1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass{aastex}
3:
4: %% preprint produces a one-column, single-spaced document:
5:
6: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
7:
8: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
9:
10: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
11: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
12: %% the \begin{document} command.
13: %%
14: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
15: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
16: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.0 Author Guide
17: %% for information.
18:
19: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
20: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
21: \def\eng{{\cal E}}
22: \def\vel{\vartheta}
23: \def\ga{\gamma}
24: \def\la{\lambda}
25: \def\md{\dot{\cal M}}
26: \def\sig{\Sigma}
27: \def\lsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
28: \def\gsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}
29:
30:
31:
32: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
33:
34: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
35:
36: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
37: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
38: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
39: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
40: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
41: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
42:
43: \shorttitle{Standing Shocks Around Black Holes}
44: \shortauthors{S. Das, I. Chattopadhyay and S.K. Chakrabarti}
45:
46:
47: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
48: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
49:
50: \begin{document}
51:
52: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
53: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
54: %% you desire.
55:
56: \title{Standing Shocks around Black Holes: An Analytical Study}
57:
58: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
59: %% author and affiliation information.
60: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
61: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
62: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
63: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
64:
65: \author{Santabrata Das, Indranil Chattopadhyay and Sandip K. Chakrabarti\altaffilmark{1}}
66: \affil{S. N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences, JD-Block, Salt Lake,
67: Kolkata, 700098, INDIA\\
68: e-mail: sbdas@boson.bose.res.in, indra@boson.bose.res.in \& chakraba@boson.bose.res.in}
69:
70: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
71: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
72: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
73: %% affiliation.
74:
75: \altaffiltext{1}{Honorary Scientist, Centre for Space Physics,
76: 114/v/1A Raja S.C. Mullick Rd., Kolkata 700047, INDIA}
77:
78: \begin{abstract}
79: We compute locations of sonic points and standing shock waves
80: in a thin, axisymmetric, adiabatic flow around a Schwarzschild black hole.
81: We use completely analytical method to achieve our goal. Our results
82: are compared with those obtained numerically and a good agreement is seen.
83: Our results positively prove the existence of shocks in centrifugal pressure
84: dominated flows. We indicate how our results could be used to
85: obtain spectral properties and frequencies of shock oscillations
86: which may be directly related to the quasi-periodic oscillations of hard X-rays.
87: \end{abstract}
88:
89: \noindent {\bf Astrophysical Journal; In press (August 20th issue)}
90:
91: \keywords{accretion, accretion discs --- black hole physics ---
92: hydrodynamics --- shock waves}
93:
94: \section{Introduction}
95:
96: In recent years, study of standing and oscillating shocks in accretion
97: flows has become very important since it is recognized that the spectral states of
98: black holes as well as Quasi-Periodic Oscillations (QPOs) observed in
99: light curves of black hole candidates are directly related to the radiative
100: transfer properties of a compact Comptonizing region close to a black hole
101: (e.g., Chakrabarti and Titarchuk 1995, CT95; Ling et al. 1997; Chakrabarti \& Manickam,
102: 2000, CM00; Muno et al., 2000; Feroci et al. 2000; Homan et al., 2001).
103: %\citep[CT95]{ct95},\citep{ling97,cm00,muno00,fero00,hom01}.
104: These shocks have been studied most extensively in the
105: literature (Chakrabarti 1989, C89; Chakrabarti 1990, C90)
106: %\citep{c89}, hereafter C89; \citep{c90}, hereafter C90)
107: and their properties have been verified by several independent groups
108: \citep{yk95,nh94,lff97} of workers. If for a given set of initial parameters
109: the standing shocks exists analytically, numerical simulations also would
110: find them \citep{cm93,mlc94,r95,mrc96} otherwise, the shock
111: would be oscillating \citep{msc96,rcm97} causing
112: QPOs in the X-rays emitted from the post-shock region. Furthermore,
113: it has been observed that at least in some of the black hole
114: candidates, such as GRS1915+105, outflows are
115: produced from the region which also emits the Comptonized
116: photons \citep{f00,d00} i.e., the post-shock
117: region or the centrifugal barrier dominated region according to
118: our present understanding of the flow solutions.
119:
120: It is therefore pertinent to ask if the properties of the shocks,
121: such as location, strength, compression ratio etc. could be
122: understood solely analytically. The solutions obtained so far by
123: Chakrabarti and his collaborators and other groups always
124: resort to numerical means. Roughly, the method was the following:
125: for a given set of parameters (such as the specific energy and specific angular
126: momentum), it is first determined if the flow allows more than one
127: X-type sonic points (C89). This is because, at the horizon, matter must
128: have velocity same as that of the velocity of light and for
129: causality arguments, the flow must be supersonic. Thus, once the
130: flow becomes supersonic through the outermost sonic point,
131: and forms a shock (i.e., jumps to a subsonic branch) it must
132: pass through the inner sonic point to become supersonic at the
133: horizon. Next question is whether the specific entropy at the
134: inner sonic point is higher compared to that at the outer sonic
135: point. This is because, at the shock, entropy must be generated
136: and post-shock flow which passes through the inner sonic must
137: have higher entropy. The final and the most important
138: question is whether all the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions
139: (also known as the shock conditions) are satisfied somewhere
140: between the two X-type sonic points. The three Rankine-Hugoniot
141: conditions could be combined to obtain a combination of
142: Mach numbers (Shock Invariant). C89 obtained this expression
143: which is continuous across the shock and used this to obtain
144: the shock location by iterative technique.
145:
146: In the present paper, we follow the same philosophy,
147: but obtain the shock locations analytically. There were two
148: motivations to do this. First, from the theoretical point
149: of view, it is challenging to find solutions of a large
150: number of non-linear equations which must satisfy
151: a number of conditions mentioned above. Second, from the
152: observers' point of view, any observation which could
153: require standing shock waves, could be explained using
154: more fundamental parameters, such as specific energy
155: and angular momentum or even better, using accretion
156: rates of Keplerian and sub-Keplerian flows as in a
157: two-component flow solution of CT95.
158: Analytical work also gives insight into why the
159: shocks form in the first place. The boundary of the
160: parameter space for shock formation is also obtained by
161: analytical means. These findings are important as
162: they would tell us when QPOs may or may not be seen.
163: These details would be discussed in future.
164:
165: In the next Section, we present the model equations and
166: shock conditions. In \S 3, we present the sonic point
167: analysis and write down the expression for Shock
168: Invariant (C89) for the shake of completeness. In \S 4,
169: we present the analytical expressions of the sonic
170: points and discuss how the parameter space is divided
171: into regions of one or three sonic points.
172: In \S 5, we present expression of shock locations and again divide
173: the parameter space into regions which may or may not have shocks.
174: We compare our solutions with numerical work.
175: In \S 6, we discuss some of the astrophysical implications
176: of our solutions and finally, in \S 7, we make concluding remarks.
177:
178: \section{Model Equations and Shock Conditions}
179:
180: We start with a thin, axisymmetric, inviscid, steady flow which is in equilibrium
181: in a direction transverse to the flow.
182: The model equations which govern the motion of matter accreting into
183: black hole are given as follows (C89):
184:
185: \noindent {\it A. Radial Momentum Equation:}
186: \be
187: \vel \frac{d\vel}{dx} + \frac{1}{\rho} \frac{dP}{dx} + \frac{\la^2}{x^3}
188: +\frac{1}{2(x-1)^2} = 0
189: \ee
190: In a non-viscous flow, integration of this equation leads to the
191: {\it Energy Conservation Equation :}
192: \be
193: {\cal E} = {\frac{\vel_{e}^{2}}{2}}+{\frac {a_{e}^{2}}{\ga - 1}}
194: +{\frac {\la^{2}}{2x^{2}}}+g(x)
195: \ee
196: where, $g(x)$ is the pseudo-Newtonian potential introduced
197: by Paczy\'nski \& Wiita (1980) which is given by,
198: $g(x) = -{\frac {1}{2(x-1)}}$. Here, $\rho$ is the mass density, $P$
199: is the isotropic pressure, $\vel_{e}$ and
200: $a_{e}$ are the non-dimensional radial and the sound
201: velocities measured in units of velocity of light $c$,
202: $x$ is the non-dimensional radial distance measured in
203: units of the Schwarzschild radius $r_{g}={2GM/c^{2}}$,
204: $M$ being the mass of the black hole and $G$ being the
205: gravitational constant. $\gamma$ is the adiabatic index of the
206: flow and $P=K\rho^\gamma$ is assumed to the equation of state. $K$ is the
207: measure of the specific entropy which is constant except at the
208: shock location where local turbulence generate some entropy enabling the flow
209: to pass through the inner sonic point. The subscript $e$ refers to
210: the quantities measured on the equatorial plane. \\
211:
212: \noindent {\it B. Continuity Equation:}
213: \be
214: \frac{d}{dx} (\vel_{e} \rho x h) = 0
215: \ee
216: which is integrated to obtain the {\it Mass Conservation Equation :}
217: \be
218: \dot{M} = \vel_{e} \rho x h,
219: \ee
220: where, $h$ is the half-thickness of the flow at radial
221: coordinate $x$. Here ${\dot {M}}$ is the mass accretion rate
222: apart from a geometric constant. If we assume that the flow is in hydrostatic
223: equilibrium in the transverse direction, the
224: vertical component of gravitational force balances
225: the pressure gradient force. Hence the expression
226: for the half thickness of the disc is given by (C89),
227: \be
228: h(x)= a_{e}x^{1/2}(x-1).
229: \ee
230: We write the mass flux conservation equation in terms of $\vel_{e}$
231: and the sound speed on the equatorial plane $a_{e}=\sqrt{\ga P/\rho}$
232: in the following way,
233: $$
234: \md = \vel_{e} a_{e}^{q}x^{3/2}(x-1) =\vel_{e} a_{e}^{q} f(x)
235: \eqno{(4a)}
236: $$
237: \noindent where, $q = {\frac {\ga +1}{\ga- 1}}$ and $f(x)=x^{3/2}(x-1)$.
238:
239: The shock conditions which we employ here are the following (C89): \\
240:
241: \noindent (a) the energy flux is continuous across the shock ---
242: \be
243: \cal E_{+} = E_{-},
244: \ee
245:
246: \noindent (b) the mass flux is continuous across the shock ---
247: \be
248: {\dot{M}}_{+} ={\dot {M}}_{-}
249: \ee
250:
251: \noindent and finally, (c) the momentum balance condition ---
252: \be
253: W_{+}+\sig_{+} {\vel^{2}_{e}}_{+} = W_{-}+\sig_{-} {\vel^{2}_{e}}_{-}
254: \ee
255: where subscripts ``$-$'' and ``$+$'' refer, respectively,
256: to quantities before and after the shock.
257: A shock satisfying these conditions is termed as a
258: Rankine-Hugoniot shock \citep{ll59}. Here, $W$ and
259: $\sig$ denote the pressure and the density, integrated
260: in the vertical direction [see, e.g., \citet{mk84}], $i.e.$,
261: \be
262: \sig = \int \limits_{-h}^{h}\rho dz = 2\rho_{e}I_{n}h,
263: \ee
264: and
265: \be
266: W = \int \limits_{-h}^{h}P dz = 2P_{e}I_{n+1}h,
267: \ee
268: where, $I_{n} = \frac {(2^{n}n!)^{2}}{(2n+1)!}$,
269: $n$ being the polytropic index as defined previously.
270: In the subsequent analysis we drop the subscript $e$
271: if no confusion arises in doing so.
272:
273: \section{Sonic Point Analysis and Shock Invariants}
274: In order to have a shock, the flow must be supersonic
275: i.e., the stationary flow must pass through the sub-sonic
276: flow to a supersonic flow. Discussions in this Section are
277: based on early works [see, \citet{c89,c90}].
278:
279: \subsection{Sonic Point Conditions}
280:
281: From the radial momentum equation and the continuity equation (Eqs. 1 and 3)
282: we derive the sonic point condition (or critical point condition)
283: in the usual way (C89). The first derivative of the radial velocity w.r.t
284: radial distance is given by,
285: \be
286: \frac {d\vel}{dx} =
287: \frac {\frac {2a^{2}}{\ga+1}\frac {d ln(f)}{dx}-\frac {dG}{dx}}
288: {{\left[ \vel -\frac {2a^{2}}{(\ga +1)\vel}\right]}}.
289: \ee
290: Here, $G(x)= \frac {\la ^{2}}{2x^{2}}-\frac {1}{2(x-1)}$ is the effective
291: potential. Since the denominator must vanish at the sonic points, if the
292: flow is assumed to be smooth everywhere, the numerator must also
293: vanish simultaneously. The vanishing of the denominator gives,
294: \be
295: \vel^{2}_{c}(x_{c})=\frac {2}{(\ga +1)}a^{2}_{c}(x_{c}).
296: \ee
297: The factor (which is unity only in isothermal flows) in front of $a^{2}_{c}(x_{c})$
298: arises because the flow is assumed to be in vertical
299: equilibrium. The vanishing of the numerator gives,
300: \be
301: a^2_c(x_c)=\frac {(\ga+1)(x_c-1)}{x^2_c} \frac {[\la^2_K(x_c)-\la^2]}{(5x_c-3)}.
302: \ee
303: The subscript $c$ denotes quantities at the critical points.
304: Here $\la_K$ is the Keplerian angular momentum defined as
305: $\la^2_K=x^3_c/{[2(x_c-1)^2]}$. It is to be noted that since
306: the left hand side is always positive, angular momentum at the sonic
307: point must be sub-Keplerian, i.e., $\lambda (x_c) <\lambda_{\it K}$
308: (e.g., C90 and references therein).
309:
310: \subsection{Mach Number Relation at the Shock}
311:
312: From the equations given in \S 2, we now seek an invariant relation which must
313: be satisfied at the shock (C89). We rewrite the condition of
314: energy flux continuity (Eq. 6), and the pressure balance condition (Eq. 8)
315: in terms of the Mach number $M=\vel/a$ of the flow,
316: \be
317: \frac {1}{2}M^{2}_{+}a^{2}_{+}+\frac {a^{2}_{+}}{\ga -1}=
318: \frac {1}{2}M^{2}_{-}a^{2}_{-}+\frac {a^{2}_{-}}{\ga -1} ,
319: \ee
320: \be
321: {\dot {\cal M_{+}}}=M_{+}a^{\nu^{'}}_{+}f(x_{s}) ,
322: \ee
323: \be
324: {\dot {\cal M_{-}}}=M_{-}a^{\nu^{'}}_{-}f(x_{s}) ,
325: \ee
326: where
327: $\nu^{'}=\frac {2\ga}{\ga-1}$, and
328: \be
329: \frac {a^{\nu}_{+}}{\dot {\cal M}_{+}}{\left( \frac{2}{3\ga-1}+
330: M^{2}_{+}\right)}=\frac {a^{\nu}_{-}}{\dot
331: {\cal M}_{-}}{\left( \frac{2}{3\ga-1}+M^{2}_{-}\right)} ,
332: \ee
333: where, $\nu = \frac {3\ga -1}{\ga -1}$ and $x_{s}$ is the location
334: of the shock. From Eqs. (14-17) one obtains the following equation
335: relating the pre- and post-shock Mach numbers of the flow at the shock (C89),
336: \be
337: C=\frac {\left[ M_{+}(3\ga-1)+(2/M_{+})\right]^{2}}{2+
338: (\ga -1)M^{2}_{+}}=\frac {\left[ M_{-}(3\ga-1)+(2/M_
339: {-})\right]^{2}}{2+(\ga -1)M^{2}_{-}} .
340: \ee
341: The constant $C$ is invariant across the shock. The Mach number of the flow just
342: before and after the shock can be written down in terms of $C$ as,
343: \be
344: M^{2}_{\mp}=\frac {2(3\ga-1)-C \pm \sqrt {C^{2}-8C\ga}}{(\ga-1)C-(3\ga-1)^{2}} .
345: \ee
346: The product of the Mach number is given by,
347: \be
348: M_{+}M_{-}=-\frac {2}{\left[ (3\ga-1)^{2}-(\ga-1)C\right]^{1/2}}.
349: \ee
350:
351: \section{Analytical Expression of the Sonic Points and Behavior in Parameter Space}
352:
353: To obtain shock locations, we need to first obtain the locations of the
354: sonic points, and ensure that at least two of them are X-type (C90).
355: In \S 3.1, we presented the sonic point conditions.
356: Using the definition $M=\vel/a$ of the Mach number,
357: and substituting $a^2_c(x_c)$ from Eq. (13) into Eq. (2),
358: we obtain following algebraic equation for $x_c$ given by,
359: \be
360: {\cal N}x^{4}_{c}-{\cal O}x^{3}_{c}+{\cal P}x^{2}_{c} \nonumber \\
361: -{\cal Q}x_{c}+{\cal R}=0.
362: \ee
363: \noindent where,
364: ${\cal N} = {10\eng}$;
365: ${\cal O}= {16\eng+2n-3}$;
366: ${\cal P}={6\eng+\la^2(4n-1)-3}$;
367: ${\cal Q}={8n\la^2}$;
368: ${\cal R}={(1+4n)\la^2}$
369: and $n$ $(=\frac {1}{\ga -1})$ is the polytropic index.
370:
371: We solve this equation analytically \citep{as70}
372: and get the location of the sonic points. Details are given in Appendix A.
373: For the purpose of critical or sonic points, $D$ of the
374: Appendix would be denoted as $D_c$. The equation has
375: four roots and Eq. A.8 can be used to check whether all
376: of them are complex (pair of complex conjugates) or at least two are real
377: and two are complex or all four are real. {\it A necessary condition to
378: form a shock wave is to have all four real roots.} Of course, only one would
379: be inside the black hole, and the other three would be outside, and out of these,
380: due to topological reasons, only two would be X-type or saddle type and
381: the one in between must be `O'-type or Center type. These
382: are determined by computing derivative $d\vel/dx$ at the sonic point by using
383: L'Hospital's rule and checking if they are real. For our purpose, two derivatives
384: at each sonic point must be real and of opposite signs in order that the
385: sonic point be of X-type or saddle type.
386:
387: Figure 1 shows the division of the parameter space.
388: Denoting the discriminant $D$ (of Appendix A) by
389: $D_c$ we find that the condition $D_c<0$ is the
390: necessary condition to have three sonic points.
391: The boundary $D_c=0$ separates this region on which
392: two sonic points merge and the third one remains
393: separate. Outside of this region $D_c>0$, and only
394: one sonic point is possible and the other two roots
395: are complex conjugate of each other. The dotted
396: curve in the middle represents the condition:
397: $$
398: {\dot {\cal M}}_o = {\dot {\cal M}}_i ,
399: $$
400: where ${\dot {\cal M}}_i$ and ${\dot {\cal M}}_o$ are the entropy
401: accretion rates at the inner and outer
402: sonic points respectively. The region above it contains parameters
403: with ${\dot {\cal M}}_i < {\dot {\cal M}}_o$ and
404: the region below it contains parameters
405: with ${\dot {\cal M}}_i > {\dot {\cal M}}_o$. This
406: latter region is suitable for shock formation in
407: accretion flows.
408:
409: In passing we wish to point out that from Eq. (11) one can easily show
410: that locations where $dM/dx=0$ exactly coincide with the sonic points of the
411: flow. Thus the number of extrema of $M=M(x)$ is the same as that of the sonic
412: points and hence the division in Fig. 1 could give an idea about the behavior
413: of $M=M(x)$ as well.
414:
415: \section {Analytical Expression for the Shock Location and Behavior in Parameter Space}
416:
417: A black hole accretion flow being transonic, it
418: must satisfy two sonic point conditions at the
419: cost of one extra unknown, namely, the the sonic point.
420: Because of this extra condition, out of the three
421: constants of motion, namely, ${\cal E}$, ${\dot M}$
422: and $\la$, only two are to be supplied as free parameters.
423: While computing shock locations, we used past experience
424: derived from numerical methods, that only one of the shocks,
425: namely $x_{s3}$ (C89 notation) is stable, and accordingly
426: our procedure as delineated below attempts to compute
427: only this location.
428:
429: The flow will have a shock only at the point where the
430: shock invariant condition is satisfied. Simplifying the
431: shock invariant relation (Eq. 18), we obtain,
432: \be
433: 2(\ga-1)(M^{2}_{+}+M^{2}_{-})-[(3\ga-1)^{2}-2(3\ga-1)(\ga-1)]M^{2}_{+}M^{2}_{-}+4=0.
434: \ee
435: We consider a relativistic flow with $\ga=4/3$ so that the polytropic index $n=3$.
436: Then from Eq. (22), we obtain,
437: \be
438: 2(M^{2}_{+}+M^{2}_{-}) -21M^{2}_{+}M^{2}_{-} +12=0.
439: \ee
440:
441: We now expand the post-shock Mach number $M^{2}_{+}$ by a
442: polynomial which must satisfy the following conditions:
443:
444: (a) $\frac {dM}{dx}$ is zero at the central `O'-type sonic point. This is a
445: general property of the flow (vide discussion at the end of last Section).
446:
447: (b) Mach no. ($M_+$) at the location of the
448: middle sonic point must match with that derived
449: from approximate analytical solution obtained using the energy equation (Eq. 2 and 4a).
450:
451: (c) Solution must pass through the position where $\frac {dM}{dx}$ is $\infty$
452: and a good guess of this the location (say, from the location of the sonic
453: points) is known.
454:
455: Similarly, we expand $M^{2}_{-}$ by a polynomial which must satisfy
456: the following conditions:
457:
458: (a) $\frac {dM}{dx}$ is zero at the outer sonic point (location of which is
459: already determined above). This is a general condition (vide discussion
460: at the end of the previous Section).
461:
462: (b) Mach No. at the outer sonic point must match with the analytical value
463: obtained from the Sonic point condition (Eq. 12).
464:
465: (c) Mach No. ($M_-$) at the location of the middle sonic point
466: must match with the analytical value derived from approximate
467: analytical solution obtained using the energy equation (Eq. 2 and 4a).
468:
469: Keeping in mind that an algebraic equation which is beyond quartic
470: cannot be solved analytically [see, \citet{as70}], we expand $M^2_\pm$ as quadratic
471: equations so that Eq. (23) may become quartic.
472: We shall show a posteriori that such an assumption introduces a very small
473: and tolerable error in our computation.
474:
475: If $x_s$ denotes the shock location, we assume,
476: \be
477: M^{2}_{\pm}=\sum^{2}_{q=0} A_{[q,\pm]}x^{q}_{s}
478: \ee
479: where, $A_{[q,\pm]}$ are constant co-efficients to be determined
480: from the conditions mentioned above. We find them to be,
481:
482: $A_{[2,+]}=\frac {1-\left(M^2_{+}\right)_{mid}}
483: {(x_{inf}-x_{mid})^2}$,
484:
485: $A_{[1,+]}=-2x_{mid}A_{[2,+]}$,
486:
487: $A_{[0,+]}=1+\left( 2x_{mid}x_{inf}-x^2_{inf}\right)A_{[2,+]}$,
488:
489: $A_{[2,-]}=\frac {\left( M^2_{-}\right)_{mid}-1}{(x_{out}-x_{mid})^2}$,
490:
491: $A_{[1,-]}=-2x_{mid}A_{[2,-]}$,
492:
493: $A_{[0,-]}=1+x^2_{out}A_{[2,-]}$,
494:
495: \noindent where, $x_{mid}$, $x_{inf}$ and $x_{out}$ are the
496: middle (O-type) sonic point, the position where first derivative
497: of Mach No. is infinity and the outer sonic point respectively.
498:
499: We now substitute the above expression (Eq. 24) for the Mach number
500: in the Mach invariant relation (Eq. 23) to obtain the following
501: algebraic equation:
502:
503: \begin{eqnarray}
504: {\cal A}x^{4}_{s}+{\cal B}x^{3}_{s}
505: +{\cal C}x^{2}_{s}
506: +{\cal D}x_{s}+{\cal F}=0,
507: \end{eqnarray}
508:
509: \noindent where,
510:
511: ${\cal Y}=\left(3\ga -1\right)\left(\ga+1\right)$,
512:
513: ${\cal Z}=2(\ga-1)$,
514:
515: ${\cal A}={\cal Y}A_{[2,+]}A_{[2,-]}$,
516:
517: ${\cal B}={\cal Y}\left(A_{[1,+]}A_{[2,-]}+A_{[2,+]}
518: A_{[1,-]}\right)$,
519:
520: ${\cal C}={\cal Y}\left(A_{[0,+]}A_{[2,-]}+A_{[1,+]}A_{[1,-]}+
521: A_{[2,+]}A_{[0,-]}\right)
522: -{\cal Z}\left(A_{[2,+]}+A_{[2,-]}\right)$,
523:
524: ${\cal D}={\cal Y}\left(A_{[0,+]}A_{[1,-]}+A_{[1,+]}
525: A_{[0,-]}\right) -{\cal Z}\left(A_{[1,+]}+A_{[1,-]}\right)$,
526:
527: ${\cal F}={\cal Y} A_{[0,+]}A_{[0,-]}-{\cal Z}\left(A_{[0,+]}+
528: A_{[0,-]}\right)-4$.
529:
530: We solve this equation for $X_s$ analytically using the same procedure
531: as in \S4 (details in Appendix A). We denote the discriminant $D$ by $D_s$,
532: and $Q$ and $R$ values as $Q_s$ and $R_s$ respectively
533: for our discussion on the parameter space behavior of shocks.
534:
535: In Figure 2, we redraw the parameter space as in Figure 1, but consider
536: the formation of shocks alone. We find that $Q_s>0$ produces no shock
537: from above, and $Q_s=0$ with $R_s\ne 0$ gives the boundary of the weakest shock
538: (shocks with unit compression ratio). This boundary, though
539: obtained using our approximate analytical method, generally coincides
540: with the dotted curve of Figure 1. The edge of the boundary
541: is obtained with an extra condition $R_s=0$. Thus, $R_s$
542: progressively decreases towards the edge along the dashed curve.
543: This edge (denoted by $D_s=R_s=0$) ought to have coincided with
544: the cusp of the $D_c=0$ curve drawn for the sonic point
545: (see, Fig. 1 also), had the analytical method been exact. A small
546: shift is the evidence that a small error is present at this corner of the parameter space.
547: We also provide the region of the oscillating shocks ($Q_s<0$ and $D_s<0$). Here, the
548: shock location is imaginary and therefore shock continuously
549: oscillates back and forth causing a very interesting astrophysical
550: effect known as Quasi-Periodic Oscillations (QPOs).
551: This would be discussed in the next Section. The boundary
552: between the shock and no-shock region from below is
553: denoted by the dashed curve marked by $D_s=0$. Below the
554: no-shock region where the energy and angular momentum
555: of the flow are very low, the flow has only one sonic point.
556:
557: In Figure 3, we draw shock location $x_s$ (along Y-axis)
558: as a function of energy (along X-axis). Different curves
559: are drawn for different specific angular momentum
560: of the flow. The rightmost one is for $\lambda=1.51$
561: and the leftmost one is for $\lambda=1.84$, interval of $\la$ is
562: $0.01$. As angular momentum is increased, the shock is located
563: farther from the black hole. Comparing the locations from those
564: obtained analytically, one notices that the same location is obtained
565: for a specific angular momentum slightly more
566: ($\sim 3$\%) than that used in the numerical method.
567: We therefore believe that the results obtained are
568: very much reliable.
569:
570: In Figure 4, we present a comparison of the boundary of
571: the parameter space for which standing shocks may form
572: as obtained by our analytical solution (shaded region) and
573: by the numerical means (solid curve) existing in the
574: literature (C89). The agreement is very good except in
575: a region near the cusp (as also noted while discussing Fig. 2).
576: Since very little parameter space is involved at this edge,
577: we think that this small mismatch is tolerable.
578:
579: \section{Astrophysical Applications}
580:
581: Even though a black hole has no hard surface, it is remarkable
582: that matter forms standing shocks around it in the same way as a
583: shock is formed when a supersonic flow encounters a hard boundary.
584: Shock waves heat up a gas and puff it up. This post-shock region
585: intercepts soft photons from
586: the pre-shock matter, particularly from the Keplerian disk which
587: is located on the equatorial plane (CT95).
588: In this scenario, the nature of the Comptonized radiation depends on the amount
589: of matter in the sub-Keplerian and in the Keplerian flow: if the intensity
590: of soft photon is very low, they cannot cool down the post-shock
591: region by inverse Compton process and the spectrum remains very
592: hot. On the other hand, if the intensity of soft photon is
593: very high (i.e., the Keplerian rate is large), they cool down
594: the post-shock region to the extent that the shock could not be
595: sustained (pressure balance condition breaks down). This
596: produces a soft state spectrum with a hard tail due to bulk motion
597: Comptonization (CT95). There are several models
598: in the literature which perhaps explain the soft/hard states. However,
599: no model other than CT95 explains the power-law hard-tail in the soft state.
600: Similarly, when the question of Quasi-Periodic Oscillations (QPOs)
601: come, shock-oscillation model turns out to be a sufficiently satisfactory one
602: (CM00).
603:
604: When the parameters fall in the `no shock' region of Fig. 2,
605: shock location becomes imaginary. However, three sonic points
606: are still present and the entropy of the flow at the inner sonic point
607: continues to be higher compared to that at the outer sonic point.
608: In this case, shock starts oscillating with a time period ($T_s$) comparable
609: to the infall time from the post-shock region \citep{rcm97}.
610: Even when shocks form, if the infall time-scale turns out to be
611: comparable to the cooling time, then the resonance condition is satisfied
612: \citep{msc96,cm00}
613: and shocks oscillate in time scales of:
614: $$
615: T_s\sim x_s/v_s ,
616: $$
617: where, $v_s \sim R^{-1}x_s^{-1/2}$ is the infall velocity
618: and $R$ is the compression ratio at the shock (easily
619: obtained analytically from our equations). Observed QPO
620: frequencies are comparable to $1/T_s$.
621:
622: When a mixture of Keplerian and sub-Keplerian matter is accreted, it is
623: easy to obtain the parameters ${\lambda}$ and ${\cal E}$ in terms of
624: the Keplerian (${\dot M}_{d}$) and sub-Keplerian (${\dot M}_h$)
625: accretion rates. Suppose, the viscosity parameter
626: is such that the flow is deviated from a Keplerian disk
627: at $x=x_K$ where its energy and angular momentum were ${\cal E}_d$
628: and $\lambda_K$ respectively. Further suppose that
629: the sub-Keplerian halo has a constant energy ${\cal E}\sim 0\sim {\cal E}_h$
630: and constant angular momentum ${\lambda}_h$, then the average
631: angular momentum and energy of the transonic flow would be,
632: $$
633: <{\cal E}> = \frac{{\dot M}_d {\cal E}_d + {\dot M}_h {\cal E}_h}{{\dot M}_d +{\dot M}_h}
634: $$
635: $$
636: <\lambda> = \frac{{\dot M}_d \lambda_d + {\dot M}_h \lambda_h}{{\dot M}_d +{\dot M}_h}
637: $$
638: It is easy to compute the shock location of the resultant flow using our formalism
639: given above.
640:
641: It is to be noted from Fig. 3 that shock solutions are allowed only if the
642: specific energy is positive. In other words, if a flow deviates from a
643: cool Keplerian disk on the equatorial plane, the flow cannot have shocks
644: as the specific energy in such a flow would be negative unless
645: this flow is mixed with a substantial amount of sub-Keplerian matter with a
646: positive energy. Typically, ${\dot M}_h >> {\dot M}_d$ and even with a small energy, the specific
647: energy of the mixture becomes positive, giving rise to shocks and (unbound) winds.
648: In the case when magnetic dissipation is present, flow
649: energy could increase to a positive value and a solution with a shock would be allowed.
650: The prospect of magnetic energy dissipation has been discussed by several
651: workers in the literature \citep{s73,bb76,b98}. Briefly, since the magnetic field rises as
652: $B_r \propto r^{-2}$ and therefore magnetic pressure rises as
653: $P_{mag} \propto r^{-4}$ while the gas pressure in the sub-Keplerian matter
654: goes as $P_{gas} \propto r^{-5/2}$, magnetic field in excess of the equipartition
655: value would escape from the disk buoyantly and may dissipate at the atmosphere
656: as in the case of the Sun. If the flow has specific energy ${\cal E}_h$
657: at, say $r=100r_g$ where the flow was in equipartition,
658: then at the shock, the energy would be at least $2^4 =16$ times
659: larger if {\it all} the magnetic energy is dissipated into the flow.
660: Thus, a basically free-fall matter of ${\cal E} \sim 10^{-4}$
661: would have an energy $\sim 10^{-3}$ and thus a shock at a few tens of
662: Schwarzschild radii would be expected.
663:
664: An accreting flow can intercept hard X-rays emitted at the inner edge
665: and this pre-heating effect need not be negligible. For instance,
666: a flow emitting isotropically with $6\%$ efficiency will definitely
667: intercept $\theta \sim \Theta_{in}/4\pi$ fraction of radiation
668: in between the shocked region and the Keplerian disk. Assuming $\theta \sim 0.1$,
669: the energy deposition due to pre-heating is $0.006$ which is significant.
670: This would energize Keplerian matter as well and shocks in the sub-Keplerian
671: flow would be expected.
672:
673: \section{Concluding Remarks}
674:
675: So far in the astrophysical literature, existence of
676: shocks in accretion flows has been indicated by steady and time-dependent
677: numerical simulations. Study of these
678: standing and oscillatory shocks in an accretion flows
679: has been shown to be of great importance. Presently we show that the shocks
680: could be studied completely analytically, at least in the case of
681: thin, axisymmetric, inviscid flows with positive energy. We note that shock locations
682: vary with flow parameters in a simple way --- they form farther from a black hole
683: when angular momentum is increased. This proves that they are mainly centrifugal
684: pressure supported.
685:
686: Given that the shocks, especially the standing shocks are the ideal locations
687: at which a flow is heated up, hard X-rays are produced from the post-shock
688: region after the soft-photons are processed by the flow by
689: inverse-Comptonization process. Thus, the spectral states and the time-dependent
690: behavior of the hard X-rays are directly related to the behavior of this
691: region. For instance, CT95 computes steady state spectra with post-shock
692: region as the source of hot, Comptonizing electrons. CM00 establishes that
693: QPOs are due to oscillations of this region, since only hard X-rays are seen to
694: exhibit QPOs. We therefore believe that shocks should be an important
695: ingredient of an accreting system. However, if the disk is cool and Keplerian
696: very far away, the specific energy must be negative. So the problem is not whether
697: shocks should exist, the problem seems to be how to energize Keplerian matter
698: as it becomes sub-Keplerian, by, say, magnetic energy
699: dissipation, pre-heating etc. These work is in progress and would be reported elsewhere.
700:
701: From the observers point of view, our work could also be useful, since the steady spectra,
702: QPO frequencies, etc. are, in principle, determined analytically
703: from a few free physical parameters. In future, we shall apply our
704: understanding to obtain spectral properties and QPO behaviors more quantitatively.
705:
706: \acknowledgments
707:
708: This work is partly supported by a project (Grant No. SP/S2/K-14/98)
709: funded by Department of Science and Technology (DST).
710:
711:
712: \begin{thebibliography}{}
713:
714: \bibitem [Abramowitz and Stegun(1970)]{as70} Abramowitz M., and Stegun I. A., Hand book
715: of Mathematical Functions, Dover Publications, INC., New York 1970.
716: \bibitem [Bisnovatyi-Kogan and Blinnikov(1976)]{bb76} Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G.S. and Blinnikov, S.I. 1976, Pisma Astron. Zh., 2, 489
717: \bibitem [Bisnovatyi-Kogan(1998)]{b98} Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G.S. in `Observational Evidence for Black
718: Holes in the Universe' Ed. S. K. Chakrabarti (Kluwer Scientific Publ: Holland)
719: \bibitem [Chakrabarti(1989)]{c89} Chakrabarti, S.K. 1989, ApJ 347, 365 (C89)
720: \bibitem [Chakrabarti(1990)]{c90} Chakrabarti, S.K. 1990
721: Theory of Transonic Astrophysical Flows (World Scientific: Singapore) (C90)
722: \bibitem [Chakrabarti and Manickam(2000)]{cm00} Chakrabarti, S.K. \& Manickam, S.G.
723: 2000, ApJ 531, L41
724: \bibitem [Chakrabarti and Molteni(1993)]{cm93} Chakrabarti, S.K. \& Molteni, 1993, ApJ 417, 672
725: \bibitem [Chakrabarti and Titarchuk(1995)]{ct95} Chakrabarti, S.K. \& Titarchuk, L.G. 1995, ApJ 455, 623 (CT95)
726: \bibitem [Dhawan et al.(2000)]{d00} Dhawan, V., Mirabel, I. F., Rodriguez, L. F. 2000, ApJ 543
727: 373
728: \bibitem [Fender et al(2000)]{f00} Fender, R.P. et al. 2000, MNRAS 312, 853
729: \bibitem [Feroci et al(2000)]{fero00} Feroci, M. et al. 1999, A \& A 351, 985.
730: \bibitem [Homan et al.(2001)]{hom01} Homan, J. et al. 2000, Ap J (in press)
731: \bibitem [Landau and Lifshitz(1959)]{ll59} Landau, L. D., and Lifshitz, E. D. 1959, {\it Fluid Mechanics}
732: (New York : Pergamon).
733: \bibitem [Ling et al(1997)]{ling97} Ling, J. C., et al. 1997, ApJ 484, 375
734: \bibitem [Lu and Feng(1997)]{lff97} Lu, J.F. \& Yuan, F. 1997, PASJ 49, 525L
735: \bibitem[Matsumoto et al.(1984)]{mk84} Matsumoto, R., Kato, S., Fukue, J. and Okazaki,
736: A.T, 1984, PASJ, 36, 7
737: \bibitem [Molteni, Lanzafame and Chakrabarti(1994)]{mlc94} Molteni, D., Lanzafame \& Chakrabarti, 1994, ApJ 425, 161
738: \bibitem [Molteni, Sponholz and Chakrabarti(1996)]{msc96} Molteni, D., Sponholz, H. \& Chakrabarti, S.K. 1996, ApJ 457, 805
739: \bibitem [Molteni, Ryu and Chakrabarti(1996)]{mrc96} Molteni, D., Ryu \& Chakrabarti, 1996, ApJ 470, 460
740: \bibitem [Muno et al.(1999)]{muno00} Muno, M.P., Morgan, E.H. \& Remillard, R.A. 1999, ApJ 527, 321
741: \bibitem [Nobuta and Hanawa(1994)]{nh94} Nobuta, K. \& Hanawa, T. 1994, PASJ, 46, 257
742: \bibitem [Paczy\'nski and Wiita(1980)]{pw80} Paczy\'{n}ski B., Wiita P.J., 1980, A\&A, {\bf 88}, 23
743: \bibitem [Ryu et al.(1995)]{r95} Ryu, D., Brown, G.L., Ostriker, J.P. \& Loeb, A. 1995,
744: ApJ, 452, 364
745: \bibitem [Ryu, Chakrabarti and Molteni(1997)]{rcm97} Ryu, D., Chakrabarti \& Molteni, D. 1997,
746: ApJ 474, 378
747: \bibitem [Shapiro(1973)]{s73} Shapiro, S.L., 1973, ApJ 185, 69S
748: \bibitem [Yang and Kafatos(1995)]{yk95} Yang, R. \& Kafatos, M. 1995, A\&A 295 238
749: \end{thebibliography}{}
750:
751: \appendix
752:
753: \section{Method of the Analytical Solution}
754:
755:
756: The procedure of obtaining an analytical solution of a
757: quartic equation,
758: $$
759: q^{4}+b_{1}q^{3}+b_{2}q^{2}+b_{3}q+b_{4}=0
760: \eqno{A.1}
761: $$
762: is to first obtain a solution of the following cubic equation:
763:
764: \noindent
765: $$
766: p^{3}+a_{1}p^{2}+a_{2}p+a_{3}=0,
767: \eqno{A.2}
768: $$
769: where,\\
770: $a_1=-b_2$, $a_2= b_{1}b_{3}-4b_{4}$, and $a_3=4b_{2}b_{4}-
771: b^{2}_{3}-b^{2}_{1}b_{4}$ .
772:
773: \noindent Let,
774:
775: $Q=\frac {3a_{2}-a^{2}_{1}}{9}$, $R=\frac {9a_{1}a_{2}
776: -27a_{3}-2a^{3}_{1}}{54}$,\\
777:
778: $S=\sqrt[3]{R+\sqrt{Q^{3}+R^{2}}}$, $T=\sqrt[3]
779: {R-\sqrt{Q^{3}+R^{2}}}$.
780:
781: \noindent The {\it discriminant} is defined as
782:
783: $$
784: D=Q^{3}+R^{2}.
785: \eqno{A.3}
786: $$
787:
788: \noindent If $D>0$, one root is real and two roots are
789: complex conjugate. In this case, the real solution is,
790: $$
791: p_{1}=S+T-\frac {1}{3}a_{1}.
792: \eqno{A.4}
793: $$
794:
795: \noindent If $D=0$, all roots are real and at least two are equal.
796:
797: \noindent If $D<0$, all roots are real and unequal. They are:
798: $$
799: p_{1}=2\sqrt{-Q}\cos(\frac {1}{3}\theta)-\frac {1}{3}a_{1},
800: \eqno{A.5}
801: $$
802:
803: $$
804: p_{2}=2\sqrt{-Q}\cos(\frac {1}{3}\theta+120^{o})-\frac {1}{3}a_{1},
805: \eqno{A.6}
806: $$
807: and,
808: $$
809: p_{3}=2\sqrt{-Q}\cos(\frac {1}{3}\theta+240^{o})-\frac {1}{3}a_{1},
810: \eqno{A.7}
811: $$
812: where, $\cos \theta=R/\sqrt{-Q}$.
813:
814: One can now write a quadratic equation using
815: any one of the real solutions of the cubic equation
816: (see, Spiegel, 1968) as follows:
817: $$
818: z^{2}+\frac {1}{2} \{ b_{1} \pm \sqrt {b^{2}_{1}-4b_{2}+4p_{1}} \}z+
819: \frac {1}{2} \{ p_{1} \mp \sqrt {p^{2}_{1}-4b_{4}} \}=0.
820: \eqno{A.8}
821: $$
822: This is a quadratic equation which can be solved easily. Since we applied this procedure
823: both of the sonic points and shocks, we denoted quantities like, $D$,$Q$ and $R$
824: by $D_c$,$Q_c$ and $R_c$ for sonic (critical) points and $D_s$,$Q_s$ and $R_s$ for
825: shocks respectively.
826: \newpage
827:
828:
829: \figcaption[fig1.eps]{Division of the parameter space as spanned by the pair
830: ${\cal E}, \la$ according to the number of sonic points.
831: Solid curve represents $D_c=0$ which divides the
832: region into $D_c>0$ (one sonic point) and $D_c<0$ (three sonic points)
833: regions. The plot is for $\gamma=4/3$. For $\gamma \gsim 1.5$, $D_c>0$ always,
834: suggesting that no shocks are possible in a flow with vertical equilibrium.
835: The dashed curve further divides the region into two regions where
836: entropy accretion rate ${\dot {\cal M}}$ at the two saddle type sonic points
837: behave differently (inner point is denoted by $i$ and outer point is
838: denoted by $o$). }
839:
840: \figcaption[fig2.eps]{Division of the parameter space as spanned by the pair
841: ${\cal E}, \la$ according to whether shocks would form or not.
842: Solid curve represents $D_c=0$ as in Fig. 1. Dashed curve
843: ($D_s=0$) surrounds the region with shocks in accretion. When $D_s<0$ and
844: yet, there are three sonic points, shocks are oscillatory, giving rise to
845: quasi-periodically varying hard X-rays.}
846:
847: \figcaption[fig3.eps]{
848: Variation of shock location ($x_s$ along y-axis) with specific energy
849: (${\cal E}$ along x-axis) of the flow. Each curve is drawn for a
850: specific angular momentum $\lambda$. From right to left curved are
851: drawn for $\lambda=1.51,~ 1.52,~1.53, ...$ till $1.84$ respectively.
852: For a given specific energy ${\cal E}$, shock location increases
853: with increasing centrifugal force (through $\lambda$). Similarly,
854: for a given $\lambda$, shock location increases with energy.
855: }
856:
857: \figcaption[fig4.eps]{
858: Comparison of the boundary of the parameter space in the
859: (${\cal E}, \lambda$) plane using the numerical and the
860: analytical methods. Except for the region near the cusp (upper left corner)
861: the agreement is very strong. }
862:
863: \end{document}
864:
865:
866:
867: