1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 03 Jan 01
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %\documentstyle[]{emulateapj}
14:
15: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
16: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
17:
18: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
19:
20: \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
21:
22: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
23:
24: %\documentclass[]{aastex}
25: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
26:
27: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
28: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
29: %% the \begin{document} command.
30: %%
31: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
32: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
33: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
34: %% for information.
35:
36: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
37: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
38:
39: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
40:
41: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
42:
43: \shorttitle{X-ray emission from the double
44: hot spot of 3C 351}
45: \shortauthors{Brunetti et al.}
46:
47: \begin{document}
48:
49: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
50: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
51: %% you desire.
52:
53: \title{{\it CHANDRA} DETECTION OF THE RADIO AND OPTICAL
54: DOUBLE HOT SPOT OF 3C 351}
55:
56: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
57: %% author and affiliation information.
58: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
59: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
60: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
61: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
62:
63: \author{G.Brunetti\altaffilmark{1,2}, M.Bondi\altaffilmark{1},
64: A.Comastri\altaffilmark{3}, M.Pedani\altaffilmark{4},
65: S.Varano\altaffilmark{2},
66: %R.Fanti\altaffilmark{1,5},
67: G.Setti\altaffilmark{1,2}, M.J.Hardcastle\altaffilmark{5}}
68:
69: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
70: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
71: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
72: %% affiliation.
73:
74: \altaffiltext{1}{Istituto di Radioastronomia del CNR, via Gobetti 101,
75: I--40129 Bologna, Italy}
76: \altaffiltext{2}{Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universita' di
77: Bologna, via Ranzani 1, I--40127 Bologna, Italy}
78: \altaffiltext{3}{Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, via Ranzani 1,
79: I--40127 Bologna, Italy}
80: \altaffiltext{4}{Centro Galileo Galilei - S/C La Palma, 38700 TF Spain}
81: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics, University of Bristol,
82: Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TL, UK}
83:
84:
85: \begin{abstract}
86: In this letter we report a {\it Chandra} X-ray detection of the
87: double northern hot spot of the radio quasar 3C 351.
88: The hot spot has also been observed in the
89: optical with the {\it Hubble
90: Space Telescope} ($R$-band) and with the 3.5m.
91: Telescopio Nazionale Galileo ($B$-band).
92: The radio-to-optical and X-ray spectra
93: are interpreted as the results of the synchrotron and
94: synchrotron-self-Compton (SSC)
95: mechanisms, respectively,
96: with hot-spot magnetic field strengths $\sim$3 times smaller
97: than the equipartition values.
98: In the framework of shock acceleration theory, we show
99: that the requirement for such a relatively small field strength is in
100: agreement with the fitted synchrotron spectral models and
101: with the sizes of the hot spots.
102: Finally, we show that the combination of a lower magnetic field
103: strength with the high frequencies of the synchrotron cut-off
104: in the fitted synchrotron spectra provides
105: strong evidence for electron acceleration in the hot spots.
106: \end{abstract}
107:
108: \keywords{quasars: individual (3C351) --- acceleration of particles ---
109: radiation mechanisms: non--thermal}
110:
111: \section{INTRODUCTION}
112:
113: It is generally assumed that the relativistic particles in
114: powerful radio galaxies and quasars,
115: initially generated in the vicinity of the active galactic
116: nucleus and channeled by the radio jets out to
117: hundreds of kpc, are re-accelerated in the radio
118: hot spots, which mark the location of strong planar
119: shocks formed at the heads of the jets
120: themselves
121: (e.g., Begelman et al.\ 1984, Meisenheimer et al.\ 1989).
122: One of the most important pieces of evidence in favor of electron
123: re-acceleration in the hot spots is the detection of synchrotron
124: emission in the optical/near-IR band, due to
125: high energy electrons (Lorentz factor $\gamma > 10^5$)
126: with very short radiative lifetimes
127: (e.g., Meisenheimer et al.\ 1997 and references therein).
128: X-ray observations of non-thermal emission from the radio hot spots
129: are of fundamental importance to constrain the energetics and the
130: spectrum of the relativistic electrons and to test the re-acceleration
131: scenario. Until the advent of {\it Chandra} non-thermal X-ray
132: emission had only been detected from a few hot spots. One well-known
133: detection was the {\it ROSAT} PSPC observation of the radio hot spots
134: of Cygnus A (Harris et al.\ 1994), where the hot spot emission was
135: interpreted as synchrotron-self-Compton (SSC) emission, implying
136: magnetic field strengths in the hot spots close to the equipartition
137: values. {\it Chandra} has enabled significant progress in this field,
138: with a number of successful detections in the first 2 years of
139: observations (3C 295: Harris et al.\ 2000; Cyg A: Wilson et al.\ 2000;
140: Pictor A: Wilson et al.\ 2001; 3C 123: Hardcastle et al.\ 2001; 3C
141: 207: Brunetti et al.\ 2001; 3C\,263, Hardcastle et al.\ in
142: prep.). With the exception of Pictor A, the best and most
143: straightforward interpretation for the X-ray emission in these
144: objects is provided by the SSC mechanism under approximate
145: equipartition conditions.
146:
147: \noindent
148: In this letter we report on the {\it Chandra}
149: discovery of X-ray emission from the double northern
150: hot spot of 3C 351 (components J and L of Bridle et al. 1994)
151: and on the modeling of the broad-band
152: spectrum.
153: $H_0=50$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ and
154: $q_0=0.5$ are assumed throughout; 1 arcsec corresponds
155: to 6.2 kpc at the redshift of 3C 351.
156: Reported errors are at the 90\% confidence level.
157:
158:
159: \section{TARGET AND DATA ANALYSIS}
160:
161: The powerful double-lobed
162: radio source 3C 351 is identified with a
163: quasar at a redshift $z=0.371$ (Laing et al.\ 1983).
164: In addition to the {\it Chandra}
165: data, we have analyzed Very Large Array (VLA) and {\it HST} archive data
166: and obtained
167: new $B$-band observations with the 3.5m Telescopio Nazionale Galileo
168: (TNG).
169: %, with the aim of comparing the radio, optical and X-ray
170: %spectra of the hot spots.
171:
172: \subsection{Radio and optical data}
173:
174: Table 1 lists the observations used in this paper and the derived
175: flux densities at different frequencies.
176: The 1.4 GHz values are derived from an A+B-configuration VLA
177: image published by
178: Leahy \& Perley (1991).
179: Excellent high-resolution deep radio images at 5 GHz have been published
180: by Bridle et al.\ (1994), and the 5-GHz flux density
181: of 3C 351--J is from this paper.
182: Higher frequency radio fluxes have been obtained by reducing
183: archive VLA observations at 15 and 22 GHz.
184: Standard procedures for calibration and deconvolution were applied
185: to the data. The fluxes of the hot spots were corrected for primary beam
186: attenuation and for atmospheric opacity.
187:
188: \noindent
189: R\"oser (1989) first discovered the northern radio hot
190: spots in the optical band, whereas L\"ahteenm\"aki \& Valtaoja (1999)
191: found optical linear polarisation ($I$- and $V$-band)
192: with the 2.5 m Nordic Optical Telescope on La Palma;
193: to our knowledge, no optical fluxes have been
194: quoted in the literature.
195: On 1995 November 29, 3C 351 was observed with the WFPC2 on the {\it HST}
196: for 2400 s using the filter F702W (close to $R$-band).
197: We analyzed these {\it HST} observations in the standard manner,
198: removing cosmic rays and using the bright quasar nucleus to correct the
199: astrometry.
200: On the basis of positional coincidence we identified optical
201: counterparts of the two northern radio hot spots on the WFPC2 image.
202: In order to better constrain the optical spectra we also observed
203: these hot spots with a 1200-s B-band exposure at
204: the 3.5m TNG on La Palma during the night of 2001 August 16.
205: The hot spots were detected with a high signal to noise and the
206: errors on the fluxes (Table 1), obtained with 4-arcsec aperture
207: photometry (the seeing was 1.5 arcsec), are within 10\%.
208:
209: \subsection{X-ray data}
210:
211: We have analyzed archival data on 3C 351
212: observed for 9.8 ks
213: with the {\it Chandra} observatory on 2000 June 1
214: in GTO time.
215: The raw level 1 data were
216: re-processed using the latest version (CIAO2.1) of the
217: CXCDS software.
218: %The target was near the aim point on the S3 ACIS chip and
219: %thus the on-axis point spread function is applicable.
220: We generated a clean data set by selecting the standard grades
221: (0,2,3,4,6) and energies in the band 0.1--10 keV.
222: The X-ray image is shown in Fig. 1, with superimposed contours of
223: the 1.4-GHz VLA radio image.
224: In addition to the nuclear source,
225: two relatively bright X-ray sources, coincident
226: with the double northern radio hot spot,
227: are clearly detected: $\sim$ 82$\pm$10 and 54$\pm$9 net counts
228: are associated
229: with components J and L, respectively.
230: Despite the poor statistics, we have attempted to derive
231: spectral information using appropriate response and
232: effective area functions. In both cases a single
233: power law (3C 351--J: $\alpha=1.2\pm0.5$;
234: 3C 351--L: $\alpha=1.7\pm1.2$), with absorption fixed at the Galactic
235: value $N_{\rm H}=2.26\times 10^{20}$cm$^{-2}$ (Elvis et al.\ 1989),
236: provides an acceptable description of the data.
237:
238: \section{EMISSION PROCESSES AND ELECTRON ACCELERATION}
239:
240: \subsection{Modeling the broad band spectrum}
241:
242: As no bright thermal emission from a cluster
243: around 3C 351 has been detected by the {\it Chandra} observation,
244: we find that X-ray emission from any shocked gas in the hot spot
245: region would be orders of magnitude lower than that observed.
246: As discussed in the Introduction, the most plausible non-thermal
247: mechanism responsible for X-ray emission is SSC.
248: In Fig. 2 we show fits to the broad band
249: spectrum of the hot spots 3C351--J and L.
250: The emitted synchrotron and SSC spectra
251: are obtained with standard
252: recipes, assuming an electron energy distribution as
253: derived under basic Fermi-I acceleration theory:
254: a power-law spectrum with injection energy index $\delta$
255: which steepens at higher energies ($\gamma>\gamma_{\rm b}$)
256: up to a high
257: energy cutoff $\gamma_{\rm c}$, whereas it
258: flattens at lower energies before a low energy cutoff
259: (equations for the electron spectrum and for the SSC calculation
260: are given in Brunetti et al. 2001,
261: Eqs. 2--9 and Appendix A).
262: The SSC flux is obtained by taking radii
263: $R_{\rm J}=0.1$ and $R_{\rm L}=0.5$ arcsec for
264: 3C 351--J and L, respectively
265: (Bridle et al.\ 1994).
266: The parameters of the spectra obtained from
267: fitting the radio and optical data points, i.e.,
268: the electron injection index ($\delta$), the
269: synchrotron break ($\nu_{\rm b}$) and
270: cutoff frequency ($\nu_{\rm c}$)
271: are given in Table 2 (90\% confidence level).
272: %The reported ranges for $\nu_{\rm b}$ and $\nu_{\rm c}$
273: %are calculated at the 90\% confidence level.
274: A synchrotron spectrum with a cutoff frequency at very high
275: energies is still consistent with the data of 3C 351--J
276: and is also plotted in Fig.\ 2 in order to show the maximum synchrotron
277: contribution to the X-rays ($\leq 30\%$ at 90\% confidence level).
278: It should be noted that the high-frequency
279: cutoff of 3C 351--J
280: is at least one order of magnitude
281: larger than those of other optical hot spots in the
282: literature, and that the break frequencies
283: for both hot spots
284: are also higher than the typical breaks measured
285: in the synchrotron spectra
286: of optical hot spots (e.g., Meisenheimer et al.\ 1997;
287: Gopal-Krishna et al.\ 2001).
288:
289: \noindent
290: We find that for both hot spots
291: the SSC mechanism provides a good representation of the
292: {\it Chandra} data for magnetic fields, ($B_{\rm ic}$, Table 2),
293: which are a factor of $\sim 3$
294: smaller than the equipartition values ($B_{\rm eq} \simeq$230
295: $\mu$G for 3C 351--J and $B_{\rm eq} \simeq$100 $\mu$G for
296: 3C 351--L).
297: For these field strengths, we find that inverse-Compton (IC)
298: scattering of cosmic microwave background (CMB) photons
299: could account for $\sim 10$\% of the X-ray flux of
300: 3C 351--L, whereas it does not significantly
301: contribute to the X-ray spectrum of 3C 351--J.
302: It is interesting to note that the X--ray luminosity of
303: 3C 351--J is comparable to or slightly higher than the
304: synchrotron radio to optical luminosity.
305: If the X-rays are of SSC origin,
306: the radiative losses of the relativistic
307: electrons would be dominated by IC
308: (due to second- and third-order scattering) so that
309: the electrons' cooling times would be a factor of
310: $\sim 4$ shorter than those due to the synchrotron
311: process alone.
312: However, as the value of the magnetic
313: field strength in the Compton-dominated
314: 3C 351--J is $\sim 3$ times smaller than equipartition,
315: the radiative
316: cooling time of the electrons emitting synchrotron
317: radiation at $\sim 10^{16}$Hz is a factor $\sim 2.5$ larger
318: than that computed under equipartition, so that
319: the acceleration of such particles is eased with respect to the
320: equipartition case.
321: A viable model for the X--ray emission of 3C 351--J can also
322: be obtained with a combination of a synchrotron spectrum and a
323: SSC component (accounting for $\geq70\%$ of the flux).
324: In this case, the resulting spectral index would be somewhat
325: steeper than that of the SSC model.
326: This would imply very efficient electron acceleration processes,
327: but the basic SSC model remains unchanged.
328: Improved spectral measurements may be able
329: to settle the size of a possible synchrotron
330: contribution.
331: %
332: %\subsection{The role of boosting}
333:
334: Relativistic boosting appears to be necessary
335: to explain the X-ray jet emission in
336: a few core-dominated radio-loud quasars
337: (e.g., Tavecchio et al.\ 2000; Celotti et al.\ 2001;
338: Brunetti et al.\ 2001), however its role
339: %the importance of boosting
340: in the case of the hot spots
341: %of radio sources
342: is still unclear; for instance, statistical analysis of
343: samples of FRII radio sources implies non-relativistic velocities
344: (e.g., Arshakian \& Longair 2000).
345: Under equipartition (in the hot spot frame)
346: IC scattering of CMB photons can produce the observed
347: X-ray fluxes for Doppler factors ${\cal D} \sim 8$
348: and 3.8 in the cases of 3C 351--J and L, respectively.
349: Such factors, however, can only be obtained for
350: relatively small angles between the hot spots' velocities
351: and the line of sight ($\theta \leq 6^o$ with $\Gamma_{\rm bulk} > 4$
352: for 3C 351--J, and
353: $\theta \leq 15^o$ with $\Gamma_{\rm bulk} > 2$
354: for 3C 351--L), whereas the radio properties of 3C 351 and
355: the lack of lobe asymmetry suggest much
356: larger inclination angles and smaller hot spot
357: velocities.
358: This problem remains even if we relax the equipartition
359: condition: assuming a departure
360: from equipartition
361: similar to that required by the SSC,
362: a Doppler factor ${\cal D} \sim 4.5$
363: ($\theta \leq 10^o$) is necessary to match the X-ray flux
364: of 3C 351--J by IC scattering of the CMB.
365: A second possible way of accounting for the large X-ray fluxes
366: of the hot spots is to require the SSC to be enhanced with respect to the
367: synchrotron emission via Doppler de-boosting.
368: We find, however, that in order to match the data under
369: equipartition conditions
370: ${\cal D} \sim 0.25$ is required, implying extremely
371: high bulk Lorentz factors ($\Gamma_{\rm bulk} \sim 15-30$,
372: with $\theta \sim 30-40^\circ$).
373: %and
374: %a very high magnetic field strength ($B \sim 900 \mu$G)
375: %in the case of 3C 351--J.
376:
377: \subsection{Is {\it in situ} re-acceleration necessary ?}
378:
379: Based on evidence for relativistic jet bulk motion
380: out to 100-kpc scales,
381: Gopal-Krishna et al.\ (2001) have reconsidered
382: a minimum loss scenario in which the relativistic electrons,
383: accelerated in the central active nucleus,
384: flow along the jets losing energy only
385: due to the inescapable IC scattering of CMB photons.
386: Under these assumptions, comparing the electron radiative lifetime
387: with the travel time to the
388: hot spots, they find that {\it in situ}
389: electron re-acceleration is in general
390: not absolutely necessary to explain the optical/near-IR synchrotron
391: radiation from the hot spots so far detected.
392: Following Gopal-Krishna et al.\ (2001) we define $\eta=
393: D_{\rm obs}/D_{\rm max}$, the ratio between the
394: distance of the hot spots from the nucleus and the
395: largest distance covered by the electrons in the jet
396: before dropping to less than e$^{-1}$ of their initial energy
397: due to IC losses; i.e.,
398:
399: \begin{equation}
400: D_{\rm max}({\rm kpc}) \simeq
401: 145 {{ \beta_{\rm bulk} \sin \theta }\over
402: {\Gamma_{\rm bulk} (1+z)^{4.5} }}
403: \left[ {{ B(\mu G) }\over{\nu_{\rm c}(10^{14}{\rm Hz}) }}
404: \right]^{1/2}
405: \label{dmax}
406: \end{equation}
407:
408: \noindent
409: With $\theta \sim 30^\circ$ and our constraints on $\nu_{\rm c}$
410: and $B$ we find $\eta\geq 26$--$110$ (3C 351--J) and
411: $\eta\sim 9$--$38$ (3C 351--L) for $\Gamma_{\rm bulk}=2$--$10$
412: (as adopted by Gopal-Krishna et al. 2000).
413: We also find that if the electrons are accelerated in 3C 351--J and then
414: transported in a jet out to
415: 3C 351--L, the lifetime of the optically emitting
416: electrons in 3C 351--L ($\sim 5\times 10^4$ yr assuming
417: $B \geq 10 \mu$G in the jet) is at least one order of magnitude
418: less than the time necessary to cover the distance between the two
419: hot spots at non-relativistic speeds, and $\eta$ is still $>2.2$
420: if they are transported at relativistic speeds.
421: These large values unequivocally point to the necessity of
422: efficient re-acceleration processes in both the northern
423: hot spots of 3C 351.
424:
425:
426: \subsection{Electron acceleration in the hot spot}
427:
428: An independent
429: estimate of the magnetic field strength $B$ in the hot spot
430: can be obtained in the framework of shock acceleration models.
431: The highest energies of the relativistic electrons accelerated
432: in a shock region by Fermi processes is given by the ratio
433: between gain and loss terms.
434: For a strong shock (here, for simplicity, we consider
435: the non-relativistic case)
436: the largest energy of the accelerated electrons is
437: (e.g., Meisenheimer et al.\ 1989):
438:
439: \begin{equation}
440: \gamma_{\rm c}
441: \propto
442: u_{-}^2 B_+^{-2} \lambda_{+}(B_+)^{-1}
443: \label{gammac}
444: \end{equation}
445:
446: \noindent
447: where $u_-$ is the velocity of the flow in the
448: upstream region (with respect to the shock),
449: $B_+=\sqrt{ B_{\rm ic}^2 + B^2}$
450: is the total equivalent magnetic field strength
451: in the downstream region,
452: and $\lambda_+(B_+)$ is the mean free path of
453: the relativistic electrons in the downstream region.
454:
455: \noindent
456: The break energy of the electrons in the downstream
457: region (i.e., the highest energy of the oldest electrons
458: in the post shock region) is:
459:
460: \begin{equation}
461: \gamma_{\rm b}=
462: {{ \gamma_{\rm c} }\over{ 1 + C {{ l }\over{u_+}}
463: B_+^2 \gamma_{\rm c} }}
464: \propto {{ u_+ }\over{l}} B_+^{-2}
465: \label{gammab}
466: \end{equation}
467:
468: \noindent
469: where $u_+$ is the velocity of the flow in the
470: downstream region, $l$ is the linear extension
471: of such a region and $C$ a constant.
472: Substituting into Eqs.(\ref{gammac}--\ref{gammab})
473: the expression for the synchrotron
474: cutoff frequency, $\nu_{\rm c} \propto \gamma_{\rm c}^2
475: B$, one obtains:
476: %an expression for $B_+$ :
477:
478: \begin{equation}
479: B_+
480: \sim 2.3
481: \left( {{ u_+ }\over{0.3}}
482: [ {{ \gamma_{\rm c} }\over{
483: \gamma_{\rm b} }} -1 ] \right)^{2/3}
484: l_{\rm kpc}^{-2/3} \left( {{ \nu_{\rm c} }\over{
485: 10^{15}{\rm Hz} }} \right)^{-1/3}
486: \xi^{1/3}
487: \label{bp}
488: \end{equation}
489:
490: \noindent
491: where $\xi = B/B_+$ is $\simeq$ 0.5 for
492: the hot spot J and 0.9 for L, and
493: the value of $l_{\rm kpc}$ can be estimated from
494: Bridle et al. (1994).
495: For $\gamma_{\rm c}/\gamma_{\rm b} >> 1$ Eq.4 reduces to
496: $B_+ \propto \nu_{\rm b}^{-1/3}$, and
497: from the values of $\nu_{\rm b}$
498: previously constrained we find
499: $B \sim 80$ and $30 \mu$G for J and
500: L, respectively, with a formal uncertainty
501: of about a factor 2.
502: These values are in good
503: agreement with the magnetic field strengths implied by an SSC origin
504: for the X-ray emission.
505:
506:
507: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
508:
509: The radio to optical spectrum of the two northern hot spots
510: of 3C 351 is well accounted
511: for by a synchrotron model under the
512: standard shock acceleration scenario.
513: The most straightforward interpretation of the X-ray emission discovered
514: by {\it Chandra} is the SSC mechanism.
515: A viable model for 3C 351--J is also given by a combination of SSC and
516: synchrotron spectra, with the SSC accounting for $\geq 70\%$
517: of the X-ray flux.
518: In order to match the X-ray fluxes a magnetic field strength
519: of a factor 3 lower than the equipartition value is required in
520: both the hot spots.
521: In principle the assumption of relativistic bulk motion of the hot
522: spots might reduce the departure from equipartition, but large {\it ad
523: hoc} distortions of the radio jet would be required, with the hot
524: spots moving close to the line of sight.
525: The frequencies of the cutoff
526: in the synchrotron spectra and the
527: magnetic field strengths
528: point to the need for {\it in situ} electron
529: (re)acceleration in the region of both the hot spots.
530: When we independently estimate the magnetic field strength
531: of the hot spots, using relationships from standard shock theory,
532: our results are consistent with the more precise
533: value obtained by modeling the X-ray
534: emission as resulting from the SSC mechanism.
535:
536:
537: \acknowledgments
538:
539: This work is partially supported by the Italian Ministry
540: for University and Research (MURST) under grant Cofin99-02-37
541: and Cofin00-02-36.
542: This paper is
543: based on observations made with the Italian Telescopio Nazionale
544: Galileo (TNG) operated on the island of La Palma by the
545: Centro Galileo Galilei of the CNAA
546: at the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of
547: the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias.
548: We would like to thank R.\ Fanti for very useful discussions and
549: A.\ Zacchei for technical support.
550:
551: \begin{thebibliography}{}
552: \bibitem[]{} Arshakian, T. G., Longair, M. S. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 846
553: \bibitem[]{} Begelman, M. C., Blandford, R., Rees, M. J.
554: 1984, Rev. Mod. Phys., 56, 255
555: \bibitem[]{} Bridle, A. H., Hough, D. H., Lonsdale, C. J., Burns, J. O.,
556: Laing, R. A. 1994, \aj, 108, 766
557: \bibitem[]{} Brunetti, G., Bondi, M., Comastri, A., Setti, G. 2001, \aap,
558: submitted
559: \bibitem[]{} Celotti, A., Ghisellini, G., Chiaberge, M. 2001, MNRAS,
560: 321, L1
561: \bibitem[]{} Elvis, M., Lockman, F.J., Wilkes, B.J. 1989, \aj, 97, 777
562: \bibitem[]{} Gopal-Krishna, Subramanian, P., Wiita, P. J.,
563: Becker, P. A. 2001, \aap, submitted; astro-ph/0108144
564: \bibitem[]{} Hardcastle, M. J., Birkinshaw, M., Worrall, D. M.
565: 2001, MNRAS, 323, L17
566: \bibitem[]{} Harris, D. E., Carilli, C. L., Perley, R. A. 1994,
567: Nature, 367, 713
568: \bibitem[]{} Harris, D. E., Nulsen, P. E. J., Ponman, T. J.,
569: Bautz, M., Cameron, R. A., et al. 2000, \apjl, 530, L81
570: \bibitem[]{} L\"ahteenm\"aki, A., Valtaoja, E. 1999, \aj, 117, 1168
571: \bibitem[]{} Laing, R. A., Riley, J. M., Longair, M. S. 1983,
572: MNRAS, 204, 151
573: \bibitem[]{} Leahy, J. P., Perley, R. A. 1991, \aj, 102, 537
574: \bibitem[]{} Meisenheimer, K., R\"oser, H.-J., Hiltner, P. R.,
575: Yates, M. G., Longair, M. S., et al. 1989, \aap, 219, 63
576: \bibitem[]{} Meisenheimer, K., Yates, M. G., Roeser, H.-J. 1997,
577: \aap, 325, 57
578: \bibitem[]{} R\"oser, H.-J. 1989, in Lecture Notes in Physics 327,
579: Hot Spots in Extragalactic Radio Sources, ed. K.Meisenheimer,
580: H.-J. R\"oser (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag), 91
581: \bibitem[]{} Tavecchio, F., Maraschi, L., Sambruna, R. M.,
582: Urry, C. M. 2000, \apjl, 544, 23
583: \bibitem[]{} Wilson, A. S., Young, A. J., Shopbell, P. L. 2000,
584: \apjl, 544, L27
585: \bibitem[]{} Wilson, A. S., Young, A. J., Shopbell, P. L. 2001,
586: \apj, 547, 740
587: \end{thebibliography}
588:
589:
590: \begin{table}
591: \begin{center}
592: \caption{Observations}
593: \begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
594: \tableline\tableline
595: Band & Freq & Telescope & Flux J & Flux L \\
596: & & & mJy & mJy \\
597: \tableline
598: Radio & 1.4 & VLA A+B & 480$^a$ & 1290$^a$ \\
599: & 4.9 & VLA A+B & 201$^b$ & \\
600: &15.0 & VLA C & 85 & 219 \\
601: &22.0 & VLA C & 72 & 174 \\
602: \tableline
603: Optical& R & HST &2.5E-3&3.8E-3 \\
604: & B & TNG &1.5E-3&1.3E-3 \\
605: \tableline
606: X-ray & 1 keV& {\it Chandra}&5.2$\pm$1.1E-6&3.4$\pm$1.1E-6 \\
607: \tableline
608: \end{tabular}
609: \end{center}
610: $^{a}$ Leahy \& Perley (1991), $^{b}$ Bridle et al.\ (1994).
611: Errors on radio fluxes (1.4 to 15 GHz) are within 5\%, whereas those
612: on 22 GHz and optical fluxes are within 10\%.
613: \end{table}
614:
615:
616: \begin{table}
617: \begin{center}
618: \caption{Spectral parameters and $B$-fields}
619: \begin{tabular}{cccccccccc}
620: \tableline\tableline
621: Hot Spot & $\delta$ & $\nu_{\rm b}$ & $\nu_{\rm c}$ & B$_{\rm ic}$ \\
622: & & ($10^{13}$Hz)&($10^{14}$Hz) & ($\mu$G) \\
623: \tableline
624: L & 2.5 & 3.6$\pm$3.0 & 11$\pm$7 & 35 \\
625: J & 2.4 & 0.35$\pm$0.25 & $\geq$90 & 70 \\
626: \tableline
627: \end{tabular}
628: \end{center}
629: \end{table}
630:
631: \newpage
632:
633: \begin{figure}
634: \plotone{f1.ps}
635: \caption{The 1.4 GHz VLA data (contours) overlaid on the
636: 0.3--8 keV ACIS {\it Chandra} image (grey scale).
637: The radio contours are : 1.0 $\times$ (-1, 1, 2, 4,{\ldots} )
638: mJy/beam; beam=1.85 arcsec.}
639: \end{figure}
640:
641: \begin{figure}
642: \plotone{f2.ps}
643: \caption{Synchrotron and SSC models (solid lines) compared with
644: the data of 3C 351--J (magenta) and L (cyan).
645: 3C 351--J: the synchrotron model (solid line)
646: has $\delta=2.4$,
647: $\nu_{\rm b}=3.2\times 10^{12}$Hz and $\nu_{\rm c}=1.2\times 10^{16}$Hz.
648: The corresponding SSC models are calculated with $B=70 \mu$G
649: and with a low frequency cutoff in the synchrotron photons at
650: 100 MHz (lower curve) and 1 MHz (upper curve).
651: A synchrotron model with $\nu_{\rm b}=1.6\times 10^{12}$Hz and
652: no cutoff is also shown (dashed line).
653: 3C 351--L: the synchrotron model has
654: $\delta=2.5$,
655: $\nu_{\rm b}=2.2\times 10^{13}$Hz and $\nu_{\rm c}=1.1\times 10^{15}$Hz,
656: the corresponding SSC models are calculated with $B=35 \mu$G,
657: with the other parameters as in the case of 3C 351--J.
658: The fluxes of 3C 351--L are reported in the panel
659: multiplied by a factor 0.1.}
660: \end{figure}
661:
662:
663:
664: \end{document}
665: