1: \documentstyle[11pt,newpasp,twoside,epsf]{article}
2: \markboth{A. J. Barth et al.}{Measuring Black Hole Masses Using
3: Ionized Gas Kinematics}
4: \pagestyle{myheadings}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7: \title{Measuring Black Hole Masses Using Ionized Gas Kinematics}
8:
9: \author{A. J. Barth$^1$, M. Sarzi, L. C. Ho, H.-W. Rix, J. C. Shields, \\
10: A. V. Filippenko, G. Rudnick, \& W. L. W. Sargent}
11: \affil{$^1$Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St.,
12: Cambridge, MA 01238}
13:
14: \begin{abstract}
15: We describe techniques for measuring the central masses of galaxies
16: using emission-line kinematics observed with the \emph{Hubble Space
17: Telescope}. For accurate results, it is necessary to model various
18: instrumental effects, particularly the blurring due to the telescope
19: PSF and the width of the spectroscopic aperture. Observations of
20: nuclear gas disks often reveal substantial internal velocity
21: dispersions in the gas, suggesting that the disks may be partially
22: pressure-supported. We also describe a technique for fitting
23: 2-dimensional spectroscopic data directly in pixel space. This method
24: may be useful for objects such as M84 that show highly complex and
25: asymmetric line profiles.
26: \end{abstract}
27: \section{Introduction}
28: Supermassive black holes are thought to occur in the nuclei of all
29: massive galaxies, or at least in those galaxies having a bulge
30: component. Recent studies have shown that the black hole mass is
31: correlated loosely with the host galaxy bulge luminosity (Kormendy \&
32: Richstone 1995; Magorrian et al.\ 1998) and correlated tightly with
33: the stellar velocity dispersion of the bulge (Ferrarese \& Merritt
34: 2000; Gebhardt et al.\ 2000). However, the slope of the
35: $M_{\mathrm{BH}}-\sigma$ relation, and the amount of intrinsic scatter
36: in the correlation, remain somewhat controversial. For further
37: progress, more black hole masses must be measured, and with the
38: highest accuracy possible.
39:
40: Disks of ionized gas and dust with radii of tens to hundreds of
41: parsecs are found in the nuclei of $\sim10-20\%$ of nearby galaxies.
42: With \emph{HST}\ spectra, it is possible to map out the velocity
43: structure of these disks and determine the central masses. In
44: principle, the measurement is straightforward: the goal is simply to
45: measure the rotation speed of a circular disk. However, the region
46: with the greatest diagnostic power for determining the central mass is
47: generally at or near the resolution limit of \emph{HST}. Near the
48: nucleus, there are steep gradients in rotation velocity and
49: emission-line surface brightness across the spectroscopic aperture.
50: In addition, the gas often has a substantial internal velocity
51: dispersion, which may affect the dynamical properties of the disks.
52: All of these effects must be taken into account in order to derive
53: accurate black hole masses from the data.
54:
55: \section{Measurement Techniques}
56:
57: \textbf{Instrumental Effects.} The velocity fields in circumnuclear
58: disks can be measured with the STIS spectrograph on \emph{HST},
59: usually with a slit width of 0\farcs1 or 0\farcs2. Due to the
60: telescope PSF and the nonzero aperture size, the innermost Keplerian
61: rotation curve is blurred into a smooth velocity gradient across the
62: nucleus. Only for the largest black holes will the Keplerian portion
63: of the velocity field be partly resolved. Kinematic analyses which do
64: not take into account this instrumental blurring (e.g., Ferrarese et
65: al.\ 1996) will tend to underestimate the true black hole masses,
66: because an unblurred model will need a smaller central mass to reach a
67: given rotation velocity near the nucleus.
68:
69: We have developed modeling software that performs a complete
70: simulation of the STIS observation, so that kinematic models for the
71: rotating disk can be compared with the data in detail. The code
72: calculates the propagation of full line profiles through the
73: spectrograph slit, accounting for PSF blurring, aperture size, and the
74: apparent wavelength shift of light that enters the slit off-center.
75: These techniques have been applied to measure the central mass of the
76: S0 galaxy NGC 3245 (Barth et al.\ 2001).
77:
78:
79: \noindent\textbf{Emission-line Surface Brightness.} Observations of
80: the velocity field are weighted by the surface brightness of emission
81: lines, which sometimes show a sharp, nearly unresolved ``spike'' at
82: the nucleus. The measured velocities near the nucleus can be very
83: sensitive to the brightness profile of this central spike. In
84: addition, a nonuniform distribution of emission-line surface
85: brightness can distort the shape of the radial velocity curves if a
86: patch of emission is located off-center in the slit (Figure 1).
87:
88: \noindent\textbf{Disk Orientation Parameters.} At least 3 slit
89: positions are needed to fully constrain the orientation of the disk.
90: For NGC 3245, we used 5 parallel positions covering the inner
91: arcsecond. The off-nuclear slit positions give enough kinematic
92: information to tightly constrain the disk inclination and the major
93: axis position angle, eliminating what would otherwise be a significant
94: source of uncertainty in the analysis.
95:
96: \noindent\textbf{Intrinsic Velocity Dispersion and Asymmetric Drift.}
97: Our modeling code includes all of the major sources of line broadening
98: that contribute to the observed linewidths. These include the
99: point-source line-spread function, the broadening due to the nonzero
100: width of the slit, the diffusion of charge on the CCD, and the
101: rotational broadening for the portion of the disk subtended by the
102: slit aperture. The models for NGC 3245 demonstrate that the disk
103: cannot be dynamically cold: the gas has an intrinsic velocity
104: dispersion which rises to $\sim150$ km s$^{-1}$ at the nucleus.
105:
106: Substantial internal velocity dispersions are observed in most
107: circumnuclear disks of this type. This suggests that the disks may be
108: partially pressure-supported, and that the black hole mass inferred
109: from pure circular rotation models may be an underestimate. For NGC
110: 3245, we apply a correction for this effect using the asymmetric drift
111: equation of stellar dynamics; in this case the effect on the black
112: hole mass is only 12\%, but it may be larger for other galaxies with
113: more turbulent disks.
114:
115: For NGC 3245, we find $M_{\mathrm{BH}} = (2.1 \pm 0.5) \times10^8$
116: $M_\odot$. The error budget includes uncertainties due to the
117: kinematic model fitting, the measurement of the stellar luminosity
118: profile, the distance to the galaxy, and differences between the
119: kinematics of H$\alpha$ and [N II].
120:
121: \begin{figure}
122: \plotone{middle.ps}
123: \caption{Central velocity curve for NGC 3245 measured from STIS data,
124: using the 0\farcs2-wide slit. The model curves are calculated for
125: $M_{\mathrm{BH}}=0, 2\times10^8$, and $4\times10^8$ $M_\odot$ and a
126: fixed value of the stellar mass-to-light ratio. (\emph{a}) Model
127: curves calculated assuming a smooth emission-line surface brightness
128: distribution of the form $S = S_0 + S_1 e^{-r/r_0}$. (\emph{b})~The
129: \emph{same} kinematic models, calculated using a WFPC2
130: H$\alpha$+[N~II] image as a more accurate map of the emission-line
131: surface brightness. This figure demonstrates that many of the
132: irregularities seen in the rotation curve are not the result of
133: kinematic disturbances, but are simply due to the patchy
134: distribution of emission-line light across the slit.}
135: \end{figure}
136:
137:
138:
139: \section{Direct Fitting of Emission-Line Profiles.}
140:
141: The analysis technique described above, based on fitting the measured
142: velocity curves, only works well if the emission-line profiles are
143: close to Gaussian. This is not always the case; for example, the
144: galaxy M84 (NGC 4374) has extremely complex line profiles near the
145: nucleus. Bower et al.\ (1998) found that the line profiles in M84
146: show two kinematic components, a fast Keplerian component and a slowly
147: rotating one. They fitted Keplerian disk models to the fast component
148: and derived a central mass of $(0.9-2.6)\times10^9$ $M_\odot$. More
149: recently, Maciejewski \& Binney (2001) showed that the two kinematic
150: components actually both arise from the disk itself, because the slit
151: is wide enough to subtend different portions of the disk having a wide
152: range of velocities. As a result, the position and velocity
153: information become badly entangled in the central regions, and it is
154: effectively impossible to measure a well-defined rotation curve for
155: the inner disk.
156:
157: To circumvent this problem, we have adapted our code to fit the
158: emission profiles of the rotating disk \emph{directly} in pixel space.
159: This method makes use of all available information in the data,
160: including the high-velocity wings of the line profiles. Preliminary
161: results for M84 are shown in Figure 2. With $M_{\mathrm{BH}} = 10^9$
162: $M_\odot$, the model naturally accounts for much of the structure in
163: the line profiles: narrow cores and broad wings at the nucleus,
164: extreme asymmetries, and even double-peaked profiles at some
165: locations. While the fits are by no means perfect, these preliminary
166: results demonstrate that direct profile fitting is a promising
167: technique for extracting black hole masses from data showing highly
168: asymmetric emission lines.
169:
170: \begin{figure}
171: \plottwo{m84nobh.ps}{m84bh.ps}
172: \caption{Preliminary model results for M84. Data and models are shown
173: for the central row of the CCD spectrum (top panel) and for four
174: off-nuclear rows. \emph{Left panel:} A trial model assuming no black
175: hole. Without a black hole, the emission profiles are nearly Gaussian
176: and the model is unable to match the width and structure of the
177: observed profiles. \emph{Right panel:} A model calculated for
178: $M_{\mathrm{BH}}=10^9$ $M_\odot$.}
179: \end{figure}
180:
181:
182:
183:
184: \begin{references}
185:
186: \reference Barth, A. J., Sarzi, M., Rix, H.-W., Ho, L. C., Filippenko,
187: A. V., \& Sargent, W.~L.~W. 2001, \apj, in press (astro-ph/0012213)
188:
189: \reference Bower, G., et al. 1998, \apj, 492, L111
190:
191: \reference Ferrarese, L., Ford, H. C., \& Jaffe, W. 1996, \apj, 470,
192: 444
193:
194: \reference Ferrarese, L., \& Merritt, D. 2000, \apj, 539, L9
195:
196: \reference Gebhardt, K., et al. 2000, \apj, 539, L13
197:
198: \reference Kormendy, J., \& Richstone, D. 1995, \araa, 33, 581
199:
200: \reference Maciejewski, W., \& Binney, J. 2001, \mnras, 323, 831
201:
202: \reference Magorrian, J., et al. 1998, \aj, 115, 2285
203:
204: \end{references}
205:
206: \end{document}
207: