1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: % 000131

3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4: % THIS STUFF IS FOR MY FULLY PORTABLE REFERENCE NOTATION.

5: 

6: 

7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8: % ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL:

9: % LINE INDENTATION:

10: %\def\rn{\noindent\parshape 2 0truecm 8.8truecm 0.3truecm 8.5truecm}

11: %\def\rn{\noindent\parshape 2 0truecm 16truecm 0.5truecm 15.5truecm}

12: % NAME STYLE: Neumann, A. E.

13: %\def\nn#1 #2{#1, #2.}				% Name with 1 initial

14: %\def\nnn#1 #2 #3{#1, #2. #3.}			% Name with 2 initials

15: %\def\nnnn#1 #2 #3 #4{#1, #2. #3. #4.}		% Name with 3 initials

16: %\def\nnnnn#1 #2 #3 #4 #5{#1, #2. #3. #4. #5.}	% Name with 4 initials

17: % AUTHOR SEPARATION STYLE: "first, & second", "first, second, & third"

18: %\def\dualand{, \&\hbox{ }}			% Lower case "and" already in use.

19: %\def\multiand{, \&\hbox{ }}			% Lower case "and" already in use.

20: % JOURNAL ARTICLE STYLE: 

21: %\def\rf#1;#2;#3;#4;#5 {{\frenchspacing\par\rn#1 #2, #3, #4, #5 \par}}

22: % BOOK STYLE: 

23: %\def\rfbook#1;#2;#3;#4;#5 {{\frenchspacing\par\rn#1 #2, #3 (#4: #5)\par}}

24: % PROCEEDINGS STYLE: 

25: %\def\rfproc#1;#2;#3;#4;#5;#6 {{\frenchspacing\par\rn#1 #2, in #3, ed. #4 (#5: #6)\par}}

26: % PREPRINT STYLE: 

27: %\def\rfprep#1;#2;#3 {{\par\rn#1 #2, #3\par}}

28: %\def\rfprep#1;#2;#3 {{\par\rn#1 #2, preprint (#3)\par}}

29: %\def\rfprepp#1;#2;#3 {{\par\rn#1 #2, in press (#3)\par}}

30: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

31: 

32: 

33: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

34: % PHYSICAL REVIEW:

35: % LINE INDENTATION:

36: %\def\rn{\noindent\parshape 2 0truecm 8.8truecm 0.3truecm 8.5truecm}

37: % NAME STYLE: A. E. Neumann

38: %\def\nn#1 #2{#2. #1}				% Name with 1 initial

39: %\def\nnn#1 #2 #3{#2. #3. #1}			% Name with 2 initials

40: %\def\nnnn#1 #2 #3 #4{#2. #3. #4 #1}		% Name with 3 initials

41: %\def\nnnnn#1 #2 #3 #4 #5{#2. #3. #4 #5. #1}	% Name with 4 initials

42: % AUTHOR SEPARATION STYLE: "first and second", "first, second, and third"

43: %\def\dualand{ and\hbox{ }}				

44: %\def\multiand{ and,\hbox{ }}				

45: % JOURNAL ARTICLE STYLE:

46: %\def\rf#1;#2;#3;#4;#5 {{\frenchspacing\par\rn#1, #3 {\bf #4}, #5 (#2). \par}}

47: % BOOK STYLE:

48: %\def\rfbook#1;#2;#3;#4;#5 {{\frenchspacing\par\rn#1, {\it #3} (#5, #4, #2).\par}}

49: % PREPRINT STYLE: 

50: %\def\rfprep#1;#2;#3 {{\par\frenchspacing\rn#1, Report  No. #3, #2 (unpublished)\par}}

51: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

52: 

53: 

54: %\def\rg#1;#2;#3;#4;#5;#6 {\par\rn#1 #2, {\it #3}, {\bf #4}, #5 (``#6'') \par}

55: % JOURNAL ARTICLE STYLE: APJ + ITALIC JOURNAL & BOLD VOLUME:

56: %\def\rf#1;#2;#3;#4;#5 {\par\rn#1 #2, {\it #3}, {\bf #4}, #5\par}

57: % BOOK STYLE: APJ + ITALIC 

58: %\def\rfbook#1;#2;#3;#4;#5 {{\frenchspacing\par\rn#1 #2, {\it #3} (#4: #5)\par}}

59: % PROCEEDINGS STYLE: APJ + ITALIC 

60: %\def\rfproc#1;#2;#3;#4;#5;#6 {{\frenchspacing\par\rn#1 #2, in {\it #3}, ed. #4 (#5: #6)\par}}

61: % BRIEFER PREPRINT STYLE: 

62: %\def\rfprep#1;#2;#3  {{\par\rn#1 #2, #3\par}}

63: %\def\rfprepp#1;#2;#3 {{\par\rn#1 #2, #3\par}}

64: 

65: 

66: % NAME STYLE: A E Neumann

67: %\def\nn#1 #2{#2 #1}						% Name with 1 initial

68: %\def\nnn#1 #2 #3{#2 #3 #1}					% Name with 2 initials

69: %\def\nnnn#1 #2 #3 4{#2 #3 #4 #1}				% Name with 3 initials

70: 

71: 

72: \def\second{{\rm s}}

73: \def\K{{\rm K}}

74: \def\milliK{{\rm mK}}

75: \def\mK{{\rm \mu K}}

76: \def\muK{{\rm \mu K}}

77: \def\MJy{{\rm MJy}}

78: \def\Jy{{\rm Jy}}

79: \def\mJy{{\rm mJy}}

80: \def\sr{{\rm sr}}

81: \def\MJysr{\MJy/\sr}

82: \def\Mpc{{\rm Mpc}}

83: \def\GHz{{\rm GHz}}

84: \def\km{{\rm km}}

85: \def\s{{\rm s}}

86: 

87: 

88: \def\expec#1{\langle#1\rangle}

89: \def\notyet{\vskip0.5cm{\large [Not written yet]}\vskip0.5cm}

90: 

91: \def\etal{{\frenchspacing\it et al.}}

92: \def\ie{{\frenchspacing\it i.e.}}

93: \def\eg{{\frenchspacing\it e.g.}}

94: \def\etc{{\frenchspacing\it etc.}}

95: \def\rms{rms}

96: %\def\rms{{\frenchspacing r.m.s.}}

97: 

98: \def\crr{\cr\noalign{\vskip 4pt}}

99: 

100: 

101: %%%% EQUATION STUFF: %%%%

102: \def\beq#1{\begin{equation}\label{#1}}

103: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}

104: \def\beqa#1{\begin{eqnarray}\label{#1}}

105: \def\eeqa{\end{eqnarray}}

106: \def\eq#1{equation~(\ref{#1})}

107: \def\Eq#1{Equation~(\ref{#1})}

108: \def\eqn#1{~(\ref{#1})}

109: 

110: %%%% FIGURE STUFF: %%%%

111: \def\fig#1{Figure~\ref{#1}}

112: \def\Fig#1{Figure~\ref{#1}}

113: 

114: %%%% SECTION REFERENCING STUFF: %%%%

115: \def\sec#1{Section~\ref{#1}}

116: \def\Sec#1{Section~\ref{#1}}

117: 

118: %\def\ns{\vskip-0.2truecm}

119: 

120: %\simlt and \simgt produce > and < signs with twiddle underneath

121: \def\spose#1{\hbox to 0pt{#1\hss}}

122: \def\simlt{\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$}}

123:      \raise 2.0pt\hbox{$\mathchar"13C$}}}

124: \def\simgt{\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$}}

125:      \raise 2.0pt\hbox{$\mathchar"13E$}}}

126: %\simpropto produces \propto with twiddle underneath

127: \def\simpropto{\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$}}

128:      \raise 2.0pt\hbox{$\propto$}}}

129: 

130: \def\ed{\end{document}}

131: 

132: %to get the nice 'draft' on each page:

133: \def\draft{

134: \special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 200 100 translate

135: 65 rotate /Times-Roman findfont 216 scalefont setfont

136: 0 0 moveto .95 setgray (DRAFT) show grestore}def end}

137: }

138: 

139: 

140: \def\P{{\rm P}}

141: 

142: \def\Ob{\Omega_{\rm b}}

143: \def\Oc{\Omega_{\rm cdm}}

144: \def\Ok{\Omega_{\rm k}}

145: \def\Ol{\Omega_\Lambda}

146: \def\Om{\Omega_{\rm m}}

147: \def\On{\Omega_\nu}

148: \def\ob{\omega_{\rm b}}

149: \def\oc{\omega_{\rm cdm}}

150: \def\ok{\omega_{\rm k}}

151: \def\ol{\omega_\Lambda}

152: \def\om{\omega_{\rm m}}

153: \def\on{\omega_\nu}

154: \def\Cl{C_\l}

155: \def\dT{\delta T}

156: \def\ns{n_s}

157: \def\nt{n_t}

158: %\def\Qs{Q_s}

159: %\def\Qt{Q_t}

160: \def\As{A_s}

161: \def\At{A_t}

162: \def\dA{d_{\rm lss}}

163: \def\zlss{z_{lss}}

164: 

165: \def\dT{\delta T}

166: %\def\data{{\bf\delta T}}

167: \def\data{{\rm data}}

168: \def\L{{\cal L}}

169: 

170: 

171: \def\w{{\bf w}}

172: 

173: \def\k{{\bf k}}

174: \def\p{{\bf p}}

175: \def\d{{\bf d}}

176: \def\x{\hat {\bf x}}

177: \def\y{\hat {\bf y}}

178: \def\xh{\widehat{\bf x}}

179: \def\th{\hbox{\boldmath $\theta$}} 

180: \def\tth{\hbox{\boldmath $\tilde \theta$}} 

181: \def\ep{\hbox{\boldmath $\epsilon$}} 

182: \def\ttheta{\hbox{$\tilde \theta$}} 

183: 

184: \def\C{{\bf C}}

185: \def\I{{\bf I}}

186: \def\M{{\bf M}}

187: 

188: 

189: 

190: \def\l{\ell}

191: \def\llo{\l_{\rm low}}

192: \def\lhi{\l_{\rm high}}

193: \def\Cl{C_\ell}

194: \def\Clo{C_\ell^{low}}

195: \def\Chi{C_\ell^{high}}

196: \def\lstar{\l^*}

197: \def\ith{i^{th}}

198: \def\first{1^{st}}

199: \def\second{2^{nd}}

200: \def\bi#1{\hbox{\boldmath{$#1$}}}

201: 

202: 

203: \documentstyle[prd,aps,epsf]{revtex}

204: %\documentstyle[emulateapj,danonecolfloat]{article}

205: %\documentstyle[aasms4]{article}

206: \def\NoApjSectionMarkInTitle#1{#1.\ }

207: %\draft

208: \begin{document}

209: %\twocolumn[%%% Begin front material

210: \twocolumn[\hsize\textwidth\columnwidth\hsize\csname@twocolumnfalse\endcsname

211: 

212: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

213: 

214: %\tighten

215: %\eqsecnum

216: %\received{4 August 1988}

217: %\accepted{23 September 1988}

218: %\journalid{337}{15 January 1989}

219: %\articleid{11}{14}

220: 

221: 

222: %\submitted{Submitted to ApJ May 20, 1999}

223: %\submitted{\today. To be submitted to ApJ.}

224: %\submitted{Submitted to ApJL September 16; accepted February 2}

225: 

226: \title{The nature of the E-B decomposition of CMB polarization}

227: \author{Matias Zaldarriaga}

228: \address{Physics Department, New York University,

229: 4 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003}

230: \date{May 10 2001. Submitted to Phys. Rev. D.}

231: 

232: \maketitle 

233: 

234: \vskip 1pc

235: 

236: \keywords{CMB---methods: data analysis}

237: 

238: 

239: \begin{abstract}

240: 

241: We present a derivation of the transformation between the $Q$ and $U$

242: Stokes parameters and the $E$ and $B$ scalar and pseudo-scalar fields.

243: We emphasize the geometrical properties that such transformation must

244: satisfy. We present the $E$ and $B$ decomposition of some simple maps

245: and of a model for a supernova remnant. We discuss the relative

246: amplitudes of the $E$ and $B$ components and argue that for generic

247: random maps $E$ and $B$ should have roughly the same amplitudes.

248: 

249: \end{abstract}

250: 

251: 

252: %\keywords{cosmic microwave background --- methods: data analysis}

253: 

254: ]%%% End front material

255: 

256: 

257: 

258: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

259: 

260: \section{Introduction}\label{introduction}

261: 

262: In the last few years there was a great surge of interest in the

263: polarization anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB).

264: The detection of CMB polarization anisotropies has become a major goal

265: in our field, prompting many groups to build experiments and to start

266: thinking about future satellite missions dedicated to polarization

267: (see for example \cite{1998ApJ...495..580K,staggs,hedman,peterson}).

268: 

269: The pattern of polarization on the sky can be characterized in terms

270: of a scalar ($E$) and a pseudo-scalar field ($B$)

271: \cite{2.kks,3.spinlong}.  This decomposition is particularly useful

272: because density fluctuations cannot produce $B$ type polarization

273: \cite{3.kks,sz97}.  A $B$ type pattern is a direct signature of the

274: presence of a stochastic background of gravitational waves. Such

275: detection would provide invaluable information about Inflation (for

276: estimates of how constraints on parameters of the inflationary model

277: would improve by measuring polarization see for example

278: \cite{1997ApJ...488....1Z,2000ApJ...530..133T,kinney}).  This is

279: perhaps the most important source for the new interest in

280: polarization. It has also been proposed that a detection of $B$

281: polarization could signal other types of ``new physics'' \cite{lue}.

282: 

283: The mathematics of the $E-B$ decomposition has been presented in

284: several papers

285: \cite{2.kks,3.spinlong,1997PhRvD..56..596H,1998ApJ...503....1Z,tegoliv}.

286: In this paper we will present a different derivation of the $E-B$

287: transformation that will highlight the ingredients that are needed to

288: connect the spin two field of $Q$ and $U$ with the scalar and

289: pseudo-scalar fields $E$ and $B$.  The aim is to gain intuition into

290: the $E-B$ decomposition, which is particularly useful at this stage

291: when new experiments are being designed. Intuition will help address

292: issues such as the optimal shape of the sky patch needed to separate

293: $E$ from $B$, or if both $Q$ and $U$ Stokes parameters need to be

294: measured.

295: 

296: We will also present the $E$ and $B$ decomposition of some simple

297: polarized maps. Our aim is to understand if having a map with $B=0$,

298: such as the one produced by density perturbation, is something generic

299: or if one should always expect $E\approx B$.

300: 

301: The paper is organized as follow, in section \S \ref{geometry} we

302: present a derivation of the $E-B$ decomposition, in \S\ref{examples}

303: we present the decomposition for some simple intensity and

304: polarization maps, We comment about observational strategies and

305: conclude in \S \ref{discussion}.

306: 

307: 

308: \section{The geometrical properties of the $E-B$ decomposition}

309: \label{geometry}

310: 

311: 

312: The CMB anisotropy field is characterized by a $2\times 2$ intensity 

313: tensor $I_{ij}$. The intensity tensor is a

314: function of direction on the sky $\hat{\bf{n}}$ and  two directions

315: perpendicular to $\hat{\bf{n}}$ that are  used to define its components

316: (${\bf \hat e}_1$,${\bf \hat e}_2$).

317: The Stokes parameters $Q$ and $U$ are defined as

318: $Q=(I_{11}-I_{22})/4$ and $U=I_{12}/2$, while the temperature 

319: anisotropy is

320: given by $T=(I_{11}+I_{22})/4$ (the factor of $4$ relates fluctuations

321: in the intensity with those in the temperature, $I\propto T^4$). These 

322: three quantities fully described any state of linearly polarized light. 

323: While the temperature is invariant

324: under a rotation in the plane perpendicular to direction

325: $\hat{\bf{n}}$,

326: $Q$ and $U$ transform under rotation by an angle $\psi$ as:

327: \begin{eqnarray}

328: Q^{\prime}&=&Q\cos 2\psi  + U\sin 2\psi  \nonumber \\  

329: U^{\prime}&=&-Q\sin 2\psi  + U\cos 2\psi 

330: \label{QUtrans} 

331: \end{eqnarray}

332: where ${\bf \hat e}_1^{\prime}=\cos \psi\ {\bf \hat e}_1+\sin\psi\ 

333: {\bf \hat e}_2$ 

334: and ${\bf \hat e}_2^{\prime}=-\sin \psi\ {\bf \hat e}_1+\cos\psi\ 

335: {\bf \hat e}_2$. 

336: 

337: It is useful not to describe the polarization field in terms of $Q$

338: and $U$ but to do so in terms of two quantities scalar under rotation, usually

339: called $E$ and $B$ \cite{2.kks,3.spinlong}.  This $E-B$ decomposition is a linear

340: transformation of the $Q-U$ field on the sky. The transformation in

341: invertible. $E$ and $B$ differ in their behavior under a parity

342: transformation, $B$ changes sign while $E$ does not.

343: 

344: To make our derivation more transparent we will work in the flat sky

345: approximation, which is valid for small patches of sky. We do this

346: only for the sake of clarity as all of our results can be trivially

347: generalized to a full sky analysis.  In the flat sky limit the

348: directions (${\bf \hat e}_1$,${\bf \hat e}_2$) used to define the

349: Stokes parameters at every point in the plane of the sky correspond to

350: the coordinate axis, (${\bf \hat e}_1$,${\bf \hat e}_2$)$=(\x,\y)$.

351: 

352: 

353: A general linear transformation can be written as,

354: \beqa{lintrans0}

355: E(\th)&=&\int d^2\ep {\bf K}_E(\th,\ep) {\bf X}(\ep)

356: \nonumber \\

357: B(\th)&=&\int d^2\ep {\bf K}_B(\th,\ep) {\bf X}(\ep).

358: \eeqa

359: where ${\bf X}$ is the 2 component vector ${\bf X}=(Q,U)$ and ${\bf

360: K}_{(E,B)}$ are the transformation kernels.  

361: 

362: We want to derive the properties that the kernels must satisfy

363: to make $E$ and $B$ transform correctly. We first consider two 

364: types of transformations, a translation and a rotation. Under a translation

365: by a distance $\th_0$ 

366: the vectors on the plane of the sky transform as, $\th^{\prime}=\th+\th_0$. Under a

367: rotation of the coordinate system by and angle $\psi$ they transform as,

368: $\th^{\prime}= {\bf R}(\psi) \th$,

369: with {\bf R} the standard rotation matrix. The explicit convention for

370: the rotation is explained bellow equation (\ref{QUtrans}). 

371: In both cases $E$ and $B$ should remain

372: unchanged, in other words,

373: \beqa{lintrans}

374: E^{\prime}(\th^{\prime})&=&E(\th) \ \ {( \rm for \ translations}

375: \nonumber \\

376: B^{\prime}(\th^{\prime})&=&B(\th) \ \ {\rm  \& \ rotations}).

377: \eeqa

378: Equation (\ref{lintrans}) implies that,

379: \beqa{lintransint}

380: \int d^2\ep {\bf K}_E(\th^{\prime},\ep) {\bf X}^{\prime}(\ep) 

381: &=& \int d^2\ep {\bf K}_E(\th,\ep) {\bf X}(\ep)

382: \nonumber \\

383: \int d^2\ep {\bf K}_B(\th^{\prime},\ep) {\bf X}^{\prime}(\ep) 

384: &=& \int d^2\ep {\bf K}_B(\th,\ep) {\bf X}(\ep)

385: \eeqa

386: Under a translation $Q$ and $U$ are remain unchanged unchanged, 

387: ${\bf X}^{\prime}(\th^{\prime})= {\bf X}(\th)$.

388: Equation (\ref{lintrans}) implies that 

389: ${\bf K}_{(E,B)}(\th,\ep)={\bf K}_{(E,B)}(\th-\ep)$.

390: 

391: On the other hand, under a rotation $Q$ and $U$ are not scalars. 

392: They change as,

393: \beq{xtrans}

394: {\bf X}^{\prime}(\th^{\prime})= {\bf R}_X(\psi){\bf X}(\th),

395: \eeq

396: with the matrix ${\bf R}_X(\psi)$ defined in equation (\ref{QUtrans}).

397: Equation (\ref{xtrans}) implies that the $E-B$ decomposition

398: has to be non-local. $E$ and $B$ at point $\th$ cannot be constructed

399: by combining $Q$ and $U$ at that same point because any such linear

400: combination (if invertible) would not be scalar under rotations.

401: 

402: The other type of transformation that needs to be considered are

403: reflections. After a reflection $E$ remains unchanged

404: and $B$ changes sign,

405: \beqa{parity}

406: E^{\prime}(\th^{\prime})&=&E(\th) 

407: \nonumber \\

408: B^{\prime}(\th^{\prime})&=&-B(\th) \ \ {(\rm for \ parity) }.

409: \eeqa

410: Although equation (\ref{parity}) is valid for any reflection,

411: to be concrete  we consider a reflection about the $\y$ axis. The

412: position vectors transform as

413: $\th^{\prime}=(\theta_x^{\prime},\theta_y^{\prime})=

414: (-\theta_x,\theta_y)$ and  the Stokes parameters as

415: $Q^{\prime}(\th^{\prime})=Q(\th)$ and

416: $U^{\prime}(\th^{\prime})=-U(\th)$. The transformation laws for

417: reflections about other axis can be obtained by combining these

418: transformation laws with the transformation properties for rotations.

419: 

420: 

421: Rather than trying to find directly the form of the kernels needed to

422: satisfy all the above properties, for pedagogical reasons we will use

423: figures \ref{fig1} and \ref{fig2} to derive the kernels in a more

424: intuitive way.  We first consider the contribution to $E(\th)$ from a

425: point $\ep$ at a distance $\tilde \theta$ along $\y$. We will assume

426: that the contribution from this point in not zero. Note that with this

427: particular configuration the axis (${\bf \hat e}_1$,${\bf \hat e}_2$)

428: at point $\ep$ are aligned with the vector $\ep-\th$. This is the

429: reason we chose this set up. We will obtain the kernels for other

430: configurations using the scalar nature of $E$ under rotations.

431: 

432: The contribution to $E(\th)$ from 

433: $\ep$, which we will call $\delta E(\th)$,  is:

434: \beq{conte}

435: \delta E(\th)\propto 

436: \alpha_{E}^q Q(\ep)+\alpha_{E}^u U(\ep), 

437: \eeq 

438: where we have introduced ${\bf

439: K}_{(E,B)}(\tilde \theta \ \y)=(\alpha^q_{(E,B)},\alpha^u_{(E,B)})$.

440: $E$ is invariant under reflections. In figure

441: \ref{fig1} we consider 

442: a reflection across the $\ep-\th$ line, the $\y$ axis. After this

443: transformation $\th^{\prime}=\th$ and $\ep^{\prime}=\ep$ but

444: the Stokes parameters change as,

445: $Q^{\prime}=Q$, $U^{\prime}=-U$. This

446: implies that $\alpha^{E}_u=0$. 

447: 

448: To construct a quantity that is invariant under parity ($E$), the

449: contribution from a point separated by $\tilde \theta \ \y$ can only

450: involve $Q$. Our conclusion is a consequence of the particular

451: geometrical set up but we will use the transformation properties under

452: rotations to derive the kernels for other directions.

453: 

454: \begin{figure}[tb]

455: \centerline{\epsfxsize=9cm\epsffile{fig1.ps}}

456: \caption{Contribution to $E(\th)$ from point $\ep$. The two panels are

457: related by a parity transformation, a reflection across the $\y$

458: axis. The axis labelled by numbers are the ones used to define the

459: Stokes parapeters. In the flat sky limit (${\bf \hat e}_1$,${\bf \hat e}_2$)$=(\x,\y)$.}

460: \label{fig1}

461: \end{figure}

462: 

463: \begin{figure}[tb]

464: \centerline{\epsfxsize=9cm\epsffile{fig2.ps}}

465: \caption{Contribution to $E(\th)$ from point $\ep$. The two panels are

466: related by a rotation by an angle $\psi$.}

467: \label{fig2}

468: \end{figure}

469: 

470: 

471: We use figure \ref{fig2} to understand what happens under

472: rotations. When we rotate the coordinate system by an angle $\psi$,

473: the Stokes parameter are changed as described by equation

474: (\ref{QUtrans}). The position angle of point $\ep$ with respect

475: to the $\x$ axis which we will call $\tilde\phi$ changes from $\pi/2$

476: to $\pi/2+\psi$. We have to allow for the kernels to depend on this

477: position angle otherwise $E$ would never be a scalar under rotations

478: given the transformation properties of $Q$ and $U$. 

479: Using the above argument about parity we concluded that,

480: \beqa{al1}

481: \alpha_q^{E}(\pi/2)&=& \omega(\tilde \theta) \nonumber \\

482: \alpha_u^{E}(\pi/2)&=& 0,

483: \eeqa

484: where we have called $\omega(\tilde \theta)$ the value of the kernel

485: at $\pi/2$. We have explicitly included a dependence on the separation

486: $\tilde \theta$ because there is no reason why all the points along

487: $\y$ should contribute equally. $E$ is a scalar so

488: \beqa{al2}

489: \delta E^{\prime}(\th^{\prime})&=&\delta E(\th) \nonumber \\

490: \alpha_E^q(\pi/2+\psi) Q^{\prime}+

491: \alpha_E^u(\pi/2+\psi) U^{\prime}&=&\omega Q.

492: \eeqa

493: This equation should be valid for arbitrary values $Q$ and $U$. 

494: Combining equation (\ref{QUtrans}) and (\ref{al2}) we obtain,

495: \beqa{al3}

496: \alpha_q^{E}(\tilde\phi)&=&-\omega(\tilde \theta) \cos(2\tilde\phi)

497: \nonumber \\

498: \alpha_u^{E}(\tilde\phi)&=& \omega(\tilde \theta) \sin(2\tilde\phi).

499: \eeqa

500: 

501: In fact equation (\ref{al3}) is simple to interpret,

502: only $Q_r=I_r-I_t$, the difference

503: between the radial and tangential intensities can be used to construct

504: $E$ and the weight can only depend on the distance $\tilde \theta$. 

505: In other words when constructing $E$ at $\th$ we should use 

506: the radial and tangential unit vectors to define the Stokes parameters,

507: (${\bf \hat e}_1$,${\bf \hat e}_2$)$=$(${\bf \hat e}_r$,${\bf \hat e}_\phi$).

508: In this frame only $Q_r$ contributes to $E$.

509: 

510: We have proven that $E(\th)$ can we expressed as,

511: \beqa{Efinal}

512: E(\th)&=&\int d^2 \tth\ \omega(\tilde \theta) Q_r(\th+\tth)

513: \nonumber \\

514: &=&\int d^2\tth \

515: \omega(\tilde \theta)\ [Q(\th + \tth)

516: \cos(2\tilde \phi) \nonumber \\

517: &-& U(\th + \tth)

518: \sin(2\tilde \phi)].

519: \label{Econv}

520: \eeqa

521: Any choice of weight $w$ will produce a quantity that is

522: scalar under rotation and invariant under parity. 

523: 

524: A similar argument  can be used to show that the only 

525: way to construct $B$, a quantity invariant under rotations but 

526: that changes sign under reflections is,

527: \beqa{Bfinal}

528: B(\th)&=&\int d^2\tth\ \omega(\tilde \theta) U_r

529: \nonumber \\

530: &=&\int d^2\tth \

531: \omega(\tilde \theta)\ [Q(\th + \tth)

532: \sin(2\tilde\phi) \nonumber \\

533:  &+& U(\th + \tth)

534: \cos(2\tilde\phi)]

535: \label{Bconv}

536: \eeqa

537: where now $U_r$ is the $U$ Stokes parameter defined with respect to

538: the radial and tangential directions. In general $\omega$ in equations 

539: (\ref{Econv}) and (\ref{Bconv}) need not be the same.

540: 

541: 

542:  

543: The usual definition of $E$ and $B$ corresponds 

544: to a particular choice of the weight $\omega$,

545: \beq{w}

546: \omega({\tilde \theta})=-1/{\tilde \theta}^2 \ \ ({\tilde \theta} > 0),

547: \eeq

548: ($\omega(0)=0$ but as will become apparent later 

549: this fact is not important for smooth fields).

550: There are several reasons why this choice is made, some of which are

551: easier to understand when working in Fourier space. As equations 

552: (\ref{Efinal}) and (\ref{Bfinal}) make clear, the $E-B$ transformation

553: is a convolution and thus becomes a multiplication in Fourier

554: space. The choice of $\omega$ is such that the relation

555: between $E-B$ and $Q-U$ is a simple rotation in Fourier space with no

556: scale dependent factor. With $\omega$ given in equation (\ref{w}) the

557: relation is,

558: \beqa{FouRel}

559: Q(\bi{l})&=&[E(\bi{l}) \cos(2\phi_{l})

560: -B(\bi{l}) \sin(2\phi_{l})]

561: \nonumber \\

562: U(\bi{l})&=&[E(\bi{l}) \sin(2\phi_{l})

563: +B(\bi{l}) \cos(2\phi_{l})].

564: \eeqa

565: Furthermore with this choice the ensemble average of 

566: $P=Q^2+U^2$ is the same as the ensemble average of $E^2+B^2$. 

567: The sign convention on the other hand is chosen so that positive values

568: of $E$ generate a tangential pattern of polarization. The convention

569: is rooted in the weak lensing literature which has identical

570: mathematics and where the $E$ field corresponds to the projected

571: density $\kappa$ which produces tangential distortions when positive. 

572: 

573: For the purpose of finding a linear combination of $Q-U$ that tests

574: for the presence of gravitational waves or $B$ type polarization any

575: choice of $\omega$ is equally good. Other practical considerations

576: such as the geometry of the observed patch of sky will probably be

577: more important. In weak lensing there is a long literature that deals

578: with different choices of $\omega$, to create for example measures of

579: the enclosed mass that are more local than the $1/\theta^2$

580: weighting. It is beyond the scope of this section to summarize that

581: literature.

582: 

583: 

584: We want the reader to take away three basic points from the above exercise:

585: \begin{itemize}

586: \item The construction of $E$ and $B$ out of $Q$ and $U$ is by

587: its very nature non-local. 

588: \item To construct scalars under rotation at point $\th$ we need to

589: average the Stokes parameters around circles centered at $\th$ using

590: the radial and tangential directions of this circle to define the

591: Stokes parameters $(Q_r,U_r)$.  The weight along the circle should be

592: constant.

593: \item To construct $E$ (a scalar) we need to average $Q_r$ 

594: and to construct $B$ (a pseudo-scalar) we need to average $U_r$. 

595: \end{itemize}

596: 

597: \section{Examples}\label{examples}

598: 

599: In this section we consider simple intensity-polarization maps to

600: illustrate some of the properties of the $E-B$ decomposition. As a 

601: byproduct we will understand better if the fact that density

602: perturbations produce only $E$ type polarization is a unique

603: prediction or if most sources of polarized emission have this

604: characteristic.

605: 

606: \subsection{Simple Maps}

607: 

608: We start by considering a localized source of radiation of typical extent 

609: $L$ and centered around the origin.  We first intend to compute

610: the $E-B$ fields for points far away from this distribution. 

611: In this limit, equation (\ref{Efinal}) and (\ref{Bfinal}) become,

612: \beqa{EBfar}

613: E(\th)&=& {\cos(2 \phi) \over \theta^2} \int d^2\tth Q(\tth) -

614: {\sin(2 \phi) \over \theta^2} \int d^2\tth U(\th)

615: \nonumber \\

616: && \\

617: B(\th)&=& {\sin(2 \phi) \over \theta^2} \int d^2\tth Q(\tth) +

618: {\cos(2 \phi) \over \theta^2} \int d^2\tth U(\tth). \nonumber

619: \eeqa

620: 

621: The choice of $\omega$ implies that the amplitude of $E$ and $B$

622: decay as $1/\theta^2$. What is more interesting is that whether $E$

623: or $B$ are different from zero depends on the direction of

624: observation. In fact there is no way to make $B$ zero everywhere and

625: keep $E$ different from zero. $E$ and $B$ are only zero everywhere if

626: the source is not polarized on average. 

627: 

628: In the case where the average polarization is along the $\x$ or

629: $\y$ axis, $E$ and $B$ are,

630: \beqa{EBfar2}

631: E(\th)&=& {\cos(2 \phi) \over \theta^2} \bar Q \ \Omega_s

632: \nonumber \\

633: B(\th)&=& {\sin(2 \phi) \over \theta^2} \bar Q \ \Omega_s

634: \eeqa

635: where $\bar Q$ gives the average polarization of the source and 

636: $\Omega_s$ is the solid angle it subtends. The

637: direction dependence of $E-B$ can be easily understood in terms of

638: parity transformations. The mean polarization is invariant under

639: reflections along directions where $B=0$ and changes sign along

640: directions where $B\ne 0$.

641: 

642: As we discussed in the previous section, the $E-B$ transformation has

643: to be non-local. This implies that a localized source of emission will

644: produce $E-B$ even outside the region where $Q$ and $U$ are not

645: zero. Our simple exercise has shown that if the source has a mean

646: polarization, the typical size of the $E$ and $B$ components are the

647: same outside the source.

648: 

649: Let us now consider points inside the source. The first potential

650: problem is that the weight function seems to diverge at zero

651: distance. We consider a

652: smooth $Q-U$ field that can be expanded in Taylor series. We assume we

653: are calculating $E$ and $B$ at point $\th$ and we expand $Q$ and $U$

654: around that point, 

655: \beqa{QUexpand} 

656: Q(\th+\tth)&=&Q|_{\th} + {\tilde \theta_i}

657: Q_{,i}|_{\th} + {1\over 2} \tilde \theta_i \tilde \theta_j Q_{,ij}|_{\th}

658: ... \nonumber \\ 

659: U(\th+\tth)&=&U|_{\th}+ \tilde \theta_i U_{,i}|_{\th} + {1\over 2}

660: \tilde \theta_i \tilde \theta_j U_{,ij}|_{\th} ...  

661: \eeqa 

662: where we denote derivatives with respect to the different 

663: coordinates as $\ _{,i}$ and summation of indecesis implied. 

664: To compute $E$ and $B$ we replace equation (\ref{QUexpand})

665: into equations (\ref{Efinal}) and (\ref{Bfinal}). The first terms to

666: contribute are the second order ones because of the $\cos(2\tilde

667: \phi)$ and $\sin(2\tilde \phi)$ factors in (\ref{Efinal}) and

668: (\ref{Bfinal}). The $1/\ttheta^2$ in $\omega(\ttheta)$ is 

669: canceled by the $\ttheta^2$ coming from the Taylor expansion. In fact there

670: is an extra $\ttheta$ from the $d^2\tth$; there is no

671: divergence at the origin. We also conclude that $E$ and $B$ are most sensitive to the

672: ``quadrupole'' pattern around $\th$; the

673: quadratic term in the Taylor expansion. 

674: 

675: 

676: 

677: As an example we can consider a filament as shown in

678: figure \ref{fig3}. The emitting region

679: has a length $L$ along the $\y$ axis and a width $l$ along the $\x$

680: axis, $(L>>l)$. We will assume that the Stokes parameters are constant

681: along the filament and are zero outside.

682: 

683: We now imagine doing the integrals in equations (\ref{Efinal}) and

684: (\ref{Bfinal}) one circle at a time. As long as the radius of the

685: circle is smaller than $l$ the angular integrals cancel. It is an

686: easy exercise to compute the values of $E$ and $B$ at the center of

687: the filament,

688: \beqa{ebcenter} 

689: E&=&-c\ \ Q \nonumber \\

690: B&=&-c\ \ U \nonumber \\

691: c&=&4\int_1^{L/l} dx {\sqrt{x^2-1} \over x^3},   

692: \eeqa

693: where $x=\ttheta/l$. Equation (\ref{ebcenter}) shows that $E$ and $B$

694: only receive contributions from rings larger than $l$ and the maximum

695: contribution comes from $\theta\approx \sqrt{3/2}l$. 

696: The contribution from far

697: away rings are down by the $1/\ttheta^2$. 

698: 

699: \begin{figure}[tb]

700: \centerline{\epsfxsize=9cm\epsffile{fig3.ps}}

701: \caption{Examples of polarization vectors inside filaments. The two

702: circles indicate points that contribute with equal weight to $E$ and

703: $B$ at the center of those circles. The contribution from points along

704: the smaller circle cancel as one moves along the circle. The contribution from

705: the second circle is different from zero. In the case shown the

706: contribution is mainly $E$. The first two filaments (labelled a),

707: produce mainly $E$ type polarization inside the filaments while the

708: second two ( labelled b), produce mainly $B$ type.}

709: \label{fig3}

710: \end{figure}

711: 

712: 

713: 

714: Although we have presented a very simplified example we see two important

715: features of the $E-B$ transformation. If the $Q-U$ fields are constant

716: over a scale $l$, rings smaller than that do not contribute to $E$ or

717: $B$. Around a particular point, if the polarization vectors tend to be

718: aligned or are perpendicular to the direction over which magnitude of the

719: polarization is changing the pattern has a larger $E$ than $B$. To

720: have $B$ the pattern has to form an angle of approximately $45^o$

721: with that direction. In the case of a filament this is illustrated in

722: figure \ref{fig3}.

723: 

724: Finally we consider a case in which the polarization patter is

725: very random, formed by regions of finite extent of typical size

726: $L$ inside which the polarization is constant.  Different patches are

727: independent. We sketch such a pattern in figure \ref{fig4}.  We

728: want to know how the typical values $E$ and $B$ at a point $\th$

729: inside a particular region compare. From our above examples we can

730: conclude that the contributions to $E$ and $B$ coming from external

731: patches are statistically the same, only depending for any particular

732: external patch, on the relative orientation of the polarization in

733: that patch and the separation vector $\tth$. The contribution from

734: points inside the same patch cancels to a great extent but some

735: $E$ and $B$ are left. Which dominates at a particular $\th$ depends

736: again on the relative orientation of the polarization and the

737: separation vector between $\th$ and the center of the patch. Thus

738: for a random pattern we expect similar levels of $E$ and $B$.

739: 

740: \begin{figure}[tb]

741: \centerline{\epsfxsize=9cm\epsffile{fig4.ps}}

742: \caption{For illustration purposes we show a random pattern of

743: polarization with a coherence length we call $L$. For the two points

744: at the center of the filled circles, only the regions outside the circles

745: contribute. External patches contribute on average the same to $E$ and

746: $B$. Only points inside the patch (but outside the circles) will

747: contribute dominantly to $E$ or to $B$. Which contribution is larger 

748: depends on the orientation of the

749: polarization inside the patch and the position of the point where 

750: $E$ and $B$ are being calculated.}

751: \label{fig4}

752: \end{figure}

753: 

754: Our final example argues that for polarization patterns that have a

755: finite coherence length one should expect to have roughly the same $E$

756: and $B$. This shows how remarkable it is that density perturbations do

757: not produce any $B$ modes. In order for $B$ to be zero, the integral of

758: $U_r$ has to vanish identically (not just statistically) for every

759: possible ring around any point, regardless of the radius of the

760: ring. It is clear that this important symmetry will not hold for most

761: random processes.

762: 

763: \subsection{Supernova remnant}

764: 

765: In this section we consider a more realistic model for polarized

766: emission, a model for the emission of a supernova remnant (SNR)

767: \cite{snm}. It has been used successfully to model the emission

768: from the the Galactic Spurs at radio frequencies around 1.4 $\GHz$.

769: 

770: The basic features of the model can be summarized as

771: follows. Radiation is produced by synchrotron emission from a shell. The

772: thickness of the shell depends on position and (to first

773: order in the shell thickness) is given by: 

774: \beq{eps} \epsilon(\psi)= \Delta r/r= \bar \epsilon \sin(\psi) 

775: \eeq 

776: where $r$ is the radius of the shell, $\psi$ is the

777: angle relative to the direction of the initial magnetic field and

778: $\bar \epsilon$ is the maximum thickness of the shell. 

779: 

780: The interstellar magnetic field had a strength $B_0$ before the SN

781: explosion.  Later it is oriented along the surface of the shell and is

782: amplified to a value, $B=B_0/2\bar\epsilon$, a consequence of flux

783: conservation. This model assumes that energy distribution of the

784: particles responsible for the emission is of the form, 

785: \beq{ener}

786: N(E)dE=K E^{-\gamma}dE.  

787: \eeq 

788: Moreover it assumes equipartition

789: between the energy density in particles and magnetic field,

790: \beq{equipart} 

791: K \int^{E_{max}}_{E_{min}} E^{-\gamma+1} dE \sim {B^2

792: \over 8\pi} 

793: \eeq

794: 

795: Detailed derivations of these equations as well as parameters that can fit

796: different structures in our galaxy can be found in

797: \cite{snm,snobs}. It is not our objective to analyze what

798: is expected from particular structures in our galaxy but rather to

799: use this model to make a map of polarization and compute its $E-B$

800: decomposition to help build intuition. 

801: For this purpose the only two relevant parameters are the

802: angle $(\beta)$ between the plane of the sky and the unperturbed interstellar

803: magnetic field ($\bf B_0$) and the maximum width of the shell $\bar

804: \epsilon$. Without loss of generality we will assume that

805: $\bf B_0$ lies in the $\bf x-z$ plane (the $\bf x-y$ plane is the 

806: plane of the sky). The projection on the sky of the unperturbed field is

807: $B_0 \cos(\beta)$.

808: 

809: We then compute the intensity and polarization observed along each

810: line of sight be integrating the synchrotron emissivity along the line

811: of sight,

812: \beqa{IQU}

813: I &=& A\ \int dx B_{\perp}^{(\gamma+1)/2} \nonumber \\

814: Q &=& A\ \Pi\ \int dx B_{\perp}^{(\gamma+1)/2} \cos(2\phi) \nonumber \\

815: U &=& A\ \Pi\ \int dx B_{\perp}^{(\gamma+1)/2} \sin(2\phi), 

816: \eeqa

817: where $\Pi$ is the degree of polarization of the synchotrom emission, $B_{\perp}$ is the component

818: of the local magnetic field on the plane of the sky and $\phi$ is the

819: angle between ${\bf B}_{\perp}$ and the $\bf x$ axis and $A$ is a

820: normalization constant that depends on several parameters such as the

821: number density of particles. 

822: 

823: 

824: Figure \ref{tqu} shows the intensity and polarization map for the case

825: $\beta=45^o$. In figures \ref{equ} and \ref{bqu} we show the

826: corresponding $E-B$ maps. $E$ and $B$

827: extend outside the remnant. The intensity and polarization map has

828: symmetries of reflection across the $\x$ and $\y$ axis. 

829: The $E$ map respects those symmetries while 

830: the $B$ map does not. The $B$ maps changes sign as one moves across

831: the $\x$ and $\y$ axis.

832: 

833: 

834: \begin{figure}[tb]

835: \centerline{\epsfxsize=9cm\epsffile{tqu.ps}}

836: \caption{Temperature and polarization map for a model of SNR with

837: $\beta=45^o$. Rods indicate the magnitude of $P=Q^2+U^2$.}

838: \label{tqu}

839: \end{figure}

840: \begin{figure}[tb]

841: 

842: \centerline{\epsfxsize=9cm\epsffile{equ.ps}}

843: \caption{$E$ type polarization for a model of SNR with $\beta=45^o$}

844: \label{equ}

845: \end{figure}

846: 

847: \begin{figure}[tb]

848: \centerline{\epsfxsize=9cm\epsffile{bqu.ps}}

849: \caption{$B$ type polarization for a model of SNR with $\beta=45^o$}

850: \label{bqu}

851: \end{figure}

852: 

853: 

854: To understand the behavior of the Stokes parameters and

855: the $E$ and $B$ fields we will look at

856: one dimensional cuts along the $\x$ axis (perpendicular to the

857: magnetic field). We show several examples in figure \ref{fig5}. 

858: Each of the columns corresponds to a cut at a different height 

859: along the remnant. 

860: 

861: 

862: \begin{figure}[tb]

863: \centerline{\epsfxsize=9cm\epsffile{fig5.ps}}

864: \caption{One dimensional cuts of $T$, $P=\sqrt{Q^2+U^2}$, $E$ and $B$

865: across SNR models. Each of the three columns corresponds to a

866: different height $y=(-0.6,0,0.6)$ in units of the radius. In each panel

867: we show the results for three different values of

868: $\beta=(0,45^o,90^o)$. The $E$ curve for $\beta=90^o$ and $y=0$ has

869: been divided by a factor of $10$ so all curves in the panel are

870: visible.}

871: \label{fig5}

872: \end{figure}

873: 

874: From figure \ref{fig5} we can conclude that:

875: \begin{itemize}

876: \item Both $E$ and $B$ extend outside the remnant and decay as

877: $1/\theta^2$.  

878: 

879: 

880: \item The temperature and polarization patterns are invariant under

881: reflections across both the $\x$ and $\y$ axis. This implies that $B$

882: is zero along both axis. $E$ is invariant under reflections across the

883: $\x$ and $\y$ axis but $B$ changes sign.

884: 

885: \item Both $E$ and $B$ tend to peak at the edges of the SNR, where the

886: $T$ and $P$ peak. We could think of the edge of the SNR as an example

887: of the more idealized ``filament'' that we considered in the previous

888: section. For $\beta=0^o$ and $45^o$ we find that $E$ is positive

889: at the peaks, that means that the polarization direction is

890: perpendicular to the direction of the ``filament''. For $\beta=90^o$

891: the situation is opposite and the polarization is parallel to the

892: filament direction.

893: 

894: \item $E$ is larger than $B$ by a factor of a few in a ``typical'' place 

895: inside the ring of maximum emission. In particular, at the edges of

896: the SNR, this means that the polarization is typically like patters

897: (a) of figure \ref{fig4} rather than patterns (b).

898: 

899: \item If $\beta=90^0$ $B$ is zero everywhere because the the

900: polarization pattern has reflection symmetry across any axis going

901: through the origin.

902: 

903: \item If $\beta=90^0$ the $E$ component has a very large peak at the

904: origin because the pattern is circular around that point. Note that 

905: there is no emission ($T=P=0$) at the origin, where $E$ has the maximum. This

906: illustrates the fact that one cannot define a degree of

907: polarization using $E$ and $B$ because their relation to $Q$ and

908: $U$ is not local. 

909: \end{itemize}

910: 

911: It is important to realize that many of our conclusions follow from

912: specific symmetry properties of the source. In reality this symmetries

913: will be broken by real world complications such as inhomogeneities in

914: the density or magnetic fields. As our examples in the previous

915: section show, as the symmetries are lost the amplitudes of $E$ and

916: $B$ become more similar. Moreover, because the $E-B$ transformation is

917: non-local, if only part of the SNR is in the observed field, the $E$

918: and $B$ decomposition will be different.

919:  

920: \section{Discussion}\label{discussion}

921: 

922: Detecting a $B$ component in the CMB polarization field would be a

923: great triumph for cosmology. As discussed above the transformation

924: between $Q-U$ and $E-B$ is necessarily non-local. Moreover, just from

925: the geometrical requirements the only way to construct scalar and

926: pseudo scalar quantities is to average $Q_r$ and $U_r$ over circles.  Thus

927: the geometry of the patch of sky to be observed should be such as to

928: allow for many different circles to be inscribed.

929: 

930: The first generation of modern experiments,

931: \cite{1998ApJ...495..580K,hedman} measure the Stokes parameters in a

932: ring on the sky. Thus only one circle can be constructed and so even

933: if both $Q$ and $U$ are measured at every pixel along the ring, there

934: is only one possible linear combination of the data that measures only

935: $E$ (the average of $Q_r$ along the ring) and one linear combination

936: that measures only $B$ (the average of $U_r$ along the ring).  All other

937: combinations of the data receive contributions simultaneously from

938: both $E$ and $B$. In practice \cite{hedman} could not use these

939: combinations because $1/f$ noise make them unreliable.

940: 

941: In general, one cannot construct circles around the points in the edge

942: of the observed patch. Thus if the aim is to have the most possible

943: linear combinations that are sensitive to either $E$ or $B$ but not to

944: both, the best strategy is to make the observed patch of sky as round

945: as possible.

946: 

947: Another consideration is that for each point where $E$ and $B$ are

948: calculated one needs to average either $Q$ or $U$ in the natural

949: frame, the radial and tangential directions.  This means that in order

950: to be able to do it for as many circles as  possibles one has to 

951: measure both $Q$ and $U$ in every pixel.

952: 

953: The emphasis of our paper was to find linear combinations of $Q$

954: and $U$ that contain information about $E$ or $B$ alone. However it is

955: perfectly possible to distinguish $E$ and $B$ type polarizations from

956: the correlation functions of $Q$ and $U$. Formulas that relate the

957: power spectrum of $E$ and $B$ with the correlation functions of $Q$

958: and $U$ can be found for example in \cite{2.kks}.  Distinguishing $E$

959: and $B$ this way does not rely on the shape of the observed

960: region, as the correlation functions can be calculated just using pair

961: of points.

962: 

963: One should realize however that obtaining constraints on $B$ from

964: correlation functions comes at the price of larger error bars. It is

965: clear that even though one can estimate the power spectrum this way,

966: the errors in an estimate of $B$ have contributions from both the

967: power in $E$ and $B$ type polarization. Thus, because we expect the

968: $B$ signal to be smaller than the $E$ one it is much better to

969: directly find linear combination (rather than quadratic combinations)

970: of the data that measure $B$. Suggestions of practical ways of

971: separating $E$ and $B$ from correlation data have been recently

972: presented in \cite{critt}. In reality a full analysis such

973: as the one described in \cite{tegoliv} will

974: incorporate all the information available in a given experiment and

975: should be preferred. 

976: 

977: We have also analyzed the $E$ and $B$ patterns expected for simple

978: maps. We argued that in general one expects both $E$ and $B$

979: type polarization to have comparable amplitudes although not

980: necessarily equal. Whether $E$ or $B$ dominates at a particular place

981: inside the source depends on the symmetries of the source. The $E$ and

982: $B$ transformation is not local so some $E$ and $B$ ``leaks'' outside

983: the source, unless on average the source is unpolarized. The amplitude

984: of $E$ and $B$ is the same outside the source on average but which

985: dominates at a particular point depends on the relative orientation

986: between the polarization direction and the separation vector.

987: 

988: 

989: %\section{conclusion}\label{conclusions}

990: 

991: 

992: 

993: %\begin{thebibliography}{ZZZZZZZZZZZ1999}

994: \begin{references}

995: %

996: %

997: 

998: 

999: \bibitem{1998ApJ...495..580K} Keating, B., Timbie, P., Polnarev, 

1000: A., \& Steinberger, J., \apj, 495, 580 (1998)

1001: 

1002: \bibitem{staggs}

1003: Staggs S. T. et al., preprint astro-ph/9904062

1004: 

1005: \bibitem{hedman}

1006: Hedman M. M., Barkats D., Gundersen J. O., Staggs S. T., Winstein B., 

1007: preprint astro-ph/0010592

1008: 

1009: \bibitem{peterson}

1010: Peterson et al., preprint astro-ph/9907276

1011: 

1012: \bibitem{2.kks} M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky \& A. Stebbins,

1013: Phys. Rev. D, 55 7368 (1997)

1014: 

1015: \bibitem{3.spinlong} 

1016: M. Zaldarriaga \& U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 1830 (1997)

1017: 

1018: 

1019: \bibitem{3.kks} M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky \& A. Stebbins,

1020: Phys. Rev. Lett., 78 2058 (1997)

1021: 

1022: \bibitem{sz97}

1023: Seljak U. \& Zaldarriaga M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 2054-2057 (1997)

1024: 

1025: 

1026: \bibitem{1997ApJ...488....1Z} 

1027: Zaldarriaga, M., Spergel, D.\ N., \& Seljak, U., \apj, 488, 1 (1997)

1028: 

1029: 

1030: \bibitem{2000ApJ...530..133T} Tegmark, M., Eisenstein, D.\ J., 

1031: Hu, W., \& de Oliveira-Costa, A., \apj, 530, 133 (2000)

1032: 

1033: \bibitem{kinney} 

1034: Kinney, W. H., Phys. Rev. D, 58 123506 (1998)

1035: 

1036: \bibitem{lue}

1037: Lue A., Wang L. \& Marc Kamionkowski 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 1506, (1999) 

1038: 

1039: \bibitem{1997PhRvD..56..596H} Hu, W.\ \& White, M.\ 

1040: \prd, 56, 596 (1997)

1041: 

1042: \bibitem{1998ApJ...503....1Z} 

1043: Zaldarriaga, M.\ \apj, 503, 1 (1998)

1044: 

1045: \bibitem{tegoliv}

1046: Tegmark M. \& de Oliveira-Costa A., preprint astro-ph/0012120 

1047: 

1048: \bibitem{snm}

1049: van der Lann H., Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., 124, 125 (1962)

1050: 

1051: \bibitem{snobs}

1052: Spoelstra, T. A. Th., Astron. \& Astrophys., 21, 61 (1972)

1053: 

1054: \bibitem{critt}

1055: Crittenden R. G, Natarajan P., Pen U. L, Theuns T,

1056: preprint astro-ph/0012336 

1057: 

1058: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1059: 

1060: 

1061: 

1062: 

1063: 

1064: 

1065: 

1066: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1067: 

1068: %\end{thebibliography}

1069: \end{references}

1070: \end{document}

1071: 

1072: 

1073: