1: % This line is the correct one for ApJ Fast Track submissions
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
4:
5: \newcommand{\xtej}{XTE\,J1550$-$564}
6: \newcommand{\gx}{GX\,339$-$4}
7:
8: %\slugcomment{draft $Id: ms.tex,v 1.4 2001/07/28 02:27:07 kaice Exp $}
9:
10: \shorttitle{Spectral and Timing Evolution of \xtej}
11: \shortauthors{Reilly et al.}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \title{USA Observation of Spectral and Timing Evolution \\
16: During the 2000 Outburst of \xtej}
17:
18: \author{
19: K. T. Reilly\altaffilmark{1},
20: E. D. Bloom,
21: W. Focke,
22: B. Giebels,
23: G. Godfrey,
24: P. M. Saz Parkinson,\\
25: G. Shabad
26: }
27: \affil{Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University,
28: Stanford, CA 94309}
29: \author{
30: P. S. Ray\altaffilmark{2},
31: R. M. Bandyopadhyay\altaffilmark{3},
32: K. S. Wood,
33: M. T. Wolff,\\
34: G. G. Fritz,
35: P. Hertz\altaffilmark{4},
36: M. P. Kowalski,
37: M. N. Lovellette,
38: D. J. Yentis
39: }
40: \affil{E. O. Hulburt Center for Space Research, Naval Research
41: Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375}
42: \and
43: \author{Jeffrey D. Scargle}
44: \affil{Space Science Division, NASA/Ames Research Center,
45: Moffett Field, CA 94305-1000}
46: \altaffiltext{1}{Kaice.Reilly@slac.stanford.edu}
47: \altaffiltext{2}{Paul.Ray@nrl.navy.mil}
48: \altaffiltext{3}{NRL/NRC Research Associate}
49: \altaffiltext{4}{Current address: NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20546-0001}
50:
51: \begin{abstract}
52: We report on timing and spectral observations of the 2000 outburst of
53: \xtej\ made by the Unconventional Stellar Aspect (USA) Experiment on
54: board the {\em Advanced Research and Global Observation Satellite}
55: (ARGOS). We observe a low-frequency quasi-periodic oscillation
56: (LFQPO) with a centroid frequency that tends to increase with
57: increasing flux and a fractional rms amplitude which is correlated
58: with the hardness ratio. The evolution of the hardness ratio (4--16
59: keV/1--4 keV) with time and source flux is examined. The
60: hardness-intensity diagram (HID) shows a cyclical movement in the
61: clockwise direction and possibly indicates the presence of two independent
62: accretion flows. We observe a relationship between the USA
63: 4--16~keV count rate and radio observations and discuss this in the
64: context of previously observed correlations between X-ray, radio,
65: optical and IR data. We examine our results in the context of models
66: invoking two accretion flows: a thin disk and a hot sub-Keplerian flow.
67: \end{abstract}
68:
69: \section{Introduction}
70:
71: \xtej\ was first observed in 1998 September by the All Sky Monitor
72: (ASM) on board the {\em Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer} (RXTE) when it
73: began an outburst lasting approximately 8 months \citep{smi98}.
74: \xtej\ began a second outburst on 2000 April 2 \citep{ms00}, lasting
75: approximately 2 months. The source was detected for a third time in
76: 2001 January but did not go into a full outburst
77: \citep{tsw+01,jbt01}.
78:
79: Recent optical observations of \xtej\ have placed a lower limit of
80: $7.4 \pm 0.7 M_\sun$ on the mass of the compact object
81: \citep{ovm+01}. This mass places the compact object well above the
82: maximum mass for a stable neutron star and so provides compelling
83: evidence that \xtej\ contains a black hole. During its 1998--1999 outburst,
84: apparent superluminal radio jets ($v > 2c$) were observed by
85: \citet{hch+01}; however, the jet's angle to the line of sight has not yet
86: been determined. Radio and optical observations of the 2000 outburst
87: also show evidence of jet formation \citep{ckj+01,jbo+01}.
88:
89: Complex timing and spectral behavior has been observed by RXTE in
90: \xtej\ during its two full outbursts. This behavior includes
91: detections of three classes of low-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations
92: (LFQPO) ($< 20$~Hz) and several
93: detections of high frequency QPOs (HFQPO) ($>100$~Hz)
94: \citep{rsm+01,mwh+01,ktr+01}. Further, color-color diagrams and
95: hardness intensity diagrams of the 1998--1999 outburst showed separate
96: spectral branches for each of the black hole states as well as
97: correlations with quasi-periodic oscillations and other timing behavior
98: \citep{hwb+01}.
99:
100: During the 1998--1999 outburst, \xtej\ exhibited all four identified
101: black hole spectral states \citep{smr+00,hwv+00}. In the 2000
102: outburst the source never achieved the high state (HS), going from an
103: initial low/hard state (LS) to an intermediate state (IS)
104: or a very high state (VHS)
105: and returning to a final LS \citep{mwh+01}. Although previous authors
106: have made a distinction between the IS and VHS, recent work on \xtej\
107: has suggested that the IS and VHS are actually the same state at
108: different X-ray flux levels \citep{hwv+00}. Therefore, for the
109: remainder of this paper we will refer to this state as the IS. The
110: transition from the initial LS to the IS was made on 2000 April 26
111: (MJD 51660). The transition from the IS back to the LS occurred
112: sometime between May 13 (MJD 51677) and May 19 (MJD 51623)
113: \citep{ckj+01}.
114:
115: In this {\em Letter}, we report on X-ray observations of the 2000
116: outburst of
117: \xtej\ made by the Unconventional Stellar Aspect (USA) Experiment on
118: the US Air Force {\em Advanced Research and Global Observation
119: Satellite} (ARGOS). For a detailed description of the USA experiment
120: see \citet{rwf+99} and \citet{sha+00}. We present lightcurves and hardness
121: ratios and track a low frequency QPO which appears in the initial and
122: late stages of the outburst.
123:
124: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
125:
126: \subsection{Lightcurves and Hardness Ratios}
127:
128: The USA Experiment observed \xtej\ at the rate of
129: 2--8 times per day between 2000
130: April 14 (MJD 51648) and June 18 (MJD 51713). For the present
131: investigation, 193 observations were used, from which we selected
132: $\sim 49$~ks of data obtained in low-background regions. The data are
133: time tagged, having 32 $\mu$s time resolution, and cover an energy
134: range of approximately 1--17~keV in 16 pulse height analyzer (PHA)
135: channels. In this
136: work we do not make use of the lowest (channel 0) and highest (channel
137: 15) PHA channel. We refer to PHA channels 1--14 ($\sim 1-16$~keV) as
138: the total range.
139:
140: To create the light curves shown in Figure~\ref{lightcurves}, a first
141: order background subtraction was made by averaging blank sky
142: observations and then subtracting these values from the count rate.
143: To determine
144: the total error, the standard deviation of the average in the
145: background was added in quadrature to the error on the count rate. USA
146: data were then corrected for obscuration by the instrument support
147: structure and the collimator response. The overall average light
148: curve (normalized to the USA Crab counting rate) for the total range
149: is shown in panel (a) of Figure~\ref{lightcurves}. The circles are
150: RXTE/ASM daily averaged data used to give the complete outburst
151: profile (USA observations did not cover the first few days of the
152: outburst). The USA data points shown are an average of several USA
153: observations. The number of observations averaged was dependent on
154: the observation spacing and signal to noise ratio.
155:
156: The spectral characteristics of the outburst were studied by dividing
157: the USA data into two energy bands, USA PHA channels 1--3 and channels
158: 4--14. These two bands correspond to 1--4~keV and 4--16~keV,
159: respectively. For the remainder of this {\em Letter} these bands will
160: be referred to as the soft band count rate (SB) and the hard band
161: count rate (HB). The
162: motivation for choosing the specific energy ranges of the SB and HB
163: came from properties of the hardness-intensity diagram (HID). During
164: the outburst, \xtej\ traces a cyclic pattern in the HID. Plots of
165: count rates versus the total range show this cyclical structure for
166: individual channels in the range 4--14, but not for channels 1, 2 or
167: 3.
168:
169: Panels (b) and (c) of Figure~\ref{lightcurves} show the SB and HB as a
170: function of time during the outburst. The bottom panel of
171: Figure~\ref{lightcurves} shows the evolution of hardness ratio using
172: these energy bands. The HID in Figure~\ref{HRintensity} shows how the
173: hardness ratio evolves with total count rate during the outburst. The
174: hardness ratio is plotted only for USA data prior to MJD 51687, after
175: which the signal to noise decreases to the point that the hardness
176: ratio is not constrained. In Figure~\ref{HRintensity} and panel (f)
177: of Figure~\ref{lightcurves}, one point is shown for each point in
178: panels (b) and (c) of Figure~\ref{lightcurves}.
179:
180: The design of the USA detector incorporated automatic gain
181: stabilization hardware and frequent iron source energy calibrations
182: were done while in orbit. We note that the USA channel to
183: energy conversion varies slightly over the USA orbit;
184: however, checks
185: performed showed that this variation made no significant impact on the
186: relevant features seen in the SB, HB, and hardness ratio.
187: A further check of our spectral
188: results was made by comparing our data to public RXTE/ASM data. Daily
189: averaged ASM data were used to find the hardness ratio as a function
190: of time and to make a HID. The ASM hardness ratio was calculated by
191: dividing the sum of ASM B Band (3--5~keV) and C Band (5--12~keV) by A
192: Band (1.5--3~keV). To try to emulate the ASM energy bands the USA PHA
193: channels 3--11 (3--11.5~keV) were summed and divided by channel 2
194: (2--3~keV). The ASM data confirmed the hardness ratio observed with
195: USA and the cyclic behavior in the HID.
196:
197: \subsection{Power Spectra: Low Frequency QPOs}
198:
199: A low frequency quasi-periodic oscillation (LFQPO) was ubiquitous
200: during the rise of the outburst and during the decay of the outburst
201: after the secondary maximum. In order to track the LFQPO evolution
202: through the outburst, observations were grouped by day and frequently
203: in sub-day groups (signal to noise ratio permitting).
204:
205: Power spectra (see \citealt{nvw+99} and references therein) were
206: calculated from these groups and averaged. The resultant power
207: spectrum for each group containing a LFQPO was fit with a power law or
208: broken power law and a Lorentzian for any observable QPO features.
209: Fits were made in three energy bands: the total range, SB, and HB. In
210: case of confusion by sub-harmonics, the strongest QPO feature was
211: chosen as the primary LFQPO (see \citealt{rsm+01}). In most cases no
212: sub-harmonics were detectable. Panel (d) of Figure~\ref{lightcurves}
213: shows how the centroid frequency of the LFQPO evolves during the
214: outburst. The evolution of the rms amplitude for all three energy
215: bands is shown in panel (e). Panels (d) and (e) show error bars
216: calculated by allowing the $\chi^{2}$ of the fit to vary by one. All
217: error bars are given at the 68\% confidence level.
218:
219: \section{Results}
220:
221: \subsection{QPO Evolution and Correlation to State Changes}
222:
223: We observe LFQPOs between MJD 51648 and 51663 and between MJD 51675
224: and 51686 which vary in frequency between 0.24--7.19~Hz and
225: 6.34--0.64~Hz, respectively. During the times of these detections the
226: source is either in the LS or near the transition from one state to
227: another. The LFQPO rms amplitude decreases rapidly at the state
228: transition from the LS to the IS and then increases during the
229: transition back to the LS, indicating that the mechanism for creating
230: the LFQPO is suppressed in the IS. The LFQPO centroid frequency
231: generally increases with increasing flux; the fractional rms amplitude
232: is correlated with hardness ratio (see Figure~\ref{lightcurves}).
233:
234: During the IS, significant detections of HFQPOs (249--278~Hz) were
235: made by RXTE between between MJD 51663 and 51675 \citep{mwh+01}. A
236: 65~Hz QPO has been discovered by \citet{ktr+01} at MJD 51684.8. These
237: HFQPO detections occurred during the periods where USA observed the
238: LFQPO to be weakening or not detectable at all. It is interesting to
239: note that the HFQPOs were observed to decrease in strength as a
240: function of time in the IS \citep{mwh+01}. These observations point to
241: an unfavorable interaction between the mechanisms for LFQPO and HFQPO
242: production. We observe a decline in rms amplitude of the LFQPO near
243: the LS/IS transition, which marks the approximate onset of the
244: HFQPOs. Towards the end of the IS, near the IS/LS transition, the
245: HFQPO weakens as the LFQPO once again becomes detectable. This trend
246: continues in the last days of the outburst, when the LFQPO rms
247: amplitude weakens and the 65~Hz QPO is detected.
248:
249: These QPO features are qualitatively consistent with observations of
250: \xtej\ ~during the 1998--1999 outburst \citep{rsm+01},
251: during which an ``antagonism'' between LFQPOs and HFQPOs was also
252: observed. During that outburst, type ``C'' QPOs were observed when
253: strong correlations were seen between the frequency and disk flux
254: while the amplitude was observed to correlate with disk temperature
255: \citep{rsm+01}. These previous observations closely resemble what we
256: see for the LFQPO observed during the 2000 outburst; thus we
257: tentatively classify the LFQPO discussed here as a type C.
258:
259: At MJD 51661.21 an anomalous QPO was detectable exclusively in the HB,
260: in contrast to the primary LFQPO which appears in all energy ranges.
261: In Figure~\ref{lightcurves} panel (d), this anomalous QPO is the
262: highest frequency point and is marked with a large unfilled circle
263: near MJD 51660. This QPO was detected between the primary LFQPO and
264: its harmonic and has a frequency of $7.19^{+0.12}_{-0.11}$~Hz, whereas
265: the primary LFQPO is seen at $4.71\pm0.05$~Hz and its harmonic is seen
266: at $9.75^{+0.4}_{-0.35}$~Hz.
267:
268: \subsection{Spectral Evolution\label{spectev}}
269:
270: From Figure~\ref{lightcurves} it is clear that the 2000 outburst of
271: \xtej\ does not follow the canonical fast rise, exponential decay
272: (FRED) outburst as would have been expected prior to the RXTE era.
273: Now, with many more examples of well-observed soft X-ray transient
274: (SXT) outbursts, it has become clear that few outbursts look like pure
275: FREDs, and that the outburst profile can be very different at high
276: energy than at low energy. Comparing the SB and HB lightcurves in
277: Figure 1 (b) and (c), the two bands rise approximately in unison, but
278: show very different behavior after the peak. With the exclusion of
279: the secondary maximum the HB light curve shows a nearly symmetric
280: outburst profile, while the SB rapidly rises, then decays
281: approximately linearly. As is often observed in SXTs, the decay
282: returns to its original path after the secondary maximum.
283:
284: In the HID (Figure~\ref{HRintensity}), we observe that the difference
285: between the SB and HB lightcurves manifests itself as a cyclic
286: structure that moves with time in a clockwise direction. The HID
287: shows a rapid drop in the hardness ratio as the source enters the IS
288: and a rapid increase as the final LS is realized. This type of
289: spectral structure, which has been seen in several other sources
290: \citep{shs+01}, is a consequence of the spectrum being harder during
291: the rise than during the decline.
292:
293: \subsection{Multiwavelength Correlations}
294: \label{sec-multi}
295:
296: Multiwavelength observations of \xtej\ during the 2000 outburst have
297: shown correlations between radio, optical, IR and X-rays. These
298: observations have been compared with similar correlations seen in
299: other black-hole candidates (BHCs), such as \gx, and have led to the
300: interpretation that the LS of BHCs is characterized by jets and the IS
301: state is characterized by quenching of these jets \citep{ckj+01}. In
302: Figure~\ref{lightcurves}, lines 1 and 8 mark the times of optical/IR
303: maxima and lines 3 and 7 indicate significant radio detections made by
304: ATCA while line 4 indicates no significant radio detection. Line 6 is
305: the time of an optical/IR minimum. (Optical/IR observations were made
306: by YALO; for complete details on the radio and optical/IR observations
307: see \citealt{ckj+01} and \citealt{jbo+01}). Radio observations by MOST
308: (not shown) made during the initial LS show a detection of 8--15~mJy
309: at 843~MHz \citep{ckj+01}. This indicates that the radio emission
310: prior to line 3 is more than a factor of 50 stronger than at the time
311: of the ATCA observation made at line 4 \citep{ckj+01}. Together, these
312: radio and optical/IR observations have been
313: interpreted\citep{ckj+01,jbo+01} as evidence for the
314: presence of jets during the initial and final LS. USA observations
315: indicate that the decline in the HB, during the IS, is associated with
316: a rapid drop in radio emission. The weak radio detection (line 3)
317: occurs while the SB is still very near its maximum and the HB has dropped
318: from its maximum by a factor of $\sim2$ and continues on a rapid
319: decline. At the point of no significant radio detection (line 4), the
320: HB has greatly reduced its rate of decrease. The return of the radio
321: signal in the final LS suggests that the mechanism of jet production
322: is related to but not dependent on HB photon production mechanism. In
323: future outbursts, it would be helpful to obtain a much more thorough
324: radio coverage in order to pin down the nature of the relationship
325: between the HB and jet quenching.
326:
327: \section{Discussion: Two Flow Models}
328: \label{2flow}
329:
330: The different behavior of the HB and SB lightcurves, together with the
331: lack of a strict correlation between the QPO frequency and source flux,
332: suggest a scenario involving a two component accretion flow. Models
333: invoking two {\em independent} accretion flows have been described by
334: \citet{ct95} and \citet{shs+01}, while \citet{van01} presents a model
335: where the two parameters are the instantaneous and time averaged
336: values of a {\em single} quantity.
337:
338: Whether the two accretion flows are dependent or independent, there
339: will be a transition radius at which the Keplerian disk is disrupted
340: and forms a hot sub-Keplerian flow. This inner flow can be an
341: advection-dominated accretion flow \citep{emn+97} or a postshock flow
342: interior to the radius where two independent flows interact
343: \citep{ct95}. One may then consider models where the LFQPO is related
344: to the Keplerian orbital period at the transition radius
345: ($r_\mathrm{tr}$, measured in units of the Schwartzchild radius)
346: between the thin disk and an inner flow. The relationship between the
347: Keplerian orbital period and radius for a $7.5 M_\sun$ black hole is
348: $R = 195 R_\mathrm{Sch} P^{2/3}$, where $R_\mathrm{Sch}$ is the
349: Schwartzchild radius and $P$ is the orbital period in seconds. Thus,
350: the LFQPO evolving from $\sim0.2$~Hz to $\sim5$~Hz could be related to
351: the transition radius changing from $\sim 570 R_\mathrm{Sch}$ to $\sim
352: 67 R_\mathrm{Sch}$. When the disk inner radius gets small enough,
353: Compton cooling becomes important and the hard Comptonized emission is
354: suppressed while the black-body emission from the disk moves into the
355: X-ray band, causing a spectral state transition. This agrees
356: remarkably well with what was observed in this outburst.
357:
358:
359: In order for a two flow model to explain the spectral characteristics
360: described in \S~\ref{spectev}, it should allow for spectral softening
361: to occur while the overall source flux is dropping.
362: For two
363: independent flows, this type of spectral evolution
364: occurs because changes in the radial
365: flow may occur on a short (free-fall) timescale, while the effect
366: of changes in the the disk accretion rate are delayed due to viscosity
367: \citep{ct95,shs+01}.
368: A model of two independent flows was applied to
369: GRS~1758$-$258 and 1E~1740.7$-$2942 by \citet{shs+01}, both of which
370: also showed spectral softening with decreasing flux. Using a
371: dependent flow model, \citet{van01} suggests that if the count rate is
372: dominated by the disk accretion rate and the spectral hardness is
373: related to the inner disk radius (which is determined by the
374: time-averaged accretion rate), the same cyclic structure in the HID
375: will result.
376:
377: Recent ideas on the role of jets in microquasars suggest a link
378: between the jet and the corona (see \citealt{fen01} and references
379: therein) and provide a theoretical basis for the observed association
380: between the HB and the radio and optical/IR signals
381: (\S~\ref{sec-multi}). This association is suggestive of a mechanism
382: by which jets are created in the LS and quenched in the IS. The LS is
383: associated with a continuous radio-emitting outflow and the presence
384: of the strong LFQPO. At the transition to the IS, discrete radio
385: ejections seem to be common but the continuous jet ceases and the
386: LFQPO mechanism is suppressed. This indicates that both the outflow
387: and the LFQPO are characteristic of the LS and are related to the
388: presence of a hot corona or sub-Keplerian flow.
389:
390: \acknowledgements
391:
392: We gratefully acknowledge useful discussions with Lev Titarchuk.
393: We thank Mark Yashar for providing useful references.
394: Work at SLAC was supported by department of Energy contract
395: DE-AC03-76SF00515. Basic research in X-ray Astronomy at the Naval
396: Research Laboratory is supported by ONR/NRL. This work was performed
397: while RMB held a National Research Council Research Associateship
398: Award at NRL. JDS is grateful to the NASA Applied Information
399: Technology Research Program for support. This paper made use of
400: quick-look results provided by the ASM/RXTE team (see
401: \url{http://xte.mit.edu}).
402:
403: \begin{thebibliography}{dummy}
404: \def \atel {The Astronomer's Telegram}
405: \bibliographystyle{plain}
406:
407: \bibitem[Chakrabarti \& Titarchuk~(1995)]{ct95} Chakrabarti,
408: S.~\& Titarchuk, L.~G.\ 1995, \apj, 455, 623
409:
410: \bibitem[Corbel et al.~(2001)]{ckj+01} Corbel, S.\ et al.\
411: 2001, ApJ, 553, in press (astro-ph/0102114)
412:
413: \bibitem[Esin et al.~(1997)]{emn+97} Esin, A.\
414: A., McClintock, J.\ E., \& Narayan, R.\ 1997, \apj, 489, 865
415:
416: \bibitem[Fender~(2001)]{fen01} Fender, R.\ 2001,
417: Proc.\ International Symposium on High Energy Gamma-Ray
418: Astronomy, Heidelberg, Eds.\ F.\ Aharonian \& H.\ Voelk, 2001, AIP,
419: in press, 1233
420:
421: \bibitem[Hannikainen et al.~(2001)]{hch+01} Hannikainen, D.\ et
422: al.\ 2001, Proc.\ of the 4th INTEGRAL Workshop, Alicante, 2070
423:
424: \bibitem[Homan et al.~(2001)]{hwb+01} Homan, J., Wijnands, R.,
425: van der Klis, M., Belloni, T., van Paradijs, J., Klein-Wolt, M., Fender,
426: R., \& M{\' e}ndez, M.\ 2001, \apjs, 132, 377
427:
428: \bibitem[Homan et al.~(2000)]{hwv+00} Homan, J. et al. 2000, ApJ, in
429: press (astro-ph/0001163)
430:
431: \bibitem[Jain et al.~(2001)]{jbo+01} Jain, R.\ K., Bailyn, C.\
432: D., Orosz, J.\ A., McClintock, J.\ E., \& Remillard, R.\ A.\ 2001,
433: \apjl, in press (astro-ph/0105115)
434:
435: \bibitem[Jain et al.~(2001)]{jbt01} Jain, R.,
436: Bailyn, C., \& Tomsick, J.\ 2001, \iaucirc, 7575, 3
437:
438: \bibitem[Kalemci et al.~(2001)]{ktr+01} Kalemci, E., Tomsick,
439: J.\ A., Rothschild, R.\ E., Pottschmidt, K., \& Kaaret, P.\ 2001,
440: \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0105395)
441:
442: \bibitem[Masetti \& Soria~(2000)]{ms00} Masetti, N.\ \&
443: Soria, R.\ 2000, \iaucirc, 7399
444:
445: \bibitem[Miller et al.~(2001)]{mwh+01} Miller, J.\ M.\ et al.\
446: 2001, \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0105371)
447:
448: \bibitem[Nowak et al.~(1999)]{nvw+99} Nowak, M.\ A., Vaughan,
449: B.\ A., Wilms, J., Dove, J.\ B., \& Begelman, M.\ C.\ 1999, \apj, 510,
450: 874
451:
452: \bibitem[Orosz et al.~(2001)]{ovm+01} Orosz, J. \ A.,
453: van der Klis, M., McClintock, J., Bailyn, C., \& Remillard, R.\ 2001,
454: \atel, 70
455:
456: \bibitem[Ray et al.~(1999)]{rwf+99} Ray, P.~S. et al. 1999, in X-ray
457: Astronomy 1999, Bologna, Italy, in press (astro-ph/9911236)
458:
459: \bibitem[Remillard et al.~(2001)]{rsm+01} Remillard, R.\ A., Sobczak, G.\ J.,
460: Muno, M.\ P., \& McClintock, J.\ E.\ 2001, \apj, submitted,
461: (astro-ph/0105508)
462:
463: \bibitem[Shabad~(2000)]{sha+00} Shabad, G. 2000, Stanford Ph.D. Thesis,
464: SLAC Report No. 562
465:
466: \bibitem[Smith~(1998)]{smi98} Smith, D.\ A.\ 1998, \iaucirc, 7008
467:
468: \bibitem[Smith et al.~(2001)]{shs+01} Smith, D.\ M.,
469: Heindl, W.\ A., \& Swank, J.\ H.\ 2001, \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0103304)
470:
471: \bibitem[Sobczak et al.~(2000)]{smr+00} Sobczak, G.\ J.,
472: McClintock, J.\ E., Remillard, R.\ A., Cui, W., Levine, A.\ M., Morgan, E.\
473: H., Orosz, J.\ A., \& Bailyn, C.\ D.\ 2000, \apj, 544, 993
474:
475: \bibitem[Tomsick et al.~(2001b)]{tsw+01} Tomsick, J.\ A., Smith,
476: E., Swank, J., Wijnands, R., \& Homan, J.\ 2001, \iaucirc, 7575
477:
478: \bibitem[van der Klis~(2001)]{van01} van der Klis, M.\ 2001, ApJ, in press
479: (astro-ph/0106291)
480:
481: \end{thebibliography}
482:
483:
484: \begin{figure}
485: \begin{center}
486: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
487: \includegraphics[angle=270]{f1.eps}
488: }
489: \end{center}
490: \caption{Time Evolution of \xtej.
491: (a) USA/ASM Crab normalized fluxes for the outburst. The circles are
492: ASM daily averaged data taken before USA started observations. ASM
493: error bars are shown but are smaller than the circles. Crosses with
494: error bars are USA data. (b) USA Soft Band count rate (SB),
495: $\sim1-4$~keV. (c) USA Hard Band count rate (HB), $\sim4-16$~keV.
496: (d) LFQPO centroid frequency. Filled squares show results
497: for the energy range 1--16~keV. The large unfilled circle shows the
498: frequency of the anomalous HB QPO. (e) LFQPO
499: percent rms amplitude. Filled squares show results for the energy
500: range 1--16~keV. Filled circles are the HB and the ``X''s are the SB.
501: The large unfilled circle marks the anomalous QPO.
502: (f) Hardness ratio (HB/SB). Line 2 shows the transition between the
503: initial LS and the IS. Line 5 shows the approximate beginning of the
504: transition period between the IS and final LS. Lines 3, 4 and 7 are
505: the times of ATCA observations. Lines 1 and 8 show optical/IR maxima
506: and line 6 shows an optical/IR minima.
507: \label{lightcurves}}
508: \end{figure}
509:
510:
511: \begin{figure}
512: \resizebox{3.5in}{!}{
513: \includegraphics{f2.eps}
514: }
515: \begin{center}
516: \caption{Hardness Ratio (HB/SB) vs. Total Range Count Rate. Squares are
517: plotted on points in which the LFQPO was detected. Points at which no
518: QPO detection was made only show error bars. The error bars shown are
519: the standard deviation of the flux and the hardness ratio. Arrows
520: plotted between points show the direction of time. The larger outlined
521: arrows mark the start and stop times of USA observations and the time
522: of the secondary maximum. Transitions between states have been marked
523: with the bold circles.
524: \label{HRintensity}}
525: \end{center}
526: \end{figure}
527: \end{document}
528: