1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{aaspp}
3: %
4: \lefthead{}
5: \righthead{Pulsar Wind Nebula in SNR G292.0_1.8}
6: %
7: %\received{}
8: %\submitted{}
9: %
10: \def\CXO{{\it Chandra X-ray Observatory}}
11: \def\chandra{{\it Chandra}}
12: \def\g292{G292.0+1.8}
13: \def\msh1154{MSH 11$-$5{\sl 4}}
14: \def\einstein{{\it Einstein}}
15: \def\EO{{\it Einstein Observatory}}
16: \def\rosat{{\it ROSAT}}
17: \def\asca{{\it ASCA}}
18: \def\astroe{{\it Astro-E}}
19: \def\xmm{{\it XMM}}
20: \def\chandra{{\it Chandra}}
21: \def\mydegree{^\circ\mskip-5mu}
22: \def\myarcmin{^\prime\mskip-5mu}
23: \def\myarcsec{\mskip1mu^{\prime\prime}\mskip-7mu.\mskip2mu}
24: \def\lsim{\hbox{\raise.35ex\rlap{$<$}\lower.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}\ }}
25: \def\gsim{\hbox{\raise.35ex\rlap{$>$}\lower.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}\ }}
26:
27: \begin{document}
28:
29: \title{A Pulsar Wind Nebula in the Oxygen-Rich Supernova Remnant
30: \g292}
31:
32: \author{John P. Hughes\altaffilmark{1},
33: Patrick O.~Slane \altaffilmark{2},
34: David N.~Burrows\altaffilmark{3},
35: Gordon Garmire\altaffilmark{3},
36: and John A.~Nousek\altaffilmark{3}}
37: %
38: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers
39: University, 136 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8109;
40: jph@physics.rutgers.edu}
41: \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street,
42: Cambridge, MA 02138; slane@head-cfa.harvard.edu}
43: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy \& Astrophysics, 525 Davey Lab,
44: Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802} % ; burrows@astro.psu.edu
45:
46: \begin{abstract}
47:
48: Using the \CXO\ we have discovered a diffuse, center-filled region of
49: hard X-ray emission within the young, oxygen-rich supernova remnant
50: (SNR) \g292. Near the peak of this diffuse emission lies a point-like
51: source of X-ray emission that is well described by an absorbed
52: power-law spectrum with photon index $1.72\pm0.09$. This source
53: appears to be marginally extended; its extent of 1.3$^{\prime\prime}$
54: (FWHM) is greater than that of a nearby serendipitous X-ray source
55: with FWHM = $1.1^{\prime\prime}$.
56: This is strong evidence for the presence within SNR \g292\ of a young
57: rapidly-rotating pulsar and its associated pulsar wind nebula. From
58: the unabsorbed, 0.2-4 keV band X-ray luminosity of the pulsar wind
59: nebula ($L_X\sim 4\times 10^{34}\,\rm ergs\,\, s^{-1}$), we infer a
60: spin-down energy loss rate of $\dot E \sim 7\times 10^{36}\,\rm
61: ergs\,\, s^{-1}$ for the still undetected pulsar. The pulsar candidate
62: is $0.9^\prime$ from the geometric center of the SNR which
63: implies a transverse velocity of $\sim$$770 (D/4.8\,{\rm kpc})
64: (t/1600\,{\rm yr})^{-1}\,\rm km \,s^{-1}$ assuming currently accepted
65: values for the distance and age of \g292.
66:
67: \end{abstract}
68:
69: \keywords{
70: ISM: individual (SNR \g292, \msh1154) --
71: pulsars: general --
72: shock waves --
73: supernova remnants --
74: X-rays: ISM
75: }
76:
77: \section{Introduction}
78:
79: \g292\ (\msh1154) is a southern supernova remnant (SNR), discovered in
80: the radio band (Milne 1969; Shaver \& Goss 1970), with a radio
81: spectral index intermediate between that of a typical shell-type
82: and Crab-type remnant (Goss et al.~1979). Optically the
83: spectrum is dominated by oxygen and neon emission lines (Goss et
84: al.~1979) covering a wide range, $\sim$2000 km s$^{-1}$, in velocity
85: (Murdin \& Clark 1979). \g292\ is, therefore, an oxygen-rich SNR, of
86: which there are only two other examples in the Galaxy (Cassiopeia A
87: and Puppis A) and a handful elsewhere (e.g., N132D, E0540$-$69.3, and
88: E0102.2$-$7219 in the Magellanic Clouds). It is believed that \g292\
89: is a young SNR with an age $\lsim$1600 yr in which the supernova
90: ejecta have not yet fully mixed with the swept-up circumstellar
91: material and thus may represent a slightly older version of Cas A.
92:
93: Recent developments suggest that \g292\ is, in fact, a composite
94: remnant, i.e., one showing both thermal emission from SN ejecta, as
95: well as a synchrotron nebula powered by a rapidly rotating neutron
96: star. Wallace \& Gaensler (1997) presented a high resolution 20-cm
97: radio map of the SNR from the Australia Telescope, which shows a
98: bright, extended nebula near the center with a flatter spectrum
99: ($\nu^{-0.4}$) than elsewhere in the remnant ($\nu^{-0.7}$).
100: Pulsar-powered plerions, like the Crab Nebula, have traditionally been
101: distinguished from their shell-type cousins by their flatter radio
102: spectra. Recently Torii, Tsunemi, \& Slane (1998) have reported on
103: the \g292\ \asca\ data. In addition to the thermal emission at soft
104: X-ray energies, above $\sim$3 keV they found a hard X-ray source with
105: a power-law spectrum, unresolved at \asca\ angular resolution and
106: positionally consistent (within the usual \asca\ position uncertainty
107: of 40$^{\prime\prime}$) with the extended, flat-spectrum radio
108: component mentioned above. Although not conclusive, these observations
109: suggest that a synchrotron nebula powered by the spin-down of a
110: central pulsar possibly lurks within \g292. This finding is quite
111: important, since it would allow us to conclusively associate the
112: young, oxygen-rich SNR \g292\ with a core-collapse, massive star SN
113: explosion. Indeed only one other oxygen-rich remnant, SNR
114: E0540$-$69.3 in the Large Magellanic Cloud, is known to contain a
115: rapidly spinning pulsar.
116:
117: \section{Observations}
118:
119: \g292\ was observed with the back-side illuminated chip (S3) of the
120: \chandra\ Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS-S) (Garmire et
121: al.~1992; Bautz et al.~1998) on 11 March, 2000, as part of the Penn
122: State GTO program. Observations were taken in full frame mode with a
123: readout time of 3.2 s. We filtered the data for times of flaring
124: background or bad aspect solution, applied the bad pixel map, and
125: verified that the level 2 events had been gain-corrected using the
126: gain map appropriate to the focal plane temperature at the time of
127: observation ($-$120 C). The effective deadtime-corrected exposure
128: time after time filtering was 43026.6 s.
129:
130: The S3 chip was used in order to take advantage of its soft response
131: and good spectral resolution. The pointing direction was set so that
132: as much of the remnant at possible fell on this chip. The remnant is
133: slightly larger than $8^\prime$ in diameter so complete coverage was
134: not possible; small portions of the remnant toward the south and west
135: were not imaged. In addition, we point out that the imaging quality
136: varies across the S3 field of view. For this observation of \g292\
137: the aimpoint and its surrounding region of $1^{\prime\prime}$ imaging
138: (50\% encircled energy radius) is on the eastern half of the remnant.
139: At the extreme northern and southern extent of the SNR, image quality
140: has degraded to $\sim$$1.5^{\prime\prime}$, while on the extreme western
141: edge it has become $\sim$$2.5^{\prime\prime}$.
142:
143: \section{Spectral and Spatial Analysis}
144:
145: In Figure 1 we show images of \g292\ in soft (left panel) and hard
146: (right panel) X-ray bands. The soft X-ray image shows a highly
147: structured and filamentary remnant with features on all scales from
148: arcminutes to arcseconds. The brightest emission is mostly confined to
149: an irregular ``belt'' that runs in an east-west direction across the
150: remnant. These features tend to be quite narrow
151: ($\lsim$3$^{\prime\prime}$) in the transverse (generally north-south)
152: direction. Comparison of separate images made in energy bands
153: containing the strong O, Ne, and Mg K$\alpha$ lines reveals complex
154: spectral variations with position. The integrated spectrum of the
155: remnant (Figure 2) shows that lines from these species, in addition to
156: Si and S, dominate the X-ray emission. Iron appears not to be a major
157: constituent of the X-ray spectrum. There is no significant Fe K-shell
158: emission: the equivalent width of a narrow line feature with energy
159: between 6.4 and 6.9 keV in the integrated ACIS-S spectrum is $<$200 eV
160: (at 95\% confidence). We defer a more detailed quantitative discussion
161: of the thermal emission from \g292\ to a future study.
162:
163: In the higher energy band, we spectacularly confirm the previous radio
164: and X-ray evidence for a plerion in \g292. Embedded within a diffuse
165: nebula approximately 1$^\prime$ in radius, we find a point-like source
166: at position $\alpha_{\rm J2000} = 11^{\rm h}24^{\rm m}39.1^{\rm s}$,
167: $\delta_{\rm J2000} = -59^{\circ}16^{\prime}20.0^{\prime\prime}$,
168: which we designate CXOU~J112439.1$-$591620 (hereafter the ``pulsar
169: candidate''). We verified absolute positions in the ACIS image by
170: identifying two serendipitous X-ray sources with optical stars
171: ($m_R=10$ and $m_R=11.8$) from the USNO-A2.0 catalog. Our resulting
172: X-ray positions are accurate to $<$1$^{\prime\prime}$.
173:
174: Figure 3 shows a smoothed 4--8 keV X-ray image centered on the pulsar
175: candidate. This band was chosen to isolate the hard nebular emission
176: and represents a compromise between obtaining sufficient signal from
177: the nebula and avoiding contamination by the generally softer thermal
178: emission. The pulsar candidate, located near the peak of the diffuse
179: emission, has a FWHM extent of 1.3$^{\prime\prime}$, while the
180: unrelated source nearby (which is at roughly the same off-axis angle)
181: has an extent of 1.1$^{\prime\prime}$, which we take to infer that the
182: pulsar candidate has an extended component (perhaps a terminal wind
183: boundary). (Neither source shows an obvious optical counterpart in
184: the digitized POSS.) As the insert to Fig.~3 shows, the X-ray
185: emission from the immediate vicinity of the pulsar candidate is rather
186: complex with a symmetric, extended component (out to a radius of
187: $\sim$1.5$^{\prime\prime}$) embedded in a ridge of emission that is
188: aligned nearly east-west. On larger scales, the pulsar candidate is
189: centered on an arcminute-long ridge of fainter emission that is also
190: oriented in roughly the east-west direction. The pulsar candidate is
191: located about 0.9$^\prime$ from our eyeball estimate of the geometric
192: center of the remnant, which is indicated by the plus sign on Fig.~3.
193:
194: Within a radius of 2.5 pixels (1.23$^{\prime\prime}$) centered on the
195: position of the pulsar candidate we obtain a total of 3326 ACIS-S
196: events for a count rate of $0.0773 \pm 0.0014$ s$^{-1}$. Background,
197: both instrumental and from the rest of \g292\ itself, was sufficiently
198: small in this aperture to be neglected. An absorbed power-law
199: provided an acceptable fit to the \chandra\ data. Numerical
200: values from the fits are given in Table 1 and the spectrum is plotted
201: in Fig.~2. The unabsorbed fluxes of the pulsar candidate are
202: $6.9\times 10^{-13}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ (0.2--4 keV band) and
203: $4.8\times 10^{-13}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ (2--8 kev band).
204:
205: Detection of pulsed emission would clearly confirm the pulsar
206: hypothesis. Unfortunately the low time resolution implicit in the
207: ACIS Timed Exposure mode makes detection of rapid pulsations
208: impossible. We searched unsuccessfully for pulsed emission from the
209: vicinity of the pulsar candidate in the \rosat\ HRI and PSPC data. In
210: neither data set was the candidate detected as a resolved source, due
211: to the poorer angular resolution of these instruments, the strong soft
212: thermal X-ray emission, and the low statistical signal. In addition
213: there have been no reports of pulsed X-ray emission from \g292\ from
214: either ASCA or RXTE.
215:
216: The spectrum of the diffuse nebula is significantly contaminated by
217: the remnant's soft thermal emission within annular apertures even
218: rather close to the pulsar candidate. For example, the aperture
219: extending over 3$^{\prime\prime}$ -- 5$^{\prime\prime}$ unmistakeably
220: shows soft thermal emission (i.e., prominent lines of O, Ne, and Mg),
221: which introduces significant uncertainty into the derived spectral
222: properties of the hard, diffuse nebula. Nevertheless out to a radius
223: of 20$^{\prime\prime}$ we were able to confirm that the spectrum above
224: 3 keV is a power law with photon index in the range $\alpha_p = 1.7 -
225: 2.0$. Because of the thermal contamination it was not possible to
226: determine if the photon index of the nebular emission steepened with
227: radius. Such an effect has been seen in other Crab-like SNRs with
228: \chandra\ (e.g., G21.5$-$0.9; Slane et al.~2000) and is expected for
229: an extended synchrotron nebula powered by a central pulsar.
230:
231: The total X-ray flux of the diffuse nebula is an important observable
232: that we estimated in the following manner. In the 4--8 keV band the
233: radial profile of the diffuse nebula centered on the pulsar candidate
234: fell roughly as an exponential with radius. The profile was summed out
235: to the radius where the emission was twice the background level, which
236: yielded a total count rate of 0.145 s$^{-1}$. For comparison the
237: pulsar candidate count rate in the same energy band is only 0.0074
238: s$^{-1}$, while at the other extreme, the total background subtracted
239: rate from \g292\ is 0.2188 s$^{-1}$. Thus the diffuse nebula accounts
240: for 66\% of the total 4--8 kev flux from the remnant. We assumed the
241: nebular spectral parameters to be the same as those of the pulsar
242: candidate in order to convert the band-limited count rate to fluxes.
243: The estimated nebular spectrum is shown in Fig.~2 (as the middle
244: curve). Our estimates of the unabsorbed fluxes from the nebula are
245: $1.5\times 10^{-11}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ (0.2--4 keV band) and
246: $1\times 10^{-11}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ (2--8 kev band). The hard
247: band flux would increase by only about 10\% if we assume that the nebula's
248: spectrum is steeper, with $\alpha_p = 2.1$ like the Crab. The increase in
249: the soft band flux in this case would be much larger, about a factor of 2.
250:
251: \section{Discussion and Results}
252:
253: We have presented evidence for a point-like source embedded in a
254: diffuse nebula, both of which exhibit featureless hard X-ray emission
255: and are spatially coincident with a flat-spectrum radio source in the
256: SNR \g292. These features are the classic signatures of a young
257: rapidly-rotating pulsar and its associated synchrotron, or pulsar
258: wind, nebula. The spin-down energy loss rate of the pulsar can be
259: estimated using the established correlation between this quantity and
260: the nebular X-ray luminosity (e.g., Seward and Wang 1988). From our
261: flux estimate we obtain an unabsorbed luminosity (0.2--4 keV band) of
262: $L_X = 4\times 10^{34} D_{4.8 \rm\, kpc}^2$ ergs s$^{-1}$, assuming
263: the H{\sc i} absorption distance of 4.8 kpc (Saken, Fesen, \& Shull
264: 1992), which implies only a modest spin-down energy loss rate of $\dot
265: E \sim 7\times 10^{36}$ ergs s$^{-1}$. Based on this estimate, then
266: for a braking index $n = 3$, and assuming that the current spin period
267: $P$ is much longer than the initial value, the remnant age implies $P
268: \sim 280$ ms and a spin-down rate $\dot P \sim 3 \times
269: 10^{-12}{\rm\ s\ s}^{-1}$. This corresponds to a surface magnetic
270: field strength $B \sim 10^{13}$~G, which is quite large. This value is
271: reduced if we relax the constraint that $P \gg P_0$. We note that
272: there are considerable uncertainties in this estimate, including the
273: relationship between $L_x$ and $\dot E$ (see, e.g., Chevalier 2000).
274: Clearly discovery of the pulsed emission from the new pulsar candidate
275: is of highest priority. Observations optimized for fast timing using
276: the HRC on \chandra\ have been approved for observation in cycle 2 and
277: will be carried out soon.
278:
279: The pulsar candidate is not directly at the geometric center of the
280: remnant, suggesting that it has moved since birth. Its implied
281: transverse speed of $\sim$$770 (D/4.8\,{\rm kpc}) (t/1600\,{\rm
282: yr})^{-1}\,\rm km \,s^{-1}$ is in good agreement, given our
283: uncertainties, with the mean birth velocity of pulsars of
284: $450\pm90\,\rm km \,s^{-1}$ (Lyne \& Lorimer 1994). Concerning the
285: uncertainties in our velocity estimate we note that it is likely that
286: the blast wave has expanded more slowly toward the southeast in \g292.
287: This is where the optical emission is most intense and thus where the
288: density of the ambient interstellar medium should be highest. If true
289: this would shift the true center of the remnant toward the southeast
290: and thereby reduce the implied transverse velocity of the pulsar
291: candidate. We note that there is no evidence in the X-ray band for a
292: bow shock preceding the pulsar candidate in this, or any, direction.
293:
294: To summarize, the \chandra\ data reveal the effects of a central
295: pulsar on three spatial scales in \g292: an unresolved source (the
296: pulsar candidate itself); a compact resolved region of X-ray emission
297: surrounding the point source and an extended pulsar wind nebula. The
298: compact emission near the pulsar (see insert to Fig.~3) shows a
299: symmetric component, $\sim$1.5$^{\prime\prime}$ (0.035 pc) in size, as
300: well as an elongated ridge of emission covering roughly
301: $3^{\prime\prime} \times 10^{\prime\prime}$ ($0.07 \times 0.23$ pc).
302: Such compact, but resolved, components have been seen by \chandra\
303: near the central compact objects in other known pulsar-wind nebula,
304: specifically the Crab (Weisskopf et al.~2000) and G21.5$-$0.9 (Slane
305: et al.~2000). These structures, on scales of tenths of parsecs, have
306: been interpreted as arising from the pulsar wind termination shock
307: (e.g., Rees \& Gunn 1974, Kennel \& Coroniti 1984). On larger scales
308: the triangular morphology of the extended pulsar wind nebula in \g292\
309: bears considerable similarity as well to the overall shape of the Crab
310: Nebula. The physical sizes are similar as well. The bright portion of
311: the nebula in \g292\ between the light and dark contours in Fig.~3 is
312: roughly 1 pc across, which is just about the same size as the long
313: extent of the so-called X-ray torus in the Crab Nebula.
314:
315: During its first year of operation \chandra\ has discovered point-like
316: sources within the two youngest Galactic oxygen-rich supernova
317: remnants (Cas A and G292.0+1.8) that are likely the compact remnants
318: of these SN explosions. The compact object in Cas A remains
319: mysterious (e.g., Pavlov et al.~2000), while the one in \g292\ appears
320: to have characteristics that are consistent with a young
321: rapidly-rotating pulsar like the Crab pulsar. Interestingly enough
322: Cas A and \g292 also differ in the properties of their X-ray emitting
323: ejecta. Cas A is dominated by Si- and Fe-rich ejecta that were likely
324: produced by explosive O- and Si-burning (Hughes et al.~2000). In
325: \g292, on the other hand, we have been unable to find evidence for
326: either of these particular types of nucleosynthetic yields, while the
327: most common ejecta features are rich in O, Ne, and Mg. Further study
328: should reveal whether these differences in the X-ray emitting ejecta
329: are due to an evolutionary or age effect or whether they signal more
330: fundamental differences in the stellar progenitors. Such studies
331: using \chandra\ will offer us a new window on the connection between
332: compact objects and the SN progenitors that form them.
333:
334: \acknowledgments
335:
336: This research has made use of the SIMBAD Astronomical Database
337: maintained by the Centre de Donn\'ees astronomiques de Strasbourg.
338: Financial support was provided by NASA contract NAS8-38252 (PSU), NASA
339: contract NAS8-39073 (SAO), and \chandra\ grant GO0-1035X to Rutgers.
340:
341: \begin{references}
342: \reference{}
343: Bautz, M.~W., et al.~1998, in Proc.~SPIE Vol 3444, X-ray
344: Optics, Instruments, and Missions, ed.~R.~B.\ Hoover \& A.~B.\ Walker,
345: 210. \reference{} Chevalier, R.~A.~2000, ApJ, 539, L45
346: \reference{}
347: Garmire, G.~P., et al.~1992, AIAA Space Program and Technologies Conference,
348: Huntsville, AL
349: \reference{}
350: Goss, W.~M., Shaver, P.~A., Zealey, W.~J., Murdin, P., \& Clark,
351: D.~H.~1979, MNRAS, 188, 357
352: \reference{}
353: Hughes, J.~P., Rakowski, C.~E., Burrows, D.~N., \&
354: Slane, P.~O.~2000, ApJ, 528, L109
355: \reference{}
356: Kennel, C.~F., \& Coroniti, F.~V.~1984, ApJ, 283, 694
357: \reference{}
358: Lyne, A.~G., \& Lorimer, D.~R.~1994, Nature, 369, 127
359: \reference{}
360: Milne, D.~K.~1969, Australian~J.~Phys., 22, 613
361: \reference{}
362: Murdin, P., \& Clark, D.~H.~1979, MNRAS, 189, 501
363: \reference{}
364: Pavlov, G.~G., Zavlin, V.~E., Aschenbach, B., Tr\"umper,
365: J., \& Sanwal, D.~2000, ApJ, 531, L53
366: \reference{}
367: Rees, M.~J., \& Gunn, J.~E.~1974, MNRAS, 167, 1
368: \reference{}
369: Seward, F.~D., \& Wang, Z.~R.~1988, ApJ, 332, 199
370: \reference{}
371: Shaver, P.~A., \& Goss, W.~M.~1970, Australian~J.~Phys., Astr.~Suppl.,
372: 14, 133
373: \reference{}
374: Saken, J.~M., Fesen, R.~A., \& Shull, J.~M.~1992, \apjs, 81, 715
375: \reference{}
376: Slane, P., Chen, Y., Schulz, N.~S., Seward, F.~D., Hughes, J.~P., \&
377: Gaensler, B.~M.~2000, ApJ, 533, L29
378: \reference{}
379: Torii, K., Tsunemi, H., \& Slane, P.~1998, in IAU Symp.~188 The Hot
380: Universe, ed.~K.~Koyama, S.~Kitamoto, \& M.~Itoh (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 258
381: \reference{}
382: Wallace, B., \& Gaensler, B.~1997, poster presented at the
383: Minnesota SNR Workshop, March 23-26, 1997
384: \reference{}
385: Weisskopf, M.~C., et al.~2000, ApJ, 536, L81
386:
387:
388: \end{references}
389:
390: \newpage
391:
392: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
393: \tablecaption{Power-law Spectral Model Fits for Pulsar Candidate}
394: \tablewidth{4.75truein}
395: \tablehead{
396: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Value and Uncertainty (1 $\sigma$)}
397: }
398: \startdata
399: $N_{\rm H}$ (H atoms cm$^{-2}$) & $3.17\pm0.15 \times 10^{21}$ \nl
400: $\alpha_{\rm P}$ & $1.72\pm0.05$ \nl
401: $F_{\rm E}(1\, \rm keV)$ (photon s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ keV$^{-1}$)
402: & $1.44\pm 0.07 \times 10^{-4}$ \nl
403: $\chi^2$/d.o.f & 116.1/102 \nl
404:
405: \enddata
406: \end{deluxetable}
407:
408: \newpage
409:
410: \figcaption[fig1.ps] {\chandra\ ACIS-S X-ray images of \g292\
411: in soft (left: 0.6--2 keV) and hard (right: 2--7 keV) X-ray bands. The
412: hard band clearly shows a diffuse, plerionic nebula containing a
413: central point-like source. The grayscale display for the hard band has been
414: adjusted so that the diffuse emission can be seen clearly, which has
415: ``burned in'' the point-like source causing it to appear extended.
416: Note that the point source can also be seen in the soft band image,
417: where it appears essentially unresolved.
418: \label{fig1}}
419:
420: \figcaption[fig2.ps] {ACIS-S X-ray spectrum of the entire \g292\
421: supernova remnant (data points at top), the estimated power-law model
422: for the diffuse nebula (middle curve), and the hard point source
423: (``pulsar candidate'') with best-fit power-law model (data points and
424: curve at bottom). Above 4 keV the diffuse nebula accounts for 66\% of
425: the total flux from \g292. The pulsar candidate spectrum extracted
426: from circular region 2.5 pixels (1.23$^{\prime\prime}$) in radius was
427: rebinned to 25 counts per channel before fitting to ensure appropriate
428: Gaussian errors for $\chi^2$ fitting.
429: \label{fig2}}
430:
431: \figcaption[fig3.ps] {\chandra\ ACIS-S 4--8 keV band X-ray image of
432: the pulsar wind nebula in \g292. The diffuse emission was adaptively
433: smoothed to an approximate signal-to-noise ratio of 10, while the
434: unresolved sources were smoothed using a single gaussian with $\sigma
435: = 0.5^{\prime\prime}$. The contour levels are plotted at values of
436: 0.0173, 0.0254, 0.0372, 0.0547, 0.0802, 0.118, 0.173, 0.619, 2.22 cts
437: s$^{-1}$ arcmin$^{-2}$. The insert shows the raw data in the
438: immediate vicinity of the pulsar candidate in unblocked pixels (i.e.,
439: 0.492$^{\prime\prime}$ $\times$ 0.492$^{\prime\prime}$). The
440: brightest pixel contains 45 detected events. Note the roughly
441: east-west extension of the central X-ray emission on both large and
442: small spatial scales. The plus sign in the main image panel marks the
443: approximate center of the soft thermal emission of the remnant.
444: \label{fig3}}
445:
446: \clearpage
447:
448: \plotfiddle{g292_acis_redheat.ps}{7in}{0}{100}{100}{-250}{-200}
449:
450: \clearpage
451:
452: \plotfiddle{sm_spec2a.ps}{5in}{0}{75}{75}{-240}{-200}
453:
454: \clearpage
455:
456: \plotfiddle{gray_cont6.ps}{5in}{0}{75}{75}{-240}{-200}
457:
458: \end{document}
459: