1: \documentstyle[twoside,psfig]{article}
2:
3: %--------------------NEW ADDITIONS TO EXISTING ARTICLE.STY------------------
4: \catcode`\@=11
5: \long\def\@makefntext#1{
6: \protect\noindent \hbox to 3.2pt {\hskip-.9pt
7: $^{{\eightrm\@thefnmark}}$\hfil}#1\hfill} %CAN BE USED
8:
9: \def\thefootnote{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
10: \def\@makefnmark{\hbox to 0pt{$^{\@thefnmark}$\hss}} %ORIGINAL
11:
12: \def\ps@myheadings{\let\@mkboth\@gobbletwo
13: \def\@oddhead{\hbox{}
14: \rightmark\hfil\eightrm\thepage}
15: \def\@oddfoot{}\def\@evenhead{\eightrm\thepage\hfil
16: \leftmark\hbox{}}\def\@evenfoot{}
17: \def\sectionmark##1{}\def\subsectionmark##1{}}
18:
19: %--------------------START OF IJMPD1.STY------------------------------------
20: %THIS STYLE FILE (IJMPD.STY) IS FOR REFERENCES FROM 1--9 ITEMS ONLY
21:
22: %THIS STYLE FILE WILL PRODUCE
23: %$^1$ IN BODY TEXT AND 1. AT REFERENCE SECTION
24:
25: \oddsidemargin=\evensidemargin
26: \addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{-30pt}
27: \addtolength{\evensidemargin}{-30pt}
28: \headsep=15pt
29: \baselineskip=13pt
30:
31: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
32: \newcommand{\symbolfootnote}{\renewcommand{\thefootnote}
33: {\fnsymbol{footnote}}}
34: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
35: \newcommand{\alphfootnote}
36: {\setcounter{footnote}{0}
37: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\sevenrm\alph{footnote}}}
38:
39: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
40: %NEWLY-DEFINED SECTION COMMANDS
41: \newcounter{sectionc}\newcounter{subsectionc}\newcounter{subsubsectionc}
42: \renewcommand{\section}[1] {\vspace{12pt}\addtocounter{sectionc}{1}
43: \setcounter{subsectionc}{0}\setcounter{subsubsectionc}{0}\noindent
44: {\tenbf\thesectionc. #1}\par\vspace{5pt}}
45: \renewcommand{\subsection}[1] {\vspace{12pt}\addtocounter{subsectionc}{1}
46: \setcounter{subsubsectionc}{0}\noindent
47: {\bf\thesectionc.\thesubsectionc. {\kern1pt \bfit #1}}\par\vspace{5pt}}
48: \renewcommand{\subsubsection}[1] {\vspace{12pt}\addtocounter{subsubsectionc}{1}
49: \noindent{\tenrm\thesectionc.\thesubsectionc.\thesubsubsectionc.
50: {\kern1pt \tenit #1}}\par\vspace{5pt}}
51: \newcommand{\nonumsection}[1] {\vspace{12pt}\noindent{\tenbf #1}
52: \par\vspace{5pt}}
53:
54: %NEW MACRO TO HANDLE APPENDICES
55: \newcounter{appendixc}
56: \newcounter{subappendixc}[appendixc]
57: \newcounter{subsubappendixc}[subappendixc]
58: \renewcommand{\thesubappendixc}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{subappendixc}}
59: \renewcommand{\thesubsubappendixc}
60: {\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{subappendixc}.\arabic{subsubappendixc}}
61:
62: \renewcommand{\appendix}[1] {\vspace{12pt}
63: \refstepcounter{appendixc}
64: \setcounter{figure}{0}
65: \setcounter{table}{0}
66: \setcounter{lemma}{0}
67: \setcounter{theorem}{0}
68: \setcounter{corollary}{0}
69: \setcounter{definition}{0}
70: \setcounter{equation}{0}
71: \renewcommand{\thefigure}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{figure}}
72: \renewcommand{\thetable}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{table}}
73: \renewcommand{\theappendixc}{\Alph{appendixc}}
74: \renewcommand{\thelemma}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{lemma}}
75: \renewcommand{\thetheorem}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{theorem}}
76: \renewcommand{\thedefinition}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{definition}}
77: \renewcommand{\thecorollary}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{corollary}}
78: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{equation}}
79: % \noindent{\tenbf Appendix \theappendixc. #1}\par\vspace{5pt}}
80: \noindent{\tenbf Appendix \theappendixc #1}\par\vspace{5pt}}
81: \newcommand{\subappendix}[1] {\vspace{12pt}
82: \refstepcounter{subappendixc}
83: \noindent{\bf Appendix \thesubappendixc. {\kern1pt \bfit #1}}
84: \par\vspace{5pt}}
85: \newcommand{\subsubappendix}[1] {\vspace{12pt}
86: \refstepcounter{subsubappendixc}
87: \noindent{\rm Appendix \thesubsubappendixc. {\kern1pt \tenit #1}}
88: \par\vspace{5pt}}
89:
90: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
91: %FOLLOWING THREE COMMANDS ARE FOR `LIST' COMMAND.
92: \topsep=0in\parsep=0in\itemsep=0in
93: \parindent=15pt
94:
95: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
96: \newcommand{\textlineskip}{\baselineskip=13pt}
97: \newcommand{\smalllineskip}{\baselineskip=10pt}
98:
99: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
100: %MACRO FOR COPYRIGHT BLOCK
101: \def\eightcirc{
102: \begin{picture}(0,0)
103: \put(4.4,1.8){\circle{6.5}}
104: \end{picture}}
105: \def\eightcopyright{\eightcirc\kern2.7pt\hbox{\eightrm c}}
106:
107: \newcommand{\copyrightheading}[1]
108: {\vspace*{-2.5cm}\smalllineskip{\flushleft
109: {\footnotesize International Journal of Modern Physics D #1}\\
110: {\footnotesize $\eightcopyright$\, World Scientific Publishing
111: Company}\\
112: }}
113:
114: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
115: %MACRO FOR PUBLISHER INFORMATION SECTION
116: \newcommand{\pub}[1]{{\begin{center}\footnotesize\smalllineskip
117: Received #1\\
118: \end{center}
119: }}
120:
121: \newcommand{\publisher}[2]{{\begin{center}\footnotesize\smalllineskip
122: Received #1\\
123: Revised #2
124: \end{center}
125: }}
126:
127: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
128: %MARCO FOR ABSTRACT BLOCK
129: \def\abstracts#1#2#3{{
130: \centering{\begin{minipage}{4.5in}\footnotesize\baselineskip=10pt
131: \parindent=0pt #1\par
132: \parindent=15pt #2\par
133: \parindent=15pt #3
134: \end{minipage}}\par}}
135:
136: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
137: %MARCO FOR KEYWORDS BLOCK
138: \def\keywords#1{{
139: \centering{\begin{minipage}{4.5in}\footnotesize\baselineskip=10pt
140: {\footnotesize\it Keywords}\/: #1
141: \end{minipage}}\par}}
142:
143: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
144: %NEW MACRO FOR BIBLIOGRAPHY
145: \newcommand{\bibit}{\nineit}
146: \newcommand{\bibbf}{\ninebf}
147: \renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]
148: {\frenchspacing
149: \ninerm\baselineskip=11pt
150: \begin{list}{\arabic{enumi}.}
151: {\usecounter{enumi}\setlength{\parsep}{0pt}
152: \setlength{\leftmargin 12.7pt}{\rightmargin 0pt} %FOR 1--9 ITEMS
153: % \setlength{\leftmargin 17pt}{\rightmargin 0pt} %FOR 10--99 ITEMS
154: % \setlength{\leftmargin 22pt}{\rightmargin 0pt} %FOR 100+ABOVE ITEMS
155: \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt} \settowidth
156: {\labelwidth}{#1.}\sloppy}}{\end{list}}
157:
158: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
159: %LIST ENVIRONMENTS
160: \newcounter{itemlistc}
161: \newcounter{romanlistc}
162: \newcounter{alphlistc}
163: \newcounter{arabiclistc}
164: \newenvironment{itemlist}
165: {\setcounter{itemlistc}{0}
166: \begin{list}{$\bullet$}
167: {\usecounter{itemlistc}
168: \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}
169: \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}}}{\end{list}}
170:
171: \newenvironment{romanlist}
172: {\setcounter{romanlistc}{0}
173: \begin{list}{$($\roman{romanlistc}$)$}
174: {\usecounter{romanlistc}
175: \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}
176: \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}}}{\end{list}}
177:
178: \newenvironment{alphlist}
179: {\setcounter{alphlistc}{0}
180: \begin{list}{$($\alph{alphlistc}$)$}
181: {\usecounter{alphlistc}
182: \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}
183: \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}}}{\end{list}}
184:
185: \newenvironment{arabiclist}
186: {\setcounter{arabiclistc}{0}
187: \begin{list}{\arabic{arabiclistc}}
188: {\usecounter{arabiclistc}
189: \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}
190: \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}}}{\end{list}}
191:
192: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
193: %FIGURE CAPTION
194: \newcommand{\fcaption}[1]{
195: \refstepcounter{figure}
196: \setbox\@tempboxa = \hbox{\footnotesize Fig.~\thefigure. #1}
197: \ifdim \wd\@tempboxa > 5in
198: {\begin{center}
199: \parbox{5in}{\footnotesize\smalllineskip Fig.~\thefigure. #1}
200: \end{center}}
201: \else
202: {\begin{center}
203: {\footnotesize Fig.~\thefigure. #1}
204: \end{center}}
205: \fi}
206:
207: %TABLE CAPTION
208: \newcommand{\tcaption}[1]{
209: \refstepcounter{table}
210: \setbox\@tempboxa = \hbox{\footnotesize Table~\thetable. #1}
211: \ifdim \wd\@tempboxa > 5in
212: {\begin{center}
213: \parbox{5in}{\footnotesize\smalllineskip Table~\thetable. #1}
214: \end{center}}
215: \else
216: {\begin{center}
217: {\footnotesize Table~\thetable. #1}
218: \end{center}}
219: \fi}
220:
221: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
222: %MACROS FOR SETTING \cite{x} OR \citeup{x}
223: \def\@citex[#1]#2{\if@filesw\immediate\write\@auxout
224: {\string\citation{#2}}\fi
225: \def\@citea{}\@cite{\@for\@citeb:=#2\do
226: {\@citea\def\@citea{,}\@ifundefined
227: {b@\@citeb}{{\bf ?}\@warning
228: {Citation `\@citeb' on page \thepage \space undefined}}
229: {\csname b@\@citeb\endcsname}}}{#1}}
230:
231: \newif\if@cghi
232: \def\cite{\@cghitrue\@ifnextchar [{\@tempswatrue
233: \@citex}{\@tempswafalse\@citex[]}}
234: \def\citelow{\@cghifalse\@ifnextchar [{\@tempswatrue
235: \@citex}{\@tempswafalse\@citex[]}}
236: \def\@cite#1#2{{$\null^{#1}$\if@tempswa\typeout
237: {IJCGA warning: optional citation argument
238: ignored: `#2'} \fi}}
239: \newcommand{\citeup}{\cite}
240:
241: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
242: %FOR SUB/SUPERSCRIPT BOLDFACED + ITALICS
243: \def\pmb#1{\setbox0=\hbox{#1}
244: \kern-.025em\copy0\kern-\wd0
245: \kern.05em\copy0\kern-\wd0
246: \kern-.025em\raise.0433em\box0}
247: \def\mbi#1{{\pmb{\mbox{\scriptsize ${#1}$}}}}
248: \def\mbr#1{{\pmb{\mbox{\scriptsize{#1}}}}}
249:
250: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
251: %FOR FNSYMBOL FOOTNOTE AND ALPH{FOOTNOTE}
252: \def\fnm#1{$^{\mbox{\scriptsize #1}}$}
253: \def\fnt#1#2{\footnotetext{\kern-.3em
254: {$^{\mbox{\scriptsize #1}}$}{#2}}}
255:
256: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
257: %FOR CREATING THE OPENING PAGE NUMBER
258: \def\fpage#1{\begingroup
259: \voffset=.3in
260: \thispagestyle{empty}\begin{table}[b]\centerline{\footnotesize #1}
261: \end{table}\endgroup}
262:
263: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
264: %MACRO FOR RUNNINGHEAD
265: %\def\runninghead#1#2{\pagestyle{myheadings}
266: %\markboth{{\protect\footnotesize\it{\quad #1}}\hfill}
267: %{\hfill{\protect\footnotesize\it{#2\quad}}}}
268: %\headsep=15pt
269:
270: \def\thefootnote{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
271: \def\@makefnmark{\hbox to 0pt{$^{\@thefnmark}$\hss}} %ORIGINAL
272:
273: \def\ps@myheadings{%
274: \let\@oddfoot\@empty\let\@evenfoot\@empty
275: \def\@evenhead{\slshape\leftmark\hfil}% %EVEN PAGE
276: \def\@oddhead{\hfil{\slshape\rightmark}}% %ODD PAGE
277: \let\@mkboth\@gobbletwo
278: \let\sectionmark\@gobble
279: \let\subsectionmark\@gobble
280: }
281: %
282: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
283: \font\tenrm=cmr10
284: \font\tenit=cmti10
285: \font\tenbf=cmbx10
286: \font\bfit=cmbxti10 at 10pt
287: \font\ninerm=cmr9
288: \font\nineit=cmti9
289: \font\ninebf=cmbx9
290: \font\eightrm=cmr8
291: \font\eightit=cmti8
292: \font\eightbf=cmbx8
293: \font\sevenrm=cmr7
294: \font\fiverm=cmr5
295:
296: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
297: \newtheorem{theorem}{\indent Theorem}
298: %OR \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[sectionc] WHICH HAS SECTION NUMBER
299:
300: \newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}
301: %OR USE \newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}[sectionc]
302:
303: \newtheorem{definition}{Definition}
304: \newtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}
305: %USERS CAN ADD ON THEIR OWN NEW THEOREM-LIKE ENVIRONMENTS.
306:
307: \newcommand{\proof}[1]{{\tenbf Proof.} #1 $\Box$.}
308:
309: %--------------------END OF IJMPD1.STY--------------------------------------
310:
311:
312: %--------------------START OF DATA FILE-------------------------------------
313: \textwidth=5truein
314: %\textheight=7.8truein
315: \textheight=7.26truein
316:
317: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
318: %DEFINITIONS
319: \def\qed{\hbox{${\vcenter{\vbox{ %HOLLOW SQUARE
320: \hrule height 0.4pt\hbox{\vrule width 0.4pt height 6pt
321: \kern5pt\vrule width 0.4pt}\hrule height 0.4pt}}}$}}
322:
323: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}} %USE SYMBOLIC FOOTNOTE
324:
325: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
326: \pagestyle{myheadings}
327:
328: \begin{document}
329: \setlength{\textheight}{7.7truein} %for 2nd page onwards
330:
331: \thispagestyle{empty}
332:
333: \markboth{\protect{\footnotesize\it Quark-diquark matter equation of
334: state $\ldots$}}{\protect{\footnotesize\it Quark-diquark matter equation of
335: state $\ldots$}}
336:
337: \normalsize\textlineskip
338:
339: \setcounter{page}{1}
340:
341: \copyrightheading{} %{Vol.~0, No.~0 (2000) 000--000}
342:
343: \vspace*{0.88truein}
344:
345: %\fpage{1}
346: \centerline{\bf QUARK-DIQUARK MATTER EQUATION OF STATE}
347: \vspace*{0.035truein}
348: \centerline{\bf AND COMPACT STAR STRUCTURE}
349: \vspace*{0.37truein}
350:
351: \centerline{\footnotesize G. LUGONES\footnote{Email: glugones@iagusp.usp.br} and J. E. HORVATH}
352: \baselineskip=12pt
353: \centerline{\footnotesize\it Instituto Astron\^omico e Geof\'{\i}sico, Universidade de S\~ao Paulo,}
354: \baselineskip=10pt
355: \centerline{\footnotesize\it Av. M. St\'efano 4200, Agua Funda, 04301-904 S\~ao Paulo SP, Brazil}
356: \vspace*{10pt}
357: \vspace*{0.225truein}
358: \publisher{(received date)}{(revised date)}
359:
360: \vspace*{0.21truein}
361: \abstracts{We present the equation of state (EOS) of quark-diquark matter in the quark
362: mass-density-dependent model.
363: The region of the $2-D$ parameter space
364: inside which this quark-diquark matter is stable against diquark
365: disassembling and
366: hadronization is determined.
367: Motivated by observational data suggesting a high
368: compactness of some neutron stars (NS) we present models based on the
369: present EOS and compare the results with those obtained with previous
370: works addressing a quark-diquark composition based on the MIT Bag model.
371: We show that very compact self-bound stars (yet having $\geq 1 M_{\odot}$)
372: are allowed by our EOS even if
373: the diquark itself is unbound.}{}{}
374:
375:
376: %---------------------------------------------------------------%
377: \vspace*{1pt}\textlineskip %) USE THIS MEASUREMENT WHEN THERE IS
378: \section{Introduction} %) A SECTION HEADING
379: \vspace*{-0.5pt}
380: \noindent
381: The spectacular advances of astronomical instrumentation in the last decade has
382: stimulated a great deal of activity on "old" questions of relativistic
383: astrophysics. Among the latter we find the internal structure of compact
384: stars,
385: which is not only interesting {\it per se}, but also important for a through
386: knowledge of the QCD diagram in the low-$T$ , high $\mu$ region.
387:
388: One of the most simple forms of (indirectly) investigating the nature of
389: high-density matter, more precisely of the EOS is by obtaining accurate
390: determinations of
391: masses and radii. In fact, leaving aside the possibility of differences due
392: to extreme rotation, and adopting General Relativity as a framework, a
393: comparison
394: of the static models generated by integration of the
395: Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff
396: equations with observed data should reveal a great deal of information about
397: the equation of state. Only recently we have achieved sufficient accuracy to
398: attempt some key tests
399: on selected objects, although it should be acknowledged that three decades
400: of
401: compact star astrophysics had produced quite clever arguments to determine
402: masses and radii, even in the cases in which they proved to be wrong.
403:
404: A paradigmatic example of the above assertions is the celebrated
405: determination
406: of the binary pulsar mass PSR 1913+16, believed to be accurate to the fourth
407: decimal place \cite{vankerkwijk}. Other methods based on combinations of
408: spectroscopic and
409: photometric techniques have been recently perfectioned, and have confirmed
410: that at least one X-ray source is significantly above the "canonical"
411: 1.44 $M_{\odot}$; namely Vela X-1 for which a value of
412: $1.87^{+0.23}_{-0.17} \, M_{\odot}$ has been obtained \cite{vankerkwijk}.
413: Some works on compact stars have attracted the attention recently
414: because not only the masses have been determined, but also indications of
415: the radii are available, suggesting a very compact structure.
416:
417: On the other hand, from a particle physics point of view
418: it is fairly well established that at high temperatures and/or high
419: baryon number densities confinement is effectively disabled. The old
420: question of
421: whether the deconfined matter takes place inside "neutron stars" is not yet
422: settled, although a great deal of interest in this issue emerged from recent
423: calculation of superconducting QCD phases (two-flavor superconducting (2SC)
424: and "color flavor locking" (CFL),
425: see \cite{Al} for a review).
426: In fact, there is growing evidence that paired states or {\it diquarks} (e.
427: g. a spin-0, color-antitriplet
428: bound state of two quarks) might occur as a component in the QCD plasma.
429: This is important
430: for understanding hadron structure and high energy particle
431: reactions. Of course, at extremely high densities diquarks are expected to
432: lose their
433: identity and dissolve into quarks. In the intermediate phase diquarks would
434: be expected
435: to be favored.
436:
437: Diquark correlations were originally thought to
438: arise in part from spin-dependent interactions between two quarks. Later the
439: non-perturbative interactions were claimed to produce a gap substantially
440: greater than in the '80s, possibly as large as $\sim 100 \, MeV$.
441: Although there is no consensus about diquark details, it seems certain that
442: a $(ud)$ quark pair
443: experiences some attraction when in total spin-0 and colour-3* states. Many
444: works assume that the diquark correlation is similar to the one experienced by electrons
445: in a superconductor, with diquarks being the Cooper pairs of QCD
446: \cite{Fredriksson}.
447: However, we shall not be concerned with the details of the
448: binding of the diquark itself in this work. This is because for compact star astrophysics
449: it is perhaps more important to look for the full
450: free energy (per baryon) behavior in bulk rather than the
451: mass of the diquark individually.
452:
453: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
454: \section{The equation of state}
455: \noindent
456: The quark mass-density-dependent model (QMDD model) is a
457: phenomenological description that attempts to incorporate the confinement
458: and asymptotic
459: freedom of quarks as a function of the baryonic density of matter.
460: According to lattice calculations \cite{belyaev} and string model
461: investigations \cite{isgur},
462: the quark-quark interaction is proportional to the distance so that
463: $m \propto n_B^{-1/3}$ may be assumed \cite{peng2000c61}. Therefore, it is reasonable to
464: adopt the
465: following parametrizations of the particle masses. For the quarks $u$ and
466: $d$
467: we define as usual
468: \cite{benvenuto95,lugones95,peng97,peng99,peng2000c61,peng2000c62}
469:
470: \begin{equation}
471: m_u = m_d = \frac{C}{ n_B^{1/3} }.
472: \end{equation}
473:
474: For diquarks, we introduce here the mass parameter $m_{D0}$ and write the
475: diquark mass $m_{D}$ as
476:
477: \begin{equation}
478: m_D = m_{D0} + m_u + m_d = m_{D0} + \frac{2 C}{ n_B^{1/3} }.
479: \label{massmd}
480: \end{equation}
481:
482:
483: The non-perturbative character of the interactions between quarks and
484: diquarks is included through this
485: particular mass parametrization with the baryon number density.
486:
487: Before describing the equation of state in detail we would like to make a
488: number of qualitative remarks:
489: To make contact with current calculations we must determine to which extent
490: the model describes the expected diquark physics. The diquark pairing gap
491: that arises from current calculations \cite{Al} clearly depends on the chemical
492: potential (or on the baryon number density).
493: Qualitatively the gap is zero at low densities, reaches a maximum value in
494: the 10-100 MeV range at intermediate
495: densities and goes to zero at high densities. To mimic this behaviour the
496: parameter $m_{D0}$
497: should have the same shape (but with negative sign) as a function of, for
498: example, the baryon number density, even though in QMDD models it is
499: introduced to simulate confinement only. We shall consider only constant
500: values for $m_{D0}$ in this work.
501: As we shall see below this approximation is a reasonable starting point for
502: the physics of interest to us here.
503: On the other hand we must note that recent lattice simulations show that the
504: diquark could be unbound \cite{Biel}
505: The latter situation can be described by the present model with positive
506: values of $m_{D0}$, which are also included in the analysis (see below).
507: We must remark that for negative values of $m_{D0}$ the diquark mass becomes
508: negative (as expected) for some
509: baryon number density beyond which the model is no longer valid. However,
510: this $n_B$ is very
511: high for typical values of $m_{D0}$ (for example, $m_{D0}$ = -100 MeV gives
512: $n_{B,lim}$ greater than $12 \times n_0$, with $n_0 = 0.16$ fm$^{-3}$ the
513: nuclear saturation density.
514: We note that our quark-diquark phase may be directly associated to the phase
515: explicitely addressed by Rapp et al. \cite{Rapp} and termed QDQ, as a state intermediate
516: between hadrons and 2SC, but an identification with the 2SC may also be
517: possible when the masses go to zero at high density.
518: Although strictly speaking this QDQ and 2SC with zero net strangeness would
519: be ustable against weak interaction decays in neutron stars,
520: the number of strange quarks that is produced in the mixture can be
521: neglected in a first approximation.
522: The finite mass $m_s \sim 150$ MeV suppress the ocupation of the
523: corresponding Fermi sea, while
524: the occupation of the bosonic QDQ or 2SC ground state is strongly favoured
525: energetically.
526: We must note that a similar mass parametrization ( $m_s = m_{s0} + C/
527: n_B^{1/3}$) has been employed
528: to describe strange quark matter within the QMDD model. Also note the
529: slightly different
530: parametrization than the one employed in Ref. \cite{HLP} motivated by an
531: intuitive construction of the mass formula.
532:
533: In view of the above, we shall proceed to model the quark - diquark plasma
534: as a gas
535: of $u$ and $d$ quarks, and $(ud)$ diquarks. Non-perturbative
536: effects are accounted for using the quark mass-density-dependent model of
537: confinement to derive the properties of the equation of state.
538:
539: The expression for the thermodynamic potential density of particles of mass
540: $m_i$,
541: chemical potential $\mu_i$ and degeneracy factor $g_i$ in the large
542: volume limit of a free gas is
543:
544: \begin{equation}
545: \Omega_i = \frac{g_i T}{2 \pi^2} \int_0^{\infty}
546: \ln (1 \pm e^{(\mu_i - (p^2 + m_i^2)^{1/2} )/T)} ) p^2 dp
547: \label{omega1}
548: \end{equation}
549:
550: Because of the dependence of the mass with density $n_B$ in the QMDD model
551: the standard relation $P= -\Omega$ is no longer valid.
552: \cite{peng2000c61,peng2000c62,benvenuto95,lugones95}
553: The pressure is actually given by
554:
555: \begin{equation}
556: P = -\frac{ \partial (V \Omega)}{\partial V } =
557: \sum_i \bigg( - \Omega_i + n_B \frac{\partial m_i}{\partial n_B}
558: \frac{\partial \Omega_i}{\partial m_i}
559: \bigg) .
560: \label{p}
561: \end{equation}
562:
563: For the other thermodynamical quantities we write (see Ref.[12])
564:
565: \begin{equation}
566: E = \Omega + \sum_i \mu_i n_i - T \frac{\partial \Omega}{\partial T}
567: \label{E}
568: \end{equation}
569:
570: \begin{equation}
571: n_i = - \frac{\partial \Omega}{\partial \mu_i} \bigg|_{T,m_k}
572: \label{n2}
573: \end{equation}
574:
575: \noindent with $E$ the energy density and $n_i$ the particle number density
576: of the $i$-species.
577:
578: As it has been stressed before \cite{benvenuto95,lugones95}, for the
579: fermionic component the
580: term $n_B \frac{\partial m_i}{\partial n_B} \frac{\partial
581: \Omega_i}{\partial m_i}$ forces the pressure to be zero at finite
582: baryon number, playing the role of the bag constant $B$ of the MIT
583: Bag Model. Needless to say, this is a property related to the mass
584: parametrization only, and has no relation with the
585: statistics of the particles themselves (Bose or Fermi).
586: However, it happens that in the case of bosons this extra term does not
587: contribute at zero temperature.
588: Thus, as in the standard case, for massive bosons at $T=0$ the energy
589: density reduces to $E = \sum_i n_i m_i$.
590:
591: As we mentioned above we shall model the quark - diquark plasma at zero
592: temperature as a mixture of a Fermi relativistic gas
593: of $u$ and $d$ quarks, and a Bose condensate of $(ud)$ diquarks.
594: We neglect the contribution of antiparticles and that of a leptonic
595: component such as
596: electrons, muons or neutrinos.
597: This mixture is then described by \cite{shapiro,chandra}
598:
599: \begin{equation}
600: P = \sum_{i=u,d} m_i n_i x_i^2 G(x_i) - \sum_{i=u,d} m_i n_i f (x_i)
601: \end{equation}
602:
603: Diquarks do not contribute to the pressure in this approximation, since they
604: are all in the ground state, but do contribute to the energy density
605:
606: \begin{equation}
607: E = \sum_{i=u,d} m_i n_i F(x_i) + m_D n_D .
608: \end{equation}
609:
610: The number density of quarks $u$ and $d$ is given by
611:
612: \begin{equation}
613: n_i = \frac{1}{\pi^2} m_i^3 x_i^3 .
614: \end{equation}
615:
616: where the functions $F, G$ and $f$ are given by
617: \cite{benvenuto95,peng2000c62}
618:
619: \begin{equation}
620: F(x_i) = \frac{3}{8} \bigg[ x_i (x_i^2 + 1)^{1/2} (2x_i^2 + 1 ) -
621: \arg \sinh(x_i) \bigg] / x_i^3
622: \end{equation}
623:
624: \begin{equation}
625: G(x_i) = \frac{1}{8} \bigg[ x_i (x_i^2 + 1)^{1/2} (2x_i^2 - 3 ) + 3
626: \arg \sinh(x_i) \bigg] / x_i^5
627: \end{equation}
628:
629: \begin{equation}
630: f(x_i) = -\frac{3}{2} \frac{n_B}{m_i} \frac{dm_i}{dn_B} \bigg[ x_i
631: (x_i^2 + 1)^{1/2}
632: - \arg \sinh(x_i) \bigg] / x_i^3
633: \end{equation}
634:
635: \noindent being $x = p_{F} / m_i = (\mu_i^2 - m _i^2)^{1/2} / m_i $, $\mu_i$
636: the chemical potential
637: and $m_i$ the mass of the particle, which in our case depends on the baryon
638: density.
639:
640:
641: These equations must be complemented with the following conditions:
642:
643: 1) Chemical equilibrium: $D \rightleftharpoons u + d$ requires $\mu_D =
644: \mu_u + \mu_d$.
645: If we use the fact that at $T=0$ the condensed diquarks all have
646: zero kinetic energy we have ($\mu_D = m_D$)
647:
648: \begin{equation}
649: m_D = \mu_u + \mu_d .
650: \end{equation}
651:
652: Then, using the fact that, $\mu = (x^2 +1)^{1/2} m$, $m_u = m_d$, and
653: $m_D = m_{D0} + 2 m_u$, we can write the chemical equilibrium as
654:
655: \begin{equation}
656: \frac{m_{D0}}{m_u} + 2 = (x_{u}^{2} +1)^{1/2} + (x_{d}^{2} +1)^{1/2} .
657: \label{chem_eq}
658: \end{equation}
659:
660:
661: 2) Electrical charge neutrality implies $ 1/3 n_D + 2/3 n_u - 1/3 n_d =
662: 0$, therefore,
663: the diquark number density is given by
664:
665: \begin{equation}
666: n_D = n_d - 2 n_u = \frac{1}{\pi^2} m_u^3 (x_d^3 - 2 x_u^3 ) .
667: \end{equation}
668:
669:
670: 3) Baryon number is given by $n_B = 2/3 n_D + 1/3 (n_u + n_d)$, thus
671:
672: \begin{equation}
673: n_B = n_d - n_u = \frac{1}{\pi^2} m_u^3 (x_d^3 - x_u^3 ).
674: \end{equation}
675:
676:
677: The equation of state can be solved numerically for each $n_B$ once the
678: parameters $(C, m_{D0})$ are given (see Figs 1 and 2).
679:
680:
681: As the baryon density increases the EOS tends to a pure "quark d-diquark"
682: composition since the number density of quarks $u$ goes to zero and the
683: abundances of quarks $d$ and diquarks $D$ become equal. The same behaviour
684: arises for smaller enough values of the mass $m_{D0}$ (see below). In these
685: cases the EOS
686: takes a very simple form: $x_u = 0$, $n_u = 0$, $n_B = n_D = n_d = ( m_u^3
687: x_d^3 ) / \pi^2$.
688:
689:
690: As expected from simple physical considerations,
691: we find that the EOS of the quark-diquark is quite soft, especially at relatively high densities,
692: because of diquark condensation. The EOS becomes somewhat stiffer at low
693: densities when compared to the MIT-inspired EOS developed in Ref.[18], at least for a large
694: region of the parameter space.
695: The same effect is found if we compare the MIT and the
696: QMDD model EOS for strange quark matter \cite{benvenuto95,lugones95}.
697:
698:
699: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
700: \section{Stability of the quark - diquark matter}
701: \noindent
702: In order to determine the allowed values for $C$ and $m_{D0}$ we impose the
703: following stability
704: criteria for quark-diquark matter.
705:
706: 1) Instability of two flavor quark matter: The energy per baryon of two
707: flavor quark matter (at $P=0$ and $T=0$) must be higher than 939 MeV (the
708: neutron mass). Assuming that the current mass of quarks $u$ and $d$ is zero
709: this results in the condition $C > (159.3 \, MeV)^2$.
710:
711: The energy per baryon of pure $udd$ matter at $P=0$ and $T=0$ is, for a
712: given $C$
713:
714: \begin{equation}
715: \frac{E}{n_B} \bigg|_{udd} = m^{'}_u [ F(x_{u0}) + 2 F(x_{d0}) ]
716: \label{enb_udd}
717: \end{equation}
718:
719:
720: \noindent where $m^{'}_u$ is the mass of quark $u$ in two flavor quark
721: matter at zero $P$ and $T$,
722:
723: \begin{equation}
724: m^{'}_u = \frac{C}{n_B^{1/3}} = \frac{C}{n_u^{1/3}} =
725: \frac{C^{1/2} \pi^{1/3}}{x_{u0}^{1/2}}
726: \end{equation}
727:
728: \noindent and $x_{d0} = 2^{1/3} x_{u0}$, where $ x_{u0} = 1.13173096$ is
729: the value that produces a zero-point pressure, $P_{udd} = 0$.
730: This criterion has already been used in previous papers
731: \cite{benvenuto95,lugones95,peng2000c61,peng2000c62}.
732:
733:
734: 2) Relative stability of quark-diquark matter: The energy per baryon of
735: quark - diquark matter
736: (hereafter ud-D matter) must be lower than
737: that of pure two flavor quark matter (at $P=0$, $T=0$).
738:
739: The zero pressure condition for quark - diquark matter at $T=0$ reads
740:
741: \begin{equation}
742: x_u^5 G(x_u) - x_u^3 f(x_u) + x_d^5 G(x_d) - x_d^3 f(x_d) = 0 .
743: \label{P_nulo}
744: \end{equation}
745:
746: The energy per baryon is given by
747:
748: \begin{equation}
749: \frac{E}{n_B} \bigg|_{ud-D} = m_u \frac{x_u^3 F(x_u) + x_d^3 F(x_d) +
750: (\frac{m_{D0}}{m_u}+2) (x_d^3 - 2 x_u^3) }{x_d^3 - x_u^3}
751: \label{enb_diq}
752: \end{equation}
753:
754: \noindent
755: Note that the mass $m_u$ of quark $u$ in $ud-D$ matter is in fact a
756: function of $C$, $x_u$ and $x_d$ given by $m_u = C / n_B^{1/3} = C / (n_d -
757: n_u)^{1/3}$, from which we derive
758:
759: \begin{equation}
760: m_u = \frac{ C^{1/2} \pi^{1/3} }{(x_d^3 - x_u^3)^{1/6}} .
761: \end{equation}
762:
763: \noindent
764: Also, the factor $(m_{D0}/m_u +2)$ in Eq. (\ref{enb_diq}) is a function of
765: $x_u$ and $x_d$ given by Eq. (\ref{chem_eq}).
766:
767:
768: The fundamental relation for this stability requirement is
769:
770: \begin{equation}
771: \frac{E}{n_B} \bigg|_{ud-D} < \frac{E}{n_B} \bigg|_{udd}
772: \label{igual1}
773: \end{equation}
774:
775: \noindent
776: therefore, from eqs. (\ref{enb_diq}) and (\ref{enb_udd}) we obtain
777:
778: \begin{equation}
779: \frac{x_u^3 F(x_u) + x_d^3 F(x_d) + (\frac{m_{D0}}{m_u}+2) (x_d^3 - 2
780: x_u^3) }{(x_d^3 - x_u^3)^{7/6}}
781: < \kappa_0
782: \label{igual2}
783: \end{equation}
784:
785: \noindent
786: where
787:
788: \begin{equation}
789: \kappa_0 = \frac{ [ F(x_{u0}) + 2 F(x_{d0}) ] }{x_{u0}^{1/2}} .
790: \label{igual22}
791: \end{equation}
792:
793: From eqs. (\ref{igual2}) and (\ref{P_nulo}) we find numerically the set
794: of values $x_{u1}$ and $x_{d1}$ that satisfy
795: the imposed stability conditions.
796:
797: Using chemical equilibrium alone (eq. (\ref{chem_eq})) we find a very simple
798: relation between
799: $m_{D0}$ and $C$
800:
801: \begin{equation}
802: m_{D0} = K C^{1/2}
803: \end{equation}
804:
805: \noindent
806: with
807:
808: \begin{equation}
809: K = \pi^{1/3} \frac{(x_{u1}^2 + 1)^{1/2} + (x_{d1}^2 + 1)^{1/2} -
810: 2}{(x_{d1}^3 - x_{u1}^3)^{1/6} } .
811: \end{equation}
812:
813: This is an "isochemical" straight line along which the energy per baryon
814: increases with $C$.
815: The condition $ (E/ n_B ) |_{ud-D} < (E / n_B) |_{udd}$
816: is fullfilled for $K < 1.723$ (the upper limit is given by the full straight
817: line in Figure 3). Also, we find that for $K < 0.8417$
818: there are no quarks $u$ in the mixture and the composition is always a pure
819: "quark d-diquark" mixture (see dashed line in Figure 3).
820:
821: 3) Absolute stability condition: we have also looked for a region inside
822: which quark - diquark matter could have even a lower energy per baryon than
823: the neutron mass
824:
825: \begin{equation}
826: \frac{E}{n_B} \bigg|_{ud-D} < 939 MeV,
827: \label{igual1}
828: \end{equation}
829:
830: \noindent
831: being though absolutely stable. In the $(C^{1/2}, m_{D0})$ parameter space
832: this region is
833: "triangle-like". The same shape has been obtained for strange quark matter
834: in the QMDD model \cite{lugones95}.
835: On the right side boundary of this "triangle-like" region the energy per
836: baryon of quark-diquark matter at zero pressure
837: is exactly 939 MeV. The region is shown in Fig. 3 and labeled with $A$ and
838: $A^{'}$.
839: It is interesting to note that negative values of
840: $m_{D0}$ are allowed (see Fig. 3) and so the diquark may be bound in
841: this model, that is, its mass will be smaller than the sum of the masses of its constituent
842: particles.
843:
844: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
845: \section{Quark-diquark stars}
846: \noindent
847: The exploration of the mass-radius relation for compact stars is in fact a
848: potentially powerful tool in testing the existence of different phases of matter inside
849: NSs, and their composition. On the other hand the observational data
850: of the mass-radius relation
851: imposes severe constaints on high density equations of state.
852:
853: Almost all of the meassured masses of "neutron stars" lie within a narrow
854: range around 1.4 $M_{\odot}$.
855: This mass scale may be due to the fact that neutron stars are formed in the
856: gravitational collapse
857: of supernovae and come just from the iron cores of core collapse supernovae.
858: However, we may wonder whether smaller neutron stars could exist and whether
859: there exist some mechanism
860: capable of create them because these are not expected in core collapse
861: models and hold the potential for discriminating among possible equations of
862: state. This question becomes more significant in view of the recent
863: claim of very
864: low-mass/low-radii objects. At least two objects, Her X-1 and RX J1856-37
865: are candidates to
866: high compactness. They have been claimed to have radii $\sim 7 km$ and a
867: masses around $1 M_{\odot}$ \cite{li,Pons}.
868:
869:
870: If quark- diquark matter has a lower energy per baryon than normal nuclear
871: matter we may expect the existence of stable stars made up entirely by this phase.
872: By solving the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations of stellar structure,
873: we explored the mass- radius relation for quark-diquark stars assuming
874: a parameter set inside the window of absolute stability.
875:
876:
877: In Figs. 4 and 5 we see that for particular values of the parameters $(C^{1/2}, m_{D0})$
878: the obtained values of $M$ and $R$ are compatible with present determinations of
879: the above sources.
880: We also find that the effect of increasing $m_{D0}$ for a fixed $C$ is to lower both
881: the maximum radius and the maximum mass of the stellar configurations.
882: Similarly, increasing $C$ at fixed $m_{D0}$ allows configurations with
883: smaller maximum radius and mass.
884: The $(C^{1/2}, m_{D0})$ values selected for the sequences shown in Figs. 4 and 5
885: match naturally the observed compactness of Her X-1 and RX J1856-37.
886:
887:
888:
889: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
890: \section{Conclusions}
891: \noindent
892: We derived an equation of state for quark diquark-matter in a
893: self-consistent phenomenological model where the mass of quarks and
894: diquarks
895: is parametrized with the baryon number density. The confining forces are
896: included via a dependence of the mass with
897: $n_B^{-1/3}$ . The model depends on two free parameters $(C^{1/2}, m_{D0})$
898: whose values can be
899: limited invoking stability criteria and allows the existence of a stable
900: state of the
901: quark-diquark gas at zero pressure, for densities of the order of few times
902: the nuclear saturation density (see Figs 1 and 2).
903: The free parameter $m_{D0}$ is introduced in order to describe in a simple
904: form the unknown binding
905: of the diquark. Negative values of $m_{D0}$ should mimic the behaviour of
906: bound color superconducting
907: quark matter while positive values are considered in view of recent results \cite{Biel}
908: claiming a diquark mass of $\sim 700$
909: MeV which suggest that this particle is unbound.
910: The mixture contains a Bose condensate of $(ud)$ diquarks so that, the
911: resulting equation of state is
912: in fact very soft, as it can be seen in Figure 1 where we have depicted
913: $P$ versus $E$ for different parameters .
914: The here described quark-diquark phase has always
915: a non-zero fermionic pressure, since due to the excess of quarks $d$ over
916: quarks $u$ there will always exist a
917: free Fermi gas of quarks $d$ to satisfy the equilibrium conditions.
918: When compared with the equation of state for quark-diquark
919: matter presented in \cite{horvath1} we found that independently of the value of
920: the parameters, the latter is considerably stiffer
921: at low densities.
922: However, in some cases (c,d, e and f of Fig. 1) there is a limiting density beyond which the
923: new equations of state are softer than the previous one. This is relevant for compact star
924: structure
925: because it allows the existence of stable compact stars with even smaller
926: radius than those calculated in previous models \cite{horvath1}. It has been argued
927: that the few percent
928: effects ($\cal{O}$ $(\Delta /\mu)^{2}$) from the condensation are impossible to
929: disentangle from other uncertainties, but the fact is that, for example, the whole strange
930: matter theory is also subject to this caveat, and in this respect the models
931: here presented open a qualitatively similar scenario for compact stars.
932:
933:
934:
935: We have found the regions in the parameter space $(C^{1/2}, m_{D0})$ where
936: quark-diquark matter in bulk is stable against
937: decaying to pure two flavor quark matter and to a neutron gas (see Fig. 3).
938: The region of absolute stability allows the existence of pure quark-diquark
939: stars.
940: It is important to note that the existence of self-bound compact stars is
941: possible
942: for both bound and $unbound$ diquarks,
943: since the assumed bosonic character of the diquark favors the transition of
944: free quarks at the Fermi surface to
945: the bosonic ground state and ensures
946: a global energy decrease, more specifically a lower value of the energy per
947: baryon,
948: for the appropiate choice of parameters.
949: That is, since typical Fermi energies in a two flavor quark mixture is
950: $\sim$ 300 MeV, the energy
951: gained by condensing bosons and sending them to the ground state is in fact
952: more relevant for stellar structure
953: than the hypothetically gained energy of the pair gap. Moreover, even in the
954: case of unbound diquarks
955: a lower energy state is reached by the system as a whole.
956: Therefore, although the parameter that mimics the pair gap may be not only
957: negative but also zero or positive,
958: energy is gained in all cases due to the assumed bosonic character of the
959: superconducting pair.
960: A slightly different parametrization used in \cite{HLP} produced different
961: results. In particular the resulting stellar models were not so compact, a
962: feature due to a larger stifness of that equation of state for all the
963: parameter range. This gauges the sensitivity of the models to the
964: assumptions on the basic physics.
965:
966: Finally, we must note that, strictly speaking, quark-diquark matter is
967: unstable against weak interactions producing strangeness.
968: In this sense, the present study may be considered as a simplification analogous to pure
969: neutron matter models of neutron stars. A more general study should include the possibility
970: of strangeness production, the appeareance of leptons in the mixture, as well as 2SC and
971: color flavor locking (CFL). We can expect that the opening of the weak
972: channel will produce an even softer equation of state and so higher compactness of
973: these stars. These improvements will be presented in future work.
974:
975:
976: %----------------------------------------------------------------
977: \nonumsection{Acknowledgements}
978: \noindent G. Lugones acknowledges the Instituto Astron\'omico
979: y Geofisico de S\~ao Paulo and the financial support received from the
980: Funda\c c\~ao de Amparo \`a Pesquisa do Estado de
981: S\~ao Paulo. J.E. Horvath wishes to acknowledge
982: the CNPq Agency (Brazil) for partial financial support.
983:
984: %---------------------------------------------------------------%
985: \nonumsection{References}
986: \noindent
987: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
988:
989: \bibitem{vankerkwijk} M.H. van Kerkwijk, in {\bibit Proceedings of the
990: ESO Workshop on Black Holes in Binaries and Galactic Nuclei}, eds.
991: L. Kaper, E.M. van den Heuvel and P.A. Woudt (Springer-Verlag, 2001).
992:
993: \bibitem{Al} M. Alford, invited talk to the {\bibit Proceedings of the Workshop
994: on Compact Stars and the QCD Phase Diagram}, Copenhagen 2001. astro-ph/0110150, to be
995: published.
996:
997: \bibitem{Biel} M. Hess, F. Karsch, E.Learmann and I. Wetzorke, {\bibit Phys.Rev.} D58 (1998) 111502
998:
999: \bibitem{Fredriksson} S. Fredriksson, M. J\"andel and T. I. Larson, {\bibit Phys.
1000: Rev. Lett.} 81, (1983) 2179.
1001:
1002: \bibitem{Dey98} Dey M., Bombaci I., Dey J., Ray S. and Samanta B.C. ,
1003: {\bibit Phys. Lett. } B438, (1998) 123; Addendum (1999), B447, 352; Erratum B467, (1999) 303.
1004:
1005: \bibitem{Li99a} Li X., Bombaci I., Dey M., Dey J. \& van den Heuvel E. P. J.,
1006: {\bibit Phys. Rev. Lett.} 83, (1999) 3776.
1007:
1008: \bibitem{Li99b} Li X., Ray S., Dey J., Dey M. \& Bombaci I., {\bibit Astrophys. J.}
1009: 527, (1999) L51.
1010:
1011: \bibitem{benvenuto95} O. G. Benvenuto and G. Lugones, {\bibit Phys. Rev} D 51, (1995) 1989
1012:
1013: \bibitem{lugones95} G. Lugones and O. G. Benvenuto, {\bibit Phys. Rev} D 52, (1995) 1276
1014:
1015: \bibitem{peng97} G. X. Peng, P. Z. Ning and H. Q. Chiang, {\bibit Phys.
1016: Rev.} C 56, (1997) 491
1017:
1018: \bibitem{peng99} G. X. Peng, H. C. Chiang, P. Z. Ning and B. S.
1019: Zou, {\bibit Phys. Rev.} C 59, (1999) 3452
1020:
1021: \bibitem{peng2000c61} G. X. Peng, H. C. Chiang, J. J. Yang, L. Li and B.
1022: Liu, {\bibit Phys. Rev.} C 61, (2000) 015201
1023:
1024: \bibitem{peng2000c62} G. X. Peng, H. C. Chiang and P. Z. Ning, {\bibit Phys.
1025: Rev.} C 62, (2000) 02580
1026:
1027: \bibitem{Pons} J. Pons, F. M. Walter, J. M. Lattimer, M. Prakash, R. Neuh\"auser, and Penghui An.,
1028: {\bibit Astrophys. J.}, 564, (2002) 981
1029:
1030: \bibitem{HLP} J.E. Horvath, G. Lugones and J.A. de Freitas Pacheco,
1031: contributed paper to
1032: the {\bibit Proceedings of the Workshop on Compact Stars in the QCD Diagram},
1033: Copenhagen 2001,astro-ph/0112159, to be published.
1034:
1035: \bibitem{shapiro} S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky, {\bibit Black
1036: holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars: the physics of compact
1037: objects}, (J. Wiley, 1983).
1038:
1039: \bibitem{chandra} S. Chandrasekhar, {\bibit An Introduction to the Study of
1040: Stellar Structure} (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1939)
1041:
1042: \bibitem{horvath1} J. E. Horvath and J. A. de Freitas Pacheco,
1043: {\bibit Int. J. of Mod. Phys.} D 7, (1998) 19
1044:
1045: \bibitem{horvath2} J. E. Horvath, J. A. de Freitas Pacheco and J. C. N. de
1046: Ara\'ujo, {\bibit Phys. Rev.} D 46, (1992) 4754
1047:
1048: \bibitem{schafer} T. Schafer, {\bibit Nucl. Phys.} A642, (1998) 45c
1049:
1050: \bibitem{li} X. -D. Li, Z. -G. Lai and Z. -R. Wang, {\bibit Astron. Astrophys.} 303, (1995) L1
1051:
1052: \bibitem{Rapp} R. Rapp, T. Schafer, E.V. Shuryak and M. Velkovsky, {\bibit Ann. Phys.} 280, (2000) 35
1053:
1054: \bibitem{belyaev} V. M. Belyaev and Ya. I. Kogan,
1055: {\bibit Phys. Lett.} B 136, (1984) 273; K. D. Born, E. Laermann, N. Pirch, T. F.
1056: Walsh and P. M. Zerwas, {\bibit Phys. Rev.} D 40, (1989) 1653
1057:
1058: \bibitem{isgur} N. Isgur and J. Paton, {\bibit Phys. Lett.} B 124, 273 (1983); {\bibit Phys.
1059: Rev.} D 31, (1985) 2910
1060:
1061: \end{thebibliography}
1062: \eject
1063:
1064:
1065: %---------------------------------------------------------------%
1066: % FIGURE CAPTIONS
1067: %---------------------------------------------------------------%
1068:
1069: \begin{figure}
1070: \fcaption{Equation of state of quark diquark matter in the quark mass density dependent model for different set
1071: of parameters $(C^{1/2}, m_{D0})$. The curves are labeled with: a = $(160,-100)$, b = $(160,0)$, c = $(200,-100)$,
1072: d = $(160,210)$, e = $(185,100)$ and f = $(185,130)$.
1073: For the sake of comparison we also include the ultrarelativistic EOS $P=E/3$
1074: and the EOS presented in Ref.[18] (labeled as HP).}
1075: \end{figure}
1076:
1077:
1078: \begin{figure}
1079: \fcaption{The particle number densities of $u$ and $d$ quarks and diquarks for the parameters $(160,200)$ (label A)
1080: and $(185,130)$ (label B) . At high baryon number densities
1081: the number of quarks $u$ goes to zero and the number of quarks $d$ and diquarks are equal. We also include the case of
1082: pure quark d - diquark matter $n_B = n_d = n_D$ corresponding to any set of parameters in the region A' of Figure 3.}
1083: \end{figure}
1084:
1085:
1086: \begin{figure}
1087: \fcaption{Different stability regions in the parameter space of the model. Inside regions A and $A^{'}$
1088: quark-diquark matter has a lower energy per baryon than a neutron being so absolutely stable.
1089: For parameters inside the region $A^{'}$ there are no $u$ quarks
1090: in the mixture, and matter is always composed by quarks $d$ and diquarks.
1091: Inside the region B below the full straight line the mixture has
1092: a lower energy than pure two flavor quark matter composed only by quarks $u$ and $d$.}
1093: \end{figure}
1094:
1095:
1096: \begin{figure}
1097: \fcaption{The mass radius relation for quark-diquark stars. The curve labeled with HP
1098: corresponds to the EOS developed in \cite{horvath1}.
1099: The other curves correspond to the following
1100: set of the parameters $(C^{1/2}, m_{D0})$ : a = $(185,130)$, b=$(185,100)$, c=$(180,100)$, d=$(160,210)$.
1101: Models overlap the range of the M-R measurements of Her X-1 and RX J1856-37.}
1102: \end{figure}
1103:
1104:
1105: \begin{figure}
1106: \fcaption{The same as the previous figure but for A= $(210,-100)$, B= $(200,-100)$, C= $(160,0)$, D=$(160,-100)$.}
1107: \end{figure}
1108:
1109:
1110: \end{document}
1111:
1112: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1113:
1114: %\section{Illustrations and Photographs}
1115: \noindent
1116: Figures are to be inserted in the text nearest their first
1117: reference. Original india ink drawings of glossy prints are
1118: preferred. Please send one set of originals with copies. If the
1119: author requires the publisher to reduce the figures, ensure that
1120: the figures (including letterings and numbers) are large enough
1121: to be clearly seen after reduction. If photographs are to be
1122: used, only black and white ones are acceptable.
1123:
1124: \begin{figure}[htbp] %ORIGINAL SIZE: width=1.4TRUEIN; height=1.5TRUEIN
1125: \vspace*{13pt}
1126: \centerline{\psfig{file=ijmpdf1.eps}} %100 percent
1127: \vspace*{13pt}
1128: \fcaption{Labeled tree {\footnotesize\it T}.}
1129: \end{figure}
1130:
1131: Figures are to be sequentially numbered in Arabic numerals. The
1132: caption must be placed below the figure. Typeset in 8 pt Times
1133: Roman with baselineskip of 10~pt. Use double spacing between a
1134: caption and the text that follows immediately.
1135:
1136:
1137: %\section{References}
1138: \noindent
1139: References in the text are to be numbered consecutively in
1140: Arabic numerals, in the order of first appearance. They are to
1141: be typed in superscripts after punctuation marks,
1142: e.g.~``$\ldots$ in the statement.$^5$''.
1143:
1144: %\nonumsection{References}
1145: \noindent
1146: References are to be listed in the order cited in the text. Use
1147: the style shown in the following examples. For journal names,
1148: use the standard abbreviations. Typeset references in 9 pt Times
1149: Roman.
1150:
1151: \begin{thebibliography}{000}
1152: \bibitem{1}
1153: H. Haber, C. Kane and T. Sterling, {\bibit Nucl. Phys.} (1979)
1154: 493.
1155:
1156: \bibitem{2}
1157: J. D. Bjorken, in {\bibit Lecture Notes on Current-Induced
1158: Reactions}, ed. J. Komer {\bibit et al.} (Springer, Heidelberg,
1159: 1975).
1160:
1161: \bibitem{3}
1162: A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, {\bibit Nuclear Structure}
1163: (Benjamin, New York, 1969), Vol. 1, pp. 100--102.
1164:
1165: \bibitem{4}
1166: R. C. Webb, PhD thesis, Princeton University, 1972.
1167:
1168: \bibitem{5}
1169: T. Toimela, Helsinki Research Institute for Theoretical Physics,
1170: Report No. HU-TFT-82-37, 1982 (unpublished).
1171: \end{thebibliography}
1172: \eject
1173:
1174: