1: % version HS Dec, following ref repts.
2:
3: \font\ssbig=cmss10 scaled \magstep1 %12pt sans serif
4: \font\bfb=cmbx12 %12pt bold
5: \font\tfont=cmbxti10
6: %\font\tfont=cmbx10
7: \font\syvec=cmbsy10 %for boldface nabla
8: \font\gkvec=cmmib10 %for boldface lowercase Greek
9: \font\ninerm=cmr9
10: \baselineskip=24pt
11:
12: %\magnification=1200
13: % LENGTH CHECK
14: % to measure length of text, set sizes such that a Nature column results
15: % (63 char/line, 67 lines/column):
16: %\hsize=10 true cm
17: %\vsize=28.5 true cm
18: %\voffset=-2 true cm
19:
20: %following macro defines vectors as boldface italic. Note in this case that
21: %all characters regarded as being in the argument of the macro will be
22: %boldface.
23: \newfam\vecfam
24: \def\vecfont{\fam\vecfam\tfont}
25: \textfont\vecfam=\tfont \scriptfont\vecfam=\seveni
26: \scriptscriptfont\vecfam=\fivei
27: \def\b#1{\vecfont #1}
28: \def\bfJ{{\b J}}
29: \def\bfP{{\b P}}
30: \def\bfr{{\b r}}
31: \def\bfR{{\b R}}
32: \def\bfT{{\b T}}
33: \def\bfu{{\b u}}
34: \def\bfv{{\b v}}
35: \def\bfZ{{\b Z}}
36: \def\bfz{{\b z}}
37: \def\bfDelta{{\bf \Delta}}
38: \def\bfOmega{{\bf \Omega}}
39: \def\kms{{\rm\,km\,s^{-1}}}
40: \def\msun{{\rm\,M_\odot}}
41: \def\cm{{\rm\,cm}}
42: \def\s{{\rm\,s}}
43: \def\pc{{\rm\,pc}}
44: \def\gyr{{\rm\,Gyr}}
45: \def\yr{{\rm\,yr}}
46: \def\alv{\alpha_{{\rm vir}}}
47: \def\mcl{M_{{\rm cl}}}
48: \def\rcl{R_{{\rm cl}}}
49: \def\fg{f_{{\rm gas}}}
50: \def\ecore{\epsilon_{{\rm core}}}
51: \def\half{{\textstyle{1\over2}}}
52: \def\third{{\textstyle{1\over3}}}
53: \def\gtorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$}\mkern-14mu
54: \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
55: \def\ltorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$<$}\mkern-14mu
56: \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
57:
58:
59: % equation numbering
60: %\new macro produces sequentially numbered equations by writing \eqno(\new)
61: %at end of displayed equations
62: \newcount\eqnumber
63: \eqnumber=1
64: \def\new{{\rm\the\eqnumber}\global\advance\eqnumber by 1}
65: %to name an equation, place command "\eqnam{\Poisson}" before equation, and
66: %thereafter "equation(\Poisson)" will generate the proper equation number.
67: \def\eqnam#1{\xdef#1{\the\eqnumber}}
68: %
69: % figure numbering
70: %\newfig macro produces sequentially numbered figures by writing
71: % Figure~\newfig{Name_of_figure} at first appearance in text.
72: \newcount\fignumber
73: \fignumber=1
74: \def\newfig#1{{\rm\the\fignumber}\xdef#1{\the\fignumber}\global\advance\fignumber by 1}
75: %
76: \def\refto#1{$^{#1}$} % For references in text as superscript
77: \def\ref#1{Ref.~#1} % for inline references
78: \def\Ref#1{#1} % ditto
79: \gdef\refis#1{\item{#1.\ }} % Ref list numbers.
80: \def\beginparmode{\endmode
81: \begingroup \def\endmode{\par\endgroup}}
82: \let\endmode=\par
83: \def\body{\beginparmode}
84: \def\head#1{ % Head; NOTE enclose the text in {}
85: \goodbreak\vskip 0.5truein % e.g., \head{I. Introduction}
86: {\centerline{\bf{#1}}\par}
87: \nobreak\vskip 0.25truein\nobreak}
88: \def\references % Begin reference
89: {\head{References}
90: \beginparmode
91: \frenchspacing \parindent=0pt \leftskip=1truecm
92: \parskip=12pt plus 3pt \everypar{\hangindent=\parindent}}
93: \def\endreferences{\body}
94:
95: %From doug@sbitp.ucsb.edu Mon Jan 11 08:46:22 1988
96: %% REFORDER.TEX 6/7/85 Doug E.
97: %% (mods: 3/25/87 R.G.Palmer)
98: %%
99: %% This macro package is intended for use with JNL.
100: %% It will automatically order and sort the references in a paper
101: %% by order of first citation.(!!) To use, say \input reforder
102: %% after \input jnl (and after all definitions of \refto etc.,
103: %% in particular after any use of the \refstyleXX macros),
104: %% but before any use of \refto etc. Use \refto{} (or \ref{} and
105: %% \Ref{}) to cite references in the text. Use \refis{} to supply
106: %% the references, SKIP A LINE after each reference. Open the
107: %% reference listing with \references and close it with \endreferences.
108: %%
109: %% REFORDER depends on the
110: %% JNL macros \refto{}, \ref{}, \Ref{} to identify citation of references.
111: %% REFORDER also contains a macro \cite{} which can be used to cite
112: %% references; e.g., ``Reference \cite{19} blah...'' will produce
113: %% output ``Reference 19 blah''. Multiple citations can be separated
114: %% by commas. E.g., \refto{24,26,27} and \cite{3,7}
115: %% are legal. Also legal is \refto{3-7}, which expands to mean the same
116: %% as \refto{3,4,5,6,7}. Reference ``numbers'' can in general be any
117: %% alphanumeric string; e.g. BjorkenAndDrell is perfectly OK used in
118: %% the form\ref{BjorkenAndDrell}; such strings should contain no blanks.
119: %%
120: %% If you have your own pet macros to cite references such as, e.g.,
121: %% \def\referpet#1{$^(#1)$)}, you can bring it to the attention of
122: %% REFORDER so all \referpet's will be properly cited simply by
123: %% declaring ``\citeall\referpet'' once near the beginning, after
124: %% \referpet is defined and
125: %% after \input reforder. This has the effect of redefining the macro
126: %% as e.g., \def\referpet#1{$^(\cite{#1})$}. (Such \citeall'ed macros
127: %% must have exactly one argument #1, as in \referpet.) See e.g.,
128: %% the end of this file where \refto, \ref and \Ref are \citeall'ed.
129: %%
130: %% REFORDER depends on the macro \refis{} to supply each reference.
131: %% \refis{} can be used to supply a reference anywhere in the paper
132: %% after its first citation. The macro \endreferences actually triggers
133: %% sorting and listing of references. Skip a line after a reference
134: %% listing (or, alternatively, end each listing in \par).
135: %%
136: %% Use \ignoreuncited after \input reforder if you wish to ignore
137: %% references that are supplied but not cited. This is particularly
138: %% useful if you maintain a master file of references (each supplied
139: %% with \refis{}) but only use a subset of these in a given paper.
140: %% Include your reference file (with \input) between \references
141: %% and \endreferences.
142: %%
143: %% Use \referencefile after \input reforder if you want an ordered
144: %% source listing of the references in file <name>.ref
145: %%
146: %% The \reftorange macro can be used to produce a superscript
147: %% reference range, like $^{10-15}$. (The \refto macro always
148: %% lists the references one by one, even for e.g. \refto{10-15}).
149: %% Use e.g. \reftorange{10}{11-14}{15} -- the references in the
150: %% middle group are cited but only 10-15 appears in the text.
151: %% Note that \reftorange does NOT check for increasing order.
152:
153: \catcode`@=11
154: \newcount\r@fcount \r@fcount=0
155: \newcount\r@fcurr
156: \immediate\newwrite\reffile
157: \newif\ifr@ffile\r@ffilefalse
158: \def\w@rnwrite#1{\ifr@ffile\immediate\write\reffile{#1}\fi\message{#1}}
159:
160: \def\writer@f#1>>{}
161: \def\referencefile{% Stuff to write .REF file
162: \r@ffiletrue\immediate\openout\reffile=\jobname.ref%
163: \def\writer@f##1>>{\ifr@ffile\immediate\write\reffile%
164: {\noexpand\refis{##1} = \csname r@fnum##1\endcsname = %
165: \expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\strip@t\expandafter%
166: \meaning\csname r@ftext\csname r@fnum##1\endcsname\endcsname}\fi}%
167: \def\strip@t##1>>{}}
168: \let\referencelist=\referencefile
169:
170: \def\citeall#1{\xdef#1##1{#1{\noexpand\cite{##1}}}}
171: \def\cite#1{\each@rg\citer@nge{#1}} % Variable No. of args, separated by ","
172:
173: \def\each@rg#1#2{{\let\thecsname=#1\expandafter\first@rg#2,\end,}}
174: \def\first@rg#1,{\thecsname{#1}\apply@rg} % each@ag is a general purpose
175: \def\apply@rg#1,{\ifx\end#1\let\next=\relax% variable no. of arg. macro.
176: \else,\thecsname{#1}\let\next=\apply@rg\fi\next}% args separated by commas
177:
178: \def\citer@nge#1{\citedor@nge#1-\end-} % Check for M-N range (M and N numbers)
179: \def\citer@ngeat#1\end-{#1}
180: \def\citedor@nge#1-#2-{\ifx\end#2\r@featspace#1 % Single argument
181: \else\citel@@p{#1}{#2}\citer@ngeat\fi} % M-N range of arguments
182: \def\citel@@p#1#2{\ifnum#1>#2{\errmessage{Reference range #1-#2\space is bad.}%
183: \errhelp{If you cite a series of references by the notation M-N, then M and
184: N must be integers, and N must be greater than or equal to M.}}\else%
185: {\count0=#1\count1=#2\advance\count1 by1\relax\expandafter\r@fcite\the\count0,%
186: \loop\advance\count0 by1\relax% Loop from M to N
187: \ifnum\count0<\count1,\expandafter\r@fcite\the\count0,%
188: \repeat}\fi}
189:
190: \def\r@featspace#1#2 {\r@fcite#1#2,} % Eat spaces at beginning or end of arg
191: \def\r@fcite#1,{\ifuncit@d{#1}% Cite individual reference
192: \newr@f{#1}%
193: \expandafter\gdef\csname r@ftext\number\r@fcount\endcsname%
194: {\message{Reference #1 to be supplied.}%
195: \writer@f#1>>#1 to be supplied.\par}%
196: \fi%
197: \csname r@fnum#1\endcsname}
198: \def\ifuncit@d#1{\expandafter\ifx\csname r@fnum#1\endcsname\relax}%
199: \def\newr@f#1{\global\advance\r@fcount by1%
200: \expandafter\xdef\csname r@fnum#1\endcsname{\number\r@fcount}}
201:
202: \let\r@fis=\refis % Save old \refis, redefine
203: \def\refis#1#2#3\par{\ifuncit@d{#1}% Use two params #2 #3 to strip blank
204: \newr@f{#1}%
205: \w@rnwrite{Reference #1=\number\r@fcount\space is not cited up to now.}\fi%
206: \expandafter\gdef\csname r@ftext\csname r@fnum#1\endcsname\endcsname%
207: {\writer@f#1>>#2#3\vskip -0.7\baselineskip\par}}
208:
209: \def\ignoreuncited{% redefine \refis if ignoring uncited references
210: \def\refis##1##2##3\par{\ifuncit@d{##1}%
211: \else\expandafter\gdef\csname r@ftext\csname r@fnum##1\endcsname\endcsname%
212: {\writer@f##1>>##2##3\vskip -0.7\baselineskip\par}\fi}}
213:
214: \def\r@ferr{\endreferences\errmessage{I was expecting to see
215: \noexpand\endreferences before now; I have inserted it here.}}
216: \let\r@ferences=\references
217: \def\references{\r@ferences\def\endmode{\r@ferr\par\endgroup}}
218:
219: \let\endr@ferences=\endreferences
220: \def\endreferences{\r@fcurr=0% Save old \endreferences, redefine
221: {\loop\ifnum\r@fcurr<\r@fcount% Loop over refnum and produce text
222: \advance\r@fcurr by 1\relax\expandafter\r@fis\expandafter{\number\r@fcurr}%
223: \csname r@ftext\number\r@fcurr\endcsname%
224: \repeat}\gdef\r@ferr{}\endr@ferences}
225:
226: % Save old \endpaper, redefine it to write parting message.
227:
228: \let\r@fend=\endpaper\gdef\endpaper{\ifr@ffile
229: \immediate\write16{Cross References written on []\jobname.REF.}\fi\r@fend}
230:
231: \catcode`@=12
232:
233: \def\reftorange#1#2#3{$^{\cite{#1}-\setbox0=\hbox{\cite{#2}}\cite{#3}}$}
234:
235: \citeall\refto % These macros will generate citations
236: \citeall\ref %
237: \citeall\Ref %
238:
239:
240:
241:
242: \centerline{\bfb Nature, Vol 416, 59 (7 March 2002)}
243: \medskip
244: \centerline{\bfb Massive star formation in 100,000 years from turbulent and pressurized molecular clouds}
245: \medskip
246: \centerline{\bfb Christopher F. McKee$^{1,2}$ and Jonathan C. Tan$^{2,3}$}
247: \smallskip
248: 1. Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
249:
250: 2. Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
251:
252: 3. Princeton University Observatory, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
253: \bigskip
254:
255: {\ssbig Massive stars (with mass $m_* \gtorder 8 \msun$) are
256: fundamental to the evolution of galaxies, because they produce heavy
257: elements, inject energy into the interstellar medium, and possibly
258: regulate the star formation rate. The individual star formation time,
259: $t_{*f}$, determines the accretion rate of the star; the value of the
260: former quantity is currently uncertain by many orders of
261: magnitude\refto{ber96,mcl97,sta00,beh01,oso99,nak00}, leading to other
262: astrophysical questions. For example, the variation of $t_{*f}$ with
263: stellar mass dictates whether massive stars can form simultaneously
264: with low-mass stars in clusters. Here we show that $t_{*f}$ is
265: determined by conditions in the star's natal cloud, and is typically
266: $\sim 10^5 \yr$. The corresponding mass accretion rate depends on the
267: pressure within the cloud---which we relate to the gas surface
268: density---and on both the instantaneous and final stellar masses.
269: Characteristic accretion rates are sufficient to overcome radiation
270: pressure from $\sim 100\msun$ protostars, while simultaneously driving
271: intense bipolar gas outflows. The weak dependence of $t_{*f}$ on the
272: final mass of the star allows high- and low-mass star formation to
273: occur nearly simultaneously in clusters.}
274: \medskip
275:
276: Massive stars form in dense molecular {\it clumps} inside molecular
277: clouds\refto{plu97}. These regions are highly turbulent and are in
278: approximate virial equilibrium, with comparable values of the
279: gravitational energy and the kinetic energy. Observed star forming
280: regions have a virial parameter
281: $\alv=5\langle\sigma^2\rangle\rcl/G\mcl$ of order unity\refto{bm92},
282: where $\langle\sigma^2\rangle$ is the mass-averaged one-dimensional
283: velocity dispersion, $\rcl$ the radius, and $\mcl$ the mass of the
284: clump. The regions of high-mass star formation studied in ref. 7 are
285: characterized by masses $\mcl\sim 3800\msun$ and radii $\rcl\sim
286: 0.5\pc$. The corresponding mean column density and visual extinction
287: are $\Sigma\sim 1\,{\rm g\,cm^{-2}}$ and $A_V=(N_{\rm H}
288: /2\times10^{21}\,{\rm cm^{-2}})\,{\rm mag}=214\,\Sigma\,{\rm mag}$,
289: with a dispersion of a factor of a few. These column densities are
290: far greater than those associated with regions of low-mass star
291: formation, but are comparable to the central surface density in the
292: Orion Nebula Cluster\refto{hil98}, which is about $1\, {\rm
293: g\,cm^{-2}}$. These regions have very high mean pressures $\overline{P}$:
294: \eqnam{\eqpbar}
295: $$ {\overline{P}\over{k_B}}={3\mcl\langle\sigma^2\rangle \over 4\pi\rcl^3k_B}=
296: \left({3\pi\fg\alv \over 20 k_B}\right)G\Sigma^2
297: \simeq 2.28\times 10^8 \fg \alv \Sigma^2
298: ~{\rm K~cm^{-3}},
299: \eqno(\new)
300: $$
301: where $k_B$ is Boltzmann's constant and $\fg$ is the fraction of the
302: cloud's mass that is in gas, as opposed to stars. They have power-law
303: density profiles\refto{tak00} $\rho\propto r^{-k_\rho}$, with
304: $k_\rho\simeq1.5\pm 0.5$.
305:
306:
307: Molecular clouds are observed to be inhomogeneous on a wide range of
308: scales, and numerical simulations show that this is a natural outcome
309: of supersonic turbulence\refto{vaz00}. Dense, self-gravitating
310: inhomogeneities that are destined to become stars are termed {\it
311: cores}. We assume that the distribution of core masses determines the
312: resulting distribution of stellar masses (the initial mass function)
313: and we take this distribution as given. Because of the disruptive effects
314: of protostellar outflows, only a fraction $\ecore$ of the total core mass
315: $M_{\rm core}$ ends up in the star: $m_{*f} = \ecore M_{\rm core}$,
316: where $m_{*f}$ is the final stellar mass (for binary and other
317: multiple star systems, $m_{*f}$ is the total mass of stars in the
318: system). To estimate $\ecore$ for massive stars, we assume that their
319: outflows are scaled versions of the outflows from low-mass stars, which is
320: qualitatively consistent with observation\refto{ric00}. For low-mass
321: stars, protostellar outflows typically eject 25-75\% of the core
322: mass\refto{mat00}. A similar analysis applied to high-mass stars
323: yields comparable results (J.C.T. \& C.F.M., in prep.), so we
324: adopt $\ecore=0.5$ as a typical value.
325:
326:
327: Our fundamental assumption is that star-forming clumps and the cores
328: embedded within them are each
329: part of a self-similar, self-gravitating
330: turbulent structure that is virialized---that is, in approximate
331: hydrostatic equilibrium---on all scales above the thermal Jeans mass.
332: The density and pressure are then power laws in radius (for the
333: pressure, $P\propto r^{-k_P})$, so that the cloud is a polytrope with
334: $P\propto\rho^{\gamma_p}$. In hydrostatic equilibrium\refto{mcl96},
335: $k_\rho=2/(2-\gamma_p)$ and $k_P=\gamma_p k_\rho = 2
336: \gamma_p/(2-\gamma_p)$. Let $c\equiv(P/\rho)^{1/2}\propto
337: r^{(1-\gamma_p)/(2-\gamma_p)}$ be the effective sound speed; if the
338: pressure is dominated by turbulent motions, then $c$ is proportional
339: to the line width. Molecular clouds and cloud cores satisfy a line
340: width-size relation in which $c$ increases outwards\refto{lar81},
341: corresponding to $\gamma_p<1$. The equation of hydrostatic equilibrium
342: gives $M=k_Pc^2r/G$ for the mass inside $r$, and $\rho=Ac^2/(2\pi
343: Gr^2)$ for the density at $r$, where
344: $A=\gamma_p(4-3\gamma_p)/(2-\gamma_p)^2$. It is then
345: immediately possible to determine the properties of a core in terms
346: of the pressure at its surface
347: and the mass of the star that will
348: form within it (see Fig. 1).
349: The radius of a core is then
350: $r_s=0.074(m_{*f}/30\msun)^{1/2}\Sigma^{-1/2}\pc$;
351: recall that the typical clump observed in ref. 7
352: has a radius of 0.5 pc, which is set by the
353: angular resolution of those observations. The mean density
354: in a core is $\bar n_{{\rm
355: H}}=1.0\times 10^6(m_{*f}/30\msun)^{-1/2}\Sigma^{3/2}\,{\rm
356: cm^{-3}}$, and the r.m.s. velocity dispersion is
357: $1.65(m_{*f}/30\msun)^{1/4}
358: \Sigma^{1/4}~{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$.
359: The thermal sound speed at temperature $T$ is $0.3(T/30\, {\rm
360: K})^{1/2}\,\kms$, and so a high-mass core is dominated by supersonic
361: turbulence and should be very clumpy.
362:
363: We now consider the timescale for a star to form in such a core.
364: On dimensional grounds, we expect the protostellar accretion rate to
365: be\refto{sta80}:
366: \eqnam{\eq:dim}$$ \dot{m}_*=\phi_* {m_* \over t_{\rm ff}},
367: \eqno(\new)
368: $$
369: so long as radiation pressure is not important. Here $m_*$ is the {\it
370: instantaneous} stellar mass, $t_{\rm ff}=[3\pi/(32G\rho)]^{1/2}$ is
371: the free-fall time and $\phi_*$ is a dimensionless constant of order
372: unity. This equation could be violated in the sense that $\phi_*\gg 1$
373: only in the unlikely case that the star forms from a coherent
374: spherical implosion; if the star formation is triggered by an external
375: increase in pressure, $\phi_*$ could be increased somewhat, but
376: deviations from spherical symmetry in the triggering impulse and in
377: the protostellar core will generally prevent $\phi_*$ from becoming
378: too large. It could be violated in the opposite sense that $\phi_*\ll
379: 1$ if the core is magnetically dominated, so that collapse could not
380: begin until the magnetic field diffused out of the core. However,
381: magnetic fields are
382: not observed to be dominant
383: in molecular cores\refto{cru99}. Equation (\eq:dim) implies that
384: the accretion rate, and thus the star formation time $t_{*f}\propto
385: m_*/\dot{m}_*$, depends weakly on the properties of the ambient
386: medium, $\dot{m}_*\propto \rho^{1/2}$.
387:
388:
389: We now show that if the collapse is spherical and self-similar, then
390: $\phi_*$ is quite close to unity provided that radiation pressure does
391: not disrupt the flow. Although we assume the collapse is spherical
392: far from the star, it will naturally proceed via a disk close to the
393: star owing to the angular momentum of the accreting material; we
394: assume this does not limit the flow of matter onto the star as
395: otherwise the disk would become very massive and gravitationally
396: unstable. Shielding by the disk reduces the importance of radiation
397: pressure on the accretion flow, and allows the formation of massive
398: stars provided the accretion rate is sufficiently large\refto{jij96}.
399: Under the assumption of a polytropic structure in hydrostatic
400: equilibrium, equation (\eq:dim) implies:
401: \eqnam{\eqmdot}$$ \dot{m}_*=\phi_* \ecore {4 \over \pi \sqrt{3}}
402: k_P A^{1/2}{c^3\over G},
403: \eqno(\new)
404: $$
405: where the value of $\rho$ entering $t_{\rm ff}$ is evaluated at the
406: radius in the initial cloud that just encloses the gas that goes into
407: the star when its mass is $m_*$. For the isothermal case
408: ($\gamma_p=1$) and for $\ecore=1$, this reduces to the classic result
409: of Shu\refto{shu77} with $\phi_*=0.975\pi
410: \sqrt{3}/8=0.663$. McLaughlin \& Pudritz\refto{mcl97} show that the
411: accretion rate $\dot m_*$ is proportional to
412: $t^{3-3\gamma_p}$, so that for $\gamma_p<1$, as observed, the
413: accretion rate {\it accelerates}\refto{mcl97,beh01}. As discussed in
414: ref. 2, termination of the accretion breaks the self-similarity once
415: the expansion wave encloses $m_{*f}$, which occurs at $t\sim
416: 0.45t_{*f}$. Thereafter, the relation $\dot{m}_*\propto
417: t^{3-3\gamma_p}$ becomes approximate, but the approximation should be reasonable good\refto{mcl97}. The star-formation time is then given by:
418: \eqnam{\eq:tsf}
419: $$ t_{*f} = {(4-3\gamma_p)\over \phi_*}t_{\rm ff}.
420: \eqno(\new)
421: $$
422: Evaluating $\phi_*$ (see Fig. 1), we conclude that
423: $\dot{m}_*\simeq m_*/t_{\rm ff}$ to within a factor 1.5 for spherical
424: cores in which the effective sound speed increases outward.
425:
426:
427: We can express the accretion rate in terms of the mean pressure of the
428: clump in which the star forms, $\bar P$ (eq. 1), and the final mass of
429: the star, $m_{*f}$,
430: \eqnam{\eqmdotSigma}
431: $$ \dot{m}_* = 4.75 \times 10^{-4} \ecore^{1/4}
432: (\fg\phi_P\alv)^{3/8} \left({m_{*f} \over 30\msun}\right)^{3/4} \Sigma^{3/4}
433: \left({m_*\over m_{*f}}\right)^j\,{\rm M_\odot\,yr^{-1}},
434: \eqno(\new)
435: $$
436: where $\phi_P\equiv P_s/ \overline{P}$ is the ratio of the core's
437: surface pressure to the mean pressure in the clump and $j\equiv
438: 3(2-k_\rho)/[2(3-k_\rho)]$; for $k_\rho=3/2$, $j=1/2$.
439: This typical accretion rate is large because the core is embedded in a
440: high-pressure environment, so that in hydrostatic equilibrium
441: it has a high density and short free-fall time.
442: Because massive cores are turbulent and clumpy, we expect the accretion
443: rate to exhibit large fluctuations. Whereas clumpiness is an attribute
444: of massive star-forming regions in our model, it is not a
445: prerequisite, as suggested in ref. 3.
446: The star formation time is:
447: \eqnam{\eq:tsfSigma}
448: $$ t_{*f} = 1.26 \times 10^{5}
449: \ecore^{-1/4}
450: (\fg\phi_P\alv)^{-3/8}
451: \left({m_{*f}\over30\msun}\right)^{1/4}
452: \Sigma^{-3/4}\,{\rm yr}.
453: \eqno(\new)
454: $$
455: The weak dependence of the star formation time on the final stellar
456: mass means that low-mass and high-mass stars can form approximately at
457: the same time. Furthermore, $t_{*f}$ is small compared to the
458: estimated timescale $\sim 10^6\,{\rm yr}$ for cluster
459: formation\refto{pal99}. With the fiducial values of the parameters, a
460: $100\msun$ star forming in a clump with $\Sigma=1\, {\rm g\,cm^{-2}}$
461: has a final accretion rate of $1.1\times 10^{-3}\,{\rm
462: M_\odot\,yr^{-1}}$ and a star formation time of $1.8\times 10^5\yr$.
463:
464: A necessary condition for massive star formation is that the
465: ram pressure associated with accretion exceed the radiation pressure
466: at the point where the dust in the infalling gas is
467: destroyed\refto{wol87}. For a 100 $M_\odot$ star, this
468: requires\refto{jij96} $\dot m_*\gtorder 6\times 10^{-4}\;M_\odot$
469: yr$^{-1}$, which is satisfied for $\Sigma\gtorder 0.5$ g cm$^{-2}$.
470: Once the core has formed a star, the star can continue to grow by
471: Bondi-Hoyle accretion\refto{bon01} provided $m_*\ltorder 10\;\msun$ so
472: that radiation pressure does not prevent the focussing of gas
473: streamlines in the wake of the star. The Bondi-Hoyle accretion rate
474: $\dot{m}_*= 2.2\times10^{-7} (M_{\rm
475: cl}/4\times10^3\msun)^{-5/4}\Sigma^{3/4} (m_*/10\msun)^2
476: \msun\yr^{-1}$ (CFM \& JCT, in prep.) is so low
477: that this process does not significantly alter the stellar mass under
478: the conditions observed in the clumps of ref.~7.
479:
480: Direct comparison of our results with observation is difficult because
481: the actual masses of massive protostars are poorly determined. Our
482: approach is to predict the properties of some well-studied
483: massive protostars in terms of their bolometric luminosities. The
484: bolometric luminosity $L_{\rm bol}$ has contributions from
485: main-sequence nuclear burning $L_{\rm ms}$, deuterium burning $L_D$,
486: and accretion $L_{\rm acc}$. The accretion luminosity $L_{\rm
487: acc}=f_{\rm acc} G m_*\dot{m}_*/r_*$, where $f_{\rm acc}$ is a factor
488: of order unity accounting for energy radiated by an accretion disk,
489: advected into the star or converted into kinetic energy of outflows,
490: and where the stellar radius $r_*$ may depend sensitively on the
491: accretion rate $\dot{m}_*$. Massive stars join the main sequence
492: during their accretion phase at a mass that also depends on the
493: accretion rate\refto{pal92}. To treat accelerating accretion rates,
494: we have developed a simple model for protostellar evolution based on
495: that of Nakano et al.\refto{nak00,nak95} The model accounts for the
496: total energy of the protostar as it accretes and dissociates matter
497: and, if the central temperature $T_c\gtorder 10^6\,{\rm K}$, burns
498: deuterium. We have modified this model to include
499: additional processes, such as deuterium shell burning, and we have
500: calibrated these modifications against the more detailed calculations
501: of Palla \& Stahler\refto{pal91,pal92}.
502:
503: Our model allows us to make predictions for the masses and accretion
504: rates of embedded protostars that are thought to power hot molecular
505: cores (CFM \& JCT, in prep.). Figure 2 compares our
506: theoretical tracks with the observed bolometric luminosities of
507: several sources. We find that uncertainties in the value of the
508: pressure create only small uncertainties in $m_*$ for $L_{\rm
509: bol}\gtorder {\rm few} \times 10^4\,{\rm L_\odot}$.
510:
511: The infrared and submillimeter spectra of accreting protostars and
512: their surrounding envelopes have been modelled in ref. 5., modelling
513: the same sources shown in Fig. 2. We note that uncertainties in the
514: structure of the gas envelope and the possible contributions from
515: additional surrounding gas cores or diffuse gas will affect the
516: observed spectrum. Comparing results, our inferred stellar masses are
517: similar, but our accretion rates are systematically smaller by factors
518: of $\sim 2-5$. The modelled\refto{oso99} high accretion rates of $\sim
519: 10^{-3}\,{\rm M_\odot\,yr^{-1}}$ for stars with $m_*\sim 10\msun$
520: would be difficult to achieve unless the pressure was increased
521: substantially; for example, if the stars are destined to reach
522: $m_{*f}\sim 30\msun$, pressure increases of a factor $\sim 40$
523: are required.
524:
525: \noindent
526: {\ninerm Received 17 September 2001; accepted 2 January 2002}
527:
528: \references
529: {
530: %\parskip=48pt
531: \refis{wol87} Wolfire, M. G. \& Cassinelli, J. Conditions for the formation of
532: massive stars. {\it Astrophys.\ J.} {\bf 319}, 850-867 (1987).
533: \par
534:
535: \refis{ber96} Bernasconi, P. A. \& Maeder, A. About the absence of a proper
536: zero age main sequence for massive stars. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} {\bf 307}, 829-839 (1996).\par
537:
538: \refis{mcl97} McLaughlin, D. E. \& Pudritz, R. E. Gravitational Collapse and
539: Star Formation in Logotropic and Nonisothermal Spheres. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 476},
540: 750-765 (1997).\par
541:
542: \refis{sta00} Stahler, S. W., Palla, F. \& Ho, P. T. P. The Formation of
543: Massive Stars. Protostars \& Planets IV, eds. Mannings, V., Boss,
544: A. P. \& Russell, S. S.
545: (University of Arizona Press, Tucson), 327-351 (2000).\par
546:
547: \refis{vaz00} V\'azquez-Semadeni, E., Ostriker, E. C., Passot, T., Gammie, C. F. \& Stone, J. M. Compressible MHD Turbulence: Implications for Molecular Cloud and Star Formation. Protostars \& Planets IV, eds. Mannings, V., Boss, A. P. \& Russell, S. S.
548: (University of Arizona Press, Tucson), 3-28 (2000).\par
549:
550: \refis{ric00} Richer, J. S., Shepherd, D. S., Cabrit, S., Bachiller, R.,
551: \& Churchwell, E. Molecular Outflows from Young Stellar Objects.
552: Protostars \& Planets IV, eds. Mannings, V., Boss,
553: A. P. \& Russell, S. S.
554: (University of Arizona Press, Tucson), 867-894 (2000).\par
555:
556: \refis{beh01} Behrend, R. \& Maeder, A. Formation of massive stars by growing
557: accretion rate. {\it Astron. Astrophys.} {\bf 373}, 190-198 (2001).\par
558:
559: \refis{oso99} Osorio, M., Lizano, S. \& D'Alessio, P. Hot Molecular Cores and
560: the Formation of Massive Stars. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 525}, 808-820 (1999).\par
561:
562: \refis{nak00} Nakano, T., Hasegawa, T., Morino, J.-I. \& Yamashita, T.
563: Evolution of Protostars Accreting Mass at Very High Rates: Is Orion IRc2 a Huge
564: Protostar? {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 534}, 976-983 (2000).\par
565:
566: \refis{sta80} Stahler, S. W., Shu, F. H. \& Taam, R. E. The evolution of
567: protostars. I - Global formulation and results. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 241}, 637-654 (1980).\par
568:
569: \refis{cru99} Crutcher, R. M. Magnetic Fields in Molecular Clouds:
570: Observations Confront Theory. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 520}, 706-713 (1999).\par
571:
572: %\refis{shu90} Shu, F. H., Tremaine, S., Adams, F. C., \& Ruden, S. Sling
573: %amplification and eccentric gravitational instabilities in gaseous
574: %disks. {\it Astrophys. J.}
575: %{\bf 358}, 495-514 (1990).\par
576:
577: \refis{jij96} Jijina, J. \& Adams, F. C. Infall Collapse Solutions in the
578: Inner Limit: Radiation Pressure and Its Effects on Star Formation. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 462},
579: 874-887 (1996).\par
580:
581: %\refis{yor99} Yorke, H. W. \& Bodenheimer, P. The Formation of Protostellar
582: %Disks. III. The Influence of Gravitationally Induced Angular
583: %Momentum Transport on Disk
584: %Structure and Appearance. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 525}, 330-342 (1999).\par
585:
586: \refis{tak00} van der Tak, F. F. S., van Dishoeck, E. F., Evans, N. J. (II) \&
587: Blake, G. A. Structure and Evolution of the Envelopes of Deeply Embedded Massive Young
588: Stars. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 537}, 283-303 (2000).\par
589:
590: \refis{mcl96} McLaughlin, D. E. \& Pudritz, R. E. A Model for the Internal
591: Structure of Molecular Cloud Cores. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 469}, 194-208 (1996).\par
592:
593: \refis{lar81} Larson, R. B. Turbulence and star formation in molecular
594: clouds. {\it Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.} {\bf 194}, 809-826 (1981).\par
595:
596: \refis{mat00} Matzner, C. D. \& McKee, C. F. Efficiencies of Low-Mass Star and
597: Star Cluster Formation. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 545}, 364-378 (2000).\par
598:
599: \refis{shu77} Shu, F. H. Self-similar collapse of isothermal spheres and star
600: formation. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 214}, 488-497 (1977).\par
601:
602: \refis{bm92} Bertoldi, F. \& McKee, C. F. Pressure-confined clumps in
603: magnetized molecular clouds. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 395}, 140-157 (1992).\par
604:
605: \refis{plu97} Plume, R., Jaffe, D. T., Evans, N. J. (II), Martin-Pintado, J.
606: \& Gomez-Gonzalez, J. Dense Gas and Star Formation: Characteristics of Cloud Cores
607: Associated with Water Masers. {it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 476}, 730-749 (1997).\par
608:
609: %\refis{oni96} Onishi, T., Mizuno, A., Kawamura, A., Ogawa, H. \& Fukui, Y. A C~$^{18}$~O Survey of Dense Cloud Cores in Taurus: Core Properties. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 465}, 815-824 (1996).\par
610:
611: \refis{hil98} Hillenbrand, L. A. \& Hartmann, L. W. A Preliminary Study of the
612: Orion Nebula Cluster Structure and Dynamics. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 492}, 540-553 (1998).\par
613:
614: %\refis{bon98} Bonnell, I. A. \& Davies, M. B. Mass segregation in young
615: %stellar clusters. {\it Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.} {\bf 295}, 691-698 (1998).\par
616:
617: \refis{pal92} Palla, F. \& Stahler, S. W. The evolution of intermediate-mass
618: protostars. II - Influence of the accretion flow. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 392}, 667-677 (1992).\par
619:
620: \refis{nak95} Nakano, T., Hasegawa, T. \& Norman, C. The Mass of a Star Formed
621: in a Cloud Core: Theory and Its Application to the Orion A Cloud. {\it Astrophys. J.}
622: {\bf 450}, 183-195 (1995).\par
623:
624: \refis{pal91} Palla, F. \& Stahler, S. W. The evolution of intermediate-mass
625: protostars. I - Basic results. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 375}, 288-299 (1991).\par
626:
627: \refis{pal99} Palla, F. \& Stahler, S. W. Star Formation in the Orion Nebula Cluster.
628: {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 525}, 772-783 (1999).\par
629:
630: \refis{sch92} Schaller, G., Schaerer, D., Meynet, G. \& Maeder, A. New grids
631: of stellar models from 0.8 to 120 solar masses at Z = 0.020 and Z = 0.001.
632: {\it Astron. Astrophys. Supp.} {\bf 96}, 269-331 (1992).\par
633:
634: \refis{hun98} Hunter, T. R. et al. G34.24+0.13MM: A Deeply Embedded
635: Proto-B-Star. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 493}, L97-L100 (1998).\par
636: \refis{mol98} Molinari, S., Testi, L., Brand, J., Cesaroni, R. \& Palla, F.
637: IRAS 23385+6053: A Prototype Massive Class 0 Object. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 505}, L39-L42
638: (1998).\par
639:
640: \refis{kau98} Kaufman, M. J., Hollenbach, D. J. \& Tielens, A. G. G. M. High-
641: Temperature Molecular Cores near Massive Stars and Application to the Orion
642: Hot Core. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 497}, 276-287 (1998).\par
643:
644: \refis{wyr99} Wyrowski, F., Schilke, P., Walmsley, C. M. \& Menten, K. M. Hot
645: Gas and Dust in a Protostellar Cluster near W3(OH). {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 514}, L43-L46
646: (1999).\par
647:
648: %\refis{cas95} Caselli, P. \& Myers, P. C. The Line Width-Size Relation in Massive Cloud Cores. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 446}, 665-686 (1995).\par
649:
650: \refis{bon01} Bonnell, I. A., Bate, M. R., Clarke, C. J. \& Pringle, J. E. Competitive accretion in embedded stellar clusters. {\it Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.} {\bf 323}, 785-794 (2001).\par
651:
652: }
653: \endreferences
654: \endmode
655: \bigskip
656: \bigskip
657: \bigskip
658: \bigskip
659: \bigskip
660: \par\noindent ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. We thank Steve Stahler, Ralph Pudritz,
661: Malcolm Walmsley and Mark Krumholz for discussions. This work was
662: supported by the NSF, by NASA (which supports the Center for Star
663: Formation Studies) and (for J.C.T.) by a Spitzer-Cotsen fellowship from
664: Princeton University.
665:
666:
667: \bigskip
668: \bigskip
669: \medskip
670: Correspondence should be addressed to
671: CFM (e-mail: cmckee@mckee.berkeley.edu) or to JCT (e-mail:
672: jt@astro.princeton.edu).
673:
674: \bigskip
675: \bigskip
676: \bigskip
677: \bigskip
678: \bigskip
679: \bigskip
680: \bigskip
681: \bigskip
682: \bigskip
683:
684:
685:
686: {\bf Fig. 1. Variation of model parameters and results with $k_\rho$.} Let
687: $P_s=\phi_P\overline{P}$ be the surface pressure of a core. The
688: properties at the surface of the core are given by
689: $r_s=[AGm_{*f}^2/(2\pi k_P^{2}\ecore^{2}P_s)]^{1/4}$, $\rho_{s} =
690: [Ak_P^2\ecore^2P_s^3/(2\pi G^3 m_{*f}^2)]^{1/4}$, and $c_s=[2\pi G^3
691: m_{*f}^2 P_s/(A k_P^2\ecore^2)]^{1/8}$. We anticipate that the
692: overall star formation efficiency in the clump will be relatively
693: high, so in equation~(\eqpbar) we adopt $\fg=2/3$ as a fiducial value.
694: We estimate $\phi_P= P_s/\overline{P} \simeq 2$ (C.F.M.
695: \& J.C.T., in prep.), and we
696: set $\alv$ equal to unity\refto{plu97}. We take $k_\rho=1.5$ as a
697: typical value, corresponding to $\gamma_p=2/3$, $k_P=1$ and $A=3/4$.
698: Following equation (\eqmdot), we evaluate $\phi_*$ using the results
699: of McLaughlin \& Pudritz\refto{mcl97}, $\phi_*=\pi\sqrt{3}
700: [(2-\gamma_p)^2(4-3\gamma_p)^{(7-6\gamma_p)/2}
701: 8^{(3\gamma_p-5)/2}m_0]^{1/(4-3\gamma_p)}$, where $m_0$ is tabulated
702: in their paper. Over the entire range of $\gamma_p$ and $k_\rho$
703: relevant to molecular clouds ($0\leq\gamma_p\leq1$, $1\leq k_\rho\leq
704: 2$), $\phi_*\simeq 1.62-0.48 k_\rho$ to within about 1\%. The star
705: formation time decreases from $3.5t_{\rm ff}$ to $1.5t_{\rm ff}$ as
706: $\gamma_p$ varies from 0 to 1. The variation of $t_{*f}$ and
707: $\dot{m}_{*f}$ relative to the $k_\rho=1.5$ case is also shown. Note
708: that the singular polytropic model in hydrostatic equilibrium breaks
709: down for $k_\rho =1$, $\gamma_p=0$, since then the pressure gradient
710: vanishes ($k_P=0$).
711:
712: \medskip
713:
714: {\bf Fig. 2. Derived properties of nearby massive protostars.} {\it
715: Solid} lines show the predicted evolution in luminosity of protostars
716: (including their accretion disks, but allowing for the powering of
717: protostellar outflows so that $f_{\rm acc}=0.5$; J.C.T. \& C.F.M., in
718: prep.) of final mass 7.5, 15, 30, 60 and 120~${\rm M_\odot}$
719: accreting from cores with $k_\rho=1.5$ embedded in a $\Sigma=1\,{\rm
720: g\,cm^{-2}}$ clump, typical of Galactic regions\refto{plu97}. The
721: luminosity step occurring at around 5 to 7~${\rm M_\odot}$, depending
722: on the model, corresponds to the onset of deuterium shell burning,
723: which swells the protostellar radius by a factor of about two and thus
724: reduces the accretion luminosity by the same factor. The {\it dashed}
725: and {\it long dashed} lines show a 30~${\rm M_\odot}$ star forming in
726: a clump with mean pressure ten times smaller and larger than the
727: fiducial value, respectively. The {\it dotted} line shows the zero
728: age main sequence luminosity from ref. 26. Four observed hot
729: molecular cores are shown: G34.24+0.13MM\refto{hun98}, IRAS
730: 23385+6053\refto{mol98}, Orion Hot Core\refto{kau98} and W3(${\rm
731: H_2O}$)---the Turner-Welch object\refto{wyr99}. The vertical error bar
732: illustrates the uncertainty in the bolometric luminosity. The
733: horizontal error bar shows the corresponding range of allowed values
734: of $m_*$ for the $\Sigma=1\,{\rm g\,cm^{-2}}$ models. These values and
735: the constraints on $\dot{m}_*$ are listed here for each source.
736:
737:
738: \vfill\eject
739:
740: \bye
741:
742:
743:
744:
745: