1: %% The command below calls the preprint style
2: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
3: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
4: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
5:
6: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
7:
8: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
9:
10: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
11:
12: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
13:
14: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
15:
16: %\documentstyle[apjfonts,emulateapj]{article}
17: %\documentstyle[emulateapj]{article}
18: %\documentstyle[12pt,aaspp4,tighten]{article}
19: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
20: %\documentclass{article}
21:
22: %\documentclass[12pt,apjpt4]{aastex}
23: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
24: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
25:
26:
27: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
28: \newcommand{\um}{$\mu$m}
29:
30: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
31:
32: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
33:
34:
35: %\shorttitle{}
36: \shortauthors{Testi et al.}
37:
38: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
39: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
40:
41: \begin{document}
42:
43:
44: \title{A Young Very Low-Mass Object surrounded by warm dust}
45:
46: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
47: %% author and affiliation information.
48: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
49: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
50: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
51: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
52:
53: \author{L. Testi\altaffilmark{1}, A. Natta\altaffilmark{1}, E. Oliva\altaffilmark{1,2}, F. D'Antona\altaffilmark{3}, F. Comer\'on\altaffilmark{4}, C. Baffa\altaffilmark{1}, G. Comoretto\altaffilmark{1} and S. Gennari\altaffilmark{1}}
54:
55: \altaffiltext{1}{Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, INAF,
56: Largo E. Fermi 5, I-50125 Firenze, Italy}
57: \altaffiltext{2}{Telescopio Nazionale Galileo and Centro Galileo Galilei, INAF,
58: P.O. Box 565, E-38700, Santa Cruz de La Palma, Spain}
59: \altaffiltext{3}{Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, INAF,
60: via Frascati 33, I-00044 Roma, Italy}
61: \altaffiltext{4}{European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2,
62: D-85748 Garching bei M\"unchen, Germany}
63:
64:
65:
66: \begin{abstract}
67: We present a complete low-resolution (R$\sim$100) near-infrared spectrum
68: of the substellar object GY~11, member of the $\rho$-Ophiuchi young association.
69: The object is remarkable because of its low estimated mass and age and because it is
70: associated with a mid-infrared source, an indication of a surrounding
71: dusty disk. Based on the comparison of our spectrum with similar spectra
72: of field M-dwarfs and atmospheric models,
73: we obtain revised estimates of the
74: spectral type, effective temperature and luminosity of the central object.
75: These parameters are used to place the object on a Hertzprung-Russell diagram
76: and to compare with the prediction of pre-main sequence evolutionary models.
77: Our analysis suggests that the central object has a
78: very low mass, probably below the deuterium burning limit and in the
79: range 8--12~M$_{Jupiter}$, and a young age, less than 1~Myr.
80: The infrared excess is shown to be consistent with the emission of a flared,
81: irradiated disk
82: similar to those found in more massive brown dwarf and TTauri
83: systems. This result suggests that substellar objects,
84: even the so-called isolated planetary
85: mass objects, found in young stellar associations are produced in a similar
86: fashion as stars, by core contraction and gravitational
87: collapse.
88: \end{abstract}
89:
90: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
91: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
92: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
93: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
94:
95: \keywords{Stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs -- Stars: fundamental parameters --
96: Stars: atmospheres -- Infrared: stars}
97:
98:
99: \section{Introduction}
100: \label{sintro}
101:
102: The discovery
103: %Brown Dwarfs (BD, M$<$0.0072~M$_\odot$) in the field
104: %and in young associations \citep{Rea95,Nea95},
105: of Brown Dwarfs (BDs) and
106: objects with masses comparable to those of giant planets, well
107: below the deuterium burning limit
108: (M$<$13~M$_J$),
109: ``free-floating" in young stellar clusters \citep{Zea00,LR00}
110: has opened an interesting debate on their origin.
111: %have been dubbed ``Isolated Planetary Mass Objects". As opposed to our
112: %Solar System planets and the exoplanets discovered by means of radial velocity
113: %measurements \citet{Mea00}, these objects are not bound to stars.
114: %The real nature
115: %of these very low-mass objects (VLMOs) is still
116: %being debated:
117: Do they form like ordinary stars from the collapse of
118: molecular cores \citep{SAL87}? If so, the very existence of
119: very low-mass objects
120: and their mass function put strong constraints on star formation theories.
121: Alternatively, BDs and isolated planetary mass objects
122: may be stellar ``embryos'' ejected from multiple
123: forming systems before reaching a stellar mass \citep{RC01}, or they may
124: form like planets by coagulation of dust particles and
125: subsequent gas accretion within circumstellar protoplanetary disks
126: \citep{Lea98}. Young (proto)-planets could then be extracted or ejected by
127: dynamical interactions from the forming planetary systems. % and become VLMOs.
128: In
129: this scenario, isolated BDs and planetary mass objects
130: are intrinsically different from stars; their study sheds
131: no light on {\it star} formation theories, but provides instead a chance of
132: studying the early evolution of giant planets where they can be observed in
133: isolation, rather than very close to a much brighter star.
134:
135: One way to shed light on the origin of very low mass objects is to
136: ascertain their association
137: with circumstellar disks, which are characteritics of stellar formation from the
138: contraction of a molecular core. Deep images in the L band \citet{Mea01} and in
139: the mid-infrared \citep{Pea00,Bea01} have shown that many very low luminosity
140: objects have excess emission at these wavelengths, and detailed studies of some
141: of them have proven that the central objects are bona-fide BDs.
142: Their infrared excess is consistent with the
143: presence of a surrounding disk similar to those found around more
144: massive pre-main sequence stars \citep{Cea98,Cea00,NT01}.
145: These initial findings, albeit limited, seem to suggest that indeed BDs
146: form like ordinary stars.
147: %We have started a program aimed at obtaining a reliable determination of the
148: %parameters (in particular, the mass) of a sample of low-luminosity objects in
149: %star forming regions, known to have a mid-infrared excess.
150: %Our aim was on one side
151:
152: We report here the first results of a project
153: aimed on one hand
154: to improve our understanding of disks around BD, following the approach of
155: in \citet{NT01}, and on the other hand to find evidence of a
156: circumstellar disk around {\it bona fide} isolated planetary mass
157: objects.
158: %therefore extending the
159: %mechanism of star formation via core contraction from objects of few solar
160: %masses to the lowest masses known so far.
161: We have used the Near-Infrared Camera
162: and Spectrograph (NICS) on the 3.56m Telescopio Nazionale Galileo to acquire
163: low-resolution (NIR) spectra of a sample of mid-infrared sources
164: located within the $\rho$-Ophiuchi cloud \citet{Bea01}. Our target list
165: included objects detected at 6.7 and 14.3~$\mu$m with the ISOCAM camera on
166: board of ISO \citep{Kea96,Cea96}, having low effective temperature
167: (T$_{eff}$), luminosity (L$_\ast$) and extinction (A$_{\rm V}$) based on
168: photometric or limited 2.2~$\mu$m spectroscopic estimates.
169: The goal of our new observations was to obtain improved
170: determinations of these parameters and to derive accurate values of masses and
171: ages of the targets by comparison with theoretical evolutionary tracks.
172: The results for the complete sample will be discussed elsewhere
173: \citep{Nea02}. In this Letter, we report on one of the sources,
174: number 33 of the ISOCAM list of \citet{Bea01}, which is associated with the
175: NIR source GY11 \citep{GY92}. The substellar nature of this object
176: was already proposed by \citet{RR90} and confirmed by
177: \citet{Cea98,WGM99}. We derive a new, accurate spectral classification of GY11,
178: and of its effective temperature and luminosity. Our data suggest
179: that GY11 is a planetary mass object, with an
180: infrared excess that can be roughly modeled as due to a circumstellar disk
181: similar to those associated to T Tauri stars. These observations provide the
182: first evidence that objects of such small mass
183: actually form in a star-like manner, and thus that they are
184: genetically different from ``planets''.
185:
186: \section{Observations}
187:
188:
189: A near-infrared low-resolution spectrum of GY11 was obtained with the
190: Telescopio Nazionale Galileo on La Palma
191: %\citep{Baffa01}
192: on July~9, 2001, using a 0\farcs5 slit and the
193: high-throughput low-resolution prism-based disperser unique to NICS
194: \citep{Baffa01},
195: the Amici device
196: \citep{O00}; this setup offers a complete NIR spectrum, 0.85 to 2.35~$\mu$m,
197: at R$\sim$100 accross the entire range, and it allows
198: an accurate classification of faint and cool dwarfs \citep{Tea01}.
199: Instrumental and telluric correction was ensured by observations
200: of A0 stars. The shape of the final spectrum was checked using
201: near infrared photometric measurements from the 2MASS second incremental
202: data release; synthetic magnitudes were computed using the appropriate
203: transmission curves and compared with the source photometry, colors were
204: found to be consistent with those of 2MASS to
205: within 10\%, as expected from typical uncertainties.
206: To better constrain the values of the
207: extinction, we also obtained optical i-band (0.77~$\mu$m) photometry at the
208: ESO-La Silla 1.54m Danish Telescope using the DFOSC instrument.
209: Photometric calibration was ensured
210: by observations of a set of \citet{L92} standard stars,
211: converted into the
212: Gunn system using the transformations given by \citet{Fea96}.
213: %Optical
214: %photometric measurements in the R and I broadbands were also obtained by
215: %\citet{Cea98}.
216:
217: \section{Central source parameters}
218:
219: %\begin{figure*}
220: %\epsscale{1.0}
221: %\plottwo{fgy11field.eps}{fgy11atm.eps}
222: %\vspace{7.5cm}
223: %\special{psfile=fgy11field.eps vscale=40 hscale=40 hoffset=-10 voffset=-65 angle=0}
224: %\special{psfile=fgy11atm.eps vscale=40 hscale=40 hoffset=220 voffset=-65 angle=0}
225: %\caption[fspec.eps]{a) The dereddened spectrum of GY11 (thick solid line) is
226: %is compared with spectra of field M-dwarfs (dotted lines) as labelled
227: %(taken from Testi et al.~2002), all spectra
228: %are normalized at the mean flux in the 1.15-1.2~$\mu$m range and shifted with
229: %constant offsets for clarity. The spectrum of GY11 is reproduced at every offset
230: %to ease the comparison. b) similar to a), but the dotted spectra are
231: %theoretical atmospheric models \citep{Aea00}, T$_{eff}$ as labelled.
232: %The thin solid lines show the GY11 spectrum subtracted by the maximum
233: %expected disk contribution, see text.}
234: %\label{fspec}
235: %\end{figure*}
236:
237: \citet{Bea01} associated the ISOCAM source~33 with a Class~II object member of
238: the $\rho$-Ophiuchi young stellar cluster known as GY11 \citep{GY92}.
239: The brown
240: dwarf nature of GY11 has been suspected for some time \citep{RR90}. However,
241: there is a large uncertainty in the literature as to the exact value
242: of its photospheric parameters and mass. \citet{Bea01}
243: estimate bolometric luminosity and
244: extinction to be L$_\ast\sim 0.001$~L$_\odot$, A$_{\rm
245: V}$=2.7 mag from NIR photometry.
246: Based on multiband infrared photometry and a 2.2$\mu$m low resolution
247: spectrum, \citet{WGM99}
248: estimate a spectral type M6.5, A$_{\rm
249: V}\sim$5~mag, L$_\ast\sim$0.002~L$_\odot$, and T$_{eff}\sim$2650~K. These
250: authors noted that due to veiling caused by dust emission, the spectral type
251: could easily be some 2--3
252: subclasses later,
253: and the extinction significantly underestimated.
254: %The extinction estimate, based on the expected
255: %intrinsic (J-H) color for a given spectral type, may also be underestimated
256: %because of these uncertainties; in fact the estimate of
257: In fact, \citet{Cea98} derive a higher value of A$_{\rm V}$=10~mag from
258: broadband photometric measurements that include optical and infrared bands.
259:
260: Our complete near infrared spectrum offers the
261: possibility of a better estimate of the source parameters, as it allow
262: us to use the global spectrum shape below 2~\um, a region which is less
263: affected by the continuum veiling due to the dust emission.
264: Given the expectation that the surface gravity of very young BDs shouls be
265: similar to sub-giants, we derive the photospheric parameters by comparison
266: with field dwarfs spectra and model atmospheres with appropriate surface
267: gravity, as suggested by the evolutionary models \citep{Cea00}.
268: We first
269: derive extinction and spectral type by matching the observed GY11 spectrum
270: with that of field dwarfs in the solar neighborhood
271: % having spectral types in the range M9.5--M6.0
272: \citep{Tea02}, obtained with the same
273: instrumental set-up and reddened using the
274: \citet{Cea89} extinction law most appropriate
275: for Ophiucus (R$_V$=4.2; Fig.~1a). We try to provide the best fit to the
276: global shape of the spectrum,
277: with particular attention to
278: the shape of the H-band, the J-band features and
279: the drop due to water vapor absorption at the red edge of the J-band.
280: %All
281: %of these spectral characteristics are predicted to be gravity dependent to
282: %%some extent, so one cannot expect a perfect match of a spectrum of a young
283: %object, with low surface gravity, with those of old dwarfs, with high surface
284: %gravity and possibly a different metallicity.
285: Overall, the best spectral match
286: is found with the field dwarf with spectral type M8.5
287: and extinction A$_{\rm V}\sim$7.0~mag.
288: Lower values of A$_{\rm V}$ (by $\sim 1$~mag)
289: offer a better match of the spectrum with later
290: dwarf spectra (M9--L0), but are not consistent with the broad band
291: optical measurements (see inset in Fig.~4).
292: A higher value of the extinction causes a too steep rise
293: of the spectrum below 1.2~\um.
294: Field dwarfs with spectral types earlier than M7.5 show large deviations
295: from the observed shape of the H-band and
296: the drop at 1.3~$\mu$m.
297: Given the uncertainties of a classification based on objects
298: with very different surface gravity, we expect our classification
299: to be accurate within one spectral class and the visual extinction
300: estimate within one magnitude.
301: %that some difference in the intensity of
302: %specific features between young, low-gravity objects and
303: %old, high-gravity field dwarfs is expected.
304:
305: %\vbox{
306: %\smallskip
307: %\vspace{13.4cm}
308: %\smallskip
309: %\special{psfile=fgy11.eps vscale=67 hscale=67 hoffset=-60 voffset=-100 angle=0}
310: %{\small\noindent Fig.~1 -- The spectrum of GY11 (thick solid line)
311: %is compared with reddened spectra of field M-dwarfs (dotted lines) as labelled
312: %(from Testi et al.~2002), all spectra
313: %are normalized at the mean flux in the 1.6-1.7~$\mu$m range and shifted with
314: %constant offsets for clarity. The spectrum of GY11 is reproduced at every offset
315: %to ease the comparison. b) similar to a), but the dotted spectra are reddened
316: %theoretical atmospheric models \citep{Aea00}, T$_{eff}$ as labelled.
317: %The thin solid lines show the GY11 spectrum after subtraction of the
318: %maximum possible contribution from an irradiated, face-on disk
319: %(see \S 4).
320: %}
321: %\smallskip
322: %}
323:
324: As a second step, in order to derive an estimate of the photospheric
325: effective temperature (Fig.~1a), we compare
326: the observed GY11 spectrum,
327: with reddened, appropriate surface gravity,
328: $\log_{10} (g)$=3.5, model atmospheres
329: %for effective temperatures in the range 2300--2600~K
330: \citep{Aea00,Chea00}.
331: The best estimate of the effective
332: temperature is $\sim$2400$\pm$100~K.
333: Higher temperature models offer a better match of the
334: H-band shape, but underestimate the drop near 1.3~\um\ and the global
335: shape of the spectrum at J-band. The derivation of the effective
336: temperature of young dwarfs based on theoretical synthesis
337: of the near infrared spectrum is very uncertain
338: \citep{Lea02}; however,
339: our value of T$_{eff}$ for an object of spectral type M8.5
340: is consistent with the spectral type vs. effective temperature scale
341: discussed by \citet{WGM99}, and only marginally
342: higher than the latest effective temperature scales derived for field dwarfs
343: \citep{Lea01}.
344:
345: To estimate the luminosity (L$_\ast$) of the object, we used the 2MASS
346: J-band magnitude, dereddened by A$_{\rm V}\sim~ 7.0$ mag,
347: and the bolometric correction derived from the best fitting (2400~K)
348: atmospheric model.
349: The value of this ``theoretical'' bolometric correction is nearly identical
350: to the empirical value adopted by \citet{WGM99}. We derive a value of
351: L$_\ast\sim$0.008~L$_\odot\pm$30\%.
352:
353: %\vbox{
354: %\smallskip
355: %\vspace{5.7cm}
356: %\smallskip
357: %\special{psfile=fhrd.eps vscale=45 hscale=45 hoffset=-10 voffset=-130 angle=0}
358: %{\small\noindent Fig.~2 -- Hertzprung-Russell diagram for three sets of
359: %evolutionary tracks \citep{DM97,Chea00,Bea97}. The position of GY11 is shown
360: %as a blue circle. The tracks are labelled with the appropriate mass,
361: %hydrogen burning stars are shown in red,
362: %deuterium burning brown dwarfs in green, and objects below the
363: %deuterium burning limit in cyan. Isochrones are shown as dotted
364: %lines and are labelled with the appropriate ages.}
365: %\smallskip
366: %}
367:
368: Using the L$_\ast$ and T$_{eff}$ values derived above, we can compare
369: the position of GY11 in the Hertzprung-Russell diagram with the predictions
370: of theoretical pre-main sequence evolutionary models. In Figure~2 we show
371: this comparison for the latest release of evolutionary tracks from three
372: leading groups in the theory of pre-main sequence evolution of substellar
373: objects.
374: %In spite of the small differences between the theoretical
375: %tracks, in all cases our measurements suggest that GY11 is a young $\tau<1$~Myr
376: %very low-mass substellar object, probably below the deuterium burning limit,
377: %with a best mass estimate in the range 7 to 12~M$_{Jupiter}$.
378: In spite of the relatively large uncertainties on
379: L$_\ast$ and T$_{eff}$, and on the limited accuracy of pre-main sequence
380: evolutionary tracks at these ages and masses, we confirm that GY11 is a
381: young ($\tau<1$~Myr), very low mass object, probably below or very close to the
382: deuterium burning limit, with a best mass estimate in the range 7 to 12~M$_{Jupiter}$.
383:
384: \section{Infrared Excess and Disk Models}
385: GY11 is the lowest mass object with a clearly detected infrared excess.
386: It is detected by ISOCAM
387: in the two broad-band filters LW2 and LW3 ($\lambda_{eff}$ 6.7 and
388: 14.3 \um, respectively) used by \citep{Bea01} in
389: their $\rho$ Oph survey, as well as in the three intermediate-band filters,
390: SW1, LW1, LW4 ($\lambda_{eff}$=3.6, 4.5 and 6.0 \um, respectively),
391: used by \citet{Cea98} in their pointed observations of optically
392: identified candidate brown dwarfs.
393: The ISOCAM measurements in the broad- and narrow-bands
394: are in good agreement, within the flux calibration
395: uncertainties, which we assume to be $\sim 20$\%.
396:
397: As usually with ISOCAM, the $\sim$6$^{\prime\prime}$ beam
398: includes multiple sources
399: seen in higher resolution
400: near-infrared images, which may contribute to the observed fluxes.
401: Figure~3 compares
402: a K$_s$ image of the region around GY11
403: extracted from the VLT/ESO archive (originally observed as
404: part of ESO proposal 63.I-0691) and the ISOCAM LW1 ($\lambda_{eff}$=4.5 \um)
405: image from the ISO archive \citep{Cea98}. The mid-infrared emission peaks very
406: close to the position of GY11. Although
407: a small contamination from the NIR source
408: $\sim$8$^{\prime\prime}$ to the east is possible,
409: we think that most of the mid-infrared observed flux comes from GY11; a
410: similar conclusion was also reached by \citet{Cea98}.
411:
412: %\vbox{
413: %\smallskip
414: %\vspace{7.5cm}
415: %\smallskip
416: %\special{psfile=fksiso.eps vscale=42 hscale=42 hoffset=-20 voffset=230 angle=-90}
417: %{\small\noindent Fig.~3 -- The ISOCAM-LW1 (contours, 4.5$\mu$m) image of the
418: %region surrounding GY11 is overlaid on the VLT K$_s$ (greyscale, 2.2$\mu$m)
419: %image. The ISOCAM image has been aligned with the VLT image
420: %by matching the position of GY10 (2320.8-1708, \cite{Cea98})
421: %with the associated mid-infrared source.
422: %}
423: %\smallskip
424: %}
425: %
426: %\vbox{
427: %\smallskip
428: %\vspace{7.5cm}
429: %\smallskip
430: %\special{psfile=fsed.eps vscale=39 hscale=39 hoffset=-10 voffset=-50 angle=0}
431: %{\small\noindent Fig.~4 -- Disk and photosphere model of the GY11 SED.
432: %The red circles with errorbars show the mid-infrared fluxes from ISOCAM
433: %\citep{Cea98,Bea01}, the black line is our NIR dereddened Amici
434: %spectrum. The green jagged line is the photospheric model for T$_{eff}$=2400~K
435: %and Log(g)=3.5 \citep{Aea00}. The blue lines show the combined photosphere plus
436: %disk emission computed as in the text. In one case (solid line) the disk inner radius is equal to R$_\star$, in the other (dotted line) to 3R$_\star$.
437: %In the inset, we show the comparison
438: %between the dereddened broad band photometry (from R to L$^\prime$; red squares)
439: %and the models (practically coincident), photosphere as a dashed line, photosphere plus disk as solid
440: %line.
441: %}
442: %\smallskip
443: %}
444:
445: In Figure~4,
446: we show the spectral energy distribution (SED) of GY~11 at all wavelengths
447: and compare it to that of an irradiated,
448: flared disk similar to those that reproduce the
449: observed characteristics of TTauri systems \citep{CG97}. The disk
450: has a dust mass of 1 Earth mass ($\sim$3\% of the mass of the central object,
451: for an assumed gas-to-dust mass ratio of 100) and
452: is heated by a
453: a central source with the GY11 temperature, luminosity and mass.
454: We show the predicted SED when the disk extends inward to the stellar surface
455: (solid line) and when it has an inner hole of 3 stellar radii (dotted line).
456: More details on the disk models can be found in
457: \citet{NT01} and \citet{Nea02}.
458: The agreement between observed and predicted fluxes is rather good,
459: especially for the disk with the large inner hole.
460: In particular, both models
461: predict total (star+disk) fluxes that
462: in the J, H, K bands are smaller than the calibrated TNG fluxes by
463: 15\% at most.
464:
465: As an independent check,
466: we computed optical and NIR broad-band
467: magnitudes from the model-predicted SED.
468: They are compared in the inset of Figure~4 with the
469: observed dereddened magnitudes
470: in i (this paper), R,I,L$^\prime$ \citep{Cea98}, J,H,K (2MASS).
471: The agreement is again quite good.
472: %in the inset in Fig.~4 as an independent check of the derivation of the
473: %parameters and model fits. As shown in the various figures, the photosphere
474: %plus disk model slightly overestimate the NIR and underestimate
475: %the mid-infrared measurements.
476: %At mid-infrared wavelengths the ISOCAM observations may not have the required
477: %angular resolution to resolve the emission from GY11 to that of nearby young
478: %objects. From our overlay of the LW1 ISOCAM image and the K$_s$ VLT image
479: %shown in Figure~1, it is clear that the mid-infrared emission peaks very
480: %close to the position of GY11, but a small contamination from the NIR source
481: %$\sim$8$^{\prime\prime}$ to the east is possible. The excess of the disk
482: %model prediction at NIR wavelengths may be related to the inner regions
483: %of the disks: in our model the disk extends to the central object surface,
484: %if the inner disk region is truncated to a few central object radii then
485: %the hotter regions of the disk are removed and the NIR emission drops
486: %significantly.
487:
488: The ISOCAM measurements, especially that at 14.3 \um, have large
489: error bars, and one should not overinterpret them. However,
490: is of some interest to point out that, if indeed the mid-infrared excess
491: is due to disk emission,
492: the disk must be flared. Therefore,
493: dust and gas must be well mixed, as in the majority of pre-main--sequence
494: stars, and no major settling of the dust onto the disk midplane has
495: occurred during the lifetime of GY11. The disk must be optically thick
496: to mid-infrared radiation; this however sets only a lower limit to the
497: disk mass of roughly 10$^{-5}$-10$^{-6}$ M$_\odot$ depending on the
498: exact value of the
499: dust mid-infrared opacity and surface density profile. Note that the
500: disk mass has to be very small; if we assume the ratio of the disk
501: mass to the mass of the central object typical of TTS (~0.03), then the
502: disk mass is about $3\times 10^{-4}$~M$_\odot$, and the disk contains only 1 Earth mass
503: of dust. As a consequence, the accretion rate (if any) is also likely
504: to be low, with an average value over the lifetime of the object that
505: cannot exceed 3$\times$10$^{-10}$~M$_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$
506: (for an age of 1~Myr). The accretion
507: luminosity is also small, about 40 times lower than the luminosity of the
508: photosphere. A direct determination of the disk mass can be derived from
509: (sub)millimeter wavelength observations. We predict for GY11 a 1.3mm
510: flux of about 0.6 mJy, which is well below the upper limit set by
511: the survey of \citet{MAN98}, but within the expected capabilities
512: of the ALMA millimeter array.
513:
514: \section{Conclusions}
515:
516: %The study of these tiny objects which may
517: %form like stars is an important way of constraining star formation
518: %theories. A key question to address is whether these planetary mass
519: %objects are produced by
520: %the collapse of an isolated cloud fragment as ordinary stars or were
521: %members of multiple (proto-)stellar systems ejected before reaching
522: %their final mass. To discriminate between these two possibilities,
523: %one needs to determine on the one hand their frequency and
524: %mass distribution in star forming regions and on the other the mass,
525: %frequency and lifetime of their circumstellar disks. These observations
526: %will be made possible by ALMA on one side and on the other by the next
527: %generation of infrared satellites (SIRTF and especially Herschel) which
528: %will have the spatial resolution, wavelength coverage, sensitivity and
529: %wide area mapping capabilities needed to detect all IPMOs surrounded
530: %by warm dust in nearby star forming regions. Based on our results,
531: %however, it seems that current instrumentation can provide an answer
532: %to at least one of the many questions raised by the discovery of these
533: %VLMOs,
534: %namely what is the fraction which have circumstellar disks.
535: %The best strategy seems to obtain images of large areas of star forming
536: %regions in the L band (3.4~$\mu$m) followed by low-resolution spectroscopy
537: %to measure the physical parameters of the central objects.
538:
539: The results presented in this letter show evidence that a young isolated
540: planetary mass objects in
541: $\rho$-Oph, with mass of about 10 M$_{\rm J}$, is surrounded by warm dust,
542: possibly distributed on a disk similar in properties to those around young
543: brown dwarfs and T Tauri stars. The implications of this finding, that should
544: be confirmed by higher spatial resolution mid-infrared observations, and
545: should be extended to a large sample of similar objects, are profound, since it
546: gives a clear indication that isolated BDs and even planetary mass objects
547: form like stars and are not produced in a
548: planet-like fashion within protoplanetary disks around more massive objects,
549: and later ejected by dynamical interactions. Isolated BDs and
550: planetary mass objects are thus an extension of the
551: stellar and substellar sequence to very low masses and have different origins
552: from ``planets''.
553:
554: \acknowledgments
555: This work is partly based on observations collected at the Italian Telescopio
556: Nazionale Galileo, Canary Islands, Spain, at the European Southern Observatory
557: telescopes on La Silla and Paranal observatories, Chile, and on data obtained
558: by the European Space Agency Infrared Space Observatory.
559: This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey,
560: which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared
561: Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by
562: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science
563: Foundation. This work was partly supported by ASI grant ARS 1/R/27/00 to the
564: Osservatorio di Arcetri.
565:
566: \begin{thebibliography}{}
567: \bibitem[Allard et al.(2000)]{Aea00}
568: Allard F., Hauschildt P.H., Schweitzer A. 2000, \apj, 539, 366
569: \bibitem[Baffa et al.(2001)]{Baffa01}
570: Baffa C., et al. 2001, \aap, 378, 722
571: \bibitem[Bontemps et al.(2001)]{Bea01}
572: Bontemps S., et al. 2001, \aap, 372, 173
573: \bibitem[Burrows et al.(1997)]{Bea97}
574: Burrows A., Marley M., Hubbard W.B., Lunine J.I., Guillot T., Saumon D.,
575: Freedman R., Sudarsky D., Sharp C. 1997, \apj, 491, 856
576: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989)]{Cea89}
577: Cardelli J.A., Clayton G.C., Mathis J.S. 1989, \apj, 345, 245
578: \bibitem[Cesarsky et al.(1996)]{Cea96}
579: Cesarsky C., et al. 1996, \aap, 315, L32
580: \bibitem[Chabrier et al.(2000)]{Chea00}
581: Chabrier C., Baraffe I., Allard F., Hautschildt P. 2000, \apj, 542, 464
582: \bibitem[Chiang \& Goldreich(1997)]{CG97}
583: Chiang E.I. \& Goldreich P. 1997, \apj, 490, 368
584: %\bibitem[Comer\'on et al.(1993)]{Cea93}
585: % Comer\'on F., Rieke G.H., Burrows A., Rieke M.J. 1993, \apj, 416, 185
586: \bibitem[Comer\'on et al.(1998)]{Cea98}
587: Comer\'on F., Rieke G.H., Claes P., Torra J., Laureijs R.J. 1998,
588: \aap, 335, 522
589: \bibitem[Comer\'on et al.(2000)]{Cea00}
590: Comer\'on F., Neuh\"auser R., Kaas A.A. 2000, \aap, 359, 269
591: \bibitem[D'Antona \& Mazzitelli(1997)]{DM97}
592: D'Antona F. \& Mazzitelli I. 1997, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 68, 807
593: \bibitem[Fukugita et al.(1996)]{Fea96}
594: Fukugita M., Ichikawa T., Gunn J.E., Doi M., Shimasaku K., Schneider D.P.
595: 1996, \aj, 111, 1748
596: \bibitem[Greene \& Young(1992)]{GY92}
597: Greene T.P. \& Young E.T. 1992, \apj, 395, 516
598: \bibitem[Kessler et al.(1996)]{Kea96}
599: Kessler M.F., et al. 1996, \aap, 315, L27
600: \bibitem[Landolt(1992)]{L92}
601: Landolt A.U. 1992, \aj, 104, 340
602: \bibitem[Leggett et al.(2001)]{Lea01}
603: Leggett S.K., Allard F., Geballe T.R., Hauschildt P.H., Schweitzer A.
604: 2001, \apj, 558, 908
605: \bibitem[Lin et al.(1998)]{Lea98}
606: Lin D.N.C., Laughlin G., Bodenheimer P., Rozyczka M. 1998, Science, 281, 2025
607: \bibitem[Lodieu et al.(2002)]{Lea02}
608: Lodieu N., Caux, E., Monin, J.-L., Klotz, N., 2002, \aap, in press
609: \bibitem[Lucas \& Roche(2000)]{LR00}
610: Lucas P.W. \& Roche P.F. 2000, MNRAS, 314, 858
611: \bibitem[Marcy et al.(2000)]{Mea00}
612: Marcy G.W., Cochran W.D., Mayor M. 2000, in {\it Protostars \& Planets IV},
613: V.~Mannings, A.P.~Boss \& S.S.~Russell eds., (Tucson: University of Arizona
614: Press), p.~1285
615: \bibitem[Muench et al.(2001)]{Mea01}
616: Muench A.A., Alves J., Lada C.J., Lada E.A. 2001, \apj, 558, L51
617: \bibitem[Nakajima et al.(1995)]{Nea95}
618: Nakajima T., Oppenheimer B.R., Kulkarni S.R., Golimowski D.A.,
619: Matthews K., Durrance S.T. 1995, Nature, 378, 463
620: \bibitem[Motte et al.(1998)]{MAN98}
621: Motte F., Andr\'e Ph., Neri R. 1998, \aap, 336, 150
622: \bibitem[Natta \& Testi(2001)]{NT01}
623: Natta A. \& Testi L. 2001, \aap, 376, L22
624: \bibitem[Natta et al.(2002)]{Nea02}
625: Natta A. et al. 2002, \aap, submitted
626: \bibitem[Oliva(2000)]{O00}
627: Oliva E. 2000, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, Vol.~71, p.~861
628: \bibitem[Persi et al.(2000)]{Pea00}
629: Persi P., et al. 2000, \aap, 357, 219
630: \bibitem[Rebolo et al.(1995)]{Rea95}
631: Rebolo R., Zapatero-Osorio M.R., Martin E.L. 1995, Nature, 377, 129
632: \bibitem[Reipurth \& Clarke(2001)]{RC01}
633: Reipurth B. \& Clarke C.J. 2001, \aj, 122, 432
634: \bibitem[Rieke \& Rieke(1990)]{RR90}
635: Rieke G.H. \& Rieke M.J. 1990, \apj, 362, L21
636: \bibitem[Shu et al.(1987)]{SAL87}
637: Shu F.H., Adams F.C., Lizano S. 1987, \araa, 25, 23
638: \bibitem[Testi et al.(2001)]{Tea01}
639: Testi L., et al. 2001, \apj, 552, L147
640: \bibitem[Testi et al.(2002)]{Tea02}
641: Testi L., et al. 2002, in preparation
642: \bibitem[Wilking et al.(1999)]{WGM99}
643: Wilking B.A., Greene T.P., Meyer M.R. 1999, \aj, 117, 469
644: %\bibitem[Williams et al.(1995)]{Wea95}
645: % Williams D.M., Comer\'on F., Rieke G.H., Rieke M.J. 1995, \apj, 454, 144
646: \bibitem[Zapatero-Osorio et al.(2000)]{Zea00}
647: Zapatero-Osorio M.R., B\'ejar V.J.S., Mart\'in E.L., Rebolo R.,
648: Barrado y Navascu\'es D., Bailer-Jones C.A.L., Mundt R.
649: 2000, Science, 290, 103
650: \end{thebibliography}
651:
652: %
653: %\clearpage
654: %
655: %%% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
656: %%% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
657:
658: %\begin{figure}
659: %\plottwo{fgy11field.eps}{fgy11atm.eps}
660: %\caption{GY11 spectra compared with field dwarfs and model atmospheres
661: %\label{fspec}}
662: %\end{figure}
663: \clearpage
664: \begin{figure}
665: \vspace{9.5cm}
666: \special{psfile=f1.eps vscale=67 hscale=67 hoffset=-60 voffset=-100 angle=0}
667: \caption{The spectrum of GY11 (thick solid line)
668: is compared with reddened spectra of field M-dwarfs (dotted lines) as labelled
669: (from Testi et al.~2002), all spectra
670: are normalized at the mean flux in the 1.6-1.7~$\mu$m range and shifted with
671: constant offsets for clarity. The spectrum of GY11 is reproduced at every offset
672: to ease the comparison. b) similar to a), but the dotted spectra are reddened
673: theoretical atmospheric models \citep{Aea00}, T$_{eff}$ as labelled.
674: %The thin solid lines show the GY11 spectrum after subtraction of the
675: %maximum possible contribution from an irradiated, face-on disk
676: %(see \S 4).
677: In both panels, the observed spectra have a lower signal to noise in the region
678: corresponding to the strong telluric absroption (1.35--1.45\,$\mu$m and
679: 1.82--1.95\,$\mu$m).
680: }
681: \end{figure}
682:
683: \clearpage
684: \begin{figure}
685: \vspace{7.5cm}
686: \special{psfile=f2.eps vscale=45 hscale=45 hoffset=-10 voffset=-130 angle=0}
687: \caption{Hertzprung-Russell diagram for three sets of
688: evolutionary tracks \citep{DM97,Chea00,Bea97}. The position of GY11 is shown
689: as a blue circle. The tracks are labelled with the appropriate mass,
690: hydrogen burning stars are shown in red,
691: deuterium burning brown dwarfs in green, and objects below the
692: deuterium burning limit in cyan. Isochrones are shown as dotted
693: lines and are labelled with the appropriate ages.}
694: \end{figure}
695:
696:
697: %\begin{figure}
698: %\plotone{fsed.eps}
699: %\caption{GY11 SED \& Synthetic Magnitudes plot \label{fsed}}
700: %\end{figure}
701: %
702:
703: \clearpage
704: \begin{figure}
705: \vspace{7.5cm}
706: \special{psfile=f3.eps vscale=42 hscale=42 hoffset=-20 voffset=230 angle=-90}
707: \caption{The ISOCAM-LW1 (contours, 4.5$\mu$m) image of the
708: region surrounding GY11 is overlaid on the VLT K$_s$ (greyscale, 2.2$\mu$m)
709: image. The ISOCAM image has been aligned with the VLT image
710: by matching the position of GY10 (2320.8-1708, \cite{Cea98})
711: with the associated mid-infrared source.
712: }
713: \end{figure}
714:
715: \clearpage
716: \begin{figure}
717: \vspace{7.5cm}
718: \special{psfile=f4.eps vscale=39 hscale=39 hoffset=-10 voffset=-50 angle=0}
719: \caption{Disk and photosphere model of the GY11 SED.
720: The red circles with errorbars show the mid-infrared fluxes from ISOCAM
721: \citep{Cea98,Bea01}, the black line is our NIR dereddened Amici
722: spectrum. The green jagged line is the photospheric model for T$_{eff}$=2400~K
723: and Log(g)=3.5 \citep{Aea00}. The blue lines show the combined photosphere plus
724: disk emission computed as in the text. In one case (solid line) the disk inner radius is equal to R$_\star$, in the other (dotted line) to 3R$_\star$.
725: In the inset, we show the comparison
726: between the dereddened broad band photometry (from R to L$^\prime$; red squares)
727: and the models (practically coincident), photosphere as a dashed line, photosphere plus disk as solid
728: line.
729: }
730: \end{figure}
731:
732:
733: \end{document}
734:
735: %%
736: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
737: