1: \label{ic}

2: 

3: 

4: \newcommand\xmas{\mbox{$x_{\rm mas}$}}

5: \newcommand\rmas{\mbox{$r_{\rm mas}$}}

6: \newcommand\Xmas{\mbox{$X_{\rm mas}$}}

7: \newcommand\Hinf{\mbox{${\rm H}_{\rm inf}$}}

8: \newcommand\Omegainf{\mbox{$\Omega_{\rm inf}$}}

9: \newcommand\Omegabg{\mbox{$\Omega_{\rm bg}$}}

10: \newcommand\Hbg{\mbox{${\rm H}_{\rm bg}$}}

11: \newcommand\rhobg{\mbox{$\rho_{\rm bg}$}}

12: \newcommand\rhorbg{\mbox{$\rho^{\rm bg}_{\rm r}$}}

13: \newcommand\rhoinf{\mbox{$\rho_{\rm inf}$}}

14: \newcommand\kinf{\mbox{$k_{\rm inf}$}}

15: \newcommand\kbg{\mbox{$k_{\rm bg}$}}

16: \newcommand\ainf{\mbox{$a_{\rm inf}$}}

17: \newcommand\abg{\mbox{$a_{\rm bg}$}}

18: \newcommand\xpbg{\mbox{$x_{\rm p}^{\rm bg}$}}

19: \newcommand\xpinf{\mbox{$x_{\rm p}^{\rm inf}$}}

20: \newcommand\xmasbg{\mbox{$x_{\rm mas}^{\rm bg}$}}

21: \newcommand\xmasinf{\mbox{$x_{\rm mas}^{\rm inf}$}}

22: \newcommand\thetainf{\mbox{$\theta^{\rm inf}$}}

23: \newcommand\thetabg{\mbox{$\theta^{\rm bg}$}}

24: %\newcommand\xHbg{\mbox{$x_{\rm H}^{\rm bg}$}}

25: %\newcommand\xHinf{\mbox{$x_{\rm H}^{\rm inf}$}}

26: \newcommand\xHbg{\mbox{$1/{\rm H}_{\rm bg}$}}

27: \newcommand\xHinf{\mbox{$1/{\rm H}_{\rm inf}$}}

28: 

29: 

30: \section{Introduction}

31: \label{introduction}

32: In this Chapter we discuss in more detail the initial conditions

33: required for inflation. In particular we examine what scales of

34: non-linear perturbations can be smoothed out by inflation.

35: 

36: %This Chapter is in a slightly different area

37: %to the rest of the thesis. However it does deal with inflation and

38: %inhomgeneties which are both central to the theme of the thesis.

39: 

40: % Although this work deals with inhomogeneities,

41: %they are not necessarily perturbative. So this work is in a slightly

42: %different area of Cosmology from the rest of the thesis and for that

43: %reason has been included in an Chapter instead of as an extra

44: %Chapter.

45: 

46: Inflation is the foremost idea for explaining the large scale

47: homogeneity and near flatness of the universe, which are the two main

48: unexplained observational features in the standard hot

49: big-bang model.  The large scale homogeneity or horizon problem

50: amounts to the fact that under hot big-bang evolution, due to a

51: decelerating scale factor ${\ddot a} < 0$, sufficiently separated

52: regions of the present day observable universe would never have been in

53: causal contact.  Nevertheless, it appears the

54: universe we observe looks very much the same, and in particular very

55: smooth, in all directions.  This fact is best seen in the 

56: %cosmic microwave

57: %background radiation (

58:  CMB which has  temperature fluctuations of

59: only one part in $10^5$ when measured from any direction in the sky

60: \cite{COBE}.

61: 

62: The inflation solution to this horizon problem is to picture the

63: universe during an early epoch to undergo an accelerated expansion,

64: ${\ddot a} > 0$.  Such expansion can take an initially small causally

65: connected patch and enlarge it to a size that comfortably encompasses

66: our present day observed universe, thereby solving the horizon problem.

67: To realize inflation, the equation of state within the inflationary

68: patch must be of a very special form, possessing negative pressure.

69: The potential energy of a scalar field has an equation of state that

70: satisfies this requirement. This fact has been a key link towards a

71: dynamical realization of inflation and thereby has further motivated

72: the inflation solution.

73: 

74: As inflation is meant to solve the horizon problem, it is important

75: that it does not require acausal initial conditions. 

76: In particular, 

77: the picture of inflation considered here

78: is for the universe to emerge from an initial singularity

79: and then 

80: enter into a hot big-bang radiation dominated evolution.  At some

81: time $t_i$ after the initial singularity, the conditions appropriate

82: for inflation should occur within a small patch that is contained

83: within the causal horizon at that time.  

84: Chaotic inflation \cite{ci,linde}  does not fall into this picture

85: as there inflation 

86: is thought to start at the Planck epoch with homogeneity assumed on

87: the Planck scale.

88: To realize the picture of a

89: ``local'' inflation, two requirements must be satisfied.  {}First a

90: physically sensible embedding must be demonstrated of the inflating

91: patch immersed within a non-inflating 

92: background \cite{embedd,Vachaspati:2000dy,Trodden:1999wc}.  

93: %CGCG

94: By embedding we mean matching the inflationary space time with the

95: background space time at the boundary of the patch.

96: Second, it must be

97: shown that

98: for $t> t_i$, the patch is dynamically stable to sustain

99: inflation \cite{piran181,kb,kb90,gpprl,gold43,other,Goldwirth:1992rj}.

100: {}For example, large fluctuations, which conceivably could

101: enter the inflating patch at a maximum rate limited only by causality,

102: should not destroy the inflationary conditions within the patch.

103: 

104: Recently, a convenient methodology has been developed

105: in \cite{Vachaspati:2000dy,Trodden:1999wc} for analyzing

106: the embedding problem, based

107: on the null Raychaudhuri equation \cite{ray,Wald:1984rg}.  In Sec. \ref{embedding_conditions}

108: the flat spacetime ($\Omega=1$)

109: formulation in \cite{Vachaspati:2000dy} 

110: is generalized to arbitrary spacetime curvature.

111: Then, an alternative solution from \cite{Vachaspati:2000dy}

112: to the embedding problem will be identified, which is especially

113: attractive for an 

114: inflating patch with an open geometry.

115: In Sec. \ref{dynamic_conditions}, initial conditions

116: for scalar field dynamics are presented, 

117: which are consistent with causality and our

118: embedding solution and which evolve into

119: successful supercooled or warm inflationary regimes.

120: %CG:

121: In Sec. \ref{dynamical_effects_on_embedding} we combine the results in

122: Sec. \ref{embedding_conditions}  and Sec. \ref{dynamic_conditions} to evaluate

123: the effect of inhomogeneities on the embedding problem.

124: Finally, Sec. \ref{conclusion} presents our conclusions.

125: 

126: \section{Embedding conditions}

127: \label{embedding_conditions}

128: The embedding of an inflationary

129: %CG

130: patch within a background space time generally is

131: regarded as unacceptable if there are any negative energy

132: regions. This requirement often is referred to as

133: the weak energy condition.  

134: The null Raychaudhuri equation is a useful diagnostic

135: tool for determining the validity of this condition.  This

136: equation determines the evolution

137: of the divergence $\theta \equiv \nabla^{\alpha}N_{\alpha}$

138: of the null ray vector $N^\alpha$ 

139: in a spacetime

140: %CG

141: with an arbitrary, and {\em not necessarily homogeneous},

142: energy density distribution.  

143: In order for the weak energy

144: condition to be valid, this equation

145: implies that for a null geodesic the condition 

146: %CG

147: \cite{Vachaspati:2000dy,Wald:1984rg}

148: \begin{equation}

149: \frac{d \theta}{ds} \leq 0

150: \label{dtheta}

151: \end{equation}

152: must be satisfied,

153: where $s$ is an affine parameter along the

154: null geodesic.  

155: 

156: {}For application of Eq.\ (\ref{dtheta}) to the inflation

157: embedding problem, the concept of anti-trapped

158: and normal regions should be understood.

159: %CG

160: Consider a sphere centered on a comoving observer.

161: If the space time were not expanding, photons emitted from the surface

162: of the sphere, radially towards the observer, would converge at

163: the observer. However, the expansion tends to work against the bundle

164: of rays converging to a point. If the expansion is rapid enough, the

165: bundle of rays will have diverging trajectories and then the spherical

166: surface from which the rays originated is

167: said to be an {\em anti-trapped\/} surface \cite{Wald:1984rg}.  

168: The spherical surface 

169: with a radius $\xmas$ is known as

170: the {\em minimally anti-trapped surface} (MAS) if any sphere with a

171: larger radius is anti-trapped.

172: {}For inwardly directed null rays, the divergence, $\theta$, will

173: be positive in anti-trapped regions of space.

174: On the other hand, 

175: if $\theta$ is negative for

176: inwardly directed null rays and positive for outwardly directed null

177: rays, the region is called {\it normal}.

178: 

179: These definitions are convenient  when

180: analyzing the weak energy condition based on Eq.\ (\ref{dtheta}).

181: {}For example, one can

182: %CG

183: immediately conclude \cite{Vachaspati:2000dy} that if an outer normal region

184: bounds an inner anti-trapped region in a not necessarily homogeneous,

185: spherically symmetric space time, the

186: weak energy condition would be violated, thus implying negative energy

187: is required at the boundary of such a configuration.

188: 

189: {}For the inflation problem, the inner

190: region is modeled as the putative inflation

191: patch (INF) and it is immersed within a outer background (BG)

192: expanding spacetime region.

193: %CG

194: As a first approximation, both the INF and BG regions are

195: characterized by FRW metrics of the form

196: \begin{equation}

197: ds^2 = -dt^2 + a^2 \left( \frac{dr^2}{1-K r^2} + r^2 d\Omega^2 \right),

198: \label{frw}   

199: \end{equation}

200: where $K=-1$ for an open geometry, 0 for a flat geometry and 1 for a

201: closed geometry. 

202: %CG

203: The effect of inhomogeneities in the BG will be considered in

204: Sec. \ref{dynamical_effects_on_embedding}. The INF patch should be homogeneous.

205: In what follows, $\theta$ and $\xmas$ will be computed for

206: a spacetime characterized by the metric Eq.\ (\ref{frw}).

207: The results below are applicable for both the

208: INF and BG regions, given that the appropriate parameters are used

209: in Eq.\ (\ref{frw}) for the two different spacetime regions.

210: 

211: Proceeding with this calculation,

212: the determinant of the metric Eq.\ (\ref{frw}) is

213: \begin{equation}

214:   \label{eq:determinant}

215:   g = |\mbox{det}(g_{\mu\nu})| = a ^ 6 r ^ 4 (1 -

216: K r^2)^{-1}\sin^2\psi ,

217: \end{equation}

218: where $\psi$ is the polar angle.

219: An incoming light ray (null vector) is given by

220: \begin{equation}

221:   \label{eq:null vector}

222:   N^\alpha

223:  = \frac{1}{a}\left[\delta^{\alpha}_{0} - a ^ {-1} (1 - K r^2)^

224:   {1/2}\delta^\alpha_1\right] ,

225: \end{equation}

226: with the divergence of the null rays being

227: \begin{equation}

228:   \label{eq:divergence}

229:   \theta

230:  = \frac{1}{\sqrt{g}} (\sqrt{g}N^\alpha)_{,\alpha}.

231: \end{equation}

232: Substituting equations (\ref{eq:determinant}) and (\ref{eq:null vector})

233: into (\ref{eq:divergence}) gives

234: \begin{equation}

235:   \label{eq:soln1}

236:   \theta

237: = \frac{2}{a} \left( {\rm H} - \frac{(1 - K r^2)^{1/2}}{ar} \right)

238: %\label{thetaio}

239: \end{equation}

240: with ${\rm H} \equiv {\dot a}/a$ the Hubble parameter.

241: The above recovers equation (10) 

242: of \cite{Vachaspati:2000dy} for $K = 0$.

243: 

244: The physical distance is given by

245: \begin{eqnarray}

246:   x &=& a \int dr (1-K r^2)^{-1/2} \\ &=& a\, \mbox{arcsinh(r)}, \quad

247:     \mbox{for $K = -1$}

248:   \label{eq:distance}

249: \end{eqnarray}

250: The MAS comoving distance, $\rmas$, must

251: give a zero divergence and so from Eq.\ (\ref{eq:soln1})

252: with, for example, $K=-1$

253: \begin{equation}

254:   \label{eq:condition}

255:   {\rm H} - \frac{{(1 + \rmas^2)}^{1/2}}{a\rmas} = 0,

256: \end{equation}

257: from which we get, using equation (\ref{eq:distance}),

258: \begin{equation}

259:   \label{eq:open_cond}

260:   \xmas = a\, \mbox{arcsinh}\left[({\rm H}^2a^2 - 1)^{-1/2}\right].

261: \end{equation}

262: {}From the Friedman equation:

263: \begin{equation}

264:   \label{eq:curv-density}

265:   {\rm H}^2 a^2 = \frac{K}{\Omega - 1}

266: \end{equation}

267: Substituting (\ref{eq:curv-density}) into (\ref{eq:open_cond})

268: gives the solution for $\xmas$ as a function of $\Omega < 1$.

269: A similar equation can be derived for the closed case $(1 < \Omega <

270: 2)$ where an upper limit is needed on $\Omega$ to ensure 

271: that $1/{\rm H}$

272: is smaller than the radius of the Universe.  

273: Therefore, the general MAS size is given by

274: \begin{equation}

275:   \label{mascond}

276:   \xmas(t) = \frac{1}{\rm H}\left\{

277: \begin{array}{ll}

278: \frac{1}{(1-\Omega)^{1/2}} \mbox{arcsinh} \left(\sqrt{\frac{1 -

279:       \Omega}{\Omega}} \right), & 0 < \Omega < 1 \\ 1, & \Omega = 1 \\

280:       \frac{1}{(\Omega - 1)^{1/2}} \mbox{arcsin}

281:       \left(\sqrt{\frac{\Omega - 1}{\Omega}} \right), & 1< \Omega < 2 %CG(28/08)

282: \end{array}

283: \right.

284: \end{equation}

285: \begin{figure}[htbp]

286:    \begin{center}

287: %         \includegraphics[angle=-90]{omega_mas.ps}

288:          \includegraphics[angle=-90]{figure1.eps}

289:      \caption{A plot of MAS size as function of the density.}

290:      

291: %     \caption{}

292:      \label{fig:xmas,Omega}

293:    \end{center}

294: \end{figure}

295: A plot of equation (\ref{mascond}) is given in Fig.

296: \ref{fig:xmas,Omega}. As can be seen, 

297: the size of the MAS becomes arbitrarily large relative

298: to the Hubble radius as $\Omega \rightarrow 0$.

299: 

300: The results for the $\xmas$ derived above are valid for either the

301: INF or BG region. In \cite{Vachaspati:2000dy}, the case $\Omega=1$ was

302: treated, and our calculation above is consistent with them in this

303: limit.  Before proceeding with our analysis for general $\Omega$, let

304: us review the results of \cite{Vachaspati:2000dy} for $\Omega=1$.  The

305: background spacetime in their work is pictured, as for us, as evolving

306: in a hot big bang regime.

307: {}For $\Omega=1$ and standard forms of matter,

308: e.g. radiation, non-relativitic matter, etc.,

309: the Hubble horizon sets the

310: the scale on which causal processes can take place.

311: For definiteness, if  we take the background causal horizon size as

312: $\xpbg = 1/\Hbg$, then by Eq.\ (\ref{mascond}) for $\Omega=1$, $\xpbg

313: =\xmasbg$.

314: \begin{figure}[htbp]

315:   \begin{center}

316:     \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{figure2.eps}

317:     \caption[A Penrose diagram for local inflation.]{A Penrose diagram for local inflation (adapted from

318:       \protect \cite{Vachaspati:2000dy} ). The arrow (ab) denotes a

319:       radially directed null-geodesic going from the normal background

320:       space time to the anti-trapped space time inside the patch.

321:       Shading represents anti-trapped regions.}

322:     \label{fig:penrose}

323:   \end{center}

324: \end{figure}

325: Fig. \ref{fig:penrose} shows a Penrose diagram for an embedding that

326: violates the weak energy condition.  Here, at the beginning of

327: inflation, $\xpinf$ is represented by line OQ and $\xmasinf$ is

328: represented by line OP.  An inflating patch is pictured to develop

329: within some region inside the background (polygon OQRS in Fig.

330: \ref{fig:penrose}).  In the inflationary patch, they assume a

331: different Hubble parameter $\Hinf$ and assume the size of this patch

332: must be $\xpinf > 1/\Hinf$.  This assumption can be justified by

333: requiring the patch to be stable against perturbations and will be

334: discussed further in the next section.  By Eq.\ (\ref{mascond}) it

335: also implies $\xmasinf = 1/\Hinf$ for $\Omega=1$.  If the patch is to

336: be set up by causal processes then we would expect it to be smaller

337: than the background Hubble horizon, $\xpinf < \xHbg$.  These

338: conditions combined imply $\xmasbg = \xHbg > \xpinf > \xmasinf$.  As

339: such the region between $\xmasbg$ and $\xpinf$ is normal with respect

340: to the BG-region and the region between $\xpinf$ and $\xmasinf$ is

341: anti-trapped with respect to the inflating patch. Thus an in-going

342: null ray will go from a negative divergence region to a positive

343: divergence region.  Based on Eq.\ (\ref{dtheta}) this leads to a

344: violation of the weak energy condition.  Due to this fact, in

345: \cite{Vachaspati:2000dy} they conclude that the only way to avoid this

346: violation is to have $\xpinf > \xHbg$ which may be impossible or at

347: least very difficult to come about through causal processes.

348: 

349: %CG

350: Although this analysis assumed a homogeneous background, the general

351: result of \cite{Vachaspati:2000dy} was that if the inflationary patch

352: contained a MAS then it must be larger than the background MAS. One of

353: the main aims of this article is to further examine the implications

354: this has for a causal embedding of an inflationary patch.

355: 

356: Our first observation is that there is an embedding consistent with

357: both causality and the weak energy condition, in particular

358: \begin{equation}

359: \xpbg , \xmasinf > \xpinf\,.

360: \label{embed2}

361: \end{equation}

362: Since $\xpinf$ in Eq.\ (\ref{embed2}) is smaller than $\xpbg$,

363: it implies consistency with causality.

364: A region which is smaller than its MAS will have no anti-trapped surfaces.

365: %{}Furthermore, note that when the MAS of a region exceeds the

366: %size of the region, effectively that region has no MAS.

367:   Thus

368: in our proposed embedding Eq.\ (\ref{embed2}), the INF-BG boundary

369: is between two normal regions. 

370: As such, provided                                                           

371: $\thetainf]_{\rm boundary}$ is sufficiently smaller than $\thetabg]_{\rm

372: boundary}$,  the weak energy condition is satisfied.

373: One interesting feature of the embedding Eq. (\ref{embed2})

374: is that for $\Omegainf < 1$ it is acceptable for

375: $\xpinf > 1/{\rm H}_{\rm inf}$.

376: 

377: As inflation proceeds, $\Omegainf \rightarrow 1$ and so $\xmasinf

378: \rightarrow \xHinf$. One of the main features of inflation is that 

379: modes of a matter perturbation  become larger than the Hubble radius

380: as the Universe expands.

381: It follows that eventually $\xpinf > \xHinf, \xmasinf$ will need to

382: occur.

383: This will not

384: cause  violation of the weak energy condition provided that $\xpinf >

385: \xmasbg$ at that time.

386: 

387: {}Fig. \ref{fig:embed} shows a Penrose diagram of the proposed

388: embedding.

389: At point T in the figure, $\xpinf=\xmasbg$ and at point P,

390: $\xpinf=\xmasinf$.

391: \begin{figure}[htbp]

392:   \begin{center}

393:     \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{figure3.eps}

394:     \caption[A successful embedding.]{A Penrose diagram for local inflation with an embedding

395:       that does not violate the weak energy condition and is not

396:       acausal.}

397:     \label{fig:embed}

398:   \end{center}

399: \end{figure}

400:  As can be seen the anti-trapped region develops in the

401: patch only after the patch has become greater than the background MAS.

402: 

403: There is another embedding which does not violate the weak energy

404: condition, in this case for $\Omegabg > 1$, but 

405: it proves not to be as useful,

406: \begin{equation}

407:   \label{eq:closed_bg}

408:   \xmasinf, \xmasbg < \xpinf < \xHbg\,.

409: \end{equation}

410: This solution is restricted by the upper limit on $\Omegabg$

411: that gives a lower limit (from Eq.\ \ref{mascond}) of $\xmasbg \approx

412: 0.8/ \Hbg$ for $\Omega=2$. 

413: As the causal 

414: scale $\xpbg$ 

415: can be only of the order of $\xHbg$, such a large inflationary

416: patch may still be acausal.

417: 

418: Additional information about embedding constraints can be

419: obtained through the Israel junction conditions \cite{Israel:1966rt}.

420: In \cite{bkt,Sakai:1994fu}

421: conditions were derived for the  embedding of one FRW spacetime

422: within another. The Israel junction conditions require the extrinsic

423: curvature on the background side of the boundary to be

424: smaller than the extrinsic curvature on the patch side of the 

425: boundary if the boundary surface energy density is to be positive. 

426: It can then be shown \cite{bkt,Sakai:1994fu} that if the 

427: energy density of the background $\rhobg$

428: is greater than that of the patch $\rhoinf$, the Israel junction

429: conditions can be satisfied for an inflationary patch of arbitrary size 

430: and geometry with any

431: background

432: geometry. They also show for $\rhobg < \rhoinf$, an embedding

433: consistent with the Israel junction conditions and $\xpinf < \xHbg$

434: requires

435: the background geometry to be closed with the geometry

436: of the inflationary patch arbitrary.

437: 

438: 

439: \section{Dynamic Conditions}

440: \label{dynamic_conditions}

441: An immediate concern with the proposed embedding Eq.\ (\ref{embed2})

442: regards the size of the inflationary patch.  As far as the embedding

443: conditions are concerned, the patch size simply must lie below the

444: $\xmas$ line in Fig. 1.  In particular, for $\Omegainf > 1$ the

445: inflationary patch size must be 

446: $< 1/\Hinf$.  

447: However, for

448: $\Omegainf < 1$, 

449: the inflationary patch size can be 

450: $ >

451: 1/\Hinf$.  The primary question which remains is what the minimal

452: initial inflation 

453: patch

454: size can be in order to be dynamically stable for

455: inflation to commence.  {}For example, if the initial patch is too

456: small, then large fluctuations initially outside the patch could enter

457: inside at a rate sufficiently fast to destroy the inflationary

458: conditions.  In this section, the dynamic conditions necessary

459: for inflation will be examined for both the scalar field

460: and a background radiation component.

461: 

462: \subsection{Scalar field}  

463: \label{scalar_field}

464: {}For scalar field driven inflation, the general dynamical conditions

465: necessary for a finite spatial patch to initiate and sustain inflation

466: have been considered in \cite{piran181,kb,kb90,gpprl,gold43,other} 

467: and a comprehensive review has

468: been given in \cite{Goldwirth:1992rj}. 

469: Here the requirements addressed in these

470: works, primarily the review \cite{Goldwirth:1992rj}, 

471: will be systematically examined

472: with emphasis on determining their implications for the

473: minimal initial inflationary patch size.  Our considerations 

474: of scalar field dynamics will generalize those in the 

475: above stated works, which focused on supercooled inflationary

476: dynamics \cite{siold,ni,ci}, 

477: in that here warm inflation dynamics \cite{wi} also will be

478: treated.

479: 

480: The classical evolution equation for the scalar inflaton

481: field has the general form

482: \begin{eqnarray}

483: & &{\ddot \phi} ({\bf x}, t)  + [3{\rm H}+\Gamma] {\dot \phi}({\bf x},t) 

484: \nonumber\\

485: & - &a^{-2} \nabla^2 \phi ({\bf x},t) + 

486: \frac{\delta V(\phi)}{\delta \phi({\bf x},t)} =0 ,

487: \label{phieom}

488: \end{eqnarray}

489: where $\Gamma$ is a dissipative coefficient, which represents

490: the effective interaction of the inflaton with other fields.

491: Here and below $\phi({\bf x},t)$ is a classical real number

492: which contains the ensemble average of the quantum and/or thermal

493: fluctuations.

494: In supercooled inflation, it is assumed the inflaton is isolated, in 

495: which case $\Gamma=0$. Thus no radiation is produced during inflation

496: and the universe inflates in a supercooled state.  On the other hand,

497: in warm inflation the inflaton interacts with

498: other fields, and the $\Gamma {\dot \phi}$ term is the simplest

499: representation of their effect on the evolution of the inflaton,

500: with generally $\Gamma > {\rm H}$.  Due to these interactions,

501: radiation is dissipated from the inflaton

502: system into the universe throughout the inflation period.

503: In general, $\Gamma$ can vary as a function of the inflaton field mode

504: to which it is associated, but here

505: $\Gamma$ is treated as a constant.

506: 

507: There are two types of potential $V(\phi)$ in Eq.\ (\ref{phieom})

508: that typically are treated in inflationary cosmology, a purely concave

509: potential of the generic form $V \sim m^2 \phi^2 + \lambda \phi^4$ 

510: and a double well potential such as $V \sim (\phi^2 - m^2)^2$.

511: Our discussion to follow will focus of the former type of potential

512: and at the end we will comment on the case of

513: the double well potential.  {}Furthermore, for most of our discussion

514: it will be adequate to consider the simplest case

515: of a quadratic potential, 

516: $V=\frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi^2$.

517: In this case,

518: going to Fourier space where we put the universe in a box

519: \begin{equation}

520: \phi({\bf x}, t) = \sum_{\bf k} \phi_{\bf k}(t) 

521: e^{i{\bf k} \cdot {\bf x}} ,

522: \end{equation}

523: Eq.\ (\ref{phieom}) becomes,

524: \begin{equation}

525: {\ddot \phi}_{\bf k} + [3{\rm H}+\Gamma] {\dot \phi}_{\bf k}(t)

526: +a^{-2} k^2 \phi_{\bf k}(t) + m^2 \phi_{\bf k}(t) =0 ,

527: \label{phikeom}

528: \end{equation}

529: where $k^2 \equiv |{\bf k}|^2$ with ${\bf k}$ the comoving

530: wave-vector and ${\bf k}/a(t)$ the corresponding physical wave-vector

531: at time $t$.

532: 

533: A necessary condition for inflation is that the zero mode

534: $\phi_{{\bf k} =0}$, must have a sufficiently large and

535: long-sustained amplitude

536: so that the potential energy $V=\frac{1}{2}m^2 \phi_0^2$ dominates the equation

537: of state of the universe, thereby driving inflation.

538: This leads to the familiar

539: slow-roll conditions, which require the curvature of the potential

540: to be sufficiently flat so that Eq.\ (\ref{phikeom}) 

541: for the zero mode becomes

542: first order in time

543: \begin{equation}

544: {\dot \phi}_0 = -\frac{dV(\phi)/d\phi_0}{3{\rm H}+\Gamma}.

545: \label{phik1eom}

546: \end{equation}

547: 

548: The dynamic initial condition problem is that the above requirements

549: should not be too special and in particular should not

550: violate causality.  The most acute initial condition

551: problem discussed in \cite{Goldwirth:1992rj} and related works is that generally

552: the initial inflaton field configuration will be very inhomogeneous,

553: thus considerable contribution of gradient energy ($(\nabla \phi)^2$)

554: should be present.  In its own right, the gradient term

555: for comoving mode ${\bf k}$ has energy density 

556: $\rho_{\nabla} = ({\bf k}^2/2a^2) \phi_{\bf k}^2$

557: and equation of state $p_{\nabla} = -\rho_{\nabla}/3$.

558: {}From the scale factor equation

559: \begin{equation}

560: \frac{\ddot a}{a} = -\frac{4 \pi G}{3}(\rho + 3p) ,

561: \label{scalefac}

562: \end{equation}

563: the effect of the gradient energy vanishes on the right hand

564: side. As such, any additional contribution from vacuum

565: energy still should drive inflation.  However,

566: excited modes with $k/a > 3{\rm H}+\Gamma$ not only will possess

567: gradient energy, but based on Eq.\ (\ref{phikeom})

568: are under-damped. As such, they also have a kinetic energy contribution

569: $\rho_{\dot \phi} \sim {\dot \phi}^2_{\bf k}$, which has

570: an equation of state $p_{\dot \phi} = \rho_{\dot \phi}$.

571: If the kinetic energy components of these modes dominates

572: the energy density in the universe, then from 

573: Eq.\ (\ref{scalefac}) inflation will cease to occur.

574: 

575: {}For the case of supercooled inflation, since $\Gamma=0$,

576: the simplest way to avoid

577: this problem is to require

578: that modes with $k/a \gtrsim {\rm H}$ initially

579: should not be excited. In other words, the inflaton field

580: initially should be smooth up to physical scales larger than

581: $\sim 1/{\rm H}$.  However, under general conditions, the causal

582: size of the pre-inflation patch  also will be of order

583: the Hubble radius $1/{\rm H}$. As such

584: this homogeneity requirement on the initial inflaton field

585: impinges on

586: being acausal,

587: since this condition

588: essentially requires initially smooth conditions up

589: to the causal scale.

590: 

591: To treat excited modes with $k/a > {\rm H}$

592: in the supercooled inflation case, the initial

593: condition dynamics are much more

594: complicated.  A simple analytical method applied to this

595: situation is the effective density approximation presented in

596: \cite{piran181,gold43} and reviewed 

597: in Sec. 7.2 of \cite{Goldwirth:1992rj}.  In this approach,

598: the inhomogeneities of the inflaton are treated in determining its

599: evolution, but the effect of these inhomogeneities on the

600: metric is only treated in the Friedmann equation through

601: homogeneous terms that represent the effective gradient and

602: kinetic energy densities as

603: \begin{eqnarray}

604: \left(\frac{\dot a}{a}\right)^2 \equiv {\rm H}^2 = 

605:  \frac{8\pi G}{3}

606: \left[\frac{1}{2} {\dot \phi}_0^2 + \frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi_0^2 \right.

607: +&& \nonumber\\ \left. \frac{1}{2} \sum_{\bf k}[{\dot \phi}_{\bf k}^2 + 

608: (\frac{{\bf k}^2}{a^2} +m^2) \phi_{\bf k}^2] +\rho_r\right]

609: -\frac{K}{a^2}.&& 

610: \end{eqnarray}

611: {}For initial field configurations with sufficiently excited

612: $k/a > {\rm H}$ modes so that their

613: gradient energies dominate the equation of state of the

614: universe, the effective density approximation indicates

615: the Friedmann and inflaton evolution equations are highly coupled.

616: In particular, the Hubble parameter will be dominated by the

617: gradient energy term and this will act back on the inflaton

618: evolution through the $3{\rm H} {\dot \phi}$ term.  

619: {}Furthermore, the initially large gradient terms also

620: can in turn induce large kinetic energy in the modes. The outcome

621: found in \cite{piran181,gold43,Goldwirth:1992rj}

622: (see also \cite{kb90}) 

623: for this case is that the universe expansion

624: is non-inflationary.  On the other hand, for the excited

625: $k/a > {\rm H}$ modes with smaller amplitudes, their evolution

626: will be oscillatory and once again the universe expansion is

627: non-inflationary.  {}For either

628: of these two possibilities,

629: this approximation method finds that after an initial period

630: of detaining the universe in a non-inflationary

631: regime, the effect of these higher modes becomes

632: negligible. At this point the remaining vacuum energy dominates and

633: eventually inflation proceeds.

634: 

635: Numerical simulations \cite{gpprl,gold43}

636: which exactly treat the effects on the

637: metric due to the inhomogeneities in the inflaton field,

638: in fact, do not support this final conclusion of the effective

639: density approximation.  Instead, the simulations

640: find that once modes with $k/a > {\rm H}$ are sufficiently

641: excited, inflation generally does not occur or

642: is highly suppressed.  Although the final conclusion

643: of the effective density approximation was incorrect, it at least

644: indicated that there is nontrivial interplay between the

645: inflaton and metric evolution equations 

646: once significant short distance inhomogeneities

647: are present in the inflaton field. 

648: 

649: In contrast to the supercooled case, once $\Gamma > {\rm H}$, the

650: effective density approximation indicates that for modes

651: with $\Gamma > k/a > {\rm H}$, there is almost no

652: feedback between the inflaton and Friedmann equations.

653: The evolution equation for these inflaton modes is

654: \begin{equation}

655: \Gamma \dot \phi_{\bf k}(t) = \left[\frac{{\bf k}^2}{a^2}+

656: m^2 \right] \phi_{\bf k}(t),

657: \end{equation}

658: and in particular 

659: is

660: independent of ${\rm H}$.  This in turn implies all these modes

661: are over-damped. As such, they only contribute gradient energy

662: to the equation of state of the universe, which alone is

663: ineffective in preventing inflation.  Thus up to the predictions

664: of the effective density approximation, in contrast to the

665: supercooled case,  in this warm inflation case modes with

666: $k/a < \Gamma$ show little coupling between the inflaton and

667: Friedmann equations. 

668: It is evident that dynamics with a $\Gamma {\dot \phi}$

669: damping term should have qualitative differences for the

670: initial condition problem compared to the case with $\Gamma=0$.

671: In particular, 

672: %CG

673: %the most enticing suggestion is that 

674: modes

675: of physical wavelength smaller that the Hubble radius

676: $1/{\rm H}$ but larger than $1/\Gamma$ could still be substantially

677: excited without destroying entrance into inflation.

678: This implies inflationary patch sizes smaller than the Hubble

679: radius may be dynamically stable in sustaining

680: inflation and based on the results of Sec. \ref{embedding_conditions}, 

681: they also

682: provide consistent spacetime embeddings, especially for 

683: $\Omegainf < 1$. 

684: {}Furthermore, studies of warm 

685: inflation \cite{wi,Berera:1997fm,taylor2000},

686: including the first principles quantum field theory

687: model \cite{wifp}, generally find

688: that to obtain adequate inflationary e-folds,

689: $N_e \stackrel{>}{\sim} 60$, it requires $\Gamma \approx N_em^2/{\rm H}$

690: with $m \gtrsim {\rm H}$ so that

691: $\Gamma \gtrsim N_e {\rm H}$ and thus $1/\Gamma \ll 1/{\rm H}$.

692: As such, for warm inflationary conditions this simple

693: analysis suggests that the smoothness requirement on the

694: initial inflationary patch is at scales much smaller than the

695: Hubble radius $1/{\rm H}$, which therefore imposes no

696: violation of causality.

697: 

698: These considerations can be extended to the more complicated situation

699: where the inflaton evolution equation has nonlinear terms,

700: such as the $\phi^4$ interaction term.  {}For supercooled inflation,

701: the effect of such interactions has been considered from the

702: perspective of mode mixing for some special cases in \cite{kb,kb90}

703: and through computer simulations of scalar fields in one spatial

704: dimension in \cite{gpprl,gold43}.  Up to the scope of these works,

705: their analysis concludes that nonlinear interactions do not present

706: any additional complications to the initial condition problem.

707: {}For the warm inflation case, this conclusion can be stated

708: in more general terms.  In particular, the dissipative coefficient 

709: $\Gamma$  completely damps the evolution, thus suppressing mode mixing,

710: of all modes with $k/a < \Gamma$.  As such, initially excited

711: modes with $k/a < \Gamma$ will evolve independently within

712: the time scales relevant to the initial period when inflation begins.

713: The only effect of excited modes with $k/a < \Gamma$ is to

714: contribute gradient energy to the equation of state of the universe,

715: and this alone is ineffective in suppressing inflation.

716: Therefore, provided the inflaton field also initially

717: maintains some vacuum energy, no aspect of the inflaton's dynamics

718: in the early period acts to circumvent entrance into the inflation 

719: phase.  

720: 

721: Although the above discussion addressed the 

722: main impediment in scalar field dynamics that

723: can prevent inflation,

724: there are a few smaller concerns worth

725: mentioning here.

726: One detail treated in \cite{Goldwirth:1992rj} is

727: inflaton initial conditions with large kinetic energy.

728: {}For $\Gamma=0$, it is shown in \cite{Goldwirth:1992rj} that this problem is 

729: self-correcting, and so should not pose a major barrier

730: in entering into the inflation phase.  {}For $\Gamma > {\rm H}$, the severity

731: of this problem diminishes further since this damping

732: term is an additional effect that helps suppress the

733: initial kinetic energy.  Another secondary detail is that above

734: we only treated concave potentials.  {}For double well potentials,

735: $V \sim (\phi^2 - m^2)^2$, as in the case of new 

736: inflation \cite{ni},

737: inflation requires the field to be well localized 

738: at the top of the potential hill $\phi =0$ and almost at

739: rest.  These requirements are necessary, otherwise as found

740: in various studies \cite{niearly}, the field can easily break up

741: into several small domains with randomly varying signs

742: of the amplitude.  {}For the supercooled case, new inflation,

743: the basic conclusion about the initial

744: conditions  required for inflation has been that they

745: are not very robust \cite{niearly,niic,Goldwirth:1992rj}.  The inclusion

746: of a dissipative term $\Gamma > {\rm H}$ will not necessarily improve this

747: situation.  On the one hand, such a term helps

748: considerably to damp kinetic energy, thus allowing

749: the inflaton to remain at the top of the hill longer

750: and drive inflation.  On the other hand, if such a damping term

751: arises too early before inflation is to begin,  since it freezes

752: the evolution of excited inflaton modes, it could prevent

753: the initial inflaton field configuration 

754: from equilibriating to $\phi=0$.

755: 

756: {}Finally in the above discussion $\Gamma \ne 0$ generally

757: represented warm inflation dynamics, although even for supercooled

758: inflation, if radiation is present at the onset of inflation,

759: such as in the new \cite{ni} and thermal \cite{ti}

760: inflation pictures, the effective evolution of the

761: inflaton could have a damping term of the form $\Gamma {\dot \phi}$.

762: Since our focus is on the initial phase

763: at the onset of inflation, it is possible

764: the effect of such damping terms also may

765: be applicable to the initial condition problem

766: in some supercooled inflation models.

767: 

768: \subsection{Radiation component}

769: \label{radiation_component}

770: So far we only considered the inflaton field system, but

771: in addition the universe could possess some background component of

772: radiation energy density, $\rhorbg$.  To realize inflation, minimally

773: it requires the vacuum energy density $\rho_{\rm v}$

774: to dominate in the patch, $\rhorbg < \rho_{\rm v}$. 

775: If initially $\rhorbg$

776: is larger than $\rho_{\rm v}$, expansion of the universe will

777: red-shift the radiation. Thus provided the vacuum energy sustains itself

778: during this early period, inflation eventually will start.

779: This is the standard new and warm inflation pictures.  

780: 

781: One could imagine that in some small patch inside a larger 

782: causally created spatial region,

783: the inflaton field configuration is reasonably smooth and is sustaining a 

784: sizable vacuum energy of magnitude

785: \begin{equation} 

786: \rho_{\rm v} \approx \rhorbg.

787: \label{rvapprr} 

788: \end{equation} 

789: As the universe expands $\rhorbg$ decreases and provided

790: $\rho_{\rm v}$ sustains itself, inflation will begin in the patch.

791: However at this moment,  there could be 

792: large energy fluctuations in the radiation

793: bath or other fields that are just outside the putative inflationary

794: patch.  One would like to understand how probable it is for such a

795: situation to curtail the inflation that had started in the patch.

796: 

797: To answer this question based solely on causality considerations,

798: one should consider the case of a perturbation

799: starting on the patch boundary and moving across the patch at the speed

800: of light, and make the extreme assumption that as the perturbation

801: overruns 

802: regions of the inflation patch, those regions convert back

803: to being non-inflating.  The question is what minimal initial

804: inflationary patch size is needed so that its expansion

805: under inflation is faster than its contraction due to the

806: impinging perturbations.  {}For the case of flat geometry $\Omega=1$,

807: this question was addressed in \cite{Goldwirth:1992rj} 

808: and they concluded that

809: the patch size should be at least 3 times the Hubble radius in

810: order for inflation to succeed in enlarging the

811: patch.  

812: {}For a general $\Omega$,

813: we can address this  question

814: by evaluating 

815: the maximum distance a perturbation can travel 

816: in the patch between the initial

817: $t_i$ and final

818: $t_f$ time of inflation

819: \begin{equation}

820: %  \label{eq:distance travelled}

821:   x_{\rm pert} = a(t) \int_{t_i}^{t_f} a^{-1} \, dt .

822: \label{xpert}

823: \end{equation}

824: Note that since $a$ is growing rapidly, there is negligible error

825: in taking $t_f \rightarrow \infty$ which implies

826: $x_{\rm pert}$ essentially is the event horizon.

827: We have examined Eq.\ (\ref{xpert}) for a variety of supercooled

828: and warm inflation models and generally find

829: $x_{\rm pert} \approx \xmas$.  

830: 

831: Thus in the most ideal case, an

832: inflationary patch smaller than the event horizon can not

833: be stable.  Here an important point of syntax should be noted,

834: that the generic size here is the event horizon and not the Hubble radius,

835: although for the flat case, $\Omega=1$, both are 

836: of the same order.

837: The above is the ideal bound based on causality.  However,

838: realistic dynamics also must be considered.

839: 

840: One case which 

841: corresponds to external perturbations entering

842: into an initially inflating patch is the case treated

843: in Subsect. IIIA of the mixing of high wavenumber modes.  

844: {}For the inflaton field interacting with itself or with other fields,

845: we argued above that if a dissipative term of the form $\Gamma {\dot \phi}$

846: is present in the inflaton effective evolution equation, then mode

847: mixing up to wave-numbers $k/a < \Gamma$ will not

848: occur within the time scale relevant to the initial condition

849: problem.  

850: 

851: In terms of the radiation bath, suppose a small vacuum 

852: dominated inflationary  regime

853: emerges, which is immersed inside a larger 

854: region containing radiation and gradient energy density.

855: Since the inflationary patch has negative pressure, the surrounding

856: radiation will flow into it.  The degree to which

857: the pressure differences are significant to this

858: process depends on the magnitudes

859: of the radiation, gradient and vacuum energies in both

860: regions as well as detailed dynamical 

861: considerations\cite{bkt,bubble}\footnote{The dynamics involves viscosity effects

862: at the interface between the inflation and background regions.

863: This viscosity is unrelated to the dissipative coefficient

864: $\Gamma$ in Sec. \ref{scalar_field}, which represents

865: the damping of the scalar field amplitude within the inflationary

866: patch.}.

867: Nevertheless, suppose the radiation tries to become uniform over

868: the entire region, including the patch.  

869: Since the patch started to inflate, it meant that initially

870: $\rho_{\rm v} \gtrsim \rhorbg$.  As time commences,

871: provided $\rho_{\rm v}$ remains constant, since expansion of the background

872: will decrease $\rhorbg$,  it means the amount of radiation

873: that flows into the inflationary patch will be less than $\rho_{\rm v}$.

874: Thus irrespective of whether the inflaton dynamics is supercooled

875: or warm, the patch should sustain a type of warm inflation due to

876: this influx of radiation from the regions that surround it. 

877: 

878: A thorough understanding of the initial

879: condition dynamics in presence of a background radiation component

880: is complicated.  To our knowledge, no quantitative analysis

881: has been done along these lines.  The review \cite{Goldwirth:1992rj}

882: only illustrated the problem with the example 

883: quoted above Eq.\ (\ref{xpert})

884: based on causality considerations but offered no dynamical 

885: examples with respect to a background radiation component.

886: Here we have offered one

887: scenario where the background radiation component  

888: should not prevent inflation from occurring.  In particular,

889: this example demonstrates that causality bounds 

890: on the rate at which radiation or other energy fluctuations

891: enter the patch are not the only aspect of this problem.

892: In addition, the magnitude of the entering

893: radiation must be adequately large to overwhelm the

894: vacuum energy.  We have offered arguments above that indicate this

895: latter requirement is not generic.  

896:  

897: %CG

898: \section{Dynamical effects on embedding}

899: \label{dynamical_effects_on_embedding}

900: As discussed in Sec. \ref{embedding_conditions}, a causally favourable

901: embedding requires the inflationary patch to start smaller than the

902: background MAS and then grow larger than it. A minimum condition for

903: this to happen is that the particle horizon of the

904: background eventually becomes greater than the background MAS.

905: 

906: For $p=\omega \rho$, the particle horizon is given by \cite{KT}

907: \begin{equation}

908:   \label{eq:particle_horizon}

909:   d(t) = \frac{1}{H} \int_0^1 \frac{dx}{\left[x^2(1-\Omega(t)) + \Omega(t) 

910:          x^{1-3w} \right]^{1/2}}.

911: \end{equation}

912: Comparing this equation with Eq.~(\ref{mascond}) it can be seen

913: that the particle horizon will only become greater than the MAS if

914: $\omega < 1/3$. This condition was also noted in \cite{DC} from a

915: slightly different perspective. There the patch was taken to start

916: larger than the background MAS.

917: 

918: It follows that our proposed embedding will not work for a pure

919: radiation background which has $\omega=1/3$. However, in general the

920: background will consist of radiation and an inhomogeneous scalar

921: field.  As discussed in Sec. \ref{dynamic_conditions}, the gradient

922: energy of the scalar field has $\omega = -1/3$ and the potential

923: energy has $\omega=-1$ while the kinetic energy has $\omega=1$. It

924: follows that if the background is gradient dominated our causal

925: embedding scheme will be viable, whereas our scheme fails if the

926: kinetic term dominates.  However, the kinetic energy of the scalar

927: field will be suppressed if the dissipative coefficient

928: $\Gamma$ of Sec. \ref{dynamic_conditions} is sufficiently large.

929: This is already required inside the putative inflation patch

930: in order to realize inflation.  Thus, it is not

931: unreasonable to expect $\Gamma$ in the background region

932: to be of the same magnitude. 

933: 

934: \section{Conclusion}

935: \label{conclusion}

936: This Chapter has investigated the initial condition

937: problem of inflation from the perspective both

938: of spacetime embedding and inflaton dynamics.  Our study

939: has highlighted two attributes of this problem which

940: have not been addressed in other works.  {}First, from

941: the perspective of spacetime embedding, we have observed that

942: the global geometry can play an important role in determining

943: the size of the initial inflationary patch that is consistent with

944: the weak energy condition.  Second, from the perspective of inflaton dynamics,

945: we have noted that a $\Gamma {\dot \phi}$

946: damping term could alleviate several

947: problems which traditionally have led to large scale homogeneity 

948: %CG

949: requirements before inflation.  

950: 

951: The purpose of this Chapter was to note for both these attributes, their

952: salient features with respect to the initial condition problem.

953: In the wake of this, several details emerge that must be understood.

954: Below, we will review the main result we found for both

955: attributes and then discuss the questions that must be addressed

956: in future work.  

957: 

958: {}For a causally generated patch a successful embedding can be achieved

959: if the patch does not contain an anti-trapped region.  We have shown

960: that the MAS size can be arbitrarily larger than the Hubble scale

961: provided $\Omega$ is made small enough.  So if the patch Hubble

962: horizon is taken as the minimum stable patch size, then the patch does

963: not have to contain an anti-trapped region if $\Omegainf < 1$.

964: This generalizes the analysis of \cite{Vachaspati:2000dy} which was

965: only for  $\Omega=1$. 

966: %An analysis based on the Israel junction

967: %conditions supports this conclusion. 

968: However, without the effects of damping, it

969: appears that the event horizon, not the Hubble horizon, 

970: is the minimum stable patch size. {}For

971: the de Sitter case one can see analytically that the event horizon is

972: equal to the MAS size regardless of $\Omega$ and numerical calculations

973: suggest the same is true for power law inflation. However, radiation

974: damping of perturbations could stabilize a patch smaller than the event

975: horizon. In this case an open geometry for the patch

976: would allow the patch not to contain an anti-trapped region and thus

977: allow a causal embedding in an expanding background which does not

978: violate the weak energy condition. 

979: Eventually the patch should develop a MAS within it, but by then it

980: could have expanded to be larger than the background MAS.

981: 

982: 

983: {}For the dynamics problem, with respect to the scalar field

984: the new consideration was the effect of a $\Gamma {\dot \phi}$

985: damping term.  We found that such a term could suppress

986: many of the effects from initial inhomogeneities of the inflaton,

987: which in studies traditionally done without this term

988: lead to important impediments to

989: entering the inflation regime.  It appears evident that

990: inclusion of such a damping term will

991: lead to qualitative differences in the

992: initial condition problem.  The most interesting

993: outcome is initial inflationary patches

994: smaller than the Hubble radius $1/{\rm H}$ may be able to inflate.

995: 

996: 

997: This Chapter examined the consequences of damping terms but did

998: not delve into their fundamental origin. 

999: {}For the cosmological setting,

1000: such damping terms are typically associated with

1001: systems involving a scalar field interacting

1002: with fields of a radiation bath.  In this case, 

1003: such damping terms have been

1004: found in first principles calculations

1005: for certain warm inflation models \cite{wifp},

1006: although more work is needed along these lines. 

1007: It is worth noting here that in the early stages of certain

1008: supercooled inflaton scenarios where radiation is present, 

1009: in particular new \cite{ni} and

1010: thermal \cite{ti} inflation, a careful examination of the

1011: dynamics may reveal damping terms similar to this.

1012: Since the initial stages are the crucial period for the

1013: initial condition problem, if further study supports the

1014: importance of such damping terms, it may be useful

1015: to better understand damping effects also in such

1016: scenarios.

1017: 

1018: Since the most suggestive situation for the damping terms is

1019: where in addition a radiation component is present in the universe,

1020: in Subsect. IIIB we also studied the effects of this 

1021: component on the initial condition problem.

1022: Specifically we studied the case most suggestive

1023: for the initial stages of new and warm inflation, 

1024: where a small inflation patch is submerged inside a larger

1025: radiation dominated spatial region.  Our main

1026: observation has been that the minimal condition for

1027: the patch to inflate is that its vacuum energy density must be larger than

1028: the background radiation energy density.  Provided the vacuum

1029: energy sustains itself, since expansion of the universe

1030: will dilute the radiation energy density, it is not clear-cut

1031: that the external radiation energy can act with sufficient magnitude

1032: to impede inflation inside the patch.

1033: 

1034: 

1035: %CG

1036: We have shown that the gradient terms, due to the inhomogeneous scalar

1037: field in the background space time, make it possible for the patch

1038: boundary to overtake the background MAS. However the kinetic energy of

1039: the scalar field must not be dominant for this to happen.  This can be

1040: ensured by including a damping term in the scalar field equation.

1041: