1: \documentstyle[11pt,newpasp,twoside,epsf]{article}
2: \markboth{V. J. Mart\'{\i}nez}{Introductory Review}
3: \pagestyle{myheadings}
4: \setcounter{page}{1}
5: \nofiles
6:
7: % Some definitions I use in these instructions.
8:
9: \def\emphasize#1{{\sl#1\/}}
10: \def\arg#1{{\it#1\/}}
11: \let\prog=\arg
12:
13: \def\edcomment#1{\iffalse\marginpar{\raggedright\sl#1\/}\else\relax\fi}
14: \marginparwidth 1.25in
15: \marginparsep .125in
16: \marginparpush .25in
17: \reversemarginpar
18:
19: \begin{document}
20: \title{Introductory Review to the Historical Development of Modern Cosmology}
21: \author{Vicent J. Mart\'{\i}nez}
22: \affil{Observatori Astron{\`o}mic, Universitat de Val{\`e}ncia,
23: E46100-Burjassot, Val{\`e}ncia, Spain}
24:
25: \begin{abstract}
26: This talk introduces the contributions of the lecturers
27: to the international summer school
28: ``Historical Development of Modern Cosmology''
29: held at the Universidad Internacional Men\'endez Pelayo, Valencia, Spain,
30: during September 18-22 2000.
31: \end{abstract}
32:
33:
34:
35:
36: \section{Prelude}
37:
38: This school on the Historical Development of Modern Cosmology is
39: taking place when the University of Valencia celebrated 500 years
40: of uninterrupted academic and scientific activity. Let me start
41: the introductory talk with a prelude regarding some astronomical
42: events that happened at the very beginning of the University's
43: existence. A few years after the foundation of the University, Jeroni
44: Muny\'os, Professor of Astronomy, Mathematics and Hebrew at this
45: University, studied the famous Type I Supernova within the
46: constellation of Cassiopeia, which appeared in 1572 (Tycho's Supernova)
47: and wrote a small book commissioned by the king Felipe II. The
48: book (see Fig. 1) was entitled
49: \begin{quote}
50: {\it Libro del nuevo Cometa, y del lugar donde
51: se hazen; y como se ver{\'a} por las Parallaxes, qu{\'a}n
52: lexos est{\'a}n de tierra...\\
53: (Book on the new Comet, and the place where it can be found, and as
54: it can be seen from its
55: parallax how far away it is from Earth...)
56: }
57: \end{quote}
58: Muny\'os knew that the new star could be used as an observational
59: evidence against the Aristotelian concept of the immutability of
60: the Cosmos, and of course, this work brought him some problems
61: with the political and ecclesiastic authorities of the time.
62: Nevertheless, Tycho Brahe knew Muny\'os's work well and, in a book
63: (see Fig. 1) in which Tycho discusses the work by other astronomers on
64: the new star, he includes a chapter devoted to Muny\'os's book
65: (Navarro Brot\'ons and Rodr\'{\i}guez Galdeano 1998).
66:
67: \begin{figure}[t]
68: \begin{center}
69: \vspace{2.cm}
70: \epsfxsize=4.95cm
71: %\begin{minipage}{\epsfxsize}\epsffile{munoz1.eps}\end{minipage}
72: \epsfxsize=7.26cm
73: %\begin{minipage}{\epsfxsize}\epsffile{munoz2.eps}\end{minipage}
74: \caption{Left: The cover of the book on the `New Comet' published
75: in 1573 by Jeroni Muny\'os commissioned by the Spanish king Felipe
76: II. Valentia, Pedro de Huete, 1573. Courtesy of the Biblioteca Valenciana,
77: Biblioteca Nicolau Primitiu, Val\`encia.
78: Right: Cover of the book {\it Astronomiae Instauratae Progymnasmata}, 1648,
79: (Impensis Ioannis Godophredi Sch\"onwetteri)
80: in which Tycho Brahe discussed work
81: on the new star (Tycho's Supernova in Cassiopeia) by many
82: other European astronomers. Courtesy of the Biblioteca Hist\`orica,
83: Universitat de Val\`encia.}
84: \end{center}
85: \end{figure}
86:
87:
88: \section{
89: What was the aim of the school?
90: }
91:
92: In the book by H. Kragh (1996), we can read:
93:
94: \begin{quote}{
95: ``In spite of cosmology's amazing development in this century and
96: the strong scientific and public interest in the new science of
97: the universe, only very little is known of how this development
98: took place."}
99: \end{quote}
100:
101: Also in his book, Kragh quotes Y. Zel'dovich and I. Novikov (1983) from
102: their book {\it Structure and Evolution of the Universe}:
103: \begin{quote}{
104: ``The history of the universe is infinitely more interesting than
105: the history of the study of the universe."
106: }
107: \end{quote}
108:
109: Undoubtedly, this view is still shared by many professional
110: astronomers. Nevertheless, it is our responsibility to provide
111: future generations of scholars in this field with a truthful
112: account of how the present cosmological paradigm has been
113: constructed from the contributions of many people. This school
114: points in this direction and these proceedings will probably
115: help to increase the general knowledge of how our
116: concept of the universe has been changing during the last 80
117: years, a period in which cosmology has experienced a dramatic
118: development. Sometimes controversy between alternative theories
119: was present in this history. The Steady State model
120: and the Big Bang model, with once-strong arguments supported by prestigious
121: defenders on both sides, is
122: a good example of controversial science. These arguments are
123: nicely explained in the chapters
124: by Kragh (p. 157), Gold (p. 171), and Narlikar (p. 175).
125:
126: The new cosmological ideas soon permeated society. It is well
127: known that the term ``Big Bang" was coined ironically by one of the
128: founders of the Steady State theory, Sir Fred Hoyle, during a BBC
129: radio interview. Two talks of this school will be devoted to the
130: popularization of Cosmology: Ten (p. 309) focuses on the
131: ideas at the beginning of the twentieth century and Hawkins (p.
132: 325) discusses the modern methods of disseminating
133: discoveries about the universe.
134:
135: \section{The beginning of the story}
136:
137: How did this history begin? We could start from many different
138: significant moments and discoveries. I like to remember the comet
139: hunters during the eighteenth and the nineteenth century.
140: The catalog of extended objects, compiled by Charles Messier (1730-1817)
141: to avoid their being confused with new comets, is the first listing of
142: nebulae widely referenced by later astronomers.
143: Lord Rosse discovered
144: the spiral structure of some of these nebulae using his 1.8-meter
145: reflecting telescope at Birr Castle (Ireland). His drawing of M51
146: (see Fig. 2)
147: has a remarkable resemblance with modern images of this spiral
148: galaxy.
149:
150: \begin{figure}
151: \begin{center}
152: \begin{minipage}{0.85\textwidth}
153: \vspace{2.cm}
154: %\plotone{m51rosse.eps}
155: \end{minipage}
156: \end{center}
157: \caption{The drawing of the Whirlpool galaxy (M51) by William
158: Parsons (Lord Rosse) performed in 1845 while observing with the
159: Leviathan of Parsonstown. Courtesy of the Birr Scientific and
160: Heritage Foundation, Birr Castle, Birr, Ireland.}
161: \end{figure}
162:
163:
164: The nature of the nebulae and their possible extragalactic character was
165: one of the items discussed in the debate on the distance scale of the
166: universe, held in Washington on 26 April 1920 between Harlow Shapley
167: of Mt. Wilson (soon after director of Harvard College Observatory) and
168: Heber D. Curtis of Lick (later director of Allegheny Observatory).
169: Shapley placed the sun far from the center of a galaxy 300\,000 light
170: years in diameter and the spiral nebulae inside it. Curtis instead
171: put the sun at the center of a 30\,000 light year galaxy and the nebulae
172: outside it as concentrations of stars similar to the Milky Way. It
173: is clear that Shapley was entirely right about the location of the sun,
174: and more nearly right about the distance scales, but Curtis was right
175: about the nebulae.
176:
177:
178: The definitive clarification of the controversy came with Edwin
179: Hubble in 1925 (but see also the contributions by Ernst {\"O}pik
180: and Knut Lundmark explained by Einasto on p. 85 and by Trimble on p.
181: 375). Hubble discovered
182: Cepheid variable stars in NGC 6822 and in Andromeda (1925a,b).
183: He estimated the
184: distance to Andromeda
185: using the period--luminosity relationship introduced by
186: Henrietta Leavitt in 1908. Although still underestimated, the
187: distance obtained by Hubble, 900\,000 light years, was the end of
188: Shapley's universe. This measurement, together with the
189: morphological classification of galaxies and the discovery of the
190: universal cosmic expansion, were the major contributions of Hubble
191: to the field. Moreover, Hubble's law ---the redshift--velocity
192: relation--- is one of the most important breakthroughs in science
193: that have happened during the twentieth century (see the contribution by
194: Christianson on p. 145.)
195:
196: \begin{figure}[h]
197: \begin{center}
198: \epsfxsize=6.05cm
199: \begin{minipage}{\epsfxsize}\epsffile{hubble1.eps}\end{minipage}
200: \epsfxsize=6.534cm
201: \begin{minipage}{\epsfxsize}\epsffile{hubble2.eps}\end{minipage}
202: \caption{The velocity--distance relation. In the left
203: panel are plotted the data shown by Hubble in his 1929 paper
204: together with his linear fit (hard to believe by modern standards).
205: In the right panel are data for Type Ia SNe obtained
206: by Riess, Press, and Kirshner (1996).
207: \copyright Edward L. Wright (UCLA), used with permission. }
208: \end{center}
209: \end{figure}
210:
211: During the eighteenth century Immanuel Kant and Johann Lambert
212: conceived the idea of a hierarchical universe of stars clustered
213: into large systems (galaxies), which in turn are clustered into
214: larger systems, and so on. Hierarchical clustering as a solution
215: of Olber's paradox was proposed by John Herschel and Richard
216: Proctor in the nineteenth century. The same idea was taken up in
217: the twentieth century by Carl Charlier. The first talk after this
218: introduction deals precisely with Olber's paradox (Hoskin p. 11).
219:
220: \section{Modern cosmology is born}
221:
222: Despite the beauty of the hierarchical universe, this idea
223: was not widely accepted. In fact,
224: one of the tenets of modern cosmology was the
225: Cosmological Principle. The principle was first formulated by E. Milne in 1933
226: as the assumption that the large-scale unverse is spatially
227: homogeneous and isotropic. Many authors in this volume regard the
228: publication of the theory of General Relativity by Albert
229: Einstein in 1915 (Einstein 1915a,b)
230: as the birth of modern cosmology. As soon as
231: 1919, the first experimental test of the theory of General
232: Relativity was performed in the expeditions led by Sir Arthur Eddington
233: and Andrew Crommelin to
234: measure, during a total solar eclipse, the bending of light rays
235: from background stars by the sun (see Coles on p. 21)
236:
237: In 1917 Einstein applied his equations of General Relativity
238: to the description of the universe, assuming the Cosmological
239: Principle. This assumption was adopted mainly for simplicity, and
240: needed to be confirmed by observations. When the first maps of the
241: distribution of galaxies, both in projection and later in redshift
242: space, became available, a clumpy distribution was revealed. In the 1970s,
243: Peebles and co-workers used
244: statistical descriptors such as the two-point correlation function
245: to conclude that the small-scale clustering
246: of galaxies was compatible with a fractal distribution, and
247: therefore a transition to homogeneity had to happen
248: if the Cosmological Principle was to be preserved. Observations of
249: redshifts of galaxies out to 15\,000 km/sec and beyond, the isotropy of
250: the X-ray background, and especially of the microwave background
251: eventually confirmed the principle. But data sets from the 1960s to
252: the 1980s showed structure nearly as large as the survey volumes and
253: left the issue open in the minds of some astronomers.
254: The arrangement of matter in the universe, how galactic structures
255: have been formed and how they can be statistically described
256: are the main topics of the contributions by Peebles (p.
257: 201), Jones (245), and Icke (p. 337). In addition, numerical
258: simulations have played an important role in recent
259: years in exploring the consequences of different scenarios for the
260: formation and evolution of large scale structure in the
261: universe (see Yepes on p. 355).
262:
263: \subsection{The cosmological constant}
264:
265: Einstein introduced the cosmological constant, $\Lambda$, in his
266: field equations to guarantee a static universe. Some years later,
267: and after the discovery by Hubble of the expansion of the
268: universe, he considered this introduction as his biggest blunder (see Heller
269: on p. 121). Nevertheless, recent observations
270: (Riess et al. 1998, Perlmutter et al. 1999) of very distant Type
271: Ia Supernovae have resurrected the cosmological constant, interpreting
272: it as the imprint of an exotic kind of energy that could be a
273: possible explanation for a universe with accelerated expansion (Silk p. 109).
274: The solutions of the Einstein equations obtained by the Russian
275: mathematician Alexander Friedmann (1922) and the Belgian mathematician
276: (and priest)
277: George Lema\^{\i}tre (1927) (see Blanchard on p. 237) were the
278: basis for the standard cosmological model of a dense, hot, and
279: expanding universe. Some of the more influential contributions in
280: the 1930s were the Einstein-de Sitter flat model (1931), and the
281: papers by Robertson (1933) and Tolman (1934). The problem of the
282: singularity at the beginning of the history of the universe is
283: discussed at length by Heller (p. 121).
284:
285: \subsection{Primordiual nucleosyntesis}
286:
287: During the first few minutes after the Big Bang the formation of
288: light elements took place. One of the
289: first works on this ``primordial nucleosynthesis" is the famous
290: $\alpha\beta\gamma$ paper published in 1948 (Alpher, Bethe, and Gamow
291: 1948). During the fifties and sixties, different
292: calculations of the relative proportions of hydrogen, helium,
293: deuterium and lithium within the framework of the Big Bang model
294: showed an excellent agreement with the present-day observed abundances. This
295: was the first theoretical prediction of the new cosmological model
296: confirmed by the observations.
297:
298:
299: \subsection{Cosmic microwave background radiation}
300:
301: In 1965, the American radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert
302: Wilson detected the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation.
303: The existence of this diffuse radiation is naturally explained in
304: the Big Bang model. When the age of the universe was about
305: 300\,000 years, the universe had cooled enough to make possible
306: the formation of stable hydrogen atoms for the first time (epoch
307: of recombination).
308: At this stage, the universe becomes transparent, because the
309: electromagnetic radiation and matter decouple. Indeed Alpher and Herman (1950)
310: had predicted that such radiation should exist at a temperature of
311: about 5K.
312:
313: The reported detection by
314: Penzias and Wilson was published in The Astrophysical Journal.
315: In a paper published in the same issue of the journal,
316: Robert Dicke, James Peebles, Peter Roll, and
317: David Wilkinson explained the cosmological origin of this
318: radiation. Without any doubt, this discovery was the strongest
319: observational evidence supporting the Big Bang model. The news
320: appeared on the first page of The New York Times on 21 May
321: 1965. Since then, the cosmic microwave radiation, as an
322: observed fossil of the early universe, has been one
323: of the main targets of observational cosmology, carried out wiht
324: the COBE (COsmic Background Explorer) satellite, the BOOMERANG balloon
325: experiment, and from the ground. After
326: 1965, the Big-Bang model becomes the generally accepted
327: cosmological model, overshadowing the Steady State theory. The
328: contributions by Novikov (p. 43) and by Silk (p. 109) deal with the
329: CMB observations, their discovery, their analysis and
330: their cosmological implications,
331: for example the flatness of the universe.
332:
333: \section{The model}
334:
335: Summarizing, the hot Big Bang model accounts for three
336: observational facts:
337: \begin{itemize}
338: \item
339: The current expansion of the universe.
340: \item
341: The cosmic microwave background radiation.
342: \item
343: The relative abundance of light chemical elements.
344: \end{itemize}
345:
346: %\subsection{Extra ingredients}
347:
348: These successes are important, but the model needs several more
349: ingredients to provide a complete picture of the origin and evolution
350: of the universe:
351: \begin{enumerate}
352: \item {\bf Cosmological parameters.}
353:
354: Alan Sandage (1970) once described cosmology as the search
355: for two numbers, the Hubble constant and the deceleration parameter
356: (the latter is, for a model with zero
357: cosmological constant, half the density parameter $\Omega$.) A few
358: more numbers are considered today as fundamental parameters in
359: modern versions of cosmological models (Silk p. 109; Trimble p. 375;
360: see also Rees 2001).
361:
362: \item {\bf Inflation}. The successful description of the universe, provided
363: by the Big Bang model, leaves many questions open such as
364: {\it why is the universe so homogeneous, so isotropic, and so flat?}.
365: A 1990s answer is the idea that the very early universe
366: passed through a period of exponential expansion, called inflation
367: (Kolb p. 295; Bonometto p. 219).
368: \begin{figure}[h]
369: \begin{center}
370: \begin{minipage}{0.7\textwidth}
371: \plotone{rubin.eps}
372: \end{minipage}
373: \end{center}
374: \caption{The galactic rotation curves for seven spiral galaxies.
375: The flatness of these curves at large distances from the galactic
376: center is explained by the presence of huge dark halos surrounding
377: the galaxies. Reproduced, with permission, from Rubin, Ford, and
378: Thonnard 1978, ApJ, 225, L107.}
379: \end{figure}
380:
381: \item {\bf Dark matter.}
382: One of the first mentions of missing mass or dark
383: matter came from Zwicky (1933), who had measured the velocity dispersion
384: in the Coma cluster and applied the virial theorem. The acceptance
385: of the dark matter was a very slow process (see the
386: contribution by van den Bergh on p. 75.) In any case, it took
387: longer than the more recent general acceptance of the existence of
388: dark energy (see Kolb on p. 295 and Bonometto on p. 219.) The
389: contribution of the Tartu astronomers to the dark matter problem
390: was remarkable (Einasto p. 85.) The evidence provided by the
391: rotation curves in spiral galaxies was overwhelming (Rubin et al.
392: 1978). These curves
393: indicated that spiral galaxies contain at least 10 times more dark
394: matter than luminous matter (see Fig. 4). Different kinds of dark
395: matter enter as contributors for the total density of the universe
396: (Trimble 1987).
397: The role of neutrinos is explained in this volume by Valle (p 275.)
398:
399: \end{enumerate}
400:
401:
402: \section{Looking forward}
403:
404: Cosmology is a science driven by observations and
405: observations are driven today by technological developments
406: (Longair p. 55.) The technologies to be developed in the 21st
407: century will provide deeper insights into the universe. Many
408: problems are still open. Some of them are part of what Bonometto (p. 219)
409: calls post-modern cosmology, which addresses questions such as
410: {\it what happened before the big bang?} or {\it are we living in
411: one universe amongst many others?} Moreover,
412: the present model seems too elaborate, requiring fine-tuned values for the
413: parameters and many different contributions to the total density
414: (Kolb p. 295.) In any case the nature of dark matter and dark
415: energy is still unknown. In my opinion, although we can be proud
416: of the knowledge of the universe acquired during the last
417: years, honestly (and modestly) we have to admit that it is only
418: the tip of the iceberg.
419:
420: \acknowledgements
421: {I would like to thank Bernard Jones, V\'{\i}ctor Navarro Brot\'ons,
422: Mar\'{\i}a Jes\'us Pons-Border\'{\i}a,
423: and Virginia Trimble for valuable comments and suggestions.
424: This work was supported by the Spanish MCyT project AYA2000-2045.
425: }
426:
427: \begin{references}
428: \reference Alpher, R. A., Bethe, H., and Gamow, G. 1948, Phys.Rev. 73, 803
429: \reference Alpher, R. A., and Herman, R. C. 1950, Rev.Mod.Phys. 22, 153
430: \reference Dicke, R. H., Peebles, P.J.E., Roll, P. G., and
431: Wilkinson, D. T. 1965, \apj \, 142, 414
432: \reference Einstein, A. 1915a Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin,
433: Sitzber., 778
434: \reference Einstein, A. 1915b Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin,
435: Sitzber., 844
436: \reference Einstein, A. 1917 Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin,
437: Sitzber., 142
438: \reference Einstein, A., and de Sitter, W. 1931, Proc.Nac.Acad.Sci 18, 213
439: \reference Friedmann, A. A. 1922, Zeitschr. f{\"u}r Phys. 10, 377
440: \reference Hubble, E. P. 1925a, \apj \, 62, 409
441: \reference Hubble, E. P. 1925b, Observatory 48, 139
442: \reference Hubble, E. P. 1929, Proc.Nac.Acad.Sci 15, 168
443: \reference Kragh, H. 1996, Cosmology and Controversy. The Historical
444: Development of Two Theories of the Universe
445: (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
446: \reference Lema\^{\i}tre, G. 1927, Ann. Soc. Scient. Brux., 47A, 49
447: \reference Milne, E. A. 1933, Zeitschr. f{\"u}r Astrophys. 6, 1
448: \reference Navarro Brot\'ons, V. and Rodr\'{\i}guez Galdeano, E. 1998,
449: Matem\'aticas, cosmolog\'{\i}a y humanismo en la Espa\~na del siglo XVI.
450: Los ``Comentarios al segundo libro de la Historia Natural de Plinio" de
451: Jer\'onimo Mu\~noz (Valencia: Ins\-ti\-tuto de Estudios Documentales e Hist\'oricos
452: sobre la Ciencia).
453: \reference
454: Penzias, A. A. and Wilson, R. W. 1965, \apj \, 142, 419
455: \reference Perlmutter, S. et al. 1999, \apj \, 517, 565
456: \reference Rees, M. J. 2001, Just Six Numbers:
457: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe (New York: Basic Books)
458: \reference
459: Riess, A. G., Press, W. H., and Kirshner, R. P. 1996, \apj \, 473, 88
460: \reference Riess, A. G. et al. 1998, \aj \, 116, 1009
461: \reference
462: Robertson, H. P. 1933, Rev.Mod.Phys. 5, 62.
463: \reference
464: Rubin, V. C., Ford, W. K., and Thonnard, N. 1978, ApJ 225, L107
465: \reference
466: Sandage, A. 1970, Physics Today 23, 31
467: \reference
468: Tolman, R.C. 1934, Relativity, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology (Oxford: Oxford
469: University Press)
470: \reference Trimble, V. 1987, \araa \, 25, 425
471: \reference Zel'ldovich, Ya. B., and Novikov, I. D. 1983, Relativistic
472: Astrophysics. II: The Structure and Evolution of the Universe (Chicago:
473: Chicago University Press)
474: \reference Zwicky, F. 1933, Helv. Phys. Acta 6, 110
475: \end{references}
476: \end{document}
477: