1: % paper on Chandra ACIS observation of M100 (NGC 4321)
2: % PK 3/26-30/01, 4/8-10/01, 4/24/01,
3: % PK after referee comments 6/15-21/01
4:
5: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex} % for preprints % for ApJ
6: \documentclass[10pt,preprint2]{aastex} % for preprints % for astro-ph
7:
8: \shorttitle{X-ray Sources in M100}
9: \shortauthors{Kaaret}
10:
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{Chandra X-Ray Point Sources, including Supernova
15: 1979C, in the Spiral Galaxy M100}
16:
17: \author{Philip Kaaret}
18:
19: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden
20: St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}
21:
22: \email{pkaaret@cfa.harvard.edu}
23:
24:
25:
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28:
29: Six x-ray point sources, with luminosities of $4 \times
30: 10^{38} - 2 \times 10^{39} \rm \, ergs \, s^{-1}$ in the
31: 0.4--7~keV band, were detected in Chandra observations of the
32: spiral galaxy M100. One source is identified with supernova
33: SN 1979C and appears to have roughly constant x-ray flux for
34: the period 16--20 years after the outburst. The x-ray
35: spectrum is soft, as would be expected if the x-ray emission
36: is due to the interaction of supernova ejecta with
37: circumstellar matter. Most of the other sources are variable
38: either within the Chandra observation or when compared to
39: archival data. None are coincident with the peak of the
40: radio emission at the nucleus. These sources have harder
41: spectra than the supernova and are likely x-ray binaries.
42: M100 has more bright x-ray sources than typical for spiral
43: galaxies of its size. This is likely related to active star
44: formation occurring in the galaxy.
45:
46: \end{abstract}
47:
48: \keywords{galaxies: individual (NGC 4321 = M100) ---
49: galaxies: spiral --- galaxies: starburst --- supernovae:
50: individual: SN 1979C (M100) --- X-rays: galaxies --- X-rays:
51: sources}
52:
53:
54:
55: \section{Introduction}
56:
57: M100 (NGC 4321) is a `grand-design' late-type spiral, which
58: has hosted 4 supernovae since 1900, has a prominent,
59: star-forming circumnuclear region, and is located in the
60: Virgo cluster . Previous x-ray observations of M100 led to
61: the detection of the most recent supernova in the galaxy (SN
62: 1979C) and of a number of other point sources
63: \citep{immler98,palumbo81}.
64:
65: Here, we report on x-ray point sources found in high-angular
66: resolution x-ray observations of M100 made with Chandra.
67: Results on the nuclear emission from the same data were
68: previously reported in \citet{ho01}. We selected this galaxy
69: for study because it is seen nearly face-on which reduces
70: ambiguity in determining the environments of x-ray sources,
71: because it contains SN 1979C which was previously detected in
72: x-rays \citep{immler98}, and because of the question of the
73: association of an x-ray source with the nucleus remains open
74: \citep{ho01}. We describe the Chandra observations and our
75: analysis in \S 2 and discuss the results in \S 3.
76:
77:
78: \section{Observations and Analysis}
79:
80: M100 was observed with the Chandra X-Ray Observatory (CXO;
81: Weisskopf 1988) on 6 Nov 1999 and 15 Jan 2000 using the ACIS
82: spectroscopic array (ACIS-S; Bautz et al.\ 1998) in imaging
83: mode and the High-Resolution Mirror Assembly (HRMA; van
84: Speybroeck et al.\ 1997). The galaxy fits almost completely
85: on the S3 chip with a small portion of the $D_{25}$ ellipse
86: on the S2 chip. We found no point sources within the portion
87: of the $D_{25}$ ellipse on the S2 chip and the analysis below
88: includes only data from S3. Level 2 data products from the
89: standard processing (version R4CU5UPD11.2) were used. The
90: processing includes standard cuts on CCD event grades,
91: elimination of events from hot pixels, hot columns, and near
92: node boundaries, and removal of cosmic ray induced events.
93:
94: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccc}
95: \tablecolumns{10}
96: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
97: \tablecaption{Chandra X-Ray Point Sources in
98: M100.\label{chandra_src}}
99: \tablewidth{0pt}
100: \tablehead{\colhead{Source} & \colhead{RA} & \colhead{DEC} &
101: \colhead{$\log(L_{X})$} & \colhead{Color} & \colhead{Obs 1}
102: & \colhead{Obs 2} }
103: \startdata
104: C1 & 12 22 54.78 & +15 49 18.3 & 39.1(1) & -0.2(2) & 39.3(1) & 38.6(2) \\
105: C2 & 12 22 54.13 & +15 49 11.9 & 39.1(1) & -0.1(2) & 38.9(2) & 39.2(1) \\
106: C3 & 12 22 54.76 & +15 49 15.9 & 39.0(1) & 0.4(3) & 39.0(1) & 39.0(1) \\
107: C4 & 12 22 54.23 & +15 49 43.8 & 38.8(1) & 0.2(3) & 38.6(2) & 38.9(2) \\
108: C5 & 12 22 58.66 & +15 47 51.0 & 38.9(1) & -0.5(3) & 38.9(2) & 38.8(2) \\
109: C6 & 12 22 46.10 & +15 48 49.7 & 38.9(1) & 0.6(3) & 39.1(1) & 38.5(3) \\
110: \enddata
111:
112: \tablecomments{This Table contains for each source: Source --
113: the label used in this paper; RA and DEC -- the J2000
114: position; $\log(L_{X})$ -- the logarithm of the luminosity in
115: the 0.4--7~keV band in units of $\rm ergs \, s^{-1}$; Color
116: -- an x-ray color (hardness ratio) defined as counts in the
117: 1-7~keV band minus counts in the 0.4--1~keV band divided by
118: the total counts in the 0.4--7~keV band; Obs 1 and Obs 2 --
119: logarithms of the luminosities in the first and second
120: Chandra observations. Numbers in parentheses indicate the
121: $1\sigma$ uncertainty in the final digit of the preceding
122: value.} \end{deluxetable}
123:
124: \begin{figure*}[th] \epsscale{1.6} \plotone{f1.eps}
125: \caption{B-band image of M100 with positions of the Chandra
126: point sources superimposed. The numbers indicate x-ray
127: sources from Table~\ref{chandra_src}. The arrow points
128: North. The image is from the Digitized Sky Survey.}
129: \label{dssb_x} \end{figure*}
130:
131: The observation on 6 Nov 1999 lasted 1165~s and had a high
132: background rate in S3, $10-70 \rm \, cts \, s^{-1}$. On 15
133: Jan 2000, 1366~s of data were obtained with a low background
134: rate, $\sim 1 \rm \, cts \, s^{-1}$. Both observations are
135: recorded in Chandra ObsID 400. We created images in the
136: 0.4--7~keV band at the full ACIS resolution of $0.49\arcsec$
137: for each observation and for the combined data. We searched
138: the images for point sources using wavdetect (CIAO V2.0) and
139: visually inspected each image. For the two sources near the
140: nucleus of M100, wavdetect reported source ellipses well in
141: excess of the HRMA/ACIS point spread function. These large
142: source ellipses are likely due to diffuse emission in this
143: region and we chose to use source regions consistent with the
144: point spread function rather than those reported by
145: wavdetect.
146:
147: The merged list of sources with detection significance above
148: $4\sigma$ and within the $D_{25}$ ellipse of M100 is given in
149: Table~\ref{chandra_src}. The positional accuracy is limited
150: by the Chandra absolute aspect which is accurate to
151: $0.6\arcsec$ ($1\sigma$ rms; Aldcroft et al.\ 2000; see also
152: the Chandra Aspect web pages
153: http://asc.harvard.edu/mta/ASPECT/). The relative positions
154: should be somewhat better. For each source, counts from the
155: full data set in the energy bands 0.4--1--7~keV were
156: extracted from source regions with a radius of 2 pixels for
157: sources near the aimpoint and larger elliptical regions for
158: sources further out. The counts were background subtracted
159: using a circular background regions with radii equal to 3
160: times the major axis of the source ellipse and with ellipses
161: twice the size of the source regions excluded (for both the
162: source of interest and any sources overlapping the background
163: region). For each source, we calculated the x-ray count
164: rate in the 0.4--7~keV band and an x-ray color (hardness
165: ratio) defined as counts in the 1-7~keV band minus counts in
166: the 0.4--1~keV divided by the total counts in the 0.4--7~keV
167: band. The x-ray colors were corrected to the values which
168: would have been measured at the aimpoint using exposure maps
169: for 0.7 and 2.4~keV, which correspond to the average photon
170: energies for the point sources in the two bands.
171:
172:
173: Count rates were converted to luminosities in the 0.4--7~keV
174: band assuming a thermal bremsstrahlung model with $kT = 2 \rm
175: \, keV$ and corrected for absorption along the line of sight
176: with a column density of $2.39 \times 10^{20} \rm \, cm^{-2}$
177: and assuming a distance of 16.1~Mpc \citep{ferrarese96}. The
178: count rates were corrected for the fraction of events
179: contained in the extraction region and for exposure using an
180: exposure map for 1.5~keV. The $kT = 2 \rm \, keV$ thermal
181: bremsstrahlung spectrum is consistent with the x-ray colors
182: for most of the sources (see below). The previously used $kT
183: = 5 \rm \, keV$ thermal bremsstrahlung spectrum
184: \citep{immler98} is not consistent with the x-ray colors.
185: However, use of $kT = 5 \rm \, keV$ would increase the
186: luminosities only by a factor of 1.3. Use of a power-law
187: with photon index 2 would increase them by 1.1. For
188: comparison with Rosat measurements \citep{immler98}, the
189: luminosities in Table~\ref{chandra_src} should be multiplied
190: by 1.0 to find the equivalent luminosity in the 0.1--2.4 band
191: assuming a thermal bremsstrahlung model with $kT = 5 \rm \,
192: keV$ for a distance of 17.1~Mpc.
193:
194:
195: \section{Results and Discussion}
196:
197: \begin{figure*}[tb] \epsscale{1.4} \plotone{f2.eps}
198: \caption{Contour map of 1.4~GHz radio emission from M100.
199: The contours are at 1, 2, 3, 4 mJy/beam. Crosses indicate
200: positions of sources from the FIRST catalog and X's indicate
201: x-ray sources from Table~\ref{chandra_src}. The radio
202: emission towards the upper-right is near the nucleus while
203: the emission towards the lower-left is from SN 1979C.}
204: \label{firstmap} \end{figure*}
205:
206: Table~\ref{chandra_src} gives the properties of the x-ray
207: point sources detected with Chandra. Fig.~\ref{dssb_x} shows
208: the locations of the Chandra sources superimposed on a
209: Digitized Sky Survey Blue image of M100. The Chandra sources
210: lie either on spiral arms, in H{\sc II} regions near spirals
211: arms, or near the nucleus, i.e.\ at regions of active star
212: formation. This supports the idea that luminous x-ray
213: sources ($L_{X} > 2 \times 10^{38} \rm \, ergs \, s^{-1}$)
214: are preferentially associated with recent star formation
215: \citep{fabbiano89,fabbiano01}.
216:
217: Comparing the sources detected with Chandra with those
218: detected with Rosat and Einstein \citep{immler98}, we find
219: several variable sources. Allowing for the uncertainty in
220: the luminosity due to the lack of spectral information, we
221: require a factor of $\sim 2$ change as evidence of
222: variability. The Chandra source C6 was undetected with Rosat
223: and appears to have increased in flux by a factor of at least
224: 3. The Chandra upper bound on the luminosity of the Rosat
225: source H17 \citep{immler98} is at least a factor of 4 below
226: the Rosat measurement. The Rosat source H24 appears to have
227: decreased in flux by a factor of at least 2 in the Chandra
228: observation. The source C2 = H21 may also be variable, but
229: caution is warranted before reaching this conclusion as the
230: Rosat flux may include some diffuse emission due to the
231: larger point spread function of Rosat. This source was also
232: detected with Einstein at a comparable flux. The Rosat
233: sources H18 and H19 were detected at lower fluxes (the Rosat
234: observation was 43~ks compared to only 2.5~ks for Chandra)
235: and their variability cannot be constrained from the short
236: Chandra observation. A longer Chandra observation would be
237: useful. H19 was detected with Einstein at a much higher flux
238: than with Rosat and is clearly variable. The sources H22 =
239: C4 and H25 = C5 appear constant.
240:
241: The nucleus of M100 (Rosat source H 23) resolves with Chandra
242: into two sources: C1 and C3. There is also diffuse emission
243: present in the low background image near the two point
244: sources. C1 lies $2.7\arcsec$ away from the nuclear position
245: derived from Digitized Sky Survey images which has an
246: uncertainty of $1.7\arcsec$ \citep{cotton99}. To further
247: investigate association of the C1 with the nucleus, we
248: examined the FIRST radio survey data at 1.4~GHz for M100
249: \citep{becker95}. The FIRST catalog \citep{white97} contains
250: two sources inside a region of extended emission near the
251: nucleus, see Fig.~\ref{firstmap}. C1 is not coincident with
252: either FIRST source and lies outside the peak of the diffuse
253: emission. C1 lies $3.5\arcsec$ away from the closer FIRST
254: source (which lies within the optical nuclear error box).
255: The offset between C1 and the FIRST source is significantly
256: larger than the astrometric uncertainty of Chandra of
257: $1.0\arcsec$ at 90\% confidence and the uncertainty of the
258: FIRST position which is less than $0.5\arcsec$ at 90\%
259: confidence. The FIRST and Chandra positions for SN 1979C,
260: see below, agree within $0.84\arcsec$ indicating there are no
261: gross errors in the x-ray positions. Hence, we exclude an
262: identification of C1 with the bright radio sources near the
263: nucleus of M100. We note that M100 does not show evidence
264: for AGN activity at other wavelengths \citep{sakamoto95}.
265:
266: C1 is the only source which shows significant variability
267: between the two Chandra observations. The variability
268: indicates the source is likely a compact object. The
269: circumnuclear region of M100 is undergoing vigorous star
270: formation with some star clusters as young as a few 10~Myr
271: \citep{ryder99}. Hence, the presence of bright x-ray point
272: sources near the nucleus is not unexpected and is likely
273: related to the young stellar population.
274:
275: The majority of the x-ray sources in M100 are variable and
276: are likely x-ray binaries. The sources are not more luminous
277: than known x-ray binaries within the Milky Way, e.g.\
278: 4U\,1543--47 \citep{orosz98}. Hence, they may be normal
279: stellar black hole candidates x-ray binaries with black
280: masses near $10 \, M_{\odot}$ and, perhaps, mildly beamed.
281: The luminosities are not high enough to warrant the
282: application of exotic models as may be required for very high
283: luminosity sources, e.g.\ the $L_{X} \sim 10^{41} \rm \, ergs
284: \, s^{-1}$ source in M82 \citep{kaaret01,matsumoto01}. In
285: Fig.~\ref{color_lum}, we show the x-ray color versus x-ray
286: luminosity (both defined in Table~\ref{chandra_src}) of the
287: Chandra sources. Excluding the softest source, which is a
288: supernova discussed below, the colors lie in the range from
289: -0.2, corresponding to a thermal bremsstrahlung spectrum with
290: $kT \sim 1.0 \rm \, keV$ or a power-law spectrum with photon
291: index $\alpha = 2.3$, to +0.6, corresponding to $kT \sim 2.3
292: \rm \, keV$ or $\alpha = 0.6$, assuming a column density of
293: $2.39 \times 10^{20} \rm \, cm^{-2}$. Such spectra are
294: reasonable for accreting x-ray binaries at these
295: luminosities.
296:
297: \begin{figure}[tb] \epsscale{0.8} \plotone{f3.eps}
298: \caption{X-ray color versus luminosity for point sources in
299: M100.} \label{color_lum} \end{figure}
300:
301: Using the x-ray point source luminosity function derived from
302: a Rosat survey of nearby spiral galaxies \citep{roberts00},
303: we estimate that roughly 1.4 x-ray sources with $L_X \ge 5
304: \times 10^{38} \rm ergs \, s^{-1}$ would be expected in M100
305: given its blue luminosity. We find 6 sources. The number of
306: x-ray point sources versus blue luminosity in M100 is similar
307: to that found for M101 \citep{wang99} and is likely related
308: to active star formation, as has been suggested for M101
309: \citep{trinchieri90}. Star formation in M100 is concentrated
310: along the spiral arms \citep{knapen96} as are the Chandra
311: sources.
312:
313:
314:
315: \subsection{SN 1979C}
316:
317: The Rosat source H25 was identified with the supernova SN
318: 1979C \citep{immler98}. Our Chandra position places the
319: source C5 only $0.84\arcsec$ away from the supernovae --
320: within the 90\% confidence error circle -- and greatly
321: strengthens this association. None of the other known
322: supernovae are detected with Chandra. SN 1901B and SN 1959E
323: are type I supernova \citep{barbon89}, so no x-ray emission
324: would be expected \citep{schlegel95}. The type of SN 1914A
325: is not known.
326:
327: Unfortunately, there are too few photons ($\sim 10$) detected
328: with Chandra from SN 1979C to make definitive statements
329: about the spectrum (e.g.\ whether it is thermal line emission
330: versus continuum emission). The source is the softest of
331: those found in M100. The x-ray color, defined above, of
332: $-0.5 \pm 0.3$ is consistent with a thermal bremsstrahlung
333: spectrum with $kT = 0.3-1.1 \rm \, keV$, or a power-law
334: spectrum with photon index of 2.3 to 4.3. This assumes a
335: column density of $2.39 \times 10^{20} \rm \, cm^{-2}$;
336: higher absorption would imply a softer intrinsic spectrum.
337: The spectrum is significantly softer than the assumed
338: spectrum used in calculating luminosities in
339: Table~\ref{chandra_src} or in \citet{immler98}.
340: Recalculating the luminosity using a more appropriate
341: spectrum, thermal bremsstrahlung with $kT = 0.6 \rm \, keV$,
342: we find a luminosity of $9 \times 10^{38} \rm erg \, s^{-1}$
343: in the 0.1--2.4~keV band and a luminosity from the Rosat data
344: of $1.3 \times 10^{39} \rm erg \, s^{-1}$ in the same band.
345:
346: The Chandra and Rosat fluxes for the source H25 = C5 are not
347: strongly inconsistent given the uncertainties due to spectral
348: shape and inter instrument calibration. The source appears
349: to have had a roughly constant, or perhaps slightly
350: declining, luminosity over the 4.3 years separating the two
351: observations. The constancy of the x-ray luminosity of SN
352: 1979C over 4~years beginning 16 years after outburst is
353: similar to the x-ray light curve of SN 1978K in NGC 1313
354: which showed a constant luminosity of $\sim 5 \times 10^{39}
355: \rm erg \, s^{-1}$ over the period 12--16 years after
356: outburst \citep{schlegel96}.
357:
358: SN 1979C was discovered on 19 April 1979 near maximum optical
359: light \citep{johnson79} and has been extensively observed.
360: The optical light curve had a linear decline, leading to
361: classification as a type II, subclass `L' or `linear'
362: \citep{panagia80}. The total radiative energy in the event
363: was $7 \times 10^{49} \rm erg$ \citep{panagia80}. The
364: progenitor is thought to be a red supergiant with a mass near
365: $17 \, M_{\odot}$ and may have been in a binary
366: \citep{weiler92,schwarz96}. Hubble Space Telescope (HST)
367: observations led to tentative identification of an optical
368: counterpart to SN 1979C \citep{vandyk99}. The H$\alpha$ flux
369: from the counterpart would imply an H$\alpha$ to X-ray flux
370: ratio of $\sim 0.013$ during 1995--1996.
371:
372: The interaction of supernova ejecta with surrounding matter
373: previously lost by the progenitor provides an adequate
374: explanation of optical, UV, and radio data on SN 1979C
375: \citep{chevalier94}. Radio emission was detected one year
376: after outburst with the maximum emission at 6~cm shortly
377: after the first detection and the maximum at 20~cm three
378: years after outburst \citep{weiler81,weiler86}. This delayed
379: turn-on with increasing delay at longer wavelengths appears
380: due to decreasing free-free absorption in ionized gas around
381: the supernova and is well explained by the circumstellar
382: interaction model \citep{weiler91}. The same model also
383: explains the observed UV lines \citep{fransson84}.
384:
385: Circumstellar interactions could produce the observed roughly
386: constant luminosity if the supernova ejecta and the
387: circumstellar matter have the appropriate radial dependence
388: \citep{schlegel96}. Such a process could produce adequate
389: luminosity and the H$\alpha$ to X-ray flux ratio is in
390: reasonable agreement with model predictions
391: \citep{chevalier94}. A soft x-ray spectrum would be
392: expected, which is consistent with the Chandra constraints.
393: The circumstellar interaction model appears consistent with
394: all the available x-ray constraints.
395:
396: Alternative explanations of the x-ray emission are possible
397: if a compact object was formed in SN 1979C. The X-ray
398: emission might arise from a rotation-powered pulsar or from
399: accretion on to a compact object fueled either by a binary
400: companion or by matter from the progenitor which has fallen
401: back onto the compact object \citep{chatterjee00}.
402: Sufficient flux could be produced by either method of
403: accretion (a black hole would be required to avoid violating
404: the Eddington limit if the emission is unbeamed), but a
405: variable or declining flux and, perhaps, a somewhat harder
406: spectrum than is observed might be expected. The presence of
407: a pulsar in SN 1979C has been suggested to explain the radio
408: light curves \citep{weiler81,pacini81}. The behavior of very
409: young pulsars is unknown with a key question being the
410: efficiency for conversion of spin-down power to observable
411: x-ray emission. X-rays would likely come mainly from a
412: surrounding synchrotron nebula and produce a relatively hard
413: power-law x-ray spectrum, mildly inconsistent with the
414: Chandra constraints. With additional x-ray observations, it
415: would be possible to search for variability and perhaps also
416: to determine whether the x-ray emission is thermal line
417: emission or due to a continuum process and to accurately
418: measure the spectral parameters.
419:
420:
421:
422: \acknowledgments
423:
424: I gratefully acknowledge the efforts of the Chandra team and
425: partial support from NASA grant NAG5-7405. I thank the
426: referee (and editor) Greg Bothun for useful comments. The
427: Digitized Sky Survey was produced at the Space Telescope
428: Science Institute under U.S. Government grant NAG W-2166.
429:
430:
431: %--------------
432:
433: %\clearpage % uncomment for Apj, comment out for astro-ph
434:
435: \begin{thebibliography}{}
436:
437: %\bibitem[et al.\ 1981]{}, ApJ,
438:
439: \bibitem[Aldcroft et al.(2000)]{aldcroft00} Aldcroft T.L. et
440: al.\ 2000, Proc.\ SPIE, 4012, 650
441:
442: \bibitem[Barbon, Cappellaro, and Turatto(1989)]{barbon89}
443: Barbon, R., Cappellaro, E., \& Turatto, M.\ 1989, A\&ApS, 81,
444: 421
445:
446: \bibitem[Bautz et al.(1998)]{bautz98} Bautz M.W.\ et al.\
447: 1998, Proc.\ SPIE, 3444, 210
448:
449: \bibitem[Becker et al(1995)]{becker95} Becker, R.H., White,
450: R.L., \& Helfand, D.\ 1995, ApJ, 453, 741
451:
452: \bibitem[Chevalier and Fransson(1994)]{chevalier94}
453: Chevalier, R.A.\ \& Fransson, C.\ 1994, ApJ, 420, 268
454:
455: \bibitem[Chatterjee et al.(2000)]{chatterjee00} Chatterjee,
456: P., Hernquist, L., \& Narayan R.\ 2000, ApJ, 534, 373
457:
458: \bibitem[Colbert and Mushotzky(1999)]{colbert99} Colbert
459: E.J.M., Mushotzky R.F.\ 1999, ApJ, 519, 89
460:
461: \bibitem[Collura et al.(1994)]{collura94} Collura A., Reale
462: F., Schulman E., Bregman J.N.\ 1994, ApJ, 420, L63
463:
464: \bibitem[Cotton et al.(1999)]{cotton99} Cotton, W.D., Condon,
465: J.J., \& Arbizazani, E.\ 1999, ApJS, 125, 409
466:
467: \bibitem[de Vaucouleurs et al.(1981)]{devauc81} de
468: Vaucouleurs, G., de Vaucouleurs, A., Buta, R., Ables, H.D.,
469: \& Hewitt, A.V.\ 1981, PASP, 93, 36
470:
471: \bibitem[Fabbiano(1989)]{fabbiano89} Fabbiano G.\ 1989,
472: ARA\&A, 27, 87
473:
474: \bibitem[Fabbiano et al.(2001)]{fabbiano01} Fabbiano, G.\,
475: Zezas, A., \& Murray, S.S.\ 2001, ApJ, to appear
476:
477: \bibitem[Freedman et al.(1994)]{freedman94} Freedman, W.L.\ et
478: al.\ 1994, ApJ, 435, L31
479:
480: \bibitem[Ferrarese et al.(1996)]{ferrarese96}Ferrarese, L.\
481: et al.\ 1996, ApJ, 464, 568
482:
483: \bibitem[Fransson(1984)]{fransson84} Fransson, C.\ 1994, A\&A,
484: 133, 264
485:
486: \bibitem[Ho et al.(2001)]{ho01}Ho, L.C.\ et al.\ 2001, ApJ,
487: to appear, astro-ph/0102504
488:
489: \bibitem[Immler et al.(1998)]{immler98} Immler, S., Pietsch,
490: W., \& Aschenbach, B.\ 1998, \aap, 331, 601
491:
492: \bibitem[Johnson(1979)]{johnson79} Johnson, G.E., 1979, IAU
493: Circ., No. 3348
494:
495: \bibitem[Kaaret et al.(2001)]{kaaret01} Kaaret, P.,
496: Prestwich, A.H., Zezas, A., Murray, S.S., Kim, D.-W.,
497: Kilgard, R.E., Schlegel, E.M., \& Ward, M.J.\ 2001, MNRAS,
498: 321, L29
499:
500: \bibitem[Knapen et al.(1996)]{knapen96} Knapen, J.H.,
501: Beckman, J.E., Cepa, J., \& Nakai, N.\ 1996, A\&A, 308, 27
502:
503: \bibitem[Matsumoto et al.(2001)]{matsumoto01} Matsumoto, H.,
504: Tsuru, T.G., Koyama, K., Awaki, H., Canizares, C.R., Kawai,
505: N., Matsushita, S., \& Kawabe, R.\ 2001, ApJ, 547, L25
506:
507: \bibitem[Orosz et al.(1998)]{orosz98} Orosz, J.A., Jain,
508: R.K., Bailyn, C.D., McClintock, J.E., \& Remillard, R.A.\
509: 1998, ApJ, 499, 375
510:
511: \bibitem[Pacini and Salvati(1981)]{pacini81} Pacini, F.\ \&
512: Salvati, M.\ 1981, ApJ, 245, L107
513:
514: \bibitem[Palumbo et al.(1981)]{palumbo81} Palumbo, G.G.C.,
515: Maccacaro, T., Panagia, N., Vettolani, G., \& Zamorani, G.\
516: 1981, ApJ, 247, 484
517:
518: \bibitem[Panagia et al.(1980)]{panagia80} Panagia, N.\ et al.\
519: 1980, MNRAS, 192, 861
520:
521: \bibitem[Roberts and Warwick(2000)]{roberts00} Roberts, T.P.\
522: \& Warwick, R.S.\ 2000, MNRAS, 315, 98
523:
524: \bibitem[Ryder and Knapen(1999)]{ryder99} Ryder, S.D.\ \&
525: Knapen, J.H.\ 1999, MNRAS, 302, L7
526:
527: \bibitem[Sakamoto et al.(1995)]{sakamoto95} Sakamoto, K.,
528: Okumura, S., Minezaki, T., Kabayashi, Y., \& Wada, K.\ 1995,
529: AJ, 110, 207
530:
531: \bibitem[Schlegel(1995)]{schlegel95} Schlegel, E.M.\ 1995,
532: Rep. Prog. Phys., 58, 1375
533:
534: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1996)]{schlegel96} Schlegel, E.M.,
535: Petre, R., \& Colbert, E.J.M.\ 1996, ApJ, 456, 187
536:
537: \bibitem[Schwarz and Pringle(1996)]{schwarz96} Schwarz, D.H.
538: \& Pringle, J.E.\ 1996, MNRAS, 282, 1018
539:
540: \bibitem[Trinchieri, Fabbiano, and
541: Romaine(1990)]{trinchieri90} Trinchieri, G., Fabbiano, G., \&
542: Romaine, S.\ 1990, ApJ, 356, 110
543:
544: \bibitem[Van Dyk et al.(1999)]{vandyk99} Van Dyk, S.D.\ et
545: al.\ 1999, PASJ, 111, 313
546:
547: \bibitem[van Speybroeck et al.(1997)]{vanS97} van Speybroeck
548: L.P. et al.\ 1997, Proc.\ SPIE, 3113, 89
549:
550: \bibitem[Wang, Immler, and Pietsch(1999)]{wang99} Wang, Q.D.,
551: Immler, S., \& Pietsch, W.\ 1999, ApJ, 523, 121
552:
553: \bibitem[Weiler et al.(1981)]{weiler81} Weiler, K.W., van der
554: Hulst, J.M., Sramek, R.A., \& Panagia, N.\ 1981, ApJ, 243,
555: L151
556:
557: \bibitem[Weiler et al.(1986)]{weiler86} Weiler, K.W.,
558: Sramek, R.A., Panagia, N., van der Hulst, J.M., \& Salvati,
559: M.\ 1986, ApJ, 301, 790
560:
561: \bibitem[Weiler et al.(1991)]{weiler91} Weiler, K.W., Van Dyk,
562: S.D., Discenna, J.L., Panagia, N., \& Sramek, R.A.\ 1991,
563: ApJ, 380, 161
564:
565: \bibitem[Weiler et al.(1992)]{weiler92} Weiler, K.W., Van Dyk,
566: S.D., Pringle, J.E., \& Panagia, N.\ 1992, ApJ, 339, 672
567:
568: \bibitem[Weisskopf et al.(1988)]{weisskopf88} Weisskopf M.C.\
569: 1988, Space Science Reviews, 47, 47
570:
571: \bibitem[White et al(1997)]{white97} White, R.L., Becker,
572: R.H., Helfand, D.J., \& Gregg, Michael D.\ 1997, ApJ, 475,
573: 479
574:
575: \end{thebibliography}
576:
577: \end{document}
578:
579:
580: V4641 SGR \citep{orosz01}
581:
582: \bibitem[Orosz et al.(2001)]{orosz01} Orosz, J.A.\ et al.\
583: 2001, astro-ph/0103045, submitted to ApJ
584:
585: