1: \documentstyle[twoside, ibvs2, ibvst, epsf]{article}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4: \IBVShead{5226}{00 Month 200x}
5:
6: \IBVStitle{Discovery of the CV ROTSE3~J015118.59--022300.1}
7:
8: \IBVSauth{Smith, D. A.$^1$; Akerlof, C.$^1$; Ashley, M. C. B.$^2$; Casperson, D.$^3$; Gisler, G.$^3$; Henden, A.$^4$; Marshall, S.$^5$; McGowan, K.$^3$; McKay, T.$^1$; Phillips, M. A.$^2$; Rykoff, E.$^1$; Shectman, S.$^6$; Vestrand, W. T.$^3$; Wozniak, P.$^3$}
9:
10: \IBVSinst{2477 Randall Laboratory, University of Michigan, 500 E. Univeristy Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA}
11: \IBVSinst{School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia}
12: \IBVSinst{Los Alamos National Laboratories, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA}
13: \IBVSinst{USRA/USNO Flagstaff Station, P.O Box 1149, Flagstaff, AZ, 86001, USA}
14: \IBVSinst{Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA}
15: \IBVSinst{Carnegie Observatories, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA}
16:
17: \IBVStyp{CV}
18: \IBVSkey{photometry}
19: \IBVSabs{We report on the discovery of an outburst from a previously unknown high-}
20: \IBVSabs{latitude CV we designate ROTSE3 J015118.59-022300.1. The object was first}
21: \IBVSabs{detected on 2001 Oct 13.291 at m-ROTSE3=14.71+-0.06, after which it faded}
22: \IBVSabs{by more than 2 magnitudes over 13 d. Spectral analysis confirms a Galactic}
23: \IBVSabs{location, despite unusual properties that render classification difficult.}
24:
25: \begintext
26:
27: On October 11, 2001, the first ROTSE-III automated telescope began observations
28: in Los Alamos, NM, USA. ROTSE-IIIa is an 0.45~m telescope with a 1.85 degree
29: field-of-view, carrying an unfiltered, thinned CCD. Although the primary task
30: of this telescope is to rapidly respond to satellite detections of Gamma-Ray
31: Bursts, most of the observing time is used to perform automated sky patrols.
32: Pairs of images are taken for each of $\sim100$ patrol fields twice a night.
33:
34: Analysis of the first ROTSE-IIIa dark run has uncovered an interesting
35: transient event, which we identify as a nova and designate
36: ROTSE3~J015118.59--022300.1. This object is absent in images taken on
37: October~11, 2001, to limiting aperture magnitudes of $m_{\rm ROTSE3}\sim17.9$.
38: It is also absent from skyview images, scanned SERC plates from the USNO~PMM
39: archive, and the USNO~A2.0 catalog. On October 13, 2001, however, the object
40: appears at $m_{\rm ROTSE3}=14.00\pm0.06$ (weather conditions prohibited
41: observations on Oct~12), after which it fades rapidly, falling by more than
42: 2~magnitudes over the next 13~d (Fig.~\ref{fig:lc}). Assuming an onset time of
43: 1.0~d before the first detection, the best-fit decay index for the light curve
44: is $\alpha\sim0.9$ ($m\propto t^{-\alpha}$), although even the early light
45: curve in Figure~\ref{fig:lc} is clearly inconsistent with a single power law.
46:
47: On 2001 Nov~20.129 and Dec~14.235 the source was observed at BVR$_{\rm
48: c}$I$_{\rm c}$ using the USNO, Flagstaff Station 1.0m telescope with a
49: SITe/Tektronix $1024\times1024$ CCD camera (Henden~2001). Figure~\ref{fig:uim}
50: shows the V-band image from the Nov 20 dataset. The nova was found to be at
51: $V=20.70\pm0.07$ and $20.90\pm0.05$ in the two observations, respectively,
52: indicating the system may have returned to its quiescent state. This
53: brightness, however, is still well above the POSS-II blue plate limit; there
54: may still be some residual activity from the disc, and the quiescent spectrum
55: may be extremely red. The four-color photometry for these two observations is
56: reported in Table~1. The USNO images along with USNO-A2.0 provide the
57: following coordinates for the object: R.A.=$01\hr51\mm18\fsec60\pm0.01$ and
58: Decl.$=-2\deg23\arcm0.\arcs42\pm0.09$ (J2000.0). The ROTSE-IIIa position is
59: consistent with this location to within its errors (0$\fsec$06 R.A.,
60: $0.\arcs8$ Decl.). The ROTSE astrometric accuracy has been calibrated against
61: the USNO~A2.0 catalog (Smith et al. 2002).
62:
63: We used the first V-band image to set a photometric zero-point for the
64: unfiltered ROTSE-III images and estimate the V magnitude for the source. Using
65: 46~bright stars ($m_{\rm ROTSE3}<16$) that show no evidence for variations in
66: intensity ($\sigma_m < 0.2$~mag) during the 56~ROTSE-III observations, we found
67: the median offset between the ROTSE aperture magnitudes and the USNO V-band
68: magnitudes to be $V-m_{\rm ROTSE3}=+0.71$. The offset for any given object is
69: of course dependent on its spectral energy distribution, and we show the offset
70: as a function of color for three different colors in Figure~\ref{fig:col}.
71: Since the spectrum of the nova during the outburst is unknown, this necessarily
72: introduces undetermined systematic errors into the magnitude estimates.
73:
74: Figure~\ref{fig:lc} shows as diamonds the ROTSE V-magnitude estimates for
75: ROTSE3 J015118.59--022300.1. Also plotted as triangles, late in the light
76: curve, are the USNO V-band measurements. Arrows indicate the mean limiting
77: magnitude for a pair of ROTSE images in which the nova was not detected. Error
78: bars on the ROTSE magnitudes include an estimate of the known systematic errors
79: (as measured through our relative photometry procedure) added in quadrature to
80: the statistical uncertainty.
81:
82: At time 02:32:41 (UT) on Nov 11, 2001, a spectrum of the source was recorded in
83: a 20-minute exposure with the Boller and Chivens Spectrograph on the 6.5~m
84: Walter Baade Magellan project telescope (Fig.~\ref{fig:spc}). The spectrum
85: shows a continuum with broad but relatively weak Balmer emission lines:
86: H$_\gamma$, H$_\delta$, H$_\epsilon$ and H$_8$. The lines are about
87: 3000~km~s$^{-1}$ wide and have a ``square'' profile (steep sides and flat top),
88: characteristic of accretion disc systems. The intensity of the line emission
89: is about half that of the continuum. The radial velocity is less than a few
90: hundred~km~s$^{-1}$.
91:
92: We therefore identify ROTSE3~J015118.59--022300.1 as a galactic cataclysmic
93: variable. While the high galactic latitude ($b=-40.74^\circ$) of this object
94: is unusual, it is not unprecedented (Downes, Webbink \& Shara 1997). If we
95: classify this event as a fast nova, the scaling relations in Duerbeck (1981)
96: would predict a peak absolute magnitude around V$\sim-8.5$. An extrapolation
97: of the decaying light curve predicts a peak apparent maximum of V$\sim14.5$ at
98: one day before the first detection, which implies a distance modulus (DM) of
99: $\sim23$, or 420~kpc. If our conversion to V-band overestimates V, the
100: resulting distance could be as low as 320~kpc. At this latitude, extinction
101: cannot explain this unreasonably large distance. If it is a fast nova, it is
102: an unusually dim one. With the large increase in brightness, it is unlikely
103: that the source is a dwarf nova (Osaki~1996). Also, its absence in the plates
104: scanned by the USNO~PMM machine (12~epochs from 1953-1997) requires a low duty
105: cycle. If this is a dwarf nova, it may be akin to WZ~Sge. It may be a
106: recurrent nova: a diverse class known to recur on timescales of decades
107: (Cordova~1994). Further observations are necessary to reliably classify this
108: system.
109:
110: ROTSE is supported by NASA under SR\&T grant NAG5-5101, the NSF under grant AST
111: 99-70818 and fellowship 00-136, the UofM, and the Michigan Space Grant
112: Consortium. Work by LANL is supported by the DoE under contract W-7405-ENG-36.
113:
114: \vspace{-0.5cm}
115:
116: \references
117:
118: Cordova, F. 1994, in {\it X-ray Binaries}, eds. Lewin, W., van Paradijs, J., \&
119: van den Heuvel, E. (Cambridge Univerisity Press: Cambridge), 331.
120:
121: Downes, R. A., Webbink, R. F., \& Shara, M. M. 1997, {\it PASP}, {\bf 109},
122: 345.\BIBCODE{1997PASP..109..345D}
123:
124: Duerbeck, H. W. 1981, {\it PASP}, {\bf 93}, 165.\BIBCODE{1981PASP...93..165D}
125:
126: Henden, A. A. 2001, {\tt ftp://ftp.nofs.navy.mil/pub/outgoing/aah/sequence/rj0151.dat}
127:
128: Osaki, Y. 1996, {\it PASP}, {\bf 108}, 39.\BIBCODE{1996PASP..108...39O}
129:
130: Smith, D., {\it et al.} 2002, in {\it Gamma-Ray Burst and Afterglow Astronomy
131: 2001}, eds. G. Ricker \& R. Vanderspeck (AIP:New York), {\it in press}.
132:
133: \endreferences
134:
135: \vspace{-0.5cm}
136:
137: \IBVSefigure{fig1.eps}
138: \IBVSefigure{fig2.eps}
139: \IBVSefigure{fig3.eps}
140: \IBVSefigure{fig4.eps}
141:
142: \IBVSfig{7.5cm}{fig1.eps}{Light curve for a transient nova discovered by
143: ROTSE-IIIa. The ROTSE-IIIa unfiltered magnitudes have been corrected by
144: $+0.71$ to estimate the source's V-band magnitude. Arrows indicate the mean
145: limiting magnitudes of pairs of images in which the source was not detected.
146: V-band observations with the USNO Flagstaff Station 1.0m telescope are
147: indicated by the triangles at 40 and 64 days. The vertical dashed line
148: indicates when a spectrum of the source was taken with Magellan.\label{fig:lc}}
149:
150: \IBVSfig{8.5cm}{fig2.eps}{Image of the region around
151: ROTSE3~J015118.59--022300.1, from the USNO Flagstaff Station 1.0m
152: telescope at 2001 Nov~20.129~(UTC). The nova, at $V=20.70\pm0.07$, is
153: indicated by crosshairs.\label{fig:uim}}
154:
155: \IBVSfig{5cm}{fig3.eps}{Offset between ROTSE magnitude and V magnitude
156: versus the BVRI colors for 46 template stars of constant intensity. The broken
157: line indicates the median value of this offset.\label{fig:col}}
158:
159: \IBVSfig{8.2cm}{fig4.eps}{Spectrum of ROTSE3~J015118.59--022300.1, as compared
160: with a nearby halo A-star, from a 20-minute exposure with the Boller and
161: Chivens Spectrograph on the 6.5~m Walter Baade Magellan project telescope at
162: 2001 Nov~11.1060~(UTC).\label{fig:spc}}
163:
164: \centerline{Table 1. The USNO Four-Color Intensity Measurements for ROTSE3~J015118.59--022300.1}
165: \vskip 3mm
166: \begin{center}
167: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
168: \hline
169: UTD & B & V & R & I \\
170: \hline
171: 011121.129 & $20.74\pm0.05$ & $20.70\pm0.07$ & $20.25\pm0.06$ & $19.80\pm0.08$ \\
172: 011214.235 & $20.91\pm0.03$ & $20.90\pm0.05$ & $20.76\pm0.07$ & $20.29\pm0.10$ \\
173: \hline
174: \end{tabular}
175: \end{center}
176:
177: \end{document}
178:
179: