1: % paper on RXTE obs of SAX J1750-200
2: % PK 7/9-11/01, 11/5-20/01, 11/26-30/01, 12/5/01
3: % after referee's comments
4: % PK 4/3/02
5: % comments from John
6: % PK4/4/02
7:
8: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex} % for ApJ submission
9: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex} % for preprints
10:
11: \shorttitle{Millisecond variability in SAX J1750.8-2900}
12: \shortauthors{Kaaret et al.}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title{Discovery of Millisecond Variability in the Neutron-Star X-Ray
17: Transient SAX J1750.8-2900}
18:
19: \author{P.\ Kaaret} \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
20: 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}
21: \email{pkaaret@cfa.harvard.edu}
22:
23: \author{J.J.M.\ in 't Zand} \affil{Astronomical Institute, Utrecht
24: University, P.O. Box 80 000, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands \\ SRON
25: National Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht,
26: the Netherlands}
27:
28: \author{J.\ Heise} \affil{SRON National Institute for Space Research,
29: Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, the Netherlands}
30:
31: \author{J.A.\ Tomsick} \affil{Center for Astrophysics and Space
32: Sciences, Code 0424, 9500 Gilman Drive, \\ University of California at
33: San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093}
34:
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37:
38: We report the discovery of millisecond oscillations in the X-ray
39: emission from the X-ray transient SAX J1750.8-2900. Millisecond
40: quasiperiodic oscillations (kHz QPOs) were present in the persistent
41: emission with frequencies ranging from 543~Hz to 1017~Hz. Oscillations
42: at a frequency of 600.75~Hz were present in the brightest X-ray burst
43: observed. We derive an upper limit on the source distance of $6.3 \pm
44: 0.7 \rm \, kpc$ from this X-ray burst.
45:
46: \end{abstract}
47:
48: \keywords{accretion, accretion disks --- gravitation --- relativity ---
49: stars: individual (SAX J1750.8-2900) --- stars: neutron --- X-rays:
50: stars}
51:
52:
53: \section{Introduction}
54:
55: The discovery of millisecond oscillations in the persistent emission
56: and also in thermonuclear X-ray bursts from neutron star low-mass X-ray
57: binaries (LMXBs) has opened a new window on the dynamics of accreting
58: neutron stars \citep{strohmayer96}. The time scales of the kHz
59: quasiperiodic oscillations found in the persistent emission (hereafter
60: kHz QPOs) match those expected from accretion dynamics very close to
61: the neutron star in a region of strong gravity, and the possibility
62: that the kHz QPOs could be used as probes of strong gravity is very
63: intriguing. The burst oscillations are in a range expected for the
64: neutron star spin periods \citep{alpar85}, and have been interpreted as
65: evidence for millisecond spin periods in accreting neutron stars
66: \citep{strohmayer97}. However, this interpretation has recently been
67: questioned because of the large frequency shifts seen in some bursts.
68: Observations of bursts from new sources would be useful in determining
69: the correct interpretation of the burst oscillations.
70:
71: Here, we describe observations made with the Rossi X-Ray Timing
72: Explorer (RXTE; Bradt, Rothschild, \& Swank 1993) following the
73: detection of X-ray bursts from the transient source SAX J1750.8-2900.
74: We report the discovery of kHz QPOs in the persistent emission and of
75: oscillations in one X-ray burst. We describe the source and our
76: observations in \S 2, our results on X-ray bursts in \S 3, our results
77: on the persistent emission in \S 4, and discuss our results in \S 5.
78:
79:
80:
81: \section{Observations of SAX J1750.8-2900}
82:
83: SAX J1750.8-2900 was discovered in March 1997 with the Wide Field
84: Cameras (WFCs) on BeppoSAX as a faint and short duration transient
85: 1\fdg 2 from the galactic center showing type-I X-ray burst activity
86: \citep{bazzano97}. Analysis of data from the WFCs and the All-Sky
87: Monitor (ASM) on RXTE shows a peak flux of 0.12~Crab (where the unit
88: `Crab' is defined as the flux of the Crab nebula in the 2-10~keV band,
89: $\sim 2 \times 10^{-8} \rm \, erg \, cm^{-2} \, s^{-1}$) and activity
90: lasting approximately 3 weeks above 0.01~Crab \citep{natalucci99}. The
91: WFCs detected nine type-I X-ray bursts, with peak fluxes between 0.4
92: and 1.0~Crab and $e$-folding decay times between 4 and 11~s in the
93: 2-8~keV band. No counterparts in other wavelength regimes were
94: identified. The type-I bursts indicate that the source is an accreting
95: neutron star.
96:
97: \begin{figure}[tb] \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f1.eps} \caption{RXTE/ASM
98: light curve of the 2001 outburst of SAX J1750.8-2900. The points are
99: one day averages of the ASM count rates. The diamonds indicate the
100: times of the PCA observations.} \label{asmlc} \end{figure}
101:
102: SAX J1750.8-2900 turned on again four years later, on 1 March 2001 (MJD
103: 51969), as shown by observations with the RXTE All-Sky Monitor (ASM)
104: (announced by the MIT ASM Team), the Proportional Counter Array (C.\
105: Markwardt, private communication), and the WFCs. The ASM light curve
106: of the 2001 outburst is shown in Fig.~\ref{asmlc}. The ASM gives
107: relatively poor coverage near the beginning of the outburst, so
108: detailed information is not available on the initial rise. The high
109: rate point at MJD 52000 is from a single ASM dwell and may be due to an
110: X-ray burst. After the initial outburst, the source flux decayed, and
111: then rose again with an almost linear dependence of ASM count rate with
112: time over a period of roughly 20 days to a peak flux of 0.12~Crab,
113: nearly identical to the 1997 maximum flux. The source subsequently
114: decayed over 10 days to a state of reduced flux, well above the level
115: associated with quiescence in neutron star LMXBs \citep{asai98}.
116:
117: Bursting activity was detected in the 2001 outburst with the WFCs,
118: although not as extensively as during the 1997 outburst probably
119: because the coverage was not as large as in 1997. Nevertheless, the
120: WFCs detected 4 bursts in a single observation on 4 April 2001 (MJD
121: 52003). These four bursts have peak fluxes and light curves similar to
122: the bursts observed in 1997. Three other bursts were detected with the
123: WFCs during the 2001 outburst, one 13 days earlier which is atypical
124: (Natalucci et al.\, in preparation), one 162 days later, and one 179
125: days later.
126:
127: The four X-ray bursts found with the WFC triggered an RXTE
128: Target-of-Opportunity program which led to 4 observations, on 2001
129: April 6, 9, 12, and 15. All of our observations occurred during the
130: second rise in flux, as indicated in Fig.~\ref{asmlc}. Data were
131: obtained with the Proportional Counter Array (PCA) in a spectral mode
132: (Standard 2) with 256 energy channels and 16~s time resolution, a low
133: resolution timing mode (Standard 1) with no energy information and
134: 0.125~s time resolution, and a high resolution timing mode (event mode)
135: with 122~$\mu$s time resolution and 64 energy channels. In addition,
136: burst catcher modes were used to acquire high time resolution data when
137: the event rates exceeded the telemetry capacity of the event mode
138: during X-ray bursts.
139:
140:
141:
142: \begin{table}[tb]
143: \begin{center}
144: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
145: \tableline
146: Number & Time & Peak flux \\
147: \tableline
148: 1 & Apr 06 at 13:26:13 & $6.1 \pm 0.6$ \\
149: 2 & Apr 12 at 14:20:30 & $6.4 \pm 0.6$ \\
150: 3 & Apr 15 at 17:02:25 & $4.8 \pm 0.5$ \\
151: 4 & Apr 15 at 18:37:08 & $1.0 \pm 0.2$ \\
152: \tableline
153: \end{tabular}
154:
155: \caption{Properties of X-Ray Bursts. The table gives the time (UTC) at
156: the start of each burst, and the bolometric peak flux in units of
157: $10^{-8} \rm \, erg \, cm^{-2} \, s^{-1}$. \label{bursttable}}
158: \end{center} \end{table}
159:
160: % use \epsscale{0.8} for preprint2
161: \begin{figure}[tb] \epsscale{0.5} \plotone{f2.eps} \caption{Light
162: curves of the four bursts (burst 1 is at the top). Shown are the PCA
163: count rates in 0.25~s intervals. The zero times are the burst start
164: times given in Table~\ref{bursttable}} \label{blcs} \end{figure}
165:
166: % use \epsscale{0.7} for preprint2
167: \begin{figure}[tb] \epsscale{0.5} \plotone{f3.eps} \caption{Spectral
168: evolution of burst 2. Shown are the unabsorbed bolometric flux (top
169: panel), the blackbody temperature (middle panel), and the equivalent
170: radius assuming a distance of 6.3~kpc (bottom panel).} \label{bur2spec}
171: \end{figure}
172:
173: \begin{figure}[tb] \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f4.eps} \caption{Dynamical
174: power spectrum of burst 2 with the burst light curve (count rate)
175: superimposed. The contours are at Leahy powers of 12, 24, and 36. The
176: contours are generated from power spectra for overlapping 4~s intervals
177: of data with the power plotted at the mid-point of the interval. The
178: power apparently preceding the burst is actually due to the part of the
179: 4~s interval overlapping the burst.} \label{bur2pow} \end{figure}
180:
181: \section{X-Ray Bursts}
182:
183: We used the Standard 1 data to search for X-ray bursts and found four
184: bursts, see Table~\ref{bursttable} and Fig.~\ref{blcs}. We examined
185: the spectral evolution of the bursts using burst catcher or event mode
186: data with 64 channels of energy resolution. We extracted spectra for
187: 0.25~s or 1~s intervals using all Proportional Counter Units (PCUs) on
188: during each burst and all layers. The fluxes were corrected for
189: deadtime effects. The maximum deadtime correction in the brightest
190: burst was 7\%. In order to eliminate the contribution of the
191: persistent emission, we subtracted off a spectrum from 10~s of data
192: preceding each burst, and fit the resulting spectra in the 3-20~keV
193: band with an absorbed blackbody model with the column density fixed to
194: the average value found from the persistent emission spectra described
195: below.
196:
197: The first three bursts are similar with comparable peak fluxes. The
198: decay ($e$-folding) times for the full band (2--60~keV) PCA count rate
199: for bursts 2 and 3 were close to 3.0~s. Burst 1 had a broader peak
200: than bursts 2 and 3, had a longer decay time of 5~s, and deviated
201: significantly from an exponential decay. Burst 4 was preceded by a
202: small precursor event, beginning 9~s earlier with a peak count rate
203: (with persistent emission subtracted) of $\sim 20\%$ of the main
204: burst. Substructure including at least two small peaks is present in
205: the precursor event. The peak count rate of burst 4 was a factor of 4
206: lower than the other bursts and the corresponding temperature was
207: lower. Its decay time was 3.4~s, close to that of bursts 2 and 3.
208:
209: The results of the spectral fits for the brightest burst, number 2, are
210: shown in Fig.~\ref{bur2spec}. The burst shows an increase in radius
211: and a simultaneous decrease in temperature near the peak, but the
212: magnitude of the radius increase is not sufficient to classify the
213: burst as an Eddington-limited photospheric radius expansion burst.
214: \citet{lewin95} found that the average peak luminosity for photospheric
215: radius expansion bursts from 5 bursters located in globular clusters,
216: hence with known distances, was $(3.0 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{38} \rm \,
217: erg \, s^{-1}$. Using this luminosity as an upper limit on the peak
218: luminosity in burst 2, we place an upper limit on the distance to SAX
219: J1750.8-2900 of $6.3 \pm 0.7 \rm \, kpc$. This upper limit is
220: consistent with the upper limit derived by \citet{natalucci99} of
221: 7~kpc.
222:
223: Using high time resolution data (merged event lists from the event and
224: burst catcher modes) with no energy selection, we computed power
225: spectra for overlapping 4~s intervals of data, with 0.125~s between
226: the starts of successive intervals, and searched for excess power in
227: the range 200-1200~Hz. We found oscillations in the second burst with
228: a maximum Leahy normalized power of 49.3 at a frequency of 600.75~Hz,
229: occurring in the burst decay 5~s after the burst rise. Allowing $2
230: \times 10^{4}$ independent trials over the 20~s duration of the burst,
231: the chance probability of occurrence is $4 \times 10^{-7}$, equivalent
232: to a $5.0 \, \sigma$ detection.
233:
234: The dynamical power spectrum is shown in Fig.~\ref{bur2pow}. In
235: addition to the oscillations in the burst decay, there are oscillations
236: present near 599.5~Hz in the initial part of the burst rise. The
237: oscillations begin at the burst onset; no oscillations are present in
238: the persistent emission before the burst onset. The frequency appears
239: to change rapidly between burst rise and decay.
240:
241:
242:
243: \section{Persistent emission}
244:
245: To study the persistent emission, we used the Standard-2 data for
246: spectral information and a 122~$\mu$s time resolution event mode for
247: timing information. We removed data around the X-ray bursts. We used
248: only PCU 2 for the color and spectral studies as it was on during all
249: of the observations and has a reasonably well understood response (in
250: particular, it does not suffer from the propane layer leak experienced
251: by PCU 0 which was the only other PCU on during all of the
252: observations). The background estimate was made using the bright
253: source background files and the response was calculated using pcarmf
254: v7.10 as supplied in ftools v5.1. All PCUs on during each observation
255: were used for the timing analysis.
256:
257:
258: % use \epsscale{0.7} for preprint2
259: \begin{figure}[tb] \epsscale{0.5} \plotone{f7.eps} \caption{Spectral
260: evolution of the persistent emission. Shown are the absorbed flux in
261: the 3-20~keV band (top panel), the Comptonization temperature (middle
262: panel), and the Comptonization optical depth (bottom panel).}
263: \label{pers_spec} \end{figure}
264:
265: \subsection{Energy spectra}
266:
267: We extracted an energy spectrum for each uninterrupted RXTE observing
268: window to investigate evolution of the energy spectrum. The energy
269: range was limited to 3-20~keV and we included a 1\% systematic error.
270: We attempted to fit the spectra with a simple absorbed powerlaw model.
271: This was unacceptable in all cases. Addition of a gaussian emission
272: line at an energy near the Fe-K transition produced an acceptable fit
273: for the first spectrum, but not for the others. The sum of a
274: blackbody plus a gaussian with absorption from material with solar
275: abundances and the sum of a multicolor disk blackbody plus a gaussian
276: with absorption produced unacceptable fits. The sum of a
277: Comptonization model \citep{st80} and a gaussian emission line with
278: absorption produced acceptable fits, $\chi^2_{\nu} < 1$, to all of the
279: spectra. We used this model to fit all of the persistent emission
280: spectra. The limiting form of the Comptonization spectrum at high
281: temperatures over the fitted energy band is indistinguishable from a
282: powerlaw given our limited statistics. Therefore, only an upper limit
283: on the Comptonization temperature could be obtained for the first
284: observation which had a spectrum consistent with the sum of a powerlaw
285: and emission line with absorption as noted above.
286:
287: The Comptonization temperature and optical depth show marked evolution
288: over the observations, see Fig.~\ref{pers_spec}. The temperature
289: begins high, the lower limit on the temperature in the first
290: observation is 8~keV, and decreases to 3~keV. Simultaneously, the
291: optical depth begins at 6 and increases to 11 for the later
292: observations. The column density of the absorbing material shows some
293: evidence for a decrease with time; however, we caution that these
294: spectra are not adequate to robustly constraint the column density.
295: The average equivalent Hydrogen column density is $4.4 \times 10^{22}
296: \rm \, cm^{-2}$.
297:
298: The iron line parameters remain roughly constant across all the
299: observations but are poorly constrained. All of the spectra were
300: consistent with a centroid energy of 6.7~keV and this centroid energy
301: was subsequently fixed for all of the fits. The width and
302: normalization were allowed to vary. The best fit line widths were in
303: the range 0.5--1.0~keV. The best fit equivalent widths ranged from 150
304: to 400~eV. The line width is consistent with previous results from
305: neutron-star LMXBs \citep{white86,asai00}. The equivalent width is
306: higher than most previously reported values for neutron-star LMXBs; the
307: maximum equivalent width reported from ASCA is 170~eV \citep{asai00}.
308:
309:
310:
311: \begin{figure}[tb] \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f5.eps} \caption{Color-color
312: diagram of the persistent emission. Each point represents 256~s of
313: data. The hard color is defined as the count rate in the 9.7--16~keV
314: band divided that in the 6.4--9.7~keV band; the soft color is the
315: 4-6.4~keV band rate divided by the 2.6--4.0~keV band rate.} \label{ccd}
316: \end{figure}
317:
318: \begin{figure}[tb] \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f6.eps} \caption{Low
319: frequency power spectra. The upper curve is the power spectrum of the
320: observations on April 6 and 9. The lower curve is for data from April
321: 12 and 15. The power is RMS normalized. The solid lines are fitted
322: curves described in the text.} \label{lowfreq} \end{figure}
323: \subsection{Source state and classification}
324:
325: We produced a color-color diagram, see Fig.~\ref{ccd}, using 256~s
326: intervals extracted from background subtracted Standard-2 data to study
327: the source state. The April 6 and 9 observations form one cluster of
328: points in the color-color diagram with high values of the hard color,
329: while the April 12 and 15 data form a distinct cluster with lower
330: values of the hard color.
331:
332: To further investigation the source state, we produced low frequency
333: (below 100~Hz) power spectra. We produced two spectra, one for each of
334: the two clusters of points in the color-color diagram, see
335: Fig.~\ref{lowfreq}.
336:
337: The power spectrum for the April 6 and 9 observations shows strong
338: band-limited noise, with an RMS fraction of 12.8\% in the 0.1--100~Hz
339: range. This clearly identifies the source state as the `island' state
340: \citep{vdk95}. The power spectrum has the form of a broken powerlaw
341: below 10~Hz and a QPO is apparent above 10~Hz. Fitting the power
342: spectrum with the sum of a broken powerlaw plus a Lorentzian, we found
343: excess noise above 20~Hz and $\chi^2/\rm DoF = 143.5/75$. We added an
344: exponentially cutoff powerlaw to fit this excess noise and the fit
345: improved to $\chi^2/\rm DoF = 111.8/72$. The residuals of this fit
346: show no systematic deviations and the fit is unlikely to be improved by
347: addition of more continuum components. For the broken powerlaw, we
348: find a break frequency of $5.7 \pm 0.2 \rm \, Hz$, an index below the
349: break of $-0.25 \pm 0.02$ and and index above the break of $-1.7 \pm
350: 0.2$. The Lorentzian centroid is $17.7 \pm 0.2 \rm \, Hz$. The break
351: and QPO centroid frequencies are consistent with the correlation
352: reported by \citet{wijnands99}.
353:
354: The power spectrum for April 12 and 15 shows weak timing noise. The
355: RMS fraction is 1.4\% in the 0.1--100~Hz range. This indicates that
356: the source was in the `banana' state. We fitted the power spectrum
357: with the sum of a powerlaw and an exponentially cutoff powerlaw. This
358: gave a reasonable fit with $\chi^2/\rm DoF = 11.6/10$. The powerlaw
359: index was $-0.89 \pm 0.14$.
360:
361: Based on the timing and color information, we suggest that SAX
362: J1750.8-2900 is an atoll source. Furthermore, we identify the source
363: as being in the ``island'' state on April 6 and 9, when the hard color
364: had high values and strong timing noise was present, and in the
365: ``banana'' state on April 12 and 15, when the hard color had low values
366: and the timing noise was weak.
367:
368:
369: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
370: \tablecolumns{10}
371: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
372: \tablecaption{High frequency peaks in the persistent emission
373: \label{qpotable}}
374: \tablewidth{0pt}
375: \tablehead{
376: \colhead{Time} & \colhead{Duration} & \colhead{Hard color} &
377: \colhead{Centroid} & \colhead{Width} & \colhead{Amplitude} \\
378: \colhead{(UTC)} & \colhead{(s)} & &
379: \colhead{(Hz)} & \colhead{(Hz)} & \colhead{(\%)} \\
380: }
381: \startdata
382: Apr 06 at 13:03:27 & 1344 & 0.46 & $543\pm 23$ & $210\pm 70$ & $8.8\pm 2.1$ \\
383: Apr 09 at 10:59:27 & 3024 & 0.45 & $651\pm 15$ & $228\pm 45$ & $9.5\pm 1.3$ \\
384: Apr 12 at 13:41:03 & 2336 & 0.37 & $1017\pm 4$ & $50\pm 12$ & $2.9\pm 0.5$ \\
385: Apr 15 at 14:57:35 & 2960 & 0.35 & $936\pm 1$ & $8\pm 2$ & $0.67 \pm 0.13$ \\
386: Apr 15 all data & 8608 & 0.35 & $1253\pm 9$ & $60\pm 24$ & $0.9\pm 0.2$ \\
387: \enddata
388:
389: \tablecomments{The table includes: Time -- the UTC time at the
390: beginning of the observation, all observations were in 2001; Duration
391: -- of the observation; Hard color -- as defined in Fig.~\ref{ccd};
392: Centroid and Width - of the fitted Lorentzian; Amplitude - RMS fraction
393: of QPO signal.} \end{deluxetable}
394:
395: \begin{figure}[tb] \epsscale{1.0} \plottwo{f8a.eps}{f8b.eps}
396: \caption{Power spectra showing kHz QPOs. The panel on the left uses
397: data from April 9, on the right from April 12. The power spectra were
398: calculated using events from the full PCA band (2--60~keV). The power
399: is Leahy normalized.} \label{khzqpo} \end{figure}
400:
401: \subsection{High frequency timing}
402:
403: We searched for high frequency QPOs in each uninterrupted RXTE
404: observation window and in combinations of the various data segments.
405: We calculated averages of 2~s power spectra for all PCA events
406: (2--60~keV) and for events in the 4.7-20.8~keV energy band. We
407: included events from all PCUs on during each observation. We note that
408: the true energy band for PCU0 likely differs somewhat from the nominal
409: range due to the propane layer leak. We searched for peaks in the
410: spectrum and fit any peak found with a Lorentzian plus a constant equal
411: to the calculated the Poisson noise level.
412:
413: There were several QPO signals above 250~Hz, see Table~\ref{qpotable}.
414: Those found on April 9 and 12 are strong detections and are shown in
415: Fig.~\ref{khzqpo}. Allowing for a number of trials equal to the search
416: interval of 1200~Hz divided by the QPO width \citep{vStra00} and
417: allowing several trial widths, we estimate a chance probability of
418: occurrence of $2 \times 10^{-11}$ for the QPO on April 9 and $3 \times
419: 10^{-6}$ for the QPO on April 12. These QPOs clearly establish SAX
420: J1750.8-2900 as a new member of the class of neutron-star low-mass
421: X-ray binaries (NS-LMXBs) exhibiting kHz QPOs. The other signals have
422: lower significance: $2 \times 10^{-3}$ for the QPO on April 6 and $2
423: \times 10^{-4}$ for the QPO on April 15. The signal on April 15 is
424: quite narrow and appears significant only in the 4.7-20.8~keV band
425: power spectrum.
426:
427: In addition to the signals detected in individual uninterrupted
428: observation segments, we also found a signal at 1253~Hz in the sum of
429: all of the April 15 data. This is the last entry in
430: Table~\ref{qpotable}. The detection has relatively low significance
431: and must be considered tentative. However, if the detection is
432: correct, then the frequency difference between the two QPOs detected on
433: April 15 is 317~Hz. The formal error on the difference of the two
434: frequency centroids is 9~Hz. The 1253~Hz peak may be broadened due to
435: shifts in the centroid frequency over the integration, so the true
436: uncertainty on the difference is somewhat larger. The frequency
437: difference is consistent with half the frequency of the burst
438: oscillations.
439:
440:
441:
442: \section{Discussion}
443:
444: The results presented here establish that SAX J1750.8-2900 exhibits
445: millisecond oscillations in its X-ray emission. The properties of the
446: kHz QPOs in the persistent emission from SAX J1750.8-2900 are similar
447: to those of the other neutron-star LMXB kHz QPO sources in terms of the
448: observed frequency range and the oscillation amplitudes. Additional
449: measurements of SAX J1750.8-2900 would be of interest to confirm our
450: tentative detection of the second kHz QPO branch and obtain a
451: simultaneous measurement of the kHz QPO frequency difference.
452:
453: The properties of the burst oscillations from SAX J1750.8-2900 are also
454: similar to those observed from other sources. The frequency shift seen
455: in the single burst from SAX J1750.8-2900 exhibiting oscillations is
456: compatible with those seen from several other sources and smaller than
457: the large shift (by 1.32\%) seen from 4U~1916-053 \citep{galloway01}.
458:
459: X-ray burst oscillation sources appear to form two distinct classes:
460: ``fast oscillators'' showing burst oscillations near 600~Hz with the
461: precise frequency close to twice the frequency difference of the kHz
462: QPOs seen in the persistent emission, and ``slow oscillators'' showing
463: burst oscillations near 300~Hz with the precise frequency near the
464: difference of the kHz QPO frequencies \citep{white97}. Our discovery
465: of 600.75~Hz oscillations from SAX J1750.8-2900 establish that it is a
466: member of the class of fast X-ray burst oscillators. Our tentative
467: detection of two contemporaneous kHz QPOs with a frequency difference
468: near 300~Hz is consistent with the properties of the other fast
469: oscillators, but should be tested with additional observations.
470:
471: \citet{muno01} showed that the fast oscillators produce burst
472: oscillations predominately, but not exclusively, in photospheric radius
473: expansion bursts, while the slow oscillators have oscillations in
474: bursts both with and without photospheric radius expansion. The burst
475: from SAX J1750.8-2900 in which we find oscillations shows weak, at
476: best, evidence for photospheric radius expansion; in particular, it
477: does not meet the requirement of 20~km of radius expansion of
478: \citet{muno01}. However, since we have a sample of only one burst with
479: oscillations, our results are not inconsistent with those of
480: \citet{muno01}.
481:
482: The fact that the behavior of the fast versus slow oscillators is
483: different in regards to the occurrence of oscillations versus burst
484: type (radius expansion or not) implies that the difference between the
485: two classes is not an observational selection effect, i.e.\ due to the
486: inclination of the neutron star spin axis relative to our line of
487: sight, but rather a physical difference in the properties of the
488: neutron stars \citep{muno01}. It would be of great interest to
489: identify a model of the X-ray burst oscillations which explained both
490: the large frequency shifts seen in some bursts \citep{galloway01} and
491: the dichotomy between the fast versus slow oscillators.
492:
493:
494:
495: \acknowledgments
496:
497: We greatly appreciate the assistance by the duty scientists of the
498: BeppoSAX Science Operations Center in the near to real-time WFC data
499: analysis. We gratefully acknowledge the efforts of the RXTE team,
500: particularly Jean Swank and Evan Smith, in performing these target of
501: opportunity observations. PK thanks Mal Ruderman for useful
502: discussions and acknowledges support from NASA grants NAG5-7405,
503: NAG5-9097, and NAG5-9104. JZ acknowledges financial support from the
504: Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).
505:
506:
507: %--------------
508:
509: %\clearpage
510:
511: \begin{thebibliography}{}
512:
513: %\bibitem[et al.\ 1981]{616}, ApJ,
514:
515: \bibitem[Alpar \& Shaham(1985)]{alpar85} Alpar, M. A. \&
516: Shaham, J. 1985, Nature, 316, 239
517:
518: \bibitem[Asai et al.(1998)]{asai98} Asai, K., Dotani, T., Hoshi, R.,
519: Tanaka, Y., Robinson, C.R., \& Terada, K.\ 1998, PASJ, 50, 611
520:
521: \bibitem[Asai et al.(2000)]{asai00} Asai, K., Dotani, T., Nagase, F.,
522: \& Mitsuda, K.\ 2000, ApJS, 131, 571
523:
524: \bibitem[Bazzano et al.(1997)]{bazzano97} Bazzano, A., Heise,
525: J., Ubertini, P., et al. 1997, IAUC 6597
526:
527: \bibitem[Bradt, Rothschild, \& Swank(1993)]{xte} Bradt, H.V.,
528: Rothschild, R.E., \& Swank, J.H. 1993, \aaps, 97, 355
529:
530: \bibitem[Galloway et al.(2001)]{galloway01} Galloway, D.K.,
531: Chakrabarty, D., Muno, M.P., \& Savlov, P.\ 2001, \apjl, 549, L85
532:
533: \bibitem[Kaaret \& Ford(1997)]{kaaret97sci} Kaaret, P. \&
534: Ford, E.C. 1997, Science, 276, 1386
535:
536: \bibitem[Kaaret et al.(1998)]{kaaret98} Kaaret, P., Yu, W.,
537: Ford, E.C., \& Zhang, S.N. 1998, ApJ, 497, L93
538:
539: \bibitem[Lewin et al.(1995)]{lewin95} Lewin, W.H.G., van
540: Paradijs, J., \& Taam, R.E.\ 1995, in X-Ray Binaries, ed.
541: W.H.G.\ Lewin, J.\ van Paradijs, \& E.P.J.\ van den Heuvel
542: (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 175
543:
544: \bibitem[Muno et al.(2001)]{muno01} Muno, M.P., Chakrabarty,
545: D., Galloway, D.K., \& Savlov, P.\ 2001, \apjl, 553, L157
546:
547: \bibitem[Natalucci et al.(1999)]{natalucci99} Natalucci, L.,
548: Cornelisse, R., Bazzano, A., Cocchi, M., Ubertini, P., Heise,
549: J., In 't Zand, J.J.M., Kuulkers, E. 1999, ApJ 523, L45
550:
551: \bibitem[Sunyaev \& Titarchuk(1980)]{st80} Sunyaev, R.A. \&
552: Titarchuk, L.\ 1980, \aap, 86, 121
553:
554: \bibitem[Strohmayer et al.(1996)]{strohmayer96} Strohmayer,
555: T.E., Zhang, W., Swank, J.H., Smale, A., Titarchuk, L., Day,
556: C., \& Lee, U. 1996, \apjl, 469, L9
557:
558: \bibitem[Strohmayer et al.(1997)]{strohmayer97} Strohmayer,
559: T.E., Zhang, W. \& Swank, J.H.\ 1997, \apjl, 487, L77
560:
561: \bibitem[van Straaten et al.(2000)]{vStra00} van Straaten,
562: S., Ford, E.C., van der Klis, M., Mendez, M., \& Kaaret, P.\
563: 2000, ApJ, 540, 1049
564:
565: \bibitem[van der Klis(1995)]{vdk95} van der Klis, M.\ 1995,
566: in X-Ray Binaries, ed. W.H.G.\ Lewin, J.\ van Paradijs, \&
567: E.P.J.\ van den Heuvel (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press),
568: 252
569:
570: \bibitem[White et al.(1986)]{white86} White, N.E., Peacock, A.,
571: Hasinger, G., Mason, K.O., Manzo, G., Taylor, B.G., \&
572: Branduardi-Raymont, G.\ 1986, MNRAS, 218, 129
573:
574: \bibitem[White \& Zhang(1997)]{white97} White, N.E.\ \&
575: Zhang, W.\ 1997, \apj, 490, L87
576:
577: \bibitem[Wijnands \& van der Klis(1999)]{wijnands99}
578: Wijnands, R.\ \& van der Klis, M.\ 1999, ApJ, 514, 939
579:
580: \end{thebibliography}
581:
582: \end{document}
583:
584: