS spectrum from Vela ``Bullet D'' showing thermal nature
118: of emission, in contrast to nonthermal emission from G266.2$-$1.2.
119: }
120: \label{fig2}
121: \vspace{-0.12in}
122: \end{figure}
123: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
124:
125: CO data \cite{may} reveal a concentration of
126: giant molecular clouds -- the Vela Molecular Ridge -- at a distance
127: of $\sim 1 - 2$~kpc in the direction of Vela.
128: The column density through the ridge
129: is in excess of $10^{22}{\rm\ cm}^{-2}$, with the NE rim
130: of \snr\ (nearest the Galactic Plane) falling along the steeply
131: increasing column density region
132: while the western rim lies along a line of much lower
133: $N_H$ (Fig. 2); the CO column density varies by more
134: than a factor of 6 between these regions. The lack of a strong variation
135: in $N_H$ across
136: \snr\ indicates that the remnant cannot be more distant than the
137: Ridge. On the other hand, if $N_H$ is
138: much larger than for the Vela SNR, as the GIS data reported here
139: indicate, then \snr\ must be as distant as possible consistent with
140: being in front of most of the Molecular Ridge gas.
141:
142: In a recent study of optical emission in the vicinity of \snr,
143: Redman et al. \cite{redman} discuss a filamentary nebula
144: lying directly along the edge of the so-called Vela ``bullet D'' region
145: \cite{asch2}, just outside the eastern edge of Fig. 1 (in the direction
146: of the extended contour), and argue that both structures
147: represent a breakout region from \snr. However, the
148: ASCA spectrum of this region (Fig. 2)
149: is clearly thermal, with large
150: overabundances of O, Mg, and Si -- quite in contrast to the nonthermal
151: spectrum observed for \snr. We conclude that an association between
152: this region and \snr\ is unlikely.
153:
154: The central region of the remnant contains a
155: compact source, which we designate as AX~J0851.9-4617.4,
156: surrounded by diffuse emission that
157: extends toward the northwest. The diffuse emission is
158: well described by a power law of spectral index $\sim 2.0$, again accompanied
159: by a soft thermal component that we associate with Vela. Given the
160: nonthermal nature of the shell emission, however, it is quite possible
161: that the diffuse central emission is associated with emission from the
162: shell projected along the central line of sight. We note that the spectrum
163: of this central emission appears harder than that from the rest of
164: the remnant, perhaps suggesting a plerionic nature, but more sensitive
165: observations are required to clarify this.
166:
167: The spectrum of the compact source is rather sparse and can
168: be adequately described by a variety of models. A power-law fit
169: yields a spectral index that is rather steep compared with known pulsars.
170: The luminosity, on the other hand, is quite reasonable for a young neutron
171: star if the distance is indeed several kpc, and the observed column density is
172: compatible with that for the SNR shell. A blackbody model leads to an
173: inferred surface temperature of $\sim 0.5$~keV with an emitting region
174: only $\sim 200 d_{\rm kpc} {\rm\ m}$ in radius which could be indicative of
175: emission from compact polar cap regions of a neutron star, although this
176: region is somewhat large for such a scenario. It is possible that
177: the source is associated with a Be star within the position error
178: circle \cite{asch1}, although the X-ray and optical properties appear
179: inconsistent for such an interpretation \cite{slane01}.
180:
181: Recent SAX observations \cite{SAX} have revealed the presence of another
182: source in the central region of \snr. This source, designated
183: SAX~J0852.0-4615, has a harder spectrum than AX~J0851.9-4617.4,
184: but is considerably
185: fainter. If at a distance of $\sim 3$~kpc, its luminosity would be similar
186: to the Vela pulsar, but this would place the source beyond the Vela
187: Molecular Ridge. Further observations are required to investigate these
188: central sources more completely.
189:
190: \section*{Conclusions}
191:
192: The ASCA observations of \snr\ reveal that the soft X-ray emission from
193: this SNR is dominated by nonthermal processes. This brings to three the
194: number of SNRs in this class, and provides additional evidence for
195: shock acceleration of cosmic rays in SNRs. Because of the bright and
196: spatially varying background caused by the Vela SNR, limits on the
197: thermal emission from \snr\ are difficult to establish.
198: However, the ASCA data
199: suggest a larger column density for this remnant than for Vela,
200: indicating that \snr\ is at a larger distance,
201: and perhaps associated with the star formation region located at a
202: distance of $1 - 2$~kpc. The point source
203: AX~J0851.9-4617.4 could represent an associated neutron star,
204: with the diffuse emission around the source being an associated synchrotron
205: nebula, albeit a very faint one. Recent SAX studies
206: reveal another possible candidate. Higher resolution
207: X-ray observations of these sources are of considerable importance.
208:
209: \vspace{0.1in}
210: \noindent {\bf Acknowledgments. }
211: This work was supported in part by NASA through contract NAS8-39073 and
212: grant NAG5-9106.
213:
214: \begin{references}
215:
216: \bibitem{asch1} Aschenbach, B. 1998, Nature 396, 141
217: \bibitem{iyud} Iyudin, A. F. et al. 1998, Nature 326, 142
218: \bibitem{aschetal} Aschenbach, B., Iyudin, A. F., \& Sch\"{o}nfelder, V. 1999,
219: A\&A 350, 997
220: \bibitem{slane01} Slane, P. et al. 2001 -- to appear in ApJ
221: (see astro-ph/0010510)
222: \bibitem{schon} Sch\"onfelder, V. et al. 2000, 5th Compton Symposium,
223: Portsmouth, AIP Conf. Proc. 510, p. 54, eds. M.L. McConnell and J.M. Ryan
224: \bibitem{tsun} Tsunemi, H. et al. 2000, PASJ, in press (astro-ph/0005452)
225: \bibitem{koy95} Koyama, K. et al. 1995, Nature, 378, 255
226: \bibitem{koy97} Koyama, K. et al.~1997, PASJ 49, L7
227: \bibitem{slane97} Slane, P. et al. 1999, ApJ, 525, 357
228: \bibitem{bocc} Bocchino, F., Maggio, A., \& Sciortino, S. 1999, A\&A 342, 839
229: \bibitem{may} May, J., Murphy, D. C., \& Thaddeus, P. 1988, A\&ASS 73, 51
230: \bibitem{redman} Redman, M. P., et al. 2000, ApJ, 543, L153
231: \bibitem{asch2} Aschenbach, B., Egger, R., Truemper, J. 1995, Nature, 373, 587
232: \bibitem{SAX} Mereghetti, S. 2001, ApJ - accepted (see astroph/0011554)
233:
234: \end{references}
235: \end{document}
236:
237: