1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %

3: % Douglas Finkbeiner et al.

4: %   Tentative Detection of Electric Dipole Emission 

5: %   from Rapidly Rotating Dust Grains

6: % ApJ MS# 54382

7: %

8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

9: 

10: % Definitions

11: %\pagestyle{empty}

12: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

13: %\documentstyle[emulateapj,danonecolfloat]{article}

14: %\usepackage{emulateapj,danonecolfloat}

15: 

16: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

17: % DEFINITIONS

18: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

19: %

20: % Formatting defintions:

21: %

22: %\def\dfplot#1{\plotone{figs/#1}}

23: %

24: % Equations:

25: %

26: \def\BE{\begin{equation}}

27: \def\BEL#1{\begin{equation}\label{#1}}

28: \def\EE{\end{equation}}

29: %

30: % Random stuff:

31: %

32: 

33: \newcommand{\IRAS}{{\it IRAS}}

34: \newcommand{\COBE}{{\it COBE}}

35: \newcommand{\MAP}{{\it MAP}}

36: 

37: \newcommand{\LPH}{LPH~201.663+1.643}

38: \newcommand{\HI}{H\,{\scriptsize I}}

39: \newcommand{\HII}{H\,{\scriptsize II}}

40: \newcommand{\Halpha}{H$\alpha$}

41: \newcommand{\etal}{{\it et al.}~}

42: \newcommand{\LOGTEN}{{\log_{10}}}

43: %

44: % Units (math mode)

45: %

46: 

47: \newcommand{\nWpMMSr}{{\rm ~nW~m}^{-2}{\rm sr}^{-1}}

48: \newcommand{\ergcmHzsr}{{\rm ~erg~cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}

49:             {\rm Hz}^{-1}{\rm sr}^{-1}}

50: \newcommand{\Ang}{{\rm ~\AA}}

51: \newcommand{\pix}{{\rm ~pix}}

52: \newcommand{\dfdegree}{^\circ}

53: \newcommand{\degree}{^\circ}

54: \newcommand{\s}{{\rm ~s}}

55: \newcommand{\kms}{{\rm ~km/s}}

56: \newcommand{\MAG}{{\rm ~mag}}

57: \newcommand{\cm}{{\rm ~cm}}

58: \newcommand{\mm}{{\rm ~mm}}

59: \newcommand{\mJy}{{\rm ~mJy}}

60: \newcommand{\Jy}{{\rm ~Jy}}

61: \newcommand{\MJy}{{\rm ~MJy}}

62: \newcommand{\MJypSr}{{\rm ~MJy}/{\rm sr}}

63: \newcommand{\MHz}{{\rm ~MHz}}

64: \newcommand{\GHz}{{\rm ~GHz}}

65: \newcommand{\Hz}{{\rm ~Hz}}

66: \newcommand{\K}{{\rm ~K}}

67: \newcommand{\mK}{\rm ~mK}

68: \newcommand{\microK}{\mu{\rm K}}

69: \newcommand{\eV}{{\rm ~eV}}

70: \newcommand{\pc}{{\rm ~pc}}

71: 

72: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

73: % TITLE PAGE

74: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

75: 

76: \begin{document}

77: %\twocolumn[

78: %\submitted{First draft; to be submitted to {\it The Astrophysical Journal}}

79: %\lefthead{EMISSION FROM RAPIDLY ROTATING DUST}

80: %\righthead{FINKBEINER ET AL.}

81: 

82: 

83: \title{Tentative Detection of Electric Dipole Emission \\ from Rapidly

84: Rotating Dust Grains}

85: 

86: \author{Douglas P. Finkbeiner\footnote{and University of California at Berkeley, Department of Astronomy}

87: \footnote{Hubble Fellow},

88: David J. Schlegel}

89: \affil{Princeton University, Department of Astrophysics,

90: Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544}

91: %\email{schlegel@astro.princeton.edu}

92: \and

93: \author{Curtis Frank}

94: \affil{University of Maryland, Department of Astronomy, College Park,

95: MD 20742-2421}

96: %\email{curt@astro.umd.edu}

97: \and

98: \author{Carl Heiles}

99: \affil{University of California at Berkeley, Department of

100: Astronomy \\ 601 Campbell Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720}

101: %\email{dfink@astro.berkeley.edu, marc@astro.berkeley.edu,

102: %heiles@astro.berkeley.edu}

103: 

104: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

105: % ABSTRACT

106: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

107: 

108: \begin{abstract}

109: We present the first tentative detection of spinning dust emission 

110: from specific astronomical sources.  All other detections in the

111: current literature are statistical. 

112: The Green Bank 140 foot telescope was used to observe 10 dust clouds

113: at 5, 8, and $10\GHz$.  In some cases, the observed emission was

114: consistent with the negative spectral slope expected for free-free

115: emission (thermal bremsstrahlung), but in two cases it was not.

116: One \HII\ region (\LPH) yields a rising spectrum, inconsistent with 

117: free-free or synchrotron emission at the $\sim 10\sigma$ level.  

118: One dark cloud (L~1622) has a similar spectrum with lower

119: significance.  Both spectra are consistent with electric dipole

120: emission from rapidly rotating dust grains (``spinning dust''), as

121: predicted by Draine \& Lazarian.

122: 

123: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

124: % SUBJECT HEADINGS

125: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

126: \emph{Subject headings: }

127: cosmic microwave background --- 

128: diffuse radiation ---

129: dust, extinction --- 

130: ISM: clouds --- 

131: radiation mechanisms: thermal --- 

132: radio continuum: ISM 

133: \end{abstract}

134: 

135: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

136: % INTRODUCTION

137: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

138: \section{INTRODUCTION}

139: 

140: \label{sec_intro}

141: 

142: In the last decade, the \COBE\ satellite and several ground- and

143: balloon-based experiments (QMAP, Saskatoon, MAXIMA, BOOMERanG, TOCO,

144: DASI, CBI, and others) have greatly increased our knowledge of the

145: Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation.  Some of these careful

146: observations of the microwave sky have also revealed new and

147: surprising features in the interstellar medium at $14 < \nu <

148: 53\GHz$.  

149: At frequencies above $100\GHz$ ($\lambda < 3\mm$), the emission from

150: Galactic cirrus is consistent with thermal emission.  This

151: emission is a broken power law, with the break at $\sim 500\GHz$,

152: interpreted by Finkbeiner \etal\ (1999) as emission from two dust

153: components.  Though this interpretation fits the data from 100 to

154: $3000\GHz$, a dramatic deviation arises at lower frequencies.  This

155: deviation motivates the work presented here. 

156: 

157: 

158: The \COBE/DMR data (7$\degree$ FWHM) exhibit dust-correlated emission

159: at 90 GHz at approximately the level predicted by a detailed model of

160: the thermal dust spectrum based on DIRBE and FIRAS data

161: \cite{finkbeiner99}.  In the other DMR channels there is a pronounced

162: excess -- more than a factor of 10 at 31.5 GHz \cite{kogut96}.  The 19

163: GHz data from Cottingham's thesis \cite{cott87,boughn92} also indicate

164: such an excess \cite{doc98}.  This microwave excess appears in the

165: Saskatoon experiment as well, but with less significance \cite{doc97}.

166: OVRO observations in a ring around the North Celestial Pole at 14 and

167: 31 GHz have demonstrated a correlation of 14 GHz emission with dust at

168: the highest resolution ($7'$) to date, but at a level $\sim 1000$

169: times brighter than the expected thermal (vibrational) dust emission

170: \cite{leitch97}.  This excess has been called the ``mystery component''

171: \cite{doc01}.

172: 

173: The spectral shape of these early measurements is consistent with

174: free-free emission from ionized gas, motivating a comparison with

175: \Halpha\ maps.  Leitch \etal\ (1997) noted the weakness of \Halpha\

176: emission in the OVRO fields and concluded that only $T>10^6\K$ gas

177: (e.g. shock-heated gas in a supernova remnant) could produce the

178: observed emission.  However, the observed emission would require an

179: energy injection rate at least 2 orders of magnitude greater than that

180: provided by supernovae (Draine \& Lazarian 1998a).  Another

181: possibility is magnetic dipole emission\footnote{

182: Note that this mechanism has nothing to do with grain rotation.} 

183: from ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic grains, resulting from thermal

184: fluctuations in the magnetization of the grain material.  This

185: component is certainly present at some level, but is sub-dominant

186: in the current data \cite{draine99}.  

187: 

188: The currently favored emission mechanism is electric dipole emission

189: from rapidly rotating dust grains, an idea first proposed by 

190: Erickson (1957) and improved upon by Ferrara \& Dettmar (1994).  Recent

191: work by Draine \& Lazarian (1998b) has refined this idea and shown

192: that ion encounters with dust grains are the dominant spin-up

193: mechanism, leading to concrete predictions of emission as a

194: function of the temperature, density, and ionization fraction of the

195: surrounding gas.

196: This emission mechanism

197: has never been unambiguously observed, but can be made to agree with

198: the observed microwave data for reasonable model parameters.  It was previously

199: impossible to tell if the excess emission results from spinning dust

200: or free-free emission, because the predicted spectral slope is similar

201: for $20 \la \nu \la 40$ GHz, and earlier observations were

202: insufficient to rule out either mechanism.  The Tenerife data

203: \cite{doc99} at 10 and $15\GHz$ have good leverage on the spectral

204: shape, but provide only a statistical detection by cross-correlation.

205: To date, no one has observed spinning dust emission from a specific

206: source.

207: 

208: The spinning dust is expected to have an emission peak at $\sim

209: 15\GHz$ (in temperature units) and be dominated by free-free below

210: $\sim 5-10\GHz$, so by choosing frequencies in this range, one can

211: hope to unambiguously detect this component.  We have obtained data

212: for several dust clouds at 5, 8, and $10\GHz$, a frequency range over

213: which the spinning dust spectrum differs measurably from that of

214: free-free or synchrotron emission.

215: 

216: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

217: % 

218: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

219: \section{OBSERVING STRATEGY}

220: 

221: This study used the NRAO\footnote{

222: The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a

223: facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative

224: agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.}

225: 43m (``140 foot'') telescope at Green Bank

226: shortly before its decomissioning on 1999 July 19.  Cassegrain C-band

227: ($5\GHz$) and X-band ($8-10\GHz$) receivers were used with a $300\MHz$

228: bandwidth, and gave a typical system temperature of $30-60\K$.

229: 

230: Data were obtained during two runs: 22-27 April and 1-6 June, 1999. 

231: The nutating subreflector on the 140 foot can switch at up to $2.5\Hz$

232: with a $12'$ throw.  Switching is restricted by hardware to a position

233: angle of $292.5\degree$ (E of N) for the X-band ($8-10\GHz$) receiver.  A

234: second level of switching was accomplished by driving the telescope

235: along the PA$=292.5\degree$ direction at a rate of $3' \s^{-1}$,

236: completing a $48'$ scan every $16\s$  (Figures

237: \ref{fig_LPH_field} and \ref{fig_L1622_field}).

238: During the scan, the ON--OFF

239: difference was recorded by a digital continuum recorder (DCR) for

240: every chop.  The same strip was then observed in the ``reverse''

241: direction, a sequence requiring nearly 1 min for a round trip

242: (including turn-around time).  During the turn-around time, a calibration

243: noise source was flashed at 1 Hz.  In C-band ($5\GHz$), switching is

244: restricted to a direction orthogonal to the scan line, so switching

245: was not performed at $5\GHz$.

246: 

247: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

248: % FIGURE 1

249: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

250: 

251: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

252: % FIGURE 2

253: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

254: 

255: The beam of the 140 foot telescope at $5\GHz$ ($6'$ FWHM) is

256: well-matched to the SFD98 $100\micron$ map, to which the data are

257: compared in \S\ref{sec_analysis}.

258: At 8 and $10\GHz$,

259: multiple parallel scans were performed to subsample a $6'$ Gaussian

260: beam.  For a typical system temperature of 40K and 200ms integration

261: (2Hz switch, so 4 samples per second with 50ms blanking time) we

262: obtain a theoretical sensitivity of 7.3 mK per difference per

263: polarization.  Typically 1 hr was spent on each target in each band,

264: yielding a theoretical sensitivity of $\sim 1\mK$ per polarization per

265: pointing.  Observations were also attempted at $18\GHz$, but the system

266: temperature was too high to obtain any useful data.  The $14\GHz$

267: receiver was not available at the time of our observing run.

268: 

269: A bandwidth of $300\MHz$ was used throughout the run.  RFI affected a

270: negligible number of the measurements, and these are easily found and

271: discarded later in the analysis. 

272: 

273: 

274: 

275: 

276: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

277: % ANALYSIS

278: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

279: \section{ANALYSIS}

280: \label{sec_analysis}

281: The Digital Continuum Recorder (DCR) records the difference between

282: the ON position and OFF

283: position some $12'$ away as the telescope scans over a target.  The PA

284: of the chop is fixed at $292.5\degree$, so as not to interfere with

285: point source measurements when scanning E-W or N-S.  This arrangement

286: is ideal for point sources, because the OFF never crosses the

287: source and the baseline difference is easily established when the ON position

288: is away from the source.  When observing the diffuse ISM, there is no

289: local zero-brightness position to compare to along the scan.  We

290: therefore scan parallel to the chop direction to reduce the problem to

291: one dimension.

292: 

293: The measured difference for each chop (Figure \ref{fig_LPH}$a$) is

294: dominated by sidelobe and atmospheric contamination, and drifts with

295: time.  All these effects are generally a smooth function of time, and

296: are removed with a low order polynomial fit with appropriate

297: outlier rejection.  

298: The data are then ``folded'' by plotting as a function of sky position

299: (Figure \ref{fig_LPH}$b$) to reveal the beam-convolved and differenced

300: structure on the sky.  Because of sidelobe and atmospheric

301: contamination, an artificial slope is present in these plots; it is

302: also fit and removed.  The data are binned in RA and the median of

303: each bin is overplotted.  Note that for the source

304: \LPH\ shown in Figure \ref{fig_LPH}, there is a difference between forward and

305: reverse scans.  In the forward direction, the ON position is slightly

306: less than 12' ahead of the OFF position because the telescope is

307: moving east.  In the reverse direction, ON is slightly more than 12'

308: away, as the telescope drives west.  This means that forward and

309: reverse scans must be analyzed separately, even though they are

310: overplotted in Figure \ref{fig_LPH}$b$.

311: 

312: Finally, we consider the correlation slope between predicted and

313: observed emission.  Because of the double-switched observing strategy,

314: it is impossible to uniquely recover the observed flux of an object.

315: However, a suitable template may be convolved with the same observing

316: strategy and compared to observation.  The SFD98 $100\micron$ and

317: temperature maps are used to predict a microwave brightness

318: temperature (Figures \ref{fig_LPH}$c$ and \ref{fig_LPH}$e$) using the factor of $50\microK$ at

319: $10\GHz$ per $I_{100\micron}$ in$\MJypSr$  \cite{doc99}.  The correlation

320: slope is then measured and tabulated; it should be consistent with 1

321: at $10\GHz$ for a correct prediction, and vary at other frequencies

322: with the shape of the spinning dust spectrum.  Separate numbers are

323: tabulated for each combination of polarization and direction

324: (Table \ref{table_slopes}).  The prediction includes a factor of $1/2$

325: for comparison to the single-polarization data.  This is why the LCP

326: and RCP measurements are combined by averaging rather than adding

327: them.  The (total Stokes I) $T_B$ per $I_{100}$ in units of $\microK

328: (\MJypSr)^{-1}$ may be obtained from Table \ref{table_slopes} by

329: multiplying the correlation slopes by 50.  Note that L1622 was

330: observed on two occasions at 8.25 GHz.  

331: 

332: \subsection{Calibration}

333: For calibration standards, we use the fits of Salter (2001), who follows

334: Kuehr \etal\ (1981) in using the form $\log_{10}S=a_0+a_1x+a_2\exp(-x)$ where

335: $x=\log_{10}\nu$, $\nu$ is in MHz and $S$ is in Jy. 

336: With $a_0=3.523$, $a_1= -0.779$, and $a_2= -3.732$ for 3C138, we

337: obtain S(5, 8.25, 9.75 GHz) = (3.54,2.50,2.22) Jy.  This agrees with a

338: simple power-law fit to 87GB \cite{gb87} and the Wright \etal\ (1991)

339: survey to within 2\%.  Cross-checks were done with 3C245 and BL-LAC,

340: and agreed to 5 percent.  The definitive calibration was determined by 

341: 3C138 however, because it was observed near L1622 and \LPH\ in both

342: space and time. 

343: 

344: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

345: % RESULTS

346: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

347: \section{RESULTS}

348: 

349: Of the targets observed (Table 1) two clouds show significant

350: dust-correlated emission at $5-10\GHz$.  The non-detection of the

351: other targets is not very surprising, because the parameters describing

352: the physical properties of these clouds span a wide range of values,

353: so the relative intensities may vary widely.

354: Both of the detected clouds (Lynds 1622 and \LPH) show a steep rise from

355: $8-10\GHz$, with the $5\GHz$ brightness apparently contaminated by

356: free-free (Table \ref{table_results}).

357: In order to compare these results to previous correlation

358: measurements, results from several experiments are overplotted on the

359: Draine \& Lazarian models in Figure \ref{fig_result}.

360: All data and model curves are normalized to emission per H

361: atom for ease of comparison.  In practice this is done by normalizing

362: to SFD $E(B-V)$ values, and then applying a conversion factor.  

363: The free-free emission curves corresponding to two values of $<n_e

364: n_p>/<n_H>$ are shown, with the upper curve determined by an emission

365: measure derived from the \Halpha\ survey\footnote{

366: The data are available at ``http://amundsen.swarthmore.edu/SHASSA/''}

367: of Gaustad \etal\ (2001).

368: 

369: Because free-free emission clearly contributes to the measured signal,

370: it is desireable to have an independent limit on the free-free and

371: show that it is consistent with our measurements.  This limit may be

372: derived from \Halpha as follows. 

373: The emission coefficient $j_\nu$ for free-free, with electrons assumed

374: to interact with ions of charge $Z_i e$ and particle density $n_i$ is

375: \BE

376: j_\nu = 5.44 \times 10^{-16} \frac{g_{ff}Z_i^2 n_e n_i}{T^{1/2}}

377: e^{-h\nu/kT} {\rm Jy~sr^{-1}~cm^{-1}}

378: \EE

379: where $g_{ff}$ is the gaunt factor for free-free.  For microwave

380: frequencies, a useful approximation is

381: \BE

382: g_{ff} =

383: \frac{3^{1/2}}{\pi}\left[\ln\frac{(2kT)^{3/2}}{\pi e^2\nu m_e^{1/2}}

384:  - \frac{5\gamma}{2}\right]

385: ~~~~~\nu_p \ll \nu \ll kT/h

386: \EE

387: where $\gamma$ is the Euler constant ($\gamma\approx 0.577$) and

388: $\nu_p$ is the plasma frequency

389: (Spitzer 1978, p. 58).

390: Evaluating for $\nu = 10^{10}\Hz$ and $T=10^4\K$ we find

391: $g_{ff}\approx4.69$ and $J$($10\GHz$) = 78.8 Jy sr$^{-1}$ for EM = 1 pc

392: cm$^{-6}$.

393: The emission measure for these clouds may be estimated from the

394: \Halpha\ emission shown in Figures 1 and 2.  

395: Note that 1R = $10^6/4\pi$ photon ${\rm cm^{-2} s^{-1} sr^{-1}}$

396: and corresponds to EM $\approx$ 2 pc cm$^{-6}$ for \Halpha\ at $T=10^4\K$.

397: For \LPH, the peak of the cloud is about 200R or EM=400.  Using a 

398: conversion factor of N(H)=$8\times10^{21}$ for 1 mag $E(B-V)$, we get

399: free-free emission of $3.2\times10^4$ Jy/sr for $N(H)=2.4\times10^{22}$ or 

400: $j_\nu/n_H = 1.3\times10^{-18}\ {\rm Jy~sr^{-1}~atom^{-1}}$ at

401: $10\GHz$. 

402: The SFD98 map shows about 6 mag extinction ($\tau \approx 6.5$) for an

403: \Halpha\ photon

404: traveling completely through this cloud, so this free-free

405: estimate should be taken as a lower limit for photons from within the

406: cloud. 

407: If the \Halpha\ emitting material is uniformly mixed with dust in a

408: cloud with total optical depth $\tau$, the effective flux observed is 

409: \BE

410: J_{\nu,eff} = \frac{J_\nu}{\tau}\int_0^\tau d\tau'e^{-\tau'}

411: =\frac{J_\nu}{\tau}(1-e^{-\tau})

412: \EE

413: In the limit of large $\tau$, the flux is simply reduced by a factor

414: of $\tau$.  In Figure \ref{fig_result}, the level of predicted

415: free-free has been multiplied by a factor of 7 and appears to be in

416: good agreement with the uniform mixture hypothesis.  Of course, this

417: result is very sensitive to the configuration of material on the front

418: side of the cloud, so the agreement may be largely coincidental.

419: 

420: 

421: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

422: % FIGURE 3

423: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

424: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

425: % FIGURE 4

426: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

427: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

428: % FIGURE 5

429: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

430: 

431: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

432: % FUTURE WORK

433: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

434: \section{FUTURE WORK}

435: \subsection{Requirements}

436: In order to demonstrate convincingly that the excess emission detected

437: by this work is electric dipole emission from spinning dust, the

438: following requirements are proposed.

439: 

440: 1.  Observations for any line of sight must agree with the model over

441:     a wide frequency range ($5-60\GHz$) for reasonable values of the

442:     model parameters (gas and dust temperature, density, and

443:     ionization fraction).  The observations must be inconsistent with

444:     free-free alone at high confidence.  Simply stated, the spectral

445:     shape should exhibit a ``roll-off'' on both sides of the emission peak.

446: 

447: 2.  Variation in the spectrum of spinning dust emission should trace

448:     variation in the parameters as derived from spectral line

449:     information and the SFD maps.  The nature of this variation should

450:     be (at least qualitatively) similar to that anticipated by the

451:     Draine \& Lazarian model.

452: 

453: 3.  Alternative explanations for the excess (such as magnetic dipole

454:     emission) should be ruled out by the spectral shape.

455:     Polarimetry is also useful, as the spinning dust emission is

456:     relatively unpolarized (Lazarian \& Draine 2000).  

457: 

458: None of these requirements are met by the current paper, so our

459: interpretation of the observed excess is only tentative.  During the

460: next few years, however, dramatically improved data will become

461: available.

462: 

463: \subsection{Prospects}

464: There are compelling reasons to pursue this project with an

465: interferometer in the southern hemisphere, such as CBI (Cosmic

466: Background Imager, Padin \etal\ 2001).  The synthesized beam

467: is $5-8'$, well-matched to the $6'$ of the IRAS \cite{iras88} map as

468: reprocessed by Schlegel \etal (1998).

469: CBI has 10 channels from $26-36\GHz$, providing spectral information

470: with high sensitivity.  Many prospective targets are in the southern

471: half of the sky, toward the Galactic center.  The frequency coverage

472: is not ideal for separation of free-free from spinning dust, but the

473: high sensitivity ($41\microK$ in 900s for the highest resolution

474: configuration) should allow clean detections and easy comparison with

475: the Rhodes \cite{jonas98} survey at $2.326\GHz$ for free-free removal.

476: The DASI (Degree Angular Scale Interferometer, Halverson \etal\ 1998) 

477: has many of the same properties, but a larger beam of about $20'$, and

478: is therefore more appropriate for comparison with the Rhodes data

479: ($20'$).  

480: 

481: The recently launched Microwave Anisotropy Probe (\emph{MAP;} Bennett \etal\

482: 1997) has full-sky

483: coverage at 22, 30, 40, 60, and 90$\GHz$ with beams of 56, 41,

484: 32, 21, and

485: $14'$ (FWHM) respectively.  These data will complement the interferometer data 

486: nicely.  With data from these projects, a decisive detection

487: of spinning dust emission may be possible in the near future. 

488:  

489: 

490: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

491: % CONCLUSIONS

492: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

493: \section{CONCLUSIONS}

494: We have explored a FIR-selected sample of dust clouds spanning a wide

495: range of IR color-temperature, column density, and ionization

496: fraction.  Our target selection procedure rejected the radio-bright

497: \HII\ regions as poor targets, because free-free was expected to

498: overwhelm spinning dust emission.  In spite of this prejudice, one

499: \HII\ region (from the catalog of diffuse \HII\ regions in Lockman,

500: Pisano \& Howard 1996; LPH) made the list, and provided a very

501: significant detection.  A dark cloud, Lynds 1622, was also detected

502: and found inconsistent with free-free emission at a lower confidence.

503: This is the first detection of a rising spectrum source at $8-10\GHz$

504: consistent with spinning dust.  The amplitude of this emission per H

505: atom apparently varies by a factor of at least 30, somewhat more than

506: theoretically expected.  Some adjustment of model parameters will be

507: needed to explain the brightness of \LPH, but the current model of

508: Draine \& Lazarian can probably accommodate the new data (Draine,

509: 2001).  Note that magnetic dipole emission from ferromagnetic or

510: ferrimagnetic grains \cite{draine99} is substantially weaker than the

511: observed signal from \LPH, but significant contributions from such a

512: mechanism cannot currently be ruled out.\footnote{

513: Because this emission may be

514: $\sim30\%$ polarized for aligned grains of strongly magnetic material,

515: polarization measurements would be helpful.}

516: Other attempts have been

517: made to explain the large variation using $12\micron$ emission as a

518: tracer of the small grain population \cite{doc01}.  We caution that

519: the interpretation of these data must remain tentative until a larger

520: sample meeting the criteria in \S 5 can be obtained. 

521: 

522: Cold neutral clouds are an obvious target choice for future work,

523: because free-free

524: emission is likely to be subdominant in them.  Diffuse ionized gas

525: also appears to be an excellent target, since ion-dust interactions

526: are effective at spinning up the grains.  As long as the density is

527: low, as in the LPH list (Lockman \etal\ 1996), \HII\ regions may be

528: the optimal targets for future work with DASI, CBI, and \MAP.

529: 

530: 

531: This measurement is rather tenuous, as was the discovery of Galactic

532: radio emission 60 years ago \cite{reber40}.  The signal was

533: immediately interpreted as free-free \cite{henyey40} but was later

534: recognized as synchrotron radiation.  Those emission mechanisms are

535: now essential tools for ISM research in the Milky Way and distant

536: galaxies.  With the expected increase in astronomical capability at

537: microwave frequencies in the near future, we anticipate that spinning

538: dust will make a useful addition to this toolbox.

539: 

540: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

541: % ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

542: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

543: %\section{Acknowledgments}

544: We would like to thank the staff at Green Bank, especially Dana

545: Balser, who spent 20 hours helping us with the backend software on the

546: first day.  Bruce Draine provided model emissivities and helpful

547: discussions.  Peter McCullough and John Gaustad provided \Halpha\ data

548: in the regions of interest prior to publication.  

549: Shaul Hanany, Al Kogut, Alex Lazarian, Jay Lockman, and George Smoot

550: provided helpful comments on the manuscript. 

551: Computers were

552: partially provided by a Sun AEGP Grant.  DPF is a Hubble Fellow, and

553: was partially supported by NASA grant NAG~5-7833.  DJS is partially

554: supported by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.  This work was also

555: supported in part by NSF grants 95-30590 and 00-97417 to CH.  This

556: research made use of the NASA Astrophysics Data System.  The Green

557: Bank 140 foot telescope was operated by the National Radio Astronomy

558: Observatory (NRAO), which is a facility of the National Science

559: Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated

560: Universities, Inc.

561: 

562: \newpage

563: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

564: % REFERENCES

565: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

566: 

567: 

568: \bibliographystyle{unsrt}

569: \bibliography{gsrp}

570: 

571: \begin{thebibliography}{DUM}

572: 

573: 

574: \bibitem[Beichman \etal\ 1988]{iras88}

575: IRAS Catalogs and Atlases: Explanatory Supplement 1988,

576: eds. Beichman, C. A., Neugebauer, G., Habing, H. J., Clegg, P. E.,

577: \& Chester, T. J.

578: (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office)

579: 

580: \bibitem[Bennett \etal\ 1997]{bennett97}

581: % ``The Microwave Anisotropy Probe (MAP) Mission''

582: Bennett, C. L. \etal\ 1997, AAS, 191, \#87.01

583: 

584: \bibitem[Boughn \etal\ 1992]{boughn92}

585: % ``Limits of Gaussian fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background

586: % at 19.2 GHz''

587: Boughn, S. P., Cheng, E. S., Cottingham, D. A., \& Fixsen, D. J. 1992,

588: \apj, 391, L49

589: 

590: \bibitem[Cottingham 1987]{cott87}

591: % Thesis on 19.2 GHz data

592: Cottingham, D. A. 1987, Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton Univ.

593: 

594: \bibitem[de Oliveira-Costa \etal\ 1997]{doc97}

595: % ``Galactic Microwave Emission at Degree Angular Scales''

596: de Oliveira-Costa, A., Kogut, A., Devlin, M. J., Netterfield, C. B.,

597: Page, L. A., Wollack, E. J. 1997, \apj, 482, L17

598: 

599: \bibitem[de Oliveira-Costa \etal\ 1998]{doc98}

600: % ``Galactic emission at 19 GHz''

601: de Oliveira-Costa, A., Tegmark, M., Page, L., Boughn, S. 1998,

602: \apj, 509, L9

603: 

604: \bibitem[de Oliveira-Costa \etal\ 1999]{doc99}

605: % ``Cross-Correlation of Tenerife Data with Galactic

606: % Templates-Evidence for Spinning Dust?''

607: de Oliveira-Costa, A. \etal\ 1999, \apj, 527, L9

608: 

609: \bibitem[de Oliveira-Costa \etal\ 2001]{doc01}

610: de Oliveira-Costa, A. \etal\ 2001, astro-ph/0010527

611: 

612: \bibitem[Draine 2001]{draine2001}

613: % model can accommodate our observation of LPH

614: Draine, B. T. 2001, priv. comm. 

615: 

616: \bibitem[Draine \& Lazarian 1998a]{draine98a}

617: % ``Diffuse Galactic Emission from Spinning Dust Grains''

618: Draine, B. T., \& Lazarian, A. 1998a, \apj, 494, L19

619: 

620: \bibitem[Draine \& Lazarian 1998b]{draine98b}

621: % ``Electric Dipole Radiation from Spinning Dust Grains''

622: Draine, B. T., \& Lazarian, A. 1998b, \apj, 508, 157

623: 

624: \bibitem[Draine \& Lazarian 1999]{draine99}

625: % ``Magnetic Dipole Microwave Emission from Dust Grains''

626: Draine, B. T., \& Lazarian, A. 1999, \apj, 512, 740

627: 

628: \bibitem[Erickson 1957]{erickson57}

629: % ``A Mechanism of Non-Thermal Radio-Noise Origin''

630: Erickson, W. C. 1957, \apj, 126, 480

631: 

632: \bibitem[Ferrara \& Dettmar 1994]{ferrara94}

633: % ``Radio-emitting dust in the free electron layer of spiral galaxies:

634: % Testing the disk/halo interface''

635: Ferrara, A., \& Dettmar, R. -J. 1994, \apj, 427, 155

636: 

637: \bibitem[Finkbeiner \etal\ 1999]{finkbeiner99}

638: % FIRAS paper

639: Finkbeiner, D. P., Davis, M., \& Schlegel, D. J. 1999, \apj, 524, 867

640: 

641: \bibitem[Gaustad, J. E. \etal\ 2001]{gaustad01}

642: % ``A Robotic Wide-Angle H-alpha Survey of the Southern Sky''

643: Gaustad, J. E., McCullough, P. R., Rosing, W., \& Van Buren, D. 2001, 

644: PASP, 113, in press (Nov. 2001)

645: 

646: \bibitem[Gawiser \& Silk 1998]{gawiser98}

647: % Extracting Primordial Density Fluctuations

648: Gawiser, E., \& Silk, J. 1998, Science 280, 1405

649: 

650: \bibitem[Gregory \& Condon 1991]{gb87}

651: % ``The 87GB catalog of radio sources covering delta between O and +

652: % 75 deg at 4.85 GHz''

653: Gregory, P. C., \& Condon, J. J. 1991, \apjs, 75, 1011

654: 

655: \bibitem[Haffner \etal\ 1998]{wham}

656: % ``Faint, Large-Scale H alpha Filaments in the Milky Way''

657: Haffner, L. M., Reynolds, R. J., \& Tufte, S. L. 1998, \apj, 501, L83

658: 

659: \bibitem[Halverson \etal\ 1998]{halverson98}

660: % ``DASI: Degree Angular Scale Interferometer for imaging anisotropy

661: % in the cosmic microwave background''

662: Halverson, N. W., Carlstrom, J. E., Dragovan, M., Holzapfel, W. L.,

663: \& Kovac, J. 1998, Proc. SPIE, 3357, 416

664: 

665: \bibitem[Henyey \& Keenan 1940]{henyey40}

666: % ``Interstellar Radiation from Free Electrons and Hydrogen Atoms''

667: Henyey, L. G. \& Keenan, P. C. 1940, \apj, 91, 625

668: 

669: \bibitem[IRAS Science Working Group]{iraspsc}

670: % Point source catalogue

671: \emph{IRAS Point Source Catalogue} 1985, Joint \IRAS\ Science Working 

672: Group (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office)

673: 

674: \bibitem[Jonas \etal\ 1998]{jonas98}

675: % ``The Rhodes/HartRAO 2326-MHz radio continuum survey''

676: Jonas, J. L., Baart, E. E., \& Nicolson, G. D. 1998, 

677: \mnras, 297, 977

678: 

679: \bibitem[Kogut \etal\ 1996]{kogut96}

680: % ``Microwave Emission at High Galactic Latitudes in the Four-Year DMR

681: %  Sky Maps''

682: Kogut, A. \etal\ 1996, \apj, 464, L5

683: 

684: \bibitem[Kuehr \etal\ 1981]{kuehr81}

685: % ``A catalogue of extragalactic radio sources having flux densities

686: % greater than 1 Jy at 5 GHz''

687: Kuehr, H., Witzel, A., Pauliny-Toth, I. I. K., \& Nauber, U. 1981,

688: \aaps, 45, 367

689:  

690: \bibitem[Lazarian \& Draine 2000]{lazarian00}

691: % ``Resonance Paramagnetic Relaxation and Alignment of Small Grains''

692: % Conclusion: Spinning dust emission is only a few % polarized

693: Lazarian, A. \& Draine, B. T. 2000, \apj, 536, L15

694: 

695: \bibitem[Leitch \etal\ 1997]{leitch97}

696: % ``An Anomalous Component of Galactic Emission''

697: Leitch, E. M., Readhead, A. C. S., Pearson, T. J., \& Myers, S. T.

698: 1997, \apj, 486, L23

699: 

700: \bibitem[Lockman \etal\ 1996]{lph96}

701: % ``Detection of 130 ``Diffuse'' Galactic H II Regions''

702: Lockman, F. J., Pisano, D. J., \& Howard, G. J. 1996, \apj, 472, 173 [LPH]

703: 

704: \bibitem[Lynds, B. T. 1962]{lynds62}

705: % ``Catalogue of dark nebulae''

706: Lynds, B. T. 1962, \apjs, 7, 1

707: 

708: \bibitem[McCollough 2001]{mccollough01}

709: % ``Halpha maps''

710: McCollough, P. 2001, priv. comm. [H$\alpha$ maps]

711: 

712: % Not relevant to this paper?

713: %\bibitem[Masi \etal\ 2001]{masi01}

714: % ``High latitude Galactic dust emission in the BOOMERanG maps''

715: %Masi, S. \etal\ 2001, astro-ph/0101539

716: 

717: %\bibitem[Netterfield \etal\ 1995]{sk94} 

718: %Netterfield, C. B., Jarosik, N., Page, L., Wilkinson, D., 

719: %\& Wollack, E. 1995, \apj, 445, L69.

720: 

721: %\bibitem[Netterfield \etal\ 1997]{sk95} 

722: % A Measurement of the Angular Power Spectrum of the Anisotropy in

723: % the Cosmic Microwave Background

724: %Netterfield, C. B., Devlin, M. J., Jarosik, N., Page, L.,

725: %\& Wollack, E. J. 1997, \apj, 474, 47

726: 

727: \bibitem[Padin \etal\ 2001]{padin01}

728: % ``First Intrinsic Anisotropy Observations with the Cosmic Background

729: % Imager''

730: Padin, S. \etal\ 2001, \apj, 549, L1

731: 

732: \bibitem[Purcell 1979]{purcell79}

733: % ``Suprathermal rotation of interstellar grains''

734: Purcell, E. M. 1979, \apj, 231, 404

735: 

736: \bibitem[Reber 1940]{reber40}

737: % ``Cosmic Static''

738: Reber, G. 1940, \apj, 91, 621

739: 

740: \bibitem[Salter 2001]{salter01}

741: % email (via C. Heiles) of good calibrators

742: Salter, Chris 2001 priv. comm. 

743: 

744: %\bibitem[Shklovsky 1955]{shklovsky55}

745: % Synchrotron paper

746: %Shklovsky, I. S. 1955, Astr. J. USSR, 32, 215

747: 

748: \bibitem[SFD98]{sfd98} 

749: %Schlegel, Finkbeiner, \& Davis 1998]

750: %Maps of Dust IR Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and CMBR

751: %Foregrounds

752: Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525 [SFD]

753: 

754: \bibitem[Spitzer 1978]{spitzer}

755: % ``Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium''

756: Spitzer, L. 1978, \emph{Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium},

757: Wiley, New York

758: 

759: \bibitem[VSS 1976]{vss76}

760: % ``Magnetic field structure in the vicinity of five dark cloud

761: % complexes''

762: Vrba F.J., Strom S.E., \& Strom K.M. 1976, \aj, 81, 958

763: 

764: \bibitem[Wright \etal\ 1991]{wright91}

765: % ``Flux densities at 8400 MHz for a large sample of radio sources''

766: Wright, A. E., \etal\ 1991, \mnras, 251, 330

767: \end{thebibliography}

768: 

769: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

770: % TABLES

771: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

772: 

773: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

774: % Table 1

775: \newpage

776: \begin{deluxetable}{l|rrrl}

777: \tablewidth{0pt}

778: \tablecaption{Target list

779:    \label{table_targetlist}

780: }

781: \tablehead{

782:    \colhead{Name}    &

783:    \colhead{$\alpha_{2000}$}    &

784:    \colhead{$\delta_{2000}$}  &

785:    \colhead{result}   &  

786:    \colhead{comment}  

787: }

788: \startdata

789: %Anti-C2                        &  05 55 07 & $ +23$ 13 15  & ND       & \\

790: %						    	      	         

791: L1622             &  05 54 23 & $ +01$ 46 54  & detected & dark cld    \\

792: \LPH              &  06 36 40 & $ +10$ 46 28  & detected & diffuse \HII  \\

793: L1591             &  06 09 55 & $ +13$ 44 34  & ND       & dark cld    \\

794: IRAS 07225$-1617$ &  07 24 47 & $ -16$ 23 21  & weak     & IRAS source \\

795: IRAS 15522$-2540$ &  15 55 16 & $ -25$ 49 40  & no 10    & IRAS source \\

796: VSS II-79         &  16 33 58 & $ -23$ 43 48  & neg corr & near L1709C \\

797: IRAS 18146$-1200$ &  18 17 29 & $ -11$ 58 52  & 8 only   & near \HII \\

798: IRAS 19441$+2926$ &  19 46 08 & $ +29$ 33 34  & ND       & IRAS source \\

799: IRAS 23339$+4811$ &  23 36 23 & $ +48$ 28 01  & ND       & IRAS source \\

800: IRAS 23350$+4815$ &  23 37 28 & $ +48$ 32 18  & ND       & IRAS source \\

801: \enddata

802: \tablecomments{

803: List of targets observed.  ND = not detected.  Most of these have

804: other names in the literature.  VSS II-79 has a significant negative

805: correlation with dust emission, perhaps from an \HII\ shell around the

806: dust filament.  

807: LPH = Lockman, Pisano, \& Howard (1996), IRAS = IRAS Science Working 

808: Group (1985), L = Lynds (1962), and VSS = Vrba, Strom, \& Strom (1976).

809: }

810: \end{deluxetable}

811: 

812: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

813: % Table 2

814: \newpage

815: \begin{deluxetable}{l|rrrrrrr}

816: \tablewidth{0pt}

817: \tablecaption{Correlation slopes

818:    \label{table_slopes}

819: }

820: \tablehead{

821:    \colhead{Name}    &

822:    \colhead{$\nu$}    &

823:    \colhead{For RCP}  &

824:    \colhead{Ret RCP}  &

825:    \colhead{For LCP}  &

826:    \colhead{Ret LCP}  &

827:    \colhead{Avg}  &

828:    \colhead{nsig}  

829: }

830: \startdata

831: L1622   &5.00&$   1.29 \pm 0.39$&$   3.49 \pm 0.84$&$   0.48 \pm 0.38$&$   3.05 \pm 0.77$&$     1.31 \pm 0.25$&   5.3 \\

832: L1622   &8.25&$   1.25 \pm 0.29$&$   0.26 \pm 0.37$&$   0.67 \pm 0.41$&$   0.52 \pm 0.35$&$     0.75 \pm 0.17$&   4.4 \\

833: L1622   &8.25&$   1.14 \pm 0.37$&$   1.24 \pm 0.44$&$   1.05 \pm 0.38$&$   1.11 \pm 0.33$&$     1.13 \pm 0.19$&   6.1 \\

834: L1622   &9.75&$   1.65 \pm 0.67$&$   0.76 \pm 0.77$&$   0.84 \pm 0.73$&$   0.78 \pm 0.65$&$     1.03 \pm 0.35$&   2.9 \\

835: LPH     &5.00&$  53.16 \pm 5.28$&$  57.01 \pm 5.68$&$  54.12 \pm 5.39$&$  58.05 \pm 5.90$&$    55.41 \pm 2.77$&  20.0 \\

836: LPH     &8.25&$  25.45 \pm 1.69$&$  25.92 \pm 1.91$&$  29.16 \pm 1.93$&$  29.50 \pm 2.25$&$    27.22 \pm 0.96$&  28.4 \\

837: LPH     &9.75&$  23.96 \pm 2.09$&$  23.33 \pm 1.70$&$  27.89 \pm 2.49$&$  27.17 \pm 1.90$&$    25.25 \pm 0.99$&  25.4 \\

838: \enddata

839: \tablecomments{Correlation slopes for Forward and Return scans, 

840: RCP and LCP polarizations.

841: These correlation slopes are for $T_B$ vs. a prediction of

842: $50\microK/I_{100}$ where $I_{100}$ is the DIRBE-temperature-corrected

843: IRAS intensity at $100\micron$ in $\MJypSr$.  This

844: temperature-corrected map may be obtained by dividing the SFD98

845: $E(B-V)$ prediction by 0.0184.  The prediction used includes a factor

846: of $1/2$ for single polarization measurements, so RCP and LCP are

847: combined by averaging, not adding.  Values in the table may be multiplied

848: by 50 to obtain units of $\microK/I_{100}$ in order to compare to

849: e.g. de Oliveira-Costa \etal\ (1999). Note that Lynds 1622 was

850: observed twice at

851: $8.25\GHz$.

852: }

853: \end{deluxetable}

854: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

855: % Table 3

856: \begin{deluxetable}{l|r|rrr|rr}

857: \tablewidth{0pt}

858: \tablecaption{Emissivity per H

859:    \label{table_results}

860: }

861: \tablehead{

862:    \colhead{Name}    &

863:    \colhead{$N(H)$}  &

864:    \colhead{$j_\nu(5\GHz)/n_{\rm H}$}    &

865:    \colhead{$8.25\GHz$}  &

866:    \colhead{$9.75\GHz$}  \\

867: %   \colhead{$EM(5\GHz)$}  &

868: %   \colhead{$EM(\Halpha)$} \\

869:    \colhead{} &

870:    \colhead{$\times10^{21}\cm^{-2}$} &

871:    \colhead{Jy sr$^{-1}$ H$^{-1}$} &

872:    \colhead{Jy sr$^{-1}$ H$^{-1}$} &

873:    \colhead{Jy sr$^{-1}$ H$^{-1}$} 

874: %   \colhead{cm$^{-6}$pc} &

875: %   \colhead{cm$^{-6}$pc} &

876: }

877: \startdata

878: L1622 & 18 &$ 7.8\pm 3.9\times10^{-19}$ &$ 6.6\pm 1.3\times10^{-19}$

879: &$ 10.1\pm 3.4\times10^{-19}$  \\

880: LPH   & 27 &$ 147\pm 17\times10^{-19}$ &$ 191\pm 7\times10^{-19}$ &$ 247\pm10\times10^{-19}$  \\

881: \enddata

882: \tablecomments{Emissivity.  $N(H)$ is estimated by using the 

883: SFD98 $E(B-V)$ extinction estimate and a conversion factor of 

884: $N(H) = 8\times 10^{21}\cm^{-2}$ per magnitude. 

885: }

886: \end{deluxetable}

887: %&$   1.0\pm 0.50 $&$ 0.28\pm 0.06 $&$ 0.37\pm 0.13 $

888: %&$ 17.02\pm 2.19 $&$ 8.15\pm 0.29 $&$ 9.08\pm 0.36 $

889: 

890: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

891: % FIGURE 1

892: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

893: 

894: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

895: \begin{figure}[tb]

896: \plotone{f1.ps}

897: \figcaption{Scan location for the LPH cloud (\emph{black

898: lines}), overplotted on SHASSA (Gaustad \etal\ 2001) \Halpha\

899: (\emph{grayscale}) and SFD98 $E(B-V)$

900: \label{fig_LPH_field}

901: (\emph{contours}).  Contour levels are 1,1.5,2,3 mag.  \Halpha\

902: brightness is measured in Rayleighs with the scale on the right.  

903: One Rayleigh is $10^6/4\pi$ photon

904: ${\rm cm^{-2} s^{-1} sr^{-1}}$. }

905: \end{figure}

906: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

907: 

908: 

909: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

910: % FIGURE 2

911: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

912: 

913: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

914: \begin{figure}[t]

915: \plotone{f2.ps}

916: \figcaption{

917: \label{fig_L1622_field}Scan location for Lynds 1622 (\emph{black lines}), overplotted on

918: \Halpha\ (\emph{grayscale}) and SFD98 $E(B-V)$ [mag] (\emph{contours}).  }

919: \end{figure}

920: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

921: 

922: 

923: 

924: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

925: % FIGURE 3

926: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

927: 

928: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

929: \begin{figure}[t]

930: \plotone{f3.ps}

931: \figcaption{

932: \label{fig_LPH}

933: For the diffuse \HII\ region \LPH: 

934: ($a$) observed differences vs. time;

935: ($b$) differences folded vs. RA for (\emph{black}) forward and 

936: (\emph{red}) return scans;

937: ($c$) (\emph{dashed}) data and (\emph{solid}) SFD-based prediction

938: using conversion factor for $10\GHz$ from de Oliveira-Costa \etal\

939: (1999) for the forward scan;

940: ($d$) correlation of data vs. prediction for the forward scan;

941: ($e$) same as ($c$) for the return scan; and 

942: ($f$) same as ($d$) for the return scan. 

943: Correlation slopes would be unity at $10\GHz$ for a correct

944: prediction, and be somewhat less at $8\GHz$.

945: Only Right Circular Polarization data are shown. 

946: LCP data look similar and there is no evidence for circular

947: polarization.

948: }

949: \end{figure}

950: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

951: 

952: 

953: 

954: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

955: % FIGURE 4

956: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

957: 

958: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

959: \begin{figure}[t]

960: \plotone{f4.ps}

961: \figcaption{

962: Same as Figure \ref{fig_LPH} but for Lynds 1622.  Notice that

963: the correlation slope is substantially less than unity in this

964: region.}

965: \label{fig_L1622}

966: \end{figure}

967: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

968: 

969: 

970: 

971: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

972: % FIGURE 5

973: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

974: 

975: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

976: \begin{figure*}[t]

977: \plotone{f5.ps}

978: \caption{Model Dust emissivity per H atom for DC, MC, CNM, WNM, and

979: WIM conditions (as in Draine \& Lazarian 1998b, Figure 9).  Solid thin

980: lines are total

981: emissivity; dashed lines are rotational emission. 

982: Gray lines are emission from free-free for given $n_H$, or rather 

983: $<n_en_p>/<n_H>$ averaged along the line of sight. 

984: The top thick line is the sum of free-free, vibrational dust, and 10 times

985: the WIM spinning dust model, shown for reference.

986: Also shown are measurements from the \COBE/DMR (\emph{open diamonds})

987: from Finkbeiner \etal\ (1999), similar to Kogut

988: \etal\ (1996); Saskatoon (\emph{open circles}) (de Oliveira-Costa 

989: \etal\ 1997); the Cottingham \& Boughn $19.2\GHz$ survey 

990: (\emph{open square}) (de

991: Oliveira-Costa \etal\ 1998), OVRO data (\emph{solid squares}) 

992: (Leitch \etal\ 1997);

993: Tenerife data (\emph{solid circles})(de Oliveira-Costa \etal\ 1999);

994: and this paper: \LPH\ (\emph{crosses}) and L1622 (\emph{stars}). 

995: The OVRO points have been lowered a factor of 3 relative to Draine \&

996: Lazarian (1998b, Figure 9), because the unusual dust temperature near

997: the NCP caused an underestimate of the H column density along those lines

998: of sight.  Given the large range of model curves, all measurements 

999: are consistent with some superposition of spinning dust, vibrational

1000: dust, and free-free emission. 

1001: }

1002: \label{fig_result}

1003: \end{figure*}

1004: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1005: 

1006: 

1007: 

1008: 

1009: \end{document}

1010: 

1011: 

1012: 

1013: 

1014: 

1015: 

1016: 

1017: 

1018: 

1019: