1: \documentclass[12pt, preprint]{aastex}
2: \usepackage{graphics}
3:
4: \shorttitle{ISO observations of the \object{Hickson 31} group}
5: \shortauthors{O'Halloran et~al.}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8:
9: \title{ISO observations of Hickson Compact Group 31 with the central
10: Wolf-Rayet galaxy NGC 1741}
11:
12: \author{B. O'Halloran\altaffilmark{1}, L. Metcalfe\altaffilmark{1,2},
13: B. McBreen\altaffilmark{1}, R. Laureijs\altaffilmark{2},
14: K. Leech\altaffilmark{2}, M. Delaney\altaffilmark{1,3},
15: D. Watson\altaffilmark{1,4} and L. Hanlon\altaffilmark{1}}
16:
17: \email{halloran@bermuda.ucd.ie}
18: \email{lmetcalf@iso.vilspa.esa.es}
19: \email{brian.mcbreen@ucd.ie}
20: \email{rlaureijs@esa.int}
21: \email{kleech@iso.vilspa.esa.es}
22: \email{mdelaney@bermuda.ucd.ie}
23: \email{dwatson@bermuda.ucd.ie}
24: \email{lhanlon@bermuda.ucd.ie}
25:
26: \altaffiltext{1}{Physics Department, University College Dublin, Dublin
27: 4, Ireland} \altaffiltext{2}{Research and Scientific Support
28: Department of ESA, Villafranca, P.O. Box 50727, E-28080 Madrid,
29: Spain} \altaffiltext{3}{Stockholm Observatory, SE-133 36
30: Saltsj\"{o}baden, Sweden} \altaffiltext{4}{X-Ray Astronomy Group,
31: Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1
32: 7RH, United Kingdom}
33:
34: \begin{abstract}
35:
36: Hickson Compact Group (HCG) 31, consisting of the Wolf-Rayet galaxy
37: NGC 1741 and its irregular dwarf companions, was observed using the
38: Infrared Space Observatory. The deconvolved ISOCAM maps of the
39: galaxies using the 7.7 $\mu$m and 14.3 $\mu$m (LW6 and LW3) filters
40: are presented, along with ISOPHOT spectrometry of the central
41: starburst region of NGC 1741 and the nucleus of galaxy HCG 31A.
42: Strong mid-IR emission was detected from the central burst in NGC
43: 1741, along with strong PAH features and a blend of features including
44: [S IV] at 10.5 $\mu$m. The 14.3/6.75 $\mu$m flux ratio, where the
45: 6.75 $\mu$m flux was synthesized from the PHT-S spectrum, and 14.3/7.7
46: $\mu$m flux ratios suggest that the central burst within NGC 1741 may
47: be moving towards the post-starburst phase. Diagnostic tools
48: including the ratio of the integrated PAH luminosity to the 40 to 120
49: $\mu$m infrared luminosity and the far-infrared colours reveal that
50: despite the high surface brightness of the nucleus, the properties of
51: NGC 1741 can be explained in terms of a starburst and do not require
52: the presence of an AGN. The Tycho catalogue star TYC 04758-466-1,
53: with m$_{V}$ = 11.3 and spectral type F6, was detected at 7.7 $\mu$m
54: and 14.3 $\mu$m.
55: \end{abstract}
56: \clearpage
57: \keywords{galaxies group - HCG 31 - galaxies interactions - galaxies
58: starburst}
59:
60: \section{Introduction}
61:
62: Compact groups are small systems of galaxies with each member
63: apparently in close proximity to the other members. They are presumed
64: to be physically associated and often show morphological peculiarities
65: indicative of gravitational interaction. Hickson (1982), by examining
66: Palomar Observatory Sky Survey plates, identified 100 compact groups
67: of galaxies with membership defined by the following criteria: (i)
68: There are more than 4 galaxies in the group within 3 magnitudes of the
69: brightest member. (ii) The group must be isolated so that no external
70: galaxies fall within a radius of 3 times the angular extent of the
71: group. (iii) The total magnitude per arcsec\(^{2}\) of the group is
72: less than 26. Considering their high densities and low velocity
73: distributions, compact groups provide an opportunity to study galaxy
74: interactions and their effects, especially considering their short
75: dynamical lifetimes of $\sim$ 10\(^{9}\) yr \citep{rub90}.
76:
77: One facet of such interactions is the presence of intense star
78: formation, and in particular the presence of Wolf-Rayet features
79: within the spectra of these objects. Wolf-Rayet galaxies are a subset
80: of emission line and HII galaxies whose integrated spectra have a
81: broad emission feature around 4650\AA~which has been attributed to
82: Wolf-Rayet stars. The emission feature usually consists of a blend of
83: lines, namely HeI $\lambda$4686, CIII/CIV $\lambda$4650 and NIII
84: $\lambda$4640. The CIV $\lambda$5808 line can also be an important
85: signature of Wolf-Rayet activity. Wolf-Rayet galaxies are important
86: in understanding massive star formation and starburst evolution
87: \citep{sch98}. The Wolf-Rayet phase in massive stars is short lived
88: and hence gives the possibility of studying an approximately coeval
89: sample of starburst galaxies. The first catalog of Wolf-Rayet
90: galaxies was compiled by Conti (1991) and contains 37 galaxies. A
91: large number of additional Wolf-Rayet galaxies have been identified
92: and a recent catalog containing 139 galaxies has been compiled by
93: Schaerer et~al. (1999). Wolf-Rayet galaxies are found among a wide
94: variety of morphological types, from blue compact dwarfs \citep{met96}
95: and irregular galaxies, to massive spirals and luminous merging IRAS
96: galaxies \citep{rig99}, with a range of metallicities and ages
97: \citep{cer94,mas99}.
98:
99:
100: Hickson Compact Group (HCG) 31 consists of 8 galaxies and was
101: observed using the Infrared Space Observatory\footnote{Based on
102: observations with ISO, an ESA project with instruments funded by ESA
103: Member States (especially the PI countries: France, Germany, the
104: Netherlands and the United Kingdom) and with the participation of ISAS
105: and NASA.} (Fig. 1). Hickson (1982) identified galaxies A to D from
106: the Palomar Sky Survey in order of luminosity, with A being the most
107: luminous because it included the central starburst. However follow-up
108: surveys \citep{rub90,con96,igl97,joh99,joh00} included the starburst
109: in galaxy C rather than A thus making C the most luminous member, and
110: we follow this convention. Galaxies A and C are also designated
111: together as NGC 1741, one of the most luminous Wolf-Rayet galaxies in
112: the catalog of Conti (1991). Rubin et al. (1990) identified several
113: further members of the HCG 31 group, galaxies E, F, G and a possible
114: member further north, Q. The galaxies C and G were included in the
115: Markarian survey and were designated as Mrk 1089 and Mrk 1090
116: respectively. HCG 31 is situated at a distance of 54.8 Mpc, assuming
117: a Hubble parameter of 75 km sec\(^{-1}\) Mpc\(^{-1}\). The redshift
118: of galaxy D \citep{hic92} places it at a distance of 359 Mpc,
119: indicating it is not a bona fide member of the HCG 31 group. We
120: present ISOCAM and ISOPHOT results on HCG 31 as part of an observing
121: programme addressing several galaxies exhibiting Wolf-Rayet
122: signatures. The observations and data reduction are presented in
123: Sect. 2. The results are contained in Sect. 3 and discussed in
124: Sect. 4. The conclusions are summarised in Sect. 5.
125:
126:
127: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
128:
129: The ISO \citep{kes96} observations were obtained using the
130: mid-infrared camera ISOCAM \citep{ces96} and the spectrometric mode of
131: the ISO photopolarimeter ISOPHOT \citep{lem96}. The astronomical
132: observing template (AOT) used was CAM01 \citep{blom01}, for the
133: imaging observations and PHT40, for spectrometry. The observing log
134: of the CAM01 observations at 7.7 $\mu$m and 14.3 $\mu$m using the LW6
135: and LW3 filters and the PHT40 observations is presented in Table 1.
136:
137: \subsection{ISOCAM}
138:
139: Each ISOCAM observation had the following configuration: 3$''$ per
140: pixel field of view (PFOV), integration time of 5.04 s per readout, a
141: raster with $4\times4$ spacecraft pointings with a different stepsize
142: on each axis: 24$''$ stepsize between raster points and a 6$''$
143: stepsize between raster lines. The ISOCAM detector was used in
144: association with one of a selection of four imaging lenses. These
145: allowed plate-scales of 1.5$''$, 3$''$, 6$''$ and 12$''$ per pixel to
146: be chosen, resulting in turn in overall detector fields-of-view of
147: 48$''$, 96$''$, and 192$''$ square. The 12$''$ per pixel
148: field-of-view (12$''$ PFOV) did not access much more sky area than the
149: 6$''$ PFOV due to vignetting of the instrument beam outside a nominal
150: maximum unvignetted field having 3$'$ diameter. The observations
151: discussed here employed the 3$''$ per pixel field-of-view, giving an
152: overall detector field of view of 96$''$ square. Apart from these
153: details of the detector plate-scale and FOV, the spatial resolution
154: was determined by the point spread function (PSF), which had a
155: full-width in arcseconds at the first Airy minimum of 0.84x$\lambda$,
156: with $\lambda$ expressed in $\mu$m. So for the 14.3 $\mu$m filter,
157: the full width of the first Airy minimum was 12$''$ resulting in a
158: Rayleigh criterion of 6$''$. The corresponding number for the 7.7
159: $\mu$m filter was 3.2$''$. All CAM data processing was performed with
160: the CAM Interactive Analysis (CIA) system \citep{ott97,del00}, and the
161: following method was applied during data processing: (i) Dark
162: subtraction was performed using a dark model with correction for slow
163: drift of the dark current throughout the mission. (ii) Glitch effects
164: due to cosmic rays were removed following the method of Aussel et al.
165: (1999). (iii) Transient correction for flux attenuation due to the
166: lag in the detector response was performed by the method described by
167: Abergel et al. (1996). (iv) The raster map was flat-fielded using a
168: library flat-field. (v) Pixels affected by glitch residuals and other
169: persistent effects were manually suppressed. (vi) The raster mosaic
170: images were deconvolved with a multi-resolution transform method
171: \citep{sta98}. Deconvolution or image restoration is a difficult step
172: in image processing especially in dealing with images with many
173: instrumental and noise defects such as those found in CAM data.
174: Consider a signal $\mathit{I}$, the result of the observation of an
175: object $\mathit{O(x,y)}$ through an optical system. This system may be
176: characterised by the point spread function (PSF) $\mathit{P(x,y)}$.
177: The observed signal results from the degradation, or convolution, of
178: $\mathit{P(x,y)}$ with $\mathit{O(x,y)}$ and the inclusion of noise
179: $\mathit{N(x,y)}$:
180:
181: $\mathit{I(x,y) = (O * P)(x,y) + N(x,y)}$
182:
183: To correct for the degradation of the optical system,
184: $\mathit{O(x,y)}$ must be determined knowing $\mathit{I(x,y)}$ and
185: $\mathit{P(x,y)}$. The presence of the additive noise means that
186: there is an infinite number of solutions to this equation. One of the
187: most widely used techniques for determining a solution is the
188: multi-resolution transform method \citep{sta98}. It is based on the
189: idea that a given realization of a random variable carries an amount
190: of information that is inversely proportional to its entropy. Among
191: an infinite number of solutions, the one that maximises its entropy
192: will minimise the amount of information required to make it compatible
193: with the observed data. The deconvolved map yielded resolution
194: enhancements of a factor of 1.2 to 1.6 with the higher values
195: associated with the 7.7 micron map. Spatial resolution for the 7.7
196: micron map was 2.2$''$, and 5$''$ for the 14.3 micron map. Similar
197: resolution enhancements by factors of 1.2 to 2.0 were obtained using
198: the multi-resolution transform method on HST and also ISO data
199: \citep{wu94,pan96}. There was a loss of flux in this process for the
200: weaker, point-like sources (D, E). On the other hand, more extended
201: sources such as the galaxies A and C have their fluxes conserved
202: through the deconvolution process. The deconvolved maps are presented
203: here, with the source photometry performed on the non-deconvolved
204: maps. Colour ratios taken on the deconvolved maps are valid because
205: any attenuation of source flux occurs similarly for a given source in
206: each filter. Photometry was performed by integrating the pixels
207: containing source flux exceeding the background by 3$\sigma$. Fluxes
208: measured in broadband filters are essentially valid either for the
209: nominally assumed $\lambda$\(^{-1}\) source spectrum, or even if the
210: measured and modelled galaxy spectrum is taken into account, since
211: colour correction terms are negligible in this case, compared with the
212: measurement precision. The lowest contour level is approximately
213: twice the standard deviation of the background noise obtained using
214: pixels from around the border of the image. The ISOCAM fluxes
215: presented in Table 2 have a photometric accuracy of about 15\%. A
216: comparison of photometry for each source before and after
217: deconvolution is given in Table 3. IRAS fluxes for NGC 1741 are also
218: given for comparison in Table 4 \citep{mos90}. The difference between
219: the 14.3 $\mu$m and the IRAS 12 $\mu$m fluxes is probably due to the
220: strong 8.5 and 11.3 $\mu$m PAH features in the IRAS band. Comparison
221: of images from different filters was obtained by matching the
222: resolution of the two deconvolved images before creating ratio maps.
223: The durations of the observations in Table 1 give the length of the
224: actual observation including instrumental, but not spacecraft,
225: overheads.
226:
227: \subsection{PHT-S}
228:
229: PHT-S consists of a dual grating spectrometer with a resolving power
230: of 90 \citep{lau98}. Bands SS and SL cover the range of 2.5 - 4.8
231: $\mu$m and 5.8 - 11.6 $\mu$m respectively. The PHT-S spectrum of the
232: nucleus of NGC 1741 was obtained by operating the $24''\times24''$
233: aperture of PHT-S in rectangular chopping mode using the ISOPHOT focal
234: plane chopper. In this mode, the satellite pointed to the position
235: between the source and an off-source position, and the chopper moved
236: alternately between these two positions. The source was always in the
237: positive beam in the spacecraft Y-direction. For the PHT-S spectrum
238: of the lobe of galaxy A, PHT-S was operated in a similar manner. In
239: Figure 1 the nominal PHT-S aperture (24"x24" square) is shown overlaid
240: on the 7.7 $\mu$m map, for the case of the off-nucleus measurement.
241: However, the beam profiles differ in detail per PHT-S detector and are
242: in general narrower than the nominal aperture \citep{lau01}. The
243: calibration of the spectrum was performed by using a spectral response
244: function derived from several calibration stars of different
245: brightness observed in chopper mode \citep{aco99}. The relative
246: spectrometric uncertainty of the PHT-S spectrum is about 20\% when
247: comparing different parts of the spectrum that are more than a few
248: microns apart. The absolute photometric uncertainty is about 30\% for
249: bright calibration sources. All PHT data processing was performed
250: using the ISOPHOT Interactive Analysis (PIA) system, version 8.1
251: \citep{gab98}. Data reduction consisted primarily of the removal of
252: instrumental effects such as radiation events which result in a jump
253: of a minimum of two consecutive read-out values, i.e. in a step
254: within the integration ramp. The disturbance is usually very short
255: and the slope of the ramp after the glitch is similar to the slope
256: before it. Once the instrumental effects had been removed, background
257: subtraction was performed and flux densities were obtained. These
258: fluxes were plotted to obtain the spectra for the central starburst
259: region of NGC 1741 and the nucleus of HCG 31A.
260:
261:
262:
263: \section{Results}
264:
265: A map of the HCG 31 group consisting of a deconvolved 7.7 $\mu$m LW6
266: map overlaid on a red Deep Sky Survey (DSS) image of the group is
267: presented in Fig. 1. Deconvolved 7.7 and 14.3 $\mu$m maps of the
268: central galaxies overlaid on DSS and H$\alpha$ images are presented in
269: Figs. 2 and 3.
270:
271: The bulk of the 7.7 $\mu$m and 14.3 $\mu$m emission comes from the
272: interacting galaxies A and C, which are together designated as NGC
273: 1741. Peak emission, which is denoted as N on each map, coincides
274: with the central region of galaxy C. A secondary peak is associated
275: with the nucleus of galaxy A, and forms an extension to the emission
276: from galaxy C. The emission at 14.3 $\mu$m is primarily confined to
277: NGC 1741, though galaxy E and a star forming knot within galaxy B are
278: also weakly detected. Since emission at 14.3 $\mu$m is a primary
279: tracer of warm dust consisting of very small dust grains
280: stochastically heated in regions of low excitation and/or heated dust
281: close to luminous stars, this indicates that most of the dust in the
282: system is within the galaxy NGC 1741. On the 7.7 $\mu$m map, emission
283: is much more widespread, with galaxies B and E well detected along
284: with two sources forming an extension of emission from galaxy A.
285: Since the 7.7 $\mu$m PAH feature is indicative of star formation
286: \citep{cha99}, this map provides a clear representation of the star
287: formation within the system, a fact outlined by the good agreement
288: between the 7.7 $\mu$m contours and the underlying H$\alpha$ map
289: \citep{igl97}. However, a surprising finding was the non-detection of
290: galaxy F on the 7.7 $\mu$m map, given its easy detection in H$\alpha$.
291: Two other sources were also detected on the 7.7 $\mu$m map and are
292: denoted by HGC 31:IR1 and HGC 31:IR2. These sources do not have any
293: known optical or H$\alpha$ counterparts, and a careful inspection of
294: the data cube before coadding of all map pointings suggests that they
295: are the residue of cosmic ray glitches that were not completely
296: eliminated, and we are not treating them as confirmed sources. As
297: regards the remaining members of the group, G and Q were outside the
298: ISOCAM map and thus not observed (Fig. 1). The background galaxy D
299: was detected at 7.7 $\mu$m, but not in H$\alpha$. The Tycho catalogue
300: star TYC 04758-466-1, with m$_{V}$ = 11.3 and spectral type F6 was
301: detected at 7.7$\mu$m and 14.3 $\mu$m, with a flux ratio that is
302: consistent with the Rayleigh-Jeans tail of a blackbody, which serves
303: as a valuable cross-check on the ISOCAM photometric calibration at
304: these faint fluxes. The ISOCAM fluxes for each source from the
305: non-deconvolved maps are given in Table 2.
306:
307: A PHT-S spectrum of the central starburst region of NGC 1741 is
308: presented in Fig. 4. Detections were made of unidentified infrared
309: bands (UIBs) at 6.2, 7.7, 8.6 and 11.3 $\mu$m that are usually
310: attributed to PAHs. The 8.6 $\mu$m feature has a peak flux roughly
311: equal to the 7.7 $\mu$m feature, which is unusual in starburst
312: spectra. Such features may be indicative of newly created PAHs
313: \citep{ver96}. The feature at 10.65 $\mu$m may be a blend of features
314: including [S IV]. A PHT-S spectrum of the nucleus of galaxy A is
315: presented in Fig. 5. PAHs at 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, and 11.3 $\mu$m and a
316: feature at 9.7$\mu$m, possibly PAH, were detected but at a level much
317: weaker than in the starburst region. For both spectra, line fluxes
318: for each feature were obtained by interpolating the continuum between
319: the ends of the wavelength range. The line fluxes for the central
320: starburst region are given in Table 5, while the fluxes for the
321: nucleus of galaxy A are given in Table 6.
322:
323: The spectral energy distribution of NGC 1741 using ISOCAM, PHT-SL from
324: the central starburst and IRAS fluxes is presented in Fig. 6. The
325: dust model, denoted by the solid curve \citep{kru94,sieb98} was fitted
326: to the data and contains three separate dust populations: the PAH
327: bands \citep{bou98}, a warm dust component at 110 K and a cooler dust
328: component at 40 K, and each component is indicated in Fig. 6.
329:
330:
331:
332: \section{Discussion}
333:
334: \subsection{Morphology and star formation in HCG 31}
335:
336: The interaction between galaxies A and C has been the primary cause of
337: the severely disturbed morphology and high rates of star formation
338: within the group. The most obvious morphological features created by
339: the interaction are the tidal tails; the northern tidal tail extending
340: from A and containing two ISO sources, and a southern tidal tail
341: containing dwarf galaxies E and F. The stripping of H I from galaxies
342: A and C allowed the dwarf galaxies to condense and form within the
343: southern tidal tail. Galaxies B and G have also been affected by the
344: central interaction of A and C. Galaxy B appears quite warped in
345: optical and continuum maps \citep{rub90,igl97}, with star formation
346: located in three H$\alpha$ knots. The galaxy is also linked to galaxy
347: C by a bridge detectable in H$\alpha$. G exhibits star formation
348: weighted towards the edge of the galaxy facing the southern tail,
349: indicating that star formation within the galaxy has been triggered by
350: interaction with the tail. The peculiar system morphology and
351: resultant star formation led to investigations of the star formation
352: history of the group \citep{igl97} with three distinct modes of star
353: formation suggested. The strongest mode of star formation, involving
354: galaxies A and C, was a product of the collision between the two, with
355: star formation being concentrated in two strong bursts coinciding with
356: the nuclei of the galaxies. The secondary mode, directly linked to
357: this interaction, involves the formation of dwarf galaxies from H I
358: stripped from both galaxies. Galaxies E and F seem to have been
359: formed in this manner. Finally, a third mode shows star formation
360: displaced along the edges of the affected galaxies, concentrated in
361: knots. This mode, responsible for star formation in galaxies B and G,
362: may be due to a stripping mechanism as the galaxies pass through a
363: denser medium such as H I stripped from galaxies A and C. Given an
364: interaction timescale of about 400 Myr and an age of the central burst
365: of about 4 to 5 Myr \citep{joh99}, it is clear that these modes of
366: star formation are very recent, ongoing, events in the dynamical
367: history of HCG 31. However, the occurance of previous periods of high
368: star formation may be noted by the presence of stellar super-clusters
369: in the central burst with ages over 10 Myr \citep{joh99,joh00}.
370:
371: NGC 1741 was previously surveyed in X-ray \citep{ste98}, UV
372: \citep{con96}, optical/H$\alpha$ \citep{rub90,igl97}, radio
373: \citep{wil91} and CO \citep{yun97}. It has been estimated that $\sim$
374: 700 Wolf Rayet and $\sim$ 10$^{4}$ O-type stars are located within the
375: central burst \citep{con96}. With some knowledge of the content of
376: the burst, it is instructive to determine the current state of star
377: formation in NGC 1741 using a diagnostic such as the 14.3/6.75 $\mu$m
378: flux ratio for the system. The 14.3/6.75 $\mu$m ratio generally
379: decreases as interactions develop and starbursts age
380: \citep{vig99,ces99,cha99,hel99}. To determine the 14.3/6.75 $\mu$m
381: ratio for NGC 1741, the 6.75 $\mu$m (ISOCAM LW2 filter) flux was
382: synthesized from the PHT-S spectrum in the wavelength range of that
383: ISOCAM filter (5 to 8.5 $\mu$m). In order to check the accuracy of
384: the synthesised flux, 6.75 $\mu$m and 7.7 $\mu$m fluxes were
385: synthesised for several sources, including Mkn 297 and NGC 7714
386: \citep{ohal00}, from their PHT-S spectra, and the derived values were
387: found to agree with the directly measured ISOCAM fluxes for the
388: sources within the photometric uncertainties. For NGC 1741, the
389: 14.3/6.75 $\mu$m ratio was found to be 1.6$\pm$0.4. This value is
390: quite low. A ratio above 3 is indicative of high star formation
391: leading to the heating of dust in the nuclear region by hot, young
392: ionising stars \citep{vig99,lau00}.
393:
394: Since the 14.3 $\mu$m flux is dominated primarily by emission from
395: very small dust grains and the 6.75 and 7.7 $\mu$m fluxes are
396: dominated by PAHs, the 14.3/7.7 $\mu$m ratio provides a diagnostic
397: similar to the 14.3/6.75 $\mu$m ratio, allowing a determination of the
398: current state of the starburst. To determine the 14.3/7.7 $\mu$m
399: ratio, fluxes were obtained in strips on each of the raster maps with
400: each strip bisecting NGC 1741 through the central starburst region.
401: Each strip was equally separated by a position angle (PA) of
402: 45$^{\circ}$, measured from north, where PA = 0$^{\circ}$. The strips
403: were divided to obtain the 14.3/7.7 $\mu$m ratio. One such
404: ratio-strip is presented in Fig. 7, taken from northwest to southeast
405: through the galaxy. The slope of the 14.3/7.7 $\mu$m ratio changes
406: over the length of the strip and attains a peak value of 1.9 at the
407: center of the starburst. To the northeast of the burst the ratio
408: drops to 1.5, while to the southwest the slope is steeper, reaching a
409: minimum of 1.3. The higher value of the ratio in the central
410: starburst region may be due to destruction of PAHs by UV ionisation
411: from O and B type stars, with an added component due to heating of
412: very small dust grains. In comparison with other galaxies with very
413: active starbursts where the 14.3/6.75 $\mu$m ratio can exceed 3, the
414: peak 14.3/7.7 $\mu$m ratio value of 1.9 for NGC 1741 is quite low
415: \citep{cha99}. The low ratio values and the age of the burst
416: \citep{joh00} suggest that, while the small central region of NGC 1741
417: is still in the throes of a very recent starburst, the central region
418: may be moving into a post-starburst stage with cessation of the
419: formation of the most massive stars \citep{cha99}. This is in
420: contrast to previous higher resolution surveys which suggest strong
421: ongoing star formation, especially in compact regions
422: \citep{rub90,con96,igl97,joh00}. However, the lower ratio values for
423: NGC 1741 may be due to ISO being sensitive to a more extended region
424: with less activity. The aging of the burst may be due to supernovae
425: and stellar winds \citep{tan88} disrupting the interstellar medium,
426: preventing further star formation as soon as the first generation of O
427: stars have formed and evolved \citep{gen00}.
428:
429:
430: \subsection{Does HCG 31 harbour an AGN?}
431:
432: Several surveys of HCGs have led to a debate about the nature of the
433: activity within compact groups. Sulentic and Rabaca (1993) and
434: Venugopal (1995) contest the claim by Hickson et al. (1989) that far
435: infrared emission is enhanced in compact groups, arguing that while
436: tidal interactions and mergers did occur in the past in compact groups
437: \citep{rub91,men95}, most compact group galaxies seem to exhibit the
438: behaviour of normal galaxies. However, a significant proportion of
439: the brightest HCGs do display some sort of activity, be it starburst
440: or AGN \citep{coz98a}.
441:
442: CO surveys of HCGs \citep{yun97,ver98} have shown that CO deficient
443: groups are also the most dynamically evolved and show a history of
444: strong star formation. An extreme example is HCG 16, which includes
445: one Seyfert 2 galaxy, two luminous LINER galaxies and 3 starburst
446: galaxies \citep{rib96}. Those groups with AGN components tend to have
447: their AGN concentrated within the group core. This is likely since
448: AGN tend to be found within luminous and early type galaxies.
449:
450: Several diagnostic tools are available to probe the nature of the
451: activity within the central region. The ratio of the integrated PAH
452: luminosity and the 40 to 120 $\mu$m IR luminosity \citep{lu99}
453: provides a tool to discriminate between starbursts, AGN and normal
454: galaxies because the lower the ratio, the more active the galaxy. For
455: NGC 1741, the ratio is 0.08 and is consistent with the values found
456: for other starbursts \citep{vig99}. Similarly, the ratio of the 7.7
457: $\mu$m PAH flux to the continuum level at this wavelength can provide
458: a measure of the level of activity within the nucleus
459: \citep{gen98,lau00,cla00}. The ratio for NGC 1741 is 3.5 and is
460: indicative of an active starburst. The results from these diagnostic
461: tools indicate that NGC 1741 is home to a compact burst of star
462: formation and that an AGN is not required within the central region of
463: the merging galaxies HCG 31 A and C.
464:
465: \subsection{How will HCG 31 evolve?}
466:
467: Coziol et al. (1998b) discuss a possible galaxy evolution scenario
468: for the HCGs. The first phase involves triggering of starbursts due
469: to mergers, as in HCG 31. When the galaxy's mass is high enough and a
470: large enough gas reservoir is available, the gas falls inwards towards
471: the centre to form and nourish an AGN. As the starburst fades, the
472: AGN can remain as a Seyfert or LINER depending on the amount of gas
473: available and the level of accretion. When the gas reservoir has
474: finally dissipated, a low luminosity AGN or a normal galaxy may be the
475: final result. Most HCGs are dominated by such low luminosity AGNs or
476: non-active galaxies in their cores indicating that the activity in the
477: system has passed and they are now in a quieter phase.
478:
479: As regards the eventual fate of HCG 31, models by Barnes (1989)
480: suggest that after continuing mergers, the final result will be an
481: elliptical galaxy. After star formation activity has ceased and the
482: remaining stars have evolved, the luminosity will fade \citep{rub90}.
483: The HCG 31 group sits within a large common H I envelope totaling
484: $\sim$ 10$^{10}$ M$_{\odot}$ of gas, which may end up within the
485: center of the object where it can fuel a starburst or an AGN. Given
486: such a large gas reservoir, and the lack of an AGN within the central
487: burst of HCG 31, it would seem that HCG 31 is in the early stages of
488: such a scenario.
489:
490:
491: \section{Conclusions}
492:
493: The 14.3/6.75 $\mu$m and 14.3/7.7 $\mu$m flux ratios (where the 6.75
494: $\mu$m flux was synthesized from PHT-S measurements) suggest that the
495: central burst within NGC 1741 may be moving towards the post-starburst
496: phase. The ratio of the integrated PAH luminosity to the 40 to 120
497: $\mu$m infrared luminosity and the far-infrared colours reveal that
498: despite the high surface brightness of the nucleus, the properties of
499: HCG 31 can be explained in terms of a starburst and do not require the
500: presence an AGN. The star TYC 04758-466-1, with m$_{V}$ = 11.3 and
501: spectral type F6 was detected at 7.7$\mu$m and 14.3 $\mu$m.
502:
503: \section{Acknowledgements}
504:
505: We thank J. Iglesias-Paramo for kindly allowing the use of the
506: H$\alpha$ map of HCG 31. The ISOCAM data presented in this paper were
507: analysed using CIA, a joint development by the ESA Astrophysics
508: Division and the ISOCAM Consortium. The ISOCAM Consortium is led by
509: the ISOCAM PI, C. Cesarsky. The ISOPHOT data presented in this paper
510: were reduced using PIA, which is a joint development by the ESA
511: Astrophysics Division and the ISOPHOT consortium with the
512: collaboration of the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center
513: (IPAC). Contributing ISOPHOT Consortium members are DIAS, RAL, AIP,
514: MPIK, and MPIA.
515:
516: \begin{thebibliography}{}
517: \bibitem[Abergel et~al.(1996)]{abe96} Abergel, A., Bernard, J.P., Boulanger, F. et al., 1996, \aap, 315, L329
518: \bibitem[Acosta-Pulido et~al.(1999)]{aco99} Acosta-Pulido, J.A., Gabriel, C., Castaeda H., 1999, Experimental Astronomy, 10, 333
519: \bibitem[Aussel et~al.(1999)]{aus99} Aussel, H., Cesarsky, C.J., Elbaz, D. et~al., 1999, A\&A, 342, 313
520: \bibitem[Barnes(1989)]{bar89} Barnes, J.E., 1989, Nat, 338, 123
521: \bibitem[Blommaert et~al.(2001)]{blom01} Blommaert, J. et~al., 2001, in ISO Handbook Volume III: The ISO Camera, Version 1.2, August 29, 2001, http://www.iso.vilspa.esa.es/manuals/
522: \bibitem[Boulanger et~al.(1998)]{bou98} Boulanger, F., Boissel, P., Cesasrsky, D. et~al., 1998, \aap, 339, 194
523: \bibitem[Cervino and Mas-Hesse(1994)]{cer94} Cervino, M., Mas-Hesse, J.M., 1994, \aap, 284, 749
524: \bibitem[Cesarsky et~al.(1996)]{ces96} Cesarsky, C., Abergel, A., Agnese, P. et~al., 1996, \aap, 315, L32
525: \bibitem[Cesarsky and Genzel(2000)]{gen00} Cesarsky, C., Genzel, R., 2000, ARA\&A, 38, 761
526: \bibitem[Cesarsky and Sauvage (1999)]{ces99} Cesarsky, C., Sauvage, M., 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, awaiting publication
527: \bibitem[Charmandaris et~al.(1999)]{cha99} Charmandaris, V., Laurent, O., Mirabel, I.F. et~al., 1999, in Galaxy Dynamics : from the Early Universe to the Present, ASP Conference Series, eds. Combes, F., Manon, G.A., Charmandaris, V., Vol. 197, 335
528: \bibitem[Clavel et~al.(2000)]{cla00} Clavel, J., Schulz, B., Altieri, B. et~al., 2000, \aap, 357, 839
529: \bibitem[Conti(1991)]{con91} Conti, P.S., 1991, \apj, 377, 115
530: \bibitem[Conti et~al.(1996)]{con96} Conti, P.S., Leitherer, C. and Vacca, W.D., 1996, \apj, 461, L87
531: \bibitem[Coziol et~al(1998a)]{coz98a} Coziol, R., Ribeiro, A.L.B., de Carvalho, R.R. et~al., 1998, \apj, 493, 563
532: \bibitem[Coziol et~al(1998b)]{coz98b} Coziol, R., de Carvalho, R.R., Capelato, H.V. et~al., 1998, \apj, 506, 545
533: \bibitem[Delaney(2000)]{del00} Delaney, M., 2000, ISOCAM Interactive Analysis User's Manual 4.0, ESA SAI/96-5226/DC
534: \bibitem[Gabriel(1998)]{gab98} Gabriel, C., 1998, PHT Interactive Analysis User Manual, ESA, http://www.iso.vilspa.esa.es/manuals/
535: \bibitem[Genzel et~al.(1998)]{gen98} Genzel, R., Lutz, D., Sturm, E. et~al., 1998, \apj, 498, 579
536: \bibitem[Helou(1999)]{hel99} Helou G., 1999, in The Universe as seen by ISO, ESA SP-427, eds. P. Cox, M.F. Kessler, ESA, volume 2, 797
537: \bibitem[Hickson(1982)]{hic82} Hickson, P., 1982, \apj, 255, 382
538: \bibitem[Hickson et~al.(1989)]{hic89} Hickson, P., Menon, T.K., Huchra, Palumbo, G.C.C., Persic, M., 1989, \apj, 341, 679
539: \bibitem[Hickson et~al.(1992)]{hic92} Hickson, P., De Olivera, C.M., Huchra, J.P. et~al., 1992, \apj, 399, 353
540: \bibitem[Iglesias-Paramo and Vilchez(1997)]{igl97} Iglesias-Paramo, J., Vilchez, J., 1997, \apj, 479, 190
541: \bibitem[Johnson et~al.(1999)]{joh99} Johnson, K.E., Vacca, W.D., Leitherer, C. et~al., 1999, \aj, 117, 1708
542: \bibitem[Johnson et~al.(2000)]{joh00} Johnson, K.E. and Conti, P.S., 2000, \aj, 119, 2146
543: \bibitem[Kessler et~al.(1996)]{kes96} Kessler, M., Steinz, J.A., Anderegg, M.E. et~al., 1996, \aap, 315, L27
544: \bibitem[Krugel and Siebenmorgen(1994)]{kru94} Krugel, E. and Siebenmorgen, R., 1994, \aap, 282, 407
545: \bibitem[Laureijs et~al.(1998)]{lau98} Laureijs, R.J., Klaas, U., Richards, P.J. et~al., 1998, {ISOPHOT Data Users Manual}, ESA, http://www.iso.vilspa.esa.es/manuals/
546: \bibitem[Laureijs et~al.(2000)]{lau00} Laureijs, R., Watson, D., Metcalfe, L., et~al., 2000, \aap, 359, 900
547: \bibitem[Laureijs et~al.(2001)]{lau01} Laureijs, R.J., Klaas, U., Richards, P.J. et~al., 2001, {PHT - The Imaging Photo-Polarimeter}, ESA, http://www.iso.vilspa.esa.es/manuals/
548: \bibitem[Lemke et~al.(1996)]{lem96} Lemke, D. Klaas, U., Abolins, J. et~al., 1996, \aap, 315, L64
549: \bibitem[Lu et~al.(1999)]{lu99} Lu, N.Y., Helou, G., Silbermann, N. et~al., 1999, in The Universe as seen by ISO, ESA SP-427, eds. P. Cox, M.F. Kessler, ESA, volume 2, 929
550: \bibitem[Mas-Hesse and Kunth(1999)]{mas99} Mas-Hesse, J.M., Kunth, D., 1999, \aap, 349, 765
551: \bibitem[Menon(1995)]{men95} Menon, T.K., 1995, \mnras, 274, 845
552: \bibitem[Metcalfe et~al.(1996)]{met96} Metcalfe, L. Steel, S., Barr, P. et al., 1996, \aap, 315, L105
553: \bibitem[Moshir et~al.(1990)]{mos90} Moshir, M., Kopan, G., Conrow, T. et~al., 1990, in The Faint Source Catalog, version 2.0, Infrared Astronomical Satellite Catalogs, Infrared Processing and Analysis Centre
554: \bibitem[Pantin and Starck(1996)]{pan96} Pantin, E.,Starck, J., 1996, \aaps, 118, 575
555: \bibitem[O'Halloran et~al.(2000)]{ohal00} O'Halloran, B., Metcalfe, L., Delaney, M., et~al., 2000, \aap, 360, 871
556: \bibitem[Ott et~al.(1997)]{ott97} Ott,, S., Abergel, A., Altieri, B. et~al., 1997, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems VI, Vol. 125 of ASP Conf. Series eds. G. Hunt, H. Payne, 34
557: \bibitem[Ribeiro et~al.(1996)]{rib96} Ribeiro, A.L.B., de Carvalho, R.R., Coziol, R. et~al., 1996, \apj, 436, 5
558: \bibitem[Rigopoulou et~al.(1999)]{rig99} Rigopoulou, D., Genzel, R., Lutz, D. et~al., 1999, in The Universe as seen by ISO, ESA SP-427, eds. P. Cox, M.F. Kessler, ESA, volume 2, 833
559: \bibitem[Rubin et~al.(1990)]{rub90} Rubin, V., Ford, W.K., Hunter, D.A., 1990, \apj, 365, 86
560: \bibitem[Rubin et~al.(1991)]{rub91} Rubin, V.C, Hunter, D.A, Ford, W.K., 1991, \apjs, 76, 153
561: \bibitem[Schaerer and Vacca(1998)]{sch98} Schaerer, D. and Vacca, W.D., 1998, \aj, 497, 618
562: \bibitem[Schaerer et~al.(1999)]{sch99} Schaerer, D., Contini, T. and Pindao, M., 1999, \aaps, 136, 35
563: \bibitem[Siebenmorgen et~al.(1998)]{sieb98} Siebenmorgen, R., Krugel, E. and Chini, R., 1998, \aap, 351, 495
564: \bibitem[Starck et~al.(1998)]{sta98} Starck, J., Murtagh, F. and Bijaoui, A., 1998, in Image Processing and Data Analysis: The Multiscale Approach, Cambridge Univ. Press
565: \bibitem[Stevens and Strickland(1998)]{ste98} Stevens, I. and Strickland, D., 1998, \mnras, 294, 523
566: \bibitem[Sulentic and De Mello Rabaca(1997)]{sul93} Sulentic, J.W. and De Mello Rabaca, D.F., 1993, \apj, 410, 520
567: \bibitem[Taniguichi and Kawara(1988)]{tan88} Taniguichi, Y. and Kawara, K., 1988, \aj, 95, 1378
568: \bibitem[Venugopal(1995)]{ven95} Venugopal, V.R., 1995, \mnras, 277, 455
569: \bibitem[Verdes-Montenegro et~al.(1998)]{ver98} Verdes-Montenegro, L., Yun, M.S., Perea, J. et~al., 1998, \apj, 497, 89
570: \bibitem[Williams et~al.(1991)]{wil91} Williams, B.A., McMahon, P.M., Van Gorkom, J.H., 1991, \aj, 101, 1957
571: \bibitem[Wu(1994)]{wu94} Wu, N., 1994, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems III, eds. D.R. Crabtree, R.J. Hanisch, J. Barnes, ASP Conference Series, vol. 61, 1994
572: \bibitem[Verstraete et~al.(1996)]{ver96} Verstraete, L., Puget, J.L, Falgarone, E. et~al., 1996, \aap, 315, 337
573: \bibitem[Vigroux et~al.(1999)]{vig99} Vigroux, L., Charmandais, V., Gallais, P. et~al., 1999, in The Universe as seen by ISO, ESA SP-427, eds. P. Cox, M.F. Kessler, ESA, volume 2, 805
574: \bibitem[Yun et~al.(1997)]{yun97} Yun, M.S., Verdes-Montenegro, L.,
575: Del Olmo, A. et~al., 1997, \apj, 475, L21
576: \end{thebibliography}
577:
578: \begin{figure} \resizebox{\columnwidth}{!} {\includegraphics*{fig1.ps}}
579:
580: \caption{Deconvolved 7.7$\mu$m map of the Hickson 31 group overlaid on
581: a red DSS image. Each member of the group (A to C, E to G, and Q) is
582: identified, along with background galaxy D. North is to the top and
583: east to the left. The large box delineates the region mapped with
584: ISOCAM, while the small box indicates the position and size of one of
585: the ISOPHOT beams. The weak sources HCG 31:IR1 and HCG 31:IR2 do not
586: have any known optical or H$\alpha$ counterparts, and a careful
587: inspection of the data cube before coadding of all map pointings
588: suggests that they are the residue of cosmic ray glitches that were
589: not completely eliminated and we are not treating them as confirmed
590: sources. The top and right-hand scales refer to a local pixel number
591: scale.}
592: \end{figure}
593:
594:
595:
596: \begin{figure} \resizebox{\columnwidth}{!} {\includegraphics*{fig2.ps}}
597:
598: \caption{Deconvolved 7.7$\mu$m map of HCG 31, superimposed on a
599: H$\alpha$ map of the group. Contour levels (mJy/arcsec\(^{-2}\)) are:
600: 0 = 0.1; 1 = 0.15; 2 = 0.2; 3 = 0.5; 4 = 1.0; 5 = 2.0; 6 = 4.0. N is
601: the starburst region. Sources A1 and C1 are extensions of emission
602: from galaxy A and lie in the northern tidal tail. Source B1 is
603: associated with the southernmost H-alpha knot within galaxy B. The map
604: notation is the same as in Fig. 1.}
605: \end{figure}
606:
607: \begin{figure} \resizebox{\columnwidth}{!} {\includegraphics*{fig3.ps}}
608:
609: \caption{Deconvolved 14.3 $\mu$m map of HCG 31, superimposed on a red
610: DSS image of the system. Contour levels (mJy/arcsec\(^{-2}\)) are: 0
611: = 0.1; 1 = 1.0; 2 = 2.0; 3 = 4.0; 4 = 6.0, 5 = 8.0, 6 = 10.0. The
612: galaxy identifications are otherwise the same as in Figs. 1 and 2.}
613: \end{figure}
614:
615: \begin{figure} \resizebox{\columnwidth}{!} {\includegraphics*{fig4.ps}}
616: \caption{PHT-S spectrum of the central starburst region of NGC 1741.
617: The PAH and [S IV] features are indicated. The bandpasses for the
618: 6.75 $\mu$m and 7.7 $\mu$m ISOCAM filters are also shown.}
619: \end{figure}
620:
621: \begin{figure} \resizebox{\columnwidth}{!}
622: {\includegraphics*{fig5.ps}}
623:
624: \caption{PHT-S spectrum of the nucleus of galaxy HCG 31A. The PAH
625: features are indicated. The bandpasses for the 6.75 $\mu$m and 7.7
626: $\mu$m ISOCAM filters are also given.}
627:
628: \end{figure}
629:
630: \begin{figure} \resizebox{\columnwidth}{!} {\includegraphics*{fig6.ps}}
631:
632: \caption{Spectral energy distribution of NGC 1741 using ISO and IRAS
633: flux data, including the key for the different symbols. The PHT-S data
634: is taken from the central starburst. The models fitted to the data
635: are described in the text.}
636:
637: \end{figure}
638:
639: \begin{figure} \resizebox{\columnwidth}{!} {\includegraphics*{fig7.ps}}
640:
641: \caption{14.3/7.7 $\mu$m ratio of ISOCAM emission profiles obtained
642: from the NE to SW scan across the central starburst region of NGC 1741
643: at PA = 45$^{\circ}$.}
644:
645: \end{figure}
646:
647: \clearpage
648: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccccc}\rotate
649: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
650:
651: \tablecaption{ Log of the ISO observations of HCG 31. The ten columns
652: list the observation name, the TDT number, the AOT, the filter, the
653: wavelength range ($\Delta\lambda$), the reference wavelength of the
654: filter, the date and duration of the observation, and the position of
655: the observation in Right Ascension and Declination respectively. The
656: + symbol represents the central starburst region of NGC 1741, while *
657: represents the nucleus of HCG 31A. \label{tbl-1}}
658:
659: \tablewidth{0pt} \tablehead{\colhead{Observation}
660: & \colhead{TDT number} & \colhead{AOT number} & \colhead{Filter} &
661: \colhead{$\Delta\lambda$} & \colhead{$\lambda_\mathrm{ref}$} &
662: \colhead{Date} & \colhead{Duration} & \colhead{Right Ascension} &
663: \colhead{Declination}\\ & & & & \colhead{($\mu$m)} & \colhead{($\mu$m)}
664: & & \colhead{(seconds)} &\colhead{(RA)} &\colhead{(DEC)}} \startdata
665: NGC1741 LW3 &85801324 &CAM01 &LW3 &12.0--18.0 &14.3 &22 Mar 1998 &2076
666: &05\(^{h}\) 01\(^{m}\) 37.7\(^{s}\) &-04$^{\circ}$ 15$'$ 32.4$''$\\
667: NGC1741 LW6 &85800809 &CAM01 &LW6 &7.0--8.5 &7.7 &22 Mar 1998 &2176
668: &05\(^{h}\) 01\(^{m}\) 37.7\(^{s}\) &-04$^{\circ}$ 15$'$ 32.4$''$\\
669: NGC1741 + &68801908 &PHOT40 &SS/SL &2.5--11.6 & &04 Oct 1997 &1132
670: &05\(^{h}\) 01\(^{m}\) 37.7\(^{s}\) &-04$^{\circ}$ 15$'$ 31.7$''$\\
671: NGC1741 * &85800921 &PHOT40 &SS/SL &2.5--11.6 & &22 Mar 1998 &1132
672: &05\(^{h}\) 01\(^{m}\) 38.9\(^{s}\) &-04$^{\circ}$ 15$'$ 30.2$''$\\
673: \enddata
674: \end{deluxetable}
675:
676:
677:
678: \clearpage
679: \begin{deluxetable}{crr}
680: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
681:
682: \tablecaption{ISOCAM fluxes for NGC 1741. The three columns list the
683: source, the flux measured at 7.7 $\mu$m, and the flux measured at 14.3
684: $\mu$m. The wavelength range for the 7.7 $\mu$m filter was 7.0 to 8.5
685: $\mu$m, while the range of the 14.3 $\mu$m filter was 12 to 18 $\mu$m.
686: The fluxes are taken from the non-deconvolved maps for all objects.
687: The beam size for the ISOCAM observations was 3$''$ pixel field of
688: view (PFOV). \label{tbl-2}}
689:
690: \tablewidth{0pt}
691: \tablehead{\colhead{Source} &
692: \colhead{7.7 $\mu$m flux} &
693: \colhead{14.3 $\mu$m flux}\\
694: &
695: \colhead{(mJy)} &
696: \colhead{(mJy)}}
697:
698: \startdata
699:
700: HCG 31A & 23.20 $\pm$ 3.50 & 12.30 $\pm$ 1.90 \\
701: HCG 31B & 5.01 $\pm$ 0.70 & $\leq$ 0.17 $\pm$ 0.00 \\
702: HCG 31C & 70.80 $\pm$ 10.60 & 30.40 $\pm$ 4.60 \\
703: HCG 31D & 0.44 $\pm$ 0.06 & $\leq$ 0.17 $\pm$ 0.00 \\
704: HCG 31E & 7.86 $\pm$ 0.23 & 2.20 $\pm$ 0.42\\
705: TYC 04758-466-1 & 6.18 $\pm$ 1.36 & 1.53 $\pm$ 0.32\\
706: \enddata
707: \end{deluxetable}
708:
709:
710: \clearpage
711: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
712: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
713:
714: \tablecaption{Comparison of photometry from each source on the 7.7
715: $\mu$m map before and after deconvolution \label{tbl-3}}
716:
717: \tablewidth{0pt} \tablehead{\colhead{Object} &
718: \colhead{Non-deconvolved flux} & \colhead{Decovolved flux}\\ & \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{(mJy)}}
719: \startdata
720: HCG 31A & 23.19 &23.17 \\
721: HCG 31B & 5.01 &4.96 \\
722: HCG 31C & 70.81 &70.77 \\
723: HCG 31D & 0.44 &0.31 \\
724: HCG 31E & 7.86 &5.22 \\
725: TYC 04758-466-1 & 6.18 &5.03 \\
726: \enddata
727: \end{deluxetable}
728:
729:
730: \clearpage
731: \begin{deluxetable}{crrr}
732: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
733:
734: \tablecaption{IRAS fluxes for NGC 1741. The four columns list the
735: filter used, the wavelength range, the reference wavelength for the
736: filter and the flux measured. \label{tbl-4}}
737:
738: \tablewidth{0pt} \tablehead{\colhead{Filter} &
739: \colhead{$\Delta\lambda$} & \colhead{$\lambda_\mathrm{ref}$} &
740: \colhead{Flux}\\ & \colhead{($\mu$m)} & \colhead{($\mu$m)} &
741: \colhead{(mJy)}}
742: \startdata
743: IRAS 12 $\mu$m &8.5--15 &12 &110 $\pm$ 20.0 \\
744: IRAS 25 $\mu$m &19--30 &25 &580 $\pm$ 40.0 \\
745: IRAS 60 $\mu$m &40--80 &60 &3920 $\pm$ 310.0 \\
746: IRAS 100 $\mu$m &83--120 &100 &5840 $\pm$ 470.0 \\
747: \enddata
748: \end{deluxetable}
749:
750:
751: \clearpage
752:
753: \begin{deluxetable}{crr}
754: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
755:
756: \tablecaption{PHT-S fluxes for the central starburst region of NGC
757: 1741. The three columns give the line identification, the wavelength
758: range and the integrated flux respectively. \label{tbl-5}}
759:
760: \tablewidth{0pt}
761:
762: \tablehead{\colhead{Line ID} & \colhead{Wavelength range} & \colhead{Flux}\\ \colhead{($\mu$m)} & \colhead{($\mu$m)} & \colhead{(10$^{-15}$ W m$^{-2}$)}}
763: \startdata
764: PAH 6.2 & 5.8 - 6.6 & 1.25 $\pm$ 0.43 \\
765: PAH 7.7 & 7.3 - 8.4 & 2.64 $\pm$ 0.56 \\
766: PAH 8.6 & 8.4 - 9.0 & 1.40 $\pm$ 0.43 \\
767: $[$SIV$]$ 10.51 & 10.4 - 10.8 & 1.11 $\pm$ 0.17 \\
768: PAH 11.3 & 11.2 - 11.6 & 1.29 $\pm$ 0.39 \\
769: \enddata
770:
771: \end{deluxetable}
772:
773: \clearpage
774: \begin{deluxetable}{crr}
775: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
776:
777: \tablecaption{PHT-S fluxes for the nucleus of HCG 31A. The three
778: columns give the line identification, the wavelength range and the
779: integrated flux respectively. \label{tbl-6}}
780:
781: \tablewidth{0pt}
782: \tablehead{\colhead{Line ID} & \colhead{Wavelength range} & \colhead{Flux}\\ \colhead{($\mu$m)} & \colhead{($\mu$m)} & \colhead{(10$^{-15}$ W m$^{-2}$)}}
783: \startdata
784: PAH 6.2 & 5.9 - 6.6 & 0.63 $\pm$ 0.19 \\
785: PAH 7.7 & 7.4 - 8.4 & 1.61 $\pm$ 0.44 \\
786: PAH 8.6 & 8.4 - 9.0 & 0.76 $\pm$ 0.23 \\
787: PAH 9.7?? & 9.4 - 10.0 & 0.52 $\pm$ 0.16 \\
788: PAH 11.3 & 11.2 - 11.6 & 0.47 $\pm$ 0.14 \\
789: \enddata
790:
791: \end{deluxetable}
792:
793: \end{document}
794: