1: \documentstyle[12pt,aas2pp4,psfig]{article}
2: %\documentstyle[11pt,aasms4,psbox]{article}
3: %\documentstyle[11pt,psbox]{article}
4: \newcommand{\asca}{{\it ASCA}}
5: \newcommand{\chandra}{{\it Chandra}}
6: \newcommand{\axj}{G0.570$-$0.018}
7: \newcommand{\NHUNIT}{${\rm H}\ {\rm cm}^{-2}$}
8: \newcommand{\LUMIUNIT}{${\rm erg}\ {\rm s}^{-1}$}
9: \newcommand{\FLUXUNIT}{${\rm erg}\ {\rm s}^{-1}\ {\rm cm}^{-2}$}
10:
11: %\slugcomment{To be submitted to ApJ}
12: %\lefthead{A. Senda et al.}
13: %\righthead{Unusual diffuse X-ray source in the Galactic center region}
14:
15: \begin{document}
16:
17: \title{Unusual diffuse X-ray source in the Galactic center region}
18:
19: \author{Atsushi~Senda,
20: Hiroshi~Murakami, and Katsuji~Koyama}
21:
22: \affil{Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University,
23: Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan; senda@cr.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp,
24: hiro@cr.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp, koyama@cr.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp}
25: \begin{abstract}
26:
27: We report the {\asca} and {\chandra} discovery of a diffuse X-ray source
28: in the Galactic center region. The X-ray spectrum is fitted with a non-equilibrium ionization (NEI)
29: plasma model of about 6-keV temperature.
30: The model requires higher than solar metal abundances,
31: a young plasma age of $\simeq$ 100 years and a large $N_{\rm H}$ value of about 10$^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$.
32: The $N_{\rm H}$ value constrains the source position to be in
33: the Galactic center region at about 8.5~kpc distance.
34: The high resolution X-ray image with the {\chandra} ACIS
35: shows a ring of 10$''$ radius which corresponds to 0.4 pc at the
36: Galactic center, and a tail-like structure.
37: Although the morphology is peculiar, the other X-ray features
38: are likely to be a very young supernova remnant, possibly
39: in a free expansion phase.
40:
41: \end{abstract}
42:
43: \keywords{Galaxy: center --- ISM: individual (G0.570$-$0.018/CXO J174702.6$-$282733 ) --- Supernova remnants --- X-rays: ISM }
44:
45: \section{Introduction}
46: The Galactic center (GC) region within $\simeq$100~pc is
47: very rich in various X-ray sources, such as X-ray binaries,
48: young stellar clusters and supernova remnants (SNRs).
49: A big mystery is a diffuse hot ($\simeq$ 10 keV) plasma of
50: $1\arcdeg \times 2\arcdeg$~elliptical shape with the total energy of
51: about $10^{54}$ ergs (Koyama et al. 1989, 1996; Yamauchi et al. 1990).
52: The dynamical age of the hot plasma is estimated to be about $10^5$~years.
53: One possible origin of the diffuse plasma is
54: multiple supernova explosions (10$^{3}$~supernovae)
55: in the past 10$^5$~years (Yamauchi et al. 1990),
56: which predicts that many young SNRs should be discovered with a deep exposure
57: above the 2 keV X-ray band.
58: With the {\asca}~Galactic center survey project, we found an extended
59: X-ray source on the Galactic plane near the giant molecular cloud Sgr~B2,
60: which exhibits unusually strong iron lines (Sakano et al. 1998).
61: The {\chandra}~Cycle~1 observation confirmed the {\asca}~results and
62: revealed a ring and tail structures in the iron K$_{\alpha}$~line band,
63: which we named G0.570$-$0.018/CXO J174702.6$-$282733 (here and after, {\axj}).
64: This paper reports the {\asca} and {\chandra} results of {\axj} and
65: discuss the nature of this peculiar source.
66:
67: \section{Observations and Data Reductions}
68:
69: {\asca} (Tanaka et al. 1994) observed the Sgr B2 region near
70: the Galactic center on October 1 in 1993 (PV phase)
71: and September 22$-$24 in 1994 (AO2).
72: {\asca} was equipped with two Gas Imaging Spectrometers (GIS2 and GIS3)
73: and two Solid-state Imaging Spectrometers (SIS0 and SIS1)
74: on the focal planes of four X-ray telescopes (XRT)
75: (Selemitsos et al. 1995; Ohashi et al. 1996; Burke et al. 1991).
76: In both the observations, {\axj} was placed on the center of the
77: SIS-field, hence was intercepted by the center gap of
78: each CCD chip. We therefore used the GIS (GIS2 and GIS3) data
79: only. For GISs, nominal bit-assignment of PH-mode wes used in
80: high and medium bit rate. After the standard data screening,
81: we obtained the effective exposure time of PV and AO2
82: of 17.5~ksec and 80.0~ksec, respectively.
83:
84: {\axj} was in the ACIS-I field of view when {\chandra}
85: observed the Sgr~B2 region on 29$-$30 March 2000.
86: The satellite and instruments are described by Weisskopf et al. (1996) and
87: Garmire et al. (2001), respectively. Data reduction is made with
88: the same method of the Sgr~B2 analysis (Murakami, Koyama, \& Maeda 2001).
89: {\axj} is located at the top of chip I3, and thus is heavily affected
90: by the Charge Transfer Inefficiency (CTI).
91: To minimize the effect of the CTI degradation, we use the software
92: developed by Townsley et al. (2000).
93: We correct the energy gain using the instrumental emission
94: line from Ni (K$_{\alpha}$=7.5keV) and Au atoms (L$_{\alpha}$=9.7keV)
95: with an accuracy of $<0.5$\% (90\% confidence).
96: The response matrix is made using the nearly contemporaneous observation
97: of reference lines from an on-board calibration source (OBSID$=$62097),
98: which are analyzed with the same CTI correction. The effective area of
99: the telescope mirrors and the detection efficiency of ACIS are calculated
100: with the {\it mkarf} program in the {\chandra} {\it Interactive Analysis of
101: Observations Software} (CIAO, Version 2.1). After screening the data,
102: we obtain the effective exposure time of 100~ksec.
103:
104: \section{Results and Analysis}
105:
106: \subsection{X-ray Morphology}
107:
108: In the {\asca} GIS image pointed at the Sgr~B2 cloud, we find a local
109: excess in the west of Sgr~B2. This excess is clearly seen if we limit
110: the X-ray energy band of 6.0$-$7.0~keV, which include the iron K-shell
111: transition line.
112: Figure~1 shows the 6.0$-$7.0~keV band image.
113: The brightest source located at the northeast is the giant molecular cloud
114: Sgr~B2 (Murakami et al. 2000). The other excess at the center of the image
115: is a newly discovered X-ray source.
116: Due to the limited statistics and spatial resolution, error of the
117: peak position of the diffuse structure is rather large of
118: $0\fdg 55 \lesssim l \lesssim 0\fdg 57$, $ - 0\fdg 02 \lesssim b \lesssim 0\fdg 00$.
119:
120: In order to investigate the accurate position and fine spatial structure of
121: this diffuse source,
122: we inspect the {\chandra} image in the 4.0$-$7.0 keV band.
123: As is shown in Figure~2, we see a complex X-ray structure with a ring of about
124: 10$''$ radius and an east-to-west tail from the ring.
125: The center coordinate of the ring structure is
126: R.A.$=$~17$^{\rm h}$47$^{\rm m}$02$\fs$6,
127: Dec$=$~$-$28$\arcdeg$27$\arcmin$33$\arcsec$ (epoch 2000),
128: which corresponds to ($l$, $b$) = (0$\fdg$570, $-$0$\fdg$018),
129: the same position of the {\asca} diffuse source within the error.
130: We hence designate this source
131: as G0.570$-$0.018/CXO J174702.6$-$282733 (hereafter {\axj}).
132: To investigate the statistical significance of the shell-like structure,
133: we make a radial profile with the center at (17$^{\rm h}$47$^{\rm m}$02$^{\rm s}$.6, $-$28$\arcdeg$27$\arcmin$33$\arcsec$)$_{\rm{J}2000}$.
134: Figure~3 shows the radial profile in the 4.0$-$7.0~keV band.
135: The excess around 10$''$ is statistically significant, hence
136: the ring-structure is real.
137: On the other hand, a faint point-like structure at the shell center
138: seen in Figure~2 is not significant because it contains only 3 photons.
139: Unlike Sgr~B2, no radio nor any other wave band counterpart
140: is found for {\axj} (see Oka et al. 1998a, 1998b;
141: Tsuboi, Handa, \& Ukita 1999; Lis{,} \& Carlstrom 1994;
142: Mehlinger et al. 1992, 1993; Seiradakis et al. 1989).
143:
144: \subsection{X-ray Spectra}
145:
146: The {\asca} X-ray spectrum is made using the data in a circle of 3-arcmin
147: radius and subtracting the background data in a 3$'$ $< r <$ 4$'$~ ring
148: as is shown in Figure 1.
149: The spectrum exhibits prominent line at 6.0$-$7.0~keV and large absorption
150: at low energy band. We then fit with a phenomenological model of a thermal
151: bremsstrahlung plus a Gaussian line.
152: The line energy is determined to be $6.60_{-0.09}^{+0.12}$~keV
153: with the equivalent width of $3.7_{-1.2}^{+3.0}$~keV
154: (here and after, errors are $90\%$ confidence unless otherwise noted),
155: indicating a $K_\alpha$ line from iron atoms with
156: lower ionization states than helium-like (6.7~keV).
157: The temperature is constrained to be higher than 2~keV. Therefore
158: the equilibrium ionization state of iron should be helium or hydrogen
159: like with the line energy of 6.7$-$6.9~keV.
160: We thus conclude that the plasma is still in an ionizing phase or in
161: a non-equilibrium ionization (NEI).
162:
163: The {\chandra} X-ray spectrum is made from the same area as with {\asca},
164: while the background spectrum is taken from a source-free
165: region with the same CTI effect as the source region.
166: The background-subtracted flux is 20400 counts and the spectrum shows a
167: clear iron line as is already found with {\asca}.
168: In the diffuse source region,
169: we also find many faint point-like sources. We hence execute the
170: CIAO '{\it wavdetect}' software of a wavelet method
171: (Freeman et al. 2000) and resolve 18 point sources.
172: The integrated flux (2.0$-$10.0 keV) of all the point sources is
173: 410 counts, which is only $\simeq$ 2\% of the diffuse X-rays.
174: Therefore a contamination of the point-sources can be ignored practically.
175: The {\chandra} spectrum is well fitted with the same phenomenological model
176: as used for the {\asca} spectrum, a bremsstrahlung plus a Gaussian line.
177: The plasma temperature is constrained to be $>3.4$ keV, while the line energy is $6.50_{-0.03}^{+0.03}$ keV with the equivalent width of $4.1_{-1.0}^{+1.4}$ keV.
178: Thus the best-fit parameters are consistent with, and are more accurate
179: than the {\asca} results.
180:
181: Since both the {\asca} and {\chandra} spectra are fitted with the same
182: model and the line center energy is consistent with an NEI plasma,
183: we simultaneously fit the two spectra with a more realistic
184: NEI plasma model (Borkowski et al. 2001).
185: In addition to a conventional thin thermal plasma model,
186: an NEI model includes another parameter,
187: which is called the ionization parameter $\tau$=$nt$,
188: where $n$~and $t$~are plasma density and elapsed time after
189: the plasma is heated-up.
190: As the parameter $\tau$~becomes larger than
191: 10$^{12}$ $\sim$ 10$^{13}$~cm$^{-3}$ s,
192: an NEI plasma approaches to a collisional ionization
193: equilibrium (CIE) plasma.
194: In addition to the strong iron line,
195: the {\chandra} spectrum includes emission lines at the energies of
196: K-shell transition of argon, calcium atoms.
197: We therefore vary the abundances of all the elements collectively
198: fixing the relative ratio to be solar (Anders, \& Grevesse 1989).
199: Free parameters are the electron temperature ($kT$), the abundance ($Z$),
200: the ionization parameter ($nt$),
201: and interstellar absorption ($N_{\rm H}$). For the other free parameter,
202: we allow one normalization factor to be fitted both the {\asca}
203: and {\chandra} fluxes simultaneously.
204: The NEI fit is acceptable with the best-fit spectra and parameters shown in
205: Figure~4 and Table~1. The data excess of {\chandra} and deficit of {\asca}
206: above and below the iron line are attributable to the gain uncertainty of
207: these instruments.
208: However this small systematic difference is not a serious problem in
209: the present analysis.
210: The ionization parameter of $\tau$ =1.7$\times$10$^{10}$~cm$^{-3}$~s
211: is very small, while the abundance is significantly
212: larger than the solar value.
213:
214: \section{Discussion}
215: {\asca} discovered a diffuse X-ray source ({\axj}) with a strong iron line
216: near the Sgr B2 cloud,
217: then {\chandra} found a ring-like structure of 10$''$-radius.
218: The hydrogen column density is determined to be
219: $N_{\rm H}=(13.9_{-3.2}^{+3.3})\times 10^{22}$~H cm$^{-2}$.
220: Since the $N_{\rm H}$~value is nearly equal to those of the Galactic center
221: sources of the same Galactic lattitude (Sakano 2000),
222: {\axj} would be located near at the Galactic center region.
223: We hence assume the source distance to be 8.5~kpc.
224: The X-ray luminosity is then estimated to be $\simeq 10^{34}$~ergs and the
225: size of the ring radius is 0.4~pc.
226: The spectra are well fitted with an NEI model with plasma temperature
227: ($kT$) of 6.1 keV, ionization parameter ($\tau$) of
228: 1.7$\times$10$^{10}$~cm$^{-3}$~s,
229: and metal abundances ($Z$) of 4.5 solar.
230: Therefore, together with the ring-like morphology, {\axj}~is likely
231: a young SNR, either in an adiabatic or a free expansion phase.
232: We first apply a Sedov self-similar model assuming in
233: an adiabatic phase.
234: This model gives the emission measure ($E.M.= n^{2}V$),
235: radius ($R$) and electron temperature ($kT$) as follows
236: (Ostriker et al. 1988);\\
237:
238:
239: $n^{2}V = (4n_{a})^{2} \times 4\pi R^{2} \times (\frac{R}{12})$ \\
240: $(\rm{cm}^{-3})$,
241:
242: $R = 5.0 \times (\frac{E}{10^{51}~\rm {ergs}})^{1/5}
243: (\frac{n_{a}}{1 ~\rm{cm}^{-3}})^{-1/5}(\frac{t_{s}}{10^{3}~\rm{years}})^{2/5}~$ \\
244: $(\rm {pc})$, and
245:
246: $kT = 4.5 \times (\frac {E}{10^{51}~\rm {ergs}})^{2/5}
247: (\frac{n_{a}}{1~\rm {cm}^{-3}})^{-2/5}(\frac{t_{s}}{10^{3} ~\rm {years}})^{-6/5}$ \\
248: $(\rm {keV})$,\\
249:
250: where $t_s$, ~$n_{a}$ and $E$ are the age of the plasma
251: (in unit of year),
252: ambient density (in units of cm$^{-3}$) and explosion energy of the
253: supernova (in units of ergs), respectively.
254: Using the observed values of $R$ = 0.4 pc, $kT$ = 6.1 keV and
255: $E.M.$ = 8.1$\times$10$^{56}$ cm$^{-3}$,
256: we obtain $t_s$, $n_a$ and $E$ to be 70 years,
257: 5.1 cm$^{-3}$ and 3.5 $\times$ 10$^{48}$ ergs,
258: respectively. The swept-up mass is then calculated to be
259: $n_{a}\times 4/3\pi R^{3} \simeq 0.03 {\rm M_{\odot}}$,
260: which is extremely smaller than that of the SN ejecta of a few
261: ${\rm M_{\odot}}$.
262: The estimated explosion energy of {\axj}~is also extremely small
263: compared with a usual SNR.
264: These indicate that only a tiny fraction of the explosion energy
265: ($\sim 10^{51}$~ergs) and ejected mass (a few ${\rm M_{\odot}}$) have
266: been converted to the thermal plasma. These facts strongly indicate that
267: {\axj}~is not in an adiabatic phase but still in a free expansion phase.
268:
269: The X-ray ring structure of {\axj}~is similar to that of SN 1987A
270: (Burrows et al. 2000), where a strong stellar wind
271: from a massive progenitor might produce a gas ring
272: of sub-pc radius, and was heated by the collision of supernova ejecta.
273: From the radial profile in Figure 3, the thickness of the
274: ring (FWHM) is about $6''$, or 0.2~pc, hence the plasma volume is
275: 1.2$\times$10$^{55}$ cm$^3$. Since the X-ray flux from the ring is $67\%$
276: of that of the whole area of {\axj}, the emission measure ($E.M.$) from the
277: ring is 5.5$\times$10$^{56}$ cm$^{-3}$. Then using the best-fit ionization
278: parameter ($nt$) of 1.7$\times$10$^{10}$~cm$^{-3}$~s,
279: the plasma density ($n$) and ionization age ($t$) of the X-ray ring
280: are estimated to be 6.7 cm$^{-3}$ and 80 year, respectively.
281: In Table 2, we compare the physical parameters of the ring of {\axj}
282: with those of SN 1987A.
283: The ring size and age are about 3$-$6 times larger
284: than those of SN 1987A. Therefore {\axj}~would be a "future SN 1987A"
285: after a free expansion with the expected speed of
286: $v = R/t \simeq$ 4900 km s$^{-1}$.
287:
288: One problem of this scenario for {\axj} is an additional X-ray structure,
289: the east-to-west X-ray tail. We suspect that the structure would be
290: made by some instability of dense stellar wind from progenitor, and
291: was heated-up by the collision of the SN ejecta. In this case, the front
292: of free expanding ejecta would be about two times larger than
293: the ring radius, hence the age of SNR is doubled. This age is still
294: in a very young phase, thus the above discussion based on a free expansion
295: phase is essentially not changed.
296:
297: In the young SNR scenario, we expect non-thermal radio emissions associated
298: with the thermal X-rays. However we see no significant radio continuum flux
299: from {\axj}.
300: In general, the X-ray flux is proportional to the square of electron
301: density ($n^2$),
302: while the radio flux is proportional to the square of magnetic field, $B^2$.
303: Assuming that magnetic field is proportional to the ambient gas density
304: (the magnetic field is frozen to the ambient gas), the flux ratio between
305: X-ray to radio is roughly constant among shell-like SNRs.
306: Referring the radio and X-ray data of typical young shell-like SNRs,
307: Cas A, Tycho and Kepler, we estimated the radio flux of {\axj} to be
308: 0.1$-$1 Jy (except Cas A) at 1 GHz, using the X-ray flux of $\sim$10$^{-12}$
309: ergs s$^{-1}$.
310: SN 1987A has almost the same X-ray flux as that of {\axj}, and the radio flux density
311: is $\sim$40 mJy at 4.7 GHz (Burrows et al. 2000).
312: These radio flux density would be below the current detection limit of
313: the radio SNRs located near the GC, where the radio background is extremely
314: high ($\sim$0.1$-$0.5 Jy).
315: Thus we encourage more deep and fine spatial resolution search for radio
316: emissions near at {\axj}.
317:
318:
319: We express our sincere thanks to T. Tsuru, and M. Kohno
320: for their contributions in very early phase of this study and
321: stimulating discussions on this paper.
322: The authors also thank Y. Maeda and M. Sakano
323: for their useful discussion.
324: H. Murakami is financially supported by JSPS grant No 199904648.
325:
326: \newpage
327:
328: \bibliography{apj-jour}
329: \begin{thebibliography}{}
330: \bibitem[Anders{,} \& Grevesse 1989]{Anders89} Anders E. \& Grevesse N. 1989, \gca, 53, 197
331: \bibitem[Borkowski{,} Lyerly{,} \& Reynolds 2001]{Borkowski01} Borkowski,
332: J. K., Lyerly, J. W., \& Reynolds, S. P. 2001, \apj, 548, 620
333: \bibitem[Burke et al. 1991]{Burke91} Burke, B. E., Mountain, R. W.,
334: Harrison, D. C., Bautz, M. W., Doty, J. P., Ricker, \& G. R., Daniels,
335: P. J. 1991, IEEE Trans. ED-38, 1069
336: \bibitem[Burrows et al. 2000]{Burrows01} Burrows, D. N. et al. 2000, \apj, 543, L149
337: \bibitem[Freeman{,} Kashyap{,} Ronser{,} \& Lamb 2000]{Freeman00} Freeman, P. E., Kashyap, V., Rosner, R., \& Lamb, D. Q. 2000, \apj, submitted
338: \bibitem[Garmire{,} Nousek \& Bautz 2001]{Garmire01} Garmire, G. P., Nousek, J. P., \& Bautz, M. W. 2001, in preparation
339: \bibitem[Koyama et al. 1989]{Koyama89} Koyama, K., Awaki, H., Kunieda, H., Takano, S., \& Tawara, Y. 1989, \nat, 339, 603
340: \bibitem[Koyama et al 1996]{Koyama96} Koyama, K., Maeda, Y., Sonobe, T., Takeshima, T., Tanaka, Y., \& Yamauchi, S. 1996, \pasj, 48, 249
341: \bibitem[Lis{,} \& Carlstrom 1994]{Lis94} Lis, D. C., \& Carlstrom, J. E. 1994, \apj, 424, 189
342: \bibitem[Mehlinger{,} Palmer{,} Goss{,} \& Yuzef-Zadeh 1993]{Mehlinger93} Mehlinger, M., Palmer, P., Goss, W. M., \& Yuzef-Zadeh, F., 1993, \apj, 412, 684
343: \bibitem[Mehlinger{,} Yuzef-Zadeh{,} Palmer{,} \& Goss 1992]{Mehlinger92} Mehlinger, M., Yuzef-Zadeh, F., Palmer, P., \& Goss, W. M. 1992, \apj, 401, 168
344: \bibitem[Murakami et al. 2000]{Murakami00} Murakami, H., Koyama, K., Sakano, M., Tsujimoto, M., \& Maeda, Y. 2000, \apj, 534, 283
345: \bibitem[Murakami{,} Koyama{,} \& Maeda 2001]{Murakami01} Murakami, H., Koyama, K., \& Maeda, Y. 2001, \apj, 558, 687
346: \bibitem[Ohashi et al. 1996]{Ohashi96} Ohashi, T., et al. 1996, \pasj, 48, 157
347: \bibitem[Oka et al. 1998a]{Oka98a}Oka, T., Hasegawa, T., Hayashi, M., Handa, T., \& Sakamoto, S. 1998a, \apj, 493, 730
348: \bibitem[Oka et al. 1998b]{Oka98b} Oka, T., Hasegawa, T., Sato, F., Tsuboi, M., \& Miyazaki, A. 1998b, \apjs, 118, 455
349: \bibitem[Ostriker \& McKee 1988]{Ostriker88} Ostriker, J. P. \& McKee, C. F. 1988, Rev. Mod. Phys., 60, 1
350: \bibitem[Sakano et al. 1998]{Sakano98} Sakano, M., et al. Proceedings of the Symposium: `Japanese-Garman Workshop on High Energy Astrophysics, October 19-21, 1998, MPE report 270, 113
351: \bibitem[Sakano Ph.D.thesis 2000]{sakano00} Sakano, M. 2000, Ph.D.thesis, Kyoto Univ.
352: \bibitem[Seiradakis et al. 1989]{Seiradakis89} Seiradakis, J. H., Reich, W., Weilebinski, R., Lasenby, A. N., \& Yusef-Zadeh, F. 1989, \aaps, 81, 291
353: \bibitem[Selemitsos et al. 1995]{Selemitsos95} Selemitsos, P. J., et al. 1995, \pasj, 47, 105
354: \bibitem[Tanaka{,} Inoue \& Holt 1994]{Tanaka94} Tanaka, Y., Inoue, H.,\& Holt, S.S., 1994, \pasj, 46, L37
355: \bibitem[Townsley{,} Broos{,} Garmire \& Nousek 2000]{Townsley00} Townsley, L. K., Broos, P. S., Garmire, G. P., \& Nousek, J. A. 2000 , \apjl, 534, 139
356: \bibitem[Tsuboi{,} Handa{,} \& Ukita 1999]{Tsuboi99} Tsuboi, M., Handa, T., \& Ukita, N. 1999, \apj, 120, 39
357: \bibitem[Weisskopf{,} O'dell \& Speybroeck 1996]{Weisskopf96} Weisskopf, M. C., O'dell, S. L., \& Speybroeck, L. P. 1996, Proc. SPIE, 2805, 2
358: \bibitem[Yamauchi et al. 1990]{Yamauchi90} Yamauchi, S., Kawada, M., Koyama, K., Kunieda, H., Tawara, Y., \& Hatsukade, I. 1990, \apj, 365, 532
359:
360: \end{thebibliography}
361:
362: \newpage
363: \onecolumn
364: \begin{figure}
365: \centering \leavevmode
366: \psfig{file=f1.eps,width=0.8\textwidth}
367: \figcaption[f1.eps]{{\asca}~GIS image in the 6.0$-$7.0~keV (iron line) band.
368: The dotted lines are the Galactic coordinate with the grid spacing of 5$'$.
369: The source at the lower-right is {\axj} and the spectrum is taken from
370: the solid circle of a 3$'$-radius. Background spectrum is taken from the annulus defined by the solid and dashed (radius = 4$'$) circles.
371: The brightest source in the upper-left is the Sgr B2 cloud.}
372: \end{figure}
373:
374: \begin{figure}
375: \psfig{file=f2.eps,width=\textwidth}
376: \figcaption[f2.eps]{{\chandra}~ACIS-I image of {\axj}~in the 4.0$-$7.0 keV band.
377: The dotted lines are the Galactic coordinate with the grid spacing of 20$''$.
378: {\axj}~is appeared to be a 10$''$ radius ring with an east-west tail.
379: This image is smoothed with a Gaussian of $\sigma$ = 2 pixels.
380: Before the smoothing, the brightest pixel has 3 photons.
381: The brightness increases with a linear scale from 0.1 (black pixel) to 1.3 photons (white pixel).
382: }
383: \end{figure}
384:
385: \begin{figure}
386: \psfig{file=f3.eps,width=\textwidth}
387: \figcaption[f3.eps]{The radial profile of the ring structure of {\axj}.
388: The ring center is (17$^{\rm h}$47$^{\rm m}$02$\fs$6,
389: $-$28$\arcdeg$27$\arcmin$33$\arcsec$)$_{\rm{J}2000}$.}
390: \end{figure}
391:
392: \begin{figure}
393: \psfig{file=f4.eps,width=\textwidth}
394: \figcaption[f4.eps]{The X-ray spectra of {\axj}~
395: obtained from {\asca}~(gray) and {\chandra}~(black).
396: The data points are given by crosses while the solid lines are
397: the best-fit NEI plasma model.
398: The data residuals are shown in the lower panel.}
399: \end{figure}
400:
401: \clearpage
402:
403: \scriptsize
404:
405: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
406: \tablewidth{0pt}
407: \tablenum{1}
408: \tablecaption{ Best-fit parameters of NEI model obtained from the combined fit of the \asca ~and \chandra ~spectra}
409: \tablehead{\colhead{$N_{\rm H}$\tablenotemark{a}} &\colhead{$kT$\tablenotemark{b}}
410: &\colhead{$nt$\tablenotemark{c}} &\colhead{Metal abundances\tablenotemark{d}}
411: &\colhead{Flux\tablenotemark{e}}
412: &\colhead{$L$x\tablenotemark{f}}
413: &\colhead{$\chi^{2}$/d.o.f} \nl
414: [10$^{22}$Hcm$^{-2}$] &[keV]
415: &[10$^{10}$ s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-3}$] &[solar]
416: &[10$^{-13}$ergs cm$^{-2}$~s]
417: &[10$^{34}$ergs s$^{-1}$] &
418: }
419: \startdata
420: 13.9(10.7--17.2) & 6.1(3.1--25.8) & 1.7(1.3--2.7) &
421: 4.5(1.6--9.9) & 8.2 & 1.3 & 41.3/40 \nl
422: \enddata
423:
424: \tablecomments{Errors are at 90\% confidence level.}
425: \tablecomments{All parameters of the model(including normalization) are best-fitted with both {\asca} and {\chandra} data points. }
426: \tablenotetext{a}{Hydrogen column density.}
427: \tablenotetext{b}{Temperture of electrons in a thin thermal plasma.}
428: \tablenotetext{c}{Ionization parameter is an NEI.}
429: \tablenotetext{d}{Metal abundances (helium fixed at cosmic). The elements included are C, N, O, Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ca, Fe, Ni.}
430: \tablenotetext{e}{Observed flux in the 2.0--10.0 keV band. }
431: \tablenotetext{f}{Absorption-corrected luminosity in the 2.0--10.0 keV band.}
432:
433: \end{deluxetable}
434:
435: \begin{center}
436: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
437: %\tablewidth{0pt}
438: \tablenum{2}
439: \tablecaption{ Comparison of the parameters between {\axj} and SN 1987A}
440: \tablehead{\colhead{}&\colhead{Distance}&\colhead{radius of an X-ray shell}
441: &\colhead{$t$} \nl
442: &[kpc] &[pc] &[years]}
443:
444: \startdata
445: {\axj} &8.5 &0.4 &80 \nl
446: SN 1987A &50\tablenotemark{a} &0.12\tablenotemark{a} &13 \nl
447: \enddata
448:
449: \tablenotetext{a}{The parameters of SN 1987A are taken from Burrows et al. (2000)}
450: \end{deluxetable}
451: \end{center}
452:
453: \end{document}
454:
455:
456:
457:
458:
459:
460:
461:
462:
463:
464:
465: