1: \documentstyle[emulateapj]{article}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %\documentstyle[aaspp4]{article}
4:
5: \newcommand\kms{km s${}^{-1}$}
6: \newcommand\bd{brown dwarf }
7: \newcommand\bds{brown dwarfs }
8: \newcommand\mj{M$_{Jup} $}
9: \newcommand\ab{$\sim$}
10: %\newcommand\deg{^{\circ}}
11: \newcommand\cd{CoD $-$33$\deg$7795 }
12: \newcommand\Ha{H$\alpha$ }
13: \newcommand\ha{H$\alpha$ }
14:
15: \begin{document}
16:
17: \title{A Distant Stellar Companion in the $\upsilon$ Andromedae System}
18: \author{Patrick J. Lowrance\altaffilmark{1,2}, J. Davy Kirkpatrick\altaffilmark{2}
19: \& Charles A. Beichman\altaffilmark{1}}
20: \altaffiltext{1}{Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA 91109}
21: \altaffiltext{2}{Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, MS 100-22, California
22: Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125}
23:
24: %\email{lowrance@ipac.caltech.edu}
25:
26: \begin{center}
27: {\it Submitted 12 Apr 2002; Accepted 2 May 2002;}
28: \end{center}
29:
30:
31: \begin{abstract}
32:
33: Upsilon Andromedae is an F8V star known to have an extrasolar system of at least 3
34: planets in orbit around it. Here we report the discovery of a low-mass stellar
35: companion to this system. The companion shares common proper motion, lies at a
36: projected separation of $\sim$750 AU, and has a spectral type of M4.5V. The effect
37: of this star on the radial velocity of the brighter primary is negligible, but
38: this system provides an interesting testbed for stellar planetary formation
39: theory and understanding dynamical stability since it is the first multiple
40: planetary system known in a multiple stellar system.
41:
42: \end{abstract}
43:
44: Subject headings: Astrometry --- binaries: visual --- planetary systems ---
45: stars: individual ($\upsilon$ Andromedae) --- stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs
46:
47:
48: \section{Introduction}
49:
50: Over the last several years, extrasolar planets have been discovered through
51: precision Doppler velocity surveys (c.f. Marcy \& Butler 2000).
52: Butler et al (1999) reported the first
53: evidence for a multiple planetary system around the F8V star $\upsilon$ Andromedae.
54: Though the combined M sin$i$ values for these three planets implied a mass
55: at least 5 times more than the combined mass of the planets in our own solar
56: system, this discovery was heralded as the first evidence
57: that our own system of planets is not unique. Currently, there are seven
58: systems of multiple planets known, and all are around apparent
59: single stars like our own Sun.
60:
61: During the course of our standardized search for wide companions to stars
62: within 25 pc of the Sun, we discovered
63: a stellar companion to $\upsilon$ Andromedae
64: ($=$HD9826:Gl 61; 01:36:47.98 $+$41:24:23.0,V$=$4.10, d$=$13.5pc) at
65: an apparent projected separation of $\sim$750AU. In this paper we
66: present astrometry and spectroscopy to confirm its companionship and
67: discuss the possible influence this secondary might have on the planetary system.
68:
69:
70:
71: \section{Observations}
72:
73: \subsection{Discovery}
74:
75: Finding companions at wide separations ($>$ few hundred AU)
76: involves searching large pieces of the sky around the nearest stars.
77: The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS; Skrutskie et
78: al.\ 1997) is currently presenting a wealth of new material with which
79: previously unknown low-luminosity companions can be found at wide separations.
80: We are in the middle of a 2MASS-based survey around all stars
81: within the Third Catalogue of Nearby Stars (CNS3; Gliese \& Jahreiss 1991)
82: for possible companions out to separations of 0.1 pc.
83: The CNS3 includes some
84: 3800 stars believed to lie within 25 pc of the Sun. Companions that are
85: M, L and T dwarfs will
86: have red optical-to-near-IR colors (R-J). Optical photometry from the
87: USNO-A catalog, which is paired up with 2MASS data during routine
88: 2MASS data processing, can be used for an appropriate color constraint.
89: Our candidates are 2MASS detections within a search radius equivalent to a physical
90: separation of 0.1 pc around the nearby star
91: that either have no optical counterparts or have very red $R-J$ colors. Confirmation of
92: companionship and classification are then found by astrometric and spectroscopic
93: follow-up, respectively.
94: Several stellar and substellar companions to nearby, main sequence stars have been found
95: in this manner (Kirkpatrick et al 2001a,2001b; Wilson et al 2001;
96: Gizis, Kirkpatrick \& Wilson 2001), and
97: the search has been standardized around all nearby stars
98: to provide more robust statistics
99: on the frequency of brown dwarf companions to stars.
100:
101: During our search, we uncovered a candidate in proximity to the bright, nearby F8V star
102: $\upsilon$ And. The candidate companion, 2MASSI J0136504$+$412332, has infrared flux and
103: colors (J$=$9.39$\pm$0.03; J$-$K$=$0.88) consistent with a mid M dwarf
104: (Kirkpatrick \& McCarthy 1994) at the distance of $\upsilon$ And.
105: As shown in Figure 1, it lies 55$\arcsec$ from $\upsilon$ And
106: at a position angle of 147$^{\circ}$.
107:
108: \subsection{Astrometric Confirmation}
109:
110: The Hipparcos mission (Perryman et al 1997) measured $\upsilon$ And
111: to have the proper motion of $\mu _{\alpha} = $ -172.57$\pm$0.52 and
112: $\mu _{\delta} = $ -381.03$\pm$0.45 mas per year.
113: From positions measured in the POSS-I and POSS-II digitized images and 2MASS (Table 1),
114: we find the candidate companion to have a proper motion over a 44.5 year baseline of
115: $\mu _{\alpha} = $ -175$\pm$8 and $\mu _{\delta} = $ -390$\pm$6 mas per year.
116: Since the two objects' $\mu _{\alpha}$'s agree to
117: within 1 $\sigma$ and the $\mu _{\delta}$'s within 2 $\sigma$,
118: we conclude they have the same proper motion within the errors.
119: We therefore conclude that this object, hereafter referred to as $\upsilon$
120: And B, is a common proper motion companion to the brighter star, which we will refer to as
121: $\upsilon$ And A. The known radial velocity planets $\upsilon$ And b, $\upsilon$ And c,
122: and $\upsilon$ And d orbit the brighter star $\upsilon$ And A.
123: We note that if planetary and stellar companions are discovered
124: in the same system, confusion can be avoided if
125: stellar objects are noted with a capital letter,
126: and planets noted with a lowercase letter.
127:
128:
129:
130:
131: \subsection{Spectroscopic Confirmation}
132:
133: The companion was observed spectroscopically on 26 Jul 2001 UT
134: using the Double Spectrograph (Oke \& Gunn 1982) on the
135: Hale 200in telescope at Palomar Observatory. The instrumental setup
136: used the blue grating of 300 lines/mm and the red grating of 316 lines/mm with
137: the 2$\farcs$0 slit to provide a wavelength coverage
138: %of 6700 to 9200 \AA\
139: %at resolution of 8\AA\ for the red spectrum. The combined
140: %blue and red spectra give continuous coverage
141: from 5200 to 9100 \AA\ at a resolution of 9 \AA.
142: Observations were reduced using standard techniques following
143: Kirkpatrick, Henry, \& McCarthy (1991) and flux calibrated using
144: the standard star LTT 9491 (Hamuy et al 1994). The spectrum is plotted in Figure 2 and
145: compared with spectral standards from Kirkpatrick et al (1991).
146: The companion's spectrum is best fit by the M4.5V standard's spectrum.
147: Based upon the spectral-type mass relation for late F stars (Cox
148: 2000,p. 382),
149: we estimate $\upsilon$ And A has a mass of $\sim$ 1.2 M$_{\odot}$, and using the
150: spectral-type mass relationship of Henry \& McCarthy (1993), we estimate a mass of
151: 0.2 M$_{\odot}$ for $\upsilon$ And B.
152:
153:
154:
155: \section{Discussion}
156:
157: The radial velocity monitoring group of Marcy, Butler and colleagues
158: excluded binaries only if their separations were less than
159: 2$\arcsec$ (G. Marcy, 2002 pers comm), so this system would still have been
160: monitored had the companion been previously known.
161: For $\upsilon$ And A, Butler et al (1999) report a measured rms velocity
162: semiamplitude of 15.1 m s$^{-1}$,
163: after extracting the three planetary orbits from the measurements.
164: %consistent with measurement errors
165: %(9 m s$^{-1$}) and the expected stellar jitter (10 m s$^{-1$}).
166: We calculate a 0.2 M$_{\odot}$ stellar companion at 750 AU would have a
167: period of $\sim$ 20000 yrs and a
168: velocity amplitude of K $\sim$ 100 m s$^{-1}$ depending on the eccentricity
169: and inclination of the orbit. However, the maximum radial
170: velocity {\it change} Butler et al might have measured over their 11
171: year baseline would be a much smaller value, $\sim$ 0.4 m s$^{-1}$
172: (for i=60 and e=0.5). For a highly eccentric (e=0.9) orbit, it could reach
173: as large as 0.9 m s$^{-1}$. Even so, this companion object would have not been
174: detectable in the radial velocity measurements.
175: %period of $\sim$ 20000 yrs and a velocity signature over their 11 yr baseline of
176: %$\lesssim$ 2$\times$10$^{-3}$ m s$^{-1}$, or at least 10$^{-4}$ times smaller
177:
178: Since the announcement of the multiple planets around $\upsilon$ And A, there have been
179: many theoretical models of the evolution and stability of three planets
180: around a single star.
181: While the inner planet is a 'typical' close, hot Jupiter with a small eccentricity (0.04),
182: the eccentricities of the outer two increase to 0.18 and 0.41, respectively.
183: Interaction between the two outer planets has been proposed as the major influence of orbital
184: evolution, but there has been much debate over the stability of such a system. Rivera \& Lissauer (2000),
185: who, like Laughlin \& Adams (1999), ignore the innermost planet in the numerical simulations,
186: found co-planar systems can be stable on small timescales,
187: but the cause of the high eccentricities does not seem easily explained by only
188: planetary interactions (Jiang \& Ip 2001).
189:
190: What influence would a distant stellar companion have on the orbits of a planetary system?
191: In the numerical models of the stabilty of
192: planets within binary systems, Holman \& Weigert (1999) found certain critical semimajor axes
193: for which disruption of the orbit could occur, depending on the eccentricity of the binary stars.
194: For the $\upsilon$ And system, the critical orbital radii range from approximately 40AU to 240AU for
195: e=0.8-0.0, respectively. While the known radial velocity planets are all well within this limit,
196: we note that a circumprimary disk or remnant Kuiper-belt
197: could be disrupted by this companion, depending on its inclination and eccentricity.
198: In the HD 141569 disk, it has been suggested that the outer gap observed in the debris disk could
199: have its origin in gravitational perturbations caused by distant companions (Weinberger et al 2000).
200:
201: Another radial velocity planet with a highly eccentric orbit (e$=$0.63) is 16 Cygni Bb.
202: It has been suggested that its high eccentricity might be due to interaction with the
203: stellar companion, 16 Cygni A, at a projected separation of 800 AU (Mazeh, Krymolowski \& Rosenfeld 1997;
204: Holman, Touma, \& Tremaine 1997). The tidal force of the secondary upon the smaller body was
205: proposed to induce a modulation of the eccentricity
206: over a long time scale ($\sim$10$^8$yr). This would cause a planetary orbit that forms with a small
207: eccentricity to slowly increase its eccentricity over the current age of the star ($\sim$ 3 Gyr).
208: They calculate the total
209: increase is only weakly sensitive to the semimajor axis ratio if the period of the modulation
210: is long, and therefore can be a large effect over the lifetime of that system.
211:
212: The projected separation of the 16 Cygni binary is consistent with the projected separation
213: we find here (750 AU), though $\upsilon$ And B
214: is approximately 0.4 the mass of 16 Cygni A. However, the presence of multiple planets in the
215: $\upsilon$ And system rules out the kind of effect noted above since the apsidal precession rate
216: of the planets due to mutual interactions greatly outweighs any induced by the stellar companion
217: (Chiang \& Murray 2002). Just as the Moon, because of its proximity, has a larger effect
218: on the terrestrial tides than the more massive but more distant Sun,
219: the mutual interaction of the planets $\upsilon$ And c
220: and $\upsilon$ And d is much larger than any tidal forces from distant $\upsilon$ And B.
221:
222:
223:
224: \section{Conclusion}
225:
226: We present astrometric and spectroscopic evidence that 2MASSI J0136504+412332 is
227: a M4.5V common proper motion companion to the star $\upsilon$ And, which harbors a multiple
228: planetary system. This represents the first system in which multiple planets
229: exist within a multiple stellar system, but such a scenario might not be rare.
230: There are residual velocity trends hinting of the presence of more than
231: one planet around the binary stars 55 Cnc and $\tau$ Boo (Fischer et al 2001).
232: There are currently only single planets known around
233: the multiple stars 16 Cyg B, 94 Cet, HD 142, HD 179811B, HD 80606, HD 195019, Gl 86, and HD 89774.
234:
235: Unifying all aspects of extra-solar planetary formation and evolution
236: into a consistent model that accounts for the distribution of known orbital
237: parameters remains a daunting task.
238: Previously unknown
239: stellar or substellar companions might be gravitationally affecting the entire system.
240: The complete picture surely includes several factors including disk viscosities, planetary
241: interactions, and companions.
242:
243:
244:
245:
246:
247:
248:
249: The authors wish to thank E. Chiang and the anonymous referee for useful comments which
250: helped to clarify the discussion.
251: P.J.L. acknowledges support from a National Research Council Fellowship.
252: P.J.L., J. D. K., and C. A. B. acknowledge the support of
253: the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, which is operated under
254: contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This publication makes use
255: of data from the Two Micron All-Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of
256: Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, funded by the National
257: Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. This research
258: has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.
259:
260:
261: \begin{references}
262:
263: Butler, R.P., Marcy, G.W., Fischer, D.A., Brown, T.M., Contos, A., Korzennik, S.G.,
264: Nisenson, P., Noyes, R.W. 1999 ApJ 526 916
265:
266: Chiang, E. \& Murray, N. ApJ, 2002, in press
267:
268: Cox, A.C., ed 2000, Allen's Astrophysical Quantities (4th ed; New
269: York: AIP), 382
270:
271: Fischer, D.A., Marcy, G.W., Butler, R.P., Vogt, S., Frink, S., Apps, K. 2001 ApJ 551 1107
272:
273: Gizis, J.E., Kirkpatrick, J.D., \& Wilson, J.C. 2001 AJ 121 2185
274:
275: Gliese, W., \& Jahreiss, H. 1991, Astronomical Data Center CD-ROM: Selected Astronomical Catalogs, Vol.\ 1,
276: ed.\ L. E. Bratzmann \& S. E. Gesser (Greenbelt, MD: NASA/GSFC).
277:
278: Hamuy, M., Suntzeff, N. B., Heathcote, S. R., Walker, A. R., Gigoux, P., \& Phillips, M. M. 1994 PASP 106 566
279:
280: Henry, T. \& McCarthy, D. 1993 AJ 106 773
281:
282: Holman, M., Touma,J., \& Tremaine, S. 1997 Nature 386 254
283:
284: Holman, M. \& Wiegert, P 1999 AJ 117 621
285:
286: Jiang, I. \& Ip, W. 2001 A\&A 367 943
287:
288: Kirkpatrick, J.D., Dahn, C.C., Monet, D.G., Reid, I. N.,
289: Gizis, J.E., Liebert, J., Burgasser, A. 2001b AJ 121 3235
290:
291: Kirkpatrick, J.D., Henry, T., \& McCarthy, D. 1991 ApJS 77 417
292:
293: Kirkpatrick, J.D., Liebert, J., Cruz, K. L., Gizis, J.E., Reid, I.N. 2001a PASP 113 814
294:
295: Kirkpatrick, J.D. \& McCarthy, D. 1994 AJ 107 333
296:
297: Laughlin, G. \& Adams, F. 1999 ApJ 526 881
298:
299: Marcy, G. W., \& Butler, R. P. 2000, PASP, 112, 137.
300:
301: Mazeh,T., Krymolowski, Y., \& Rosenfeld, G. 1997 ApJ 477 L103
302:
303: Oke, J.B. and Gunn, J.E. 1982, PASP, 94 586
304:
305: Perryman, M.A.C. et al 1997 A\& A 323 49
306:
307: Rivera, E.J. \& Lissauer, J.J. 2000 ApJ 530 454
308:
309: Skrutskie, M. F., et al. 1997, in The
310: Impact of Large-Scale Near-IR Sky Surveys, ed.\ F. Garzon (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 25.
311:
312: Weinberger, A. J., Rich, R. M., Becklin, E. E., Zuckerman, B. \& Matthews, K. 2000 ApJ 544 937
313:
314: Wilson, J. C., Kirkpatrick, J.D., Gizis, J. E., Skrutskie, M. F., Monet, D. G., Houck, J. R. 2001 AJ 122 1989
315:
316:
317: \end{references}
318:
319:
320:
321:
322: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
323: \tablecaption{Measured Positions of $\upsilon$ And B}
324: \tablenum{1}
325: \tablehead{\colhead{Epoch (UT)} & \colhead{R.A. J2000} & \colhead{Decl J2000} & \colhead{Survey}}
326: \startdata
327: 16 Sep 1953 & 01:36:51.1 & +41:23:49.9 & POSS I (O) \\
328: 14 Nov 1995 & 01:36:50.5 & +41:23:33.1 & POSS II (N) \\
329: 11 Feb 1998 & 01:36:50.42 & +41:23:32.57 & 2MASS (J) \\
330: \enddata
331: \end{deluxetable}
332:
333:
334:
335: %\centering \leavevmode
336: %epsfxsize=.95\columnwidth \epsfbox{figure1.ps}
337: \plotone{f1.ps}
338: \figcaption{Discovery images of the $\upsilon$ And B representing the
339: (a) POSS-I (O), (b) POSS-II (N), and (c) 2MASS (J) images. As the brighter $\upsilon$ And A
340: moves to the southwest over the 44.5 year baseline, so does the fainter companion. (In the 2MASS
341: image, the bright object due north of $\upsilon$ And A is a latent image caused by the 2MASS scanning
342: procedure, and the glint due south of $\upsilon$ And A and west of $\upsilon$ And B is an internal
343: reflection artifact. See http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/releases/second/doc/explsup.html) }
344:
345:
346: %\centering \leavevmode
347: %epsfxsize=.85\columnwidth \epsfbox{figure2.ps}
348:
349: \plotone{f2.ps}
350: \figcaption{ Spectrum of $\upsilon$ And B (solid) (in
351: ergs/s/cm$^2$/\AA)
352: compared with standard late-type M dwarf spectra (dashed)
353: (Kirkpatrick et al 1991). The spectra are normalized to the flux at 7500\AA\ and offset by integers.
354: The best fit is consistent with an M4.5V spectral type.}
355:
356:
357:
358: \end{document}
359:
360: