1: \documentstyle[emulateapj]{article}
2:
3: \slugcomment{To appear in the PASP (2002 July issue)}
4:
5: \begin{document}
6:
7: \title{Possible Recovery of SN 1961V In {\sl Hubble Space Telescope\/} Archival
8: Images\footnote{Based on observations made with the NASA/ESA {\sl
9: Hubble Space Telescope}, obtained from the data archive of the Space Telescope
10: Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for
11: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555.}}
12:
13: \author{Schuyler D.~Van Dyk}
14: \affil{IPAC/Caltech, Mailcode 100-22, Pasadena CA 91125}
15: \authoremail{vandyk@ipac.caltech.edu}
16:
17: \author{Alexei V.~Filippenko and Weidong Li}
18: \affil{Department of Astronomy, 601 Campbell Hall, University of
19: California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411}
20: \authoremail{alex@astro.berkeley.edu, weidong@astro.berkeley.edu}
21:
22: \begin{abstract}
23: SN 1961V in NGC 1058 was originally classified by Fritz Zwicky as a ``Type V''
24: supernova. However, it has been argued that SN 1961V was not a genuine
25: supernova, but instead the superoutburst of an $\eta$ Carinae-like luminous
26: blue variable star. In particular, Filippenko et al. (1995, AJ, 110, 2261) used
27: pre-refurbishment {\sl HST\/} WFPC images and the known radio position of SN
28: 1961V to conclude that the star survived the eruption and is likely coincident
29: with a $V \approx 25.6$ mag, $V-I \approx 1.9$ mag object. Recently, Stockdale
30: et al. (2001, AJ, 122, 283) recovered the fading SN 1961V at radio wavelengths
31: and argue that its behavior is similar that of some Type II supernovae.
32: We have analyzed post-refurbishment archival {\sl HST\/} WFPC2 data and find
33: that the new radio position is still consistent with the Filippenko et
34: al. object, which has not changed in brightness or color, but is also
35: consistent with an adjacent, fainter ($I \approx 24.3$ mag) and very red ($V-I
36: > 1.0$ mag) object. We suggest that this fainter object could be the survivor
37: of SN 1961V. Forthcoming {\sl HST\/} observations may settle this issue.
38: \end{abstract}
39:
40: \keywords{supernovae: general --- supernovae: individual (SN 1961V) ---
41: stars: evolution --- stars: variables: other ---
42: galaxies: individual (NGC 1058) --- galaxies: stellar content}
43:
44: \section{Introduction}
45:
46: Supernova 1961V in NGC 1058 is an unusual object among the nearly 2100
47: historical supernovae (SNe), and its nature is unclear. Discovered in 1961
48: July by P. Wild, SN 1961V had perhaps the most bizarre light curve ever
49: recorded for a SN, with pre-maximum and post-maximum plateaus of $\sim 0.5$ yr,
50: a sustained three-year plateau at $m_{\rm pg} \approx 18.5$ mag, and a subsequent
51: decline to $m_{\rm pg} \approx 21$--22 mag (see Humphreys \& Davidson 1994;
52: Humphreys, Davidson, \& Smith 1999). Spectroscopically, it is one of very few
53: members of the archaic Zwicky (1964, 1965) ``Type V'' SN classification. Its
54: spectrum, dominated by narrow emission lines of H, He~I, and Fe~II, suggested a
55: maximum expansion velocity of only $\sim 2000$ km s$^{-1}$. Along with only SN
56: 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC; e.g., Gilmozzi et al. 1987;
57: Sonneborn, Altner, \& Kirshner 1987), SN 1993J in M81 (Aldering, Humphreys, \&
58: Richmond 1994; Cohen, Darling, \& Porter 1995), and SN 1997bs in M66 (Van Dyk
59: et al. 2000), SN 1961V has a possible progenitor star identified on pre-SN
60: images.
61:
62: The progenitor of SN 1961V may have been one of the most extraordinary stars
63: known. Identified as a $m_{\rm pg} \approx 18$ mag star in many photographs of NGC
64: 1058 prior to the explosion (Bertola 1964; Zwicky 1964; Klemola 1986), it was
65: extremely luminous, at $M_{\rm pg}^0 \approx -12$ mag for a distance of 9.3 Mpc
66: (determined using {\sl Hubble Space Telescope\/} [{\sl HST}] observations of
67: Cepheids;
68: Silbermann et al. 1996), leading to an initial (almost certainly erroneous)
69: theoretical mass estimate of $\sim 2000$ $M_{\sun}$ (Utrobin 1984).
70: Nonetheless, with somewhat more likely mass estimates of $\gtrsim$100--200
71: $M_{\sun}$ (Goodrich et al. 1989), it was among the most luminous and massive
72: known individual stars in any galaxy.
73:
74: Based on an optical spectroscopic detection of SN 1961V in 1986 and reanalysis
75: of older data, Goodrich et al. (1989) postulate that SN 1961V was not a genuine
76: supernova (defined as the explosion of a star at the end of its life), but
77: rather was the giant eruption of a luminous blue variable (LBV) star, much like
78: an exaggerated version of $\eta$ Carinae (see Davidson \& Humphreys 1997 for a
79: review of $\eta$ Car). Goodrich et al. suggest that SN 1961V actually survived
80: the eruption, and that the progenitor faded because of the formation of
81: optically thick dust in the ejecta. They further predict that at the site of
82: SN 1961V should be a quiescent S Dor-type, hot Of/WN star enshrouded by dust
83: and possibly a dense wind; if its circumstellar extinction $A_V \approx 5$ mag
84: and its bolometric correction BC $\approx -4$ mag, the star should now have $V
85: \approx 27$ mag. Alternatively, if $A_V \approx 4$ mag, as in the case of
86: $\eta$ Car, and BC $\approx -3$ mag, then $V \approx 25$--26 mag. Finally, $V$
87: could be as bright as 22--23 mag if the star has $A_V = 4$--5 mag and an
88: active, optically thick wind with BC $\approx 0$ mag.
89:
90: Motivated by this prediction, Filippenko et al.~(1995; hereafter F95) attempted
91: to recover the surviving star via multi-band imaging using
92: {\sl HST}, utilizing the radio position obtained by Cowan,
93: Henry, \& Branch (1988). Their pre-refurbishment WFPC $VRI$ (flight system
94: filters F555W, F702W, and F785LP) images, accompanied by precise astrometry
95: obtained from deep ground-based optical data, led them to associate SN 1961V
96: with one star in a cluster of three stars, all within $\sim 2\arcsec$ ($\sim
97: 90$ pc) of each other, as the possible eruption survivor. Their most likely
98: candidate (``Object 6''), shown in Figure 1 of the present paper\footnote{This
99: is Figure 2 in F95; it is given again here because it came out so poorly in
100: F95, both in the original version and in the Erratum.}, has $V \approx 25.6$,
101: $V-R \approx 1.0$, and $R-I \approx 0.9$ mag, roughly the colors of a
102: mid-K-type supergiant; if dereddened by reasonable amounts of interstellar and
103: circumstellar reddening, the colors are consistent with those of O-type stars.
104: F95 point out that unaberrated images, particularly in bluer bands, are
105: required to better isolate the possible survivor.
106:
107: Based on its fading radio emission recently detected in new observations using
108: the Very Large Array (VLA), Stockdale et al. (2001) argue that the current
109: radio properties of SN 1961V are consistent with those of some ``peculiar''
110: Type II radio SNe. In particular, they compare SN 1961V with SN 1986J in NGC
111: 891 (Weiler, Panagia, \& Sramek 1990), which was originally classified as Type
112: V (Rupen et al. 1987), but is generally considered to be a prototypical Type IIn
113: SN (see Schlegel 1990 and Filippenko 1997 for discussion of this SN subtype).
114: Stockdale et al. contend that it is less likely, based on its radio properties,
115: that SN 1961V was similar to $\eta$ Car or other LBVs. (However, there is a
116: lack of radio observations of bright LBVs with ages similar to that of SN
117: 1961V, preventing a secure determination of the true nature of SN 1961V.) In
118: other words, they argue there should be no survivor, only a very old SN or
119: young SN remnant emerging forty years after explosion.
120:
121: In this paper we further investigate whether SN 1961V survived a LBV
122: superoutburst by exploiting archival {\sl HST\/} WFPC2 images that contain the
123: SN site. We recover ``Object 6'' of F95, and we show that an {\it
124: additional\/} faint and very red object is consistent with the radio position
125: of SN 1961V and may represent the possible surviving star. We consider it less
126: likely to be a fading, very old SN, but additional observations are necessary
127: to further clarify this issue.
128:
129: \section{Analysis of Archival {\sl HST\/} WFPC2 Images}
130:
131: Two {\sl HST\/} programs, GO-5446 and GO-9042, have imaged NGC 1058, the host
132: galaxy of SN 1961V; the datasets are publicly available in the {\sl HST\/}
133: archive. The former program obtained on 1994 September 8 a pair of 80-s
134: exposures with the F606W filter, while the latter program obtained on 2001
135: July 3 two pairs of 230-s exposures, one pair with the F450W filter and the
136: other with the F814W filter. These bandpasses roughly correspond to $V$, $B$,
137: and $I$. Using the radio position of SN 1961V from Stockdale et al.~(2001; it
138: is coincident with the position measured by Cowan et al.~1988, to within the
139: errors), and correcting for geometric distortions on the WF3 chip, we isolate
140: the site of the SN for both sets of observations.
141:
142: Figures 2 and 3 show the SN site on the F814W and F450W images, respectively.
143: An error circle is plotted at the radio position, based on the astrometric
144: information in the headers of the F450W and F814W images, with a
145: (conservative) radius of $\sim 1{\farcs}5$ (the observations by GO-9042
146: employed the fine-lock mode, which results in about this level of astrometric
147: uncertainty; see the discussions of {\sl HST\/} astrometry in F95 and Van Dyk
148: et al. 1999b). Figure 4 shows the site in the F606W image; this exposure was
149: obtained in ``gyro'' mode and likely has less reliable astrometry than the
150: F814W and F450W images, so we impose the error circle of Figures 2 and 3 onto
151: Figure 4. The source numbering is from Figure 1, as in F95. Object 8 is
152: situated off the F450W and F814W images, but is detected on the F606W image.
153:
154: To measure the brightnesses of the various sources through each of the three
155: bands, we employed version 1.1 of the package HSTphot (Dolphin 2000a,b). We
156: followed the ``recipe'' in the HSTphot
157: online\footnote{http://www.noao.edu/staff/dolphin/hstphot/} manual, initially adopting a
158: $4\sigma$ detection threshold and using the following tasks in sequential
159: order: {\it mask}, {\it crmask}, {\it coadd}, {\it getsky}, {\it hotpixels},
160: and {\it hstphot}. As Dolphin (2000b) has shown, HSTphot produces results that
161: are quite consistent with those obtained from both the DAOPHOT and DoPHOT
162: packages, while accounting for WFPC2 point-spread function variations and
163: charge-transfer effects across the chips, zeropoints, aperture corrections,
164: etc., automatically within one package. (We have also conducted limited tests
165: of HSTphot {\it vs.\/} DAOPHOT and find very good agreement in the results.)
166: Table 1 gives the results of our photometry in the flight system bandpasses.
167: Not all sources were detected in all three bands, given the relatively low
168: signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of these images. Detection limits ($3\sigma$) are
169: $m_{\rm F450W} \approx 25.3$, $m_{\rm F606W} \approx 25.4$, and
170: $m_{\rm F814W} \approx 25.3$ mag.
171:
172: In order to further analyze the archival images, we have transformed our flight
173: system magnitudes into Johnson-Cousins $BVI$ magnitudes, in an analogous manner
174: to that of F95, i.e., via synthetic photometry of normal stars of a wide span
175: of spectral types and luminosity classes, obtained by applying the STSDAS
176: package SYNPHOT to the Bruzual Spectral Synthetic Atlas. In Table 1 we list
177: the $BVI$ magnitudes, wherever possible, for the objects in the SN 1961V
178: environment. In two cases, we used the detection limit at F606W to set a lower
179: limit on the $I$ magnitude; for Object 8, we could only approximate the
180: transformation.
181:
182: Despite the passband differences between the two studies (F606W and F814W here
183: {\it vs.\/} F555W and F785LP in F95), the $V$ and $I$ magnitudes of Objects
184: 1--10 agree fairly well overall. Our $V$-band magnitudes are brighter by
185: $-0.08$ mag, but with a rather large dispersion, 0.34 mag. Our $I$-band
186: magnitudes are fainter by 0.04 mag, with a dispersion of 0.20 mag. The average
187: errors in our $V$ and $I$ magnitudes are 0.18 and 0.17 mag, respectively; for
188: the measurements in F95, they are 0.14 and 0.20 mag, respectively. Thus, the
189: $I$-band magnitudes agree to within the errors, but the dispersion in our $V$
190: magnitudes is about a factor of two larger than the uncertainties in either
191: study. We cannot account for this discrepancy entirely through differences in
192: bandpass or S/N; it may arise from underestimates of the uncertainty in the
193: aberrated WFPC photometry. For example, the largest disagreements are for
194: Object 5 (which is clearly extended), Object 7 (which is in a crowded
195: environment with a high background), and Object 10 (which also may well be
196: extended).
197:
198: In Figures 5 and 6 we show the color-magnitude diagrams for the objects in the
199: SN 1961V environment. As pointed out by F95, SN 1961V appears to have occurred
200: in a region containing several massive supergiant stars. Objects 4, 7, and 9
201: are consistent with being early-type supergiants. Objects 1 and 10 are also of
202: early type and are possible supergiants, but we cannot be certain because
203: substantial disagreement exists between their respective $B-V$ and $V-I$
204: colors. Object 5 is consistent with either an intermediate-type supergiant or
205: an early-type supergiant reddened by $A_V \approx 0.8$ mag. We have no color
206: information for Object 8, but F95 identified it as an intermediate-type
207: supergiant. Both Objects 2 and 6 have quite similar colors and brightnesses,
208: consistent with late-type supergiants. An additional faint, red object is
209: detected only in the F814W image, just to the southeast of Object 6, and was
210: not identified by F95. We list this in Table 1 as ``Object 11'' and represent
211: it with limits in Figure 6 (its $I$-band brightness and $V-I$ color limits are
212: based on the 3$\sigma$ detection limit of the F606W image).
213:
214: Figure 3 also hints at an underlying population of fainter blue stars,
215: extending from Object 5 northeast to Object 8, and to the west around Object
216: 10. Such a background of blue stars may have also been detected by Utrobin
217: (1987) and Goodrich et al. (1989). Figure 4 hints at extended nebular
218: emission, primarily H$\alpha$ falling within the F606W bandpass, that appears
219: to trace these blue stars. The S/N in both the F450W and F606W images is
220: simply not sufficient to better detect this population and nebulosity.
221:
222: \section{Discussion}
223:
224: As can be seen in Figure 2, Objects 2, 5, 6, and 11 are within the positional
225: error circle for SN 1961V and, therefore, can be considered viable candidates
226: for its survivor or remnant. Object 5 is quite diffuse and fairly blue; barely
227: visible in Figure 2, it is not detected as a source in the F814W image. F95
228: identify it as a possible O6 I--III star, although it appears here as a
229: possible supergiant intermediate in type, or perhaps of early type and
230: somewhat reddened. Even if SN 1961V were a fading Type II SN, its color should
231: be fairly red, even without local interstellar or circumstellar reddening,
232: since its optical spectral energy distribution should be dominated by H$\alpha$
233: emission (e.g., Long, Blair, \& Krzeminski 1989; Fesen 1993; Chevalier \&
234: Fransson 1994). We therefore do not further consider Object 5 as a possible
235: candidate.
236:
237: Both Objects 2 and 6 are quite red, so they are more consistent with our
238: expectations for either an old SN or reddened LBV star. They are roughly
239: equidistant from the radio position (Cowan et al. 1988; Stockdale et al. 2001)
240: on the WFPC2 images. However, central to the argument by F95 that SN 1961V
241: survived the superoutburst as Object 6 is its near-coincidence with the radio
242: position projected onto the WFPC images. This projection is based on the
243: application of an independent, accurate astrometric grid, established from deep
244: ground-based imaging, to the WFPC chip on which the SN environment lies, with
245: the knowledge that the relative astrometry within a given chip is excellent.
246: This projection falls within our error circle and may, in fact, better
247: represent the actual SN position on the {\sl HST\/} images. Object 2 is more
248: distant from this position; hence, we no longer consider it to be a candidate.
249: Furthermore, to within the errors, both Objects 2 and 6 have not changed in
250: brightness or color between the WFPC and WFPC2 exposures. It is possible that
251: they are both LBVs, reddened by similar amounts and remaining at relatively the
252: same brightness; it is more likely, however, that both Objects 2 and 6 are
253: similar late-type supergiants. We therefore also now consider it less likely
254: that Object 6 is the SN 1961V survivor.
255:
256: Another candidate for the survivor or very young remnant of SN 1961V may be
257: Object 11. It is faint ($I \gtrsim 24.3$ mag), but also quite red ($B-I
258: \gtrsim 1.0$ mag and $V-I \gtrsim 1.1$ mag). Unlike the possibly early
259: stellar-type Object 10, which is actually fainter in $I$, Object 11 is not
260: detected in the F606W and F450W images. From the independent astrometric grid,
261: the radio position actually lies just to the southeast, within a few pixels of
262: Object 6 (Fig. 1), and is certainly within the WFPC2 error circle. However, it
263: is virtually coincident with Object 11. A hint of this source can be seen in
264: the deconvolved F785LP image (Fig. 1). It is seen in each of the raw F814W
265: images before cosmic-ray rejection and coaddition and is detected by HSTphot in
266: the coadded image at the 5$\sigma$ level.
267:
268: Could the brightness and color of Object 11 be consistent with a decades-old
269: SN? If SN 1961V is currently an old radio SN, as Stockdale et al.~(2001)
270: suggest, its optical luminosity, particularly at H$\alpha$, might still be
271: relatively high, since late-time SN radio and optical emission appear to be
272: correlated (e.g., Chevalier \& Fransson 1994). SN 1961V has not dropped off
273: precipitously in radio brightness at very late times, in contrast with SN 1957D
274: (Cowan, Roberts, \& Branch 1994; Long, Winkler, \& Blair 1992) or SN 1980K
275: (Montes et al. 1998), so we also might not expect the optical emission to have
276: dropped off completely. Therefore, an old SN 1961V could be bright enough to
277: detect with {\sl HST\/}, and may be fairly red.
278:
279: We can explore this further by comparing SN 1961V with two old Type II radio
280: SNe which are seen in {\sl HST\/} images. SN 1986J is in publicly available
281: {\sl HST\/} archival images, obtained by GO-9042 on 2001 July 3 with the F450W
282: and F814W filters (see Van Dyk et al.~1999b, their Figure 4, for a finder
283: chart). Again, applying HSTphot to these images containing SN 1986J, we obtain
284: $m_{\rm F450W}=23.13{\pm}0.06$ ($B \approx 23.4$ mag) and
285: $m_{\rm F814W}=20.39{\pm}0.01$ ($I \approx 20.4$ mag), corresponding to a color
286: $B-I \approx 3.0$ mag. We can also compare with the Type II-L SN 1979C in
287: M100, which Van Dyk et al. (1999a) detect in {\sl HST\/} images from 1996. We
288: transform the brightness of SN 1979C in the F439W, F555W, and F814W bands to $B
289: \approx 23.2$ mag, $V \approx 22.1$ mag, and $I \approx 21.0$ mag; hence, $B-I
290: \approx 2.2$ and $V-I \approx 1.1$ mag. Both SNe are quite red, but the
291: brightness of SN 1986J is evolving much more slowly than that of SN 1979C
292: (compare $I \approx 20.4$ mag for SN 1986J with Gunn $i \approx 20.2$ mag in
293: 1986; Rupen et al. 1987).
294:
295: The host galaxies for SNe 1961V and 1986J are in the same group, at a distance
296: of 9.3 Mpc (Silbermann et al. 1996). If we assume $A_V = 1.5$ mag for SN 1986J
297: (Leibundgut et al. 1991), we find that $M_I^0 \approx -10.3$ mag. For SN
298: 1979C, at 16.1 Mpc and $A_V \approx 0.5$ mag (Van Dyk et al. 1999a), $M_I^0
299: \approx -10.5$ mag. (If either SN is experiencing higher intrinsic
300: circumstellar extinction, then these absolute magnitudes will be even
301: brighter.) In contrast, for Object 11, assuming circumstellar $A_V \approx
302: 4$--5 mag, we derive $M_I^0 \approx -7.9$ to $-8.5$ mag; assuming less
303: extinction, of course, means that Object 11 would be intrinsically fainter.
304:
305: Making a direct comparison of SN 1961V in the optical with these old radio SNe,
306: of course, is difficult, since both SN 1986J and SN 1979C are about 20 years
307: younger than SN 1961V \footnote{Although not discovered until 1986, the
308: explosion date of SN 1986J was possibly sometime between 1978 and 1983 (Rupen
309: et al.~1987).}; they could still significantly fade over the next two
310: decades. Also, SNe~II-L and IIn behave differently in both the optical and the
311: radio. Unfortunately, no optical data on old radio SNe as old as SN 1961V are
312: available, other than the ground-based emission-line data for SN 1957D from
313: 1987 through 1988 (Long et al. 1989). Nonetheless, although SNe 1986J and
314: 1979C are indeed quite red, they both appear to be intrinsically brighter than
315: Object 11, making it less likely that Object 11 is an old SN.
316:
317: Another distinct possibility is that no positional coincidence actually exists
318: --- SN 1961V is not Object 11 or any of the other objects detected in the WFPC2
319: images. This implies that SN 1961V may have faded below detectability in all of
320: these bands (specifically, it must have $I \gtrsim 25.3$ mag). If SN 1961V is
321: an old SN, then it would have intrinsically faded or circumstellar extinction
322: would have significantly increased since the 1986 spectroscopic observations by
323: Goodrich et al. (1989). (In fact, if this is true, then the SN must also have
324: faded significantly between 1986 and the 1991 WFPC observations by F95.) Even
325: if SN 1961V is an $\eta$ Car-like LBV that has survived a superoutburst, it
326: also may no longer be detectable: A similar, younger case of a possible $\eta$
327: Car-like LBV, SN 1997bs in M66 (Van Dyk et al. 2000), has faded considerably
328: and become bluer in recent {\sl HST\/} Snapshot images (Li et al. 2002), rather
329: than redder and brighter, as predicted for increasing amounts of dust.
330:
331:
332: \section{Conclusions}
333:
334: Ultimately, we conclude that SN 1961V is most likely Object 11, and that it has
335: survived its eruption. The brightness and color limits for Object 11, shown in
336: Figure 6, are consistent with an early-type supergiant star with $A_V \gtrsim
337: 1$ mag --- specifically, the $V$ magnitude ($\sim 27$--25 mag) predicted by
338: Goodrich et al. (1989) for circumstellar $A_V \approx 4$--5 mag and BC $\approx
339: -3$ to $-4$ mag of a quiescent LBV surrounded by optically thick dust and a
340: stellar wind. Its current absolute brightness is more consistent with a
341: low-luminosity LBV, such as R71 in the LMC (Humphreys \& Davidson 1994),
342: possibly in quiescence, than with a decades-old ``peculiar'' Type II SN.
343:
344: Clearly, full resolution of the nature of SN 1961V still eludes us. As
345: Stockdale et al. (2001) point out, further multi-wavelength observations are
346: needed. Ideally, one might obtain spectra of the candidates: Gruendl et
347: al. (2002) attempted to detect the SN with the echelle spectrograph on the Kitt
348: Peak 4-m telescope, but failed to do so. They conclude that they simply may
349: have misplaced the spectrograph slit. However, if SN 1961V is indeed Object
350: 11, an alternative explanation is that its relative faintness and redness may
351: have made detection very difficult.
352:
353: An upcoming {\sl HST\/} Cycle 11 program, GO-9371 (PI: Y.-H. Chu), will obtain
354: spectra of the SN 1961V environment within $1''$ of the SN position using STIS,
355: to find signatures of LBV ejecta nebulae, old SNe, and SN remnants. They will
356: also obtain WFPC2 $VRI$ images. If the slit is centered on Object 11, and the
357: exposures are of sufficient depth, these spectra might provide the definitive
358: answer. If the broad-band imaging is also sufficiently deep and at the highest
359: possible resolution, the brightnesses and colors of the candidate and other
360: stars in the environment could be more accurately measured. SN 1961V is also a
361: GTO target using the newly installed ACS at the F475W, F625W, and F775W bands,
362: complementing the GO program.
363:
364: In addition, deep, high-resolution, near-infrared imaging may be necessary,
365: since we might expect old, cooling SNe and dust-enshrouded hot LBVs to have
366: different infrared colors. For example, $\eta$ Car has $J-H \approx 0.9$ mag
367: and $H-K \approx 1.5$ mag (Whitelock et al. 1983), while at late times
368: ($\gtrsim$100 d) the Type IIn SN 1998S (also a radio SN) has $J-H \approx 0.4$
369: mag and $H-K \approx 0.8$ mag due to dust in the circumstellar medium (Fassia
370: et al. 2000). Unfortunately, published data are not available for any SN~IIn
371: (and, with the exception of SN 1987A, for any other SN of any type) in the
372: infrared at very late times (i.e., several years to decades after explosion),
373: but we might expect that these SNe get redder through additional dust
374: formation. Although this is not a rigorous test, the infrared detection of SN
375: 1961V would also help determine its nature. The red color of Object 11 implies
376: that it should be a relatively bright infrared source for detection with a
377: large-aperture telescope under excellent seeing conditions, or with
378: {\sl HST}/NICMOS and {\sl SIRTF}.
379:
380: Finally, as an important aside, if SN 1961V, SN 1986J, the old ``Type V'' SN
381: classification, and Type IIn SNe bear any connection, {\it and\/} if the
382: progenitor of SN 1961V did survive, then the ``explosion'' mechanism is not
383: core collapse in all SNe IIn. That is, the SN~IIn subclass, which is already
384: known to span a very broad range of properties (e.g., Filippenko 1997), may
385: include a number of SN ``impostors.'' The occurrence of SN 1961V and its
386: possible cousins [SN 1954J (Smith, Humphreys, \& Gehrz 2001), SN 1997bs (Van
387: Dyk et al. 2000), SN 1999bw (Filippenko, Li, \& Modjaz 1999), and SN 2000ch
388: (Filippenko 2000)], and their apparent resemblance to $\eta$ Car and LBV
389: superoutbursts, add an intriguing twist to the evolution of very massive stars.
390:
391: \acknowledgements
392:
393: We thank A.~J.~Barth for producing Figure 1, which was originally published by
394: Filippenko et al.~(1995). The work of A.V.F.'s group at UC Berkeley is
395: supported by NSF grant AST-9987438, as well as by NASA grant AR-08754 from the
396: Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under NASA
397: contract NAS5-26555. A.V.F.~is grateful for a Guggenheim Foundation
398: Fellowship.
399:
400: \clearpage
401:
402: \begin{thebibliography}{}
403: \bibitem[Aldering et al.~1994]{ald94} Aldering, G., Humphreys, R.~M., \&
404: Richmond, M. W. 1994, \aj, 107, 662
405: \bibitem[Bertola 1964]{ber64} Bertola, F. 1964, Ann. d'Ap., 27, 319
406: \bibitem[Bessell 1990]{bes90} Bessell, M.~S. 1990, \pasp, 102, 1181
407: \bibitem[Binney \& Merrifield 1998]{bin98} Binney, J., \& Merrifield, M. 1998, Galactic
408: Astronomy (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 107--108
409: \bibitem[Cardelli, Clayton, \& Mathis 1989]{car89} Cardelli, J.~A., Clayton, G.~C.,
410: \& Mathis, J.~S. 1989, \apj, 345, 245
411: \bibitem[Chevalier \& Fransson 1994]{che94} Chevalier, R.~A., \& Fransson, C. 1994, \apj,
412: 420, 268
413: \bibitem[Cohen et al.~1995]{coh95} Cohen, J.~G., Darling, J., \& Porter, A. C. 1995, \aj, 110,
414: 308
415: \bibitem[Cowan et al.~1988]{cow88} Cowan, J.~J., Henry, R.~B.~C., \& Branch, D. 1988,
416: \apj, 329, 116
417: \bibitem[Cowan et al.~1994]{cow94} Cowan, J.~J., Roberts, D.~A., \& Branch, D. 1994,
418: \apj, 434, 128
419: \bibitem[Davidson \& Humphreys 1997]{dav97} Davidson, K., \& Humphreys, R.~M. 1997,
420: \araa, 35, 1
421: \bibitem[Dolphin 2000a]{dol00a} Dolphin, A.~E. 2000a, \pasp, 112, 1383
422: \bibitem[Dolphin 2000b]{dol00b} Dolphin, A.~E. 2000b, \pasp, 112, 1397
423: \bibitem[Fassia et al.~2000]{fas00} Fassia, A., et al.~2000, \mnras, 318, 1093
424: \bibitem[Fesen 1993]{fes93} Fesen, R.~A. 1993, \apjl, 413, L109
425: \bibitem[Filippenko 1997]{fil97} Filippenko, A.~V. 1997, \araa, 35, 309
426: \bibitem[Filippenko 2000]{fil00} Filippenko, A.~V. 2000, \iaucirc~7421
427: \bibitem[Filippenko et al.~1995]{fil95} Filippenko, A.~V., Barth, A. J.,
428: Bower, G. C., Ho, L. C., Stringfellow, G. S., Goodrich, R. W., \& Porter,
429: A. C. 1995, \aj, 110, 2261 [Erratum: 1996, \aj, 112, 806] (F95)
430: \bibitem[Filippenko, Li, \& Modjaz 1999]{fil99} Filippenko, A. V., Li, W. D.,
431: \& Modjaz, M. 1999, \iaucirc~7152
432: \bibitem[Gilmozzi et al.~1987]{gil87} Gilmozzi, R., et al.~1987, Nature, 328,
433: 318
434: \bibitem[Goodrich et al.~1989]{goo89} Goodrich, R. W., Stringfellow, G. S.,
435: Penrod, G. D., \& Filippenko, A. V. 1989, \apj, 342, 908
436: \bibitem[Gruendl et al.~2002]{gru02} Gruendl, R.~A., Chu, Y.-H., Van Dyk, S.~D.,
437: \& Stockdale, C.~J. 2002, \aj, in press
438: \bibitem[Humphreys \& Davidson 1994]{hum94} Humphreys, R. M., \& Davidson, K.
439: 1994, \pasp, 106, 1025
440: \bibitem[Humphreys, Davidson, \& Smith 1999]{hum99} Humphreys, R. M., Davidson,
441: K., \& Smith, N. 1999, \pasp, 111, 1124
442: \bibitem[Klemola 1986]{kle86} Klemola, A.~R. 1986, \pasp, 98, 464
443: \bibitem[Leibundgut et al.~1991]{lei91} Leibundgut, B., et al. 1991, \apj, 372, 531
444: \bibitem[Li et al.~2002]{li02} Li, W., Filippenko, A. V., Van Dyk, S. D., Hu,
445: J., Qiu, Y., Modjaz, M., \& Leonard, D. C. 2002, \pasp, in press
446: \bibitem[Long et al.~1989]{lon89} Long, K.~S., Blair, W.~P., \& Krzeminski, W. 1989,
447: \apjl, 340, L25
448: \bibitem[Long et al.~1992]{lon92} Long, K.~S., Winkler, P.~F., \& Blair, W.~P. 1992,
449: \apj, 395, 632
450: \bibitem[Montes et al.~1998]{mon98} Montes, M.~J., Van Dyk, S.~D., Weiler, K.~W.,
451: Sramek, R.~A., \& Panagia, N. 1998, \apj, 506, 874
452: \bibitem[Rupen et al.~1987]{rup87} Rupen, M.~P., Van Gorkom, J.~H., Knapp, G.~R.,
453: Gunn, J.~E., \& Schneider, D.~P. 1987, \aj, 94, 61
454: \bibitem[Schlegel 1990]{sch90} Schlegel, E. M. 1990, \mnras, 244, 269
455: \bibitem[Silbermann et al.~1996]{sil96} Silbermann, N.~A., et al. 1996, \apj, 470, 1
456: \bibitem[Smith, Humphreys, \& Gehrz 2001]{smi01} Smith, N., Humphreys, R.~M., \&
457: Gehrz, R.~D. 2001, \pasp, 113, 692
458: \bibitem[Sonneborn, Altner, \& Kirshner 1987]{son87} Sonneborn, G., Altner, B.,
459: \& Kirshner, R.~P. 1987, \apjl, 323, L35
460: \bibitem[Stockdale et al.~2001]{sto01} Stockdale, C.~J., Rupen, M.~P., Cowan,
461: J.~J., Chu, Y.-H., \& Jones, S.~S. 2001, \aj, 122, 283
462: \bibitem[Utrobin 1984]{utr84} Utrobin, V.~P. 1984, Ap\&SS, 98, 115
463: \bibitem[Utrobin 1987]{utr87} Utrobin, V.~P. 1987, Soviet Astr. Letters, 13, 50
464: \bibitem[Van Dyk et al.~1999a]{van99a} Van Dyk, S.~D., Peng, C.~Y., Barth, A.~J.,
465: Filippenko, A.~V., Chevalier, R.~A., Fesen, R.~A., Fransson, C., Kirshner, R.~P.,
466: \& Leibundgut, B. 1999a, \pasp, 111, 313
467: \bibitem[Van Dyk et al.~1999b]{van99b} Van Dyk, S.~D., Peng, C.~Y., Barth, A.~J.,
468: \& Filippenko, A.~V. 1999b, \aj, 118, 2331
469: \bibitem[Van Dyk et al.~2000]{van00} Van Dyk, S.~D., Peng, C.~Y., King, J.~Y.,
470: Filippenko, A.~V., Treffers, R.~R., Li, W., \& Richmond, M.~W. 2000, PASP, 112, 1532
471: \bibitem[Weiler, Panagia, \& Sramek 1990]{wei90} Weiler, K. W., Panagia, N.,
472: \& Sramek, R. A. 1990, \apj, 364, 611
473: \bibitem[Whitelock et al.~1983]{whi83} Whitelock, P.~A., et al. 1983, \mnras, 203, 385
474: \bibitem[Zwicky 1964]{zwi64} Zwicky, F. 1964, \apj, 139, 514
475: \bibitem[Zwicky 1965]{zwi65} Zwicky, F. 1965, in Stars and Stellar Systems,
476: Vol. 8, Stellar Structure, ed. L. H. Aller \& D. B. McLaughlin (Chicago:
477: University of Chicago Press), p. 367.
478: \end{thebibliography}
479:
480: \begin{deluxetable}{cccclll}
481: \def\phmm{\phm{$-$}}
482: \tablenum{1}
483: \tablecolumns{3}
484: \tablecaption{{\sl HST\/} WFPC2 Photometry of the SN 1961V Environment}
485: \tablehead{\colhead{Object} & \colhead{$m_{\rm F450W}$}
486: & \colhead{$m_{\rm F606W}$} & \colhead{$m_{\rm F814W}$}
487: & \colhead{$B$} & \colhead{$V$}
488: & \colhead{$I$}}
489: \startdata
490: 1 & 24.51(02) & 25.07(35) & 24.15(24) & 24.49 & 24.97 & 24.15 \nl
491: 2 & \nodata & 24.95(24) & 23.57(12) & \nodata & 25.47 & 23.58 \nl
492: 3 & \nodata & \nodata & 23.15(08) & \nodata & \nodata & \llap{$\gtrsim$}23.2 \nl
493: 4 & 23.84(10) & 24.22(14) & 24.09(17) & 23.82 & 24.22 & 24.10 \nl
494: 5 & 24.76(25) & 24.39(16) & \nodata & 24.82 & 24.50 & \nodata \nl
495: 6 & \nodata & 25.00(27) & 23.73(13) & \nodata & 25.49 & 23.73 \nl
496: 7 & 24.02(14) & 23.84(14) & 23.83(14) & 24.04 & 23.85 & 23.83 \nl
497: 8 & \nodata & 24.29(01) & \nodata & \nodata & \llap{$\sim$}24.3 & \nodata \nl
498: 9 & 23.63(10) & 23.84(10) & 23.76(13) & 23.61 & 23.83 & 23.76 \nl
499: 10 & 24.79(24) & 24.07(12) & 24.48(26) & 24.90 & 24.13 & 24.46 \nl
500: 11 & \nodata & \nodata & 24.31(22) & \nodata & \nodata & \llap{$\gtrsim$}24.3 \nl
501: \enddata
502: \tablenotetext{}{Note: The values given in parentheses are the
503: uncertainties in the last two digits of the magnitudes.}
504: \end{deluxetable}
505:
506: \clearpage
507:
508: \begin{figure}
509: \figurenum{1}
510:
511: \caption{Figure 2 of F95, showing {\sl HST\/} WFPC unrestored ({\it left}) and
512: deconvolved ({\it right}; Lucy-Richardson algorithm) images of the SN 1961V
513: environment. Objects discussed in the present paper are labeled. The nominal
514: radio positions (Cowan et al. 1988; uncertainties $\pm 0.3''$) of SN 1961V and
515: an old radio supernova remnant are marked with triangles labeled ``61V'' and
516: ``SNR,'' respectively.}
517:
518: \end{figure}
519:
520: \begin{figure}
521: \figurenum{2}
522: \caption{{\sl HST\/} WFPC2 F814W image of the SN 1961V environment, obtained by
523: program GO-9042 and available in the archive. An error circle of radius
524: $1.5''$ is plotted at the radio position of SN 1961V.
525: Note how close the environment
526: is to the edge of the WF3 chip. Source numbering is
527: given in Figure 1. Also labelled is Object 11, which is coincident with the
528: radio position of SN 1961V, as indicated by F95, and which we suggest may be
529: the survivor of SN 1961V.}
530: \end{figure}
531:
532: \begin{figure}
533: \figurenum{3}
534: \caption{{\sl HST\/} WFPC2 F450W image of the SN 1961V environment,
535: obtained by program GO-9042, with the same scale,
536: position, and orientation as in Figure 2. Object 8, as in Figure 2, is off
537: the WF3 chip.}
538: \end{figure}
539:
540: \begin{figure}
541: \figurenum{4}
542: \caption{{\sl HST\/} WFPC2 F606W image of the SN 1961V environment,
543: obtained by program GO-5446, with the same scale,
544: position, and orientation as Figure 2. Object 8, which is off the WF3
545: chip in Figures 2 and 3, is labelled.}
546: \end{figure}
547:
548: \clearpage
549:
550: \begin{figure}
551: \figurenum{5}
552: \plotone{fg5.ps}
553: \caption{$B-V$ {\it vs.\/} $V$ color-magnitude diagram for the objects
554: in the SN 1961V environment. The points for the objects are labelled.
555: Shown is the locus for the main sequence ({\it solid line}) and for
556: supergiants ({\it dashed line}) derived from Bessell (1990) and Binney
557: \& Merrifield (1998). Also shown is the reddening vector from Cardelli
558: et al.~(1989).}
559: \end{figure}
560:
561: \clearpage
562:
563: \begin{figure}
564: \figurenum{6}
565: \plotone{fg6.ps}
566: \caption{$V-I$ {\it vs.\/} $I$ color-magnitude diagram for the objects
567: in the SN 1961V environment. The points for the objects are labelled.
568: An upper limit for the magnitude and lower limit for the color of Object
569: 11 is represented. Shown are the loci for the main sequence ({\it solid
570: line}) and for supergiants ({\it dashed line}) derived from Bessell (1990)
571: and Binney \& Merrifield (1998). Also shown is the reddening vector from
572: Cardelli et al.~(1989).}
573: \end{figure}
574:
575: \end{document}
576: