1: %the Version 1, 8/22/01
2: % \documentclass{aastex}
3:
4: %% preprint produces a one-column, single-spaced document:
5:
6: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
7:
8: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
9:
10: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
11: % reduces spacing between lines
12: \tighten
13: %\eqsecnum
14:
15: %\received{ January 1999}
16: %\accepted{}
17: %\journalid{337}{15 January 1995}
18: %\articleid{11}{14}
19:
20: %\slugcomment{In press, ApJ )}
21: \def\lsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
22: \def\gsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}
23: \def\lax {\ifmmode{_<\atop^{\sim}}\else{${_<\atop^{\sim}}$}\fi}
24: \def\gax {\ifmmode{_>\atop^{\sim}}\else{${_>\atop^{\sim}}$}\fi}
25: \def\etal{{\it et al.\/} }
26: \def\gtorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$}\mkern-14mu
27: \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
28: \def\ltorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$<$}\mkern-14mu
29: \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
30:
31:
32: \def\pmb#1{\setbox0=\hbox{#1}%
33: \kern-0.015em\copy0\kern-\wd0
34: \kern0.03em\copy0\kern-\wd0
35: \kern-0.015em\raise0.0433em\box0 }
36:
37: \begin{document}
38:
39: \title{Timing and Spectral Properties of X-ray Emission from the Converging
40: Flows onto Black hole: Monte-Carlo Simulations}
41:
42: \author{Philippe Laurent\altaffilmark{1},
43: Lev Titarchuk \altaffilmark{1,2,3}}
44: %\author{Philippe Laurent}
45: \altaffiltext{1}{CEA, DSM/DAPNIA/SAp, Centre d'Etudes de Saclay, 91191
46: Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France; plaurent@cea.fr}
47:
48: \altaffiltext{2}{George Mason University/Center for Earth Observing and
49: Space Research, Fairfax VA 22030-4444;}
50:
51: \altaffiltext{3}{US Naval Research Laboratory, Space Science
52: Division, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW, Washington,
53: DC 20375-5352; lev@xip.nrl.navy.mil}
54: %\affil{CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SAp, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvvete, France}
55: %\email{{plaurent@cea.fr}}
56: %\author{Lev Titarchuk}
57: %\affil{George Mason University/CEOSR, Fairfax VA, US}
58: %\email{lev@xip.nrl.navy.mil}
59:
60:
61: \vskip 0.5 truecm
62:
63: %c\font\rom=cmr10
64: %c\centerline{\rom Accepted, Astrophys. J. }
65:
66:
67: \begin{abstract}
68: %We present the timing and spectral analysis of Monte Carlo simulations of
69: %X-ray radiation for a converging inflow (CI) onto a black hole.
70: We demonstrate that a X-ray spectrum of a converging inflow (CI) onto a black hole is the sum of
71: a thermal (disk) component and the convolution of some fraction of this component with
72: the Comptonization spread (Green's) function. The latter component is seen as an
73: extended power law at energies much higher than the characteristic energy of the soft photons.
74: We show that the high energy photon production (source function) in the CI atmosphere
75: is distributed with the characteristic maximum at about the photon bending radius, $1.5r_{\rm S}$,
76: independently of the seed
77: (soft) photon distribution. We show that high frequency oscillations
78: of the soft photon source in this region lead to the oscillations
79: of the high energy part
80: of the spectrum but not {of} the thermal component.
81: %Because the effective area
82: %of the X-ray emitting disk
83: %($\sim 100-120$ Schwarzschild square radii, $R_{\rm S}^2$)
84: % is one order of magnitude larger than that of
85: %the inner edge region
86: %which is of order of ($\sim (9-10)$ $R_{\rm S}^2$
87: The high frequency oscillations of the inner region are not significant
88: in the thermal component of the spectrum.
89: We further demonstrate that Doppler and recoil effects
90: (which are responsible for the formation of the CI spectrum)
91: are related to the hard (positive) and soft (negative) time lags between the soft and hard
92: photon energy channels respectively.
93: %We demonstrate the presence of two types of time lags in the simulated CI spectra.
94: %We conclude that the high frequency QPO is related to the extended power law spectral component,
95: %the soft and hard time lags are inevitable and natural properties of the X-ray emission from the converging
96: %inflows onto black holes.
97: \end{abstract}
98:
99: %\keywords{X-rays: bursts-stars --- accretion disks, LMXB, X-ray
100: %binary --stars: neutron ---stars:
101: %individual: 4U 1728-34, GX 340+0, Sco X-1}
102:
103: \keywords{black hole physics---accretion disks --- radiation mechanisms: nonthermal---X-rays: general}
104:
105: \section{Introduction}
106:
107: %It has long been known that accreting stellar-mass black holes (BH) in
108: %Galactic binaries exhibit a ``bi-modal" spectral behavior - namely the so
109: %called high-soft and low-hard spectral states; see Liang (1998) for a recent
110: %review. High and low in this context refer to the relative 2-10 keV luminosities
111: %in a given system, which is related to the rate at which mass accretion is
112: %taking place.
113: Accreting stellar-mass black holes (BH) in
114: Galactic binaries exhibit
115: %a ``bi-modal" spectral behavior - namely the so
116: so called high-soft and low-hard spectral states (e.g. Borozdin et al. 1999, hereafter BOR99).
117: An increase in the soft blackbody luminosity component leads to the
118: appearance of an extended power law. An important observational fact is
119: that this effect is seen as a persistent phenomenon only in BH candidates,
120: and thus it is apparently a {\it unique} black hole signature.
121: Although in Neutron star (NS) systems similar power law components are
122: detected in the intermediate stages (Strickman \& Barret 1999; Iaria et al. 2000;
123: Di Salvo et al. 2001), they are of a transient nature, disappearing with
124: increasing luminosity (Di Salvo et al.).
125: %The low-hard state spectral form on the other hand, has been seen in
126: %BH and NS binaries as well under certain conditions (Barret \& Grindlay 1995;
127: %Heindl \& Smith 1998).
128: %Previously
129: %the hard component in NS systems
130: %was associated with the low
131: %luminosity states of bursters (Barret \& Grindlay 1995 {}; Heindl \& Smith 1998) when
132: %the soft component is suppressed.
133: %But the recent observations by Strickman,
134: %Barret (1999); Iaria et al. (2000); Di Salvo et al. (2000) show that a
135: %similar
136: %hard component feature, extending to above 100 keV, appears at times
137: %along
138: %with a soft thermal component.
139:
140: It thus seems a reasonable assumption that the unique spectral signature
141: of the soft state of BH binaries is directly tied to the black hole event
142: horizon. This is the primary motivation for the Bulk Motion Comptonization Model
143: (BMC) introduced in several previous papers, and recently applied with striking
144: success to a substantial body of observational data (Shrader \& Titarchuk 1998;
145: BOR99; Titarchuk \& Shrader 2002, hereafter TS02). A complete theory of
146: BH accretion must, however, be also able to accommodate in a
147: natural manner a growing number of observational traits exhibited in the temporal
148: domain. For example, it is now well established that BH X-ray binaries
149: exhibit quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) phenomena in three
150: frequency domains: $\sim 0.1$ Hz, ($\sim 1-10$ Hz) and
151: ($\sim 10^2$ Hz).
152: %It is likely that these are interrelated by some as
153: %yet unspecified underlying physics.
154: The $\sim 10^2-$Hz QPOs seem to occur
155: during periods of flaring, and when the spectra (although in the high-soft state)
156: tend to be relatively hard, i.e. the relative importance of the power-law component
157: with respect to the thermal. Furthermore, the QPO
158: amplitudes increase with energy, that is there is a higher degree of
159: modulation of the signal in the hard-power law than in the thermal excess component.
160: In addition to the QPO phenomena, it has been noted by Nowak et al.
161: (2000) (also see Cui et al. 2000) that measures of the coherence
162: between the intensity variations in the hard power law and thermal
163: components is negligible.
164:
165: %In this paper we present evidence based on Monte Carlo simulations in both
166: %the temporal and spectral domains in support of our ideas regarding the converging inflow (CI)
167: %phenomenon.
168: We argue that the BH X-ray spectrum in the high-soft state is formed in the relatively
169: cold accretion flow with a subrelativistic bulk velocity $v_{bulk}\lax c$ and
170: with a temperature of a few keV and less ($v_{th}\ll c$). In such a flow
171: the effect of the bulk Comptonization
172: %(of order of $v_{bulk}/c$)
173: is much stronger than
174: the effect of the thermal Comptonization which is a second order with respect to
175: $v_{th}/c$.
176: % {\it We demonstrate that the high frequency
177: %QPO behavior of the extended power law spectrum, presence of the hard and soft lags between
178: %the different energy bands and absence of the correlation between the intensity variations
179: %in the hard power law and thermal components are intrinsic properties of the converging inflow
180: %phenomena.}
181: %In \S 2, we describe the details of the Monte Carlo
182: %simulations of the converging inflow spectra.
183: In this {\it Letter} we present results of Monte Carlo simulations probing the spatial, spectral, timing and time-lag properties of X-ray radiation in
184: CI atmosphere in \S\S 2-4. Comparisons are drawn to the recent X-ray observations of BH sources.
185: Summary and conclusions follow in \S 5.
186: \section{Emergent spectrum and hard photon spatial distribution}
187: %\section{The Monte-Carlo simulations}
188: The geometry used in these simulations is similar to the one used
189: in the Laurent \& Titarchuk (1999), hereafter LT99, consisting of a
190: thin disk with an inner radius of 3 $r_{\rm S}$, merged with a spherical CI cloud
191: harboring a BH in its center, where $r_{\rm S}=2GM/c^2$ is
192: the Sc{h}warzchild radius and $M$ is a BH mass. The cloud outer radius is $r_{out}$.
193: The disk is assumed always to be optically thick.
194:
195: In addition to free-fall into the central BH, we have also taken
196: into account the thermal motion of the CI electrons,
197: simulated at an electron temperature of 5 keV. This is likely to be a typical
198: temperature of the CI in the high-soft state of galactic BHs
199: [see Chakrabarti \& Titarchuk (1995) and BOR99 for details].
200: %The CI inflow temperature is less than the temperature of
201: %the sub-Keplerian inflow (presumably located above the disk)
202: %but it is higher than the temperature of the disk flow which is of order of a few keV
203: %or less (Shakura \& Sunyaev 1973).
204: % see also LT99) calculated the temperature of the sub-Keplerian flow
205: % using the thermal equilibrium between an illumination of the sub-Keplerian flow by the disk photons
206: %and the gravitational energy release in the sub-Keplerian flow.
207: The seed X-ray photons were generated uniformly and isotropically
208: at the surface of the border of the accretion disk,
209: from $r_{d,in}= {3} r_{\rm S}$ to $r_{d, out} = 10r_s$.
210: These photons were generated according to a thermal spectrum with a
211: single temperature of 0.9 keV, similar to the ones measured in Black Hole binary systems
212: (see for example BOR99). In fact, BOR99 also demonstrate that the multicolor disk spectrum
213: can be fitted by the effective single temperature blackbody spectrum in the energy range of interest
214: (for photon energies higher than 2 keV).
215: The parameters of our simulations are the BH mass $m$ in solar units,
216: the CI electron temperature, $T_e=5$keV,
217: the mass accretion rate, $\dot m=4$ in Eddington units (see LT99),
218: and the cloud outer radius, $r_{out}=10r_{\rm S}$.
219: %The optical thickness of the cloud $\tau_0$ then
220: %is computed through the mass accretion rate $\dot m$ according to the
221: %following formulae :
222: %\begin{equation}
223: %\tau_0 = \dot m [ 1 - (r_{\rm S}/ r_{out})^{1/2}]
224: %\end{equation}
225: %We assume that $m=10$, $kT_e=5$ keV, $\dot m=4$ and
226: %$r_{out}=10r_{\rm S}$.
227: It is worth noting that, for these parameters,
228: the bulk motion effects are not significant at $r> 10r_{\rm S}$.\footnote{
229: In general, the bulk motion Comptonization is effective when $\tau v_{bulk}/c
230: =\dot m r_{\rm S}/r$ {\it is not smaller than unity} (e.g. Rees, 1978; Titarchuk et al. 1997).}
231: %Where $\tau=\dot m(r_{\rm S}/r)^{1/2}$ is an optical depth in the CI cloud at a radius $r$
232: %calculated from infinity (see Titarchuk \& Zannias 1998, hereafter TZ98).
233:
234: In Figure 1 we present the simulated spectrum of the X-ray emission emerging
235: from the CI atmosphere. The spectrum exhibits three features: a soft X-ray bump, an extended power law
236: and a sharp exponential turnover near 300 keV.
237: %The disk photons escaping directly to an observer
238: %or after scattering off CI electrons with the small energy change forms the soft part of the spectrum.
239: %The extended power law is a result of photon scatterings off CI electrons. For any
240: %scattering event, the relative (average) change in the photon energy is nearly constant, but the intensity
241: %(or probability of such a scattering) decreases exponentially with a number of scatterings.
242: %TZ98 were first to prove, using the kinetic equation formalism,
243: %that the extended power law is an intrinsic property of the converging inflow.
244: As demonstrated previously (Titarchuk \& Zannias 1998, hereafter TZ98; LT99)
245: the extended power law is a result of soft photon upscattering off CI electrons.
246: The qualitative explanation of this phenomena was given
247: by Ebisawa et al. (1996), hereafter ETC and later by Papathanassiou \& Psaltis (2001).
248: The exponential turnover is formed by a small fraction of those photons which undergo scatterings
249: near the horizon where the strong curvature of the photon trajectories prevent us from detecting most
250: them. In Figure 1 we indicate, with arrows the places in the CI atmosphere where photons
251: of a particular energy mainly come from.\footnote{Recently, Reig et al. (2001) show
252: that the extended power law can be also formed as a result of the bulk motion Comptonization
253: when the rotational component is dominant in the flow. The photons gain energy from the rotational motion
254: of the electrons.}
255:
256: A {precise} analysis of the X-ray photon distribution in CI atmosphere can be made through
257: calculation of the source function, either by semi-analytical methods solving
258: the relativistic kinetic equation (RKE) (TZ98) or by Monte Carlo simulations (LT99).
259: TZ98 calculate the photon kinetics in the lab frame demonstrating that the source function has a strong peak near the photon bending
260: radius, $1.5r_s$ (Fig. 3 there).
261: %This peak is formed as a result of the combination of competing effects:
262: %the Doppler effect which is getting stronger with approach
263: %to the horizon, and the photon bending effect which acts to prevent photon escape.
264: In Figure 2 we show the Monte Carlo simulated source functions for four energy bands:
265: 2-5 keV (curve a), 5-13 keV (curve b), 19-29 keV (curve c) and 60-150 keV (curve d).
266: The peak at around $(1.5-2)r_{\rm S}$ is clearly seen
267: for the second and the third bands which is in a good agreement with TZ98's source function.
268: \footnote{TZ98 implemented the method of separation of variables to solve the RKE Green's function.
269: They then showed that the source function of the upscattered photons is distributed according to
270: the first eigenfunction of the RKE space operator defined by equations (21-24) in TZ98.}
271:
272: TZ98 calculated the upscattering part of spectrum neglecting the recoil effect.
273: Our Monte Carlo simulations, not limited by TZ98's approximation, reproduce
274: the source function spatial distribution for high energy bands (curve {\it d} in Figure 2).
275: We confirm that the density of the highest energy X-ray photons is concentrated
276: near the black hole horizon.
277: %The distribution has a maximum in the immediate vicinity of $r_{\rm S}$.
278: Comparison of TZ98's semi-analytical calculations and our Monte-Carlo simulations leads us to conclude
279: that the source function really follows the RKE first eigenfunction distribution
280: until very high energies. At that point the upscattering photon spatial distribution also becomes a function of energy.
281: %Thus the method of the separation of variables is not applicable for the whole energy range
282: %but it gives a correct result for the extended power law part of the spectrum for which the recoil effect
283: %can be neglected.
284: %It is worth noting that the upscattered photon source function for thermal Comptonization in
285: %an axisymmetric cloud has a maximum at the center of the cloud
286: %(see Sunyaev Titarchuk 1980; hereafter ST80 and Titarchuk 1994) but in our case, with the velocity increase
287: %towards the horizon, the maximum tends to be near the horizon, i.e. between $r_{\rm S}$ and $2~r_{\rm S}$.
288: As seen from Figure 2
289: the source function in the soft energy band (curve {\it a}) has two maxima:
290: one is at 2.2 $r_{\rm S}$ related to the photon
291: bending radius and another (wide one) is at 5 $r_{\rm S}$ affected by the disk emission area.
292: %The first peak consists of the soft photons which at first gain (due to Doppler effect) and then lose
293: %their energy (due to the recoil effect) being scattered near the photon bending radius.
294: %The second peak is a result of the photon emission and scattering in
295: %the immediate disk vicinity.
296:
297: \section{An Illumination Effect of CI Atmosphere and High Frequency QPO Phenomena}
298:
299: We {remind} the reader that the emergent spectrum is a result of integration of the product of
300: the photon escape probability and the source function distribution along a line of sight
301: (e.g. Chandrasekhar 1960).
302: The normalization of the upscattering spectrum is determined by the fraction of the soft (disk)
303: photons which illuminate the inner region of the CI atmosphere below $3r_{\rm S}$, i.e.
304: around the maximum of the upscattered photon source function.
305: From the Monte Carlo simulations we extract the fraction of the soft photons emitted
306: at some particular disk radius $r$ which form the high energy part of spectrum
307: (for $E>10$ keV). This distribution is presented in the upper panel of Figure 3.
308: As seen from this plot, the strength of the high energy tail is mostly determined by the photons
309: emitted at the inner edge of the disk. Thus any perturbation in the disk should be immediately translated
310: to the oscillation of the hard tail with a frequency related to the inner disk edge.
311: The CI atmosphere manifests the high frequencies QPO of the innermost part of the disk.
312: In the lower panel of Figure 3 we present the power density spectrum for the simulated X-ray emission coming
313: from CI atmosphere in the energies higher than 10 keV. We assume that the PDS is a sum of
314: the red noise component (where the power law index equals to 1) and QPOs power proportional
315: to the illumination factor for a given disk radius, $r$ (see the upper panel).
316: We also assume that the perturbation frequency at $r$ is related to the Keplerian frequency
317: $\nu_{\rm K}=2.2(3r_{\rm s}/r)^{1.5}/m$ kHz.
318:
319: There is a striking similarity between the high frequency QPO and spectral energy distribution
320: of the Monte Carlo results
321: and real observations of BHC in their soft-high state. For example,
322: in XTE J1550-564 the $\sim 200-$Hz QPO phenomenon tends to be detected in the high state at times
323: when the bolometric luminosity surges and the hard-power-law spectral component is prominent
324: (TS02). The noted lack of coherence between intensity variations of the
325: high-soft-state low energy bands is also in a good agreement with the our simulations where
326: the high energy tail intensity {\it correlates} with the supply of the soft photons
327: from the inner disk edge but {\it it does not correlate} with the production of the disk photons at large.
328:
329: \section{Positive and Negative Time Lags}
330: Additional important information related to the X-ray spectral-energy
331: distribution can be extracted from the time lags between different energy
332: bands. The hard and soft lags have been observed for several sources (e.g. Reig et al. 2000, hereafter
333: R00: Tomsick \& Kaaret 2000 for GRS 1915+105 and Wijnands et al. 1999, Remillard et al. 2001 for
334: XTE J1550-564).
335: %In addition, there have been suggestions of separate harmonic components
336: %of given feature having lags of the opposite
337: %signs [e.g. Tomsick \& Kaaret (2000) studied the QPO properties of
338: %GRS 1915+105 where both negative (soft) phase lags and positive
339: %(hard) lags were detected].
340: It is natural to expect the
341: positive time lags in the case of the unsaturated thermal Comptonization.
342: The primary soft photons gain energy
343: in process of scattering off hot electrons; thus the hard photons spend more
344: time in the cloud than the soft ones.
345: Nobili at al. (2000)
346: first suggested that in a corona with a temperature stratification (a hot core and a relatively
347: cold outer part) the thermal Comptonization can account for the positive and
348: negative time lags as well as the observed colors (see R00).\footnote {This Comptonization model with a hot core (for the similar models,
349: see also Skibo \& Dermer 1995 and Lehr et al. 2000) may reproduce
350: the intrinsic spectral and timing properties of the converging inflow.}
351: %In the case of the bulk-motion Comptonization, {\it both negative and positive time lags are
352: %anticipated} and the negative lags are associated with a soft energy spectrum,
353: %whereas the positive lags are seen when the spectrum is harder (compare with GRS 1915+105
354: %observations by Reig et al. 2000).
355:
356: %In the thermal Comptonization case, the primary soft photons gain energy
357: %in process of scattering off hot electrons; thus the hard photons spend more
358: %time in the cloud than the soft ones. There is then an one-to-one
359: %correspondence between the photon energy and the photon travel time in the cloud.
360: In the bulk-motion Comptonization case, the soft disk
361: photons at first gain energy in the deep layers of the converging inflow,
362: and then in their subsequent path towards the observer lose
363: energy in the relatively cold outer layers. If the overall optical
364: depth of the converging inflow atmosphere (or the mass accretion rate) is
365: near unity, we would detect only the positive lags as in the thermal
366: Comptonization case, because relatively few photons would lose energy in
367: escaping. But with an increase of the
368: optical depth, the soft lags appear because more hard photons lose their
369: energy in the cold outer layers.
370: %There is a piling up effect at low
371: %energies due to the recoil effect (see Sunyaev \& Titarchuk 1980; hereafter ST80).
372: %A significant portion of the low-energy photon distribution,
373: %particularly at energies of order 2-5~keV, results from this
374: %piling up effect. The low-energy photons spend more time in the matter
375: %than the higher-energy photons because they undergo additional scatterings
376: %off the CI cold electrons.
377:
378: %In fact, for unsaturated Comptonization the spectral formation
379: %is mostly due to the Doppler effect but in the saturated case the spectrum is
380: %equally determined by recoil and Doppler effects (see e.g. ST80 and figures of
381: %spectra there).
382: % For thermal Comptonization
383: %the relative change of energy $\Delta E/E=(4kT_e-E)/m_ec^2$. In the
384: %unsaturated case, the photon energy E, on average, is less than $4kT_e$ and thus most of
385: %the photons gain energy and the soft photons are led by the hard ones and thus the hard
386: %lags occur due to Comptonization. But in the saturated case when the Comptonization
387: %parameter is very high, i.e. when $4kT_e/m_ec^2\tau^2>1$,
388: %a significant fraction of the hard photons lose energy trying to
389: %thermalize to the average electron energy, $ kT_e$. In this case there is a distribution of
390: %soft and hard lags as a result of Comptonization. Some of hard photons are
391: %followed by the soft ones.
392:
393: %A very similar situation is realized for Bulk motion Comptonization where
394: %the temperature of the electrons should be replaced by $m_e v_b^2/3$ [Titarchuk, Mastichiadis \&
395: %Kylafis (1997), appendix D). Because in the outer part of the converging inflow atmosphere
396: %$(r>5r_s)$ $m_e v_b^2/3=m_ec^2(r_S/r)/3$ is less than 30 keV
397: %photons with energies greater than 30 keV readily lose their energies. Consequently the hard
398: %photons can be followed by the photons with energies less than 30 keV.
399:
400: %Because the hard state is characterized by the thermal Comptonization
401: %spectra we expect the hard lags in the hard state and
402: %{\it we expect the soft lags in the high-soft states characterized by
403: %high values of the illumination factor $f$} (i.e. power-law dominated) (see BOR99,
404: %Shrader \& Titarchuk 1999). Hard lags would be more likely to occur in high-soft states with lower
405: %{\it f} values.
406:
407: In Figure 4 we present the calculations of the
408: of time lags for two energy bands 2-13 keV and 13-900 keV.
409: We first compute the time spent by the photon, drawn in a given direction,
410: to cross the whole system without being scattered.
411: Then, we compute the real time of flight of the photon, taking into account
412: its scattering and its complete trajectory in the system. The general relativistic
413: gravitational time dilatation was also taken into account in these computations.
414: The time lag is then determined as a difference between these two times.
415: In this time-lag definition, a photon which undergoes no scattering has a zero lag.
416: Thus the time lags between two energy bands can be defined a difference of these
417: two time lags, i.e. $\delta t =t_2-t_1$ where $t_1$ and $t_2$ are time lags
418: for 2-13-keV and 13-900-keV bands respectively.
419: The time lags for 2-13-keV band are distributed over the interval between 1 and 600
420: Schwarzschild times, $t_{\rm S}=r_{\rm S}/c$ and the time lags for 13-900-keV
421: band are distributed over the interval between 200 and $10^3$ ${t}_{\rm S}$.
422: %Hereafter, we use the time lag in units of ms instead of dimensionless units
423: %of $t/t_{\rm S}$.
424: For a ten solar mass BH $t_{\rm S}=0.1$ ms.
425: Thus, for $t_1<15$ ms all time lags $\delta t$ are positive, i.e. high energy photons
426: are produced later than the soft energies photons. The $t_2-$ distribution has a broad
427: peak at 30 ms and $t_1-$ distribution has a broad peak at 8 ms.
428: Consequently, the positive lags $\delta t$ are mostly higher than 20 ms.
429: which is in a good agreement with the time lags detection in GRS 1915+105 (R00).
430: The values of the positive time lags for this source are consistent with the BH
431: mass being around 20 solar masses (see BOR99 for the BH mass determination in GRS 1915+105).
432: We show that the absolute value of the
433: time (phase) lags get higher with the energy. In fact, Wijnands et al. (1999)
434: for XTE J1550-564 (see also Remillard et al. 2001) and Tomsick \& Kaaret (2000)
435: for GRS 1915+105 show that the phase lags of both signs
436: increase from 0 to 0.5 radians as the photon energy varies from 3 keV to 100 keV.
437: These phase lag changes correspond to the time lag changes from 0 to 15 ms and from 0 to
438: 50 ms for XTE J1550-564 and GRS 1915+105 respectively.
439: These values are very close to what we obtain in our simulations.
440:
441: For $t_1>15$ ms we get the time lags of both signs. Positive values of $\delta t$
442: should be of order 30 ms and higher. Negative values should not be higher than 20 ms
443: for a 10 solar mass BH.
444: %At the moment the empirical picture is not entirely clear, but
445: %it seems to be at least consistent with the CI picture.
446: %Reig et al. (2000) have examined data for GRS~1915+105 and find that
447: %the negative lags are associated with soft spectra.
448: %For XTE~J1550-564, Wijnands, et al. (1999) and Remillard et al. (2001) find both
449: %hard and soft lags associated with the $\sim 10$~Hz QPO. Based on TS02's
450: %analysis, each of these observations corresponds to high-soft spectral
451: %states, but with relatively high (0.2$-$0.6) {\it f} values.
452: Our simulations demonstrate that for high accretion
453: rates time lags of both signs are present, i.e. the upscattering and down-scattering are
454: equally important in the formation of CI spectrum, whereas for the low mass accretion rates
455: the upscattering process leads to the CI spectral formation and only the positive times lags are
456: present.
457: %These results confirm Reig's et al. and TS02's suggestions that the phenomena
458: %of the presense of the time lags of both signs can be explained in terms of the Comptonization
459: %model.
460: %Finally, we present additional arguments for interpretation of the observed time lags
461: %by using the BMC model.
462: %The typical observed values of the positive $\delta t$ are
463: %between 30 and 60 ms (R00 ) and
464: Our simulations are in a good agreement with the R00's values of $\delta=30-60$ ms.
465: The results for the simulated time lags can be understood using the simple
466: upscattering model (see ETC). We assume that
467: at any scattering event the relative mean energy change is constant, $\eta$, i.e.
468: $\eta=<\delta E>/E$. The number of scatterings $k$ which are needed for the soft photon of energy
469: $E_0$ to gain energy E is $k(E)=\ln(E/E_0)/\ln(1+\eta)$.
470: Then $\delta t= k\times l(1-r_{\rm S}/r)^{-1}/c$
471: where $l$ is the photon mean free path, $l=[b(E)\sigma_{\rm T}n]^{-1}$, $(1-r_{\rm S}/r)$ is
472: the relativistic dilatation factor (e.g. Landau \& Lifshitz 1971)
473: and $b(E)$ is an energy dependent factor less than unity (e.g. Pozdnyakov et al, 1983).
474: The free path $l$ is estimated as $l\sim 2(r/r_{\rm S})^{1.5}r_{\rm S}/b(E)\dot m$ with an assumption that
475: the number density $n$ is calculated for the free fall distribution, (see LT99, Eq. 2).
476: With $r/r_{\rm S}\approx 1.18$ (see Fig. 2, curve {\it d}), $\dot m=4$ and $b\approx0.5$ for $E=100$ keV
477: we get $l\approx 1.2 r_{\rm S}$.
478: $b(E)\approx 1$ for $E=10$ keV and $r/r_{\rm S}\gtorder 2$ and consequently
479: $l\gtorder 1.5 r_{\rm S}$.\footnote{It is worth noting that the emergent high energy photon gains its energy being
480: predominantly close to horizon, $r=(1-2)r_{\rm S}$ where the photon trajectory are close to
481: circular (e.g. TZ98). Thus our estimated values of the free path $l\sim (1-1.5) r_{\rm S}$ are consistent
482: with the trajectory length. With $\eta=0.1$ extracted from our simulations for $E<100$ keV
483: where the extended power law is seen in the spectrum (see also Papathanassiou \& Psaltis 2001, Fig. 3)
484: the time lags are $\delta t= 7.6$ ms and $50$ ms for $E=10$ keV and $100$ keV respectively.}
485: %These estimates are consistent with the time lags produced in the Monte Carlo simulations.
486:
487: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
488:
489: Using Monte Carlo simulations we have presented a detailed timing analysis
490: of the X-ray radiation from a CI atmosphere.
491: (1) We confirm TZ98's results that the high energy photons are produced predominantly in
492: the deep layers of the CI atmosphere from 1 to 2 Schwarzchild radii.
493: (2) We also confirm that the $~$ 100-Hz phenomena should be seen in the high energy tail of the spectrum
494: rather than in the soft spectral component because the inner part of the converging inflow
495: is mostly fed by soft
496: photons from the innermost part of the disk but the contribution of this disk area to the disk emission is
497: small.
498: (3) We find that the characteristic time lags in the converging inflow are order of a few tens of ms
499: at 10 keV and the hard (positive) time lags increase logarithmically with energy.
500: (4) We demonstrate that soft (negative) along with hard (positive) lags are present
501: in the X-ray emission from the converging inflow for the mass accretion higher than
502: Eddington. %Whereas, for low mass flux the hard lags are only present.
503: %These results of the Monte Carlo
504: %simulations are consistent with the time lag measurements in BHC sources (e.g. R00).
505: %Furthermore, we confirm Reig's et al. conclusion deduced from the values of the measured time lags of order
506: %10 ms that the Comptonizing region is compact (i.e. a few times of Schwarzchild radii).
507: In the end we can also conclude that that almost all of the X-ray timing and spectral properties
508: of the high-soft state in BHs tends to indicate that {\it the high energy tail of spectrum
509: is produced within the CI region, $(1-3)\times r_{\rm S}$
510: where the bulk inflow (gravitational attraction) is a dominant process}.
511:
512: We acknowledge the fruitful discussions with Chris Shrader and Paul Ray.
513: We also acknowledge the useful suggestions and the valuable corrections by the referee
514: which improve the paper presentation.
515:
516: \begin{thebibliography}{}
517:
518: %\bibitem[Barret \& Grindlay(1995)]{BG}
519: %Barret, D., \& Grindlay, J.E. 1995, ApJ, 440, 841
520: \bibitem[Borozdin et al. (1999)]{BOR99}
521: Borozdin, K., Revnivtsev, M., Trudolyubov, S., Shrader, C. \& Titarchuk, L. 1999,
522: ApJ, 517, 367 (BOR99)
523:
524: \bibitem[Chakrabarti \& Titarchuk (1995)]{CT95}
525: Chakrabarti, S.K., \& Titarchuk, L. G. 1995, ApJ, 455, 623
526:
527: \bibitem[Chadrasekhar (1960)]{chandra}
528: Chandrasekhar, S. 1960, {\it Radiative Transfer}, New York: Dover
529:
530: \bibitem[ Cui et al. (2000)]{cui}
531: Cui, W., Zhang, S.N. \& Chen, W. 2000, ApJ, 531, L45
532:
533: \bibitem[ Di Salvo et al. (2000)]{di}
534: Di Salvo, T., et al. 2000, ApJ, 544, L119
535:
536: \bibitem[Ebisawa et al. (1996)]{EB96}
537: Ebisawa, K., Titarchuk, L. \& Chakrabarti, S.K. 1996, PASJ , 48, 59 (ETC)
538:
539: %\bibitem[ Heindl \& Smith (1998)]{hs}
540: %Heindl, M., \& Smith, D.M. 1998, ApJ, 506, L35
541: \bibitem[Iaria et al. (2001)]{ia}
542: Iaria, R., Burderi, L., Di Salvo, T., La Barbera, A. \& Robba, N.R. 2001, ApJ, 547, 412
543:
544: \bibitem[Landau \& Lifshitz (1971)]{LL}
545: Landau, L.D. \& Lifshitz, E.M. 1971, {\it The Classical Theory of Fields }, New York: Pergamon Press
546:
547: \bibitem[ Laurent \& Titarchuk(1999)]{LT99}
548: Laurent, P., \& Titarchuk, L. 1999, ApJ, 511, 289 (LT99)
549:
550: \bibitem[Lehr et al. (2000)]{leh}
551: Lehr, D.E., Wagoner, R.V. \& Wilms, J. 2000, astro-ph/0004211
552:
553: %\bibitem[ Liang (1998)]{L98}
554: %Liang, E. P. 1998, Phys. Rep., 302, 66
555:
556: \bibitem[ Nobili et al. (2000)]{nob}
557: Nobili, L., Turrola, R., Zampieri, L., \& Belloni, T. 2000, ApJ, 538, L137
558:
559: \bibitem[ Nowak et al. (2000)]{Now}
560: Nowak, M.A., Wilms, J., Heindl, W.A. Pottschmidt, K., Dove, J.B. \& Begelman, M.C.
561: 2001, MNRAS, 320, 316
562:
563: \bibitem[Papathanassiou \& Psaltis (2001)]{PP01}
564: Papathanassiou, H. \& Psaltis, D. 2001, MNRAS, in press, astro-ph/0011447
565:
566: \bibitem[Pozdnyakov et al (1983)]{POZ83}
567: Pozdnyakov, L.A., Sobol', I.M. \& Sunyaev R.A. 1983, Astrophys. Space. Phys. Rev., 9, 1
568:
569: \bibitem[Rees (1997)]{re}
570: Rees, M. 1997, Phys. Scr., 17, 193
571:
572: \bibitem[Reig et al. (2001)]{rei}
573: Reig, P., Kylafis, N.D. \& Spruit, E.C. 2001, A\&A, 375, 155
574:
575: \bibitem[Reig et al. (2000)]{rei}
576: Reig, P., Belloni, T., van der Klis, M., Mendez, M., Kylafis, N.D. \& Ford, E.C.
577: 2000, ApJ, 541, 883 (R00)
578:
579: \bibitem[Remillard, et al. (2001)]{2001}
580: Remillard, R. A., Sobzchak, G. J., Muno, M.P., \& McClintock J.E. 2001, ApJ, in press
581: astro-ph/0105508
582:
583: \bibitem[Skibo \& Dermer (1995)]{sd95}
584: Skibo, J.G., \& Dermer, C.D. 1995, ApJ, 455, L27
585:
586: %\bibitem[Shakura \& Sunyaev (1973)]{ss73}
587: %Shakura, N.I., \& Sunyaev, R.A. 1973, A\&A, 24, 337
588:
589: %\bibitem[Shrader \& Titarchuk (1999)]{ST99}
590: %Shrader, C.R., \& Titarchuk, L. G. 1999, ApJ, 521, L121
591:
592: \bibitem[Shrader \& Titarchuk (1998)]{ST98}
593: Shrader, C.R., \& Titarchuk, L. G. 1998, ApJ, 499, L31
594:
595: \bibitem[Strickman \& Barret (1999)]{SB99}
596: Strickman, M., \& Barret, D. 1999, in proceedings of the fifth Compton Symposium
597: (eds. M.L. McConnel \& J.M. Ryan) p. 222
598:
599: %\bibitem[Sunyaev \& Titarchuk (1980)]{sun80} Sunyaev, R. \&
600: %Titarchuk, L., 1980, A \& A, 86, 121
601:
602: %\bibitem[Titarchuk (1994)]{tit}
603: %Titarchuk, L., 1994, ApJ, 434, 570
604:
605: \bibitem[Titarchuk, \& Shrader (2002)]{TS02}
606: Titarchuk, L., \& Shrader, C. 2002, ApJ, in press
607:
608: \bibitem[Titarchuk, et al. (1997)]{TZ98}
609: Titarchuk, L., Mastichiadis, A., \& Kylafis, N.D. 1997, ApJ, 487, 834
610:
611: \bibitem[Titarchuk, \& Zannias (1998)]{TZ98}
612: Titarchuk, L., \& Zannias, T. 1998, ApJ, 493, 863 (TZ98)
613:
614: \bibitem[Tomsick, \& Kaaret (2000)]{TK}
615: Tomsick, J. A., \& Kaaret, P. 2000, ApJ, 548, 401
616:
617: %\bibitem[Titarchuk, Lapidus \& Muslimov (1998)]{TLM98}
618: %Titarchuk, L., Lapidus, I.,\& Muslimov, A. 1998, \apj, 499, 315
619: %(TLM98)
620:
621: \bibitem[Wijnands wt al. (1999)]{whv}
622: Wijnands, A.D., Homan, J. \& van der Klis, M. 1999, ApJ, 526, L33
623:
624:
625: \end{thebibliography}
626:
627:
628: \clearpage
629:
630:
631: \begin{figure}
632: \epsscale{0.7}
633: \plotone{f1.eps}
634: \caption{Monte Carlo simulated emergent spectrum of Converging Inflow.
635: Mass accretion rate in Eddington units, $\dot m=4$, electron temperature
636: of the flow $kT_e={5}$ keV. }
637: \label{fig1}
638: \end{figure}
639:
640: \begin{figure}
641: \epsscale{0.7}
642: \plotone{f2.eps}
643: \caption{ Source photon spatial distribution in the converging inflow atmosphere for different energy bands:
644: {\it a} is for (2-5) keV, {\it b} is for (5-13) keV, {\it c} is for (19-29) keV and
645: {\it d} is for (60-150) keV. }
646: \label{fig2}
647: \end{figure}
648:
649: \begin{figure}
650: \epsscale{0.7}
651: \plotone{f3.eps}
652: \caption{ Distribution of soft photons over disk radius which upscatter to energies 10 keV and higher
653: in CI atmosphere (upper panel). Power density spectrum for photon energies higher than 10 keV
654: (lower panel). It is assumed that any disk annulus oscillates with Keplerian frequency. The continuum
655: is a red noise.}
656: \label{fig3}
657: \end{figure}
658:
659:
660: \begin{figure}
661: \epsscale{0.7}
662: \plotone{f4.eps}
663: \caption{ Time lag distributions for two {energy bands}. One can clearly see the area
664: between 150 and 600 $r_{\rm S}/c $ where time lags of both signs can be present. }
665: \label{fig4}
666: \end{figure}
667:
668: \clearpage
669:
670: \end{document}
671: