1: \documentstyle[psfig]{mn}
2: \title[Isolated Black Holes]{X-Rays from Isolated Black Holes in the Milky Way}
3:
4: \author[E. Agol and M. Kamionkowski]{
5: Eric Agol\thanks{Chandra Fellow, Email: agol@tapir.caltech.edu} and
6: Marc Kamionkowski \\
7: California Institute of Technology, Mail Code 130-33, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA}
8:
9: \onecolumn
10: \date{August 2001}
11: \pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}-\pageref{lastpage}}
12: \pubyear{2001}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \maketitle
17:
18: \label{firstpage}
19:
20: \begin{abstract}
21: Galactic stellar-population-synthesis models, chemical-enrichment models, and
22: long-duration Bulge microlensing events indicate about $N_{\rm
23: tot}=10^8-10^9$
24: stellar-mass black holes reside in our Galaxy. We study X-ray emission
25: {}from accretion from the interstellar medium on to isolated black holes.
26: Although isolated black holes may be fewer in number than neutron stars,
27: $N_{NS} \sim 10^9$,
28: their higher masses, $\langle M\rangle \sim 9 {\rm M}_\odot$, and smaller space
29: velocities, $\sigma_v \sim 40$ km~s$^{-1}$ result in Bondi-Hoyle accretion rates
30: $\sim 4 \times 10^3$ times higher than for neutron stars.
31: We estimate that $\sim 10^4$ isolated black holes within the Milky Way should
32: accrete at $\dot M > 10^{15}$ g~s$^{-1}$, comparable to accretion rates inferred for
33: black-hole X-ray binaries given a total number of black holes
34: $N_{\rm tot}=N_9 10^9$.
35: If black holes accrete at efficiencies only $\sim
36: 10^{-4}(N_{NS}/N_{\rm tot})^{0.8}$
37: of the neutron-star accretion efficiency, a comparable number of each
38: may be detectable. We make predictions for the number of isolated
39: accreting black holes in our Galaxy which can be detected with X-ray surveys
40: as a function of efficiency, concluding that all-sky surveys at a depth of
41: $F= F_{-15}10^{-15}$ erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~dex$^{-1}$ can find $N(>F)\sim 10^4 N_9
42: (F_{-15}/\epsilon_{-5})^{-1.2}$ isolated accreting black holes for a velocity
43: dispersion of 40 km~s$^{-1}$ and X-ray accretion efficiency of
44: $\epsilon = \epsilon_{-5} 10^{-5}$. Deeper surveys of the Galactic plane
45: with {\em Chandra} or {\em XMM-Newton} may find tens of these objects per
46: year, depending on
47: the efficiency. We argue that a minimum mass can be derived for microlensing
48: black-hole candidates if they are detected in the X-ray.
49: \end{abstract}
50:
51: \begin{keywords}
52: accretion, accretion discs --- black hole physics --- Galaxy: stellar content
53: --- X-rays: ISM, stars
54: \end{keywords}
55:
56: \section{Introduction}
57:
58: A black hole may only be detected via its interactions with surrounding
59: matter or light. Black holes in binary-star systems are strong
60: and transient X-ray sources
61: fed by accretion from a stellar companion. However, isolated black
62: holes---that is, black holes without companions or black holes in wide binaries---can
63: easily escape detection. These may constitute the majority of the population
64: of black holes since the fraction in close binaries with $a < 100$ AU is $\sim$ 0.01
65: based stellar evolution calculations for massive star binaries
66: (Chris Fryer, priv. comm. 2001). Young isolated neutron stars are much easier to
67: detect as pulsars, but once the magnetic field, spin, and thermal energy decay
68: away, an old neutron star becomes as invisible as a black hole. Several
69: authors (Ostriker, Rees \& Silk 1970, Treves \& Colpi 1991, Blaes \&
70: Madau 1993) have proposed searching for isolated old neutron stars lit
71: up by accreting matter from the interstellar medium (ISM). A tenth of
72: the rest-mass energy of the accreting gas can be directly converted to
73: luminosity assuming that all the accreted material is thermalised as it
74: hits the neutron-star surface. These predictions motivated searches that
75: turned up several isolated neutron-star candidates (Stocke et al. 1995,
76: Walter et al. 1996, Wang 1997, Schwope et al. 1999); however, it is possible
77: that these are young cooling neutron stars powered by processes other than
78: accretion (Treves et al. 2000).
79:
80: The known Galactic black-hole X-ray-binary population
81: has a velocity dispersion smaller by a factor of $\sim 5$ than neutron
82: stars (Hansen \& Phinney 1997, White \& van Paradijs 1996, van Paradijs \&
83: White 1995) and average
84: mass larger by a factor of $\sim 6$ (see below and Bailyn et al. 1998, Thorsett \&
85: Chakrabarty 1999). The accretion rate for an object of mass $M$ accreting from
86: the interstellar medium is determined by the Bondi-Hoyle formula
87: (Bondi \& Hoyle 1944),
88: \begin{equation}\label{bondi}
89: \dot M = {\lambda 4 \pi G^2 M^2 n \mu \over (v^2 + c_s^2)^{3/2}},
90: \end{equation}
91: where $v$ is the velocity of the black hole with respect to the
92: local interstellar medium, $n$ is the number density of hydrogen in the
93: interstellar medium, $\mu = \rho/n$ where $\rho$ is the particle mass
94: density,
95: $c_s$ is the sound speed of the interstellar medium, and $\lambda$ is a
96: parameter of order unity (we set $\lambda =1$ hereafter). Assuming that
97: isolated black holes have the same mass range and velocity dispersion as
98: black holes in X-ray binaries, one would expect the typical accretion rate
99: on to isolated black holes from the ISM to be larger by a factor of
100: $\sim 4\times 10^3$ compared to neutron stars. The expected detection
101: rate of isolated black holes accreting from the ISM may be reduced as the
102: number of black holes in our Galaxy may be smaller by a factor of $\sim 10$
103: than the number of neutron stars, and the lack of a hard surface may
104: result in lower luminosities for black holes accreting at small accretion
105: rates. Garcia et al. (2001) argue that black holes have quiescent
106: X-ray efficiencies $\sim 10^{-2}$ of neutron stars; however, Bildsten \&
107: Rutledge (2000) argue that the detected X-rays may have nothing to do with
108: accretion, and V404 Cyg is an exception to this rule indicating that there
109: may be a wide range of accretion efficiencies. If black holes do have a
110: reduced efficiency compared to neutron stars, this reduction can be
111: compensated by the larger accretion rates and the smaller scale height
112: of black holes which increases their number density in the mid-plane where
113: most of the interstellar gas mass is located. Black
114: holes do not have an intrinsic magnetic field, so accretion can proceed
115: uninhibited by magnetic pressure or torque. Thus, we are motivated to compute
116: the expected numbers and accretion rates of isolated black holes in our Galaxy.
117:
118: The problem of black holes accreting from the interstellar medium has
119: been considered by several authors. We approach the problem in a different
120: way from previous authors (listed below) by using the properties of black-hole
121: X-ray binaries and black-hole microlensing candidates to constrain the
122: phase-space distribution of black holes within the entire Galactic disc
123: (discussed in detail in Agol \& Kamionkowski 2001, in preparation),
124: while considering the properties of all phases of the ISM, deriving the
125: distribution of accretion rates including
126: radiative pre-heating, and finally deriving the distribution of X-ray
127: fluxes. Grindlay (1978) considered spherical-accretion models for
128: X-ray sources now known to be accreting from companions.
129: Carr (1979) estimated the luminosity of black holes
130: in the galactic disc, but did not predict their detection probability.
131: McDowell (1985) computed the visual and infrared fluxes of black
132: holes accreting spherically from molecular clouds, but only out to 150 pc.
133: Campana \& Pardi (1993) computed the fluxes of black holes within the
134: disc of the Galaxy accreting spherically from molecular clouds, without
135: computing the probability distribution of accretion rates.
136: Heckler \& Kolb (1996) computed the fluxes of a putative halo population of black
137: holes accreting spherically while passing within 10 pc of the Sun.
138: The large velocities, low densities, and large scale heights of a halo
139: population greatly reduces the number of black holes at a given accretion
140: rate. Popov \& Prokhorov (1998) took into account the spatial distribution
141: of the warm interstellar medium, assuming the black holes receive a kick
142: velocity at birth of $\sim 200$ km~s$^{-1}$, which greatly reduces the accretion
143: rates. Fujita et al. (1998) computed the fluxes of black holes in the
144: disc accreting via an advection-dominated accretion flow at a distance
145: of 400 pc (the Orion cloud) for a few velocities, without computing the
146: full probability distribution. Grindlay et al. (2001) estimate that
147: of order $10^3$ black holes in molecular clouds might be detectable by
148: the proposed Energetic X-ray Imaging Survey Telescope ({\em EXIST}) experiment
149: based on an accretion efficiency of $10^{-2}$.
150:
151: The spectrum of an accreting black hole has been computed in the
152: spherical-accretion limit (Ipser \& Price 1977, 1982, 1983); however,
153: as we show below, the accreted material will possess non-zero angular
154: momentum, possibly forming an accretion disc which may increase
155: the efficiency of accretion. Thus, we parameterize our results in
156: terms of the unknown accretion efficiency.
157:
158: In section 2 we summarize the known properties of binary and isolated
159: black holes and their distribution in phase space. In section 3 we estimate
160: the accreted angular momentum, discuss the range of accretion efficiencies,
161: and discuss the effects of radiative feedback. In section 4 we discuss
162: the properties of the interstellar medium necessary for computing the
163: accretion rates of black holes. In section 5 we compute the distribution
164: of accretion rates and luminosities for black holes within the disc of
165: the galaxy. In section 6 we estimate the detection rates of black holes
166: under the persistent and transient assumptions, and then we
167: predict the fluxes as a function of distance for the three candidate
168: black-hole microlenses. Finally in section 7 we summarize.
169:
170: \section{Isolated black holes in our Galaxy}
171:
172: The relevant results from Agol \& Kamionkowski (2001) on the number and
173: distribution of black holes within the Galaxy are summarized here.
174:
175: \subsection{Number of black holes}
176:
177: Three microlensing events toward the Galactic Bulge have been found
178: by the MACHO and OGLE teams (Bennett et al. 2001, Mao et al. 2001).
179: These events are of long enough duration ($>$ 1 year) to observe variations
180: in the microlensing light curve due to the motion of the Earth around the
181: Sun, an effect known as microlensing parallax. This breaks some
182: of the degeneracy between distance, velocity, and mass of the lensing
183: object; when combined with a model for the velocity and number density
184: of black holes in the Galaxy, this results in an estimate of the likely
185: mass of the lensing objects. In all three cases, the objects likely
186: have masses greater than 3M$_\odot$, while they are not detected as
187: main-sequence stars, leading to the conclusion that they are most
188: likely black holes (Bennett et al. 2001, Agol \& Kamionkowski 2001).
189: Based on the probability of microlensing toward the Bulge and assuming
190: that isolated black holes have the same scale height as black holes
191: in binaries, one concludes that the total number of black holes in the
192: Milky Way disk is %$N_{\rm tot} = 1_{-0.3}^{+0.8}\times 10^9(f/0.2)^{-1}$
193: %(1-$\sigma$ errors)
194: %the number of black holes is
195: $2\times 10^8 < N_{\rm tot}(f/0.2)
196: < 4\times 10^9$ at 95 per cent confidence,
197: for a microlensing detection efficiency $f$,
198: estimated to be 20 per cent (Alcock et al. 2000).
199: Given the uncertainty in these estimates, we will make predictions
200: based on $N_{\rm tot}=N_910^9$ black holes, and note that our results
201: scale with $N_9$.
202:
203: As discussed below, there is some evidence that the velocity
204: dispersion of isolated black holes is similar to that of the
205: stellar disk. We thus assume that the number density of black
206: holes is distributed as
207: \begin{equation}
208: N_{\rm BH} = N_\odot \exp{\left[-{|Z|\over H} -{(R-R_\odot)\over R_{\rm disc}}\right]},
209: \end{equation}
210: where $N_\odot$ is the number density at the solar circle, $Z$ and $R$
211: are the cylindrical Galactic coordinates, $R_\odot = 8$ kpc is the
212: distance to Galactic centre, $H$ and $R_{\rm disc}$ are the disc scale height
213: and scale length. We will assume that the black-hole disc scale height is
214: $H= 375$ pc and scale length is $R_{\rm disc}=3$ kpc. This implies a local
215: number density of $N_\odot = 1.64\times10^5 N_9 (H/375 {\rm pc})^{-1}$.
216:
217: \subsection{Velocity distribution of isolated black holes}
218:
219: White \& van Paradijs (1996) have estimated that the rms distance from the
220: Galactic plane for black-hole X-ray binaries,
221: $z_{\rm rms}$, is about 450 pc, which corresponds to a scale height of
222: $H \sim 320$ pc and velocity dispersion of
223: $\sigma_v \sim 40$ km~s$^{-1}$.
224: This is consistent with the radial-velocity measurements of
225: low-mass black-hole X-ray binaries when corrected for Galactic rotation
226: (Brandt et al. 1995, Nelemans et al. 1999), with the exception
227: of GRS 1655-40 which has $v_r = -114$ km~s$^{-1}$.
228: We have improved on the work by White \& van Paradijs (1996) by
229: using a maximum-likelihood analysis based on 19 black-hole X-ray binaries,
230: concluding that $H = 375_{-60}^{+135}$ pc (Agol \& Kamionkowski 2001).
231: In addition, the three isolated black holes have a vertical velocity
232: dispersion of $\sigma_z< 27$ km~s$^{-1}$ at 95 per cent confidence, indicating that their
233: kinematics, and thus spatial distribution, is similar to that of
234: black holes in X-ray binaries. Thus, we take the isolated black holes to
235: have the same velocity dispersion and scale height as black hole
236: X-ray binaries.
237:
238: \subsection{Mass distribution of isolated black holes}
239:
240: The distribution of masses of black holes in X-ray binaries and
241: microlensing events can be fit with a power law mass distribution,
242: \begin{equation}\label{dndm}
243: dN/dM=n_M M^{-\gamma},
244: \end{equation}
245: with a lower mass cutoff at $M_1$ and upper mass cutoff of $M_2$. We obtain
246: a best fit for $\gamma=0.6$, $M_1=4 {\rm M}_\odot$, and $M_2=14
247: {\rm M}_\odot$ (Agol \& Kamionkowski 2001).
248: Since there may be larger-mass black holes that have not yet been detected,
249: we impose an upper limit mass cutoff of $M_2=50 {\rm M}_\odot$
250: based on the theoretical mass limit for pulsational stability (Schwarzchild \&
251: H\"arm 1959), assuming that about half of the mass is lost before collapse.
252: This yields $M_1=4{\rm M}_\odot$ and $\gamma=2.4$, close to the value of the Salpeter IMF
253: (Agol \& Kamionkowski 2001).
254: The average mass of either distribution is $\sim 9 {\rm M}_\odot$, close to the
255: mean of the data $\langle M\rangle =9.6M_\odot$. We have normalized this
256: to unity, $n_M=(\gamma-1)/(M_1^{1-\gamma} -M_2^{1-\gamma})$, and we assume
257: that it applies throughout the Galaxy. We will later mention how our
258: predictions differ for $M_2=13{\rm M}_\odot$, but will otherwise use $M_2=50{\rm M}_\odot$.
259:
260: \section{Efficiency of accretion}
261:
262: \subsection{Angular momentum of accreted material}
263:
264: The Bondi-Hoyle formula may be appropriate for computing the accretion rate,
265: but not the efficiency. If the accreting gas were perfectly uniform,
266: then the accreted angular momentum is quite small, and the accretion
267: flow follows a one-dimensional supersonic solution, for which the
268: luminosity can be predicted (Shapiro \& Teukolsky 1983, Ipser \& Price
269: 1977). However,
270: small perturbations in the density or velocity of the accreting gas
271: will lead to an angular momentum large enough to circularise gas before
272: it accretes (Shapiro \& Lightman 1976). If there is a gradient in the
273: density field that is perpendicular to the direction of motion of the
274: black hole, then the accreted angular momentum scales as
275: \begin{equation}
276: l= {1\over 4} {\Delta \rho \over \rho} v r_A,
277: \end{equation}
278: where $\Delta \rho$ is the difference in velocity between the top
279: and bottom of the accretion cylinder and $r_A=GM/(v^2+c_s^2)$ is the accretion
280: radius.
281: Numerical simulations confirm that this formula
282: is correct to order of magnitude (Ruffert 1999).
283: The observed density fluctuations in our galaxy scale
284: as $\delta \rho /\rho \sim (L/10^{18} {\rm cm})^{1/3}$ (Armstrong, Rickett,
285: \& Spangler 1995), extending down to a scale of $\sim 10^{8}$ cm. The exponent
286: of this scaling is nearly consistent with a Kolmogorov spectrum of
287: density (Dubinski et al. 1995).
288: Evaluating this at $L=2 r_A$, we can
289: then find the radius of the resulting accretion disc, $r_{\rm disc}$,
290: by equating the angular momentum of the gas with the Keplerian
291: angular momentum due to the black hole, $l_{\rm Kep} =
292: \sqrt{GMr_{\rm disc}}$. This gives
293: \begin{equation}
294: {r_{\rm disc}\over r_g} = 10^{4} r_g \left({M\over9{\rm M}_\odot}\right)^{2/3} \left({\sqrt{v^2+c_s^2}
295: \over 40 {\rm km~s^{-1}}}\right)^{-10/3}.
296: \end{equation}
297: So, we see that a disc will almost always form in interstellar accretion.
298: A similar argument is given in Fujita et al. (1998) for the case of
299: molecular clouds, for which the slope of velocity fluctuations is similar
300: to that expected by a Kolmogorov spectrum (Larson 1981). The neutral
301: interstellar medium seems to follow a power-law with a similar slope
302: (Lazarian \& Pogosyan 2000), which will also lead to non-zero accreted
303: angular momentum; however, the length scales probed in molecular and
304: atomic gas are much larger than the scale of the accretion radius.
305:
306: The accretion time scale for the disk scales as $t_{d} =
307: \alpha_{SS}^{-1}(GM/r_{\rm disc}^3)^{-1/2}
308: (r_{\rm disc}/h)^2 $ where $h$ is the height of the disc and $\alpha_{SS}$
309: is the ratio of the viscous stress to the pressure in the disk.
310: If the velocity and density fields of the ISM are incoherent on
311: the scale of these fluctuations, then the angular momentum can change on
312: a time scale of $t_a=r_A/v$ as gas will be accreted with the angular momentum
313: vector pointing in a different direction after this time scale. Thus, the
314: angular momentum of the disc can be reduced due to a random walk of the accreted
315: angular momentum vector if $t_a \ll t_d$. We estimate
316: \begin{equation}
317: {t_d\over t_a} \sim 2 {r_A\over 2\times 10^{13} {\rm cm}}
318: \left({0.1 r \over h}\right)^2 \left({\alpha_{SS}\over 0.1}\right)^{-1},
319: \end{equation}
320: which indicates that there may only be a slight reduction in the angular
321: momentum since these time scales are comparable.
322: The residual angular momentum means that we {\em cannot}
323: use spherical-accretion formulae for the luminosity, but we must
324: estimate the efficiency of the accretion disc that forms.
325:
326: \subsection{Range of efficiencies}
327:
328: We assume that the black holes radiate a spectrum with spectral index
329: $\alpha=1$, where $F_\nu \propto \nu^{-\alpha}$, consistent with the
330: typical spectrum of black-hole X-ray binaries, so that equal energy is
331: emitted per unit decade of energy.
332: We define $L_{\rm ion}$ as the luminosity from 1 to 1000 Ryd (13.6 eV),
333: so the efficiency is
334: $\epsilon_{\rm ion}= L_{\rm ion}/(\dot M c^2)$.
335: Estimates of the accretion rate in Cygnus X-1 indicate that it is
336: accreting with an X-ray efficiency of $\epsilon_{\rm ion}\sim 10^{-1}$ (Shapiro \& Teukolsky
337: 1983). However, at low accretion rates the density of the gas decreases,
338: so it may not be able to cool,
339: reducing the radiative efficiency. By estimating the mass accretion
340: rates in black-hole X-ray binaries and X-ray luminosities in the
341: quiescent state, Lasota (2000) concludes that the 2--10 keV efficiency is
342: about $2\times 10^{-6}$ assuming that this luminosity
343: is solely due to accretion, implying $\epsilon_{\rm ion} \sim 10^{-5}$.
344: Low upper limits on the X-ray Bondi-accretion efficiencies are inferred for
345: some supermassive black holes in elliptical galaxies (Loewenstein et al. 2001).
346: The Galactic-centre black hole has an X-ray efficiency of $\sim 4\times
347: 10^{-8} - 2\times10^{-6}$ in the 2--10 keV band for a Bondi-Hoyle accretion
348: rate of $10^{-6} {\rm M}_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$ (Baganoff et al. 2001). Thus, we parameterize
349: our results in terms of an unknown X-ray efficiency.
350:
351: For certain ranges of parameters, the disc may be unstable to the
352: hydrogen-ionisation disc instability (Lasota 2001), creating intermittent
353: outbursts of higher luminosity between long periods of quiescence, with
354: changes in luminosity of $10^{5}$. We will discuss the possible effect
355: this may have on the number of detectable sources in section 6.2.
356:
357: \subsection{Radiative feedback}
358:
359: The gas in the vicinity of the black hole will be heated by the
360: ionising radiation field produced by accretion. If the temperature
361: rises enough, then the accretion radius, and thus the accretion rate,
362: will decrease (Shvartsman 1971, Ostriker et al. 1976). For an
363: $\alpha=1$ spectrum, the mean opacity from 1-1000 Ryd of neutral gas with cosmic
364: abundance is $\sigma_{\rm cold}=3.87\times 10^{-18}$ cm$^{2}$ per hydrogen
365: atom. The heating rate is then given by $H=L_xn_H\sigma_{\rm cold}
366: /(4\pi R^2)$, where $R$ is the distance from the black hole. For
367: temperatures smaller than $\sim 10^4$ K and for a
368: small ratio of radiation energy density to gas energy density,
369: the heating rate greatly exceeds the cooling rate. Consider a fluid element
370: directly in front of the path of a moving black hole. As the black hole
371: approaches with velocity $v$, the ratio of the total heating rate to the
372: initial energy density, $e_0$ of the gas is
373: \begin{equation}
374: {e_{\rm tot}\over e_0}={1\over e_0}\int_R^\infty dR H/v = 2\times 10^5
375: \epsilon_{\rm ion} v_{40}^{-2} (r/r_A) T_4^{-1},
376: \end{equation}
377: where $e_{\rm tot}$ is the total energy density absorbed by a fluid element
378: (neglecting cooling), $v=v_{40} 40$km~s$^{-1}$ and $T=T_4 10^4$ K. Thus, even
379: for small efficiencies
380: the gas is strongly heated outside the accretion radius. Once H and He
381: are ionized, the mean opacity drops by three orders of magnitude, and the
382: gas remains at around $2\times 10^{4}$ K.
383: This has been confirmed with detailed numerical simulations by
384: Blaes, Warren \& Madau (1995). Above this temperature, the
385: cooling and heating times become much longer than the accretion time
386: so the gas falls in adiabatically.
387: Thus we take the temperature of the accreted gas to be $T_0=2\times 10^4$ K
388: for all phases of the ISM except the hot HII.
389:
390: \section{Gas in our Galaxy}
391:
392: \subsection{Phases of the ISM}
393: The interstellar medium in our Galaxy consists of at least five identifiable
394: phases (Bland-Hawthorn \& Reynolds 2000) in approximate
395: pressure equilibrium, $P \sim 2\times 10^3 k_B$.
396: The highest accretion rates will occur in the regions
397: of the highest density.
398: This means that the observable sources will be dominated
399: by the giant molecular clouds (GMCs) consisting mostly of H$_2$ ($T \sim
400: 10$ K) and the cold neutral medium consisting of HI clouds
401: (CNM, $T \sim 10^2$ K). These phases comprise approximately
402: 40 and 50 per cent of the total mass of gas in our Galaxy.
403:
404: The warm neutral and ionised components ($T\sim 8000$K) of the
405: interstellar medium have densities that are $\sim 10^{-2}$ of
406: the CNM, so the maximum accretion rates are $\sim 10^{-2}$ times
407: smaller than than the maximum for the CNM, while
408: the hot component of the ISM ($T\sim 10^6$K) has a density $\sim 10^{-2}$ of the
409: warm components, reducing the maximum accretion rate by another
410: factor of $10^{-2}$. However, these phases fill a much larger
411: volume in the interstellar medium, and thus should be considered.
412:
413: We next refine the above estimates by considering the distribution
414: of each phase as a function of number density.
415:
416: \subsection{Filling fraction of interstellar medium}
417:
418: To estimate the distribution of accretion rates for black holes
419: in our Galaxy requires knowing the volume of the Galaxy filled
420: by gas of a given number density. We define this as
421: \begin{equation}
422: {df \over dn} = f_0 n^{-\beta},
423: \end{equation}
424: where $df/dn$ is the fraction of volume filled by gas with number
425: density between $n$ and $n+dn$, and $f_0$ is a normalization constant.
426: Berkhuijsen (1999) has shown that
427: $\beta_{GMC} \sim 2.8$, while $\beta_{CNM} \sim 3.8$. This can
428: be seen for the molecular clouds by noting that the mass function
429: of molecular clouds in our Galaxy scales as $dN/dM \propto M^{-1.6}$
430: (Dickey \& Garwood 1989), while number density of clouds scales
431: with size, $D$, as $n \propto D^{-1}$ (Larson 1981, Scoville
432: \& Sanders 1987).
433: Assuming that clouds have a spherical volume, one finds
434: $df/dn \propto V(dM/dn)(dN/dM) \propto n^{-2.8}$. Since the
435: number density-size relation is derived for the average density
436: of clouds, $\beta$ may be slightly smaller since each cloud may
437: contain regions where the gas density is higher than average.
438:
439: We assume that the GMCs span number densities
440: {}from $n_1=10^2$ to $n_2=10^5$ cm$^{-3}$, while the CNM spans number
441: densities from $n_1=10$ to $n_2=10^2$ cm$^{-3}$.
442: Finally, we assume that the scale height of
443: the molecular clouds is 75 pc, while the scale height of the CNM
444: is 150 pc.
445:
446: The surface mass density of molecular gas as a function of radius we
447: take from Clemens, Sanders \& Scoville (1988) and Scoville \& Sanders
448: (1987), while the
449: distribution of the CNM we assume is constant with $\Sigma = 4.5
450: {\rm M}_\odot~$pc$^{-2}$ for $R> 4$ kpc, and zero inside 4 kpc
451: (Scoville \& Sanders 1987). The molecular-gas surface density has a
452: a strong peak at the Galactic centre, another peak around 5 kpc from the
453: Galactic centre, then decreases outwards (Scoville \& Sanders 1987).
454: We ignore variations of the surface density in azimuth, and we
455: approximate the distribution in $z$ as an exponential,
456: $f_0(z)=f_0(0)\exp(-|z|/H)$.
457: {}From these surface densities, we compute the filling fraction in the
458: mid-plane as,
459: \begin{equation}
460: f_0(0)= {\Sigma (\beta-2)(n_1^{1-\beta}-n_2^{1-\beta}) \over
461: 2H \mu (\beta-1)(n_1^{2-\beta}-n_2^{2-\beta})},
462: \end{equation}
463: where $\mu =2.72 m_p$ for the GMC, and $\mu = 1.36 m_p$ for the CNM.
464: At the solar circle, this gives $f_0({\rm GMC})=10^{-3}$, while
465: $f_0({\rm CNM})=0.04$.
466:
467: The warm HI, warm HII, and hot HII we take as constant densities
468: of 0.3, 0.15, and 0.002 cm$^{-3}$ respectively, mid-plane filling factors of
469: 35, 20, and 40 per cent, as well as scale heights of
470: 0.5, 1, and 3 kpc (Bland-Hawthorn \& Reynolds 2000). We assume
471: that the hot HII has a temperature of $10^6$ K, and thus $c_s= 150$ km~s$^{-1}$.
472: The corresponding surface mass densities are 4, 2, and
473: 0.2 M$_\odot~$pc$^{-2}$, respectively, which we assume are constant as a
474: function of Galactic radius.
475:
476: \section{Accretion rate and luminosity distribution functions}
477:
478: The distribution function of mass-accretion rate for black holes
479: located at a given region in the Galaxy is given by
480: \begin{equation}
481: {d^2 N \over d\dot M dV}= \int\limits_{M_1}^{M_2} dM
482: \int\limits_{n_1}^{n_2} dn
483: \int\limits_0^\infty dv {df \over dn} {d^2 n_{\rm BH} \over dM dv }
484: \delta(\dot M(n,M,v)-\dot M),
485: \end{equation}
486: where $dV$ is the volume element and
487: \begin{equation}
488: {d^2 n_{\rm BH}\over dM dv} = N_{\rm BH}(R,z) \sqrt{2\over \pi} {v^2 \over \sigma_v^3}
489: \exp{\left[-{v^2\over 2 \sigma_v^2}\right]} n_M M^{-\gamma}.
490: \end{equation}
491: We define $\dot M_0 = \pi G^2 {\rm M}_\odot^2 m_p (1 {\rm km~s^{-1}})^{-3}
492: = 3.8 \times 10^{14}$, so that $\dot M(n,M,v) =
493: \dot M_0 n M^2 (v^2+c_s^2)^{-3/2}$.
494: For a given mass and sound speed, we can define the minimum number density
495: required for accretion at a rate greater than $\dot M$:
496: $n > n_0 = \dot M c_s^3/(\dot M_0 M^2)$.
497: Using equations (\ref{bondi}) and (\ref{dndm}), we
498: can first carry out the $v$ integration analytically,
499: \begin{equation}\label{dndmdot}
500: {d^2 N\over d\dot M dV } = N_{\rm BH} \int\limits_{M_1}^{M_2} dM \, n_M
501: M^{-\gamma}\int\limits_{{\rm max}\{n_1,n_0\}}^{{\rm max}\{n_2,n_0\}} dn
502: f_0 n^{-\beta}
503: \sqrt{2\over \pi} {v_0 \over \sigma_v^3}
504: {(\dot M_0 n M^2)^{2/3}\over \dot M^{5/3}}
505: \exp{\left[-{v_0^2\over2\sigma_v^2}\right]},
506: \end{equation}
507: where $v_0^2=(\dot M_0 n M^2/\dot M)^{2/3} -c_s^2$.
508: The remaining two integrals we compute numerically.
509:
510: \vskip 2mm
511: \hbox{~}
512: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig1.ps,width=5in}} %FIGURE 1
513: \noindent{
514: \scriptsize \addtolength{\baselineskip}{-3pt}
515: \vskip 1mm
516: \begin{normalsize}
517: \noindent Fig. 1: The number density of black holes accreting with
518: accretion rates between $\dot M$ and $\dot M+d\dot M$ as
519: a function of $\dot M$ at the solar radius for $\sigma_v=40$ km~s$^{-1}$.
520: The solid curve refers to black holes accreting
521: within molecular clouds, while the short dashed curve refers to
522: black holes within the cold neutral medium. The dotted curve
523: is black holes within the warm HI, the dash-dot curve for the
524: warm HII, while the dash-triple dot curve for the hot HII.
525: \end{normalsize}
526: \vskip 3mm
527: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{3pt}
528: }
529:
530: In Figure 1 we plot the function $dN/d\dot M$ for the various phases of the
531: interstellar medium at the solar circle. The densest gas (GMCs) dominates
532: the highest
533: accretion rates, while the hottest gas dominates the lowest accretion
534: rates. For the hot HII, accretion is subsonic and $n$ is assumed to be
535: constant, so $\dot M \propto M^2$. Thus, $dN/d\dot M \propto
536: \dot M^{-(1+\gamma)/2}$, spanning a range in $\dot M$ of $(M_2/M_1)^2$,
537: or two decades. This is consistent with the numerical spectrum shown in
538: Figure 1. The other phases have more complicated accretion-rate
539: distributions since $\sigma_v > c_s$.
540:
541: To compute the expected total number of black holes in the Galaxy accreting
542: at a rate $\dot M$, we integrate the luminosity functions (assumed
543: to be constant) over the gas filling fraction times the number density
544: of black holes as a function of position over the entire Galaxy,
545: \begin{equation} \label{dndmdotgal}
546: {dN\over d\dot M} = {d^2 N\over d\dot M dV }\Biggr|_{(R_\odot,z=0)}
547: \int\limits_0^\infty dR\, 2\pi
548: R \exp{\left[-{R-R_\odot\over R_{\rm disc}}\right]}
549: 2{\Sigma(R)\over \Sigma(R_\odot)}
550: \int\limits_0^\infty dz \exp{\left[-{z\over H_{\rm BH}}-{z\over H_{gas}}\right]}.
551: \end{equation}
552: Figure 2(a) shows $N(>{\dot M})=\int_{\dot M}^\infty d\dot M'
553: (dN/d\dot M')$ for both
554: black holes and neutron stars. For neutron stars, we choose $M=1.4 {\rm M}_\odot$, 86 per cent
555: with $\sigma_v = 175$ km~s$^{-1}$ and 14 per cent with $\sigma_v=700$ km~s$^{-1}$ (Cordes
556: \& Chernoff 1998),
557: $N_\odot = 5.2\times 10^5$ kpc$^{-3}$, and $H=1$ kpc, yielding a
558: total of $10^9$ neutron stars within our galaxy.
559: The total number of accreting black holes is smaller than the total
560: number in the disk since we have assumed that the gas filling factor decreases
561: with scale height. This reduction may be artificial since gas at some density
562: presumably fills the entire Galaxy, but this only affects small accretion rates.
563:
564: We expect $\sim 10^4 N_9$ isolated black holes to be accreting
565: at rates comparable to the estimated rates in black-hole X-ray binaries,
566: $\dot M > 10^{15}$ g~s$^{-1}$ (van Paradijs 1996). This exceeds
567: the parent population of black-hole X-ray binaries, which
568: may be 10$^{2-3}$ (Iben et al. 1995).
569: Black holes outnumber neutron stars due to
570: their larger mass and smaller space velocity as shown in Figure 2(a).
571:
572: To compute the number of detectable isolated black holes requires
573: converting the accretion-rate distribution into a luminosity function.
574: Given the uncertainties in accretion physics, we will make two assumptions
575: based on what is known about black-hole X-ray binaries: persistent
576: and transient sources. The first assumption shown in Figure 2(b) is
577: that the sources are time-steady, similar to high-mass
578: X-ray binaries such as Cygnus X-1. Under this assumption, we simply convert
579: the accretion rate into an X-ray luminosity in a given X-ray band. Shown
580: is the ionising radiation band from 1--1000 Ryd for
581: $\epsilon_{\rm ion}=10^{-5}$;
582: the horizontal axis simply scales with efficiency. The black-hole
583: and neutron-star functions overlap for $\epsilon_{\rm ion} \sim 10^{-5}$
584: despite the lower black-hole efficiency due to the larger black-hole
585: mass, smaller velocity
586: dispersion, and smaller scale height.
587: The total luminosity of isolated accreting black holes within
588: the Milky Way is $\sim 10^{36}N_9\epsilon_{-5}$ erg~s$^{-1}$.
589:
590: \vskip 2mm
591: \hbox{~}
592: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig2a.ps,width=5in}} %FIGURE 2
593: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig2b.ps,width=5in}} %FIGURE 2
594: \noindent{
595: \scriptsize \addtolength{\baselineskip}{-3pt}
596: \vskip 1mm
597: \begin{normalsize}
598: \noindent Fig. 2: (a) The number of black holes in the Milky Way with
599: accretion rates greater than $\dot M$ for $\sigma_v=40$ km~s$^{-1}$ (solid line).
600: For comparison, the dotted line shows the same computation for neutron stars.
601: (b) The number of black holes in the Milky Way with luminosities greater
602: than $L_{\rm ion}$ with $\epsilon_{\rm ion}=10^{-5}$ and the number of neutron
603: stars for $\epsilon_{\rm ion}=10^{-1}$ (dotted line).
604: \end{normalsize}
605: \vskip 3mm
606: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{3pt}
607: }
608:
609: The second assumption that the black holes are transient
610: we discuss in section 6.2 below.
611:
612: \section{Detection probability}
613:
614: To compute the detection probability, we need to integrate the number
615: of sources above a given observed flux as a function of position within
616: the Galaxy. We will consider two energy emission bands, `soft' X-ray
617: {}from 1--10 keV, and `hard' X-ray from 10--100 keV, which have
618: efficiencies of $\epsilon_{\rm soft}$ and $\epsilon_{\rm hard}$. Since the
619: model spectrum we have used is flat, $\nu f_\nu \propto \nu^0$, the luminosity
620: per unit decade of photon energy is constant. Thus, the flux in each
621: of these bands is $1/3$ of the flux of ionising photons which
622: covers three decades, or $\epsilon_{\rm soft}=\epsilon_{\rm hard}=\epsilon_{\rm ion}/3$.
623: A more complex X-ray spectrum will change our
624: results by factors of order unity, which we defer to future work given
625: the poor theoretical understanding of the spectra of accreting black holes.
626:
627: For neutron stars, we assume a spectrum composed of a blackbody with $T=0.15$ keV
628: plus a power law with $\alpha = 1$ (i.e. flat in $\nu F_\nu$) and
629: the flux from 1--10 keV equal to 1 per cent of the total flux of the blackbody
630: component. This was chosen to be similar to the spectra of neutron-star
631: binaries Cen X-4 and Aquila X-1 in quiescence (Rutledge et al. 2001a,b).
632: This spectrum yields $\epsilon_{\rm soft}=
633: 0.13 \epsilon_{\rm ion}$ and $\epsilon_{\rm hard}= 0.03 \epsilon_{\rm ion}$ due
634: to the fact that most of the flux is in the extreme ultraviolet.
635: We neglect photoelectric absorption since the half-column density of molecular
636: clouds is approximately $N_H\sim 1\times 10^{22}$cm$^{-2}$, which leads
637: to absorption of only 36 per cent of the flux in the soft X-ray band
638: (using the opacities of Morrison \& McCammon 1987). Toward the
639: Galactic centre,
640: the hydrogen column density is about $N_H\sim 6\times 10^{22}$cm$^{-2}$ due
641: to the ring of gas near the centre, leading to absorption of about 86 per cent of the
642: soft flux. In the hard--X-ray band, the absorption is negligible.
643:
644: \subsection{Persistent sources}
645:
646: For the persistent-source assumption, we assume that the accretion flow
647: emits isotropically, so we simply need to integrate
648: the luminosity function over the entire galaxy with the
649: transformation:
650: \begin{equation}
651: {dN\over dF dV} = {dN \over d\dot M dV} {4 \pi D^2 \over
652: \epsilon_{\rm soft,hard} c^2},
653: \end{equation}
654: where $D$ is the distance to a given point in the Galaxy.
655: Figure 3 shows the predicted number of sources as a function
656: of flux integrated over the entire Galaxy for the persistent-source assumption.
657: Despite the much lower assumed efficiency, the number of detectable black holes
658: becomes comparable to the number of detectable neutron stars for
659: $\epsilon_{BH}\sim 10^{-4}\epsilon_{NS}(N_{BH}/N_{NS})^{0.8}$.
660: The number of black holes above a certain flux at high flux scales approximately
661: as $N(>F) = 10^4F^{-1.2}$ near $F=10^{-15}\epsilon_{-5}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$.
662: Given the flatness of this dependence,
663: the best detection strategy is to cover as much area of the sky as possible,
664: assuming the constraint of a fixed amount of observing time with an X-ray
665: telescope with a sensitivity that scales as $t^{-1/2}$. Reducing
666: the mass cutoff from $M_2=50{\rm M}_\odot$ to $M_2=13 {\rm M}_\odot$ only decreases
667: the number of objects by a factor of $\sim 2$ since there are fewer objects
668: at high mass (Figure 3).
669:
670: \vskip 2mm
671: \hbox{~}
672: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig3.ps,width=5in}} %FIGURE 3
673: \noindent{
674: \scriptsize \addtolength{\baselineskip}{-3pt}
675: \vskip 1mm
676: \begin{normalsize}
677: \noindent Fig.~3: The number of black holes visible to an observer located
678: within the Solar system as a function of X-ray flux in either the soft
679: or hard X-ray bands for a persistent accretion efficiency of
680: $\epsilon_{\rm ion} = 10^{-5}$ with $\epsilon_{\rm soft,hard}
681: =\epsilon_{\rm ion}/3$ for $M_2=50{\rm M}_\odot$ (solid line) and
682: $M_2=13 {\rm M}_\odot$ (dashed line). For comparison the number of
683: neutron stars above
684: a given soft X-ray flux is shown as well in the soft X-ray band with
685: $\epsilon_{\rm soft} = 0.13 \epsilon_{\rm ion} = 0.013$ (dotted line).
686: In addition, we show predictions for a population of $10^6$ black holes
687: with mass $250 {\rm M}_\odot$ for efficiencies of $10^{-5}$ (dash-dot line).
688: Note that the horizontal axis scales with efficiency for each object.
689: \end{normalsize}
690: \vskip 3mm
691: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{3pt}
692: }
693:
694: We have also computed the the number density of black holes with fluxes
695: greater than $10^{-15}\epsilon_{-5}$ erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$ as a function of Galactic
696: latitude and longitude for one quadrant of the Galaxy (Figure 4).
697: The black holes are strongly concentrated toward the Galactic plane
698: and toward the Galactic centre. Half of the black holes lie within
699: the dashed contour which covers an area of 504 deg$^2$ in Figure 4,
700: giving an average of 3$N_9$ per square degree within this region near the
701: Galactic plane. We have not attempted to include the inhomogeneity of
702: the ISM which might be important for nearby black holes in the local bubble
703: or for black holes in interstellar clouds.
704:
705: \vskip 2mm
706: \hbox{~}
707: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig4.ps,width=5in}} %FIGURE 4
708: \noindent{
709: \scriptsize \addtolength{\baselineskip}{-3pt}
710: \vskip 1mm
711: \begin{normalsize}
712: \noindent Fig.~4: The logarithm of the number density of black holes
713: per degree square with fluxes above $F_X=10^{-15}\epsilon_{-5}$ erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$
714: in the soft or hard band as a function of galactic longitude, $l(^\circ)$,
715: and latitude, $b(^\circ)$.
716: The labels indicate the logarithm of the number density. The dashed line
717: indicates the contour within which 50 per cent of the black holes are contained.
718: The total number of black holes above this flux level
719: is $\sim 5000$, while the maximum number density is 94 per square degree
720: at the Galactic Center.
721: \end{normalsize}
722: \vskip 3mm
723: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{3pt}
724: }
725:
726: Finally, we have computed the distribution of sources with distance from
727: the Sun. Figure 5 shows the number of black-hole sources with fluxes
728: greater than $F=10^{-15}\epsilon_{-5}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ less
729: than a given distance for each of the phases of the ISM. The total number
730: of sources above this flux level is 3800$N_9$ in the GMCs, 6700$N_9$ in
731: the CNM, 900$N_9$ in the warm HI, 200$N_9$ in the warm HII, and 0
732: in the hot HII. The average distance for the
733: detectable black holes is 5 kpc in the GMCs, 1 kpc in the CNM,
734: 200 pc in the warm HI, and 140 pc in the warm HII. The average distance
735: of black holes in all phases is 2 kpc. Note that there
736: is a rise in the number of black holes in GMCs at the Galactic centre
737: (8 kpc away) since the surface density of molecular gas increases
738: by a factor of $\sim 10$ within 500 pc of the Galactic centre. The
739: sources in the gas clouds tend to be more distant since it
740: requires looking further in the Galaxy to find clouds, while the
741: the sources in the interstellar gas tend to be closer since they are
742: fainter due to lower accretion rates.
743:
744:
745: The sensitivity of the ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS) Bright Source Catalog
746: is about $10^{-12}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ (Voges et al. 1999;
747: we have converted count rate to flux assuming $\alpha=1$), so at most
748: $3N_9\epsilon_{-5}^{1.2}$ accreting black hole should have been detected
749: by this survey given the assumption of persistence.
750: We can see immediately from Figure 3 why it may have been difficult to
751: detect isolated accreting neutron stars with the RASS since we predict
752: about one visible neutron star on the sky at this flux level, which will
753: be reduced further by X-ray absorption. Danner (1998) has surveyed sources
754: in molecular clouds within the RASS, finding no new isolated neutron-star
755: candidates, and thus, we presume, no isolated black-hole candidates.
756: For an X-ray observatory such as {\em EXIST}, which will reach sensitivities
757: of $\sim 10^{-13}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ for one-year co-added data
758: (Grindlay et al. 1999 ), about $\sim 50N_9\epsilon_{-5}^{1.2}$ sources
759: may be detectable at hard X-ray energies as well. {\em EXIST} will have an
760: angular resolution of about 2 arcminutes and position sensitivity
761: of $\sim 30$ arcsec, which should make identification feasible within
762: molecular clouds.
763:
764: The {\em Chandra} and {\em XMM-Newton} observatories have much better sensitivities
765: $\sim 10^{-14}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ for a 10 kilo-second (ksec)
766: observation; however, both satellites
767: cover a much smaller field of view ($16'\times 16'$). The ChaMPlane
768: survey ({\em Chandra} Multi-wavelength Galactic Plane Survey, Wilkes et al. 2000)
769: will cover about 1 square degree per year to a flux of $\sim 10^{-15}$
770: erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ for the 1--10 keV band.
771: This flux limit is deep enough that $\sim 10^4N_9\epsilon_{-5}^{1.2}$ sources
772: within the Galactic plane might be detectable (Figure 3); however, the central
773: 50 per cent are spread over an area of 504 deg$^2$ in the Galactic Plane
774: (Figure 4). The {\em XMM-Newton}
775: serendipitous Survey will cover an area of the sky $\sim$ 10 times
776: larger than the {\em Chandra} Serendipitous Survey at similar sensitivity
777: (Watson et al. 2001). Thus, these surveys may result in
778: $\sim 30N_9\epsilon_{-5}^{1.2} $ detections per year.
779:
780: One might expect that targeting molecular clouds may be advantageous
781: for finding black holes. However,
782: due to their proximity, the 23 clouds within 1 kpc have angular sizes
783: of about 5--20$^\circ$ (Dame et al. 1987), which will make them rather
784: difficult to cover with the small field of view of {\em Chandra} or {\em XMM-Newton}. For
785: instance, the single pointing in the $\rho$-Ophiucus molecular cloud observed
786: by Imanishi et al. (2001) covers a volume $\sim$ 18 pc$^3$
787: (assuming the cloud is spherical), so we expect only $\sim 3\times 10^{-2}N_9$
788: black holes to reside within the observed volume. Observations pointed
789: at molecular clouds will not improve these detection rates, but observations
790: pointing toward the Galactic centre should improve the number
791: of detections significantly. Surveys targeted at the Galactic Center
792: (Baganoff et al. 2001) may find $7 N_9\epsilon_{-5}^{1.2}$ per
793: {\em Chandra} or {\em XMM-Newton} field.
794:
795: \vskip 2mm
796: \hbox{~}
797: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig5.ps,width=5in}} %FIGURE 5
798: \noindent{
799: \scriptsize \addtolength{\baselineskip}{-3pt}
800: \vskip 1mm
801: \begin{normalsize}
802: \noindent Fig.~5: The total number of black hole sources with
803: fluxes greater than $F=10^{-15}\epsilon_{-5}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ and
804: less distant than $D$. The solid line is for the CNM, the
805: dotted line for the GMCs, the dashed line for the warm HI,
806: and the dash-dot line for the warm HII.
807: \end{normalsize}
808: \vskip 3mm
809: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{3pt}
810: }
811:
812: \subsection{Transient sources}
813:
814: The second assumption is that each of the sources are transient, driven by the
815: hydrogen-ionisation instability at radii in the accretion disc with
816: $T\sim 5000$ K
817: as in low-mass X-ray binaries. In this case, we assume that the sources
818: undergo outbursts for several months with luminosities near Eddington,
819: while remaining faint for several decades.
820: Chen, Shrader \& Livio (1997) have shown that soft X-ray transients
821: tend to peak at $L_{\rm out}\sim 0.2 L_{\rm Edd}$ with an average duration
822: (decay time scale) of
823: $t_o \sim 20$ days and recurrence times varying from 2 years to 60 years for
824: black holes. These are only the observed transients; transients with
825: longer recurrence time scales may not have had time to repeat.
826: If we assume that each black hole accretes quiescently for a time
827: $t_q$, storing up mass in the accretion disk with a small fraction of
828: gas accreting on to the black hole, and then all of this
829: mass is released in an outburst of duration $t_o$, then
830: \begin{equation}
831: t_q = 130 yr {L_{\rm out}\over 0.2 L_{\rm Edd}} {t_o\over 20 {\rm days}}
832: \left({\epsilon_o \dot M \over 10^{14} {\rm g~s^{-1}}}\right)^{-1}
833: {M \over 9 {\rm M}_\odot},
834: \end{equation}
835: where $\epsilon_o$ is the radiative efficiency of accretion during
836: outburst. The outburst rate in the Milky Way is then
837: \begin{equation}
838: \dot N_{\rm out} = \int_{M_1}^{M_2} dM\int_0^\infty d\dot M
839: {d^2N\over dM d\dot M} t_q^{-1}.
840: \end{equation}
841: Assuming a 10 per cent efficiency during outburst, we find
842: $\dot N_{\rm out} \sim 536N_9$ yr$^{-1}$ for $\sigma_v=40$ km~s$^{-1}$.
843: This is clearly inconsistent with observations, demonstrating
844: that not all isolated black holes undergo transient
845: outbursts if the assumptions of our calculation are correct.
846: If only black holes accreting above $\dot M > 10^{15}$ g~s$^{-1}$
847: undergo outbursts, consistent with the observed X-ray novae
848: (van Paradijs 1996), then these numbers reduce to 50 yr$^{-1}$,
849: still large given that about $\sim 1$ transient is detected
850: each year, and generally they are found to have companions.
851: We conclude that only a small fraction of isolated black holes
852: might experience transience similar to X-ray novae.
853:
854: \subsection{Detecting microlensing candidates}
855:
856: The uncertainty in distance of the MACHO black-hole microlensing candidates
857: leads to an uncertainty in their mass, and thus an uncertainty in their
858: status as black holes. One possible way to constrain the mass of these
859: lenses is to look for X-rays from accretion. Figure 6 shows the flux as a
860: function of distance for MACHO 96-BLG-5, MACHO 98-BLG-6, and OGLE-1999-BUL-32
861: (Mao et al. 2001) for a number density of 1 cm$^{-3}$
862: with the total velocity set to $\sqrt{3/2}$ times the observed sky velocity
863: projected on to the lens plane (ignoring the unknown projected source velocity)
864: and subtracted from the Galactic rotation velocity
865: (220 km~s$^{-1}$) and an X-ray efficiency of $\epsilon_{\rm ion}=10^{-3}$.
866: We note that if the sky velocity of the source is significant, then the
867: inferred lens velocity will be different, typically smaller, which will
868: increase the luminosity. The flux scales as $F\propto \epsilon n D^{-4}$
869: for small distances since the mass depends on the inverse of the distance
870: and the flux decreases as the inverse of distance squared.
871: Observing in the X-ray would be advantageous to avoid confusion with the
872: background microlensed star. In the soft X-ray, a 1--10 keV flux of
873: $\sim 10^{-15}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ can
874: be detected with a $\sim$ 400 ksec exposure with {\em Chandra} or $\sim$ 200 ksec
875: with {\em XMM-Newton}. A detection of a black-hole candidate at such a flux level will allow
876: an upper limit on the distance of $\sim 1-3$ kpc to be placed, assuming they
877: accrete from the diffuse ISM with $n < n_{\rm max} =1$ cm$^{-3}$ and assuming
878: an X-ray efficiency less than $\epsilon_{\rm max} =10^{-3}$. A decrease in
879: efficiency will lead to a decrease in flux, and thus a decrease in the distance
880: upper limit. An upper limit on distance converts into a lower limit on mass,
881: since $M \propto D^{-1}$, which may confirm the black-hole hypothesis. The
882: mass lower limit is proportional to $M_{\rm min} \propto (\epsilon_{\rm max}
883: n_{\rm max}/F)^{-1/4}$, a weak dependence on our assumed parameters.
884: A cloud or companion
885: could increase the accretion rate, resulting in a higher luminosity, thus
886: a larger distance for the same flux; however, clouds occupy less than 5 per cent
887: of the volume near the Galactic plane and can be searched for
888: in HI 21 cm or CO absorption or emission (the MACHO fields are toward
889: Baade's window, thus unlikely to contain a high molecular column density),
890: while companions should be detectable with HST.
891:
892: \vskip 2mm
893: \hbox{~}
894: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig6.ps,width=5in}} %FIGURE 6
895: \noindent{
896: \scriptsize \addtolength{\baselineskip}{-3pt}
897: \vskip 1mm
898: \begin{normalsize}
899: \noindent Fig.~6: The flux as a function of distance for MACHO 96-BLG-5
900: (solid), MACHO 98-BLG-6 (dashed) and OGLE-1999-BUL-32 (dotted) as a function
901: of distance for $\epsilon_{\rm ion}=10^{-3}$.
902: \end{normalsize}
903: \vskip 3mm
904: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{3pt}
905: }
906:
907: \section{Conclusions}
908:
909: We have estimated the number of isolated black holes that might be revealed
910: by their X-ray emission from accretion of interstellar gas.
911: We have improved upon previous calculations by taking into account
912: the density distribution of the interstellar medium,
913: as well as using the known properties of black-hole X-ray binaries and MACHO
914: black-hole candidates to constrain the phase space and accretion efficiency
915: of isolated accreting black holes. We conclude that persistent isolated black
916: holes may be competitive with neutron stars in creating detectable X-ray flux
917: if their efficiencies differ by $\epsilon_{BH} \sim 10^{-4} \epsilon_{NS}
918: (N_{BH}/N_{NS})^{0.8}$.
919: The ROSAT survey did not have the sensitivity to
920: detect either isolated accreting neutron stars or black holes;
921: an all-sky survey with two orders of magnitude more sensitivity,
922: $\sim 10^{-14}$ erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~dex${-1}$, may be able to detect
923: $\sim 10^3N_9\epsilon_{-5}^{1.2}$ accreting black holes.
924: The X-ray observatories {\em XMM-Newton} and {\em Chandra} may be able
925: to detect this population with pointed observations; however, they suffer
926: {}from having small fields of view. Despite this limitation, Galactic plane
927: surveys being carried out with these telescopes may be able to detect
928: tens per year for $\epsilon_{-5}=1$. If the accreting sources with
929: $\dot M > 10^{15}$ g~s$^{-1}$ go through transient outbursts, then 50 isolated
930: black holes per year would be detectable as X-ray novae, so we reject
931: this possibility since isolated X-ray novae have not been observed.
932:
933: The greatest uncertainty in our predictions is the efficiency of black-hole
934: accretion, with which we have parameterized our results.
935: Most of the detectable black
936: holes should reside in interstellar clouds that have higher densities;
937: however, this leads to the problem of confusion with other X-ray sources
938: such as the coronae of massive stars. Some tests for whether an accreting
939: object is a black hole are the following: 1) Is there high-energy emission?
940: Accreting black holes tend to show spectra which have power laws extending up
941: to $\sim 10^2$ keV (Grove et al. 1998). 2) What is the nature of the
942: variability? Accreting black holes show no pulsations, show only
943: QPOs with $\nu < 1$ kHz, and show power spectra that cut off around 500 Hz
944: (Sunyaev \& Revnivtsev 2000). 3) What is the mass? Without a binary
945: companion, the mass of an accreting object is difficult to measure;
946: however, this might be achieved by carrying out astrometry of background
947: stars to look for gravitational distortion by the accreting object
948: (Paczy\'nski 2001). 4) What do other parts of the spectra look like?
949: Accreting black holes can produce relativistic radio jets (Mirabel \&
950: Rodr\'iguez 1999), and photoionisation of the surrounding gas might result
951: in observable infrared lines (Maloney, Colgan \& Hollenbach 1997).
952:
953: There are several assumptions in our calculation that might affect the
954: results. We have assumed that the accretion flow is one-dimensional,
955: and that the sonic point is at the accretion radius. We have also assumed
956: that the accretion is time steady; this may not be the case for higher
957: accretion rates than we find for black holes accreting from the ISM
958: (e.g. Grindlay 1978). If the black hole is moving slower than the sound
959: speed at the accretion radius then the preheated region outside the
960: accretion radius may have a chance to expand into the ISM, reducing the
961: number density, and thus reducing the accretion rate. We have neglected
962: mechanical feedback, which may occur if a jet or wind is developed.
963: Recent work on non-radiating
964: accretion flows indicates that strong winds can be formed which carry the
965: bulk of the energy outwards as mechanical rather than radiative energy
966: (Blandford \& Begelman 1999, Igumenshchev, Abramowicz \& Narayan 2000,
967: Hawley, Balbus \& Stone 2001). These authors argue that the accretion
968: rate scales as $\dot M \propto r$. If the outer radius is taken
969: as $r_A$, then $\dot M (10 r_g) \sim 10 (v/c)^2 \dot M(r_A) \sim 2\times
970: 10^{-7} v_{40}^{-2} \dot M(r_A)$. If the outer radius is taken to be the
971: circularization radius, then $\dot M(10 r_g) \sim 10^{-3}
972: (M/9{\rm M}_\odot)^{-2/3} [(v^2+c_s^2)^{1/2}/40 {\rm km~s^{-1}}]^{-10/3}$.
973: Either of these circumstances will make black holes less visible,
974: which in the formalism of this paper corresponds to a further reduction in
975: the accretion efficiency.
976: Magnetic fields will likely play an important role as they are amplified
977: by flux-freezing, possibly heating the gas to virial temperatures
978: (Igumenshchev \& Narayan 2001) and can transport angular momentum via
979: the magnetorotational instability once the circularization radius is
980: reached, modifying the dynamics of the accretion flow.
981: We have not explored the dependence of the efficiency on other parameters,
982: which may result, for example, from changes in the gas density and
983: angular momentum as a function of the accretion rate, so our extrapolation
984: {}from estimated efficiencies of black-hole X-ray binaries may be too
985: optimistic. The validity of these assumptions can be tested with 3-D
986: radiation MHD simulations of a black hole accreting from an inhomogeneous
987: medium, a daunting numerical problem.
988:
989: It is possible that a population of intermediate-mass black
990: holes (IMBHs) exist with larger masses around $250 {\rm M}_\odot$, the remnants
991: of the first generation of star formation (Madau \& Rees 2001). The larger
992: masses of these objects would result in yet larger accretion rates and
993: luminosities by a factor of $\sim 10^3$, if they are distributed with
994: same phase-space distribution as $9 {\rm M}_\odot$ black holes. If we assume that
995: $\sim 10^6$ IMBHs reside in our galaxy, then we find that the number of
996: detectable objects at high fluxes may comparable to $9 {\rm M}_\odot$
997: black holes accreting at the same efficiency (Figure 3).
998: However, if these objects reside in the halo or bulge of the galaxy,
999: the number detectable will be decreased significantly.
1000:
1001: \section*{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
1002:
1003: We acknowledge D.~Bennett, L.~Bildsten, O.~Blaes, R.~Blandford,
1004: J.~Carpenter,
1005: D.~Chernoff, G.~Dubus, A.~Esin, C.~Fryer, J.~Grindlay,
1006: T.~Kallman, L.~Koopmans, J.~Krolik, Y.~Lithwick, A.~Melatos,
1007: S.~Phinney, M.~Rees, R.~Rutledge, N.~Scoville, and K.~Sheth
1008: for useful conversations and ideas which greatly improved this work. This
1009: work was supported in part by NSF AST-0096023, NASA NAG5-8506, and DoE
1010: DE-FG03-92-ER40701. Support for the work done by EA was provided by the
1011: National Aeronautics and Space Administration through Chandra
1012: Postdoctoral Fellowship Award Number PF0-10013 issued by the Chandra
1013: X-ray Observatory Center, which is operated by the Smithsonian
1014: Astrophysical Observatory for and on behalf of the National Aeronautics
1015: Space Administration under contract NAS8-39073.
1016:
1017: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1018: \bibitem{b2}Alcock C. et al. (the MACHO collaboration), 2000, ApJ, 541, 734
1019: \bibitem{b202}Armstrong, J. W., Rickett, B. J., Spangler, S. R., 1995, ApJ, 443, 209
1020: \bibitem{b201}Baganoff, F. K. et al., 2001, Nature, 413, 45
1021: \bibitem{b4}Bailyn C. D., Jain R. K., Coppi P., Orosz J. A., 1998, ApJ, 499, 367
1022: \bibitem{b6}Bennett D. P. et al., 2001, submitted, astro-ph/0109467
1023: \bibitem{b602}Berkhuijsen, E. M., 1999, Plasma Turbulence and Energetic
1024: Particles in Astrophysics, Ostrowski, M. \& Schlickeiser, R., eds., Krak\'ow
1025: \bibitem{b601}Bildsten, L., Rutledge, R. E., 2000, ApJ, 541, 908
1026: \bibitem{b8}Blaes O. M., Madau P., 1993, ApJ, 403, 690
1027: \bibitem{b9}Blaes O., Warren O., Madau P., 1995, ApJ, 454, 370
1028: \bibitem{b10}Bland-Hawthorn J., Reynolds R., 2000, in Encyclopedia of Astronomy \& Astrophysics, MacMillan and Institute of Physics Publishing
1029: \bibitem{b11}Blandford R. D., Begelman M. C., 1999, MNRAS, 303, L1
1030: \bibitem{b12}Bondi H., Hoyle F., 1944, MNRAS, 104, 273
1031: \bibitem{b13}Brandt W. N., Podsiadlowski Ph., Sigurdsson S., 1995, MNRAS, 277, L35
1032: \bibitem{b14}Campana S., Pardi M. C., 1993, A\&A, 277, 477
1033: \bibitem{b15}Carr B. J., 1979, MNRAS, 189, 123
1034: \bibitem{b16}Chen W., Shrader C. R., Livio M., 1997, ApJ, 491, 312
1035: \bibitem{b17}Clemens D. P., Sanders D. B., Scoville N. Z., 1988, ApJ, 327, 139
1036: \bibitem{b171}Cordes, J. M., Chernoff, D. F., 1998, ApJ, 505, 315
1037: \bibitem{b19}Dame T. M. et al., 1987, 322, 706
1038: \bibitem{b20}Danner R., 1998, A\&AS, 128, 331
1039: \bibitem{b21}Dickey J. M., Garwood R. W., 1989, ApJ, 341, 201
1040: \bibitem{b22}Dubinski J., Narayan R., Phillips T. G., 1995, ApJ, 448, 226
1041: \bibitem{b24}Fujita Y., Inoue S., Nakamura T., Manmoto T., Nakamura K. E., 1998, ApJ, 495, L85
1042: \bibitem{b25}Garcia M. R., McClintock J. E., Narayan R., Callanan P., Murray S. S., 2001, ApJ, 553, L47
1043: \bibitem{b27}Grindlay J. et al., 1999, astro-ph/0005496
1044: \bibitem{b270}Grindlay J. et al., 2001, Gamma-Ray Astrophysics 2001, AIP Conf.
1045: Proceedings, in press
1046: \bibitem{b271}Grindlay J., 1978, ApJ, 221, 234
1047: \bibitem{b28}Grove J. E., Johnson W. N., Kroeger R. A., McNaron-Brown K., Skibo J. G., Phlips B. F., 1998, ApJ, 500, 899
1048: \bibitem{b280}Hansen, B. M. S., Phinney, E. S., 1997, MNRAS, 291, 569
1049: \bibitem{b29}Hawley J. F., Balbus S. A., Stone J.M., 2001, ApJ, 554, L49
1050: \bibitem{b30}Heckler A. F., Kolb E. W., 1996, ApJ, 472, L85
1051: \bibitem{b31}Iben I., Jr., Tutukov A. V., Yungelson L. R., 1995, ApJS, 100, 233
1052: \bibitem{b32}Igumenshchev I. V., Abramowicz M. A., Narayan R., 2000, ApJ, 537, L27
1053: \bibitem{b320}Igumenshchev I. V., Narayan R., 2001, astro-ph/0105365
1054: \bibitem{b321}Imanishi, K., Koyama, K., Tsuboi, Y., 2001, ApJ, 557, 747
1055: \bibitem{b34}Ipser J. R., Price R. H., 1977, ApJ, 216, 578
1056: \bibitem{b340}Ipser J. R., Price R. H., 1982, ApJ, 255, 654
1057: \bibitem{b341}Ipser J. R., Price R. H., 1983, ApJ, 267, 371
1058: \bibitem{b37}Larson R. B., 1981, MNRAS, 194, 809
1059: \bibitem{b38}Lasota J. P., 2000, A\&A, 360, 575
1060: \bibitem{b380}Lasota J. P., 2001, NewAR, 45, 449
1061: \bibitem{b382}Lazarian, A., Pogosyan, D., 2000, ApJ, 537, 720
1062: \bibitem{b381}Loewenstein, M., Mushotzky, R. F., Angelini, L., Arnaud, K. A., Quataert, E., 2001, ApJ, 555, L21
1063: \bibitem{b39}Madau P., Rees M. J., 2001, ApJ, 551, L27
1064: \bibitem{b40}Maloney P. R., Colgan S. W. J., Hollenbach D. J., 1997, ApJ, 482, L41
1065: \bibitem{b401}Mao S., Smith M. C., Wozniak P., Udalski A., Szymanski M., Kubiak M., Pietrzynski G., Soszynski I., Zebrun K., 2001, astro-ph/0108312
1066: \bibitem{b41}McDowell J., 1985, MNRAS, 217, 77
1067: \bibitem{b43}Mirabel I. F., Rodr\'iguez L. F., 1999, ARA\&A, 37, 409
1068: \bibitem{b44}Morrison R., McCammon D., 1983, ApJ, 270, 119
1069: \bibitem{b45}Nelemans G., Tauris T. M., van den Heuvel E. P. J., 1999, A\&A, 352, L87
1070: \bibitem{b46}Ostriker J. P., McCray R., Weaver R., Yahil A., 1976, ApJ, 208, L61
1071: \bibitem{b47}Ostriker J. P., Rees M. J., Silk J., 1970, Astrophysical Letters, 6, 179
1072: \bibitem{b49}Paczy\'nski B., 2001, astro-ph/0107443
1073: \bibitem{b52}Popov S. B., Prokhorov M. E., 1998, A\&A, 331, 535
1074: \bibitem{b53}Ruffert M., 1999, A\&A, 346, 861
1075: \bibitem{b54}Rutledge R. E., Bildsten L., Brown E. F., Pavlov G. G., Zavlin V. E., 2001, ApJ, 551, 921
1076: \bibitem{b55}Rutledge R. E., Bildsten L., Brown E. F., Pavlov G. G., Zavlin V. E., 2001, ApJ, in press, astro-ph/0105319
1077: \bibitem{b561}Schwarzchild, M., H\"arm, R. 1959, ApJ, 129, 637
1078: \bibitem{b57}Schwope A. D., Hasinger G., Schwarz R., Haberl F., Schmidt M., 1999, A\&A, 341, L51
1079: \bibitem{b58}Scoville N. Z., Sanders D. B., 1987, in Hollenbach D. J., Thronson H. A., eds., Interstellar Processes, Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, p. 21
1080: \bibitem{b59}Shapiro S. L., Lightman A. P., 1976, ApJ, 204, 555
1081: \bibitem{b60}Shapiro S. L., Teukolsky S. A., 1983, Black Holes, White Dwarfs, \& Neutron Stars. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY
1082: \bibitem{b600}Shvartsman, V. F., 1971, Soviet Astronomy AJ, 14, 662
1083: \bibitem{b610}Stocke, J. T., Wang, Q. D., Perlman, E. S., Donahue, M. E., Schachter, J. F., 1995, AJ, 109, 1199
1084: \bibitem{b62}Sunyaev R., Revnivtsev M., 2000, A\&A, 358, 617
1085: \bibitem{b620}Thorsett, S. E, Chakrabarty, D., 1999, ApJ, 512, 288
1086: \bibitem{b621}Treves, A., Colpi, 1991, A\&A, 241, 107
1087: \bibitem{b622}Treves, A., Turolla, R., Zane, S., Colpi, M., 2000, PASP, 112, 297
1088: \bibitem{b64}van Paradijs J., 1996, ApJ, 464, L139
1089: \bibitem{b640}van Paradijs J., White, N. E., 1995, ApJ, 447, L33
1090: \bibitem{b65}Voges W. et al., 1999, A\& A, 349, 389
1091: \bibitem{b66}Walter F. M., Wolk S. J., Neuhauser R., 1996, Nature, 379, 233
1092: \bibitem{b67}Wang J. C. L., 1997, ApJ, 486, L119
1093: \bibitem{b670}Watson, M. G. et al., 2001, A\&A, 365, L51
1094: \bibitem{b68}White N. E., van Paradijs J., 1996, ApJ, 473, L25
1095: \bibitem{b69}Wilkes B. J. et al., 2000, astro-ph/0011377
1096: \end{thebibliography}
1097: \bsp
1098: \label{lastpage}
1099: \end{document}
1100: