1: %last modified: avishay March 16 

2: %\documentstyle[referee,epsf]{mn}

3: \documentstyle[epsfig]{mn}

4: 

5: % If your system has the AMS fonts version 2.0 installed, MN.sty can be

6: % made to use them by uncommenting the line: %\AMStwofontstrue

7: %

8: % By doing this, you will be able to obtain u5 pright Greek characters.

9: % e.g. \umu, \upi etc.  See the section on "Upright Greek characters" in

10: % this guide for further information.

11: %

12: % If you are using AMS 2.0 fonts, bold math letters/symbols are available

13: % at a larger range of sizes for NFSS release 1 and 2 (using \boldmath or

14: % preferably \bmath).

15: 

16: \newif\ifAMStwofonts

17: %\AMStwofontstrue

18: 

19: %%%%% AUTHORS - PLACE YOUR OWN MACROS HERE %%%%%

20: 

21: 

22: \def\gtorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$}\mkern-14mu

23:              \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}

24: \def\ltorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$<$}\mkern-14mu

25:              \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}

26: 

27: 

28: 

29: 

30: 

31: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

32: 

33: \ifoldfss

34:   %

35:   \newcommand{\rmn}[1] {{\rm #1}}

36:   \newcommand{\itl}[1] {{\it #1}}

37:   \newcommand{\bld}[1] {{\bf #1}}

38:   %

39:   \ifCUPmtlplainloaded \else

40:     \NewTextAlphabet{textbfit} {cmbxti10} {}

41:     \NewTextAlphabet{textbfss} {cmssbx10} {}

42:     \NewMathAlphabet{mathbfit} {cmbxti10} {} % for math mode

43:     \NewMathAlphabet{mathbfss} {cmssbx10} {} %  "   "    "

44:   \fi

45:   %

46:   \ifAMStwofonts

47:   %

48:     \ifCUPmtlplainloaded \else

49:       \NewSymbolFont{upmath} {eurm10}

50:       \NewSymbolFont{AMSa} {msam10}

51:       \NewMathSymbol{\upi}     {0}{upmath}{19}

52:       \NewMathSymbol{\umu}     {0}{upmath}{16}

53:       \NewMathSymbol{\upartial}{0}{upmath}{40}

54:       \NewMathSymbol{\leqslant}{3}{AMSa}{36}

55:       \NewMathSymbol{\geqslant}{3}{AMSa}{3E}

56:       \let\oldle=\le     \let\oldleq=\leq

57:       \let\oldge=\ge     \let\oldgeq=\geq

58:       \let\leq=\leqslant \let\le=\leqslant

59:       \let\geq=\geqslant \let\ge=\geqslant

60:     \fi

61:     %

62:   \fi

63: %

64: \fi % End of OFSS

65: 

66: \ifnfssone

67:   %

68:   \newmathalphabet{\mathit}

69:   \addtoversion{normal}{\mathit}{cmr}{m}{it}

70:   \addtoversion{bold}{\mathit}{cmr}{bx}{it}

71:   %

72:   \newcommand{\rmn}[1] {\mathrm{#1}}

73:   \newcommand{\itl}[1] {\mathit{#1}}

74:   \newcommand{\bld}[1] {\mathbf{#1}}

75:   %

76:   \def\textbfit{\protect\txtbfit}

77:   \def\textbfss{\protect\txtbfss}

78:   \long\def\txtbfit#1{{\fontfamily{cmr}\fontseries{bx}\fontshape{it}%

79:     \selectfont #1}}

80:   \long\def\txtbfss#1{{\fontfamily{cmss}\fontseries{bx}\fontshape{n}%

81:     \selectfont #1}}

82:   %

83:   \newmathalphabet{\mathbfit} % math mode version of \textbfit{..}

84:   \addtoversion{normal}{\mathbfit}{cmr}{bx}{it}

85:   \addtoversion{bold}{\mathbfit}{cmr}{bx}{it}

86:   %

87:   \newmathalphabet{\mathbfss} % math mode version of \textbfss{..}

88:   \addtoversion{normal}{\mathbfss}{cmss}{bx}{n}

89:   \addtoversion{bold}{\mathbfss}{cmss}{bx}{n}

90:   %

91:   \ifAMStwofonts

92:     %

93:     \ifCUPmtlplainloaded \else

94:       %

95:       % Make NFSS 1 use the extra sizes available for bold math italic and

96:       % bold math symbol.  These definitions may already be loaded if your

97:       % NFSS format was built with fontdef.max.

98:       %

99:       \UseAMStwoboldmath

100:       %

101:       \makeatletter

102:       \new@mathgroup\upmath@group

103:       \define@mathgroup\mv@normal\upmath@group{eur}{m}{n}

104:       \define@mathgroup\mv@bold\upmath@group{eur}{b}{n}

105:       \edef\UPM{\hexnumber\upmath@group}

106:       %

107:       \new@mathgroup\amsa@group

108:       \define@mathgroup\mv@normal\amsa@group{msa}{m}{n}

109:       \define@mathgroup\mv@bold\amsa@group{msa}{m}{n}

110:       \edef\AMSa{\hexnumber\amsa@group}

111:       \makeatother

112:       %

113:       \mathchardef\upi="0\UPM19

114:       \mathchardef\umu="0\UPM16

115:       \mathchardef\upartial="0\UPM40

116:       \mathchardef\leqslant="3\AMSa36

117:       \mathchardef\geqslant="3\AMSa3E

118:       %

119:       \let\oldle=\le     \let\oldleq=\leq

120:       \let\oldge=\ge     \let\oldgeq=\geq

121:       \let\leq=\leqslant \let\le=\leqslant

122:       \let\geq=\geqslant \let\ge=\geqslant

123:       %

124:     \fi

125:   \fi

126:   %

127: \fi % End of NFSS release 1

128: 

129: \ifnfsstwo

130:   %

131:   \newcommand{\rmn}[1] {\mathrm{#1}}

132:   \newcommand{\itl}[1] {\mathit{#1}}

133:   \newcommand{\bld}[1] {\mathbf{#1}}

134:   %

135:   \def\textbfit{\protect\txtbfit}

136:   \def\textbfss{\protect\txtbfss}

137:   \long\def\txtbfit#1{{\fontfamily{cmr}\fontseries{bx}\fontshape{it}%

138:     \selectfont #1}}

139:   \long\def\txtbfss#1{{\fontfamily{cmss}\fontseries{bx}\fontshape{n}%

140:     \selectfont #1}}

141:   %

142:   \DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathbfit}{OT1}{cmr}{bx}{it}

143:   \SetMathAlphabet\mathbfit{bold}{OT1}{cmr}{bx}{it}

144:   \DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathbfss}{OT1}{cmss}{bx}{n}

145:   \SetMathAlphabet\mathbfss{bold}{OT1}{cmss}{bx}{n}

146:   %

147:   \ifAMStwofonts

148:     %

149:     \ifCUPmtlplainloaded \else

150:       \DeclareSymbolFont{UPM}{U}{eur}{m}{n}

151:       \SetSymbolFont{UPM}{bold}{U}{eur}{b}{n}

152:       \DeclareSymbolFont{AMSa}{U}{msa}{m}{n}

153:       \DeclareMathSymbol{\upi}{0}{UPM}{"19}

154:       \DeclareMathSymbol{\umu}{0}{UPM}{"16}

155:       \DeclareMathSymbol{\upartial}{0}{UPM}{"40}

156:       \DeclareMathSymbol{\leqslant}{3}{AMSa}{"36}

157:       \DeclareMathSymbol{\geqslant}{3}{AMSa}{"3E}

158:       %

159:       \let\oldle=\le     \let\oldleq=\leq

160:       \let\oldge=\ge     \let\oldgeq=\geq

161:       \let\leq=\leqslant \let\le=\leqslant

162:       \let\geq=\geqslant \let\ge=\geqslant

163:       %

164:     \fi

165:   \fi

166:   %

167: \fi % End of NFSS release 2

168: 

169: \ifCUPmtlplainloaded \else

170:   \ifAMStwofonts \else % If no AMS fonts

171:     \def\upi{\pi}

172:     \def\umu{\mu}

173:     \def\upartial{\partial}

174:   \fi

175: \fi

176: 

177: 

178: 

179: 

180: 

181: \title[Supernova 2002ap - The First Month] {Supernova 2002ap - The First Month}

182: 

183: \date{Accepted - .

184:       Received - ;}

185: 

186: \author[A. Gal-Yam et al.]{Avishay Gal-Yam$^{1,2}$, 

187: Eran O. Ofek$^{1}$,

188: and Ohad Shemmer$^{1}$\\

189: $^{1}$ School of Physics \& Astronomy and Wise Observatory, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; avishay@wise.tau.ac.il \\

190: $^{2}$ Colton Fellow. \\}

191: 

192: %\pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}}

193: %\pubyear{1994}

194: 

195: \begin{document}

196: 

197: \maketitle

198: 

199: %\label{firstpage}

200: 

201: \begin{abstract}

202: 

203: Supernova (SN) 2002ap in M74 was discovered on January 29, 2002.

204: Being one of the nearest (10 Mpc) SN events in the last 

205: decades, and spectroscopically similar 

206: to the so-called ``hypernovae'' 1997ef and 1998bw, both possibly

207: associated with gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), it is of great

208: interest. Shortly after its discovery,

209: we launched an intensive photometric and spectroscopic monitoring campaign

210: of this event, and here we report the results of the first

211: month of observations. We use our $UBVRI$ photometry to

212: estimate the magnitudes at, and dates of, peak brightness. 

213: Our data suggest that this object reached its peak $B-$band luminosity on 

214: Feb. $7.1_{-1.3}^{+2}$ UT. Based on its similarity to SN 1998bw, we estimate 

215: the range of possible 

216: dates for a GRB that may have been associated with SN 2002ap. We find 

217: that it may include dates outside the time frame for which all available 

218: gamma-ray data have been intensively scanned, according to recent reports. 

219: The absolute magnitude at peak 

220: brightness of SN 2002ap (M$_{B}=-16.9$) shows that it was

221: significantly fainter than SN 1998bw, or normal

222: type-Ia SNe, but similar to SN 1997ef. 

223: Our spectroscopic observations confirm that SN 2002ap

224: is strikingly similar to SNe 1998bw and 1997ef. We briefly describe the 

225: spectral evolution of this object. To assist other observers 

226: and to stimulate theoretical models, we make our entire 

227: data set publicly available in digital form.\footnotemark[1]

228: 

229: \end{abstract}

230: 

231: 

232: \begin{keywords}

233: supernovae: individual: SN 2002ap -- gamma-rays: bursts.

234: \end{keywords}

235: 

236: %\footnotetext{http://wise-obs.tau.ac.il/$\sim$avishay/local.html}

237: 

238: \section{Introduction}

239: 

240: Supernova (SN) 2002ap in M74 was discovered by Y. Hirose and confirmed by 

241: R. Kushida and W. Li in images obtained on January 29 and 30, 2002 

242: (Nakano et al. 2002; UT dates are used throughout this {\it Letter}). 

243: The relative proximity of this event ($v_{r}=657$ km s$^{-1}$, $D\sim10$ 

244: Mpc, Tully 1988) and its ensuing brightness made it a promising target 

245: for intensive follow-up

246: studies. Three independent teams promptly obtained low resolution 

247: spectroscopic observations on Jan. 30 (Meikle et al. 2002), and Jan. 31

248: (Kinugasa et al. 2002, Gal-Yam \& Shemmer 2002). All groups noted the

249: spectral resemblance of this object to the so-called ``hypernovae'' 1998bw

250: and 1997ef, both of which may have been associated with gamma-ray

251: bursts (GRBs; Galama et al. 1998, Iwamoto et al. 2000). Using the well-sampled

252: spectral observations of SN 1998bw by Patat et al. (2001), 

253: Gal-Yam \& Shemmer estimated that SN 2002ap was discovered prior to peak

254: brightness. Being both nearby, of a rare type, and possibly connected

255: to GRBs, SN 2002ap became a focus of a multi-wavelength observational

256: effort. Follow up studies include detection in the radio 

257: (Berger, Kulkarni, \& Frail 2002), IR imaging (e.g. Mattila \& Meikle 2002) 

258: and spectroscopy (e.g., Motohara et al. 2002), UV and X-ray imaging 

259: (Rodriguez-Pascual et al. 2002), optical polarimetry (e.g., Wang et 

260: al. 2002) and high-resolution spectroscopy (e.g., Lauroesch et al. 2002).

261: 

262: We have undertaken an intensive observational

263: monitoring campaign of this SN with multi-color imaging and 

264: low-resolution optical spectroscopy. The backbone of our program consists of

265: target-of-opportunity observations obtained with the Wise Observatory 

266: 1-m telescope as part of the queue program.

267: The resulting set of observations presents a coherent 

268: picture of the evolution of SN 2002ap in the optical band during the first 

269: month since its discovery. As this SN now approaches solar conjunction

270: and will not be observable during the next few months, we have analysed

271: the data set collected so far. In this {\it Letter} we briefly report 

272: and discuss our main results. All the data presented here are available

273: electronically via our website\footnotemark[1].

274: 

275: \footnotetext[1]{http://wise-obs.tau.ac.il/$\sim$avishay/local.html}

276: 

277: \section{Observations}

278: 

279: \subsection{Photometry}

280: 

281: $UBVRI$ photometry was obtained with the Wise Observatory 1-m 

282: telescope during nine nights, using the

283: Tektronics ($1024\times1024$ pixel)

284: and SITe ($2048\times4096$ pixel) CCD cameras. 

285: Time series of 60 s $V-$band images were

286: obtained on five occasions, in order to search for variability on 

287: short ($< 1$ hr) time scales. As no such effects were evident, these

288: data were averaged and used to improve the photometric sampling. 

289: 

290: Figure 1 shows a combined $BVR$ image of the field of SN 2002ap, produced from

291: the stacked images obtained during February 2002. As the SN is isolated

292: and contamination by underlying galactic light is constrained to lie below

293: $B=21.6$ mag (Smartt, Ramirez-Ruiz, \& Vreeswijk 2002), we used aperture photometry on the SN and nearby reference stars (see Fig. 1 and Table 1). 

294: The SN flux was measured and compared with that of nearby bright stars

295: using standard IRAF\footnotemark[2] routines. The photometric stability of each

296: reference star in each band was checked against the entire reference set, and stars 

297: with the lowest root-mean-square scatter values were used in the final calibration. $1-\sigma$ error estimates, including

298: \footnotetext[2]{IRAF (Image Reduction and Analysis Facility) is distributed

299: by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated

300: by AURA, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the 

301: National Science Foundation.}

302: Poisson noise in the SN flux and the scatter in the flux of reference 

303: stars, were computed, and found to be below 0.025 mag, except for the 

304: $U-$band data, where some points have errors as large as 0.16 magnitudes.    

305: In Figure 2 we plot the resulting $UBVRI$ light curves of this object.  

306: The data provided by Henden (2002) were used for absolute calibration. 

307: We estimate the errors in the absolute zero 

308: point determination to be smaller than $2\%$. As a consistency check, we 

309: compare our photometry with the measurements of Riffeser, Goessl, \& Ries, 

310: (2002) and find excellent agreement. We therefore combine their early 

311: $UBR$ points with our data set. As both our own observations and those of

312: SN 1998bw around peak brightness (Galama et al. 1998) suggest that these

313: objects have smoothly varying light curves, we use cubic spline interpolation 

314: to get approximate $UBVRI$ curves. From these, we determine the dates of

315: peak brightness, and the SN magnitudes at peak in each band. 

316: Conservative margins on the peak dates are set by 

317: the latest point seen to be rising and the first to be declining. 

318: Assuming that the light curves of SN 2002ap had similar shapes around

319: peak to those of SN 1998bw, 

320: we can better constrain the dates of peak by checking by how much one can 

321: adjust the peak dates without creating pronounced ``wiggles'' or ``humps'', 

322: not seen in the light curves of Galama et al. (1998)

323: or in well sampled parts of our own data.

324: The calculated peak dates and their estimated errors, as well as the 

325: more conservative margins discussed above, are reported in

326: Table 2, along with the SN absolute magnitudes, calculated assuming the

327: distance modulus to M74 given by Tully (1988), $\mu=30.24$ for $H_{0}=65$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$.  

328: %$\mu=29.46$ (Sharina, Karachentsev \& Tikhonov 1996). 

329: We correct for foreground Galactic extinction according to Schlegel,

330: Finkbeiner, \& Davis (1998), using the extinction curve of Cardelli, 

331: Clayton, \& Mathis (1989). Based on high resolution

332: spectroscopic observations, Klose, Guenther \& Woitas (2002) estimate that 

333: this SN suffered little intrinsic extinction ($A_{V}\sim0.025$ mag) 

334: in its host, so the absolute 

335: magnitudes we derive are probably a fair estimate of the

336: SN luminosity. If so, it is clearly evident that unlike SN 1998bw, 

337: SN 2002ap was not optically luminous, being $\sim2$ magnitudes fainter

338: in the $B-$band. The peak luminosity of SN 2002ap may be comparable to

339: that of SN 1998bw only if the distance to M74 is significantly 

340: underestimated. Apart from

341: the lower peak magnitudes, the general shape of the light curves is 

342: similar to those of SN 1998bw (Galama et al. 1998). As can be seen 

343: in Fig. 2 and Table 2, the light curves are wider in the redder bands, and 

344: the bluer the band, the earlier the date of the peak. The decline rates are 

345: also similar, with the SN becoming 

346: fainter by $\sim1.3$ mag in the $V-$band some 

347: 20 days after peak.  

348: 

349: \begin{figure}

350: \centerline{\epsfxsize=85mm\epsfbox{figure1.eps}}

351: \caption{A $12'$ by $8.3'$ section of a combined $BVR$ image of the field of

352: SN 2002ap, obtained at the Wise Observatory. Nearby reference

353: stars are marked, as well as the schematic location of the spectroscopic

354: comparison star within the slit.}

355: \end{figure}

356: 

357: \begin{figure}

358: \centerline{\epsfxsize=85mm\epsfbox{figure2.eps}}

359: \caption{Multi-color light curves of SN 2002ap. Note the excellent

360: agreement between the Wise photometry (circles) and the

361: photometry of Riffeser, Goessl and Ries (2002; squares). For all the 

362: points lacking error bars, the estimated errors are smaller than the size 

363: of the mark. Photometric points calculated synthetically

364: from Wise spectroscopy (see Poznanski et al. 2002 for details)

365: are marked with triangles. Error bars reflect the combined 

366: uncertainties resulting from the flux calibration 

367: of the spectra and, in some cases, incomplete spectral coverage of the filter 

368: bandpasses. The solid lines are cubic-spline interpolations between

369: the photometric points.

370: For clarity, the $U$, $R$ and $I$ light curves have been shifted by

371: the amounts noted on the plot.}

372: \end{figure}

373: 

374: \begin{table}

375: \caption {Local calibrators in the field of SN 2002ap} \label {stars table}

376: \vspace{0.2cm}

377: \begin{centering}

378: \begin{minipage}{70mm}

379: \begin{scriptsize}

380: \begin{tabular}{lllccccc}

381: \hline

382: $\#$ & R.A. & Dec. & $U$ & $B$ & $V$ & $R$ & $I$ \\

383: \hline

384: 1 & 01:36:19.53 & 15:45:21.8 & 14.10 & 13.84 & 13.06 & 12.61 & 12.14 \\

385: 2 & 01:36:14.61 & 15:44:58.2 & 14.40 & 14.33 & 13.69 & 13.32 & 12.95 \\

386: 3 & 01:36:14.32 & 15:47:01.5 & 14.30 & 14.01 & 13.22 & 12.77 & 12.34 \\

387: 4 & 01:36:14.09 & 15:47:23.7 & 15.30 & 15.10 & 14.37 & 14.37 & 13.56 \\

388: 5 & 01:36:14.90 & 15:47:19.4 & 15.69 & 15.22 & 14.38 & 13.89 & 13.45 \\

389: 6 & 01:36:14.56 & 15:43:38.9 & 15.32 & 14.83 & 13.90 & 13.40 & 12.92 \\

390: 7 & 01:36:32.05 & 15:45:07.8 & 15.27 & 14.11 & 12.85 & 12.07 & 11.35 \\

391: 8 & 01:36:27.38 & 15:46:30.3 & 14.73 & 14.53 & 13.80 & 13.37 & 12.97 \\

392: 9 & 01:36:23.04 & 15:47:45.5 & 15.17 & 15.18 & 14.61 & 14.26 & 13.90 \\

393: 10 & 01:36:04.48 & 15:43:17.7 & 13.82 & 13.61 & 12.91 & 12.52 & 12.16 \\

394: \hline

395: \end{tabular}

396: \end{scriptsize}

397: 

398: Notes:\\ 

399: Astrometric solution based on 33 USNO-A2.0 (Monet et al. 1996) 

400: stars with final RMS scatter of $0.331''$ and $0.462''$ in R.A. 

401: (J2000) and Dec., respectively; Photometric $UBVRI$ data are 

402: from Henden (2002); Star $\# 8$ is the spectroscopic comparison star.

403: \end{minipage}

404: \end{centering}

405: \end{table}

406: 

407: \begin{table}

408: \caption {SN 2002ap peak dates and magnitudes} \label {mags table}

409: \vspace{0.2cm}

410: \begin{centering}

411: \begin{minipage}{70mm}

412: \begin{tabular}{cccccc}

413: \hline

414:  & $U$ & $B$ & $V$ & $R$ & $I$ \\

415: \hline

416: Peak date & $4.7^{+1}_{-1}$ & $7.1^{+2}_{-1.3}$ & $8.8^{+2}_{-2}$ & $9.7^{+2}_{-2}$ & $14.8^{+1}_{-4}$ \\

417: (Feb. 2002) & & & & & \\

418: Possible range & $_{-1.9}^{+1.1}$ & $_{-1.3}^{+7.6}$ & $_{-4}^{+5.9}$ & $_{-3.9}^{+7.9}$ & $_{-9}^{+3.9}$\\

419: (days) & & & & & \\

420: Apparent & 13.3 & 13.1 & 12.4 & 12.2 & 12.3 \\

421: magnitude & & & & & \\

422: Absolute & $-16.6$ & $-16.9$ & $-17.7$ & $-17.8$ & $-17.8$ \\

423: magnitude & & & & & \\

424: Adopted & 0.387 & 0.307 & 0.236 & 0.190 & 0.138 \\

425: extinction & & & & & \\

426: \hline

427: \end{tabular}

428: 

429: Note:\\ 

430: The given peak dates were estimated from cubic spline interpolations

431: and their errors estimated assuming that the light curves of SN 2002ap

432: were similar to those of SN 1998bw around peak (see text). 

433: The most conservative range of possible dates for the peak in each band 

434: was set to lie between the latest point seen to be rising and the

435: earliest seen to be on the decline.\\

436: \end{minipage}

437: \end{centering}

438: \end{table}

439: 

440: \subsection{Spectroscopy} 

441: 

442: Long-slit spectra of SN 2002ap were obtained with the Wise Observatory

443: 1m telescope on five nights: 2002 January 31 and February 7, 14, 21 and 

444: 27, using the Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (FOSC; Brosch \& Goldberg

445: 1994). We used a 10$''-$wide slit, and a 600 line mm$^{-1}$ grism,

446: resulting in a dispersion of 3.75~\AA/pix ($\sim$8~\AA\ resolution) and

447: a spectral range of $\sim$4000 -- 7800~\AA. Two exposures were obtained 

448: each night and used to reject cosmic ray hits.

449: Reduction of the bias-subtracted and flat-field corrected spectra was

450: carried out in the usual manner using IRAF\footnotemark[2].

451: A He-Ar arc spectrum was used for the wavelength solution.

452: In all but the first spectrum, the SN and a nearby bright star 

453: were observed simultaneously through the slit (see Fig. 1), providing an

454: intrinsic relative calibration during non-photometric conditions

455: (see, e.g., Kaspi et al. 2000).

456: Our photometry shows this star to be constant (to within photometric errors)

457: during the period of the observations. The wide ($10''$) slit ensured 

458: that the effects of atmospheric refraction at the non-parallactic angle were 

459: not important.  

460: Each spectrum of the SN was divided by the simultaneously-observed

461: spectrum of the comparison star. A spectrum of the comparison star obtained

462: on Feb. 7, under photometric conditions, was flux calibrated using the Wise

463: Observatory standard sensitivity function and extinction curve. These

464: do not change appreciably from night to night, and are routinely updated 

465: using spectrophotometric standard stars.

466: The SN spectra were calibrated to an absolute flux scale by multiplying each 

467: SN/star ratio by the flux calibrated spectrum of the comparison star. 

468: The January 31 spectrum (taken without the comparison star in the slit) 

469: was directly calibrated using the mean curves. The final fluxed

470: spectra were then compared to our photometry (Fig. 2), showing excellent

471: consistency. We estimate that the relative flux calibration of the last four

472: spectra is good to $2-3$ per cent, and the absolute flux

473: calibration has an uncertainty of $\sim$10 per cent, at most.

474: 

475: Figure 3 shows our entire spectroscopic data set. The first spectrum

476: is very blue and almost featureless, peaking around $5000$~\AA~with

477: secondary broad emission peaks around $4200$~\AA~and $6200$~\AA. This

478: spectral shape closely resembles early time spectra of SN 1997ef

479: (e.g. Garnavich et al. 1997)

480: and 1998bw (e.g., Patat et al. 2001, see also Fig. 4, top panel) leading to the 

481: prompt spectral identification of this object ($\S~1$). Figure 4 

482: demonstrates that this spectral resemblance continues throughout the epoch of

483: peak brightness (unless otherwise noted, from here on we refer to our 

484: best estimate $B-$band peak date, Feb. 7.1 UT, as the time of peak brightness), 

485: and up until the date of our last spectrum ($\sim20$ days 

486: after maximum).  

487: 

488: The spectral evolution of SN 2002ap displays several

489: characteristic trends also identified in 1997ef (Matheson et al. 2001, 

490: Iwamoto et al. 2000) and 1998bw (Stathakis et al. 2000,

491: Patat et al. 2001, and references therein). These include

492: the reddening of the continuum, a redward shift and narrowing of 

493: prominent ``emission-like'' and ``absorption-like''\footnotemark[3] features, 

494: and decreasing values of the expansion velocities. 

495: \footnotetext[3]{Model synthetic spectra show that at early times,

496: the spectral shape of these objects is determined by the wavelength 

497: dependence of the absorption optical depth, so that features in the

498: spectrum cannot generally be attributed to a certain emission or

499: absorption line (e.g. Patat et al, 2001, and references within.)} 

500: Following Patat et al. (2001)

501: we have calculated expansion velocities from the Si II $\lambda 6355$ 

502: absorption, and find a decrease from $\sim 38000$ km s$^{-1}$ 

503: $7$ days prior to peak to $\sim 15000$ km s$^{-1}$ at peak, 

504: and to $\sim 6000$ km s$^{-1}$ 14 days later. This is

505: similar to the results obtained for 1998bw, and consistent with the

506: measurements of Motohara et al. (2002; $\sim 16000$ km s$^{-1}$ around peak

507: from $1.083 \mu$ He~I) and Filippenko \& Chornock (2002; $\sim 9000$

508: km s$^{-1}$ four days after peak from $7774$~\AA~O~I). 

509: The prominence of the $4600$~\AA~emission peak

510: relative to the one bluewards of $5000$~\AA~(both tentatively attributed to

511: Fe II blends, e.g., Patat et al. 2001 and references therein)

512: in spectra of SN 2002ap at and after peak resembles spectra of SN 1997ef but

513: differs somewhat from those of SN 1998bw. A notable feature in 

514: the spectra of SN 2002ap is a narrow, unresolved absorption, consistent with 

515: He II $\lambda4686$. This feature first emerges in the spectrum taken

516: near peak brightness and is stronger still seven days later. It does not appear

517: in later spectra of the object, nor in spectra of either SN 1997ef or 1998bw. 

518: 

519: \begin{figure}

520: \centerline{\epsfxsize=85mm\epsfbox{figure3.eps}}

521: \caption{Time sequence of Wise Observatory spectra of SN 2002ap.

522: For each spectrum we note the SN age relative to our best estimate

523: $B-$band maximum, Feb. 7.1. For clarity, some of the spectra were

524: vertically shifted by the amounts noted in parenthesis, in units of 

525: $10^{-14}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$~\AA$^{-1}$. We have replaced short regions in

526: the spectra, strongly affected by cosmic-ray hits, with linear 

527: interpolations. Features around $6300$~\AA, 

528: $6900$~\AA~and $7600$~\AA, are residuals from 

529: imperfectly removed sky lines and telluric absorption.}

530: \end{figure}

531:  

532: \begin{figure}

533: \centerline{\epsfxsize=85mm\epsfbox{figure4.eps}}

534: \caption{Comparison of Wise spectra of SN 2002ap (solid lines)

535: with contemporary spectra of SN 1998bw (dotted line)

536: at ages $7$ days before peak (top panel)

537: and at peak magnitude (middle panel), from Patat et al. 2001. 

538: The bottom panel demonstrates the resemblance of the spectrum of

539: SN 2002ap at age 20 days (solid line) to SN 1997ef

540: at age 40 days (dotted line; from Matheson et al. 2001; the superposed 

541: narrow lines are from the underlying galaxy;

542: earlier spectra of SN 1997ef were not available in digital form).}

543: \end{figure}

544:  

545: 

546: \section{Discussion and Conclusions} 

547: 

548: We have presented the results of our optical photometric and

549: spectroscopic monitoring of SN 2002ap, during the first month after its 

550: discovery. Our best estimate for the date of

551: $B-$band maximum is Feb. 7.1, 2002, and our derived peak magnitude 

552: of M$_{B}=-16.9$ is 

553: significantly lower than the one measured for the ``hypernova'' SN 1998bw.

554: However, except for the lower peak magnitude, the 

555: characteristics of the light curves, as well as the spectral evolution

556: of this object, are strikingly similar to those of SNe 1997ef and 1998bw.

557: Our work shows that, at least to some degree, one may use the well studied

558: properties of SN 1998bw as a tentative basis upon which to plan future

559: observations of SN 2002ap, after scaling the peak magnitude.  

560: 

561: In light of its similarity to SNe 1998bw and 1997ef, one of the 

562: intriguing questions about SN 2002ap is whether it was also associated

563: with a GRB. Using our most conservative 

564: estimate for the date of the $B-$band peak, 

565: Feb. $7.1_{-1.3}^{+7.6}$ days (Table 2), and assuming that the lag between a

566: hypothetical GRB and the time

567: of $B-$band maximum is similar to that measured for SN 1998bw (14.3 days,

568: Galama et al. 1998), we would expect the GRB trigger to have occurred around

569: Jan. $23.8_{-1.3}^{+7.6}$ days. 

570: However, if we use instead our estimated $U-$band peak 

571: date, Feb. $4.7_{-1.9}^{+1.1}$ days, which is 

572: best constrained by our photometry, 

573: along with the

574: appropriate $U-$band time lag from Galama et al. 1998 (13.7 days), the resulting

575: GRB trigger time is Jan. $22.0_{-1.9}^{+1.1}$ days. 

576: Hurley et al. (2002) found no candidate GRB that might be associated with

577: SN 2002ap in an intensive search of gamma-ray data from 

578: all available sources, starting Jan. 21. Our results suggest that 

579: the GRB trigger may have occurred outside the time frame searched. 

580: If the GRB-peak magnitude time lag for SN 2002ap was just one day longer

581: than the lag measured for SN 1998bw, the trigger is likely to have been

582: missed by Hurley et al. We conclude that in order to detect, or set a secure

583: upper limit to the fluence of a GRB associated with SN 2002ap, a search similar

584: to the one reported by Hurley et al. should be extended to include data

585: taken several days prior to January 21.   

586:   

587: Finally, there remains the question of the classification of SN 2002ap and its

588: look-alikes, SNe 1998bw and 1997ef (and possibly also SN 1998ey, 

589: Garnavich, Jha, \& Kirshner 1998, and the recent SN 2002bl,

590: Filippenko, Leonard, \& Moran 2002). Various authors have used various

591: types for these events, usually some combination of Ib, Ic, and 

592: ``peculiar''. In 

593: view of the fact that these SNe are spectroscopically similar to each other,

594: but well

595: distinguished from prototypical SNe Ib (e.g. SN 1984L) or Ic (e.g., SN 1987M or

596: 1994I), we suggest that they be

597: defined as a new SN sub-type, and provisionally designate them as type Id SNe. 

598: This should replace the often used nickname ``hypernovae'', initially 

599: used to describe the unusually energetic and luminous SN 1998bw

600: (Iwamoto et al. 1998). This term has since become somewhat misleading as it 

601: was later applied to events that were modeled as highly energetic 

602: explosions, but were not especially luminous, such as SN 1997ef 

603: (Iwamoto et al. 2000). Currently, all events that

604: are spectroscopically similar to SNe 1998bw and 1997ef, e.g.,

605: 2002ap and 2002bl, are sometimes referred to as ``hypernovae'' for lack

606: of a better name, even though they are not known to be very luminous

607: or exceptionally energetic.     

608: Admittedly, these events are probably closer to type Ic SNe than to any other

609: sub-type, and the physical differences between them and other type Ic's are not

610: fully understood. However, the current SN classification scheme is purely 

611: observational and based mostly on optical spectroscopic properties 

612: (see Filippenko 1997, for a review). In our opinion, the difference between

613: the early-time spectra of the three well studied

614: ``Id'' events and those of prototypical

615: Ib and Ic SNe are no less significant than the differences between other 

616: types of SNe. So much so that there was some question as to whether the 

617: first of these events, 1997ef, was in fact a SN, when judged by its earliest

618: spectra (Garnavich et al. 1997). 

619: 

620: \section*{Acknowledgments}

621: 

622: This work, and the queue observing program, would not have been possible 

623: without the support of the Wise Observatory staff, especially P. Ibbetson

624: and J. Dann. We thank N. Brosch, Y.-J. Choi, S. Kaspi and Y. Lipkin for their

625: help and support. Special thanks go to D. Maoz for many helpful discussions. 

626: A. V. Filippenko and F. Patat are thanked for making available

627: digital copies of their data on SNe 1997ef and 1998bw, and the anonymous

628: referee for useful comments. 

629: This work was supported by the Israel Science Foundation ---

630: the Jack Adler Foundation for Space Research, Grant 63/01-1.

631:   

632: \begin{thebibliography}{}

633: 

634: \bibitem{} Berger E., Kulkarni S.~R., \& Frail D.~A., 2002, IAU Circ.  7817

635: \bibitem{} Brosch N., Goldberg Y., 1994, MNRAS, 268, L27

636: \bibitem{} Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., \& Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245

637: \bibitem{} Filippenko, A. V. 1997, ARA\&A, 35, 309

638: \bibitem{} Filippenko A.~V., \& Chornock R., 2002, IAU Circ.  7825

639: \bibitem{} Filippenko A.~V., Leonard, D. C., \& Moran, E. C. 2002, IAU Circ.  7845

640: \bibitem{} Galama T.~J., et al., 1998, Nature,  395, 670

641: \bibitem{} Gal-Yam A., \& Shemmer O., 2002, IAU Circ.  7811

642: \bibitem{} Garnavich, P., Jha, S., Kirshner, R., \& Challis, P. 1997, IAU Circ. 6778

643: \bibitem{} Garnavich, P., Jha, S., \& Kirshner, R. 1998, IAU Circ. 7066

644: \bibitem{} Henden, A. 2002, GCN 1242

645: \bibitem{} Hurley, K.~et al.\ 2002, GCN 1252

646: \bibitem{} Iwamoto, K.~et al.\ 1998, Nature, 395, 672

647: \bibitem{} Iwamoto, K.~et al.\ 2000, ApJ, 534, 660

648: \bibitem{} Kaspi S., Smith. P.S., Netzer H., Maoz D., Jannuzi B.T., Giveon U., 2000, ApJ, 533, 631

649: \bibitem{} Kinugasa K., Kawakita H., Ayani K., Kawabata T., \& Yamaoka H., 2002, IAU Circ.  7811

650: \bibitem{} Klose, S., Guenther, E., \& Woitas, J. 2002, GCN 1248

651: \bibitem{} Lauroesch J.~T., York D.~G., Hastings C., Bowen D.~V., Meyer D., Lamb D.~Q., 2002, GCN 1247

652: \bibitem{} Matheson, T., Filippenko, A.~V., Li, W., Leonard, D.~C., \& Shields, J.~C.\ 2001, AJ, 121, 1648

653: \bibitem{} Mattila S., \& Meikle P., 2002, IAU Circ.  7820

654: \bibitem{} Meikle P., Lucy L., Smartt S., Leibundgut B., Lundqvist P., \& Ostensen R., 2002, IAU Circ.  7811

655: \bibitem{} Monet, D., et al. 1996, USNO-SA2.0, (U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington DC)

656: \bibitem{} Motohara K., Nomoto K., Gerardy C., Fesen R., \& Henry P., 2002, IAU Circ.  7834

657: \bibitem{} Nakano S., Kushida R., Kushida Y., \& Li W., 2002, IAU Circ.  7810

658: \bibitem{} Patat, F.~et al.\ 2001, ApJ, 555, 900

659: \bibitem{} Poznanski, D., Gal-Yam, A., Maoz, D., Filippenko, A. V., Leonard, D. C., \& Matheson, T. 2002, PASP, submitted, astro-ph/0202198 

660: \bibitem{} Riffeser, A., Goessl, A. C., \& Ries, C. 2002, IAU Circ. 7825

661: \bibitem{} Rodriguez Pascual P., Gonzalez Riestra R., Gonzalez Garcia B., Santos Lleo M., Guainazzi M., Schartel N., 2002, IAU Circ.  7821

662: \bibitem{} Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davies, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525

663: \bibitem{} Smartt S., Ramirez-Ruiz E., Vreeswijk P., 2002, IAU Circ. 7816

664: \bibitem{} Smith, J. A., et al. 2002, AJ, in press, astro-ph/0201143

665: \bibitem{} Stathakis, R.~A.~et al.\ 2000, MNRAS, 314, 807

666: \bibitem{} Tully, R. B. 1988, in "Nearby Galaxies Catalogue", Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

667: \bibitem{} Wang L., Baade D., Fransson C., Hoeflich P., Lundqvist P., \& Wheeler J.~C., 2002, IAU Circ.  7820

668: 

669: \end{thebibliography}

670: 

671: \end{document}

672: