1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
4: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
5: \slugcomment{To appear in Ap.J. (Letters)}
6:
7: \shorttitle{Black hole mass of BL Lacs}
8: \shortauthors{Falomo et al.}
9:
10: \def\ref{\par \noindent \hang}
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{The black hole mass of BL Lac objects from the stellar velocity
15: dispersion of the host galaxy}
16:
17: \author{R. Falomo}
18: \affil{Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5,
19: 35122 Padova, Italy}
20: \email{falomo@pd.astro.it}
21:
22: \author{J.K. Kotilainen}
23: \affil{Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, V\"ais\"al\"antie 20,
24: FIN--21500 Piikki\"o, Finland}
25: \email{jarkot@astro.utu.fi}
26:
27: \and
28:
29: \author{A. Treves}
30: \affil{Universit\`a dell'Insubria, via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy}
31: \email{treves@mib.infn.it}
32:
33: \begin{abstract}
34:
35: The correlation between black hole mass $M_{BH}$ and stellar
36: velocity dispersion $\sigma$ in nearby elliptical galaxies affords a novel
37: way to determine $M_{BH}$ in active galaxies.
38: We report on measurements of $\sigma$
39: from optical spectra of 7 BL Lac host galaxies.
40: The derived values of $\sigma$ are in the range
41: of 160 -- 290 km s$^{-1}$ corresponding to $M_{BH}$ of 5 $\times$ 10$^7$ to
42: 1 $\times$ 10$^9$ M$_\odot$. The average ratio of $M_{BH}$ to the host
43: galaxy mass is 1.4 $\times$ 10$^{-3}$, consistent with that estimated in other
44: active and inactive galaxies.
45: The velocity dispersions and the derived values of
46: $M_{BH}$ of the BL Lacs are similar to those obtained for
47: low redshift radio galaxies, in good agreement with the predictions of the
48: unified models for radio--loud active galaxies.
49:
50: \end{abstract}
51:
52: \keywords{BL Lacertae objects -- galaxies:active -- galaxies: elliptical and
53: lenticular -- galaxies: kinematics and dynamics -- galaxies:nuclei}
54:
55: \section{Introduction}
56:
57: The mass of the central black hole (BH) is of paramount importance in
58: theoretical models of AGN. In particular, the dependence of BH mass
59: ($M_{BH}$) on the global host galaxy properties provides clues to the role of
60: BHs in galaxy formation and evolution. Dynamical determination of $M_{BH}$ in
61: AGN is difficult, because of the bright emission from the nucleus. The main
62: method that has proved to be successful for AGN is reverberation mapping of
63: broad emission lines, which is extremely time consuming and gives results on
64: $M_{BH}$ that depend on the assumed geometry of the accretion disk.
65: Therefore, only for a few well studied quasars and Seyfert galaxies $M_{BH}$
66: is known (see e.g. Kaspi et al. 2000; Nelson 2000; Wandel 2002 and references
67: therein). Reverberation mapping cannot be employed for BL Lac objects because
68: they lack prominent broad emission lines, therefore other methods need to be
69: applied. The discovery of a correlation between
70: $M_{BH}$ and the luminosity of the bulge in nearby early-type galaxies (e.g.
71: Magorrian et al. 1998) offered a new tool for evaluating $M_{BH}$ (see the
72: recent reviews by Merritt \& Ferrarese 2001 [hereafter MF01];
73: Kormendy \& Gebhardt 2001). This correlation has been applied so far for a
74: sample of nearby quasars (McLure \& Dunlop 2001) and BL Lacs
75: (Treves et al. 2001).
76:
77: Recently, a stricter correlation was found relating $M_{BH}$ with the stellar
78: velocity dispersion $\sigma$ of the spheroidal component in nearby inactive
79: galaxies (Gebhardt et al. 2000; Ferrarese \& Merritt 2000). This relationship
80: clearly demonstrates a connection between BHs and bulges of galaxies and has
81: spurred a substantial effort in theoretical modelling (e.g.
82: Silk \& Rees 1998; H\"ahnelt \& Kauffmann 2000;
83: Adams, Graff \& Richstone 2001). The
84: relationship appears to predict more accurately $M_{BH}$, but requires the
85: measurement of $\sigma$ in the host galaxies of AGN that is difficult to
86: obtain, in particular for objects at moderate or high redshift and with very
87: luminous nuclei. On the other hand, BL Lacs have relatively fainter nuclei
88: than quasars (e.g. Falomo et al. 1999), and for them this measurement (at
89: least for low redshift objects) can be secured with a single spectrum
90: observable with a medium-sized telescope.
91:
92: We present here medium resolution optical spectroscopy of the host
93: galaxies of 7 BL Lac objects from which we derive the stellar
94: velocity dispersion.
95: According to the shape of their spectral energy distribution (SED), BL Lacs
96: are broadly distinguished into two types (see Giommi \& Padovani 1995) :
97: those whose SED peaks at
98: near-infrared/optical and the $\gamma$-ray MeV regions (low frequency
99: peaked BL Lacs or LBL), and those
100: that have SED peaking in the UV/X-ray and the $\gamma$-ray TeV energies
101: (called high frequency peaked BL Lacs or HBL).
102: Our selection of nearby (z $<$ 0.2) BL Lacs includes 5 HBL and 2 LBL.
103: For all observed targets high quality images have
104: been obtained either from the ground (Falomo \& Kotilainen 1999) or
105: with HST + WFPC2 (Urry et al. 2000; Falomo et al. 2000). From these
106: images, the characterization of the host galaxies and the nuclear
107: luminosity can be obtained.
108:
109: \section{Observations and data analysis}
110:
111: The observations were obtained in June 2001 using the 2.5m Nordic
112: Optical Telescope (NOT) equipped with
113: ALFOSC\footnote{See URL http://www.not.iac.es for instrument characteristics}.
114: Spectra were secured
115: using two grisms to cover the spectral ranges 4800 -- 5800 \AA~(setup A)
116: and 5700 -- 8000 \AA ~(setup B)
117: at 0.54 \AA~pixel$^{-1}$ and 1.3 \AA ~pixel$^{-1}$ dispersion, respectively.
118: This allows us to measure the absorption lines of H$\beta$ (4861 \AA), Mg I
119: (5175 \AA), Ca E-band (5269 \AA), Na I (5892 \AA) and the TiO + CaI
120: (6178 \AA), TiO + FeI (6266 \AA) and other absorption line blends from
121: the host galaxies at a spectral resolution R $\sim$3000.
122:
123: The chosen grisms combined with a 1\arcsec\ slit yield a spectral resolution
124: for velocity dispersion measurement of $\sim$60 -- 80 km s$^{-1}$, which is
125: adequate for the expected range of $\sigma$ in luminous ellipticals (e.g.
126: Djorgovski \& Davis 1987; Bender, Burstein \& Faber 1992)
127: such as the hosts of BL Lacs.
128: In addition to the spectra of the BL Lac hosts, we acquired spectra of bright
129: stars of type G8-III to K1-III, that exhibit a low rotational velocity
130: (V$\times$$\sin{(i)}<$ 20 km$s^{-1}$). These are used as templates of zero
131: velocity dispersion. Furthermore, spectra of the well studied nearby
132: elliptical galaxy NGC 5831 were also secured in order to provide a test of
133: the adopted procedure to derive $\sigma$.
134:
135: During the observations, seeing ranged between 1\arcsec\ and 1.5\arcsec . \
136: The targets were centered into the slit or positioned 1\arcsec\ away from the
137: nucleus and then the 1D spectrum was extracted from an aperture of
138: 3\arcsec\ - 5\arcsec\ diameter, which is in all cases within the
139: effective radius of the host galaxy.
140: In one case (Mkn 180), spectra with the object both centered into the slit
141: and off-centered by 1\arcsec\ were taken but no significant difference
142: was apparent in the shape of the spectral features.
143: Standard data reduction was applied to the spectra using the tasks available
144: in the {\sc IRAF}\footnote{{\sc IRAF} is distributed by the
145: National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the
146: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under
147: cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.} package.
148: The procedure includes bias subtraction, flat-fielding, wavelength
149: calibration and extraction of 1D spectra. For each observation, we took two
150: spectra and combined them in order to remove cosmic ray hits and other
151: occasional spurious signals in the detector. In Table 1 we report the list of
152: our targets together with the instrumental setup and the S/N of each
153: spectrum derived
154: from the continuum in the middle of the observed spectral range.
155:
156: The stellar velocity dispersion $\sigma$ was determined using the
157: Fourier Quotient method (e.g. Sargent et al. 1977) implemented in the
158: {\sc IRAF} STSDAS package. The spectra were first normalized by subtracting
159: the continuum, converted to a logarithmic scale and then multiplied by a
160: cosine bell function that apodizes 10\% of the pixels at each end of the
161: spectrum. Finally, the Fourier Transform of the galaxy spectra was divided by
162: the Fourier Transform of template stars and $\sigma$ was computed from a
163: $\chi^{2}$ fit with a Gaussian broadening function (see Bertola et al. 1984;
164: Kuijken \& Merrifield 1993 for further details on this method). The $r.m.s.$
165: scatter of the $\sigma$ results using different template stars was typically
166: $\sim$10 km$s^{-1}$ and can be considered as the minimum uncertainty of the
167: measurement. The observed values of $\sigma$ and their estimated errors are
168: reported in the last column of Table 1.
169:
170: For three objects we have spectra in both spectral ranges. The resulting
171: stellar velocity dispersions are in all cases in good agreement, with average
172: difference 12 km s$^{-1}$, ensuring sufficient homogeneity of data taken with
173: different grisms and/or resolution. Note, however, that there is a tendency
174: for the red grism (lower resolution) data to result in slightly larger value
175: of $\sigma$. For the nearby elliptical NGC 5831 we obtained
176: $\sigma$ = 167$\pm$5 and 185$\pm$10 km s$^{-1}$ for the setup A and B,
177: respectively.
178: These values are in good agreement with previous measurements in the
179: literature ($<\sigma>$ = 168 km s$^{-1}$; Prugniel et al. 1998).
180: In Fig. 1 we show an example of the spectrum of the BL Lac object Mrk 501
181: compared with that of the elliptical galaxy NGC 5831 observed in both
182: spectral ranges.
183:
184: Since early-type galaxies exhibit some gradients in velocity dispersion
185: (Davies et al. 1983; Fisher, Illingworth \& Franx 1995), the measured value
186: of $\sigma$ depends somewhat on the distances of the galaxies
187: and the size of the used aperture. In order to compare our values of
188: $\sigma$ with the data available in literature (in particular with the MF01
189: relationship), we applied aperture corrections according to the procedure
190: given in J\"orgensen, Franx \& Kjaergaard (1995). The individual measurements
191: of $\sigma$ are therefore corrected to a circular aperture with a metric
192: diameter of 1.19$h^{-1}$ kpc, equivalent to 3.4\arcsec\ at the distance of
193: the Coma cluster to derive central velocity dispersion $\sigma_c$,
194: given in column 3 of Table 2. When
195: measurements of $\sigma$ in two spectral ranges are available,
196: the average is reported.
197:
198: No previous systematic study of the stellar velocity
199: dispersion in BL Lacs is available although recently
200: Barth, Ho \& Sargent (2002) report optical spectroscopy
201: for Mrk 501. These authors measured a value of
202: $\sigma$ = 372$\pm$18 km s$^{-1}$ which differs significantly from ours
203: ($\sigma$ = 291$\pm$13 km s$^{-1}$).
204: Their measurement of $\sigma$, derived from
205: the region 5200 - 5600 \AA, could be reconciled with
206: our value, given their large scatter (81 km s$^{-1}$) fitting the
207: data in this range. On the other hand the higher
208: $\sigma$ value obtained from the Ca II triplet
209: lines (8498, 8542 and 8662 \AA), that are partly blended with telluric
210: absorptions, appears inconsistent with our value within the estimated errors.
211: Applying aperture correction to the value of Barth et al the
212: difference of $sigma$ becomes even larger (by $\sim$ 15 km s$^{-1}$).
213:
214:
215: \section{Results and discussion}
216:
217: We have adopted the relationship between $M_{BH}$ and $\sigma_c$ found for
218: nearby early-type galaxies that is based on optical spectroscopy (MF01):
219:
220: $M_{BH}$ = 1.48$\pm$0.24 $\times$ 10$^8$ ($\sigma$/200)$^{4.65\pm0.48}$ [M$_\sun$] \hfill (1)
221:
222: We assume that this relationship is also valid for AGN (see e.g. MF01) and in
223: particular for BL Lacs. This is consistent with our imaging studies of
224: BL Lacs (Falomo \& Kotilainen 1999; Urry et al. 2000; Falomo et al 2000),
225: indicating that all our objects are hosted by luminous ellipticals.
226: The derived values of $M_{BH}$ are reported in column 4 of Table 2,
227: where the errors are
228: the composition in quadrature of uncertainties in $\sigma$ and in the MF01
229: relationship. Using the Gebhardt et al. (2000) relationship instead of the
230: one by MF01, tends to yield slightly lower values of $M_{BH}$ but does not
231: substantially modify our main conclusions. The values of $M_{BH}$ in Table 2
232: span a factor
233: $\sim$20 from 5 x 10$^7$ M$_\odot$ for PKS 2201+04 to 9 x 10$^8$ M$_\odot$ for Mrk 501.
234:
235: As mentioned above, $M_{BH}$ is also correlated, but with a larger scatter,
236: with the luminosity of the bulge of the host galaxy. The host galaxy
237: absolute magnitude M$_R$ (uncorrected for extinction) and the effective radii R$_e$ of the
238: 7 BL Lacs are given in columns 5 and 6 of Table 2.
239: $M_{BH}$ was thus calculated following the
240: relationship by McLure \& Dunlop (2002):
241:
242: log $M_{BH}$ = --0.50$\pm$0.05 M$_R$ -- 2.91$\pm$1.23 [M$_{\odot}$] \hfill (2)
243:
244: The corresponding values of $M_{BH}$ are given in column 7 of Table 2.
245: For most sources the difference of $M_{BH}$ derived with the two methods is
246: within the estimated uncertainty. The average values of $M_{BH}$ for our
247: BL Lacs derived, respectively, from $\sigma$ and the host luminosity are:
248: $<$log$ M_{BH}>_{\sigma}$ = 8.62 $\pm$ 0.23 and
249: $<$log$ M_{BH}>_{host}$ = 8.66 $\pm$ 0.25.
250:
251: In two cases (I Zw 187 and PKS 2201+04) a factor of $\sim$3 difference in
252: $M_{BH}$ is found. We note that for PKS 2201+04 we derive a significantly
253: lower velocity dispersion with respect to the rest of the observed sources
254: leading to a low $M_{BH}$. On the other hand, for this target $\sigma$ is
255: well determined (good S/N data and the two spectral ranges giving similar
256: result).
257:
258: In our sample there are two LBL type and five HBL
259: type BL Lacs (column 2 of Table 2). With the caveat that the number of
260: studied objects is very small, we find no significant difference of
261: $M_{BH}$ between the two types of BL Lacs.
262:
263: The measurements of $\sigma$ combined with the effective radii of the
264: host galaxies can be used to estimate the mass of the hosts through
265: the relationship (Bender et al. 1992) :
266:
267: $M_{host}$=5$\sigma^{2}r_e$/G \hfill (3)
268:
269: This dynamical mass (column 8 of Table 2) turns out to be in the range
270: of 1 -- 4 x 10$^{11}$ M$_\odot$. The ratio between $M_{BH}$ and
271: $M_{host}$ is in the range of 0.5 -- 3.6 $\times$ 10$^{-3}$, with
272: $<M_{BH}$/$M_{host}>$ = 1.4 $\times$ 10$^{-3}$. This is in good
273: agreement with values derived for both AGN and inactive galaxies
274: ($<M_{BH}$/$M_{host}>$ = 1.2 $\times$ 10$^{-3}$ ; McLure \& Dunlop
275: 2001; MF01).
276:
277: In the unified model of radio-loud AGN, BL Lacs are believed to
278: be drawn from the
279: population of radio galaxies according to orientation effects (e.g.
280: Urry 1999). It is therefore interesting to compare orientation-independent
281: properties, such as the velocity dispersion of the host galaxy, of
282: BL Lac and radio galaxy populations.
283: We show in Fig. 2 the comparison of the host luminosity
284: M$_R$ vs. log$\sigma$ (the Faber-Jackson relationship) for the BL Lacs with
285: respect to a large sample of low redshift radio galaxies
286: (Bettoni et al. 2001). Both samples follow quite well the original
287: Faber \& Jackson (1976) correlation. The similarity of the distributions of
288: $\sigma$ for these two samples (Fig. 3) furthermore implies that the
289: distributions of $M_{BH}$ in radio galaxies and BL Lacs are
290: indistinguishable, consistent with the model that both types of AGN belong to
291: the same population but are observed from different orientation angles.
292:
293: \begin{acknowledgments}
294:
295: We thank D. Bettoni for helpful discussions and suggestions on the
296: measurements of the velocity dispersion. This work has received partial
297: support under contracts COFIN 2001/028773 and ASI-IR-35.
298: Nordic Optical Telescope is operated on the island of La Palma jointly
299: by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden, in the Spanish
300: Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica
301: de Canarias. We thank the NOT staff for kind hospitality and support.
302: The data presented here have been taken using ALFOSC, which is owned by
303: the Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia (IAA) and operated at the
304: Nordic Optical Telescope under agreement between IAA and the NBIfAFG of
305: the Astronomical Observatory of Copenhagen.
306:
307: \end{acknowledgments}
308:
309: \begin{references}
310: \reference{}Adams,F.C., Graff,D.S., Richstone,D.O., 2001, ApJ 551, L31
311: \reference{}Barth,A., Ho,L.C., Sargent,W.L.W., 2002, ApJ 566, L13
312: \reference{}Bender,R., Burstein,D., Faber,S.M., 1992, ApJ 399, 462
313: \reference{}Bertola,F., Bettoni,D., Rusconi,L., Sedmak,G., 1984, AJ 89, 356
314: \reference{}Bettoni,D., Falomo,R., Fasano,G., Govoni,F., Salvo,M., Scarpa,R., 2001, A\&A 380, 471
315: \reference{}Davies,R.L., Efstathiou,G., Fall,S.M., Illingworth,G., Schechter,P.L., 1983, ApJ 266, 41
316: \reference{}Djorgovski,S., Davis,M., 1987, ApJ 313, 59
317: \reference{}Faber,S.M., Jackson,R.E., 1976, ApJ 204, 668
318: \reference{}Falomo,R., Urry, C.M. Scarpa,R., Pesce,J. and Treves,A., 1999, ASP 159, 389
319: \reference{}Falomo,R., Kotilainen,J., 1999, A\&A 352, 85
320: \reference{}Falomo,R., Scarpa,R., Treves,A., Urry,C.M., 2000, ApJ 542, 731
321: \reference{}Ferrarese,L., Merritt,D., 2000, ApJ 539, L9
322: \reference{}Fisher,D., Illingworth,G., Franx,M., 1995, ApJ 438, 539
323: \reference{}Gebhardt,K., Bender,R., Bower,G. et al., 2000, ApJ 539, L13
324: \reference{}Giommi,P., Padovani,P., 1995, ApJ 444, 567
325: \reference{}H\"ahnelt,M.G., Kauffmann,G., 2000, MNRAS 318, L35
326: \reference{}J\"orgensen,I., Franx,M., Kjaergaard,P., 1995, MNRAS 276, 1341
327: \reference{}Kaspi,S., Smith,P.S., Netzer,H. et al., 2000, ApJ 533, 631
328: \reference{}Kormendy,J., Gebhardt,K., 2001, astro-ph/0105230
329: \reference{}Kuijken,K., Merrifield,M.R., 1993, MNRAS 264, 712
330: \reference{}Magorrian,J. Tremaine,S., Richstone,D. et al., 1998, AJ 115, 2285
331: \reference{}McLure,R., Dunlop,J., 2001, MNRAS 327, 199
332: \reference{}McLure,R., Dunlop,J., 2002, astro-ph/0201081
333: \reference{}Merritt,D., Ferrarese,L., 2001, MNRAS 320, L30 (MF01)
334: \reference{}Nelson,C.H., 2000, ApJ 544, L91
335: \reference{}Prugniel,P., Zasov,A., Busarello,G., Simien,F., 1998, A\&AS 127, 117
336: \reference{}Sargent,W.L.W., Schechter,P.L., Boksenberg,A., Shortridge,K., 1977, ApJ 212, 362
337: \reference{}Silk,J., Rees,M.J., 1998, A\&A 331, L1
338: \reference{}Treves,A., Carangelo,N., Falomo,R. et al., 2001, astro-ph/0107129
339: \reference{}Urry,C.M., Scarpa,R., O'Dowd,M. et al., 2000, ApJ 532, 816
340: \reference{}Urry,C.M., 1999, ASP 159, 3
341: \reference{}Wandel,A., 2002, ApJ, 565, 762
342: \end{references}
343:
344: % FIGURES
345:
346: % Fig 1
347: \begin{figure*}
348: \epsscale{1}
349: \plotone{f1.eps}
350: \caption{Optical spectra of the BL Lac object Mrk 501 (z = 0.034) and of the
351: nearby elliptical galaxy NGC 5831 (z = 0.0055). The spectra are normalized to
352: the continuum and plotted in the rest frame.}
353: \end{figure*}
354:
355: \clearpage
356:
357: % Fig 2
358: \begin{figure}
359: \epsscale{1}
360: \plotone{f2.eps}
361: \caption{The host galaxy stellar velocity dispersion $\sigma_c$ vs. the
362: $R$-band absolute magnitude for the BL Lacs (filled circles) and
363: for low redshift radio galaxies (Bettoni et al. 2001;
364: open circles). The solid line indicates the original Faber \& Jackson (1976)
365: relationship, transformed into the $R$-band.}
366: \end{figure}
367:
368: \clearpage
369:
370: % Fig 3
371: \begin{figure}
372: \epsscale{1}
373: \plotone{f3.eps}
374: \caption{The distribution of the stellar velocity dispersion $\sigma_c$ of
375: low redshift radio galaxies (Bettoni et al. 2001; {\it upper panel}) compared
376: with that of the BL Lacs studied in this paper ({\it lower panel}).}
377: \end{figure}
378:
379: \clearpage
380:
381: % TABLE 1 - Observations --------------------------------------
382: %
383: \begin{deluxetable}{llrlrll}
384: \tablecolumns{7}
385: \tablewidth{0pc}
386: \tablecaption{Journal of observations and results.}
387: \tablehead{
388: \colhead{Object} & \colhead{z} & \colhead{Setup}&
389: \colhead{Exposure} &\colhead{S/N} & \colhead{$\sigma$}\\
390: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(sec)} & \colhead{} &
391: \colhead{km s$^{-1}$}}
392: \startdata
393: NGC 5831 & 0.0055 & A & 600 &45 & 167$\pm$5 \\
394: & & B & 600 &55 & 185$\pm$10 \\
395: & & & & & \\
396: Mrk 421 & 0.031 & B & 3600 &40 & 220$\pm$10 \\
397: Mrk 180 & 0.045 & A & 3600 &40 & 225$\pm$10 \\
398: Mrk 501 & 0.034 & A & 2400 &40 & 265$\pm$10 \\
399: & & B & 3600 &55 & 280$\pm$15 \\
400: I Zw 187 & 0.055 & B & 3600 &30 & 253$\pm$15 \\
401: 3C 371 & 0.051 & A & 2400 &40 & 255$\pm$15 \\
402: & & B & 3600 &35 & 265$\pm$20 \\
403: 1ES 1959+65 & 0.048 & B & 2400 &18 & 180$\pm$15 \\
404: PKS 2201+04 & 0.027 & A & 3600 &30 & 148$\pm$5 \\
405: & & B & 2400 &50 & 153$\pm$8 \\
406: \enddata
407: \end{deluxetable}
408:
409: % TABLE 2 - Sigma and BH masses --------------------------------------
410: \begin{deluxetable}{llllllll}
411: \tablecolumns{8}
412: \tablewidth{0pc}
413: \tablecaption{Velocity dispersion and BH masses of BL Lacs}
414: \tablehead{
415: \colhead{Object} & \colhead{LBL/HBL} & \colhead{$\sigma_c$} &
416: \colhead{log($M_{BH}$)$_\sigma$} & \colhead{M$_R$} & \colhead{R$_e$} &
417: \colhead{log($M_{BH}$)$_{bulge}$} & \colhead{log($M_{(host)}$)} \\
418: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{km s$^{-1}$} &
419: \colhead{[M$_{\odot}$]} & \colhead{} & \colhead{kpc} &
420: \colhead{[M$_{\odot}$]} & \colhead{[M$_{\odot}$]}
421: }
422: \startdata
423: Mrk 421 & HBL & 236$\pm$10& 8.50$\pm$0.18 & -23.12 &3.4& 8.65 & 11.20 \\
424: Mrk 180 & HBL & 244$\pm$10& 8.57$\pm$0.19 & -22.81 &5.0& 8.50 & 11.45 \\
425: Mrk 501 & HBL & 291$\pm$13& 8.93$\pm$0.21 & -23.87 &15 & 9.00 & 11.59 \\
426: I Zw 187 & HBL & 253$\pm$15& 8.65$\pm$0.18 & -22.22 &4.7& 8.20 & 11.39 \\
427: 3C 371 & LBL & 284$\pm$18& 8.88$\pm$0.20 & -23.67 &2.9& 8.90 & 11.32 \\
428: 1ES 1959+65 & HBL & 195$\pm$15& 8.12$\pm$0.13 & -22.48 &6.6& 8.30 & 11.27 \\
429: PKS 2201+04 & LBL & 160$\pm$7 & 7.72$\pm$0.13 & -22.36 &5.1& 8.27 & 11.00 \\
430: \enddata
431: \end{deluxetable}
432:
433: \end{document}
434:
435:
436:
437:
438:
439: