1: % $Id: ifa-red1.tex,v 1.15 2002/02/20 09:33:26 mliu Exp $
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: %%-- this makes it look like a real ApJ article
5: \documentclass{aastex}
6: \usepackage{natbib,graphicx,latexsym}
7: \usepackage{emulateapj5}
8:
9: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
10: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
11:
12: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
13: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
14: %----------------------------------------------------------------------%
15:
16: %%--- Put a large, light-grey ``DRAFT - etc etc.'' across each page. ---%%
17: %\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 50 150 translate
18: %90 rotate /Times-Roman findfont 30 scalefont setfont
19: %0 0 moveto 0.7 setgray (DRAFT --- do not circulate --- DRAFT) show
20: %grestore}def end}
21:
22:
23: \newcommand{\Msini}{\mbox{$M \sin i$}}
24: \newcommand{\HST}{{\sl HST}}
25: \newcommand{\IUE}{{\sl IUE}}
26: \newcommand{\Msun}{\mbox{$M_{\sun}$}}
27: \newcommand{\Mjup}{\mbox{$M_{Jup}$}}
28: \newcommand{\degree}{\mbox{$^{\circ}$}}
29: \newcommand{\perone}{\mbox{$^{-1}$}}
30: \newcommand{\pertwo}{\mbox{$^{-2}$}}
31: \newcommand{\perthree}{\mbox{$^{-3}$}}
32: \newcommand{\ea}{et al.}
33: \newcommand{\etal}{et al.}
34: \newcommand{\eg}{e.g.}
35: \newcommand{\ie}{i.e.}
36: \newcommand{\cf}{cf.}
37: \newcommand{\IRAS}{{\sl IRAS}}
38: \newcommand{\ROSAT}{{\sl ROSAT}}
39: \newcommand{\hf}{\mbox{$h_{50}$}}
40: \newcommand{\hfperone}{\mbox{$h_{50}^{-1}$}}
41: \newcommand{\msyr}{\hbox{m~s$^{-1}$~yr$^{-1}$}}
42: \newcommand{\kms}{\hbox{km~s$^{-1}$}}
43: \newcommand{\rchisq}{\mbox{$\tilde\chi^2$}}
44: \newcommand{\Ho}{\mbox{$H_0$}}
45: \newcommand{\Zsun}{\mbox{$Z_{\odot}$}}
46: \newcommand{\htwoo}{{\hbox{H$_2$O}}} % H20
47: \newcommand{\htwo}{{\hbox{H$_2$}}} % H2
48: \newcommand{\meth}{{\hbox{CH$_4$}}} % CH4
49: \newcommand{\Kp}{\mbox{$K^{\prime}$}}
50: \newcommand{\Ks}{\mbox{$K_S$}}
51: \newcommand{\degs}{\mbox{$^{\circ}$}}
52: \newcommand{\Lbol}{\mbox{$L_{bol}$}}
53: \newcommand{\Teff}{\mbox{$T_{\rm eff}$}}
54:
55: \newcommand{\Rc}{\mbox{${R}$}}
56: \newcommand{\Ic}{\mbox{${I}$}}
57: %\newcommand{\Rc}{\mbox{${R_c}$}}
58: %\newcommand{\Ic}{\mbox{${I_c}$}}
59: \newcommand{\zp}{\mbox{${z^\prime}$}}
60:
61:
62: \slugcomment{{\em Astrophysical Journal Letters}, in press}
63: \shorttitle{Methane Dwarf from the IfA-Deep Survey}
64: \shortauthors{Liu et al.}
65:
66:
67: \begin{document}
68:
69: \title{Discovery of a Methane Dwarf from the IfA-Deep
70: Survey\altaffilmark{1}}
71: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations obtained at the Subaru Telescope,
72: Infrared Telescope Facility, and W. M. Keck Observatory.}
73:
74: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
75: %% author and affiliation information.
76: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
77: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
78: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
79: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
80:
81: \author{\sc Michael C. Liu\altaffilmark{2}, Richard Wainscoat, Eduardo
82: L. Mart\'in, Brian Barris, John Tonry}
83: \affil{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai`i, 2680 Woodlawn
84: Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822}
85: \altaffiltext{2}{Beatrice Watson Parrent Fellow.}
86: \email{mliu@ifa.hawaii.edu}
87:
88:
89:
90: \begin{abstract}
91: We present the discovery of a distant methane dwarf, the first from the
92: Institute for Astronomy (IfA) Deep Survey. The object (``IfA~0230-Z1'')
93: was identified from deep optical \Ic\ and \zp-band imaging, being
94: conducted as an IfA-wide collaboration using the prime-focus imager
95: Suprime-Cam on the Subaru 8.2-m Telescope. IfA~0230-Z1 is extremely red
96: in the $\Ic{\zp}J$ (0.8--1.2~\micron) bands but relatively blue in
97: $J-H$; such colors are uniquely characteristic of T~dwarfs. A near-IR
98: spectrum taken with the Keck Telescope shows strong \htwoo\ absorption
99: and a continuum break indicative of \meth, confirming the object has a
100: very cool atmosphere. Comparison with nearby T~dwarfs gives a spectral
101: type of T3--T4 and a distance of $\sim$45~pc. Simple estimates based on
102: previous T~dwarf discoveries suggest that the IfA survey will find a
103: comparable number of T~dwarfs as the 2MASS survey, albeit at a much
104: larger average distance. We also discuss the survey's ability to probe
105: the galactic scale height of ultracool (L and T) dwarfs.
106: \end{abstract}
107:
108: \keywords{stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs --- infrared: stars --- surveys}
109:
110:
111: \section{Introduction}
112:
113: In the past few years, observational studies of substellar objects have
114: been revolutionized, in large part from the advent of wide-field sky
115: surveys, namely the 2-Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS;
116: \citealp{1997ilsn.proc...25S}), the Deep Near-Infrared Survey of the
117: Southern Sky (DENIS; \citealp{1999A&A...349..236E}), and the Sloan
118: Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; \citealp{2000AJ....120.1579Y}). The coolest
119: of the known substellar objects, the T~dwarfs, are identified by
120: absorption features from \meth, which becomes the dominant C-bearing
121: molecule for $\Teff\lesssim1300$~K \citep{1996ApJ...472L..37F}. The
122: first T~dwarf, GL~229B, was found as a companion to a nearby M~star
123: \citep{1995Natur.378..463N}. Field T~dwarfs have subsequently been
124: found by SDSS \citep{1999ApJ...522L..61S, 2000ApJ...531L..61T,
125: 2000ApJ...536L..35L, geb01}, 2MASS \citep{1999ApJ...522L..65B,
126: 2000ApJ...531L..57B, 2000AJ....120.1100B, burg01}, and the NTT Deep
127: Field \citep{1999A&A...349L..41C}. To date, more than 20 of these
128: objects are known \citep{burg01b}. These objects are of great interest
129: for numerous reasons, \eg, they are the lowest mass field objects known
130: to date, and their physical properties are in many ways more akin to
131: giant planets than to stars.
132:
133: The spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of T~dwarfs are distinct from
134: all other known astronomical bodies, characterized by steeply rising
135: flux in the optical from $\sim$0.8--1.0~\micron\ due to the
136: pressure-broadened K~I doublet and a near-IR continuum
137: ($\lesssim2.5~\micron$) showing strong absorption from \htwoo, \meth,
138: and collisionally induced \htwo\ opacity \citep{1999ApJ...519..802K,
139: 2000ApJ...531..438B, 2000ApJ...533L.155L, burg01, geb01, leg01}. As a
140: result, their broad-band colors are unique: their optical colors are
141: extremely red up to $J$-band (1.25~\micron), while near-IR colors are at
142: least as blue as early-type stars, with the coolest objects being
143: uniquely blue in the IR. Hence, pure infrared surveys such as 2MASS can
144: identify the coolest T~dwarfs, which have very strong \meth\ absorption,
145: but are insensitive to the warmer objects, which have IR colors similar
146: to main sequence stars, giant stars, and asteroids. In contrast, the
147: far-red ($i^\prime$ and \zp) bands of the SDSS provide good sensitivity
148: to T~dwarfs over a wide range of temperture, including ``L/T
149: transition'' objects \citep[e.g.][]{2000ApJ...536L..35L} where methane
150: is just beginning to appear in the SEDs. In addition, the much higher
151: etendue of current optical imagers compared to near-IR ones indicates
152: that surveys in the far-red should be very scientifically fruitful.
153: However, the relatively shallow depth of SDSS means that T~dwarfs can be
154: found only out to a distance of $\sim$30~pc.
155:
156: The IfA-Deep Survey is an imaging survey being conducted as
157: collaboration among many members of the Institute for Astronomy (IfA) at
158: the University of Hawaii during 2001--2002. The project uses the
159: prime-focus imager Suprime-Cam on the Subaru 8.2-m Telescope to map
160: several blank fields in the far-red, the $RI\zp$ bands
161: (0.6--1.0~\micron), with a total area of 2.5~sq.\ degrees. This survey
162: will serve a variety of scientific programs, including weak lensing;
163: searches for high-redshift supernovae, extremely red galaxies, and
164: high-redshift clusters; galactic structure studies; and time-variability
165: surveys. Since the survey is on-going, a complete description of its
166: properties awaits a future paper. The baseline design calls for
167: 10~nights of observing, reaching limiting 5$\sigma$ Vega magnitudes of
168: $R\approx27.1$, $I\approx 26.5$, and $\zp\approx 25.5$~mags, though the
169: final outcome will depend on the vicissitudes of telescope performance
170: and weather. Here we present the discovery of the survey's first
171: T~dwarf, ``IfA~0230-Z1'', found from the first clear night of
172: observations. We also examine the survey's total T~dwarf yield and its
173: sensitivity to the vertical scale height of ultracool dwarfs once
174: completed.
175:
176:
177: %----------------------------------------------------------------------%
178: \clearpage
179: \section{Observations}
180:
181: \subsection{Subaru/Suprime-Cam: Optical Imaging}
182:
183: Optical imaging of the RA 02:30~hr field of the IfA-Deep Survey was
184: obtained on 22 October 2001 UT using the prime focus imager Suprime-Cam
185: \citep{1998SPIE.3355..363M} on the Subaru 8.2-m Telescope on Mauna Kea,
186: Hawaii. The instrument is a mosaic of ten contiguous 2048$\times$4096
187: MIT/Lincoln Lab phase 2 and 3 CCDs with a total field of view of
188: 34\arcmin$\times$27\arcmin. Conditions were photometric with 0\farcs8
189: FWHM seeing. We imaged two adjacent fields with a total area of
190: 0.5~sq.\ degrees. Dithered \Rc, \Ic, \zp-band observations were
191: obtained with integrations of 560~s, 645~s, and 960~s per filter per
192: pointing, respectively. The \Rc\ and \Ic-band filter are Cousins
193: filters. The \zp\ filter has an effective wavelength of 9195~\AA\ and a
194: FWHM of 1410~\AA, very similar to that used by the SDSS survey
195: \citep{1996AJ....111.1748F}.
196:
197: Images were flattened, defringed, warped onto a common sky coordinate
198: system, registered, and cleaned of cosmic rays. A preliminary
199: photometric calibration of the \Rc\ and \Ic\ data was done using optical
200: imaging previously obtained from smaller telescopes, which was
201: calibrated with standards from \citet{1992AJ....104..340L}. For the
202: \zp\ data, the preliminary calibration was done by comparing the
203: \Rc\Ic\zp\ colors of stars in the Suprime-Cam data with the stellar
204: locus. The latter was synthesized from the spectral energy
205: distributions of \citet{1983ApJS...52..121G} and the instrumental
206: (filter+detector+atmosphere) transmission profiles. The resulting
207: magnitudes in Table~1 are Vega-based.
208:
209:
210: \subsection{IRTF/Spex and Keck/NIRSPEC: Infrared Follow-Up}
211:
212: We identified an extremely red stellar object at RA(2000) = 02:26:37.6,
213: DEC(2000) = 00:51:54.7 in the $I$ and \zp-band imaging. We refer to it
214: as ``IfA~0230-Z1'' hereinafter. We obtained $J$ and $H$-band photometry
215: on 06 November 2001 UT using the facility spectrograph Spex
216: \citep{1998SPIE.3354..468R}. Spex has a slit-viewing camera, which uses
217: a 512$\times$512 InSb array from Raytheon-SBRC and has a pixel scale of
218: 0\farcs118~pixel\perone. Conditions were photometric with 0\farcs85
219: FWHM seeing. We obtained a total of 18~min and 10~min of integration at
220: $J$ and $H$-band respectively. The Spex filters were purchased as part
221: of the Mauna Kea Filter Consortium \citep{mkofilters1, mkofilters2}, and
222: hence will be common to most of the current major infrared
223: telescopes. We obtained images of the standard star SJ~9105 from
224: \citet{1998AJ....116.2475P} immediately after observing IfA~0230-Z1.
225: The resulting magnitudes in Table~1 are Vega-based.
226:
227: We obtained an $H$-band spectrum of IfA~0230-Z1 on 10 November 2001 UT
228: with the Keck Telescope and the facility spectrograph NIRSPEC
229: \citep{1998SPIE.3354..566M}. NIRSPEC uses a 1024$\times$1024 InSb
230: ALADDIN detector from Raytheon-SBRC. A total of 30~min of integration
231: was obtained in low resolution mode using the NIRSPEC-5 blocking filter
232: and the 0\farcs76 slit. Conditions were very non-photometric due to high
233: thick cirrus. The object was dithered on the slit between exposures.
234: The slit PA was set to 73\fdg6 east of north, so that the bright object
235: 5\farcs65 away (``object~A'') was also on the slit for all the
236: exposures. This provided a well-detected reference for registering the
237: frames, and also a check on the resulting spectrophotometry (see below).
238: A nearby A0V star was observed immediately afterward to calibrate the
239: telluric and instrumental throughput.
240:
241: The spectra were reduced using custom IDL scripts. The raw images on
242: the NIRSPEC detector are curved in both the spectral and spatial
243: directions. After subtracting a dark frame and dividing by a flat
244: field, the individual images were cleaned of outlier pixels and
245: rectified using traces of the arc lamp lines and the object spectra.
246: Pairs of images taken at successive nods were subtracted to remove the
247: sky emission. Images were then registered, shifted, and stacked to form
248: a final 2-d mosaic of the spectrum. Extractions of 1-d spectra from the
249: mosaic were done in a manner to produce reliable errors based on photon
250: counting (Poisson) statistics. Details will be presented in a future
251: paper. We divided the extracted spectra by the spectra of the A0V
252: calibrator star and then multiplied by a 9720~K blackbody to restore the
253: true shape of the continuum. Hydrogen absorption features in the
254: calibrator were removed by linear interpolation. Wavelength calibration
255: was done with spectra of argon and neon lamps.
256:
257: The spectral resolution ($\lambda/\Delta{\lambda}$) of the original
258: extracted spectra was $R=1640$ (9.7~\AA); many of the telluric OH
259: emission lines are well-separated from each other. The resulting S/N
260: was only $\approx1\!-\!3$~pixel\perone, so we smoothed the spectra with
261: a 32~pixel FWHM Gaussian, with proper weighting accounting for the
262: measurement errors, and rebinned the data to 2 pixels per spectral
263: resolution element. The final spectra have a resolution of $R=180$ and
264: are plotted in Figure~\ref{fig-spectra}.
265:
266:
267: %----------------------------------------------------------------------%
268:
269: \section{Analysis}
270:
271: \subsection{Spectral Classification}
272:
273: The \Ic\zp$J$-band colors of IfA~0230-Z1 are extremely red, while the
274: $J-H$ colors are relatively blue. Such colors are uniquely
275: characteristic of T~dwarfs. IfA~0230-Z1 has $\zp-J=2.74\pm0.15$~mag
276: (Vega), comparable to the reddest known T~dwarfs. Its $J-H$ color of
277: 0.34$\pm$0.05 indicate a spectral type of T3--T4 \citep{leg01}.
278:
279: Figure~\ref{fig-spectra} shows the Keck/NIRSPEC spectra of IfA~0230-Z1
280: and object~A, which were observed simultaneously and reduced in an
281: identical fashion. The spectrum of object~A shows a featureless
282: continuum $f_\lambda\sim\lambda^{-0.7}$, consistent with the near-IR
283: continuum of a low redshift galaxy \citep{2001MNRAS.326..745M}. On the
284: other hand, IfA~0230-Z1 shows a peak in its continuum around
285: 1.58~\micron. The continuum is depressed in the blue and the red around
286: the peak, indicating the presence of \htwoo\ and \meth\ absorption,
287: respectively. Since object A's spectrum does not show any such
288: features, we conclude that these features are real and not due to, \eg,
289: systematic errors in the spectrophotometry due to telluric water
290: vapor.\footnote{We also observed IfA~0230-Z1 using Keck/NIRSPEC with the
291: same instrumental configuration on the previous night for a total of
292: 20~min. Conditions were more cloudy, and the resulting spectrum had
293: much lower S/N. However, the overall shape of the object's continuum was
294: consistent with the higher S/N data in Figure~\ref{fig-spectra}, with a
295: factor of $\sim$2 drop from the peak to the reddest wavelengths. Given
296: its very low S/N, we chose not to use this data.}
297:
298: Figure~\ref{fig-spectra} provides a comparison of IfA~0230-Z1 with local
299: T~dwarfs found in the SDSS and classified by \citet{geb01}. Based on
300: this, we estimate a spectral type of T3--T4 for IfA~0230-Z1, which
301: agrees with the typing from the broad-band colors alone. Since the
302: shape of the $H$-band continuum is changing rapidly with spectral type,
303: the uncertainty in the spectral typing is no more than 1~spectral
304: subclass.
305:
306:
307: \subsection{Distance}
308:
309: Only three T~dwarfs have known distances, all of them companions to main
310: sequence stars. Two of them, GL~229B and GL~570D, are much cooler
311: objects than IfA~0230-Z1, with stronger \meth\ absorption
312: \citep{1995Sci...270.1478O, 2000ApJ...531L..57B}. The third, GL~86B,
313: appears to have modest methane absorption like IfA~0230-Z1, but its
314: magnitudes and colors are poorly known \citep{els01}. Also, at fixed
315: effective temperature/spectral type, younger (less massive) brown dwarfs
316: will be more luminuous than older (more massive) ones. Hence, even if
317: there were T3~dwarfs with known distances, their ages and hence their
318: luminosities might be different than IfA~0230-Z1.
319:
320: We estimate the distance as follows. For ages older than $\sim$0.1~Gyr,
321: the radius of a brown dwarf is largely independent of its mass, to
322: within about 30\% \citep{bur01}. Hence, $L\sim\Teff^4$. The bolometric
323: correction at $J$-band is observed to be nearly constant for late-L and
324: T~dwarfs \citep{leg01} so the absolute $J$-band magnitude $M_J$ will
325: scale directly with \Teff$^4$. The difference in effective temperature
326: between the late-L dwarfs and the late-T dwarf GL~229B is estimated to
327: be quite small, perhaps only 1300 to 1000~K \citep{2000AJ....120..447K,
328: burg01}. Adopting $\Teff\approx1150$~K for IfA~0230-Z1 means its
329: $J$-band absolute magnitude will be $\approx$0.6 mag brighter than for
330: GL~229B, which has $M_J = 15.51\pm0.09$~mag \citep{1999ApJ...517L.139L}.
331: (Note that this is a differential comparison and does not depend on the
332: absolute \Teff\ scale adopted.) Hence, we estimate $M_J\approx14.9$~mag
333: for IfA~0230-Z1. This compares favorably to the two L8~dwarfs with known
334: distances, which have an average $M_J\approx14.85$~mag
335: \citep{2000AJ....120..447K}. The resulting distance estimate for
336: IfA~0230-Z1 is 45~pc, with an error of $\sim$20\% ($\pm$9~pc) based on
337: the uncertainties in the radius and absolute $J$-band magnitude.
338:
339:
340: \subsection{Survey Predictions: Number Counts and Scale Height
341: of Ultracool Dwarfs}
342:
343: The 0230 field of the IfA-Deep survey is contained with the SDSS Early
344: Data Release \citep{sdss-edr}, but IfA~0230-Z1 is $\sim$0.6~mags too
345: faint in \zp\ to be detected by SDSS. With the detection of only a
346: single object, any discussion of the T~dwarf number counts at magnitudes
347: fainter than SDSS is unwarranted. However, we can do a simple
348: comparison. The first five T~dwarfs from SDSS
349: \citep{1999ApJ...522L..61S, 2000ApJ...531L..61T, 2000ApJ...536L..35L}
350: were found in an area of 355~square degrees, with an effective limiting
351: magnitude of $\zp\approx19.5$~mags (Vega). This means a surface density
352: of about 1~per 70 square degrees. Our \zp-band imaging of the 0230 field
353: used in this paper reaches $\sim$4 mags deeper. Assuming a uniform
354: volume density of T~dwarfs, the expected surface density would be 1~per
355: 0.3~square degrees, consistent with our discovery of a single object.
356: The final IfA survey will go a factor of 3 deeper in flux and cover 5
357: times more area, suggesting a total yield of $\sim$40 T~dwarfs. In
358: comparison, 13 T~dwarfs have been found from the $\sim$40\% of the 2MASS
359: data searched to date \citep{burg01b}. This suggests the IfA survey
360: will find a comparable number of T~dwarfs as the entire 2MASS survey,
361: albeit at a much larger average distance. However, these numbers should
362: be taken with caution since they are based on the small sample of
363: objects found to date by SDSS.
364:
365: The completed IfA-Deep survey will be sensitive to T~dwarfs out to
366: $\sim$300~pc and L~dwarfs out to $\sim$2~kpc. By probing several lines
367: of sight, the survey should provide the first insights into the vertical
368: scale height of ultracool dwarfs. To examine this aspect quantiatively,
369: we consider a simple model of an exponential disk based on
370: \citet{1992ApJS...83..111W}, with a radial scale length of 3.5~kpc and
371: different vertical scale heights. For the L~dwarfs, we adopt a local
372: volume density of 0.01~pc\perthree\ and assume an equal number of
373: objects per spectral subclass (L0 to L8), consistent with the analyses
374: of \citet{1999ApJ...521..613R} and \citet{chab01}. We adopt a local
375: volume density for T~dwarfs of 0.006~pc\perthree, using the
376: \citet{burg01b} results for T5 to T8 dwarfs and then doubling it to
377: account for early T~dwarfs excluded from their 2MASS-selected sample.
378: For the T~dwarfs, we assume half the population is in early T dwarfs,
379: with the rest equally divided into T6, T7, and T8 dwarfs. These inputs
380: are very approximate, but consistent with the limited current
381: observations. Finally, we compute \zp-band absolute magnitudes using
382: data from \citet{2000AJ....120..447K}, \citet{2000ApJ...531L..57B},
383: \citet{els01}, and \citet{leg01}.
384:
385: The differences in the observed counts of L and T~dwarfs between our low
386: and high galactic latitude fields will be very sensitive to the objects'
387: vertical scale height. The 0230 field lies at very high galactic
388: latitude ($b=-53\degs$), while other fields in the IfA-Deep Survey cover
389: lower latitudes, down to the 0749 field at $b=18\degs$. For a canonical
390: scale height of 325~pc, we predict the counts of L~dwarfs in our high
391: and low latitude fields will differ by a factor of 3. In contrast, if
392: the scale height for ultracool objects is 100~pc, akin to the
393: Population~I constitutents of the Galactic disk
394: \citep{2000asqu.book.....C}, the difference between high and low
395: latitude counts will be much larger, about a factor of 9. For the
396: T~dwarfs, the dependence on scale height has a different behavior, since
397: our survey is only sensitive to much closer objects. For a 325~pc scale
398: height, the low latitude field is predicted to have about 1.5 times as
399: many T~dwarfs as the high latitude field. However, in the case of a
400: 100~pc scale height, there should be 3 times as many T~dwarfs in the low
401: latitude field compared to the high latitude field.
402:
403:
404:
405: %----------------------------------------------------------------------%
406:
407: \section{Conclusions}
408:
409: We have found a methane dwarf from the first night of observations for
410: the IfA-Deep Survey. The object has very red optical colors and
411: relatively blue near-IR colors. Its $H$-band spectrum shows strong
412: \htwoo\ and modest \meth\ absorption. The inferred spectral type is
413: T3--T4. The majority of T~dwarfs known to date have very deep \meth\
414: absorption, so IfA~0230-Z1 is an interesting object in that it lies in a
415: transition region of spectral type (and hence \Teff), where methane is
416: beginning to dominate the SED. The colors of early T-type objects, like
417: IfA~0230-Z1, make them difficult to identify in pure near-IR surveys
418: such as 2MASS but they are easily distinguished in our deep
419: optical/far-red survey. Such objects are useful to understand the
420: physics of ultracool atmospheres. Slightly warmer objects, the late
421: L-dwarfs, have extremely red near-IR colors, which have been interpreted
422: as being due to the role of dust. However, the very blue near-IR colors
423: of T~dwarfs are consistent with ``clear'', \ie, dust-free, atmospheres
424: \citep[e.g.][]{2001udns.conf....9T}.
425:
426: With its high sensitivity in the far-red bands, the IfA-Deep survey will
427: be an excellent means to search for brown dwarfs. Preliminary estimates
428: based on the T~dwarf discoveries by SDSS suggests the IfA survey will
429: find a comparable number of T~dwarfs as the 2MASS survey, albeit at a
430: much larger average distance. The final survey will go $\gtrsim$100
431: times fainter than SDSS, raising the possibility of finding isolated
432: brown dwarfs much cooler than those found to date. Furthermore, the
433: survey will be sensitive to T~dwarfs out to $\sim$300~pc and L~dwarfs
434: out to $\sim2$~kpc along several lines of sight, at galactic latitudes
435: ranging from $|b|\approx20-60\degs$. This raises the possibility of
436: providing the first insights into the vertical scale height of ultracool
437: dwarfs, thereby telling us about their origin in a galactic context.
438:
439:
440:
441: \acknowledgments
442:
443: The authors wish to extend special thanks to those of Hawaiian ancestry
444: on whose sacred mountain we are privileged to be guests. Without their
445: generous hospitality, none of the observations presented herein would
446: have been possible. It is a pleasure to acknowlege our collaborators on
447: the IfA-Deep Survey: Herve Aussel, Ken Chambers, Pat Henry, Nick Kaiser,
448: Eugene Magnier, Dave Sanders, and Alan Stockton. We are grateful for
449: the support from the staffs of the Subaru Telescope, IRTF, and Keck
450: Observatory, including Yutaka Komiyama, Ryusuke Ogasawara, Paul Hirsh,
451: John Rayner, David Sprayberry, and Gary Puniwai. We thank Pete Challis,
452: Alan Tokunaga and Jonathan Leong for help with the Subaru and Keck
453: observations; Sungsoo Kim, Lisa Prato, and Ian McLean for providing the
454: REDSPEC reduction software and documentation; and Mamori Doi for SDSS
455: filter data. The Subaru Telescope is operated by the National
456: Astronomical Observatory of Japan. The IRTF is operated by the
457: University of Hawaii under a contract from National Aeronautics and
458: Space Administration (NASA). W.M. Keck Observatory was made possible by
459: the generous financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation and is
460: operated by Caltech, the University of California, and NASA. M. Liu is
461: grateful for research support from the Beatrice Watson Parrent
462: Fellowship at the University of Hawai`i.
463:
464:
465: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
466: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
467: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
468:
469: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
470: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
471: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
472:
473: %\appendix
474: %\section{Appendicial material}
475:
476: %%======================================================================%%
477:
478: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
479: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
480: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
481: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
482: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
483: %%
484: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
485: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
486: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
487: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
488: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
489: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
490: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
491: %% place of the \cite commands.
492:
493: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
494: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
495: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
496:
497: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
498: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
499: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
500: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
501: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
502:
503: %\begin{thebibliography}{}
504: %\end{thebibliography}
505:
506: %\bibliography{/home/notebook/mliu/tex/bibtex/mliu}
507: %\bibliography{/home/computer/mliu/tex/bibtex/mliu}
508: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
509:
510: \begin{thebibliography}{40}
511: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
512:
513: \bibitem[{Burgasser(2001)}]{burg01b}
514: Burgasser, A.~J. 2001, in 4th Tetons Summer Conference on Galactic Structure,
515: Stars, and the Interstellar Medium, in press (astro-ph/0101242)
516:
517: \bibitem[{Burgasser {et~al.}(1999)}]{1999ApJ...522L..65B}
518: Burgasser, A.~J. {et~al.} 1999, \apjl, 522, L65
519:
520: \bibitem[{Burgasser {et~al.}(2000{\natexlab{a}})}]{2000AJ....120.1100B}
521: ---. 2000{\natexlab{a}}, \aj, 120, 1100
522:
523: \bibitem[{Burgasser {et~al.}(2000{\natexlab{b}})}]{2000ApJ...531L..57B}
524: ---. 2000{\natexlab{b}}, \apjl, 531, L57
525:
526: \bibitem[{Burgasser {et~al.}(2002)}]{burg01}
527: ---. 2002, \apj, 564, 421
528:
529: \bibitem[{Burrows {et~al.}(2001)Burrows, Hubbard, Lunine, \& Liebert}]{bur01}
530: Burrows, A., Hubbard, W.~B., Lunine, J.~I., \& Liebert, J. 2001, Rev. Mod.
531: Physics, in press (astro-ph/0103383)
532:
533: \bibitem[{Burrows {et~al.}(2000)Burrows, {Marley}, \&
534: {Sharp}}]{2000ApJ...531..438B}
535: Burrows, A., {Marley}, M.~S., \& {Sharp}, C.~M. 2000, \apj, 531, 438
536:
537: \bibitem[{Chabrier(2001)}]{chab01}
538: Chabrier, G. 2001, \apj, in press (astro-ph/0110024)
539:
540: \bibitem[{Cox(2000)}]{2000asqu.book.....C}
541: Cox, A.~N. 2000, {Allen's Astrophysical Quantities (4th ed.)} (New York:
542: Springer)
543:
544: \bibitem[{Cuby {et~al.}(1999)Cuby, {Saracco}, {Moorwood}, {D'Odorico},
545: {Lidman}, {Comer{\' o}n}, \& {Spyromilio}}]{1999A&A...349L..41C}
546: Cuby, J.~G., {Saracco}, P., {Moorwood}, A.~F.~M., {D'Odorico}, S., {Lidman},
547: C., {Comer{\' o}n}, F., \& {Spyromilio}, J. 1999, \aap, 349, L41
548:
549: \bibitem[{Els {et~al.}(2001)Els, Sterzik, Marchis, Pantin, Endl, \&
550: Kurster}]{els01}
551: Els, S.~G., Sterzik, M.~F., Marchis, F., Pantin, E., Endl, M., \& Kurster, M.
552: 2001, \aap, in press
553:
554: \bibitem[{Epchtein {et~al.}(1999)}]{1999A&A...349..236E}
555: Epchtein, N. {et~al.} 1999, \aap, 349, 236
556:
557: \bibitem[{Fegley \& {Lodders}(1996)}]{1996ApJ...472L..37F}
558: Fegley, B.~J. \& {Lodders}, K. 1996, \apjl, 472, L37
559:
560: \bibitem[{Fukugita {et~al.}(1996)Fukugita, {Ichikawa}, {Gunn}, {Doi},
561: {Shimasaku}, \& {Schneider}}]{1996AJ....111.1748F}
562: Fukugita, M., {Ichikawa}, T., {Gunn}, J.~E., {Doi}, M., {Shimasaku}, K., \&
563: {Schneider}, D.~P. 1996, \aj, 111, 1748
564:
565: \bibitem[{Geballe {et~al.}(2002)}]{geb01}
566: Geballe, T. {et~al.} 2002, \apj, 564, 466
567:
568: \bibitem[{Gunn \& {Stryker}(1983)}]{1983ApJS...52..121G}
569: Gunn, J.~E. \& {Stryker}, L.~L. 1983, \apjs, 52, 121
570:
571: \bibitem[{Kirkpatrick {et~al.}(1999)Kirkpatrick, {Reid}, {Liebert}, {Cutri},
572: {Nelson}, {Beichman}, {Dahn}, {Monet}, {Gizis}, \&
573: {Skrutskie}}]{1999ApJ...519..802K}
574: Kirkpatrick, J.~D., {Reid}, I.~N., {Liebert}, J., {Cutri}, R.~M., {Nelson}, B.,
575: {Beichman}, C.~A., {Dahn}, C.~C., {Monet}, D.~G., {Gizis}, J.~E., \&
576: {Skrutskie}, M.~F. 1999, \apj, 519, 802
577:
578: \bibitem[{Kirkpatrick {et~al.}(2000)Kirkpatrick, {Reid}, {Liebert}, {Gizis},
579: {Burgasser}, {Monet}, {Dahn}, {Nelson}, \& {Williams}}]{2000AJ....120..447K}
580: Kirkpatrick, J.~D., {Reid}, I.~N., {Liebert}, J., {Gizis}, J.~E., {Burgasser},
581: A.~J., {Monet}, D.~G., {Dahn}, C.~C., {Nelson}, B., \& {Williams}, R.~J.
582: 2000, \aj, 120, 447
583:
584: \bibitem[{Landolt(1992)}]{1992AJ....104..340L}
585: Landolt, A.~U. 1992, \aj, 104, 340
586:
587: \bibitem[{Leggett {et~al.}(1999)Leggett, {Toomey}, {Geballe}, \&
588: {Brown}}]{1999ApJ...517L.139L}
589: Leggett, S.~K., {Toomey}, D.~W., {Geballe}, T.~R., \& {Brown}, R.~H. 1999,
590: \apjl, 517, L139
591:
592: \bibitem[{Leggett {et~al.}(2000)}]{2000ApJ...536L..35L}
593: Leggett, S.~K. {et~al.} 2000, \apjl, 536, L35
594:
595: \bibitem[{Leggett {et~al.}(2002)}]{leg01}
596: ---. 2002, \apj, 564, 452
597:
598: \bibitem[{Liebert {et~al.}(2000)Liebert, {Reid}, {Burrows}, {Burgasser},
599: {Kirkpatrick}, \& {Gizis}}]{2000ApJ...533L.155L}
600: Liebert, J., {Reid}, I.~N., {Burrows}, A., {Burgasser}, A.~J., {Kirkpatrick},
601: J.~D., \& {Gizis}, J.~E. 2000, \apjl, 533, L155
602:
603: \bibitem[{Mannucci {et~al.}(2001)Mannucci, {Basile}, {Poggianti}, {Cimatti},
604: {Daddi}, {Pozzetti}, \& {Vanzi}}]{2001MNRAS.326..745M}
605: Mannucci, F., {Basile}, F., {Poggianti}, B.~M., {Cimatti}, A., {Daddi}, E.,
606: {Pozzetti}, L., \& {Vanzi}, L. 2001, \mnras, 326, 745
607:
608: \bibitem[{McLean {et~al.}(1998)}]{1998SPIE.3354..566M}
609: McLean, I.~S. {et~al.} 1998, in Proc. SPIE Vol. 3354, p. 566-578, Infrared
610: Astronomical Instrumentation, Albert M. Fowler; Ed., Vol. 3354, 566--578
611:
612: \bibitem[{Miyazaki {et~al.}(1998)Miyazaki, {Sekiguchi}, {Imi}, {Okada},
613: {Nakata}, \& {Komiyama}}]{1998SPIE.3355..363M}
614: Miyazaki, S., {Sekiguchi}, M., {Imi}, K., {Okada}, N., {Nakata}, F., \&
615: {Komiyama}, Y. 1998, in Proc. SPIE Vol. 3355, p. 363-374, Optical
616: Astronomical Instrumentation, Sandro D'Odorico; Ed., Vol. 3355, 363--374
617:
618: \bibitem[{Nakajima {et~al.}(1995)Nakajima, {Oppenheimer}, {Kulkarni},
619: {Golimowski}, {Matthews}, \& {Durrance}}]{1995Natur.378..463N}
620: Nakajima, T., {Oppenheimer}, B.~R., {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {Golimowski}, D.~A.,
621: {Matthews}, K., \& {Durrance}, S.~T. 1995, \nat, 378, 463
622:
623: \bibitem[{Oppenheimer {et~al.}(1995)Oppenheimer, {Kulkarni}, {Matthews}, \&
624: {Nakajima}}]{1995Sci...270.1478O}
625: Oppenheimer, B.~R., {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {Matthews}, K., \& {Nakajima}, T. 1995,
626: Science, 270, 1478
627:
628: \bibitem[{Persson {et~al.}(1998)Persson, {Murphy}, {Krzeminski}, {Roth}, \&
629: {Rieke}}]{1998AJ....116.2475P}
630: Persson, S.~E., {Murphy}, D.~C., {Krzeminski}, W., {Roth}, M., \& {Rieke},
631: M.~J. 1998, \aj, 116, 2475
632:
633: \bibitem[{Rayner {et~al.}(1998)Rayner, {Toomey}, {Onaka}, {Denault},
634: {Stahlberger}, {Watanabe}, \& {Wang}}]{1998SPIE.3354..468R}
635: Rayner, J.~T., {Toomey}, D.~W., {Onaka}, P.~M., {Denault}, A.~J.,
636: {Stahlberger}, W.~E., {Watanabe}, D.~Y., \& {Wang}, S. 1998, in Proc. SPIE
637: Vol. 3354, p. 468-479, Infrared Astronomical Instrumentation, Albert M.
638: Fowler; Ed., Vol. 3354, 468--479
639:
640: \bibitem[{Reid {et~al.}(1999)}]{1999ApJ...521..613R}
641: Reid, I.~N. {et~al.} 1999, \apj, 521, 613
642:
643: \bibitem[{Simons \& Tokunaga(2001)}]{mkofilters1}
644: Simons, D.~A. \& Tokunaga, A.~T. 2001, \pasp, in press (astro-ph/0110594)
645:
646: \bibitem[{Skrutskie {et~al.}(1997)}]{1997ilsn.proc...25S}
647: Skrutskie, M.~F. {et~al.} 1997, in ASSL Vol. 210: The Impact of Large Scale
648: Near-IR Sky Surveys, 25
649:
650: \bibitem[{Stoughton {et~al.}(2002)}]{sdss-edr}
651: Stoughton, C. {et~al.} 2002, \aj, 123, 485
652:
653: \bibitem[{{Strauss} {et~al.}(1999)}]{1999ApJ...522L..61S}
654: {Strauss}, M.~A. {et~al.} 1999, \apjl, 522, L61
655:
656: \bibitem[{Tokunaga {et~al.}(2001)Tokunaga, Simons, \& Vacca}]{mkofilters2}
657: Tokunaga, A.~T., Simons, D.~A., \& Vacca, W.~D. 2001, \pasp, in press
658: (astro-ph/0110593)
659:
660: \bibitem[{{Tsuji}(2001)}]{2001udns.conf....9T}
661: {Tsuji}, T. 2001, in Proceedings of IAU Symposium 202: Ultracool Dwarfs ---
662: Surveys, Properties and Spectral Classification, ed. H.~R.~A. Jones \&
663: I.~Steele (Springer-Verlag), 9
664:
665: \bibitem[{Tsvetanov {et~al.}(2000)}]{2000ApJ...531L..61T}
666: Tsvetanov, Z.~I. {et~al.} 2000, \apjl, 531, L61
667:
668: \bibitem[{Wainscoat {et~al.}(1992)Wainscoat, {Cohen}, {Volk}, {Walker}, \&
669: {Schwartz}}]{1992ApJS...83..111W}
670: Wainscoat, R.~J., {Cohen}, M., {Volk}, K., {Walker}, H.~J., \& {Schwartz},
671: D.~E. 1992, \apjs, 83, 111
672:
673: \bibitem[{{York} {et~al.}(2000)}]{2000AJ....120.1579Y}
674: {York}, D.~G. {et~al.} 2000, \aj, 120, 1579
675:
676: \end{thebibliography}
677:
678: \clearpage
679:
680: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
681: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
682:
683:
684: \begin{figure}
685: \vskip -3in
686: \hskip -0.25in
687: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=5.5in,angle=90]{f1.ps}}
688: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=5.5in,angle=90]{plot-multipanel.ps}}
689: \caption{\normalsize Optical and near-IR imaging for IfA~0230-Z1,
690: indicated by the arrow. Each image is 30\arcsec\ on a side with North
691: up and East left. The optical images are slightly trailed due to a
692: telescope guiding problem. The \Ic\ and \zp-band images are from
693: Subaru/Suprime-Cam. The $J$-band image is from IRTF/Spex and has been
694: smoothed using a gaussian with FWHM equal to the seeing to enhance the
695: faint objects. The bright object at PA 286\degs\ and a separation of
696: 5\farcs7 is ``object A,'' used for the Keck/NIRSPEC spectroscopy (see
697: Figure~\ref{fig-spectra}).
698: \label{fig-multipanel}}
699: \end{figure}
700:
701: \clearpage
702:
703: \begin{figure}[t]
704: \hskip -1.6in
705: \hbox{
706: \raise 0.25in
707: \vbox{
708: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=3in]{f2a.ps}}}
709: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=3in]{plot-2spec.ps}}}
710: \hskip -4.5in %needed for emulateapj style
711: %\hskip -3.5in
712: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=3.3in]{f2b.ps}}}
713: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=3.3in]{plot-compare.ps}}}
714: \caption{\normalsize {\bf Left:} Keck/NIRSPEC spectra of IfA~0230-Z1 and
715: an adjacent bright galaxy observed simultaneously on the same slit. The
716: spectra have been smoothed to $R=180$ and rebinned to 2 pixels per
717: spectral resolution element. The formal 1$\sigma$ errors are shown as
718: shaded regions at the bottom of each plot. IfA~0230-Z1 shows a peak
719: near 1.58~\micron\ and depressed flux on the blue and the red sides,
720: indicative of \htwoo\ and \meth\ absorption, respectively. In contrast,
721: object~A shows a featureless continuum.
722: %
723: {\bf Right:} IfA~0230-Z1 compared with spectra of local T~dwarfs from
724: \citet{geb01}: SDSS~1254 (T2), SDSS~1021 (T3), SDSS~1750 (T3.5),
725: 2MASS~0559 (T4.5). Each spectrum has been normalized to an average flux
726: of 1.0 in the 1.55--1.60~\micron\ region and then offset by an integer
727: value. The dotted lines indicate the zero flux level for each spectrum.
728: \label{fig-spectra}}
729: \end{figure}
730:
731:
732:
733:
734: %%======================================================================%%
735: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
736: %% each one.
737:
738: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
739: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
740: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
741: %%
742:
743: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
744: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
745:
746:
747: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
748: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
749: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
750: %% inside the \tablecaption.
751:
752:
753: %\clearpage
754:
755: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
756: \tabletypesize{\normalsize}
757: \tablecaption{Photometry of IfA~0230-Z1 \label{table-phot}}
758: \tablewidth{0pt}
759: \tablehead{
760: \colhead{Filter ($\lambda_c$)} & \colhead{Mag (Vega)}}
761:
762: \startdata
763: \Rc\ (0.66~\micron) & $>$25.5 \\
764: \Ic\ (0.81~\micron) & 23.61 $\pm$ 0.10 \\
765: \zp\ (0.92~\micron) & 20.91 $\pm$ 0.15 \\
766: $J_{MK}$ (1.24~\micron) & 18.17 $\pm$ 0.03 \\
767: $H_{MK}$ (1.65~\micron) & 17.83 $\pm$ 0.04 \\
768: \enddata
769:
770: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
771: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
772: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
773:
774: %\tablenotetext{a}{Sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1} that was generated
775: %with the deluxetable environment}
776:
777: \end{deluxetable}
778:
779:
780:
781: \end{document}
782:
783: