1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \usepackage{emulateapj5}
3:
4: \topmargin 0.6cm
5:
6: \received{}
7: \accepted{}
8:
9: \slugcomment{23 January 2002 Revision; Accepted by ApJ Letters}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \title{FIRST~0747+2739: A FIRST/2MASS Quasar with an Overabundance of
14: \ion{C}{4} Absorption Systems}
15:
16: \author{Gordon T. Richards\altaffilmark{1},
17: Michael D. Gregg\altaffilmark{2},
18: Robert H. Becker\altaffilmark{2},
19: and Richard L. White\altaffilmark{3}
20: }
21:
22: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania
23: State University, University Park, PA 16802; gtr@astro.psu.edu}
24: \altaffiltext{2}{UC-Davis and IGPP/LLNL, L-413, 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94550; gregg,bob@igpp.ucllnl.org}
25: \altaffiltext{3}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218; rlw@stsci.edu}
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28:
29: We present a Keck ESI spectrum of FIRST~074711.2+273904, a $K=15.4$
30: quasar with redshift 4.11 that is detected by both FIRST and 2MASS.
31: The spectrum contains at least 14 independent \ion{C}{4} absorption
32: systems longward of the Ly$\alpha$ forest. These systems are found
33: over a path length of $\Delta z = 0.984$, constituting one of the
34: highest densities per unit redshift of \ion{C}{4} absorption ever
35: observed. One of the \ion{C}{4} systems is trough-like and resembles
36: a weak BAL-type outflow. Two of the \ion{C}{4} are ``associated''
37: absorption systems with $|v| < 3000\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$. Of the 11
38: remaining systems with $v > 3000\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$, eight are either
39: resolved or require multiple discrete systems to fit the line
40: profiles. In addition to \ion{C}{4} absorption, there are two
41: low-ionization \ion{Mg}{2} absorption systems along with two damped
42: Ly$\alpha$ systems, at least one of which may be a \ion{C}{4} system.
43: The overdensity of \ion{C}{4} absorption spans a redshift range of
44: $\Delta z \sim 1$. Superclusters along the line of sight are unlikely
45: to cause an overdensity stretching over such a long redshift path,
46: thus the absorption may be an example of narrow, high-velocity,
47: intrinsic absorption that originates from the quasar. We suggest that
48: this quasar is a member of a transitional class of BAL quasars where
49: we are just barely seeing the spatial, density, or temporal edge of
50: the BAL-producing region (or period); the multiple high-velocity
51: absorption systems may be the remnants (or precursors) of a stronger
52: BAL outflow. If correct, then some simpler absorption line complexes
53: in other quasars may also be due to outflowing rather than intervening
54: material.
55:
56: \end{abstract}
57:
58: \keywords{quasars: absorption lines --- quasars: individual (FIRST
59: J074711.2+273904)}
60:
61: \section{Introduction}
62:
63: It is generally agreed that the broad absorption line (BAL) systems
64: seen in the spectra of many quasars are intrinsic to the quasar,
65: arising from high velocity outflow of gas directly from the accretion
66: disk region \citep{wmf+91}. Narrow absorption lines in quasar
67: spectra, however, arise from a variety of sources. Narrow absorption
68: lines with small velocities relative to the quasar emission redshift
69: could be caused by galaxies along the line of sight, clouds in the
70: interstellar medium of the host galaxy, or even smaller scale gas
71: flows within a few parsecs of the black hole. On the other hand, most
72: of the narrow absorption systems that have large velocities with
73: respect to the emission redshift of the quasar are thought to be
74: intervening \citep{ssb88}; however, there is increasing evidence that
75: even some fraction of these may be intrinsic. In many BAL quasars,
76: the absorption troughs have considerable structure, suggesting a
77: connection to narrow absorption line systems. We discuss the spectrum
78: of a newly discovered quasar, FIRST J074711.2+273904 (hereafter
79: FIRST~0747+2739), with an overdensity of \ion{C}{4} absorbers in its
80: spectrum. It may be an example of an object whose BAL component has
81: been caught in a transitional state that could be related to
82: orientation, time, or density.
83:
84: \section{Data}
85:
86: FIRST~0747+2739 was discovered in the early stages of an ongoing
87: project to search for extremely red quasars \citep{glw+02}.
88: Candidates are found by matching point sources from the The 2-Micron
89: All-Sky Survey (2MASS; \citealt{klp+94}) with FIRST radio sources, and
90: then further matching to an optical catalog such as the APM
91: \citep{mi92}. This object also has been discovered independently by
92: \citet{bvp+02}. FIRST~0747+2739 has $R-K = 2.5$, not particularly
93: red, but it is undetected on the blue Palomar sky survey plate,
94: yielding $B-K \gtrsim 7$. The initial spectrum was obtained using the
95: Kast spectrograph on the Lick Observatory 3m telescope. A higher
96: signal-to-noise spectrum was obtained at Keck Observatory using the
97: Low Resolution Imaging Spectrograph (LRIS; \citealt{occ+95}),
98: revealing a strikingly rich system of absorption lines redward of
99: Ly$\alpha$.
100:
101: FIRST~0747+2739 is located at $07^{\rm h} 47^{\rm m} 11^{\rm
102: s}.208+27^{\circ} 39\arcmin 04\farcs00$ (J2000). There is a 2MASS
103: source within $1\arcsec$ with $J$, $H$, and $K$ magnitudes of $16.77$,
104: $16.16$, and $15.38$, respectively. The peak $20\,{\rm cm}$ flux
105: density as measured by FIRST \citep{bwh95} is $1.08\pm0.14\,{\rm
106: mJy}$; the integrated FIRST flux density is $1.55\,{\rm mJy}$.
107:
108: Motivated by the LRIS spectrum, we obtained a high-dispersion spectrum
109: of FIRST~0747+2739 using the echelle spectrograph and imager (ESI;
110: \citealt{em98}) on the Keck II telescope on the night of 2000 April 6.
111: The night was photometric with $0\farcs9$ seeing. A 900s
112: high-resolution spectrum was taken through a $1\farcs0$ slit in the
113: echellette mode of ESI. In this mode, the spectral range of
114: $3900\,{\rm \AA}$ to $11000\,{\rm \AA}$ is covered in 10 spectral
115: orders with a nearly constant dispersion of $11.4\,{\rm km}\,{\rm
116: s^{-1}}\,{\rm pixel^{-1}}$. The signal-to-noise of the spectrum
117: ranges from 20 to 40 per pixel. Wavelength calibrations were
118: performed with observations of a CuAr lamp. The spectrophotometric
119: standard G191-B2B \citep{msb+88,mg90} was observed for flux
120: calibration. All observations were carried out at the parallactic
121: angle. The data were reduced using a tailored set of IRAF and IDL
122: routines developed by us specifically for ESI data.
123:
124: \section{Analysis and Discussion}
125:
126: The overdensity of absorption features in the spectrum of
127: FIRST~0747+2739 is immediately apparent in the Keck ESI data
128: (Figure~\ref{fig:fig1}). Also conspicuous are a weak trough-like
129: feature near $7815\,{\rm \AA}$ and two damped Ly$\alpha$ systems. The
130: region longward of Ly$\alpha$ emission is plotted on an expanded scale
131: in the lower panels of Figure~\ref{fig:fig1}. We used an automated
132: routine to search this spectral region for absorption lines with
133: significance greater than $10\sigma$. A total of 42 absorption line
134: systems were identified, 34 being \ion{C}{4} doublets, including a
135: BAL-like \ion{C}{4} trough. The systems are given in
136: Table~\ref{tab:tab1}, which lists the system identification code, the
137: redshift, the rest equivalent width of the blue and red components of
138: the \ion{C}{4} doublet (if detected), the ``ejection'' velocity of the
139: system, and other absorption species belonging to each system. The
140: velocities are with respect to the quasar redshift and are given by $v
141: = (R^2-1)/(R^2+1)$, where $R=(1+z_{em})/(1+z_{abs})$. The individual
142: systems are merged into 18 ``Poisson'' systems (14 of which are
143: \ion{C}{4}) by combining absorbers within $1000\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$
144: \citep{ssb88}.
145:
146: \subsection{Line Densities}
147:
148: How unusual is the abundance of \ion{C}{4} absorbers seen towards
149: FIRST~0747+2739? At high-redshift, \citet{ste90} found that (based on
150: 11 quasars) the expected number of \ion{C}{4} absorbers per unit
151: redshift is approximately $1.0\pm0.5$ at $z\sim3.25$ for rest
152: equivalent width larger than $0.15\,{\rm \AA}$ and $\beta c >
153: 5000\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$. If we sum the equivalent widths of the each
154: of the \ion{C}{4} systems within $150\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$, and ignore
155: those three systems with $\beta c < 5000\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$, we find
156: seven combined systems with rest equivalent widths larger than
157: $0.15\,{\rm \AA}$ for both lines in the \ion{C}{4} doublet. The path
158: length searched for \ion{C}{4} between Ly$\alpha$ emission and
159: \ion{C}{4} emission is $\Delta z = 0.984$. Thus, $dN/dz$ is $7.11$
160: for this line of sight --- an excess of 12 standard deviations from
161: the \citet{ste90} measurement.
162:
163: For weak \ion{C}{4} lines, \citet{tls96} find $dN/dz = 7.1\pm1.7$ for
164: $W_r > 0.03\,{\rm \AA}$ and $1.5 < z < 2.9$ (based on four quasars).
165: If we impose constraints on the \citet{tls96} data to match our more
166: conservative $10\sigma$ significance limit and combine systems within
167: $200\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$, then the density reported by \citet{tls96} is
168: reduced to $dN/dz = 3.75\pm1.25$. In our Keck ESI spectrum of
169: FIRST~0747+2739 we find, using the same criteria, at least 9 distinct
170: high-velocity \ion{C}{4} systems. Over the path length observed, that
171: yields $dN/dz = 9.1\pm3.0$, which is a $4.3\sigma$ excess as compared
172: to \citet{tls96}; thus there is evidence that the overdensity of
173: absorption may extend to weaker systems.
174:
175: Since \citet{ssb88} and \citet{ste90} found that the density of
176: absorption lines decreases with increasing redshift (for strong lines)
177: and since the \ion{C}{4} absorption systems found in FIRST~0747+2739
178: are at higher redshifts than either the \citet{tls96} or \citet{ste90}
179: samples, our observed density of lines may be even more significant.
180:
181: What can explain the large overdensity of absorption toward
182: FIRST~0747+2739? All possible explanations can be classified as
183: intervening or intrinsic. In the intervening case, the absorption
184: lines arise from material associated with galaxies along the line of
185: sight that have no relation to the quasar. In the intrinsic case, the
186: absorption is caused by high velocity ejecta from the quasar itself.
187:
188: \subsection{The Intervening Hypothesis}
189:
190: The number density of strong \ion{C}{4} lines towards this quasar is
191: much larger than is normally observed. An examination of the spectra
192: and tables from \citet{ssb88} and \citet{ste90} along with a query of
193: the \citet{yyc+91} catalog of quasar absorption lines reveals that
194: such a concentration of \ion{C}{4} absorption over such a long path
195: length is extremely rare. None of the 11 high-redshift quasars from
196: \citet{ste90} has a density of \ion{C}{4} absorption higher than
197: FIRST~0747+2739. Two of the 55 lower redshift quasars from
198: \citet{ssb88} do have absorption line densities higher then
199: FIRST~0747+2739; Q0013-004 (UM~224; $z=2.086$) and Q0854+191
200: ($z=1.896$) have six and seven strong ($W_r > 0.15\,{\rm \AA}$)
201: ``Poisson'' systems over path lengths of $\Delta z \sim 0.6$,
202: respectively.
203:
204: Quasars that have relatively high densities of absorption have created
205: much interest in the search for signs of superclustering at high
206: redshift \citep[e.g.,][]{hhw89,rfs91,fhc+93,di96}. However, most of
207: these quasars have absorption systems where the overdensity is very
208: limited in its redshift range, such as CSO~118 \citep{gcb01} and the
209: well-studied PKS~0237$-$233 \citep{fhc+93}. FIRST~074711.2+273904 is
210: different in the sense that the overdensity of \ion{C}{4} absorption
211: is spread over a large redshift range ($\Delta z \sim 1$) --- much too
212: large to be explained by a single supercluster. A search of the NASA
213: Extragalactic Database (NED) to look for other quasars to test the
214: superclustering hypothesis found no other known quasars within 30
215: arcminutes, although there are five other radio sources within
216: $10\arcmin$ of FIRST~0747+2739.
217:
218: One possible way to reconcile the intervening hypothesis with the
219: absorption line overdensity in FIRST~0747+2739 is if the quasar is
220: being gravitationally magnified by the intervening material. Such
221: magnification could occur without producing multiple images, and might
222: help to explain why a quasar with $z>4$ is so bright. The possibility
223: of compound microlensing of quasars by their absorption line systems
224: is not a new concept \citep{tw95,vqy+96}. This object, however, is a
225: point source in our NIRC K-band image from Keck Observatory, obtained
226: in 0\farcs4 seeing.
227:
228: Finally, it is possible that the apparent overdensity of absorption
229: systems in FIRST~0747+2739 is either just chance coincidence, or is
230: not actually all that uncommon. The number of high-redshift quasars
231: that are well-studied for absorption is still quite small and
232: additional investigations may yet turn up more cases like
233: FIRST~0747+2739. Such a finding would not necessarily be evidence for
234: either the intrinsic or the intervening hypothesis, however. For
235: now, we conclude that the nature of FIRST~0747+2739 is highly unusual
236: and next to impossible to reconcile with any picture where a
237: significant number of the absorbing systems can be attributed to
238: intervening objects unassociated with the quasar.
239:
240: \subsection{The Intrinsic Hypothesis}
241:
242: Strong circumstantial evidence to support the intrinsic interpretation
243: for the plethora of narrow, high-velocity absorption systems in
244: FIRST~0747+2739 is the presence of similar, almost certainly
245: intrinsic, absorption at low velocities relative to the quasar
246: emission line frame. System S is typical of intrinsic absorption line
247: systems seen in other quasars, exhibiting \ion{N}{5} absorption and a
248: small blueshift relative to the quasar's \ion{C}{4} emission redshift.
249: System Q appears to be a weak BAL-like outflow; System P is also
250: broad, but the blue and red components of the troughs are resolved.
251: Finally, System R, with a velocity of only $+1600$ km~s$^{-1}$, may
252: also be an intrinsic absorption system.
253:
254: There is ample evidence in the literature for the intrinsic
255: interpretation of high-velocity non-BAL outflows in quasars.
256: \citet{jhk+96} and \citet{hbc+97} found weak, high-velocity,
257: trough-like outflows; \citet{hbc+97} showed that the outflows in
258: Q~2345+125 are intrinsic because the absorption profiles varied in
259: $\sim3.5$ months in the quasar rest frame. \citet{ric01} and
260: \citet{rlb+01} give statistical evidence that some narrow,
261: high-velocity \ion{C}{4} absorption line systems may be intrinsic in
262: nature. Finally, \citet{gcb01} discuss an overdensity of \ion{C}{4}
263: absorption in CSO~118.
264:
265: FIRST~0747+2739 is similar to one of the quasars that comprise the
266: so-called ``Tololo Pair'' \citep[e.g.,][]{di96}, namely
267: Tol~1038$-$2712, which also has weak BAL-like troughs. This
268: well-studied pair is a favorite for superclustering studies
269: \citep[e.g.,][]{jpu+86} since the two quasars appear to have common
270: absorption line systems despite the rather large ($17\arcmin.9$)
271: separation between the quasars. Other authors
272: \citep[e.g.,][]{cds87,rob87} still favor the hypothesis that both are
273: BALQSOs and the absorption is from intrinsic high velocity outflow.
274: The velocity separation of the lines in the Tololo Pair is reminiscent
275: of the of the double-trough BAL structure found by \citet{kvm+93} for
276: BALQSOs in general, lending credence to the idea that the absorption
277: lines in the Tololo pair are intrinsic. In any case, the similarity
278: of Tol~1038$-$2712 and FIRST~0747+2739 may help lead to an
279: understanding of the nature of the absorption in both systems.
280:
281: Q1303+308 provides another interesting comparison; because of its
282: complex absorption structure, it has been classified as a BALQSO
283: \citep{fwm+87}; however, the absorption lines are all very narrow and
284: do not meet the traditional BAL criteria set forth largely by the same
285: authors a few years later \citep{wmf+91}. One must then wonder, how
286: we would classify an object with a slightly lower incidence of
287: absorption than Q1303+308. Such an object might simply be classified
288: as a quasar with an overdensity of absorption line systems much like
289: FIRST~0747+2739.
290:
291: The fashionable method of determining whether a particular absorption
292: system is intrinsic is either to determine the ``coverage fraction''
293: of the quasar or to show that the absorption line system is variable
294: \citep{bhs97,hbj+97}. Lacking the data to test for variability, we
295: have analyzed the coverage fractions for each of our systems as a
296: function of velocity. Many of the high-velocity systems do indeed
297: have coverage fractions that are consistent with the intrinsic
298: hypothesis; however, the majority of the systems are resolved into
299: multiple components or blended, which means that the coverage fraction
300: results are not entirely reliable. Thus, on the basis of our covering
301: fraction analysis alone, we are not able to confirm (or exclude) the
302: possibility that the overdensity of absorption lines in this quasar
303: spectrum is due to intrinsic absorption.
304:
305: Regardless of the lack of conclusive evidence from variability or
306: coverage fractions, the presence of trough-like absorption at moderate
307: velocities and the large redshift span of the overdensity of the
308: \ion{C}{4} absorption points towards an intrinsic origin of at least
309: some of the relatively narrow, high-velocity \ion{C}{4} absorption
310: systems. We suggest that FIRST~0747+2739 is a quasar in transition
311: from (to) a quasi-BAL object to (from) a standard quasar. The lack of
312: strong, broad absorption can be explained as being the result of one
313: or more effects. As time goes on, it may be natural for the lines to
314: become narrow as the clouds dissipate down to their small, dense
315: cores; or BAL features might be a superposition of many narrow
316: features and FIRST~0747+2739 has a relatively low density of them; or
317: perhaps the many narrow absorbers can somehow be attributed to
318: orientation effects.
319:
320: \section{Conclusions}
321:
322: In summary, we find that that overdensity of \ion{C}{4} absorption
323: lines seen along the line of sight to FIRST~0747+2739 is sufficiently
324: high that it is likely that at least some of these systems are
325: high-velocity, intrinsic absorption systems. The presence of weak
326: trough-like absorption features suggests that FIRST~0747+2739 may be a
327: transitional BAL quasar that is being observed at a brief phase in its
328: transition to (or from) a standard quasar, or is being viewed at a
329: highly specific orientation, or that it is a BAL with a very low
330: absorber density. If the absorption is intrinsic, monitoring with
331: high resolution spectroscopy over the course of $\gtrsim 18$ months
332: may reveal variability of the absorbers, a signature of intrinsic
333: absorption. Confirmation (or exclusion) of the intrinsic hypothesis
334: for the unusually large number of high-velocity \ion{C}{4} systems in
335: FIRST~0747+2739 would have interesting consequences for \ion{C}{4}
336: absorption line studies, particularly high-redshift superclustering
337: studies.
338:
339: \acknowledgements
340:
341: GTR acknowledges support from NSF grant AST99-00703. RHB and MDG
342: acknowledge support from the NSF (grants AST-98-02791 and
343: AST-98-02732) and the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics
344: (operated under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by the
345: University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under
346: contract No. W-7405-Eng-48). This research has made use of the
347: NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet
348: Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under
349: contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. We
350: thank Rajib Ganguly and Jane Charlton for useful discussions.
351:
352: \begin{thebibliography}{32}
353: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
354:
355: \bibitem[{{Barlow} {et~al.}(1997){Barlow}, {Hamann}, \& {Sargent}}]{bhs97}
356: {Barlow}, T.~A., {Hamann}, F., \& {Sargent}, W. L.~W. 1997, in ASP Conf. Ser.
357: 128: Mass Ejection from Active Galactic Nuclei, 13
358:
359: \bibitem[{{Becker} {et~al.}(1995){Becker}, {White}, \& {Helfand}}]{bwh95}
360: {Becker}, R.~H., {White}, R.~L., \& {Helfand}, D.~J. 1995, \apj, 450, 559
361:
362: \bibitem[{{Benn} {et~al.}(2002){Benn}, {Vigotti}, {Pedani}, {Holt}, {Mack},
363: {Curran}, \& {S{\' a}nchez}}]{bvp+02}
364: {Benn}, C.~R., {Vigotti}, M., {Pedani}, M., {Holt}, J., {Mack}, K.-H.,
365: {Curran}, R., \& {S{\' a}nchez}, S.~F. 2002, \mnras, 329, 221
366:
367: \bibitem[{{Cristiani} {et~al.}(1987){Cristiani}, {Danziger}, \&
368: {Shaver}}]{cds87}
369: {Cristiani}, S., {Danziger}, I.~J., \& {Shaver}, P.~A. 1987, \mnras, 227, 639
370:
371: \bibitem[{{Dinshaw} \& {Impey}(1996)}]{di96}
372: {Dinshaw}, N. \& {Impey}, C.~D. 1996, \apj, 458, 73
373:
374: \bibitem[{{Epps} \& {Miller}(1998)}]{em98}
375: {Epps}, H.~W. \& {Miller}, J.~S. 1998, \procspie, 3355, 48
376:
377: \bibitem[{{Foltz} {et~al.}(1993){Foltz}, {Hewett}, {Chaffee}, \&
378: {Hogan}}]{fhc+93}
379: {Foltz}, C.~B., {Hewett}, P.~C., {Chaffee}, F.~H., \& {Hogan}, C.~J. 1993, \aj,
380: 105, 22
381:
382: \bibitem[{{Foltz} {et~al.}(1987){Foltz}, {Weymann}, {Morris}, \&
383: {Turnshek}}]{fwm+87}
384: {Foltz}, C.~B., {Weymann}, R.~J., {Morris}, S.~L., \& {Turnshek}, D.~A. 1987,
385: \apj, 317, 450
386:
387: \bibitem[{{Ganguly} {et~al.}(2001){Ganguly}, {Charlton}, \& {Bond}}]{gcb01}
388: {Ganguly}, R., {Charlton}, J.~C., \& {Bond}, N.~A. 2001, \apj, 553, L101
389:
390: \bibitem[{{Gregg et al.}(2002)}]{glw+02}
391: {Gregg, M. D., et al.} 2002, \apj, in press, astroph/0107441
392:
393: \bibitem[{{Hamann} {et~al.}(1997{\natexlab{a}}){Hamann}, {Barlow}, {Cohen},
394: {Junkkarinen}, \& {Burbidge}}]{hbc+97}
395: {Hamann}, F., {Barlow}, T., {Cohen}, R.~D., {Junkkarinen}, V., \& {Burbidge},
396: E.~M. 1997{\natexlab{a}}, in ASP Conf. Ser. 128: Mass Ejection from AGN, 19
397:
398: \bibitem[{{Hamann} {et~al.}(1997{\natexlab{b}}){Hamann}, {Barlow},
399: {Junkkarinen}, \& {Burbidge}}]{hbj+97}
400: {Hamann}, F., {Barlow}, T.~A., {Junkkarinen}, V., \& {Burbidge}, E.~M.
401: 1997{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 478, 80
402:
403: \bibitem[{{Heisler} {et~al.}(1989){Heisler}, {Hogan}, \& {White}}]{hhw89}
404: {Heisler}, J., {Hogan}, C.~J., \& {White}, S. D.~M. 1989, \apj, 347, 52
405:
406: \bibitem[{{Jakobsen} {et~al.}(1986){Jakobsen}, {Perryman}, {Ulrich},
407: {Macchetto}, \& {di Serego Alighieri}}]{jpu+86}
408: {Jakobsen}, P., {Perryman}, M. A.~C., {Ulrich}, M.~H., {Macchetto}, F., \& {di
409: Serego Alighieri}, S. 1986, \apjl, 303, L27
410:
411: \bibitem[{{Jannuzi et al.}(1996)}]{jhk+96}
412: {Jannuzi, B. T., et al.} 1996, \apjl, 470, L11
413:
414: \bibitem[{{Kleinmann et al.}(1994)}]{klp+94}
415: {Kleinmann, S. G., et al.} 1994, \apss, 217, 11
416:
417: \bibitem[{{Korista} {et~al.}(1993){Korista}, {Voit}, {Morris}, \&
418: {Weymann}}]{kvm+93}
419: {Korista}, K.~T., {Voit}, G.~M., {Morris}, S.~L., \& {Weymann}, R.~J. 1993,
420: \apjs, 88, 357
421:
422: \bibitem[{{Massey} \& {Gronwall}(1990)}]{mg90}
423: {Massey}, P. \& {Gronwall}, C. 1990, \apj, 358, 344
424:
425: \bibitem[{{Massey} {et~al.}(1988){Massey}, {Strobel}, {Barnes}, \&
426: {Anderson}}]{msb+88}
427: {Massey}, P., {Strobel}, K., {Barnes}, J.~V., \& {Anderson}, E. 1988, \apj,
428: 328, 315
429:
430: \bibitem[{{McMahon} \& {Irwin}(1992)}]{mi92}
431: {McMahon}, R.~G. \& {Irwin}, M.~J. 1992, in ASSL Vol. 174: Digitised Pptical
432: Sky Surveys, 417
433:
434: \bibitem[{{Oke et al.}(1995)}]{occ+95}
435: {Oke, J. B., et al.} 1995, \pasp, 107, 375
436:
437: \bibitem[{{Richards}(2001)}]{ric01}
438: {Richards}, G.~T. 2001, \apjs, 133, 53
439:
440: \bibitem[{{Richards} {et~al.}(2001){Richards}, {Laurent-Muehleisen}, {Becker},
441: \& {York}}]{rlb+01}
442: {Richards}, G.~T., {Laurent-Muehleisen}, S.~A., {Becker}, R.~H., \& {York},
443: D.~G. 2001, \apj, 547, 635
444:
445: \bibitem[{{Robertson}(1987)}]{rob87}
446: {Robertson}, J.~G. 1987, \mnras, 227, 653
447:
448: \bibitem[{{Romani} {et~al.}(1991){Romani}, {Filippenko}, \& {Steidel}}]{rfs91}
449: {Romani}, R.~W., {Filippenko}, A.~V., \& {Steidel}, C.~C. 1991, \pasp, 103, 154
450:
451: \bibitem[{{Sargent} {et~al.}(1988){Sargent}, {Steidel}, \&
452: {Boksenberg}}]{ssb88}
453: {Sargent}, W. L.~W., {Steidel}, C.~C., \& {Boksenberg}, A. 1988, \apjs, 68, 539
454:
455: \bibitem[{{Steidel}(1990)}]{ste90}
456: {Steidel}, C.~C. 1990, \apjs, 72, 1
457:
458: \bibitem[{{Thomas} {et~al.}(1995){Thomas}, {Webster}, \& {Drinkwater}}]{tw95}
459: {Thomas}, P.~A., {Webster}, R.~L., \& {Drinkwater}, M.~J. 1995, \mnras, 273,
460: 1069
461:
462: \bibitem[{{Tripp} {et~al.}(1996){Tripp}, {Lu}, \& {Savage}}]{tls96}
463: {Tripp}, T.~M., {Lu}, L., \& {Savage}, B.~D. 1996, \apjs, 102, 239
464:
465: \bibitem[{{Vanden Berk} {et~al.}(1996){Vanden Berk}, {Quashnock}, {York}, \&
466: {Yanny}}]{vqy+96}
467: {Vanden Berk}, D.~E., {Quashnock}, J.~M., {York}, D.~G., \& {Yanny}, B. 1996,
468: \apj, 469, 78
469:
470: \bibitem[{{Weymann} {et~al.}(1991){Weymann}, {Morris}, {Foltz}, \&
471: {Hewett}}]{wmf+91}
472: {Weymann}, R.~J., {Morris}, S.~L., {Foltz}, C.~B., \& {Hewett}, P.~C. 1991,
473: \apj, 373, 23
474:
475: \bibitem[{{York} {et~al.}(1991){York}, {Yanny}, {Crotts}, {Carilli},
476: {Garrison}, \& {Matheson}}]{yyc+91}
477: {York}, D.~G., {Yanny}, B., {Crotts}, A., {Carilli}, C., {Garrison}, E., \&
478: {Matheson}, L. 1991, \mnras, 250, 24
479:
480: \end{thebibliography}
481:
482: \begin{figure}[h]
483: \epsscale{0.9}
484: \plotone{f1.eps}
485: \caption{({\em Top}) The FIRST~0747+2739 ESI spectrum from
486: $4000\,{\rm\AA}$ to $9000\,{\rm\AA}$, smoothed by 9 pixels; the top
487: axis gives the rest frame wavelengths. Note the weak trough just
488: blueward of the C\,IV emission line. Regions that may be affected by
489: the ${\rm O_2}$ A and B telluric absorption bands are labeled.
490: However, the absorption in these regions is probably real since the
491: spectrum of another quasar taken on the same night showed no residual
492: absorption after telluric correction. ({\em Bottom Six Panels}) An
493: expanded view of the spectrum longward of Ly$\alpha$ at the full
494: $11.4\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s^{-1}}\,{\rm pixel^{-1}}$ resolution. The 14
495: C\,IV systems are labeled; a horizontal line connects the wavelength
496: of the lowest redshift $\lambda\,1548$ to the highest redshift
497: $\lambda\,1551$ line. \label{fig:fig1}}
498: \end{figure}
499:
500: \begin{deluxetable}{lrccrl}
501: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
502: \tablecaption{Absorption Systems\label{tab:tab1}}
503: \tablewidth{0pt}
504: \tablecolumns{5}
505: \tablehead{
506: \colhead{} & \colhead{} &
507: \multicolumn{2}{c}{C\,IV ${\rm W_{r}}$} &
508: \colhead{Vel.} & \colhead{} \\
509: \cline{3-4} \\
510: \colhead{Sys.} & \colhead{$z$} &
511: \colhead{$1548$} & \colhead{$1551$} &
512: \colhead{(km/s)} & \colhead{Other Lines}
513: }
514: \startdata
515: A1a & 1.3762\tablenotemark{a} & & & 193330 & Mg\,II \\
516: A1b & 1.3766 & & & 193300 & Mg\,II,Mg\,I \\
517: \vspace{0.05cm}
518: A2 & 1.3783 & & & 193170 & Mg\,II,Mg\,I \\
519: B & 2.0704 & & & 140840 & Mg\,II,Mg\,I,Fe\,II 2344, \\
520: \vspace{0.05cm}
521: & & & & & 2374,2383,2587,2600 \\
522: \vspace{0.05cm}
523: C & 2.6083\tablenotemark{b} & & & 100370 & Fe\,II 2344,2374,2383 \\
524: \vspace{0.05cm}
525: D & 3.0741 & 0.18 & 0.11 & 66830 & \\
526: E1a & 3.1556\tablenotemark{a} & 0.09 & 0.05 & 61150 & \\
527: E1b & 3.1565\tablenotemark{a} & 0.14 & 0.08 & 61090 & \\
528: E1c & 3.1574 & 0.24 & 0.18 & 61030 & \\
529: \vspace{0.05cm}
530: E2 & 3.1585 & 0.22 & 0.17 & 60950 & \\
531: F1 & 3.1893 & 0.09 & 0.06 & 58830 & \\
532: \vspace{0.05cm}
533: F2 & 3.1939\tablenotemark{c} & 0.21 & 0.12 & 58510 & \\
534: G1 & 3.4212 & 0.28 & 0.24 & 43140 & DLA,Si\,II,Fe\,II,Al\,II \\
535: G2 & 3.4222 & 0.15 & 0.08 & 43070 & DLA \\
536: \vspace{0.05cm}
537: G3 & 3.4231 & 0.09 & 0.04 & 43020 & DLA,Si\,II,Fe\,II,Al\,II \\
538: H1 & 3.4534\tablenotemark{d} & 0.06 & 0.03 & 41000 & \\
539: \vspace{0.05cm}
540: H2 & 3.4546\tablenotemark{d} & 0.04 & 0.04 & 40920 & \\
541: Ja & 3.5344\tablenotemark{a} & 0.10 & 0.05 & 35680 & Si\,IV?,Al\,II? \\
542: \vspace{0.05cm}
543: Jb & 3.5353 & 0.21 & 0.14 & 35620 & Si\,IV?,Al\,II? \\
544: K1 & 3.6248\tablenotemark{d} & 0.06 & 0.03 & 29830 & \\
545: K2a & 3.6260 & 0.11 & 0.06 & 29750 & \\
546: \vspace{0.05cm}
547: K2b & 3.6268\tablenotemark{a} & 0.04 & 0.03 & 29700 & \\
548: \vspace{0.05cm}
549: L & 3.7380 & 0.24 & 0.15 & 22630 & \\
550: \vspace{0.05cm}
551: M & 3.8428 & 0.11 & 0.05 & 16100 & \\
552: N1 & 3.8972\tablenotemark{a} & & & 12750 & DLA,O\,I,Si\,II\tablenotemark{e}, C\,II, \\
553: & & & & & \ion{Fe}{2},\ion{Al}{2} \\
554: N2 & 3.8985\tablenotemark{a} & & & 12670 & DLA,O\,I,Si\,II\tablenotemark{e}, C\,II, \\
555: & & & & & \ion{Fe}{2},\ion{Al}{2} \\
556: N3 & 3.8996 & ? & ? & 12610 & DLA,O\,I,Si\,II\tablenotemark{e}, C\,II, \\
557: \vspace{0.05cm}
558: & & & & & Fe\,II,Al\,II,Si\,IV? \\
559: O1 & 3.9008\tablenotemark{f} & 0.06 & 0.07 & 12530 & Si\,IV\\
560: O2 & 3.9036\tablenotemark{f} & 0.20 & 0.11 & 12360 & Si\,IV\\
561: O3 & 3.9050\tablenotemark{f} & 0.14 & 0.10 & 12280 & Si\,IV\\
562: \vspace{0.05cm}
563: O4 & 3.9065\tablenotemark{f} & 0.15 & 0.11 & 12190 & Si\,IV\\
564: P1 & 3.9289\tablenotemark{g} & 0.06 & 0.04 & 10820 & \\
565: P2 & 3.9297\tablenotemark{g} & 0.08 & 0.03 & 10770 & \\
566: P3 & 3.9306\tablenotemark{g} & 0.11 & 0.05 & 10720 & \\
567: \vspace{0.05cm}
568: P4 & 3.9315\tablenotemark{g} & 0.08 & 0.04 & 10660 & \\
569: \vspace{0.05cm}
570: Q & 4.0449\tablenotemark{h} & BAL? & BAL? & 3850 & \\
571: \vspace{0.05cm}
572: R & 4.0825 & 0.06 & 0.03 & 1620 & \\
573: S1a & 4.1164\tablenotemark{a} & 0.05 & 0.04 & -380 & N\,V \\
574: S1b & 4.1174 & 0.11 & 0.07 & -430 & N\,V\\
575: S1c & 4.1182\tablenotemark{a} & 0.07 & 0.05 & -480 & N\,V\\
576: S2a & 4.1200\tablenotemark{a} & 0.11 & 0.09 & -590 & N\,V\\
577: S2b & 4.1208 & 0.23 & 0.22 & -630 & N\,V\\
578: \enddata
579:
580: \tablecomments{Systems are combined within $1000\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$.
581: The letter ``I'' is skipped to avoid confusion. Major subsystems
582: (distinct minima) are indicated by 1, 2, 3, 4 after the system letter.
583: Minor subsystems (needed to explain the line profile) are indicated by
584: a, b, c. Unless otherwise indicated, the absorption line systems are
585: damped Ly$\alpha$ (DLA); Mg\,II $\lambda\lambda\,2796,2804$; Mg\,I
586: $\lambda\,2853$; Al\,II $\lambda\,1671$; O\,I $\lambda\,1602$; C\,II
587: $\lambda\,1335$; Fe\,II $\lambda\,1608$; Si\,II $\lambda\,1527$;
588: Si\,IV $\lambda\lambda\,1393,1402$; and N\,V
589: $\lambda\lambda\,1238,1242$.}
590:
591: \tablenotetext{a}{Weaker system. Needed to explain profile of
592: stronger system.}
593: \tablenotetext{b}{Based on Fe\,II. Mg\,II is beyond the wavelength range studied.}
594: \tablenotetext{c}{Line profile is resolved at this resolution.}
595: \tablenotetext{d}{Questionable system.}
596: \tablenotetext{e}{Also Si\,II $\lambda\,1304$.}
597: \tablenotetext{f}{Heavily blended.}
598: \tablenotetext{g}{Heavily blended, trough-like.}
599: \tablenotetext{h}{Too blended and trough-like to resolve into components.}
600: \end{deluxetable}
601:
602: \end{document}
603:
604:
605:
606:
607:
608:
609:
610:
611:
612: