1: \documentstyle[11pt,newpasp,twoside,epsf]{article}
2: \markboth{Izumi Hachisu}{APS Conf. Ser. Style}
3: \pagestyle{myheadings}
4: \nofiles
5:
6: \def\edcomment#1{\iffalse\marginpar{\raggedright\sl#1\/}\else\relax\fi}
7: \marginparwidth 1.25in
8: \marginparsep .125in
9: \marginparpush .25in
10: \reversemarginpar
11:
12: \begin{document}
13: \title{Evolution of binaries producing Type Ia supernovae,
14: luminous supersoft X-ray sources, and recurrent novae
15: }
16:
17: \author{Izumi Hachisu}
18:
19: \affil{College of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo,
20: Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan}
21:
22: \begin{abstract}
23: We have been proposing two evolutionary paths to Type Ia supernovae
24: (SNe Ia), which are called the supersoft X-ray source (SSS) channel
25: and the symbiotic channel, depending on the orbital separation
26: just prior to an SN Ia explosion.
27: The essential difference of our treatment is inclusion of strong,
28: optically thick winds on mass-accreting white dwarfs (WDs)
29: in the elementary processes of binary evolution when the mass
30: accretion rate on to WDs exceeds a critical rate of
31: $\dot M_{\rm cr} \sim 1 \times 10^{-6} M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$.
32: Once optically thick winds begin to blow from the WD,
33: the binary can avoid forming a common envelope in some cases.
34: We call this {\it accretion wind}. So that the WDs are able
35: to grow up to the Chandrasekhar mass and explode as an SN Ia,
36: showing SSS or recurrent nova phenomena in the way to SNe Ia.
37: Thus, the accretion wind process of WDs can open new channels
38: to SNe Ia. We have modeled the LMC supersoft source RX J0513.9-6951
39: as an example of the systems in the accretion wind phase.
40: Further inclusions of two other elementary
41: processes make the channels much wider; these are
42: the case BB mass transfer in the SSS channel
43: and the strong orbital shrinkage during the superwind phase of the
44: primary star in the symbiotic channel. As a result, the estimated
45: birth rate of SNe Ia via these two channels becomes compatible with
46: the observation in our Galaxy. Interestingly, the U Sco and T CrB
47: subclasses of recurrent novae can be naturally understood as a part
48: of evolutionary stages in these two SSS and symbiotic channels
49: to SNe Ia, respectively. Thus we have a unified picture
50: of binary evolutions to SNe Ia, luminous SSS, and recurrent novae.
51: \end{abstract}
52:
53: \section{Introduction}
54: Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are one of the most luminous
55: explosive events of stars. Recently, SNe Ia have been used
56: as good distance indicators that provide a promising tool
57: for determining cosmological parameters (Perlmutter et al. 1999;
58: Riess et al. 1998)
59: because of their almost uniform maximum luminosities.
60: However, one of the most important unresolved problems on SNe Ia is
61: that we do not know the exact progenitor systems of SNe Ia.
62: \par
63: It is widely accepted that the exploding star itself is
64: an accreting white dwarf (WD) in a binary
65: (Nomoto 1982; Nomoto, Thielemann, \& Yokoi 1984).
66: However, the companion star (and thus the observed binary system)
67: is not known. Several objects have ever been considered,
68: which include merging double white dwarfs
69: (Iben \& Tutukov 1984; Webbink 1984),
70: recurrent novae (Starrfield, Sparks, \& Truran, 1985),
71: symbiotic stars (Munari \& Renzini 1992) etc
72: (Livio 2000, for recent summary).
73: \par
74: Among these models, the systems of double white dwarfs
75: (the double degenerate model) are not theoretically
76: supported; when two WDs merge, carbon ignites not at the center
77: but near the surface layer of the C+O WD;
78: so that the C+O WD is converted into an O+Ne+Mg WD (Saio \& Nomoto 1998).
79: If the total mass of the merger exceeds the Chandrasekhar mass,
80: the merged WD does not explode as an SN Ia but collapses to a neutron star
81: (Nomoto \& Kondo 1991).
82:
83: \begin{figure}
84: %%%%%\plottwo{sn1afig.eps}{acc_map_z02.eps}
85: \plottwo{hachisu3_f1.eps}{hachisu3_f2.eps}
86: \caption{{\bf Left:}
87: Optically thick winds blow from mass-accreting white dwarfs
88: when the mass transfer rate exceeds a critical
89: rate, i.e., $\dot M_{\rm acc} > \dot M_{\rm cr}$. Here, we assume
90: that the white dwarf accretes mass from equatorial region and,
91: at the same time, blows winds from polar regions. {\bf Right:}
92: Response of white dwarfs to mass accretion is illustrated
93: in the white dwarf mass and the mass accretion rate plane,
94: i.e., in the $M_{\rm WD}$-$\dot M_{\rm acc}$ plane.
95: Strong optically thick winds blow above the line of
96: $\dot M_{\rm acc} > \dot M_{\rm cr}$.
97: There is no steady state burning below
98: $\dot M_{\rm acc} < \dot M_{\rm std}$. Instead, intermittent
99: shell flashes occur. The envelope mass at which hydrogen ignites
100: to flash is also shown (taken from Fig. 9 of Nomoto 1982).
101: }
102: \end{figure}
103:
104: On the other hand, the single degenerate systems has become more
105: promising, in which a C+O WD gains mass from a non-degenerate
106: companion star and grows its mass up to the Chandrasekhar mass.
107: Such promising progenitors include luminous supersoft X-ray sources
108: (SSS), recurrent novae (RNe), and symbiotic stars.
109: However, the most important problem in these single degenerate systems
110: is that we did not know the mechanism how to grow the mass of the WDs.
111: Instead, there are effective mass-losing mechanisms
112: such as nova ejection
113: and common envelope evolutions that get rid of the mass accumulated
114: on the WD. Here, I review and summarize our recent developments
115: of the mechanisms that enable to grow the mass of WDs in the
116: single degenerate systems and give a unified picture of
117: evolutions of SSSs, recurrent novae, and SNe Ia.
118:
119:
120: \section{Accretion wind evolution}
121: First, we briefly explain how the mass of WDs in the single
122: degenerate systems grow toward the Chandrasekhar mass limit.
123: The reason that the standard binary evolution theory
124: fails to explain the evolutionary path to SNe Ia and recurrent novae
125: lies mainly in the theoretical prediction of a common envelope
126: formation and the ensuing spiral-in process, because these processes
127: inhibit the growth of white dwarfs in binary systems. As discussed
128: in many previous papers on binary evolution,
129: it has been widely accepted that a hydrogen-rich envelope on
130: a mass-accreting white dwarf expands to a red giant size
131: when its mass accretion rate,
132: $\dot M_{\rm acc}$, exceeds a critical limit, i.e.,
133: \begin{equation}
134: \dot M_{\rm cr} = 8.3 \times 10^{-7}
135: ({{M_{\rm WD}} \over {M_\odot}} - 0.4) ~M_\odot
136: \mbox{~yr}^{-1},
137: \end{equation}
138: (see, e.g., Fig. 9 of Nomoto 1982)
139: and easily forms a common envelope.
140: Once a common envelope is formed, two stars begin to spiral-in
141: each other as a result of viscous drag, thus producing
142: a double degenerate system (Iben \& Tutukov 1984; Webbink 1984).
143: \par
144: However, Hachisu, Kato, \& Nomoto (1996)
145: found that white dwarfs begin to blow
146: strong winds ($v_{\rm wind} \sim 1000$ km s$^{-1}$ and
147: $\dot M_{\rm wind} > 1 \times 10^{-6} M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$)
148: when $\dot M_{\rm acc} > \dot M_{\rm cr}$,
149: as illustrated in Fig. 1, thus
150: preventing the binary from collapsing.
151: The binary does not spiral-in but keeps its separation.
152: Hydrogen burns steadily, and therefore the helium layer of
153: the white dwarf can grow at a rate of
154: $\dot M_{\rm He} \approx \dot M_{\rm cr}$.
155: The other transferred matter is blown in the wind
156: ($\dot M_{\rm wind} \approx \dot M_{\rm acc} - \dot M_{\rm cr}$),
157: where $\dot M_{\rm wind}$ is the wind mass loss rate.
158: We call this {\it accretion wind} because it begins to blow
159: when the accretion rate exceeds the critical rate.
160: \par
161: Therefore, we have to revise Fig. 9 of Nomoto (1982),
162: which has been used widely in binary evolution scenarios to show the
163: basic processes of mass-accreting white dwarfs.
164: The revision to Nomoto's Fig. 9 is shown in Fig. 1.
165: The most important difference of Fig. 1 from
166: Nomoto's Fig. 9 is that white dwarfs increase their masses
167: in a much wider parameter region.
168: In our new diagram, the status of a mass-accreting white dwarf
169: is specified by the following three phases:
170: (1) accretion wind phase ($\dot M_{\rm acc} > \dot M_{\rm cr}$);
171: (2) steady shell-burning phase
172: ($\dot M_{\rm std} < \dot M_{\rm acc} < \dot M_{\rm cr}$);
173: and (3) intermittent shell-flash phase
174: ($\dot M_{\rm acc} < \dot M_{\rm std}$), where
175: $\dot M_{\rm std}$ means the lowest limit of the mass accretion rate
176: for steady hydrogen shell-burning.
177: The new growing region of white dwarfs,
178: $\dot M_{\rm acc} > \dot M_{\rm std}$,
179: is much wider than old Nomoto's (1982) narrow strip,
180: $\dot M_{\rm std} < \dot M_{\rm acc} < \dot M_{\rm cr}$.
181:
182:
183: \begin{figure}
184: %%%%%\plottwo{ciaql_2.eps}{ciaql_1.eps}
185: \plottwo{hachisu3_f3.eps}{hachisu3_f4.eps}
186: \caption{{\bf Left:}
187: Geometrical configuration of our RX J0513.9-6951 model in the optical
188: high state (wind phase). The cool component is a slightly evolved
189: MS companion filling up its inner critical Roche lobe.
190: The hot component, WD, blows a strong wind.
191: The accretion disk is blown off outward and has a larger size than
192: the no-wind phase. {\bf Right:}
193: Geometrical configuration in the optical low state (no-wind phase).
194: }
195: \end{figure}
196:
197: \begin{figure}
198: %%%%%\plotone{vmagfitall1.eps}
199: \plotone{hachisu3_f5.eps}
200: \caption{
201: Light curve is plotted against time for a $1.35 M_\odot$ white
202: dwarf model together with the MACHO data (Alcock et al. 1996).
203: We assume a larger size of the accretion disk
204: (1.0 times the Roche lobe size) in the optical high state
205: (the wind phase) but a smaller size (0.8 times the Roche lobe size)
206: in the optical low state (the static, no-wind phase).
207: The transition from the optical high to low state
208: corresponds to the cease point of the strong wind
209: (large open circles).
210: }
211: \end{figure}
212:
213:
214: \subsection{RX J0513.9-6951 as an example of accretion wind phase}
215: As an example of the {\it accretion wind} phase,
216: we have modeled long-term optical light curves of the LMC supersoft
217: X-ray source RX J0513.9-6951 based on our wind model of
218: mass-accreting white dwarfs. The source shows a quasi-periodic
219: variability, the period of which is $\sim 170$ d and
220: the amplitude of which is $\sim 1$ mag (Alcock et al. 1996).
221: The source has a relatively longer ($\sim 130$ d) optical high-state
222: ($V \sim 16.2$) and a shorter ($\sim 40$ d) optical low-state
223: ($V \sim 17.0$) with the transition time of several days.
224: X-rays were observed only in the optical low-states.
225: This indicates that a strong wind blows only in the optical high-state
226: because X-rays are self-absorbed by the wind.
227: To examine the idea of the strong wind,
228: we have calculated envelope solutions of mass-accreting WDs
229: and found that optically thick winds really occur when the mass
230: accretion rate exceeds a critical rate of $\dot M_{\rm cr}$
231: for $M_{\rm WD} > 0.7 M_\odot$
232: even in a low metallicity of $Z=0.004$ of LMC.
233: \par
234: We attribute the $100-150$ d bright
235: phase to our strong wind phase with an expanded white dwarf
236: photosphere, whereas the $\sim 40$ d
237: less bright phase to our static (no-wind) phase with a shrinking
238: envelope of the WD. The duration and
239: the brightness of the optical high state is explained by
240: the model of a WD mass, $M_{\rm WD}= 1.35 ~M_\odot$,
241: with an extending accretion disk edge over the Roche lobe size
242: during the wind phase as illustrated in Fig. 2.
243: Irradiation of the accretion disk by the WD photosphere
244: plays an essential role to reproduce the optical light curve
245: because a large part of the optical light comes from the
246: accretion disk.
247: \par
248: The switching mechanism from the optical high to low state
249: is understood as follows:
250: Strong winds from the WD themselves make the separation increase,
251: because the high velocity wind do not carry away large angular momentum.
252: The winds further strip off the very surface layer of the companion star.
253: As a result, the mass transfer rate decreases and it finally
254: stops the strong winds. After the wind stops, the surface of
255: the companion recovers in a thermal timescale of the envelope
256: and the mass transfer rate increases up and strong winds begin to blow
257: again. Thus, the semi-periodic cycles repeat.
258: \par
259: Light curve fittings indicate that the optical high state
260: is initiated by a sudden increase in the mass transfer rate of
261: $\dot M_{\rm acc} \sim 1 \times 10^{-5} ~M_\odot$.
262: Then, the envelope of the white dwarf expands to
263: $R_{\rm ph} \sim 0.1 ~R_\odot$, not exceeding over the
264: accretion disk size of $\sim 2 ~R_\odot$. Our light curve
265: fittings are shown in Fig. 3. In our models,
266: about 40\% of the transferred matter can be accumulated on
267: the white dwarf but the rest is blown off in the wind.
268: This suggests that it takes $\sim 1 \times 10^5$ yr for the white dwarf
269: of $1.35 ~M_\odot$ to grow to $1.38 ~M_\odot$
270: and to explode as a Type Ia supernova.
271:
272:
273: \subsection{Two evolutionary paths to RNe and SNe Ia}
274: Based on the new mechanism of the accretion wind evolution as
275: shown in Fig. 1, Hachisu, Kato, \& Nomoto (1999a) and Hachisu et al. (1999b)
276: have proposed two paths to SNe Ia (see also, Li \& van den Heuvel 1997).
277: In these two paths, WDs can accrete mass continuously from
278: the companion and grow at a rate of $\dot M_{\rm cr}$ of eq. (1).
279: Therefore, candidates for SN Ia progenitors are systems at the final
280: stages on these paths; i.e., one is a supersoft
281: X-ray source (SSS) consisting of a WD and a lobe-filling,
282: more massive, main-sequence (MS) companion as shown in the late stage of
283: Fig. 4 (the WD+MS systems; see also Li \& van den Heuvel 1997)
284: and the other is a symbiotic star consisting of a WD
285: and a mass-losing red giant (RG) as shown in the late stage of Fig. 5
286: (the WD+RG systems, see also Hachisu et al. 1996).
287: Both the systems contribute to main parts of the SN Ia birth rate
288: (Hachisu et al. 1999a, 1999b).
289: \par
290: Hachisu et al. (1999a, 1999b) have followed many binary evolutions
291: until SN Ia explosions. The final outcome is summarized
292: in Fig. 6 for the initial orbital period, $P_0$ (in units of days),
293: and the initial donor mass, $M_{d,0}$, which is representing
294: $M_{\rm RG,0}$ (the initial mass of the red-giant component),
295: or $M_{\rm MS,0}$ (the initial mass of the slightly
296: evolved main-sequence component). In this figure,
297: the initial mass of the white dwarf is assumed to be
298: $M_{\rm WD,0}= 1.0 M_\odot$.
299: The right-hand region, longer orbital periods of
300: $P_0 \sim 100$---1000 d, represents
301: our results for the WD+RG system.
302: In the left-hand region, shorter orbital periods of $P_0 \sim 0.3$---10 d,
303: are shown the results for the WD+MS system.
304: \par
305: We plot the initial parameter regions of binaries (thin solid
306: curves in Fig. 6) that finally produce an SN Ia, which are corresponding to
307: stage (F) in Fig. 4 or stage (D) in Fig.5.
308: Left diagram in Fig. 6 shows such two regions of the WD+MS systems
309: (SSS channel) and the WD+RG systems (symbiotic channel). We have added
310: in this figure the final parameter regions (thick solid curves)
311: just before an SN Ia explosion occurs. Starting from the initial region
312: encircled by the thin solid curves, binary systems evolve and
313: can explode as an SN Ia in the regions enclosed
314: by the thick solid curves. Hachisu \& Kato (2001)
315: showed that some recurrent novae lie on the boarder of their
316: parameter region that can produce an SN Ia
317: (see also Kato 2001 in this volume).
318: Among six recurrent novae with known orbital periods,
319: five fall in the final regions of SN Ia progenitors
320: just before the explosion. Only T Pyx is far out of the regions
321: of SNe Ia.
322:
323: \begin{figure}
324: %%%%%\plottwo{hemtsn1a.eps}{windsn1a.eps}
325: \plottwo{hachisu3_f6.eps}{hachisu3_f7.eps}
326: \caption{ SSS channel. {\bf Left:}
327: Early evolutionary path through the common envelope evolution to
328: the helium (Case BB) mass transfer. {\bf Right:}
329: Late evolutionary path to an SN Ia explosion in our wind model.
330: }
331: \end{figure}
332:
333: \begin{figure}
334: %%%%%\plottwo{channel1.eps}{channel2.eps}
335: \plottwo{hachisu3_f8.eps}{hachisu3_f9.eps}
336: \caption{ Symbiotic channel.
337: {\bf Left:} Early evolutionary path through the first common
338: envelope evolution to a symbiotic system.
339: {\bf Right:} Late evolutionary path through
340: the symbiotic channel to an SN Ia.
341: }
342: \end{figure}
343:
344:
345: \section{Case BB mass transfer}
346: It has been shown that the ejecta of the recurrent nova
347: U Sco are helium-rich as much as He/H$\sim 2$ by number
348: (Williams et al. 1981). The accretion disk of U Sco is also
349: suggested to be helium-rich (Hanes 1985). Many of the SSSs
350: have a stronger He {\scriptsize II} line than Balmer lines,
351: thus also suggesting that the companion of the WD+MS systems
352: (SSS channel) is helium-rich.
353: In this section, therefore, we describe
354: the reason that the cool component of the WD+MS systems has
355: a helium-rich envelope.
356: \par
357: Previous works consider only the initial systems
358: consisting of a more massive AGB star with a C+O core and a less massive
359: main-sequence star. This system undergoes a common envelope evolution
360: and it finally yields a binary system of a mass-accreting C+O WD and
361: a lobe-filling MS/subgiant star. Thus, they do not
362: include another important evolutionary path, in which
363: a more massive component fills up its inner
364: critical Roche lobe when it develops a {\it helium core}
365: of $\sim 0.8-2.0 M_\odot$ in its {\it red giant phase}
366: as shown in the early stage of Fig. 4.
367: \par
368: We consider, for example, a close binary with the primary mass of
369: $M_{1,i} = 7 M_\odot$ and the secondary mass of $M_{2,i} = 2 M_\odot$
370: with the initial separation of $a_{i} \sim 80-600 ~R_\odot$.
371: When the primary has evolved to a red giant developing a helium
372: core of $M_{\rm 1,He} \sim 1.0-1.6 M_\odot$,
373: it fills up its inner critical Roche lobe.
374: Then, the binary undergoes a common envelope (CE) evolution,
375: which yields a much more compact close binary
376: of a naked helium star of $M_{1,{\rm He}} \sim 1.0-1.6 M_\odot$ and
377: a main-sequence star of $M_2= 2 M_\odot$
378: with the final separation of $a_{\rm f, CE} \sim 4-50 ~R_\odot$.
379: Here, we assume a relation of
380: \begin{equation}
381: {{a_{\rm f,CE}} \over {a_i}} \sim \alpha_{\rm CE}
382: \left({{M_{\rm 1,core}} \over {M_{1,i}}} \right)
383: \left({{M_2} \over {M_{1,i}-M_{\rm 1,core}}} \right),
384: \end{equation}
385: with the efficiency factor of $\alpha_{\rm CE}=1.0$ for the
386: common envelope evolutions.
387: \par
388: After the common envelope evolution,
389: the radii of the inner critical Roche lobes of the primary and
390: the secondary become $R_1^* \sim 0.36 a_{\rm f,CE}$ and
391: $R_2^* \sim 0.4 a_{\rm f,CE}$, respectively.
392: Since the secondary radius should be smaller than its inner critical
393: Roche lobe, i.e., $1.7 R_\odot \le R_2 < R_2^*$
394: ($1.7 R_\odot$ is the radius of a $2 M_\odot$ ZAMS star),
395: the initial separation $a_{i}$ should exceeds $80 ~R_\odot$.
396: The upper bound of the initial separation
397: is obtained from the maximum radius of the $7 M_\odot$ star
398: which has formed a helium core, i.e.,
399: $a_{i} \approx 2 R_{\rm 1,max} <~ 2 \times 300 ~R_\odot$.
400: Thus, the allowable range of the initial separations is
401: $80 ~R_\odot <~ a_{i} <~ 600 ~R_\odot$ for a pair
402: of $M_{1,i}= 7 M_\odot$ and $M_{2,i}= 2 M_\odot$.
403: Then, we have $R_1^* \sim 1.5-18 ~R_\odot$ and $R_2^* \sim 1.7-20 ~R_\odot$
404: after the first common envelope evolution.
405: \par
406: After the hydrogen-rich envelope is stripped away and
407: hydrogen shell burning vanishes, the naked helium core
408: contracts to ignite a central helium burning and
409: becomes a helium main sequence star.
410: When the helium star forms a C+O core, its helium envelope
411: expands to fills its inner critical Roche lobe again.
412: The helium is transferred stably to the secondary
413: on an {\it evolutionary time scale} of $\tau_{\rm EV} \sim 10^5$ yr
414: because the mass ratio is smaller than $0.79$ ($q= M_1/M_2 < 0.79$).
415: The resultant mass transfer rate is
416: $\dot M_1 \sim 10^{-5} M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$.
417: No common envelope is formed for such a low rate.
418: After the helium envelope is lost, the primary becomes a C+O WD
419: of $M_{\rm C+O} \sim 0.9-1.1 M_\odot$ and the separation increases
420: by 10\%$-$40\%, i.e.,
421: $a_{\rm f, He} \sim (1.1-1.4) a_{\rm f, CE} \sim (4-70) R_\odot$.
422: Here, we assume the conservations of the total mass and angular momentum
423: during the helium mass transfer
424: to obtain the separation after the helium mass transfer,
425: $a_{\rm f, He}$.
426: The secondary receives almost pure helium matter of
427: $\Delta M_{\rm He} \sim 0.1-0.5 M_\odot$
428: to form a helium-enriched envelope.
429: The secondary's hydrogen content decreases to
430: $X \sim 0.6$ if helium is completely mixed into the star.
431: For the $9+2.5 M_\odot$ case, much more helium is transferred,
432: but much less helium for the $6+2 M_\odot$ case.
433:
434:
435:
436: \section{Shrink of orbital separation during superwind phase}
437: Based on the population synthesis analysis,
438: Yungelson \& Livio (1998) claimed that almost no realization frequency
439: is derived for the original WD+RG model (Hachisu et al. 1996).
440: In this section, we point out that very wide binaries with initial
441: separations of $a_i >~ 1500 ~R_\odot$, which were not included in their
442: analysis, are essentially important in our SN Ia modeling.
443: \par
444: The more massive component (the initial mass of $M_{1,i}$) of
445: a binary first evolves to a red giant (AGB stage) and fills its inner
446: critical Roche lobe. After a common envelope phase,
447: the more massive component leaves a C+O WD,
448: and the separation of the binary decreases by a factor of
449: $a_f/a_i \sim 1/40 - 1/50$ from eq.(2)
450: for $M_{\rm WD} \sim 1 ~M_\odot$
451: and $M_2 \sim 1 ~M_\odot$ because a $\sim 1 ~M_\odot$ WD descends
452: from a main-sequence star of $M_{1,i} \sim 7-8 ~M_\odot$.
453: Yungelson \& Livio (1998) assumed that
454: the separation of interacting binaries is {\it smaller than}
455: $a_i <~ 1500 ~R_\odot$.
456: Then, the widest binaries have separations of
457: $a_f <~ 30-40 ~R_\odot$ after common envelope evolution.
458: The orbital period is
459: $P_0 <~ 20$ days for $M_{\rm WD,0} \sim 1 ~M_\odot$
460: and $M_{\rm RG,0} \sim 1 ~M_\odot$.
461: There is no SN Ia region of the WD+RG systems
462: for $P_0 <~ 20$ days as seen from Fig. 6.
463: Thus, Yungelson \& Livio concluded that we cannot expect
464: any SN Ia explosions from the right-hand SN Ia region
465: (WD+RG system) in Fig. 6.
466: \par
467: The reason that Yungelson \& Livio's modeling fails to reproduce
468: our SN Ia progenitors is their assumption of $a_i <~ 1500 ~R_\odot$.
469: In what follows, we show that WD+RG binaries wide enough
470: to have $P_0 \sim 100-1000$ d are born from initially very wide
471: binaries with $a_i \sim 1500-40000 ~R_\odot$.
472: \par
473: A star with a zero-age main-sequence mass of
474: $M_{1,i} < 8 ~M_\odot$ ends its life by ejecting its envelope in a
475: wind of relatively slow velocities ($v \sim 10-40$ km s$^{-1}$)
476: as shown in Fig. 5.
477: These wind velocities are as low as the orbital velocities of
478: binaries with separations of $a_i \sim 1500-40000 ~R_\odot$
479: for a pair of $M_{1,i} \sim 7 ~M_\odot$ and $M_{2,i} \sim 1 ~M_\odot$.
480: When the wind velocity is as low as the orbital velocity,
481: we have the separation shrinking due to effective loss of
482: the angular momentum by the outflowing gas, i.e.,
483: $\dot a/a \approx 2 \dot M_1 / M_2 < 0$ (see Hachisu et al. 1999a).
484: \par
485: Once the binary system begins to shrink, its evolution becomes
486: similar to a common envelope evolution
487: (see {\it stages B-D} in Fig. 5).
488: Thus, the separation is reduced by a factor of $1/40-1/50$, i.e.,
489: $a_f \sim 30-1000 ~R_\odot$
490: for $M_{1,i} \sim 7 ~M_\odot$ and $M_{2,i} \sim 1 ~M_\odot$.
491: The orbital period becomes $P_0 \sim 15-3000$ days for a pair of
492: $M_{\rm WD,0} \sim 1 ~M_\odot$ and $M_2 \sim 1 ~M_\odot$
493: ({\it stage D} in Fig. 5).
494: These initial sets of the parameters are very consistent with
495: the initial conditions of our WD+RG progenitor systems.
496:
497:
498: \begin{figure}
499: %%%%%\plottwo{rn_region.eps}{phase_sp.eps}
500: \plottwo{hachisu3_f10.eps}{hachisu3_f11.eps}
501: \caption{
502: {\bf Left:}
503: Regions producing SNe Ia are plotted
504: in the $\log P - M_{\rm d}$ (orbital period --- donor mass) plane
505: for the WD+MS system ({\it left}) and the WD+RG system ({\it right}).
506: Here we assume an initial white dwarf mass of $1.0 M_\odot$.
507: Currently known positions of each recurrent nova are indicated
508: by a star mark ($\star$) for U Sco (Hachisu et al. 2000),
509: a filled triangle for T CrB (Belczy\'nski \& Mikolajewska 1998),
510: an open rectangle for T Pyx (Patterson et al. 1998),
511: but by arrows for the other three recurrent novae, V394 CrA,
512: CI Aql, and RS Oph,
513: because the mass of the companion is not yet available explicitly.
514: {\bf Right:}
515: The accretion winds of WDs open new two channels to SNe Ia
516: while the two evolutionary processes of the case BB mass transfer
517: and the orbital shrinkage during the superwind phase enlarge
518: the initial phase volume of SN Ia progenitors
519: for the SSS channel and the symbiotic channel, respectively.
520: }
521: \end{figure}
522:
523:
524: \section{Type Ia supernova rates}
525: We estimate the SN Ia rate from the WD+RG and WD+MS systems
526: in our Galaxy by
527: \begin{equation}
528: \nu = 0.2 \int d q \int d~\log A
529: \int {{d M} \over M^{2.5}}
530: \quad {\rm yr}^{-1},
531: \end{equation}
532: where $q$, $A$, and $M$ are the mass ratio ($q=M_2/M_1 \le 1$),
533: the initial separation in units of solar radius,
534: and the primary initial mass
535: in solar mass units (from eq. [1] of Iben \& Tutukov 1984).
536: The SN Ia rate is essentially the same as the volume of
537: the initial phase space consisting of $q$, $A$, and $M$
538: as shown in Fig. 6.
539: \par
540: The accretion winds of WDs open new two channels to SNe Ia.
541: The case BB mass transfer in the SSS channel extends
542: the phase volume towards the low mass ratio region as shown
543: in Fig. 6. On the other hand, the orbital shrinkage
544: during the superwind phase in the symbiotic channel enlarges
545: the phase space towards the large initial separation
546: also shown in Fig. 6.
547: Therefore, the estimated rate of WD+RG/WD+MS systems becomes close
548: to the observed rate in our Galaxy, i.e., $\nu \sim 0.003$ yr$^{-1}$,
549: which comes from the SSS channel of $\nu_{\rm MS} \sim 0.001$ yr$^{-1}$
550: and the symbiotic channel of $\nu_{\rm RG} \sim 0.002$ yr$^{-1}$.
551:
552:
553: \begin{references}
554: \reference Alcock, C. et al. 1996, \mnras, 280, L49
555: \reference Belczy\'nski, K., \& Mikolajewska, J. 1998, \mnras, 296, 77
556: \reference Hachisu, I., \& Kato, M. 2001, \apj, 558, 323
557: \reference Hachisu, I., Kato, M., Kato, T, \& Matsumoto, K. 2000, \apj,
558: 528, L97
559: \reference Hachisu, I., Kato, M., \& Nomoto, K. 1996, \apjl, 470, L97
560: \reference Hachisu, I., Kato, M., \& Nomoto, K. 1999a, \apj, 522, 487
561: \reference Hachisu, I., Kato, M., Nomoto, K., \& Umeda, H. 1999b, \apj, 519, 314
562: \reference Hanes, D. A. 1985, \mnras, 213, 443
563: \reference Iben, I. Jr., \& Tutukov, A. V. 1984, \apjs, 54, 335
564: \reference Kato, M. 2001, in The Physics of Cataclysmic Variables and
565: Related Objects (this volume), in press
566: \reference Livio, M. 2000, in Type Ia Supernovae: Theory and Cosmology,
567: ed. J. C. Niemeyer \& J. W. Truran (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 33
568: \reference Li, X.-D., \& van den Heuvel, E. P. J. 1997, \aap, 322, L9
569: \reference Munari, U., \& Renzini, A. 1992, \apj, 397, L87
570: \reference Nomoto, K. 1982, \apj, 253, 798
571: \reference Nomoto, K., \& Kondo, Y. 1991, \apjl, 367, L19
572: \reference Nomoto, K., Thielemann, F., \& Yokoi, K. 1984, \apj, 286, 644
573: \reference Patterson, J. et al. 1998, \pasp, 110, 380
574: \reference Perlmutter, S. et al. 1999, \apj, 1999, 517, 565
575: \reference Riess, A. G. et al. 1998, \aj, 116, 1009
576: \reference Saio, H., \& Nomoto, K. 1998, \apj, 500, 388
577: \reference Starrfield, S., Sparks, W. M., \& Truran, J. W. 1985, \apj,
578: 291, 136
579: \reference Webbink, R. F. 1984, \apj, 277, 355
580: \reference Williams, R. E., Sparks, W. M., Gallagher, J. S., Ney, E. P.,
581: Starrfield, S. G., \& Truran, J. W. 1981, \apj, 251, 221
582: \reference Yungelson, L., \& Livio, M. 1998, \apj, 497, 168
583: \end{references}
584: \end{document}
585: