1: \documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
2:
3: \newcommand{\vsini}{\mbox{$v\,\!\sin\,\!i$}}
4: \newcommand{\teff}{$T_{\rm eff}\ $}
5: \newcommand{\ha}{\mbox{H$\alpha$}}
6: \newcommand{\bvz}{\mbox{$(B-V)_0$}}
7: \newcommand{\kms}{km\ s$^{-1}$}
8: \newcommand{\lgni}{$\log\ N({\rm Li})$}
9: \newcommand{\RH}{$R_{\rm H\alpha}$}
10: \newcommand{\RIRT}{$R_{\rm 8498}$}
11: \newcommand{\FH}{$F_{\rm H\alpha}$}
12:
13: \doublespace
14:
15: \begin{document}
16:
17: \title{ROTATIONAL STUDIES OF LATE-TYPE STARS. VII. M34 (NGC 1039) AND
18: THE EVOLUTION OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM AND ACTIVITY IN YOUNG SOLAR-TYPE STARS}
19:
20: \author{David R. Soderblom}
21: \affil{Space Telescope Science Institute\\
22: 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore MD 21218\\
23: email: soderblom@stsci.edu}
24:
25: \author{Burton F. Jones}
26: \affil{University of California Observatories/Lick Observatory\\
27: and Board of Studies in Astronomy and Astrophysics,\\ University of
28: California, Santa Cruz 95064\\
29: email: jones@ucolick.org}
30: \and
31: \author{Debra Fischer}
32: \affil{Department of Astronomy\\
33: University of California, Berkeley CA 94720\\
34: email: fischer@serpens.berkeley.edu}
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37: We analyze Keck Hires observations of rotation and activity in F, G, and
38: K dwarf members of the open cluster M34 (NGC 1039), which is 250 Myr old,
39: and we compare them to the Pleiades, Hyades, and NGC 6475.
40: The upper bound to rotation seen in M34 is about a factor of two lower than
41: for the 100 Myr-old Pleiades, but most M34 stars are well below this
42: upper bound, and it is the overall convergence in rotation rates that is most striking. A few K dwarfs in M34 are still rapid rotators, suggesting that
43: they have undergone core-envelope decoupling, followed by
44: replenishment of surface angular momentum from an internal reservoir.
45: Our comparison of rotation in these clusters indicates that the time scale
46: for the coupling of the envelope to the core must be close to 100 Myr if
47: decoupling does, in fact, occur.
48:
49: \keywords{clusters: open --- stars:late-type --- stars:evolution\\
50: --- stars:rotation}
51:
52: \end{abstract}
53:
54: \section{Introduction}
55:
56: M34 (NGC 1039) is an open cluster that is about 250 Myr old (\cite{MMM93}
57: 1993; \cite{Jon96} 1996). That makes it ideal for comparing to the Pleiades
58: (age $\sim100$ Myr: \cite{Pat78} 1978; \cite{MMM93} 1993; \cite{BMG96} 1996)
59: and Hyades (600 Myr: \cite{Pat78} 1978; \cite{TSL97} 1997).
60: Such a comparison is especially interesting for solar-type stars, which
61: undergo much change over that age interval. Solar-type stars (by which we
62: mean roughly F7V to K2V) reach the Zero-Age Main Sequence (ZAMS) rotating
63: at a variety of rates, from roughly solar on up to $\sim100$ times solar,
64: as seen in the Pleiades (\cite{SH87} 1987; {\cite{sshj} 1993, hereafter
65: Paper 4), for example. Yet almost no spread in rotation exists among the
66: solar-type stars of the Hyades (\cite{RTL87} 1987; Paper 4).
67: Chromospheric emission (CE), being intimately related to rotation,
68: exhibits similar differences between these clusters (Paper 4).
69:
70: The differences in rotation seen between the Pleiades and Hyades are
71: believed to be an evolutionary effect. The paradigm is that rotation
72: and convection interact in stars like the Sun to generate a magnetic
73: field. One manifestation of those fields is CE\@. The magnetic field can
74: grip
75: an ionized stellar wind well beyond the surface
76: of the star, leading to angular momentum loss. In this picture, a
77: rapidly rotating star generates a stronger magnetic field than a slowly
78: rotating star, leading to a stronger field, more CE, and more rapid
79: angular momentum (AM)
80: loss. Thus rotation rates among a coeval population may start out
81: very different, but should converge with time.
82:
83: %Yet a star in the Pleiades can take many paths in losing AM so as to end
84: %up looking like a star in the Hyades.
85: However, there is more than one way for a fast-rotating star in the
86: Pleiades to end up looking like a slowly-rotating star in the Hyades.
87: For example, we can suppose that
88: stars always rotate as solid bodies, forcing the entire
89: star to spin down as AM is lost.
90: An alternative hypothesis is that ZAMS stars may rotate at different
91: rates in their convective envelopes and radiative cores (\cite{SH87} 1987).
92: The envelope has a relatively large radius but little mass, so spinning
93: it down takes less time than it would to decelerate the entire star.
94: But the core contains most of the AM and acts as
95: a reservoir that can replenish the surface rotation
96: for an extended time. In this case the surface rotation rate (and the
97: spread in rates among a group of stars) will depend
98: on the AM loss rate of the envelope, as well as the coupling time scale
99: between the core and envelope.
100: A coupling timescale that is short compared to the timescale for envelope AM
101: loss is essentially the same as
102: solid-body rotation.
103:
104: Models for these two scenarios have been put forth by \cite{JCC93} (1993)
105: and
106: \cite{CCJ94} (1994), and the essential difference between the two cases is
107: as just described: If solid-body rotation pertains, then all the stars in
108: the Pleiades will lose AM, and a sample of such stars will be seen to
109: gradually converge in its distribution of angular velocity ($\Omega$).
110: But if the core and envelope decouple, then the surface rates of some stars
111: can stay high for an extended period as they get replenished from the core,
112: followed by overall spindown once solid-body rotation is established.
113: In other words, core-envelope decoupling delays the start of the solid-body
114: phase. \cite{BSP01} (2001) show that an additional factor is needed to
115: explain the existence of slowly-rotating stars in clusters as young as the
116: Pleiades, namely the time scale for coupling of the star to a disk in the
117: pre-main sequence phase. This adds another parameter to the models, but
118: without
119: it the distributions of rotation seen cannot be explained, with or without
120: core-envelope decoupling.
121:
122: It may be possible to distinguish between these models with and without
123: decoupling by looking at
124: a cluster intermediate in age to the Pleiades and Hyades, so that we
125: can see if such stars have changed their distributions of rotation
126: rates. Such an effort was made in Paper 5 of this series
127: (\cite{paper5} 1993),
128: where rotation among stars of the Ursa Major Group was studied.
129: After carefully considering membership for that kinematic group,
130: there were not enough stars left for a
131: meaningful comparison. More recently, \cite{JJ97} (1997) obtained
132: rotation rates for some stars in NGC 6475, a cluster that is about 220
133: Myr old. Their results, shown below, reveal some fast rotators at that age,
134: but their sample is too small, especially for G and K dwarfs, to
135: provide a useful comparison to the Pleiades, and, as they note, their sample
136: was x-ray selected and is therefore biased toward rapid rotators.
137:
138: M34, at an age of 250 Myr, is well-suited for such a study of rotation
139: in young solar-type stars. It is fairly
140: rich, and it is close enough to make its solar-type stars accessible to
141: high-resolution spectroscopy with the Keck telescope and its HiRes
142: spectrograph. This paper will illustrate how rotation and
143: CE behave among a 250 Myr old group of stars, and what that may mean
144: for AM evolution among stars like the Sun.
145:
146: \section{Observations and Analysis}
147:
148: We began this program at the Lick 3m Shane telescope, using the Hamilton
149: spectrograph (\cite{Vog87} 1987), which records echelle spectra on a TI
150: $800\times800$ CCD at a resolving power of about 50,000. We attempted to
151: repeat in M34 what we had done in the Pleiades (Paper 4) for G dwarfs, but
152: we
153: had consistently bad luck with observing conditions. The result was low
154: signal-to-noise spectra of some of the earlier spectral types we are
155: interested in, mostly mid- to late-F dwarfs. These spectra were reduced
156: in the same way as the Hamilton spectra described in Paper 4.
157:
158: Our primary interest, however, is in the G and K dwarfs of M34, for it is
159: among those stars that we hoped to find some UFRs (Ultra-Fast Rotators),
160: i.e., stars with $v \sin i \ga 20$ km s$^{-1}$. Such stars are found in
161: the Pleiades and $\alpha$ Persei clusters, but not in the Hyades. Just
162: finding a few of them in M34 would constrain AM loss models. Also, we
163: wished to study CE by examining H$\alpha$ and the \ion{Ca}{2} infrared
164: triplet (IRT), meaning we required at least moderate signal-to-noise.
165:
166: This led us to observe M34 members with the HiRes spectrograph (\cite{Vog92}
167: 1992) on the Keck telescope. Targets were chosen from the membership study
168: of
169: \cite{Jon96} (1996), and range in $(B-V)$ from 0.44 to 1.29.
170: The HiRes spectra included H$\alpha$, the Li $\lambda6708$ feature (which is
171: reported on in \cite{JFS97} 1997), and two of the three IRT lines
172: ($\lambda8498$ and $\lambda8662$).
173:
174: The detector for the Keck observations was a Tektronix $2048\times2048$ CCD
175: having 24 $\mu$m pixels. We used the ``C1'' slit decker, which yielded a
176: projected slit height of 7 arcsec (36.6 pixels), and a projected slit width
177: of 0.86 arcsec (3 pixels), for a resolving power of 45,000. The wavelength
178: range was about 6300 to 8700 \AA, divided into 16 orders, with each order
179: covering about 100 \AA. This means the order coverage is incomplete.
180: Integration times ranged from 5 to 40 minutes, and that gave a typical
181: signal-to-noise of 70.
182:
183: We obtained rotation (\vsini) and radial velocity ($v_{\rm rad}$) measures
184: by cross-correlating the spectra against narrow-lined templates, choosing
185: a template with a temperature similar to the program star. Standard star
186: spectra were also cross-correlated with spun-up templates, and the FWHM was
187: measured. These procedures are described in \cite{JFS97} (1997). The
188: emission fluxes in the H$\alpha$ and the 8498 \AA\ line of the IRT were
189: determined in the same way as in Paper 4, namely by first subtracting the
190: profile of an inactive star of the same intrinsic color (see Table 3 of
191: Paper 4), measuring the equivalent width of the resultant emission
192: feature, and then converting that $W_\lambda$ to a flux. Finally, the
193: fluxes were ratioed to the stellar bolometric flux to calculate \RH\ and
194: \RIRT. The appropriate formulae are given in Paper 4.
195: Our results are listed in Table 1.
196: \marginpar{Tab. 1}
197: Some values in Table 1 differ from what was reported in \cite{JFS97} (1997).
198: First, in that paper we formally derived \vsini\ values as low as 5 \kms,
199: but here we list any value below 7 \kms\ as ``$\le7$'' to be more
200: conservative. Second, for three stars we could derive \vsini\ values for
201: both components of spectroscopic binaries; these are JP 156, 257, and 317.
202:
203: \section{Discussion}
204:
205: \subsection{Angular Momentum Loss After the ZAMS}
206:
207: The essence of our observations of rotation in M34 stars is illustrated
208: in Figure 1.
209: \marginpar{Fig. 1}
210: The first panel shows rotation in the Pleiades (Paper 4), to which two
211: lines have been added. The upper curve represents the upper
212: bound of the Pleiades distribution of rotation, while the lower curve is
213: the mean of rotation in the Hyades (panel d, from Paper 4).
214: One key conclusion
215: of Paper 4 was that the rotation of solar-type stars, in evolving from the
216: Pleiades to the Hyades, changes only modestly in the mean, but undergoes
217: a huge convergence in rotation rates. Thus, at any one mass in the
218: Pleiades, the rotation rates differ by an order of magnitude or more,
219: yet in the Hyades stars of the same mass have nearly identical rotation
220: rates. This effect is shown here in \vsini, but it has been confirmed
221: through measurements of rotation periods (\cite{RTL87} 1987; \cite{PSS93}
222: 1993; \cite{PSM93} 1993; \cite{KT98} 1998).
223:
224: Figure 1(b) shows the \vsini\ observations of \cite{JJ97} (1997) for NGC 6475
225: (220 Myr old). The presence of two stars with \vsini$\approx20$ \kms\
226: at \bvz$\approx1.1$ suggests that rapid rotators exist at that age,
227: but the small sample size precludes drawing more conclusions.
228:
229: Figure 1(c) shows our results for M34. For the bluer stars
230: [\bvz$\la0.7$], the rotation rates are similar to most Pleiads in this
231: color range, except that the upper branch of the Pleiades rotational
232: distribution (stars with \vsini$\approx50$ \kms) has disappeared.
233: For the stars redder than 0.7 in \bvz, few if any members of M34 have spun
234: down to the low rates seen in the Hyades (represented by the lower line
235: in each plot and shown in Fig. 1(d)). Many stars have \vsini\ values of
236: about 8 to 15 \kms,
237: essentially the same as seen in the Pleiades, but the upper envelope
238: for M34 is about a factor of two lower than for the Pleiades (as
239: represented by the upper line). Also, the proportion of rapid rotators
240: in M34 (those with \vsini$\ga15$ \kms) is the same as the proportion
241: of UFRs (stars with \vsini$\ga30$ \kms) seen in the Pleiades, given
242: the sample sizes. Finally, M34 contains at least one blue UFR (JP 158,
243: at \bvz=0.80 and \vsini=45 \kms).
244:
245: It is clear that the convergence in rotation rates exceeds any overall
246: decrease in the average rotation rate as solar-type stars evolve from
247: the age of the Pleiades to the age of M34 and on to the age of the Hyades.
248: Stars that rotate relatively
249: slowly at the age of the Pleiades will still be rotating at about the
250: same rate much later. For example, \cite{KT98} (1998) see Pleiades
251: stars with rotation periods of 7 to 8 days at \bvz$\approx1.1$, while at
252: that same color \cite{RTL87} (1987) observe rotation periods of 11 to 12
253: days in the Hyades, a change by a factor of about 1.5;
254: our M34 \vsini\ values for the slow rotators are consistent with this trend.
255: Yet in that same 500 Myr, the surface rotation rates of the
256: UFRs have declined by a factor of twenty or more.
257:
258: The calculations done so far to study AM loss in young solar-type stars
259: have, of necessity, adopted the Pleiades and Hyades as being fully
260: representative of any ensembles of stars of their ages. Yet the Pleiades
261: and Hyades differ in one important respect (besides age): their
262: metallicities. The Pleiades has near-solar abundances ([Fe/H] =
263: $+0.06\pm0.05$; \cite{KS2000} 2000),
264: but the higher metallicity of the Hyades ([Fe/H] = $+0.127\pm0.022$;
265: \cite{BF90} 1990),
266: means that Hyads have deeper convective envelopes at a given mass.
267: Other things being equal, this may lead to stars in the Hyades losing
268: AM more quickly than solar-metallicity stars do. The importance of
269: this can be gauged by pretending that a given Hyad acts like a
270: solar-metallicity star of slightly lower mass. A comparison of the
271: AM loss tracks of \cite{CCJ94} (1994) and the models of \cite{SPT00}
272: (2000) for different masses show
273: that lower-mass stars indeed lose AM more quickly, but the net difference
274: is modest. In other words, there appears to be no valid reason to reject
275: the Hyades as a basis of comparison for the observations.
276:
277: \subsection{Activity in M 34}
278:
279: Figure 2
280: \marginpar{Fig. 2}
281: shows \RH\ versus \bv\ for stars in the Pleiades (from Paper 4),
282: NGC 6475 (\cite{JJ97} 1997), and M34. Among the M34 stars we observed,
283: there are five that exhibit ``overt'' \ha\ emission; i.e., portions of
284: the line rise above the continuum. These have been highlighted in Fig. 2(c)
285: with overlaid crosses, and their \ha\ profiles are shown in Figure 3.
286: \marginpar{Fig. 3}
287: In Paper 4 we also showed six examples of Pleiades
288: stars with overt \ha\ emission, and those shown in Fig. 2(a)
289: have also been highlighted.
290:
291: \ha\ emission in M34 is similar to that seen in the Pleiades. All
292: the M34 stars with \vsini $>15$ \kms\ and \bv$\ge0.80$ show overt \ha\
293: emission, although few Pleiads above the same thresholds do. The lack
294: of Pleiads with overt emission is probably not simply due to rotational
295: broadening of the lines. This can be seen by noting that in the same
296: color range of $(B-V)\approx1.0$ to 1.1 there are M34 stars with overt
297: emission having \vsini\ as great as Pleiads that lack overt emission.
298:
299: Figure 4
300: \marginpar{Fig. 4}
301: compares the Pleiades and M34 with regard to the relation between \ha\
302: emission and a pseudo-Rossby number, $N^\prime_{\rm R}$.
303: The Rossby number is the ratio of a
304: star's rotation period to its convective turnover time, the latter being
305: calculated from models (see Paper 4). Only an upper limit to $P_{\rm rot}$
306: can be determined from \vsini, of course, but that is sufficient here.
307: The details of the calculation are given in Paper 4, eq. (7).
308:
309: At a given value of $N^\prime_{\rm R}$, stars in M34 and the Pleiades
310: have comparable levels of \ha\ emission overall. However, any star can
311: be moved to the right in this diagram because the measured \vsini\ may not
312: show the full extent of the true rotation ($v_{\rm eq}$). Within a
313: cluster, those stars with the largest \vsini\ values are probably seen
314: equator-on, and so it is more likely that Pleiades stars with
315: $\log N^\prime_{\rm R}$ from $-1.0$ to $-1.4$ in fact have true
316: $\log N^\prime_{\rm R}$ values that are smaller (i.e., approaching $-2$)
317: because those stars do not have the largest \vsini\ values seen in their
318: color range.
319:
320: Figure 5
321: \marginpar{Fig. 5}
322: shows a comparison of \RH\ to \RIRT\ for M34 stars. As for the Pleiades
323: (Paper 4), different chromospheric indices yield different pictures of
324: the chromosphere, with scatter that exceeds observational error, but
325: there is a broad correlation between the quantities.
326:
327: One expects the stars with overt \ha\ to also emit strongly in x-rays.
328: \cite{Sim2000} (2000) has recently published Rosat observations of M34, and
329: of the five stars that emit in \ha, only two were detected by him. Of the
330: remaining three, two (stars 265 and 356) would have been at the very edges
331: of
332: the Rosat field (where the sensitivity is lower),
333: but star 536 is only 12 arcmin from the center of the field and
334: so should have been detected. The small number of stars in common between
335: our
336: sample and Simon's prevents firm conclusions from being drawn, but it
337: appears possible that not all strong \ha\ emitters are also strong in x-rays.
338:
339: \section{Core-Envelope Decoupling versus Solid-Body Rotation}
340:
341: It has been hypothesized that the surface AM of some stars is steadily
342: replenished by an internal reservoir over
343: time when they are young. Can we entirely rule out solid-body rotation?
344: \cite{CCJ94} (1994) show calculations of the evolution of rotation when no
345: decoupling occurs. In their Figure 3 the net change in $\Omega$ (the
346: angular
347: velocity) for the slow rotators in going from 100 to 250 Myr is only about
348: 0.1 dex, an amount that may be undetectable in our observations of \vsini.
349: The rapid
350: rotators in their models drop by about 0.3 dex in $\Omega$ over this time
351: interval, just as we see them do. For the slow rotators, the change in the
352: models going from 100 Myr to 600 Myr is 0.3 dex, or a factor of two. The
353: actual change we see is comparable to this.
354:
355: If core-envelope decoupling occurs, it effects should be most evident at
356: an intermediate age like that of M 34 among stars that started as UFRs. By
357: comparison, the slow rotators are probably spinning as solid bodies for the most part, and the very fastest rotators in the Pleiades must also be solid bodies
358: because they already have extremely short periods (as little as 0.25 day): how
359: much faster could a core be spinning? In M 34 we see intermediate-level
360: rotation rates at \bv\ near 1.0, while the more massive stars have mostly converged to similar rates. Why do these K dwarfs still show appreciable
361: surface rates? Either they are inherently less efficient at losing AM,
362: which is contradicted by models, or they have tapped into an internal
363: reservoir.
364: It may be possible to
365: construct models with solid-body rotation that match the observations
366: better, but the easiest way to account for all the data is to
367: invoke core-envelope decoupling.
368: As we have pointed out before (Paper 4), core-envelope decoupling
369: also helps to account for the strong mass dependence of rotation in
370: solar-type stars by the way in which the ratio of the moment of inertia
371: of the core to that of the envelope vary with mass.
372: Observations of rotation periods for a significant sample of stars in a
373: cluster about 200 to 300 Myr old will, we believe, settle this issue by
374: showing just how slowly the slowest-rotating stars spin.
375:
376: \cite{BSP01} (2001) also favor core-envelope decoupling in their models of
377: disk locking in the early evolution of solar-type stars. They note that
378: models with solid-body rotation require disk locking for 10 to 20 Myr.
379: This is not impossible, but it is uncomfortably long when other observations
380: suggest lifetimes for optically thick disks that are well
381: under 10 Myr (\cite{HYJ00} (2000).
382:
383: For the moment,
384: assume that core-envelope decoupling indeed takes place in order to
385: see what constraints we can place on the time scale for angular momentum
386: transfer ($\tau_{\rm coupl}$) between the surface and the inner regions.
387: First, we note that $\tau_{\rm coupl}$ cannot be much less than about
388: 100 Myr, or otherwise core-envelope decoupling would never occur in the
389: first place. This is because the PMS evolutionary time scales for
390: low-mass stars can exceed 100 Myr, yet we see UFRs in those masses.
391: At the same time, the near-uniformity of rotation rates seen in the
392: Hyades, at an age of 600 Myr, suggests that several $\tau_{\rm coupl}$
393: have occurred in the 500 Myr from the Pleiades to the Hyades. If
394: $\tau_{\rm coupl}$ were as much as 500-1000 Myr, then Hyades stars could not
395: have achieved
396: such uniform rotation rates, and if $\tau_{\rm coupl}\sim2$ Gyr, then the
397: Sun would not show solid-body rotation (unless it started as a slow rotator).
398: All this means
399: that $\tau_{\rm coupl}$ is unlikely to exceed 100 Myr by much, and so, to first
400: order, if decoupling occurs then the recoupling timescale,
401: $\tau_{\rm coupl}$, is $\sim100$ Myr.
402:
403: \acknowledgments
404: These observations were made in part at the W. M. Keck Observatory.
405: The W. M. Keck Observatory is operated as a scientific partnership between
406: the California Institute of Technology and the University of California.
407: It was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck
408: foundation. D.S. acknowledges support from NASA's Ultraviolet, Visible, and
409: Gravitational Physics Research and Analysis Program.
410:
411: \begin{thebibliography}{DUM}
412:
413: \bibitem[Barnes, Sofia, \& Pinsonneault]{BSP01}
414: Barnes, S., Sofia, S., \& Pinsonneault, M. 2001, \apj, 548, 1071
415:
416: \bibitem[Basri, Marcy, \& Graham]{BMG96}
417: Basri, G., Marcy, G. W., \& Graham, J. R. 1996, \apj, 458, 600
418:
419: \bibitem[Boesgaard \& Friel]{BF90}
420: Boesgaard, A. M., \& Friel, E. D. 1990, \apj, 351, 467
421:
422: \bibitem[Collier Cameron \& Li]{CCJ94}
423: Collier Cameron, A., \& Li, J. 1994, \mnras, 269, 1099
424:
425: \bibitem[Hollenbach, Yorke, \& Johnstone]{HYJ00}
426: Hollenbach, D. J., Yorke, H. W., \& Johnstone, D. 2000, in Protostars and
427: Planets IV, ed. V. Mannings, A. P. Boss, \& S. S. Russell
428: (Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Press), 401
429:
430: \bibitem[James \& Jeffries]{JJ97}
431: James, D. J., \& Jeffries, R. D. 1997, \mnras, 291, 252
432:
433: \bibitem[Jones et al.]{JFS97}
434: Jones, B. F., Fischer, D., Shetrone, M.,
435: \& Soderblom, D. R. 1997, \aj, 114, 352
436:
437: \bibitem[Jones \& Prosser]{Jon96}
438: Jones, B. F., \& Prosser, C. F. 1996, \aj, 111, 1193
439:
440: \bibitem[King et al.]{KS2000}
441: King, J. R., Soderblom, D. R., Fischer, D., \& Jones, B. F.
442: 2000, \apj, 533, 944
443:
444: \bibitem[Krishnamurthi et al.]{KT98}
445: Krishnamurthi, A., et al. 1998, \apj, 493, 914
446:
447: %\bibitem
448: %Lang, K. R. 1991, Astrophysical Data: Planets and Stars (New
449: %York: Springer), 116
450:
451: \bibitem[Li \& Collier Cameron]{JCC93}
452: Li, J., \& Collier Cameron, A. 1993, \mnras, 261, 766
453:
454: \bibitem[Meynet, Mermilliod, \& Maeder]{MMM93}
455: Meynet, G., Mermilliod, J.-C., \& Maeder, A. 1993, \aaps, 98, 477
456:
457: %\bibitem
458: %Noyes, R. W., Hartmann, L. W., Baliunas, S. L., Duncan, D. K., \&
459: %Vaughan, A. H. 1984, \apj, 279, 763
460:
461: \bibitem[Patenaude]{Pat78}
462: Patenaude, M. 1978, \aap, 66, 225
463:
464: %\bibitem[Patten \& Simon]{PS96}
465: %Patten, B. M., \& Simon, T. 1996, \apjs, 106, 489
466:
467: %\bibitem
468: %Pinsonneault, M. H., Kawaler, S. D., \& Demarque, P. 1990, \apjs, 74, 501
469:
470: \bibitem[Prosser et al.]{PSS93}
471: Prosser, C. E., Schild, R. E., Stauffer, J. R., \& Jones, B. F.
472: 1993a, \pasp, 105, 269
473:
474: \bibitem[Prosser et al.]{PSM93}
475: Prosser, C. E., Shetrone, M. D., Marilli, E., Catalano, S., Williams, S. D.,
476: Backman, D. E., Laaksonen, B. D., Adige, V., Marschall, L. A., \&
477: Stauffer, J. R.
478: 1993b, \pasp, 105, 1407
479:
480: \bibitem[Radick et al.]{RTL87}
481: Radick, R. R., Thompson, D. T., Lockwood, G. W., Duncan, D. K., \&
482: Baggett, W. E. 1987, \apj, 321, 459
483:
484: \bibitem[Sills, Pinsonneault, \& Terndrup]{SPT00}
485: Sills, A., Pinsonneault, M. H., \& Terndrup, D. M. 2000, \apj, 534, 335
486:
487: \bibitem[Simon]{Sim2000}
488: Simon, T. 2000, \pasp, 112, 599
489:
490: \bibitem[Soderblom \& Mayor]{paper5}
491: Soderblom, D. R. \& Mayor, M. 1993, \apj, 402, L5 (Paper 5)
492:
493: \bibitem[Soderblom et al.]{sshj}
494: Soderblom D. R., Stauffer, J. R., Hudon, J. D., \& Jones, B. F. 1993,
495: \apjs, 85, 316 (Paper 4)
496:
497: \bibitem[Stauffer \& Hartmann]{SH87}
498: Stauffer, J. R., \& Hartmann, L. W. 1987, \apj, 318, 337
499:
500: %\bibitem
501: %Stauffer, J. R., Hartmann, L. W., Soderblom, D.R., \& Burnham, N.
502: %1984, \apj, 280, 202
503:
504: \bibitem[Torres, Stefanik, \& Latham]{TSL97}
505: Torres, G., Stefanik, R., \& Latham, D. W. 1997, \apj, 479, 268
506:
507: \bibitem[Vogt]{Vog87}
508: Vogt, S. S. 1987, \pasp, 99, 1214
509:
510: \bibitem[Vogt]{Vog92}
511: Vogt, S. S. 1992, in ESO Workshop on High Resolution Spectroscopy with the
512: VLT (Garching: ESO), 223
513:
514: \end{thebibliography}
515:
516: \newpage
517:
518: \figcaption{
519: Rotation rate (\vsini, in \kms) versus dereddened \bv\ for solar-type
520: stars in four clusters. The upper line is meant to schematically
521: outline the upper bound to rotation for the Pleiades. The lower line
522: is a mean relation for the Hyades from Paper 4.
523: (a) The Pleiades, 100 Myr old, from Paper 4. The triangles
524: represent upper limits to \vsini.
525: (b) NGC 6475, 220 Myr old, from \cite{JJ97} (1997).
526: (c) M 34, at 250 Myr.
527: There are four stars in the Pleiades and five in M 34 that exhibit H$\alpha$
528: emission that rises above the continuum and their points are overlaid with
529: crosses.
530: (d) the Hyades, at 600 Myr. For the Hyades, the open symbols
531: represent \vsini\ values, while the filled symbols are determined from
532: observations of rotation periods, and so have no aspect dependence.
533: }
534:
535: \figcaption{
536: Normalized indices of \ha\ emission, \RH, versus dereddened \bv\ color
537: for (a) the Pleiades (from Paper 4), (b) NGC 6475 (from
538: \cite{JJ97} 1997), and, (c) M 34. The vertical dotted
539: lines for two Pleiades stars connect maximum and minimum estimates of
540: \RH\ for those two stars because both show evidence of emission over
541: the full breadth of the profile, not just in the core of \ha\ (see Paper 4).
542: There are five stars in the Pleiades and five in M 34 that exhibit H$\alpha$
543: emission that rises above the continuum and their points are overlaid with
544: crosses.
545: }
546:
547: \figcaption{
548: \ha\ profiles for five M34 stars with ``overt'' \ha\ emission, i.e.,
549: emission that rises above the continuum.
550: }
551:
552: \figcaption{
553: Normalized indices of \ha\ emission, \RH, versus $N^\prime_{\rm R}$, the
554: normalized \vsini\ equivalent to a Rossby number. For the Pleiades,
555: upper limits to \vsini\ are not shown, and for both the Pleiades and
556: M34 stars with overt \ha\ emission are highlighted. In the bottom panel,
557: the solid points are for M34 and the crosses are for the Pleiades.
558: }
559:
560: \figcaption{
561: Normalized indices of Ca {\sc ii} IRT emission, \RIRT, versus \RH\
562: for stars in M34. As expected, the two quantities are well-correlated
563: overall, but the correlation breaks down among the weak emitters.
564: }
565:
566: \end{document}
567: