1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 02 Nov 00
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17:
18: \documentclass{aastex}
19: \usepackage{emulateapj5}
20:
21: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
22:
23: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
24:
25: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
26:
27: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
28:
29: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
30:
31: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
32: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
33: %% the \begin{document} command.
34: %%
35: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
36: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
37: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
38: %% for information.
39:
40: \newcommand{\etal}{{et al.}}
41:
42: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
43:
44: \slugcomment{accepted 2001-09-20}
45:
46: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
47: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
48: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
49: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
50: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
51: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
52:
53: \shorttitle{New wide pair of cool white dwarfs}
54: \shortauthors{Scholz et al.}
55:
56: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
57: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
58:
59: \begin{document}
60:
61: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
62: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
63: %% you desire.
64:
65: \title{A new wide pair of cool white dwarfs in the Solar neighbourhood}
66:
67: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
68: %% author and affiliation information.
69: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
70: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
71: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
72: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
73:
74: \author{R.-D. Scholz, G. P. Szokoly and M. Andersen }
75: \affil{Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam,
76: An der Sternwarte 16, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany}
77:
78: \author{R. Ibata}
79: \affil{Observatoire de Strasbourg, 11, rue de l'Universite,
80: F-67000 Strasbourg, France}
81:
82: \author{M. J. Irwin}
83: \affil{Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK}
84:
85: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
86: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
87: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
88: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
89: %% editorial office after submission.
90:
91: \begin{abstract}
92: We report the discovery of a wide pair (93~arcsec angular separation) of
93: extremely cool ($T_{eff}<4000$~K) white dwarfs with a very large common
94: proper motion ($\sim1.9$~arcsec/yr). The objects were discovered in a high
95: proper motion survey in the poorly investigated southern sky region with
96: $\delta<-60^{\circ}$ using SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey (SSS) data. Both objects,
97: SSSPM~J2231-7514 and SSSPM~J2231-7515, show featureless optical spectra.
98: Fits of black-body models to the spectra yield effective temperatures of
99: 3810~K and 3600~K, respectively for the bright ($V=16.60$) and faint
100: ($V=16.87$) component. Both degenerates are much brighter than other recent
101: discoveries of cool white dwarfs with comparable effective temperatures
102: and/or $B_J-R$ colours.
103: Therefore, they should be relatively nearby objects.
104: The comparison with other cool white dwarfs and a photometric
105: distance determination yield distance estimates between 9~pc
106: and 14~pc. The latter seems to be more realistic, since
107: the good agreement of the proper motion of both components
108: within the errors of about 8~mas/yr and the angular separation between the
109: two stars support a distance of about 15~pc with relatively small masses of
110: the components.
111: With smaller distance we should be able to measure a differential proper
112: motion due to orbital motion if the orbital plane is not strongly inclined
113: and the present orbital velocity vector is not close to the line of sight.
114: The space velocity based on that distance and assumptions on radial velocity
115: makes the new pair of extremely cool white dwarfs some of the probably oldest
116: members of the Galactic disk population, although the possibility that
117: these objects are part of a Galactic halo dark matter component can also
118: not yet be ruled out.
119: \end{abstract}
120:
121: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
122: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
123: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
124: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
125:
126: \keywords{astrometry --- binaries: general --- dark matter ---
127: Galaxy: halo --- solar neighbourhood --- white dwarfs}
128:
129: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
130: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
131: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
132: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
133: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
134: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
135: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
136: %% each reference.
137:
138: \section{Introduction}
139:
140: Cool white dwarfs are interesting objects for a number of reasons such as
141: determining the age of the Galactic disk \citep{leg98} and as possible
142: components of the Galactic dark matter halo \citep{iba00,opp01b}.
143: A detailed photometric and spectroscopic analysis of all known cool white
144: dwarfs (4000~K$<T_{eff}<12000$~K) with trigonometric parallax measurements was
145: summarised by \citet{ber01}. Additionly there are a number of recent
146: discoveries of cool white dwarfs with effective temperatures below
147: 4000~K \citep{ham97,iba00,har01,opp01b}, one of which, WD~0346$+$246, has
148: a trigonometric parallax measurement \citep{ham99}.
149:
150: As shown by \citet{opp01b}, the temperature of cool white dwarfs
151: is well correlated with the $B_J-R$ colour of photographic plates
152: taken with the United Kingdom Schmidt Telescope (UKST). \citet{opp01b} have
153: also presented a photographic colour-colour diagram $(B_J-R)$ vs. $(R-I)$
154: of cool white dwarfs together with curves of synthetic colours expected
155: for different chemical compositions. These observations can now be
156: used for confirmation of recent theoretical models on the formation of
157: molecular hydrogen in cool white dwarf atmospheres leading to collisionally-
158: induced opacity at wavelengths longer than 6000{\AA} \citep{han98}.
159:
160: \section{Discovery of the common high proper motion pair}
161:
162: Several high proper motion surveys have been carried out recently
163: with the aim of completing the proper motion catalogues of Luyten, e.g.
164: \citet{luy79}, at fainter magnitudes and finding new low-luminosity
165: objects \citep{mon00,sch00,rui01,opp01b}.
166: Most of these efforts are concentrated on the southern sky with
167: $\delta < -33^{\circ}$, where the main source for Luyten's catalogues is
168: the Bruce Proper Motion Survey, most of whose plates reach only to about
169: $m_{pg} = 15.5$. In the northern sky, Luyten's catalogues are based on
170: observations with the Palomar Schmidt telescope.
171:
172: Recently, the entire southern sky has been scanned in two passbands ($B_J$
173: and $R$), with additional scans of plates at different epochs and in other
174: passbands (including $I$) over large sky areas \citep{ham01a,ham01b,ham01c} -
175: (hereafter SSS). SSS data were the
176: observational basis of the recent survey for cool white dwarfs by
177: \citet{opp01b}, covering about 10\% of the sky around the South Galactic Cap.
178: We have made use of the same observational material but our search was
179: carried out in a region close to the south celestial pole, at
180: declinations $\delta < -60^{\circ}$, where in most fields three different
181: epoch measurements on UKST $B_J$ and $R$ plates and ESO $R$ plates were
182: available.
183:
184: The basic reduction consisted of a re-matching of previously (i.e. within a
185: standard identification radius of 3~arcsec) unmatched objects and the
186: subsequent determination of proper motions using linear regression over
187: the SSS measured coordinates at three epochs.
188: The search area is difficult to estimate as well as the completeness
189: of the survey. This is due to the fact that in many fields the epochs
190: of two of the plates were very close to each other. On the other hand we
191: made a rather restrictive preselection of undisturbed star-like
192: objects based on their image parameters, in order to exclude spurious
193: matching leading to false proper motions. Therefore, we do not attempt to
194: draw conclusions on the statistical properties of the survey, but just present
195: the discovery of the two objects with the largest proper motion obtained
196: so far in the SSS data.
197:
198: The coordinates, photographic photometry and the
199: proper motions of the two high proper motion stars are given in
200: Table~\ref{sssdata}. The $I$ band magnitudes (as well as the corresponding
201: extra-epoch positions used in the proper motion solution) were kindly provided
202: to us by Nigel Hambly. A further improvement of the proper motion solution
203: was achieved from including additional positions measured on the recent epoch
204: acquisition images. These positions were obtained in the system of the SSS
205: catalogues by using all stars with small proper motions in a field of
206: $15 \times 15$~arcmin$^2$ as reference stars (see note to Table~\ref{sssdata}).
207: There is no significant difference between the proper motions of the two
208: components. Since the discovery of the wide pair of cool white dwarfs
209: with very large common proper motion
210: is based on SSS data, we have given them the names SSSPM~J2231-7514 and
211: SSSPM~J2231-7515.
212:
213: SSSPM~J2231-7515 (but not its companion since it was brighter than the survey
214: limit) was also discovered in another on-going program using APM measures of
215: the same UKST sky survey plates \citep{iba00}, which also aims to find cool
216: high proper motion white dwarfs.
217:
218: \section{Observations}
219:
220: \subsection{DFOSC observations}
221:
222: Observations of the new common proper motion pair
223: were carried out using the {\em Danish Faint Object
224: Spectrograph} ({\em DFOSC}) on the Danish 1.54m Telescope in La
225: Silla. Data were taken during the nights starting June 19-20, 2001 (local
226: time) in relatively good almost photometric conditions.
227:
228: Seeing varied slightly during these nights between 1.0 and 1.2~arcsec.
229: Only short V-band (Bessel) images were taken that are relevant to our
230: objects as acquisition images (Figure~\ref{ssspm_ima}).
231: Spectroscopy was done using a 2.0~arcsec
232: wide long-slit (corresponding to 5.1 pixels in imaging mode),
233: positioning both objects on the slit at the same time. Two
234: grisms were used, number-5 (5200-10200{\AA}, 7000{\AA} blaze, 3.3{\AA}/pixel
235: resolution -- one 1800s spectroscopic observation) and number-7
236: (3800-6800{\AA}, 5250{\AA} blaze, 1.65{\AA}/pixel resolution --
237: a 1800s and a 1300s spectroscopic observation).
238: Two spectrophotometric standards were taken using each grism,
239: LTT 7379 and LTT 9239 \citep{ham92,ham94}, as well as a large number of
240: zero, flat (both for imaging and spectroscopy for all grisms used) and
241: arc-lamp (for both grisms) calibration frames. For broad-band photometric
242: calibrations, Landolt standard fields \citep{lan92} were observed repeatedly.
243:
244: \subsection{EFOSC observations}
245:
246: After completing the reduction of the DFOSC observations, we realised
247: that a spectrum of one of the objects, SSSPM~J2231-7515, which was discovered
248: independently, had already been observed half a year earlier.
249: The spectrum of this star was observed with the EFOSC
250: spectrograph on the ESO~3.6m telescope during the night of 2 December
251: 2000. A slit width of 1.5~arcsec was used with grism number~1 (3185-10940{\AA},
252: 4500{\AA} blaze, 6.30{\AA}/pixel resolution) for three exposures of 300s each.
253:
254: \section{Data reduction}
255:
256: All of the data was reduced in the standard manner using IRAF procedures.
257: Consequently in the following sections we only describe important results
258: or deviations from normal.
259:
260: \subsection{DFOSC data}
261:
262: For the imaging data all images were bias-corrected, trimmed and then
263: flat-fielded using twilight flats. After measuring photometric zeropoints
264: in 6 standard fields \citep{lan92}, we adopted a zeropoint of 24.66 (for 1s
265: exposure time and airmass of 1.45 -- the airmass of our acquisition frames)
266: in the Bessel V-band. Examination of the measured zeropoints shows that
267: conditions were very close to photometric (with a hint of very weak cirrus in
268: some cases). Using this zeropoint, we measured the (Vega) magnitudes of the
269: two objects to be 16.60 and 16.87 in V (Bessel). We also measured the magnitude
270: of the extra object, accidentally landing on our 2 arcsec wide slit (see below)
271: to be 16.86 (see Figure~\ref{ssspm_ima}).
272: Instrumental magnitude errors are small (1-2\%), the
273: main source of error is the determination of the zeropoint. We therefore
274: estimate the overall accuracy of these magnitudes to be better than 5\%.
275:
276: Spectroscopic frames (science and standard fields and calibration frames)
277: were also bias and zero subtracted, trimmed and flatfielded (using different
278: flat-field frames for the two grisms). The only complication was the
279: removal of focal plane geometric distortions to improve the sky subtraction.
280: This was done by tracing lines in the wavelength calibration frames. A
281: smooth distortion map was fitted to the results and was applied to all frames.
282:
283: All objects on the slit were traced along the dispersion axis. Sky subtraction
284: was done through fitting in a 35~arcsec wide band, centered on the object,
285: excluding the central 16~arcsec region. A relatively wide aperture was
286: defined for all objects, which includes all the flux (but degrades the
287: S/N slightly). Object spectra were `optimally' extracted within this aperture,
288: with both cosmic-ray removal (based on photon statistics) and a weighted
289: sum based on estimated signal-to-noise ratio.
290:
291: Wavelength calibration was done using He-Ne arc exposures. For the
292: number-7 grism (bluer, higher resolution) the procedure worked quite
293: well (0.06{\AA} RMS, 0.15{\AA} maximum deviation) in the wavelength range
294: 3889-6717{\AA}. For the number 5 grism (red, lower resolution), the accuracy
295: is worse (as expected), around 0.5{\AA} RMS (peak deviation is 1{\AA}), in
296: the range of 5852-8783{\AA}. In addition, the exact position of the
297: object on the slit can also introduce an additional, systematic shift of
298: the spectra. This later effect is estimated to be 1.5{\AA} for the lower
299: resolution and 0.8{\AA} for the higher resolution grism. These estimates
300: were also verified by checking emission lines in the sky background.
301:
302: It is important to note that beyond 7000{\AA} the CCD suffers from serious
303: fringing, which we could not remove.
304:
305: Flux calibration was attempted by observing two standard stars in the same
306: two grism configurations. However, during the reduction we encountered
307: several problems with the red end calibration possibly related to the fringing.
308: The serendipitously observed 3rd object in the slit turned out to be a
309: K0-K1 star. Using a library spectrum \citep{jac84}, we corrected the
310: continuum slope of this object and used this smooth correction to reduce the
311: calibration problems for the two white dwarfs. The quality of this correction
312: was checked by comparing overlapping regions in wavelength in different
313: observations. For the K-star, differences were less than 1\%. For the fainter
314: high proper motion object (which is closer to the K-star), differences were
315: 1-2\%, showing no colour dependence. For the brighter high proper motion
316: object, differences were 5\%. These residual differences were assumed to be
317: `grey' effects (i.e. not depending on wavelength).
318:
319: Finally we calculated synthetic Bessel-V magnitudes for the objects
320: from the spectra. In the case of the brighter object, the measured broad-band
321: magnitude was reproduced better than 1\%, while for the fainter one a 9\%
322: difference was measured. We applied a (colour independent) correction to
323: match the spectrum to the measured broadband magnitudes.
324:
325: The resulting spectra are shown in Figure~\ref{ssspm_spec}. Assuming that our
326: correction was right, fluxes are accurate to 5-10\%, but in any case,
327: not worse than 40\% (which {\em can} be a colour dependent effect). As
328: all our corrections were smooth and the examination of the extracted
329: raw spectra showed that this not well understood effect is also smooth,
330: we are quite certain that we neither introduced nor removed fine
331: structure (e.g. emission or absorption lines) in the data.
332:
333: Both spectra were fitted with a black-body spectrum in the range 4300-6800{\AA}
334: (where our data are the most accurate). The fit values are 3810~K for the
335: bright one and 3600~K for the faint one. If our reduction truly reproduced
336: the correct continuum shape, the accuracy of these numbers is $\pm$100~K.
337: As we are not sure that we did not introduce a tilt in the spectra,
338: we can only say with high degree of confidence that the temperatures are
339: in the range of 3000-5000~K (clearly cool white dwarfs).
340:
341: \subsection{Reduction of EFOSC data}
342:
343: The three consecutive 300s exposures were combined to
344: reject cosmic ray defects, and reduced in a way similar to that detailed above.
345: The wavelength-calibration (by comparison to He-Ar lines) is accurate to
346: 2.3\AA rms, and flux-calibration was performed by comparison to the
347: standard star LTT2415. Contrary to the DFOSC observations however, the
348: EFOSC spectrograph did not give rise to unexpected variations between
349: exposures in the red part of the spectrum. The resulting spectrum of
350: SSSPM~J2231-7515 is shown in Figure~\ref{ssspm_fig3}.
351:
352: We have fit two black-body curves to the spectrum of Figure~\ref{ssspm_fig3}.
353: The solid line shows a fit to the red side ($\lambda>6000${\AA}), which has a
354: temperature of $T=3800$~K, but which fails to follow the blue side of the
355: spectrum. Fitting instead the blue end ($\lambda<6000${\AA}), gives a cooler
356: temperature of $T=3100$~K (dashed line), but which gives a poor fit in the
357: red. The study of cool white dwarf atmospheres by \citet{ber97}
358: employed H- and He atmospheres to fit $BRIJHK$
359: colors and H-alpha lines. They also often found that the observed $B$-band
360: flux was too faint for the best fit to $RIJHK$. This would suggest that an
361: additional source of opacity exists near the B-band, and that the higher
362: temperature value ($T=3800$~K) is a better estimate for the true
363: atmospheric temperature.
364:
365: There is a good agreement of the latter temperature value with that obtained
366: from the black-body fit to the DFOSC spectrum of SSSPM~J2231-7515
367: (Figure~\ref{ssspm_spec}). This confirms the corrections applied
368: in the flux calibration of the DFOSC data and suggests both white dwarfs have
369: equivalent black body temperatures $<$4000~K.
370:
371: \section{Distance estimates}
372:
373: \subsection{Distance estimate based on magnitude and colour}
374:
375: With the above temperatures, respectively of 3810~K and 3600~K
376: (3100~K to 3800~K), the newly discovered objects
377: are comparable to the coolest known white dwarf WD0346+246 with 3750~K
378: \citep{hod00,opp01a} for which a trigonometric parallax of 36$\pm$5~mas
379: (28$\pm$4~pc)
380: has been measured \citep{ham99}. If we assume our objects to have the same
381: physical properties (temperature, mass, chemical composition)
382: as WD0346+246, we can estimate their distance from a comparison of their
383: apparent $V$ magnitudes. With $V=19.06$ \citep{opp01a}, WD0346+246 is more than
384: two magnitudes fainter than our objects (16.60 and 16.87), and consequently
385: we get distance estimates of 9~pc and 10.2~pc. These distance estimates
386: have the
387: same relative uncertainty as for the comparison object, i.e. $\pm$1.3~pc and
388: $\pm$1.5~pc, respectively, and rely on the
389: assumption of identical physical properties, which is unlikely to be the
390: case.
391:
392: For an alternative distance estimate we can apply the photometric parallax
393: relation given in \citet{opp01b}:
394: \begin{equation}
395: M_{B_J}=12.73+2.58(B_J-R).
396: \end{equation}
397: With the $B_J$ magnitudes and $B_J-R$ colours from Table~\ref{sssdata}
398: we get 14.1~pc and 13.1~pc, respectively for the bright and faint component
399: of our cool white dwarf pair with an uncertainty of about 20\%.
400: All objects
401: listed in Table~1 of \citet{opp01b}, with comparable colour ($B_J-R>1.5$)
402: to our newly discovered objects, are at least two magnitudes fainter in
403: $B_J$. The fainter component, SSSPM~J2231-7515 is with $B_J-R=+1.75$ and
404: $R-I=+0.63$ very close to the colours of the two known extremely cool
405: white dwarfs F351-50 and WD0346+246 as shown in the colour-colour-diagram
406: of \citet{opp01b}.
407:
408: \subsection{Distance estimate based on kinematics and separation}
409:
410: From the angular separation we can make an estimate of the expected
411: differential proper motion due to orbital motion of the wide binary if we
412: make plausible assumptions for the total mass of the system and the
413: orbital characteristics. In Table~\ref{pmorb} we give an example of the
414: results for masses of both components respectively of 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8
415: solar masses in an assumed circular orbit perpendicular to the line of sight.
416:
417: A conservative estimate of the proper motion errors based on the formal
418: errors and on the change in proper motion with different numbers of
419: distinct epoch positions included in the solution (see Table~\ref{sssdata}),
420: gives 8~mas/yr. Since we measure zero differential proper motion within
421: these errors, we can conclude that for a circular orbit as above the distance
422: must be at least about 15~pc even allowing for some inclination of the orbit.
423: Only in the case of an almost edge-on orbital plane with respect to
424: the line of sight and both components located such that their orbital
425: motion manifests itself mainly in line-of-sight radial velocity, would we see
426: no differential proper motion for smaller ditances.
427:
428: We have also computed possible heliocentric space velocities
429: based on assumptions on distance and radial velocity of the cool white
430: dwarf pair. The distance estimates of about 10~pc to 15~pc, based on
431: magnitude and colour and on the angular separation and the not measurable
432: differential proper motion, already lead to rather large space velocities.
433: However, clear halo-like space velocities are only computed assuming 25~pc
434: to 30~pc distance, which is probably not realistic given the
435: magnitudes and temperature estimates.
436:
437: %\begin{displaymath}
438: %2^2=4
439: %\end{displaymath}
440:
441: \section{conclusions}
442:
443: A common proper motion pair with the very large proper motion of about
444: 1.9~arcsec has been discovered from SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey data. Both
445: objects, SSSPM~J2231-7514 and SSSPM~J2231-7515, were classified from
446: follow-up spectroscopy as featureless cool white dwarfs.
447: Effective temperatures of both objects were obtained
448: by fitting the flux-calibrated spectra with black-body models.
449: If the temperature estimates are correct, the newly discovered white
450: dwarfs belong to the small number
451: of presently known extremely cool white dwarfs with $T_{eff}<4000$~K.
452: With a distance of about 10~pc to 15~pc, obtained from comparison with other
453: known cool white dwarfs, they would also be the nearest objects of
454: that temperature class. A conservative temperature estimate of
455: $T_{eff}<5000$~K still makes the new objects interesting for follow-up
456: observations, since they would be only the second known double degenerates in
457: that temperature class within about 25 pc (after LHS~239 and LHS~240).
458: Currently, there are only 11 cool white dwarfs with $T_{eff}<5000$~K
459: and trigonometric parallaxes of less than 25~pc \citep{ber01}. All
460: presently known or suspected degenerates with $T_{eff}<4000$~K are at
461: trigonometric or photometric distances of more than 25~pc
462: \citep{ham99,iba00,har01,opp01b}.
463:
464: Further investigation of the new objects is obviously needed. A
465: trigonometric parallax measurement and further improvement of the
466: (differential) proper motion analysis of the wide binary
467: will allow a mass estimate. The trigonometric parallax will also
468: be important for the classification of the new pair of cool white
469: dwarfs as Galactic disk or halo components. From the current
470: estimates, based on the available data and some assumptions,
471: the objects might be among the coolest and oldest Galactic disk
472: white dwarfs, although we can not yet exclude the possibility
473: that they belong to the dark matter component of the Galactic halo.
474: Accurate photometry, including IR photometry is needed to constrain the
475: amount of absorption due to molecular hydrogen. Our first attempts to
476: estimate the temperature by black-body fits provided only preliminary
477: values. As shown by \citet{opp01a}, the physical parameters of cool
478: white dwarfs can only be obtained from fitting synthetic spectra to the
479: observed spectral energy distribution. Since the objects are
480: rather bright, higher resolution spectroscopy can be carried out
481: and one can attempt to measure their radial velocity if any lines
482: can be resolved.
483:
484:
485: \acknowledgments
486:
487: This research has made use of the SuperCOSMOS Sky Surveys, i.e. digitized
488: data obtained from scans of UKST and ESO
489: Schmidt plates. We would like to thank the SuperCOSMOS team for producing
490: such excellent data. We thank Nigel Hambly for helpful discussion and
491: for providing us with the $I$ band SSS data.
492:
493: RDS gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Deutsches Zentrum
494: f\"ur Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) (F\"or\-der\-kenn\-zeichen 50~OI~0001).
495: GPS acknowledges support under DLR grant 50 OR 9908.
496: MA gratefully acknowledge support from the
497: instrument center IJAF in Denmark.
498:
499: \begin{thebibliography}{}
500:
501: % The Chemical Evolution of Cool White Dwarfs and the Age of the Local
502: % Galactic Disk
503: \bibitem[Bergeron, Ruiz and Leggett(1997)]{ber97}
504: Bergeron, P., Ruiz, M. T., Leggett, S. K. 1997, \apjs, 108, 339
505:
506: % Photometric and spectroscopic analysis of cool white dwarfs with
507: % trigonometric parallax measurements
508: \bibitem[Bergeron, Leggett and Ruiz(2001)]{ber01}
509: Bergeron, P., Leggett, S. K., Ruiz, M. T. 2001, \apjs, 133, 413
510:
511: % The cool white dwarf luminosity function and the age of the
512: % Galactic disk
513: \bibitem[Leggett, Ruiz and Bergeron(1998)]{leg98}
514: Leggett, S.K., Ruiz, M.T., Bergeron, P. 1998, \apj, 497, 294
515:
516: % WD~0346+246: A very low luminosity, cool degenerate in Taurus
517: \bibitem[Hambly, Smartt and Hodgkin(1997)]{ham97}
518: Hambly, N.C., Smartt, S.J., Hodgkin, S.T. 1997, \apjl, 489, L157
519:
520: % On the parallax of WD 0346++246: a halo white dwarf candidate
521: \bibitem[Hambly \etal(1999)]{ham99} Hambly, N.C., Smartt, S.J., Hodgkin, S.T.,
522: Jameson, R.F., Kemp, S.N., Rolleston, W.R.J. and Steele, I.A. 1999,
523: \mnras, 309, L33
524:
525: % The SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey - I. Introduction and description
526: \bibitem[Hambly \etal(2001a)]{ham01a} Hambly, N.C., MacGillivray, H.T.,
527: Read, M.A., Tritton, S.B. \etal 2001a,
528: \mnras, 326, 1279
529:
530: % The SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey - II. Image detection, parametrization,
531: % classification and photometry
532: \bibitem[Hambly \etal(2001b)]{ham01b} Hambly, N.C., Irwin, M.J.,
533: MacGillivray, H.T. 2001b,
534: \mnras, 326, 1295
535:
536: % The SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey - III. Astrometry
537: \bibitem[Hambly \etal(2001c)]{ham01c} Hambly, N.C., Davenhall, A.C.,
538: Irwin, M.J., MacGillivray, H.T. 2001c,
539: \mnras, 326, 1315
540:
541: % Southern spectrophotometric standards.
542: \bibitem[Hamuy \etal(1992)]{ham92} Hamuy, M., Walker, A. R.,
543: Suntzeff, N. B., Gigoux, P., Heathcote, S. R. and Phillips, M. M. 1992,
544: \pasp, 104, 533
545:
546: % Southern spectrophotometric standards, 2
547: \bibitem[Hamuy \etal(1994)]{ham94} Hamuy, M., Suntzeff, N. B.,
548: Heathcote, S. R., Walker, A. R., Gigoux, P. and
549: Phillips, M. M. 1994, \pasp, 106, 566
550:
551: % Old and blue white-dwarf stars as a detectable source of
552: % microlensing events
553: \bibitem[Hansen(1998)]{han98} Hansen, B. 1998, Nature, 394, 860
554:
555: % A new very cool white dwarf discovered by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
556: \bibitem[Harris \etal(2001)]{har01} Harris, H.C., Hansen, B.M.S., Liebert, J.
557: \etal\, 2001, \apjl, 549, L109
558:
559: % Infrared spectrum of an extremely cool white-dwarf star
560: \bibitem[Hodgkin \etal(2000)]{hod00} Hodgkin, S.T., Oppenheimer, B.R.,
561: Hambly, N.C., Jameson, R.F., Smartt, S.J. and Steele, I.A. 2000,
562: Nature, 403, 57
563:
564: % Discovery of High Proper-Motion Ancient White Dwarfs: Nearby Massive
565: % Compact Halo Objects?
566: \bibitem[Ibata \etal(2000)]{iba00} Ibata, R., Irwin, M., Bienaym{\' e}, O.,
567: Scholz, R. and Guibert, J. 2000, \apjl, 532, L41
568:
569: % A Library of stellar spectra
570: \bibitem[Jacoby \etal(1984)]{jac84} Jacoby, G. H., Hunter, D. A. and
571: Christian, C. A. 1984, \apjs, 56, 257
572:
573: % UBVRI photometric standard stars in the magnitude range 11.5-16.0
574: % around the celestial equator
575: \bibitem[Landolt(1992)]{lan92} Landolt, A. U., 1992, \aj, 104, 340
576:
577: \bibitem[Luyten(1979)]{luy79} Luyten, W.J. 1979,
578: LHS Catalogue. Second Edition. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
579:
580: % A Survey for Faint Stars of Large Proper Motion Using Extra POSS II Plates
581: \bibitem[Monet \etal(2000)]{mon00} Monet, D.G., Fisher, M.D., Liebert, J.,
582: Canzian, B., Harris, H.C, and Reid, I.N. 2000, \aj, 120, 1541
583:
584: % Observations of Ultracool White Dwarfs
585: \bibitem[Oppenheimer \etal(2001a)]{opp01a} Oppenheimer, B.R., Saumon, D.,
586: Hodgkin, S.T., Jameson, R.F., Hambly, N.C., Chabrier, G., Fillipenko, A.V.,
587: Coil, A.L. and Brown, M.E. 2001, \apj, 550, 448
588:
589: % Direct Detection of Galactic Halo Dark Matter
590: \bibitem[Oppenheimer \etal(2001b)]{opp01b} Oppenheimer, B.R., Hambly, N.C.,
591: Digby, A.P., Hodgkin, S.T. and Saumon, D. 2001, Science, 292, 698
592:
593: % Cal{\' a}n-ESO proper-motion catalog
594: \bibitem[Ruiz \etal(2001)]{rui01} Ruiz, M.T., Wischnjewsky, M., Rojo, P.M. and
595: Gonzalez, L.E. 2001, \apjs, 133, 119
596:
597: % New high-proper motion survey in the Southern sky
598: \bibitem[Scholz \etal(2000)]{sch00} Scholz, R.-D., Irwin, M., Ibata, R.,
599: Jahrei{\ss}, H. and Malkov, O.Yu. 2000, \aap, 353, 958
600:
601: \end{thebibliography}
602:
603: \include{tab1}
604:
605: \include{tab2}
606:
607: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
608: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
609:
610: \begin{figure}
611: \plotone{f1.eps}
612: \caption{The $V$ band acquisition image taken at epoch 2001.47, where
613: the components of the high proper motion pair are marked together with
614: a field K-star which was exactly on
615: the slit and could be used for an additional check of the flux
616: calibration of the spectra.\label{ssspm_ima}}
617: \end{figure}
618:
619: \begin{figure}
620: \plotone{f2.eps}
621: \caption{Flux calibrated spectra obtained with the Danish 1.5m telescope
622: using DFOSC. The atmospheric A- and B-band, which we did not remove, are
623: the only features seen in the spectra. The red part of the spectra
624: ($>7000${\AA}) suffers from fringing. There are no spectral features
625: which could be associated with the objects. We classified both of
626: them as extremely cool white dwarfs. Black-body fits to the spectra
627: in the range 4300-6800{\AA} (shown by overlaid solid lines)
628: yielded temperatures of
629: 3810~K and 3600~K, respectively for the bright and faint
630: component.\label{ssspm_spec}}
631: \end{figure}
632:
633: \begin{figure}
634: \plotone{f3.eps}
635: \caption{Flux calibrated spectrum of the fainter component, SSSPM~J2231-7515,
636: obtained with EFOSC at the ESO 3.6m telescope. The solid
637: line shows a black-body fit ($T=3800$~K) to the red side ($\lambda>6000${\AA}),
638: which fails to follow the blue side of the spectrum, whereas the dashed line
639: represents a black-body fit ($T=3100$~K) to the blue end ($\lambda<6000${\AA}),
640: which gives a poor fit in the red.\label{ssspm_fig3}}
641: \end{figure}
642:
643:
644:
645: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
646: %% that appears after it.
647:
648: \end{document}
649:
650:
651: