1:
2: %% The command below calls the preprint style
3: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
4: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
5: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
6:
7: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
8:
9: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
10:
11: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
12:
13: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
14:
15: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
16:
17: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
18: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
19: %% the \begin{document} command.
20: %%
21: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
22: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
23: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
24: %% for information.
25:
26: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
27: %\newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
28: \newcommand\kms{\ifmmode \mathrm{km\,s^{-1}} \else $\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$\fi}
29:
30: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
31:
32: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
33: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
34: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
35: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
36: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
37: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
38:
39: \shorttitle{Photometry and radial velocities of Cepheids}
40: \shortauthors{Bersier}
41:
42: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
43: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
44:
45: \begin{document}
46:
47: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
48: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
49: %% you desire.
50:
51: \title{Fundamental parameters of Cepheids. V. \\
52: Additional photometry and radial velocity data for southern Cepheids\footnote{
53: Based on observations obtained at the European Southern Observatory, La Silla}}
54:
55:
56: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
57: %% author and affiliation information.
58: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
59: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
60: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
61: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
62:
63: \author{D. Bersier}
64: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St,
65: Cambridge, MA 02138}
66: \email{dbersier@cfa.harvard.edu}
67:
68:
69:
70:
71: \begin{abstract}
72:
73: I present photometric and radial velocity data for Galactic Cepheids,
74: most of them being in the southern hemisphere. There are 1250 Geneva
75: 7-color photometric measurements for 62 Cepheids, the average
76: uncertainty per measurement is better than $0.01^m$. A total of 832
77: velocity measurements have been obtained with the CORAVEL radial
78: velocity spectrograph for 46 Cepheids. The average accuracy of the
79: radial velocity data is 0.38 \kms. There are 33 stars with both
80: photometry and radial velocity data. I discuss the possible binarity
81: or period change that these new data reveal. I also present
82: reddenings for all Cepheids with photometry. The data are available
83: electronically.
84:
85: \end{abstract}
86:
87:
88: \keywords{Cepheids --- techniques: radial velocities --- techniques: photometric
89: --- (ISM:) dust, extinction}
90:
91:
92: \section{Introduction}
93:
94: A significant amount of photometry and radial velocity data for
95: Cepheids had been published by \citet{ber94a} and
96: \citet{ber94b}. These have been used to devise a new version of the
97: Baade-Wesselink method \citep{bbk97}. However most Cepheids in
98: Bersier, Burki \& Kurucz's sample are in the northern hemisphere. New
99: observations have been obtained for (mostly) long-period Cepheids
100: visible from the southern hemisphere. I present here these new
101: observations, along with older unpublished data. The photometry is in
102: the Geneva 7-color system and the radial velocity data have been
103: obtained with the CORAVEL radial velocity scanner \citep{bmp79}.
104:
105:
106:
107: \section{Observations}
108:
109: \subsection{Photometry}
110:
111: A search in the Geneva photometry database revealed that several
112: Cepheids already had a substantial number of measurements. These data
113: could constitute a basis for expanding Bersier et al.'s (1997) efforts
114: to determine Period-Radius and Period-Luminosity relations via the
115: Baade-Wesselink method. I present these old unpublished
116: data\footnote{the present paper contains only unpublished data. Other
117: Cepheid data can be found in \citet{ber94a} and references therein.}
118: together with new data obtained in several runs during 1996 and
119: 1997. Like the data given in \citet{ber94a}, the measurements are in
120: the Geneva 7-color system (Golay 1980, Rufener 1988) and most have
121: been obtained with the 70-cm Swiss telescope at La Silla Observatory.
122: The instrument used is a photometer \citep{b76} that measures each
123: filter several times per second; the exposure is stopped after a
124: minimum signal-to noise ratio has been reached in each filter; the
125: integration time was at least three minutes. Given that most of our
126: stars are brighter than $m_V = 10$ the uncertainty is better than
127: $0.01^m$ for virtually all measurements. Furthermore all measurements
128: have been obtained in photometric conditions. Table~\ref{tbl_nph}
129: lists all 62 Cepheids that have data. The 1250 individual measurements
130: in seven colors are given in Table~\ref{tbl_ph}\footnote{All the data
131: presented in this paper are available electronically at \\
132: \url{ftp://cfa-ftp.harvard.edu/pub/dbersier/}}. Forty-three stars
133: have more than 20 measurements. Figure~\ref{fig_lc} presents examples
134: of light and color curves for well-observed Cepheids.
135:
136:
137: \subsection{Radial velocity}
138:
139: Most observations were obtained in several runs on the 1.5 meter
140: Danish telescope at ESO La Silla in 1996 and 1997, hence these data
141: are contemporaneous with most of the photometry presented above. I
142: used the CORAVEL spectrograph, described in detail in
143: \citet{bmp79}. The instrument was optimized to yield accurate radial
144: velocities through a cross-correlation method. The light is dispersed
145: and then goes through a mask (based on the spectrum of Arcturus)
146: before being detected by a photomultiplier. An arc spectrum is
147: obtained just before and just after each star exposure, to provide a
148: good wavelength solution. The observing setup is such that the
149: cross-correlation function (CCF) is viewed in real-time. This allows
150: to stop the exposure when the CCF has a sufficient signal-to-noise. A
151: Gaussian is fitted to the observed cross-correlation function to yield
152: the velocity.
153:
154: A total of 46 Cepheids have been observed, representing 832
155: measurements. Twenty-four stars have 15 data points or more. Some
156: stars have very few measurements though. They have been left out of
157: the target list early in the program, when it has been realized that
158: it would not be possible to obtain extensive phase coverage for all
159: Cepheids before the instrument decommissioning. Table~\ref{tbl_nvr}
160: gives the name of each program Cepheid and the respective number of
161: measurements. Individual measurements and their associated
162: uncertainties are given in Table~\ref{tbl_vr}. Given that most of the
163: program stars are fairly bright, the average error per measurement is
164: 0.38 \kms.
165: %Table~\ref{tbl_nvr} also points to other published CORAVEL
166: %measurements.
167: Examples of well-covered velocity curves are given in
168: Fig.~\ref{fig_lc}.
169:
170:
171:
172: \section*{Results and discussion}
173:
174:
175: \subsection{Reddening}
176:
177: Following the method of \citet{b96} it is possible to determine the
178: color excess for Cepheids. This is based on the method of \citet{f90},
179: using two colors that are linearly related to each other. In
180: \citet{b96} there was a hint of a possible systematic difference with
181: Fernie's scale. This became clearly apparent with the large number of
182: stars available here when comparing both sources of color excesses
183: (see Fig.~\ref{fig_ebv}), there is a problem for stars with $E(B-V) >
184: 0.5$. The same problem was apparent when comparing my color excesses
185: with those for Cepheids in open clusters \citep{fw87}, which is not
186: surprising given that Fernie's scale is ultimately tied to the
187: reddening given by \citet{fw87}. The source of this problem might be
188: in the small number of calibration stars with large $E(B-V)$ used in
189: \citet{b96}. In order to remedy this situation, I determined a new
190: calibration of the color excess, using more stars with $E(B-V) > 0.5$.
191: As in \citet{b96} I used F- and G-type supergiants in clusters and OB
192: associations from the list of \citet{afp90} and supergiants with low
193: reddening from \citet{g91}. I also tried to use different combinations
194: of colors. The best results have been obtained with
195: \begin{equation}
196: E(B-V) = 0.887*(B_2-V_1) - 1.623*m_2-0.913
197: \end{equation}
198: where $m_2 = (B_1-B_2)-0.457(B_2-V_1)$.
199: The average error on the reddening so determined is $0.03^m$.
200: Figure~\ref{fig_ebv} presents a comparison of the new reddenings
201: with those of \citet{f90}, the agreement is now much better;
202: a fit gives $E(B-V)_{F90} = 0.98 E(B-V)_{here} + 0.02$.
203: These new color excesses for 85 stars are given in Table~\ref{tbl_nph}.
204:
205:
206: \subsection{Comments on individual stars}
207:
208: In most cases, I compared the CORAVEL data with already published
209: radial velocity data, usually using the periods given in \citet{s89}.
210: This is because a number of Cepheids have been suspected to be binary
211: or to have a changing period.
212:
213: \paragraph{U Car} It is clearly a binary. My data are offset from Coulson
214: \& Caldwell's (1985, hereafter CC) velocities by more than 10 \kms.
215:
216: \paragraph{VY Car} The large phase offset between the CORAVEL+CC
217: data and \citet{s55} data suggests a period change.
218:
219: \paragraph{XX Car} Even though there a few new data points, it is enough
220: to show that this star is a binary. The CORAVEL data are offset by
221: about 30 \kms. with respect to CC's data.
222:
223: \paragraph{V Cen} \citet{s89} suggested that this could be a binary. Adding data
224: from \citet{s55}, \citet{le80} and \citet{g81}, the evidence for binarity
225: is marginal. Lloyd Evans velocities are shifted by only $\sim 2$ \kms\ with
226: respect to CORAVEL+Gieren. Stibbs' data only add scatter.
227:
228: \paragraph{V659 Cen} Photometric measurements made around $HJD = 44600$
229: are shifted in phase with respect to measurements obtained around $HJD= 50100$.
230:
231: \paragraph{S Cru} The CORAVEL data are shifted by 2.7 \kms\ with respect to
232: Gieren's (1981) data. The period giving the best Fourier fit ($P =
233: 4.689838^d$) is longer than what is predicted by \citet{s89} ephemeris
234: ($P = 4.689392^d$).
235:
236: \paragraph{T Cru} The binarity suspected by \citet{s89} is confirmed. The
237: data from \citet{le80} are shifted by about 4 \kms\ with respect to
238: mine. \citet{s55} data are also significantly shifted, giving a
239: lower limit on the amplitude of $\sim 8\,\kms$.
240:
241: \paragraph{SY Nor} Binarity was suspected by \citet{m77}. \citet{ber94b}
242: confirmed the binary nature on the basis of radial velocity
243: measurement. With the data published here, and adding the data of
244: \citet{mcs92} it is possible to constrain the orbital period at
245: $P_{orb} = 551.7^d$. When folded with that period, the orbital
246: amplitude is approximately 30 \kms.
247:
248: \paragraph{AQ Pup} Even though I have only two measurements, adding the
249: data from \citet{s55}, \citet{cc85} and \citet{bms88} clearly shows
250: that the period is changing.
251:
252: \paragraph{Y Sgr} \citet{s89} gives evidence that this is a binary. The present
253: data seem to support an orbital period around 10000 days.
254:
255: \paragraph{WZ Sgr} The data from \citet{cc85} are clearly shifted with
256: respect to the CORAVEL data. This confirms the binary nature of this
257: Cepheid \citep{s89}. The measurements from \citet{go96} do not show
258: any shift in $\gamma$-velocity with respect to mine.
259:
260: \paragraph{RZ Vel} Using data from \citet{s55}, \citet{le80} and \citet{cc85},
261: this star seems to show evidence for binarity and for a changing period.
262:
263: \paragraph{AH Vel} This star is a known binary, although the orbital period
264: is not known yet (Szabados 1989, and references therein). The
265: $\gamma$-velocity determined from CORAVEL data is almost identical to that
266: given by \citet{s55}. Unfortunately the present data do not put much
267: constraint on the orbital period.
268:
269:
270:
271: Several Cepheids in this sample are known binaries. The list of known
272: binaries for which I present data include U Aql, $\eta$ Aql, YZ Car,
273: XX Cen, DX Gem, S Mus, U Sgr, X Sgr and Y Sgr. Apart from those that
274: have a published orbit, evidence for binarity include the presence of
275: a UV-bright companion, long-term shift in the $\gamma$-velocity or
276: evidence from the photometry. One of the primary motivations for
277: publishing the present data set is that it will provide additional
278: radial velocities allowing to obtain orbits for several binary
279: Cepheids. Also, some light and velocity curves are good enough to be
280: used for a Baade-Wesselink analysis.
281:
282:
283: \acknowledgments
284:
285: It is a pleasure to thank J.-C. Mermilliod, F. Kienzle and F. Pont for
286: their help with the observations, and S. Udry for extracting the
287: velocity data. I thank the referee for comments that improved the
288: presentation of this paper.
289: This work has been supported by NSF grant AST-9979812.
290: I also acknowledge partial support from the Swiss NSF through grant
291: 8220-050332.
292:
293:
294:
295:
296: \begin{thebibliography}{}
297:
298: \bibitem[Arellano-Ferro \& Parrao(1990)]{afp90}
299: Arellano-Ferro, A, Parrao, L. 1990, \aap, 239, 205
300: \bibitem[Baranne, Mayor \& Poncet(1979)]{bmp79}
301: Baranne, A., Mayor, M., Poncet, J.~L. 1979, Vistas in Astronomy, 23, 279
302: %\bibitem[Barnes et al.(1988)]{b88}
303: \bibitem[Barnes, Moffett, \& Slovak(1988)]{bms88}
304: Barnes, T.~G., Moffett, T.~J., \& Slovak, M.~H.\ 1988, \apjs, 66, 43
305: \bibitem[Bersier(1996)]{b96} Bersier, D.~1996, \aap, 308, 514
306: \bibitem[Bersier, Burki, \& Kurucz(1997)]{bbk97}
307: Bersier, D., Burki, G., \& Kurucz, R.~L.\ 1997, \aap, 320, 228
308: %\bibitem[Bersier \& Burki(1996)]{ber96}
309: %Bersier, D. \& Burki, G.\ 1996, \aap, 306, 417
310: \bibitem[Bersier, Burki, \& Burnet(1994)]{ber94a}
311: Bersier, D., Burki, G., \& Burnet, M.\ 1994, \aaps, 108, 9
312: \bibitem[Bersier et al.(1994)]{ber94b}
313: Bersier, D., Burki, G., Mayor, M., \& Duquennoy, A.\ 1994, \aaps, 108, 25
314: \bibitem[Burnet(1976)]{b76} Burnet, M. 1976, PhD thesis No 232, Ecole Polytechnique
315: F\'ed\'erale de Lausanne
316: \bibitem[Coulson \& Caldwell(1985)]{cc85}
317: Coulson, I.~M.~\& Caldwell, J.~A.~R.\ 1985, SAAO Circulars, 9, 5
318: \bibitem[Feast \& Walker(1987)]{fw87}
319: Feast, M. W., Walker, A.R. 1987, \araa, 25, 345
320: \bibitem[Fernie(1990)]{f90} Fernie, J.~D. 1990, \apjs, 72, 153
321: \bibitem[Gieren(1981)]{g81} Gieren, W.~P.~1981, \apjs, 46, 287
322: \bibitem[Golay(1980)]{g80} Golay, M.~1980, Vistas in Astronomy, 24, 141
323: \bibitem[Gorynya et al.(1996)]{go96} Gorynya, N.~A., Samus', N.~N.,
324: Rastorguev, A.~S., \& Sachkov, M.~E.\ 1996, Astronomy Letters, 22, 175
325: \bibitem[Gray(1991)]{g91} Gray, R.O. 1991, \aap, 252, 237
326: %\bibitem[Kienzle et al.(1999)]{kmbp99}
327: %Kienzle, F., Moskalik, P., Bersier, D., Pont, F. 1999, \aap, 341, 818
328: \bibitem[Lloyd Evans(1980)]{le80}
329: Lloyd Evans, T., 1980, SAAO Circulars, 1, 257
330: \bibitem[Madore(1977)]{m77} Madore, B.~F.~1977, \mnras, 178, 505
331: \bibitem[Mermilliod, Mayor \& Burki(1987)]{mmb87}
332: Mermilliod, J.-C., Mayor, M., Burki, G. 1987, \aaps, 70, 389
333: \bibitem[Metzger et al.(1992)]{mcs92}
334: Metzger, M.~R., Caldwell, J.~A.~R., Schechter, P.~L. 1992, \aj, 103, 529
335: \bibitem[Pont, Burki \& Mayor(1994)]{pbm94}
336: Pont, F., Burki, G. Mayor, M. 1994, \aap, 105, 165
337: \bibitem[Rufener(1988)]{r88}
338: Rufener, F.~1988, Catalogue of stars measured in the Geneva Photometric
339: System ($4^{th}$ ed.), Observatoire de Gen\`eve, Switzerland
340: \bibitem[Stibbs(1955)]{s55} Stibbs, D.~W.~N.~1955, \mnras, 115, 363
341: \bibitem[Szabados(1989)]{s89}
342: Szabados, L.\ 1989, Communications of the Konkoly Observatory Hungary, 94, 1
343:
344: \end{thebibliography}
345:
346:
347:
348:
349: \clearpage
350:
351: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
352: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
353:
354:
355: \begin{figure}
356: \epsscale{0.8}
357: \plotone{f1.eps}
358: \caption{The light- (top), color- (middle), and radial velocity (bottom)
359: curves for $\beta$ Dor (left), $\eta$ Aql (center) and U Nor (right).
360: \label{fig_lc}}
361: \end{figure}
362:
363:
364: \clearpage
365:
366:
367: \begin{figure}
368: \epsscale{1}
369: \plotone{f2.eps}
370: \caption{Comparison between the reddenings of \citet{f90} and
371: mine. The left panel shows reddenings determined with the calibration
372: given in \citet{b96}. There is clearly a scale error for $E(B-V)
373: \gtrsim 0.5$. The right panel shows the color excesses computed with
374: the new calibration given in this paper. The line is the one-to-one
375: correspondence.
376: \label{fig_ebv}}
377: \end{figure}
378:
379:
380: \clearpage
381:
382:
383:
384:
385: %% Table with number of phot measurements per star and E(B-V)
386:
387: %\input{nmesphot.tex}
388:
389:
390: %% Table with number of phot measurements per star
391:
392: \begin{deluxetable}{l r c l r c l r c l r c}
393: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
394: \tablecaption{Number of photometric measurements and color excess
395: for each Cepheid\label{tbl_nph}}
396: \tablewidth{0pt}
397: \tablehead{
398: \colhead{Star}\hfill & \colhead{$N$} & \colhead{$E(B-V)$} & %
399: \colhead{Star}\hfill & \colhead{$N$} & \colhead{$E(B-V)$} & %
400: \colhead{Star}\hfill & \colhead{$N$} & \colhead{$E(B-V)$} & %
401: \colhead{Star}\hfill & \colhead{$N$} & \colhead{$E(B-V)$} \\
402: }
403: \startdata
404: SZ Aql & 23 & 0.624 & VW Cen & 21 & 0.337 & V508 Mon\tablenotemark{a} & 20 & 0.328 & Y Sgr & 15 & 0.186 \\
405: TT Aql & 28 & 0.509 & XX Cen & 25 & 0.240 & R Mus & 20 & 0.083 & WZ Sgr & 29 & 0.424 \\
406: FF Aql & 6 & 0.221 & AZ Cen & 4 & 0.179 & S Mus & 24 & 0.208 & RY Sco & 27 & 0.770 \\
407: $\eta$ Aql & 19 & 0.131 & KN Cen & 24 & 0.929 & UU Mus & 21 & 0.370 & KQ Sco & 31 & 0.915 \\
408: CO Aur\tablenotemark{a} & 31 & 0.214 & V659 Cen & 14 & 0.202 & S Nor\tablenotemark{a} & 49 & 0.170 & Y Sct & 26 & 0.798 \\
409: SS CMa & 27 & 0.554 & $\delta$ Cep & 3 & 0.067 & U Nor & 41 & 0.996 & Z Sct & 21 & 0.511 \\
410: U Car & 27 & 0.273 & AV Cir & 4 & 0.385 & QZ Nor & 11 & 0.233 & RU Sct & 24 & 0.998 \\
411: VY Car & 27 & 0.227 & R Cru\tablenotemark{a} & 111 & 0.138 & V340 Nor\tablenotemark{a} & 51 & 0.303 & ST Tau\tablenotemark{a} & 17 & 0.305 \\
412: WZ Car & 27 & 0.348 & S Cru\tablenotemark{a} & 113 & 0.160 & Y Oph & 3 & 0.648 & SZ Tau\tablenotemark{a} & 24 & 0.289 \\
413: XX Car & 24 & 0.318 & T Cru\tablenotemark{a} & 111 & 0.147 & V440 Per\tablenotemark{a} & 35 & 0.226 & EU Tau\tablenotemark{a} & 24 & 0.198 \\
414: XY Car & 23 & 0.375 & X Cru\tablenotemark{a} & 111 & 0.249 & X Pup & 22 & 0.410 & S TrA & 13 & 0.046 \\
415: XZ Car & 24 & 0.330 & SU Cru & 22 & 0.872 & RS Pup & 29 & 0.476 & $\alpha$ UMi & 5 & 0.000 \\
416: YZ Car & 37 & 0.353 & BG Cru & 24 & 0.103 & VZ Pup & 28 & 0.489 & RY Vel & 30 & 0.622 \\
417: AQ Car & 24 & 0.114 & X Cyg\tablenotemark{a} & 16 & 0.220 & AP Pup & 6 & 0.181 & RZ Vel & 30 & 0.278 \\
418: FR Car & 17 & 0.301 & DT Cyg\tablenotemark{a} & 23 & 0.033 & AQ Pup & 29 & 0.548 & SW Vel & 26 & 0.339 \\
419: GI Car & 4 & 0.191 & $\beta$ Dor & 29 & 0.025 & LS Pup & 28 & 0.469 & AH Vel & 33 & 0.034 \\
420: IT Car & 4 & 0.177 & DX Gem\tablenotemark{a} & 21 & 0.460 & MY Pup & 29 & 0.111 & DR Vel & 28 & 0.717 \\
421: l Car & 31 & 0.133 & $\zeta$ Gem\tablenotemark{a} & 27 & 0.000 & V335 Pup & 6 & 0.246 & T Vul\tablenotemark{a} & 24 & 0.064 \\
422: SU Cas & 3 & 0.258 & V473 Lyr\tablenotemark{a} & 29 & 0.119 & S Sge & 5 & 0.095 & SV Vul\tablenotemark{a} & 16 & 0.511 \\
423: DL Cas & 4 & 0.479 & T Mon & 32 & 0.211 & U Sgr\tablenotemark{a} & 50 & 0.406 & & & \\
424: V636 Cas\tablenotemark{a} & 32 & 0.541 & BE Mon\tablenotemark{a} & 18 & 0.516 & W Sgr\tablenotemark{a} & 68 & 0.092 & & & \\
425: V Cen & 19 & 0.258 & V465 Mon\tablenotemark{a} & 18 & 0.283 & X Sgr & 13 & 0.207 & & & \\
426: \enddata
427:
428: \tablenotetext{a}{Data published in \citet{ber94a}. The color excess given
429: here supersedes that given in \citet{b96}.}
430:
431: \end{deluxetable}
432:
433: \clearpage
434:
435:
436:
437: %% Table with individual photometry. Long version is phot.dat
438:
439: \begin{deluxetable}{l c c r c r r r r r r}
440: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \tablecaption{Photometric data
441: for each Cepheid\label{tbl_ph}}
442: \tablewidth{0pt}
443: \tablehead{
444: \colhead{Star}\hfill & \colhead{HJD-2400000} & \colhead{$P$\tablenotemark{a}} &
445: \colhead{$V$} & \colhead{$Q$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$U-B$} &
446: \colhead{$V-B$} & \colhead{$B_1-B$} & \colhead{$B_2-B$} &
447: \colhead{$V_1-B$} & \colhead{$G-B$}
448: }
449: \startdata
450: SZ Aql & 49528.825 & 3 & 8.946 & 3 & 2.554 & -1.042 & 1.425 & 1.110 & -0.211 & -0.211 \\
451: SZ Aql & 49529.767 & 1 & 8.894 & 3 & 2.461 & -0.954 & 1.382 & 1.126 & -0.127 & -0.113 \\
452: SZ Aql & 49534.778 & 3 & 8.283 & 3 & 2.449 & -0.708 & 1.293 & 1.164 & 0.099 & 0.176 \\
453: SZ Aql & 49537.708 & 3 & 8.574 & 3 & 2.601 & -1.026 & 1.441 & 1.083 & -0.194 & -0.178 \\
454: SZ Aql & 49539.720 & 4 & 8.807 & 4 & 2.772 & -1.179 & 1.511 & 1.060 & -0.341 & -0.348 \\
455: SZ Aql & 49541.716 & 4 & 9.037 & 4 & 2.876 & -1.286 & 1.563 & 1.037 & -0.440 & -0.475 \\
456: SZ Aql & 49543.677 & 3 & 9.159 & 3 & 2.865 & -1.293 & 1.543 & 1.027 & -0.448 & -0.482 \\
457: SZ Aql & 49548.682 & 2 & 8.060 & 3 & 2.367 & -0.408 & 1.154 & 1.255 & 0.388 & 0.511 \\
458: SZ Aql & 49549.694 & 2 & 8.040 & 2 & 2.374 & -0.452 & 1.187 & 1.238 & 0.342 & 0.454 \\
459: SZ Aql & 49558.650 & 3 & 9.018 & 3 & 2.859 & -1.278 & 1.564 & 1.031 & -0.434 & -0.467 \\
460: \enddata
461:
462: \tablenotetext{a}{$P$ is the weight of the $V$ magnitude, it goes from
463: 4 (excellent) to 0 (bad data); $Q$ is the weight for the colors; see
464: \citet{r88} for further details.}
465:
466: \tablecomments{Table~\ref{tbl_ph} is presented in its complete form in
467: the electronic version of the journal. Only a fraction is shown here
468: for guidance regarding its form and content.}
469:
470: \end{deluxetable}
471:
472:
473: \clearpage
474:
475:
476:
477: %% Table with number of Vr measurements per star
478:
479: %\input{nmesvr.tex}
480:
481:
482: \begin{deluxetable}{l r l r l r l r l r l r l r l r }
483: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
484: \tablecaption{Number of velocity measurements per Cepheid\label{tbl_nvr}}
485: \tablewidth{0pt}
486: \tablehead{
487: \colhead{Star}\hfill & \colhead{$N$} & \colhead{Star}\hfill & \colhead{$N$} &
488: \colhead{Star}\hfill & \colhead{$N$} & \colhead{Star}\hfill & \colhead{$N$} &
489: \colhead{Star}\hfill & \colhead{$N$} & \colhead{Star}\hfill & \colhead{$N$}
490: }
491: \startdata
492: U Aql & 38 & XY Car\tablenotemark{a} & 6 & V659 Cen & 3 & %
493: R Mus & 3 & AQ Pup & 2 & RU Sct & 33 \\
494: SZ Aql & 31 & XZ Car\tablenotemark{a} & 6 & R Cru & 35 & %
495: S Mus & 3 & LS Pup & 1 & S TrA & 3 \\
496: TT Aql & 43 & YZ Car\tablenotemark{a} & 14 & S Cru & 40 & %
497: UU Mus & 23 & U Sgr\tablenotemark{b,c} & 32 & RY Vel & 8 \\
498: $\eta$ Aql & 28 & AQ Car\tablenotemark{a} & 15 & T Cru & 39 & %
499: U Nor & 25 & X Sgr & 2 & RZ Vel & 18 \\
500: U Car & 16 & l Car & 19 & X Cru & 34 & %
501: SY Nor & 29 & Y Sgr & 17 & SW Vel & 24 \\
502: VY Car & 16 & V Cen & 21 & SU Cru\tablenotemark{a} & 31 & %
503: X Pup & 10 & WZ Sgr & 35 & AH Vel\tablenotemark{a} & 4 \\
504: WZ Car & 6 & VW Cen & 1 & $\beta$ Dor & 30 & %
505: RS Pup & 14 & Y Sct & 9 & & \\
506: XX Car & 6 & XX Cen & 34 & DX Gem\tablenotemark{b} & 33 & %
507: VZ Pup & 2 & Z Sct & 8 & & \\
508: \enddata
509:
510: \tablenotetext{a}{More CORAVEL data published by \citet{pbm94}}
511: \tablenotetext{b}{More CORAVEL data published by \citet{ber94a}}
512: \tablenotetext{c}{More CORAVEL data published by \citet{mmb87}}
513:
514: \end{deluxetable}
515:
516:
517: \clearpage
518:
519:
520: %% Table with individual Vr. Long version is vr.dat
521:
522: \begin{deluxetable}{l c r r}
523: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \tablecaption{Radial velocity measurements
524: for each Cepheid\label{tbl_vr}}
525: \tablewidth{0pt}
526: \tablehead{
527: \colhead{Star}\hfill & \colhead{HJD-2400000} & \colhead{$V_r\ (\kms)$} &
528: \colhead{$\sigma_{V_r}\ (\kms)$} }
529: \startdata
530: U Aql & 48076.734 & 18.21 & 0.37 \\
531: U Aql & 48808.691 & -12.64 & 0.38 \\
532: U Aql & 50224.595 & -3.44 & 0.34 \\
533: U Aql & 50226.563 & 10.20 & 0.48 \\
534: U Aql & 50227.506 & -22.84 & 0.51 \\
535: U Aql & 50227.598 & -22.96 & 0.46 \\
536: U Aql & 50230.586 & -7.57 & 0.40 \\
537: U Aql & 50274.800 & 11.62 & 0.30 \\
538: U Aql & 50275.773 & 8.94 & 0.35 \\
539: U Aql & 50276.783 & -21.80 & 0.32 \\
540: \enddata
541:
542: \tablecomments{Table~\ref{tbl_vr} is presented in its complete form in
543: the electronic version of the journal. Only a fraction is shown here
544: for guidance regarding its form and content.}
545:
546: \end{deluxetable}
547:
548:
549:
550:
551: \end{document}
552:
553:
554: