1: \def\etal{{et al.\thinspace}}

2: \def\cf{{\em cf.\ }}

3: \def\eg{{\em e.g.\ }}

4: \def\etc{{\em etc.\ }}

5: \def\ie{{\em i.e.\ }}

6: \def\spose#1{\hbox to 0pt{#1\hss}}

7: \def\approxlt{\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\sim$}}

8:         \raise 2.0pt\hbox{$<$}}}

9: \def\approxgt{\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\sim$}}

10:         \raise 2.0pt\hbox{$>$}}}

11: \def\multcent#1{\halign {\centerline{##}\cr #1}}

12: \def\multleft#1{\hbox to size{\vbox {\halign {\lft{##}\cr #1}}\hfill}\par}

13: \def\multright#1{\hbox to size{\vbox {\halign {\rt{##}\cr #1}}\hfill}\par}

14: \def\Mdot{\hbox{$\dot M$}}

15: \def\degmark{^\circ}

16: \def\boxit#1{\vbox{\hrule\hbox{\vrule\kern3pt\vbox{\kern3pt

17:           #1 \kern3pt}\kern3pt\vrule}\hrule}}

18: \font\big=cmr10 scaled\magstep2

19: \font\bigbf=cmbx10 scaled\magstep2

20: \font\bigit=cmti10 scaled\magstep2

21: %       Simple units

22: \def\cm{{\rm\thinspace cm}}

23: \def\dyn{{\rm\thinspace dyn}}

24: \def\erg{{\rm\thinspace erg}}

25: \def\eV{{\rm\thinspace eV}}

26: \def\g{{\rm\thinspace g}}

27: \def\ga{{\rm\thinspace gauss}}

28: \def\K{{\rm\thinspace K}}

29: \def\keV{{\rm\thinspace keV}}

30: \def\km{{\rm\thinspace km}}

31: \def\kpc{{\rm\thinspace kpc}}

32: \def\Lsun{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace L_{\odot}$}}

33: \def\m{{\rm\thinspace m}}

34: \def\Mpc{{\rm\thinspace Mpc}}

35: \def\Msun{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace M_{\odot}$}}

36: \def\pc{{\rm\thinspace pc}}

37: \def\ph{{\rm\thinspace ph}}

38: \def\s{{\rm\thinspace s}}

39: \def\yr{{\rm\thinspace yr}}

40: \def\sr{{\rm\thinspace sr}}

41: \def\Hz{{\rm\thinspace Hz}}

42: \def\chisq{\hbox{$\chi^2$}}

43: \def\delchi{\hbox{$\Delta\chi$}}

44: %       Compound units

45: \def\cmps{\hbox{$\cm\s^{-1}\,$}}

46: \def\cmsq{\hbox{$\cm^2\,$}}

47: \def\cmcu{\hbox{$\cm^3\,$}}

48: \def\pcmcu{\hbox{$\cm^{-3}\,$}}

49: \def\pcmcuK{\hbox{$\cm^{-3}\K\,$}}

50: \def\dynpcmsq{\hbox{$\dyn\cm^{-2}\,$}}

51: \def\ergcmcups{\hbox{$\erg\cm^3\ps\,$}}

52: \def\ergpcmps{\hbox{$\erg\cm^{-3}\s^{-1}\,$}}

53: \def\ergpcmsqps{\hbox{$\erg\cm^{-2}\s^{-1}\,$}}

54: \def\ergpcmsqpspA{\hbox{$\erg\cm^{-2}\s^{-1}$\AA$^{-1}\,$}}

55: \def\ergps{\hbox{$\erg\s^{-1}\,$}}

56: \def\gpcm{\hbox{$\g\cm^{-3}\,$}}

57: \def\gpcmps{\hbox{$\g\cm^{-3}\s^{-1}\,$}}

58: \def\gps{\hbox{$\g\s^{-1}\,$}}

59: \def\kmps{\hbox{$\km\s^{-1}\,$}}

60: \def\Lsunppc{\hbox{$\Lsun\pc^{-3}\,$}}

61: \def\Msunpc{\hbox{$\Msun\pc^{-3}\,$}}

62: \def\Msunpkpc{\hbox{$\Msun\kpc^{-1}\,$}}

63: \def\Msunppc{\hbox{$\Msun\pc^{-3}\,$}}

64: \def\Msunppcpyr{\hbox{$\Msun\pc^{-3}\yr^{-1}\,$}}

65: \def\Msunpyr{\hbox{$\Msun\yr^{-1}\,$}}

66: \def\pcm{\hbox{$\cm^{-3}\,$}}

67: \def\pcmsq{\hbox{$\cm^{-2}\,$}}

68: \def\pcmK{\hbox{$\cm^{-3}\K$}}

69: \def\phpcmsqps{\hbox{$\ph\cm^{-2}\s^{-1}\,$}}

70: \def\pHz{\hbox{$\Hz^{-1}\,$}}

71: \def\pmpc{\hbox{$\Mpc^{-1}\,$}}

72: \def\pmpccu{\hbox{$\Mpc^{-3}\,$}}

73: \def\ps{\hbox{$\s^{-1}\,$}}

74: \def\psqcm{\hbox{$\cm^{-2}\,$}}

75: \def\psr{\hbox{$\sr^{-1}\,$}}

76: \def\pyr{\hbox{$\yr^{-1}\,$}}

77: \def\kmpspMpc{\hbox{$\kmps\Mpc^{-1}$}}

78: \def\Msunpyrpkpc{\hbox{$\Msunpyr\kpc^{-1}$}}

79: 

80: % The first item in a LaTeX file must be a \documentstyle command to

81: % declare the overall style of the paper.  The \documentstyle lines

82: % that are relevant for the AASTeX macros are shown; one is uncommented out

83: % so that the file can be processed.

84: 

85: \documentclass[preprint]{aastex}

86: %\documentclass{aastex}

87: 

88: % The eqsecnum style changes the way equations are numbered.  Normally,

89: % equations are just numbered sequentially through the entire paper.

90: % If eqsecnum appears in the \documentstyle command, equation numbers will

91: % be sequential through each section, and will be formatted "(sec-eqn)",

92: % where sec is the current section number and eqn is the number of the

93: % equation within that section.  The eqsecnum option can be used with

94: % any substyle.

95: 

96: %\documentstyle[11pt,eqsecnum,aaspp4]{article}

97: 

98: % Authors are permitted to use the fonts provided by the American Mathematical

99: % Society, if they are available to them on their local system.  These fonts

100: % are not part of the AASTeX macro package or the regular TeX distribution.

101: 

102: %\documentstyle[12pt,amssym,aasms4]{article}

103: 

104: % Here's some slug-line data.  The receipt and acceptance dates will be 

105: % filled in by the editorial staff with the appropriate dates.  Rules will 

106: % appear on the title page of the manuscript until these are uncommented 

107: % out by the editorial staff.

108: 

109: \received{}

110: \accepted{}

111: 

112: \slugcomment{To appear in The Astrophysical Journal v564 n1 January 1, 2002}

113: 

114: % Authors may supply running head information, if they wish to do so, although

115: % this may be modified by the editorial offices.  The left head contains a

116: % list of authors, usually three allowed---otherwise use et al.  The right

117: % head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.  Running heads

118: % are not printed.

119: 

120: \shorttitle{A \emph{Chandra} X-ray Study of Cygnus A --- II. The Nucleus}

121: \shortauthors{Young, Wilson, Terashima, Arnaud \& Smith}

122: 

123: % This is the end of the "preamble".  Now we wish to start with the

124: % real material for the paper, which we indicate with \begin{document}.

125: % Following the \begin{document} command is the front matter for the

126: % paper, viz., the title, author and address data, the abstract, and

127: % any keywords or subject headings that are relevant.

128: 

129: \begin{document}

130: 

131: \title{A \emph{Chandra} X-ray Study of Cygnus A --- II. The Nucleus}

132: 

133: \author{Andrew J. Young, Andrew S. Wilson\altaffilmark{1}, Yuichi

134: Terashima\altaffilmark{2}}

135: 

136: \affil{Astronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD

137: 	20742}

138: 

139: \author{Keith A. Arnaud\altaffilmark{3}}

140: 

141: \affil{Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics, NASA Goddard Space

142: 	Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771}

143: 

144: \and

145: 

146: \author{David  A. Smith}

147: 

148: \affil{Astronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742}

149: 

150: % Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which

151: % are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name.  The actual alternate

152: % affiliation information is typeset in footnotes at the bottom of the

153: % first page, and the text itself is specified in \altaffiltext commands.

154: % There is a separate \altaffiltext for each alternate affiliation

155: % indicated above.

156: 

157: \altaffiltext{1}{Adjunct Astronomer, Space Telescope Science

158: 	Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218}

159: 

160: \altaffiltext{2}{Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, 3-1-1

161: 	Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan}

162: 

163: \altaffiltext{3}{also Astronomy Department, University of Maryland,

164: 	College Park, MD 20742}

165: 

166: % The abstract environment prints out the receipt and acceptance dates

167: % if they are relevant for the journal style.  For the aasms style, they

168: % will print out as horizontal rules for the editorial staff to type

169: % on, so long as the author does not include \received and \accepted

170: % commands.  This should not be done, since \received and \accepted dates

171: % are not known to the author.

172: 

173: \begin{abstract}

174: 

175:   We report \emph{Chandra} ACIS and quasi-simultaneous \emph{RXTE} observations

176:   of the nearby, powerful radio galaxy Cygnus A, with the present paper

177:   focusing on the properties of the active nucleus. In the \emph{Chandra}

178:   observation, the hard ($>$ a few keV) X-ray emission is spatially unresolved

179:   with a size $\approxlt 1\arcsec$ (1.5 kpc, $H_0 = 50$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$)

180:   and coincides with the radio and near infrared nuclei. In contrast, the soft

181:   ($< 2 \keV$) emission exhibits a bi-polar nebulosity that aligns with the

182:   optical bi-polar continuum and emission-line structures and approximately

183:   with the radio jet. In particular, the soft X-ray emission corresponds very

184:   well with the [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda 5007$ and H$\alpha$ + [\ion{N}{2}]

185:   $\lambda\lambda 6548$, 6583 nebulosity imaged with HST. At the location of

186:   the nucleus there is only weak soft X-ray emission, an effect that may be

187:   intrinsic or result from a dust lane that crosses the nucleus perpendicular

188:   to the source axis. The spectra of the various X-ray components have been

189:   obtained by simultaneous fits to the 6 detectors. The compact nucleus is

190:   detected to 100 keV and is well described by a heavily absorbed power law

191:   spectrum with $\Gamma_h = 1.52^{+0.12}_{-0.12}$ (similar to other narrow line

192:   radio galaxies) and equivalent hydrogen column $N_H ({\rm nuc}) =

193:   2.0^{+0.1}_{-0.2} \times 10^{23} \pcmsq$. This column is compatible with the

194:   dust obscuration to the near infrared source for a normal gas to dust ratio.

195:   The soft ($<2 \keV$) emission from the nucleus may be described by a power

196:   law spectrum with the same index (i.e. $\Gamma_l = \Gamma_h$), though direct

197:   fits suggests a slightly larger value for $\Gamma_l$. Narrow emission lines

198:   from highly ionized neon and silicon, as well as a ``neutral'' Fe K$\alpha$

199:   line, are detected in the nucleus and its vicinity ($r \approxlt 2 \kpc$).

200:   The equivalent width (EW) of the Fe K$\alpha$ line ($182^{+40}_{-54}$ eV) is

201:   in good agreement with theoretical predictions for the EW versus $N_H ({\rm

202:   nuc})$ relationship in various geometries. An Fe K edge is also seen. The

203:   \emph{RXTE} observations indicate a temperature of $kT = 6.9^{+0.3}_{-1.0}$

204:   keV for the cluster gas (discussed in Paper III of this series) and cluster

205:   emission lines of Fe K$\alpha$ and Fe K$\beta$ and / or Ni K$\alpha$.

206: 

207:   We consider the possibility that the extended soft X-ray emission is

208:   electron-scattered nuclear radiation. Given that 1\% of the unabsorbed 2 --

209:   10 keV nuclear radiation would have to be scattered, the necessary gas column

210:   ($N_H ({\rm scattering}) \simeq 3.5 \times 10^{22} \pcmsq$) would absorb the

211:   X-rays rather than scatter them if the gas is cold. Thus the scattering

212:   plasma must be highly ionized. If this ionization is achieved through

213:   photoionization by the nucleus, the ionization parameter $\xi > 1$ erg cm

214:   s$^{-1}$ and the electron density $n_e \simeq 6 \pcmcu$ given the observed

215:   distance of the soft X-ray emission from the nucleus. The electron column

216:   density inferred from the X-ray observations is much too low to account for

217:   the extended optical scattered light, strongly suggesting that the polarized

218:   optical light is scattered by dust. The presence of highly ionized Ne lines

219:   in the soft X-ray spectrum requires $20 \approxlt \xi \approxlt 300$ erg cm

220:   s$^{-1}$; these lines may originate closer to the nucleus than the extended

221:   soft continuum or in a lower density gas. A collisionally-ionized thermal

222:   model of the extended soft X-rays cannot be ruled out, but is unattractive in

223:   view of the low metal abundance required ($Z = 0.03 Z_\odot$).

224: 

225:   The hard X-ray to far-infrared ratio for the nucleus of Cygnus A is similar

226:   to that seen in Seyfert 1 and unobscured radio galaxies. By means of the

227:   correlation between hard X-ray luminosity and nuclear optical absolute

228:   magnitude for these classes of object, we estimate $M_B = -22.4$ for Cygnus

229:   A, near the borderline between Seyferts and QSOs.

230: 

231: \end{abstract}

232: 

233: % The different journals have different requirements for keywords.  The

234: % keywords.apj file, found on aas.org in the pubs/aastex-misc directory, 

235: % contains a list of keywords used with the ApJ and Letters.  These are 

236: % usually assigned by the editor, but authors may include them in their

237: % manuscripts if they wish. 

238: 

239: \keywords{galaxies: active --- galaxies: individual (Cygnus A) --- galaxies:

240:   ISM --- galaxies: nuclei --- galaxies: X-rays --- radio continuum: galaxies}

241: 

242: % That's it for the front matter.  On to the main body of the paper.

243: % We'll only put in tutorial remarks at the beginning of each section

244: % so you can see entire sections together.

245: 

246: % In the first two sections, you should notice the use of the LaTeX \cite

247: % command to identify citations.  The citations are tied to the

248: % reference list via symbolic KEYs.  We have chosen the first three

249: % characters of the first author's name plus the last two numeral of the

250: % year of publication.  The corresponding reference has a \bibitem

251: % command in the reference list below.

252: %

253: % Please see the AASTeX manual for a more complete discussion on how to make

254: % \cite-\bibitem work for you.   

255: 

256: \section{Introduction} \label{sec:intro}

257: 

258: Cygnus A (3C 405) is the closest and best studied of the powerful ``classical

259: double'' (FR II) radio galaxies. At a heliocentric redshift of $z = 0.0562$

260: (Stockton, Ridgway \& Lilly 1994) it is the most powerful radio source in the

261: 3C catalog out to $z \simeq 1$, and about 1.5 orders of magnitude more luminous

262: than any other 3C source within $z \le 0.1$. It is interesting for a number of

263: reasons, including: i) radio ``hot spots'', the shocked jet material at the

264: termini of the jets, were first observed in Cygnus A (Hargrave \& Ryle 1974);

265: ii) the galaxy may be at the center of a cooling flow in a cluster of galaxies

266: (Arnaud et al. 1984; Reynolds \& Fabian 1996), and iii) there is evidence for a

267: ``buried quasar'' in the nucleus (Djorgovski et al. 1991; Ward et al. 1991;

268: Antonucci, Hurt \& Kinney 1994; Ueno et al. 1994; Ogle et al. 1997). In this

269: paper we present new \emph{Chandra} X-ray observations of the nucleus and

270: circumnuclear environment of Cygnus A.

271: 

272: In the past there has been debate concerning the nature of the nucleus and

273: circumnuclear regions (approximately the central $4\arcsec$ [6 kpc]) of Cygnus

274: A, in particular the central bi-polar optical morphology. Suggested

275: explanations have included i) the merger of two galaxies (Baade \& Minkowski

276: 1954), ii) the intersection of a single galaxy by a dust lane (Osterbrock

277: 1983), or iii) a bi-polar scattering nebula (see e.g. Stockton, Ridgway \&

278: Lilly 1994). The presently favored model is that at least some of the central

279: optical morphology results from scattering of light from a hidden nucleus

280: located at the radio core. In the following paragraphs we summarize the key

281: observations of the nucleus and nuclear environment at radio, X-ray, infrared,

282: optical and ultraviolet wavelengths.

283: 

284: Radio observations with the VLA at 6 cm wavelength with 0\farcs4 resolution

285: (Perley, Dreher \& Cowan 1984) show a compact radio core with a knotty,

286: one-sided jet running along position angle (PA) $284\degmark \pm 2\degmark$

287: from $\sim 1$ -- 25\arcsec. Higher resolution VLBI observations show a ``core''

288: with a pc-scale jet that is aligned with the kpc-scale jet to within

289: $4\degmark$ (Carilli, Bartel \& Linfield 1991).

290: 

291: Near-infrared imaging shows an unresolved nucleus, within 1\arcsec\ of the

292: radio core, and suggested to be obscured by $A_V \simeq 50 \pm 30$ magnitudes

293: of extinction (Djorgovski  et al. 1991). Near-infrared spectroscopy by Ward et

294: al. (1991) detected emission in narrow molecular hydrogen lines, Pa$\alpha$ and

295: Br$\gamma$. Using an empirical relationship between broad H$\alpha$ flux and

296: X-ray luminosity for quasars with little reddening, and an observed upper limit

297: to the flux of broad Pa$\alpha$, these authors estimate an extinction $A_V

298: ({\rm BLR}) > 24$ mag to the broad line region. A similar relationship between

299: X-ray luminosity and near infrared luminosity, along with an assumption about

300: the spectral slope of the nuclear spectrum, implies an extinction of $A_V ({\rm

301: nuc}) \simeq 54 \pm 9$ mag to the nuclear continuum source (Ward et al. 1991).

302: A more recent study suggests $A_V \sim 150$ -- 200 mag to the nucleus (Ward

303: 1996). For a standard dust to gas ratio $A_V ({\rm mag}) = 5 \times 10^{-22}

304: N_H (\pcmsq)$, this value of $A_V$ implies an obscuring column density of $N_H

305: \simeq 3 \times 10^{23} \pcmsq$ to the nucleus.

306: 

307: Within the central few arc-seconds of Cygnus A, there is an optical source with

308: a bi-polar morphology, the northwest component being dominated by line emission and

309: the southeast component being dominated by continuum emission (see, e.g. Stockton et

310: al. 1994). In an HST V band image (Jackson et al. 1996) the central component

311: resembles the apex of a conical structure similar to that seen in other

312: galaxies and attributed to light from a hidden nucleus escaping along a

313: restricted range of solid angle, i.e. an ``ionization cone''.

314: 

315: Ultraviolet observations with the HST FOS by Antonucci, Hurt \& Kinney (1994)

316: show noisy, broad [\ion{Mg}{2}] with a FWHM $\sim 7500 \kmps$, which is

317: suggestive of a hidden broad line region. Subsequent optical spectroscopic

318: observations using Keck II (Ogle et al. 1997) show polarized continuum and

319: broad Balmer line emission, with the continuum polarization in the northwest

320: component rising to $\sim$ 16\% at 3800\AA. The polarized light comes from a

321: bi-conical structure with an opening half-angle in the range $46\degmark$ --

322: $55\degmark$, corresponding to the ``ionization cone'' seen with HST. The

323: symmetry of the polarization vectors indicates that this light originated in

324: the nucleus and has been scattered into our line of sight.

325: 

326: Cygnus A is surrounded by cluster gas and this makes a determination of the

327: X-ray spectrum of the nucleus difficult. The findings of previous X-ray studies

328: of the nucleus and cluster gas of Cygnus A are summarized in

329: Table~\ref{tab:previous_xray}.  The detection of a hard power-law is compelling

330: evidence for a hidden active nucleus or quasar in the nucleus of Cygnus A and

331: the values found for the intrinsic column density are typical of Seyfert 2

332: galaxies (Awaki et al. 1991; Smith \& Done 1996; Turner et al. 1997a). Also,

333: Arnaud (1996) showed that the hard X-rays come from a point source within

334: 30\arcsec\ of the radio core.

335: 

336: In this paper, we focus on \emph{Chandra} X-ray observations of the nucleus of

337: Cygnus A. Our results on the X-ray emission from the radio hot spots and the

338: intra-cluster gas are discussed by Wilson et al. (2000; hereafter Paper I) and

339: Smith et al. (2001; hereafter Paper III), respectively, while a future paper

340: will deal with the cavity inflated by the radio jets. A Hubble constant of $H_0

341: = 50$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ and a deceleration parameter of $q_0 = 0$ have

342: been assumed throughout. The luminosity and ``angular size'' distances to

343: Cygnus A are then 346.4 Mpc and 310.6 Mpc, respectively, and 1\arcsec\

344: corresponds to 1.51 kpc.

345: 

346: \section{Observations and Reduction}

347: 

348: \subsection{Observations}

349: 

350: The nucleus of Cygnus A is known to be a strong X-ray source, and we were

351: concerned that ``pile-up'' would affect the \emph{Chandra} observations. In

352: order to obtain the count rate of the nucleus and circumnuclear regions, we

353: first obtained a short observation (obs id 359) of Cygnus A on 2000 March 8

354: using chip S3 (backside illuminated) of the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer

355: (ACIS; Garmire et al. 2000). Single exposures with a 0.1~s frame-time were

356: alternated with two exposures with a 0.4~s frame-time, the total integration

357: time being $\la 1$ ks. This observation showed the nucleus was not

358: significantly piled-up in either the 0.1~s or 0.4~s frame-time, but the

359: observed count-rate indicated that a 3.2~s frame-time observation of the

360: nucleus would suffer from significant pile-up. On this basis, we decided to

361: observe Cygnus A for separate, longer exposures with frame-times of 0.4~s and

362: 3.2~s, which were designed to study primarily the X-ray emission of the nucleus

363: and the larger scale regions, respectively. The resulting level 1 and level 2

364: peak count rates in the long exposure 3.2~s frame-time observation (see below)

365: are 0.0425 and 0.0286 cts pixel$^{-1}$ s$^{-1}$ respectively. Thus only 67\% of

366: the events were good grades, a clear indication of pile-up. In contrast, the

367: level 2 and level 1 peak count rates in the long 0.4~s frame-time exposure are

368: 0.053 and 0.056 cts pixel$^{-1}$ s$^{-1}$, respectively, indicating about 94\%

369: good grades. The higher count rate in the 0.4~s than the 3.2~s frame-time is

370: also an indicator of pile-up in the 3.2~s frame-time observation.

371: 

372: These longer integrations were taken with the ACIS instrument in two separate

373: observations. On 2000 May 21 (obs id 360) the standard 3.2~s frame-time was

374: used. CCDs I2, I3, S1, S2, S3 and S4 were read out, though most of the X-ray

375: emission from Cygnus A is on S3. On 2000 May 26 (obs id 1707) a sub-array

376: window 128 pixels wide on the S3 chip was used with a 0.4~s frame-time to

377: mitigate the effects of pile-up in the inner regions, as discussed above. Both

378: exposures were taken with Cygnus A at the aim-point of the S3 chip. The data

379: were screened in the usual way for times of high background count rates and

380: aspect errors. The 3.2~s and 0.4~s frame-time data have total good exposure

381: times of 34720~s and 9227~s respectively.  Spectra and instrument responses

382: were generated using {\sc ciao} 2.1 (with reprocessed data) and CALDB 2.3, and

383: analyzed with {\sc xspec} v11.0.1. The \emph{Chandra} response is not reliable

384: below 0.45 keV, although the backside-illuminated S3 chip has good sensitivity

385: to X-rays down to 0.1 keV. To improve the sampling of the X-ray images, we

386: interpolated the data from the original $0\farcs5$ to $0\farcs05$-sized pixels

387: and then smoothed the resulting image with a Gaussian of FWHM $0\farcs5$.

388: 

389: Cygnus A was also observed using the \emph{Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer}

390: (\emph{RXTE}) on  May 20, 2000. Data were gathered using the Proportional

391: Counter Array (PCA) and High Energy X-ray Timing Experiment (HEXTE). Two PCA

392: counters (PCU0 and PCU2) were operating at the time of the observation, but

393: PCU0 had suffered the loss of its propane layer one week earlier. Because a

394: good background subtraction model is not yet available  for PCU0 in this new

395: state we have restricted our analysis to PCU2. We used the standard Rex

396: script\footnote{\url{http://RXTE.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/xte/recipes/rex.html}} to

397: generate PCA and HEXTE light curves, source and background spectra, and

398: response matrices. Both the PCA and HEXTE have a field of view of $1\degmark$

399: (FWHM) and are sensitive to photons in the ranges 2 -- 60 keV and 15 -- 250 keV

400: respectively. The PCA and HEXTE have a spectral resolution of $\Delta E / E

401: \simeq 18\%$ at 6 keV and 60 keV respectively. The good exposure times were

402: 29.3 ks for the PCA and 9.7 ks for each of the two HEXTE clusters.

403: 

404: \subsection{Extraction Regions}

405: 

406: To obtain a \emph{Chandra} spectrum of the nucleus, counts were extracted from

407: a 2\farcs5 diameter circle centered on the peak of the X-ray emission. In the

408: 0.4~s frame-time data there are 2781 counts corresponding to a count rate of

409: $0.301 \pm 0.006$ ct \ps. Background counts were extracted from a concentric

410: annulus with an inner diameter 7\arcsec\ and outer diameter 20\arcsec. The

411: background level is very low and is equivalent to only 43 counts, 1.5\% of the

412: total within the 2\farcs5 diameter circle used for the nucleus.

413: 

414: \label{sec:nw_se_nuc}

415: 

416: In order to investigate the spectrum of the circumnuclear extended regions, we

417: took counts from two sectors of a circle with diameter $7\arcsec$ centered on

418: the nucleus. The sectors have half-angles of $55\degmark$ and their axes are

419: aligned with the jet and counter jet. In the 0.4~s frame-time data there are

420: 3183 counts, corresponding to a count rate of $0.345 \pm 0.006$ cts s$^{-1}$,

421: within these sectors. Background counts were extracted from a concentric

422: annulus with inner diameter $7\arcsec$ and outer diameter $14\arcsec$. The

423: background level is equivalent to 224 counts, 8\% of the total inside the two

424: sectors. The source extraction regions contain some flux from the nucleus.

425: 

426: \section{X-ray Morphology}

427: 

428: The X-ray morphology within the central $4 \arcsec \times 4 \arcsec$ around the

429: nucleus varies strongly with photon energy (see Fig.~\ref{fig:collage}). Above

430: approximately 2 \keV\, the nucleus appears to be point-like and coincident with

431: the radio core (see Section~\ref{sec:x_ray_align}), while below $\sim 1 \keV$ a

432: bi-polar distribution is clearly seen in the higher signal-to-noise ratio 3.2~s

433: frame-time data, with one peak of emission $\simeq 1\farcs2$ northwest of the

434: nucleus along PA ${287^{+35\degmark}_{-13\degmark}}$ and a second peak $\simeq

435: 1\farcs3$ southeast of the nucleus along PA

436: ${115^{+30\degmark}_{-21\degmark}}$. These are the position angles of the

437: center of the brightest pixels, in the 0.25 -- 1 keV image, to the northwest

438: and southeast relative to the location of the nucleus and determined using the

439: {\sc iraf} {\sc center} tool. The quoted ``error bars'' are the range of

440: position angle given by moving $\sqrt{2}$ pixels from the peak pixel diagonally

441: NE and SW. The bi-polar distribution is easily seen in a color image

442: (Fig.~\ref{fig:color}), in which the data were divided into three bands, red

443: representing 0.1 -- 1.275 keV, green 1.275 -- 2.2 keV and blue 2.2 -- 10 keV.

444: Images in the three bands were then combined to give the overall color picture.

445: The nuclear region has a blue, and hence hard, X-ray point-like core with the

446: two offset regions to the northwest and southeast appearing yellower,

447: indicative of softer X-ray emission. Even though a clear bi-polar morphology is

448: seen, there is also soft X-ray emission close to the nucleus. A comparatively

449: smooth distribution of hot gas is projected around the nuclear region.

450: 

451: The double morphology may be due, in part, to the presence of a dust lane

452: running N-S across the nucleus obscuring the central $\sim 1\arcsec$ of the

453: soft X-ray emission. The 0.25 -- 1 keV flux per pixel at the location of the

454: nucleus is approximately 40\% of that at the peak of the soft X-ray emission

455: some $\sim 1\farcs2$ from the nucleus. If the intrinsic luminosity and spectra

456: of these two regions are the same then a modest additional column density of

457: $N_H ({\rm cold\ gas\ in\ dust\ lane}) \simeq 2.4 \times 10^{21} \pcmsq$

458: obscuring the nucleus would be sufficient to account for the lower flux at the

459: nucleus. This column density is consistent with the additional reddening of the

460: nucleus by the dust lane (Shaw \& Tadhunter 1994; Tadhunter, Metz \& Robinson

461: 1994), assuming a standard dust to gas ratio.

462: 

463: To determine whether \emph{Chandra} resolves the point-like, hard X-ray

464: nucleus, its radial profile was compared with a model of the point spread

465: function. It should be noted that on larger spatial scales, significant X-ray

466: emission is observed in the neighborhood of the nucleus. Most of this larger

467: scale emission is thermal in origin with a temperature of 4 -- 5 keV and

468: apparently represents emission from the intracluster gas projected close to the

469: nucleus (Paper III). This hot plasma has a significant high energy tail so the

470: wings of the PSF from the nucleus may merge into the continuum emission from

471: the thermal plasma. To minimize this effect, the point spread function was

472: calculated at 8.6 keV where the contribution from the cluster gas is much

473: smaller than at lower energies. The background level was determined using a

474: circle of radius 22\farcs5 offset 50\arcsec\ southeast of the nucleus. Radial profiles

475: of the point spread function at 8.6 keV and the observed 7 -- 9 keV counts

476: (from the 0.4 s frame-time data) centered on the nucleus are shown in

477: Fig.~\ref{fig:psf}. The hard X-ray nucleus is seen to be  unresolved.

478: 

479: \section{X-ray Spectra}

480: 

481: \subsection{Nucleus} \label{sec:nuc_spec}

482: 

483: The grossly different spatial resolutions of \emph{Chandra} and \emph{RXTE}

484: mean that different spectral models have to be fitted to data sets from each

485: observatory. The 2\farcs5 diameter circle used to extract counts from the

486: \emph{Chandra} data effectively isolates the nucleus from the surrounding

487: cluster, whereas the $\simeq 1\degmark$ resolution of \emph{RXTE} yields a

488: spectrum that includes the nucleus, features associated with the radio source,

489: and the intra-cluster gas. The \emph{Chandra} data show the ``hot spots'' to

490: have $\approxlt 1\%$ of the 7 -- 10 keV flux of the nucleus so flux from the

491: ``hot spots'' will not contribute significantly to the \emph{RXTE} spectrum.

492: The \emph{Chandra} and \emph{RXTE} spectra are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:spec}.

493: The \emph{Chandra} spectrum of the nucleus has two main components --- a soft

494: component below 2 keV, and a hard component above 2 keV. In the previous

495: Section, we noted that the soft component is spatially extended and the hard

496: component spatially unresolved. Additionally there is a strong iron line around

497: 6.4 keV in the rest frame of Cygnus A. The \emph{Chandra} spectrum was modeled

498: over the energy range 0.7 -- 9 keV. The \emph{RXTE} spectra cover a much larger

499: spatial area and extend up to much higher energies. The PCA spectra were fitted

500: over energy ranges of 3 -- 20 keV (layer 1), 6 -- 20 keV (layer 2) and 8 -- 20

501: keV (layer 3). The HEXTE spectra were fitted over the energy range 15 -- 200

502: keV, and grouped (using the {\sc ftool} {\sc grppha}) into bins such that the

503: signal to noise ratio in each bin exceeded 40 (i.e. $(s_i - b_i) / \sqrt{s_i +

504: b_i} > 40$ where $s_i$ are the measured source counts and $b_i$ are the

505: background counts in bin $i$). The various spectral components were modeled as

506: follows, i) a heavily absorbed power law (with photon index $\Gamma_h$, where

507: the ``h'' stands for ``high energy'') to represent the hidden quasar, ii)

508: either a power law (with photon index $\Gamma_l$, where ``l'' stands for ``low

509: energy'') plus narrow emission lines (``Model 1'') or a bremsstrahlung plus

510: narrow emission lines (``Model 2''), all absorbed by the Galactic column

511: density (assumed here to be $N_H ({\rm Gal}) = 3.3 \times 10^{21} \pcmsq$

512: [Dickey \& Lockman 1990]), to describe the extended soft X-ray emission (there

513: is only very marginal evidence for intrinsic absorption of this emission -- see

514: Section \ref{sec:column}), iii) a ``neutral'' iron fluorescence line, and iv) a

515: high temperature bremsstrahlung with two narrow emission lines to represent the

516: thermal emission of the intra-cluster gas. Components i), ii) and iii) were

517: fitted to all of the data sets, while component iv) was fitted to only the

518: \emph{RXTE} data sets.  The six data sets -- one \emph{Chandra}, three

519: \emph{RXTE} PCA and two \emph{RXTE} HEXTE -- were modeled simultaneously using

520: {\sc xspec}, with the relative normalizations of the \emph{Chandra}, PCA and

521: HEXTE data allowed to vary. The parameters of these models are listed in Table

522: \ref{tab:nuc_spec}. All quantities refer to the rest-frame of Cygnus A, with

523: the exception of the column density to the low energy nuclear emission, which

524: refers to the observer's frame. The relative normalizations in

525: Table~\ref{tab:nuc_spec} give the factors by which the calibrated spectra from

526: the various instruments have been multiplied to provide the best fit. The

527: factor for \emph{Chandra} is defined to be 1.0 and those for the \emph{RXTE}

528: detectors are close to or consistent with unity.

529: 

530: In ``Model 1'' the low energy ($<2 \keV$) part of the nuclear spectrum is

531: modeled with a power law, the photon index ($\Gamma_l$) of which is constrained

532: to be the same as that ($\Gamma_h$) of the high energy power law describing the

533: hidden nucleus. Such would be the case if the low energy emission represents

534: electron-scattered light from the hidden nucleus. This model provides an

535: excellent description of the data with a \chisq\ of 181 for 185 degrees of

536: freedom (d.o.f.). In ``Model 2'' the low energy part of the spectrum is modeled

537: as bremsstrahlung emission. This also provides an excellent description of the

538: data with a \chisq\ of 177 for 184 d.o.f. (Table~\ref{tab:nuc_spec}). In both

539: models the hidden nucleus is described by a power law, the best fit value of

540: which has $\Gamma_{h1} (= \Gamma_{l1}) = 1.52^{+0.12}_{-0.12}$ (the subscript 1

541: denotes ``Model 1''), $\Gamma_{h2} = 1.53^{+0.12}_{-0.15}$ (the subscript 2

542: denotes ``Model 2''), obscured by a column density of $2.0^{+0.1}_{-0.2} \times

543: 10^{23} \pcmsq$. These values of $\Gamma$ are consistent with that obtained --

544: $\Gamma_l = 1.80^{+1.1}_{-1.1}$ -- by simply modeling the soft (0.6 -- 2.5 keV)

545: spectrum by an absorbed power-law. The HEXTE data alone are well described by a

546: power law of photon index $\Gamma_h = 1.48^{+0.36}_{-0.34}$, between 20 and 200

547: keV. These values for $\Gamma_h$ are similar to those found for unobscured AGN,

548: such as Seyfert 1 galaxies. The unabsorbed rest-frame 2 -- 10 keV luminosity of

549: the hidden nucleus in Cygnus A is $L_X ({\rm nuc}) = 3.7 \times 10^{44}

550: \ergps$, and its 0.5 -- 2 keV luminosity $1.5 \times 10^{44} \ergps$. In Model

551: 1, the soft X-ray component is absorbed by a column density of

552: $1.9^{+1.7}_{-1.0} \times 10^{21} \pcmsq$ which is nominally lower than, but

553: consistent with, the Galactic value. The \emph{Chandra} data show soft X-ray

554: lines from He-like and/or H-like Ne and ionized Si from the nucleus (see Table

555: \ref{tab:nuc_lines}). A strong, narrow nuclear Fe K$\alpha$ fluorescence line

556: is seen at $6.40^{+0.05}_{-0.03}$ keV, consistent with \ion{Fe}{2} --

557: \ion{Fe}{18}. If the line width is a free parameter we obtain $\sigma_{\rm Fe}

558: = 0.09^{+0.03}_{-0.04}$ keV which is not significantly broad, and comparable to

559: the detector resolution at 6 keV, $\sigma_{\rm detector} \simeq 0.08$

560: keV\footnote{In the present calibration the FWHM of the line response is

561: systematically narrower than the data, so $\sigma_{\rm Fe}$ is consistent with

562: zero.}. The equivalent width (EW) of the Fe line, $182^{+40}_{-54}$ eV, is in

563: excellent agreement with theoretical predictions for the EW versus $N_H ({\rm

564: nuc})$ relation in various geometries (see Fig. 3 of Ptak et al. 1996). A

565: strong, nuclear, iron absorption edge is observed at a rest-frame energy of

566: approximately 7.2 keV, corresponding to the K shell edge of \ion{Fe}{1} --

567: \ion{Fe}{10} (see Fig.~\ref{fig:fe_line_edge}). If the iron abundance in the

568: absorbing gas is allowed to vary (using the {\sc vphabs} model in {\sc xspec})

569: the best fitting value is found to be $Z ({\rm Fe}) = 0.90^{+0.46}_{-0.48}

570: \times Z_\odot ({\rm Fe})$. In addition, there is tentative evidence for an

571: iron K$\beta$ line at a rest-frame energy of 7.1 keV, and this will add to the

572: uncertainty in the estimate of the iron abundance.

573: 

574: The temperature of the thermal emission from the cluster gas, measured by the

575: \emph{RXTE} instruments, is $kT_1 = 6.9^{+0.3}_{-1.0} \keV$, $kT_2 =

576: 6.8^{+0.5}_{-0.8} \keV$, and the unabsorbed rest-frame 2 -- 10 keV luminosity

577: of the cluster is $L_X ({\rm cluster}) = 1.2 \times 10^{45} \ergps$. These

578: parameters for the cluster are in good agreement with  the results from

579: \emph{Ginga} (Ueno et al. 1994), \emph{EXOSAT} (Arnaud et al. 1987) and

580: \emph{ASCA} (Sambruna et al. 1999; Markevitch et al. 1998, 1999). The cluster

581: flux we measure with \emph{RXTE} is larger than that found from modeling the

582: \emph{Chandra}-detected emission in chip S3 (an $8^\prime \times 8^\prime$

583: region of the inner part of the cluster gas --- see paper III) since the field

584: of view of \emph{RXTE} is much larger than that of \emph{Chandra}. The model of

585: the cluster gas includes two strong emission lines, one at a rest-frame energy

586: of 6.70 keV from ionized Fe K$\alpha$, and another at 7.90 keV (see Table

587: \ref{tab:nuc_lines}) that may be either or both of ionized Fe K$\beta$ and

588: ionized Ni K$\alpha$. 

589: 

590: \subsection{Northwest and Southeast Regions} \label{sec:nw_se_spec}

591: 

592: In order to study the extended soft X-ray emission within a few arc seconds of

593: the nucleus, we obtained a spectrum from the 0.4~s frame-time data using two

594: sectors of a circle with diameter $7\arcsec$ centered on the nucleus. The

595: sectors had half-angles of $55\degmark$ and their axes were aligned with the

596: jet and counter jet (cf. Fig.~\ref{fig:collage}, bottom panels). We restrict

597: our attention to the energy range 0.5 -- 2 keV to minimize the contribution

598: from the unresolved nucleus. The spectrum was initially modeled by a hot

599: thermal plasma with solar metal abundances using the {\sc mekal} model in {\sc

600: xspec}, absorbed by the Galactic column. This model provides a very poor fit to

601: the data (see Table~\ref{tab:nw_se_spec}) and may be ruled out. If the metal

602: abundances are allowed to vary, the best model has an abundance of only 3\% of

603: solar, which is implausible. Bremsstrahlung or power-law models, both absorbed

604: by the Galactic column, are also unsatisfactory (Table~\ref{tab:nw_se_spec})

605: 

606: A power law plus narrow emission lines, all absorbed by the Galactic column,

607: provides a much better description of the data (see Tables

608: \ref{tab:nw_se_spec}, \ref{tab:nw_se_lines} and Fig.~\ref{fig:nw_se_spec}),

609: with a $\chi^2$ value of 22 for 21 degrees of freedom (d.o.f.). The photon

610: index of the power law, $\Gamma_l = 2.01^{+0.46}_{-0.54}$, is consistent with

611: that obtained through the 2\farcs5 aperture, but marginally steeper than that

612: found for the heavily absorbed nuclear source at high energy, $\Gamma_h =

613: 1.52^{+0.12}_{-0.12}$ (Model 1), or $\Gamma_h = 1.53^{+0.12}_{-0.15}$ (Model 2;

614: see Table~\ref{tab:nuc_spec}). For the power law plus narrow emission lines

615: model, the unabsorbed rest-frame 0.5 -- 2 keV luminosity is $3.8 \times 10^{42}

616: \ergps$ and, by extrapolating to higher energies with $\Gamma_l = 2.01$, the

617: unabsorbed rest-frame 2 -- 10 keV luminosity is found to be $3.7 \times 10^{42}

618: \ergps$ (7\arcsec\ diameter, double sector aperture). For comparison, the power

619: law plus lines model through the 2\farcs5 aperture (Model 1) has a rest-frame

620: 0.5 -- 2 keV luminosity, corrected for Galactic absorption, of $2.0 \times

621: 10^{42} \ergps$ and, by extrapolating the low energy power law to higher

622: energies with $\Gamma_l = 1.52$, an unabsorbed rest-frame 2 -- 10 keV

623: luminosity of $4.2 \times 10^{42} \ergps$.

624: 

625: We observe lines from \ion{Ne}{7} -- \ion{Ne}{9} K$\alpha$ and \ion{Si}{2} --

626: \ion{Si}{11} K$\alpha$, and tentatively detect a H-like Ne K$\alpha$ line (see

627: Table \ref{tab:nw_se_lines}). The spectrum is shown in

628: Fig.~\ref{fig:nw_se_spec}. If we fit a power law from 4 -- 9 keV plus a narrow

629: Gaussian we find an iron line consistent with \ion{Fe}{2} -- \ion{Fe}{18}

630: K$\alpha$ with an equivalent width of 226~eV. In the 3.2~s frame-time data we

631: observe two lines, \ion{Ne}{5} -- \ion{Ne}{9} K$\alpha$ and \ion{Si}{7} --

632: \ion{Si}{10} K$\alpha$, consistent with the 0.4~s frame-time data, but do not

633: require the H-like Ne line. The line fluxes from the 3.2~s frame-time

634: observation are too low because of the effects of pile-up, and we do not give

635: them.

636: 

637: It should be noted that the value of $\Gamma_l$ depends on the assumed

638: absorbing column density. As can be seen from Fig.~\ref{fig:gamma_nh}, the

639: lower the absorbing column density the lower the inferred photon index, with an

640: uncertainty of $\Delta N_H \simeq 1 \times 10^{21} \pcmsq$ corresponding to an

641: uncertainty in the photon index of $\Delta \Gamma_l \simeq 0.6$. The precise

642: values of the extinction towards, and intrinsic to, Cygnus A are difficult to

643: determine, given its low galactic latitude. Within Cygnus A itself the

644: extinction is very patchy (see, e.g., Fig. 7 of Jackson et al. 1998), while the

645: foreground reddening, measured towards three normal elliptical galaxies in the

646: Cygnus A group, is approximately $E(B-V) = 0.36$ (Spinrad \& Stauffer 1982).

647: Assuming a standard gas to dust ratio this foreground extinction corresponds to

648: a column density of $2.2 \times 10^{21} \pcmsq$. If the average absorbing

649: column density over the $7\arcsec$, double sector aperture is close to this

650: value instead of the assumed $N_H ({\rm Gal}) = 3.3 \times 10^{21} \pcmsq$, the

651: value of $\Gamma_l$ becomes $\simeq 1.5$, the same value as found for

652: $\Gamma_h$ (Section \ref{sec:nuc_spec}).

653: 

654: To investigate any spectral differences between the northwest and southeast regions the

655: circumnuclear emission was divided into two regions. A circle of diameter

656: 10\arcsec\ centered on the peak of the X-ray emission was divided into two

657: semi-circles by a line running along PA 14$\degmark$ which is perpendicular to

658: the radio jet on small scales. Also, a square region of $3 \times 3$ pixels

659: ($1\farcs5 \times 1\farcs5$) centered on the peak pixel was excluded. The 0.4 s

660: frame-time data between 0.5 and 2 keV from each region were modeled by an

661: absorbed power law of fixed photon index $\Gamma = 2.10$ (cf. Table

662: \ref{tab:nw_se_spec}). The best model has column densities of $N_H$ (NW) $ =

663: 2.6^{+0.9}_{-0.8} \times 10^{21} \pcmsq$, consistent with the Galactic column

664: density towards Cygnus A, and $N_H$ (SE) $ = 4.7^{+1.5}_{-1.1} \times 10^{21}

665: \pcmsq$. This possible excess column to the southeast side suggests it is the farther,

666: in agreement with Carilli \& Barthel (1996). If real, the difference in

667: absorbing columns would correspond to $\Delta A_V \simeq 1$ mag of optical

668: extinction. \label{sec:column}

669: 

670: \section{Comparison with Observations at Other Wavelengths}

671: 

672: The central few arc seconds of Cygnus A contain considerable structure

673: (Section~\ref{sec:intro}). Radio observations (Perley, Dreher \& Cowan 1984;

674: Carilli, Bartel \& Linfield 1991) show a compact ``core'' located at

675: $\alpha_{\rm r} = 19^{\rm h}\ 59^{\rm m}\ 28\fs348$, $\delta_{\rm r} =

676: 40^\circ\ 44^\prime\ 02\farcs17$ (J2000) with a prominent jet running along PA

677: $284 \pm 3^\circ$ (Carilli et al. 1991).  We assume the core to be the location

678: of the ``true'' nucleus, i.e.  the putative super-massive black hole and

679: accretion disk. The peak of the X-ray emission, found using the {\sc iraf} tool

680: ``{\sc center}'' and the \emph{Chandra} astrometry, is at $\alpha_{\rm x} =

681: 19^{\rm h}\ 59^{\rm m}\ 28\fs375$, $\delta_{\rm x} = 40^\circ\ 44^\prime\

682: 02\farcs36$ (J2000). The offset between these two positions is less than

683: $0\farcs4$ (i.e., smaller than one \emph{Chandra} pixel and within the current

684: systematics) and we assume them to be coincident. The \emph{Chandra} images

685: were, therefore, shifted so the peak of the X-ray emission coincides with the

686: peak of the radio emission. A superposition of the \emph{Chandra} 3.2~s

687: frame-time data on a 6 cm radio map is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:chandra_6cm}. The

688: two peaks of soft X-ray emission, one $\simeq 1\farcs2$ along PA 287$\degmark$

689: to the northwest and the other $\simeq 1\farcs3$ along PA 115$\degmark$ to the

690: southeast are, to within a few degrees, along the PA of the radio jet and

691: counter jet, respectively. The peak to the northwest coincides with a ``neck''

692: in the radio jet, and also corresponds to a channel dividing the northwest

693: cloud seen in HST images (discussed below). There is evidence of a counter jet

694: in the radio observations (Carilli \& Barthel 1996), and this passes just to

695: the north of the southeast X-ray peak. \label{sec:x_ray_align}

696: 

697: We recomputed the plate solutions of the infrared K$^\prime$ and optical r band

698: images of Stockton et al. (1994) using the known positions of stars in the

699: field of Cygnus A (Griffin 1963). Unsaturated stars c, d, g and h (using the

700: nomenclature of Griffin 1963) were used for the K$^\prime$ band and c, d and g

701: for the r band. Having obtained the plate solution using the stars, the {\sc

702: iraf} tool {\sc center} places the K$^\prime$ nucleus at $\alpha_{{\rm

703: K}^\prime} = 19^{\rm h}\ 59^{\rm m}\ 28\fs378$, $\delta_{{\rm K}^\prime} =

704: 40^\circ\ 44^\prime\ 02\farcs09$ (J2000), which is within $0\farcs4$ of the

705: radio core and represents coincidence given the errors. The nucleus in the r

706: band image is not point-like, so cannot be simply aligned with the radio core.

707: Instead, the same offset (less than $0\farcs4$) was applied to the r band image

708: as was applied to the K$^\prime$ image. The r band image shows bright peaks of

709: emission at the nucleus, and to the northwest and southeast. The bright,

710: extended optical emission correlates well with the extended X-ray emission (see

711: Fig.~\ref{fig:opt_r_band}).

712: 

713: HST imaging in wavebands containing optical emission lines (Jackson et al.

714: 1994; Jackson et al 1996) reveals three distinct structures in a roughly

715: $4^{\prime\prime} \times 4^{\prime\prime}$ region around the nucleus. There are

716: two ``clouds'', one to the northwest and one to the southeast, and a ``bar'' connecting the S

717: extreme of the northwest cloud to the N extreme of the southeast cloud. In the middle of the

718: ``bar'' there is a bright optical knot at $\alpha_{\rm HST} = 19^{\rm h}\

719: 59^{\rm m}\ 28\fs344$, $\delta_{\rm HST} = 40\degmark\ 44^\prime\ 2\farcs25$

720: (J2000) (Jackson et al. 1994), which is within 0\farcs1 of the radio core.

721: Thus, in aligning the optical, radio and X-ray images, the central optical

722: component in the HST images was assumed to coincide with the radio and X-ray

723: nuclei. There are bright peaks in [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda 5007$ and H$\alpha$ +

724: [\ion{N}{2}]$\lambda\lambda 6548$, 6583 emission coincident with the hard X-ray

725: nucleus, and the northern region of the extended X-ray emission to the northwest (see

726: Figs. \ref{fig:hst_oiii} and \ref{fig:hst_halpha}). Diffuse [\ion{O}{3}] line

727: emission is seen from an approximately bi-conical region centered on the

728: nucleus and in this regard the X-ray and [\ion{O}{3}] emissions appear well

729: correlated (as also found in NGC 1068 [Young, Wilson \& Shopbell 2001], where

730: the ionization of the X-ray emitting gas is dominated by photoionization

731: [Paerels et al. 2000]). \label{sec:hst_align}

732: 

733: \section{Discussion}

734: 

735: \subsection{The Hidden Nucleus} \label{sec:hidden_nuc}

736: 

737: The \emph{Chandra} observations of the nucleus of Cygnus A identify the source

738: of hard X-ray emission with an unresolved point source located within

739: $0\farcs4$ of, and probably coincident with, the radio core. The spectrum of

740: this point source is well described by a power law of photon index $\Gamma =

741: 1.5^{+0.12}_{-0.12}$, with rest-frame 2 -- 10 keV luminosity (corrected for

742: absorption) of $L_X ({\rm nuc}) = 3.7 \times 10^{44} \ergps$ obscured by a

743: column density of $2.0^{+0.1}_{-0.2} \times 10^{23} \pcmsq$. The power law

744: slope has been determined with unprecedented precision for Cygnus A, and is at

745: the lower end of the distribution of photon indices for NLRG (see Fig. 2(a) of

746: Sambruna et al. 1999). A narrow Fe K$\alpha$ line is observed in the energy

747: range of \ion{Fe}{2} -- \ion{Fe}{18}, with an equivalent width of approximately

748: 200~eV. The fact that the hard X-ray power law is detected out to 100 keV

749: confirms the similarity to Seyferts and quasars. However, we find no evidence

750: for broad Fe K$\alpha$.

751: 

752: The above noted value of $L_X ({\rm nuc})$ in the 2 -- 10 keV band and the

753: [\ion{O}{3}]$\lambda5007$ luminosity ($2.6\times10^{43} \ergps$, after

754: correction for 1.5 mag of Galactic extinction -- see Osterbrock \& Miller 1975)

755: are in accordance with the X-ray -- [\ion{O}{3}] luminosity correlation for

756: Seyfert galaxies and unobscured radio galaxies (e.g., Mulchaey et al. 1994,

757: Sambruna et al. 1999), and are comparable to the two type 2 QSO candidates IRAS

758: 23060+0505 and IRAS 20460+1925 (see Fig. 5 in Halpern et al. 1998). The X-ray

759: to far infrared luminosity ratio in Cygnus A $L_{\rm X} (2 - 10 \keV) / L_{\rm

760: FIR} = 0.18$ and is similar to QSOs (e.g., Elvis et al. 1994). The far infrared

761: luminosity was calculated from the \emph{IRAS} fluxes using $F_{\rm FIR} = 1.26

762: \times 10^{-14} (2.58S_{60} + S_{100})$ W m$^{-2}$, where $S_{60}$ and

763: $S_{100}$ are the flux densities at 60 $\mu$m and 100 $\mu$m, respectively, in

764: units of Jy.

765: 

766: We attempt to estimate the nuclear optical absolute magnitude which cannot be

767: measured directly because of the heavy extinction toward the nucleus. First, we

768: assume the spectral energy distribution (SED) of Cygnus A is the same as the

769: median SED of radio-loud quasars presented in Elvis et al. (1994). Then,

770: normalizing to the X-ray flux, the absolute magnitude in the B band is found to

771: be $M_{\rm B}=-22.4$. Alternatively, the H$\beta$ luminosity -- $M_{\rm B}$

772: correlation for type 1 Seyfert galaxies and QSOs (Ho \& Peng 2001), gives

773: $M_{\rm B}=-21.2$. Note, however, that the H$\beta$ luminosities adopted in Ho

774: \& Peng (2001) are a combination of the broad and narrow components and the

775: broad component dominates in type 1 QSOs.  We used only the narrow component of

776: H$\beta$ for Cygnus A and therefore this last value of $M_{\rm B}$ should be

777: regarded as an upper limit (i.e. a lower limit on the B band luminosity). This

778: upper limit is consistent with the estimate obtained using the SED.

779: 

780: \subsection{Electron-scattered Nuclear Flux} \label{sec:electron-scattered}

781: 

782: In this section we discuss the possibility that the extended bi-polar soft

783: X-ray continuum emission to the northwest and southeast of the nucleus is

784: electron-scattered nuclear light. In such a model the continuum spectrum of the

785: electron-scattered component is identical to that of the nucleus, and the

786: observations are consistent with the directly viewed hard component and the

787: soft component having the same photon index (i.e. $\Gamma_h = \Gamma_l$,

788: Sections \ref{sec:nuc_spec} and \ref{sec:nw_se_spec}). An extrapolation of the

789: soft X-ray power law has an unabsorbed rest-frame 2 -- 10 keV luminosity of

790: approximately $3.7 \times 10^{42} \ergps$ (see Section \ref{sec:nw_se_spec})

791: which corresponds to approximately 1\% of the unobscured 2 -- 10 keV nuclear

792: luminosity ($3.7 \times 10^{44} \ergps$; see Section \ref{sec:nuc_spec}). This

793: is compatible with the range of scattering fractions inferred in Seyfert 2

794: galaxies, in which typically 0.25 -- 5\% of the nuclear light is hypothesized

795: to be scattered into our line of sight (Turner et al. 1997b), and less than the

796: 5 -- 10\% inferred in those objects exhibiting broad polarized H$\alpha$ (Awaki

797: et al. 2000); of course, there may be, in addition, intrinsically extended

798: thermal emission. If the X-rays are scattered by an optically thin population

799: of electrons in a bi-conical region, then \begin{eqnarray*} L_{\rm scattered} &

800: = & L_{\rm intrinsic} \frac{\Omega}{4\pi} \tau_{\rm scattering} \\ & = & L_{\rm

801: intrinsic} \left( 1 - \cos \theta \right) \tau_{\rm scattering} \end{eqnarray*}

802: where $\theta$ is the opening half-angle of the bi-conical region, observed by

803: HST to be $\theta \simeq 55\degmark$. Using the luminosities given above, we

804: find an optical depth through one cone of $\tau_{\rm scattering} \simeq 0.02$

805: and a column density $N_e ({\rm scattering}) = \tau_{\rm scattering} / \sigma_T

806: = 3.5 \times 10^{22} \pcmsq$. This is significantly higher than both the

807: Galactic column density to Cygnus A, $N_H ({\rm Gal}) = 3.3 \times 10^{21}

808: \cmsq$, and the upper limit to the intrinsic column density to the southeast or

809: northwest regions, $\max \{ N_H({\rm SE}), N_H({\rm NW}) \} - N_H({\rm Gal})

810: \approxlt 2.9 \times 10^{21} \pcmsq$ (see Section \ref{sec:column}). The lack

811: of strong absorption in the \emph{Chandra} soft X-ray spectrum rules out such a

812: high column of \emph{cold}, ionized gas.

813: 

814: As just noted, the observed intrinsic absorbing column density to the soft

815: X-ray emission, assuming the absorbing gas is cold, is $N_H ({\rm observed,\

816: intrinsic}) \approxlt 2.9 \times 10^{21} \pcmsq$ (see above), while the column

817: density for the scattering medium is inferred to be much larger, $N_H ({\rm

818: scattering}) \simeq 3.5 \times 10^{22} \pcmsq$. This discrepancy may be

819: reconciled if the scattering medium is ionized and hence has a lower opacity to

820: soft X-rays. Ideally, the absorber should be modeled as an ionized gas.

821: However, we can get an idea of the conditions required by writing

822: \begin{eqnarray*} N_H ({\rm observed,\ intrinsic}) = N_H ({\rm scattering})

823: \frac{ \sigma_{\rm abs} ({\rm ionized}) }{ \sigma_{\rm abs} ({\rm cold}) },

824: \end{eqnarray*} where $\sigma_{\rm abs} ({\rm ionized})$ and $\sigma_{\rm abs}

825: ({\rm cold})$ are the absorption cross sections of ionized and cold gas,

826: respectively, and bearing in mind that $\sigma_{\rm abs} ({\rm ionized}) /

827: \sigma_{\rm abs} ({\rm cold})$ is a function of energy even for a single

828: ionization parameter for the ionized gas. The absorbing column intrinsic to

829: Cygnus A affects the observed spectrum most in the range $\simeq 0.5$ -- 1 keV.

830: At just above $E = 0.5 \keV$, $\sigma_{\rm abs} ({\rm cold}) \simeq (1 - 2)

831: \times 10^{-22} / (E/\keV)^3 \cmsq$ (Morrison \& McCammon 1983), and

832: $\sigma_{\rm abs} ({\rm ionized}) \simeq (2 - 3) \times 10^{-23} / (E/\keV)^3

833: \cmsq$ (Krolik \& Kallman 1984, their Fig. 4) for a photoionized gas with an

834: ionization parameter (taking into account their different definition of the

835: ionization parameter) of $\xi = L_X ({\rm nuc}) / (n_H R^2) \simeq 1$ erg cm

836: s$^{-1}$, where $n_H$ is the number density of hydrogen nuclei and $R$ is the

837: distance from the nucleus. This ionization parameter corresponds to a plasma

838: temperature of $2 \times 10^4 \K$ and such a plasma has almost an order of

839: magnitude lower soft X-ray opacity than neutral gas near 0.5 keV. Similarly, at

840: $E = 1 \keV$ $\sigma_{\rm abs} ({\rm cold}) \simeq 2.4 \times 10^{-22} \cmsq$

841: and $\sigma_{\rm abs} ({\rm ionized}) \simeq 3.6 \times 10^{-23} \cmsq$ for a

842: photoionized gas with $\xi = 63$ erg cm s$^{-1}$ and $T = 9.1 \times 10^4 \K$

843: (again from Krolik \& Kallman 1984, their Fig. 4). Thus, such a plasma has

844: almost an order of magnitude lower soft X-ray opacity than neutral gas, but

845: this time at 1 keV. Thus a conservative lower limit is $\xi > 1$ erg cm

846: s$^{-1}$; it is a lower limit because there could be \emph{cold} gas present

847: with the intrinsic column ($N_H ({\rm observed,\ intrinsic}) \approxlt 2.9

848: \times 10^{21} \pcmsq$) and \emph{zero} absorption from the scattering column,

849: which would then have to have a very high value of $\xi$.

850: 

851: The measured unabsorbed X-ray luminosity of the nucleus then implies $n_e R^2

852: \approxlt 3.7 \times 10^{44} (\xi / 1 $ erg cm s$^{-1})^{-1}$ (taking $n_e

853: \simeq n_H$). The column density of the scattering electrons $N_e ({\rm

854: scattering}) \simeq 3.5 \times 10^{22} \pcmsq$ corresponds to a number density

855: of $n_e \simeq 11 / R (\kpc) = 6 \pcmcu$ for the observed $R = 1.9$ kpc.

856: Combining the equations for $n_e R^2$ and $n_e R$ we find $R < 3.4 (\xi / 1$

857: erg cm s$^{-1})^{-1} \kpc$, which agrees with the observed distance of the soft

858: X-ray emission from the nucleus if $\xi \simeq 1$ erg cm s$^{-1}$. A low value

859: of $\xi$ is consistent with the low ionization state of the Fe K$\alpha$ line

860: observed from the nucleus and circumnuclear region (see

861: Tables~\ref{tab:nuc_lines} and \ref{tab:nw_se_lines}).

862: 

863: The presence of highly ionized Ne lines in the soft X-ray spectrum may be used

864: to constrain the location of gas emitting those lines. To photoionize Ne to

865: \ion{Ne}{7} and \ion{Ne}{10} requires $20 \approxlt \xi \approxlt 300$ erg cm

866: s$^{-1}$ (Kallman \& McCray 1982) implying $n_e R^2 \approxlt 1.9 \times

867: 10^{43} (\xi / 20$ erg cm s$^{-1})^{-1}$. If $n_e = 6 \pcmcu$, we get $R \le

868: 569 \pc$, substantially smaller than the observed nuclear distance of the soft

869: X-ray peaks (Figs.~\ref{fig:chandra_6cm}~--~\ref{fig:hst_halpha}), which are

870: dominated by continuum radiation. It is possible, however, that $n_e$ may be

871: lower, allowing a larger value of $R$. This would be the case in a multi-phase

872: gas, e.g., with warm dense blobs embedded in a hotter less dense gas, which

873: would be responsible for the observed highly ionized line emission.

874: 

875: The nuclear absolute magnitude is estimated by Ogle et al. (1997) using the

876: optical polarized flux as \begin{eqnarray*} M = M_{\rm PF} - 2.5\log \left(

877: \frac{1}{q\tau P} \right) - A, \end{eqnarray*} where $M_{\rm PF}$ is the

878: absolute magnitude of the polarized flux, $q$ is the source covering fraction,

879: $\tau$ is the scattering optical depth, $P$ is the intrinsic polarization of

880: the scattered light, and $A$ is the extinction. The observed $M_{\rm PF} =

881: -15.2$ (rest B band corrected for Galactic extinction, western component only,

882: $H_0$ = 50 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$), $P=11$\%, and $q=0.86$\% (Ogle et al. 1997)

883: gives $M_{\rm B} = -22.8 - 2.5\log \tau - A_{\rm B}$. Our estimation of $M_{\rm

884: B}$ from the SED and this relation suggest that $\tau$ is order of 1 if the

885: extinction is small. This $\tau$ is much larger than that estimated from the

886: extended soft X-ray emission if the scattering particles are electrons,

887: suggesting instead that the polarized optical light is scattered by dust,

888: unless the value of $\Omega$ for the X-rays is much smaller than we assumed.

889: 

890: \subsection{A Non-Scattering Origin for the Extended Soft X-ray Flux}

891: 

892: The extended, soft X-ray emission may also be described by a thermal

893: bremsstrahlung model (see Table~\ref{tab:nw_se_spec}). The direct

894: bremsstrahlung emission from a plasma with the density inferred in the

895: scattering model ($n_e \sim 6 \pcmcu$; Section \ref{sec:electron-scattered})

896: would dominate over the scattered flux unless the emitting and scattering

897: medium has a temperature below $10^6$ K, which is significantly lower than that

898: required in the bremsstrahlung model -- $kT = 1.5^{+1.5}_{-0.5} \keV \simeq 2

899: \times 10^7 \K$. An argument against the extended emission being entirely due

900: to a thermal plasma is the extremely low metallicity required to provide a good

901: description of the data. A bremsstrahlung model has no metal lines and the best

902: fitting {\sc mekal} model has $Z = 0.03 Z_\odot$. This is unrealistic in what

903: is apparently a metal rich environment (see Paper III).

904: 

905: \subsection{Conclusions}

906: 

907: We have obtained the highest resolution ($< 1\arcsec$) image to date of the

908: X-ray emission of the nuclear region of Cygnus A with \emph{Chandra} and also

909: made quasi-simultaneous \emph{RXTE} observations. To summarize, we find:

910: 

911: \begin{itemize}

912: 

913: \item The hard X-ray nucleus is located within 0\farcs4 of the radio core (i.e.

914: coincident to within the current \emph{Chandra} systematics), and unresolved.

915: The nucleus is well described by a power law of photon index $\Gamma_h \simeq

916: 1.5$ heavily absorbed by a column density of $N_H \simeq 2 \times 10^{23}

917: \pcmsq$. The rest-frame 2 -- 10 keV unabsorbed luminosity of the nucleus is

918: $L_X ({\rm nuc}) \simeq 3.7 \times 10^{44} \ergps$. Emission lines from H-like

919: and/or He-like Ne, highly ionized Si and ``neutral'' Fe are observed from the

920: nucleus. A strong Fe K absorption edge is seen, confirming the heavy

921: obscuration of the nucleus.

922: 

923: \item The \emph{RXTE} observations show that the spectrum of the cluster gas

924: may be described by a bremsstrahlung model with temperature $kT \simeq 6.9$~keV

925: and a rest-frame 2 -- 10 keV unabsorbed luminosity of $L_X ({\rm cluster}) =

926: 1.2 \times 10^{45} \ergps$. Emission lines from ionized Fe K$\alpha$, and

927: either, or both of, Ni K$\alpha$ and Fe K$\beta$ are also observed from the

928: cluster.

929: 

930: \item Bi-polar soft X-ray emission is observed to extend $\simeq 1\farcs2$

931: towards the northwest and southeast of the nucleus of Cygnus A, and aligns well with the

932: bi-polar structures seen in optical continuum and line radiation. The bi-polar

933: morphology may be produced or enhanced by the passage of a dust lane across the

934: nucleus, providing an additional absorbing column density of $N_H ({\rm cold\

935: gas\ in\ dust\ lane}) \simeq 2.4 \times 10^{21} \pcmsq$ and suppressing the

936: very soft X-ray flux. Emission lines from \ion{Ne}{7} -- \ion{Ne}{9},

937: \ion{Si}{2} -- \ion{Si}{11}, and tentatively H-like Ne are observed in the soft

938: X-ray spectrum of the northwest and southeast regions.

939: 

940: \item Extrapolation of the best power law model of the soft (0.5 -- 2 keV),

941: extended, circumnuclear emission to higher energies gives a 2 -- 10 keV

942: luminosity of $\simeq 3.7 \times 10^{42} \ergps$, which is 1\% of that of the

943: unabsorbed nuclear luminosity in the same band. Furthermore, the photon index

944: ($\Gamma_l$) of this soft emission agrees with that ($\Gamma_h$) of the

945: directly viewed hard X-ray emission, and so the soft emission is consistent

946: with being electron-scattered X-rays from the nucleus. The scattering region

947: must be ionized to ionization parameter $\xi \approxgt 1$ in order to be

948: sufficiently transparent to soft X-rays. The column density of the scattering

949: electrons is inferred to be much lower than that required to generate the

950: polarized optical light by electron scattering, suggesting the optical light

951: is, in fact, scattered by dust.

952: 

953: \item The extended soft X-ray emission is well correlated with ionized gas

954: observed optically with HST, in particular images in [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda

955: 5007$ and H$\alpha$ + [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda\lambda 6548$, 6583. This result is

956: consistent with the soft X-ray emitting gas being photoionized.

957: 

958: \end{itemize}

959: 

960: Future high spectral resolution observations with the \emph{Chandra} and

961: \emph{XMM-Newton} gratings would be able to resolve triplet lines, such as

962: \ion{Ne}{9}, that are good diagnostics of the plasma temperature and the

963: relative importance of photoionization and collisional ionization. In addition,

964: the presence of narrow radiative recombination continua would confirm that the

965: soft X-ray emitting gas is photoionized (cf. Paerels et al. 2000).

966: 

967: We are grateful to Patrick Shopbell for assistance with the HST images, and

968: thank A. Stockton for providing electronic versions of his r and K$^\prime$

969: band images. The VLA radio map was provided in electronic form by R. A. Perley.

970: We thank the referee, Dan Harris, for constructive criticism that improved the

971: clarity and presentation of this paper. YT is supported by the Japan Society

972: for the Promotion of Science Postdoctoral Fellowship for Young Scientists. This

973: research was supported by NASA through grants NAG 81027 and NAG 81755.

974: 

975: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

976: 

977: \begin{thebibliography}{}

978: 

979: \bibitem[]{} Antonucci, R., Hurt, T., \& Kinney, A. 1994, Nature, 371,

980: 313

981: 

982: \bibitem[]{} Arnaud, K. A. 1996, In Cygnus A -- Study of a Radio Galaxy, Eds. C.

983: L. Carilli, \& D. E. Harris, p. 51 (Cambridge University Press)

984: 

985: \bibitem[]{} Arnaud, K. A., Fabian, A. C., Eales, S. A., Jones, C. \& Forman,

986: W. 1984, MNRAS, 211, 981

987: 

988: \bibitem[]{} Arnaud, K. A., Johnstone, R. M., Fabian, A. C., Crawford, C. S.,

989: Nulsen, P. E. J., Shafer, R. A., \& Mushotzky, R. F. 1987, MNRAS, 227, 241

990: 

991: \bibitem[]{} Awaki, H., Koyama, K., Inoue, H., \& Halpren, J. P. 1991, PASJ, 43,

992: 195

993: 

994: \bibitem[]{} Awaki, H., Ueno, S., Taniguchi, Y., \& Weaver, K. A. 2000, ApJ,

995: 542, 175

996: 

997: \bibitem[]{} Baade, W., \& Minkowski, R. 1954, ApJ, 119, 206

998: 

999: %\bibitem[]{} Carilli, C. L. 1989, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of

1000: %Technology

1001: 

1002: \bibitem[]{} Carilli, C. L., Bartel, N., \& Linfield, R. P. 1991, AJ,

1003:   102, 1691

1004: 

1005: \bibitem[]{} Carilli, C. L., \& Barthel, P. D. 1996, A\&A Rev., 7, 1

1006: 

1007: %\bibitem[]{} Carilli, C. L., Perley, R. A., Bartel, N., \& Dreher, J. W. 1996,

1008: %In Cygnus A -- Study of a Radio Galaxy, Eds. C. L. Carilli, \& D. E. Harris, p.

1009: %76 (Cambridge University Press)

1010: 

1011: \bibitem[]{} Dickey, J. M., \& Lockman, F. J. 1990, ARA\&A, 28, 215

1012: 

1013: \bibitem[]{} Djorgovski, S., Weir, N., Matthews, K., \& Graham, J. R. 1991,

1014: ApJ, 372, L67

1015: 

1016: \bibitem[]{} Elvis, M., et al. 1994, ApJS, 95, 1

1017: 

1018: \bibitem[]{} Garmire, G. P., et al. 2000, ApJS, submitted

1019: 

1020: \bibitem[]{} Griffin, R. F. 1963, AJ, 68, 421

1021: 

1022: \bibitem[]{} Halpern, J. P., Eracleous, M., \& Forster, K. 1998, ApJ, 501, 103

1023: 

1024: \bibitem[]{} Hargrave, P. J., \& Ryle, M. 1974, MNRAS, 166, 305

1025: 

1026: \bibitem[]{} Harris, D. E., Perley, R. A., \& Carilli, C. L. 1994, in

1027: Multi-Wavelength Continuum Emission of AGN (IAU Symposium 159), Eds.

1028: Courvoisier, T. J.-L. \& Blecha, A., p. 375 (Kluwer Academic Publishers)

1029: 

1030: \bibitem[]{} Ho, L. C., \& Peng, C. Y. 2001, ApJ in press

1031: 

1032: %\bibitem[]{} Jackson, N., Sparks, W. B., Miley, G. K. \& Macchetto, F. 1994,

1033: %A\&A, 284, 65

1034: 

1035: \bibitem[]{} Jackson, N., Tadhunter, C., \& Sparks, W. B. 1998,

1036: MNRAS, 301,131

1037: 

1038: \bibitem[]{} Jackson, N., Tadhunter, C., Sparks, W. B., Miley, G. K., \&

1039: Macchetto, F. 1996, A\&A, 307, L29

1040: 

1041: \bibitem[]{} Kallman, T. R., \& McCray, R. 1982, ApJS, 50, 263

1042: 

1043: \bibitem[]{} Krolik, J. H., \& Kallman, T. R. 1984, ApJ, 286, 366

1044: 

1045: %\bibitem[]{} Krichbaum, T. P., et al. 1993, A\&A, 275, 375

1046: 

1047: \bibitem[]{} Markevitch, M., Forman, W. R., Sarazin, C. L., \& Vikhlinin, A.

1048: 1998, ApJ, 503, 77

1049: 

1050: \bibitem[]{} Markevitch, M., Sarazin, C. L., \& Vikhlinin, A. 1999, ApJ, 521,

1051: 526

1052: 

1053: \bibitem[]{} Morrison, R. \& McCammon, D. 1983, ApJ, 270, 119

1054: 

1055: \bibitem[]{} Mulchaey, J. S., Koratkar, A., Ward, M. J., Wilson, A. S.,

1056: Whittle, M., Antonucci, R. R. J., Kinney, A. L., \& Hurt, T. 1994, ApJ, 436,

1057: 586

1058: 

1059: \bibitem[]{} Ogle, P. M., Cohen, M. H., Miller, J. S., Tran, H. D., Fosbury, R.

1060: A. E., \& Goodrich, R. W. 1997, ApJ, 482, L37

1061: 

1062: \bibitem[]{} Osterbrock, D. E. 1983, PASP, 95, 12

1063: 

1064: \bibitem[]{} Osterbrock, D. E., \& Miller, J. S. 1975, ApJ, 197, 535

1065: 

1066: \bibitem[]{} Paerels, F., et al. 2000, Bull. A. A. S., 32, 1181

1067: 

1068: \bibitem[]{} Perley, R. A., Dreher, J. W., \& Cowan, J. J. 1984, ApJ, 285, L35

1069: 

1070: \bibitem[]{} Ptak, A., Yaqoob, T., Serlemitsos, P. J., Kunieda, H., \&

1071: Terashima, Y. 1996, ApJ, 459, 542

1072: 

1073: \bibitem[]{} Reynolds, C. S., \& Fabian, A. C. 1996, MNRAS, 278, 479

1074: 

1075: \bibitem[]{} Sambruna, R. M., Eracleous, M., \& Mushotzky, R. F. 1999, ApJ,

1076: 526, 60

1077: 

1078: \bibitem[]{} Shaw, M. \& Tadhunter, C. 1994, MNRAS, 267, 589

1079: 

1080: \bibitem[]{} Smith, D. A., \& Done, C. 1996, MNRAS, 280, 355

1081: 

1082: \bibitem[]{} Smith, D. A., Wilson, A. S., Arnaud, K. A., Terashima, Y., \&

1083: Young, A. J. 2001, ApJ, submitted (Paper III)

1084: 

1085: \bibitem[]{} Spinrad, H., \& Stauffer, J. R. 1982, MNRAS, 200, 153

1086: 

1087: \bibitem[]{} Stockton, A., Ridgway, S. E., \& Lilly, S. J. 1994, AJ, 108, 414

1088: 

1089: \bibitem[]{} Tadhunter, C. N., Metz, S., \& Robinson, A. 1994, MNRAS, 268, 989

1090: 

1091: %\bibitem[]{} Tadhunter, C. N., Packham, C., Axon, D. J., Jackson, N. J., Hough,

1092: %J. H., Robinson, A., Young, S., \& Sparks, W. 1999, ApJ, 512, L91

1093: 

1094: %\bibitem[]{} Tadhunter, C. N., et al. 2000, MNRAS, 313, L52

1095: 

1096: \bibitem[]{} Turner, T. J., George, I. M., Nandra, K., \& Mushotzky, R. F.

1097: 1997a, ApJS, 113, 23

1098: 

1099: \bibitem[]{} Turner, T. J., George, I. M., Nandra, K., \& Mushotzky, R. F.

1100: 1997b, ApJ, 488, 164

1101: 

1102: \bibitem[]{} Ueno, S., Koyama, K., Nishida, M., Yamauchi, S., \& Ward, M. J.

1103: 1994, ApJ, 431, L1

1104: 

1105: \bibitem[]{} Ward, M. J. 1996, In Cygnus A -- Study of a Radio Galaxy, Eds. C.

1106: L. Carilli, \& D. E. Harris, p. 43 (Cambridge University Press)

1107: 

1108: \bibitem[]{} Ward, M. J., Blanco, P. R., Wilson, A. S., \& Nishida, M. 1991,

1109: ApJ, 382, 115

1110: 

1111: %\bibitem[]{} White, D. A. 2000, MNRAS, 312, 663

1112: 

1113: \bibitem[]{} Wilson, A. S., Young, A. J., \& Shopbell, P. L. 2000, ApJ, 544,

1114: L27 (Paper I)

1115: 

1116: \bibitem[]{} Young, A. J., Wilson, A. S., \& Shopbell, P. L. 2001, ApJ, 556, 6

1117: 

1118: \end{thebibliography}

1119: 

1120: \singlespace

1121: 

1122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1123: 

1124: \onecolumn

1125: 

1126: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1127: 

1128: \vfil\eject\clearpage

1129: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}

1130: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

1131: \tablewidth{0pt} \rotate

1132:   

1133: \tablecaption{Previous X-ray Spectral Models of the Nucleus and Cluster Gas of

1134: Cygnus A \label{tab:previous_xray}}

1135: 

1136: \tablecolumns{7}

1137: 

1138: \tablehead{ \colhead{Observatory} & \colhead{Reference} & \colhead{$N_H$ (nuc)}

1139: & \colhead{$\Gamma$ (nuc)} & \colhead{$L_X ({\rm nuc})$ \tablenotemark{c}} &

1140: \colhead{$kT$ (cluster)} & \colhead{$L_X ({\rm cluster})$ \tablenotemark{c}} \\

1141: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{[\pcmsq]} & \colhead{} & \colhead{[\ergps]}

1142: & \colhead{[\keV]} & \colhead{[\ergps]}}

1143: 

1144: \startdata

1145: 

1146: \emph{EXOSAT} / \emph{HEAO1} & Arnaud et al. (1987) & $8.2^{+10.0}_{-3.0}

1147: \times 10^{22}$ & 1.7\tablenotemark{a}~~ (1.78\tablenotemark{b}~ ) & $5.3

1148: \times 10^{44}$ & $4.1^{+5.6}_{-1.5}$ & $6.7 \times 10^{44}$ \\

1149: 

1150: \emph{Ginga} & Ueno et al. (1994) & $3.75^{+0.75}_{-0.71} \times 10^{23}$ &

1151: $1.98^{+0.18}_{-0.20}$ & $1.1 \times 10^{45}$ & $7.3^{+1.8}_{-1.3}$ & $1.2

1152: \times 10^{45}$ \\

1153: 

1154: \emph{ROSAT} HRI & Harris et al. (1994) & $8.2 \times 10^{22}$\tablenotemark{a}

1155: & & $3.6 \times 10^{45}$ & & \\

1156: 

1157: \emph{ASCA} & Sambruna et al. (1999) & $1.1^{+2.1}_{-0.6} \times 10^{23}$ &

1158: $1.80^{+0.28}_{-0.43}$ & $2.5 \times 10^{44}$ & $7.6^{+1.5}_{-1.5}$ & $9.9

1159: \times 10^{44}$ \\

1160: 

1161: & & $1.5^{+2.1}_{-0.9} \times 10^{23}$ & $1.76^{+0.35}_{-0.34}$ & $7.9 \times

1162: 10^{44}$ & $8.4^{+1.3}_{-1.4}$ & $8.9 \times 10^{44}$ \\

1163: 

1164: \enddata

1165: 

1166: \tablenotetext{a}{Parameter fixed.}

1167: 

1168: \tablenotetext{b}{Value if allowed to vary.}

1169: 

1170: \tablenotetext{c}{Over energy range 2 -- 10 keV.}

1171: 

1172: \end{deluxetable}

1173: 

1174: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1175: 

1176: \vfil\eject\clearpage

1177: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}

1178: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

1179: \tablewidth{0pt} %\rotate

1180:   

1181: \tablecaption{Spectral Models of the Nucleus and Cluster Gas of Cygnus A

1182: \label{tab:nuc_spec}}

1183: 

1184: \tablecolumns{4}

1185: 

1186: \tablehead{ \colhead{Model component} & \colhead{Parameter} &

1187:   \colhead{Model 1} & \colhead{Model 2}}

1188: 

1189: \startdata

1190: 

1191: Column density to low energy emission (nucleus) & $N_{\rm H}$ [$\pcmsq$] &

1192: $1.9^{+1.7}_{-1.0} \times 10^{21}$ & $3.3 \times 10^{21}$ \tablenotemark{a} \\

1193: 

1194: \\

1195: 

1196: Low energy ($< 2 \keV$) bremsstrahlung (nucleus) & $kT$ [keV] & &

1197: $6.6^{+\infty}_{-5.2}$\\

1198: 

1199: & $K_{\rm Brem}\tablenotemark{e}$ & & $9.5^{+4.8}_{-1.3} \times 10^{-5}$ \\

1200: 

1201: \\

1202: 

1203: Low energy ($<2 \keV$) power-law (nucleus) & $\Gamma_l$ &

1204: $1.52^{+0.12}_{-0.12}$ \tablenotemark{f} & \\

1205: 

1206: & $K_{\rm PL}$\tablenotemark{c} & $6.0^{+1.7}_{-1.1} \times 10^{-5}$ & \\

1207: 

1208: \\

1209: 

1210: Column density to nucleus & $N_{\rm H}$ [$\pcmsq$] & $ 2.0^{+0.1}_{-0.2} \times

1211: 10^{23}$ & $2.0^{+0.1}_{-0.2} \times 10^{23}$ \\

1212: 

1213: \\

1214: 

1215: High energy power-law (nucleus) & $\Gamma_h$ & $1.52^{+0.12}_{-0.12}$ &

1216: $1.53^{+0.12}_{-0.15}$ \\

1217: 

1218: & $K_{\rm PL}$\tablenotemark{c} & $5.2^{+1.6}_{-1.1} \times 10^{-3}$

1219: & $5.3^{+1.6}_{-1.0} \times 10^{-3}$ \\

1220: 

1221: \\

1222: 

1223: Bremsstrahlung (cluster gas)\tablenotemark{b} & $kT$ [keV] &

1224: $6.9^{+0.3}_{-1.0}$ & $6.8^{+0.5}_{-0.8}$ \\

1225: 

1226: & $K_{\rm Brem}$\tablenotemark{e} & $2.3^{+0.5}_{-0.3} \times

1227: 10^{-2}$ & $2.3^{+0.4}_{-0.3} \times 10^{-2}$ \\

1228: 

1229: \\

1230: 

1231: Relative normalizations & \emph{Chandra} & 1.00 & 1.00 \\

1232: 

1233: & \emph{RXTE} PCA & $1.31^{+0.75}_{-0.26}$ & $1.34^{+0.39}_{-0.31}$ \\

1234: 

1235: & \emph{RXTE} HEXTE & $1.08^{+0.31}_{-0.07}$ & $1.10^{+0.51}_{-0.11}$ \\

1236: 

1237: \\

1238: 

1239: Fit statistic & \chisq\ / d.o.f. & 181 / 185 & 177 / 184 \\

1240: 

1241: \enddata

1242: 

1243: \tablenotetext{a}{Parameter fixed at Galactic column density.}

1244: 

1245: \tablenotetext{b}{The cluster gas contributes significantly to only

1246: 	the \emph{RXTE} data sets.}

1247: 

1248: \tablenotetext{c}{$K_{\rm PL} = \phpcmsqps\keV^{-1}$ at 1

1249:   keV.}

1250: 

1251: \tablenotetext{d}{$K_{\rm Fe} = \phpcmsqps$ in the line.}

1252: 

1253: \tablenotetext{e}{$K_{\rm Brem} = 3.02 \times 10^{-15} \int n_e n_I dV / (4 \pi

1254: D_A^2)$, where $n_e$ is the electron density ($\pcmcu$), $n_I$ is the ion

1255: density ($\pcmcu$), and $D_A$ is the angular size distance to the source (cm).}

1256: 

1257: \tablenotetext{f}{Fixed to the same value as found for $\Gamma_h$.}

1258: 

1259: \end{deluxetable}

1260: 

1261: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1262: 

1263: \vfil\eject\clearpage \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccc}

1264: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize} \tablewidth{0pt} \rotate

1265: 

1266: \tablecaption{Emission Lines From the Nucleus (\emph{Chandra}, Aperture

1267: Diameter 2\farcs5) and Cluster Gas (\emph{RXTE}, Spatial Resolution $\simeq

1268: 1\degmark$)\label{tab:nuc_lines}}

1269: 

1270: \tablecolumns{9}

1271: 

1272: \tablehead{ \colhead{Model} & \colhead{Location} & \colhead{} & 

1273:         \colhead{Energy} & \colhead{Line} & \colhead{} & \colhead{Rest-frame

1274:         energy} & \colhead{$K$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{EW} \\ \colhead{} &

1275:         \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{[keV]} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} &

1276:         \colhead{[keV]} & \colhead{} & \colhead{[eV]}}

1277: 

1278: \startdata

1279: 

1280: 1 & Nucleus & & 0.90 -- 1.02 & \ion{Ne}{9} triplet -- \ion{Ne}{10} & &

1281: $0.97^{+0.03}_{-0.06}$ & $6.0^{+9.6}_{-4.9} \times 10^{-6}$ &

1282: 90\tablenotemark{b} \\

1283: 

1284: 1 & Nucleus & & 1.76 -- 1.86 & \ion{Si}{7} -- \ion{Si}{13} & &

1285: $1.83^{+0.02}_{-0.06}$ & $3.7^{+2.3}_{-2.3} \times 10^{-6}$ &

1286: 148\tablenotemark{b} \\

1287: 

1288: 1 & Nucleus & & 6.40 -- 6.44 & \ion{Fe}{2} -- \ion{Fe}{18} & &

1289: $6.40^{+0.05}_{-0.03}$ & $5.9^{+1.4}_{-1.8} \times 10^{-5}$ &

1290: 182\tablenotemark{c} \\

1291: 

1292: 1 & Cluster gas & & 6.65 -- 6.69 & \ion{Fe}{24} -- \ion{Fe}{25} & &

1293: $6.70^{+0.04}_{-0.04}$ & $2.9^{+0.9}_{-0.6} \times 10^{-4}$ &

1294: 444\tablenotemark{d} \\

1295: 

1296: 1 & Cluster gas & $\left\{ \begin{array}{c} \\ \\ \end{array} \right.$ &

1297: \begin{tabular}{c}7.70 -- 8.08 \\ 7.68 -- 7.88 \end{tabular} &

1298: \begin{tabular}{c} \ion{Ni}{25} -- \ion{Ni}{28} \\ \ion{Fe}{22} K$\beta$ --

1299: \ion{Fe}{25} K$\beta$ \end{tabular} & $\left. \begin{array}{c} \\ \\

1300: \end{array} \right\}$ & $7.90^{+0.21}_{-0.22}$ & $5.0^{+0.9}_{-1.5} \times

1301: 10^{-5}$ & 115\tablenotemark{d} \\

1302: 

1303: \\

1304: 

1305: \cline{1-9}

1306: 

1307: \\

1308: 

1309: 2 & Nucleus & & 0.90 -- 0.92 & \ion{Ne}{9} triplet & &

1310: $0.92^{+0.07}_{-0.02}$ & $1.7^{+0.6}_{-1.2} \times 10^{-5}$ &

1311: 202\tablenotemark{e} \\

1312: 

1313: 2 & Nucleus & & 1.76 -- 1.86 & \ion{Si}{7} -- \ion{Si}{13} & &

1314: $1.83^{+0.03}_{-0.07}$ & $3.3^{+2.7}_{-2.4} \times 10^{-6}$ &

1315: 109\tablenotemark{e} \\

1316: 

1317: 2 & Nucleus & & 6.40 -- 6.44 & \ion{Fe}{2} -- \ion{Fe}{18} & &

1318: $6.41^{+0.04}_{-0.04}$ & $6.6^{+0.9}_{-2.4} \times 10^{-5}$ &

1319: 202\tablenotemark{c} \\

1320: 

1321: 2 & Cluster gas & & 6.65 -- 6.69 & \ion{Fe}{24} -- \ion{Fe}{25} & &

1322: $6.70^{+0.05}_{-0.05}$ & $2.7^{+0.4}_{-0.7} \times 10^{-4}$ &

1323: 434\tablenotemark{d} \\

1324: 

1325: 2 & Cluster gas & $\left\{ \begin{array}{c} \\ \\ \end{array} \right.$ &

1326: \begin{tabular}{c} 7.70 -- 8.08 \\ 7.74 -- 7.88 \end{tabular} &

1327: \begin{tabular}{c} \ion{Ni}{25} -- \ion{Ni}{28} \\ \ion{Fe}{23} K$\beta$ --

1328: \ion{Fe}{25} K$\beta$ \end{tabular} & $\left. \begin{array}{c} \\ \\

1329: \end{array} \right\}$ & $7.90^{+0.19}_{-0.17}$ & $4.8^{+1.3}_{-1.2} \times

1330: 10^{-5}$ & 115\tablenotemark{d} \\

1331: 

1332: \enddata

1333: 

1334: \tablenotetext{a}{$K = \phpcmsqps$ in the line.}

1335: 

1336: \tablenotetext{b}{With respect to the unabsorbed low-energy power-law

1337: component.}

1338: 

1339: \tablenotetext{c}{With respect to the unabsorbed high-energy

1340: power-law component.}

1341: 

1342: \tablenotetext{d}{With respect to the unabsorbed bremsstrahlung

1343: component modeling the cluster emission.}

1344: 

1345: \tablenotetext{e}{With respect to the unabsorbed low-energy

1346: bremsstrahlung component.}

1347: 

1348: \end{deluxetable}

1349: 

1350: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1351: 

1352: \vfil\eject\clearpage

1353: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}

1354: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

1355: \tablewidth{0pt} \rotate

1356:   

1357: \tablecaption{Spectral Models of the Northwest and Southeast Circumnuclear Regions (Two

1358:   Sectors, Diameter 7\arcsec) \label{tab:nw_se_spec}}

1359: 

1360: \tablecolumns{8}

1361: 

1362: \tablehead{ \colhead{Frame-time} & \colhead{Model} & \colhead{$N_{\rm H}$} &

1363: \colhead{$kT$} & \colhead{Abundance} & \colhead{$\Gamma_l$} &

1364: \colhead{Normalization\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$\chisq$ / d.o.f.} \\

1365: \colhead{[sec]} & \colhead{} & \colhead{[\pcmsq]} & \colhead{[keV]} &

1366: \colhead{[$\times Z_\odot$]} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{}}

1367: 

1368: \startdata

1369: 

1370: 0.4 & {\sc mekal} & $3.3 \times 10^{21}$ \tablenotemark{b} &

1371: $4.9^{+5.9}_{-1.9}$ & 1.00\tablenotemark{c} & & $K_{\rm MEKAL} =

1372: 3.7^{+0.6}_{-0.6} \times 10^{-4}$ & 50 / 27 \\

1373: 

1374: 0.4 & {\sc mekal} & $3.3 \times 10^{21}$ \tablenotemark{b} &

1375: $1.5^{+1.5}_{-0.5}$ & $0.03^{+0.24}_{-0.03}$ & & $K_{\rm MEKAL} =

1376: 6.4^{+2.6}_{-2.0} \times 10^{-4}$ & 44 / 26 \\

1377: 

1378: 0.4 & Brem & $3.3 \times 10^{21}$ \tablenotemark{b} &

1379: $1.5^{+1.5}_{-0.5}$ & & & $K_{\rm Brem} = 2.1^{+0.9}_{-0.5} \times

1380: 10^{-4}$ & 44 / 27 \\

1381: 

1382: 0.4 & PL & $3.3 \times 10^{21}$ \tablenotemark{b} & & & $2.17^{+0.36}_{-0.38}$

1383: & $K_{\rm PL} = 1.4^{+0.1}_{-0.2} \times 10^{-4}$ & 42 / 27 \\

1384: 

1385: 0.4 & PL + lines & $3.3 \times 10^{21}$ \tablenotemark{b} & & &

1386: $2.01^{+0.46}_{-0.54}$ & $K_{\rm PL} = 1.1^{+0.2}_{-0.2} \times 10^{-4}$ & 22 /

1387: 21 \\

1388: 

1389: \enddata

1390: 

1391: \tablenotetext{a}{Model normalizations are\\ $K_{\rm MEKAL} = 10^{-14} / (4 \pi

1392: [D_A \{ 1+z \} ]^2 ) \int n_e n_H dV$, where $n_e$ is the electron density

1393: ($\pcmcu$), $n_H$ is the hydrogen density ($\pcmcu$) and $D_A$ is the angular

1394: size distance to the source (cm),\\ $K_{\rm Brem} = 3.02 \times 10^{-15} \int

1395: n_e n_I dV / (4 \pi D_A^2)$, where $n_e$ is the electron density ($\pcmcu$),

1396: $n_I$ is the ion density ($\pcmcu$), and $D_A$ is the angular size distance to

1397: the source (cm),\\ $K_{\rm PL} = \phpcmsqps\keV^{-1}$ at 1 keV.}

1398: 

1399: \tablenotetext{b}{Fixed at the Galactic column.}

1400: 

1401: \tablenotetext{c}{Parameter fixed.}

1402: 

1403: \end{deluxetable}

1404: 

1405: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1406: 

1407: \vfil\eject\clearpage

1408: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}

1409: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

1410: \tablewidth{0pt} \rotate

1411:   

1412: \tablecaption{Emission Lines From the Northwest and Southeast Circumnuclear Regions (Two

1413: Sectors, Diameter 7\arcsec) \label{tab:nw_se_lines}}

1414: 

1415: \tablecolumns{6}

1416: 

1417: \tablehead{ \colhead{Frame-time} & \colhead{Energy} & \colhead{Line} &

1418:   \colhead{Rest-frame energy} & \colhead{$K$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{EW}

1419:   \\ \colhead{[sec]} & \colhead{[keV]} & \colhead{} & \colhead{[keV]} &

1420:   \colhead{} & \colhead{[eV]}}

1421: 

1422: \startdata

1423: 

1424: 0.4 & 0.89 -- 0.92 & \ion{Ne}{7} -- \ion{Ne}{9} & $0.91^{+0.01}_{-0.02}$ &

1425: $1.8^{+1.0}_{-0.8} \times 10^{-5}$ & 127 \\

1426: 

1427: 0.4 & 1.02 & \ion{Ne}{10} Ly $\alpha$ ? & $1.08^{+0.28}_{-0.09}$ &

1428: $5.5^{+5.1}_{-5.5} \times 10^{-6}$ & 54 \\

1429: 

1430: 0.4 & 1.74 -- 1.82 & \ion{Si}{2} -- \ion{Si}{11} &

1431: $1.76^{+0.06}_{-0.03}$ & $4.2^{+3.0}_{-2.7} \times 10^{-6}$ & 110 \\

1432: 

1433: 0.4 & 6.40 -- 6.44 & \ion{Fe}{2} -- \ion{Fe}{18} & $6.39^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$ &

1434: $5.0^{+0.9}_{-1.8} \times 10^{-5}$ & 226 \\

1435: 

1436: \enddata

1437: 

1438: \tablenotetext{a}{$K = \phpcmsqps$ in the line.}

1439: 

1440: \end{deluxetable}

1441: 

1442: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1443: 

1444: \vfil\eject\clearpage

1445: 

1446: \begin{figure}

1447:   \centerline{

1448:     \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{fig1.ps}}

1449: 

1450: \caption{ \label{fig:collage} Grey scale representations of \emph{Chandra}

1451:   X-ray images of the nucleus of Cygnus A in three energy bands and for each of

1452:   the two frame-times used. The \emph{Chandra} images have been resampled to

1453:   ten times smaller pixel size and smoothed by a Gaussian of FWHM $0\farcs5$.

1454:   The left column has a 0.4~s frame-time and the right column a 3.2 ~s

1455:   frame-time. In the top row the energy range is 7 -- 10 keV, the center row 4

1456:   -- 6 keV and the bottom row 0.25 -- 1 keV. The center left panel also shows

1457:   the point spread function at 4.51 keV. The `+' symbol indicates the location

1458:   of the peak of the hard X-ray emission that has been aligned with the radio

1459:   core. The lookup tables for the grey scale are different in each panel, with

1460:   the upper two rows having a logarithmic scale and the bottom row a linear

1461:   scale.}

1462: 

1463: \end{figure}

1464: 

1465: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1466: 

1467: \begin{figure}

1468:   \centerline{

1469:     \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=0.8]{fig2.ps}}

1470: 

1471: \caption{ \label{fig:color} Color representation of the \emph{Chandra} X-ray

1472:   image of the nucleus of Cygnus A. The image has been resampled to ten times

1473:   smaller pixel size and smoothed by a Gaussian of FWHM $0\farcs5$. The data

1474:   were divided into three bands, red representing 0.1 -- 1.275 keV, green 1.275

1475:   -- 2.2 keV and blue 2.2 -- 10 keV. The nuclear region has a blue (hard)

1476:   point-like core with two offset regions of softer emission. This emission is

1477:   embedded in a comparatively smooth distribution of hot gas. The `+' symbol

1478:   indicates the location of the peak of the hard X-ray emission that has been

1479:   aligned with the radio core.}

1480: 

1481: \end{figure}

1482: 

1483: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1484: 

1485: \begin{figure}

1486:   \includegraphics[angle=270, scale=0.65]{fig3.ps} 

1487: 

1488: \caption{ \label{fig:psf} The radial profile of counts from the nucleus of

1489:   Cygnus A extracted from the 0.4~s frame-time data in the energy range 7 -- 9

1490:   keV (`$+$' points with Poissonian error bars) compared to the theoretically

1491:   computed PSF at 8.6 keV (`$\times$' points). The data indicate the hard X-ray

1492:   source in the nucleus is unresolved.}

1493: 

1494: \end{figure}

1495: 

1496: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1497: 

1498: \begin{figure}

1499:   \centerline{

1500:     \includegraphics[angle=270, scale=0.65]{fig4.ps}}

1501: 

1502: \caption{ \label{fig:spec} X-ray spectra of Cygnus A extracted from the 0.4 s

1503:   frame-time \emph{Chandra} data and the \emph{RXTE} data. The energy scale is

1504:   as observed. The upper panel shows the data points with error bars (crosses),

1505:   with the model folded through the instrument responses (solid lines passing

1506:   through the data points). The lower panel shows the $\chi$ residuals from

1507:   this fit. The parameters of the model (``Model 1'') are listed in Table

1508:   \ref{tab:nuc_spec}. The spectrum over the range 0.7 -- 9 keV is the

1509:   \emph{Chandra} observation of the nucleus through a circular aperture of

1510:   diameter 2\farcs5 with a 0.4~s frame-time. The curve near the top of the

1511:   figure at 3 keV and extending from 3 to 20 keV is the \emph{RXTE} layer 1 PCA

1512:   spectrum, that extending from 6 to 20 keV is the layer 2 PCA spectrum, and

1513:   that extending from 8 to 20 keV is the layer 3 PCA spectrum. The HEXTE

1514:   spectrum extends from 12 to 200 keV.}

1515: 

1516: \end{figure}

1517: 

1518: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1519: 

1520: \begin{figure}

1521:   \includegraphics[angle=270, scale=0.65]{fig5.ps}

1522:   

1523: \caption{ \label{fig:fe_line_edge} Confidence contours (plotted at 68\%, 90\%

1524:   and 99\%) of the rest-frame energy of the iron line and absorption edge from

1525:   modeling the 0.4~s frame-time \emph{Chandra} data. The aperture is a circle

1526:   of diameter $2\farcs5$. The line energy is consistent with that of the Fe

1527:   K$\alpha$ fluorescence line of neutral iron. The absorption edge is

1528:   consistent with that of iron in the range \ion{Fe}{1} -- \ion{Fe}{10}. The

1529:   panel in the upper right show the ratio of the \emph{Chandra} data to a power

1530:   law as a function of rest-frame energy. To produce this panel, the data were

1531:   modeled by a power law from 4 to 9 keV.}

1532: 

1533: \end{figure}

1534: 

1535: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1536:   

1537: \begin{figure}

1538:   \includegraphics[angle=270, scale=0.65]{fig6.ps}

1539: 

1540: \caption{ \label{fig:nw_se_spec} X-ray spectrum of the soft extended nuclear

1541:   emission of Cygnus A extracted from the 0.4~s frame-time data

1542:   (Section~\ref{sec:nw_se_spec}). The aperture consisted of two sectors of a

1543:   circle with diameter $7\arcsec$ centered on the nucleus, each sector having

1544:   an opening half-angle of $55\degmark$ and their axes aligned with the jet and

1545:   counter jet. The energy scale is as observed. The upper panel shows the data

1546:   points with error bars (crosses) and the model folded through the instrument

1547:   response (uppermost solid line passing through the data points). The

1548:   individual components of the model are plotted below this with dotted lines.

1549:   The lower panel shows the $\chi$ residuals to this fit. The parameters of

1550:   this model are listed in Tables \ref{tab:nw_se_spec} and

1551:   \ref{tab:nw_se_lines}.}

1552: 

1553: \end{figure}

1554: 

1555: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1556: 

1557: \begin{figure}

1558:   \includegraphics[angle=270, scale=0.65]{fig7.ps}

1559:   

1560: \caption{ \label{fig:gamma_nh} Confidence contours of the absorbing column

1561: density $N_H$ and photon index $\Gamma_l$ of the soft X-ray emission plotted at

1562: 68\%, 90\% and 99\%. The aperture consists of two sectors of a circle with

1563: diameter $7\arcsec$ centered on the nucleus, each sector having an opening

1564: half-angle of $55\degmark$ and their axes aligned with the jet and counter jet.

1565: Note that $\Gamma_l$ and $N_H$ are not independent, and an error in the value

1566: of the assumed column density will give a corresponding error in the value of

1567: $\Gamma_l$. The Galactic column density is assumed to be $3.3 \times 10^{21}

1568: \pcmsq$ in this paper.}

1569: 

1570: \end{figure}

1571: 

1572: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1573: \begin{figure}

1574:   \includegraphics[angle=0, scale=0.80]{fig8.ps}

1575: 

1576: \caption{ \label{fig:chandra_6cm} A superposition of the \emph{Chandra} 3.2 s

1577:   frame-time data with events in the range 0.25 to 1.00 keV (contours) on a 6

1578:   cm radio map (grey scale; Perley et al. 1984). The resolution (FWHM) of the

1579:   radio map is 0\farcs4. The contours of the \emph{Chandra} image are plotted

1580:   at 2, 6, 10, 14 and 18 cts ($0\farcs5$ pixel)$^{-1}$. The \emph{Chandra}

1581:   image has been resampled to ten times smaller pixel size and then smoothed by

1582:   a Gaussian of FWHM $0\farcs5$. The grey scale of the radio map is

1583:   proportional to the logarithm of the intensity between 0.001 (white) and 1 Jy

1584:   (beam)$^{-1}$ (black), as indicated by the vertical bar. Note the ``neck'' in

1585:   the radio jet 1\farcs2\ to the northwest of the nucleus, where it passes through the

1586:   northwest extended X-ray emission. This ``neck'' also corresponds to a channel

1587:   dividing the northwest cloud seen in HST images in bands containing redshifted

1588:   [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda 5007$ (see Fig.~\ref{fig:hst_oiii}) and H$\alpha$ (see

1589:   Fig.~\ref{fig:hst_halpha}).}

1590: 

1591: \end{figure}

1592: 

1593: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1594: 

1595: \begin{figure}

1596: \includegraphics[angle=270, scale=0.7]{fig9.ps}

1597: 

1598: \caption{ \label{fig:opt_r_band} A superposition of the \emph{Chandra} 3.2 s

1599:   frame-time data with events in the range 0.25 to 1.00 keV (contours) on an

1600:   optical r band image taken through a filter with center wavelength/bandwidth

1601:   7531/361 \AA\ (grey scale; Stockton et al. 1994). The FWHM seeing for the

1602:   optical image was 0\farcs81. The contours of the \emph{Chandra} image are at

1603:   2, 6, 10, 14, and 18 cts ($0\farcs5$ pixel)$^{-1}$. The \emph{Chandra} image

1604:   has been resampled to ten times smaller pixel size and then smoothed by a

1605:   Gaussian of FWHM $0\farcs5$. The grey scale of the optical image is

1606:   proportional to the intensity squared between $5 \times 10^{-20}$ (white) and

1607:   $6 \times 10^{-19} \ergpcmsqpspA$ (black).}

1608: 

1609: \end{figure}

1610: 

1611: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1612: 

1613: \begin{figure}

1614:   \includegraphics[angle=0, scale=0.80]{fig10.ps}

1615: 

1616: \caption{  \label{fig:hst_oiii} A superposition of the \emph{Chandra} 3.2 s

1617:   frame-time data with events in the range 0.25 to 1.00 keV (solid contours) on

1618:   an HST image taken through a Linear Ramp Filter at redshifted [\ion{O}{3}]

1619:   $\lambda$5007 (grey scale). The peaks of the 2.00 to 7.50 keV X-ray emission

1620:   and the central optical component of the HST images were aligned with the

1621:   radio core (see Section \ref{sec:hst_align}). The contours are at 2, 6, 10,

1622:   14, and 18 cts ($0\farcs5$ pixel)$^{-1}$. The \emph{Chandra} image has been

1623:   resampled to ten times smaller pixel size and smoothed by a Gaussian of FWHM

1624:   $0\farcs5$. The optical image has approximately 0\farcs1 pixel$^{-1}$. The

1625:   grey scale of the optical image is proportional to the logarithm of the line

1626:   intensity and ranges from $1 \times 10^{-16}$ (white) to $9 \times 10^{-14}

1627:   \ergpcmsqps ({\rm arcsec})^{-2}$ (black), as indicated by the vertical bar.}

1628: 

1629: \end{figure}

1630: 

1631: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1632: 

1633: \begin{figure}

1634:   \includegraphics[angle=270, scale=0.7]{fig11.ps}

1635: 

1636: \caption{ \label{fig:hst_halpha} A superposition of the \emph{Chandra} 3.2 s

1637:   frame-time data with events in the range 0.25 to 1.00 keV (solid contours) on

1638:   an HST image taken through a Linear Ramp Filter at redshifted H$\alpha$ and

1639:   [\ion{N}{2}] $\lambda \lambda 6548$, 6583 line emission (grey scale). The

1640:   peaks of the 2.00 to 7.50 keV X-ray emission and the central optical

1641:   component of the HST images were aligned with the radio core

1642:   (Section~\ref{sec:hst_align}). The contours are at 2, 6, 10, 14, and 18 cts

1643:   ($0\farcs5$ pixel)$^{-1}$. The \emph{Chandra} image has been resampled to ten

1644:   times smaller pixel size and then smoothed by a Gaussian of FWHM $0\farcs5$.

1645:   The optical image has approximately 0\farcs1 pixel$^{-1}$. The grey scale of

1646:   the optical image is proportional to the logarithm of the intensity and

1647:   ranges from $1 \times 10^{-15}$ (white) to $2 \times 10^{-13} \ergpcmsqps

1648:   ({\rm arcsec})^{-2}$ (black), as indicated by the vertical bar.}

1649: 

1650: \end{figure}

1651: 

1652: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1653: 

1654: \end{document}

1655: