1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3:
4: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
5: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
6:
7:
8:
9: \shorttitle{$H_0$ =55}
10: \shortauthors{Arp}
11:
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15:
16:
17: \title{Arguments for a Hubble Constant near $H_0$ = 55}
18:
19:
20: \author{H. Arp}
21: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astrophysik, Garching 85741, Germany}
22: \email{arp@mpa-garching.mpg.de}
23:
24:
25:
26: \begin{abstract}
27: Recent analyses of Cepheid distances to spiral galaxies have led to an announcement of a Hubble
28: constant of $H_0 = 72 \pm 8$ km/sec/Mpc. The new Cepheid distances, however, show that there
29: are numerous redshift distances with large excesses which cannot be due to peculiar velocities.
30: Ignoring these discordant redshifts, if the Hubble constant is calibrated with Cepheid distances of low
31: redshift spirals a value near $H_0$ = 55 is obtained. Use of independent
32: distance criteria such as Tully-Fisher and group membership verifies this value and leads to three
33: conclusions: 1) The peculiar velocities of galaxies in space are characteristically small.
34: 2) Sc companions to normal Sb's tend to be less luminous, with younger stellar populations and
35: small amounts non velocity redshift. 3) ScI and other purportedly over luminous spirals have large
36: amounts of intrinsic redshift.
37: \end{abstract}
38:
39: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
40: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
41: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
42: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
43:
44: \keywords{Cepheids --- galaxies:distances and redshifts}
45:
46:
47:
48: \section{Introduction}
49:
50: Ever since Hubble's discovery of the redshift-apparent magnitude relation for galaxies, the value of the
51: slope of the inferred redshift-distance law has been in contention. In the 1960's there were two camps,
52: one claiming a value around 50 and the other claiming around $H_0$ = 100 km/sec/Mpc. The latter, high
53: figure in recent years has come down to values in the 70's. Now, with the results from the Hubble
54: space Telescope measurement of distances to galaxies with Cepheids, the best
55: value has been announced to be $H_0 = 72 \pm 8$ (Freedman et al. 2001).
56:
57: It is interesting to note that in the Virgo Cluster the spirals always gave higher $H_0$'s because their
58: redshifts were on average higher. It was argued by G. de Vaucouleurs and others that this was
59: because there was a group of more distant spirals just in back of the Virgo Cluster. This proposed
60: segregation has been put finally to rest with the new HST
61:
62: \begin{table}[t]
63: \caption{Galaxy Distances\label{tab:galdist}}
64: \vspace{0.4cm}
65: \begin{center}
66: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|l}
67: \hline
68: & & & & \\
69: Galaxy ~~ Type &
70: $Cepheids (D_Z)$ &
71: $ H_0 = 72$ &
72: $ H_0 = 55$ &
73: \\ \hline
74:
75: NGC1365 ~SBbI &
76: 17.95 Mpc &
77: 21.7 Mpc &
78: 28.4 Mpc & \\
79:
80: NGC4321~ ScI~~ &
81: 15.21~~~~~~~~&
82: 20.3 ~~~~~~~&
83: 26.6 ~~~~~~~& \\
84:
85: NGC4535~ SBcI~&
86: 15.78~~~~~~~~&
87: 25.3 ~~~~~~~&
88: 33.1 ~~~~~~~& \\
89:
90: NGC4536~ ScI~~ &
91: 14.93~~~~~~~~&
92: 22.9 ~~~~~~~&
93: 29.9 ~~~~~~~& \\
94:
95: & & & \\ \hline
96: \end{tabular}
97: \end{center}
98: \end{table}
99:
100:
101: Cepheid distances which show these high
102: redshift spirals to be firmly at the distance of the center of the Cluster. (See for e.g. Table 1 of the
103: present paper.) Their high redshift must now be explained by something else. Peculiar velocities will
104: not work because the redshifts are systematically positive. For field galaxies peculiar velocities of the
105: order of 1000 km/sec are out of the question because they would blow apart the whole lower third of
106: the Hubble redshift-apparent magnitude relation.
107:
108: The long debated and ever changing value of the Hubble constant certainly involves excess
109: redshifts, particularly of the spirals. It is the purpose of the following paper to argue that the new
110: Cepheid measures actually require a value of $H_0$ only slightly greater than 50. One consequence is
111: that spiral galaxies can contain a component of non-velocity redshift. Independent
112: supporting evidence for this result is reviewed.
113:
114: \section{The Cepheid Evidence}
115:
116: Table 1 lists the final adopted distances for the luminosity class I Galaxies in Table 4 of Freedman et al.
117: 2001. (Corrected for metallicity and called $D_z$ in the above reference.) In the last two columns of
118: Table 1 above are listed the redshift distances for these galaxies, One column for $H_0$
119: = 72 and the last column for $H_0$ = 55. Since the Cepheid distances are the most accurate direct
120: measure of distance available they force the conclusion that the redshift distances for these particular
121: galaxies are inescapably too large.
122:
123: If one uses the $v_0$ redshifts from Sandage and Tamman (1981) and divides by the Cepheid
124: distances listed in Table 1, one gets $H_0$ = 87, 96 ,115, and 110. Because the Cepheid distances are
125: so accurate it can be finally established that the Hubble constant discrepancies lie in the redshifts not
126: the distances.
127:
128: Are these excess redshifts due to peculiar velocities? If so why would they be all in the same
129: direction and
130: why most conspicuously in the SI's? Actually this systematic redshift excess has been
131: demonstrated previously in analyses using independent distance indicators.
132:
133: \section{Redshift Distances Compared to Tully-Fisher Distances}
134:
135: As is well known, Tully-Fisher distances rely on a mass calculated from rotation which is converted to
136: luminosity by means of a mass-luminosity relation and hence into a distance modulus. Calibrated with
137: nearby galaxies whose distances are best known, they represent, in principle, distance determinations
138: independent of the redshift of the galaxy.
139:
140:
141: Fig. 1 shows the differences in distances derived from redshifts relative to the distances derived from
142: Tully-Fisher measures. The $d_z - d_{TF}$ is plotted against blue luminosity from an analysis
143: published by Arp (1990) using $H_0$ = 65. From a best fit of Cepheid distances D. Russell (2001)
144: reports an $H_0$ = 60. But the
145: deviations for the most luminous galaxies would be even larger using $H_0$ = 55 as advocated in the
146: present paper. The diagram illustrates that for low redshift Sc galaxies the T-F distances agree
147: well with the redshift distances. But for larger redshift galaxies the redshift distances are increasingly
148: in excess, reaching the rather staggering discrepancy of up to 30 Mpc! {\it It is among the highest
149: distance discrepancies that we find the ScI galaxies, the same highest luminosity class which gave
150: such excessive Hubble constants in Table 1 using Cepheid distances.}
151:
152: It is now important to plot a diagram similar to Fig. 1 using the new HST Cepheid distances.
153:
154:
155: \section{Redshift Distances Compared to HST Cepheid Distances}
156:
157: Fig. 2 shows the redshift differences between distances derived using an $H_0$ = 55 and
158: distances announced for the Cepheids in Freedman et al. (2001), i.e. $d_z(55)$ - $D_z(Ceph)$. The
159: result is that the highest redshift Sc galaxies show the greatest excess compared to Cepheid
160: distances just as they did when compared to Tully-Fisher distances in Fig. 1. Also, as in Fig. 1, the low
161: redshift Sc's show good agreement with their redshift distances.
162:
163: Fig. 3 now shows the same plot for Sb galaxies. (Points from a new Cepheid distance from Macri
164: et al. 2001 and Saha et al. 2001 have been added.) {\it The result is that the high redshift Sb's show
165: the same increasing discrepancy toward higher redshift.}
166:
167: Other important properties that Figs. 2 and 3 show:
168:
169: \begin{figure}[p]
170: %\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}\hfill\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}
171: %\vskip 2.5cm
172: %\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}\hfill\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}
173: \plotone{H55f1.ps}
174: \caption{The excess of redshift distance over Tully-Fisher distance ($d_z - d_{TF}$)
175: is plotted as a function of the blue luminosity as derived in Arp (1990). The open circles are for Sc's
176: with $v_0 < 1000 km/sec$ and demonstrate that redshift and Tully=Fisher distances agree well
177: for low redshift galaxies over a wide range in luminosity.
178: \label{fig1}}
179: \end{figure}
180:
181:
182: \begin{figure}[p]
183: %{\em $\backslash$begin\{figure\}$[$p$]$
184: %\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}\hfill\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}
185: %\vskip 2.5cm
186: %\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}\hfill\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}
187: \plotone{H55f2.ps}
188: \caption{Differences between distances using $H_0$ = 55 and distances from for the Cepheids in
189: Freedman et al. (2001), i.e., $d_z(55)$ - $D_z(Ceph)$. Open circles represent galaxies with redshifts
190: $69 \leq v_0 \leq 372$, the half filled circles $435 \leq v_0 \leq 792$ and the filled circles
191: $1464 \leq v_0 \leq 1818$ km/sec. Absolute mags. are at Cepheid distances.
192: \label{fig2}}
193: \end{figure}
194:
195: \begin{figure}[p]
196: %\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}\hfill\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}
197: %\vskip 2.5cm
198: %\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}\hfill\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}
199: \plotone{H55f3a.ps}
200: \caption{The same excess of redshift distance from Cepheid distance is plotted for Sb galaxies. The
201: open circles are $0 \leq v_0 \leq 366$, half filled circles $366 < v_0 \leq 860$ and filled circles
202: $1114 \leq v_0 \leq 1577$ km/sec.
203: \label{fig3}}
204: \end{figure}
205:
206:
207:
208:
209: 1) The Sb's are, as class, brighter than $M_B$ = -20 mag. The Sc spirals are generally fainter than
210: $M_B$ = -20. This is in the sense that Sc's are usually found as fainter companions to a dominant
211: Sb in a group (like M31 and M81 group, see Arp 1990; 1994; 1998a,b).
212:
213: 2) In the above references fainter companion Sc's are systematically redshifted from the redshift of
214: the central Sb. This same effect is seen in Fig. 2 where the low luminosity Sc's are shifted slightly
215: above the zero difference line. In Arp 1990, Table Ib, some of the most certain Sc companions of Sb's
216: are listed with
217: excess redshifts of from +21 to + 599 km/sec with an average of about +174. The average upward
218: displacement of the Sc's fainter than $M_B$ = -20 mag. in Fig. 2 is about 1.5 Mpc or about a
219: systematic redshift excess of around 83 km/sec.
220:
221: 3) It might be better to try to set the value of $H_0$ with Sb spirals. But we see from Fig.
222: 3, that {\it the same type of galaxies, with their only difference being their high redshift, give much too
223: great redshift distances compared to their real (Cepheid) distances.}
224:
225:
226: \subsection{Peculiar Velocities}
227:
228: It is clear from both Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 that the high luminosity Sc's and Sb's have unacceptably large
229: redshifts for their distances. In the past such deviations have been attributed to peculiar
230: (non-Hubbble flow) velocities. There are, however, four outstanding reasons why this explanation
231: cannot be invoked here:
232:
233: 1) The spirals with low redshift that we know to be nearby have very small peculiar velocities. We
234: can see from Figs. 1 and 2 particularly that more than a few hundred km/sec would disrupt the good
235: agreement between their Cepheid and redshift distances. There seems to be no obvious reason why
236: locally galaxies should be anomalously quiet.
237:
238: 2) The largest excess redshifts as seen in Figs. 2 and 3 are essentially all positive (nine out of nine).
239: If these were peculiar velocities we would expect as many negative as positive discrepancies.
240:
241: 3) The largest excess redshifts are from galaxies with recognizably different morphology, namely
242: predominantly luminosity class I galaxies. There is no reason for just these kinds of galaxies to be
243: expanding faster than the rest.
244:
245: 4) It has been argued in the past by Sandage and Tamman (e. g. 1981) that the Hubble flow is quiet to
246: $\leq$ 50 km/sec. Even smaller peculiar velocities are required not to wash out redshift periodicities of
247: 72 km/sec (Tifft 1976; Arp and Sulentic 1985) and 37.5 km/sec (Napier and Guthrie 1993).
248:
249: Of course we have direct evidence from clusters and groups of galaxies that the Sc spirals and lower
250: luminosity companions in general have non-velocity redshifts. In the two nearest groups centered on
251: Sb's, M31 and M81, 22 out of 22 major companions have positive redshifts with respect to the central
252: galaxy (Arp 1994). More distant groups show the same pattern. Then there are the cases where high
253: redshift ScI's are actually linked by luminous connections to much lower redshift galaxies
254: (Arp 1990).
255:
256: \section{What is $H_0$?}
257:
258: Fig. 2 shows that $H_0$ = 55 fits reasonably well the lower luminosity Sc's if they have
259: approximately 100 km/sec intrinsic redshift. That value is loosely corroborated by the low luminosity
260: Sb's in Fig. 3 but the accuracy is obviously low. The question arises, can we support this
261: value with a different set of galaxies? The answer is that we can by using the
262: accepted members of the Virgo Cluster of classes: E + E/S0, S0 + SB0 + S0p and Sa + Sab. These 55
263: galaxies, give a luminosity weighted mean redshift of $v_0$ = 863 km/sec (Arp 1988a). This weighting
264: does not allow faint, small mass objects to overly affect the final average. The
265: derived value represents {\it the redshift of the average mass} residing in the major galaxies in
266: the center of Virgo.
267:
268: Taking the Cepheid distance to Virgo as 15.3 Mpc (from Freedman et al 2001, Table 8) we obtain a
269: Hubble constant of $$H_0 = 863/15.3 = 56.4 km/sec/Mpc$$ Alternatively we could take the redshift
270: of the brightest galaxy in Virgo, the central E/S0, M49, and obtain $$H_0 = 822/15.3 = 53.7
271: km/sec/Mpc$$
272:
273: It is enlightening to notice that in Table 2 of Arp 1988 the luminosity weighted mean redshift of the
274: Sb +SBb class galaxies is 97 km/sec and the same mean for the Sc + Sbc classes is 1344 km/sec.
275: These would give wildly implausible Hubble constants and yet it is these very classes which the
276: Freedman et al. (2001) Cepheid calculations of $H_0$ are based - as per Figs. 2 and 3.
277:
278: The most illuminating diagram for understanding why there is a long history of contention over
279: the value of the Hubble constant is shown here in Fig. 4. It is clear that the redshift independent
280: distances to the nearest galaxies define a Hubble relation just slightly greater than $H_0$ = 50. But as
281: one goes past about $d_{TF}$ = 15 Mpc one encounters galaxies which have excess redshifts. Most of
282: these are high luminosity or ScI spirals.
283:
284: \begin{figure}
285: %\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}\hfill\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}
286: %\vskip 2.5cm
287: %\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}\hfill\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}
288: \plotone{H55f4.ps}
289: \caption{The Tully-Fisher distance ($d_TF$) is plotted against Local Group centered redshift
290: ($v_0$) for measured Sc's. For low redshift galaxies a very accurate fit to $H_0$ = 55 is evident. For
291: higher redshift galaxies Hubble constants of $H_0 \geq 100$ must result. Data and Figure from
292: Arp (1990).
293: \label{fig4}}
294: \end{figure}
295:
296:
297: \begin{figure}
298: %\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}\hfill\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}
299: %\vskip 2.5cm
300: %\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}\hfill\rule{5cm}{0.2mm}
301: \plotone{H55f5.eps}
302: \caption{The Cepheid distance, $D_z$(Ceph), is plotted against Local Group centered redshift
303: ($v_0$) for available galaxies. For low redshift galaxies a very accurate fit to $H_0$ = 55 is evident.
304: Past 15 Mpc, however, excess redshifts appear which are too large and too positive to be peculiar
305: velocities. Filled circles are Sb, open circles Sc.
306: \label{fig5}}
307: \end{figure}
308:
309: What has happened in the controversy is that in an attempt to
310: get further out in distance in order to minimize the effect of presumed peculiar velocities,
311: investigators have taken more and more galaxies with excess (intrinsic) redshifts. Naturally the
312: Hubble constant increases - and also becomes very indeterminate. On the other hand, previous
313: analyses which obtained $H_0$ near 55 (e.g. Sandage 2000; Theaureau et al. 1999) used distance
314: limited samples to avoid Malmquist bias. But the "long distance scale" was involved and the sample
315: was redshift-distance limited which excluded galaxies with large intrinsic redshifts.
316:
317: The Tully-Fisher plot in Fig. 4 is strikingly confirmed by using Cepheid distances in Fig. 5. In the latter
318: figure we can be sure the more luminous spirals are at their plotted distance and that their redshifts
319: indicate too high an expansion velocity for that distance. Arguments against these discrepancies being
320: peculiar velocity are given in section 4.1.
321:
322:
323: \section{Remarks on some Discordant Points in Figs. 2 and 3}
324:
325: In Fig. 3 both strongly negative Sb points come from the Virgo Cluster and one has an obviously low
326: redshift of $v_0$ = 366 km/sec. The latter is a good candidate for an older galaxy if the intrinsic
327: redshifts are a function of the age of their constituent matter (Arp 1998b).
328:
329: In Fig. 2 the discordant point at $M_B$ = -19.52 mag. and excess redshift distance of 13.65 Mpc is
330: NGC 4496A. This is an interesting object because there is a smaller galaxy with cz = 4510 km/sec
331: only 0.87 arcmin from A which has cz = 1725 km/sec. What is going on? The solution I would suggest
332: is that NGC 4496A was a high redshift ScI like the points to its left. But the interaction with the high
333: redshift companion (the interaction is argued in Arp 1990b) destroyed the sharp star forming arms
334: characteristic of the ScI, reduced its luminosity in the process, and turned it into the SBcIII-IV which
335: it presently classified. Note that a galaxy of this morphological type is ordinarily a low luminosity,
336: dwarf type object.
337:
338: The most difficult point in Fig. 2 is the open circle at $M_B$ = -21.24 mag. which represents the
339: nearby ScI galaxy M101. Its placement in the sky and redshift would argue for its being a companion
340: to M81. That would make its luminosity and absolute diameter much more in consonance with other
341: galaxies of its type. However, its Cepheid distance would have to be reduced from 6.7 to around 3.6
342: Mpc. As it stands it is an anomalous point in Fig. 2. Perhaps its cepheids are very low metal content
343: and are vibrating in a low luminosity/ low overtone mode.
344:
345:
346:
347: \section*{References}
348:
349: \noindent Arp, H. 1988a, A\&A 201, 70
350: \medskip
351:
352: \noindent Arp, H. 1988b, Seeing Red: Redshifts, Cosmology and Academic Science, Apeiron, Montreal
353: \medskip
354:
355: \noindent Arp, H. 1990a, Astro. Phys. Sp. Sci. 167,183
356: \medskip
357:
358: \noindent Arp, H. 1990b, P.A.S.P. 102, 436
359: \medskip
360:
361: \noindent Arp, H. 1994, ApJ 430, 74
362: \medskip
363:
364: \noindent Arp, H. 1998, ApJ 496, 661
365: \medskip
366:
367: \noindent Arp, H., Sulentic, J. 1985, ApJ 291, 88
368: \medskip
369:
370: \noindent Freedman,W., Madore, B., Gibson, B. et al. 2001, ApJ 553, 47
371: \medskip
372:
373: \noindent Macri, L., Stetson, P., Bothun, G., et al. 2001, ApJ in press and astro-ph/0105491
374: \medskip
375:
376: \noindent Napier, W., Guthrie, B. 1993, Progress in New Cosmologies, Plenum Press, 29.
377: \medskip
378:
379: \noindent Russell, D. 2001, ApJ submitted
380: \medskip
381:
382: \noindent Saha, A., Sandage A., Thim, F. et al. 2001, ApJ 551, 973
383: \medskip
384:
385: \noindent Sandage, A. 2000, PASP 112, 504
386: \medskip
387:
388: \noindent Sandage, A., Tamman, G. 1981, A Revised Shapley-Ames Catalog of Bright Galaxies,
389: Carnegie Institution of Washington
390: \medskip
391:
392: \noindent Theureau, G., Hanski, M., Ekholm, T., Bottinelli, L., Gougenheim, L., Pateurel, G., Teerikorpi,
393: P. 1999, IAU 183, 71
394: \medskip
395:
396: \noindent Tifft, W. 1976, Apj 206, 38
397: \medskip
398:
399:
400:
401: \end{document}
402:
403:
404:
405:
406:
407:
408:
409:
410:
411:
412:
413:
414:
415:
416: