1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint2]{aastex}
3: \usepackage{natbib}
4:
5: \begin{document}
6:
7: \title{NGC 2362: a Template for Early Stellar Evolution
8: \footnote{Based on observations collected at the European Southern
9: Observatory, La Silla, under project 66.C-0119.} }
10:
11: \author{A. Moitinho}
12: \affil{Observatorio Astron\'omico Nacional, UNAM,
13: Apdo. Postal 877, C.P. 22800, Ensenada B.C., M\'exico}
14: \email{andrem@astrosen.unam.mx}
15:
16: \author{J. Alves}
17: \affil{European Southern Observatory, Karl Schwarzschild Stra\ss\ e 2,
18: D-85748 Garching, Germany}
19: \email{jalves@eso.org}
20:
21: \author{N. Hu\'elamo}
22: \affil{Max-Planck f\"ur Extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstrasse
23: 1, D-85741 Garching, Germany}
24: \email{huelamo@mpe.mpg.de}
25:
26: \and
27:
28: \author{C.J. Lada}
29: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,Mail Stop 72,
30: Cambridge, MA 02138}
31: \email{clada@cfa.harvard.edu}
32:
33:
34: \begin{abstract}
35: We present UBVRI photometry for the young open cluster NGC 2362.
36: From analysis of the appropriate color-color and color-magnitude
37: diagrams we derive the fundamental parameters of the NGC 2362
38: cluster to be: age $=$ 5$^{+1}_{-2}$ Myr, distance $=$ 1480 pc,
39: $E(B-V)=$ 0.10 mag. The cluster age was independently determined for
40: both high mass ($2.1 - 36$M$_{\sun}$) and low mass ($0.7 -
41: 1.2$M$_{\sun}$) stars with excellent agreement between the ages
42: derived using post-main sequence \citep{Girardi2000iso} and pre-main
43: sequence \citep{Baraffe1998} evolutionary tracks for the high and
44: low mass stars respectively. Analysis of this cluster's
45: color-magnitude diagram reveals a well defined pre-main sequence
46: (covering $\Delta$ V $\sim$ 9 magnitudes in $V$ and extending from
47: early A stars to near the hydrogen burning limit) which makes this
48: cluster an ideal laboratory for pre-main sequence evolution studies.
49:
50: \end{abstract}
51:
52: \keywords{Stars: fundamental parameters -- Stars: pre-main sequence --
53: open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 2362 --
54: Hertzsprung-Russel (HR) and C-M diagrams -- Stars: formation}
55:
56: \section{Introduction}
57:
58: The evolution of pre-main-sequence (PMS) stars -- young contracting
59: stars on their way to the main sequence -- is poorly understood
60: although significant progress have been made in recent years
61: \citep[see][for reviews]{Palla1999,Chabrier2000}. Observationally,
62: these stars are also among the hardest to study because they are
63: usually heavily extincted by their parental molecular cloud and are
64: often seen in projection against bright H{\footnotesize II} regions.
65:
66: The ideal laboratory of pre-main-sequence stellar evolution would then
67: be the youngest possible galactic cluster free from dust extinction
68: and nebula contamination, at a distance that permits detection of
69: low-mass members to at least the hydrogen burning limit. An
70: investigation of such an ideal cluster would provide robust
71: observables to test pre-main-sequence models (luminosity functions,
72: color-magnitude, and color-color diagrams), free from completeness
73: corrections and scatter due to variable extinction and nebula
74: emission. In turn, the age of this very young cluster would be well
75: constrained, as would be its star formation history, and its
76: underlying initial mass function (IMF). The age of this cluster would
77: also set an upper limit on the timescale for the disruption of the
78: molecular material that originated the cluster. Finally, observations
79: from X-rays down to the mid-Infrared wavelengths would also be able to
80: provide a transparent characterization of an entire pre-main-sequence
81: population down to brown dwarf masses, while shedding new light on the
82: X-ray/UV/H$_\alpha$/infrared-excess phenomena observed in young stars
83: \citep[see][for reviews]{Bertout1989,Feigelson1999}.
84:
85: In this letter we present a UBVRI survey of the stellar cluster NGC
86: 2362, probably the best proxy to the ideal cluster described above.
87: The cluster is virtually free from dust extinction and shows no signs
88: of nebular emission. Walter Baade suggested more than fifty years ago
89: that NGC 2362 appeared to be almost exclusively made up of B stars
90: with little evidence for low mass stars \citep{Johnson1950}. This same
91: population of B stars has been used as the standard observational
92: template to define the upper end of the Zero Age Main Sequence.
93: Despite the claims for an abnormal mass function, a deep $I-$band
94: study of the central $6^\prime \times 6^\prime$ region of the cluster
95: \citep{Wilner1991} uncovered a substantial population of lower mass
96: stars whose mass function appeared to be similar to that of the field
97: \citep{Kroupa1992}. Recently, \citet{Alves2001} presented sensitive
98: JHK observations of NGC 2362 that confirm this finding. More
99: interesting perhaps, they found virtually no stars with detectable
100: near--infrared excess emission, suggesting that this young cluster
101: largely consists of diskless, post-T Tauri stars. In a survey of young
102: clusters at L band (3.4 $\mu$m), \citet{Haisch2001} confirmed this
103: result and further found NGC 2362 to be the youngest known cluster
104: without a significant population of disk bearing stars. Consequently,
105: NGC 2362 plays a pivotal role in the determination of the overall
106: lifetime of circumstellar disks in clusters and for setting the
107: timescale allowed for planet building within such disks.
108: Unfortunately, the age of this cluster is not well constrained. The
109: best existing age estimate essentially rests on the position in the HR
110: diagram of a single object, $\tau$CMa, the cluster's only post-main
111: sequence star \citep{Balona1996}. An improved age determination for
112: the cluster is urgently needed.
113:
114:
115: Our new deep UBVRI survey of NGC 2362 reveals a long, narrow, and well
116: defined pre-main-sequence, spanning about 9 magnitudes, in the $V$
117: band, from A-stars down to about $0.15$M$_{\sun}$, close to the
118: hydrogen burning limit. This enables us to provide an improved and
119: independent determination of the cluster's age. Comparison with modern
120: calculations of PMS evolution yields an age of $=$ 5$^{+1}_{-2}$ Myr
121: which closely agrees with the age we obtain from the cluster's early
122: type stars as derived from post-mais-sequence models. Our observations
123: of the early type stars also yield new estimates for the cluster's
124: distance and extinction which we find to be in good agreement with
125: previous determinations.
126:
127: The remaining of this letter is organized as follows: we present the
128: observations in Section 2, the results in Section 3, and conclude with
129: a discussion on Section 4.
130:
131:
132:
133: \section{Observations and Reductions}
134: \begin{figure}[t]
135: \plotone{f1.eps}
136: \caption{Mosaic of 15s exposures of NGC2362 in the V band. North is
137: up and east is left. The surveyed area covers $\sim 540^{\prime 2}$
138: The central $\sim 1.2^{\prime 2}$ portion of the mosaic,
139: which includes $\tau$CMa, is composed of a 1s exposure.}
140: \label{fig:mosaic}
141: \end{figure}
142: CCD UBVR and Gunn {\it i} optical data were collected with DFOSC
143: mounted at the 1.5m Danish telescope in La Silla during the nights of
144: 2001 February 2 and 4. The field-of-view of
145: DFOSC was $13.7^{\prime }\times 13.7^{\prime }$ with a plate-scale of
146: 0.39$^{\prime\prime}$ per pixel. Due to severe distortions on the
147: edges, the images were trimmed which resulted in an effective
148: field-of-view of $12.9^{\prime }\times 13.3^{\prime }$. A total of 36
149: images for the cluster, 10 images for the control field, and 36 images
150: of standard fields, were obtained.
151:
152: To overcome the observational difficulties imposed by $\tau$CMa
153: (severe bleeding, scattered light, ghost images) resulting in
154: significant data corruption at the very center of the cluster
155: ($\alpha_{2000} = 07^h18^m46^s.3$, $\delta_{2000} =
156: -24^{\circ}57^{\prime}22^{\prime\prime}$), a series of exposures of
157: NGC\,2362 were taken at four positions (NSEW) as close as possible to
158: $\tau$CMa but avoiding it or its scattered light (see
159: Fig.~\ref{fig:mosaic}). During the same night we acquired short
160: exposures (1 sec) centered on $\tau$CMa to get photometry for the
161: bright stars at the center of the cluster and, in particular, those
162: that were in the region (an area of $\sim 1.2^{\prime 2}$) not covered
163: by the NSEW mosaic.
164:
165:
166: A nearby control field ($\sim 32^{\prime}$ north of the cluster) was
167: also observed, with the same exposure times as the cluster field
168: ($280, 25, 15, 15$ and $40$s in the $U,B,V,R$ and Gunn {\it i} bands,
169: respectively), during the night of February 4th. The control field
170: observations covered one field of view of the CCD. Although the
171: integration times for the cluster and control field were the same, the
172: control field data is not as deep due to the proximity of the moon
173: during the control field observations. Calibration into the standard
174: system was achieved by the observation of several \citet{Landolt1992}
175: fields. The typical seeing (FWHM) throughout the run was $\sim
176: 1.1^{\prime\prime}$.
177:
178: All CCD frames were processed within IRAF. Images were subjected to
179: the the usual bias and flatfield corrections, and cosmic rays were
180: removed. Photometry was performed with the IRAF/DAOPHOT package. A
181: $7.8^{\prime\prime}$ ($20$ pixel) aperture radius was used in standard
182: star photometry. The photometry, aperture corrections, extinction
183: corrections, transformation to the standard system and construction of
184: the photometric catalog were performed following the procedures
185: thoroughly described in \citet{Moitinho2001a}. The final catalog
186: contains photometry for approximately 8300 stars ($\sim$ 4500 stars in
187: all UBVRI bands) in the cluster field, plus approximately 2000 stars
188: in the control field.
189:
190: \section{Results}
191: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
192: \epsscale{1.4}
193: \plotone{f2.eps}
194: \caption{a) V vs. (V-I) diagram of the inner $9.1^{\prime}$ of the
195: field of NGC\,2362. b) The same as in (a) for the control field.
196: The control field data is not as deep due to the proximity
197: of the moon during the control field observations.}
198: \label{fig:hr}
199: \end{figure*}
200: In Fig.~\ref{fig:hr}a we introduce the $V$ vs. $(V-I)$ diagram of the
201: stars contained in a $9.1^{\prime}$ diameter circle centered on
202: NGC\,2362 (hereafter the \emph{on} field). The center of the cluster
203: was estimated to be the peak of the stellar density distribution. The
204: distribution was computed using the stars falling along the cluster
205: sequence delineated in Fig.~\ref{fig:hr}a (both ZAMS and PMS stars).
206: The center is practically coincident with $\tau$CMa. Although previous
207: estimates of the cluster's diameter give a diameter of $5^{\prime}$
208: \citep{Lynga1987}, we find a significant concentration of stars, above
209: the background, in the inner $9.1^{\prime}$ diameter.
210:
211: Fig.~\ref{fig:hr}b shows the $V$ vs. $(V-I)$ diagram for the control
212: field (hereafter the \emph{off} field). The area covered on the sky is
213: the same as in the left panel. The distribution of stars in the
214: \emph{on} field color-magnitude diagram follows a sequence which
215: splits into two clearly separated branches below about $V$ = $15$
216: magnitudes. The red branch of this sequence extends at least from $V
217: \sim 15$ to $21$ and has no counterpart in the \emph{off} field
218: color-magnitude diagram. This red branch is part of a very long PMS
219: band of stars which starts at about $V \geq 12$ mag and is clearly
220: visible from $V \geq 15$ to $V \sim 21$ mag.
221:
222: The reddening towards NGC\,2362 was determined by fitting the
223: \citet{Schmidt-Kaler1982} ZAMS to the B-star sequence in the $(U-B$) vs.
224: $(B-V)$ diagram. We have determined $E(B-V)=0.10 $ mag, which is in
225: agreement with the previous estimates by \cite{Perry1973} and
226: \cite{Balona1996}. No evidence of variable extinction was found
227: at a $0.04$ mag level in $E(B-V)$.
228:
229: The distance to NGC\,2362 was determined by fitting the
230: \citet{Schmidt-Kaler1982} ZAMS to the B-star sequence in different
231: color-magnitude diagrams. Unlike older clusters, where the A type
232: stars are already on the main sequence, the ZAMS stars in NGC\,2362
233: are almost exclusively of spectral type B. This makes the distance
234: determination more difficult since the B-star portion of the ZAMS is
235: nearly vertical for most color-magnitude combinations. The color that
236: provides a B-star sequence with the lowest possible slope is $(U-B)$.
237: Therefore, distance was mainly constrained by the fit in the $V$ vs.
238: $(U-B)$ plane. The apparent distance modulus was found to be
239: $(m-M)=11.16$ mag. Using the standard value for the ratio of
240: total-to-selective absorption, $R_V=3.1$, we find the distance to NGC
241: 2362 to be $1480$ pc ($(m-M)_o=10.85$) which is virtually the same as the
242: value adopted by \citet{Balona1996} ($(m-M)_o=10.87)$.
243:
244: The age of NGC\,2362 was determined following two different
245: approaches. In the first case, we have derived a turn-off age by
246: fitting solar composition post-main-sequence isochrones of
247: \citet{Girardi2000iso} to color-magnitude diagrams (using various
248: color-magnitude combinations). In the second case, the
249: pre-main-sequence isochrones of \citet{Baraffe1998} (solar recipe)
250: were used in deriving an age based on the location of the low-mass PMS
251: stars in the $V$ vs. $V-I$ plane. These particular PMS models were
252: selected because they are the most consistent with constraints imposed
253: by recently derived dynamical masses of PMS binary stars
254: \citep{Steffen2001}. The solar recipe version of the PMS models has
255: only been computed for the $0.7 - 1.2$M$_{\sun}$ mass range, which was
256: the region used in estimating the age. The \citet{Baraffe1998} models
257: have also been computed for lower masses ($< 0.7$M$_{\sun}$) using non
258: solar mixing lengths (which is unimportant at such low masses).
259: However, the predicted optical colors at these cool temperatures are
260: not robust (indeed we found departures from the observed sequence),
261: and therefore have not been used in the age fits.
262:
263: The youth of NGC\,2362 poses two problems to the turn-off
264: age determination. First, the observed B-star sequence does not show
265: any evident evolutionary deviation from the ZAMS (in fact, NGC\,2362
266: has been used in the past to define the upper ZAMS). Second, the
267: high-mass end is dominated by poor statistics, which adds extra
268: difficulty to the analysis: The only star that exhibits evolutionary
269: effects is $\tau$CMa which, to make things even harder, is found to be
270: a multiple system \citep[eg.][]{vanLeeuwen1997}.
271:
272: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
273: \epsscale{1.4}
274: \plotone{f3.eps}
275: \caption{a) $V$ vs. $U-B$ diagram for the central $9.1^{\prime}$ of
276: NGC\,2362. The filled line is a \citet{Girardi2000iso} 5 Myr post-
277: main sequence isochrone. The dashed line is the
278: \citet{Schmidt-Kaler1982} ZAMS used in the distance determination.
279: b) isochrone fits in the $V$ vs. $V-I$ plane. The line on the left
280: is the 5 Myr post-main sequence isochrones as in frame (a). The
281: lines on the right are 5 Myr PMS isochrones \citep{Baraffe1998}.
282: The brighter PMS isochrone has been plotted 0.75 mag brighter to
283: account for the binary population. In both plots, the faint end of
284: the bar appended to $\tau$CMa (large circle) indicates the
285: magnitude of its equivalent single (non-multiple) star.}
286: \label{fig:age}
287: \end{figure*}
288: Fig.~\ref{fig:age} shows a 5 Myr isochrone fit in the $V$ vs. $U-B$
289: and $V$ vs. $V-I$ planes. The filled circle in the bright end is
290: $\tau$CMa, which has been plotted using the photometry of
291: \citet{Fernie1983}. A bar reaching 0.75 mag fainter indicates the
292: magnitude it would have if it was a simple (non-multiple) system. The
293: fit has been essentially constrained by the position of $\tau$CMa
294: considering that it is a system of two similar - O9Ib - stars. This
295: age determination agrees with the one by \citet{Balona1996}, which was
296: also based on the position of $\tau$CMa.
297:
298:
299: As previously mentioned, we have also determined the cluster's age by
300: fitting pre-main sequence isochrones of \citet{Baraffe1998} to the
301: low-mass sequence on the $V$ vs. $V-I$ diagram (Fig.~\ref{fig:age}).
302: In this case, none of the problems of the turn-off fit arise: the
303: sequence is well populated, and the evolutionary status is quite
304: obvious (the PMS stars are well above the main sequence). Furthermore,
305: the luminosity of the PMS branch is a sensitive function of age.
306: Also, the absence of variable reddening within the cluster results in
307: an extremely well defined PMS which also helps to constrain the age.
308: The best fit was obtained for a 5 Myr isochrone (lines on the right of
309: Fig.~\ref{fig:age}). A 0.75 mag brighter PMS isochrone was also
310: plotted to account for the presence of binaries. That the PMS is so
311: tight (well below the binary limit) is indicative of a very simple
312: star formation history, most probably a single and quick episode of
313: star formation. The age spread of the PMS stars in the cluster is
314: likely less than 3 Myr (see below).
315:
316: To estimate the age uncertainty we have not considered the
317: uncertainties in the models themselves. Taking into account the
318: photometric and fitting errors we estimate an uncertainty of
319: ${}^{+1}_{-2}$ Myr. The low dispersion of the PMS, together with the
320: sensitivity of the PMS luminosity to age, have allowed us to place tight
321: constraints on the age. A somewhat higher uncertainty towards a
322: younger age arises from the fact that we fit the PMS isochrones to the
323: {\em lower/bluer envelope} of the observed sequence. Although the {\em
324: lower/bluer envelope} fitting is usually performed in order to avoid
325: the effects of binary contamination and rotation, it could lead the
326: PMS fit towards slightly older ages if those effects are not
327: important.
328:
329: We note here that the ages derived from the pre-main sequence and
330: post- main sequence isochrones are in excellent agreement with each
331: other as well as with the previous age determination for the cluster
332: which was based primarily on the position of $\tau$CMa in the HR
333: diagram (Balona and Laney 1996). Moreover these age estimates are
334: also consistent with the dynamical age estimated for the
335: H{\footnotesize II} region surrounding the cluster and excited by
336: $\tau$CMa \citep{Haisch2001}.
337:
338:
339: \section{Conclusions}
340: We report UBVRI observations of NGC 2362, a very young open cluster in
341: CMa, and a nearby control field. The main findings of this letter
342: are:
343: \begin{enumerate}
344: \item We derive the following fundamental parameters for NGC 2362:
345: age $=$ 5$^{+1}_{-2}$ Myr, distance $=$ 1480 pc, and reddening $=
346: E(B-V)=$ 0.10 mag. Cluster ages were obtained separately from
347: both the high-mass population (OB-stars on the main sequence) and
348: the low-mass (PMS) population of the cluster and found to be in
349: excellent agreement.
350: \item Analysis of this cluster's color-magnitude diagram reveals a
351: long, narrow, and well defined cluster pre-main-sequence,
352: spanning about 9 magnitudes (in $V$) in the optical
353: color-magnitude diagrams, with a negligible scatter. This PMS
354: extends from early A stars to late type stars near the hydrogen
355: burning limit.
356: \item Star formation in the cluster was likely characterized by a
357: single quick episode or burst spanning an interval of no more than
358: about 3 million years.
359: \item The observed properties of NGC\,2362 make it an ideal
360: laboratory for testing pre-main sequence models and investigating
361: early stellar evolution.
362: \end{enumerate}
363:
364: \acknowledgments We thank the referee for his/her useful comments
365: which improved the paper. A. Moitinho acknowledges financial
366: support by CONACyT (Mexico; grant I33940-E) and DGAPA (Mexico;
367: grant IN111500). This research made use of the NASA Astrophysics
368: Data System, of the Simbad database operated at the Centre de
369: Donn\'es Stellaires --- Strasbourg, France, and of the WEBDA open
370: cluster database of J.-C. Mermilliod.
371:
372: %\bibliography{tese}
373: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
374:
375: \begin{thebibliography}{20}
376: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
377:
378: \bibitem[{Alves {et~al.}(2001)Alves, Lada, Lada, Muench, \&
379: Moitinho}]{Alves2001}
380: Alves, J., Lada, C., Lada, A., Muench, A., \& Moitinho, A. 2001, A\&A,
381: submitted
382:
383: \bibitem[{Balona \& Laney(1996)}]{Balona1996}
384: Balona, L.~A. \& Laney, C.~D. 1996, MNRAS, 281, 1341
385:
386: \bibitem[{Baraffe {et~al.}(1998)Baraffe, Chabrier, Allard, \&
387: Hauschildt}]{Baraffe1998}
388: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P.~H. 1998, A\&A, 337,
389: 403
390:
391: \bibitem[{Bertout(1989)}]{Bertout1989}
392: Bertout, C. 1989, ARA\&A, 27, 351
393:
394: \bibitem[{Chabrier \& Baraffe(2000)}]{Chabrier2000}
395: Chabrier, G. \& Baraffe, I. 2000, ARA\&A, 38, 337
396:
397: \bibitem[{Feigelson \& Montmerle(1999)}]{Feigelson1999}
398: Feigelson, E.~D. \& Montmerle, T. 1999, \araa, 37, 363
399:
400: \bibitem[{Fernie(1983)}]{Fernie1983}
401: Fernie, J.~D. 1983, ApJS, 52, 7
402:
403: \bibitem[{Girardi {et~al.}(2000)Girardi, Bressan, Bertelli, \&
404: Chiosi}]{Girardi2000iso}
405: Girardi, L., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G., \& Chiosi, C. 2000, A\&AS, 141, 371
406:
407: \bibitem[{Haisch {et~al.}(2001)Haisch, Lada, \& Lada}]{Haisch2001}
408: Haisch, K.~E., Lada, E.~A., \& Lada, C.~J. 2001, ApJL, 553, L153
409:
410: \bibitem[{Johnson(1950)}]{Johnson1950}
411: Johnson, H.~L. 1950, ApJ, 112, 240
412:
413: \bibitem[{Kroupa {et~al.}(1992)Kroupa, Gilmore, \& Tout}]{Kroupa1992}
414: Kroupa, P., Gilmore, G., \& Tout, C.~A. 1992, AJ, 103, 1602
415:
416: \bibitem[{Landolt(1992)}]{Landolt1992}
417: Landolt, A.~U. 1992, AJ, 104, 340
418:
419: \bibitem[{Lyng{\aa}(1987)}]{Lynga1987}
420: Lyng{\aa}, G. 1987, Computer Based Catalogue of Open Cluster Data, 5th ed.,
421: Observatoire de Strasbourg, Centre de Donn\'ees Stellaires,
422: Strasbourg
423:
424: \bibitem[{Moitinho(2001)}]{Moitinho2001a}
425: Moitinho, A. 2001, A\&A, 370, 436
426:
427: \bibitem[{Palla(1999)}]{Palla1999}
428: Palla, F. 1999, in {Proceedings of Star Formation 1999}, ed. T.~Nakamoto
429: (Nobeyama Radio Observatory), 6
430:
431: \bibitem[{Perry(1973)}]{Perry1973}
432: Perry, C.~L. 1973, in IAU Symp. 50: Spectral Classification and Multicolour
433: Photometry, Vol.~50, 192
434:
435: \bibitem[{Schmidt-Kaler(1982)}]{Schmidt-Kaler1982}
436: Schmidt-Kaler, T. 1982, Landolt-B{\"o}rnstein, Group VI, Vol. 2b, Stars and
437: Star Clusters (Berlin: Springer), 15
438:
439: \bibitem[{Steffen {et~al.}(2001)Steffen, Mathieu, Lattanzi, Mazeh, Prato,
440: Simon, Zinnecker, \& Loreggia}]{Steffen2001}
441: Steffen, A.~T., Mathieu, R.~D., Lattanzi, M.~G., Mazeh, T., Prato, L., Simon,
442: M., Zinnecker, H., \& Loreggia, D. 2001, AJ, 34, 3
443:
444: \bibitem[{van Leeuwen \& van Genderen(1997)}]{vanLeeuwen1997}
445: van Leeuwen, F. \& van Genderen, A.~M. 1997, A\&A, 327, 1070
446:
447: \bibitem[{Wilner \& Lada(1991)}]{Wilner1991}
448: Wilner, D.~J. \& Lada, C.~J. 1991, AJ, 102, 105
449:
450: \end{thebibliography}
451:
452:
453:
454: \end{document}
455:
456: