1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \begin{document}
3: \title{A Statistical Strategy for the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effects Cluster Data}
4: \author{Jounghun Lee}
5: \affil{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo,Tokyo 113-0033, Japan}
6: \email{lee@utap.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp}
7:
8: \begin{abstract}
9:
10: We present a statistical strategy for the efficient determination
11: of the cluster luminosity function from the interferometric
12: Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effects cluster data.
13: To determine the cluster luminosity function from the noise contaminated
14: SZ map, we first define the zeroth-order cluster luminosity function
15: as difference between the measured peak number density of the SZ map
16: and the mean number density of noise. Then we demonstrate that the noise
17: contamination effects can be removed by the stabilized deconvolution of
18: the zeroth-order cluster luminosity function with the one-dimensional
19: Gaussian distribution. We test this analysis technique against Monte-Carlo
20: simulations, and find that it works quite well especially in the
21: medium amplitude range where the conventional cluster selection
22: method based on the threshold cut-off usually fails.
23:
24: \end{abstract}
25: \keywords{galaxies: clusters: general --- methods:statistical}
26:
27: \newcommand{\etal}{{\it et al.}}
28: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
29: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
30: \newcommand{\ben}{\begin{eqnarray}}
31: \newcommand{\een}{\end{eqnarray}}
32: \newcommand{\bS}{{\bf S}}
33: \newcommand{\bL}{{\bf L}}
34: \newcommand{\bth}{\vec{\theta}}
35: \newcommand{\hbth}{\hat{\theta}}
36: \newcommand{\bu}{{\bf u}}
37:
38: \section{INTRODUCTION}
39:
40: Galaxy clusters are the biggest bound objects of the universe.
41: Being rare and formed relatively late, the abundance of galaxy
42: clusters depends sensitively on the background cosmology
43: \citep{bar-etal96,hen97,bah-fan98,via-lid99,
44: bor-etal99,fan-chi01,gre-etal01,mol-etal02}.
45: To find as many galaxy clusters as possible and to investigate
46: the evolution of their abundance have thus become two of the most
47: challenging tasks of the current observational cosmology.
48: The cluster survey is categorized by the observing waveband as
49: the X-ray, the optical, and the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect.
50: In the past the X-ray or the optical surveys were favored due
51: to their high rate of detecting clusters and relatively low-costs.
52: However, thanks to recent development in technology,
53: the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect is currently spotlighted as a powerful
54: cosmological probe \citep{car-etal96,whi-etal99,hol-etal00,lo-etal00}
55: that can provide a statistically unbiased sample of clusters unlike
56: the X-ray and the optical surveys.
57:
58: The Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect represents the change in brightness
59: of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation caused by the
60: interaction of the CMB photons with the ionized intra-cluster gas
61: \cite{sun-zel72}. The underlying physics of the SZ effect is the
62: inverse Compton scattering: free electrons of the hot intra-cluster
63: gas scatter off the CMB photons as they pass through the galaxy
64: clusters, which results in the shift of the CMB photon frequency
65: and a corresponding change in its radiation energy.
66: Depending on whether the scattering of the CMB photons was by
67: the random or systematic motions of the electrons, the SZ effect
68: is called thermal or kinetic respectively. Here we focus on the
69: thermal SZ effect since its contribution is order of magnitude
70: stronger than the kinetic counterpart \citep{spr-etal01,zha-etal02}.
71:
72: The SZ effects ($\Delta I_{f}$) observed at a given frequency
73: ($f$) at a given position $\bth$ on the sky depend on the
74: electron number density ($n_{e}$) and temperature ($T_{e}$) within
75: the galaxy clusters that the CMB photons have encountered all along
76: the path:
77: \begin{equation}
78: \Delta I_{f}(\bth) = -2g_{f}\frac{\sigma_{T}k_{B}}{m_{e}c^{2}}
79: \int n_{e}(l\hbth)T_{e}(l\hbth)dl \equiv -2g_{f}y(\bth),
80: \label{eqn:thomson}
81: \end{equation}
82: with the integral taken along the CMB path in the line-of-sight
83: direction ($\hbth \equiv \bth/\vert \bth \vert$).
84: Here $y$ is the cluster Comptonization parameter, and
85: $g_{f}$ is the frequency-dependent spectral shape factor.
86: Note that the SZ effects are spatially localized with the associated
87: clusters along the line of sight, unlike the primordial CMB
88: fluctuations.
89:
90: Equation (\ref{eqn:thomson}) implies that the amplitude of the SZ
91: effects observed in a narrow frequency band with almost fixed $g_{f}$
92: can be quantified by the $y$-parameter. Provided that noise were
93: absent in the SZ map, clusters could be counted as local maxima of $y$.
94: In practice, however, noise always dominate the SZ map.
95: A critical issue is how to eliminate the dominant noise-contamination
96: effects. A common observational practice to identify true signals from
97: the noise-contaminated field is to select only such peaks with amplitudes
98: above some threshold (usually several times the noise standard deviation).
99: Using this technique, however, one can select only high-amplitude
100: signals for a given observational integration time. In order to
101: increase the signal to noise ratio, one has to decrease the noise
102: level by increasing the integration time, which is proportional only
103: to the square of the the noise level.
104:
105: Considering the usual high-costs of the SZ experiments, this
106: conventional technique of signal selection is too inefficient
107: to apply to the SZ cluster data . One may wish to find a more
108: efficient statistical strategy that can allow us to determine the cluster
109: luminosity function as quickly and accurately as possible.
110: Powerful new generations of SZ instruments such as AMiBA
111: (Array for Microwave Background Anisotropy, see Lo \etal\ 2001)
112: are already in the pipeline. Expecting plenty of cluster data
113: coming out in a few years, it is quite urgent in fact to develop such
114: statistical strategies now.
115:
116: In this Letter we develop a statistical strategy for the efficient
117: determination of the cluster luminosity function,
118: especially from interferometric SZ surveys using AMiBA as our model
119: experiment.
120:
121:
122: \section{SZ CLUSTER LUMINOSITY FUNCTION }
123:
124: The SZ cluster luminosity function, $n_{cl}(y)$, is defined as the
125: number density of galaxy clusters with the associated cluster Compton
126: parameter in the range of $[y,y+dy]$. Its cumulative function,
127: $N_{cl}(\ge y) \equiv \int _{y}n_{cl}(y^{\prime}) dy^{\prime}$, is
128: connected to the cluster mass function (see eq.[7] in Barbosa \etal\
129: 1996), and thus can be used in principle as a cosmological discriminator
130: \citep{hol-etal00,fan-chi01,die-etal02,gre-etal01,mol-etal02,ben-etal02}.
131: In practice, the direct conversion of the cluster luminosity
132: function into the cluster mass function is fraught with the
133: difficulties related to the rather large scatter in the correlation
134: between cluster mass and the SZ effect strength
135: \citep[e.g., see][]{met02}.
136:
137: Anyway, our goal here is to find an efficient way to find $n_{cl}(y)$
138: from the observed SZ map that is expected to be significantly
139: contaminated by noise. There are two different sources of noise:
140: instrumental noise and primordial CMB fluctuations.
141: The primordial fluctuations, however, turned out to be negligible in
142: interferometric SZ cluster surveys \cite{zha-etal02}.
143: In the following analysis, we concentrate on instrumental noise only.
144:
145: Our model experiment, AMiBA, as an interferometric SZ survey, will
146: employ the drift-scan method to optimize the observations. For the
147: detailed description of AMiBA and the drift-scan method, see
148: Lo \etal\ (2000) and Pen \etal\ (2002) respectively.
149: Among many advantages of the drift-scan method, it makes noise-analysis
150: tractable: in a SZ map measured from the drift-scanned CMB sky,
151: noise is Gaussian white. Therefore, a total SZ map measured by AMiBA
152: will be a combination of non-Gaussian cluster sources with Gaussian
153: white. In the following two subsections,
154: we simulate a total SZ map by means of the Monte-Carlo method,
155: and reconstruct the cluster luminosity function by eliminating
156: the noise contamination effects from the SZ map.
157:
158: \subsection{Monte-Carlo Simulations of Drift-Scan SZ Maps}
159:
160: We have constructed a random field on a $2048^{2}$ mesh in a periodic
161: box of linear size $1$ deg using the Monte-Carlo method,
162: in such a way that the random field possesses the main statistical
163: properties of a cleaned SZ map expected from AMiBA drift-scan survey
164: over a unit area per a unit hour, assuming the flat-sky approximation.
165:
166: By a cleaned SZ map, we mean the SZ map smoothed by a optimal filter:
167: In Fourier $\bu$-space
168: ($\bu$: the Fourier counterpart of $\bth$, $u \equiv \vert \bu \vert$),
169: the optimal filter for AMiBA drift-scan observations is given
170: \cite{pen-etal02} as $W_{C}(u) = W_{F}(u)W_{N}(u)$, where
171: $W_{F}(u)$ and $W_{N}(u)$ are the cluster intrinsic shape and the
172: natural beam respectively.
173: We use $W_{F}(u) = \frac{1}{u}$ and approximate $W_{N}(u)$
174: as $W_{N}(u) \approx \exp\left(-\frac{u^{2}\theta^{2}_{A}}{2}\right)
175: - \exp\left(-\frac{u^{2}\theta^{2}_{B}}{2}\right)$, where the
176: two angular scales, $\theta_{A}$ and $\theta_{B}$, represent
177: the size of the natural and primary beam respectively, related
178: to each other by $\frac{\theta_{A}}{\theta_{B}} = \frac{1}{6}$
179: (Pen 2002, private communications).
180: We first constructed a Gaussian random field with the white noise
181: power spectrum and convolved it by $W_{C}(u)$, and rescaled
182: the field by its rms fluctuations, $\sigma^{2}_{0} =
183: \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{2}}\int \vert W_{C}(u)\vert^{2}d^{2}{\bf u}$.
184:
185: Second, we simulated the cluster sources by generating a sparse set
186: of two dimensional Gaussian functions of which peak locations and
187: amplitudes were chosen randomly. Zhang \etal\ (2002) showed that
188: the optimal scan rate for the purpose of AMiBA cluster search
189: is around $150$ hours per square degree, which could find 1 cluster
190: every $8$ hours. Thus, the total number of the cluster sources was set
191: to be $20$, with the expectation that the number of clusters per
192: square degree from the AMiBA cluster search would be around the same
193: number. We locate the cluster sources in the two-dimensional map
194: deliberately so that they are not overlapping one another.
195: The size of each cluster source, i.e., the length scale of each
196: Gaussian function was chosen to be twice the pixel size, which is
197: consistent with the expected AMiBA drift-scan map.
198: The randomly chosen amplitudes of the cluster sources were in the
199: range of $[0,5\sigma_{0}]$ where we would like to reconstruct the
200: cluster luminosity function from the noise-contaminated map.
201: The cluster amplitudes were chosen to be distributed exponentially,
202: mimicking the real cluster distribution in this range
203: \citep{zha-etal02}.
204:
205: Finally, we obtained a simulated SZ map by combining the Gaussian noise
206: field with the cluster sources. Then we identified the local maxima of
207: the total field by selecting those pixels whose amplitudes
208: exceed the amplitudes of their $8$ closest-neighboring points,
209: and count the number density of the total SZ map, $n_{sz}(\nu)$,
210: as a function of the rescaled amplitude, $\nu \equiv y/\sigma_{0}$.
211:
212:
213: \subsection{Deconvolution Method}
214:
215: If there were no clusters, the measured SZ map would be just
216: a map of Gaussian noise, whose mean number density of local maxima,
217: $n_{g}(\nu)$, is analytically derived to be \cite{lon57,bon-efs87}:
218: \beq
219: n_{g}(\nu) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2}}R_{*}^{-2}e^{-\frac{\nu^2}{2}}
220: \int^{\infty}_{0} [x^2+e^{-x^2}-1]
221: \frac{\exp[-\frac{1}{2}(x-\gamma\nu)^{2}/(1-\gamma^{2})]}
222: {[2\pi(1-\gamma^2)]^{1/2}}dx.
223: \label{eqn:noi}
224: \eeq
225: Here
226: $\sigma^{2}_{i} = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{2}}\int \vert
227: W_{C}(u)\vert^{2}u^{2i}d^{2}{\bf u}$ for our noise spectrum, and
228: $R_{*} \equiv \sqrt{2}(\sigma_{1}/\sigma_{2})$,
229: $\gamma \equiv \sigma_{1}^{2}/(\sigma_{0}\sigma_{2})$.
230:
231: The difference between the peak number density of the total SZ map
232: and equation (\ref{eqn:noi}) provides a zeroth-order approximation
233: to the cluster luminosity function:
234: $n_{cl}^{(0)}(\nu) = n_{sz}(\nu) - n_{g}(\nu)$.
235: At high $\nu$-tail ($\nu \gg 1$) where the mean number density
236: of noise peaks drops practically to zero,
237: $n_{sz}(\nu) \approx n_{cl}^{(0)}(\nu) \approx n_{cl}(\nu)$.
238: At low-$\nu$ range ($0 \le \nu \le 2$) where Gaussian noise strongly
239: dominates, $n_{sz}(\nu) \approx n_{g}(\nu)$ and $n_{cl}^{(0)}(\nu)$
240: measures just Poissonian noise scatter around equation (2).
241:
242: The intriguing section is at the medium-$\nu$ range ($\nu \sim 3$),
243: where $n_{cl}^{(0)}(\nu)$ includes not only the noise-scatter but
244: also the noise-contaminated cluster peaks to a non-negligible degree.
245: With the conventional cluster selection procedure based on the
246: amplitude cut-off, the number density of cluster peaks in this
247: intermediate range cannot be determined since the peaks in this
248: range are all disregarded as noise. Thus, it is this medium-amplitude
249: section where one needs a better analysis technique to find the
250: number density.
251:
252: Noise contaminates the cluster number density by changing its amplitude.
253: Let $x$ measure the noise-contamination effects on the peak amplitude
254: such that $\nu = \nu_{0} + x$ where $\nu_{0}$ and $\nu$ are the real
255: and contaminated amplitude of a cluster peak respectively.
256: For a Gaussian noise, $x$ can be assumed to be a Gaussian variable.
257: Now, the probability distribution of $\nu$ can be written as a convolution
258: of the probability distributions of $\nu_{0}$ and $x$.
259: In terms of the number density, one can say
260: \beq
261: n_{cl}^{(0)}(\nu) = \frac{N_{cl}^{\rm tot}}{N_{sz}^{\rm tot}}
262: \int p(x)n_{cl}(\nu-x)dx,
263: \label{eqn:dec}
264: \eeq
265: where $p(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-\frac{x^{2}}{2}}$ and
266: $N_{sz}^{\rm tot}$ and $N_{cl}^{\rm tot}$ are the total number
267: of peaks of the SZ map and that of real clusters respectively.
268:
269: Equation (\ref{eqn:dec}) implies that the cluster luminosity function,
270: $n_{cl}(\nu)$, can be found by the deconvolution of the
271: $n_{cl}^{(0)}(\nu)$ and $p(x)$. In theory, the deconvolution of
272: $n_{cl}^{(0)}(\nu)$ and $p(x)$ could be easily conducted :
273: just dividing the Fourier transform of $n_{cl}^{(0)}(\nu)$ by that of
274: $p(x)$, performing its inverse Fourier transformation.
275: In practice, however, the deconvolution process itself is very
276: unstable \cite{pre-etal92}. To make the deconvolution stable
277: and optimize the estimation of $n_{cl}(\nu)$, we apply a Wiener
278: filter, say, $W_{P}(\nu)$, to $n_{cl}^{(0)}(\nu)$.
279:
280: Let $P_{-}$ and $P_{+}$ be the real and corrupted power spectrum of
281: $n_{cl}^{(0)}(\nu)$ respectively, then the Wiener filter in
282: the Fourier $\nu_{k}$-space ($\nu_{k}$: the Fourier counter part
283: of $\nu$) can be written as
284: $W_{P}(\nu_{k}) = \frac{P_{-}(\nu_{k})}{P_{+}(\nu_{k})}$.
285: One can easily see that $W_{P}(\nu_{k}) \approx 1$ where the error is
286: negligible, and $W_{P}(\nu_{k}) \approx 0$ where the error is dominant.
287: Unfortunately, we cannot determine the exact functional form
288: of $W_{P}(\nu_{k})$ since the only available quantity to us is
289: $P_{+}(\nu_{k})$. Nevertheless,
290: since the Wiener filter works in the least-square sense \cite{pre-etal92},
291: even a fairly reasonable approximation to $W_{P}(\nu_{k})$ can make it work
292: quite well. Figure \ref{fig:pow} plots $P_{+}(\nu_{k})$, showing
293: there is a sharp boundary between the noise-dominant and
294: negligible sections where $P_{+}(\nu_{k})$ has two distinct behaviors.
295: Finding a turning point, $\nu_{k0}$, by eye, we approximated the
296: Wiener filter by a step function such that
297: $W_{P}(\nu_{k}) = \Theta(\vert\nu_{k}\vert < \nu_{k0})$, given the
298: asymptotic behaviors of $W_{P}(\nu_{k})$.
299:
300: Here is our recipe for the determination of the cluster luminosity
301: function from the total SZ map:
302: Construct $n_{cl}^{(0)}(\nu)$ on a one-dimensional discrete grid
303: by counting the peak number density of the total SZ map
304: and subtracting equation (3) from it.
305: Calculate its power spectrum, $P_{+}(\nu_{k})$, by measuring the mean
306: square amplitude of its Fourier transform. Plot $P_{+}(\nu_{k})$ to
307: find the turning-point, $\nu_{k0}$. Approximate $W_{P}(\nu_{k})$ as a
308: step-function such that
309: $W_{P}(\nu_{k}) = \Theta(\vert\nu_{k}\vert < \nu_{k0})$.
310: Convolve $n_{cl}^{(0)}(\nu)$ by $W_{P}(\nu_{k})$ and deconvolve it
311: by the one-dimensional Gaussian distribution, $p(x)$.
312:
313: In the upper panel of Figure \ref{fig:dis}, we show the cumulative
314: cluster luminosity function $N_{cl}(\ge \nu)$ (solid line)
315: reconstructed from the SZ map with the above recipe and compare
316: it with the real distribution (square dots). We also plot the
317: cumulative peak number density of the total SZ map (long-dashed line),
318: the cumulative noise mean number density (dashed line), and the
319: cumulative zeroth-order cluster luminosity function
320: (dotted line) for comparison.
321: Figure \ref{fig:dis} reveals that the reconstructed cluster luminosity
322: function is indeed in good agreement with the real distribution,
323: especially in the medium range of $2 \le \nu \le 4$. Note also
324: that in the low-$\nu$ section ($\nu \le 1$) noise dominates
325: the SZ peaks while in the high-$\nu$ tail ($\nu \ge 4$) the total
326: SZ peaks are mainly the cluster peaks as expected.
327:
328: When determining $n_{cl}(\nu)$, the total number of cluster peaks,
329: $N_{cl}^{\rm tot}$, are assumed to be given as priors. In case that
330: $N_{cl}^{\rm tot}$ is not available, we can still determine the
331: probability density distribution of cluster peaks,
332: $P_{cl}(\ge \nu) = N_{cl}(\ge \nu)/N_{cl}^{\rm tot}$.
333: The lower panel of Figure \ref{fig:dis} plots the cumulative
334: probability density distributions that can be determined using
335: our analysis technique without any prior.
336: Again, the real and the reconstructed distributions agree with each
337: other quite well.
338:
339: We tested our technique against different realizations of the SZ maps
340: by varying the total number of cluster peaks and distribution shapes,
341: and found it quite robust.
342:
343: \section{SUMMARY AND DISCUSSIONS}
344:
345: We have developed a useful analysis technique to determine the cluster
346: luminosity function efficiently, using AMiBA, a drift-scan
347: interferometric SZ survey, as a model experiment. We have simulated a
348: total SZ map using the Monte-Carlo method, and counted the peak number
349: density from it. The total SZ map is constructed by combining a
350: Gaussian noise field with cluster sources. We noted that the peak number
351: density of the SZ map at medium peak amplitude range has non-negligible
352: contributions from the cluster peaks with noise-contamination effects
353: included.
354:
355: To determine the cluster number density, i.e., the cluster luminosity
356: function, first we have measured the zeroth-order
357: cluster luminosity function by subtracting the available
358: mean noise number density from the peak number density of the total
359: SZ map. We have quantified the noise-contamination effects included in
360: the zeroth-order approximation by a single Gaussian variable,
361: and found that the cluster luminosity function can be expressed as
362: the deconvolution of the zeroth-order approximation by the
363: one-dimensional Gaussian distribution.
364:
365: We have stabilized the deconvolution process by convolving the
366: zeroth-order approximation with a Wiener filter.
367: The approximate functional form of the Wiener filter has been determined
368: from the information of the power spectrum of the zeroth-order
369: approximation. Finally by deconvolving the Wiener-filtered
370: zeroth-order approximation of the cluster luminosity function
371: we have determined the cluster luminosity function from the simulated
372: SZ map. We have compared the reconstructed (cumulative) cluster
373: luminosity function with the real one, and found good agreements
374: between them, especially in the medium amplitude range where the
375: conventional technique fails.
376:
377: The consequence of the statistical strategy presented here
378: is that it can allow us to find the cumulative distribution of
379: the sources even when the number of the sources occupy only
380: small fraction of the total number of maximum peaks.
381: We also expect this statistical strategy to be applied to the
382: construction of the cluster mass function in weak gravitational
383: lensing analysis.
384:
385: However, it is worth noting that the measurement accuracy of the
386: cluster luminosity function may be improved on by improving the
387: approximation accuracy of the Winer filter, and it is also worth
388: noting that although our technique determines the cluster number
389: density efficiently but it cannot select the cluster peaks from the SZ map.
390: Furthermore, to examine the usefulness of our analysis technique
391: in real practice, testing it against real SZ hydrodynamic simulations
392: will be necessary. Our future work is in this direction.
393:
394: \acknowledgments
395:
396: We thank U. L. Pen for many helpful discussions on drift-scan method,
397: and K. Yoshikawa for useful comments. This work was supported by the
398: research grants of the JSPS fellowship .
399:
400: \newpage
401: \begin{thebibliography}{}
402: \bibitem[Bahcall \& Fan 1998]{bah-fan98}
403: Bahcall, N., \& Fan, X. 1998, \apj, 504, 1
404: \bibitem[Barbosa \etal\ 1996]{bar-etal96}
405: Barbosa, D. Bartlett, J. G., Blanchard, A., \& Oukbir, J. 1996, \aap, 314, 13
406: \bibitem[Benson \etal\ 2002]{ben-etal02}
407: Benson, A. J., Reichardt, C., \& Kamionkowski, M. 2002, \mnras, 331, 71
408: \bibitem[Bond \& Efstathiou 1987]{bon-efs87}
409: Bond, J. R., \& Efstathious, G. 1987, \mnras,226, 655
410: \bibitem[Borgani \etal\ 1999]{bor-etal99}
411: Borgani, S., Rosati, P., Tozzi, P., \& Colin, N. 1999, \apj, 517, 40
412: \bibitem[Carlstrom \etal\ 1996]{car-etal96}
413: Carlstrom, J. E., Joy, M., \& Grego L. 1996, \apj, 456, 75
414: \bibitem[Diego \etal\ 2002]{die-etal02}
415: Diego, J. M., Martinez-Gonzalev, E., Sanz, J> L., Benitez, N., J. Silk
416: 2002, \mnras, 331, 556
417: \bibitem[Fan \& Chiueh 2001]{fan-chi01}
418: Fan, Z., \& Chiueh, T. 2001, \apj, 550, 547
419: \bibitem[Grego \etal\ 2001]{gre-etal01}
420: Grego, L., Carlstrom, J. E., Reese, E. D., Holder, G. P.,
421: Holzapfel, W. L., Joy, M. K., Mohr, J. J., \& Patel, S. 2001, 552, 2
422: \bibitem[Henry 1997]{hen97}
423: Henry, J. P. 1997, \apj, 489, L1
424: \bibitem[Holder \etal\ 2000]{hol-etal00}
425: Holder, G. P., Mohr,J. J., Carlstrom, J. E., Evrard, A. E., \&
426: Leitch, E. M. 2000, \apj, 544, 629
427: \bibitem[Lo \etal\ 2000]{lo-etal00}
428: Lo, K. H., Chiueh, T. H., Martin, R. N., Ng, K. W., Liang, H.,
429: Pen, U. L, \& Ma, C. P. 2000, preprint (astro-ph/0012282)
430: \bibitem[Longuet-Higgins 1957]{lon57}
431: Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1957, Phil Trans Roy Soc London A, 249, 321
432: \bibitem[Metzler 2002]{met02}
433: Metzler, C. A. 2002, preprint (astro-ph/9812295)
434: \bibitem[Molnar \etal\ 2002]{mol-etal02}
435: Molnar, S. M., birkinshaw, M.,\& Mushotzky, R. F. 2002, \apj, 570, 1
436: \bibitem[Pen \etal\ 2002]{pen-etal02}
437: Pen, U. L., Ng, K. W., Kesteven, M. J., \& Sault, B. 2002, preprint
438: \bibitem[Press \etal\ 1992]{pre-etal92}
439: Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., \& Flannery, B. P.
440: 1992, Numerical Recipes in Fortran (Univ. of Cambridge: New York)
441: \bibitem[Springel \etal\ 2001]{spr-etal01}
442: Springel, V., White, M., Hernquist, L. 2001, \apj, 549, 681
443: \bibitem[Sunyaev \& Zel'dovich 1972]{sun-zel72}
444: Sunyaev, R. A., \& Zel'dovich, Y. B. 1972, Comm. Astrophys. Sp. Phys.,
445: 4, 173
446: \bibitem[Viana \& Liddle 1999]{via-lid99}
447: Viana, P. T. P., \& Liddle, A. R. 1999, 303, 535
448: \bibitem[White \etal\ 1999]{whi-etal99}
449: White, M., Carlstrom, J. E., Dragovan, M., \& Holzapfel, W. L. 1999,
450: \apj, 514, 12
451: \bibitem[Zhang \etal\ 2002]{zha-etal02}
452: Zhang, P., Pen, U. L., \& Wang, B. 2002, preprint (astro-ph/0201375)
453: \end{thebibliography}
454: \clearpage
455: \begin{figure}
456: \plotone{f1.eps}
457: \caption{The power spectrum of the SZ map. The dashed line indicates
458: the location of the turning point. \label{fig:pow}}
459: \end{figure}
460: \clearpage
461: \begin{figure}
462: \plotone{f2.eps}
463: \caption{{\it Upper}:The cumulative number density of local maxima as a
464: function of the rescaled amplitude, $\nu$. The total number of cluster peaks
465: ($N_{cl}^{\rm tot}$) are assumed to be given as a prior.
466: $N_{cl}^{\rm tot} = 20$ in this figure.
467: {\it Lower}: The cumulative probability distribution of local maxima as a
468: function of the rescaled amplitude. Unlike the number density, the
469: cluster probability distribution can be reconstructed without any prior.
470: \label{fig:dis}}
471: \end{figure}
472: \end{document}