1:
2: %\newcommand{\version} {October 24th, 2001}
3:
4: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
5:
6: \newcommand{\PG} {PG 1115$+$166}
7: \newcommand{\logg} {\log g}
8: \newcommand{\Te} {T_{\rm eff}}
9: \newcommand{\mv} {$M_V$}
10: \newcommand{\msun} {$M_\odot$}
11: \newcommand\gta{\lower 0.5ex\hbox{$\buildrel > \over \sim\ $}} %greater than about
12: \newcommand\lta{\lower 0.5ex\hbox{$\buildrel < \over \sim\ $}} %less than about
13: \newcommand{\nhe} {N({\rm He})/N({\rm H})}
14: %
15: \shortauthors{Bergeron et al.}
16: \shorttitle{Analysis of the DAB White Dwarf \PG}
17: %
18: \begin{document}
19:
20: %\title{\version}
21:
22: \title{Spectroscopic Analysis of the DAB White Dwarf \PG:\\
23: An Unresolved DA + DB Degenerate Binary}
24:
25: \author{P. Bergeron}
26: \affil{D\'epartement de Physique, Universit\'e de Montr\'eal, C.P.~6128,
27: Succ.~Centre-Ville,
28: Montr\'eal, Qu\'ebec, Canada, H3C 3J7.}
29: \email{bergeron@astro.umontreal.ca}
30: \and
31: \author{James Liebert}
32: \affil{Steward Observatory}
33: \affil{University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721}
34: \email{liebert@as.arizona.edu}
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37:
38: A spectroscopic analysis of the DAB white dwarf \PG\ is presented. The
39: observed hydrogen and helium line profiles are shown to be
40: incompatible with model spectra calculated under the assumption of
41: homogeneous or stratified chemical compositions. In contrast, an
42: excellent fit to the optical spectrum of \PG\ can be achieved if the
43: object is interpreted as an unresolved double degenerate composed of a
44: hydrogen-line DA star and a helium-line DB star. The atmospheric
45: parameters obtained from the best fit are $\Te=22,090$~K and
46: $\logg=8.12$ for the DA star, $\Te=16,210$~K and $\logg=8.19$ for the
47: DB star. This binary interpretation is consistent with the results
48: recently reported by Burleigh et al. that \PG\ also exhibits radial
49: velocity variations. The implications of this discovery with respect
50: to the DAB spectral class are discussed.
51:
52: \end{abstract}
53:
54: \keywords{stars: binaries, stars: individual (\PG), white dwarfs}
55:
56: \section{Introduction}
57:
58: DAB stars are white dwarfs whose optical spectra are characterized by
59: the simultaneous presence of strong hydrogen Balmer lines together
60: with weaker neutral helium lines. To date, only a handful of these
61: objects are known \citep[see][and references therein]{burleigh}. DAB
62: stars are particularly important objects as they are likely to provide
63: the key to understanding the nature of the so-called ``DB gap'', a
64: range in effective temperature between $\Te\sim30,000$ and 45,000~K
65: where no helium atmosphere white dwarf (DO or DB stars) has ever
66: been identified \citep{liebert86}; the coolest DO star PG 1133$+$489 has an estimated
67: temperature of $\Te=46,000$~K
68: \citep{DW97}, while the hottest DB star PG 0112$+$104 is below
69: $\Te=31,500$~K \citep{beauchamp99}. The most widely accepted
70: explanation for the presence of this gap is the existence of competing
71: mechanisms that are affecting the atmospheric composition of white
72: dwarfs as they evolve along the cooling sequence \citep[see,
73: e.g.,][]{FW97}. Hence it is believed that residual hydrogen present in
74: the envelope of hot DO white dwarfs slowly diffuses towards the
75: surface, building an atmosphere that is gradually enriched with
76: hydrogen. By the time cooling DO stars have reached $\Te\sim45,000$~K,
77: they would all bear the signature of a hydrogen-rich atmosphere, a DA
78: star. Such DA stars should have a thin hydrogen atmosphere in
79: diffusive equilibrium on top of the helium envelope. At the red edge
80: of the DB gap, convective dilution of this thin hydrogen atmosphere
81: with the underlying convective helium envelope is then believed to
82: turn $\sim20$\% of all DA stars near $\Te\sim30,000$~K into DB white
83: dwarfs. The identification of white dwarfs with hybrid spectra in
84: these particular ranges of effective temperature has always been of
85: significant interest since they may represent objects transitioning
86: from one spectral type to another.
87:
88: Recently, \citet{burleigh} have reported the discovery of a new DAB
89: white dwarf, \PG, as part of a survey aimed at identifying helium-rich
90: objects crossing the DB gap. The authors have examined hot white
91: dwarfs that went undetected by the ROSAT and EUVE surveys of the
92: extreme ultraviolet sky. Effective temperatures and surface gravities
93: for the objects in their sample had been supplied by us as part of
94: another project aimed at redetermining the luminosity function of DA
95: stars using $\Te$ and $\logg$ values obtained from detailed fits to
96: the hydrogen lines \citep[see, e.g.,][]{BSL}. As such, the DAB nature
97: of \PG\ was already known to us back in 1996 from our own
98: spectroscopic observations of the PG sample. The optical spectrum of
99: \PG\ had also been thoroughly analyzed using model atmospheres with
100: homogeneous and stratified helium/hydrogen compositions. In this
101: paper, we report the results of our findings. Interestingly enough, we
102: show that the conclusions of \citet{burleigh} that \PG\ is probably a
103: double degenerate binary composed a DA and a DB star is confirmed by
104: our detailed analysis.
105:
106: We first present our spectroscopic observations and model atmosphere
107: calculations in \S\S\ 1 and 2, respectively. The optical spectrum is
108: then analyzed in detail in \S\ 3 using using homogeneous,
109: stratified, and composite model atmospheres. Our discussion of the
110: results follows in \S\ 4.
111:
112: \section{Spectroscopic Observations}
113:
114: Optical spectroscopy for \PG\ has been obtained on 1996 May 20 using
115: the Steward Observatory 2.3-m reflector telescope equipped with the
116: Boller \& Chivens spectrograph and a Loral CCD detector. The 4.5
117: arcsec slit together with the 600 l/mm grating in first order provided
118: a spectral coverage of $\lambda\lambda$3200--5300 at an intermediate
119: resolution of $\sim 6$~\AA\ FWHM.
120:
121: Our optical spectrum for \PG\ is compared in Figure
122: \ref{fg:f1} with those of MCT 0453$-$2933 and MCT 0128$-$3846
123: taken from \citet{wes94}. There is an obvious similarity between all
124: three objects. The HeI $\lambda\lambda$4026 and 4471 absorption lines
125: can be seen in all three spectra with about equal shape and
126: strength. Weaker HeI features at $\lambda\lambda$4713, 4921,
127: and 5015 are also observed in \PG\ and MCT 0453$-$2933; these lines
128: are much weaker but nevertheless present in the spectrum of MCT
129: 0128$-$3846. The two MCT objects have been analyzed by \citet{wes94}
130: and shown to be unresolved, composite systems consisting of a DA white
131: dwarf together with a DB or DBA star.
132:
133: \section{Model Atmospheres and Synthetic Spectra}
134:
135: The mixed hydrogen and helium model atmospheres and synthetic spectra
136: used in this analysis are described in \citet{dao94}. These are
137: calculated assuming either a homogeneous or a stratified chemical H/He
138: composition. The homogeneous model atmospheres are similar to those
139: described in \citet{wes80}, while the stratified configurations have
140: been calculated using the formalism discussed at length in
141: \citet{jordan86} and \citet{vennes92}. The
142: homogeneous model grid covers a range of
143: $\Te=20,000~(5000)~100,000$~K, $\logg=6.5~(0.5)~8.5$, and
144: $\log\nhe=-5.0~(1.0)~0.0$ (where the numbers in parentheses indicate
145: the step value), as well as pure hydrogen models. Stratified models have
146: been calculated for the same range of effective temperature and
147: surface gravity, with $\log q_{\rm H}\equiv \log M_{\rm
148: H}/M_{\star}=-17.0~(0.5)-15.0$ at $\logg=8.0$. As discussed in
149: \citet{dao94}, the particular range of $\log q_{\rm H}$ used varies with
150: $\logg$ as to yield synthetic spectra that look relatively similar
151: with respect to the strength of the helium lines in the $\logg$ --
152: $\log q_{\rm H}$ plane.
153:
154: The synthetic spectra for the mixed H/He models have been calculated
155: following \citet[][see also \citealt{BSL,bergeron93}]{bergeron91}, where
156: the treatment of the hydrogen line profiles is described at length.
157: The HeI lines have been treated as Voigt profiles with the Stark
158: broadening parameters listed in \citet{dao94}.
159:
160: Our grid of model atmospheres and synthetic spectra for DB stars is
161: described in \citet{beauchamp96}. These include the improved Stark
162: profiles of neutral helium of \citet{beauchamp97}. The model
163: atmospheres used here assume a pure helium composition and cover a
164: range of $\Te=10,000~(1000)~16,000~(2000)~30,000$~K and
165: $\logg=7.0~(0.5)~9.0$.
166:
167: \section{Model Atmosphere Analysis}
168:
169: Our fitting technique relies on the nonlinear least-squares method of
170: Levenberg-Marquardt \citep{press86}, which is based on a steepest
171: descent method. The model spectra (convolved with a Gaussian
172: instrumental profile) and the optical spectrum of \PG\ are first
173: normalized to a continuum set to unity. The calculation of $\chi ^2$
174: is then carried out in terms of these normalized line profiles
175: only. All atmospheric parameters -- $\Te$, $\logg$, $\nhe$ or $\log
176: q_{\rm H}$ -- are considered free parameters. When fitting DA + DB
177: model spectra, the total flux of the system is obtained from the sum
178: of the monochromatic Eddington fluxes of the individual components,
179: weighted by their respective radius. Those radii are obtained from
180: the thin and thick hydrogen envelope evolutionary models with
181: carbon/oxygen cores described in \citet{BLR}.
182:
183: Our best fits to the optical spectrum of \PG\ using homogeneous,
184: stratified, and composite DA+DB models are shown in Figure
185: \ref{fg:f2}. The solution using homogeneous models, $\Te=32,000$~K,
186: $\logg=7.95$, and $\log \nhe=-1.44$, is in excellent agreement with
187: that obtained by \citet{burleigh}, $\Te=33,000$~K and $\log \nhe=-1.5$
188: (their value of $\logg$ is not given). The problem mentioned by these
189: authors with the HeII $\lambda$4686 predicted by their models is not
190: observed here, however, even though this particular line is included
191: in our model calculations. The fits to the hydrogen Balmer lines are
192: qualitatively similar between the homogeneous and stratified models:
193: the low Balmer lines (H$\beta$ to H$\delta$) are predicted too strong
194: while the higher members are too weak. The homogeneous model yields a
195: satisfactory fit for the HeI lines $\lambda\lambda$4026, 4713, and
196: 5015, but a poor fit to the remaining helium lines. The fit with the
197: stratified model is considerably worse.
198:
199: On the other hand, the DA+DB solution provides an excellent fit to the
200: Balmer and neutral helium lines simultaneously. All observed features
201: are reproduced in detail and this is clearly the only viable solution
202: for \PG. The effective temperatures determined for both the DA and the
203: DB components are significantly lower than the values achieved under
204: the assumption of a single object with a homogeneous or stratified
205: composition. This is a direct consequence of the hydrogen lines being
206: diluted by the continuum flux of the DB star (see below); the Balmer lines
207: are weakened, and the effective temperature of the model needs to be
208: increased to match the observed line profiles.
209:
210: The surface gravities of both components of the system are almost
211: identical, $\logg\sim 8.15$, which corresponds to a mass of $\sim0.7$
212: \msun\ using the evolutionary models described above. The white dwarf
213: cooling ages inferred for the DA and DB stars are respectively
214: $6.0\times10^7$ and $2.2\times10^8$ years. Since both stars have
215: roughly the same radius, the contribution of each component to the
216: total luminosity is only a function of the effective
217: temperature. Since the DB star is significantly cooler than the DA
218: component, the former will contribute less to the combined luminosity
219: of the system. This is illustrated more quantitatively in Figure
220: \ref{fg:f3} where the contribution of each component to the total
221: flux is depicted. Also shown is the multichannel $ugvr$ photometry
222: taken from \citet[][$v=15.14$, $u-v=0.15$, $g-v=-0.14$,
223: $g-r=-0.51$]{green86}, which is in good agreement with our adopted
224: solution, with the exception of the $u$ magnitude; multichannel $u$
225: magnitudes were sometimes compromised by the atmospheric dispersion,
226: the finite size of the entrance aperture, and the drift of the target
227: away from the aperture center during the exposure. While the flux in
228: the ultraviolet is completely dominated by the DA component, there is
229: a more significant contribution of the DB star in the optical regions
230: of the energy distribution. In particular, the cores of the lower
231: Balmer lines are filled in by the continuum flux of the DB star,
232: resulting in the poor fits of the homogeneous and stratified solutions
233: displayed in Figure \ref{fg:f2} and discussed above.
234:
235: Finally, \citet{burleigh} have reported radial velocity variations in
236: \PG\ from H$\alpha$ measurements (see their Fig.~2), with possible HeI
237: $\lambda$6678 moving in anti-phase with the hydrogen line, in
238: agreement with a DA+DB interpretation. No orbital period has yet been
239: reported.
240:
241: \section{Discussion}
242:
243: Our analysis has shown conclusively that the simultaneous presence of
244: hydrogen and helium in the spectrum of \PG\ is a simple result of an
245: unresolved binary system composed of a DA white dwarf and a DB
246: star. Both components of the \PG\ system lie well below the cool edge
247: of the DB gap, and as such, this DAB ``system'' cannot contribute to
248: our understanding of the nature of the DB gap. Two other DAB stars,
249: MCT 0128$-$3846 and MCT 0453$-$2933 shown in Figure \ref{fg:f1}, are
250: similar DA + DB (or DBA) unresolved composite systems, rather than
251: single objects with mixed hydrogen and helium compositions.
252:
253: Additional DAB stars include HS 0209$+$0832, a $\Te\sim35,000$~K white
254: dwarf that has been recently observed with HST and analyzed by
255: \citet{wolff00}. The authors conclude that the hydrogen and helium lines,
256: as well as numerous metallic features, are all compatible with a
257: homogeneously mixed composition, and that the object is probably in the
258: process of accreting matter from the interstellar medium. If this is
259: the case, HS 0209$+$0832 is a transient phenomenon, and is not
260: connected to the DB gap either. Its temperature within the DB gap is
261: thus purely coincidental.
262:
263: The case of G104$-$27 reported by \citet{holberg90}, with a
264: temperature of $\Te=26,000$~K, is also peculiar. Their spectrum shows
265: a weak HeI $\lambda$4471 feature, and possible
266: $\lambda$5015. However, subsequent observations of this object,
267: including 7 independent spectra collected over the years by one of us
268: (PB), reveal a featureless spectrum near the $\lambda$4471
269: region. This particular spectroscopic feature may of course be
270: variable, as is the case for HS 0209$+$0832 \citep{edelmann}. Such
271: variations could be expected if G104$-$27 and HS 0209$-$0832 accrete
272: from an inhomogeneous interstellar medium, or if the distribution of
273: helium on the stellar surface is inhomogeneous, as discussed by
274: \citet{edelmann}.
275:
276: Finally, there is GD 323, the prototype of DAB
277: stars. \citet{liebert84} showed that the combined ultraviolet and
278: optical spectrophotometry of this star could not be reproduced with a
279: homogeneously mixed hydrogen and helium composition, and suggested
280: that a fit with a stratified composition be attempted. This idea was
281: explored more quantitatively by \citet{koester94} who confirmed that
282: the most promising explanation to account for the observed line
283: profiles was a stratified atmosphere. Their estimated temperature of
284: $\Te=28,750$~K places GD 323 just below the cool end of the empirical
285: DB gap. However, even their stratified solution does not reproduce the
286: optical spectrum very well, at least not at the level of our best fit
287: for \PG\ shown in Figure
288: \ref{fg:f1}, and inconsistent values of the hydrogen layer mass are
289: derived from the optical and ultraviolet spectra.
290:
291: All in all, there seems to be no such objects as ``DAB stars
292: transiting the DB gap'', as sought by \citet{burleigh}; we mention
293: also that no additional DAB spectrum has been identified in our PG
294: luminosity function sample. This is perhaps not surprising,
295: however. Indeed, if the scenario proposed to explain the DB gap is
296: correct, by definition we should not observe any helium-rich objects
297: crossing the DB gap. Stars with mixed hydrogen and helium compositions
298: must be searched either slightly above the hot end of the DB gap
299: ($\Te\
300: \gta45,000$~K) or slightly below the cool end ($\Te\
301: \lta30,000$~K). Interestingly enough, such stars have probably already
302: been identified. PG 1305$-$017 analyzed by
303: \citet{dao94}, with an estimated temperature of $\Te=44,400$~K, is the perfect
304: example of a hybrid white dwarf with strong hydrogen and helium lines
305: -- a DAO star in this case -- that can be successfully explained in
306: terms of a stratified chemical composition (see Fig.~8 of Bergeron et
307: al.). This object corresponds precisely to our expectation of a DO
308: star turning into a DA star near the hot end of the DB gap, i.e. a
309: thin hydrogen atmosphere in diffusive equilibrium on top of a helium
310: envelope. Similarly, at the cool end of the DB gap, the reappearance
311: of helium-rich atmosphere white dwarfs near 30,000~K is explained in
312: terms of the dilution of this thin hydrogen atmosphere with the more
313: massive underlying helium convection zone. It is clear that DA white
314: dwarfs caught in the process of being convectively diluted will have a
315: complex chemical stratification that will not be homogeneous nor
316: stratified. GD 323 with a temperature slightly below the cool edge of
317: the DB gap might be such an exotic object. Hence, objects that could
318: support the DO to DA and DA to DB transition scenarios do exist, but
319: they should not be looked for within the DB gap itself. This
320: interpretation is at least currently supported by observations.
321:
322: One possible scenario for the origin of Type Ia Supernovae is
323: the double degenerate model in which two white dwarfs with a total
324: mass exceeding the Chandrasekhar limit are assumed to coalesce
325: \citep{webbink84,iben84}. In order for the system to merge within a
326: Hubble time, however, the orbital period must be less than $\sim 10$
327: hours. Since the total mass of the \PG\ system ($M\sim1.4$ \msun) is
328: close to the Chandrasekhar limit, a precise measurement of its orbital
329: period would establish whether \PG\ represents a likely supernova
330: candidate.
331:
332: \acknowledgements This work was supported in part by the NSERC
333: Canada, by the Fund FCAR (Qu\'ebec), and by the NSF grant AST
334: 92-27961.
335:
336: \clearpage
337: \begin{thebibliography}{}
338:
339: \bibitem[Beauchamp et al.(1997)]{beauchamp97} Beauchamp, A., Wesemael, F.,
340: \& Bergeron, P. 1997, \apjs, 108, 559
341:
342: \bibitem[Beauchamp et al.(1999)]{beauchamp99} Beauchamp, A., Wesemael, F.,
343: Bergeron, P., Fontaine, G., Saffer, R. A., Liebert, J., \& Brassard, P.
344: 1999, \apj, 516, 887
345:
346: \bibitem[Beauchamp et al.(1996)]{beauchamp96} Beauchamp, A., Wesemael, F.,
347: Bergeron, P., Liebert, J., \& Saffer, R. A. 1996, in ASP
348: Conf. Ser. Vol. 96, Hydrogen-Deficient Stars, ed. S. Jeffery \&
349: U. Heber (San Francisco: ASP), 295
350:
351: \bibitem[Bergeron(1993)]{bergeron93} Bergeron, P. 1993, in White
352: Dwarfs: Advances in Observation and Theory, NATO ASI Series,
353: ed. M. A. Barstow (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 267
354:
355: \bibitem[Bergeron et al.(2001)]{BLR} Bergeron, P., Leggett, S. K., \& Ruiz, M. T.
356: 2001, \apjs, 133, 413
357:
358: \bibitem[Bergeron et al.(1992)]{BSL} Bergeron, P., Saffer, R. A., \&
359: Liebert, J. 1992, \apj, 394, 247
360:
361: \bibitem[Bergeron et al.(1991)]{bergeron91} Bergeron, P., Wesemael, F.,
362: \& Fontaine, G. 1991, \apj, 367, 253
363:
364: \bibitem[Bergeron et al.(1994)]{dao94} Bergeron, P., Wesemael, F., Beauchamp, A.,
365: Wood, M. A., Lamontagne, R., Fontaine, G., \& Liebert, J. 1994, \apj, 432, 305
366:
367: \bibitem[Burleigh et al.(2001)]{burleigh} Burleigh, M., Bannister, N.,
368: \& Barstow, M., 2001, in ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 226, 12th European Workshop
369: on White Dwarf Stars, eds. J. L. Provencal, H. L. Shipman,
370: J. MacDonald, \& S. Goodchild, 135
371:
372: \bibitem[Dreizler \& Werner(1997)]{DW97} Dreizler, S., \& Werner, K. 1997,
373: in White Dwarfs, Proc. 10th European Workshop on White Dwarfs, eds. J.
374: Isern, M. Hernanz, \& E. Garcia-Berro (Dordretch; Kluwer), 213
375:
376: \bibitem[Edelmann et al.(2001)]{edelmann} Edelmann, H., Heber, U.,
377: \& Napiwotzki, R., 2001, in ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 226, 12th European Workshop
378: on White Dwarf Stars, eds. J. L. Provencal, H. L. Shipman,
379: J. MacDonald, \& S. Goodchild, 143
380:
381: \bibitem[Fontaine \& Wesemael(1997)]{FW97} Fontaine, G., \& Wesemael, F.
382: 1987, in IAU Colloquium 95, The Second Conference on Faint Blue Stars,
383: eds. A.G.D. Philip, D.S. Hayes and J.~Liebert (Schenectady: L. Davis Press), 319
384:
385: \bibitem[Green et al.(1986)]{green86} Green, R. F., Schmidt, M., \&
386: Liebert, J. 1986, \apjs, 61, 305
387:
388: \bibitem[Holberg et al.(1990)]{holberg90} Holberg, J. B., Kidder, K. M.,
389: \& Wesemael, F. 1990, \apj, 365, L77
390:
391: \bibitem[Iben \& Tutukov(1984)]{iben84} Iben, I. Jr., \& Tutukov, A.V. 1984, \apjs,
392: 54, 335
393:
394: \bibitem[Jordan \& Koester(1986)]{jordan86} Jordan, S., \& Koester, D. 1986, \aap,
395: 65, 367
396:
397: \bibitem[Koester et al.(1994)]{koester94} Koester, D., Liebert, J., \&
398: Saffer, R. A. 1994, \apj, 422, 783
399:
400: \bibitem[Liebert et al.(1986)]{liebert86} Liebert, J., Wesemael, F., Hansen, C. J.,
401: Fontaine, G., Shipman, H. L., Sion, E. M., Winget, D. E., \& Green, R. F. 1986,
402: \apj, 309, 241
403:
404: \bibitem[Liebert et al.(1984)]{liebert84} Liebert, J., Wesemael, F., Sion,
405: E. M., \& Wegner 1984, \apj, 277, 692
406:
407: \bibitem[Press et al.(1986)]{press86} Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky,
408: S. A., \& Vetterling, W. T. 1986, Numerical Recipes (Cambridge:
409: Cambridge University Press)
410:
411: \bibitem[Vennes \& Fontaine(1992)]{vennes92} Vennes, S., \& Fontaine, G. 1992,
412: \apj, 401, 288
413:
414: \bibitem[Webbink(1984)]{webbink84} Webbink, R. F. 1984, \apj, 277, 355
415:
416: \bibitem[Wesemael et al.(1980)]{wes80} Wesemael, F., Auer, L. H., Van Horn,
417: H. M., \& Savedoff, M. P. 1980, \apjs, 43, 159
418:
419: \bibitem[Wesemael et al.(1994)]{wes94} Wesemael, F., Bergeron, P.,
420: Lamontagne, R., Fontaine, G., Beauchamp, A., Demers, S., Irwin, M. J.,
421: Holberg, J. B., Kepler, S. O., \& Vennes, S. 1994, \apj, 429, 369
422:
423: \bibitem[Wolff et al.(2000)]{wolff00} Wolff, B., Jordan, S.,
424: Koester, D., \& Reimers, D. 2000, \aap, 361, 629
425:
426: \end{thebibliography}
427:
428: \clearpage
429: \figcaption[f1.ps] {Comparison of our optical spectrum of the DAB
430: star \PG\ with those of MCT 0453$-$2933 and MCT 0128$-$3846,
431: two additional DAB stars that have been interpreted by \citet{wes94}
432: as unresolved composite systems consisting of a DA white dwarf and a
433: DB or DBA companion. The spectra are normalized at 4400 \AA\ and are
434: shifted vertically by 0.5 for clarity.\label{fg:f1}}
435:
436: \figcaption[f2.ps] {Our best fits to the optical spectrum of
437: \PG\ using homogeneous, stratified, and composite DA+DB
438: models. The atmospheric parameters for each solution are given in the
439: figure. Both the observed and theoretical spectra are normalized to a
440: continuum set to unity. The top spectra are shifted by a factor of 0.4
441: from each other for clarity. Clearly, the DA+DB solution provides the
442: best fit to the overall spectrum.\label{fg:f2}}
443:
444: \figcaption[f3.ps] {Relative energy distributions for our best DA+DB fit
445: obtained in Figure \ref{fg:f2}. The thin lines show the individual
446: contributions of the DA and DB components, properly weighted by their
447: respective radius, while the thick line corresponds to the total
448: monochromatic flux of the composite system. The dots indicate the
449: multichannel $ugvr$ photometry normalized at the $v$
450: magnitude to match the predicted energy distribution.\label{fg:f3}}
451:
452: \clearpage
453: \begin{figure}[p]
454: \plotone{f1.ps}
455: \begin{flushright}
456: Figure \ref{fg:f1}
457: \end{flushright}
458: \end{figure}
459:
460: \begin{figure}[p]
461: \plotone{f2.ps}
462: \begin{flushright}
463: Figure \ref{fg:f2}
464: \end{flushright}
465: \end{figure}
466:
467: \begin{figure}[p]
468: \plotone{f3.ps}
469: \begin{flushright}
470: Figure \ref{fg:f3}
471: \end{flushright}
472: \end{figure}
473:
474: \end{document}
475: