1: \documentclass{article}
2: \usepackage{emulateapj,pstricks,apjfonts}
3:
4: \def\bfs{\mbox{blank field sources}}
5: \def\1wga{\mbox{1WGA~J1226.9$+$3332}}
6: \def\fxv{\mbox{$F_X/F_V$}}
7: \def\cgs{\mbox{erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$}}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \submitted{ApJ accepted}
12:
13: \lefthead{1WGA~J1226.9$+$3332 : a high redshift cluster}
14: \righthead{Cagnoni et al.}
15:
16: \title{1WGA~J1226.9$+$3332 : a high redshift cluster discovered by {\em Chandra}}
17:
18: \author{I. Cagnoni\altaffilmark{1,2}, M. Elvis\altaffilmark{2}, D.-W. Kim\altaffilmark{2}, P. Mazzotta\altaffilmark{2,3}, J.-S. Huang\altaffilmark{2}
19: \and A. Celotti\altaffilmark{1}}
20: \affil{$^{1}$ SISSA, Via Beirut 4 -34138, Trieste, Italy}
21: \affil{$^{2}$ Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street,
22: Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}
23: \affil{$^{3}$ ESA fellow}
24: \footnote{email: Ilaria Cagnoni: ilale@sissa.it or icagnoni@cfa.harvard.edu\\
25: Martin Elvis: melvis@cfa.harvard.edu\\
26: Dong-Woo Kim: dkim@cfa.harvard.edu\\
27: Pasquale Mazzotta: pmazzotta@cfa.harvard.edu\\
28: Jiasheng S. Huang: jhuang@cfa.harvard.edu\\
29: Annalisa Celotti: celotti@sissa.it}
30:
31: \begin{abstract}
32:
33: We report the detection of \1wga \/ as an arcminute scale
34: extended X-ray source with the {\em Chandra} X-ray Observatory.
35: The {\em Chandra} observation and R and K band imaging
36: strongly support the identification of \1wga \/ as a high
37: redshift cluster of galaxies, most probably at $z=0.85 \pm 0.15$,
38: with an inferred
39: temperature $kT =10^{+4}_{-3}$~keV and an unabsorbed luminosity (in a $r=120^{\prime \prime}$ aperture) of
40: $1.3^{+0.16}_{-0.14} \times 10^{45}$~erg s$^{-1}$ (0.5-10~keV).
41: This indication of redshift is also supported by the K and R band imaging, and
42: is in agreement with the spectroscopic redshift of 0.89 found
43: by Ebeling et al. (2001).
44: The surface brightness profile is consistent with a
45: $\beta$-model with $\beta = 0.770 \pm 0.025$, $r_c=(18.1 \pm
46: 0.9)^{\prime \prime}$ (corresponding to $101 \pm 5$ kpc at $z=0.89$), and $S(0)=1.02 \pm 0.08$ counts arcsec$^{-2}$ .
47: \1wga \/ was selected as an extreme X-ray loud source with \fxv \/ $> 60$;
48: this selection method, thanks to the large area sampled,
49: seems to be a highly efficient method
50: for finding luminous high z clusters of galaxies.
51:
52: \end{abstract}
53:
54:
55: \keywords{
56: galaxies: high-redshift ---
57: galaxies: clusters: general ---
58: galaxies: clusters: individual (\1wga ) ---
59: X-rays: galaxies: clusters ---
60: X-rays: individual (\1wga )
61: }
62:
63: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
64: \section{Introduction}
65:
66: Clusters of galaxies are good tracers of the large scale
67: structure of the matter distribution in the universe.
68: The standard models of structure formation predict that
69: the cluster distribution and evolution is fully determined by the spectrum
70: of primordial perturbations and cosmological parameters $\Omega_0$ and
71: $\Lambda$ (e.g. Press \& Schechter 1974; and later works), thus
72: observations of high redshift clusters constrain these parameters
73: (e.g., Oukbir \& Blanchard 1992). Moreover X-ray measurements of high
74: redshift clusters of galaxies can place strong constraints on the
75: thermodynamic evolution of the intracluster medium (ICM).
76: For example the Luminosity-Temperature ($L_X-T$) relation at
77: different redshifts probes the interrelated evolution of
78: the cluster baryon mass and the total mass (e.g. Kaiser 1991; Evrard
79: \& Henry 1991; and later works).
80: Furthermore X-ray and observations of the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect
81: of a sample of objects at
82: different $z$ may be used to obtain an independent estimate of
83: $H_0$ (for a review see e.g., Birkinshaw 1999)
84:
85: Given this potential wealth of information in the
86: past few years a great effort has been made to search
87: for high redshift clusters of galaxies (e.g. Rosati et al. 1998;
88: Vikhlinin et al. 1998).
89: Among the different methods, X-ray surveys
90: have played the most important role,
91: but no method allowed the identification of more than
92: a handful of clusters at $z>0.8$.\\
93: The finding of clusters from the X-ray data was complicated mainly by the
94: low spatial and/or spectral resolution of the previous X-ray missions.
95: {\it Einstein} and {\it ROSAT} marked an important step in the study of
96: clusters but thanks to sub-arcsecond {\it Chandra} spatial resolution
97: it is now possible to distinguish easily between point sources and the
98: more diffuse X-ray emission from clusters at any redshift.
99:
100: We present the {\it Chandra} observation of \1wga .
101: This source is one of 16 peculiar {\em ROSAT} PSPC sources
102: selected for their extremely high X-ray to optical flux ratio
103: (Cagnoni et al. 2000; Cagnoni et al., in prep.).
104: \1wga \/ is a bright ($F_{0.1-2.4{\rm keV}} > 10^{-13}$ \cgs )
105: WGACAT (White, Giommi \& Angelini
106: 1994) source with blank fields, i.e. no optical
107: counterparts on the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey to O=21.5.
108: The extreme \fxv \/ ratio that follows from this is incompatible
109: with all major and common classes of extragalactic sources,
110: including normal quasars, AGNs,
111: normal galaxies and nearby clusters of galaxies (Maccacaro et
112: al. 1988). Possibilities for the nature of these `blanks'
113: (Cagnoni et al. in prep.) include:
114:
115:
116: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
117: %%%% FIGURE 1
118: \begin{figure*}[tb]
119: \pspicture(0,2)(9,12)
120: %\psgrid(0,0)(9,12)
121:
122: \rput[tl]{0}(0.,12){\epsfxsize=8.2cm
123: \epsffile{fig1a.epsi}}
124:
125: \rput[tl]{0}(10.5,12){\epsfxsize=7.2cm
126: \epsffile{fig1b.epsi}}
127:
128: \rput[tl]{0}(-0.1,4.5){
129: \begin{minipage}{18.5cm}
130: \small\parindent=3.5mm
131: {\sc Fig.}~1.--- {\em Chandra} view of 1WGA~J1226.9$+$3332: (a) cleaned data
132: (see text) in the whole S3 chip and (b) zoom of the cluster
133: (smoothed and background subtracted).
134: %
135: \par
136: \end{minipage}
137: }
138: \endpspicture
139: \vspace{-0.5in}
140: \end{figure*}
141: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
142:
143:
144: %
145: (a) Quasar-2s, i.e. high luminosity, high redshift
146: heavily obscured quasars, the bright analogs of
147: Seyfert~2s;
148: %
149: (b) Low Mass Seyfert-2s, that is AGNs powered by a low mass obscured
150: black hole (i.e. obscured Narrow Line Sy~1);
151: %
152: (c) AGNs with no big blue bump, e.g. ADAFs;
153: %
154: (d) Isolated Neutron Stars undergoing Bondi accretion from the
155: ISM (Madau \& Blaes 1994);
156: %
157: (e) $\gamma$-ray burst X-ray afterglows,
158: %.
159: (f) failed clusters, in which a large overdensity of matter
160: has collapsed but has not formed galaxies (Tucker, Tananbaum \& Remillard 1995);
161: %
162: and, most relevant to this paper, (g) high redshift clusters of galaxies.
163:
164: Here we present strong evidence that \1wga \/ is indeed a high redshift cluster.
165:
166:
167: We will use H$_0$=75~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$ and $q_0 = 0.5$;
168: errors in the paper represent 1$\sigma$ confidence levels, unless
169: explicitly stated otherwise.
170:
171: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
172: \section{{\em Chandra} observations}
173:
174: \1wga \/ was one of two `blanks' for which we obtained Cycle~1
175: {\em Chandra} (Weisskopf et al., 1996) observing time.
176: It was observed in
177: ACIS-S configuration (Garmire et al., in prep.) with the backside
178: illuminated S3 chip for a total useful exposure time of 9832.3 s.
179: The data was cleaned
180: as described in Markevitch et al. (2000a) and for
181: the spectral and image analysis we used the latest available
182: ACIS background dataset (Markevitch et al. 2000b).
183:
184: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
185: %%%% FIGURE 2
186: \begin{figure*}[b]
187: \pspicture(0,7)(4,12)
188: %\psgrid(0,0)(9,12)
189:
190: \rput[tl]{0}(3,12.1){\epsfysize=6.0cm
191: \epsffile{fig2.epsi}}
192:
193: \rput[tl]{0}(0,5.5){
194: \begin{minipage}{18.5cm}
195: \small\parindent=3.5mm
196: {\sc Fig.}~2.--- Background subtracted surface brightness radial profile of
197: \1wga \/ (error bars) together with the best fit $\beta$-model (see text).
198: %
199: \par
200: \end{minipage}
201: }
202: \endpspicture
203: \end{figure*}
204: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
205:
206: \subsection{Spatial analysis}
207:
208: To maximize the signal-to-noise ratio,
209: we extracted the image in the 0.5-5 keV band (Fig.~1a and b).
210: Along with a number of faint point-like sources,
211: \1wga \/ is clearly seen as an extended source on an arcminute scale.
212: It shows azimuthal symmetry, except for a possible excess to the
213: north-west, $\sim 40^{\prime \prime}$ from the cluster center.
214:
215: After subtracting the background, from the same regions in a normalized
216: ACIS background map (Markevitch et al. 2000b), we extracted the X-ray surface
217: brightness profile (Fig.~2) in concentric annular regions centered on
218: the X-ray emission peak and chosen in order to have 20 counts per annulus.
219: %The source is detectable above the noise out to a radius of
220: %100$^{\prime \prime}$ (Fig.~2) and the
221: The profile appears to be
222: smooth without any obvious central excess related to a cooling flow
223: (Figs.~1 and 2).
224:
225:
226:
227: We fitted the surface brightness profile with a standard $\beta$ model
228: \footnote{$S(r)=S(0)[1+(r/r_c)^2]^{-3 \beta + 1/2}$}
229: (Cavaliere \& Fusco-Femiano 1976) using the {\em Sherpa} (Siemiginowska
230: et al., in prep.) modeling and fitting tool from the CXC analysis
231: package CIAO 2.0 (Elvis et al., in prep.).
232: We obtained best fit values of $\beta = 0.770 \pm 0.025$, $r_c=(18.1 \pm
233: 0.9)^{\prime \prime}$ (corresponding to $101 \pm 5$ kpc at $z=0.89$), and $S(0)=1.02 \pm 0.08$ counts arcsec$^{-2}$ with a $\chi ^2$ of 27.5 for 26 degrees of freedom (d.o.f.).
234: The excess to the north-west of the cluster is also visible in the radial profile; a drop of the surface brightness at $\sim 40^{\prime \prime}$ is present in the radial profile for the north-west sector. Similar features in the surface brightness radial
235: profiles were detected by {\em Chandra} in nearby clusters (e.g. Markevitch et al. 1999;2000a;2001, Vikhlinin et al. 2001; Mazzotta et al. 2001) and interpreted as signs of subclump motion.
236:
237: \subsection{Spectral analysis}
238:
239: We extracted an overall spectrum in a circle with $r=120^{\prime \prime}$ in the 0.5-10 keV band in PI channels, corrected for the gain difference
240: between the different regions of the CCD.
241: The spectrum (Fig.~3) contains $\sim 1100$ net counts and we binned it in
242: order to have 100 counts per bin\footnote{A smaller binning, e.g. as in Fig.~3, leads to similar results}. Both the effective area file (ARF) and
243: the redistribution matrix (RMF) where computed by weighting each position
244: dependent ARF's and RMF's by the X-ray brightness.
245: We fitted the spectrum in the 0.5-10~keV range with an absorbed
246: Raymond-Smith model (Raymond \& Smith, 1977) using {\em Sherpa}.
247: The source redshift is treated as unknown and, because of the
248: the low statistics, no iron line or other line complex features
249: are expected to be visible.
250:
251: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
252: %%%% FIGURE 3 and 4
253: \begin{figure*}[tb]
254: \pspicture(0,2)(9,12)
255: %\psgrid(0,0)(9,12)
256:
257: \rput[tl]{0}(0.,12){\epsfxsize=8.5cm
258: \epsffile{fig3.epsi}}
259:
260: \rput[tl]{0}(10.5,12){\epsfxsize=6.8cm
261: \epsffile{fig4.epsi}}
262:
263: \rput[tl]{0}(-0.1,4.5){
264: \begin{minipage}{18.5cm}
265: \small\parindent=3.5mm
266: {\sc Fig.}~3.--- {\em Chandra} ACIS Spectrum and residuals to a Raymond-Smith
267: model with $kT=10.23$ keV and $z=0.89$. The spectrum was binned, for display
268: purposes, to obtain a minimum of 30 counts per bin.\\
269: \small\parindent=3.5mm
270: {\sc Fig.}~4.--- The contours of the fit with a Raymond-Smith
271: plasma at 1, 2 and 3 $\sigma$.
272: The three blue solid lines represent the luminosity-temperature relation (Markevitch 1998) for $q_0 =0.5$ and the three blue dashed lines for $q_0 =0$.
273: The red lines represent the limits on the redshift obtain from the R-K color
274: of the brightest object assuming it is a first ranked elliptical (Coleman, Wu \& Weedman 1980), while the dotted lines are the limits from the magnitude of the first ranked elliptical (see text). The big dot corresponds to the best fit to the {\em Chand
275: ra} spectrum.
276: %
277: \par
278: \end{minipage}
279: }
280: \endpspicture
281: %\vspace{-0.5in}
282: \end{figure*}
283: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
284:
285:
286:
287: In order to get an estimate of the temperature, we fixed
288: the equivalent hydrogen column density to the Galactic value
289: ($N_H=1.38 \times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$, Stark et al. 1992),
290: the metal abundance to 0.3 times
291: the Solar value, and we draw confidence levels
292: for the T and z (Fig. 4).
293: We find a best fit value of
294: $kT=10.24$~keV and $z=0.85$ ($\chi ^2$ is 18.68 for 20 d.o.f.)\footnote{
295: Normalizing the background map using an area of \1wga \/ observation without sources (7.56\% lower background) consistent results are obtained:
296: kT=11.94 keV and z=0.87}.
297: However, as shown in Fig.~4, these values are not well constrained.
298:
299:
300: While submitting this paper we found that the same object had been
301: independently identified as a cluster of galaxies in the WARPS survey (Ebeling et al. 2001) and
302: observed for Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect measurement by Joy et al. (2001).
303: The cluster spectroscopic redshift measured by Ebeling et al. (2001)
304: is $z=0.89$, which is within the errors of our estimate based on {\em Chandra} and optical/IR constraints (see Section~4).
305: Fixing the redshift to this value we obtain a temperature of
306: $kT =10.47^{+4}_{-3}$~keV (kT=12.07 keV using a normalized background), which is in good agreement with that obtained from the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich measurement by Joy et al. (2001) ($kT =10.0^{+2.0}_{-1.5}$~keV).
307: The absorbed 0.5-2.0 keV flux\footnote{The main component in the flux error is the uncertainty on the cluster temperature (quoted in the text); using the $\pm 1\sigma$ values on T we derive an error of $+11$\% $-12$\% on the flux.
308: Other contributions come from the normalization chosen for the background ($\pm 9$\%),
309: from the fraction of counts lost using the $r=120^{\prime \prime}$ aperture assuming a
310: $\beta$-profile ($\pm 5$\%) and from the Poisson error on the counts ($\pm 3$\%)}
311: %
312: in a $r=120^{\prime \prime}$ aperture is $(3.0 \pm 0.3) \times 10^{-13}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$,
313: consistent with the Ebeling et al. (2001) PSPC measurement;
314: the 0.5-10.0 keV absorbed flux in the same aperture (Table~1) is $(8.03^{+0.96}_{-0.88}) \times 10^{-13}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. For z=0.89 the
315: unabsorbed bolometric and 0.5-2.0 keV band luminosities are
316: $L=(2.2 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{45}$ erg~s$^{-1}$ and $L_{X(0.5-2.0)}=(4.4 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{44}$ erg~s$^{-1}$ respectively.
317:
318: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
319:
320: \section{Optical, Infrared and Radio Observations}
321:
322: We obtained an R-band image of the \1wga \/ field on Feb. 2, 1997
323: using the SAO 1.2~m telescope on Mt.Hopkins.
324: A R$ = 20.4 \pm 0.2$ galaxy is detected less than 1$^{\prime \prime}$
325: from the X-ray centroid (Table~1).
326:
327: A K-band image of the field was obtained
328: using NSFCam at the NASA IRTF on Jan. 31, 2000.
329: The same galaxy is also seen, but is much brighter at
330: K=15.5 (Fig. 5) isophotal magnitude.
331: The K-band magnitude within the core radius of the X-ray source
332: is K=15.4, implying that little large scale IR emission
333: is present.
334: The R-K color of this object is 5.1 with an estimated uncertainty
335: of 0.3 mag due to the poor image quality in both K- and R-band.
336:
337:
338:
339: Comparing R and K-band images, it is clear that there are many more objects
340: detected in the K- than in the R-band. We detect
341: 23 objects with K$<$19.5 mag in the $1.5'\times1.5'$
342: image using the source extractor software (SExtractor,
343: Bertin \& Arnouts 1996) versus only 4 at R.
344: The star/galaxy classification was carried out
345: morphologically using the Kron radius (Bertin \& Arnouts 1996), and 3 objects are
346: classified as pointlike. These objects are also detected in the R-band
347: and have bluer colors (R-K$<$4.2) than the extended objects; we argue
348: they are stars.
349: We should not have to worry about the star contamination of
350: the sample since there are very few stars with K$>$16 (e.g. Glazebrook et al. 1995).
351: The rest of the morphologically extended objects
352: are galaxies. These, including the bright one located
353: at the X-ray centroid, have very similar red colors ($4.5<$R-K$<6.5$),
354: implying that they likely have
355: similar redshifts and belong to a cluster.
356: A high-z cluster,
357: CIG J0848+4453, at z=1.27 was detected in a near-IR field survey using
358: similar color criteria in an over-dense region (Stanford et al 1997).
359: The apparent asymmetry of the galaxy distribution may be an artifact
360: of the longer exposure time at the center of the K-band mosaic image which is offset from the X-ray centroid.
361:
362: The galaxy surface density in the K-band image is clearly high (Fig.~5).
363: We generate K-band galaxy number counts in our field in the range
364: $15<K<19.5$, and compare them with those obtained from
365: the near-IR field survey in this range (Gardner et al. 1993,
366: Saracco et al. 1997, Huang et al. 1997, Minezaki et al. 1998,
367: Huang et al. 2000) with their coverage ranging from 200~arcmin$^2$ to
368: 10~deg$^2$. The number counts obtained
369: from our image are substantially higher ($> 10 \sigma$, a factor of
370: 100 at K=19) than those from the field
371: surveys. Such a large excess cannot be due to Poisson statistics or magnitude
372: errors.
373:
374: Both the high density and the similar (extremely red) colors for these galaxies thus imply that they are likely to be members of a cluster.
375:
376:
377: The FIRST survey detected a faint $3.61 \pm 0.18$~mJy source
378: at 1.4 GHz (Becker, White \& Helfand, 1995) close to
379: the center of the X-ray emission (Table~1).
380: The radio source is pointlike (FWHM$ \leq 0.91^{\prime \prime}$, $\leq 16$~kpc at $z=0.85$)
381: and has a luminosity $L_R (z=0.85) \sim 6.6 \times 10^{24}$ ~W~Hz$^{-1}$,
382: compatible with low luminosity radio-loud AGNs (e.g. Zirbel \& Baum, 1995).
383:
384:
385:
386:
387:
388: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
389: \section{Discussion and Conclusion}
390:
391:
392: {\em Chandra} has shown that \1wga \/ is an extended X-ray source,
393: with a hard, high temperature thermal spectrum.
394: Optical and IR imaging has shown that \1wga \/ has
395: faint optical/IR counterparts.
396: A cluster of galaxies is
397: the only known type of object that could fit such a
398: description. Moreover the K-band image shows a strong excess
399: of galaxies compared with field counts at K$ > 17$ (Fig.~ 5) around \1wga .
400: Physical clustering is the only possible explanation.
401: Several lines of argument go on to suggest that it
402: is a high redshift cluster of galaxies.
403: Below we list these arguments and try to constrain its
404: temperature and redshift. These results are summarized in Figure~4.
405:
406: \noindent
407: (1)
408: The {\it Chandra} X-ray profile is well fitted by a $\beta$ model with
409: $\beta$=0.77, a value in agreement with a typical relaxed cluster (e.g.
410: Jones \& Forman, 1999 and references therein).
411: Moreover, if the cluster redshift is $0.7<z<1.2$, then
412: the observed angular core radius, $r_c=(18.1 \pm
413: 0.9)^{\prime \prime}$ ($101 \pm 5$ kpc at $z=0.89$ with the assumed
414: cosmology),
415: corresponds to a linear size of $90<r<150$~kpc
416: for any value of $\Omega$ ($130<r<220$~kpc
417: for any value of $\Omega$ for $H_0$=50~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$),
418: values consistent with a typical relaxed cluster.
419:
420: \noindent
421: (2)
422: It is well known that clusters of galaxies follow
423: a well-defined Luminosity-Temperature
424: relation (e.g. Markevitch 1998 and reference therein).
425: Recently it has been shown that the local $L_X-T$ relation does not evolve
426: (or is consistent with little evolution) with redshift up to $z\approx 0.8$
427: (see e.g. Wu et al. 1999; Della Ceca et al
428: 2000; Fairley et al. 2000 and reference therein).
429: Fig.~4 shows that the $L_X-T$ relation ($L = A T_6^{\alpha}$ where
430: $T_6 =T/6$ keV, $\alpha =2.02 \pm 0.40$ and
431: $A=(1.71 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{44}$ $h^{-2}$ erg s$^{-1}$)
432: from Markevitch (1998) requires a
433: $3 \sigma$ lower limit of $T>4$~keV and z$>$0.4, while
434: the $1 \sigma $ limits require T$>7.5$~keV and $z>0.65$
435: if no evolution is assumed.
436: The best fit value of 0.85 obtained from {\em Chandra} spectrum (dot in
437: Figure~4) is consistent with the unevolving $L_X-T$ relation.
438: % and with the {\em Chandra} core radius.
439:
440: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
441: %%%% FIGURE 5
442: \begin{figure*}[tb]
443: \pspicture(0,2)(9,12)
444: %\psgrid(0,0)(9,18)
445:
446: \rput[tl]{0}(4.5,12){\epsfxsize=8cm
447: \epsffile{fig5.epsi}}
448:
449: \rput[tl]{0}(2,4.5){
450: \begin{minipage}{18.5cm}
451: \small\parindent=3.5mm
452: {\sc Fig.}~5.--- K-band image of \1wga . The circle shows the {\em Chandra}
453: X-ray core radius of $18^{\prime \prime}$.
454: %
455: \par
456: \end{minipage}
457: }
458: \endpspicture
459: \vspace{-0.8in}
460: \end{figure*}
461: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
462:
463:
464: \noindent
465: (3)
466: K-band imaging has shown that \1wga \/ has
467: a galaxy at K=15.5. If this source is a first ranked cluster elliptical
468: with $M_K =-26.7 \pm 0.5$ (Collins \& Mann 1998),
469: then, assuming negligible K-correction, $q_0 =0.5$ and , H$_0$=50~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$ as in Collins \& Mann (1998),
470: it has $z=0.68^{+0.30}_{-0.19}$ (dotted lines in Fig.~4).
471:
472: \noindent
473: (4)
474: the color of the K-band galaxies is extremely red, with none bluer than R-K$\sim 4.5$ and a maximum R-K$=6.5$.
475: Only a unevolving elliptical galaxy at $0.7<$z$<1.5$
476: or a Sbc galaxy at z$>1.1$ can have such a red color (Coleman, Woo \& Weedman, 1980).
477: Using the more accurate R-K$\sim 5.1 \pm 0.3$ of the first ranked elliptical
478: we can restrict the redshift range to $0.75 < z < 1.0$
479: (red lines in Fig.~4).
480:
481: Using all these constraints we conclude that
482: \1wga \/ is a distant cluster of galaxies with a most probable redshift of
483: $0.85 \pm 0.15$ and not smaller than $z=0.65$.
484:
485: This gives $kT =10^{+4}_{-3}$~keV and implies an X-ray luminosity, determined in a $r=120^{\prime \prime}$ aperture, of
486: $L_{X (0.5 - 10 keV)} = 1.3^{+0.16}_{-0.14} \times 10^{45}$ erg s$^{-1}$,
487: corresponding, for $z=0.85$, to a bolometric $L=(2 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{45}$ erg s$^{-1}$.
488: Our estimated redshift is similar to the spectroscopic $z=0.89$ found by Ebeling et al. (2001).
489:
490: The blank field X-ray source \1wga \/ is thus a highly luminous and
491: massive high redshift cluster and a useful source to
492: determine the evolution of the clusters X-ray luminosity function (e.g. Rosati et al., 1998).
493: Since models in the direction of low $\Omega$ universe
494: (with or without cosmological constant) (e.g. Henry 2000, Borgani \& Guzzo 2001) predict a higher density of high redshift clusters compared to high $\Omega$ models, finding hot high redshift clusters has a strong leverage on cosmological models.
495:
496: Since such high luminosity, high redshift clusters should be rare,
497: the relative ease with which
498: this discovery was made is potentially of great significance.
499: The search for high \fxv \/ sources (`blanks'), sampling a large area of the sky, is an efficient method of finding very luminous high redshift clusters;
500: serendipitous typical flux limited surveys can find (and found) plenty of $z>0.6$
501: clusters, but they are inefficient at finding such luminous clusters
502: because they cover relatively small areas ($\sim 100$ deg$^2$).
503: This methodology is a useful complement to serendipitous flux limited surveys.
504:
505:
506:
507:
508: \acknowledgments
509:
510: We gratefully acknowledge the work by the whole Chandra team in
511: making {\em Chandra} a great success and the staff of CXC for the rapid reprocess
512: of the data and the CIAO data analysis software.
513: We are grateful to M. Markevitch for making his data available in electronic form and for his prompt answers to ACIS background related questions.
514: We thank M. Massarotti, R. Della Ceca, M. Chiaberge, S. Borgani and S. Andreon
515: for useful discussion.
516: IC thanks A. Fruscione, F. Nicastro and A. Siemiginowska for a quick
517: introduction to CIAO.
518: We are also grateful to the staffs of NASA-IRTF and FLWO.
519:
520: This research has made use of the
521: NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet
522: Propulsion Laboratory, CalTech, under contract with
523: the NASA.
524:
525: This work was supported by NASA grant GO 0-1086X
526: and by the Italian MURST (IC and AC).
527: P.M. acknowledges an ESA fellowship.
528:
529:
530: \begin{references}
531:
532: \reference{}Becker, R.H., White, R.L. \& Helfand, D.J. 1995, ApJ, 450, 559
533:
534: \reference{}Bertin E., \& Arnouts S. 1996, A\&AS, 117, 693
535:
536: \reference{} Birkinshaw, M. 1999, Phys. Rep, 310, 97
537:
538: \reference{} Borgani, S. \& Guzzo, L., 2001, Nature, 409, 68016, 39
539:
540: \reference{} Cagnoni, I., Celotti, A., Elvis, M., Kim, D.-W. \& Nicastro, F., 2000
541: proceedings of the "4th Italian Congress on AGNs", Trieste May 2000, MemSAIt in press
542: (astro-ph/0006257)
543:
544: \reference{}Cavaliere, A. \& Fusco-Femiano, R., 1976, A\&A, 49, 137
545:
546: \reference{}Collins, C.A. \& Mann, R. G., 1998, MNRAS, 297, 128
547:
548: \reference{}Coleman, G.D., Wu, C.-C. \& Weedman, D.W., 1980, ApJS, 43, 393
549:
550: \reference{}Della Ceca, R., Scaramella, R., Gioia, I.M., Rosati, P., Fiore, F. \& Squires, G., 2000, A\&A, 353, 498
551:
552: \reference{} Ebeling, H. et al. 2001, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0012175)
553:
554: \reference{} Evrard, A.\ E.\ \& Henry, J.\ P.\ 1991, \apj, 383, 95
555:
556: \reference{}Fairley, B. W., Jones, L. R., Scharf, C.,
557: Ebeling, H., Perlman, E., Horner, D., Wegner, G. \& Malkan, M.,
558: 2000, MNRAS, 315, 669
559:
560: \reference{}Forman, W. \& Jones, C., 1984, ApJ, 276, 38
561:
562: \reference{}Gardner, J.P., Cowie L.L., Wainscoat R.J., 1993, ApJ, 415, L9
563:
564: \reference{}Glazebrook, K., Peacock, J.A., Collins, C.A., \& Miller, L., 1995, MNRAS, 266, 65
565:
566: \reference{}Henry, J.\ P.\ 2000, \apj, 534, 565
567:
568:
569: \reference{}Huang J.-S., Cowie L.L., Gardner J.P., et al., 1997, ApJ, 476, 12
570:
571: \reference{}Huang J.-S. Thompson, D., K\"ummel M.W., Meisenheimer K., Wolf C.
572: Beckwith S.V.W., Fockenbrock R., Hippelein H., von Kuhlmann B.,
573: Phleps S., R\"oser, H.-J., and Thommes E. 2000, A\&A, accepted.
574:
575: \reference{}Jones, C. \& Forman, W., 1999, ApJ, 511, 65
576: \reference{} Joy, M. et al., 2001, ApJL submitted (astro-ph/0012052)
577:
578: \reference{} Kaiser, N.\ 1991, \apj, 383,
579: 104
580:
581: \reference{}Maccacaro, T., Gioia, I.M., Wolter, A., Zamorani, G. \&
582: Stocke, J.T., 1988, ApJ, 326, 680
583:
584: \reference{}Madau, P. \& Blaes, O., 1994, ApJ, 423, 748.
585:
586: \reference{}Machalski, J. \& Condon, J.J., 1999, ApJS, 123, 41
587:
588: \reference{}Markevitch, M., 1998, ApJ, 504, 27
589:
590: \reference{}Markevitch, M. et al., 1999, ApJ, 521, 526
591:
592: \reference{}Markevitch, M. et al., 2000a, ApJ, 541, 542
593:
594:
595: \reference{} Markevich, M. et al. 2000b, ``ACIS Background'', ACIS
596: Calibration Data and Data Products
597: (http://asc.harvard.edu/cal/Links/Acis/acis/WWWacis\_cal.html)
598:
599: \reference{}Markevitch, M., 2001, Proceedings of teh ``X-ray astronomy meeting'', Palermo, Sep. 4-8, 2000, in press (astro-ph/0102291)
600:
601:
602: \reference{}Minezaki T., Kobayashii Y., Yoshii Y., Peterson B.A., 1998, ApJ, 494, 111
603:
604:
605: \reference{} Oukbir, J.\ \&
606: Blanchard, A.\ 1992, \aap, 262, L21
607:
608: \reference{1974ApJ...187..425P} Press, W.\ H.\ \&
609: Schechter, P.\ 1974, \apj, 187, 425
610:
611: \reference{}Raymond, J.C, \& Smith, B.W., 1977, APJS, 35, 419
612:
613: \reference{} Rosati, P., della Ceca, R., Norman, C.\ \& Giacconi, R.\ 1998, \apjl,
614: 492,
615: L21
616:
617: \reference{}Stanford, S. A.; Elston, Richard; Eisenhardt, Peter R.; Spinrad, Hyron; Stern,
618: Daniel; Dey, Arjun 1997, AJ, 114, 2232
619:
620: \reference{}Saracco P., D'Odorico S., Moorwood A., et al, 1999, A\&A, 349, 751
621:
622: \reference{}Stark, A.A, Gammie, C.F., Wilson, R.W., Bally, J., Linke, R.A., Heiles, C. \& Hurwitz, M., 1992, ApJS, 79, 77
623:
624: \reference{}Tucker W. H., Tananbaum, H. \& Remillard, R. A., 1995, ApJ, 444, 532
625:
626: \reference{} Vikhlinin, A.,
627: McNamara, B.\ R., Forman, W., Jones, C., Quintana, H.\ \& Hornstrup, A.\
628: 1998, \apj, 502, 558
629:
630: \reference{} Vikhlinin, A., Markevitch, M. \& Murray, S. S., 2001 ApJ submitted (astro-ph/0008496)
631:
632:
633:
634: \reference{}Weisskopf, M.C., O'Dell, S.L. \& Van Speybroeck, L.P., 1996, SPIE, 2805, 2
635:
636: \reference{}White, N.E., Giommi, P. \& Angelini, L., 1994, IAUC 6100
637:
638: \reference{}Wu, X.-P., Xue,Y.J. \& Fang, L.-Z., ApJ. 524, 22
639:
640: \reference{} Zirbel, B.L. \& Baum, S.A., 1995, ApJ, 448, 521
641:
642:
643: \end{references}
644:
645: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
646: {\footnotesize
647: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.4}
648: \renewcommand{\tabcolsep}{1mm}
649: \begin{center}
650: TABLE 1
651: \vspace{1mm}
652:
653: {\sc 1WGA~J1226.9$+$3332 observations}
654: \vspace{1mm}
655:
656: \begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
657: \hline \hline
658: Energy Band & Instrument & Date &Exposure &Coordinates &Offset$^a$ &Count Rate &Flux (units)\\
659: & & &(ks) &(J2000) &($\prime \prime$) &(Counts s$^{-1}$) & \\
660: \hline
661: X-ray &{\it Chandra} &Jul 31 2000 &9832.3 &12 26 58.2 +33 32 48.28 &0.0 &$0.107 \pm 0.006^b$ &$8.03 \times 10^{-13}$ (\cgs $^c$)\\
662: R-band &SAO 48in &Feb 02 1997 &900 &12 26 58.2 +33 32 48.7 &0.87 &-- &$20.4 \pm 0.2$ (Mag.)\\
663: K-band &IRTF &Jan 31 2000 &1200 &12 26 58 +33 32 48$^c$ &2.0 &-- &15.5 (Mag.)\\
664: Radio &FIRST &-- &-- &12 26 58.19 +33 32 48.61 &0.79 &-- &$3.61 \pm 0.18$ (mJy at 1.4~GHz)\\
665: \hline
666: \end{tabular}
667: \end{center}
668: $^a$ Offset from {\em Chandra} position\\
669: $^b$ [0.5-10 keV] in a circle with r=120$^{\prime \prime}$ computed from the spectral model within sherpa\
670: $^c$ Due to the lack of bright stars in the K-band image,
671: we obtained an estimate of the position using the objects in common with the R
672: image.\\
673: }
674: \vspace{3mm}
675: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
676:
677:
678:
679:
680:
681: \end{document}
682:
683:
684:
685:
686:
687:
688:
689:
690: