1: \documentclass[11pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\singlespace
3: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
4:
5: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
6:
7: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
8:
9: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
10:
11:
12: \newcommand{\feii}{\ion{Fe}{2}}
13: \newcommand{\kms}{km\,s$^{-1}$}
14: \newcommand{\lb}{$\lambda$}
15: \newcommand{\hbeta}{H$\beta$}
16:
17:
18:
19: \slugcomment{Accepted to ApJ.}
20:
21:
22: \shorttitle{Infrared Fe\,II Emission in NLS1 Galaxies}
23: \shortauthors{Rodr\'{\i}guez-Ardila et al.}
24:
25:
26: \begin{document}
27:
28:
29: \title{Infrared \feii\ Emission in Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies}
30:
31:
32:
33: \author{A. Rodr\'{\i}guez-Ardila\altaffilmark{1} and S. M. Viegas}
34: \affil{Instituto Astron\^omico e Geof\'{\i}sico - Universidade de S\~ao
35: Paulo,
36: Av. Miguel Stefano 4200, CEP 04301-904, S\~ao Paulo, SP, Brazil}
37:
38: \author{M. G. Pastoriza}
39: \affil{Departamento de Astronomia - UFRGS. Av. Bento Gon\c calves 9500,
40: CEP 91501-970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil}
41:
42:
43: \and
44:
45: \author{L. Prato\altaffilmark{1}}
46: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
47: 90095-1562}
48:
49: \altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer at the Infrared Telescope facility, which
50: is operated by the University of Hawaii under contract from the National
51: Aeronautics and Space Administration}
52:
53:
54:
55: \begin{abstract}
56: We obtained 0.8-2.4 $\mu$m spectra at a
57: resolution of 320 km\,s$^{-1}$ of four narrow-line Seyfert
58: 1 galaxies in order to study the near-infrared properties of
59: these objects. We focus on the analysis of the \feii\ emission
60: in that region and the kinematics of the low-ionization broad lines.
61: We show that the 1$\mu$m \feii\ lines (\lb9997,
62: \lb10501, \lb10863 and \lb11126) are the strongest \feii\
63: lines in the observed interval.
64: For the first time, primary cascade lines of \feii\ arising from
65: the decay of upper levels pumped by Ly$\alpha$ fluorescence are
66: resolved and identified in active galactic nuclei.
67: Excitation mechanisms leading to the emission of the 1$\mu$m \feii\
68: features are discussed. A combination of Ly$\alpha$ fluorescence
69: and collisional excitation are found to be the main contributors.
70: The flux ratio between near-IR \feii\
71: lines varies from object to object, in contrast to what
72: is observed in the optical region. A good correlation
73: between the 1$\mu$m and optical \feii\
74: emission is found. This suggests that the upper $z^{\rm 4}F^{\rm 0}$ and
75: $z^{\rm 4}D^{\rm 0}$ levels from which the bulk of the optical
76: \feii\ lines descend are mainly populated by the transitions leading
77: to the 1$\mu$m lines. The width and profile shape of \feii\ \lb11127,
78: \ion{Ca}{2} \lb8642 and \ion{O}{1} \lb8446 are very similar but
79: significantly narrower than Pa$\beta$, giving
80: strong observational support to the hypothesis that the
81: region where \feii, \ion{Ca}{2} and \ion{O}{1}
82: are produced are co-spatial, interrelated kinematically and most
83: probably located in the outermost portion of the BLR.
84:
85:
86: \end{abstract}
87:
88:
89: \keywords{galaxies: active -- galaxies: Seyfert --
90: infrared: galaxies }
91:
92:
93: \section{Introduction}
94:
95: Narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies (hereafter NLS1s) are a
96: peculiar group of Seyfert 1 objects, recognized by
97: \citet{op85} for their optical properties:
98: (a) the broad components of the permitted lines have FWHM $<$
99: 2000 \kms, narrower that those of the classical Seyfert
100: 1s (i.e $\sim$4000 \kms), (b) the [\ion{O}{3}]/\hbeta\ ratio is
101: less than 3, and (c) usually, strong \feii\ emission dominates
102: the optical and ultraviolet spectrum. In the
103: soft and hard X-ray bands NLS1s also seem to have
104: peculiar properties. In most cases they are
105: characterized by a very steep spectrum and extreme
106: and rapid variability \citep{bbf96, ley99}. Up to now,
107: no single model can explain all of the observed properties
108: of these objects and much effort has recently been made
109: in order to understand their central engines. Variability
110: studies \citep{pet2000} point out that the ultimate cause
111: for their peculiar behavior may be attributable to a smaller black
112: hole mass ($\sim 10^{6}$ M$\odot$) together with a
113: near- or super-Eddington accretion rate.
114:
115: NLS1 galaxies are ideal objects for studying many features
116: which are clearly separated in their spectra but are
117: heavily blended in classical Seyfert 1s because of the broadness
118: of their permitted lines. Such is the case with the \feii\
119: emission lines, which produce a ubiquitous pseudo-continuum
120: from the ultraviolet through the near-infrared (near-IR).
121: This pseudo-continuum
122: carries a large amount of energy from the BLR
123: and is not yet well
124: understood. In the optical and UV regions, the \feii\
125: lines have been well studied \citep{wnw85, jol91, lip93}.
126: The main processes believed to contribute to the bulk of that
127: emission are continuum fluorescence
128: via UV resonance lines, self-fluorescence via overlapping
129: \feii\ transitions and collisional excitation. Nonetheless,
130: most models that include these processes cannot account
131: for the observed strength of the \feii\ lines. \citet{pen87},
132: \citet{sp98} and \citet{ver99} considered that fluorescent
133: excitation by Ly$\alpha$ may be important
134: in understanding the \feii\
135: spectrum in active galactic nuclei (AGNs), from the
136: ultraviolet to the IR. Hovewer, the lack of suitable
137: data in the latter region has hindered tests of
138: predictions.
139:
140: In the near-IR region, \feii\ emission lines have been mostly
141: observed in a variety of Galactic emission-line stars
142: \citep{hp89, rudy91, ham94}. At least in these sources,
143: the \feii\ lines redward of 7000 \AA\ can be attributed
144: to cascades from excited states which are pumped by
145: resonant absorption of \ion{H}{1} Ly$\alpha$. In all
146: cases, the strongest \feii\ lines are the ones located
147: at $\lambda$9997, $\lambda$10171, $\lambda$10490,
148: $\lambda$10501, $\lambda$10863 and $\lambda$11126,
149: emitted after the decay of the common upper term ($b~^{\rm 4}G$).
150: Because of their close proximity in wavelength, they are termed
151: the 1$\mu$m \feii\ lines. Other important \feii\ lines
152: also detected in Galactic sources are located in
153: the 8500$-$9300 \AA\ interval. They are primary cascade lines
154: descending from the upper 5p levels to the lower
155: $e^{\rm 4}D$ and $e^{\rm 6}D$ terms. With the advent of
156: a new generation of IR detectors with greater sensitivity
157: and resolution in this region, it is now possible to
158: search for these lines in AGNs, mainly in NLS1s, and
159: test the validity of the models of \feii\ emission. This
160: is a crucial step in understanding the physical processes
161: at work in the central engines of these objects.
162:
163: The only detection to date of the 1$\mu$m
164: \feii\ lines in an AGN was reported by
165: \citet[hereafter RMPH]{rudy00} in their 0.8 -- 2.5$\mu$m
166: spectrophotometric observation of I\,Zw\,1, the
167: archetypical NLS1 galaxy. Their data clearly reveal \feii\
168: $\lambda$9997, $\lambda$10501, $\lambda$10863 and
169: $\lambda$11126. Based on the absence of the crucial cascade
170: lines that feed the common upper state where the
171: 1$\mu$m \feii\ lines originate (assuming Ly$\alpha$ fluoresence as the
172: dominant mechanism), as well as the relatively low energy of that
173: state, RMPH suggest that the observed lines are collisionally
174: excited. No individual identification of \feii\ lines
175: in the 8500$-$9300 interval has yet been done in Seyferts.
176: But it is believed that the strong broad feature, centered at
177: \lb9220 \AA\ and observed in many AGNs is, in part,
178: due to \feii\ \citep{morward89}.
179:
180: In this paper we present mid-resolution ($\sim$ 320 km\,s$^{-1}$),
181: near-IR spectroscopy of four NLS1 galaxies (1H1934-063, Ark\,564,
182: Mrk\,335, and Mrk\,1044), not previously observed in
183: this spectral region, whose optical spectra reveal
184: strong to moderate \feii\ emission. In \S 2 we present
185: the observations, data reduction, and a brief description of
186: the most conspicuous spectroscopic features observed in each
187: galaxy. The excitation mechanism
188: of the \feii\ lines and the observed relative intensity are
189: discussed in \S 3. The kinematics of the BLR derived from
190: the low-ionization lines is treated in \S 4. Conclusions
191: are presented in \S 5.
192:
193:
194: \section{Observations, Data Reduction and Results} \label{observa}
195:
196: \subsection{Observations}
197:
198: The data were obtained at the NASA 3m Infrared Telescope
199: Facility (IRTF) on 2000 October 11 and 13 (UT)
200: with the SpeX facility spectrometer \citep{rayner98, rayner01}.
201: In the short wavelength
202: cross-dispersed mode, SpeX provides nearly continuous coverage
203: from 8200 \AA~ through 24000 \AA. Ten minute integrations,
204: nodding in an off-on-on-off source pattern, were combined to
205: produce final spectra. Typical total integration times ranged
206: from 30$-$40 minutes. A0V stars were observed
207: near targets to provide telluric standards at similar airmasses.
208: Seeing was $\sim$1.$''$0. An 0.$''$8 slit yielded an
209: instrumental resolution of 320 \kms.
210:
211: \subsection{Data Reduction}
212:
213: The spectral extraction and wavelength calibration procedures were
214: carried out using Spextool, the in-house software developed
215: and provided by the SpeX team for the IRTF
216: community \citep{cvr01}\footnote{Spextool is available from the
217: IRTF website: http://irtf.ifa.hawaii.edu/Facility/spex/spex.html}.
218: Each on-off source pair of observations was reduced individually
219: and the results summed to provide a final spectrum. A 1$''$ or
220: 3$''$ (in the case of 1H\,1934-063) aperture was used to extract the
221: spectra. Observations of an argon arc lamp enabled wavelength calibration
222: of the data; the RMS of the dispersion solution for the four target
223: galaxies was $\sim$2$\times$10$^{-5}\mu$m.
224:
225: Wavelength calibrated final target spectra were divided
226: by AOV stars observed at a similar airmasses. However, even small
227: differences in airmass between the target galaxies
228: and standard stars resulted in residuals, primarily evident in the
229: spectrum of Mrk 1044. The spectra were each multiplied
230: by a black body function corresponding to 10,000 K in order to
231: restore the true continuum shape of the targets.
232:
233: Spectra were flux calibrated by normalizing to the $K$ band
234: magnitude, 6.303 mag, of one of the observed A0V standard stars,
235: HD\,182761. We used the task STANDARD of the ONESPEC package of
236: IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by NOAO, which is operated
237: by AURA Inc., under contract to the NSF.} for this
238: purpose. In this process, a blackbody flux
239: distribution based on the magnitude and spectral
240: type of the star was employed. The error in the flux calibration
241: is $\sim$10\%, estimated from comparison with an overlapping
242: visual wavelength, red spectrum of 1H1934-063 at 0.8$-$0.95 $\mu$m
243: and previously published IR spectrophotometry for
244: MRK\,335 \citep{rudy82}. Nonetheless, this calibration is
245: not absolute. For this reason, the uncertainties quoted in this paper
246: reflects the errors derived from the S/N of the spectra.
247:
248: We correct the
249: spectra for Galactic extinction, as determined from the
250: {\it COBE/IRAS} infrared maps of \citet{sfd98}.
251: The value of the Galactic {\it E(B-V)} as well as basic
252: information for each object is listed in
253: Table~\ref{tabledata}. Finally, each spectrum
254: was shifted to rest wavelength. The value of $z$ adopted
255: was determined by averaging the redshift measured from the
256: strongest lines, usually \ion{O}{1} \lb8446, [\ion{S}{3}]
257: \lb9531, \feii\ \lb9997, Pa$\delta$, \ion{He}{1} \lb10830,
258: \ion{O}{1} \lb11287, Pa$\beta$, Pa$\alpha$ and Br$\gamma$.
259: In all cases, the radial velocities were in very good
260: agreement with the values reported in the literature.
261:
262:
263: \subsection{Results}
264:
265: The resulting extracted spectra in the wavelength
266: interval 0.8 -- 2.4$\mu$m, corrected for
267: redshift, are displayed in Figures~\ref{fig1} -- \ref{fig4}.
268: Identification of the known emission lines are
269: given for each spectrum. Prominent lines of \feii,
270: \ion{H}{1}, \ion{He}{1}, \ion{O}{1} and
271: \ion{Ca}{2} are observed in the four galaxies,
272: similar to those present in I\,Zw\,1. In addition,
273: \ion{He}{2} \lb10124, as well as lines of
274: [\ion{S}{3}] $\lambda\lambda$9070, 9531,
275: [\ion{S}{8}] \lb9912, [\ion{S}{9}] \lb12523,
276: [\ion{Fe}{2}] \lb12567, [\ion{Si}{10}] \lb14305
277: and [\ion{Si}{6}] \lb19630, not present in I\,Zw\,1,
278: are clearly detected in our data. A
279: detailed analysis of the narrow emission lines is
280: beyond the scope of this paper and will be discussed
281: in a future publication \citep{roar01a}.
282:
283: In order to measure the flux of the emission lines
284: we have assumed that they can be represented by a
285: single or a sum of Gaussian profiles. The
286: LINER routine (Pogge \& Owen 1993), a $\chi^{2}$
287: minimization algorithm that fits as many as eight
288: Gaussians to a profile, was
289: used for this purpose. Table~\ref{tableflux} list
290: fluxes and FWHM for the detected
291: \feii\ and other permitted lines. The FWHM values were
292: corrected for instrumental broadening ($\sim$ 320 \kms).
293: Except for \feii\ \lb10501\ and
294: \lb11127, which are isolated features, the
295: \feii\ lines are blendend with \ion{He}{1}
296: $\lambda$10830 plus Pa$\gamma$ (\feii\ $\lambda$10863)
297: or \ion{He}{2} $\lambda$10124 plus Pa$\delta$
298: (\feii\ $\lambda$9956, $\lambda$9997
299: and $\lambda$10171). For consistency, in these latter
300: cases the \feii\ and Paschen lines were constrained to
301: have the same width as those derived for \feii\ $\lambda$11127
302: and Pa$\beta$, respectively. Nonetheless, it is interesting
303: to note that even if no constraint was imposed, the
304: resulting line widths were in agreement with those found
305: for the isolated lines.
306:
307: The above procedure also allowed us to separate the
308: contribution of the NLR in those lines that are emitted
309: both in the BLR and the NLR. The results show that
310: in the Paschen lines, for instance, nearly half the total
311: flux is emitted by the NLR, very similar to what was found
312: by \citet{ro00} for the Balmer lines. Table~\ref{tablefluxbn}
313: list the fluxes and FWHM of the Pashen and \ion{He}{1}
314: \lb10839 lines that could be deblended into a narrow and
315: broad component. All the values of FWHM were corrected for
316: instrumental broading. In Mrk\,1044 it was not possible to find
317: a consistent solution for Pa$\delta$, Pa$\gamma$ and \ion{He}{1}
318: \lb10839 due to the lower S/N of the spectrum. For this
319: reason, the total fluxes associated with each of the latter three
320: lines are reported but must be understood as the sum of
321: the contribution of both the NLR and BLR.
322:
323: The presence of emission from the NLR is demonstrated by
324: the observation of strong [\ion{S}{3}] \lb9068, \lb9531.
325: In order to test the validity of the Gaussian
326: approximation, we used the technique applied by
327: \citet{ro00} to separate the narrow and broad flux in
328: Pa$\beta$, consisting of using
329: the profile of a line known to be emitted exclusively in
330: the NLR as a template. In the current work, we assumed that the width
331: of the narrow component of the permitted lines would be
332: similar to that of [\ion{S}{3}] \lb9531, the strongest
333: forbidden line observed. Based on this assumption, the
334: [\ion{S}{3}] \lb9531 line was scaled to the peak
335: intensity of a given permitted line and then subtracted off
336: in different proportions until the residuals consist
337: of a pure broad component with no absorption superimposed.
338: This procedure has the advantage of being free from
339: any assumption regarding the form of the line profiles.
340: The results were almost identical
341: to those obtained using the Gaussian approximation.
342: Figure~\ref{deblend} shows examples of the deblending
343: of Pa$\beta$ and the region around Pa$\delta$ for
344: Ark\,564.
345:
346: In the rest of this section we will give
347: brief descriptions of the most important features
348: observed in the NLS1 spectra.
349:
350: \subsubsection{1H\,1934-063}
351:
352: 1H\,1934-063 is a relatively poorly known NLS1
353: but an excellent laboratory to study many emission
354: line processes. Its optical spectrum, described by
355: \citet{ro00}, is full of both permitted and forbidden
356: lines. High ionization lines such as [\ion{Fe}{10}]
357: and [\ion{Fe}{14}] are very prominent. In the
358: near-IR it also displays a very
359: rich spectrum, both in permitted and forbidden lines
360: (see Figure~\ref{fig1}). \ion{He}{1} \lb10830,
361: Pa$\alpha$, Pa$\beta$, Pa$\delta$, \ion{O}{1} \lb8446,
362: \lb11287, the \ion{Ca}{2} triplet in emission and
363: the 1$\mu$m \feii\ lines are strong. In addition,
364: Br$\gamma$ and Br$\delta$ are clearly observed. A very
365: conspicous blend of low-ionization species, centered
366: in 9220 \AA\ is present. We identified \feii\ \lb9177, \lb9202
367: and \lb9256 as well as Pa9 \lb9227 as contributors to this
368: feature. \ion{Mg}{2} \lb9218, \lb9244 are probably present
369: but heavily blended with the Pa9. The continuum emission is very steep,
370: and follows a simple power-law form.
371: High-ionization, forbidden lines of [\ion{S}{8}],
372: [\ion{S}{9}], [\ion{Si}{10}], [\ion{Si}{7}] and
373: [\ion{Ca}{8}] are clearly visible as well as a
374: blip at the expected position of the
375: H$_{2}$ (1,0)S(1) \lb2.122$\mu$m. [\ion{S}{3}]
376: \lb9531 is, by far, the strongest forbidden line
377: detected.
378:
379:
380: \subsubsection{Ark\,564}
381:
382: Ark\,564 is a widely known and well studied NLS1 galaxy,
383: mainly in the UV and X-ray region \citep{bbf96, cren99,
384: com00, ball00}. It is the brightest NLS1 in the 2-10 keV range; the
385: {\it ROSAT} and {\it ASCA} observations reveal a complex
386: X-ray spectrum \citep{vaug99}. In the near-IR, this
387: object is also very rich in emission lines
388: (see Figure~\ref{fig2}), similar
389: in intensity to those of 1H\,1934-063. The permitted lines
390: are rather narrow, just slightly broader than the forbidden lines.
391: The 1$\mu$m lines
392: are strong and well resolved. Br$\gamma$ is clearly
393: detected as well as the molecular H$_{2}$ line (1,0)S(1)
394: at \lb2.121$\mu$m. The \ion{He}{1} \lb10830,
395: \ion{Ca}{2} triplet,
396: and \ion{O}{1} \lb8446, \lb11287
397: lines are all strong. The \lb9220 blend is
398: present with \feii\ \lb9177, \lb9202, \lb9256, Pa9 and
399: \ion{Mg}{2} \lb9244 clearly resolved. The forbidden line
400: spectrum is remarkable,
401: displaying strong low and high ionization lines such
402: as [\ion{S}{3}] \lb9068,9031, [\ion{C}{1}] \lb9850,
403: [\ion{S}{8}] \lb9912, [\ion{S}{2}] \lb10286,10322,
404: [\ion{S}{9}] \lb12523, [\ion{Si}{10}] \lb14305 and
405: [\ion{Si}{6}] \lb19630. The continuum emission rises
406: steeply from Pa$\beta$ to shorter wavelengths and is flat
407: between 1.5 and 2.6$\mu$m.
408:
409: \subsubsection{Mrk\,335}
410:
411: This object is a strong UV and X-ray source
412: \citep{bbf96, cren99, com00, ball00}. The near-IR
413: spectrum is dominated by \ion{He}{1} \lb10830
414: and the \ion{H}{1} Paschen lines (Figure~\ref{fig3}).
415: The 1$\mu$m \feii\ feature is not as strong as in the former two
416: galaxies. In addition, \feii\ \lb11127 and Pa$\alpha$ are
417: affected by atmospheric absorption. The \ion{Ca}{2}
418: triplet in emission, although present, is weak.
419: The \lb9220 feature is rather strong. From the Gaussian fitting,
420: we identified \feii\ \lb9177, \lb9202, \lb9256 and Pa9
421: as individual components of this blend. The continuum
422: emission of this galaxy is particularly interesting:
423: there is a broad minimum around 1.4$\mu$m and a rapid
424: rise towards longer wavelengths. It
425: probably represents the shift from a non-thermal
426: continuum to the thermal dust emission regime.
427: In their near-IR spectrophotometry
428: of Mrk\,335, \citet{rudy82} pointed out that the colours of this
429: object are among the reddest and most nonstellar
430: reported for any Seyfert Galaxy. They also conclude
431: that the small flux at 10$\mu$m and 20$\mu$m indicates that
432: Mrk\,335 does not contain large amounts of cool dust
433: and that the bulk of near-IR luminosity is produced
434: by a relatively small amount of warm dust.
435:
436: \subsubsection{Mrk\,1044} \label{mrk1044}
437:
438: The dominant feature in the spectrum
439: of this galaxy is \ion{He}{1} \lb10830
440: (Figure~\ref{fig4}). The 1$\mu$m
441: \feii\ lines are present but only
442: \lb9997 and \lb10501 are easily identified. \feii\
443: \lb11127 is severly affected by atmospheric absorption
444: so it is only possible to derive a lower limit for
445: the flux of this line. \ion{O}{1} \lb8446, \lb11287,
446: \ion{Ca}{2} \lb8498, \lb8542, \lb8662 and the \lb9220
447: feature are other important signatures of the BLR visible
448: in this spectrum. The NLR contribution, as in
449: Mrk\,335, is rather weak, with only [\ion{S}{3}] \lb9531
450: clearly observed. The continuum emission also shows
451: a broad minimum around 1.4$\mu$m. It is very
452: steep blueward and mostly flat redward of 1.4$\mu$m.
453:
454: \section{Discussion}
455:
456: The spectra presented here not only confirm the
457: presence of the 1$\mu$m \feii\ lines in NLS1s, but also
458: that they are the strongest and most prominent
459: \feii\ lines observed in the 0.8$-$2.4 $\mu$m interval.
460: This suggests that the 1$\mu$m \feii\ lines
461: are a common feature in these objects, similar to
462: the \feii\ bumps at both sides of H$\beta$ in the
463: optical region. In addition, fainter \feii\ lines
464: are clearly detected in the interval 8700$-$9300 \AA.
465: Our goal is to discuss the dominant excitation mechanism
466: for these lines and to confirm if, as in I\,Zw\,1,
467: collisional excitation is the most plausible one. For
468: this purpose, our data as well as information from other
469: wavebands will be used. It is also important to determine
470: if the relative intensities of the 1$\mu$m \feii\ lines
471: vary from object to object, or if, as in the optical region,
472: they are approximately constant.
473:
474:
475: \subsection{Excitation Mechanisms of the near-IR \feii\ lines}
476:
477: Excitation mechanisms invoked for the \feii\ emission
478: include continuum fluorescence via the UV resonance lines,
479: self-fluorescence via overlapping \feii\ transitions,
480: and collisional excitation. The latter two are thought
481: to contribute to the bulk of the \feii\ emission
482: \citep{wnw85}. Nonetheless, most models that take into
483: account these processes fail at reproducing the observed
484: intensity of UV and optical \feii\ lines.
485:
486: \subsubsection{What we have learned from stars}
487:
488: Based on the observation of \feii\ lines in low resolution
489: {\it IUE} spectra of cool giants and supergiants, \citet{joh83}
490: and \citet{jojor84} proposed a large set of pumping channels
491: for Ly$\alpha$ to excite \feii\ levels with
492: excitation energy around 10 eV (5p levels). The decay route
493: from these levels include $e^{\rm 4}D$ and $e^{\rm 6}D$ of
494: 3$d^{\rm 6}(^{\rm 5}D)5s$, which lie at wavelengths
495: $\sim$8000$-$9600 \AA. These two levels
496: decay giving rise to multiplets such as UV 399, 391, 380 ($\sim$
497: 2850\AA), 373 ($\sim$2770\AA) and 363 ($\sim$2530\AA), which supply
498: approximately 20\% of the total energy in \feii\ lines
499: between 2000 and 3000 \AA\ \citep{pen87}.
500: In addition, \citet{jojor84} proposed Ly$\alpha$
501: fluorescence to pump a further $^{\rm 4}G^{\rm 0}$ level at
502: $\sim$13 eV, whose primary decay to b$^{\rm 4}G$ produces the UV
503: lines at \lb1841, \lb1845, \lb1870 and \lb1873\footnote{In the \citet{jojor84}
504: paper, the primary decay from $^{\rm 4}G^{\rm 0}$ to b$^{\rm 4}G$
505: produce only \feii\ \lb1870,1873. Nonetheless, data from the Iron
506: Project also predict lines at \lb1841 and \lb1845 due to the fine
507: structure of that upper level \citep{nahar95, pra01}.
508: The current notation for $^{\rm 4}G^{\rm 0}$ is $(u,t)^{\rm 4}G^{\rm 0}$.}.
509: A subsequent cascade to $z^{\rm 4}F^{\rm 0}$
510: would produce the 1$\mu$m \feii\ lines, as is illustrated
511: in Figure~\ref{levels}.
512:
513: Near-infrared spectroscopy of young stellar objects \citep{hasim88,
514: hp89, ham94, kerc94}
515: has, in fact, shown most of the near-IR \feii\ emission features
516: associated to L$\alpha$ fluorescence. The flux ratios measured
517: from our objects agree with this scenario.
518:
519: \subsubsection{Is Ly$\alpha$ fluorescence also at work in AGNs?}
520:
521: In AGNs, a definitive test to confirm the presence of the
522: Ly$\alpha$ pumping has been elusive due to both the blending
523: of the broad lines and the lack of suitable data in the near-IR region.
524: Recently, \citet[hereafter SP98]{sp98},
525: using theoretical \feii\ emission-line strengths, derived by
526: considering all of the above four mechanisms, demonstrated that a key
527: feature associated with Ly$\alpha$ pumping is significant \feii\
528: emission in the wavelength interval 8500$-$9500 \AA. In particular,
529: their models predict strong \feii\ lines at \lb8490, \lb8927,
530: \lb9130, \lb9177 and \lb9203. Figure~\ref{feiilyalf} shows
531: an enlarged portion of the \lb8900$-$\lb9300 region for each of
532: the object's spectra, clearly displaying the latter three \feii\ lines
533: and a blip at the expected position of \feii\ \lb8927.
534: This result offers the first direct evidence of Ly$\alpha$
535: pumping in AGNs and will be discussed in detail in \citet{roar01b}.
536:
537: If Ly$\alpha$ fluorescence is also responsible for the
538: production of the 1$\mu$m lines, the feed lines \lb1841, \lb1845,
539: \lb1870 and \lb1873
540: should be observed (see Figure~\ref{levels}). We have searched
541: the {\it IUE} and {\it HST/FOS} public spectra available for the
542: objects studied here to look for emission lines at these four
543: positions. No significant emission was found, as is illustrated
544: in Figure~\ref{arkuv}, where the region around \lb1860 in
545: Ark\,564 and Mrk\,335 is shown.
546: The spikes detected at the expected positions are almost
547: at the noise level. Assuming that they actually correspond to
548: \lb1840,1844 and \lb1870,1873, Table~\ref{balance} gives the flux
549: upper limit measured for these features (column 2) and the strength
550: that they should need to have (assuming zero internal reddening)
551: in order to produced the observed 1$\mu$m lines (column 3).
552: The expected values were derived assuming a one-to-one relation
553: between the number of photons of the 1$\mu$m and UV \feii\ lines.
554: Column 4 of that same table lists the E(B-V) necessary to reduce
555: the expected UV flux to the observed value. It was derived
556: using the Galactic extinction law of
557: \citet{ccm89}. Since that the amount
558: of reddening should conceal other UV features that
559: are otherwise prominent, we discard this effect for explaining the
560: weakness of the feed UV lines. Another argument against
561: strong reddening is the presence of a steep blue continuum
562: in most of these objects.
563:
564: There is still the possibility that these lines are, in fact,
565: emitted but then efficiently destroyed within the BLR. But
566: following the
567: same line of reasoning of RMPH, other UV features should
568: also be affected by such a destruction mechanism. Since
569: Ly$\alpha$, \ion{He}{2} $\lambda$1640 and other important
570: UV lines are clearly visible, we ruled out
571: that hypothesis.
572:
573: We conclude that Ly$\alpha$ fluorescence cannot
574: be the only process responsible for the emission of the
575: 1$\mu$m \feii\ lines. From the observed strength
576: of the UV lines, that mechanism appears to have a minimal
577: contribution to the near-IR features.
578:
579: \subsubsection{Alternative mechanisms}
580:
581: An alternative process to the production of
582: the near-IR \feii\ emission is recombination. However,
583: in addition to the 1$\mu$m lines,
584: a myriad of other transitions should also be present
585: in the 0.8 -- 2.4$\mu$m interval, some of them as strong or
586: stronger than the ones around 1$\mu$m \citep{kur81}.
587: Their absence clearly rules out this hypothesis.
588:
589: Continuum fluorescence, first suggested by \citet{waok67},
590: has been a popular explanation for the presence of
591: strong \feii\ emission in Seyfert 1 galaxies and quasars.
592: In this process, the 5 eV levels of \feii\ are excited by
593: absorption of ultraviolet continuum photons in the
594: resonance-line transitions. Nonetheless, this process
595: very unlikely contribute to populate the upper b$^{\rm 4}G$
596: level because no resonant transitions connecting this level
597: to the ground levels have yet been identified.
598:
599: There are other two possible excitation mechanisms. The first
600: one takes advantage of the fact that the 1$\mu$m lines
601: are, by far, the strongest \feii\ lines observed in the
602: 0.8$-$2.4$\mu$m interval. Since they all descend from a common
603: upper level ($b~^{4}G$, see Figure~\ref{levels}), their presence
604: suggests that some sort of selective mechanism is operating
605: to populate that particular level. Collisional pumping from
606: the metastable $a~^{4}G$ level is, at least
607: qualitatively, a viable process to explain the strength of
608: these features in AGNs. The small energy separation between the two
609: levels involved ($\sim$3.57 eV), the high density of the
610: BLR gas (N$_{\rm e} \leq 10^{9}$ cm$^{-3}$) and the
611: temperature predicted for the \feii\ region by most models
612: ($\sim$8000 K) favors this mechanims. In order to
613: be efficient, the population of the level $a~^{4}G$ must
614: be significant, i.e. above the Boltzman population.
615: This can be done by the decay to $a~^{4}G$ from
616: another set of levels such as $^{\rm 4}F^{\rm 0}$.
617: A signature of this process is \feii\ emission
618: in the 1535$-$1550 \AA\ interval. The \feii\ line at \lb1534
619: (5$p^{\rm 4}F^{\rm 0}-a~^{4}G$) is a particular example of this
620: decay route. Unfortunately, its proximity to the strong
621: \ion{C}{4} \lb1548 feature may hamper the detection of that
622: emission. The $a~^{4}G$ levels can also be populated by decays
623: from $y^{\rm 4}H^{\rm 0}$. This route produces lines in
624: the 2430$-$2460 wavelength interval. It is also possible
625: that $b^{\rm 4}G$ be collisionally populated from the lower
626: $z^{\rm 4}F^{\rm 0}$. That requires high optical depths in
627: the strong optical and UV permitted transitions originating
628: from this latter level in order to keep it significantly populated.
629: This condition seems plausible because most optical and
630: UV \feii\ multiplets are rather strong in AGNs.
631:
632: The last possible process is to populate $b^{\rm 4}G$ directly
633: by decays from other levels previously pumped by Ly$\alpha$ fluorescence.
634: In particular, the upper $^{\rm 4}F^{\rm 0}$ level, after absorption
635: of a Ly$\alpha$ photon, may cascade directly to $b^{\rm 4}G$, emitting
636: \feii\ lines in the 2700$-$2770 \AA\ interval (\feii\ \lb2707,
637: \lb2739, \lb2765, \lb2769). In this case, no collisional excitation
638: of $b^{\rm 4}G$ is required. An inspection of the {\it IUE/HST}
639: spectra of Ark\,564, Mrk\,335 and Mrk\,1044 show evidence of
640: the above lines at the expected position, suggesting that this
641: process may also contribute to the 1$\mu$m \feii\
642: line intensities.
643:
644: \subsubsection{Conclusions}
645:
646: In summary, clear evidence of Ly$\alpha$ pumping of \feii\
647: is found from the observation of the primary cascade lines in
648: the 8900$-$9300 \AA\ interval, formed by the decay of the upper 5p
649: levels to the $e^{\rm 4}D$ and $e^{\rm 6}D$ levels. This result
650: confirms that fluorescence excitation by Ly$\alpha$ has an
651: active role in the \feii\ spectra of AGNs. Nonetheless,
652: contrary to what was previously suggested, this same process seems
653: to be insufficient to explain the
654: strength of the 1$\mu$m lines, the strongest of all \feii\ lines
655: in the 8000$-$24000 \AA\ region. This conclusion is drawn from the
656: weakness of the primary cascade lines that feed the upper term from which
657: the 1$\mu$m \feii\ emission originates. Our observations point
658: to a combination of collisional excitation and decays from
659: levels populated by Ly$\alpha$ photons to
660: produce the \feii\ spectrum in the near-IR.
661:
662: \subsection{Relative Intensities of the 1$\mu$m \feii\ Lines}
663:
664: One advantage of the 1$\mu$m \feii\ lines over the
665: corresponding emission in the optical region is that
666: most of the individual lines are clearly separated in
667: wavelength, allowing their measurement without the need
668: of constructing an \feii\ template to
669: quantify them. Although in most cases emission from
670: \ion{H}{1}, \ion{He}{1} and \ion{He}{2} is near the \feii\
671: lines, it is still possible to measure, at a good
672: confidence level, the flux of the individual components.
673:
674: In all cases our spectra show that $\lambda$9997
675: is the strongest \feii\ transition in the near-IR. The
676: relative fluxes of other \feii\ lines compared
677: to that of $\lambda$9997 are listed in Table~\ref{feiirat}.
678: We have also included for comparison, data taken
679: from RMPH for I\,Zw\,1 (column 6), from \citet{rudy91}
680: for LkH$\alpha$\,101 (column 7), and from \citet{kerc94} for
681: MWC 249 and R\,Mon (columns 8 and 9 respectively). The
682: last three objects are Galactic sources, well known for
683: their strong \feii\ emission lines in the near-IR,
684: which is believe to arise in a gas with physical
685: conditions similar to those found in AGNs.
686:
687: The 1$\mu$m \feii\ ratios vary from
688: object to object, as is seen in Table~\ref{feiirat}. Comparing
689: the values derived for our sample with those of I\,Zw\,1
690: (considered as the prototype NLS1), we found that, within errors,
691: 1H\,1934-063 is the most I\,Zw\,1-like. On the other hand, Mrk\,1044
692: deviates most significantly in regard to the \feii\
693: emission. The situation is
694: also highly discrepant when we compare the NLS1 ratios
695: to those of Galactic objects. No agreement between these two
696: groups can be seen. The ratios among
697: the Galactic sources look rather constant, in contrast to
698: the large scatter showed by the NLS1 data. \citet{rudy91}
699: had already noted the similarity of line ratios between
700: Lk\,H$\alpha$ 101 and $\eta$ Car, another Galactic source,
701: and argued that this may suggest that the same process gives
702: rise to the lines in both. They proposed Ly$\alpha$ fluorescence
703: as the dominant mechanism for the production of \feii\
704: but did not discard collisional excitation.
705:
706: It may be argued that the large scatter in \feii\ line
707: ratios is due to reddening, since none of the NLS1
708: spectra have been corrected for internal extinction
709: (the Galactic source line ratios all have been corrected).
710: However, the near-IR region is less affected by
711: reddening than the UV and optical regions and the wavelength
712: interval where the 1$\mu$m \feii\ features are located
713: is relatively small. Thus, one would expect that the
714: reddening is not important here. In addition, all the
715: objects have strong emission lines in the UV,
716: indicating that the reddening
717: is small. In order to completely avoid any reddening effect,
718: we have calculated line ratios that are very
719: close in wavelength and therefore insensitive to reddening.
720: Such is the case for \feii\ \lb9997/\lb10171, \feii\ \lb11127/\lb10863 and
721: \feii\ \lb10501/\lb10863. The results, also listed in
722: Table~\ref{feiirat}, follow the same trend, in the
723: sense that the line ratios vary from galaxy to galaxy
724: and also differ from the line ratios derived for the Galactic
725: sources. This variation is more clearly seen in
726: Figure~\ref{ratiosfeii}, where the line ratios are plotted
727: for the objects listed in Table~\ref{feiirat}. The large scatter
728: of the NLS1 data and the constancy among Galactic sources
729: is evident.
730:
731: The above results strongly contrast to what is observed
732: in the optical region, where the relative intensities of the
733: \feii\ lines in AGNs seems rather similar from object to
734: object. Apparently, the only difference between the optical \feii\
735: features of two given objects is the width of the individual
736: lines (unless a scale factor). This result was clearly illustrated
737: in \citet{phi78} by comparing the \feii\ emission in the region
738: 4400$-$5300 \AA\ of several Seyfert 1 galaxies. The \feii\
739: emission in that same interval for I\,Zw\,1,
740: Ark\,564 and 1H\,1934-063 is shown in Figure~\ref{optfeii}.
741: Note how similar are the \feii\ multiplets
742: in these objects. For that reason, usually I\,Zw\,1, which has
743: one of the narrowest permitted lines in Seyfert 1s, is used as a
744: template to determine the strength of the \feii\ emission
745: \citep{bogre91, roar00}.
746:
747: The question that arises now is if there
748: is a correlation between the strength of the \feii\ in
749: the optical and near-IR. Figure~\ref{feiicorr} shows
750: FeII/\hbeta\ versus \feii\ IR/Pa\,$\delta$. The former is
751: the flux of the \feii\ emission centered in $\lambda$4570,
752: which scales with the total optical \feii, normalized to
753: \hbeta, while the latter is the sum of the \feii\ lines
754: \lb9997, \lb10171 and \lb10501, normalized
755: to the Pa$\delta$ flux. Except for Mrk\,335 (the galaxy with the
756: smallest \feii/\hbeta), \feii\ \lb9997 seems to scale
757: with the corresponding optical \feii. That correlation is
758: very important, since most of the optical \feii\ lines
759: in the wavelength interval 4400$-$5300 arise from
760: the same upper two upper levels $z^{\rm 4}F^{\rm 0}$ and
761: $z^{\rm 4}D^{\rm 0}$. Although no definitive conclusions
762: can be drawn due to the reduced number of points,
763: Figure~\ref{feiicorr} clearly suggest that the optical
764: \feii\ emission is directly linked to the 1$\mu$m \feii\
765: lines. In this scenario, decays from $b^{\rm 4}G^{\rm 0}$ largely
766: contribute to the population of those two levels. Although
767: a detailed balance between the energy carried by the near-IR
768: and optical \feii\ lines is far from the scope of this paper,
769: this result is important for current \feii\ modeling.
770:
771: Factors such as different optical depth effects and, possibly,
772: different sensitivities to physical parameters between the
773: near-IR and optical \feii\ lines can be invoked
774: to explain why the line ratios in the former region present
775: more scatter than those of the latter. Additional observations
776: in a larger sample of objects and a more accurate modeling
777: of the 1$\mu$m \feii\ lines are needed to explain this trend.
778: It is also interesting
779: to understand why Mrk\,335 deviates so much from the other
780: NLS1s. While its optical \feii\ is rather low for a typical
781: NLS1s, its near-IR \feii\ ranks it as a strong
782: emitter.
783:
784: \section{Kinematics of the BRL region} \label{kin}
785:
786: The quality and spectral resolution of the SpeX data
787: allow us to study and compare, for the first time, the
788: form and width of the different near-IR permitted emission
789: line profiles of AGNs, and in particular of NLS1s. This
790: is important for at least two reasons. First,
791: it has been argued (from both theoretical models and
792: observational grounds) that low-ionization lines such as
793: \feii, \ion{O}{1}, \ion{Mg}{2}, \ion{Ca}{2} and Balmer
794: lines are formed in a distinct, separate zone (most
795: probably the outer part of the BLR) from the place
796: where most high-ionization lines (i.e Ly$\alpha$,
797: \ion{He}{2}, \ion{Ca}{4}) are produced \citep{csdjp86, rms97}.
798: Differences in line widths between low
799: and high ionization lines are usually interpreted as
800: evidence of this stratification, provided the velocity
801: field does not differ strongly from gravitationally
802: bound Keplerian or virial motion, as seems to be
803: the case for most AGNs \citep{pw99}.
804: Second, the presence of asymmetries in the line
805: profiles helps to distinguish between radial and
806: rotational motions, setting constrains on the
807: velocity field of the BLR.
808:
809: Although the visible and UV spectral regions in AGNs
810: are full of permitted emission lines, usually they are
811: severely blended, affecting the placement of
812: the continuum level and the separation of the individual
813: profiles. Such is the case with the \feii\
814: lines, which form a pseudo-continuum even in NLS1s
815: because of their close proximity. The near-IR region is
816: promising in this respect (if the resolution is high enough).
817: Lines such as \ion{Ca}{2}
818: \lb8664, \feii\ \lb11127, \ion{O}{1} \lb11287 and
819: Pa$\beta$ are completely isolated or mildly blended,
820: making their separation and the analysis of their
821: emission profiles easier.
822:
823: For the above reasons we have chosen \feii\ \lb11127,
824: \ion{O}{1} \lb11287, \ion{O}{1} \lb8446 and \ion{Ca}{2}
825: \lb8664 as representative of low-ionization BLR lines, and
826: Pa$\beta$ as an example of a BLR recombination line.
827: By comparing their emission line profiles, we expect to
828: get clues about the structure and kinematics of
829: the emitting region. In addition,
830: we have used the [\ion{S}{3}] \lb9531 profile to
831: represent the velocity field of the Narrow Line
832: Region (NLR).
833:
834: The observed profiles of Pa$\beta$, \feii\ \lb11127,
835: \ion{O}{1} \lb11286 and [\ion{S}{3}] \lb9531 are shown
836: in velocity space in Figure~\ref{profiles}.
837: In order to easily compare them, the peak
838: intensity of each line has been normalized to unity.
839: In all cases, Pa$\beta$ has been stripped of the
840: narrow component by subtracting the contribution
841: from the NLR according to the procedure explained
842: in \S \ref{observa}. Since the \feii\ and
843: the \ion{O}{1} emission are features restricted to
844: the BLR, there is no need to determine such a
845: contribution in these two lines.
846:
847: The results are surprising. Except for Mrk\,1044,
848: \feii\ and \ion{O}{1} share almost the same velocity
849: field and display very similar line profiles. However,
850: they are significantly narrower than Pa$\beta$. In
851: fact, they are just slightly broader than [\ion{S}{3}]
852: \lb9531. Assuming that this latter line is formed
853: in the inner portion of the NLR (its critical density,
854: $N_{c}$, is $\sim 10^{7.5}$ cm$^{-3}$),
855: the small width of \feii\ and \ion{O}{1} indicates
856: that we are probably looking at the outer boundaries
857: of the BLR. The result obtained for Mrk\,1044 can
858: be explained if we recall that in
859: Figure~\ref{profiles} the \feii\ profile plotted
860: corresponds to that of \lb10501 instead of \lb11127, because
861: this latter line is severely affected by atmospheric
862: absorption (see \S \ref{mrk1044}).
863: \feii\ \lb10501 is, in fact, a blend of two \feii\ lines
864: located at \lb10491 and \lb10501. Observations in
865: stars \citep{rudy91} show that the latter line is about 5 times
866: stronger than the former (in which case the effect of \lb10491
867: on the blend width would be negligible). A lower ratio may cause
868: \lb10501 to appear broader, as it seems to be the case
869: for Mrk\,1044 as well as for Ark\,564
870: (see Table~\ref{tableflux}).
871:
872: Assuming that the clouds emitting the broad lines
873: are gravitationally bound to the central mass
874: concentration and that the velocity field is Keplerian,
875: Figure~\ref{profiles} clearly supports the hypothesis
876: that \feii\ and \ion{O}{1} are emitted in the outer part
877: of the BLR while most of the Pa$\beta$ flux is formed
878: in the intermediate portion of this region.
879: This result is compatible with the physical conditions
880: needed to form permitted \feii\ and \ion{O}{1}, i.e. neutral
881: gas strongly shielded from the incident ionizing
882: radiation of the central source, conditions which can
883: only be met deeper within the neutral zone of the
884: outermost part of the BLR.
885:
886: The above results seem to contradict that of \citet{morward89},
887: who compared the H$\alpha$ and \ion{O}{1} \lb8446 line profiles
888: in a sample of 12 objects. They found no evidence for
889: differences between the profiles of these two lines.
890: Nonetheless, recall that Pa$\beta$ is less affected than
891: H$\alpha$ by radiation transport effects. When crossing the BLR,
892: H$\alpha$ photons produced in inner higher velocity clouds
893: are more likely to be absorbed than Pa$\beta$ photons. Thus,
894: the H$\alpha$ line probes the outer low velocity clouds, while
895: the Pa$\beta$ profile shows the contribution from inner high
896: velocity clouds. For the above reason, we expect that
897: Pa$\alpha$ be broader than H$\alpha$ as well as broader
898: than low ionization lines such as \ion{O}{1} and \feii.
899: The most important point here is that Figure~\ref{profiles}
900: shows that low-ionization BLR lines are emitted almost
901: at the border between the BLR and NLR.
902:
903: Another interesting result that can be drawn from
904: Figure~\ref{profiles} is the difference in the
905: form of the profiles from object to object: in
906: 1H\,1934-063 they are typically Gaussian while in Ark\,564
907: they are mostly Lorentzian, with Mrk\,335 and Mrk\,1044
908: being intermediate cases. This is valid not only for Pa$\alpha$
909: but also for \feii\ and \ion{O}{1}. Since the spectra were
910: taken at the same resolution, with the same telescope and setup, this
911: clearly indicates differences in the velocity fields
912: of the objects.
913:
914: It is also possible to probe weakly ionized material within
915: the BLR by means of \ion{Ca}{2} \lb8664, one of the Ca
916: near-IR triplet lines that is perfectly isolated and has
917: good S/N in our data. The observed \ion{Ca}{2} \lb8664
918: is compared to that of \ion{O}{1} \lb8446 in Figure~\ref{caii}.
919: Clearly, these two lines have very similar form and width,
920: indicating that they share the overall
921: kinematics of the region where they are
922: emitted. This was already pointed out by \citet{pe88} in
923: his study of the \ion{Ca}{2} and \ion{O}{1} lines in
924: 14 out of 40 AGNs for which simultaneous emission of
925: these two ions was found. Here, our results not only
926: agree with those of \citet{pe88}, but also extend
927: that analysis to the \feii\ and show that those
928: three lines should have similar kinematics.
929: Due to the high complexity the \feii\ atom, its spectrum
930: is far from being understood. Information derived for
931: \ion{O}{1} or \ion{Ca}{2} (i.e. column density and ionization
932: parameters) provide valuable constraints for modelling the \feii\
933: atom, given that these species seem to form from
934: the same ensemble of clouds.
935:
936: The importance of the \ion{Ca}{2}
937: emission as a valuable diagnostic of the the BLR is
938: stressed by \citet{ferper89}. Using photoionization
939: models that reproduce well both the high and low ionization
940: line intensities, they found that clouds with extremely
941: high column densities (N$_{\rm e} \sim$ 10$^{25}$ cm$^{-2}$)
942: are needed to emit \ion{Ca}{2}. The large N$_{\rm e}$ suggests
943: that the clouds might be a wind or corona above a star or
944: accretion disk. It is well known that a wind scenario
945: usually produces asymmetries in the observed profiles.
946: The \ion{Ca}{2} line profiles in Ark\,564 marginally
947: show evidences of assymetries towards the blue (Figure~\ref{caii},
948: upper right panel). High-resolution spectroscopy around
949: this region is highly desirable to find additional clues
950: about the kinematics of the outer portion of the BLR.
951: Our results stress the kinematic connection
952: between the low ionization species and confirm previous
953: claims that the understanding of the mechanisms leading to
954: the formation of the \feii\ and \ion{Ca}{2} lines is crucial
955: for solving the puzzle associated with the geometry and
956: physical conditions of the outer parts of the BLR.
957:
958: In summary, the comparison of the near-IR broad emission
959: line profiles definitively shows the presence of a stratification
960: within the BLR. Low-ionization lines such as \feii, \ion{O}{1}
961: and \ion{Ca}{2} are emitted in the outer edge of the BLR.
962: Pa$\beta$ emission, on the other hand, maps the velocity field
963: of the inner portions of the BLR.
964:
965: \section{Conclusions}
966:
967: We have analyzed four NLS1 spectra in the wavelength range
968: 0.8 -- 2.4$\mu$m in order to study the \feii\ emission and
969: the kinematics of the BLR. The results show that the \feii\
970: emission in the 8500$-$9300 \AA\ interval and around
971: 1$\mu$m are common features of this class of AGNs. The
972: \feii\ lines in the former interval are, for the first time,
973: resolved in this type of object. Since they are primary cascades of the
974: upper 5p levels pumped by Ly$\alpha$ fluorescence, our
975: data offer clear observational evidence for the presence of
976: this excitation mechanism in AGNs. The \feii\ lines located
977: at \lb9997, \lb10501, \lb10863 and \lb11127, which share
978: the same upper and lower levels ($b^{\rm 4}G$ and $z^{\rm 4}F^{\rm 0}$,
979: respectively), are very prominent and the strongest \feii\ lines
980: in the four spectra. Although Ly$\alpha$ fluorescence
981: indirectly contributes to their production, that
982: mechanism cannot explain their full strength because of the
983: weakness of the UV \feii\ lines that feed the upper $b^{\rm 4}G$
984: level. Collisional ionization, mainly from the $a^{\rm 4}G$ and
985: $z^{\rm 4}F^{\rm 0}$ levels, is suggested as an additional
986: mechanism that plays an active role in exciting the 1$\mu$m
987: \feii\ lines.
988:
989: The near-IR \feii\ line ratios (i.e. \lb9997/\lb10501 and
990: \lb10501/\lb10863) show a large scatter from
991: object to object, contrary to what is observed in the
992: optical region. Nonetheless, the apparent good correlation
993: found between the \feii\ emission of these two wavelength
994: intervals supports a common origin. Since most of
995: the optical \feii\ multiplets originate in transitions
996: from $z^{\rm 4}F^{\rm 0}$, that level would be mainly
997: populated by the decay from $b^{\rm 4}G$.
998:
999: The emission line profiles of \feii,
1000: \ion{O}{1} and \ion{Ca}{2} are very similar in form and
1001: width but significantly narrower than that of Pa$\beta$.
1002: This strongly suggests that the \ion{Ca}{2}, \feii\ and
1003: \ion{O}{1} regions are co-spatial and kinematically linked.
1004: Moreover, because their profiles are just slightly broader
1005: than that of [\ion{S}{3}] \lb9531, low ionization BLR lines
1006: are most likely formed in the outermost portion of
1007: the BLR. This is compatible with the physical conditions
1008: required to form them: cool gas with high column
1009: densities that provides a shield from the incident
1010: ultraviolet continuum of the central source and a location
1011: deep, within the neutral zone of the BLR. The larger
1012: width of the Paschen lines indicates that they are
1013: suitable for mapping the gas located at intermediate positions
1014: in the BLR.
1015:
1016: Given the high complexity of the \feii\ atom and its ubiquitous
1017: emission in AGNs, only detailed model calculations that take into
1018: account all possible excitation mechanisms and transitions among
1019: the levels can shed some light on the dominant processes involved
1020: in the excitation of this atom. The data presented here
1021: provide valuable constraints for understanding this complex emission.
1022:
1023:
1024: \acknowledgments
1025:
1026: We thank the referee, Dr. Fred Hamann, for his useful and
1027: thoughtful comments that helped to improve this manuscript.
1028: We also wish to thank the IRTF staff, support scientist Bobby Bus,
1029: and telescope operator Dave Griep for contributing to a productive
1030: observing run. Mike Cushing provided patient assistance with the
1031: xspextool software. This research has been supported by the
1032: Funda\c c\~ao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de S\~ao Paulo $-$
1033: FAPESP, under contract 00/01020-5 and PRONEX grants 662175/1996-4
1034: and 7697100300. We acknowledge the use the Atomic
1035: Line List v2.04 (http://www.pa.uky.edu/~peter/atomic/).
1036:
1037:
1038: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1039:
1040: \bibitem[Ballantyne, Iwasawa \& Fabian(2000)]{ball00} Ballantyne, D.
1041: R.,
1042: Iwasawa, K., and Fabian, A. C. 2000, Astro-ph/0011360.
1043: \bibitem[Boller, Brandt \& Fink(1996)]{bbf96} Boller, Th., Brandt,
1044: W. N. and Fink, H. 1996, \aap, 305, 53
1045: \bibitem[Boroson \& Green(1991)]{bogre91} Boroson, T. A., and
1046: Green, R. F. 1991, \apjs, 80, 109
1047: \bibitem[Cardelli, Clayton \& Mathis(1989)]{ccm89} Cardelli, J. A.,
1048: Clayton, G. C., and Mathis, J. S. 1989, \apj, 345, 245
1049: \bibitem[Collin-Souffrin et al.(1986)]{csdjp86} Collin-Souffrin, S.,
1050: Dumont, S., Joly, M., and P\'equignot, D. 1986, \aap, 166, 27
1051: \bibitem[Comastri et al.(2001)]{com00} Comastri, A., Stirpe, G. M.,
1052: Vignali, C., Brandt, W. N., Leighly, K. M., Fiore, F.,
1053: Guainazzi, M., Matt, G., Nicastro, F., Puchnarewicz, E. M.,
1054: and Siemiginowska, A. 2001, \aap, 365, 400
1055: \bibitem[Crenshaw et al.(1999)]{cren99} Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer,
1056: S. B., Boggess, A., Maran, S. P., Mushotzky, R. F., and
1057: Wu, C. 1999, \apj, 516, 750
1058: \bibitem[Cushing, Vacca \& Rayner(2001)]{cvr01} Cushing, M. C., Vacca,
1059: W. D., and Rayner, J. T. 2001, PASP, In prep.
1060: \bibitem[Ferland \& Persson(1989)]{ferper89} Ferland, G. J., and Persson
1061: S. E. 1989, \apj, 347, 656
1062: \bibitem[Hamann \& Simon(1988)]{hasim88} Hamann, F., and Simon, M. 1988,
1063: \apj, 327, 876
1064: \bibitem[Hamann \& Persson(1989)]{hp89} Hamann, F., and Persson,
1065: S. E. 1989, \apjs, 71, 931
1066: \bibitem[Hamann et al.(1994)]{ham94} Hamann, F., DePoy, D. L.,
1067: Johansson, S., and Elias, J. 1994, \apj, 422, 626
1068: \bibitem[Johansson(1983)]{joh83} Johansson, S. 1983, \mnras, 205, 71P
1069: \bibitem[Johansson \& Jordan(1984)]{jojor84} Johansson, S., and
1070: Jordan, C. 1984, \mnras, 210, 239
1071: \bibitem[Joly(1991)]{jol91} Joly, M. 1991, \aap, 242, 49
1072: \bibitem[Kelly, Rieke \& Campbell(1994)]{kerc94} Kelly, D. M., Rieke, G. H.,
1073: and Campbell, B. 1994, \apj, 425, 231
1074: \bibitem[Kurucz(1981)]{kur81} Kurucz, R. 1981, SAO Spec. Rep., No. 390
1075: \bibitem[Leighly(1999)]{ley99} Leighly, K. M. 1999, \apjs, 125, 317
1076: \bibitem[Lipari, Terlevich \& Macchetto(1993)]{lip93} Lipari, S.,
1077: Terlevich, R., and Macchetto, F. 1993, \apj, 406, 451
1078: \bibitem[Morris \& Ward(1989)]{morward89} Morris, S. L., and Ward, M. J.
1079: \apj, 340, 713
1080: \bibitem[Nahar(1995)]{nahar95} Nahar, S. N. 1995, \aap, 293, 967
1081: \bibitem[Osterbrock \& Pogge(1985)]{op85} Osterbrock, D. E. and
1082: Pogge, R. W. 1985, \apj, 297, 166
1083: \bibitem[Penston(1987)]{pen87} Penston, M. V. 1987, \mnras, 229, 1p
1084: \bibitem[Persson(1988)]{pe88} Persson, S. E. 1988, \apj, 330, 751
1085: \bibitem[Peterson \& Wandel(1999)]{pw99} Peterson, B., and Wandel, A.
1086: 1999, \apjl, 521, L95
1087: \bibitem[Peterson et al.(2000)]{pet2000} Peterson, B., McHardy, I. M.,
1088: Wilkes, B. J., Berlind, P., Bertram, R., Calkins, M., Collier, S.
1089: J., Huchra, J. P., Mathur, S., Papadakis, I., Peters, J., Pogge, R. W.,
1090: Romano, P., Tokarz, S., Uttley, P., Vestergaard, M., and Wagner,
1091: R. M. 2000, \apj, 542, 161
1092: \bibitem[Phillips(1978)]{phi78} Phillips, M. M. 1978, \apj, 226, 736
1093: \bibitem[Pogge \& Owen(1993)]{poo93} Pogge, R. W., and Owen, J. M.
1094: 1993, OSU Internal Report 93-01
1095: \bibitem[Pradhan(2001)]{pra01} Pradhan, A . K. 2001, Private communication.
1096: \bibitem[Rayner et al.(1998)]{rayner98} Rayner, J. T., Toomey, D. W.,
1097: Onaka, P. M., Denault, A. J., Stahlberger, W. E.,
1098: Watanabe, D. Y., and Wang, S.-I. 1998, Infrared Astronomical Instrumentation,
1099: ed. A. M. Fowler Proc. SPIE, 3354, 468
1100: \bibitem[Rayner et al.(2001)]{rayner01}Rayner, J. T., Toomey, D. W.,
1101: Onaka, P. M., Denault, A. J., Stahlberger, W. E.,
1102: Watanabe, D. Y., and Wang, S.-I. 2001, PASP, In prep.
1103:
1104: \bibitem[Rodr\'{\i}guez-Ardila, Pastoriza \& Donzelli(2000)]{roar00}
1105: Rodr\'{\i}guez-Ardila, A., Pastoriza, M. G., and Donzelli, C. J.
1106: 2000, \apjs, 126, 63
1107: \bibitem[Rodr\'{\i}guez-Ardila et al.(2000)]{ro00} Rodr\'{\i}guez-Ardila,
1108: A., Binette, L., Pastoriza, M. G., and Donzelli, C. J. \apj, 538, 581
1109: \bibitem[Rodr\'{\i}guez-Ardila et al.(2001a)]{roar01a} Rodr\'{\i}guez-Ardila,
1110: A., Viegas, S., Pastoriza, M. G., and Prato, L. 2001a. {\it in Prep.}
1111: \bibitem[Rodr\'{\i}guez-Ardila et al.(2001b)]{roar01b} Rodr\'{\i}guez-Ardila,
1112: A., Viegas, S., Pastoriza, M. G., and Prato, L. 2001b. {\it in Prep.}
1113:
1114: \bibitem[Rodr\'{\i}guez-Pascual, Mass-Hesse \& Santos-Ll\`eo(1997)]{rms97}
1115: Rodr\'{\i}guez-Pascual, P. M., Mass-Hesse, J. M., and Santos-Ll\`eo,
1116: M. 1997, \aap, 327, 72
1117: \bibitem[Rudy et al.(1982)]{rudy82} Rudy, R. J., Jones, B., Le Van, P.
1118: D.,
1119: Puetter, R. C., Smith, H. E., Willner, S. P., and Tokunaga, A. T.
1120: 1982, \apj, 257, 570
1121: \bibitem[Rudy et al.(1991)]{rudy91} Rudy, R. J., Erwin, P.,
1122: Rossano, G. S., and Puetter, R. C. 1991, \apj, 383, 344
1123: \bibitem[Rudy et al.(2000)]{rudy00} Rudy, R. J., Mazuk, S., Puetter,
1124: R. C., and Hamann, F. 2000, \apj, 539, 166 (RMPH)
1125: \bibitem[Schlegel, Finkbeiner \& Davis(1998)]{sfd98} Schlegel, D. J.,
1126: Finkbeiner, D. P., and Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
1127: \bibitem[Sigut \& Pradhan(1998)]{sp98} Sigut, T. A. A. and Pradhan,
1128: A. K. 1998, \apjl, 499, L139 (SP98)
1129: \bibitem[Vaughan et al.(1999)]{vaug99} Vaughan, S., Reeves, J.,
1130: Warwick, R., Edelson, R. 1999, \mnras, 309, 113
1131: \bibitem[Wampler \& Oke(1967)]{waok67} Wampler, E. J., and Oke, J. B.
1132: 1967, \apj, 148, 695
1133: \bibitem[Verner et al.(1999)]{ver99} Verner, E. M., Verner, D. A.,
1134: Korista, K. T., Ferguson, J. W., Hamann, F., and Ferland, G. J.
1135: 1999, \apjs, 120, 101
1136: \bibitem[Wills, Netzer \& Wills(1985)]{wnw85} Wills, B. J., Netzer, H.,
1137: and Wills, D. 1985, \apj, 288, 94
1138:
1139:
1140:
1141: \end{thebibliography}
1142:
1143: \clearpage
1144:
1145: \begin{figure}
1146: \plotone{f1.ps}
1147: \caption{Near-IR spectrum of the NLS1 galaxy 1H\,1934-063 in rest
1148: wavelengths. The upper panel shows the spectrum in the wavelength
1149: interval 0.8--2.4$\mu$m, and the box in the upper right a zoom of
1150: the K-band spectrum, with the identification of the most important
1151: emission lines. The lower panel displays the spectrum around
1152: 1$\mu$m and identifies the \feii\ and other permitted and forbidden
1153: lines present in this region. \label{fig1}}
1154: \end{figure}
1155:
1156: \clearpage
1157:
1158: \begin{figure}
1159: \plotone{f2.ps}
1160: \caption{The same as Figure~\ref{fig1} for Ark\,564. \label{fig2}}
1161: \end{figure}
1162:
1163: \clearpage
1164:
1165: \begin{figure}
1166: \plotone{f3.ps}
1167: \caption{The same as Figure~\ref{fig1} for Mrk\,335. \label{fig3}}
1168: \end{figure}
1169:
1170: \clearpage
1171:
1172: \begin{figure}
1173: \plotone{f4.ps}
1174: \caption{The same as Figure~\ref{fig1} for Mrk\,1044. \label{fig4}}
1175: \end{figure}
1176:
1177:
1178: \clearpage
1179: \begin{figure}
1180: \plotone{f5.ps}
1181: \caption{Example of the deblending procedure applied to Pa$\beta$ and
1182: Pa$\delta$ for Ark\,564. The histogram is the data and the thick
1183: line the fit to the observed blend. Individual Gaussian components are
1184: in thin lines. The residuals of the fits are drawn in dashed
1185: lines.\label{deblend}}
1186: \end{figure}
1187:
1188:
1189: \clearpage
1190:
1191: \begin{figure}
1192: \plotone{f6.ps}
1193: \caption{Energy level diagram for \feii\ illustrating the
1194: transitions to $z~^{4}F^{0}$ and $z~^{4}D^{0}$
1195: from the upper $b^{\rm 4}G$ level leading to the 1$\mu$m
1196: lines. The strongest lines observed are drawn in bold face. The
1197: excitation via Ly$\alpha$ fluorescence is also shown. \label{levels}}
1198: \end{figure}
1199:
1200: \clearpage
1201: \begin{figure}
1202: \plotone{f7.ps}
1203: \caption{Zoom around the \lb8900$-$\lb9300 region showing the presence
1204: of the \feii\ lines at \lb8927, \lb9130, \lb9177 and \lb9202. These lines
1205: are all primary cascades from L$\alpha$ pumped levels at $\sim$10 eV.
1206: \label{feiilyalf}}
1207: \end{figure}
1208:
1209:
1210:
1211:
1212: \clearpage
1213: \begin{figure}
1214: \plotone{f8.ps}
1215: \caption{FOS/HST UV spectra for Ark\,564 (top) and Mrk\,335 (bottom) in the
1216: region around \lb1870. The arrows mark the expected position of the
1217: \feii\ lines \lb1841, \lb1845, \lb1870 and \lb1873, resulting from the
1218: primary decay of the upper $u~^{\rm 4}G^{\rm 0}$ and $t~^{\rm 4}G^{\rm 0}$
1219: terms, pumped Ly$\alpha$ fluorescence. The presence of these lines
1220: is crucial for determining if this mechanism contributes to the production of
1221: the 1$\mu$m \feii\ lines. \label{arkuv}}
1222: \end{figure}
1223:
1224:
1225: \clearpage
1226:
1227: \begin{figure}
1228: \plotone{f9.ps}
1229: \caption{Ratios between the most important \feii\ lines
1230: observed in the galaxies and the Galactic sources
1231: Lk\,H$\alpha$101, MWC\,349, and R Mon. The solid line is the value reported
1232: by RMPH for I\,Zw\,1 and the dotted line corresponds to the uncertainty.
1233: The starred points correspond to the Galatic sources.
1234: \label{ratiosfeii}}
1235: \end{figure}
1236:
1237:
1238: \clearpage
1239: \begin{figure}
1240: \plotone{f10.ps}
1241: \caption{Comparison of the optical \feii\ spectra of 1H\,1934-063
1242: (upper), I\,Zw\,1 (middle) and Ark\,564 (lower). Except for the
1243: width of the individual lines (narrower in Ark\,564), the three
1244: spectra look similar. Note that the relative intensities of
1245: the \feii\ lines seem to be constant in the three objects.
1246: The H$\beta$ and H$\gamma$ lines of I\,Zw\,1 were removed
1247: for clarity.
1248: \label{optfeii}}
1249: \end{figure}
1250:
1251: \clearpage
1252:
1253: \begin{figure}
1254: \plotone{f11.ps}
1255: \caption{Optical \feii\ emission (\feii \lb4750/\hbeta) versus the
1256: sum of the flux of \feii\ \lb9997, \lb10171 and \lb10501 divided by Pa$\delta$
1257: (\feii\ IR/Pa$\delta$). Values of \feii \lb4750/\hbeta\ are listed in Table~\ref{feiirat}.
1258: Mrk 335 clearly departs from an apparent correlation
1259: between these two quantities. \label{feiicorr}}
1260: \end{figure}
1261:
1262: \clearpage
1263:
1264: \begin{figure}
1265: \plotone{f12.ps}
1266: \caption{Comparison of the line profiles of Pa$\beta$ (thick histogram),
1267: \ion{O}{1} \lb11287 (solid line), \feii\ \lb11127 (dashed histogram) and
1268: [\ion{S}{3}] \lb9531 (dotted histogram) in velocity space, showing clearly
1269: that Pa$\beta$ is significantly wider than the lines emitted
1270: in the partially ionized zone of the the BLR. This suggests that
1271: low-ionization lines such as \feii\ and \ion{O}{1} form in
1272: the outermost part of the BLR.
1273: \label{profiles}}
1274: \end{figure}
1275:
1276: \clearpage
1277:
1278: \begin{figure}
1279: \plotone{f13.ps}
1280: \caption{Comparison of the emission line profiles of \ion{Ca}{2}
1281: \lb8662 (thick line) and \ion{O}{1} \lb8446 (histogram),
1282: in velocity space. \label{caii}}
1283: \end{figure}
1284:
1285: \clearpage
1286:
1287:
1288:
1289: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
1290: \tablecaption{Basic information of the NLS1 galaxies \label{tabledata}}
1291: \tablewidth{0pt}
1292: \tablehead{
1293: \colhead{Galaxy} & \colhead{z} & \colhead{M$_{v}$\tablenotemark{a}} &
1294:
1295: \colhead{A$_{v}$\tablenotemark{b}} & {Morphology}
1296: }
1297: \startdata
1298: 1H\,1934-063 & 0.01059 & -19.04 & 0.972 & Sb \\
1299: Ark\,564 & 0.02468 & -20.42 & 0.198 & SB \\
1300: Mrk\,335 & 0.02578 & -21.32 & 0.118 & S0/a \\
1301: Mrk\,1044 & 0.01645 & -18.84 & 0.113 & SB0 \\
1302: \enddata
1303: \tablenotetext{a}{A value of H$_{\rm o}$ = 75 \kms Mpc$^{-1}$ was assumed}
1304: \tablenotetext{b}{Galactic extinction}
1305:
1306: \end{deluxetable}
1307:
1308:
1309: \clearpage
1310:
1311: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
1312: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1313: \tablecaption{Observed emission line fluxes and FWHM for the
1314: permitted lines\tablenotemark{a}. \label{tableflux}}
1315: \tablewidth{0pt}
1316: \tablehead{
1317: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{1H\,1934-063} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Ark\,564} &
1318: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Mrk\,335} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Mrk\,1044} \\
1319: \colhead{Line} & \colhead{Flux} & \colhead{FWHM} & \colhead{Flux} &
1320: \colhead{FWHM} & \colhead{Flux} & \colhead{FWHM} & \colhead{Flux} & \colhead{FWHM}
1321: }
1322: \startdata
1323: \ion{Fe}{2} \lb8927 & \nodata & \nodata & 0.18$\pm$0.05 &580 & 0.34$\pm$0.13 & 700 & 0.22\tablenotemark{2} & \nodata \\
1324: \ion{Fe}{2} \lb9127 & 2.13$\pm$0.41 & 950 & 0.59$\pm$0.11 &600 &0.72$\pm$0.23 & 900 & 0.91$\pm$0.29 & 1050 \\
1325: \ion{Fe}{2} \lb9177 & 2.77$\pm$0.41 & 950 & 0.75$\pm$0.15 &600 & 1.83$\pm$0.23 & 900 & 0.38$\pm$0.25 & 1050 \\
1326: \ion{Fe}{2} \lb9202 & 1.90$\pm$0.41 & 950 & 0.52$\pm$0.15 &600 & 1.38$\pm$0.23 & 900 & \nodata & \nodata \\
1327: Pa9 \lb9229 & 5.00$\pm$0.42 & 950 & 1.91$\pm$0.20 &820 & 4.52$\pm$0.31 & 1250 & 2.60$\pm$0.47 & 1900 \\
1328: \ion{Fe}{2} \lb9256 & 0.80$\pm$0.25 & 500 & 0.46$\pm$0.20 &800 & 0.66$\pm$0.21 & 900 & \nodata & \nodata \\
1329: \ion{Fe}{2} \lb9956 & 1.24$\pm$0.28 & 1000 &0.54$\pm$0.07 &750 & \nodata & \nodata & 0.63$\pm$0.07 & 1000 \\
1330: \ion{Fe}{2} \lb9997 & 4.52$\pm$0.28 & 1000& 1.72$\pm$0.07 &750 & 4.36$\pm$0.12 & 1600 & 1.36$\pm$0.07 & 1000 \\
1331: \ion{He}{2} \lb10124 & 3.44$\pm$0.30 & 1100& 1.72$\pm$0.13 &1650 & 3.62$\pm$0.14 & 1850 & 1.06$\pm$0.14 & 1800 \\
1332: \ion{Fe}{2} \lb10171 & 0.85$\pm$0.28 & 1000& 0.38$\pm$0.07 &750 & 0.77$\pm$0.12 & 1600 & 0.22$\pm$0.07 & 1000 \\
1333: \ion{Fe}{2} \lb10501 & 2.62$\pm$0.25 & 1000& 1.30$\pm$0.09 &1100 & 1.83$\pm$0.23 & 1600 & 1.16$\pm$0.28 & 1620 \\
1334: \ion{Fe}{2} \lb10863 & 4.24$\pm$0.25 & 950 & 0.99$\pm$0.08 &700 & \nodata &\nodata & 1.31$\pm$0.17 & 900 \\
1335: \ion{Fe}{2} \lb11127 & 1.30$\pm$0.23 & 850 & 0.54$\pm$0.07 &600 & 0.55$\pm$0.14 & 1100 & 0.52\tablenotemark{3} \\
1336: \ion{O}{1} \lb11287 & 6.91$\pm$0.24 & 850 & 2.70$\pm$0.07 &600 & 3.87$\pm$0.17 & 1100 & 1.52$\pm$0.17 & 900 \\
1337: Pa$\alpha$ \lb18761\tablenotemark{3} & 25.43 & 970 & 13.46 &600 & 20.76 & 1200& 4.21 & 1200 \\
1338: Br$\gamma$ \lb21655 & 2.24$\pm$0.14 & 850 & 1.05$\pm$0.06 &600 & 2.67$\pm$0.31 & 1150 & 0.78$\pm$0.91 & 1000 \\
1339: \enddata
1340: \tablenotetext{a}{Fluxes in units of 10$^{-14}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ and FWHM
1341: in \kms}
1342: \tablenotetext{1}{lower limit}
1343: \tablenotetext{2}{upper limit}
1344: \tablenotetext{3}{Flux measurement affected by atmospheric absorption, so it represents a
1345: lower limit}
1346:
1347: \end{deluxetable}
1348:
1349: \clearpage
1350:
1351: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
1352: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1353: \tablecaption{Observed emission line fluxes and FWHM for the
1354: permitted lines with broad and narrow components\tablenotemark{a}. \label{tablefluxbn}}
1355: \tablewidth{0pt}
1356: \tablehead{
1357: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{1H\,1934-063} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Ark\,564} &
1358: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Mrk\,335} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Mrk\,1044} \\
1359: \colhead{Line} & \colhead{Flux} & \colhead{FWHM} & \colhead{Flux} &
1360: \colhead{FWHM} & \colhead{Flux} & \colhead{FWHM} & \colhead{Flux} & \colhead{FWHM}
1361: }
1362: \startdata
1363: Pa$\delta_{\rm n}$ \lb10049 & \nodata & \nodata & 1.00$\pm$0.03 & 320 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1364: Pa$\delta_{\rm b}$ \lb10049 & 7.58$\pm$0.27 & 1000 & 3.16$\pm$0.10 & 1650 & 5.86$\pm$0.09& 1100 & 2.85$\pm$0.09 & 1250 \\
1365: \ion{He}{1}$_{\rm n}$ \lb10830 & 7.53$\pm$0.20 & 410 & 4.90$\pm$0.08 & 370 & 5.49$\pm$0.14 & 550 & \nodata & \nodata \\
1366: \ion{He}{1}$_{\rm b}$ \lb10830 & 19.6$\pm$0.33 & 1230 & 5.46$\pm$0.41 & 2400 & 24.10$\pm$0.44 & 2020 & 8.35$\pm$0.19 & 1000 \\
1367: Pa$\gamma_{\rm n}$ \lb10937 & 4.29$\pm$0.25 & 570 & 1.84$\pm$0.07 & 320 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1368: Pa$\gamma_{\rm b}$ \lb10937 & 9.22$\pm$0.41 & 1600 & 4.00$\pm$0.29 & 1700 & 11.60$\pm$0.24 & 1500 & 3.92$\pm$0.28 & 1500 \\
1369: Pa$\beta_{\rm n}$ \lb12820 & 8.36$\pm$0.22 & 600 & 3.95$\pm$0.08 & 400 & 4.29$\pm$0.13 & 600 & 2.22$\pm$0.10 & 600 \\
1370: Pa$\beta_{\rm b}$ \lb12820 & 9.64$\pm$0.39 & 1800 & 5.90$\pm$0.30 & 1800 & 12.73$\pm$0.36 & 2050 & 3.18$\pm$0.27 & 2300 \\
1371:
1372: \enddata
1373: \tablenotetext{a}{Fluxes in units of 10$^{-14}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ and FWHM
1374: in \kms. The subcripts n,b stand for narrow and broad components, respectively}
1375:
1376: \end{deluxetable}
1377:
1378: \clearpage
1379:
1380: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
1381: \tablecaption{Measured and expected flux for the \feii\ lines \lb1840,1844\tablenotemark{a,b} \label{balance}}
1382: \tablewidth{0pt}
1383: \tablehead{
1384: \colhead{Galaxy} & \colhead{Observed\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{Expected} & \colhead{E(B-V)}}
1385: \startdata
1386: 1H\,1934-063 & 13.2 & 158.0 & 0.61 \\
1387: Ark\,564 & 0.7 & 58.0 & 1.10 \\
1388: Mrk\,335 & 1.7 & 74.9 & 0.93 \\
1389: Mrk\,1044 & 0.6 & 57.0 & 1.12 \\
1390: \enddata
1391: \tablenotetext{a}{In units of 10$^{-14}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$}
1392: \tablenotetext{b}{The values of columns 2 and 3 correspond to the sum of the flux of
1393: the individual \feii\ features}
1394: \tablenotetext{c}{Upper limit}
1395: \end{deluxetable}
1396:
1397: \clearpage
1398:
1399: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
1400: \tablecaption{\feii\ line ratios for the observed sample \label{feiirat}}
1401: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1402: \tablewidth{0pt}
1403: \tablehead{
1404: \colhead{Ratio} & \colhead{1H\,1934-063} & \colhead{Ark\,564} &
1405: \colhead{Mrk\,335} & \colhead{Mrk\,1044} & \colhead{I\,Zw\,1\tablenotemark{1}}
1406: & \colhead{LkH$\alpha$\,101\tablenotemark{2}} & \colhead{MWC 349\tablenotemark{5}} &
1407: \colhead{R Mon\tablenotemark{5}}
1408: }
1409: \startdata
1410: \lb9997/\lb10171 & 5.32$\pm$1.78 & 4.53$\pm$0.85 & 5.66$\pm$0.90 & 6.18$\pm$2.00 & \nodata & 3.70 & 3.5 & \nodata \\
1411: \lb9997/\lb10501 & 1.72$\pm$0.20 & 1.32$\pm$0.11 & 2.38$\pm$0.31 & 1.17$\pm$0.29 & 2.22$\pm$0.29 & 1.11 & 1.6 & 1.5 \\
1412: \lb9997/\lb10863 & 1.07$\pm$0.10 & 1.74$\pm$0.16 & \nodata & 1.04$\pm$0.15 & 0.90$\pm$0.15 & 1.26 & \nodata & 0.98 \\
1413: \lb9997/\lb11127 & 3.47$\pm$0.65 & 3.19$\pm$0.43 & 7.92$\pm$1.05 & 2.51 & 4.59$\pm$0.76 & 1.59 & 2.00 & 1.9 \\
1414: \lb11127/\lb10863 & 0.31$\pm$0.06 & 0.55$\pm$0.08 & \nodata & \nodata & 0.20$\pm$0.04 & 0.80 & \nodata & 0.55 \\
1415: \lb10501/\lb10863 & 0.62$\pm$0.07 & 1.31$\pm$0.14 & \nodata & 0.89$\pm$0.24 & 0.41$\pm$0.07 & 1.14 & \nodata & 0.70 \\
1416: \lb10501/\lb11127 & 2.02$\pm$0.41 & 2.40$\pm$0.35 & 3.33$\pm$0.94 & 2.23 & 2.06$\pm$0.37 & 1.43 & 1.20 & 1.3 \\
1417: \feii\ \lb4750/H$\beta$ & 0.89\tablenotemark{3} & 0.81\tablenotemark{4} & 0.47\tablenotemark{4} & 0.91\tablenotemark{4} & 1.34\tablenotemark{4}
1418: & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1419:
1420: \enddata
1421:
1422: \tablerefs{
1423: (1) Rudy et al. 2000; (2) Rudy et al. 1991 (3) Rodr\'{\i}guez-Ardila,
1424: Pastoriza
1425: \& Donzelli 2000; (4) Joly 1991; (5) Kelly, Rieke \& Campbell 1994}
1426:
1427: \end{deluxetable}
1428:
1429:
1430: \end{document}
1431:
1432: