1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 03 Jan 01
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17:
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
29: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
30: %% the \begin{document} command.
31: %%
32: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
33: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
34: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
35: %% for information.
36:
37: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
38: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
39:
40: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
41:
42: % \slugcomment{/earthshine/aastex502/ms020213.tex, draft ms 13 Feb 2002}
43:
44: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
45: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
46: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
47: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
48: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
49: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
50:
51: \shorttitle{The Spectrum of Earthshine}
52: \shortauthors{Woolf et al.}
53:
54: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
55: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
56:
57: \begin{document}
58:
59: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
60: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
61: %% you desire.
62:
63: \title{The Spectrum of Earthshine: \\
64: A Pale Blue Dot Observed from the Ground}
65:
66: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
67: %% author and affiliation information.
68: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
69: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
70: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
71: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
72:
73: \author{N. J. Woolf and P. S. Smith}
74: \affil{Steward Observatory, Tucson AZ 85721}
75: \email{nwoolf@as.arizona.edu, psmith@as.arizona.edu}
76:
77: \and
78:
79: \author{W. A. Traub and K. W. Jucks}
80: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge MA 02138}
81: \email{wtraub@cfa.harvard.edu, kjucks@cfa.harvard.edu}
82:
83: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
84: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
85: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
86: %% affiliation.
87:
88: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
89: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
90: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
91: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
92: %% editorial office after submission.
93:
94: \begin{abstract}
95: We report the visible reflection spectrum of the integrated Earth,
96: illuminated as it would be seen as an spatially-unresolved extrasolar
97: planet. The spectrum was derived from observation of lunar earthshine
98: in the range 4800 to 9200\AA\ at a spectral resolution of about 600.
99: We observe absorption features of ozone, molecular oxygen and water.
100: We see enhanced reflectivity at short wavelengths from Rayleigh
101: scattering, and apparently negligible contributions from aerosol and
102: ocean water scattering. We also see enhanced reflectivity at long
103: wavelengths starting at about 7300\AA, corresponding to the well-known
104: red reflectivity edge of vegetation due to its chlorophyll content;
105: however this signal is not conclusive, due to the breakdown of our
106: simple model at wavelengths beyond 7900\AA.
107: \end{abstract}
108:
109: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
110: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
111: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
112: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
113:
114: \keywords{astrobiology, extrasolar planets, Earth, Moon, Earthshine}
115:
116: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
117: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
118: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
119: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
120: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
121: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
122: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
123: %% each reference.
124:
125: \section{Introduction}
126:
127: %% for decades \citep{hen61,lyn68,spi85}, but
128: %% sharp center had often been remarked on \citep{can78}
129:
130: Earthshine is sunlight which has reflected from the Earth onto the dark side of
131: the moon and back again to Earth. Here ``dark side'' refers to that portion of the
132: lunar surface which, at any instant, faces the Earth but does not face the sun.
133: Both earthshine, from the dark side of the moon, and moonlight, from the bright
134: side of the moon, are transmitted through the same
135: air mass just prior to detection, and thus suffer the same extinction and imposed
136: absorption features. Their ratio is the reflection coefficient of the Earth
137: multiplied by a geometric factor, and by the ratio of phase effects of the
138: moon. (We ignore weak additive Raman-shifted spectra from both bodies, i.e.,
139: the Ring effect.) We report here the results of our effort to obtain a
140: spectrum of the Earth as it would be seen from outside the solar system.
141: Our goal is to pave the way for interpreting extrasolar terrestrial planet
142: spectra which might be obtained in the future, for example as part of the
143: Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF) program.
144:
145: \section{Observations}
146:
147: We observed the spectrum of earthshine and moonlight soon after sunset on
148: June 24/25 2001 (25/26 UT) from Kitt Peak, Arizona, using the Steward
149: Observatory 2.3m telescope with its Boller and Chivens spectrograph, a CCD
150: detector and a 300 line/mm grating. The raw spectrum is shown in Fig.~1.
151: A spectral range from 4800 to 9200\AA\
152: was recorded, at a resolution of about 600, or a spectral width of about 8-9\AA.
153: The telescope drive
154: was set to lunar rate and was guided in right ascension, keeping the limb in
155: the same position on the slit to within about a minute of arc in
156: declination between the different observations. At the time of these
157: observations, about 1/4 of the moon appeared sunlit, and 3/4 was nominally dark.
158:
159: The 1.5 arcsec wide spectrograph slit has a length of about 200 arcsec.
160: It was set perpendicular
161: to the lunar limb, with approximately half of its length on the limb and half
162: on adjacent sky. Both the sunlit and Earth-lit limb spectra were
163: corrected for scattered light in the
164: telescope by subtracting the adjacent sky spectrum; this amounted to about 2/3
165: of the total signal in the earthshine spectrum. Each earthshine spectrum was
166: bracketed by moonlight spectra.
167:
168: Both nights were partly cloudy, and the observations were made during breaks
169: in the clouds. Data from the first night have more noise than data from the
170: second night, but are in qualitative agreement. The second night produced two
171: independent sets of observations; the first was taken under more
172: clear conditions, and is the one reported here.
173:
174: The measured reflectivity of the integrated Earth is shown in Fig.~2.
175: The reflectivity is the ratio of the earthshine to moonlight spectra, both
176: sky-subtracted. We have also corrected for the color effect of lunar phase
177: \citep{lane73}, which makes the apparent reflectivity about 16\% too
178: strong in the blue; this color bias was removed by multiplying the apparent
179: reflectivity by a 8-segment piecewise-linear factor which ranged from 0.835 at
180: 5000\AA\ to 1.00 at 9000\AA.
181:
182: The reflectivity in Fig. 2 has also been corrected for CCD fringing.
183: Dome flats were not adequate to exactly match the lunar-spectrum fringing
184: in the thinned
185: CCD chip because flexure in the instrument and/or telescope changed the
186: position of the fringes slightly. Use of a quartz lamp internal to the
187: spectrograph ensured that fringes were at the same location on the
188: chip as for the lunar observations, but their amplitude was suppressed
189: because the lamp does not illuminate the slit with an f/9 beam as does
190: light that passes through the telescope. We used the internal lamp
191: to partially correct the fringes, by dividing by the lamp spectrum,
192: but a noticeable fringe pattern remained. Five
193: residual interference fringe packets in the red part of the spectrum were
194: least-squares fitted with smooth gaussian envelope sinusoids and subtracted
195: from the data. The fitting procedure removed most of the remaining
196: fringing, but there remains a
197: residual noise which is larger in this region than elsewhere in the spectrum.
198: The zero-mean subtracted component is explicitly displayed (offset in
199: intensity) beneath the data in Fig.~2.
200:
201:
202: \section{Spectrum Model and Analysis}
203:
204: Our model of the Earth's reflection spectrum is a simple box model in which
205: each box represents a potentially major contributor to the final spectrum.
206: By using a box model, we ignore the interactions between components
207: (e.g., reflections between clouds and ground, multiple scattering, etc.);
208: in other words, we focus on the net resulting spectrum, not the interplay
209: of generating mechanisms.
210: The model has 9 independent parameters, each of which scales an independent
211: physical component. The standard-atmosphere component is discussed in
212: \citet{traub02}, and the other components are discussed briefly here.
213:
214: (1) Optical depth of standard atmospheric species H$_2$O, O$_2$, and O$_3$.
215: The optical depth is calculated at very high spectral resolution, using a
216: model atmosphere with thin layers from 0 to 100 km altitude, standard mixing
217: ratio profiles of species, and Doppler and pressure broadening. The resulting
218: spectrum is smeared and sampled to match the experimental wavelength grid and
219: resolution.
220:
221: (2) Optical depth of stratospheric O$_3$. Here O$_3$ is the only absorber, and
222: atmospheric layers are limited to stratospheric altitudes, otherwise similar
223: to the full standard atmosphere component.
224:
225: (3) Rayleigh scattering. This is a source term with
226: $\lambda^{-4}$ functional form.
227:
228: (4) Aerosol scattering. This is also a source term but with
229: $\lambda^{-1.3}$ form.
230:
231: (5) Reflectivity of high clouds. This is a constant reflectivity term,
232: independent of wavelength, as from a very high cloud.
233:
234: (6) Reflectivity of ocean water. This is light which has penetrated the
235: surface and has been scattered out of the water. It has a
236: $10^{-(\lambda - \lambda_0)/\Delta\lambda}$
237: form, giving the ocean its blue color, where $\lambda_0 = 5500$\AA\
238: and $\Delta \lambda = 1300$\AA\ here.
239:
240: (7) Reflectivity of ocean pigment. This is ocean pigment due to chlorophyll
241: and its products, here represented by a gaussian centered at 5500\AA\ and with
242: full width at half maximum 650\AA, giving waters with phytoplankton a green
243: color. The longer-wavelength chlorophyll feature (item 8) is not seen in practice;
244: water absorbs quite strongly at these wavelengths (item 6).
245:
246: (8) Reflectivity of vegetated land. This is the reflectivity of vegetation
247: containing chlorophyll, on land, dominated by a sharp rise in reflectivity
248: for wavelengths longer than about 7200\AA, plus some smaller bumps at shorter
249: and longer wavelengths. It is modeled here by functional forms approximating
250: these features. (If our eyes were sensitive to wavelengths longer than 7200\AA,
251: all vegetation would appear to be infrared bright, not green!)
252:
253: (9) Reflectivity of low clouds and surface, below bulk of atmosphere.
254: The nominally featureless reflectivity of land, low clouds, and the 2\% Fresnel
255: reflectivity of the air-ocean interface are lumped into this single term,
256: independent of wavelength.
257:
258: In terms of our model, the two dominant components in the spectrum are the
259: ``high cloud'' continuum and the ``clear atmosphere'' spectrum of water, ozone,
260: and oxygen. All components are displayed in Fig.~2, where the linear sum of
261: the 7 component spectra is equal to the smooth model function superposed on
262: the data. The main features of water, ozone, and oxygen are labeled; weak
263: bands of water are not labeled. The relative strength of each spectral
264: component is proportional to the intrinsic reflectivity times the
265: effective projected area on Earth of that component.
266: For example, suppose that the clear
267: atmosphere spectrum arises entirely over water, which has a Fresnel
268: reflectivity of 0.02, and that the continuum spectrum is from clouds, with a
269: nominal reflectivity of 0.30. Then the fact that we observe these components
270: to have similar strengths indicates that the clear atmosphere area is roughly
271: 15 times greater than the cloudy area, i.e., the model Earth has a relatively
272: clear sky.
273:
274: Rayleigh scattered light from molecules is the next largest component.
275: In our box model this component is multiplied by the transmission of the clear
276: atmosphere, which is how it is displayed in Fig.~2.
277: The remaining components are relatively small, and carry less significance
278: than the dominant three.
279:
280: The vegetation ``red edge'' signal in Fig.~2 is the
281: well-known signature of chlorophyll in land vegetation, described above.
282: The earthshine
283: spectrum shows increased reflectivity in the 7200 to 7900\AA\ region, suggestive
284: of a vegetation signal in this range. However the data do not show continued
285: high reflectivity at longer wavelengths (7900 to 9200\AA), as would be expected for a
286: vegetation reflection profile, making the interpretation ambiguous.
287: Nevertheless, on the basis of the abrupt reflectivity increase at 7200\AA\ we
288: suspect that the vegetation signal is indeed present, and that either the data
289: or the model fail at longer wavelengths, masking this signal.
290:
291: The three remaining components are weakest. The ocean clear-water signal,
292: the aerosol signal, and the ocean phytoplankton signal all make relatively
293: small contributions to the spectrum. Note that there is a superficial
294: similarity between each of the blue continuum spectra (Rayleigh, ocean, and
295: aerosol), however their wavelength variations are quite different when viewed
296: over a wide range of wavelengths, and this allows the components to be
297: independently determined, with relatively small correlation.
298:
299: In summary, the earthshine spectrum shows strong evidence for cloud, ozone,
300: water, oxygen, Rayleigh scattering, and very probably vegetation signals.
301: Apparently weak components are aerosols, ocean water, and phytoplankton
302: signals.
303:
304:
305: \section{Discussion}
306:
307: In order to characterize an extrasolar terrestrial planet using visible light,
308: there are three main avenues of approach. (1) The diurnal
309: photometric variability could be measured. \citet{ford01} have shown
310: that for an Earth-like planet, variation on the order of 100\% may be
311: expected. (2) The spectral reflectivity of the atmosphere could be measured.
312: As shown here and in \citet{traub02}, absorption features due to
313: ozone, water vapor, and molecular oxygen could be seen, as well as enhanced
314: reflectivity due to Rayleigh and aerosol scattering. (3) The spectral
315: reflectivity of the surface could be measured. As we have shown in Fig.~2.
316: This potentially includes the reflectivity of clear ocean water (blue),
317: phytoplankton in the ocean (green), and land vegetation (red).
318:
319: The vegetation signal in Fig.~2 is relatively small, about 6\% above the
320: nearby continuum. But at the time of observation only about 17\% of the
321: projected area was land, as shown in the simulated cloud-free Earth
322: image\footnote{Earth simulation images are
323: available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/earthview/vplanet.html}
324: in Fig.~3.
325: Of this fraction of land, only part is cloud-free and vegetated,
326: so in principle the vegetation signal could be at least 6 times larger than
327: we observe. An infrared view of the whole
328: earth\footnote{http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/comp/ir/}
329: showed little or no cloud cover
330: over the land masses illustrated in Fig.~3, so it is reasonable to expect
331: that we might be seeing a large part of the available vegetation signal
332: in our spectrum.
333:
334: For example, this expectation is borne out in data taken by the GOME
335: satellite\footnote{For a sample spectrum, see http://earth.esa.int/symposia/data/popp}
336: in which the spectral region from about 3100 to 8000\AA\ was observed
337: in a nadir-pointing mode, and the field of view was relatively
338: small, and filled with vegetated land in northern Italy. In that reflection
339: spectrum, the vegetation signal is about 2.4 times larger than the adjacent
340: continuum, showing that this is a potentially very large differential signal
341: on a similarly vegetated extrasolar planet.
342:
343: The residual spectral mismatch in Fig.~2
344: in the range 7300-7900\AA\ suggests that yet more vegetation signal could
345: be accommodated in the model, but that this may be thwarted by a bias
346: in either the data or the model in the 7900 to 9200\AA\ region.
347: Although a more detailed reflectivity model of the composite Earth has yet to
348: be developed, we believe that the enhancement of reflectivity redward of
349: 7300\AA\ is significant, and is an indicator of vegetation.
350:
351:
352: \section{Comments}
353:
354: Our spectrum of the Earth as it would appear to an extrasolar observer
355: will be useful for learning how to analyze the spectra of extrasolar planets,
356: discovering the key spectral features of Earth analogs, and determining the
357: necessary spectral resolution and signal-to-noise ratios. This spectrum illustrates
358: both atmospheric and surface reflectivity features. It was not feasible to
359: look for variability because of the limited observing period.
360:
361: We note that the reflectivity of the Earth has not been static throughout the
362: past 4.5 Gyr. In particular, oxygen and ozone become abundant perhaps
363: only 2.3 Gyr ago, affecting the atmospheric absorption component of the reflection
364: spectrum. Then perhaps about 2.0 Gyr ago a green phytoplankton signal
365: developed in the oceans. About 0.44 Gyr ago, an extensive land plant
366: cover developed, generating the red chlorophyll edge in the reflection
367: spectrum \citep{lunine99}.
368:
369: An observer in a nearby stellar system would have been
370: able to use the oxygen and ozone absorption features to suspect the presence of life
371: on Earth anytime during the past 50\% of the age of the solar system. The extrasolar
372: observer would have been able to use the chlorophyll red-edge reflection
373: feature to confirm the presence of life on Earth anytime during the most recent 10\%
374: of the age of the solar system.
375:
376: As the Earth evolved there have also
377: been significant changes in the temperature structure, the abundances of H$_2$O,
378: CO$_2$, CH$_4$, and perhaps the character of cloud coverage. Some of these changes
379: may have been sudden and even oscillatory, as opposed to gradual. Thus the spectrum
380: of the evolving Earth has shown dramatic changes (e.g., \citet{traub02}),
381: and we may expect that similar signatures will be found on extrasolar terrestrial
382: planets.
383:
384: We suggest that further observations of Earthshine should be made.
385: One purpose is to validate our ability to characterize extrasolar
386: terrestrial planets using visible wavelengths In particular, it would
387: be valuable to make earthshine observations from space as well as ground, to
388: remove the complicating factor of observing through the Earth's atmosphere.
389: It would also be valuable to observe different types of land and ocean and
390: cloud cover on Earth, and furthermore to do so for a full diurnal cycle in
391: order to test the spectroscopy and the prediction of variable photometry.
392:
393:
394: %% In this section, we use the \subsection command to set off
395: %% a subsection. \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.
396:
397: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label
398: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the
399: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.
400: %% You can use LaTeX's \ref and \label commands to keep track of
401: %% cross-references to sections, equations, tables, and figures.
402: %% That way, if you change the order of any elements, LaTeX will
403: %% automatically renumber them.
404:
405: %% This section also includes several of the displayed math environments
406: %% mentioned in the Author Guide.
407:
408:
409: %% angle with the $x$ axis. Results of this task are shown in table~\ref{tbl-1}.
410: %% Roughly \slantfrac{4}{5} of the electronically submitted abstracts
411:
412: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
413: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
414: %% command.
415:
416: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
417: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
418: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
419: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
420: %% text to be printed in the second.
421:
422: \acknowledgments
423:
424: We thank our colleagues on the TPF biomarkers team study \citep{desmarais02}
425: initiated by Charles Beichman and led by David Des Marais.
426: We thank Felix Kogan, James Marr, Sara Seager, Jim Kasting, and an
427: anonymous referee for advice.
428: This work was supported in part by funds from Jet Propulsion Laboratory's
429: TPF studies, to NW via the Lockheed-Martin corporation,
430: and to WT and KJ via the Ball Aerospace corporation.
431:
432:
433:
434: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
435: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
436: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
437: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
438: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
439: %%
440: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
441: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
442: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
443: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
444: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
445: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
446: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
447: %% place of the \cite commands.
448:
449: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
450: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
451: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
452:
453: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
454: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
455: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
456: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
457: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
458:
459: \begin{thebibliography}{}
460:
461: \bibitem[Des Marais et al.(2002)]{desmarais02}
462: % Biosignatures and planetary properties to be investigated by the TPF mission
463: Des Marais, D., Harwit, M., Jucks, K. W., Kasting, J., Lunine, J.,
464: Lin, D., Seager, S., Schneider, J., Traub, W. A., and Woolf, N.
465: 2002, Astrobiology, submitted;
466: an earlier version is also available as JPL Publication 01-008
467:
468: \bibitem[Ford et al.(2001)]{ford01}
469: % Characterization of extrasolar terrestrial planets from diurnal photometric variability
470: Ford, E. B., Seager, S., and Turner, E. L.
471: 2001, Nature, 412, 885
472:
473: \bibitem[Lane and Irvine(1973)]{lane73}
474: Lane, A. P. and Irvine, W. M.
475: 1973, \aj, 78, 267
476:
477: \bibitem[Lunine(1999)]{lunine99}
478: % Earth: Evolution of a habitable world
479: Lunine, J. I. 1999,
480: Earth: Evolution of a habitable world,
481: Cambridge University Press
482:
483: %\bibitem[Popp(1998)]{popp98}
484: %Popp, T.
485: %1998, web site
486:
487: \bibitem[Traub and Jucks(2002)]{traub02}
488: % A possible aeronomy of planetary systems beyond the solar system,
489: Traub, W. A. and Jucks, K. W.
490: 2002, Atmospheres in the Solar System: Comparative Aeronomy,
491: Edited by M. Mendillo, A. Nagy, and H. J. Waite,
492: AGU Geophysical Monograph 130, 000
493:
494: \end{thebibliography}
495:
496:
497: \clearpage
498:
499: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
500: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
501:
502:
503: \begin{figure}
504: \figurenum{1}
505: \plotone{f1.eps}
506: \caption{Spectrum of earthshine, after sky subtraction.
507: Ordinate is CCD data units.
508: A mix of solar features such as Na D line and H$\alpha$
509: is seen along with terrestrial oxygen A and B bands, and many water vapor
510: features. CCD fringes disturb the spectrum from about 7200-9200\AA.
511: % \label{fig1}
512: }
513: \end{figure}
514:
515: \clearpage
516:
517: \begin{figure}
518: \figurenum{2}
519: \plotone{f2.eps}
520: \caption{The observed reflectivity spectrum of the integrated Earth,
521: as determined from earthshine, is shown at the top, with a model spectrum
522: superposed. The reflectivity scale is arbitrary. Five interference
523: fringe packets (inset, offset but otherwise to scale) simulating CCD
524: fringing were subtracted from the data. Seven component spectra (below)
525: were fitted and summed to produce the model spectrum.
526: {\bf High} is reflectivity from a high cloud.
527: {\bf Clear} is the clear-atmosphere transmission.
528: {\bf Ray} is Rayleigh scattered light.
529: {\bf Veg} is the vegetation reflection spectrum from land chlorophyll plants.
530: {\bf Ocn} is the blue spectrum from subsurface ocean water.
531: {\bf Aer} is aerosol scattered light, here negligible.
532: {\bf Pig} is the green pigmented phytoplankton reflection of ocean waters,
533: also negligible here.
534: % \label{fig2}
535: }
536: \end{figure}
537:
538: \clearpage
539:
540: \begin{figure}
541: \figurenum{3}
542: \plotone{f3.eps}
543: \caption{A simulated image of the cloud-free, illuminated Earth as seen from the moon
544: at the time of the observations reported here, centered on the Pacific Ocean.
545: For reference the illuminated appearance of the moon from the Earth would be
546: approximately the inverse, i.e., the illuminated and dark fractional areas
547: would be exchanged.
548: % \label{fig3}
549: }
550: \end{figure}
551:
552: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
553: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
554: %% User Guide for details.
555: %%
556: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
557: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
558: %% after every seventh one.
559:
560: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
561: %% \tableline, not \hline.
562: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
563: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
564:
565: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
566: %% that appears after it.
567:
568: \end{document}
569:
570: %%
571: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
572: